DOCSLIB.ORG

Klickitat County Characteristics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Klickitat County Characteristics Klickitat County, Washington Community Wildfire Protection Plan 2018 Klickitat County Emergency Management 199 Industrial Way Goldendale, WA 98620 (509) 773-0582 Prepared By Northwest Management, Inc. -This page intentionally left blank- Acknowledgements This Community Wildfire Protection Plan represents the efforts and cooperation of a number of organizations and agencies working together to improve preparedness for wildfire events while reducing factors of risk. Cities and Communities of Klickitat County: Klickitat County Fire City of Goldendale Districts City of Bingen #1-15 City of White Salmon Town of Bickleton Unincorporated Communities Town of Centerville & Town of Dallesport Local Businesses and Citizens Town of Glenwood of Klickitat County Eastern Klickitat Conservation District Town of Klickitat Central Klickitat Conservation District To obtain copies of this plan contact: Klickitat County Department of Emergency Management 199 Industrial Way Goldendale, Washington 98620 509-773-0582 i Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................... I FOREWORD .......................................................................................................................... IV SIGNATURE PAGES ............................................................................................................... VI KLICKITAT COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ............................................................................................................... VI KLICKITAT COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS AND DEPARTMENTS ....................................................................VII OTHER ADVISORY GROUP REPRESENTATIVES ...................................................................................................... X CHAPTER 1: PLAN OVERVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT ................................................................ 1 GOALS AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES ..................................................................................................................... 1 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE (GAO) ........................................................................... 3 STATE AND FEDERAL CWPP GUIDELINES ........................................................................................................... 4 INTEGRATION WITH OTHER LOCAL PLANNING DOCUMENTS .................................................................................. 4 CHAPTER 2: DOCUMENTING THE PLANNING PROCESS ........................................................... 6 DESCRIPTION OF THE PLANNING PROCESS .......................................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER 3: KLICKITAT COUNTY CHARACTERISTICS .............................................................. 11 POPULATION AND DEMOGRAPHICS ................................................................................................................. 11 LAND OWNERSHIP ....................................................................................................................................... 13 DEVELOPMENT TRENDS ................................................................................................................................ 13 AGRICULTURE ............................................................................................................................................. 14 NATURAL RESOURCES .................................................................................................................................. 14 CHAPTER 4: RISK AND PREPAREDNESS ASSESSMENTS .......................................................... 20 WILDLAND FIRE CHARACTERISTICS ................................................................................................................. 20 WILDFIRE HAZARDS ..................................................................................................................................... 22 WILDFIRE HAZARD ASSESSMENT .................................................................................................................... 33 OVERVIEW OF FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM ........................................................................................................ 47 FIRE PROTECTION ISSUES .............................................................................................................................. 62 CURRENT WILDFIRE MITIGATION ACTIVITIES .................................................................................................... 70 CHAPTER 5: LANDSCAPE RISK ASSESSMENTS........................................................................ 74 OVERALL FUELS ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................................................ 76 OVERALL MITIGATION ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................................... 80 EASTERN AND SOUTH CENTRAL LANDSCAPE RISK ASSESSMENT ........................................................................... 83 NORTH CENTRAL AND WESTERN LANDSCAPE RISK ASSESSMENT.......................................................................... 