DOCSLIB.ORG

Project Criteria

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project Criteria Habitats Monitoring and Mitigation Fund Project criteria Aim and purpose of the fund: Developers within the Borough Council of King’s Lynn and West Norfolk boundary are now required to pay a small levy of £55 per dwelling to the borough council in order to help monitor and mitigate the adverse effects of increasing visitor numbers to Natura 2000 sites* resulting from the development. These levies have been drawn together to create the Habitat Monitoring and Mitigation fund. The fund is being administrated on behalf of the Borough Council of King’s Lynn and West Norfolk by the Norfolk Coast Partnership. This fund operates on a competitive application basis to fund projects that will monitor and mitigate increasing visitor numbers to these sites in the borough of King’s Lynn and West Norfolk: • Roydon Common and Dersingham Bog SAC • The Wash and North Norfolk Coast SAC (Marine) • The Wash SPA • The North Norfolk Coast SAC/SPA • The Norfolk Valley Fens SAC (in West Norfolk) It also includes other Natura 2000 sites outside of King’s Lynn and West Norfolk: • Breckland SAC/SPA • The Norfolk Valley Fens SAC (all) • The River Wensum SAC • The Ouse Washes SAC/SPA Who can apply? Landowners and managers of applicable Natura 2000 sites, together with those of Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace (‘SANGs’) and relevant Green Infrastructure projects will be entitled to apply to the fund. Definition: For the purpose of the fund, monitoring is defined as additional systematic process of collecting, analysing and using information about site characteristics (e.g. flora and fauna) and/or visitors, carried out to identify adverse impacts of increased visitors to the site resulting from the development. For the purpose of the fund, we define mitigation as projects that reduce or minimise adverse impacts of increased visitors within the site boundary, e.g. fencing, improved directional signage etc. *Natura 2000 sites are either/both those designated as Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) and Special Protection Areas (SPA). Min/max funds available for each application: £500 min. /£5,000 max. per application (this maximum limit can be increased in exceptional circumstances, particularly for collaborative projects between organisations). Essential Criteria: • Geographical location: Does the project relate to a Natura 2000 site/s situated within the Borough of King’s Lynn and West Norfolk, or affect a Natura 2000 site/s which is visited by significant numbers of inhabitants of the Borough of King's Lynn & West Norfolk? • Growing visitor numbers/pressure: Is the project necessary in order to monitor and/or mitigate the impacts of a specific new development on the growing visitor numbers and/or visitor pressure on Natura 2000 sites? (e.g. pointed out by a present study, photos, pointed out by site manager, site wardens, NGOs, etc.) 1/2 HabitatsMonitoring&MitigationFund_Project_Criteria V33 v.2021_05 • All permissions are in place: Are all necessary permissions of any kind in place? (e.g. planning permission, landowner, Environment Agency licences, appropriate assessments, or indeed evidence that no permissions are necessary). • Timescale of the project: Is there a clear timescale of the project? (short- upto 6 months/medium- 6-12 months/long term- 12 months+) • Non-Statutory activity: Is the activity to be funded a non-statutory one, and not part of the running costs that an organisation would ordinarily or statutorily be responsible for? • Measurable outcome/benefit of the project (mitigation) projects should be capable of being monitored: Can monitoring data be provided to assess the impact of the project? The outcomes/benefits of the project should be measurable. (e.g. providing baseline information for future mitigation, etc.) • Fulfil wider objectives: Does the project support or form part of existing site plans and recognise other relevant policies relating to the site e.g. the Norfolk Coast AONB Management Plan, the Wash and North Norfolk Coast Partnership Management Plan, etc.? • Site citation: Does the project support the citation for the specific designated Natura 2000 site/s, and other citations (e.g. if it is also an