DOCSLIB.ORG

Phylogenetic Relationships and Classification of the Vespinae (Hymenoptera: Vespidae)·

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phylogenetic Relationships and Classification of the Vespinae (Hymenoptera: Vespidae)· Systematic Entomology (1987) 12, 413-431 Phylogenetic relationships and classification of the Vespinae (Hymenoptera: Vespidae)· JAMES M. CARPENTER Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University,'! Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A. ABSTRACT. The phylogenetic relationships of the genera, subgenera and species-groups ofthe Vespinae are analysed using cladistic techniques. The results are used as the basis for a natural classification of these wasps. The cladogram for the four genera recognized is: Vespa + .cProvespa + (Dolichovespula + Vespula)). No subgenera are recognized; all those previously described are synonymized with the appropriate genus. The . synonymies of Nyctovespa with Vespa and Rugovespula with Vespula are new. Introduction Nomenclature. More serious is the lack of a comprehensive phylogenetic system. As a The yellowjack6ts and hornets are the· most result, paraphyletic taxa are in use, and much­ familiar of wasps. Almost ubiquitous through­ discussion of the evolutionary development of out the north temperate regions and oriental behaviour is misplaced. Without differentiation tropics, they are generally recognized - and of features into derived and primitive states, feared - by layrrmh. The history of human disputes ongroupings and evolutionary develop­ knowledge of these wasps is ancient (cf. Sprad­ ment are unresolvable (cf. Yamane, 1976; bery, 1973; Edwards, 1980). The fascination Greene, 1979; Matsuura & Yamane, 1984; Mac­ engendered by their eusocial behaviour is also Donald & Matthews, 1975, 1984). The present ancient, and so they are the subject of an ever­ work is intended to redress this situation, by burgeoning number of behavioural studies. In providing the first comprehensive cladistic treat­ addition to social organization, considerable ment of supraspecific taxa in the Vespinae. current interest is focused on aspects of venom chemistry, economic injury and biological con­ trol potential (e.g. Akre & MacDonald, 1986). Previous treatments With the attention paid to these wasps, it might be expected that their classification would be The taxonomic history of the vesplne genera has stable, and their evolutionary relationships been reviewed by Bequaert (1930, 1932), grasped at least in outline. But this is not the Guiglia (1971) and Edwards (1980). I review case. Great controversy currently exists; both here only recent studies dealing with evolution­ nomenclature and classification vary from ary relationships, independent of taxonomy. author to author, and evolutionary relationships MacDonald & Matthews (1975, 1984) ques­ are in dispute. Some current classifications do tioned the placement ofVespula squamosa in the not follow the International Code of Zoological ruta species group, or Vespula s.str. (Bequaert, 1932). Correspondence: Dr J. M. Carpenter, Museum This stance has been followed by general of Comparative Zoqlogy, Harvard University, authors, who have regarded this species and its Cambridge, Mass. 02138, U.S.A. sister-species sulphurea as of uncertain place- 413 414 lames M. Carpenter ment (Edwards, 1980; Alae et aI., 1981). Mac­ characters (tyloides) is also incorrectly inferred, Donald & Matthews (1975: 1004) stated: and the states of the other two characters 'Comparative nest architectural, behavioral, associating Boreovespula and Dolichovespula morphological, and electrophoretic data cur­ are also true ofsylvestris (Metavespula). Finally, rently under study strongly indicate that the autapomorphic state for Boreovespula is not V.squamosa is wrongly aligned with the V.rufa true of all the included species, and this taxon is group'. No morphological or electrophoretic paraphyletic. data pertinent to this question have ever been Greene (1979) presented a discussion of published, but MacDonald (1977) and Mac­ behavioural characters which he considered to Donald & Matthews (1984) listed a number of show a 'phyletic sequence' with Dolichovespula nest architecture and behavioural characters as the most primitive yellowjacket genus and the which, they suggested, showed greater similarity vulgaris group the most recently derived group. to the V. vulgaris species group (Paravespula). This