The Fox (Vulpes Vulpes) As a Reservoir for Canine Angiostrongylosis in Denmark Field Survey and Experimental Infections

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Fox (Vulpes Vulpes) As a Reservoir for Canine Angiostrongylosis in Denmark Field Survey and Experimental Infections Acta vet. scand. 1992,33, 357-362. The Fox (Vulpes vulpes) as a Reservoir for Canine Angiostrongylosis in Denmark Field survey and experimental infections By G. Bolt, J. Monrad, P. Henriksen, H. H. Dietz, J. Koch, E. Bindseil and A. L. Jensen Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Frederiksberg, and National Veterinary Laboratory, Arhus , Denmark. Bolt, G., J. Monrad, P. Henriksen, H. H. Dietz, J. Koch, E. Bindseil and A. L. Jensen: The fox (Vulpes vulpes) as a reservoir for canine angiostrongylosis in Denmark. Acta vet. scand, 1992, 33, 357·362. - Until recently, Angiostrongylus vasorum was not con­ sidered to be an endogenous Danish parasite, since demonstration of this worm had been confined to necropsy findings in 2 dogs, both of which had visited France. During the last 2 years, however, clinical cases have been diagnosed among a conside­ rable number of Danish dogs, none of which had ever been outside Denmark. All these cases have occurred north of Copenhagen, where an endemic focus seems to exist. In this field survey A. vasorum was found for the first time in wild Danish red foxes. Furthermore, experimental infections showed that the parasite can be transfer­ red between foxes and dogs. Consequently, the wild fox population must be conside­ red a potential reservoir for transfer of A. vasorum to domestic dogs. Angiostrongylus vasorum; experimental transfer. Introduetlon Angiostrongylus vasorum (French heart­ diagnosis is based on the demonstration of worm) is a metastrongyloid parasite of the the characteristic first stage larvae (Ll) in domestic dog (Canis familiaris) and other faecal samples analyzed by the Baermann carnivores belonging to Canidae. The adult method (Jacobs & Prole 1975, Iergensen & worms parasitize in the right atrium of the Madsen 1982). heart and particularly in the pulmonary In Europe A. vasorum is known to be arteries. The life cycle is indirect with a num­ endemic among dogs in south-west France ber of mollusc species acting as obligatory (Dorchies 1976, Guilhon & Cens 1973), Ire­ intermediate hosts (Guilhon 1965, Guilhon land (Dodd 1973, Jacobs & Prole 1975), and 1967, Guilhon & Cens 1973,). The pathologi­ in south-west England (Jones et al. 1980, cal and clinical manifestations of canine Simpson & Neal 1982). Sporadic cases have angiostrongylosis are multiple, as reported been reported from other parts of France elsewhere (Dodd 1973, Guelfi 1976, Prest (Guilhon 1969), south-east England (Cobb & wood et al. 1981, Schelling et al. 1986). The Fisher 1990), former West Germany (Pal major symptoms are respiratory distress and laske 1967), Spain (Sanchez et al. 1979), Swit­ loss of condition (Cobb & Fisher 1990, Guelfi zerland (Eckert & Ldmmler 1972, Neff1971), 1976, Koch & Bolt 1990). The parasitological and from the European part of the former Acta vet. scand. vol. 33 no. 4 - 1992 358 G. Bolt et al. Sovjet Union (Eckert & Liimmler 1972, ate vicinity of humans and their dogs. The Rosen et al. 1970). Outside Europe the para­ present study was designed to examine the site has been reported to be endemic among occurrence of A. vasorum in the red fox pop­ dogs in Uganda iBwangamoi 1972), and spo­ ulation in the locality north of Copenhagen, radic cases have been reported from dogs in where the canine outbreaks had occurred. Brasil (Lima et al. 1985, Rosen et al. 1970), Furthermore, artificial infections were estab­ Columbia (Rosen et al. 1970), the United lished in order to investigate, whether strains States (Williams 1985), and from the Asiatic of A. vasorum isolated from Danish foxes part of the former Sovjet Union (Eckert & and dogs might be transmissible to dogs and Liimmler 1972). All cases reported from the foxes, respectively. United States have occurred among import­ ed dogs. Materials and methods Among foxes (Vulpes vulpes) A. vasorum Examination ofwild foxes has been reported from France (Guilhon During the period October 1990 to May 1991 1971), Ireland (Guilhon 1971), Italy (Poli et a total of 15 adult red foxes (V. vulpes) from al. 1985), Spain tTarazona 1974), the former the above mentioned region were examined Sovjet Union (Eckert & Liimmler 1972, for A. vasorum. Of these 13 foxes were killed Rosen et al. 1970), Germany (Rosen et al. during hunting and can therefore be consid­ 1970) and Canada (Smith & ThrelfallI973). ered fairly representative of the fox popula­ In Italy and France the fox is considered to tion at the hunting ground, which is located be a reservoir for transmission of A. vasorum in the northern outskirts of Copenhagen to domestic dogs (Guilhon 1965, Guilhon (Jregersborg Game Reserve). Faecal samples 1971, Poli et al. 1985). Guilhon succesfully from all 15 foxes were subjected