DOCSLIB.ORG

Learning from the 2016 Australian Census and Ensuring Effective

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Learning from the 2016 Australian Census and Ensuring Effective CONFERENCE OF EUROPEAN STATISTICIANS Workshop on Statistical Dissemination and Communication WP.2-2 12-14 June 2019, Gdansk, Poland 06 June 2019 Learning from the 2016 Australian Census and ensuring effective issues management during ABS' most challenging sensitive and divisive data collection Samantha PALMER and Nick STATHIS (ABS, Australia) [email protected], [email protected] Abstract and paper In 2016 the Australian Census was affected by a 40-hour webform outage which created significant communication, enumeration and reputational challenges in both the short and medium term. Exactly one year from the Census outage the Australian Bureau of Statistics was directed by the Australian Government to run a national wide census of all eligible Australian voters on whether the Australian law should be changed to allow same sex couples to marry. The ABS was given 99 days to deliver the outcome with communication and issues management a key plank to ensuring both high levels of both participation and trust in the results. Parliamentarians were to use the results as a guide to whether support legislation. This paper will outline how the lessons the learned from the 2016 Census were successfully applied to deliver effective communication to maximise respondent participation and ensure prompt successful issues management. Approaches to working with Government (within in the Independence of the ABS), engagement with Parliamentary Inquiries, measurement of sentiment, use of media and social media monitoring and readiness/preparation will be provided in this paper along with examples of how issues were managed and outcomes achieved. Learning from the 2016 Australian Census and ensuring effective issues management during ABS' most challenging sensitive and divisive data collection 2019 UNECE Workshop on the Dissemination and Communication of Statistics, Gdansk, Poland Samantha Palmer, General Manager People, Capability & Communication, Australian Bureau of Statistics Context The Australian Bureau of the Statistics is Australia’s national statistical organisation. The ABS produces around 500 statistical releases every year (around 2 major statistical products every working day), and then we also do a Census of Population and Housing, as well as a Census of Agriculture, every five years. ABS is a complex organisation working across a large country (almost the same size at the US) to a population of only 25 million. ABS has around 3000 staff with a range of skills including statistical, mathematical, economic, IT, information management, operations management, field interviewing and corporate (such as finance, risk management, HR). We provide national statistical services from 10 locations (every capital city and two regional cities), with most of our work programs located across several locations. The Australian Statistician, rather than our Government Minister, is accountable for the operations of the ABS. This independence helps deliver the integrity of Australia’s statistical system – but the ABS is not truly independent of Government or the Parliament in some very important ways. The Australian Government sets our budget funding (as well as a few Census related choices) and the Commonwealth Parliament establishes our legislative framework, while we provide statistical services to all governments and the broader community. The ABS operates in a context in which we have significantly less funding and staffing compared to 10 years ago and our fragile, ageing statistical infrastructure is being replaced over five years. 2016 Census overview The Census in Australia is a major exercise, with the 2016 Census costing $500 million, involving 38,000 field staff, and complex delivery models for different populations, such as Indigenous, remote, homeless, and elderly. The 2016 was the first to shift from a traditional drop and collect paper forms model to a digital first Census to be more efficient, align with the Government’s digital transformation agenda, and deliver on community expectations about efficient, simple on-line transactions with government. A very tight timeframe to delivery, due to a range of reasons, lead to a very quick internal privacy impact assessment process associated with the length of retention of names and addresses from the Census. Australian Censuses have a long history of prompting privacy debates, particularly in the 1970s, around the late 1990s and then in the lead up to the 2006 Census. Australia appears to have quite a different public privacy discourse from other generally comparable countries who also undertake 5-yearly Censuses, such as Canada, New Zealand, the Netherlands and Ireland. All of these countries retain their Census data permanently, and use it to generate quality statistics. Because this is a consistent challenge the communication team ran community sentiment testing which showed that 97-98% of the community expected to fully and accurately complete the Census right through the media and social media debate about