sequence, he argued, was the opposite It will be shown below that these features are of that proposed by Yamane (1976). In fact, either plesiomorphic in Vespinae, or uninforma­ Greene's discussion conflated character state tive. MacDonald (1977) stated that the male change and branching sequence. Although genitalia of squamosa are distinctive (also men­ Greene (1979: 614) stated that Dolichovespula tioned by Yamane et aI., 1980), and MacDonald 'probably has a relatively closer ancestral rela­ & Matthews (1984) cited a study by Kugler et al. tionship with Vespa', he later stated (p. 618): 'I (1976) showing seven ovarioles per ovary in have assumed the yellowjackets constitute a squamosa (versus six in most other vespines) as monophyletic group in which the genus Vespula also indicating wrong placement ofsquamosa in evolved from Dolichovespula stock, which in the rufa group. These traits, of course, are turn arose from the Vespa lineage'. This is the autapomorphies, and such unique characters are same sequence as Yamane proposed. Thus, irrelevant to the placement of the species - they whereas Greene is probably correct in the . only show that it is monophyletic. Synapomor­ polarities inferred for the behaviours discussed, phies uniting the squamosa and rufa groups are they are irrelevant to the question ofphylogene­ presented below. tic relationships among yellowjackets, as either Yamane (1976) presented a cladogram for polarity is in accord with the same scheme. vespine subgenera; however, it did not include Yamane et al. (1980) argued that the division Provespa or the parasitic subgenera (viz Vespula of Vespula s.l. into the rufa and vulgaris groups (only with austriaca), and Pseudovespula). This was inappropriate, and subdivided Vespula s.l. latter omission is unimportant, as recognition of into seven groups. Their character states were a subgenera for the parasitic species renders other mixture of primitive and derived, and they subgenera paraphyletic, as discussed below. stated (p. 34): 'These groups are, however, Yamane (1976: Table 3) listed fifteen characters rather phenetic'. They did not investigate the used in the construction of his tree, and differen­ interrelationships of these groups (nor establish tiated these into primitive and derived states. their monophyly), but did adopt Guiglia's (1972) He upheld the monophyly of Vespula + division of Vespula into the subgenera Vespula Dolichovespula, and Dolichovespula, but could and Paravespula! They considered the assign­ not determine whether Allovespula was the sis­ ment of the koreensis group to Paravespula and ter-group of Paravespula or Dolichovespula. As the squamosa group to Vespula to throw doubt developed below, the polarity of two of on this division. They stated (p. 34): 'They have Yamane's characters was incorrectly inferred, characters both peculiar to them and transitional and there are no grounds for grouping between the two subgenera'. The interrelation­ Allovespula with Dolichovespula (done on the ships of these groups are discussed below, aI).d it basis of grey, pliable nest paper). Yamane's is shown that the peculiar characters are cladogram also showed the interrelationships of autapomorphies, whereas the 'transitional' are the subgenera of Dolichovespula as: Meta­ symplesiomorphies. vespula + (Boreovespula + Dolichovespula). Archer (1982) described the subgenus The latter two taxa were grouped by three char­ Rugovespula for the koreensis group, primarily acters, and single autapomorphies were noted because-the male genitalia ofthis group 'are very for each of them. The polarity of one of these different from those of other species of Para- Phylogenetic relationships and classification ofVespinae 415 vespula'. It is shown below that the differences are vespine autapomorphies not mentioned by discussed all show the pnmitive state in Carpenter (1981). The autapomorphies are Rugovespula, and this taxon is the sister-group included in the matrix to establish the mono­ of Paravespula. phyly of each terminal taxon in the 'Cladistic Varvio-Aho et al. (1984) presented an Diagnoses' section. allozyme data set for the eight species of Euro­ pean yellowjackets, and analyses which they Character matrix (Table 1) suggested showed that Dolichovespula was not a 1 Prestigma length. Prestigma shorter than monophyletic group, and that Paravespula + pterostigma, O. Prestigma ~ pterostigma, 1. Pre­ Vespula was not monophyletic. Carpenter stigma 3x pterostigma, 2. (1987) showed that these authors incorrectly 2 lRI cell length. Length of first submarginal (lRI) analysed their data, and that their data are in fact cell ::; distance from ap<;x of cell to apex of wing, largely uninformative· on the relationships of O. Length of cell> this distance, 1. these yellowjacket species. 