Improved Short-Term Atlantic Hurricane Intensity Forecasts Using Reconnaissance- Based Core Measurements David Andrew Murray

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Improved Short-Term Atlantic Hurricane Intensity Forecasts Using Reconnaissance- Based Core Measurements David Andrew Murray Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2009 Improved Short-Term Atlantic Hurricane Intensity Forecasts Using Reconnaissance- Based Core Measurements David Andrew Murray Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES IMPROVED SHORT-TERM ATLANTIC HURRICANE INTENSITY FORECASTS USING RECONNAISSANCE-BASED CORE MEASUREMENTS By DAVID ANDREW MURRAY A Thesis submitted to the Department of Meteorology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2009 The members of the committee approve the thesis of David Andrew Murray defended on November 6, 2009. __________________________________ Robert Hart Professor Directing Thesis __________________________________ Carol Anne Clayson Committee Member __________________________________ Philip Sura Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members. ii This thesis is dedicated to my wonderful, loving wife, Marisa Murray, for her tremendous support throughout the process of the research and the writing of the manuscript. Her acceptance of my working late hours and her support at home made completion of this work possible. My appreciation to her for all the sacrifices she made cannot be expressed in words. Thank you, Marisa. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my committee members, both Dr. Carol Anne Clayson for her advice as well as Dr. Philip Sura for his input regarding the statistical methods involved in this research. I also would like to thank the Hart/Reasor/Ruscher lab for their support and for making days in the lab more enjoyable. Thanks are also due to my parents for their continued support throughout my education. I would also like to thank my best friend, Tim Kurtz, for helping me keep my sanity. Special recognition is due to Ben Schenkel for all the time he invested reviewing my work, offering excellent suggestions, assisting me with coding problems, and proofreading my thesis. His efforts are greatly appreciated. Finally, I would like to recognize my major professor, Dr. Robert Hart, for all of his assistance and advice over the last year and a half. He has been not only a great mentor and advisor but also a good friend, and I thank Bob for everything. This research was funded by NASA Grant #NNX09AC43G and by the Florida Catastrophic Storm Risk Management Center of the Florida State University College of Business. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ............................................................................................. vii List of Figures ............................................................................................ viii Abstract ................................................................................................ xv 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 1 1.1 Datasets .......................................................................................... 2 1.2 Intensity Forecast Models .............................................................. 3 1.2.1 Climatology and Persistence (CLIPER) Models ............... 3 1.2.2 Dynamical Models ............................................................. 4 1.2.3 Statistical-synoptic and Statistical-dynamical Models ...... 6 1.3 Eyewall Contraction and ERC Theory .......................................... 10 1.4 Previous TC Intensity Forecasting Studies .................................... 12 1.4.1 Rapid Intensity Index ......................................................... 12 1.4.2 Annular Hurricanes ............................................................ 14 1.4.3 Logistic Growth Equation Model (LGEM) ....................... 15 1.4.4 Secondary Eyewall Formation Probability ........................ 16 1.4.5 Inner-core Studies .............................................................. 17 1.5 Objectives ...................................................................................... 18 2. DATA ................................................................................................ 25 2.1 Vortex Data Messages ................................................................... 25 2.2 NHC ATCF Archives .................................................................... 28 2.3 Manual Corrections to ATCF Data ................................................ 29 3. VORTEX DATA MESSAGE CLIMATOLOGY ................................. 32 3.1 Development .................................................................................. 32 3.2 Distribution of VDM Parameters ................................................... 34 3.2.1 Distribution of VDM Reports ............................................ 34 3.2.2 Distribution of Variables Reported in VDMs .................... 36 4. EYE STRUCTURE FORECAST TOOL .............................................. 