privacy, and the 2016 Census had stronger support for a compulsory response than was recorded in 2011. Issues start - The Privacy ‘slow burn’ starts… and builds As expected, the Australian privacy lobby commenced communicating negatively about the Census about 6 months before the Census. Coincidentally, the 2016 Census got caught up in the more combative political environment that has emerged in Australia over recent years. A lengthy Federal election campaign from May to early July precluded the usual factual briefing of Federal MPs and Senators in the lead up to the Census in August that year. As a result high profile independent politicians started to use media and social media to publicise their concerns about privacy and the Census, which was amplified in the political pre-election contested environment. One significant privacy social influencer started the #CensusFail hashtag with inaccurate stories abounding regarding what was actually happening with Census privacy. 1 Image 1: Example of media coverage: Senator refuses to participate in media Census night outage On Census night the online form suffered a DDoS attack and was taken off line for 40 hours, and having encouraged the community to complete it that night, outrage ensued as a result of the outage. The ABS suffered an immediate significant negative impact in reputation and trust. Once the Census on-line form was back operating from the afternoon of 11 August, we then received over a million more household responses on-line over coming weeks. Within a week of Census night, overall Census responses were back to our original expectations of the number of Census returns and the results from the Census were strong – 95.1% response rate, 63.3% online responses and net 1.0% undercount. The Prime Minister directed an Inquiry into the Census by his cyber-security advisory Alistair MacGibbon and the Senate also held an Inquiry which involved public dissection of all that went poorly with the operation of the Census. Recovering to ensure the Census Data was trusted The ABS put additional effort to our communication of Census data in April, June and October 2017. We prioritised better engagement with the media and key stakeholders around the time of the Census release so they were able to effectively use and communicate the plethora of Census data when it became available. This included pre-embargoed briefings days before to ensure coverage was accurate and ready on release day. We better prepared for a possible denial of service attack, or any business continuity disruption, including testing our response. Preparations for issues management were detailed and scenarios were practiced including for a real hacking of data and failure of website during release. We broke with tradition of an 11.30am release and issued Census data earlier (at 9am) to thwart possible plans to disrupt. The Chair of the Independent Assurance Panel that ABS had engaged to review our data and assess its fitness for purpose and quality, issued a report on the Census data quality and spoke at the launch, thus removing any speculation or commentary about the quality of the data. 2 National public sentiment testing after the data release showed 82% of respondents agreed they trust the ABS to deliver high quality reliable statistics for Australia (most remaining proportion were neutral). First direction from Government to ABS to undertake a data collection on marriage equality Prior to the 2016 Australian Federal Election campaign, the Liberal-National Coalition Government made a commitment that it would provide the Australian people with an opportunity to have their say on whether the law should change to allow same-sex marriage. The Government’s preference was to deliver on that commitment through a compulsory attendance plebiscite however the necessary legislation was voted down. So one year after the 2016 Census the government announced that it would use its powers under the Census and Statistics Act 1905 to direct the Australian Statistician to request statistical information from all eligible Australians on the electoral roll as to their views on whether or not the law in relation to marriage should be changed to allow same-sex couples to marry. The results were required to be provided 99 days later. The Prime Minister also announced that a Yes response recorded in the postal survey would facilitate the introduction of a Private Member’s Bill to legalise same-sex marriage. Participation in the Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey was voluntary.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Preliminary Report on Methodology Options for the 2016 Census.Pdf
