Stormwater Capture Potential in Urban and Suburban California (PDF)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stormwater Capture Potential in Urban and Suburban California (PDF) JUNE 2014 ISSUE BRIEF IB:14-05-G Stormwater Capture Potential in Urban and Suburban California Communities throughout California are facing serious and growing threats to their ability to provide a safe, reliable supply of water. Drought, coupled with over-allocation of existing water sources, is affecting cities, farms, businesses, industries, and the environment all across the state. For many communities, 2013 was the driest year in a century, and the lack of precipitation has critical implications for the continued viability of surface water and groundwater resources that supply our cities. The long-term effects of climate change are likely to exacerbate this. Capturing and using or storing stormwater runoff when it rains can help communities increase water supply reliability—so they have the water they need when it doesn’t. Capturing stormwater runoff from impervious surfaces below the surface and help add to, or recharge, groundwater in urban and suburban areas when it rains—whether aquifers—vast stores of water that fill in the voids, pores, or by directing the runoff to open spaces and allowing it to cracks in soil or rocks underground. Groundwater has been infiltrate into the ground to recharge groundwater supplies used to supply growing communities in Southern California or by harvesting the runoff, primarily from rooftops, in for more than 150 years, and today it fills approximately rain barrels and cisterns for direct use in nonpotable 40 percent of the region’s overall water needs (Figure 1— applications—can be used to increase California’s water showing water supply sources for water districts in Southern supplies dramatically. In southern California and the San California including local groundwater production and Francisco Bay Area, capturing runoff using these approaches imported water sources such as the Colorado River and the can increase water supplies by as much as 630,000 acre- East and West branches of the State Water Project) (NRDC feet each year. Capturing this volume, roughly equal to 2009). It is also used extensively in other portions of the state, the amount of water used by the entire City of Los Angeles supplying communities in the Central Coast, portions of the annually, would increase the sustainability of California’s San Francisco Bay Area, throughout the Central Valley, and water supplies while at the same time reducing a leading into the Shasta-Cascade region. cause of surface water pollution in the state. However, as California’s population has grown and more and more land has been developed or redeveloped, much of the natural landscape in these developed areas STORMWATER RUNOFF, CAPTURE, has been paved over, drastically altering the hydrologic AND WaTER SUPPLY regime that replaces and recharges groundwater. When it rains on urban and suburban landscapes, impervious When it rains on undeveloped lands, much of the rainwater surfaces like streets, sidewalks, rooftops, and parking lots either soaks into the ground or evaporates. Critically in this prevent the water from soaking into the ground. This cuts system, water that is not taken up by plants can infiltrate off groundwater aquifers from a principal supply source and Figure 1. Water supply sources and dominant source type for water districts in Southern California Palmdale Glendale VENTURA LOS ANGELES Victorville } COUNTY San Fernando COUNTY Burbank Pasadena Foothill MWD SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY San Marino Calleguas MWD Ventura Los Angeles Yucaipa Valley WD Oxnard Las Virgenes MWD Upper San Gabriel San Valley MWD Inland Empire Three Valleys Utilities Agency Bernardino MWD Los Angeles Beaumont- Cherry Valley WD Central BasinvMWD Riverside Beverly Hills Santa Monica Long Anaheim Palm Beach Western MWD of Springs West Basin Riverside County MWD Santa Ana ORANGE Hemet COUNTY Eastern MWD Torrance Long Beach Compton Fullerton MWD of Temecula RIVERSIDE Orange County COUNTY Santa Ana Anaheim WATER SUPPLY - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGION Oceanside Water Supply Source SAN DIEGO COUNTY Breakout of District Water Supply by Source Escondido (district colored by dominant source) West Branch Los Angeles Aqueduct East Branch Groundwater San Diego Colorado River Other County WA Study Area Boundary Water Supply Aqueduct San or Canal Diego Water supply by district based on 2005 statistics. Map created by GreenInfo Miles Chula Network, January 2009. 