DOCSLIB.ORG

R E P O R T Select Committee on Intelligence United

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
R E P O R T Select Committee on Intelligence United 1 113TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 1st Session SENATE 113–7 R E P O R T OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE UNITED STATES SENATE COVERING THE PERIOD JANUARY 5, 2011 TO JANUARY 3, 2013 MARCH 22, 2013.—Ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 29–010 WASHINGTON : 2013 VerDate Mar 15 2010 23:44 Mar 27, 2013 Jkt 029010 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\SR007.XXX SR007 pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS E:\Seals\Congress.#13 SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California, Chairman SAXBY CHAMBLISS, Georgia, Vice Chairman JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER IV, West Virginia RICHARD BURR, North Carolina RON WYDEN, Oregon JAMES RISCH, Idaho BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland DANIEL COATS, Indiana MARK UDALL, Colorado MARCO RUBIO, Florida MARK WARNER, Virginia SUSAN COLLINS, Maine MARTIN HEINRICH, New Mexico TOM COBURN, Oklahoma ANGUS KING, Maine HARRY REID, Nevada, Ex Officio Member MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky, Ex Officio Member CARL LEVIN, Michigan, Ex Officio Member JAMES INHOFE, Oklahoma, Ex Officio Member DAVID GRANNIS, Staff Director MARTHA SCOTT POINDEXTER, Minority Staff Director KATHLEEN P. MCGHEE, Chief Clerk During the period covered by this report, the composition of the Select Committee on Intel- ligence was as follows: DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California, Chairman SAXBY CHAMBLISS, Georgia, Vice Chairman JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER IV, West Virginia OLYMPIA J. SNOWE, Maine RON WYDEN, Oregon RICHARD BURR, North Carolina BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland JAMES RISCH, Idaho BILL NELSON, Florida DANIEL COATS, Indiana KENT CONRAD, North Dakota ROY BLUNT, Missouri MARK UDALL, Colorado MARCO RUBIO, Florida MARK WARNER, Virginia HARRY REID, Nevada, Ex Officio Member MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky, Ex Officio Member CARL LEVIN, Michigan, Ex Officio Member JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona, Ex Officio Member DAVID GRANNIS, Staff Director MARTHA SCOTT POINDEXTER, Minority Staff Director KATHLEEN P. MCGHEE, Chief Clerk (II) VerDate Mar 15 2010 01:28 Mar 28, 2013 Jkt 029010 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 E:\HR\OC\SR007.XXX SR007 pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS PREFACE The Select Committee on Intelligence submits to the Senate this report on its activities from January 5, 2011, to January 3, 2013. This report also includes references to activities underway at the conclusion of the 112th Congress that the Committee expects to continue into the future. Under the provisions of Senate Resolution 400 of the 94th Con- gress, the Committee is charged with the responsibility of carrying out oversight of the programs and activities of the Intelligence Community of the United States. Due to the need to protect sources and methods used by the Intelligence Community to pro- tect our nation’s security, most of the Committee’s oversight work is conducted in secret and cannot be discussed publicly. Neverthe- less, the Select Committee on Intelligence has submitted activities reports on a biennial basis since 1977 in order to provide as much information as possible to the American public about its intel- ligence oversight activities. We submit this report to the Senate in continuation of that practice. We also thank all of the members of the Committee in the 112th Congress. In particular, we would like to thank five Senators who played important roles in the oversight of the Intelligence Commu- nity who have completed their service with the Committee. Senator Snowe served on the Committee beginning in the 108th Congress in 2003 and completed her service on the Committee during the 112th Congress when she retired from the U.S. Senate. Senator Conrad served on the Committee during the 112th Congress after which he also retired from the Senate. Senator Nelson served on the Committee starting with the 110th Congress in 2007 through the 112th Congress. Senator Blunt served on the Committee during the 112th Congress. Senator McCain served as an ex officio mem- ber of the Committee while he was Ranking Member of the Senate Armed Services Committee during the 110th, 111th, and 112th Congresses. Their unique insights and perspectives contributed greatly to the Committee’s oversight work and their strong support for the