DOCSLIB.ORG

NYS Food Scraps Recyclers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NYS Food Scraps Recyclers Updated 9/21/21 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Materials Management FOOD SCRAP RECYCLERS Food Donation and Food Scraps Recycling Law The Environmental Conservation Law Section 27-2211(1) requires the Department to publish a list of organics recyclers that manage source-separated organics. The information provided in the following fulfills that requirement. The information provided reflects current records of the Department, however, data changes may occur each business day. The following list was compiled to assist large businesses and institutions in identifying facilities across the state that offer food scraps recycling services. This is not an endorsement of the following companies or guarantee of food scraps recycling services. Note: If you are an organics recycler, not listed below, that offers food scraps recycling services for large businesses, please contact [email protected]. Sorted by Region of State Where The Food Scraps Recycling Facility Is Located LONG ISLAND Grounds For A Peel Composting, Inc. Address: 178 Oxhead Road, Centereach, NY 11720 Phone Number: 917-647-7348 Website: https://groundsforapeel.com NEW YORK CITY Waste Management / Varick CORe Facility Address: 221 Varick Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11237 Phone Number: 718-612-5203 Website: https://www.wm.com/us/en/inside-wm/sustainable-technology/organics-recycling HUDSON VALLEY Community Compost / Arrowhead Farm Address: 5941 Route 209, Kerhonkson, NY 12446 Phone Number: 845-787-DIRT Website: https://www.communitycompostco.com Greenway Environmental / Hurds Farm Compost Address: 205 Hurds Road, Clintondale, NY 12515 Phone Number: 845-656-6071 Website: https://www.greenwayny.com Updated 9/21/21 Sorted by Region of State Where The Food Scraps Recycling Facility Is Located HUDSON VALLEY CONT. McEnroe Organic Farm Address: 194 Coleman Station Road, Millerton, NY 12546 Phone Number: 845-789-3252 Website: http://www.mcenroeorganicfarm.com/ Sustainable Materials Management, Inc. Address: 2 Bayview Road, Cortlandt Manor, NY 10567 Phone Number: 914-265-6067 Website: https://www.smmcompost.com Ulster County Resource Recovery Facility Address: 999 Flatbush Road, Kingston, NY 12401 Phone Number: 845-336-0600 Website: https://www.ucrra.org CAPITAL REGION Almstead Nursery and Mulch Address: 905 NYS Route 66, Claverack, NY 12535 Phone Number: 518-249-1238 Website: http://www.almsteadmulch.com Town of Bethlehem Compost Facility Address: 74 Elm Avenue East, Selkirk, NY12158 Phone Number: 518-439-4955 ext 1510 Website: http://www.townofbethlehem.org/125/Compost-Facility NORTH COUNTRY Blue Line Compost Address: 1421 State Route 3 Saranac Lake, NY 12983 Phone Number: (518) 304-3688 Website: https://bluelinecompost.com/ Pleasant Valley Compost Address: 37 Pleasant Valley Road, Argyle, NY 12809 Phone Number: Website: Updated 9/21/21 Sorted by Region of State Where The Food Scraps Recycling Facility Is Located MOHAWK VALLEY/CENTRAL NEW YORK/FINGER LAKES Cayuga Compost Address: 3225 Agard Road, Trumansburg, NY 14886 Phone Number: 607-387-6826 Website: www.cayugacompost.com Cayuga Regional Digester & Bioenergy Enterprise Address: 7389 County House Road, Auburn, NY 13021 Phone Number: 914-774-0212 Website: www.cayugadigester.com Closed Loop Systems Address: 41 Doran Avenue, Geneva, NY 14456 Phone Number: 315-719-6343 Website: https://closedloopsys.com FLX Scraps to Gardens / Finger Lakes Compost, LLC Address: 4420 Pre Emption Road, Rock Stream, NY 14878 Phone Number: 315-335-0424 Website: www.fingerlakescompost.com OCRRA Amboy Compost Site Address: 6296 Airport Road Camillus, NY 13209 Phone Number: 315-453-2866 Website: https://ocrra.org/locations/compost-locations/amboy-compost-site/ Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Authority Address: 80 Leland Ave, Utica, NY 13502 Phone Number: 315-733-1224 Website: https://www.ohswa.org Seward Sand and Gravel, Inc. Address: 532 County Highway 58, Oneonta, NY 13820 Phone Number: 607-432-1653 Website: https://www.sewardsandandgravel.com Tompkins County Recycling and Solid Waste Center Address: 160 Commercial Avenue, Ithaca, NY14850 Phone Number: 607-273-6632 Website: https://recycletompkins.org Vermi-Green, LLC Address: 744 Yellowmills Road, Palmyra, NY 14522 Phone Number: 585-289-7267 Website: https://www.vermigreen.com Updated 9/21/21 Sorted by Region of State Where The Food Scraps Recycling Facility Is Located WESTERN NEW YORK Baskin Livestock Address: 9778 Creek Rd, Batavia, NY 14020 Phone Number: 585-344-4452 Website: http://baskinlivestock.com/ Buffalo River Compost Address: 47 Ensign Street, Buffalo, NY 14210 Website: www.noco.com Generate Buffalo Digester, LLC Address: 2900 North America Drive, West Seneca, NY 14224 Phone Number: 716-970-4746 