Genetic Variability of Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes: the Dual Impact on Psychiatric Therapy and Regulation of Brain Function

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Genetic Variability of Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes: the Dual Impact on Psychiatric Therapy and Regulation of Brain Function Molecular Psychiatry (2013) 18, 273 -- 287 & 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 1359-4184/13 www.nature.com/mp EXPERT REVIEW Genetic variability of drug-metabolizing enzymes: the dual impact on psychiatric therapy and regulation of brain function JC Stingl1,4, J Brockmo¨ ller2 and R Viviani3 Polymorphic drug-metabolizing enzymes (DMEs) are responsible for the metabolism of the majority of psychotropic drugs. By explaining a large portion of variability in individual drug metabolism, pharmacogenetics offers a diagnostic tool in the burgeoning era of personalized medicine. This review updates existing evidence on the influence of pharmacogenetic variants on drug exposure and discusses the rationale for genetic testing in the clinical context. Dose adjustments based on pharmacogenetic knowledge are the first step to translate pharmacogenetics into clinical practice. However, also clinical factors, such as the consequences on toxicity and therapeutic failure, must be considered to provide clinical recommendations and assess the cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenetic treatment strategies. DME polymorphisms are relevant not only for clinical pharmacology and practice but also for research in psychiatry and neuroscience. Several DMEs, above all the cytochrome P (CYP) enzymes, are expressed in the brain, where they may contribute to the local biochemical homeostasis. Of particular interest is the possibility of DMEs playing a physiological role through their action on endogenous substrates, which may underlie the reported associations between genetic polymorphisms and cognitive function, personality and vulnerability to mental disorders. Neuroimaging studies have recently presented evidence of an effect of the CYP2D6 polymorphism on basic brain function. This review summarizes evidence on the effect of DME polymorphisms on brain function that adds to the well- known effects of DME polymorphisms on pharmacokinetics in explaining the range of phenotypes that are relevant to psychiatric practice. Molecular Psychiatry (2013) 18, 273--287; doi:10.1038/mp.2012.42; published online 8 May 2012 Keywords: CYP2D6; CYP2C19; DME endogenous substrates; DME in brain; polymorphic DMEs; psychotropic drugs; pharmacogenetic dose adjustments INTRODUCTION pharmacogenetic testing in psychiatry and highlight clinical Many drug-metabolizing enzymes (DMEs) are affected by genetic situations in which it may be useful. polymorphisms resulting in variations in functional activity.1 Much less is known about the emerging picture of the function These genetic polymorphisms have been subjected to intense of these enzymes in the central nervous system when locally study, as they may be responsible for more than 10-fold expressed. In the second part of this review, we will review differences in drug clearance affecting therapy outcome and evidence suggesting that through their activity in the CNS, DMEs safety.2--5 Gradually, it also became clear that several DMEs are may affect therapy outcome and psychic processes independently expressed throughout the body, including the brain,6 suggesting from their action in the liver. Metabolism of drugs may take place that they may have a role in the regulation of physiological directly in brain tissue, but even more intriguingly, some evidence homeostasis by biotransformation of endogenous compounds.7 suggests that DMEs may be associated with psychological traits of Very different amounts of knowledge have been obtained on clinical significance. The aim of this review is to summarize the the role of DMEs in response to drugs, in vulnerability to the current state of knowledge on both aspects of DME function while effects of other xenobiotics, and in differences in biological considering the implications of their manifold roles. function through the action on endogenous ligands. For what concerns the pharmacogenetics of drug exposure, the impact of DME polymorphisms has been explored in hundreds of studies. PHARMACOGENETIC TESTING IN PSYCHOTROPIC DRUG THERAPY The maturity of the field is reflected by current discussions about Genetic variability of DMEs can affect all phases of drug the possibility of delivering ‘personalized medicine’ by making metabolism (Table 