Intelligence Community has helped protect our nation’s se- curity. For that, we are grateful. We also thank all the Committee’s staff during the 112th Con- gress whose diligence and professionalism have enabled the Com- mittee to fulfill its vital legislative and oversight responsibilities. DIANNE FEINSTEIN, Chairman. SAXBY CHAMBLISS, Vice Chairman. (III) VerDate Mar 15 2010 23:41 Mar 27, 2013 Jkt 029010 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 7633 Sfmt 7633 E:\HR\OC\SR007.XXX SR007 pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS VerDate Mar 15 2010 23:41 Mar 27, 2013 Jkt 029010 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 7633 Sfmt 7633 E:\HR\OC\SR007.XXX SR007 pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS C O N T E N T S Page Preface ...................................................................................................................... III I. Introduction .................................................................................................... 1 II. Legislation ...................................................................................................... 2 A. Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 ............................. 2 B. Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ............................. 3 C. Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 ............................. 4 D. Reauthorization of Title VII of FISA ...................................................... 5 E. Senate Resolution (S. Res. 86) Recognizing the Defense Intelligence Agency on its 50th Anniversary ............................................................. 6 F. Other Legislation ...................................................................................... 6 III. Oversight Activities ....................................................................................... 7 A. Hearings .................................................................................................... 7 1. Worldwide Threat ............................................................................. 7 2. Afghanistan/Pakistan ....................................................................... 8 3. Iran .................................................................................................... 9 4. Iraq .................................................................................................... 9 5. Unauthorized Disclosure of Classified Information to the Media (‘‘Leaks’’) ............................................................................................ 10 6. CIA Operation that Killed Usama bin Ladin ................................. 10 7. Oversight of Intelligence Community Counterterrorism Efforts .. 10 8. Cybersecurity .................................................................................... 11 9. Covert action ..................................................................................... 11 10. Counterproliferation ......................................................................... 12 11. Implementation of FISA Authorities .............................................. 12 B. Inquiries and Reviews ............................................................................. 13 1. Study of the CIA’s Detention and Interrogation Program ............ 13 2. Committee Review of Intelligence Issues Related to the Septem- ber 11, 2012, Terrorist Attacks in Benghazi, Libya ...................... 14 C. Intelligence Community Issues ............................................................... 15 1. Response to Unauthorized Disclosures of Classified Information 15 2. Information Sharing ......................................................................... 15 3. Strategic Plan ................................................................................... 16 4. Role of the Intelligence Community in the United States Export Control Regime ................................................................................. 16 5. Core Contractors .............................................................................. 17 6. Comptroller General Access to Intelligence Community Informa- tion ..................................................................................................... 17 7. Cyber Analysis .................................................................................. 18 8. Analysis on North Korea ................................................................. 18 9. Intelligence Advance Research Projects Activity ........................... 18 10. Intelligence Community Information Technology Enterprise ....... 19 11. Space Launch .................................................................................... 