to the Baer­ transferred the parasite from dogs to 2 foxes mann method. Hearts and lungs from some and a jackal (Canis aureus). Patent infections of the foxes were dissected . The right atrium were established in all 3 experimental ani­ and the pulmonary arteries were inspected mals (Guilhon 1965). According to our for adult parasites, but neither gross patho­ knowledge no experimental transfer from logical nor histopathological examinations wild foxes to dogs has ever been reported. were performed. In Denmark A. vasorum until recently had only been detected on necropsy of 2 dogs, Production ofinfective larvae both of which had visited France (Finnerup L1 were isolated by the Baermann method 1983, Monrad 1989). Over the last 2 years, from faeces of naturally infected foxes and however, clinical cases have been diagnosed dogs. The snails Biomphalaria glabrata and in a considerable number of Danish dogs, Helix pomatia (edible snail) were used as none of which have ever been outside Den­ intermediate hosts. Experimental infection mark (Koch 1992, Koch & Bolt 1990, Rosen of B. glabrata, was performed by adding L1 lund et al. 1991). Interestingly, all these cases to a beaker containing the snails according to have occurred north of Copenhagen, where the method described by Guilhon & de Gaa an endemic focus of yet unknown, but pos­ Ion (1969). Experimental infection of H. sibly growing extension seems to exist. This pomatia was performed in 2 steps. Firstly, suburban region is characterized by a dense each snail was fed a small piece of lettuce population of red foxes living in the immedi- contaminated with fluid containing L1 as Acta vel. scand, vol. 33 no. 4 • 1992 Angiostrongylosis in Denmark 359 described by Guilhon & Afghabi (1969), and Results secondly, each snail was placed on a water Wild foxe s film containing the L1 larvae in a beaker. In 12 of the 15 foxes typical A. vasorum L1 In order to demonstrate the development of were found in the faeces, though in moderate infective third-stage larvae (L3), the snails numbers « 150 Ll/g). Poor blood coagula­ were comminuted, and a proportion (10%) tion was observed in 4 of the infected foxes. of the snail tissue was digested in an Whenever infected foxes were necropsied, HClIpepsin solution at 30°C. Slightly modi­ adult A. vasorum of both sexes were found in fied versions of the techniques described by the right atrium of the heart and in the pul­ Wallace & Rosen (1969) were used. The L3 monary arteries. Few worms were found in recovered from the snails by digestion were each fox, and all foxes appeared to be in counted under a stereomicroscope. good bodily condition, indicating that the infection was of minor significance to the Infection offoxes and dogs foxes. Another 2 helminth species, Crenoso The final hosts were infected by feeding ma vulpis and Capillaria aerophila, were them infective snail material mixed with a found in 8 and 2 of the foxes, respectively. palatable feed. Two adult silver foxes (V. vulpes) originating from a fox farm were Experimental infection offoxes infected with L3 developed from Ll, which In the faeces from fox No.1 and fox No.2 had originally been isolated from the faeces excretion of A. vasorum L1 started 52 and 55 of a dog suffering from angiostrongylosis. days post infection , respectively. The foxes Fox No.1 received approximately 250 larvae were euthanized 74 days post infection . At passed in B. glabrata and fox No. 2 that time the faeces of fox No.1 and fox No. approximately 100 larvae passed in H. poma 2 contained 153 Ll/g and 1.5 Ll/g, respec­ tia. Another 2 uninfected foxes (No. 3 and tively. No clinical symptoms were noticed No.4), which were of the same origin as fox during the course of infection . At necropsy No.1 and No.2, served as non-infected con­ gross pathological lesions comparable to trols. The faeces of all 4 foxes were examined those described for naturally infected foxes by the Baermann method once a week. (Poli et al. 1985) and experimentally infected Two 4 month old SPF beagle puppies (dog dogs (Neff 1971, Prestwood et al. 1981) were No.1 and dog No.2) were infected, as well. found in the lungs of both foxes. A total of Dog No. 1 was infected with 100-200 L3 52 adult worms (28 females and 24 males) developed in B. glabrata from L1 isolated were found in fox No.1, whereas a total of 8 from the faeces of 2 wild red foxes. Dog No. adult worms (5 females and 3 males) were 2 was infected with 300-500 L3 developed in found in fox No.2. The faeces of fox No.3 B. glabrata from Ll isolated from the faeces and fox No.4 did at no time contain larvae, of 2 dogs suffering from angiostrongylosis. and no worms were found post mortem in Faeces from the dogs were examined by the these 2 foxes. Baermann method twice a week. Gross pathological lesions were noticed at Experimental infection ofdogs necropsy of foxes and dogs, while histopath­ In the faeces from dog No.1 and dog No.2 ological examination of lung tissue was car­ excretion of A.