NNR, SSSI or County Wildlife Site)? • Value for money: Does the project offer best value for money? Three quotes will be required for all works undertaken. Desirable Criteria: • Project continuity: Is there a plan to ensure that the outcomes of the project are maintained after funding has finished? • Added value: Does the project offer match funding in the form of cash, volunteer time or staff time? • Public engagement: Does the project involve support from the local community and offer public engagement? • General education: Does the project educate or engage with the local community/visitors about general environmental impacts on the Natura 2000 sites; and look to enable their involvement in the future of the site/s? • Demonstrate innovation or best practise – Is something new being trialled or is the project learning from best practise? • Additional environmental benefits – Does the project offer any additional benefits with regards to changes in the wider environment? (e.g. addresses coastal change, sustainable transport, enhancement of the site biodiversity, etc.) • Joint working – Does the project demonstrate complementary and joint working on projects at multiple locations through the region. 2/2 HabitatsMonitoring&MitigationFund_Project_Criteria V33 v.2021_05 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • River Glaven State of the Environment Report
    The River Glaven A State of the Environment Report ©Ashley Dace and licensed for reuse under this Creative ©Evelyn Simak and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence Commons Licence © Ashley Dace and licensed for reuse under this C reative ©Oliver Dixon and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence Commons Licence Produced by Norfolk Biodiversity Information Service Spring 201 4 i Norfolk Biodiversity Information Service (NBIS) is a Local Record Centre holding information on species, GEODIVERSITY , habitats and protected sites for the county of Norfolk. For more information see our website: www.nbis.org.uk This report is available for download from the NBIS website www.nbis.org.uk Report written by Lizzy Oddy, March 2014. Acknowledgements: The author would like to thank the following people for their help and input into this report: Mark Andrews (Environment Agency); Anj Beckham (Norfolk County Council Historic Environment Service); Andrew Cannon (Natural Surroundings); Claire Humphries (Environment Agency); Tim Jacklin (Wild Trout Trust); Kelly Powell (Norfolk County Council Historic Environment Service); Carl Sayer (University College London); Ian Shepherd (River Glaven Conservation Group); Mike Sutton-Croft (Norfolk Non-native Species Initiative); Jonah Tosney (Norfolk Rivers Trust) Cover Photos Clockwise from top left: Wiveton Bridge (©Evelyn Simak and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence); Glandford Ford (©Ashley Dace and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence); River Glaven above Glandford (©Oliver Dixon and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence); Swan at Glandford Ford (© Ashley Dace and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence). ii CONTENTS Foreword – Gemma Clark, 9 Chalk Rivers Project Community Involvement Officer.
    [Show full text]
  • Accounting for National Nature Reserves
    Natural England Research Report NERR078 Accounting for National Nature Reserves: A Natural Capital Account of the National Nature Reserves managed by Natural England www.gov.uk/naturalACCOUNTING FOR-england NATIONAL NATURE RESERVES Natural England Research Report NERR078 Accounting for National Nature Reserves: A Natural Capital Account of the National Nature Reserves managed by Natural England Tim Sunderland1, Ruth Waters1, Dan Marsh2, Cat Hudson1 and Jane Lusardi1 Published 21st February 2019 1 Natural England 2 University of Waikato, New Zealand This report is published by Natural England under the Open Government Licence - OGLv3.0 for public sector information. You are encouraged to use, and reuse, information subject to certain conditions. For details of the licence visit Copyright. Natural England photographs are only available for non commercial purposes. If any other information such as maps or data cannot be used commercially this will be made clear within the report. ISBN 