19 12. Defense Clandestine Service and Defense Intelligence Agency Vision 2020 ....................................................................................... 19 13. Analysis ............................................................................................. 20 14. Committee Review of Arab Spring Analysis and Production ....... 20 15. Foreign Language Capabilities ....................................................... 20 16. Education and Training ................................................................... 21 17. Counterintelligence .......................................................................... 21 18. Accounting Standards and Auditability ......................................... 21 19. Improper Payments .........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Domestic Security: Confronting a Changing Threat to Ensure Public Safety and Civil Liberties 1
    Domestic Security: Confronting a Changing Threat to Ensure Public Safety and Civil Liberties 1 Domestic Security: Confronting a Changing Threat to Ensure Public Safety and Civil Liberties 2 Domestic Security: Confronting a Changing Threat to Ensure Public Safety and Civil Liberties BENS Practitioners Panel Michael Allen Thomas Kean Former Majority Staff Director House Perma- Chair, The National Commission on Terrorist nent Select Committee on Intelligence United Attacks Upon the United States States House of Representatives Former Governor of New Jersey Alfred Berkeley Michael Leiter Vice Chair National Infrastructure Advisory Former Director of the National Counterter- Council rorism Center Former President NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. Joseph Lieberman Michael Chertoff (Vice Chair) Former United States Senator (CT) Former Secretary of Homeland Security Former Chairman Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee Commissioner Edward Davis United States Senate Former Commissioner, Boston Police Department James Locher Former Assistant Secretary of Defense for Robert Graham (Vice Chair) Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict Former Governor of Florida Former Chairman Senate Select Committee Steven McCraw (Vice Chair) on Intelligence United States Senate Director, Texas Department of Public Safety Homeland Security Advisor to the Governor David Hall of Texas Director Missouri Information and Analysis Center Norton Schwartz (Chair) President & CEO Business Executives Lee Hamilton for National Security Former United States Representative (IN) Vice Chair The National Commission Maurice Sonnenberg on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States Former Member President’s Intelligence Advisory Board Michael Hayden Vice Chair Report of the National Former Director CIA Commission on Terrorism Former Director NSA Frances Townsend Brian Michael Jenkins Former Assistant to the President for Home- Senior Advisor to the President RAND land Security and Counterterrorism Corporation Juan Zarate Loch K.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from Fort Hood: Improving Our Ability to Connect the Dots
    LESSONS FROM FORT HOOD: IMPROVING OUR ABILITY TO CONNECT THE DOTS HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT, INVESTIGATIONS, AND MANAGEMENT OF THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION SEPTEMBER 14, 2012 Serial No. 112–118 Printed for the use of the Committee on Homeland Security Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 81–127 PDF WASHINGTON : 2013 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY PETER T. KING, New York, Chairman LAMAR SMITH, Texas BENNIE G. THOMPSON, Mississippi DANIEL E. LUNGREN, California LORETTA SANCHEZ, California MIKE ROGERS, Alabama SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas HENRY CUELLAR, Texas GUS M. BILIRAKIS, Florida YVETTE D. CLARKE, New York PAUL C. BROUN, Georgia LAURA RICHARDSON, California CANDICE S. MILLER, Michigan DANNY K. DAVIS, Illinois TIM WALBERG, Michigan BRIAN HIGGINS, New York CHIP CRAVAACK, Minnesota CEDRIC L. RICHMOND, Louisiana JOE WALSH, Illinois HANSEN CLARKE, Michigan PATRICK MEEHAN, Pennsylvania WILLIAM R. KEATING, Massachusetts BEN QUAYLE, Arizona KATHLEEN C. HOCHUL, New York SCOTT RIGELL, Virginia JANICE HAHN, California BILLY LONG, Missouri RON BARBER, Arizona JEFF DUNCAN, South Carolina TOM MARINO, Pennsylvania BLAKE FARENTHOLD, Texas ROBERT L. TURNER, New York MICHAEL J. RUSSELL, Staff Director/Chief Counsel KERRY ANN WATKINS, Senior Policy Director MICHAEL S. TWINCHEK, Chief Clerk I. LANIER AVANT, Minority Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT, INVESTIGATIONS, AND MANAGEMENT MICHAEL T.