1). In phase I, lipophilic drugs or xenobiotics use of computerized databases to assess the cumulative empirical are transformed by oxidation reactions, reductions or hydrolysis to evidence and rationally justify pharmacogenetic dose adjust- more soluble compounds. Generally, this transformation corres- ments.8,9 In the first part of this review, we will summarize the ponds to detoxification and inactivation and facilitates hepatic or recent data on the influence of DME polymorphisms on renal excretion. However, xenobiotics may at times be activated to psychotropic drug therapy. We will also discuss strengths and toxic or therapeutically active compounds.10 Cytochrome P450 limitations of current assessments of the clinical utility of (CYP450) enzymes are the major family of enzymes mediating the 1Institute of Pharmacology of Natural Products and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; 2Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center, Georg-August-University, Go¨ ttingen, Germany and 3Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy III, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany. Correspondence: Professor JC Stingl, Research Department, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175 Bonn, Germany. E-mails: [email protected] and [email protected] 4Current address: Research Department, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany. Received 15 August 2011; revised 28 March 2012; accepted 3 April 2012; published online 8 May 2012 DME polymorphism in research and practice JC Stingl et al 274 Table 1. Polymorphic drug-metabolizing enzymes (DMEs) in psychiatry DME Phase of liver metabolism Main role Degree of polymorphism References CYP2D6 I Xenobiotics High 20,166 CYP2C19 I Xenobiotics High 159 CYP1A2 I Endobiotics Medium 167 CYP2C9 I Xenobiotics Medium 39 CYP3A4 I Xenobiotics Low 168 CYP2B6 I Endobiotics Medium 169 CYP2A6 I Endobiotics High 170 CYP2C8 I Xenobiotics Medium 56 CYP2E1 I Endobiotics Low 69 UGT1A4 II Xenobiotics Medium 171 UGT1A6 II Endobiotics Medium 171 UGT2B7 II Endobiotics Medium 171 UGT1A9 II Endobiotics Medium 171 Degree of polymorphism; high, alleles leading to complete enzyme deficiency; medium, polymorphic but still residual enzyme activity; low, rare genetic variants but no polymorphic phenotype.18,20 Liver CYP450 expression Brain CYP450 expression CYP1A2 CYP1B1 10% 8.0% CYP2D6 CYP3A4/5/7 CYP2C8/9/19 non-DME DME 6.0% non-DME DME CYP2J2 23% 15% 57.6% 42.4% 23% 77% 20.0% CYP2E1 7.5% CYP2E1 5% CYP1A1 0.2% CYP2D6 CYP2B6 CYP2A6 2% CYP3A5 0.2% CYP2B6 0.2% 1% 3% CYP2C8 0.3% Figure 1. The relative amount of expression of the CYP450 enzymes in the liver and brain is shown (data from Shimada et al.245 and Dutheil et al.66). One can see that the expression patterns in the brain and liver differ; the only enzymes that are expressed in substantial amounts in both organs are CYP2D6 and CYP2E1. Furthermore, the relative amount of CYP450 enzymes with DME activity varies, being higher in the liver. Furthermore, most of the CYP450 DMEs expressed in the brain possess DME activity only on individual compounds52 and are presumably primarily involved with endogenous substrates. CYP1B1, for example, metabolizes estradiol246 and CYP2J2 metabolizes ebastine and astemizole.247,248 phase I of drug metabolism.11 In the liver, most expressed CYP450 Proportion of psychotropic medications metabolized enzymes are involved in xenobiotic metabolism; in the brain, by individual enzymes however, they may be involved in endobiotic metabolism (that is biosynthesis or deactivation of endogenous compounds) (Figure 1). Locally expressed CYP450 enzymes or local endogenous substrates CYP3A4 may also modulate pharmacodynamics in the brain.12,13 In phase II, solubility of drugs is increased by conjugation CYP2D6 CYP2C19 with hydrophilic residues. The main DMEs involved in phase II metabolism are glucuronyl transferases (UGTs), N-acetyltrans- ferases, sulfonyltransferases and glutathione S-transferases. Phase CYP2C9 CYP2B6 CYP1A2 II DMEs present polymorphisms of varying functional significance. However, because most psychiatric drugs are extensively meta- bolized by phase I DMEs, the majority of pharmacogenetic effects of clinical significance are attributable to phase I, with a few notable exceptions like lamotrigine or morphine (Table 1, Figure 2). Among the phase I DMEs, CYP2D6 is particularly notable because Aldehyde Dopa- it is involved in the metabolism of approximately half of the oxidase decarboxylase COMT UGT1A4 commonly prescribed psychotropic drugs.14 Before and after biotransformation, most drugs are excreted or Figure 2. Relative contribution of individual DMEs in the metabolism taken up by transporters (often referred to as phase 0 or phase III of of psychopharmacological drugs estimated from involvement in the main metabolic pathways (based on data from Hiemke et al163). drug metabolism). Functional polymorphisms in drug transporters 15--17 As can be seen in the figure, the most important liver enzymes arebeyondthescopeofthisarticleandarereviewedelsewhere. involved in antidepressant and antipsychotic drug metabolism are DME phenotypes express wide ranges of clinically significant the CYP450 enzymes CYP2D6, CYP3A4, CYP2C19 and CYP1A2, and 18 variation and appear as almost monogenetic