87 CHAPTER 6: MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................... 92 MAINTENANCE AND MONITORING ................................................................................................................. 93 PRIORITIZATION OF MITIGATION ACTIVITIES ..................................................................................................... 93 POLICY AND PLANNING EFFORTS .................................................................................................................... 93 FIRE PREVENTION AND EDUCATION PROJECTS .................................................................................................. 96 INFRASTRUCTURE ENHANCEMENTS ................................................................................................................. 98 PROPOSED PROJECT AREAS ......................................................................................................................... 101 ii APPENDIX 1 - MAPPING PRODUCTS ................................................................................... 112 APPENDIX 2 - DOCUMENTING THE PLANNING PROCESS ..................................................... 113 ADVISORY GROUP INVOLVEMENT DOCUMENTATION ....................................................................................... 113 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT DOCUMENTATION ...................................................................................................... 122 APPENDIX 3 - RISK ANALYSIS MODELS ............................................................................... 126 HISTORIC FIRE REGIME ............................................................................................................................... 126 APPENDIX 4 –CONTACT INFORMATION .............................................................................. 129 KLICKITAT COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENTS AND FIRE DISTRICTS ............................................................................ 129 OTHER NATURAL RESOURCES ENTITIES AND AGENCIES .................................................................................... 130 APPENDIX 5 - STATE AND FEDERAL CWPP GUIDANCE ......................................................... 131 NATIONAL COHESIVE STRATEGY ................................................................................................................... 131 NATIONAL FIRE PLAN ................................................................................................................................. 132 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE FORESTERS ............................................................................................... 133 HEALTHY FORESTS RESTORATION ACT ........................................................................................................... 136 FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY PHILOSOPHY ............................................................................ 136 APPENDIX 6 - POTENTIAL CWPP PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES ............................................ 138 APPENDIX 7 – POST FIRE RECOVERY INFORMATION ........................................................... 141 DURING THE FIRE RESOURCES ...................................................................................................................... 141 AFTER THE FIRE RESOURCES ........................................................................................................................ 141 FIRE RECOVERY SAFETY TIPS ........................................................................................................................ 144 OTHER POST-FIRE CONSIDERATIONS ............................................................................................................. 150 POST FIRE RECOVERY: WAYS TO MOVE FORWARD .......................................................................................... 152 APPENDIX 8 – GLENWOOD STRUCTURE PROTECTION PLAN ................................................ 159 APPENDIX 9 – EXPOSURE OF HUMAN COMMUNITIES TO WILDFIRE IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST ..................................................................................................................... 176 APPENDIX 10 - ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ....................................................................... 185
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Flood Basalts and Glacier Floods—Roadside Geology
