DOCSLIB.ORG

Aqueduct Floods: Flood Protection

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aqueduct Floods: Flood Protection Aqueduct Floods: Flood Protection Dr. Philip Ward (Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University Amsterdam) Setup 1. Flood risk assessment model 2. Framework for estimating costs and benefits of dikes • Developing national 3. FloodResults Risk using Management first model framework implementation Plan for Nigeria • To develop resilience to floods, following recommendations from PDNA after 2012 floods Flood risk The elements (e.g. buildings, The threatening event The resistance or lack of humans, economic values) (including its probability and resistance of the exposed present in the area affected geographical extent) elements to the hazard Current flood risk: GLOFRIS Hazard Inundation depth (50 yr return period) Damage per Expected return period Annual Damage (EAD) Vulnerability $ $/yr Value of assets Exposure Ward et al., 2013. Environmental Research Letters, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044019 Winsemius et al., 2013. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, doi:10.5194/hess-17-1871-2013 Setup 1. Flood risk assessment model 2. Framework for estimating costs and benefits of dikes • Developing national 3. FloodResults Risk using Management first model framework implementation Plan for Nigeria • To develop resilience to floods, following recommendations from PDNA after 2012 floods FLOPROS: global flood protection standards database Scussolini et al., 2016. NHESS, doi:10.5194/nhess- 16-1049-2016 Costs and benefits: benefits B = EADnoadapt - EADadapt • Developing national Flood Risk Management implementation Plan for Nigeria • To develop resilience to floods, following recommendations from PDNA after 2012 floods Costs and benefits: costs C = (DikeHeightadapt – DikeHeightbaseline) X Cost of dike (USD.km.m) X • Developing national Flood Risk Management Length of dike required implementation Plan for Nigeria • To develop resilience(+ to maintenance costs of x% p.a.) floods, following recommendations from PDNA after 2012 floods Costs and benefits: costs C = (DikeHeightadapt – DikeHeightbaseline) X Cost of dike (USD.km.m) X • Developing national Flood Risk Management Length of dike required implementation Plan for Nigeria • To develop resilience(+ to maintenance costs of x% p.a.) floods, following recommendations from PDNA after 2012 floods Costs and benefits: costs C = (DikeHeightadapt – DikeHeightbaseline) X Cost of dike (USD.km.m) X • Developing national Flood Risk Management Length of dike required implementation Plan for Nigeria • To develop resilience(+ to maintenance costs of x% p.a.) floods, following recommendations from PDNA after 2012 floods Costs and benefits: costs C = (DikeHeightadapt – DikeHeightbaseline) X Cost of dike (USD.km.m) X • Developing national Flood Risk Management Length of dike required implementation Plan for Nigeria • To develop resilience(+ to maintenance costs of x% p.a.) floods, following recommendations from PDNA after 2012 floods Costs and benefits: costs C = (DikeHeightadapt – DikeHeightbaseline) X Cost of dike (USD.km.m) X • Developing national Flood Risk Management Length of dike required implementation Plan for Nigeria • To develop resilience(+ to maintenance costs of x% p.a.) floods, following recommendations from PDNA after 2012 floods Setup 1. Flood risk assessment model 2. Framework for estimating costs and benefits of dikes • Developing national 3. FloodResults Risk using Management first model framework implementation Plan for Nigeria • To develop resilience to floods, following recommendations from PDNA after 2012 floods Research questions 1. What protection standards are required to keep future flood risk constant? And what are the associated costs and benefits? 