DOCSLIB.ORG

Is Mount Sinai in Saudi Arabia?* by Gordon Franz

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Is Mount Sinai in Saudi Arabia?* by Gordon Franz Is Mount Sinai in Saudi Arabia?* by Gordon Franz Two treasure hunters stood on the top of Jebel al-Lawz thinking it was the real Mt. Sinai, the “Mountain of God.” One was struck with fear because he thought he was trespassing on the “holiest place on earth.” As he gulped down Gatorade and munched on M&Ms, a sense of guilt overcame him because he had forged a letter from the king of Saudi Arabia in order to obtain a visa into the Kingdom (Cornuke and Halbrook 2000:10, 11, 74, 77, 79; Blum 1998a:206). Should he have felt guilty for this deceit? Yes, what he did was illegal, and offended the honor of the Saudi Arabian people. Should he have been afraid because he was on the holy mountain of God (Exodus 19:12)? No, because he was standing on the wrong mountain. MT. SINAI IS NOT IN SAUDI ARABIA! This article will examine four aspects of the question regarding whether or not Mt. Sinai is located in Saudi Arabia. First, the credibility of the claims will be questioned. Second, the false assumptions by the proponents of Jebel al-Lawz will be disputed. Third, the Biblical evidence will be discussed. Fourth, the archaeological evidence will be examined. Mount Sinai was the destination of Moses and the children of Israel after the Lord miraculously delivered them from the bondage of Egypt (Exodus 18:5). It was from this mountain that the Lord gave the Ten Commandments to Moses and the people of Israel (Exodus 19:1–3, 11, 18; 20:1–17). Here, too, the prophet Elijah found himself after his escape from wicked Queen Jezebel (1 Kings 19). Pilgrims, scholars and tourists have visited the traditional site, Jebel Musa (Arabic for the Mountain of Moses) for more than 1,600 years. In the early fourth century AD Eusebius of Caesarea placed Mt. Sinai in the southern Sinai Peninsula. When Egeria made a pilgrimage to the East between AD 381 and 384, she visited Jebel Musa as Mt. Sinai (Wilkinson 1981:1, 18, 91–100). This impressive mountain located in the southern Sinai Peninsula is situated behind the Byzantine monastery of St. Catherine built by Emperor Justinian in the middle of the sixth century AD (Tsafrir 1978:219). It may come as a surprise to most people, but scholars have identified 13 different sites as the “real” Mount Sinai (Har-El 1983:2). I would agree with the proponents of the Jebel al-Lawz hypothesis that Jebel Musa, the traditional Mt. Sinai, or any other site in the southern Sinai Peninsula, cannot be the real Mt. Sinai. Professor Har-El (1983:175–233) in his book, The Sinai Journey, has argued very convincingly against the southern Sinai theory. * This article was originally published in Bible and Spade 13 (2000): 101–112. Reprinted by permission. 72 CTS Journal 12 (Spring 2006) Recently, six American treasure hunters have added a 14th mountain to the already long list of candidates for the real Mt. Sinai: Jebel al-Lawz. Who’s Who Among the Treasure Hunters The idea of Mt. Sinai being in Midian (Saudi Arabia) is not new. Charles Beke suggested Mount Baggir, to the northeast of the Gulf of Aqaba, as the true location of Mt. Sinai in his book Sinai in Arabia and of Midian in 1878. Alois Musil (1926:263, 264, 269, 296–98) and H. Philby (1957:222–24) identify Mt. Sinai/Horeb with Jebel al-Manifa, near Wadi al-Hrob, 20 km north of ‘Ajnuna. A French scholar, Jean Koenig (1971), has added the volcanic peak of Hala ‘l-bedr to the list. The late Ron Wyatt, a nurse anesthetist turned treasure hunter, added a fourth Midian site, Jebel al-Lawz, to the list. He also claimed to have discovered Noah’s Ark, Sodom and Gomorrah, the Exodus crossing and some of Pharaoh’s chariots, the Ark of the Covenant with the blood of Jesus on the mercy seat, and other spectacular archaeological discoveries. This list is enough to make any archaeologist green with envy!1 In 1978, Wyatt claimed to have discovered the Exodus crossing at Newaba in the Gulf of Aqaba (the eastern branch of the Red Sea) and some of “Pharaoh’s chariot wheels.”2 This led him to conclude that Mt. Sinai