    [Show full text]
  • Predator Empire: the Geopolitics of US Drone Warfare Ian G
    This article was downloaded by: [Virginia Commonwealth University Libraries] On: 26 June 2013, At: 16:12 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Geopolitics Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fgeo20 Predator Empire: The Geopolitics of US Drone Warfare Ian G. R. Shaw a a School of Geographical and Earth Sciences , The University of Glasgow , Scotland Published online: 14 Jun 2013. To cite this article: Ian G. R. Shaw (2013): Predator Empire: The Geopolitics of US Drone Warfare, Geopolitics, DOI:10.1080/14650045.2012.749241 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2012.749241 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. Geopolitics,00:1–24,2013 Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 1465-0045 print / 1557-3028 online DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2012.749241 Predator Empire: The Geopolitics of US Drone Warfare IAN G.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan for Hunting Terrorists Signals U.S. Intends to Keep Adding Names to Kill Lists - the Wa
    Plan for hunting terrorists signals U.S. intends to keep adding names to kill lists - The Wa... Page 1 of 7 Back to previous page Plan for hunting terrorists signals U.S. intends to keep adding names to kill lists By Greg Miller, Published: October 23 Over the past two years, the Obama administration has been secretly developing a new blueprint for pursuing terrorists, a next-generation targeting list called the “disposition matrix.” The matrix contains the names of terrorism suspects arrayed against an accounting of the resources being marshaled to track them down, including sealed indictments and clandestine operations. U.S. officials said the database is designed to go beyond existing kill lists, mapping plans for the “disposition” of suspects beyond the reach of American drones. Although the matrix is a work in progress, the effort to create it reflects a reality setting in among the nation’s counterterrorism ranks: The United States’ conventional wars are winding down, but the government expects to continue adding names to kill or capture lists for years. Among senior Obama administration officials, there is a broad consensus that such operations are likely to be extended at least another decade. Given the way al-Qaeda continues to metastasize, some officials said no clear end is in sight. “We can’t possibly kill everyone who wants to harm us,” a senior administration official said. “It’s a necessary part of what we do. We’re not going to wind up in 10 years in a world of everybody holding hands and saying, ‘We love America.’ ” That timeline suggests that the United States has reached only the midpoint of what was once known as the global war on terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • The FBI: Protecting the Homeland in the 21St Century
    EMBARGOED until 10 a.m., March 25, 2015 UNCLASSIFIED (U) The FBI: Protecting the Homeland in the 21st Century (U) Report of the Congressionally-directed (U) 9/11 Review Commission To (U) The Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation By (U) Commissioners Bruce Hoffman Edwin Meese III Timothy J. Roemer EMBARGOED(U) March 2015 EMBARGOED until 10 a.m., March 25, 2015 UNCLASSIFIED EMBARGOED until 10 a.m., March 25, 2015 UNCLASSIFIED EMBARGOED 1 EMBARGOED until 10 a.m., March 25, 2015 UNCLASSIFIED EMBARGOED until 10 a.m., March 25, 2015 UNCLASSIFIED (U) TABLE OF CONTENTS (U) Introduction: The 9/11 Review Commission…..……….………........ p. 3 (U) Chapter I: Baseline: The FBI Today…………………………….. p. 15 (U) Chapter II: The Sum of Five Cases………………….……………. p. 38 (U) Chapter III: Anticipating New Threats and Missions…………....... p. 53 (U) Chapter IV: Collaboration and Information Sharing………………. p. 73 (U) Chapter V: New Information Related to the 9/11 Attacks………… p. 100 (U) Key Findings and Recommendations…………………………………. p. 108 (U) Conclusion: ………………………………………………………… p. 118 (U) Appendix A: Briefs Provided by FBI Headquarters Divisions.…..… p. 119 (U) Appendix B: Interviews Conducted……… ………………………. p. 121 (U) Appendix C: Select FBI Intelligence Program Developments…….