3 Base of lRS cell. M vein obliquely oriented with Finally, Matsuura & Yamane (1984) respect to m-euI at base of second submarginal (IRS) cell, O. M vein vertically oriented (apex of published two matrices totalling forty-two char­ discal cell truncate), 1. acters for the Vespinae (including Vespula, 4 lRS cell M: RS. Second submarginal cell with Paravespula, Rugovespula and the squamosa section ofM vein distal to m-eu2 crossvein shorter group as terminal taxa). The matrix is than section of RS vein basal to r2 crossvein, O. M reproduced here as Table 2, with correction of section
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Towards Simultaneous Analysis of Morphological and Molecular Data in Hymenoptera
    Towards simultaneous analysis of morphological and molecular data in Hymenoptera JAMES M. CARPENTER &WARD C. WHEELER Accepted 5 January 1999 Carpenter, J. M. & W. C. Wheeler. (1999). Towards simultaneous analysis of molecular and morphological data in Hymenoptera. Ð Zoologica Scripta 28, 251±260. Principles and methods of simultaneous analysis in cladistics are reviewed, and the first, preliminary, analysis of combined molecular and morphological data on higher level relationships in Hymenoptera is presented to exemplify these principles. The morphological data from Ronquist et al. (in press) matrix, derived from the character diagnoses of the phylogenetic tree of Rasnitsyn (1988), are combined with new molecular data for representatives of 10 superfamilies of Hymenoptera by means of optimization alignment. The resulting cladogram supports Apocrita and Aculeata as groups, and the superfamly Chrysidoidea, but not Chalcidoidea, Evanioidea, Vespoidea and Apoidea. James M. Carpenter, Department of Entomology, and Ward C. Wheeler, Department of Invertebrates, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, U SA. E-mail: [email protected] Introduction of consensus techniques to the results of independent Investigation of the higher-level phylogeny of Hymenoptera analysis of multiple data sets, as for example in so-called is at a very early stage. Although cladistic analysis was ®rst `phylogenetic supertrees' (Sanderson et al. 1998), does not applied more than 30 years ago, in an investigation of the measure the strength of evidence supporting results from ovipositor by Oeser (1961), a comprehensive analysis of all the different data sources Ð in addition to other draw- the major lineages remains to be done.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera (Stinging Wasps)
    Return to insect order home Page 1 of 3 Visit us on the Web: www.gardeninghelp.org Insect Order ID: Hymenoptera (Stinging Wasps) Life Cycle–Complete metamorphosis: Queens or solitary adults lay eggs. Larvae eat, grow and molt. This stage is repeated a varying number of times, depending on species, until hormonal changes cause the larvae to pupate. Inside a cell (in nests) or a pupal case (solitary), they change in form and color and develop wings. The adults look completely different from the larvae. Solitary wasps: Social wasps: Adults–Stinging wasps have hard bodies and most have membranous wings (some are wingless). The forewing is larger than the hindwing and the two are hooked together as are all Hymenoptera, hence the name "married wings," but this is difficult to see. Some species fold their wings lengthwise, making their wings look long and narrow. The head is oblong and clearly separated from the thorax, and the eyes are compound eyes, but not multifaceted. All have a cinched-in waist (wasp waist). Eggs are laid from the base of the ovipositor, while the ovipositor itself, in most species, has evolved into a stinger. Thus only females have stingers. (Click images to enlarge or orange text for more information.) Oblong head Compound eyes Folded wings but not multifaceted appear Cinched in waist long & narrow Return to insect order home Page 2 of 3 Eggs–Colonies of social wasps have at least one queen that lays both fertilized and unfertilized eggs. Most are fertilized and all fertilized eggs are female. Most of these become workers; a few become queens.
