DOCSLIB.ORG

State Super-Maximum Security Policies: an Examination of Admission Characteristics, Classification Reviews, Mental Health Amenities, and Inmate Privileges

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
State Super-Maximum Security Policies: an Examination of Admission Characteristics, Classification Reviews, Mental Health Amenities, and Inmate Privileges The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Master's Theses Fall 12-2011 State Super-Maximum Security Policies: An Examination of Admission Characteristics, Classification Reviews, Mental Health Amenities, and Inmate Privileges Harry Daniel Butler University of Southern Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses Part of the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Butler, Harry Daniel, "State Super-Maximum Security Policies: An Examination of Admission Characteristics, Classification Reviews, Mental Health Amenities, and Inmate Privileges" (2011). Master's Theses. 248. https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/248 This Masters Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The University of Southern Mississippi STATE SUPER-MAXIMUM SECURITY POLICIES: AN EXAMINATION OF ADMISSION CHARACTERISTICS, CLASSIFICATION REVIEWS, MENTAL HEALTH AMENITIES, AND INMATE PRIVILEGES by Harry Daniel Butler A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School of The University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Approved: ____________________________________ Director ____________________________________ ____________________________________ ____________________________________ Dean of the Graduate School December 2011 ABSTRACT AN EXAMINATION OF STATE SUPER-MAXIMUM SECURITY POLICIES: SEARCHING FOR SIMILARITIES IN ADMISSION CHARACTERISTICS, CLASSIFICATION REVIEWS, MENTAL HEALTH AMENITIES, AND INMATE PRIVILEGES by Harry Daniel Butler June 2011 Super-maximum security prisons have flourished within a political environment that endorses tougher criminal sanctions. This punitive evolution has created new problems for correctional agencies attempting to control the “worst of the worst” inmates. Federal courts and researchers have examined the detrimental effects supermax isolation has on inmates’ mental health. This analysis examines forty-two state supermax policies to determine how states admit inmates to supermax custody, the classification review process, the management of inmates with mental illnesses, and the availability of privileges for supermax inmates. Drawing on the concept of the McDonaldization of Justice (Ritzer, 1993), particular attention is given to understanding the role of official policy and procedures on managing problematic inmates. Guided by previous research on supermax penitentiaries, the correctional policies have been aggregated regionally to provide insight into geographical differences for the operation of supermax units. Policy implications for establishing more inclusive and thorough rules and regulations for the admission, review, and management of supermax units are discussed. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer would like to thank the thesis chair of this project, Dr. Wes Johnson, for his insight, guidance, and tutelage. Dr. Hayden Griffin and Dr. Philip Carlan have also contributed their time and expertise in helping guide this project to completion. Dr. Wes Johnson worked closely with me throughout this project to ensure I maintained my sanity while also empirically examining a topic that is in need of great research. I would like to thank Dr. Hayden Griffin for aiding me in establishing a thesis topic and collecting data. I would also like to thank Dr. Philip Carlan for providing insight into how to present the collected data in a concise format. Dr. Lisa Nored, the Chair of the School of Criminal Justice at the University of Southern Mississippi, deserves a special thanks for assisting me administratively to complete the project. I would also like to thank Dr. Alan Thompson, the School of Criminal Justice Master’s Director, for helping me balance my thesis with the requirements of my assistantship and for advising me as a student. Without the hard work and assistance of the faculty within the department, I would not have been able to complete the current project. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................... ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................. iii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................. vi CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................1 Problem Statement Research Questions Definition of Terms Delimitations Justification II. LITERATURE REVIEW ..............................................................................9 Beginning of the Supermax Supermax Prisons Expand to the States Definition and Classification Problems Goals and Characteristics of a Supermax Paying for Supermax Imprisonment Mental Health Issues Judicial Response to Conditions in Supermax Prisons Deterrence and Supermax Imprisonment Ironies of Supermax Imprisonment III. METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................39 Overview Procedures Limitations Data Analysis IV. ANALYSIS OF DATA ...............................................................................47 Admission Characteristics for Supermax Units Supermax Classification Review Mental Health Amenities Supermax Inmate Privileges iv V. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION ...................................................................109 Summary of Major Findings and Recommendations for Future Studies Classification Reviews for Supermax Inmates Treatment Plans for the Mentally Ill Supermax Privileges Limitations of the Study Conclusion APPENDIXES .................................................................................................................135 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................143 v LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Overview of Supermax Admission Characteristics ...............................................47 2a. Northeastern Admission Characteristics of Supermax Prisons .............................49 2b. Midwestern Admission Characteristics of Supermax Prisons ...............................50 2c. Southern Admission Characteristics of Supermax Prisons ....................................51 2d. Western Admission Characteristics of Supermax Prisons .....................................52 3. Regional Differences among State Supermax Admission Characteristics ............55 4. Names of Supermax Policies Comparison .............................................................58 5. Summary of Classification Review Findings ........................................................60 6a. Northeastern Classification Reviews .....................................................................61 6b. Midwestern Classification Reviews .......................................................................62 6c. Southern Classification Reviews ...........................................................................63 6d. Western Classification Reviews ............................................................................64 7. Mental Health Guidelines for Supermax Inmates ..................................................77 8. Regional Differences Among Mental Health Guidelines ......................................81 8a. Northeastern State Analysis of Mental Health Guidelines ....................................83 8b. Midwestern State Analysis of Mental Health Guidelines ......................................84 8c. Southern State Analysis of Mental Health Guidelines ..........................................85 8d. Western State Analysis of Mental Health Guidelines ............................................86 9. Overview of Supermax Privileges .........................................................................88 10. Regional Analysis of Supermax Privileges............................................................91 11a. Northeastern Supermax Visitation Privileges ........................................................92 vi 11b. Midwestern Supermax Visitation Privileges .........................................................93 11c. Southern Supermax Visitation Privileges ..............................................................94 11d. Western Supermax Visitation Privileges ...............................................................95 12a. Northeastern Supermax Telephone Privileges .......................................................98 12b. Midwestern Supermax Telephone Privileges ........................................................99 12c. Southern Supermax Telephone Privileges ...........................................................100 12d. Western Supermax Telephone Privileges ............................................................101 13a. Northeastern Supermax Programming Privileges ................................................104 13b. Midwestern Supermax Programming Privileges .................................................105 13c. Southern Supermax Programming Privileges ......................................................106 13d. Western Supermax Programming Privileges .......................................................107 vii 1 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Over the last thirty years, the United States penal culture has shifted
Load more

Recommended publications
  • America's Longest Held Prisoner of War: Lessons Learned from the Capture, Prosecution, and Extradition of General Manuel Noriega Geoffrey S