0 12.5 25 Vista MEXICO Source: NRDC 2009 PAGE 2 | Stormwater Capture Potential in Urban and Suburban California West Coast groundwater basins on the coastal plain of Los Angeles, approximately 54,000 acre-feet of rain and stormwater runoff per year are currently captured and recharged, primarily by the Los Angeles County Flood Control District (Johnson 2008). But the Water Replenishment District of Southern California, which manages the groundwater basins, also must import roughly 30,000 acre-feet of water per year to make up for excess groundwater pumping by water rights holders. At the same time, an estimated 180,000 acre-feet of stormwater runoff is lost to the ocean each year from its service area (Water Replenishment District 2012), representing a lost opportunity to increase local water supplies. A vegetated swale in a parking lot QUANTIFYING THE POTENTIAL FOR © Haan-Fawn Chou STORMWATER CAPTURE leaves the water with nowhere to go but downhill. Instead In 2009, NRDC and the University of California, Santa of adding to our groundwater supplies or nourishing plant Barbara conducted an analysis of the potential stormwater life, it picks up animal waste, trash, metals, chemicals, and capture for water supply that could be achieved at new other contaminants in its path, ultimately dumping the building projects and redevelopment projects for residential pollution into rivers, lakes, or ocean waters. At the same and commercial properties in urbanized Southern California time, the drastically increased volume of runoff can lead to and the San Francisco Bay Area. Focusing on opportunities increasingly severe flooding and erosion. And even when for either infiltration of runoff to recharge groundwater it isn’t raining, water from excess landscape irrigation, car resources or rooftop rainwater capture for on-site use, washing, industrial processes, and other uses flows into the study found that stormwater capture could increase storm sewer systems—an estimated 10 million to 25 million overall water supplies by up to 405,000 acre-feet per year by gallons flow into Santa Monica Bay alone for each dry- 2030 (NRDC 2009). However, that analysis did not address weather day (City of Los Angeles 2009), and more than 100 stormwater runoff from existing development, by far the million gallons flow to the ocean from across Los Angeles largest source of runoff, and was limited in the types of land County (City of Los Angeles BOS). Altogether, hundreds of use it considered. As a result, while demonstrating a robust billions of gallons of potential water supply are thrown away potential to increase water supply through stormwater each year in a manner that endangers public health and capture, the analysis was conservative in its assessment of the ecosystems, and weakens coastal and other economies that overall potential for stormwater capture. depend on clean water for tourism revenue. To inform ongoing discussions about the drought and “Green infrastructure” is an approach to water and pressing challenges for the California water supply sector, stormwater management that, among other goals, aims we have updated this analysis using new data in order to to maintain or enhance the pre-development or natural provide a more comprehensive picture of the potential for hydrology of urban and developing watersheds. It includes stormwater capture to augment local water supplies. The a wide variety of practices that can be used to capture analysis again focused on urbanized Southern California stormwater runoff to increase water supplies at both a and the San Francisco Bay Area, as the two most heavily distributed (or on-site) scale and at subregional or regional urbanized and developed regions of the state; combined, scales. Green infrastructure may be used to promote they account for approximately 75 percent of California’s infiltration of water into the ground, where it can recharge population. groundwater supplies, or to promote its capture in rain For this analysis, we calculated the potential water supply barrels and cisterns for later use. Many California cities and that could be captured from existing impervious surfaces towns are already using a combination of distributed and in urban and suburban landscapes through infiltration or regional practices to capture stormwater and put it to use. rooftop rainwater harvesting on the basis of a GIS analysis There is a tremendous need, and opportunity, to capture of selected land uses and impervious surface cover.1 more stormwater as a way to sustainably increase water Calculations for runoff were based on an analysis of total supplies. For example, a one-inch rain event in Los Angeles impervious cover and average annual precipitation for each County can generate more than 10 billion gallons (roughly land use type.2 30,000 acre-feet) of stormwater runoff, most of which In addition to precipitation-based runoff, dry-weather ultimately flows into the Pacific Ocean. In the Central and runoff from human activities, such as landscape irrigation PAGE 3 | Stormwater Capture Potential in Urban and Suburban California Figure 2. Map of impervious surface cover within the San Francisco Bay Area study area SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA SONOMA Imperviousness COUNTY NAPA Sacramento COUNTY E Percent Imperviousness: >1 Santa Rosa SOLANO < 20% COUNTY Napa 20 - 40% } Fairfield 40 - 60% 60 - 80% MARIN COUNTY E 80 - 100% San Stockton Rafael Concord Antioch Richmond Public / Protected Open Space CONTRA COSTA R COUNTY Study Area Boundary San Oakland Francisco Livermore P Modesto ALAMEDA San COUNTY Mateo Fremont @ >1 SAN SANTA MATEO CLARA San Jose Miles COUNTY COUNTY 0 12.5 25 50 Percent imperviousness based } on USGS National Land Cover Data 2011 Percent Developed Imperviousness. Gilroy Map created May 2014.