must be in Saudi Arabia. His candidate for Mt. Sinai was Jebel al-Lawz because it was the highest peak in the entire northwest Saudi Arabian region (Noorbergen 1982:157–74). In 1984 Wyatt and his two sons illegally crossed the border of Jordan into Saudi Arabia to visit the site. They explored and photographed the area around Jebel al-Lawz. As they tried to get back across the border they were captured and jailed for 78 days as Israeli spies. They were eventually released. Eleven months later, Wyatt returned to Saudi Arabia legally under the patronage of a certain Mr. Samran al-Motairy. This time he had a contract with Samran to split the take on any “commercial minerals” found by them on their treasure hunt (Fasold 1993b:4–6; Blum 1998a:47). To help locate the gold, Wyatt convinced David Fasold, with his “molecular frequency 1 Archaeologists in his own denomination, the Seventh Day Adventists, do not support his views. Dr. David Merling at the Institute of Archaeology, Horn Archaeological Museum, Andrews University, Berrien Springs, MI 49104–0990, has prepared a packet with articles refuting some of his ideas. Two other Seventh Day Adventist researchers have evaluated Wyatt’s claims and found them wanting (Standish and Standish 1999). Another balanced review of Ron Wyatt’s claims can be found on Bill Crouse’s “Christian Information Ministries” website, www.fni.com/cim/reports/wyatt.txt. 2 Some have questioned the validity of this claim (Fasold 1993a:6, 7; Anonymous 1999:13). Is Mount Sinai in Saudi Arabia? 73 generator” (MFG), into joining their expedition to search for the “gold of Exodus” (Blum 1998a:49–51). Fasold claimed this device can detect various types of metal under the ground. When one of Samran’s workers discovered “a bracelet that glittered for all the world like the purest of gold” (Blum 1998a:58), they were arrested and charged with “robbing Saudi Arabia of its wealth from antiquity” which they claimed was a capital offense (Cornuke and Halbrook 2000:218). When they were finally released, all their film and notes were confiscated, and they were made to promise they would never return to Saudi Arabia and never publish or talk about their findings (Blum 1998a:59; Williams 1990:25). Upon his return, Fasold shared the story with Jim Irwin, the Apollo 15 astronaut who walked on the moon. Irwin in turn put Fasold in touch with two other potential treasure hunters—Larry Williams, a commodity trader and treasure hunter, and Robert Cornuke, a former police officer and SWAT team member (Cornuke and Halbrook 2000:17, 20). Fasold told them about the location of Mt. Sinai and the gold from Egypt. Part of his material is reproduced in Williams’ book (1990:25, 209–11) as well as his own newsletters (1993a: 1993b). Before they began this venture, they allegedly consulted an unnamed university professor in California, who wishes his identity to remain a “deep dark secret” (Blum 1998a:108). He seemed to agree with this idea and encouraged them in their pursuit. Williams and Cornuke journeyed to Saudi Arabia twice in the summer of 1988 as self-proclaimed “adventurers of history” in search of the “real” Mt. Sinai and the “gold of Exodus.” They returned to tell the tale (Williams 1990: 10). Williams wrote a book about their adventures entitled The Mountain of Moses. The Discovery of Mount Sinai (1990). It was later reprinted under the title The Mount Sinai Myth (1990). Another author, Howard Blum, also wrote a popular book entitled The Gold of Exodus: The Discovery of the True Mount Sinai (1998a) based on the adventures of these two treasure hunters. The book has a number of inconsistencies. For example, Ronald Hendel (1999:54) points out that before Williams and Cornuke went to Saudi Arabia in the summer of 1988, they allegedly had a meeting with an unnamed Biblical scholar from southern California. During the course of the conversation the unnamed scholar mentioned an interview of Dr. Frank Moore Cross in the August 1992 edition of Bible Review (Blum 1998a:120–22). Talk about getting an advance copy of a publication! How did this professor get a copy of a 1992 issue of Bible Review in 1988? The book