978-1-78354-518-6 © Natural England 2018 ACCOUNTING FOR NATIONAL NATURE RESERVES Project details This report should be cited as: SUNDERLAND, T., WATERS, R.D., MARSH, D. V. K., HUDSON, C., AND LUSARDI, J. (2018). Accounting for National Nature Reserves: A natural capital account of the National Nature Reserves managed by Natural England. Natural England Research Report, Number 078 Project manager Tim Sunderland Principal Specialist in Economics Horizon House Bristol BS1 5TL [email protected] Acknowledgements We would like to thank everyone who contributed to this report both within Natural England and externally. ii Natural England Research Report 078 Foreword England’s National Nature Reserves (NNRs) are the crown jewels of our natural heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan
    Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report May 2021 Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report LC- 654 Document Control Box Client South Norfolk Council Habitats Regulations Assessment Report Title Regulation 18 – HRA Report Status FINAL Filename LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Date May 2021 Author SC Reviewed ND Approved ND Photo: Female broad bodied chaser by Shutterstock Regulation 18 – HRA Report May 2021 LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of this report ............................................................................................................................................... 1 2 The South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................... 3 2.1 Greater Norwich Local Plan .................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................................ 3 2.3 Village Clusters ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Possible New Marine Special Protection Area for Birds in the Greater Wash
    Natural England Technical Information Note TIN169 A potential new marine Special Protection Area for birds in The Greater Wash This Technical Information Note (TIN) has been prepared to help inform you about the public consultation on a potential Special Protection Area (pSPA) along the Greater Wash coast. Other notes about the process for classifying marine SPAs and about the species to be protected within them are available. For details see Further Information below. Background As part of wider work to identify potential marine Special Protection Areas in UK waters, Natural The Greater Wash area, stretching from England and JNCC are now consulting on the Bridlington Bay in the north to approximately proposals on behalf of the Department for the Great Yarmouth in the south, is being Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). recommended by Natural England and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) as a These proposals are to create a new Greater Special Protection Area (SPA) under the Wash SPA: European Union’s Directive on the Conservation of Wild Birds (‘Birds Directive’). encompassing areas of importance for non- breeding red-throated diver Gavia stellata, The UK Government has ongoing obligations common scoter Melanitta nigra and little gull under the Birds Directive requiring it to protect Hydrocoloeus minute. the breeding, moulting and wintering areas and Incorporating the foraging areas for tern staging posts along migration routes of species species breeding within existing SPAs. to which the Directive applies. In seeking to fulfil this obligation, Natural England and JNCC have: Special Protection Areas The Birds Directive was adopted in 1979 to Reviewed information from the JNCC based tackle declines in wild bird populations across on survey work carried out in the waters Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS)