Recommended publications
  • Drug Allergy: Diagnosis and Management of Drug Allergy in Adults and Children
    NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE SCOPE 1 Guideline title Drug allergy: diagnosis and management of drug allergy in adults and children 1.1 Short title Drug allergy 2 The remit The Department of Health has asked NICE: ‘To produce a clinical guideline on Drug allergy: diagnosis and management of drug allergy in adults and children 3 Clinical need for the guideline 3.1 Epidemiology a) Diagnosing a drug allergy is challenging, with considerable variation in service provision, practice and referral pattern. This can lead to under-diagnosis, misdiagnosis and self-diagnosis. b) All drugs have the potential to cause side effects, also known as adverse drug reactions, but not all of these are allergic in nature; other reactions are caused by drug intolerance, idiosyncratic reactions and pseudo-allergic reactions. c) The British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology (BSACI) defines drug allergy as an adverse drug reaction with an established immunological mechanism. However, the mechanism at presentation may not be apparent from the clinical history, and therefore, whether a drug reaction is allergic or non-allergic cannot always be established without investigation. Drug allergy guideline – Draft scope for consultation 3–31 October 2012 Page 1 of 8 d) Drug allergy can be further defined as an immune-mediated hypersensitivity reaction to a medicinal product and may be divided into immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated (immediate onset) and non- IgE-mediated (delayed onset, usually involving T cells) reactions. e) Adverse drug
    [Show full text]
  • Hypersensitivity to Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: from Pathogenesis to Clinical Practice
    ARTIGO DE REVISÃO Hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: From pathogenesis to clinical practice Hipersensibilidade a anti-inflamatórios não esteroides: Da patogénese à prática clínica Data de receção / Received in: 28/10/2017 Data de aceitação / Accepted for publication in: 17/11/2017 Rev Port Imunoalergologia 2018; 26 (3): 207-220 Inês Mota, Ângela Gaspar, Mário Morais-Almeida Imunoallergy Department, CUF Descobertas Hospital, Lisbon ABSTRACT Nonsteroidal anti - inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are one of the leading causes of hypersensitivity reactions, which affect a considerable percentage of the general population. These drugs can induce a wide spectrum of reactions with distinct timing, organ involvement and severity, including either immunological or nonimmunological mechanisms. A proper diagnosis can be particularly challenging since most reactions result from the pharmacological mechanism of the drug and might be dose - dependent. The clinical classification of NSAIDs - induced reactions has changed over time. Accurate diagnosis depends on strict clinical history and proper understanding of underlying mechanism. Skin testing and in vitro testing have limited usefulness. Drug chal- lenge tests with the culprit or alternative drugs are the gold standard for the diagnosis, and provide information about drug avoidance and safe therapeutic options. In selected cases drug desensitization might be a therapeutic option. In this review, we will attempt to highlight the main aspects to be taken into account for a proper management of patients with NSAIDs hyper- sensitivity. Key - words: Acetylsalicylate acid, alternative drugs, desensitization, diagnosis, hypersensitivity, nonsteroidal anti - inflammatory drugs. 207 REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE IMUNOALERGOLOGIA Inês Mota, Ângela Gaspar, Mário Morais-Almeida RESUMO Os anti - inflamatórios não esteroides (AINEs) são uma das principais causas de reações de hipersensibilidade, afetando uma percentagem considerável da população em geral.