46 4.1 Development .................................................................................. 46 4.2 Application ..................................................................................... 47 4.2.1 Pattern of Climatological Intensity Change ....................... 47 4.2.2 Relation to Sawyer-Eliassen Nonlinear Balance ............... 51 4.3 Hindcasting Results ....................................................................... 52 5. STATISTICAL REGRESSION FORECAST MODEL (ASPIRE) ...... 60 5.1 Development of Database for Regression ...................................... 60 5.2 Formulation of Forecast Equations ................................................ 62 5.2.1 Overview of Stepwise Multiple Regression ...................... 62 5.2.2 Forecast Equation Sets ....................................................... 63 v 5.3 Predictor Variables ......................................................................... 65 5.4 Interpretation of Equations ............................................................ 68 6. ASPIRE RESULTS ............................................................................... 86 6.1 Testing of Developmental Equations on Independent Datasets .... 87 6.2 Improvement through the Use of Intensity Bins ............................ 89 6.3 Comparison to SHIPS Benchmark ................................................. 90 6.3.1 ASPIRE Performance Stratified by Intensity .................... 90 6.3.2 ASPIRE Performance Stratified by Geography ................. 94 6.4 Implications .................................................................................... 97 7. CASE STUDIES .................................................................................... 113 7.1 Well-Hindcast Case: Hurricane Ivan (2004) ................................. 114 7.1.1 Storm History ..................................................................... 114 7.1.2 Performance and Analysis of ASPIRE Hindcasts ............. 115 7.2 Poorly-Hindcast Case: Hurricane Katrina (2005) ......................... 116 7.2.1 Storm History ..................................................................... 116 7.2.2 Performance and Analysis of ASPIRE Hindcasts ............. 117 8. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK ............................................ 126 REFERENCES .......................................................................................... 129 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH ...................................................................... 134 vi LIST OF TABLES 1.1: 2003 SHIPS model predictors from DeMaria et al. (2005) ............................ 24 2.1: Explanation of Vortex Data Message along with its field location in the ATCF f-deck archives. .................................................................................... 30 2.2: List of manual changes made to Vortex Messages in ATCF f-deck archives. For storms with more than two reported eyewalls, only the first two are provided below. For eye shape data, 1=Circular; 2=Concentric; 3=Elliptical. ..................................................................................................... 30 3.1: Summary of differences between the VDM climatology presented in this study and that of Piech (2007). ........................................................................ 45 4.1: Summary of the types of TC intensity forecast guidance. .............................. 59 5.1: Summary of types of regression equation sets developed in the ASPIRE technique. ........................................................................................................ 83 5.2: Table of predictors chosen for stepwise regression (NSNC, NS, and TOTAL). Before regression is performed, all predictor distributions were examined for normality and transformed using natural logarithms or exponentials as necessary. Italicized predictor names denote variables which were transformed to achieve approximate normality. The number of times the predictors were selected during the NSNC, NS, and TOTAL methods using the step indicated by the stopping rules is also listed, with a maximum possible of 133 times selected (19 intensity bins by 7 forecast times). .............................................................................................................. 83 5.3: Julian day/Calendar day equivalent. ............................................................... 85 7.1: Number of VDMs by forecast hour for Hurricanes Ivan and Katrina along with the average number of VDMs per TC in the ASPIRE database
Recommended publications
  • The 2009 Atlantic Hurricane Season in Perspective by Dr