Recommended publications
  • The Colorado River Aqueduct
    Fact Sheet: Our Water Lifeline__ The Colorado River Aqueduct. Photo: Aerial photo of CRA Investment in Reliability The Colorado River Aqueduct is considered one of the nation’s Many innovations came from this period in time, including the top civil engineering marvels. It was originally conceived by creation of a medical system for contract workers that would William Mulholland and designed by Metropolitan’s first Chief become the forerunner for the prepaid healthcare plan offered Engineer Frank Weymouth after consideration of more than by Kaiser Permanente. 50 routes. The 242-mile CRA carries water from Lake Havasu to the system’s terminal reservoir at Lake Mathews in Riverside. This reservoir’s location was selected because it is situated at the upper end of Metropolitan’s service area and its elevation of nearly 1,400 feet allows water to flow by gravity to the majority of our service area The CRA was the largest public works project built in Southern California during the Great Depression. Overwhelming voter approval in 1929 for a $220 million bond – equivalent to a $3.75 billion investment today – brought jobs to 35,000 people. Miners, engineers, surveyors, cooks and more came to build Colorado River the aqueduct, living in the harshest of desert conditions and Aqueduct ultimately constructing 150 miles of canals, siphons, conduits and pipelines. They added five pumping plants to lift water over mountains so deliveries could then flow west by gravity. And they blasted 90-plus miles of tunnels, including a waterway under Mount San Jacinto. THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA // // JULY 2021 FACT SHEET: THE COLORADO RIVER AQUEDUCT // // OUR WATER LIFELINE The Vision Despite the city of Los Angeles’ investment in its aqueduct, by the early 1920s, Southern Californians understood the region did not have enough local supplies to meet growing demands.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Erie Canal Aqueduct & Broad Street Corridor
    HISTORIC ERIE CANAL AQUEDUCT & BROAD STREET CORRIDOR MASTER PLAN MAY 2009 PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF ROCHESTER Copyright May 2009 Cooper Carry All rights reserved. Design: Cooper Carry 2 Historic Erie Canal AQUedUct & Broad Street Corridor Master Plan HISTORIC ERIE CANAL AQUEDUCT & BROAD STREET CORRIDOR 1.0 MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS 5 1.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 23 1.2 INTRODUCTION 27 1.3 PARTICIPANTS 33 2.1 SITE ANALYSIS/ RESEARCH 53 2.2 DESIGN PROCESS 57 2.3 HISTORIC PRECEDENT 59 2.4 MARKET CONDITIONS 67 2.5 DESIGN ALTERNATIVES 75 2.6 RECOMMENDATIONS 93 2.7 PHASING 101 2.8 INFRASTRUCTURE & UTILITIES 113 3.1 RESOURCES 115 3.2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Historic Erie Canal AQUedUct & Broad Street Corridor Master Plan 3 A city... is the pulsating product of the human hand and mind, reflecting man’s history, his struggle for freedom, creativity and genius. - Charles Abrams VISION STATEMENT: “Celebrating the Genesee River and Erie Canal, create a vibrant, walkable mixed-use neighborhood as an international destination grounded in Rochester history connecting to greater city assets and neighborhoods and promoting flexible mass transit alternatives.” 4 Historic Erie Canal AQUedUct & Broad Street Corridor Master Plan 1.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CREATING A NEW CANAL DISTRICT Recognizing the unrealized potential of the area, the City of the historic experience with open space and streetscape initiatives Rochester undertook a planning process to develop a master plan which coordinate with the milestones of the trail. for the Historic Erie Canal Aqueduct and adjoining Broad Street Corridor. The resulting Master Plan for the Historic Erie Canal Following the pathway of the original canal, this linear water Aqueduct and Broad Street Corridor represents a strategic new amenity creates a signature urban place drawing visitors, residents, beginning for this underutilized quarter of downtown Rochester.