Recommended publications
  • The Red and Gray Fox
    The Red and Gray Fox There are five species of foxes found in North America but only two, the red (Vulpes vulpes), And the gray (Urocyon cinereoargentus) live in towns or cities. Fox are canids and close relatives of coyotes, wolves and domestic dogs. Foxes are not large animals, The red fox is the larger of the two typically weighing 7 to 5 pounds, and reaching as much as 3 feet in length (not including the tail, which can be as long as 1 to 1 and a half feet in length). Gray foxes rarely exceed 11 or 12 pounds and are often much smaller. Coloration among fox greatly varies, and it is not always a sure bet that a red colored fox is indeed a “red fox” and a gray colored fox is indeed a “gray fox. The one sure way to tell them apart is the white tip of a red fox’s tail. Gray Fox (Urocyon cinereoargentus) Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) Regardless of which fox both prefer diverse habitats, including fields, woods, shrubby cover, farmland or other. Both species readily adapt to urban and suburban areas. Foxes are primarily nocturnal in urban areas but this is more an accommodation in avoiding other wildlife and humans. Just because you may see it during the day doesn’t necessarily mean it’s sick. Sometimes red fox will exhibit a brazenness that is so overt as to be disarming. A homeowner hanging laundry may watch a fox walk through the yard, going about its business, seemingly oblivious to the human nearby.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Fur Harvester Digest 3 SEASON DATES and BAG LIMITS
    2021 Michigan Fur Harvester Digest RAP (Report All Poaching): Call or Text (800) 292-7800 Michigan.gov/Trapping Table of Contents Furbearer Management ...................................................................3 Season Dates and Bag Limits ..........................................................4 License Types and Fees ....................................................................6 License Types and Fees by Age .......................................................6 Purchasing a License .......................................................................6 Apprentice & Youth Hunting .............................................................9 Fur Harvester License .....................................................................10 Kill Tags, Registration, and Incidental Catch .................................11 When and Where to Hunt/Trap ...................................................... 14 Hunting Hours and Zone Boundaries .............................................14 Hunting and Trapping on Public Land ............................................18 Safety Zones, Right-of-Ways, Waterways .......................................20 Hunting and Trapping on Private Land ...........................................20 Equipment and Fur Harvester Rules ............................................. 21 Use of Bait When Hunting and Trapping ........................................21 Hunting with Dogs ...........................................................................21 Equipment Regulations ...................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • Red Fox (Vulpes Vulpes) Story and Photos by Joseph Filo, Sr
    Trailside Nature & Science Center - What’s in Your Backyard? Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) Story and Photos by Joseph Filo, Sr. Park Naturalist In normal times, a great many of us miss what happens in and around our own backyards. With so many of us sheltering in place these days, there is an opportunity to better observe our yards and neighborhoods during those 8, 10, 12 or more hours that we would not ordinarily be home. Such an opportunity presented itself at my home over the last two months. In early April, we first saw a female red fox under our bird feeders (photo). Other than some sections of her fur, she looked quite healthy, in fact, she looked pregnant. She continued to visit on an almost daily basis, eating spilled seed from the feeder, and occasionally stalking a bird or squirrel. She also seemed to be eating some of the fresh young grass shoots. Foxes are omnivores. Although we often think of them hunters, eating mice, voles chipmunks, etc. But they also eat plants, including acorns, grass seeds and fruits. There is some dispute as to whether or not the red fox is native to North America. Red foxes were definitely introduced from Europe, but whether or not they were already here is not known for sure. If they were here, they were not abundant. The North American and Eurasian red foxes were once thought to be two separate species, Vulpes fulva and Vulpes vulpes, respectively. They are now considered a single species. We continued to enjoy watching her visit both our bird feeding stations, then we missed her for a few days.