    u 0 by Robert J. Carson and Kevin R. Pogue WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Information Circular 90 January 1996 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENTOF Natural Resources Jennifer M. Belcher - Commissioner of Public Lands Kaleen Cottingham - Supervisor FLOOD BASALTS AND GLACIER FLOODS: Roadside Geology of Parts of Walla Walla, Franklin, and Columbia Counties, Washington by Robert J. Carson and Kevin R. Pogue WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Information Circular 90 January 1996 Kaleen Cottingham - Supervisor Division of Geology and Earth Resources WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Jennifer M. Belcher-Commissio11er of Public Lands Kaleeo Cottingham-Supervisor DMSION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Raymond Lasmanis-State Geologist J. Eric Schuster-Assistant State Geologist William S. Lingley, Jr.-Assistant State Geologist This report is available from: Publications Washington Department of Natural Resources Division of Geology and Earth Resources P.O. Box 47007 Olympia, WA 98504-7007 Price $ 3.24 Tax (WA residents only) ~ Total $ 3.50 Mail orders must be prepaid: please add $1.00 to each order for postage and handling. Make checks payable to the Department of Natural Resources. Front Cover: Palouse Falls (56 m high) in the canyon of the Palouse River. Printed oo recycled paper Printed io the United States of America Contents 1 General geology of southeastern Washington 1 Magnetic polarity 2 Geologic time 2 Columbia River Basalt Group 2 Tectonic features 5 Quaternary sedimentation 6 Road log 7 Further reading 7 Acknowledgments 8 Part 1 - Walla Walla to Palouse Falls (69.0 miles) 21 Part 2 - Palouse Falls to Lower Monumental Dam (27.0 miles) 26 Part 3 - Lower Monumental Dam to Ice Harbor Dam (38.7 miles) 33 Part 4 - Ice Harbor Dam to Wallula Gap (26.7 mi les) 38 Part 5 - Wallula Gap to Walla Walla (42.0 miles) 44 References cited ILLUSTRATIONS I Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory Great Basin Coordination and Dispatch
    Directory Chapter 50 CHAPTER 50 - DIRECTORY GREAT BASIN COORDINATION AND DISPATCH CENTERS QUICK REFERENCE CENTER PRIMARY NUMBER PAGE NUMBER Eastern Great Basin Coordination Center 801-531-5320 50 - 2 Western Great Basin Coordination Center 775-861-6455 50 - 3 Boise Dispatch Center 208-384-3400 50 - 4 Central Idaho Interagency Fire Center 208-756-5157 50 - 5 Central Nevada Interagency Dispatch Center 775-623-1555 50 - 6 Coeur d'Alene Interagency Dispatcher Center 208-772-3283 50 - 7 Color Country Interagency Fire Center 435-865-4600 50 - 8 Eastern Idaho Interagency Fire Center 208-524-7600 50 - 9 Elko Interagency Dispatch Center 775-748-4000 50 - 10 Ely Interagency Communications Center 775-289-1925 50 - 11 Great Basin Smokejumpers - BLM NIFC 208-387-5426 50 - 12 Las Vegas Interagency Communications Center 702-515-5300 50 - 13 Moab Interagency Fire Center 435-259-1850 50 - 14 Nevada Division of Emergency Management Dispatch 775-315-2757 50 - 15 Northern Utah Interagency Fire Center 801-908-1900 50 - 16 Payette National Forest Dispatch 208-634-2757 50 - 17 Richfield Interagency Fire Center 435-896-8404 50 - 18 Sierra Front Interagency Dispatch Center 775-882-9187 50 - 19 South Central Idaho Interagency Dispatch Center 208-886-2373 50 - 20 Teton Interagency Dispatch Center 307-739-3630 50 - 21 Uintah Basin Interagency Fire Center 435-789-7021 50 - 22 50 - 1 2012 Great Basin Mobilization Guide Directory Chapter 50 UNIT: FIRE PHONE NUMBER: 801-531-5320 EASTERN GREAT BASIN COORDINATION CENTER NIGHT OR 24 HR PHONE NUMBER: 5500 W. Amelia Earhart
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Service Job Corps Civilian Conservation Center Wildland Fire
    Forest Service Job Corps Civilian Conservation Center Wildland Fire Program 2016 Annual Report Weber Basin Job Corps: Above Average Performance In an Above Average Fire Season Brandon J. Everett, Job Corps Forest Area Fire Management Officer, Uinta-Wasatch–Cache National Forest-Weber Basin Job Corps Civilian Conservation Center The year 2016 was an above average season for the Uinta- Forest Service Wasatch-Cache National Forest. Job Corps Participating in nearly every fire on the forest, the Weber Basin Fire Program Job Corps Civilian Conservation Statistics Center (JCCCC) fire program assisted in finance, fire cache and camp support, structure 1,138 students red- preparation, suppression, moni- carded for firefighting toring and rehabilitation. and camp crews Weber Basin firefighters re- sponded to 63 incidents, spend- Weber Basin Job Corps students, accompanied by Salt Lake Ranger District Module Supervisor David 412 fire assignments ing 338 days on assignment. Inskeep, perform ignition operation on the Bear River RX burn on the Bear River Bird Refuge. October 2016. Photo by Standard Examiner. One hundred and twenty-four $7,515,675.36 salary majority of the season commit- The Weber Basin Job Corps fire camp crews worked 148 days paid to students on ted to the Weber Basin Hand- program continued its partner- on assignment. Altogether, fire crew. This crew is typically orga- ship with Wasatch Helitack, fire assignments qualified students worked a nized as a 20 person Firefighter detailing two students and two total of 63,301 hours on fire Type 2 (FFT2) IA crew staffed staff to that program. Another 3,385 student work assignments during the 2016 with administratively deter- student worked the entire sea- days fire season.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Ecoregions of Idaho