    [Show full text]
  • Washita Basin Project Oklahoma
    Washita Basin Project Oklahoma James M. Bailey, Ph.D. Bureau of Reclamation 2008 0 Table of Contents Table of Contents .............................................................................................................. 1 Washita Basin Project ...................................................................................................... 2 Physical Setting ............................................................................................................. 3 Prehistoric and Historic Setting .................................................................................. 4 Project Investigation and Authorization .................................................................. 11 Project Construction................................................................................................... 16 Uses of Project Water ................................................................................................. 30 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 32 Bibliography .................................................................................................................... 33 Index................................................................................................................................. 35 1 Washita Basin Project Located adjacent to America’s arid west/humid east division line known as the 100th meridian, western Oklahoma’s rolling uplands are susceptible to unpredictable weather cycles.
    [Show full text]
  • New York City's Water Story
    New York City’s Water Story: From Mountain Top to Tap SCHOHARIE COUNTY Schoharie Reservoir 1,130 FEET Delaware Watershed Gilboa Catskill Watershed Stamford The water we use today is the same water that fell as C rain when dinosaurs roamed a D t Prattsville Siuslaw s DELAWARE COUNTY West Branch Delaware e k l i the earth. In its endless a l Windham l w a W r cycle, water is the only e a t W e GREENE COUNTY rs Schoharie Creek substance that naturally a h te e r d Grand Gorge sh exists as a solid, e d liquid or gas. Delhi Lenox Roxbury East Branch Delaware Hunter Tannersville Andes Walton HUNTER MOUNTAIN Water’s journey from 4,040 FEET mountain top to tap begins Margaretville Shandaken Tunnel when rain and snow fall on COLUMBIA COUNTY watersheds, the areas Massachusetts of land that catch, absorb, Downsville Phoenicia and carry water downhill to gently and swiftly Deposit Pepacton Woodstock flowing streams. Cannonsville Reservoir Reservoir 1,150 FEET 1,280 FEET Esopus Creek SLIDE MOUNTAIN Boiceville West Delaware Tunnel East Delaware Tunnel 4,180 FEET Streams provide life-cycle Neversink Frost Valley needs for fish and other RIver aquatic organisms. Oxygen is Ashokan Rondout trapped in the fresh water as Creek Reservoir Claryville Olivebridge 590 FEET Kingston it tumbles over rocks into deep pools. Overhanging tree branches keep water r C e A v cool as fresh water T i Grahamsville S K R DUTCHESS COUNTY continues its journey. IL L n Neversink A Neversink Reservoir Tunnel Q o s 1,440 FEET U s E d Liberty Rondout Reservoir d Water is naturally filtered D u u U 840 FEET U C C H H T by the soil and tree roots in T dense forests as it travels toward reservoirs.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulation of Flows and Water Quality in the California Aqueduct Using DSM2
    Simulation of Flows and Water Quality in the California Aqueduct Using DSM2 Siqing Liu, Bob Suits DWR, Bay Delta Office, Modeling Support Branch 2011 CWEMF Annual Meeting, February 28 –March 2 1 Topics • Project objectives • Aqueduct System modeled • Assumptions / issues with modeling • Model results –Flows / Storage, EC, Bromide 2 Objectives Simulate Aqueduct hydraulics and water quality • 1990 – 2010 period • DSM2 Aqueduct version calibrated by CH2Mhill Achieve 1st step in enabling forecasting Physical System Canals simulated • South Bay Aqueduct (42 miles) • California Aqueduct (444 miles) • East Branch to Silverwood Lake • West Branch to Pyramid Lake (40 miles) • Delta‐Mendota Canal (117 miles) 4 Physical System, cont Pumping Plants Banks Pumping Plant Buena Vista (Check 30) Jones Pumping Plant Teerink (Check 35) South Bay Chrisman (Check 36) O’Neill Pumping-Generating Edmonston (Check 40) Gianelli Pumping-Generating Alamo (Check 42) Dos Amigos (Check 13) Oso (West Branch) Las Perillas (Costal branch) Pearblossom (Check 58) 5 Physical System, cont Check structures and gates • Pools separated by check structures throughout the aqueduct system (SWP: 66, DMC: 21 ) • Gates at check structures regulate flow rates and water surface elevation 6 Physical System, cont Turnout and diversion structures • Water delivered to agricultural and municipal contractors through diversion structures • Over 270 diversion structures on SWP • Over 200 turnouts on DMC 7 Physical System, cont Reservoirs / Lakes Represented as complete mixing of water body •
