DOCSLIB.ORG

PDF – JCAS Vol 11, Issue 1 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PDF – JCAS Vol 11, Issue 1 2013 Journal for Critical Animal Studies Volume 11 Issue 1 2013 ISSN: 1948-352X Journal for Critical Animal Studies, Volume 11, Issue 1, 2013 (ISSN 1948-352X) Journal for Critical Animal Studies Editorial Executive Board Editor Dr. John Sorenson [email protected] Brock University Associate Editors Larry Butz [email protected] Rice University Dr. Lindgren Johnson [email protected] Independent Scholar Kirby Pringle [email protected] University of Southern California Dr. Vasile Stanescu [email protected] Stanford University Dr. Susan Thomas [email protected] Hollins University Media Editor Dr. Carol Glasser [email protected] University of California, Irvine Managing Editor Drew Winter [email protected] Institute for Critical Animal Studies Editorial Board For a complete list of the members of the Editorial Board please see the JCAS link on the Institute for Critical Animal Studies website: http://www.criticalanimalstudies.org/?page_id=393 Cover Art: Photograph from We Animals (www.weanimals.org) by Jo-Anne MacArthur, with permission. Special thanks to Dr. Cory Shaman for technical support with layout and design of this issue. 1 Journal for Critical Animal Studies, Volume 11, Issue 1, 2013 (ISSN 1948-352X) JCAS Volume 11, Issue 1, 2013 Issue Editors Dr. Lindgren Johnson [email protected] Dr. Susan Thomas [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS ISSUE INTRODUCTION ..………………………………………………………………… 5-7 ESSAYS The Voice of Animals: A Response to Recent French Care Theory in Animal Ethics Josephine Donovan .………………………………………………………………………… 8-23 Feminism and Husbandry: Drawing the Fine Line between Mine and Bovine Carmen Cusack .……………………………………………………………………………. 24-45 Unpatients: The Structural Violence of Animals in Medical Education Jeff Thomas ………………………………………………………………………………… 46-62 Back to the Flesh: On Devaluation and Appreciation of Animal Being in Ecological Socialism Kris Forkasiewicz ..…………………………..…………………………………………...… 63-88 “The Paragon of Animals”? Animal Morality and Wroblewski’s Subversion of Human Exceptionalism in The Story of Edgar Sawtelle Annette Krizanich ..….……………………..…………………………………………...…. 89-107 2 Journal for Critical Animal Studies, Volume 11, Issue 1, 2013 (ISSN 1948-352X) INTERVIEW Interview with Carol J. Adams Lindgren Johnson and Susan Thomas ...…..……………………………………………... 108-132 CREATIVE WORK Allegory of the Alien Invasion Lisa Kretz ..…......……………………………………………………………………...… 133-135 Guide Human Isobel Wood …..………………………………………………………………………………. 136 BOOK REVIEWS Experiencing Animal Minds: An Anthology of Animal-Human Encounters (Julie A. Smith and Robert W. Mitchell) Karen Davis …...……..…………………………………………………………………... 137-142 Understanding Animal Abuse: A Sociological Analysis (Clifton Flynn) Jamie J. Hagen …………………………………………………………………………… 143-149 The Costs and Benefits of Animal Experiments (Andre Knight) Frances M. C. Robinson ..………………………………………………………………... 150-158 Animal Sensibility and Inclusive Justice in the Age of Bernard Shaw (Rod Preece) Will Boisseau ……….……………………………………………………………………. 159-161 FILM REVIEWS Peaceable Kingdom: The Journey Home (2010) Adam Weitzenfeld ….……………………………………………………………….…… 162-169 3 Journal for Critical Animal Studies, Volume 11, Issue 1, 2013 (ISSN 1948-352X) If a Tree Falls: A Story of the Earth Liberation Front (2011) Ian Smith ……………..………………………………………………………………...… 170-173 JCAS: SUBMISSION GUIDELINES ..……………………………………………...… 174-175 4 Journal for Critical Animal Studies, Volume 11, Issue 1, 2013 (ISSN 1948-352X) Issue Introduction Lindgren Johnson & Susan Thomas (issue editors) Work on this issue, for the two of us, began last summer when we started drafting questions for our interview of Carol Adams. In the midst of rereading Adams’ work and tossing around what we might ask her, Chick-fil-A famously made various public announcements promoting the “traditional family” and condemning non-heteronormativity. People took, as you might expect, to Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter to register their support or disdain for such a platform, “liking” their chosen side. But they also took, in the midst of a heat wave, to the hot asphalt parking lots of Chick-fil-As across the country to demonstrate. Hitting the pavement, questions of alterity—both human and animal—intersected and coincided, as chickens became the (unrecognized) bodies through which humans, however they might determine their sexual or