… p. 122 (U) Appendix D: Acronyms……………… …………………………… p. 124 EMBARGOED 2 EMBARGOED until 10 a.m., March 25, 2015 UNCLASSIFIED EMBARGOED until 10 a.m., March 25, 2015 UNCLASSIFIED (U) INTRODUCTION THE FBI 9/11 REVIEW COMMISSION (U) The FBI 9/11 Review Commission was established in January 2014 pursuant to a congressional mandate.1 The United States Congress directed the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI, or the “Bureau”) to create a commission with the expertise and scope to conduct a “comprehensive external review of the implementation of the recommendations related to the FBI that were proposed by the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (commonly known as the 9/11 Commission).”2 The Review Commission was tasked specifically to report on: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 9/11, Counterterrorism and the Senior Interagency Strategy Team
    INTERAGENCY STUDY A SpeciAl Study publiShed by the SimonS center for interAgency cooperAtion • iAS-003 • April 2014 9/11, COUNTERTERRORISM AND THE SENIOR INTERAGENCY STRATEGY TEAM INTERAGENCY SMALL GROUP PERFORMANCE IN STRATEGY FORMULATION AND IMPLEMENTATION by Christopher Lamb and Erin Staine-Pyne President Barrack Obama meets with NCTC Director Michael Leiter (center right) at the National Counterterrorism Center in McLean, Va., Oct. 6, 2009. White House photo by Samantha Appleton 9/11, Counterterrorism, and the Senior Interagency Strategy Team Interagency Small Group Performance in Strategy Formulation and Implementation by Christopher Lamb and Erin Staine-Pyne Arthur D. Simons Center for Interagency Cooperation Fort Leavenworth, Kansas interAgency Study no. 003, April 2014 9/11, Counterterrorism, and the Senior Interagency Strategy Team Interagency Small Group Performance in Strategy Formulation and Implementation by Christopher Lamb and Erin Staine-Pyne Abstract The belief that better information-sharing among national security departments and agencies could have prevented 9/11 motivated the President and Congress to create new institutions to safeguard the nation against catastrophic terrorist attacks. The National Counterterrorism Center in particular was designed to improve interagency coordination for the counterterrorism mission. Inside the Center, a small interagency group called the “Senior Interagency Strategy Team” (SIST) was established to serve as the primary organizational mechanism for interagency collaboration. Initially, the high-level group was successful. Buoyed by the national counterterrorism consensus following 9/11, the group produced the first National Implementation Plan for the War on Terror. However, the plan was poorly received, and the SIST’s prominent role and productivity fell precipitously thereafter, so much so that all subsequent leaders of the group questioned the value of its existence.
    [Show full text]
  • Leaving Guantanamo
    JANUARY 2012 HASC COMMITTEE PRINT 112-4 2120 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON, DC 20515 202.225.4151 ARMEDSERVICES.HOUSE.GOV LEAVING GUANTANAMO LEAVING As of September 2011, the LEAVING U.S. government believed that 27 percent of former GTMO detainees were confi rmed or suspected to have been engaged GUANTANAMO in terrorist or insurgent activities. POLICIES, PRESSURES, AND DETAINEES RETURNING TO THE FIGHT SUSPECTED OR CONFIRMED HASC 71-370_cover.indd 1 3/14/12 12:44 PM JANUARY 2012 HASC COMMITTEE PRINT 112-4 2120 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON, DC 20515 202.225.4151 ARMEDSERVICES.HOUSE.GOV LEAVING GUANTANAMO LEAVING As of September 2011, the LEAVING U.S. government believed that 27 percent of former GTMO detainees were confi rmed or suspected to have been engaged GUANTANAMO in terrorist or insurgent activities. POLICIES, PRESSURES, AND DETAINEES RETURNING TO THE FIGHT SUSPECTED OR CONFIRMED HASC 71-370_cover.indd 1 3/14/12 12:44 PM SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND INVESTIGATIONS of the COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 71-370_text_CX.indd i 3/23/12 8:55 AM ….we have been very selective in terms of returning people. One of the things we have discovered over time is that we are not particularly good at predicting which returnee will be a recidivist. Some of those that we have considered the most dangerous and who have been released or who we considered dangerous and potentially going back into the fi ght have not, and some that we evaluated as SECRETARY OF DEFENSE ROBERT GATES not being much of a danger or much of a risk FEBRUARY 17, 2011 we have discovered in the fi ght.