    AIRCURRENTS THE 2009 ATLANTIC EDITor’s noTE: November 30 marked the official end of the Atlantic HURRICANE SEASON hurricane season. With nine named storms, including three hurricanes, and no U.S. landfalling hurricanes, this season was the second quietest since IN PERSPECTIVE 1995, the year the present period of above-average sea surface temperatures (SSTs) began. This year’s relative inactivity stands in sharp contrast to the 2008 season, during which Hurricanes Dolly, Gustav, and Ike battered the Gulf Coast, causing well over 10 billion USD in insured losses. With no U.S. landfalling hurricanes in 2009, but a near miss in the Northeast, 2009 reminds us yet again of the dramatic short term variability in hurricane 12.2009 landfalls, regardless of whether SSTs are above or below average. By Dr. Peter S. Dailey HOW DOES ACTIVITY IN 2009 COMPARE TO Hurricanes are much more intense than tropical storms, LONG-TERM AVERAGES? producing winds of at least 74 mph. Only about half of By all standard measures, the 2009 Atlantic hurricane tropical storms reach hurricane strength in a typical year, season was below average. Figure 1 shows the evolution with an average of six hurricanes by year end. Major of a “typical” season, which reflects the long-term hurricanes, with winds of 111 mph or more, are even rarer, climatological average over many decades of activity. with only about three expected in the typical year. Note the Tropical storms, which produce winds of at least 39 mph, sharp increase in activity during the core of the season—the occur rather frequently.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influences of the North Atlantic Subtropical High and the African Easterly Jet on Hurricane Tracks During Strong and Weak Seasons
    Meteorology Senior Theses Undergraduate Theses and Capstone Projects 2018 The nflueI nces of the North Atlantic Subtropical High and the African Easterly Jet on Hurricane Tracks During Strong and Weak Seasons Hannah Messier Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/mteor_stheses Part of the Meteorology Commons Recommended Citation Messier, Hannah, "The nflueI nces of the North Atlantic Subtropical High and the African Easterly Jet on Hurricane Tracks During Strong and Weak Seasons" (2018). Meteorology Senior Theses. 40. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/mteor_stheses/40 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate Theses and Capstone Projects at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Meteorology Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Influences of the North Atlantic Subtropical High and the African Easterly Jet on Hurricane Tracks During Strong and Weak Seasons Hannah Messier Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa Alex Gonzalez — Mentor Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames Iowa Joshua J. Alland — Mentor Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York ABSTRACT The summertime behavior of the North Atlantic Subtropical High (NASH), African Easterly Jet (AEJ), and the Saharan Air Layer (SAL) can provide clues about key physical aspects of a particular hurricane season. More accurate tropical weather forecasts are imperative to those living in coastal areas around the United States to prevent loss of life and property.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Title of Document: the EFFECT of HURRICANE SANDY
    ABSTRACT Title of Document: THE EFFECT OF HURRICANE SANDY ON NEW JERSEY ATLANTIC COASTAL MARSHES EVALUATED WITH SATELLITE IMAGERY Diana Marie Roman, Master of Science, August 2015 Directed By: Professor, Michael S. Kearney, Environmental Science and Technology Hurricane Sandy, one of several large extratropical hurricanes to impact New Jersey since 1900, produced some of the most extensive coastal destruction within the last fifty years. Though the damage to barrier islands from Sandy was well-documented, the effect of Sandy on the New Jersey coastal marshes has not. The objective of this analysis, based on twenty-three Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) data sets collected between 1984 and 2011 and Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) images collected between 2013 and 2014 was to determine the effect of Hurricane Sandy on the New Jersey Atlantic coastal marshes. Image processing was performed using ENVI image analysis software with the NDX model (Rogers and Kearney, 2004). Results support the conclusion that the marshes were stable between 1984 and 2006, but had decreased in vegetation density coverage since 2007. Hurricane Sandy caused the greatest damage to low-lying marshes located close to where landfall occurred. THE EFFECT OF HURRICANE SANDY ON NEW JERSEY ATLANTIC COASTAL MARSHES EVALUATED WITH SATELLITE IMAGERY by Diana Marie Roman Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science 2015 Advisory Committee: Professor Michael Kearney, Chair Professor Andrew Baldwin Associate Professor Andrew Elmore © Copyright by Diana Marie Roman 2015 Forward Hurricane storm impacts on coastal salt marshes have increased over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Housing Coalition Hurricane Member Update Webinar May 1, 2020 Sponsored by Fannie Mae AGENDA