is excerpted in an article in the February 1998 issue of Vanity Fair (Bloom 1998b). A video entitled “The Search for the Real Mt. Sinai” (1998) is being distributed based on these books. According to the advertisement for the video, Hershel Shanks, the editor of Biblical Archaeology Review and Bible 74 CTS Journal 12 (Spring 2006) Review, endorsed this video by saying, “Jebal al Lawz is the most likely site for Mt. Sinai.” A weak review of Blum’s book and the video was given by Ronald Hendel in the July/August 1999 issue of Biblical Archaeology Review (pages Map of the route of the Exodus according to Har-EL (adapted from Har-El 1983:357). Is Mount Sinai in Saudi Arabia? 75 54, 56) in which he never adequately deals with the arguments set forth by Williams and Blum. A spirited response appeared in the November/December 1999 issue of the same magazine by Tom Beard, the producer of the video (pages 66, 67). Hershel Shanks also added a clarification of his endorsement.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Yahoel As Sar Torah 105 Emblematic Representations of the Divine Mysteries
    Orlov: Aural Apocalypticism / 4. Korrektur / Mohr Siebeck 08.06.2017 / Seite III Andrei A. Orlov Yahoel and Metatron Aural Apocalypticism and the Origins of Early Jewish Mysticism Mohr Siebeck Orlov: Aural Apocalypticism / 4. Korrektur / Mohr Siebeck 08.06.2017 / Seite 105 Yahoel as Sar Torah 105 emblematic representations of the divine mysteries. If it is indeed so, Yahoel’s role in controlling these entities puts him in a very special position as the dis- tinguished experts in secrets, who not only reveals the knowledge of esoteric realities but literally controls them by taming the Hayyot and the Leviathans through his power as the personification of the divine Name. Yahoel as Sar Torah In Jewish tradition, the Torah has often been viewed as the ultimate com- pendium of esoteric data, knowledge which is deeply concealed from the eyes of the uninitiated. In light of this, we should now draw our attention to another office of Yahoel which is closely related to his role as the revealer of ultimate secrets – his possible role as the Prince of the Torah or Sar Torah. The process of clarifying this obscure mission of Yahoel has special sig- nificance for the main task of this book, which attempts to demonstrate the formative influences of the aural ideology found in the Apocalypse of Abraham on the theophanic molds of certain early Jewish mystical accounts. In the past, scholars who wanted to demonstrate the conceptual gap between apocalyptic and early Jewish mystical accounts have often used Sar Torah sym- bolism to illustrate such discontinuity between the two religious phenomena.
    [Show full text]
  • The God Who Delivers (Part 2)
    The God Who Delivers (part 2) Review from Creation to Jacob’s family in Egypt? Our last study ended the book of Genesis with Joseph enjoying life as the Pharoah’s commanding officer. After forgiving his brothers for what they had done, Jacob and his entire clan moves to Egypt and this is where the book of Exodus begins. What turn of event occurs in the life of the Israelites in Egypt? Exodus 1:8-11 A generation passes and new powers come to be. A new pharaoh “whom Joseph meant nothing” became fearful the Israelite nation, becoming so fruitful and huge, would rebel against him. The Israelites became slaves to the Egyptians. The Pharoah comes up with what solution? 1:22 Kill every Hebrew boy that is born. The future deliverer is delivered. 2:1-10. A boy is spared, saved from a watery death through the means of an “ark”. Sound familiar? Moses is delivered to one day deliver God’s people out of Egypt, but for the time being, was being brought up in the Egyptian royal household. Moses becomes an enemy to Egypt. 2:11-15. Moses tries to do what is right, but has to flee Egypt for his life so he goes to Mdian. God has a message for Moses. Chapter 3. The Lord tells Moses he will be the one to deliver the Israelites out of slavery, but Moses immediately doubts. 3:11. God tells Moses who He is. 3:14-15. I am who I am. God gives Moses special abilities in order to convince the people.