    [Show full text]
  • Pilot Study to Assess Outcomes of a Drug Allergy Clarification Service on a General Medicine Floor at a Local Community Hospital Crystal M
    Original Research PRACTICE-BASED RESEARCH Pilot Study to Assess Outcomes of a Drug Allergy Clarification Service on a General Medicine Floor at a Local Community Hospital Crystal M. Deas, PharmD, BCPS1; C. Whitney White, PharmD, BCPS2 1Samford University, McWhorter School of Pharmacy, Clinical Pharmacist, Cooper Green Mercy Health Services, Birmingham, AL 2University of Mississippi School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS Abstract Purpose: Drug allergy documentation in the patient medical record varies in level of detail, and drug intolerances are often inappropriately documented as an allergy in the medical record. A pilot study was conducted to determine the impact of a pharmacy- led drug allergy clarification service. Methods: The pilot quality improvement service was implemented in Fall 2016. General medicine patients were identified through daily census reporting and the electronic medical record (EMR) was reviewed within 72 hours of admission for documented drug allergies and/or intolerances. Patients were interviewed by a clinical pharmacist or a fourth year pharmacy student to determine a complete drug allergy and intolerance history. Results: A total of 55 patients were interviewed and received the pilot service. A drug allergy/intolerance was documented in EMR for 54.5% (n=30) of patients interviewed. Of those 30 patients, 96.6% (n=29) were noted to have at least one discrepancy between EMR documentation and patient interview. The primary discrepancy noted was drug allergies or intolerances documented in the EMR without a description of the reaction. Conclusion: A pharmacy-led drug allergy clarification service was effective in identifying and clarifying EMR documentation of patients’ drug allergies and intolerances.
    [Show full text]
  • Practical Guidance for the Evaluation and Management of Drug Hypersensitivity: Specific Drugs
    Specific Drugs Practical Guidance for the Evaluation and Management of Drug Hypersensitivity: Specific Drugs Chief Editors: Ana Dioun Broyles, MD, Aleena Banerji, MD, and Mariana Castells, MD, PhD Ana Dioun Broyles, MDa, Aleena Banerji, MDb, Sara Barmettler, MDc, Catherine M. Biggs, MDd, Kimberly Blumenthal, MDe, Patrick J. Brennan, MD, PhDf, Rebecca G. Breslow, MDg, Knut Brockow, MDh, Kathleen M. Buchheit, MDi, Katherine N. Cahill, MDj, Josefina Cernadas, MD, iPhDk, Anca Mirela Chiriac, MDl, Elena Crestani, MD, MSm, Pascal Demoly, MD, PhDn, Pascale Dewachter, MD, PhDo, Meredith Dilley, MDp, Jocelyn R. Farmer, MD, PhDq, Dinah Foer, MDr, Ari J. Fried, MDs, Sarah L. Garon, MDt, Matthew P. Giannetti, MDu, David L. Hepner, MD, MPHv, David I. Hong, MDw, Joyce T. Hsu, MDx, Parul H. Kothari, MDy, Timothy Kyin, MDz, Timothy Lax, MDaa, Min Jung Lee, MDbb, Kathleen Lee-Sarwar, MD, MScc, Anne Liu, MDdd, Stephanie Logsdon, MDee, Margee Louisias, MD, MPHff, Andrew MacGinnitie, MD, PhDgg, Michelle Maciag, MDhh, Samantha Minnicozzi, MDii, Allison E. Norton, MDjj, Iris M. Otani, MDkk, Miguel Park, MDll, Sarita Patil, MDmm, Elizabeth J. Phillips, MDnn, Matthieu Picard, MDoo, Craig D. Platt, MD, PhDpp, Rima Rachid, MDqq, Tito Rodriguez, MDrr, Antonino Romano, MDss, Cosby A. Stone, Jr., MD, MPHtt, Maria Jose Torres, MD, PhDuu, Miriam Verdú,MDvv, Alberta L. Wang, MDww, Paige Wickner, MDxx, Anna R. Wolfson, MDyy, Johnson T. Wong, MDzz, Christina Yee, MD, PhDaaa, Joseph Zhou, MD, PhDbbb, and Mariana Castells, MD, PhDccc Boston, Mass; Vancouver and Montreal,
    [Show full text]
  • A5343 a Trial of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Bedaquiline and Delamanid, Alone and in Combination, Among Pa
    A5343 A Trial of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Bedaquiline and Delamanid, Alone and in Combination, among Participants Taking Multidrug Treatment for Drug-Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis A Limited-Center Trial of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) Sponsored by: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Industry Support Provided by: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Otsuka Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd. ViiV Healthcare, Ltd. IND# 127,382 The ACTG Tuberculosis Transformative Science Group Gavin Churchyard, MBBCh, MMED, FCP, PhD, Chair Protocol Co-Chairs: Kelly Dooley, MD, PhD Gary Maartens, MBChB, MMed Protocol Vice Chair: Francesca Conradie, MD, DTM&H DAIDS Clinical Representatives: Richard Hafner, MD Roxana Rustomjee MbChB, MMed, FCPhM, FRCP, PhD Clinical Trials Specialists: Laura E. Moran, MPH Chanelle Houston, BS FINAL Version 4.0 June 26, 2018 A5343 FINAL