2. What protection standards maximize the net present value (NPV) of the investment? Example: Oregon Best-estimate protection standard Return period = 60 years Current EAD: USD0.9 billion p.a. EAD future = EAD current (Business as Usual; RCP8.5/SSP2) EAD future = EAD current (Business as Usual; RCP8.5/SSP2) EAD future = EAD current (Business as Usual; RCP8.5/SSP2) USD0.9 billion p.a. EAD future = EAD current (Business as Usual; RCP8.5/SSP2) Current and future flood protection standards a) RCP2.6/SSP1 (‘Sustainability’) b) RCP4.5/SSP2 (‘Middle of the Road’) c) RCP6.0/SSP3 (‘Fragmented world’) d) RCP8.5/SSP5 (‘Fossil-fuel based’) Costs and benefits at global scale Sustainability Middle of the Road Fragmented world Fossil-fuel based RCP2.6/SSP1 RCP4.5/SSP2 RCP6.0/SSP3 RCP8.5/SSP5 Maintain constant Expected Annual Damage Benefits (USD billion p.a.) 339 276 125 827 Costs (USD billion p.a.) 170 177 155 219 B:C ratio 2.0 1.6 0.8 3.8 Net present value (USD billion) 169 99 -30 608 • All values in USD 2005 (PPP) • Costs and benefits accumulated until 2100 • Average results over 5 GCMs • 5% discount rate, 1% maintenance costs per year Ward et al., 2017. Nature Climate Change, doi:10.1038/nclimate3350 Costs and benefits at global scale Sustainability Middle of the Road Fragmented world Fossil-fuel based RCP2.6/SSP1 RCP4.5/SSP2 RCP6.0/SSP3 RCP8.5/SSP5 Maintain constant Expected Annual Damage Benefits (USD billion p.a.) 339 276 125 827 Costs (USD billion p.a.) 170 177 155 219 B:C ratio 2.0 1.6 0.8 3.8 Net present value (USD billion) 169 99 -30 608 • All values in USD 2005 (PPP) • Costs and benefits accumulated until 2100 • Average results over 5 GCMs • 5% discount rate, 1% maintenance costs per year Ward et al., 2017. Nature Climate Change, doi:10.1038/nclimate3350 Costs and benefits at global scale Sustainability Middle of the Road Fragmented world Fossil-fuel based RCP2.6/SSP1 RCP4.5/SSP2 RCP6.0/SSP3 RCP8.5/SSP5 Maintain constant Expected Annual Damage Benefits (USD billion p.a.) 339 276 125 827 Costs (USD billion p.a.) 170 177 155 219 B:C ratio 2.0 1.6 0.8 3.8 Net present value (USD billion) 169 99 -30 608 Maintain constant Expected Annual Damage as a percentage of GDP Benefits (USD billion p.a.) 275 225 100 721 Costs (USD billion p.a.) 73 80 76 108 B:C ratio 3.8 2.8 1.3 6.7 Net present value (USD billion) 202 145 24 613 • All values in USD 2005 (PPP) • Costs and benefits accumulated until 2100 • Average results over 5 GCMs • 5% discount rate, 1% maintenance costs per year Ward et al., 2017. Nature Climate Change, doi:10.1038/nclimate3350 Benefit:Cost ratios per state a) RCP2.6/SSP1 (‘Sustainability’) b) RCP4.5/SSP2 (‘Middle of the Road’) c) RCP6.0/SSP3 (‘Fragmented world’) d) RCP8.5/SSP5 (‘Fossil-fuel based’) Ward et al., 2017. Nature Climate Change, doi:10.1038/nclimate3350 Research questions 1. What protection standards are required to keep future flood risk constant? And what are the associated costs and benefits? 2. What protection standards maximize the net present value (NPV) of the investment? Return periods of protection with highest NPV a) RCP2.6/SSP1 (‘Sustainability’) b) RCP4.5/SSP2 (‘Middle of the Road’) c) RCP6.0/SSP3 (‘Fragmented world’) d) RCP8.5/SSP5 (‘Fossil-fuel based’) Ward et al., 2017. Nature Climate Change, doi:10.1038/nclimate3350 Next steps 1. Coastal flood risk 2. Costs and benefits of coastal adaptation • Developing national 3. FloodMore Risk adaptation Management strategies implementation Plan for Nigeria 4. User testing • To develop resilience to floods, following recommendations from PDNA after 2012 floods Thank you! Gracias Artwork: © www.henkdeboer.nl Questions: [email protected].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Colorado River Aqueduct
    Fact Sheet: Our Water Lifeline__ The Colorado River Aqueduct. Photo: Aerial photo of CRA Investment in Reliability The Colorado River Aqueduct is considered one of the nation’s Many innovations came from this period in time, including the top civil engineering marvels. It was originally conceived by creation of a medical system for contract workers that would William Mulholland and designed by Metropolitan’s first Chief become the forerunner for the prepaid healthcare plan offered Engineer Frank Weymouth after consideration of more than by Kaiser Permanente. 