    [Show full text]
  • Pine Sawflies, Neodiprion Spp. (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Diprionidae)1 Wayne N
    EENY317 Pine Sawflies, Neodiprion spp. (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Diprionidae)1 Wayne N. Dixon2 Introduction Pine sawfly larvae, Neodiprion spp., are the most common defoliating insects of pine trees, Pinus spp., in Florida. Sawfly infestations can cause growth loss and mortality, especially when followed by secondary attack by bark and wood-boring beetles (Coleoptera: Buprestidae, Cerambycidae, Scolytidae). Trees of all ages are susceptible to sawfly defoliation (Barnard and Dixon 1983; Coppel and Benjamin 1965). Distribution Neodiprion spp. are indigenous to Florida. Host tree specificity and location will bear on sawfly distribution statewide. Description Six species are covered here so there is some variation in appearance. However, an adult female has a length of 8 to 10 mm, with narrow antennae on the head and a stout and Figure 1. Larvae of the blackheaded pine sawfly, Neodiprion excitans thick-waisted body. This is unlike most Hymenopteran Rohwer, on Pinus sp. Credits: Arnold T. Drooz, USDA Forest Service; www.forestryimages.org insects which have the thinner, wasp-like waist. The background color varies from light to dark brown, with Adult yellow-red-white markings common. The two pairs of The adult male has a length of 5 to 7 mm. The male has wings are clear to light brown with prominent veins. broad, feathery antennae on the head with a slender, thick- waisted body. It generally has brown to black color wings, similar to the female. 1. This document is EENY317 (originally published as DPI Entomology Circular No. 258), one of a series of the Department of Entomology and Nematology, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date January 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Orders
    CMG GardenNotes #313 Insect Orders Outline Anoplura: sucking lice, page 1 Blattaria: cockroaches and woodroaches, page 2 Coleoptera: beetles, page 2 Collembola: springtails, page 4 Dermaptera: earwigs, page 4 Diptera: flies, page 5 Ephemeroptera: mayflies, page 6 Hemiptera (suborder Heteroptera): true bugs, page 7 Hemiptera (suborders Auchenorrhyncha and Sternorrhyncha): aphids, cicadas, leafhoppers, mealybugs, scale and whiteflies, page 8 Hymenoptera: ants, bees, horntails, sawflies, and wasp, page 9 Isoptera: termites, page 11 Lepidoptera: butterflies and moths, page 12 Mallophaga: chewing and biting lice, page 13 Mantodea: mantids, page 14 Neuroptera: antlions, lacewings, snakeflies and dobsonflies, page 14 Odonata: dragonflies and damselflies, page 15 Orthoptera: crickets, grasshoppers, and katydids, page 15 Phasmida: Walking sticks, page 16 Plecoptera: stoneflies, page 16 Psocoptera: Psocids or booklice, page 17 Siphonaptera: Fleas, page 17 Thysanoptera: Thrips, page 17 Trichoptera: Caddisflies, page 18 Zygentomaa: Silverfish and Firebrats, page 18 Anoplura Sucking Lice • Feeds by sucking blood from mammals. • Some species (head lice and crabs lice) feed on humans. Metamorphosis: Simple/Gradual Features: [Figure 1] Figure 1. Sucking lice o Wingless o Mouthparts: Piercing/sucking, designed to feed on blood. o Body: Small head with larger, pear-shaped thorax and nine segmented abdomen. 313-1 Blattaria (Subclass of Dictyoptera) Cockroaches and Woodroaches • Most species are found in warmer subtropical to tropical climates. • The German, Oriental and American cockroach are indoor pests. • Woodroaches live outdoors feeding on decaying bark and other debris. Metamorphosis: Simple/Gradual Figure 2. American cockroach Features: [Figure 2] o Body: Flattened o Antennae: Long, thread-like o Mouthparts: Chewing o Wings: If present, are thickened, semi-transparent with distinct veins and lay flat.