    Florida Housing Coalition Hurricane Member Update Webinar May 1, 2020 Sponsored by Fannie Mae AGENDA • COVID-19 Updates • NOAA, National Hurricane Center, and National Weather Service: Preparing for Hurricane Season COVID-19 SHIP Frequently Asked Questions New Content on Topics Including: • File Documentation • Technical Revisions • Rental Assistance • Mortgage Assistance • Foreclosure Counseling • Reporting COVID SHIP Assistance FAQ File Documentation Question Upcoming COVID-19 Trainings “Implementing Effective Rental Assistance Programs with Federal and State Resources” May 13 at 10:00 am https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/7291419462613166863 “COVID-19 SHIP Rent Assistance Implementation" May 18 at 2:00 pm https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/7691296448631153675 “COVID-19 SHIP Mortgage Assistance Implementation" May 20 at 2:00 pm https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/620374553799087627 Recent COVID-19 Trainings Recordings: • Emergency SHIP Assistance for Renters https://vimeo.com/403418248 • Helping Homeowners with COVID-19 SHIP Emergency Assistance https://vimeo.com/407646578 • Assisting Homeless and Special Needs Populations through COVID-19 https://vimeo.com/405609513 • Virtual SHIP https://vimeo.com/410260129 NOAA, National Hurricane Center, and National Weather Service: Preparing for Hurricane Season Andrew Latto NHC Hurricane Specialist [email protected] Regarding evacuations and planning: • https://www.weather.gov/wrn/2020-hurricane- evacuation Regarding Evacuations and Planning Regarding evacuations and planning:
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane & Tropical Storm
    5.8 HURRICANE & TROPICAL STORM SECTION 5.8 HURRICANE AND TROPICAL STORM 5.8.1 HAZARD DESCRIPTION A tropical cyclone is a rotating, organized system of clouds and thunderstorms that originates over tropical or sub-tropical waters and has a closed low-level circulation. Tropical depressions, tropical storms, and hurricanes are all considered tropical cyclones. These storms rotate counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere around the center and are accompanied by heavy rain and strong winds (NOAA, 2013). Almost all tropical storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic basin (which includes the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea) form between June 1 and November 30 (hurricane season). August and September are peak months for hurricane development. The average wind speeds for tropical storms and hurricanes are listed below: . A tropical depression has a maximum sustained wind speeds of 38 miles per hour (mph) or less . A tropical storm has maximum sustained wind speeds of 39 to 73 mph . A hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 74 mph or higher. In the western North Pacific, hurricanes are called typhoons; similar storms in the Indian Ocean and South Pacific Ocean are called cyclones. A major hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 111 mph or higher (NOAA, 2013). Over a two-year period, the United States coastline is struck by an average of three hurricanes, one of which is classified as a major hurricane. Hurricanes, tropical storms, and tropical depressions may pose a threat to life and property. These storms bring heavy rain, storm surge and flooding (NOAA, 2013). The cooler waters off the coast of New Jersey can serve to diminish the energy of storms that have traveled up the eastern seaboard.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded 10/05/21 07:00 AM UTC 3074 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW VOLUME 145
    AUGUST 2017 H A Z E L T O N E T A L . 3073 Analyzing Simulated Convective Bursts in Two Atlantic Hurricanes. Part I: Burst Formation and Development a ANDREW T. HAZELTON Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Science, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida ROBERT F. ROGERS NOAA/AOML/Hurricane Research Division, Miami, Florida ROBERT E. HART Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Science, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida (Manuscript received 15 July 2016, in final form 21 April 2017) ABSTRACT Understanding the structure and evolution of the tropical cyclone (TC) inner core remains an elusive challenge in tropical meteorology, especially the role of transient asymmetric features such as localized strong updrafts known as convective bursts (CBs). This study investigates the formation of CBs and their role in TC structure and evolution using high-resolution simulations of two Atlantic hurricanes (Dean in 2007 and Bill in 2009) with the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model. Several different aspects of the dynamics and thermodynamics of the TC inner-core region are investigated with respect to their influence on TC convective burst development. Composites with CBs show stronger radial inflow in the lowest 2 km, and stronger radial outflow from the eye to the eyewall around z 5 2–4 km, than composites without CBs. Asymmetric vorticity associated with eyewall mesovortices appears to be a major factor in some of the radial flow anomalies that lead to CB development. The anomalous outflow from these mesovortices, along with outflow from supergradient parcels above the boundary layer, favors low-level convergence and also appears to mix high-ue air from the eye into the eyewall.