50 routes. The 242-mile CRA carries water from Lake Havasu to the system’s terminal reservoir at Lake Mathews in Riverside. This reservoir’s location was selected because it is situated at the upper end of Metropolitan’s service area and its elevation of nearly 1,400 feet allows water to flow by gravity to the majority of our service area The CRA was the largest public works project built in Southern California during the Great Depression. Overwhelming voter approval in 1929 for a $220 million bond – equivalent to a $3.75 billion investment today – brought jobs to 35,000 people. Miners, engineers, surveyors, cooks and more came to build Colorado River the aqueduct, living in the harshest of desert conditions and Aqueduct ultimately constructing 150 miles of canals, siphons, conduits and pipelines. They added five pumping plants to lift water over mountains so deliveries could then flow west by gravity. And they blasted 90-plus miles of tunnels, including a waterway under Mount San Jacinto. THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA // // JULY 2021 FACT SHEET: THE COLORADO RIVER AQUEDUCT // // OUR WATER LIFELINE The Vision Despite the city of Los Angeles’ investment in its aqueduct, by the early 1920s, Southern Californians understood the region did not have enough local supplies to meet growing demands.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Erie Canal Aqueduct & Broad Street Corridor
    HISTORIC ERIE CANAL AQUEDUCT & BROAD STREET CORRIDOR MASTER PLAN MAY 2009 PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF ROCHESTER Copyright May 2009 Cooper Carry All rights reserved. Design: Cooper Carry 2 Historic Erie Canal AQUedUct & Broad Street Corridor Master Plan HISTORIC ERIE CANAL AQUEDUCT & BROAD STREET CORRIDOR 1.0 MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS 5 1.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 23 1.2 INTRODUCTION 27 1.3 PARTICIPANTS 33 2.1 SITE ANALYSIS/ RESEARCH 53 2.2 DESIGN PROCESS 57 2.3 HISTORIC PRECEDENT 59 2.4 MARKET CONDITIONS 67 2.5 DESIGN ALTERNATIVES 75 2.6 RECOMMENDATIONS 93 2.7 PHASING 101 2.8 INFRASTRUCTURE & UTILITIES 113 3.1 RESOURCES 115 3.2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Historic Erie Canal AQUedUct & Broad Street Corridor Master Plan 3 A city... is the pulsating product of the human hand and mind, reflecting man’s history, his struggle for freedom, creativity and genius. - Charles Abrams VISION STATEMENT: “Celebrating the Genesee River and Erie Canal, create a vibrant, walkable mixed-use neighborhood as an international destination grounded in Rochester history connecting to greater city assets and neighborhoods and promoting flexible mass transit alternatives.” 4 Historic Erie Canal AQUedUct & Broad Street Corridor Master Plan 1.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CREATING A NEW CANAL DISTRICT Recognizing the unrealized potential of the area, the City of the historic experience with open space and streetscape initiatives Rochester undertook a planning process to develop a master plan which coordinate with the milestones of the trail. for the Historic Erie Canal Aqueduct and adjoining Broad Street Corridor. The resulting Master Plan for the Historic Erie Canal Following the pathway of the original canal, this linear water Aqueduct and Broad Street Corridor represents a strategic new amenity creates a signature urban place drawing visitors, residents, beginning for this underutilized quarter of downtown Rochester.
    [Show full text]
  • Washita Basin Project Oklahoma
    Washita Basin Project Oklahoma James M. Bailey, Ph.D. Bureau of Reclamation 2008 0 Table of Contents Table of Contents .............................................................................................................. 1 Washita Basin Project ...................................................................................................... 2 Physical Setting ............................................................................................................. 3 Prehistoric and Historic Setting .................................................................................. 4 Project Investigation and Authorization .................................................................. 11 Project Construction................................................................................................... 16 Uses of Project Water ................................................................................................. 30 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 32 Bibliography .................................................................................................................... 33 Index................................................................................................................................. 35 1 Washita Basin Project Located adjacent to America’s arid west/humid east division line known as the 100th meridian, western Oklahoma’s rolling uplands are susceptible to unpredictable weather cycles.