gender identification, waged their campaigns. We revisit the events of last summer not only to introduce our interview of Carol Adams, in which she talks at length about the Chick-fil-A campaign—in addition to many other issues, including the place of direct action and the rise of the locavore movement—but to provide a frame of some sort to the essays that follow. This is not a special topics issue, so we cannot claim any intentionally consistent thread running through the contents; nonetheless, much of what follows does speak, in some sense, to the ease with which animals—whether it be their bodies, their suffering, their morality, their lives—so easily get lost. This loss is one that occurs not only in the ways they become, to coin Adams’ famous concept, absent referents, but in the ways, even when they are being seen and their voices ostensibly heard, they still face annihilation. Of course, CAS is all about demonstrating the infrastructures and ideologies that hide animals from our awareness, from any possibility of our attentiveness, so such a focus on these various losses is really nothing new; yet these essays, ranging from literary and legal analyses to an exposure of animal abuse in medical school training, also speak to and move toward the ways that animals can be seen and heard, cared for, and learned from. The issue begins with Josephine Donovan’s “The Voice of Animals: A Response to Recent French Care Theory in Animal Ethics.” Donovan examines new work in French animal care theory that builds on its American counterpart, as articulated in The Feminist Care Tradition in Animal Ethics (2007), co-edited by Donovan herself and Carol Adams. Deriving largely from 5 Journal for Critical Animal Studies, Volume 11, Issue 1, 2013 (ISSN 1948-352X) Carol Gilligan’s groundbreaking In a Different Voice (in which Gilligan explores the “different voice” of adolescent girls and, additionally, a corresponding “different ethic”—what Donovan and Adams define as an “ethic-of-care”), American animal care theory seeks to apply this feminist care-ethic by way of hearing and paying attention to animals’ own “different voice.” Working with texts that have not yet been translated into English, Donovan focuses, in particular, on the ways French care theory so often falls short of true “care” in its allowance of meat eating. As Donovan argues, care theory demands that, unlike Temple Grandin or Aldo Leopold, we not only “see animals in distress,” but we pay attention to that communication so that it registers as “sufficiently significant,” morally and politically. To truly “care,” we must hear and heed “the different voice” of animals, one that, she insists, can easily be discerned. Carmen Cusack, in “Feminism and Husbandry: Drawing the Fine Line between Mine and Bovine,” continues to explore, in her focus on the relevance of feminist approaches to animal suffering, many of the central concerns of Donovan. Cusack examines “the sexual oppression of female cows, which is unavoidable in the dairy industry,” and why it ought to be a feminist issue. Yet she also explores—and what makes her article unique—is its consideration of the interconnections of the legal terminology of rape, husbandry, and bestiality, terminology “through which feminist resistance to dairy can begin.” The next essay, “Unpatients: The Structural Violence of Animals in Medical Education,” written by Jeff Thomas, illuminates the institutionalization of violence against animals in medical school. Revealing his experience with a live dissection lab at Tulane, Thomas shows, first hand, the ironies of medical school’s insistence on harm against animals, a harm that has become so naturalized as not to warrant attention. Thomas also reveals the ways that the law might serve as the means toward the beginnings of animal justice in medical school, as he traces the process he went through in becoming a whistle blower. Following these two essays written by members of both the legal and medical communities, Kris Forkasiewicz’s “Back to the Flesh: On Devaluation and Appreciation of Animal Being in Ecological Socialism” takes us decidedly into the political realm. Forkasiewicz believes that “ecosocialists have arguably made the most headway in providing us with a framework” for exposing “capital's inherent anti-ecological tendencies.” Yet, he insists, “something crucial is missing from contemporary ecosocialist theory” in its dismissal of the somatic and bodied being of human and nonhuman animals, asserting further that the 