    [Show full text]
  • Sierra Nevada Red Fox (Vulpes Vulpes Necator): a Conservation Assessment
    Sierra Nevada Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes necator): A Conservation Assessment John D. Perrine * Environmental Science, Policy and Management Department and Museum of Vertebrate Zoology University of California, Berkeley Lori A. Campbell** USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station Sierra Nevada Research Center Davis, California Gregory A. Green Tetra Tech EC Bothell, Washington Current address and contact information: *Primary Author: J. Perrine, Biological Sciences Department, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407-0401 [email protected] **L. Campbell, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616 Perrine, Campbell and Green R5-FR-010 August 2010 NOTES IN PROOF • Genetic analyses by B. Sacks and others 2010 (Conservation Genetics 11:1523-1539) indicate that the Sacramento Valley red fox population is native to California and is closely related to the Sierra Nevada red fox. They designated the Sacramento Valley red fox as a new subspecies, V. v. patwin. • In August 2010, as this document was going to press, biologists on the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest detected a red fox at an automatic camera station near the Sonora Pass along the border of Tuolomne and Mono Counties. Preliminary genetic analyses conducted at UC Davis indicate that the fox was a Sierra Nevada red fox. Further surveys and analyses are planned. • The California Department of Fish and Game Region 1 Timber Harvest Program has established a Sierra Nevada red fox information portal, where many management-relevant documents can be downloaded as PDFs. See: https://r1.dfg.ca.gov/Portal/SierraNevadaRedFox/tabid/618/Default.aspx Sierra Nevada Red Fox Conservation Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This conservation assessment provides a science-based, comprehensive assessment of the status of the Sierra Nevada red fox (Vulpes vulpes necator) and its habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species Facts San Joaquin Kit
    Endangered SpecU.S. Environmental iesFacts Protection Agency San Joaquin Kit Fox Vulpes macrot is mutica Description and Ecology Status Endangered, listed March 11, 1967. Critical Habitat Not designated. current distribution records include the Antioch area of Contra Costa County. Appearance The average male San Joaquin kit fox measures about 32 inches in length (of which 12 inches is the Habitat Because the San Joaquin kit fox requires dens length of its tail). It stands 12 inches high at the shoulder, for shelter, protection and reproduction, a habitat’s soil and weighs about 5 pounds. The female is a little smaller. type is important. Loose-textured soils are preferable, but The San Joaquin kit fox is the smallest canid species in North modification of the burrows of other animals facilitates America (but the largest kit fox subspecies). Its foot pads denning in other soil types. The historical native vegetation of are also small and distinct from other canids in its range, the Valley was largely annual grassland (“California Prairie”) averaging 1.2 inches long and 1 inch wide. The legs are long, and various scrub and subshrub communities. Vernal pool, the body slim, and the large ears are set close together. The alkali meadows and playas still provide support habitat, but B. Moose Pet erson, U.S. Fish Serviceand Wildlife B. Moose Pet nose is slim and pointed. The tail, typically carried low and have wet soils unsuitable for denning. Some of the habitat has been converted to an agricultural patchwork of row The San Joaquin kit fox is straight, tapers slightly toward its distinct black tip.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural History of the European Badger. Updated
    Wildlife Online - Natural History of the European Badger Wildlife Online- Wildlife information at the click of a mouse-- Home About What's New & Planned? Speed Read Species Profiles Wildlife Articles Animal-Human Conflict Q&A FAQ Bibliography Gallery Links Site Map Disclaimer Photos Needed Many Thanks! Contact EUROPEAN BADGER Meles meles Content Updated: 6th August 2010 CONTENTS: Taxonomy Length Weight Colour Distribution Longevity Sexing Activity Setts Territory Predators Food and Feeding Breeding Biology Behaviour and Social Structure Interaction with Humans -- Feeding Badgers Questions and Answers http://www.wildlifeonline.me.uk/european_badger.html[26/08/2014 08:57:21] Wildlife Online - Natural History of the European Badger Taxonomy: When Carl von Linné (more commonly known as Carl Linnaeus prior to his ennoblement in 1761) included the European badger in the 10th volume of his Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus differentiis, synonymis, locis (understandably shortened to System naturae by most), he placed it in the Ursidae family alongside the bears (as Ursus meles). Over the years, subsequent authors have moved the badger into the Meles genus (as proposed by the French zoologist Mathurin Jacques Brisson in his 1762 Regnum animale in classes IX). Today, all badgers are part of the Mustellidae (Weasel Family), which is the largest and most diverse family within the Carnivore order. Globally there are 66 extant mustelid species, divided into 25 genera and six subfamilies; representatives of the Musteliidae include the Otters, Skunks, Weasels, Stoats and Badgers. Worldwide, we currently recognize nine species of badger, divided into seven genera: Arctonyx, Suillotaxus, Mydaus, Melogale, Mellivora, Taxidea and Meles.