    [Show full text]
  • Wedge-Shaped Beetles (Suggested Common Name) Ripiphorus Spp. (Insecta: Coleoptera: Ripiphoridae)1 David Owens, Ashley N
    EENY613 Wedge-Shaped Beetles (suggested common name) Ripiphorus spp. (Insecta: Coleoptera: Ripiphoridae)1 David Owens, Ashley N. Mortensen, Jeanette Klopchin, William Kern, and Jamie D. Ellis2 Introduction Ripiphoridae are a family of unusual parasitic beetles that are thought to be related to tumbling flower beetles (Coleoptera: Mordellidae) and blister beetles (Coleoptera: Meloidae). There is disagreement over the spelling of the family (Ripiphoridae) and genus (Ripiphorus) names. Here we use the original spelling that starts with only the letter Figure 1. Adult specimens of the two genera of Ripiphoridae. A) “R”; however, an initial “Rh” has also been used in the Macrosiagon Hentz, and B) Ripiphorus Bosc. scientific community (Rhipiphoridae and Rhipiphorus). Credits: Allen M. Boatman There are an estimated 35 nearctic species of Ripiphorus, Generally, the biology of the family Ripiphoridae is poorly two of which have been collected in Florida: Ripiphorus known. Ripiphorids parasitize bees and wasps (Hymenop- schwarzi LeConte (Figure 2A) and Ripiphorus fasciatus Say tera), roaches (Blattodea), and wood-boring beetles (Co- (Figure 2B). Due to limited information for both of these leoptera). However, the specific hosts for many ripiphorid species, the information presented below is characteristic species are unknown. Furthermore, only one sex (either of the genus Ripiphorus. Information specific to Ripiphorus male or female) has been described for several species, and fasciatus and Ripiphorus schwarzi is presented where the males and females of some species look different. detailed information is available. Two genera of Ripiphoridae infest hymenopteran (bee and wasp) nests: Macrosiagon Hentz (Figure 1A) and Ripiphorus Bosc (formerly Myodites Latreille) (Figure 1B). Species of Macrosiagon are parasites of a variety of hymenopteran families including: Halictidae, Vespidae, Tiphiidae, Apidae, Pompilidae, Crabronidae, and Sphecidae.
    [Show full text]
  • André Nel Sixtieth Anniversary Festschrift
    Palaeoentomology 002 (6): 534–555 ISSN 2624-2826 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/pe/ PALAEOENTOMOLOGY PE Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press Editorial ISSN 2624-2834 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/palaeoentomology.2.6.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:25D35BD3-0C86-4BD6-B350-C98CA499A9B4 André Nel sixtieth anniversary Festschrift DANY AZAR1, 2, ROMAIN GARROUSTE3 & ANTONIO ARILLO4 1Lebanese University, Faculty of Sciences II, Department of Natural Sciences, P.O. Box: 26110217, Fanar, Matn, Lebanon. Email: [email protected] 2State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China. 3Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité, ISYEB-UMR 7205-CNRS, MNHN, UPMC, EPHE, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Sorbonne Universités, 57 rue Cuvier, CP 50, Entomologie, F-75005, Paris, France. 4Departamento de Biodiversidad, Ecología y Evolución, Facultad de Biología, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain. FIGURE 1. Portrait of André Nel. During the last “International Congress on Fossil Insects, mainly by our esteemed Russian colleagues, and where Arthropods and Amber” held this year in the Dominican several of our members in the IPS contributed in edited volumes honoring some of our great scientists. Republic, we unanimously agreed—in the International This issue is a Festschrift to celebrate the 60th Palaeoentomological Society (IPS)—to honor our great birthday of Professor André Nel (from the ‘Muséum colleagues who have given us and the science (and still) national d’Histoire naturelle’, Paris) and constitutes significant knowledge on the evolution of fossil insects a tribute to him for his great ongoing, prolific and his and terrestrial arthropods over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 City of York Biodiversity Action Plan
    CITY OF YORK Local Biodiversity Action Plan 2017 City of York Local Biodiversity Action Plan - Executive Summary What is biodiversity and why is it important? Biodiversity is the variety of all species of plant and animal life on earth, and the places in which they live. Biodiversity has its own intrinsic value but is also provides us with a wide range of essential goods and services such as such as food, fresh water and clean air, natural flood and climate regulation and pollination of crops, but also less obvious services such as benefits to our health and wellbeing and providing a sense of place. We are experiencing global declines in biodiversity, and the goods and services which it provides are consistently undervalued. Efforts to protect and enhance biodiversity need to be significantly