6 Journal for Critical Animal Studies, Volume 11, Issue 1, 2013 (ISSN 1948-352X) “socioecological crisis is in fact a symptom of our deep-seated alienation from animality and from the somatic dimension of our existence.” While the essay acknowledges that it does not offer solutions, it nonetheless points, through an engagement with the work of Merleau-Ponty, Marx, Ralph Acampora, Joel Kovel, David Pepper, and Sajay Samuel (to name a few), the necessity of ecosocialism’s acknowledgement of its role in alienating the human animal and the concomitant acknowledgement of that human animal as “part of a broader community of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Animals Liberation Philosophy and Policy Journal Volume 5, Issue 2
    AAnniimmaallss LLiibbeerraattiioonn PPhhiilloossoopphhyy aanndd PPoolliiccyy JJoouurrnnaall VVoolluummee 55,, IIssssuuee 22 -- 22000077 Animal Liberation Philosophy and Policy Journal Volume 5, Issue 2 2007 Edited By: Steven Best, Chief Editor ____________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Lev Tolstoy and the Freedom to Choose One’s Own Path Andrea Rossing McDowell Pg. 2-28 Jewish Ethics and Nonhuman Animals Lisa Kemmerer Pg. 29-47 Deliberative Democracy, Direct Action, and Animal Advocacy Stephen D’Arcy Pg. 48-63 Should Anti-Vivisectionists Boycott Animal-Tested Medicines? Katherine Perlo Pg. 64-78 A Note on Pedagogy: Humane Education Making a Difference Piers Bierne and Meena Alagappan Pg. 79-94 BOOK REVIEWS _________________ Fast Food Nation: The Dark Side of the All-American Meal, by Eric Schlosser (2005) Reviewed by Lisa Kemmerer Pg. 95-101 Eternal Treblinka: Our Treatment of Animals and the Holocaust, by Charles Patterson (2002) Reviewed by Steven Best Pg. 102-118 The Longest Struggle: Animal Advocacy from Pythagoras to PETA, by Norm Phelps (2007) Reviewed by Steven Best Pg. 119-130 Journal for Critical Animal Studies, Volume V, Issue 2, 2007 Lev Tolstoy and the Freedom to Choose One’s Own Path Andrea Rossing McDowell, PhD It is difficult to be sat on all day, every day, by some other creature, without forming an opinion about them. On the other hand, it is perfectly possible to sit all day every day, on top of another creature and not have the slightest thought about them whatsoever. -- Douglas Adams, Dirk Gently’s Holistic Detective Agency (1988) Committed to the idea that the lives of humans and animals are inextricably linked, Lev Nikolayevich Tolstoy (1828–1910) promoted—through literature, essays, and letters—the animal world as another venue in which to practice concern and kindness, consequently leading to more peaceful, consonant human relations.
    [Show full text]
  • 219 No Animal Food
    219 No Animal Food: The Road to Veganism in Britain, 1909-1944 Leah Leneman1 UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH There were individuals in the vegetarian movement in Britain who believed that to refrain from eating flesh, fowl, and fish while continuing to partake of dairy products and eggs was not going far enough. Between 1909 and 1912, The Vegetarian Society's journal published a vigorous correspond- ence on this subject. In 1910, a publisher brought out a cookery book entitled, No Animal Food. After World War I, the debate continued within the Vegetarian Society about the acceptability of animal by-products. It centered on issues of cruelty and health as well as on consistency versus expediency. The Society saw its function as one of persuading as many people as possible to give up slaughterhouse products and also refused journal space to those who abjured dairy products. The year 1944 saw the word "vergan" coined and the breakaway Vegan Society formed. The idea that eating animal flesh is unhealthy and morally wrong has been around for millennia, in many different parts of the world and in many cultures (Williams, 1896). In Britain, a national Vegetarian Society was formed in 1847 to promulgate the ideology of non-meat eating (Twigg, 1982). Vegetarianism, as defined by the Society-then and now-and by British vegetarians in general, permitted the consumption of dairy products and eggs on the grounds that it was not necessary to kill the animal to obtain them. In 1944, a group of Vegetarian Society members coined a new word-vegan-for those who refused to partake of any animal product and broke away to form a separate organization, The Vegan Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Teen Stabbing Questions Still Unanswered What Motivated 14-Year-Old Boy to Attack Family?