    [Show full text]
  • 11B-01 Polygonal Eyewall Asymmetries During the Rapid Intensification of Hurricane Michael (2018)
    11B-01 POLYGONAL EYEWALL ASYMMETRIES DURING THE RAPID INTENSIFICATION OF HURRICANE MICHAEL (2018) Ting-Yu Cha1*, Michael M. Bell1, Wen-Chau Lee2, Alexander J. DesRosiers1 1Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 2National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado 1. INTRODUCTION Hurricane Michael (2018) was the first axisymmetric and asymmetric tangential winds Category 5 hurricane to make landfall in the (Jou et al. 2008; Cha and Bell 2019). United States since Hurricane Andrew (1992) and Analyses of Hurricane Michael (2018) caused extensive damage in Florida and Georgia demonstrate the first observation of high-order (Beven et al. 2019). Satellite and radar imagery wave propagation using tangential wind showed evidence of an evolving polygonal asymmetries as a proxy for the PV signal. The eyewall as Michael underwent rapid results show that the propagation speeds of the intensification (RI) during its approach to Florida. waves are consistent with linear wave theory on Polygonal eyewalls are hypothesized to be the a vortex and help to provide new insight into result of asymmetric vorticity dynamics internal to physical mechanisms contributing to TC rapid the storm that can modulate TC structure and intensification. intensity through counter-propagating vortex Rossby waves (VRWs) that redistribute eyewall 2. DATA AND METHODOLOGY potential vorticity (PV) and angular momentum Hurricane Michael was within the NEXRAD and form mesovortices (Hendricks et al. 2012; KEVX ground-based radar surveillance range Kuo et al. 1999,2016; Muramatsu 1986; Schubert during its rapid intensification (RI), and its et al. 1999, Lee and Wu 2019). TC internal intensity reached category 5 (140 kt) at the time dynamics are a primary factor impacting the rate of landfall around 1730 UTC (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Names: a Bunch of Hot Air?
    Weather and Climate Extremes 12 (2016) 80–84 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Weather and Climate Extremes journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/wace Hurricane names: A bunch of hot air? Gary Smith n Department of Economics, Pomona College, United States article info abstract Article history: It has been argued that female-named hurricanes are deadlier because people do not take them ser- Received 7 July 2015 iously. However, this conclusion is based on a questionable statistical analysis of a narrowly defined data Received in revised form set. The reported relationship is not robust in that it is not confirmed by a straightforward analysis of 10 November 2015 more inclusive data or different data. Accepted 22 November 2015 & 2015 Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license Available online 28 November 2015 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Keywords: Hurricanes Data grubbing Sexism Jung, Shavitt, Viswanathan, and Hilbe (2014) argue that people depression (less than 39 mph), tropical storm (39–73 mph), hur- do not take hurricanes with female names seriously and are con- ricane (more than 73 mph), and major hurricane (more than sequently underprepared and more likely to be killed. The authors 110 mph). Tropical storms and hurricanes are generally given report that this “hazardous form of implicit sexism” is supported names like Hurricane Sandy, but tropical depressions are not. by their analysis of 92 hurricanes that hit the United States be- Jung et al. (2014) examine a narrowly defined dataset: U.S. tween 1950 and 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Hurricane Season of 1997
    2012 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW VOLUME 127 Atlantic Hurricane Season of 1997 EDWARD N. RAPPAPORT Tropical Prediction Center, National Hurricane Center, NOAA/NWS, Miami, Florida (Manuscript received 12 June 1998, in ®nal form 5 October 1998) ABSTRACT The 1997 Atlantic hurricane season is summarized and the year's tropical storms, hurricanes, and one sub- tropical storm are described. The tropical cyclones were relatively few in number, short lived, and weak compared to long-term climatology. Most systems originated outside the deep Tropics. Hurricane Danny was the only system to make landfall. It produced rainfall totals to near 1 m in southern Alabama and is blamed for ®ve deaths. Hurricane Erika was responsible for the season's two other fatalities, in the coastal waters of Puerto Rico. 1. Introduction This is one of the smallest contributions (by percentage) on record by tropical waves. On average, about 60% of A sharp drop in tropical cyclone activity occurred in tropical cyclones originate from tropical waves (Pasch the Atlantic hurricane basin from 1995±96 to 1997 (Ta- et al. 1998). ble 1). Only seven tropical storms formed in 1997, and Historically, many of the strongest Atlantic tropical just three of those reached hurricane strength (Table 2). cyclones develop from tropical waves between the coast This also represents a considerable reduction from the of Africa and the Lesser Antilles in the August±Sep- long-term averages of ten tropical storms and six hur- tember period. Such tropical cyclone formation appears ricanes. The months of August and September were par- to be related to 1) the wave's ``intrinsic'' potential for ticularly quiet.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Resolution Hurricane Forecasts Chris Davis, Wei Wang, Steven