Version 4.0 06/26/18 A Trial of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Bedaquiline and Delamanid, Alone and in Combination, among Participants Taking Multidrug Treatment for Drug-Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis SIGNATURE PAGE I will conduct the study in accordance with the provisions of this protocol and all applicable protocol-related documents. I agree to conduct this study in compliance with United States (US) Health and Human Service regulations (45 CFR 46); applicable U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulations; standards of the International Conference on Harmonization Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (E6); Institutional Review
    [Show full text]
  • ASCIA Consensus Cephalosporin Allergy
    Drug (Medication) Allergy Terms This document has been developed by the ASCIA Drug Allergy Committee to assist clinical immunology/allergy specialists and other health professionals who manage drug allergy. It is based on expert consensus and references listed on page 9. ASCIA Drug Allergy Committee members are listed on the ASCIA website www.allergy.org.au/members/committees#dac SUMMARY OF ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS AND DRUG ALLERGY 1 ASCIA Information for Health Professionals - Drug Allergy Terms TERMS ASSOCIATED WITH DRUG ALLERGY • Acute generalised exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), also known as Acute generalised pustular drug eruption and toxic pustuloderma, is a rare severe exanthematous cutaneous adverse skin reaction (SCAR), that is mostly related to pustulosis (AGEP) medication administration. • AGEP appears on average five days after a medication is started. • Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is a general term that includes all unintended effects of a drug except for therapeutic failures, intentional overdose, abuse of the drug or errors in administration. ADRs can be Adverse drug classified into two types: reactions (ADRs) - Type A reactions are predictable reactions and are based on known pharmacological properties of the drug. - Type B reactions are unpredictable and include drug allergy, drug intolerance and idiosyncratic reactions to drugs. • Anaphylaxis is a severe and immediate Immunoglobulin E (IgE) mediated allergic reaction. • Anaphylaxis can affect breathing and/or the heart and blood pressure. • Anaphylaxis is potentially life threatening and requires urgent medical attention. Anaphylaxis • Whist anaphylaxis is more likely when medication is given by intravenous (IV) or intramuscular injection (IMI), anaphylaxis to oral medications can also occur. • The most common causes of anaphylaxis are allergies to drugs (medications), foods and insect bites or stings.
    [Show full text]
  • Adverse Drug Reaction and Toxicity Caused by Commonly Used Antimicrobials in Canine Practice
    Veterinary World, EISSN: 2231-0916 REVIEW ARTICLE Available at www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.7/May-2014/6.pdf Open Access Adverse drug reaction and toxicity caused by commonly used antimicrobials in canine practice 122234 K. Arunvikram , Ipsita Mohanty , K. K. Sardar , S. Palai , G. Sahoo and R. C. Patra 1. Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar -243122, Uttar Pradesh, India: 2. Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Veterinary College, Orissa University of Agricultural and Technology, Bhubaneswar - 751 003, Odisha, India;3. Department of Biochemistry, Veterinary College, Orissa University of Agricultural and Technology, Bhubaneswar - 751 003, Odisha, India; 4. Department of Clinical Medicine, Veterinary College, Orissa University of Agricultural and Technology, Bhubaneswar - 751 003, Odisha, India Corresponding author: Ipsita Mohanty, email: [email protected] Received:20-03-2014, Revised: 05-04-2014, Accepted: 08-04-2014, Published online: 08-05-2014 doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2014.299-305 How to cite this article: Arunvikram K, Mohanty I, Sardar KK, Palai S, Sahoo G and Patra RC (2014) Adverse drug reaction and toxicity caused by commonly used antimicrobials in canine practice,Veterinary World 7(5): 299-305. Abstract An adverse drug reaction (ADR) is a serious concern for practicing veterinarians and other health professionals, and refers to an unintended, undesired and unexpected response to a drug that negatively affects the patient's health. It may be iatrogenic or genetically induced, and may result in death of the affected animal. The ADRs are often complicated and unexpected due to myriad clinical symptoms and multiple mechanisms of drug-host interaction. Toxicity due to commonly used drugs is not uncommon when they are used injudiciously or for a prolonged period.