    1 0 . C o l u m b i a P l a t e a u 1 3 . C e n t r a l B a s i n a n d R a n g e Ecoregion 10 is an arid grassland and sagebrush steppe that is surrounded by moister, predominantly forested, mountainous ecoregions. It is Ecoregion 13 is internally-drained and composed of north-trending, fault-block ranges and intervening, drier basins. It is vast and includes parts underlain by thick basalt. In the east, where precipitation is greater, deep loess soils have been extensively cultivated for wheat. of Nevada, Utah, California, and Idaho. In Idaho, sagebrush grassland, saltbush–greasewood, mountain brush, and woodland occur; forests are absent unlike in the cooler, wetter, more rugged Ecoregion 19. Grazing is widespread. Cropland is less common than in Ecoregions 12 and 80. Ecoregions of Idaho The unforested hills and plateaus of the Dissected Loess Uplands ecoregion are cut by the canyons of Ecoregion 10l and are disjunct. 10f Pure grasslands dominate lower elevations. Mountain brush grows on higher, moister sites. Grazing and farming have eliminated The arid Shadscale-Dominated Saline Basins ecoregion is nearly flat, internally-drained, and has light-colored alkaline soils that are Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and America into 15 ecological regions. Level II divides the continent into 52 regions Literature Cited: much of the original plant cover. Nevertheless, Ecoregion 10f is not as suited to farming as Ecoregions 10h and 10j because it has thinner soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical and Current Forest and Range Landscapes in the Interior
    United States Department of Historical and Current Forest Agriculture Forest Service and Range Landscapes in the Pacific Northwest Research Station United States Interior Columbia River Basin Department of the Interior and Portions of the Klamath Bureau of Land Management General Technical and Great Basins Report PNW-GTR-458 September 1999 Part 1: Linking Vegetation Patterns and Landscape Vulnerability to Potential Insect and Pathogen Disturbances Authors PAUL F. HESSBURG is a research plant pathologist and R. BRION SALTER is a GIS analyst, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 1133 N. Western Avenue, Wenatchee, WA 98801; BRADLEY G. SMITH is a quantitative ecologist, Pacific Northwest Region, Deschutes National Forest, 1645 Highway 20 E., Bend, OR 97701; SCOTT D. KREITER is a GIS analyst, Wenatchee, WA; CRAIG A. MILLER is a geographer, Wenatchee, WA; CECILIA H. McNICOLL was a plant ecol- ogist, Intermountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, and is currently at Pike and San Isabel National Forests, Leadville Ranger District, Leadville, CO 80461; and WENDEL J. HANN was the regional ecologist, Northern Region, Intermountain Fire Sciences Laboratory, and is currently the National Landscape Ecologist stationed at White River National Forest, Dillon Ranger District, Silverthorne, CO 80498. Historical and Current Forest and Range Landscapes in the Interior Columbia River Basin and Portions of the Klamath and Great Basins Part 1: Linking Vegetation Patterns and Landscape Vulnerability to Potential Insect and Pathogen Disturbances Paul F. Hessburg, Bradley G. Smith, Scott D. Kreiter, Craig A. Miller, R. Brion Salter, Cecilia H. McNicoll, and Wendel J. Hann Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project: Scientific Assessment Thomas M.
    [Show full text]
  • Gunnison River Interagency Handcrew Operating Guidelines
    Gunnison River Interagency Handcrew Operating Guidelines Updated 5/25/16 Gunnison River Interagency Handcrew Operating Guidelines Table of Contents Mission 2 Code of Conduct 2 Zero Tolerance Policy 2 Disciplinary Action Procedures 3 Safety 3 Crew Organization 3 Equipment Guidelines 7 Crew Boss Responsibilities 8 Logistics and Purchasing 9 Contact Name and Number 10 Appendix A 11 Appendix B 12 Appendix C 13 Appendix D 1 Gunnison River Interagency Handcrew Operating Guidelines The Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forest, Southwest District of the Bureau of Land Management, Black Canyon National Park, and Colorado Division of Fire Prevention and Control agree to participate in a Type 2 Initial Attack (IA) or Type 2 Handcrew following the guidelines and components outlined in this document. The crew will be listed as CRW2 IA or CRW2 in ROSS based on qualifications of assigned personnel. (See Appendix A). **Other wildland fire management agencies may provide crew members, when a position is available and they have qualified personnel to fill the position from within the Montrose Dispatch Area. The crew name is Gunnison River Interagency Handcrew, and is hereinafter referred to as “the crew” or “GRC”. Oversite of the crew will come from the Montrose Coordinating Group and is hereinafter referred to as “MTCG”. A working group comprised of agency representatives will be formed to review this document annually. This group will work with MTCG for review and approval of operating guidelines to ensure compliance with agency policies. Mission The Gunnison River Interagency crew will provide safe, effective support for wildland fire operations as well as other all-risk incidents within the qualifications and skills of crew personnel.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Impact Statement and Proposed Land-Use Plan Amendments for the Boardman to Hemingway Transmission Line Proje