    [Show full text]
  • (WILD): Population Densities and Den Use of Red Foxes () and Badgers
    The German wildlife information system (WILD): population densities and den use of red foxes () and badgers () during 2003-2007 in Germany Oliver Keuling, Grit Greiser, Andreas Grauer, Egbert Strauß, Martina Bartel-Steinbach, Roland Klein, Ludger Wenzelides, Armin Winter To cite this version: Oliver Keuling, Grit Greiser, Andreas Grauer, Egbert Strauß, Martina Bartel-Steinbach, et al.. The German wildlife information system (WILD): population densities and den use of red foxes () and badgers () during 2003-2007 in Germany. European Journal of Wildlife Research, Springer Verlag, 2010, 57 (1), pp.95-105. 10.1007/s10344-010-0403-z. hal-00598188 HAL Id: hal-00598188 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00598188 Submitted on 5 Jun 2011 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Eur J Wildl Res (2011) 57:95–105 DOI 10.1007/s10344-010-0403-z ORIGINAL PAPER The German wildlife information system (WILD): population densities and den use of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and badgers (Meles meles) during 2003–2007 in Germany Oliver Keuling & Grit Greiser & Andreas Grauer & Egbert Strauß & Martina Bartel-Steinbach & Roland Klein & Ludger Wenzelides & Armin Winter Received: 22 September 2009 /Revised: 11 May 2010 /Accepted: 21 May 2010 /Published online: 5 June 2010 # Springer-Verlag 2010 Abstract Monitoring the populations of badgers and red densities estimated as well as potential annual population foxes may help us to manage these predator species as a increases were calculated for 2003–2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Coyotes (Canis Latrans) Have Wide, Pointed America
    Are coyotes dangerous? How can you protect your pet? What you can do Coyotes are generally not dangerous to hikers. It can be difficult to accept, but pets can be seen as a You have options when it comes to dealing with Eastern Humans have had a mostly peaceful relationship food source, threat or possible mate. Coyotes have coyotes in your neighborhood: with coyotes for the past 100 years in New Jersey. In taken pets from backyards, open spaces and even the past 10 years, there have been very few reported right off the leash. Keep pet vaccinations current. Do nothing. Coyote attacks on people in New Jersey. Vaccinations and reduce the risk to your pet by You might have no concerns about coyotes, following these guidelines: however, we recommend you understand the Can we get rid of them? possible risks to your pets and yourself. Cat Owners: Be prepared and encourage coyotes to FAQ TNC recommends against allowing cats outdoors. remain wild. Populations may fluctuate but coyotes came to New Help both people and coyotes by taking action to Jersey naturally and live in every county; it would be The only way to guarantee your cat’s safety is to keep it indoors. Outdoor cats face potential death instill them with a healthy and natural fear of impossible to eliminate them. They have adapted to people. If you have concerns about encountering neighborhoods because our environment supports from cars, diseases, foxes, parasites, raccoons, dogs and birds of prey. Protect your cat and other wildlife. a coyote, you may want to keep a deterrent them.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Help a Fox Or Coyote with Mange
    How to help a fox or coyote with mange Sarcoptic mange is an infection of the skin caused by a parasitic mite. The most common clinical signs of mange are hair loss, thick crusting, and intense itchiness in the infested animal. While any mammal can suffer from mange, at DCHS the most commonly admitted animals with Sarcoptic mange are foxes, coyotes, and squirrels. The mite itself is not deadly, but it opens up a pathway for infection, and crusts on eyelids can lead to vision problems. This condition is treatable and patients often recover quite well with treatment unless there are secondary issues from the associated debilitation and starvation. We are happy to treat a fox if it can be captured and brought to the wildlife center; however, even with the best of intentions, it can be difficult to live trap a fox or coyote. They are smart and leery of entering a live trap. Wisconsin trapping laws prohibit the public from setting a live trap without a trapper's license, unless the landowner deems an animal a nuisance. Landowners are allowed to trap nuisance animals on their property, and through this loophole the landowner can trap an animal for treatment. Depending on the condition of the animal, during the spring and summer season when many animals have dependent young, DCHS may recommend postponing trapping until late summer or fall once the young have grown. DCHS does not rent out live traps for use with wildlife, live traps may be purchased from many home improvement stores (Home Depot and Menards) Fox showing the hair loss and crusty or agriculture supply stores (Blain’s Farm and Fleet).