    High-resolution Hurricane Forecasts Chris Davis, Wei Wang, Steven Cavallo, James Done, Jimy Dudhia, Sherrie Fredrick, John Michalakes, Ginger Caldwell, and Tom Engel National Center for Atmospheric Research1 Boulder, Colorado Ryan Torn University at Albany, SUNY Albany, New York Submitted to Computing in Science and Engineering Revised, April, 2010 Corresponding Author: Christopher A. Davis P.O. Box 3000 Boulder, CO 80307 [email protected] Phone: 303-497-8990 Fax: 303-497-8181 1 The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation. 2 Abstract The authors discuss the challenges of predicting hurricanes using dynamic numerical models of the atmosphere-ocean system. The performance of particular model is investigated for a large sample of Atlantic tropical cyclones from the 2005, 2007 and 2009 hurricane seasons. The model, derived from the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, is capable of resolving the deep convective motions within a hurricane and the eye and eye wall of the storm. The use of finer resolution leads to demonstrably improved predictions of storm intensity compared with predictions from coarser resolution models. Possible future real-time applications of this model in a high-performance computing environment are discussed using hurricane Bill (2009) as an example. These applications are well suited to massively parallel architectures. 3 1. Introduction The prediction of hurricane intensity remains a daunting challenge even after four decades of research. The intrinsic difficulties lay in the vast range of spatial and temporal scales of atmospheric motions that affect tropical cyclone intensity. The range of spatial scales is literally millimeters to 1000 kilometers or more.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA's Quikscat Sees Category 3 Hurricane Bill's Winds Go a Long Distance 20 August 2009
    NASA's QuikScat sees category 3 Hurricane Bill's winds go a long distance 20 August 2009 QuikScat used microwaves to peer through Bill's clouds and measure his winds on August 18 at 5:23 p.m. EDT when Bill was a powerful Category 4 hurricane. Credit: NASA JPL, Peter Falcon NASA satellites continue to capture important wind speed and cloud data that forecasters at the National Hurricane Center are using to help their NASA's MODIS instrument on the Terra satellite captured forecasts. QuikScat has been particularly helpful in Hurricane Bill, located off the Lesser Antilles in the determining the extent of hurricane and tropical Atlantic Ocean on August 19 at 12:15 p.m. EDT. Credit: storm-force winds, and they go a great distance. NASA, MODIS Rapid Response NASA's QuikScat satellite uses microwave technology to peer through the clouds and measure the surface winds of a tropical cyclone. At 5 a.m. EDT on August 19, Bill's maximum On Thursday, August 19, QuikScat data found that sustained winds had decreased to 125 mph, and he Bill's hurricane force winds have dropped down to was moving northwest near 18 mph. That motion is a Category 3 hurricane at 125 mph. However, expected to continue for a day until he turns to the forecasters note that Bill is moving into an area north-northwest late Friday. Minimum central that could help him strengthen back to Category 4 pressure was 949 millibars. Bill was located about hurricane on Friday or Saturday. 790 miles south-southeast of Bermuda and only 325 miles north-northeast of the Leeward Islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical Cyclone Wind Field Asymmetry Development and Evaluation of A
    PUBLICATIONS Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans RESEARCH ARTICLE Tropical cyclone wind field asymmetry—Development and 10.1002/2016JC012237 evaluation of a new parametric model Key Points: Mohammad Olfateh 1, David P. Callaghan 1, Peter Nielsen1, and Tom E. Baldock 1 A new parametric model for tropical cyclone wind fields is proposed to 1 enable the modeling of wind field School of Civil Engineering, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia asymmetries The new asymmetric model improves estimations of tropical cyclone wind Abstract A new parametric model is developed to describe the wind field asymmetry commonly fields compared to the conventional observed in tropical cyclones or hurricanes in a reference frame fixed at its center. Observations from Holland (1980) symmetric model Asymmetric features of historical 21 hurricanes from the North Atlantic basin and TC Roger (1993) in the Coral Sea are analyzed to determine tropical cyclones are quantitatively the azimuthal and radial asymmetry typical in these mesoscale systems after removing the forward speed. investigated using the new model On the basis of the observations, a new asymmetric directional wind model is proposed which adjusts the parameters of asymmetry widely used Holland (1980) axisymmetric wind model to account for the action of blocking high-pressure systems, boundary layer friction, and forward speed. The model is tested against the observations and Correspondence to: M. Olfateh, demonstrated to capture the physical features of asymmetric cyclones and provides a better fit to observed [email protected] winds than the Holland model. Optimum values and distributions of the model parameters are derived for use in statistical modeling.
    [Show full text]