    B2H Final EIS and Proposed LUP Amendments Appendix H—Visual Resources Supporting Data Appendix H VISUAL RESOURCES SUPPORTING DATA This appendix includes the following: Appendix H1 – Visual Analysis Unit Descriptions - Visual Analysis Unit Descriptions Table - Change in Cultural Modification to the Scenic Quality Rating Units Appendix H2 – Contrast Rating Worksheets - Baker Field Office Visual Contrast Rating Worksheets* - Malheur Field Office Visual Contrast Rating Worksheets* - Owyhee Field Office Visual Contrast Rating Worksheets* - Additional Visual Contrast Rating Worksheets Appendix H3 – Photo Simulations - Photo Simulations from Visual Resource Report 1 - Additional Photo Simulations *NOTE: For the Final Environmental Impact Statement, additional route variations have been analyzed. As a result, certain routes analyzed for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement have been renamed. They are as follows: Proposed Action changed to Applicant’s Proposed Action Alternative Burnt River Alternative to Flagstaff A – Burnt River Alternative Flagstaff Hill to Flagstaff A Alternative Double Mountain Alternative to Variation S5-B2 H-1 This page intentionally left blank. B2H Final EIS and Proposed LUP Amendments Appendix H1—Visual Analysis Unit Descriptions Appendix H1 VISUAL ANALYSIS UNIT DESCRIPTIONS The Visual Analysis Unit (VAU) descriptions are provided in Table H1-1, which includes an overall description of each VAU within the B2H Project area for visual resources. The descriptions of the units include information about the landforms, topography, water, and vegetation within the units, as well as other features and information. The VAUs are identified by two digits, followed by three numbers, and a unit name. The two digits represent the BLM field office or resource area in which the unit is located (BR=Border Resource Area; CE=Central Oregon Resource Area; BA=Baker Resource Area; MA=Malheur Resource Area; OW=Owyhee Field Office; FR=Four Rivers Field Office).
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the Columbia Plateau Regional Aquifer-System Analysis, Washington, Oregon, and Idaho
    SUMMARY OF THE COLUMBIA PLATEAU REGIONAL AQUIFER-SYSTEM ANALYSIS, WASHINGTON, OREGON, AND IDAHO PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1413-A USGS tience for a changing world Availability of Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey Order U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) publications from the Documents. Check or money order must be payable to the offices listed below. Detailed ordering instructions, along with Superintendent of Documents. Order by mail from prices of the last offerings, are given in the current-year issues of the catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Superintendent of Documents Survey." Government Printing Office Washington, DC 20402 Books, Maps, and Other Publications Information Periodicals By Mail Many Information Periodicals products are available through Books, maps, and other publications are available by mail the systems or formats listed below: from Printed Products USGS Information Services Box 25286, Federal Center Printed copies of the Minerals Yearbook and the Mineral Com­ Denver, CO 80225 modity Summaries can be ordered from the Superintendent of Publications include Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water- Documents, Government Printing Office (address above). Supply Papers, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Printed copies of Metal Industry Indicators and Mineral Indus­ Circulars, Fact Sheets, publications of general interest, single try Surveys can be ordered from the Center for Disease Control copies of permanent USGS catalogs, and topographic and and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and thematic maps. Health, Pittsburgh Research Center, P.O. Box 18070, Pitts­ burgh, PA 15236-0070. Over the Counter Mines FaxBack: Return fax service Books, maps, and other publications of the U.S. Geological Survey are available over the counter at the following USGS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Hood River/Cascade Locks, Oregon
    US Department of Agricuture FFoorreesstt SSeerrvviiccee Pacific Northwest Region (Region 6) EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY Wildland Fire Crews GS-0462-03,04,05 Handcrew/Engine Crews Hood River/Cascade Locks, Oregon Find rewarding and challenging work with the USDA Forest Service at the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area. We are recruiting crew members for our Initial Attack Handcrew based in Cascade Locks and our Wildland Fire Engines based in either Cascade Locks or Hood River. THE POSITIONS These positions are temporary seasonal employment as THE COLUMBIA RIVER GORGE NSA part of our 10-person IA Crew or our Wildland Fire Engine The Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area stretches program. Our positions begin in June, and continue into along the Columbia River between the Deschutes River November. Applications for both the Handcrew and and the Sandy River in Oregon, and Maryhill and Engine crews can be found at https://www.usajobs.gov/ Washougal on the Washington side. The cities of Hood River, The Dalles, Stevenson, White Salmon, and several Prior wildland firefighting experience is preferred, but all smaller communities all fall within the Scenic Area. The applicants with a strong work ethic and a desire to work Portland Metro area borders the Scenic Area 30 miles West outdoors in a challenging and dynamic environment are of Cascade Locks on Interstate 84. More information encouraged to apply. Applicants are expected to arrive in about the Columbia River Gorge NSA can be found at excellent physical condition, and must be able to commit to http://www.fs.usda.gov/main/crgnsa/home. a fire season of uncertain schedules and extremely long shifts of 16 hours or more.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Incident Review Summary “No One Ever Made a Decision Because of a Number