    [Show full text]
  • Aqueduct Global Maps 2.0
    Working Paper AQUEDUCT METADATA DOCUMENT AQUEDUCT GLOBAL MAPS 2.0 FRANCIS GASSERT, MATT LANDIS, MATT LUCK, PAUL REIG, AND TIEN SHIAO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CONTENTS This document describes the specific characteristics of the Executive Summary........................................................1 indicator data and calculations for the Aqueduct Water Risk Total water withdrawal....................................................2 Atlas Global Maps. Complete guidelines and processes for Consumptive and non-consumptive use........................5 data collection, calculations, and mapping techniques are Total blue water (Bt)....................................................... 6 described fully in the Aqueduct Water Risk Framework.1 The Aqueduct Water Risk Atlas makes use of a Water Risk Available blue water (Ba)................................................7 Framework (Figure 1), that includes 12 global indicators Baseline water stress......................................................8 grouped into three categories of risk and one overall score. Inter-annual variability................................................... 9 Seasonal variability......................................................10 Flood occurrence......................................................... 11 Aqueduct Water Risk Framework Figure 1 | Drought severity...........................................................12 Upstream storage.........................................................13 OVERALL WATER RISK Groundwater stress ......................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Potomac River Watershed Assessment: Potomac River Sustainable Flow and Water Resources Analysis
    Middle Potomac River Watershed Assessment: Potomac River Sustainable Flow and Water Resources Analysis April 2014 Middle Potomac River Watershed Assessment: Potomac River Sustainable Flow and Water Resources Analysis United States Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore District The Natural Conservancy Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin Final Report April 2014 Recommended citation: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, The Nature Conservancy, and Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin. 2014. Middle Potomac River Watershed Assessment: Potomac River Sustainable Flow and Water Resources Analysis. Final Report. 107 pp. and 11 appendices. Cover photograph: Great Falls on the Potomac River as seen from Virginia. Jim Palmer (ICPRB) Middle Potomac River Watershed Assessment Abstract The Middle Potomac River Watershed Assessment (MPRWA) was a collaborative effort to assess the relationship between streamflow alteration and ecological response in the Potomac River and its tributaries in a study area defined as the Middle Potomac. The assessment is comprised of five distinct components: (1) a large river environmental flow needs assessment, (2) a stream and small rivers environmental flow needs assessment, (3) a projection of future water uses, (4) a stakeholder engagement process, and (5) development of a concept or scope for a strategic comprehensive plan for watershed management. This information can be used to balance and mitigate water use conflicts and prevent ecological degradation. To assess flow needs in the Potomac watershed, the Ecologically Sustainable Water Management (ESWM) approach was used for large rivers and the Ecological Limits of Hydrologic Alteration (ELOHA) framework was adapted for streams and small rivers. In the large rivers included in this study, based on currently available information, there has been no discernible adverse ecological impact on focal species due to human modification of flows.