    [Show full text]
  • Parshat Matot/Masei
    Parshat Matot/Masei A free excerpt from the Kehot Publication Society's Chumash Bemidbar/Book of Numbers with commentary based on the works of the Lubavitcher Rebbe, produced by Chabad of California. The full volume is available for purchase at www.kehot.com. For personal use only. All rights reserved. The right to reproduce this book or portions thereof, in any form, requires permission in writing from Chabad of California, Inc. THE TORAH - CHUMASH BEMIDBAR WITH AN INTERPOLATED ENGLISH TRANSLATION AND COMMENTARY BASED ON THE WORKS OF THE LUBAVITCHER REBBE Copyright © 2006-2009 by Chabad of California THE TORAHSecond,- revisedCHUMASH printingB 2009EMIDBAR WITH AN INTERPOLATED ENGLISH TRANSLATION AND COMMENTARYA BprojectASED ON of THE WORKS OF ChabadTHE LUBAVITCH of CaliforniaREBBE 741 Gayley Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90024 310-208-7511Copyright / Fax © 310-208-58112004 by ChabadPublished of California, by Inc. Kehot Publication Society 770 Eastern Parkway,Published Brooklyn, by New York 11213 Kehot718-774-4000 Publication / Fax 718-774-2718 Society 770 Eastern Parkway,[email protected] Brooklyn, New York 11213 718-774-4000 / Fax 718-774-2718 Order Department: 291 KingstonOrder Avenue, Department: Brooklyn, New York 11213 291 Kingston718-778-0226 Avenue / /Brooklyn, Fax 718-778-4148 New York 11213 718-778-0226www.kehot.com / Fax 718-778-4148 www.kehotonline.com All rights reserved, including the right to reproduce this book All rightsor portions reserved, thereof, including in any the form, right without to reproduce permission, this book or portionsin writing, thereof, from in anyChabad form, of without California, permission, Inc. in writing, from Chabad of California, Inc. The Kehot logo is a trademark ofThe Merkos Kehot L’Inyonei logo is a Chinuch,trademark Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Chronology
    A Brief Chronology B.C.E. is an abbreviation of "Before the Common Era" and C.E. of the "Common Era." The Common Era is that of the Gregorian calendar, where time is measured before or after what was thought to be the birth year of Jesus: in Latin, Anno Domini, the "Year of the Lord," abbreviated A.D. In fact, Jesus' date of birth is now placed in or about 4 B.C.E. Muslims also use a "before" and "after" system. In their case the watershed date is that of the Hijrah or Emigration of Muhammad from Mecca to Medina in 622 C.E., called in the West A.H., or Anno Hegirae. Jewish time reckoning is only "after," that is, from the Creation of the World, normally understood to be about 4000 years B.C.E. B.C.E. ca. 1700 God's Covenant with Abraham ca. 1200 The exodus from Egypt; the giving of the Torah to Moses on Mount Sinai ca. 1000 David, king of the Israelites, captures Jerusalem and makes it his capital ca. 970 Solomon builds the First Temple in Jerusalem 621 Josiah centralizes all Jewish worship in the Temple in Jeru- salem 587 Babylonians under Nebuchadnezzar carry Israelites into exile in Babylon; the destruction of Solomon's Temple £38 Exiles return to Judea; Ezra; Nehemiah; rebuilding of Jerusa- lem Temple 332 Alexander the Great in the Near East; Greek dynasties rule Palestine ca. 280 Translation of Bible in Greek: the "Septuagint" 200 The Seleucid dynasty of Syria replaces the Ptolemies as rulers of Palestine 17 £-164 Antiochus IV Epiphanes; profanation of the Temple 164 Maccabean revolt; Jewish independence 164-37 The Hasmonean dynasty rules Palestine xviii CHRONOLOGY 37-4 Herod the Great, king of Judea ca.