    [Show full text]
  • What's Wild About African Wild Dogs?
    Skill – Reading Comprehension Name: _________________________ What’s Wild About African Wild Dogs? By: Catherine Clarke Fox What’s the difference between African wild dogs and the dogs we know as pets? For one thing, African wild dogs, which live in Africa, south of the Sahara desert, only have four toes, while domestic dogs and wolves have five. But you wouldn’t want to count for yourself, because these are truly wild animals. Wild dogs are not somebody's domestic dogs that ran away and didn't come back, although some people used to think that," explains Dr. "Tico" McNutt, who studies these animals at Wild Dog Research Camp in the African country of Botswana. "They are actually Africa's wolf, and just like wolves, they do not make good pets. They need to be out in the wild doing what they are supposed to be doing - ranging many miles every day and hunting to find the food they need to survive and feed pups." In fact, they travel so far that researchers use radio collars to keep track of them. The collars send out radio signals that tell people where the dogs are. African wild dogs are a separate species from domestic dogs: Lycaon pictus, which means painted, wolf-like animal. No two wild dogs have the same pattern to their coats, so it is easy to tell them apart. Roaming through grasslands, savannas, and wooded areas, they hunt gazelles and other antelopes, baby wildebeests, warthogs, birds, and rats. Incredible hunters, they can run up to 35 miles per hour (56 kilometers per hour).
    [Show full text]
  • Red Fox Vulpes Vulpes
    Red Fox Vulpes vulpes The red fox (Vulpes vulpes) is not native to Vermont, it was introduced by European colonists. The native fox species, the gray fox, proved too elusive, so early European settlers brought the red fox to use for fox hunting. Red foxes, however, are native to other parts of North America. In comparison, the red fox is slightly larger than the gray fox and it occupies a wider range of habitats. Hunted and trapped for its coat, it’s a popular furbearer. Vermont Wildlife Fact Sheet Physical Description In Vermont, it commonly about ten months. The red fox breeds late January through breeds once a year. The red fox is the size of a February. The males will small dog and belongs to the exhibit signs of aggression Food Items same family, the canids. An adult during the breeding season, red fox may weigh between eight fighting other males for The red fox is an and fifteen pounds and is establishment of territories omnivore, feeding on small approximately 39 to 43 inches in and vying for the female's mammals, birds, woodchucks, length. It has long pointed black attention. Females often mate insects, eggs, carrion (dead tipped ears, black cheek patches, with more than one male but animals) and also fruits and black "leg stockings" and a long, will form a partnership with berries. It can be a nuisance bushy, white tipped tail. only one. In preparation of because it will occasionally prey There are several color the birth, the female remains on domestic cats, poultry, lambs, phases of the red fox, ranging in or near the den.
    [Show full text]
  • Gray Fox Urocyon Cinereoargenteus Long Pointed Ears
    YOUTH MAGAZINE OF THE TEXAS WILDLIFE ASSOCIATION FEBRUARY 2018 CRITTER CONNECTIONS All About Foxes Foxglove Penstemon The foxglove penstemon (Penstemon cobaea), prairie beardtongue, or false foxglove is a flower found on hillsides and rocky areas in Texas from the Rolling Plains and Blackland Prairie ecoregions, south to the Gulf of Mexico. They are native or natural to the United States and grow in many other states from Nebraska to Texas. The bell shaped flowers can be different colors, from white, to dark pink, to light purple. The stems are usually 30cm or 12in tall, but can grow to be twice that size. They will grow flowers two years after the seeds are planted. False Name Even though this plant is sometimes called a foxglove, it is a pretender. It is not related to the true foxglove plants which grow in Europe and were brought over to the United States. People call it a false foxglove because it looks a lot like the plants in the true foxglove family. The name foxglove comes from old English words which mean fox’s glove, but scientists don’t really understand why it was named that. Why do you think it is called a foxglove? Pretty for Pollinators The flowers are long and tube or bell shaped and are made of five lobes, two large at the top and three smaller lobes at the bottom. They create a perfect stage for pollinators such as bees to land on the flower and walk inside to drink nectar. There are even dark lines inside the flower showing pollinators where to find the nectar.
    [Show full text]