    [Show full text]
  • Ideology and Terror: Understanding the Tools, Tactics, and Techniques of Violent Extremism
    S. Hrg. 115–309 IDEOLOGY AND TERROR: UNDERSTANDING THE TOOLS, TACTICS, AND TECHNIQUES OF VIOLENT EXTREMISM HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JUNE 14, 2017 Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdsys.gov/ Printed for the use of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 27–393 PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS RON JOHNSON, Wisconsin, Chairman JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona CLAIRE MCCASKILL, Missouri ROB PORTMAN, Ohio THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware RAND PAUL, Kentucky JON TESTER, Montana JAMES LANKFORD, Oklahoma HEIDI HEITKAMP, North Dakota MICHAEL B. ENZI, Wyoming GARY C. PETERS, Michigan JOHN HOEVEN, North Dakota MAGGIE HASSAN, New Hampshire STEVE DAINES, Montana KAMALA D. HARRIS, California CHRISTOPHER R. HIXON, Staff Director GABRIELLE D’ADAMO SINGER, Chief Counsel DANIEL P. LIPS, Policy Director MARGARET E. DAUM, Minority Staff Director JULIE G. KLEIN, Minority Professional Staff Member LAURA W. KILBRIDE, Chief Clerk BONNI E. DINERSTEIN, Hearing Clerk (II) C O N T E N T S Opening statements: Page Senator Johnson ............................................................................................... 1 Senator McCaskill ............................................................................................ 3 Senator Hassan ................................................................................................. 17 Senator
    [Show full text]
  • National Security Law: a Career Guide
    National Security Law: A Career Guide Bernard Koteen Office of Public Interest Advising Harvard Law School Bernard Koteen Office of Public Interest Advising Harvard Law School Wasserstein Hall, Suite 4039 Cambridge, MA 02138 (617) 495-3108 Fax: (617) 496-4944 [email protected] www.law.harvard.edu/students/opia © 2014 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College 1 Table of Contents Acknowledgments 2 Introduction to National Security Law 3 Chapter 1: Career Opportunities in the Federal Government 5 The Executive Branch The Department of Justice: Prosecuting National Security Law Capitol Hill Chapter 2: Career Opportunities in the Military 14 Chapter 3: Career Opportunities at the State/Local Level 16 Chapter 4: Career Opportunities at Advocacy Organizations 18 Chapter 5: Career Opportunities at Think Tanks 20 Chapter 6: Preparing for a Career in National Security Law 21 Chapter 7: Personal Narratives 28 Directory of Organizations 53 Acknowledgements Many thanks to all those who are dedicating their efforts to national security, both in government and in non-profit and advocacy work. We are particularly grateful to Jamil N. Jaffer, Carrie F. Cordero, Matthew Olsen, Juliette Kayyem, Eugene R. Fidell, Michael Bahar, Rebecca Weiner, Michael Leiter, and Lindsay Rodman for providing personal narratives for the guide, and to the staff and interns at OPIA. 2 INTRODUCTION TO NATIONAL SECURITY LAW National Security Law (NSL) first began to surface in the law school curricula in the late 1980s. The field has burgeoned since September 11, 2001, for obvious reasons. The demand for NSL lawyers has intensified, within and outside government, as has scholarly interest in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 the Islamophobia Misinformation Experts
    Chapter 2 The Islamophobia misinformation experts A small group of conservative foundations and wealthy donors are the lifeblood of the Islamophobia network in America, supporting a central nervous system con- sisting of a clutch of misinformation experts. Just as Newt Gingrich relied on these experts’ talking points to grossly mischaracterize the dangers of Sharia law in our country, the five men profiled in this chapter are responsible for orchestrating the majority of misinformation about Islam and Muslims in America today. This small network produces talking points and messages relied upon and repeated by every segment of this interconnected network of money, grassroots leaders, media talk- ing heads, and elected officials. There are five key think tanks led by scholars who are primarily responsible for orchestrating the majority of anti-Islam messages polluting our national discourse today: • Frank Gaffney at the Center for Security Policy • David Yerushalmi at the Society of Americans for National Existence • Daniel Pipes at the Middle East Forum • Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch and Stop Islamization of America • Steven Emerson of the Investigative Project on Terrorism All five are actively promoting the deeply mistaken portrayal of Islam—a religion of nearly 1.6 billion people worldwide, including 2.6 million Americans—as an inherently violent ideology that seeks domination over the United States and all non-Muslims.1 Spencer neatly sums up their inaccurate and perverse view of Islam as “the only religion in the world that has a