    [Show full text]
  • Princetown Audio Walk Transcript
    Transcript of Audio Walk for Princetown Peter Nash – Presenter Jackie Ridley, Sustainable Tourism Officer, Dartmoor National Park Authority Ella Briens, Ranger, Dartmoor National Park Authority Track 1 – Introduction, High Moorland Visitor Centre, Princetown (Grid reference SX 591 735) Hello and welcome to Dartmoor National Park and this audio walk encapsulating the ancient settlements, railways and quarries around Princetown. The town stands at 1400ft above sea level and is surrounded by beautiful open moorland, but is famous, or rather infamous for its prison. Still very much functioning today, and an institution rather dominating the town, we are going to be heading in the opposite direction to the prison, to take in some altogether older artefacts of mankind and nature on this beautiful area of Dartmoor National Park. As with all the Dartmoor National Park Authority audio walks, we’ve divided this audio tour into several sections, each one being a separate track for you to download onto your player, and that way you can simply switch off when you are walking, and then start playing the new track at the next point of interest and I’ll give you full directions when to do this in the audio itself. You’ll also find that the names of each track include the grid reference of where you should be, so that you can follow the tour using a standard Ordnance Survey map – in this case the Explorer OL28 for Dartmoor. Or you can download the accompanying map with this audio walk so that you can have a back-up to the instructions in the audio.
    [Show full text]
  • Drainage Report City of Hesperia
    DRAINAGE REPORT CITY OF HESPERIA C.O. 7094 RANCHERO ROAD AQUEDUCT CROSSING Ranchero Road Hesperia, CA 92345 Prepared for: City of Hesperia 9700 Seventh Avenue Hesperia, CA 92345 Prepared by: Cordoba Corporation 1611 East 17th Street Santa Ana, CA 92705 July 2019 Drainage Report July 3, 2019 Ranchero Road Aqueduct Crossing Version: Final Table of Contents SECTION 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1.1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 PROJECT SCOPE ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 1 SECTION 2 SITE DESCRIPTION 2.1 TOPOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................................................ 2 2.2 GEOLOGY AND SOILS ............................................................................................................................ 2 2.3 LAND USE .............................................................................................................................................. 2 SECTION 3 DRAINAGE CONDITIONS AND FACILITIES 3.1 EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITIONS AND FACILITIES .............................................................................. 2 3.2 PROPOSED DRAINAGE CONDITIONS AND FACILITIES ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Mill on the Leybourne Stream and Its Water Management in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries
    Archaeologia Cantiana Vol. 130 - 2010 THE MILL ON THE LEYBOURNE STREAM AND ITS WATER MANAGEMENT IN THE EIGHTEENTH AND NINETEENTH CENTURIES SIMON PRATT, PETER SEARY AND SHEILA SWEETINBURGH In 2004 the Canterbury Archaeological Trust undertook a desk-based assessment of the environs of the former watermill (TQ 68715 58485) at Leybourne (Fig. 1), along with the recording of a surviving wall of the mill and a contour survey of an area to its south and west. The same area was sampled by evaluation trenching the following year (Fig. 2). These investigations into the mill’s water-management system formed part of a much broader project, commissioned and coordinated by Kent County Council, to deal with the archaeological impact of the realignment of the A228 to bypass Leybourne and West Malling. The greater part of that project is reported upon elsewhere1 whilst much of the later history of the mill has been covered in an unpublished study,2 which its author generously made available. Though some of the various phases of undated, low-level water channels identified on the valley floor (Tr.11, 18, ?19, 24 and 24A) may have fed early mills mentioned in documentary sources, there was no clear evidence that they were so associated, nor that they had been artificially diverted from their natural course. Other than these channels, only two main phases of water-management system could be identified during fieldwork and it is upon them, and contemporary documentary evidence, that this article will concentrate. The first such phase (Fig. 3) included three or four leats or ditches (A-D), most probably feeding a small mill pond.