    Save $86.25 with coupons in today’s paper Penn State holds The Kirby at 30 off late Honoring the Center’s charge rich history and its to beat Temple impact on the region SPORTS • 1C SPECIAL SECTION Sunday, September 18, 2016 BREAKING NEWS AT TIMESLEADER.COM '365/=[+<</M /88=C6@+83+sǍL Teen stabbing questions still unanswered What motivated 14-year-old boy to attack family? By Bill O’Boyle Sinoracki in the chest, causing Sinoracki’s wife, Bobbi Jo, 36, ,9,9C6/Ľ>37/=6/+./<L-97 his death. and the couple’s 17-year-old Investigators say Hocken- daughter. KINGSTON TWP. — Specu- berry, 14, of 145 S. Lehigh A preliminary hearing lation has been rampant since St. — located adjacent to the for Hockenberry, originally last Sunday when a 14-year-old Sinoracki home — entered 7 scheduled for Sept. 22, has boy entered his neighbors’ Orchard St. and stabbed three been continued at the request house in the middle of the day members of the Sinoracki fam- of his attorney, Frank Nocito. and stabbed three people, kill- According to the office of ing one. ily. Hockenberry is charged Magisterial District Justice Everyone connected to the James Tupper and Kingston case and the general public with homicide, aggravated assault, simple assault, reck- Township Police Chief Michael have been wondering what Moravec, the hearing will be lessly endangering another Photo courtesy of GoFundMe could have motivated the held at 9:30 a.m. Nov. 7 at person and burglary in connec- In this photo taken from the GoFundMe account page set up for the Sinoracki accused, Zachary Hocken- Tupper’s office, 11 Carverton family, David Sinoracki is shown with his wife, Bobbi Jo, and their three children, berry, to walk into a home on tion with the death of David Megan 17; Madison, 14; and David Jr., 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Ealr, Volume 34, Number 3
    Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review Volume 34 Number 3 Smart Brownfields Redevelopment for the 21st Century Symposium Articles Converting Brownfield Environmental Negatives into Energy Positives Steven Ferrey [pages 417–478] Abstract: There is a new paradigm for evaluating landfills. While landfills are contaminated repositories of hazardous wastes, they also are brown- fields that can be redeveloped for renewable energy development. It is possible to view landfills through a new lens: As endowed areas of renew- able energy potential that can be magnets for a host of renewable devel- opment incentives. Landfills also are critical resource areas for the con- trol of greenhouse gases. Landfill materials decompose into methane, a greenhouse gas that is more than twenty times more potent—molecule for molecule—than carbon dioxide. This Article traces the molecular composition of waste in landfills, analyzing the chemical stew that brews in these repositories. Without doubt, landfills in America are brownfields. And many of these landfills leak and cause public health risks. This Arti- cle also analyzes the potential to utilize landfill gas for electricity produc- tion or as a thermal resource. It evaluates the energy potential at munici- pal sewage treatment plants and the ability to utilize the land at landfills to host wind turbines. The environmental regulatory envelope that sur- rounds landfill operation is explored. Also analyzed are the various incen- tives that foster renewable energy development and are applicable to landfill brownfields development. These include tax credits, tax-pref- erenced financing, renewable energy credits under state renewable port- folio standard (RPS) systems in twenty-two states, and direct renewable trust fund subsidies in sixteen states, as well as net metering available in forty states.