    [Show full text]
  • The Two Screens: on Mary Douglas S Proposal
    The Two Screens: On Mary Douglass Proposal for a Literary Structure to the Book of Leviticus* Gary A. Rendsburg In memoriam – Mary Douglas (1921–2007) In the middle volume of her recent trio of monographs devoted to the priestly source in the Torah, Mary Douglas proposes that the book of Leviticus bears a literary structure that reflects the layout and config- uration of the Tabernacle.1 This short note is intended to supply further support to this proposal, though first I present a brief summary of the work, its major suppositions, and its principal finding. The springboard for Douglass assertion is the famous discovery of Ramban2 (brought to the attention of modern scholars by Nahum Sar- na3) that the tripartite division of the Tabernacle reflects the similar tripartite division of Mount Sinai. As laid out in Exodus 19 and 24, (a) the people as a whole occupied the lower slopes; (b) Aaron, his two sons, and the elders were permitted halfway up the mountain; and (c) only Moses was allowed on the summit. In like fashion, according to the priestly instructions in Exodus 25–40 and the book of Leviticus, (a) the people as a whole were allowed to enter the outer court of the Taberna- * It was my distinct pleasure to deliver an oral version of this article at the Mary Douglas Seminar Series organized by the University of London in May 2005, in the presence of Professor Douglas and other distinguished colleagues. I also take the op- portunity to thank my colleague Azzan Yadin for his helpful comments on an earlier version of this article.
    [Show full text]
  • The Old Story Teller As a John the Baptist-Figure in Demille's Samson and Delilah
    CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture ISSN 1481-4374 Purdue University Press ©Purdue University Volume 8 (2006) Issue 3 Article 2 The Old Story Teller as a John the Baptist-figure in DeMille's Samson and Delilah Anton Karl Kozlovic Flinders University Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, and the Critical and Cultural Studies Commons Dedicated to the dissemination of scholarly and professional information, Purdue University Press selects, develops, and distributes quality resources in several key subject areas for which its parent university is famous, including business, technology, health, veterinary medicine, and other selected disciplines in the humanities and sciences. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, the peer-reviewed, full-text, and open-access learned journal in the humanities and social sciences, publishes new scholarship following tenets of the discipline of comparative literature and the field of cultural studies designated as "comparative cultural studies." Publications in the journal are indexed in the Annual Bibliography of English Language and Literature (Chadwyck-Healey), the Arts and Humanities Citation Index (Thomson Reuters ISI), the Humanities Index (Wilson), Humanities International Complete (EBSCO), the International Bibliography of the Modern Language Association of America, and Scopus (Elsevier). The journal is affiliated with the Purdue University Press monograph series of Books in Comparative Cultural Studies. Contact: <[email protected]> Recommended Citation Kozlovic, Anton Karl. "The Old Story Teller as a John the Baptist-figure in DeMille's Samson and Delilah." CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 8.3 (2006): <https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.1314> This text has been double-blind peer reviewed by 2+1 experts in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Covenant of Mount Sinai
    mark h lane www.biblenumbersforlife.com COVENANT OF MOUNT SINAI SUMMARY The children of Israel were slaves in Egypt. The Lord brought them out with a mighty hand and with an outstretched arm. He brought them into the desert of Sinai and made them a nation under God, with the right to occupy and live in the Promised Land, AS TENANTS, subject to obedience to the Law of Moses. To have the privilege to continue to occupy the Promised Land Israel must keep: The ritual law concerning the priesthood and the continual offering of animal sacrifices, etc. The civil law concerning rights of citizens, land transactions, execution of justice, etc. The moral law: Love your neighbor as yourself The heart law: Love the LORD your God and serve him only In the Law of Moses there were blessings for obedience and curses for disobedience. Penalties for disobedience went as far as being shipped back to Egypt as slaves. All who relied on observing the Law of Moses were under a curse. It is written: “Cursed is everyone who does not continue to do everything written in the Book of the Law” (Deut. 27:26). None of the blessings under the Law of Moses concern eternal life, the heavenly realm, or the forgiveness of sins necessary to stand before God in the life hereafter. The people under the Covenant of Sinai did not even enjoy the privilege of speaking to the Lord face to face. The high priest, who crawled into the Most Holy Place once a year, was required to fill the room with incense so that he would not see the LORD and die.