increased. The Biodiversity of the City of York The City of York area is a special place not only for its history, buildings and archaeology but also for its wildlife. York Minister is an 800 year old jewel in the historical crown of the city, but we also have our natural gems as well. York supports species and habitats which are of national, regional and local conservation importance including the endangered Tansy Beetle which until 2014 was known only to occur along stretches of the River Ouse around York and Selby; ancient flood meadows of which c.9-10% of the national resource occurs in York; populations of Otters and Water Voles on the River Ouse, River Foss and their tributaries; the country’s most northerly example of extensive lowland heath at Strensall Common; and internationally important populations of wetland birds in the Lower Derwent Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Museum of Natural History
    p m r- r-' ME FYF-11 - - T r r.- 1. 4,6*. of the FLORIDA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY THE COMPARATIVE ECOLOGY OF BOBCAT, BLACK BEAR, AND FLORIDA PANTHER IN SOUTH FLORIDA David Steffen Maehr Volume 40, No. 1, pf 1-176 1997 == 46 1ms 34 i " 4 '· 0?1~ I. Al' Ai: *'%, R' I.' I / Em/-.Ail-%- .1/9" . -_____- UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE Numbers of the BULLETIN OF THE FLORIDA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY am published at irregular intervals Volumes contain about 300 pages and are not necessarily completed in any one calendar year. JOHN F. EISENBERG, EDITOR RICHARD FRANZ CO-EDIWR RHODA J. BRYANT, A£ANAGING EMOR Communications concerning purchase or exchange of the publications and all manuscripts should be addressed to: Managing Editor. Bulletin; Florida Museum of Natural Histoty, University of Florida P. O. Box 117800, Gainesville FL 32611-7800; US.A This journal is printed on recycled paper. ISSN: 0071-6154 CODEN: BF 5BAS Publication date: October 1, 1997 Price: $ 10.00 Frontispiece: Female Florida panther #32 treed by hounds in a laurel oak at the site of her first capture on the Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge in central Collier County, 3 February 1989. Photograph by David S. Maehr. THE COMPARATIVE ECOLOGY OF BOBCAT, BLACK BEAR, AND FLORIDA PANTHER IN SOUTH FLORIDA David Steffen Maehri ABSTRACT Comparisons of food habits, habitat use, and movements revealed a low probability for competitive interactions among bobcat (Lynx ndia). Florida panther (Puma concotor cooi 1 and black bear (Urns amencanus) in South Florida. All three species preferred upland forests but ©onsumed different foods and utilized the landscape in ways that resulted in ecological separation.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Studies of Hornet Wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) Vespa Linnaeus of India
    Rec. zool. Surv. India: llO(Part-2) : 57-80,2010 TAXONOMIC STUDIES OF HORNET WASPS (HYMENOPTERA: VESPIDAE) VESPA LINNAEUS OF INDIA P. GIRISH KUMAR AND G. SRINIVASAN Zoological Survey of India, M-Block, New Alipore, Kolkata, West Bengal-700053, India E-mail: [email protected]:[email protected] INTRODUCTION here. Since it is a taxonomic paper, we generally used The members of the genus Vespa Linnaeus are the term 'Female' instead of 'Queen' and 'Worker' and commonly known as Hornet wasps. They are highly mentioned the terms 'Fertile female' and 'Sterile female' evolved social wasps. They built their nest by using wherever it is necessary. wood pulp. They have large colonies consisting of a All specimens studied are properly registered and single female queen, a large number of sterile workers deposited. Most of the specimens are deposited at and males. Hornet wasps are mainly distributed in 'National Zoological Collections' of the Hymenoptera Oriental and Palaearctic Regions of the world. There Section, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata (NZSI) and are 23 valid species known from the world so far of the rest of the specimens are deposited at Arunachal which 16 species from Indian subcontinent and 15 Pradesh Field Station, Zoological Survey of India, species from India (Carpenter & Kojima, 1997). Itanagar (APFS/ZSI). Economically, hornet wasps can be both beneficial and Genus Vespa Linnaeus harmful. They are beneficial as predators of agricultural, 1758. Vespa Linnaeus, Syst. Nat., ed. 10,1 : 343, 572, Genus forest and hygienic pests. The larvae and pupae of (17 species). Vespa are utilized as food by man in some parts of the Type species : "Vespa crabro, Fab." [= Vespa crabro world.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Matrilineal Relationships Via Mitochondrial