Website: https://www.buffalodigester.com Generate Niagara Digester, LLC Address: 2175 Liberty Drive, Wheatfield, NY 14304 Phone Number: 716-313-4746 Website: www.generatecapital.com Good Earth Organics Corp. Address: 5960 Broadway, Lancaster, NY 14086 Phone Number: 716-684-8111 Website: https://goodearth.org/home/content/4-good-earth-organics Modern Landfill, Inc. Address: 1445 Pletcher Road, Model City, NY 14107 Phone Number: 800-330-7107 Website: https://www.moderncorporation.com Noblehurst Farms / Natural Upcycling Address: 1801 Craig Rd, Pavilion, NY 14525 Phone Number: 585-584-3124 Website: http://naturalupcycling.com Synergy Biogas Address: 6466 Lemley Road, Covington, NY 14591 Phone Number: 203-869-1446 Website: https://ch4biogas.com/projects/synergy-biogas/ Updated 9/21/21 Sorted by Region of State Where The Food Scraps Recycling Facility Is Located OUT OF STATE Waste Management / Flora CORe Facility (NJ) Address: 847 Flora Street, Elizabeth, NJ 07201 Phone Number: 718-612-5203 Website: https://www.wm.com/us/en/inside-wm/sustainable-technology/organics-recycling .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Five Principles of Waste Product Redesign Under the Upcycling Concept
    International Forum on Energy, Environment Science and Materials (IFEESM 2015) Five Principles of Waste Product Redesign under the Upcycling Concept Jiang XU1 & Ping GU1 1School of Design, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China KEYWORD: Upcycling; Redesign principle; Green design; Industrial design; Product design ABSTRACT: It explores and constructs the principles of waste product redesign which are based on the concept of upcycling. It clarifies the basic concept of upcycling, briefly describes its current development, deeply discusses its value and significance, combines with the idea of upcycling which behinds regeneration design principle from the concept of “4R” of green design, and takes real-life case as example to analyze the principles of waste product redesign. It puts forward five principles of waste product redesign: value enhancement, make the most use of waste, durable and environmental protection, cost control and populace's aesthetic. INTRODUCTION Recently, environmental problems was becoming worse and worse, while as a developing country, China is facing dual pressures that economical development and environmental protection. However, large numbers of goods become waste every day all over the world, but the traditional recycling ways, such as melting down and restructuring, not only produce much CO2, but also those restruc- tured parts or products cannot mention in the same breath with raw ones. As a result, the western countries started to center their attention to the concept of “upcycling” of green design, which can transfer the old and waste things into more valuable products to vigorously develop the green econ- omy. Nevertheless, this new concept hasn’t been well known and the old notion of traditionally inef- ficient reuse still predominant in China, so it should be beneficial for our social development to con- struct the principles of waste products’ redesign which are based on the concept of upcycling.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Efficiency, Extended Producer Responsibility And
    Resource Efficiency, Extended Producer Responsibility and Producer Ownership A presentation to the Annual Symposium of the Greening Growth Partnership and Economics and Environmental Policy Research Network By Professor Paul Ekins University College London and International Resource Panel Ottawa February 27th, 2020 The imperative of increasing resource efficiency The promise of double decoupling Key messages from the Summary for Policy Makers http://www.unep.org/resourcepanel/KnowledgeResources/AssessmentAreasReports/Cross-CuttingPublications/tabid/133337/Default.aspx Headline Message: “With concerted action, there is significant potential for increasing resource efficiency, which will have numerous benefits for the economy and the environment” By 2050 policies to improve resource efficiency and tackle climate change could • reduce global resource extraction by up to 28% globally. • cut global GHG emissions by around 60%, • boost the value of world economic activity by 1% How to increase resource efficiency? Waste/resource management focus • Make it easier to recycle materials by differentiating between wastes and recyclables (definition of waste, by-products) • Increase the quality of collected recyclates (separate collections) • Create markets for recycled materials through product specifications and green public procurement (standards and regulation) • Ban the incineration of recyclables • Facilitate industrial clusters that exchange materials while they are still resources to prevent them from becoming wastes (industrial symbiosis)
    [Show full text]