    [Show full text]
  • Rolston on Animals, Ethics, and the Factory Farm
    [Expositions 6.1 (2012) 29–40] Expositions (online) ISSN: 1747–5376 Unnaturally Cruel: Rolston on Animals, Ethics, and the Factory Farm CHRISTIAN DIEHM University of Wisconsin, Stevens Point In 2010, over nine billion animals were killed in the United States for human consumption. This included nearly 1 million calves, 2.5 million sheep and lambs, 34 million cattle, 110 million hogs, 242 million turkeys, and well over 8.7 billion chickens (USDA 2011a; 2011b). Though hundreds of slaughterhouses actively contributed to these totals, more than half of the cattle just mentioned were killed at just fourteen plants. A slightly greater percentage of hogs was killed at only twelve (USDA 2011a). Chickens were processed in a total of three hundred and ten federally inspected facilities (USDA 2011b), which means that if every facility operated at the same capacity, each would have slaughtered over fifty-three birds per minute (nearly one per second) in every minute of every day, adding up to more than twenty-eight million apiece over the course of twelve months.1 Incredible as these figures may seem, 2010 was an average year for agricultural animals. Indeed, for nearly a decade now the total number of birds and mammals killed annually in the US has come in at or above the nine billion mark, and such enormous totals are possible only by virtue of the existence of an equally enormous network of industrialized agricultural suppliers. These high-volume farming operations – dubbed “factory farms” by the general public, or “Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs)” by state and federal agencies – are defined by the ways in which they restrict animals’ movements and behaviors, locate more and more bodies in less and less space, and increasingly mechanize many aspects of traditional husbandry.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sexual Politics of Meat by Carol J. Adams
    THE SEXUAL POLITICS OF MEAT A FEMINISTVEGETARIAN CRITICAL THEORY Praise for The Sexual Politics of Meat and Carol J. Adams “A clearheaded scholar joins the ideas of two movements—vegetari- anism and feminism—and turns them into a single coherent and moral theory. Her argument is rational and persuasive. New ground—whole acres of it—is broken by Adams.” —Colman McCarthy, Washington Post Book World “Th e Sexual Politics of Meat examines the historical, gender, race, and class implications of meat culture, and makes the links between the prac tice of butchering/eating animals and the maintenance of male domi nance. Read this powerful new book and you may well become a vegetarian.” —Ms. “Adams’s work will almost surely become a ‘bible’ for feminist and pro gressive animal rights activists. Depiction of animal exploita- tion as one manifestation of a brutal patriarchal culture has been explored in two [of her] books, Th e Sexual Politics of Meat and Neither Man nor Beast: Feminism and the Defense of Animals. Adams argues that factory farming is part of a whole culture of oppression and insti- tutionalized violence. Th e treatment of animals as objects is parallel to and associated with patriarchal society’s objectifi cation of women, blacks, and other minorities in order to routinely exploit them. Adams excels in constructing unexpected juxtapositions by using the language of one kind of relationship to illuminate another. Employing poetic rather than rhetorical techniques, Adams makes powerful connec- tions that encourage readers to draw their own conclusions.” —Choice “A dynamic contribution toward creating a feminist/animal rights theory.” —Animals’ Agenda “A cohesive, passionate case linking meat-eating to the oppression of animals and women .