    [Show full text]
  • Roebling's Delaware Aqueduct
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Upper Delaware Upper Delaware Scenic and Recreational River Roebling’s Delaware Aqueduct Upper Delaware Scenic and Recreational River is the home of the oldest existing wire cable suspension bridge in the nation — the Delaware Aqueduct, or Roebling Bridge as it is now known. Begun in 1847 as one of four suspension aqueducts on the Delaware and Hudson Canal, it was designed by and built under the supervision of John A. Roebling, future engineer of the Brooklyn Bridge. “Build the Canal above The Delaware and Hudson (D&H) Canal and To alleviate the bottleneck and speed the flow the River” Gravity Railroad was a transportation system of canal traffic at the Delaware River crossing, between coal fields of northeastern the D&H Canal Company approved engineer Pennsylvania and markets on the Hudson Russel F. Lord’s plan to build two aqueducts. River. It operated from 1828 until 1898. The availability and price of land along the existing route of the canal made it less When the D&H Canal was first built, a 16- expensive to reroute the canal across the foot-high slackwater dam was built to form a Lackawaxen River and through Lackawaxen, pool of deep, slow-moving water, which Pennsylvania. allowed canal boats to safely cross the river. Mules and their drivers crossed the Delaware John Roebling’s new suspension design was River on a rope ferry, while canal boats were selected for the project. Compared to poled or floated across the river to the guard conventional bridges, Roebling’s design lock.
    [Show full text]
  • Aqueduct Trail Network Trail Surface Type
    L a n c a s t e r ARLINGTONS W i n c h e s t e r ADAMS GREAT WOODS MEADOW SANDY POND DUNBACK MEADOW TRUST LAND CONSERVATION DERBY AREA PURCHASE C o n c o r d GARDNER LINCOLN Schultz HILL LAND TOWN Glenwood Camp ELEMENTARY Farm CR RESOLUTE FOREST Cemetery Virginia SCHOOL SCOUT L e x i n g t o n RESERVATION M a y n a r d MT A r l i n g t o n B o l t o n MISERY Nicewicz QUIRK CODMAN Family S t o w WELL SOUTH LINCOLN L i n c o l n Farm APR SITE Davis Farm Garber Pantry (!T C l i n t o n Conservation Brook WMA Area MIDDLESEX CO. HOSPITAL Beaver Brook North Reservation DANFORTH Pantry CREEK Brook PROPERTY Rock Meadow Farm CR Conservation Area B e l m o n t MCDOWELL/VAN SILVER Wachusett BELMONT CHESTNUT LEER LAND HILL Reservoir (!T WELL (!T Marlborough-Sudbury W a l t h a m Wachusett Aqueduct State Forest CLARK WHITE S u d b u r y STORER CEDAR HILL Chedco POND RD CAT ROCK Prospect GIRL SCOUT WAVERLEY H u d s o n CONSERVATION T Farms CR WATERSHED Assabet River HILL Hill Park CAMP (! National HASTINGS (!T Wildlife Refuge Bay WESTON COLLEGE Circuit Ross Flood CONSERVATION Trail AREA KENDAL B o y l s t o n Control GREEN Site (!T GATES HOPBROOK MARSH B e r l i n POND CONSERVATION JERICHO MEMORIAL LAND TOWN FOREST WALTHAM SIMPSON FOREST (!T RAOD PARK Great Meadows W a t e r t o w n MOUNT National Eager PISGAH Wildlife Refuge Woods CR Mt Feake Flagg Stone HIGH Linwood Cemetery Swamp WMA Charles SCHOOL Cemetery (!T MT PISGAH River Reservation CONSERVATION BRANDEIS/ROBERTS AREA W a y l a n d W e s t o n Riverbridge LYONS CUTLER North CR Nobscot Scout RAYMOND RESERVATION Ghiloni Reservation CR Mt.
    [Show full text]