    Preliminary Report on Methodology Options for the 2016 Census Prepared by Don Royce for the 2016 Census Strategy Census Management Office Released date: 2011-09-30 Final version The conclusions and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect those of Statistics Canada. Table of contents Page Executive summary .................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 5 2. Overview of the study ............................................................................................................................ 6 3. Census-taking approaches ................................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Traditional census ............................................................................................................................. 9 3.1.1 Description ............................................................................................................................. 9 3.1.2 Necessary conditions ........................................................................................................... 10 3.1.3 Strengths .............................................................................................................................. 10 3.1.4 Weaknesses ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) to Assist the Committee with Its Inquiry
    ABS House Locked Bag 10 45 Benjamin Way Belconnen ACT 2616 Belconnen ACT 2617 Telephone: (02) 6252 6705 Australian Statistician Senator Chris Ketter Chair Senate Economics References Committee Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Dear Senator Inquiry into 2016 Census I am pleased to provide a first submission from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) to assist the Committee with its Inquiry. The ABS exists to inform decision-making, research and discussion by governments, business and the community by leading the collection, analysis and provision of high quality, objective and relevant statistical information. This has been the mission of my predecessors, and it is one that I, and my staff, strive to give it the greatest effect. The Census is the most significant collection that the ABS conducts and it provides information that is critical for many important decisions by governments, businesses and the community. The ABS is committed to delivering a high quality 2016 Census and current indications are that this will be achieved. The unavailability of the Census online system for nearly 2 days slowed our progress in collecting Census returns. However, by Sunday 14 August, after the online Census had been back up for 3 days and with paper forms arriving steadily, we had caught up to our expected Census collection path and then exceeded it over most of the coming weeks. The timing of this Inquiry and the deadline set for submissions of 21 September means we have been preparing this submission while we are still undertaking the Census process. As a consequence, the information in the submission around Census completion is the latest available when the submission was lodged, and we will be able to provide the Committee with updated information in October.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Status 2018
    Overview of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health status 2018 Core funding is Core funding providedis provided by the by the Australian Government AustralianDepartment of Department Health of Health The Australian Indigenous HealthInfoNet The Australian Indigenous HealthInfoNet’s mission is to contribute to improvements in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health by making relevant, high quality knowledge and information easily accessible to policy makers, health service providers, program managers, clinicians and other health professionals (including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health workers) and researchers. The HealthInfoNet also provides easy-to- read and summarised material for students and the general community. The HealthInfoNet achieves its mission by undertaking research into various aspects of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health and disseminating the results (and other relevant knowledge and information) mainly via the Australian Indigenous HealthInfoNet websites (healthinfonet.ecu.edu.au), the Alcohol and Other Drugs Knowledge Centre (aodknowledgecentre.ecu.edu.au) and Tackling Indigenous Smoking (tacklingsmoking. org.au). The research involves analysis and synthesis of data and information obtained from academic, professional, government and other sources. The HealthInfoNet’s work in knowledge exchange aims to facilitate the transfer of pure and applied research into policy and practice to address the needs of a wide range of users. Recognition statement The Australian Indigenous HealthInfoNet recognises and acknowledges the sovereignty of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people as the original custodians of the country. Aboriginal and Torres Strait cultures are persistent and enduring, continuing unbroken from the past to the present, characterised by resilience and a strong sense of purpose and identity despite the undeniably negative impacts of colonisation and dispossession.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission DR165