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson Eight
    Class of Nonviolence – Lesson Eight Animals, My Brethren by Edgar Kupfer-Koberwitz The following pages were written in the wounded or killed for my pleasure and Concentration Camp Dachau, in the midst of all convenience? kinds of cruelties. They were furtively scrawled in • Is it not only too natural that I do not a hospital barrack where I stayed during my inflict on other creatures the same thing illness, in a time when Death grasped day by day which, I hope and fear, will never be after us, when we lost twelve thousand within inflicted on me? Would it not be most four and a half months. unfair to do such things for no other purpose than for enjoying a trifling Dear Friend: physical pleasure at the expense of others' sufferings, others' deaths? You asked me why I do not eat meat and you are wondering at the reasons of my behavior. These creatures are smaller and more helpless Perhaps you think I took a vow -- some kind of than I am, but can you imagine a reasonable man penitence -- denying me all the glorious of noble feelings who would like to base on such pleasures of eating meat. You remember juicy a difference a claim or right to abuse the steaks, succulent fishes, wonderfully tasted weakness and the smallness of others? Don't you sauces, deliciously smoked ham and thousand think that it is just the bigger, the stronger, the wonders prepared out of meat, charming superior's duty to protect the weaker creatures thousands of human palates; certainly you will instead of persecuting them, instead of killing remember the delicacy of roasted chicken.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside the H$U$ Brain
    Insidecover story the HSUS Brain You can avoid becoming a Humane Society of the United States statistic. Here’s what you need to know. By David Martosko, The Center for Consumer Freedom ike many social Full disclosure, it turns out, is movements, the bad for business. world of animal When PETA co-founder Ingrid rights is Newkirk famously said, “A rat is difficult to under- a pig is a dog is a boy,” she wasn’t stand from the out- making chit-chat. She was de- Lside. And like most animal scribing a moral philosophy—she rights groups, the Humane Soci- and millions of people living in ety of the United States (HSUS) America believe a heifer has the would rather you stay in the dark. same moral value as your child. (Continued on page 18) National Meat Association 1 7 The animal rights religion Figure out what animals need, raise money Meet the outsiders “Animal rights” is a belief system with to give it to them, steamroll inconvenient For the first 50 years of its existence, the sacraments and high priests like Newkirk and people who get in the way, and remake the HSUS was a moderate, milquetoast animal HSUS CEO Wayne Pacelle, and acolytes in world in Peter Singer’s image. protection group. It was started in 1954 by HSUS up-and-comer Paul Shapiro and Mercy Lather, rinse, repeat. For Animals founder, Nathan Runkle, among The problem is that it’s impossible to ask “Wayne Pacelle, Paul Shapiro, many others. It has its Bible (Animal Libera- heifers what they need.
    [Show full text]
  • Animals Liberation Philosophy and Policy Journal Volume 5, Issue 1
    AAnniimmaallss LLiibbeerraattiioonn PPhhiilloossoopphhyy aanndd PPoolliiccyy JJoouurrnnaall VVoolluummee 55,, IIssssuuee 11 -- 22000077 Animal Liberation Philosophy and Policy Journal Volume 5, Issue 1 2007 Edited By: Steven Best, Chief Editor ____________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Steven Best, Chief Editor Pg. 2-3 Introducing Critical Animal Studies Steven Best, Anthony J. Nocella II, Richard Kahn, Carol Gigliotti, and Lisa Kemmerer Pg. 4-5 Extrinsic and Intrinsic Arguments: Strategies for Promoting Animal Rights Katherine Perlo Pg. 6-19 Animal Rights Law: Fundamentalism versus Pragmatism David Sztybel Pg. 20-54 Unmasking the Animal Liberation Front Using Critical Pedagogy: Seeing the ALF for Who They Really Are Anthony J. Nocella II Pg. 55-64 The Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act: New, Improved, and ACLU-Approved Steven Best Pg. 65-81 BOOK REVIEWS _________________ In Defense of Animals: The Second Wave, by Peter Singer ed. (2005) Reviewed by Matthew Calarco Pg. 82-87 Dominion: The Power of Man, the Suffering of Animals, and the Call to Mercy, by Matthew Scully (2003) Reviewed by Lisa Kemmerer Pg. 88-91 Terrorists or Freedom Fighters?: Reflections on the Liberation of Animals, by Steven Best and Anthony J. Nocella, II, eds. (2004) Reviewed by Lauren E. Eastwood Pg. 92 Introduction Welcome to the sixth issue of our journal. You’ll first notice that our journal and site has undergone a name change. The Center on Animal Liberation Affairs is now the Institute for Critical Animal Studies, and the Animal Liberation Philosophy and Policy Journal is now the Journal for Critical Animal Studies. The name changes, decided through discussion among our board members, were prompted by both philosophical and pragmatic motivations.