    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7 (1990), as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the 8th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2002) and Resolutions IX.1 Annex B, IX.6, IX.21 and IX. 22 of the 9th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2005). Notes for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Further information and guidance in support of Ramsar site designations are provided in the Strategic Framework for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Wise Use Handbook 7, 2nd edition, as amended by COP9 Resolution IX.1 Annex B). A 3rd edition of the Handbook, incorporating these amendments, is in preparation and will be available in 2006. 3. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Secretariat. Compilers should provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of all maps. 1. Name and address of the compiler of this form: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY. DD MM YY Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House City Road Designation date Site Reference Number Peterborough Cambridgeshire PE1 1JY UK Telephone/Fax: +44 (0)1733 – 562 626 / +44 (0)1733 – 555 948 Email: [email protected] 2. Date this sheet was completed/updated: Designated: 30 March 1988 3. Country: UK (England) 4. Name of the Ramsar site: The Wash 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment: Draft Scoping Report
    North Norfolk 2016 - 2036 HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT Draft Scoping Report May 2017 North Norfolk District Council Planning Policy Team Telephone: 01263 516318 E-Mail: [email protected] Write to: Planning Policy Manager, North Norfolk District Council, Holt Road, Cromer, NR27 9EN www.north-norfolk.gov.uk/localplan All documents can be made available in Braille, audio, large print or in other languages. Please contact 01263 516318 to discuss your requirements. Draft HRA Scoping - North Norfolk District Council – Emerging Local Plan Executive Summary Habitats Regulations Assessment is required in accordance with the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010, (amended 2012); in order to ensure that plans and projects do not have a likely significant effect on any European designated sites for nature conservation. Such plans or projects can only proceed if the competent authority is convinced they will not have an “adverse effect on the integrity of a European site”. Where there is uncertainty over the effects then the competent authority will need to demonstrate how these can be avoided and what mitigation can be put in place. A Local Plan is the subject of Habitats Regulations Assessment, which is the responsibility of the plan-making body (in this case North Norfolk District Council) to produce. This scoping report provides the background and review of evidence to support the commencement of screening and the final Habitats Regulations Assessment of the North Norfolk Core Strategy and Site Allocations documents. This report considers: • The European designated sites within and outside the plan area affected. • The characteristics of these sites and their conservation objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Transactions of the Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists' Society
    20 NOV 2Q02 I FXCHA^O'-"> 1 Norfolk Bird Report - 2001 Editor: Giles Dunmore Editorial 95 Review of the Year 98 Wetland Bird Surveys for Breydon and The Wash 1 05 Norfolk Bird Atlas 1 07 Systematic List 1 09 Introductions, Escapes, Ferals and Hybrids 248 Earliest and Latest Dates of Summer Migrants 253 Latest and Earliest Dates of Winter Migrants 254 Non-accepted and non-submitted records 255 Contributors 256 Ringing Report 258 Hunstanton Cliffs: a Forgotten Migration Hotspot 268 1 Yellow-legged Gulls in Norfolk: 1 96 -200 1 273 Marmora’s Warbler on Scolt Head - a first for Norfolk 28 Pallas’s Grasshopper Warbler at Blakeney Point - the second for Norfolk 283 Blyth’s Pipit at Happisburgh in September 1 999 - the second for Norfolk 285 Norfolk Mammal Report - 2001 Editor: Ian Keymer Editorial 287 Bats at Paston Great Barn 288 Memories of an ex-editor 298 Harvest Mice: more common than suspected? 299 Are we under-recording the Norfolk mink population? 301 National Key Sites for Water Voles in Norfolk 304 A Guide to identification of Shrews and Rodents 309 Published by NORFOLK AND NORWICH NATURALISTS’ SOCIETY Castle Museum, Norwich, NRl 3JU (Transactions Volume 35 part 2 October 2002) Please note that the page numbering in this report follows on from part 1 of the Transactions pub- lished in July 2002 ISSN 0375 7226 www.nnns.org.uk Keepsake back numbers are available from David & Iris Pauli, 8 Lindford Drive, Eaton, Norwich NR4 6LT Front cover photograph: Tree Sparrow (Richard Brooks) Back cover photograph: Grey Seal (Graeme Cresswell) NORFOLK BIRD REPORT - 2001 Editorial x On behalf of the Society 1 am pleased to present the annual report on the Birds of Norfolk.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Aggregate and Silica Sand Assessment 2012