    \ STUDY OF ECONOMICS, BUSINESS AND SOCIAL STRUCTURE ON TASMANIA’S FLINDERS ISLAND APRIL31 2019March 2019 Economics and Financial Consulting | Study of Economics, Business and Social Structure on Tasmania’s Flinders Island Contents Key Findings……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 4` The Structural Challenge for Flinders Council ..................................................................................................................................... 7 The Flinders Island Population Challenge ........................................................................................................................................... 8 An employment cohort ‘Tipping Point’? ............................................................................................................................................. 9 Unemployment and Underemployment........................................................................................................................................... 11 What This Means for Flinders Island ................................................................................................................................................. 11 Educational profile ............................................................................................................................................................................ 11 What This Means for Flinders Island Residents ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Women and Girls in Tasmania Health and Wellbeing Fact Sheet
    WOMEN AND GIRLS IN TASMANIA HEALTH & FACT SHEET 2018 WELLBEING 10.5% or more than one in ten Tasmanian women are ‘risky’ drinkers, compared to one in four males (26.6 per cent).2 Across Australia, intimate partner violence contributes to more death, disability and illness in women aged 15 to 44 than any other preventable risk factor.1 of Tasmanian women have a BMI 61% classification of overweight or obese.3 16% Around of Tasmanian women experienced high or very 16% high levels of psychological distress.4 of Tasmanian mothers smoke during pregnancy. This is 5 per cent higher than the national average.5 Dementia, Alzheimer’s disease and ischaemic heart disease were the 60% joint leading causes of of Tasmanian women and girls death for females in regularly (three or four times a week) Tasmania in 2016.6 participate in sport and recreation.7 GPO Box 65, HOBART TAS 7000 Phone: (03) 6232 7133 Email: [email protected] Visit: www.women.tas.gov.au HEALTH & WELLBEING Good health and wellbeing Self-Assessed Health Status is essential for women and There is no significant difference between the self-assessed health status girls to increase quality of of Tasmanian women and men. Generally, around half the adult population consistently assess their health to be ‘excellent or very good’ and approximately life, get the most out of one in five assess their health as ‘fair or poor’. The following table shows data education, and participate used in previous snapshots from the ABS General Social Survey (GSS) in 2006 and the 2016 Tasmanian Population Health Survey.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Changing Religious Profile—Rising Nones
    JASR 30.2 (2017): 129-143 JASR (print) ISSN 1031-2943 https://doi.org.10.1558/jasr.34826 JASR (online) ISSN 1744-9014 Australia’s Changing ReligiousSociolinguistic Profile—Rising Studies Nones and Pentecostals, DecliningGuidelines British for Protestants submission in The EditorsSuperdiversity: welcome articles, re viewsViews and research from notes the for 2016 publication Census in future issues of Sociolinguistic Studies. Submitted articles are subject to a blind, peer review process. Please adhere to the guidelines below when preparing submissions for the journal. Gary D. Bouma Initial submissions Submission of articles to SociolinguisticMonash UniversityStudies should normally be done via the journal’s website at www.equinoxjournals.com. You will need to register with the website as an author, and follow theAnna instructions Halafoff and guideline s relating to submission. Authors who are unable to use this website for on-line submission should contact the editors for advice on how to submitDeakin their manuscripts. University Articles are normally in English (we also accept articles in Spanish, Galician, Portuguese or French) and should not exceed 8,000 words, inclusive of endnotes and references. Appendices may be included, but are included in the total word count. Authors should ensure that all submissions,Abstract whether first or revised versions, are anonymised to facilitate blind reviewing. Authors’ names and institutional affiliations The 2016 Australian Census reveals continued change in Australia’s should appear only in the covering email message. religious diversity. While reviewing some of the highlights of this develop- Submission of an article or book review is taken to imply that it has not previously ment—the continuing increase in the ‘no religion’ category, the first ever been published or is not being considered for publication elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • School Education H Crawford and D Venn