    [Show full text]
  • Torah Texts Describing the Revelation at Mt. Sinai-Horeb Emphasize The
    Paradox on the Holy Mountain By Steven Dunn, Ph.D. © 2018 Torah texts describing the revelation at Mt. Sinai-Horeb emphasize the presence of God in sounds (lwq) of thunder, accompanied by blasts of the Shofar, with fire and dark clouds (Exod 19:16-25; 20:18-21; Deut 4:11-12; 5:22-24). These dramatic, awe-inspiring theophanies re- veal divine power and holy danger associated with proximity to divine presence. In contrast, Elijah’s encounter with God on Mt. Horeb in 1 Kings 19:11-12, begins with a similar audible, vis- ual drama of strong, violent winds, an earthquake and fire—none of which manifest divine presence. Rather, it is hqd hmmd lwq, “a voice of thin silence” (v. 12) which manifests God, causing Elijah to hide his face in his cloak, lest he “see” divine presence (and presumably die).1 Revelation in external phenomena present a type of kataphatic experience, while revelation in silence presents a more apophatic, mystical experience.2 Traditional Jewish and Christian mystical traditions point to divine silence and darkness as the highest form of revelatory experience. This paper explores the contrasting theophanies experienced by Moses and the Israelites at Sinai and Elijah’s encounter in silence on Horeb, how they use symbolic imagery to convey transcendent spiritual realities, and speculate whether 1 Kings 19:11-12 represents a “higher” form of revela- tory encounter. Moses and Israel on Sinai: Three months after their escape from Egypt, Moses leads the Israelites into the wilderness of Sinai where they pitch camp at the base of Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Calendar 2020-2025 (PDF)
    For your convenience we are pleased to offer: The following programs may be viewed • Electric Sabbath candles (can be obtained from Spiritual on your television on Channel 50: Care, ext. 35550, or after hours at ext. 34444). • “Healing Through Jewish Songs and Stories” • Kosher food is available in the Employee Cafeteria (Street at 1:45 and 2:30 p.m. Level, South Tower) and the Plaza Café (Plaza Level, • Sabbath Services: every Friday at 4 p.m. South Tower). For any questions regarding kosher food for patients, please call ext. 34797. • Havdalah (end of Sabbath) Services: every Saturday night at 9 p.m. • The Sabbath elevators (#13, North Tower; #38, Saperstein) stop at every fl oor of the medical center on the Sabbath • Rabbi Jason Weiner’s Torah Study: Tuesdays and holidays. in the chapel at noon. • Jewish reading material and prayer books are available at • Kabbalat Shabbat Services: Fridays in the ext. 35550. chapel at 3 p.m. Beverly Boulevard PLAZA LEVEL P2 ACCESS P6 BEVERLY SAPERSTEIN CENTER via North Tower V Elevators San Vicente Boulevard OSCHIN SPIELBERG V P1 Cedars-Sinai Medical Center NORTH TOWER TAPER EMERGENCY 8700 Beverly Blvd. P5 V Los Angeles, CA 90048 V Alden Drive Gracie Allen Drive For more information: George Burns Road Burns George Sherbourne Drive Sherbourne 310-423-3277 V P3 Ray Charles Cafeteria PAVILION THALIANS Jewish chaplain’s offi ce: SOUTH TOWER 310-423-5238 MEDICAL MEDICAL www.cedars-sinai.edu/chaplaincy Parking OFFICES OFFICES Office WEST EAST V Staff Parking P8 Only P4 © 2020 Cedars-Sinai 18792 (0720) 3rd Street Jewish Calendar 5781-5785 | 2020-2025 Founded On Jewish Values One hundred years ago, Jewish concerns about meeting the From generation to generation, Cedars-Sinai health needs of a growing Los Angeles community took root has fulfi lled and perpetuated its commitment to with the dedication of Kaspare Cohn Hospital, predecessor its Jewish tradition and values.