    Norfolk County Council Norfolk Minerals and Waste Development Framework Ninth Annual Monitoring Report Mineral Data Local Aggregate & Silica Sand Assessment 2012 Published May 2014 1 Norfolk County Council Norfolk Minerals and Waste Development Framework Ninth Annual Monitoring Report Mineral Data Local Aggregate & Silica Sand Assessment 2012 Published May 2014 T. McCabe Interim Director of Environment, Transport and Development Norfolk County Council Martineau Lane Norwich NR1 2SG www.norfolk.gov.uk Price: Free If you would need this document in large print, audio, braille, an alternative format or a different language please contact Norfolk County Council on 0344 800 8020 or 0344 8008011 (textphone) and we will do our best to help. 2 Contents Page 1 Introduction 5 2 Sand and Gravel 7 2.1 Production 7 2.2 Sand and gravel quarries in Norfolk 8 2.3 Sand and gravel landbank of permitted mineral 10 reserves 3 Carstone 12 3.1 Production 12 3.2 Carstone quarries in Norfolk 13 3.3 Carstone landbank of permitted mineral reserves 14 4 Secondary and Recycled Aggregate 16 4.1 Overall inert waste management figures in Norfolk 16 4.2 Recycling aggregates at mineral workings 17 4.3 Secondary and Recycled Aggregate Sources 17 4.4 Secondary and Recycled Aggregate Sources in 18 Norfolk over 20,000 tonnes per annum. 5 Materials sourced outside the County 19 5.1 Imports and exports 19 5.2 Crushed Rock 19 5.3 Marine sources 20 6 Supply and Demand Assessment 20 6.1 Supply 20 6.2 Demand 21 7 Conclusion 24 8 Silica Sand 26 3 List of Tables Table 1: Sand and
    [Show full text]
  • The Ouse Washes
    NRA Anglii j i t - u THE OUSE WASHES “The Ouse Washes offer a rich variety of experiences both as an internationally important wildlife site and its continuing role of protecting the fens from flooding. ” O wildlife RSPB NRA National Rivers Authority Anglian Region THE ANGLIAN REGION The Anglian Region hosts a rich variety of wildlife habitats, flora and landscapes associated with its streams, rivers, ponds, lakes, wetlands, estuaries and coastal waters. Many of these are protected by statutory designations, for example, 75% of the coastline is covered by a conservation and/or landscape designation. Five Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty fall either partially or wholly within Anglian Region, along with England's newest National Park - the Broads. A fifth of England and Wales internationally important wetlands, from large estuaries such as the Humber and the Wash, to Ouse Washes in flood washlands such as the Ouse Washes, occur within this region. THE OUSE WASHES - FLOOD DEFENCE IMPORTANCE The Middle and South Level Barrier Banks contain Bedford Ouse flood flows within the Ouse Washes and are therefore vital for the flood protection of the Cambridgeshire Fens. Complete towns, villages and isolated dwellings, Flood waters are able to flow throigh \ together with approximately 29,000 the Hundred Foot River when pean " hectatres of agricultural land are protected from flooding by the Ouse When the peak flood has passed, i Washes Defences. Washes and back into the Old Failure of the South Level Barrier Bank would cause over 230 residential properties to be flooded to depths of up to 1.8m. As much as 11,000 hectares of Flooded washland and ditches agricultural land would be flooded.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment Appendix A
    Minerals Site Specific Allocations Plan – Single Issue Silica Sand Review Habitats Regulations Assessment – Test of Likely Significant Effects Regulation 61 of the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 September 2015 Minerals Site Specific Allocations Plan – Single Issue Silica Sand Review Habitats Regulations Assessment – Test of Likely Significant Effects Regulation 61 of the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 September 2015 Mr T McCabe – Executive Director Community and Environmental Services Norfolk County Council Martineau Lane Norwich NR1 2SG www.norfolk.gov.uk If you need this document in large print, audio, braille, an alternative format or