    Louisiana Law Review Volume 71 | Number 4 Summer 2011 America's Longest Held Prisoner of War: Lessons Learned from the Capture, Prosecution, and Extradition of General Manuel Noriega Geoffrey S. Corn Sharon G. Finegan Repository Citation Geoffrey S. Corn and Sharon G. Finegan, America's Longest Held Prisoner of War: Lessons Learned from the Capture, Prosecution, and Extradition of General Manuel Noriega, 71 La. L. Rev. (2011) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol71/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law Review by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. America's Longest Held Prisoner of War: Lessons Learned from the Capture, Prosecution, and Extradition of General Manuel Noriega Geoffrey S. Corn* Sharon G. Finegan" INTRODUCTION In the fall of 1986, while serving his first tour as an Army officer in Panama, one of the authors, Professor Corn, participated in a large-scale field training exercise called Operation Kindle Liberty. For three weeks he worked alongside members of the Panamanian Defense Force (PDF) with the mission of enhancing the capability of the Panamanian military to work side-by-side with the U.S. military to defend the Panama Canal. At the end of their training, as is customary, the commanding generals of both armies came to the field to visit the troops. Then-First Lieutenant Corn stood in an impromptu formation outside of the combined U.S.-PDF tactical operations center as General John Galvin, Commander of United States Southern Command, and his Panamanian counterpart General Manuel Noriega walked down the row of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • If You Have Issues Viewing Or Accessing This File Contact Us at NCJRS.Gov
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. ---- -------~~----~~~-----------------------., GEORGIA PRISONS A report prepared by the Georgia Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights /-'V \l ~,~ ~ '", " ,< I ; , ,1t ATTRIBllrON: The findings and recommendations contained in this report are those of the Georgia Advisory Committee to the United States Commission on Civil Rights and, as such, are not attributable to the Commission. This report has been prepared by the State Advisory Committee for submission to the Commission, and will be considered by the Commission in formulating its recommenda­ tions to the President and Congress. RIGHT OF RESPONSE: Prior to the publication of a report, the State Advisory Committee affords to all individuals or organizations that may be defamed, degraded, or incriminated by any material contained in the report an opportunity to respond in writing to such material. All responses have been incorporated, appended, or otherwise reflected in the publication. -.u~ X.i1lJJG&&WMW.. aZ:&iwa5zvL MEMBERSHIP GEORGIA ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO THE UNITED STATES COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS Edward E. ElsOlLl, Chairman'>',,>,, Atlanta Mercedes Wright, Vice Chairwoman Savannah Kathleen Wood, Acting Secretary Atlanta Clarence A. Bacote * E. T. Kehrer * Atlanta Atlanta K. Z. Chavis * Carol R. King * Atlanta Albany Charles Clark ** S. Jarvin Levison * Atlanta Atlanta Charles S. Hamilton Arthur J. McClung * Augusta Columbus Joseph M. Hendricks Frances Pauley * Macon Atlanta Jolmnie Hilburn John H. Ruffin, Jr. Augusta Augusta Gary Holmes ** Clayton Sinclair ** Atlanta Atlanta James L. Hooten MOrgan Stanford * Savannah Atlanta Eugene C. Tillman Brunswick * No longer a member of the Committee ** Appointed to the Cummittee after the informal hearing ii -~ -~- ~-~-.~-------------------------; LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL GEORGIA ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO THE U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Court Prison Litigation Project Revised Handbook
    FEDERAL COURT PRISON LITIGATION PROJECT REVISED HANDBOOK April 2002 Prepared With a Grant from the Federal District Court of the Northern District of Illinois by James P.Chapman Eric Dorkin Sarah Geraghty PART I CHAPTER 1: FINDING YOUR CLIENT ...........................................2 SECTION 1: PRISON LOCATOR SERVICES ........................................2 CHAPTER 2: PREPARING YOUR CASE ...........................................3 SECTION 2: ASSESSING THE COMPLAINT. .......................................3 SECTION 3: THE DECISION TO SUE DEFENDANTS IN OFFICIAL/INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY ......4 SECTION 4: REQUESTING STATE PRISON RECORDS ................................5 SECTION 5: WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM .........................6 CHAPTER 3: VISITING YOUR CLIENT .......................................... 7 SECTION 6: PREPARING TO VISIT YOUR CLIENT ..................................7 SECTION 7: VISITING YOUR CLIENT ...........................................9 SECTION 8: TELEPHONE PROCEDURES .........................................11 SECTION 9: HOUSING CLASSIFICATIONS FOR CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS ............12 CHAPTER 4: INTERVIEWING YOUR CLIENT ....................................14 SECTION 10: CORRECTIONAL FACILITY ENTRANCE PROCEDURES ....................14 SECTION 11: THE CLIENT INTERVIEW .........................................14 SECTION 12: RELATIONSHIP WITH CLIENT DURING THE LITIGATION ..................15 CHAPTER 5: ATTACHMENT OF DAMAGE AWARDS ..............................17 SECTION 13: INTRODUCTION ...............................................17
    [Show full text]
  • These Defendants Include: Patricia L. Caruso, Director of the MDOC; Unknown Straub, Deputy Director of the MDOC; Dave J