    [Show full text]
  • BGR 2018 Annual Luncheon Release
    Officers Hardy B. Fowler Chairman BGR Media Release Ludovico Feoli Vice Chairman For Immediate Release – October 17, 2018 J. Storey Charbonnet Secretary Contact: Norma Grace Marci Schramm Treasurer Director of Membership and Engagement Nathalie G. Simon [email protected] Assistant Secretary (504) 525-4152, ext. 108 Todd McDonald Assistant Treasurer Past Chairman Mark A. Mayer BGR Announces 2018 Annual Luncheon Speaker, President & CEO National Security Expert Michael E. Leiter Amy L. Glovinsky Leiter, former director of the National Counterterrorism Board Members Christine Albert Center, has served in numerous high-level counterterrorism Anne P. Baños and cybersecurity positions Toya Barnes-Teamer Susan G. Brennan Kelly R. Brown NEW ORLEANS, LA (October 17, 2018) –The Bureau of Charmaine Caccioppi Governmental Research (BGR) announced its 2018 annual luncheon Andrea Chen Maureen Clary speaker, Michael E. Leiter, the former director of the National Jaimmé A. Collins Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) under Presidents George W. Bush and Leah N. Engelhardt Louis M. Freeman, Jr. Barack Obama. At the luncheon, Leiter will discuss “Counterterrorism Alex Gershanik and Cybersecurity: National Security Challenges for the Present and the Hunter G. Hill H. Merritt Lane, III Future.” The luncheon will take place Friday, December 7, at 12:00 p.m. Andrew R. Lee at the New Orleans Marriott hotel located at 555 Canal St. Martin Mayer Jennifer Medbery “BGR is honored to have Michael Leiter as our keynote speaker this year, Jennifer M. Neil Melissa Sawyer and he continues our tradition of presenting some of the country’s most Slade Simons respected thought leaders to headline our annual luncheon,” said BGR Blake J.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael E. Leiter
    Michael E. Leiter Partner, Washington, D.C. National Security; CFIUS; Cybersecurity and Privacy; Congressional Investigations and Government Policy Michael Leiter heads the firm’s CFIUS and national security practice. He represents clients in a broad range of transactions, investigations and incidents involving U.S. national security. He also co-leads the firm’s cybersecurity practice and has an additional focus on aerospace and defense mergers and acquisitions, and government relations and investigations. Mr. Leiter has significant experience navigating national security reviews before CFIUS and negotiating complex mitigation agreements across the full range of business sectors, having represented corporations, private equity, venture capital and sovereign wealth funds. In 2021, he was named by Foreign Investment Watch as one of its Top Advisors, a listing recognizing “top global CFIUS experts.” Mr. Leiter also has been recognized as a leading lawyer in Chambers USA. Mr. Leiter also has assisted clients in matters involving the Defense Counterintelligence Security Agency, export controls, aerospace and defense, government services-related T: 202.371.7540 mergers and acquisitions, and government contracting. In addition to his transaction F: 202.661.0540 practice, Mr. Leiter has extensive experience with all aspects of cybersecurity based on his [email protected] previous private sector experience and through serving in senior national security positions in the federal government in which he oversaw numerous legal and operational aspects of cybersecurity. He routinely works with clients on issues that include cybersecurity Education preparedness, breach response, and board and corporate leadership counseling. J.D., Harvard Law School, 2000 (magna cum laude; President (Editor-in-Chief), His recent transactional experience includes representing, among others: Harvard Law Review) - Amadeus IT Group in its $1.5 billion acquisition of TravelClick, Inc.
    [Show full text]