    [Show full text]
  • New York City's Water Story
    New York City’s Water Story: From Mountain Top to Tap SCHOHARIE COUNTY Schoharie Reservoir 1,130 FEET Delaware Watershed Gilboa Catskill Watershed Stamford The water we use today is the same water that fell as C rain when dinosaurs roamed a D t Prattsville Siuslaw s DELAWARE COUNTY West Branch Delaware e k l i the earth. In its endless a l Windham l w a W r cycle, water is the only e a t W e GREENE COUNTY rs Schoharie Creek substance that naturally a h te e r d Grand Gorge sh exists as a solid, e d liquid or gas. Delhi Lenox Roxbury East Branch Delaware Hunter Tannersville Andes Walton HUNTER MOUNTAIN Water’s journey from 4,040 FEET mountain top to tap begins Margaretville Shandaken Tunnel when rain and snow fall on COLUMBIA COUNTY watersheds, the areas Massachusetts of land that catch, absorb, Downsville Phoenicia and carry water downhill to gently and swiftly Deposit Pepacton Woodstock flowing streams. Cannonsville Reservoir Reservoir 1,150 FEET 1,280 FEET Esopus Creek SLIDE MOUNTAIN Boiceville West Delaware Tunnel East Delaware Tunnel 4,180 FEET Streams provide life-cycle Neversink Frost Valley needs for fish and other RIver aquatic organisms. Oxygen is Ashokan Rondout trapped in the fresh water as Creek Reservoir Claryville Olivebridge 590 FEET Kingston it tumbles over rocks into deep pools. Overhanging tree branches keep water r C e A v cool as fresh water T i Grahamsville S K R DUTCHESS COUNTY continues its journey. IL L n Neversink A Neversink Reservoir Tunnel Q o s 1,440 FEET U s E d Liberty Rondout Reservoir d Water is naturally filtered D u u U 840 FEET U C C H H T by the soil and tree roots in T dense forests as it travels toward reservoirs.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulation of Flows and Water Quality in the California Aqueduct Using DSM2
    Simulation of Flows and Water Quality in the California Aqueduct Using DSM2 Siqing Liu, Bob Suits DWR, Bay Delta Office, Modeling Support Branch 2011 CWEMF Annual Meeting, February 28 –March 2 1 Topics • Project objectives • Aqueduct System modeled • Assumptions / issues with modeling • Model results –Flows / Storage, EC, Bromide 2 Objectives Simulate Aqueduct hydraulics and water quality • 1990 – 2010 period • DSM2 Aqueduct version calibrated by CH2Mhill Achieve 1st step in enabling forecasting Physical System Canals simulated • South Bay Aqueduct (42 miles) • California Aqueduct (444 miles) • East Branch to Silverwood Lake • West Branch to Pyramid Lake (40 miles) • Delta‐Mendota Canal (117 miles) 4 Physical System, cont Pumping Plants Banks Pumping Plant Buena Vista (Check 30) Jones Pumping Plant Teerink (Check 35) South Bay Chrisman (Check 36) O’Neill Pumping-Generating Edmonston (Check 40) Gianelli Pumping-Generating Alamo (Check 42) Dos Amigos (Check 13) Oso (West Branch) Las Perillas (Costal branch) Pearblossom (Check 58) 5 Physical System, cont Check structures and gates • Pools separated by check structures throughout the aqueduct system (SWP: 66, DMC: 21 ) • Gates at check structures regulate flow rates and water surface elevation 6 Physical System, cont Turnout and diversion structures • Water delivered to agricultural and municipal contractors through diversion structures • Over 270 diversion structures on SWP • Over 200 turnouts on DMC 7 Physical System, cont Reservoirs / Lakes Represented as complete mixing of water body •
    [Show full text]
  • Aqueduct Global Maps 2.0
    Working Paper AQUEDUCT METADATA DOCUMENT AQUEDUCT GLOBAL MAPS 2.0 FRANCIS GASSERT, MATT LANDIS, MATT LUCK, PAUL REIG, AND TIEN SHIAO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CONTENTS This document describes the specific characteristics of the Executive Summary........................................................1 indicator data and calculations for the Aqueduct Water Risk Total water withdrawal....................................................2 Atlas Global Maps. Complete guidelines and processes for Consumptive and non-consumptive use........................5 data collection, calculations, and mapping techniques are Total blue water (Bt)....................................................... 6 described fully in the Aqueduct Water Risk Framework.1 The Aqueduct Water Risk Atlas makes use of a Water Risk Available blue water (Ba)................................................7 Framework (Figure 1), that includes 12 global indicators Baseline water stress......................................................8 grouped into three categories of risk and one overall score. Inter-annual variability................................................... 9 Seasonal variability......................................................10 Flood occurrence......................................................... 11 Aqueduct Water Risk Framework Figure 1 | Drought severity...........................................................12 Upstream storage.........................................................13 OVERALL WATER RISK Groundwater stress ......................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Potomac River Watershed Assessment: Potomac River Sustainable Flow and Water Resources Analysis
    Middle Potomac River Watershed Assessment: Potomac River Sustainable Flow and Water Resources Analysis April 2014 Middle Potomac River Watershed Assessment: Potomac River Sustainable Flow and Water Resources Analysis United States Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore District The Natural Conservancy Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin Final Report April 2014 Recommended citation: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, The Nature Conservancy, and Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin. 2014. Middle Potomac River Watershed Assessment: Potomac River Sustainable Flow and Water Resources Analysis. Final Report. 107 pp. and 11 appendices. Cover photograph: Great Falls on the Potomac River as seen from Virginia. Jim Palmer (ICPRB) Middle Potomac River Watershed Assessment Abstract The Middle Potomac River Watershed Assessment (MPRWA) was a collaborative effort to assess the relationship between streamflow alteration and ecological response in the Potomac River and its tributaries in a study area defined as the Middle Potomac. The assessment is comprised of five distinct components: (1) a large river environmental flow needs assessment, (2) a stream and small rivers environmental flow needs assessment, (3) a projection of future water uses, (4) a stakeholder engagement process, and (5) development of a concept or scope for a strategic comprehensive plan for watershed management. This information can be used to balance and mitigate water use conflicts and prevent ecological degradation. To assess flow needs in the Potomac watershed, the Ecologically Sustainable Water Management (ESWM) approach was used for large rivers and the Ecological Limits of Hydrologic Alteration (ELOHA) framework was adapted for streams and small rivers. In the large rivers included in this study, based on currently available information, there has been no discernible adverse ecological impact on focal species due to human modification of flows.