    Wildland Fire Lessons Learned Center 2019 Incident Review Summary “No one ever made a decision because of a number . They need a story.” Daniel Kahneman Psychologist and professor known for his work on the psychology of judgment and decision-making. Contents 1. Introduction……………………………..…………………………. 2 2. Fatalities……..………….………….……….….…………………… 3 3. Stop the Bleed……….…………………………………………….. 4 4. Horizontal Hazards…….………….…….………………………. 5 5. Wheels Up………..…………………………………………………. 6 6. Entrapments……...........………………………………………… 7 7. The Point Is . ……………………………………………………. 8 8. Ash Pit Burn Injuries……………………………………………..10 1. Introduction The information in this report comes from wildland fire incidents—from various agencies—submitted to and gathered by the Wildland Fire Lessons Learned Center (LLC) in 2019. The primary source of data is accident reports (FLA, RLS, SAI, etc.). Most of these reports have been posted to the LCC’s Incident Reviews Database. SAFENETs and other data sources have been included when no actual report could be located. This year we collected information on 95 incidents. We have combed through these reports and extracted specific lessons and compiled a few numbers. Use this information to inform your future operations. Turn these lessons into learning. Throughout this report, this Action Icon identifies training curriculum related to the topic. If you are an instructor, you will need to look at each exercise ahead of time to pull up videos or to print reading material. 2 2. Fatalities In 2019 there were nine wildland fire-related fatalities reported, ten fewer than 2018. There were no multiple-fatality events. Fort Jackson Prescribed Fire Fatality Occurred on a prescribed fire during ATV firing operations. Spring Coulee Fire Entrapment Fatality Entrapment, severe burn injuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Plains Interagency Handcrew Standard Operations Guide
    MID-PLAINS INTERAGENCY HANDCREW STANDARD OPERATIONS GUIDE MID-PLAINS INTERAGENCY CREW Service, Growth, Leadership 1 Service, Growth, Leadership 2 Table of Contents Purpose ........................................................................................................................ 4 Defining “Interagency” ............................................................................................... 4 Mission Statement ....................................................................................................... 4 Code of Conduct ......................................................................................................... 4 Crew Guiding Principals ............................................................................................. 4 Safety .......................................................................................................................... 5 Briefing Checklist ....................................................................................................... 5 Maintaining Reliability and Performance ................................................................... 5 Driving / Travel........................................................................................................... 5 Qualifications .............................................................................................................. 6 Organization ................................................................................................................ 6 Schedule .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2020 the Rendezvous the Newsletter of the Rocky Mountain Forest Service Association
    Te Rendezvous Spring 2020 The Rendezvous The Newsletter of the Rocky Mountain Forest Service Association R o s Volume 7 - Number 2 R c r o k e n ck y e io y M n iat ou M ai oc nta ount Ass in Forest Service Good News! Thanks to Rocky Mountaineers In this Issue The Rocky Mountaineers have established a permanent memorial college scholarship fund to assist deserving high school students who Western Heritage 4 are directly related to current Rocky Mountaineer members or are endorsed by a Rocky Mountaineer member. Membership News 6 8 One objective of the scholarship fund is to provide a donation By the Numbers opportunity for members and families, friends and associates of 9 Rocky Mountaineers who wish to honor and pay tribute to a loved Memorial Grove one. 13 The Glossary The inspiration of the Memorial Scholarship was to honor Clint Kyhl who passed in February of 2015. One of Clint’s core values, as a 17 Stayin’ at Home steward of public land, was to provide for quality and diverse 26 education experiences for families. We presented our first scholarship Training a Forester of $1500 in 2015 and awarded two additional scholarships in 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019 respectively. Regional Forester’s 30 Letter The Rocky Mountaineers are proud to announce the winners of the 2020 Memorial Scholarships! We had 29 applications this year Meet Nona Dale 34 and as usual, it was difficult to decide on the winners. Remembrances 37 This was the first year we had two scholarships just for those studying in natural resources and the first year we offered four scholarships.
    [Show full text]