    Case: 08-1779 Document: 00615826829 Filed: 08/27/2009 Page: 1 NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 09a0614n.06 Nos. 08-1710/1779/1820 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT LAMONT BERNARD HEARD, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) PATRICIA CARUSO, named as ) ON APPEAL FROM THE Director of the Michigan Department ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT of Corrections, in her individual ) COURT FOR THE WESTERN capacity, et al., ) DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN ) Defendants-Appellees, ) ) O P I N I O N RANDALL MASKER, named as Mail ) Room Supervisor, in his individual ) capacity. ) ) Defendant-Appellee. ) _______________________________________) Before: MOORE, CLAY, and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges. KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. Lamont Bernard Heard (“Heard”), a Michigan prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees, several employees of the Michigan Department of Corrections (“MDOC”), in this civil-rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 Additionally, Heard appeals the judgment 1These defendants include: Patricia L. Caruso, Director of the MDOC; Unknown Straub, Deputy Director of the MDOC; Dave J. Burnett, MDOC Special Activities Coordinator; Robert Mulvaney, MDOC Security Threat Group Coordinator; Jeri-Ann Sherry, Warden of Chippewa Correctional Facility (“Chippewa”); Greg McQuiggin, Deputy Warden of Chippewa; Michael Brown, Security Threat Group Coordinator at Chippewa; Steven Therrian, a lieutenant at Chippewa; Case: 08-1779 Document: 00615826829 Filed: 08/27/2009 Page: 2 in favor of MDOC employee Randall Masker (“Masker”) following a bench trial on Heard’s claim that Masker opened Heard’s legal mail outside Heard’s presence. These cases have been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia State Advisory Committee to the DS Commission on Civil Rights, Washington, DC *Corrective Irstitutions
    DOCUMEMT BIZASHE 178 671 OB OIS 960 TITLE Georgia Prisons. INSTITUTION Georgia State Advisory Committee to the D.S. Commission on Civil Rights. SPONS AGENCY Commission on Civil Rights, Washington, D.C. PUB DATE Feb 76 NOTE 7Bp. FDRS PRICE MF01/pC04 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Corrective Irstitutions; Educational Opportunities; Employment Opportunities; Employment Practices; *Facility Requirements; Institutional Facilities; *Minority Groups; *Prisoners; *Racial Discrimination; *Rehabilitation Programs IDENTIFIERS *Georgia 0 ABSTRACT Findings from a study of Georgia's 16 adult penal institutions indicate that the State's prigon system is plagued by many problems. For example, inadequate funds are allocated to maintain facilities and services for its prisoners. As a result, many of the prisons are aktiquated, overcrowded and understaffed. In addition, minorities are not hired proportionate to tkeir numbers in the State's population. Discriminatoi:y racial patterns are also found with regard to minority prisoners in prison work assignments, educational and vocational opportunities, and in the overall treatment of inmates. In order to rectify some of these problems, it is suggested that the State legislature and the Board of Corrections take action to recruit more black employees' provide more opportunities for inmates to learn marketable skills, and to expand academic training for prisoners. (Author/EB) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can De made from the original document. *********************************************************************** GEORGIA PRISONS A report prepared by the Georgia Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights February 1976 ATTRIBUTION: The findings and recommendations contained in this report are those of the Georgia Advisory Committee to the United States Commission on Civil Rights and, as such, are not attributable to theCommission.
    [Show full text]
  • The Triple Crown (1867-2020)
    The Triple Crown (1867-2020) Kentucky Derby Winner Preakness Stakes Winner Belmont Stakes Winner Horse of the Year Jockey Jockey Jockey Champion 3yo Trainer Trainer Trainer Year Owner Owner Owner 2020 Authentic (Sept. 5, 2020) f-Swiss Skydiver (Oct. 3, 2020) Tiz the Law (June 20, 2020) Authentic John Velazquez Robby Albarado Manny Franco Authentic Bob Baffert Kenny McPeek Barclay Tagg Spendthrift Farm, MyRaceHorse Stable, Madaket Stables & Starlight Racing Peter J. Callaghan Sackatoga Stable 2019 Country House War of Will Sir Winston Bricks and Mortar Flavien Prat Tyler Gaffalione Joel Rosario Maximum Security Bill Mott Mark Casse Mark Casse Mrs. J.V. Shields Jr., E.J.M. McFadden Jr. & LNJ Foxwoods Gary Barber Tracy Farmer 2018 Justify Justify Justify Justify Mike Smith Mike Smith Mike Smith Justify Bob Baffert Bob Baffert Bob Baffert WinStar Farm LLC, China Horse Club, Starlight Racing & Head of Plains Partners LLC WinStar Farm LLC, China Horse Club, Starlight Racing & Head of Plains Partners LLC WinStar Farm LLC, China Horse Club, Starlight Racing & Head of Plains Partners LLC 2017 Always Dreaming Cloud Computing Tapwrit Gun Runner John Velazquez Javier Castellano Joel Ortiz West Coast Todd Pletcher Chad Brown Todd Pletcher MeB Racing, Brooklyn Boyz, Teresa Viola, St. Elias, Siena Farm & West Point Thoroughbreds Bridlewood Farm, Eclipse Thoroughbred Partners & Robert V. LaPenta Klaravich Stables Inc. & William H. Lawrence 2016 Nyquist Exaggerator Creator California Chrome Mario Gutierrez Kent Desormeaux Irad Ortiz Jr. Arrogate Doug