    [Show full text]
  • Princetown Audio Walk Transcript
    Transcript of Audio Walk for Princetown Peter Nash – Presenter Jackie Ridley, Sustainable Tourism Officer, Dartmoor National Park Authority Ella Briens, Ranger, Dartmoor National Park Authority Track 1 – Introduction, High Moorland Visitor Centre, Princetown (Grid reference SX 591 735) Hello and welcome to Dartmoor National Park and this audio walk encapsulating the ancient settlements, railways and quarries around Princetown. The town stands at 1400ft above sea level and is surrounded by beautiful open moorland, but is famous, or rather infamous for its prison. Still very much functioning today, and an institution rather dominating the town, we are going to be heading in the opposite direction to the prison, to take in some altogether older artefacts of mankind and nature on this beautiful area of Dartmoor National Park. As with all the Dartmoor National Park Authority audio walks, we’ve divided this audio tour into several sections, each one being a separate track for you to download onto your player, and that way you can simply switch off when you are walking, and then start playing the new track at the next point of interest and I’ll give you full directions when to do this in the audio itself. You’ll also find that the names of each track include the grid reference of where you should be, so that you can follow the tour using a standard Ordnance Survey map – in this case the Explorer OL28 for Dartmoor. Or you can download the accompanying map with this audio walk so that you can have a back-up to the instructions in the audio.
    [Show full text]
  • Drainage Report City of Hesperia
    DRAINAGE REPORT CITY OF HESPERIA C.O. 7094 RANCHERO ROAD AQUEDUCT CROSSING Ranchero Road Hesperia, CA 92345 Prepared for: City of Hesperia 9700 Seventh Avenue Hesperia, CA 92345 Prepared by: Cordoba Corporation 1611 East 17th Street Santa Ana, CA 92705 July 2019 Drainage Report July 3, 2019 Ranchero Road Aqueduct Crossing Version: Final Table of Contents SECTION 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1.1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 PROJECT SCOPE ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 1 SECTION 2 SITE DESCRIPTION 2.1 TOPOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................................................ 2 2.2 GEOLOGY AND SOILS ............................................................................................................................ 2 2.3 LAND USE .............................................................................................................................................. 2 SECTION 3 DRAINAGE CONDITIONS AND FACILITIES 3.1 EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITIONS AND FACILITIES .............................................................................. 2 3.2 PROPOSED DRAINAGE CONDITIONS AND FACILITIES ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Mill on the Leybourne Stream and Its Water Management in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries
    Archaeologia Cantiana Vol. 130 - 2010 THE MILL ON THE LEYBOURNE STREAM AND ITS WATER MANAGEMENT IN THE EIGHTEENTH AND NINETEENTH CENTURIES SIMON PRATT, PETER SEARY AND SHEILA SWEETINBURGH In 2004 the Canterbury Archaeological Trust undertook a desk-based assessment of the environs of the former watermill (TQ 68715 58485) at Leybourne (Fig. 1), along with the recording of a surviving wall of the mill and a contour survey of an area to its south and west. The same area was sampled by evaluation trenching the following year (Fig. 2). These investigations into the mill’s water-management system formed part of a much broader project, commissioned and coordinated by Kent County Council, to deal with the archaeological impact of the realignment of the A228 to bypass Leybourne and West Malling. The greater part of that project is reported upon elsewhere1 whilst much of the later history of the mill has been covered in an unpublished study,2 which its author generously made available. Though some of the various phases of undated, low-level water channels identified on the valley floor (Tr.11, 18, ?19, 24 and 24A) may have fed early mills mentioned in documentary sources, there was no clear evidence that they were so associated, nor that they had been artificially diverted from their natural course. Other than these channels, only two main phases of water-management system could be identified during fieldwork and it is upon them, and contemporary documentary evidence, that this article will concentrate. The first such phase (Fig. 3) included three or four leats or ditches (A-D), most probably feeding a small mill pond.