    [Show full text]
  • Devarim 5780
    סב ׳ ׳ ד רבד י ם שת ״ ף Devarim 5780 Followership ** KEY IDEA OF THE WEEK ** Judaism encourages followers and leaders to form a partnership of mutual respect. PARSHAT DEVARIM IN A NUTSHELL The book of Devarim is, in essence, Moses’ renewal of the Israel about the story of the spies and the people’s lack of same covenant that God made with Israel at Mount Sinai. faith that led to forty year wandering in the desert. This time Moses joins the covenant to the next generation, Then he moves on to more recent events, retelling the because they will soon enter the Promised Land and create a stories of their battles and victories over Moab and Ammon society based on the Torah there. And because a covenant and the settlement of their land (on the other side of the often begins with a preamble and an historical outline, this is River Jordan) by the tribes of Reuben and Gad and part of also how parshat Devarim begins. Moses explains the Menashe. The parsha ends with the appointment of Joshua background to the covenant, and then discusses the events as his successor. He will lead the people into the Land. that led to the covenant and its renewal. First we have an introduction which describes the time and QUESTION TO PONDER: place: we are in the last weeks of Moses’ life and the people Why do you think Joshua was chosen to lead after Moses? are camped by the banks of the River Jordan. Moses reminds THE CORE IDEA In the last month of his life, Moses gathered the people and ‘Send men …” In our parsha, it was the people who taught them the laws they were to keep and reminded them requested it: “Then all of you came to me and said, ‘Let us of their history since the Exodus.
    [Show full text]
  • Egypt Sinai Peninsula in the Cairo Flight Information Region (FIR) (HECC)
    FAA Background Information Regarding U.S. Civil Aviation – Egypt Sinai Peninsula in the Cairo Flight Information Region (FIR) (HECC) Due to ongoing fighting between military forces and extremist/militant elements and the continuing extremist/militant threat to civil aviation, the FAA assesses there is continued risk to U.S. civil aviation operating into, out of, within, or over the Egyptian Sinai Peninsula in the Cairo Flight Information Region (FIR) (HECC), within the lateral limits described in NOTAM A0010/21, at altitudes below Flight Level (FL) 260. Civil aircraft operating on established international civil air routes transiting the Egyptian Sinai Peninsula in the Cairo FIR (HECC) at altitudes below FL 260 and aircraft operating to and from Sinai airports are at risk from extremist/militant attacks involving a variety of anti-aircraft capable weapons, including man-portable air defense systems (MANPADS), anti-tank guided missiles (ATGMs), small arms-fire and indirect fire weapons, such as mortars and rockets targeting aircraft and Sinai airports. Some MANPADS present a risk up to a maximum altitude of 25,000 feet. The Islamic State in Iraq and ash-Sham in the Sinai (ISIS-Sinai), an Egypt-based affiliate of ISIS, continues to conduct attacks in the Sinai Peninsula, some of which have demonstrated their intent and capability to target critical infrastructure and civilian targets. During 2020, ISIS-Sinai continued attacks against Egyptian security forces and civilian targets in northern Sinai, including multiple improvised explosive device (IED) attacks against residential areas and an attack against a gas pipeline. From 2014 to 2017, ISIS-Sinai attacked multiple aviation-related targets, most notably in December 2017, when the group used an anti-tank guided missile to destroy a military VIP helicopter at Al ‘Arish International Airport (ICAO: HEAR).
    [Show full text]