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting Major Prison Incidents
    PREDICTINQ MAJOR PRISON Criminology Research Council Grant 12/87 SUMMARY OF REPORT This report reviews the nature and causes of major prison incidents, and also investigates the extent to which their occurrence can be predicted by monitoring indicators of the prison environment, especially minor incidents and disciplinary reports. Major prison incidents, such as fires, riots, mass escapes and hostage-taking, are important features of custodial systems. They can cause enormous material damage and extensive human suffering in a short space of time. Planning for their prevention and control is a significant pre-occupation amongst corrections administrators, and the management of a major incident may be the most rigorous test prison managers are likely to face. Major prison incidents have a number of features that distinguish them from other forms of violent or disruptive behaviour that occur in prisons. They are: collective events, involving large groups of prisoners; of relatively short duration; involve a loss of control over part or all of the facility; often have significant political or administrative consequences. Explaining the causes of major prison incidents A variety of theoretical models have been proposed to explain major incidents. One way to characterise theoretical models is as "internal" or "external" models. Internal models emphasise the characteristics or conditions of prisons that give rise to violence. On the other hand, external models give precedence to the characteristics that prisoners bring into the system that make them prone to violence. Integrated theories that combine these two approaches have also been proposed. Other theoretical approaches consider the breakdown of normal social structures that occurs in prisons, including disorganization in prison administration, that makes violent upheaval more likely.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Kentucky Derby Tipsheet
    TWINSPIRES TIPSHEET 145TH RUNNING OF THE KENTUCKY DERBY The Kentucky Derby (Gr 1) 1-1/4 Miles - PURSE $3,000,000 POST HORSE ML ODDS TOP PICKS 1 War of Will 20-1 12 Omaha Beach 2 Tax 20-1 17 Roadster 3 By My Standards 20-1 13 Code of Honor 4 Gray Magician 50-1 Improbable 6-1 5 $30 WIN Vekoma 20-1 6 12 ($30) 7 Maximum Security 10-1 Tacitus 10-1 8 $10 EXACTA Plus Que Parfait 30-1 9 12 with 5,11,13,16,17 ($50) 10 Cuting Humor 30-1 Haikal 30-1 11 $2 TRIFECTA Omaha Beach 4-1 12 12,13,17 with 12,13,17 with 13 Code of Honor 15-1 5,11,12,13,16,17 ($48) 14 Win Win Win 15-1 powered by brisnet.com 15 Master Fencer (JPN) 50-1 16 Game Winner 5-1 17 Roadster 6-1 18 Long Range Toddy 30-1 19 Spinoff 30-1 20 Country House 30-1 The first leg of the Triple Crown will take place on Saturday with the 145th running of The lightly raced ROADSTER (#17) (6-1) showed his versatility when taking back and the $3 million Kentucky Derby (G1). A field of 20 sophomores is entered in one of the rallying in the stretch past Game Winner in the Santa Anita Derby to notch his biggest more competitive editions of the Run for the Roses in recent years. victory to date. The gray son of Quality Road has been a much-hyped horse since his debut and he looks to be peaking at the right time.
    [Show full text]
  • Saturday Breeders' Cup Insert
    IMPRIMIS PUTS ORSENO BACK IN THE Back-to-back wins at the 2000 Breeders= Cup--held then as just a one-day, blockbuster eight-race program--put an exclamation SPOTLIGHT point on a career year for the now by Steve Sherack 65-year-old. You have to have the right AThat year, we won two horses, manage them properly Breeders= Cups, the Preakness, and and get them to the big races a bunch of Grade Ones, and I just when they are at their best. thought it was gonna happen Those are the sentiments of every year,@ said Orseno, a former Classic-winning trainer Joe private trainer for Stronach Stables Orseno, who will saddle between 1998 and 2002. Saturday=s GI Breeders= Cup AIt=s not like I forgot how to train Turf Sprint morning-line co- in the last 20 years,@ he added with second choice Imprimis a laugh. AYou have to have the (Broken Vow). horses.@ It=s been some time, Orseno certainly had the horses 20 years to be exact, but this on that aforementioned isn=t Orseno=s first trip to the Joe Orseno | Ryan Thompson Championship Saturday at Breeders= Cup with a live Churchill Downs. runner. Far from it. Cont. p2 BC SATURDAY SPECIAL EDITION $ PAGE 2 OF 22 $ THETDN.COM THURSDAY $ NOV. 5, 2019 Perfect Sting and Macho Uno reeled off dramatic wins in consecutive fashion beneath Hall of Famer Jerry Bailey, providing Orseno with a rolling double in the GI Breeders= Cup Filly & Mare Turf and GI Breeders= Cup Juvenile, respectively. He also tightened the girth on Red Bullet to an upset victory over GI Kentucky Derby winner Fusaichi Pegasus earlier that spring in the second leg of the Triple Crown.