    SCHOOL EDUCATION H CRAWFORD AND D VENN 2016 CENSUS PAPERS Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research ANU College of Arts & Social Sciences 2016 CENSUS PAPER NO. 10 Series note The Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research (CAEPR) undertakes high-quality, independent research to further the social and economic development and empowerment of Indigenous people throughout Australia. For more than 25 years, CAEPR has aimed to combine academic and teaching excellence on Indigenous economic and social development and public policy with realism, objectivity and relevance. CAEPR maintains a substantial publications program, including Research Monographs, Discussion Papers, Working Papers and Topical Issues. The CAEPR Census Papers document changes to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population in terms of its size, composition, and a range of social and economic indicators, using data from the 2016 Census. All papers in the 2016 Census Paper series are peer reviewed internally. All CAEPR publications are available in electronic format for free download from CAEPR’s website: caepr.cass.anu.edu.au CAEPR is located within the Research School of Social Sciences in the College of Arts & Social Sciences at the Australian National University (ANU). The Centre is funded from a range of sources, including ANU, the Australian Research Council, industry and philanthropic partners, and Australian state and territory governments. As with all CAEPR publications, the views expressed in this Census Paper are those of the author(s) and do not
    [Show full text]
  • Sbs Submission to Senate Standing Committee On
    SBS SUBMISSION TO SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS DEFENCE AND TRADE ISSUES FACING DIASPORA COMMUNITIES IN AUSTRALIA July 2020 Key Points • For more than 40 years, SBS has played a unique and vital role in supporting diaspora communities in Australia by providing trusted, inclusive, balanced and independent news and information services. SBS is a critical public policy intervention that supports diaspora communities in a way that benefits the entire Australian population. SBS services help diaspora communities participate in Australian cultural, economic and civic life, and foster a sense of belonging in Australia. • SBS services and activities directly address issues faced by diaspora communities, including: Urgent issues relevant to the current coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis 1. availability and promotion of important coronavirus information in languages other than English (LOTE); and 2. meeting employment and economic challenges, especially those arising from the COVID-19 pandemic; Enduring issues facing the diaspora communities 3. addressing language barriers aids participation in all aspects of life in Australia; 4. access to trusted Australian produced news media in LOTE, covering both local and global issues; 5. limited formal education in segments of diaspora communities, particularly among some migrants who come to Australia via humanitarian programs; and 6. fostering a sense of belonging and promoting mutual understanding and respect between the general population and diaspora communities. • As the only national Australian broadcaster providing news, information and content services in 63 LOTE, SBS is uniquely placed to facilitate and enable diaspora communities’ ongoing success, particularly during the difficult period of overcoming the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Status 2019 OVERVIEW of ABORIGINAL and TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER HEALTH STATUS 2019
    Overview of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health status 2019 OVERVIEW OF ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER HEALTH STATUS 2019 The Australian Indigenous HealthInfoNet The Australian Indigenous HealthInfoNet’s mission is to contribute to improvements in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health by making relevant, high quality knowledge and information easily accessible to policy makers, health service providers, program managers, clinicians and other health professionals (including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Workers) and researchers. The HealthInfoNet also provides easy- to-read and summarised material for students and the general community. The HealthInfoNet achieves its mission by undertaking research into various aspects of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health and disseminating the results (and other relevant knowledge and information) mainly via the Australian Indigenous HealthInfoNet websites (https://healthinfonet.ecu.edu.au), The Alcohol and Other Drugs Knowledge Centre (https://aodknowledgecentre.ecu.edu.au) and Tackling Indigenous Smoking (https://tacklingsmoking.org.au). The research involves analysis and synthesis of data and information obtained from academic, professional, government and other sources. The HealthInfoNet’s work in knowledge exchange aims to facilitate the transfer of pure and applied research into policy and practice to address the needs of a wide range of users. Recognition statement The Australian Indigenous HealthInfoNet recognises and acknowledges the sovereignty of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people as the original custodians of the country. Aboriginal and Torres Strait cultures are persistent and enduring, continuing unbroken from the past to the present, characterised by resilience and a strong sense of purpose and identity despite the undeniably negative impacts of colonisation and dispossession.