in a different language please contact Norfolk County Council on 0344 800 8020 or 0344 8008011 (textphone) and we will do our best to help. List of Contents Page Summary S-1 Chapters and Appendices 1 Introduction 1-1 1.1 Silica Sand Review of the Minerals Site Specific Allocations DPD 1-1 1.2 Legislative Framework 1-2 1.3 Scope of Work 1-3 1.4 Methodology 1-4 1.5 Zone of Influence 1-5 1.6 Designated Sites within the Zone of Influence 1-6 1.7 Consultation 1-6 2 Screening Matrix 2-7 3 Summary of Task 1 and Recommendationsfor Task 2 3-1 4 References 6-1 Appendix A Location of the Designated Sites A-1 Appendix B Designated Sites and Qualifying Features B-1 B.1 Ouse Washes SPA B-1 B.2 The Wash SPA B-2 B.3 Norfolk Valley Fens SAC B-4 B.4 Ouse Washes SAC B-6 B.5 Roydon Common and Dersingham Bog SAC B-6 B.6 The Wash and North Norfolk Coast SAC B-7 B.7 Ouse Washes
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Coast Path Guided Trail Holiday
    Norfolk Coast Path Guided Trail Holiday Tour Style: Guided Trails Destinations: Norfolk & England Trip code: XNLDW Trip Walking Grade: 2 HOLIDAY OVERVIEW The Norfolk coastline is a designated area of outstanding beauty, internationally renowned for its prolific bird life. It has some of the finest salt marshes and sand dunes in Europe. Famous nature reserves passed on our route include Holme Dunes, Scolt Head, Blakeney and Cley Marshes. WHAT'S INCLUDED • Full Board en-suite accommodation • Experienced HF Holidays Walking Leader • All transport to and from walk HOLIDAYS HIGHLIGHTS • Walk from the great cliffs of Hunstanton to the Edwardian resort of Cromer www.hfholidays.co.uk PAGE 1 [email protected] Tel: +44(0) 20 3974 8865 • Wide skies and stunning panoramas across the rolling waves of the North Sea • See the amazing bird life in this designated area of outstanding beauty along the Norfolk Coast • Rich history unfolds as you pass quaint old harbour villages, salt marshes and sand dunes TRIP SUITABILITY This Guided Walking/Hiking Trail is graded 2. Although there is little ascent the average daily distance is about 10 miles. Most of the trail is on good paths but there are sections of beach walking and some walking on shingle. It is your responsibility to ensure you have the relevant fitness required to join this holiday. A sustained effort is required to complete this trail and provision cannot be made for anyone who opts out. Please be sure you can manage the daily mileage and ascent as listed below. The walking day is normally 6 to 7 hours.
    [Show full text]
  • The Norfolk & Norwich
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE NORFOLK & NORWICH NATURALISTS' SOCIETY VOL. XXIII 1974 - 1976 LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS Page Allard, P. R. 29 Banham, P. R. 145 Buckley, J 86,172 Funnell, B.M 251 Gosling, L. M 49 Gurney, C Ill Harding, P. T 267 Harrison, R. H 45 Hornby, R 231 Ismay, J 231, 271 Kington, J. A. 140 Lambley, P. W 170, 231, 269, 270 Norgate, T. B 167 Oliver, J 120 Peet, T. N.D 156,249 Ramsay, H. R. 28 Watts, G. D 231 Williams, R. B 257 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS (Plates adjoin pages indicated) Bat, Long-eared 60 Bearded Tit 95 Bewick's Swan ••• 103 Black-bellied Dipper ... ... ... ••• ••• ••• ••• 44 Black-headed Gull 29 Black-tailed Godwit ... ... ... ••• ••• ••• ••• 87 Common Tern ••• 94 Curlew ••• 216 Deer, Roe 61 Page Green Sandpiper ... ... ... 216 Hawfinch 79 Heron Hortus Sanitatus, figures from 117 Kingfisher 200 Knot 28 Lapwing 102 Little Egret 12 Little Ringed Plover ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 29 Osprey 102 Pied Flycatcher 44 217 Pyiausta peilucidalis 249 Red-breasted Flycatcher ... ... 44 Salt Pans 150-151 Sandwich Tern 28,201 Short-eared Owl ... ... ... ... ... 45 Snipe 200 Sparrowhawk 44 Squirrel, Grey 60 Water-rail 13 Waxwing 78,201 Weather Maps, Europe, 1784 143- 144 White-fronted Goose 45 Wryneck 217 Yare Valley 247 - 249 INDEX TO VOLUME XXIII Amphibia and Reptile Records for Norfolk ... ... 172 Barton Broad, Bird Report ... ... ... ... 5 Bird Report, Classified Notes 1972 30 1973 96 1974 202 Bird Report, Editorial 1972 2 1973 71 1974 194 Bird Ringing Recoveries 22, 92, 197 Birds and the Weather of 1784 140 Blakeney Point, Bird Report 5 Breydon Water, Bird Report ..
    [Show full text]