    [Show full text]
  • Kentucky Derby
    The Legacy and Traditions of Churchill Downs and the Kentucky Derby The Kentucky Derby The Kentucky Derby has taken place annually in Louis- ville, Kentucky since 1875. It was started by Meriwether Lewis Clark, Jr. at his track he called Churchill Downs, and it has run continuously since that first race. This first jewel of the Triple Crown has produced famous winners, with thirteen of these winners gaining that Triple Crown title. Lewis limited the Derby to only 3-year old horses. The race has evolved and grown over time and has changed since its first running, remaining an important event for more than a century. Through the study of the Derby’s influential historic traditions, notable winners and horse farms in Kentucky, and its profound cultural TABLE OF CONTENTS impact, this program will identify and explore these dif- Background and History…..2 ferent aspects that all contribute to the excitement and legacy of the “most exciting two minutes in sports.” Curriculum Standards…..3 Traditions ................ 4-8 Triple Crown ............ 9 Derby Winners ........ 10-11 Notable Horse Farms….12-13 Significant Figures…...15 Bibliography………….16 Image list…………….17-18 Derby Activities…….19-22 To replicate the races he witnessed in Europe, Meri- wether Lewis Clark Jr., the grandson of explorer Wil- liam Clark, created three races in the United States that resembled those he’d attended in Europe. The first meet was in May of 1875. Family ties to the horse racing world led Clark to his purchase of what would become Churchill Downs, named after his uncles, John and Henry Churchill in 1883.
    [Show full text]
  • Penology an Educational Problem1
    Penology an Educational Problem1 HASTINGS H. HART, LL.D. FOR nearly forty years I have been a member of the Ameri can Prison Congress and a student of penology. For fifteen years I was an inspector of prisons, and for more than twenty years since that time I have given special study to the treatment of the delinquent child, the juvenile court, the proba tion system, and institutions for delinquent children. In this address I shall offer some suggestions with reference to the edu cational phases of penology. In so doing I am not embarrassed, as these superintendents and wardens would be, by experience or responsibility, but can speak with the assurance of the outside observer, who is always able to tell the other fellow how the job should be done. A great deal of what I know about this subject has been learned from personal contact with wardens and superintendents like Z. R. Brockway, J. W. McClaughry, Albert Garvin, Henry Wolfer, F. L. Christian, Thomas M. Osborne, Calvin Derrick, Mrs. Jessie Hodder, and Mrs. Martha P. Falconer, and with such prison chaplains as Albert G. Byers of Ohio, George Hickox of Michigan, and Rev. William J. Batt of Massachusetts. I have learned also from personal association with such students of penology as Ex-President Rutherford B. Hayes, Ex-Governor George Hoadley, Frederick Howard Wines, Charles R. Hender son, General Roeliff Brinkerhoff, Amos W. Butler, Burdette G. Lewis, and George W. Kirchwey; and from the study of their writings and the reports of commissions, surveys, and the heads of institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Rock 2-12.Indd
    WorkingWor king ttoo EExtendx ten d D Democracyemocracy ttoo All VolumeVlVolume 2, 2N2, NNumberum ber 12 12 DecemberDecem ber 2013 2013 PELICAN BAY REPS MEET WITH TOP CDC PRISONCRATS B y Arturo Castellanos, October 20, 2013 ger strikes, they were forthcoming in other the same has not been put in place in your his is a short update from the four areas. For example, there will be additional SHU prison – including women – then you principle SHU reps here at Pelican allowed personal property items in SHU. need to sweat your warden about it asap. TBay State Prison to inform you that The memos on those and other supplemen- Finally, if any of you on PBSP GP [Gen- Mr. Michael Stainer [director of the Divi- tal demands will be out soon and placed in eral Population] or any prison have gone sion of Adult Institutions], kept his word the new CDCR DOM [Department Opera- through the potty watch be sure you contact and arrived here on Sept. 25 and 26 with tions Manual] Article 43 as soon as pos- the Prison Law Offi ce but address your let- Mr. Ralph Diaz [warden at the California sible. ters Attn: Sara Norman [Prison Law Offi ce, Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and Those memos should be more specifi c so 1917 Fifth St., Berkeley CA 94710]. She’s State Prison (SATF) at Corcoran] and Mr. prison staff and prisoners will know what an attorney there. She came up asking for George Giurbino [retired director of the kind and size of the items is or is not al- names and information on this but we only Division of Adult Institutions].
    [Show full text]