    [Show full text]
  • Roebling's Delaware Aqueduct
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Upper Delaware Upper Delaware Scenic and Recreational River Roebling’s Delaware Aqueduct Upper Delaware Scenic and Recreational River is the home of the oldest existing wire cable suspension bridge in the nation — the Delaware Aqueduct, or Roebling Bridge as it is now known. Begun in 1847 as one of four suspension aqueducts on the Delaware and Hudson Canal, it was designed by and built under the supervision of John A. Roebling, future engineer of the Brooklyn Bridge. “Build the Canal above The Delaware and Hudson (D&H) Canal and To alleviate the bottleneck and speed the flow the River” Gravity Railroad was a transportation system of canal traffic at the Delaware River crossing, between coal fields of northeastern the D&H Canal Company approved engineer Pennsylvania and markets on the Hudson Russel F. Lord’s plan to build two aqueducts. River. It operated from 1828 until 1898. The availability and price of land along the existing route of the canal made it less When the D&H Canal was first built, a 16- expensive to reroute the canal across the foot-high slackwater dam was built to form a Lackawaxen River and through Lackawaxen, pool of deep, slow-moving water, which Pennsylvania. allowed canal boats to safely cross the river. Mules and their drivers crossed the Delaware John Roebling’s new suspension design was River on a rope ferry, while canal boats were selected for the project. Compared to poled or floated across the river to the guard conventional bridges, Roebling’s design lock.
    [Show full text]
  • Aqueduct Trail Network Trail Surface Type
    L a n c a s t e r ARLINGTONS W i n c h e s t e r ADAMS GREAT WOODS MEADOW SANDY POND DUNBACK MEADOW TRUST LAND CONSERVATION DERBY AREA PURCHASE C o n c o r d GARDNER LINCOLN Schultz HILL LAND TOWN Glenwood Camp ELEMENTARY Farm CR RESOLUTE FOREST Cemetery Virginia SCHOOL SCOUT L e x i n g t o n RESERVATION M a y n a r d MT A r l i n g t o n B o l t o n MISERY Nicewicz QUIRK CODMAN Family S t o w WELL SOUTH LINCOLN L i n c o l n Farm APR SITE Davis Farm Garber Pantry (!T C l i n t o n Conservation Brook WMA Area MIDDLESEX CO. HOSPITAL Beaver Brook North Reservation DANFORTH Pantry CREEK Brook PROPERTY Rock Meadow Farm CR Conservation Area B e l m o n t MCDOWELL/VAN SILVER Wachusett BELMONT CHESTNUT LEER LAND HILL Reservoir (!T WELL (!T Marlborough-Sudbury W a l t h a m Wachusett Aqueduct State Forest CLARK WHITE S u d b u r y STORER CEDAR HILL Chedco POND RD CAT ROCK Prospect GIRL SCOUT WAVERLEY H u d s o n CONSERVATION T Farms CR WATERSHED Assabet River HILL Hill Park CAMP (! National HASTINGS (!T Wildlife Refuge Bay WESTON COLLEGE Circuit Ross Flood CONSERVATION Trail AREA KENDAL B o y l s t o n Control GREEN Site (!T GATES HOPBROOK MARSH B e r l i n POND CONSERVATION JERICHO MEMORIAL LAND TOWN FOREST WALTHAM SIMPSON FOREST (!T RAOD PARK Great Meadows W a t e r t o w n MOUNT National Eager PISGAH Wildlife Refuge Woods CR Mt Feake Flagg Stone HIGH Linwood Cemetery Swamp WMA Charles SCHOOL Cemetery (!T MT PISGAH River Reservation CONSERVATION BRANDEIS/ROBERTS AREA W a y l a n d W e s t o n Riverbridge LYONS CUTLER North CR Nobscot Scout RAYMOND RESERVATION Ghiloni Reservation CR Mt.
    [Show full text]