    [Show full text]
  • Our People - Census 2016 Murrumbidgee Local Health District Community Profile from the 2016 Australian Bureau of Statistics Census Release 2
    Our people - Census 2016 Murrumbidgee Local Health District Community Profile from the 2016 Australian Bureau of Statistics Census Release 2 Date: December 2017 Author: Kim Gilchrist, Epidemiologist, Public Health Unit, MLHD [email protected] Copies available: http://www.mlhd.health.nsw.gov.au/about/health-statistics/ Murrumbidgee Local Health District ABN 71 172 428 618 Locked Bag 10, Wagga Wagga NSW 2650 Tel 02 6933 9100 Fax 02 6933 9188 Website www.mlhd.health.nsw.gov.au Page 1 of 86 Release 2 Acknowledgements Data were compiled for the Murrumbidgee region through: Australian Bureau of Statistics 2016 – Census of Population and Housing - Findings based on use of ABS TableBuilder data. The report structure and some commentary was based on profiles published by: .id consulting pty ltd, Collingwood Australia http://home.id.com.au/ Further interactive reports for local government areas are available from .id consulting for: Albury City Berrigan Federation Griffith City Hilltops Murray Shire Council Murrumbidgee Council Wagga Wagga City council City of Wodonga Individual Community Profiles for all LGAs and other geographies are available from the Australian Bureau of Statistics website: www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/D3310114.nsf/Home/2016%20Census%20Community%20Profiles Page 2 of 86 Release 2 Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Key Points for Murrumbidgee ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ASIC Annual Report 2016-2017
    ANNUAL REPORT 2016–2017 investor and consumer trust and confidence fair and efficient markets efficient registration services Contents Chairman’s report 2 4. PEOPLE, COMMUNITY Government priorities and AND THE ENVIRONMENT 105 parliamentary inquiries 6 4.1 ASIC’s people 106 Commissioners 11 4.2 Diversity at ASIC 112 1. ABOUT ASIC 13 4.3 ASIC in the Community 114 1.1 ASIC’s role 14 4.4 Indigenous awareness 1.2 Corporate structure and action at ASIC 116 at 30 June 2017 17 4.5 Ecologically sustainable development 1.3 ASIC and regulated populations 19 and environmental performance 118 1.4 ASIC’s surveillance coverage 5. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 121 of regulated populations 22 6. APPENDICES 171 1.5 ASIC for all Australians 24 6.1 The role of Commission 172 1.6 Financial summary 6.2 Audit Committee and and expenditure 26 audit services 173 2. ANNUAL PERFORMANCE 6.3 External committees and panels 174 STATEMENT 27 6.4 Portfolio budget statement Introductory statement 28 outcomes 180 2.1 Investor and consumer trust and 6.5 Six-year summary of key confidence 30 stakeholder data 182 2.2 Fair and efficient markets 36 6.6 Reports required under statute and 2.3 Efficient registration services 42 other reporting requirements 184 2.4 Banking Act, Life Insurance Act, 6.7 Consultancies and expenditure unclaimed money and on advertising 187 special accounts 44 6.8 ASIC’s use of significant compulsory information-gathering powers 190 3. PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES IN DETAIL 45 Glossary 192 3.1 Investor and consumer trust Compliance index 194 and confidence 46 General index 200 3.2 Fair and efficient markets 62 Contact details inside back cover 3.3 Efficient registration services 82 3.4 Unclaimed money and managing property vested in ASIC 87 3.5 Assessing misconduct and other reports 89 3.6 Performance against ASIC’s service and operational standards 96 3.7 Regional activities 102 GREG MEDCRAFT 5 October 2017 The Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the Parliamentary Joint Standing Committee on the National Capital and External Territories
    Submission to the Parliamentary Joint Standing Committee on the National Capital and External Territories Inquiry into economic, social and environmental sustainability in the Indian Ocean Territories January 2021 © Commonwealth of Australia 2021 ISBN 978-1-922521-11-8 January 2021 Ownership of intellectual property rights in this publication Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Commonwealth of Australia (referred to below as the Commonwealth). Disclaimer The material contained in this publication is made available on the understanding that the Commonwealth is not providing professional advice, and that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use, and seek independent advice if necessary. The Commonwealth makes no representations or warranties as to the contents or accuracy of the information contained in this publication. To the extent permitted by law, the Commonwealth disclaims liability to any person or organisation in respect of anything done, or omitted to be done, in reliance upon information contained in this publication. Creative Commons licence With the exception of (a) the Coat of Arms; (b) the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications photos and graphics; and (c) [OTHER], copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Australia Licence. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Australia Licence is a standard form licence agreement that allows you to copy, communicate and adapt this publication provided that you attribute the work to the Commonwealth and abide by the other licence terms. Further information on the licence terms is available from https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This publication should be attributed in the following way: © Commonwealth of Australia 2021.
    [Show full text]