    Eastern Illinois University The Keep Masters Theses Student Theses & Publications 2003 Investigation of Matrilineal Relationships via Mitochondrial DNA in the Southeastern Yellowjacket (Vespula squamosa) Anthony Deets Eastern Illinois University This research is a product of the graduate program in Biological Sciences at Eastern Illinois University. Find out more about the program. Recommended Citation Deets, Anthony, "Investigation of Matrilineal Relationships via Mitochondrial DNA in the Southeastern Yellowjacket (Vespula squamosa)" (2003). Masters Theses. 1488. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/1488 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses & Publications at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THESIS/FIELD EXPERIENCE PAPER REPRODUCTION CERTIFICATE TO: Graduate Degree Candidates (who have written formal theses) SUBJECT: Permission to Reproduce Theses The University Library is receiving a number of request from other institutions asking permission to reproduce dissertations for inclusion in their library holdings. Although no copyright laws are involved, we feel that professional courtesy demands that permission be obtained from the author before we allow these to be copied. PLEASE SIGN ONE OF THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS: Booth Library of Eastern Illinois University has my permission to lend my thesis to a reputable college or university for the purpose of copying it for inclusion in that institution's
    [Show full text]
  • Occurrence and Molecular Phylogeny of Honey Bee Viruses in Vespids
    viruses Article Occurrence and Molecular Phylogeny of Honey Bee Viruses in Vespids 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 5, Sa Yang y, Philippe Gayral y, Hongxia Zhao y, Yaojun Wu y, Xuejian Jiang y, 1,2 3, 1,2 1,2 3 Yanyan Wu , Diane Bigot z, Xinling Wang , Dahe Yang , Elisabeth A. Herniou , 1,2 1,2 1,2 3, , 1,2, , Shuai Deng , Fei Li , Qingyun Diao , Eric Darrouzet * y and Chunsheng Hou * y 1 Institute of Apicultural Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100093, China; [email protected] (S.Y.); [email protected] (Y.W.); [email protected] (X.W.); [email protected] (D.Y.); [email protected] (S.D.); [email protected] (F.L.); [email protected] (Q.D.) 2 Key Laboratory of Pollinating Insect Biology, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100093, China 3 Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte, UMR 7261, CNRS—Université de Tours, F-37200 Tours, France; [email protected] (P.G.); [email protected] (D.B.); [email protected] (E.A.H.) 4 Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Guangdong Institute of Applied Biological Resources, Guangzhou 510260, China; [email protected] 5 Institute of Forestry Protection, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Forestry Research Institute, Nanning 530002, China; [email protected] (Y.W.); [email protected] (X.J.) * Correspondence: [email protected] (E.D.); [email protected] (C.H.); Tel.: +33-(0)2-47-36-71-60 (E.D.); +86-1062597285 (C.H.) These authors contributed equally to this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Vespidae (Hymenoptera: Vespoidea) in Iran
    J Insect Biodivers Syst 06(1): 27–86 ISSN: 2423-8112 JOURNAL OF INSECT BIODIVERSITY AND SYSTEMATICS Monograph http://jibs.modares.ac.ir http://zoobank.org/References/084E3072-A417-4949-9826-FB78E91A3F61 Updated Checklist of Vespidae (Hymenoptera: Vespoidea) in Iran Zahra Rahmani1, Ehsan Rakhshani1* & James Michael Carpenter2 1 Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture, University of Zabol, P.O. Box 98615-538, I.R. Iran. 2 Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA. ABSTRACT. 231 species of the family Vespidae (Hymenoptera, Vespoidea) of Iran, in 55 genera belonging to 4 subfamilies Eumeninae (45 genera, 184 species), Masarinae (5 genera, 24 species), Polistinae (2 genera, 17 species) and Vespinae (3 genera, 6 species) are listed. An overall assessment of the distribution pattern of the vespid species in Iran indicates a complex fauna of different biogeographic regions. 111 species are found in both Eastern and Western Palaearctic regions, while 67 species were found only in the Eastern Palaearctic region. Few species (14 species – 6.1%) of various genera are known as elements of central and western Asian area and their area of distribution is not known in Europe (West Palaearctic) and in the Far East. The species that were found both in the Oriental and Afrotropical Regions comprises 11.7 and 15.6% the Iranian vespid fauna, respectively. Many species (48, 20.8%) are exclusively recorded from Iran and as yet there is no record of Received: these species from other countries. The highest percentage of the vespid 01 January, 2020 species are recorded from Sistan-o Baluchestan (42 species, 18.2%), Alborz (42 Accepted: species, 18.2%), Fars (39 species, 16.9%) and Tehran provinces (38 Species 17 January, 2020 16.5%), representing the fauna of the Southeastern, North- and South Central Published: of the country.
    [Show full text]