    [Show full text]
  • Practical Guidelines for Diagnosing Hypersensitivity Reactions to Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
    GUIDELINES Practical Guidelines for Diagnosing Hypersensitivity Reactions to Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs N Ortega,1 I Doña,2 E Moreno,3 MT Audicana,4 MJ Barasona,5 MP Berges-Gimeno,6 N Blanca-Lopez,7 T Lobera,8 A Padial,9 A Rosado,10 MJ Torres2 1Allergy Service, Hospital Doctor Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain 2Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga, Spain 3Allergy Service, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain 4Allergy Service, Santiago Apóstol Hospital, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain 5Allergy Service, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain 6Allergy Division, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain 7Allergy Service, Infanta Leonor Hospital, Madrid, Spain 8Allergy Service, Centro de Alta Resolución San Millán, Logroño, Spain 9Allergy Service, La Paz Hospital, Madrid, Spain 10Allergy Service, Alcorcón Hospital, Madrid, Spain Abstract Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the drugs most frequently involved in hypersensitivity reactions. These reactions include various clinical entities with different mechanisms leading to the release of inflammatory mediators. Characterization of patients based on clinical manifestations and suspected underlying mechanisms is critical for implementation of adequate diagnostic procedures and patient management. Our objectives were to prepare a systematic review of available scientific evidence and to provide general guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with hypersensitivity reactions to NSAIDs. We also propose a practical algorithm for the diagnosis of specific types of hypersensitivity to NSAIDs and provide recommendations for the management of hypersensitive patients. Key words: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Hypersensitivity. Intolerance. Idiosyncrasy. Acetylsalicylic acid. Algorithm. Diagnosis. Resumen Los antiinflamatorios no esteroideos (AINE) es el grupo farmacológico que más frecuentemente ha sido relacionado con las reacciones de hipersensibilidad.
    [Show full text]
  • Views and finally Assessed for Causality, Preventability, and Immediate Therapeutic Management Dr
    Article Adverse Drug Reactions in Patients with CKD Sole`ne M. Laville ,1 Vale´rie Gras-Champel,2 Julien Moragny,2 Marie Metzger,1 Christian Jacquelinet,1,3 Christian Combe ,4,5 Denis Fouque ,6 Maurice Laville,6 Luc Frimat,7,8 Bruce M. Robinson,9 Be´ne´dicte Stengel,1 Ziad A. Massy,1,10 and Sophie Liabeuf ,2,11 on behalf of the Chronic Kidney Disease-Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (CKD-REIN) Study Group* Abstract Background and objectives Little is known about the burden of adverse drug reactions in CKD. We estimated the incidence of overall and serious adverse drug reactions and assessed the probability of causation, preventability, Due to the number of contributing authors, and factors associated with adverse drug reactions in patients seen by nephrologists. the affiliations are listed at the end of Design, setting, participants, & measurements The Chronic Kidney Disease-Renal Epidemiology and Information this article. Network cohort included 3033 outpatients (65% men) with CKD and eGFR,60 ml/min per 1.73 m2,withfollow- up for 2 years. Adverse drug reactions were identified from hospitalization reports, medical records, and Correspondence: participant interviews and finally assessed for causality, preventability, and immediate therapeutic management Dr. Be´ne´dicte Stengel, E´quipe E´pide´miologie by experts in pharmacology. Clinique, Centre for Epidemiology and Results Median (interquartile range) age was 69 (60–76) years old; 55% had eGFR$30 ml/min per 1.73 m2, and 45% Population Health had eGFR,30 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Participants were prescribed a median (range) of eight (five to ten) drugs.