    [Show full text]
  • Equality, Priority and Nonhuman Animals*
    Equality, Priority and Catia Faria Nonhuman Animals* Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Department of Law [email protected] http://upf.academia.edu/catiafaria Igualdad, prioridad y animales no humanos ABSTRACT: This paper assesses the implications of egali- RESUMEN: Este artículo analiza las implicaciones del iguali- tarianism and prioritarianism for the consideration of tarismo y del prioritarismo en lo que refiere a la conside- nonhuman animals. These implications have been often ración de los animales no humanos. Estas implicaciones overlooked. The paper argues that neither egalitarianism han sido comúnmente pasadas por alto. Este artículo de- nor prioritarianism can consistently deprive nonhuman fenderá que ni el igualitarismo ni el prioritarismo pueden animals of moral consideration. If you really are an egali- privar de forma consistente de consideración moral a los tarian (or a prioritarian) you are necessarily committed animales no humanos. Si realmente alguien es igualitaris- both to the rejection of speciesism and to assigning prior- ta (o prioritarista) ha de tener necesariamente una posi- ity to the interests of nonhuman animals, since they are ción de rechazo del especismo, y estar a favor de asignar the worst-off. From this, important practical consequen- prioridad a los intereses de los animales no humanos, ces follow for the improvement of the current situation of dado que estos son los que están peor. De aquí se siguen nonhuman animals. importantes consecuencias prácticas para la mejora de la situación actual de los animales no humanos. KEYWORDS: egalitarianism, prioritarianism, nonhuman ani- PALABRAS-CLAVE: igualitarismo, prioritarismo, animales no hu- mals, speciesism, equality manos, especismo, igualdad 1. Introduction It is commonly assumed that human beings should be given preferential moral consideration, if not absolute priority, over the members of other species.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethical Consistency of Animal Equality
    1 The ethical consistency of animal equality Stijn Bruers, Sept 2013, DRAFT 2 Contents 0. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................ 5 0.1 SUMMARY: TOWARDS A COHERENT THEORY OF ANIMAL EQUALITY ........................................................................ 9 1. PART ONE: ETHICAL CONSISTENCY ......................................................................................................... 18 1.1 THE BASIC ELEMENTS ................................................................................................................................. 18 a) The input data: moral intuitions .......................................................................................................... 18 b) The method: rule universalism............................................................................................................. 20 1.2 THE GOAL: CONSISTENCY AND COHERENCE ..................................................................................................... 27 1.3 THE PROBLEM: MORAL ILLUSIONS ................................................................................................................ 30 a) Optical illusions .................................................................................................................................... 30 b) Moral illusions ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Activist Influences on Public Perceptions Challenges and Opportunities
    Activist Influences on Public Perceptions Challenges and Opportunities Alberta Social License Conference March 12, 2015 Kay Johnson Smith President and CEO OUR MISSION The Alliance MONITORS animal rights activist and other detractor groups and ENGAGES proactively in those same spaces. OUR ROLE IT’S ABOUT BRINGING EVERYONE TO THE TABLE FOR GOOD. BOARD OF DIRECTORS Alltech American Farm Bureau Federation Bayer Animal Health American Feed Industry Assn. Cattle Empire LLC American National Cattlewomen Cooper Farms American Sheep Industry Assn. Diamond V American Veal Association Elanco Animal Health Iowa Soybean Association Genus/PIC/ABS National Cattlemen's Beef Assn. Hy-Line North America National Chicken Council Merck Animal Health National Milk Producers Fed. Morning Fresh Farms, Inc National Pork Board Murphy-Brown, LLC National Pork Producers Council Potash Corp. National Turkey Federation Vance Publishing United Egg Producers Zoetis United Soybean Board Dr. Robert Hagevoort, NMSU U.S. Poultry & Egg Association* Charleston/Orwig *chair KNOW THE OPPOSITION ANIMAL RIGHTS IN THE U.S. TODAY Paul Shapiro, HSUS Josh Balk, HSUS Bruce Friedrich, Farm Vice President, Farm Animal Director of Corporate Policy Sanctuary Director of Policy & Protection (formerly with Compassion Advocacy (founder - Compassion Over Over Killing) (formerly with PETA) Killing) “Veganism must become “Nothing is more “The way for farm the world baseline.” important than animals to be happy “Eating meat is unethical.” promoting would be to stop veganism." eating them.”
    [Show full text]