    [Show full text]
  • Biomarkers in Drug Hypersensitivity
    BIOMARKERS IN DRUG HYPERSENSITIVITY EDITED BY : José A. G. Agúndez, Silvia Selinski, Emanuela Corsini, Klaus Golka and Elena García-Martín PUBLISHED IN : Frontiers in Pharmacology Frontiers Copyright Statement About Frontiers © Copyright 2007-2017 Frontiers Media SA. All rights reserved. Frontiers is more than just an open-access publisher of scholarly articles: it is a pioneering All content included on this site, approach to the world of academia, radically improving the way scholarly research such as text, graphics, logos, button icons, images, video/audio clips, is managed. The grand vision of Frontiers is a world where all people have an equal downloads, data compilations and software, is the property of or is opportunity to seek, share and generate knowledge. Frontiers provides immediate and licensed to Frontiers Media SA permanent online open access to all its publications, but this alone is not enough to (“Frontiers”) or its licensees and/or subcontractors. The copyright in the realize our grand goals. text of individual articles is the property of their respective authors, subject to a license granted to Frontiers. Frontiers Journal Series The compilation of articles constituting The Frontiers Journal Series is a multi-tier and interdisciplinary set of open-access, online this e-book, wherever published, as well as the compilation of all other journals, promising a paradigm shift from the current review, selection and dissemination content on this site, is the exclusive processes in academic publishing. All Frontiers journals are driven by researchers for property of Frontiers. For the conditions for downloading and researchers; therefore, they constitute a service to the scholarly community.
    [Show full text]
  • The Multiple Faces of Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drug Hypersensitivity M
    M. Sánchez-Borges, et al. Original Article The multiple faces of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug hypersensitivity M. Sánchez-Borges1,2, A. Capriles-Hulett1,3, F. Caballero-Fonseca1,3 1 Centro Médico-Docente La Trinidad, 2 Clínica El Avila, 3 Centro Médico de Caracas, Caracas, Venezuela Summary. Based on the clinical picture and triggering drugs, allergic and pseudoallergic adverse reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can be classified in four patterns : respiratory, cutaneous, mixed and systemic. This categorization is useful for the purpose of describing patient populations included in studies about NSAID adverse reactions as well as for the routine management of the patient in the clinical setting. Key words: Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Urticaria. Angioedema. Asthma. Cysteinil-leukotrienes. Cyclooxygenases. Introduction and pseudoallergic reactions to drugs that inhibit cyclooxygenase enzymes [2]. In this paper we would like Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are to discuss in detail the clinical features of these reactions recognized among the most frequently used therapeutic in an attempt to give clinicians further insights for the agents all over the world, and average consumption has better management of patients suffering from them. For been estimated as high as 80 tablets per person per year the purpose of this article, four clinical patterns will be [1]. Due to the magnitude of exposure, it is not surprising analyzed: 1) Respiratory 2) Cutaneous 3) Mixed 4) Sys- that NSAIDs are one
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnosis and Management of Drug Allergy in Adults, Children and Young People
    DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION Drug allergy: diagnosis and management of drug allergy in adults, children and young people NICE guideline Draft for consultation, April 2014 If you wish to comment on this version of the guideline, please be aware that all the supporting information and evidence is contained in the full version. Drug Allergy: NICE guideline DRAFT (April 2014) Page 1 of 29 DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................... 3 Drug recommendations ................................................................................ 5 Patient-centred care ......................................................................................... 6 Strength of recommendations .......................................................................... 7 Key priorities for implementation ...................................................................... 9 1 Recommendations .................................................................................. 13 1.1 Assessment ...................................................................................... 13 1.2 Documenting and sharing information with other healthcare professionals .............................................................................................. 15 1.3 Providing information and support to patients ................................... 17 1.4 Non-specialist management and referral to specialist services ........ 18 2 Research recommendations ..................................................................
    [Show full text]