  • Upcycling Wastes with Biogas Production: an Exergy and Economic Analysis
    Venice 2012, Fourth International Symposium on Energy from Biomass and Waste Upcycling wastes with biogas production: An exergy and economic analysis M. Martin*, A. Parsapour* *Environmental Technology and Management, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden SUMMARY: The massive consumption of finite resources creates high economical and environmental costs due to material dispersion and waste generation. In order to overcome this, by-products and wastes may be used, to avoid the use of virgin materials and benefit from the useful inherent energy of the material. By adding value to the material, economic and environmental performance can be improve, which is called upcycling. In this paper, an exergy and economic analysis of a biogas process is examined. In order to investigate if biogas production from wastes can upcycle materials, biogas production from a by- product from the brewing process is examined. From the analysis, the process is found to upcycle the by-product with an increase in exergy and economic benefit due to the generation of biomethane and biofertilizer. This analysis thus shows that by using by-products as such, the sustainability of the system may improve. 1. INTRODUCTION Given the concerns for sustainable development, the availability of energy from fossil sources and their environmental effects continues to produce problems for nations worldwide. With the current availability of alternative energy sources, our dependence on fossil sources can thus be questioned. Among these, bioenergy and biofuels have great potential for development and improvement. However, many experts have criticized the environmental performance and energy efficiency of biofuel production (Wibe, 2010; Akinci, 2008; Searchinger, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Responsible Manufacturing in the Marine Production
    local repairers of ship spares. This study considers the UN “Responsible Manufacturing Sustainable Development Goals on climate change, in the marine production: sustainable production and consumption. The results on prospects offered by ΑΜ technology are based upon Legal and technical aspects” already successful upcycling of marine spare parts. The outcome is that shipowners, as users/consumers should 1 2 Yanna Pavlopoulou & Evanthia Kostidi be aware and support the expansion of a global new legislation that implements the “right to repair”, the 1 Managing Partner at CommonLawgic Research Center; mandatory concept of Extended Producer’s Responsibility PhD candidate at National Technical University of Athens (NTUA) Greece, Sector of Industrial Management and (EPR) and responsible innovation ethics. A new movement Operations Research, Environmental Economics and Su- has to emerge urging the manufacturers to design circular stainability Unit. Contact details: [email protected]* materials, upcycled products and shared services, with the 2 PhD Candidate at University of the Aegean (Greece) at support of additive manufacturing and circular makers. the Department of Shipping, Trade and Transport, MSc. Shipping in Transport and International Trade, MSc Keywords: responsible, circular innovation, additive Mechanical Engineering. Contact details: manufacturing,3D printing, EPR, maritime [email protected]** ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Responsible innovation is an emerging concept aligned to Marine technology and business competition flourished in consumers’ business objectives. Corporate social the past decade, under the environmental umbrella, offering responsibility in contrast is a backward response to ways to combat shipping’s Sulphur and ocean footprint. challenges. The issue at stake is how to forward regulate the The Greek shipping combated but lost the battles on BWM competitive and socio-ethical aspects of technology and SOx policy measures.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on Upcycling: Current Body of Literature, Knowledge Gaps and a Way Forward
    Venice Italy Apr 13-14, 2015, 17 (4) Part I A Review on Upcycling: Current Body of Literature, Knowledge Gaps and a Way Forward Kyungeun Sung related books have been published since 1999.1 Most books Abstract—Upcycling is a process in which used materials are (96%; 115 out of 120 books) in the sample were published converted into something of higher value and/or quality in their between 2008 and 2014 with higher publication rate between second life. It has been increasingly recognised as one promising 2012 and 2014 as 62.5% of all samples (75 books between means to reduce material and energy use, and to engender sustainable 2012 and 2014; 21 books in 2012; 28 in 2013; and 26 in production and consumption. For this reason and other foreseeable benefits, the concept of upcycling has received more attention from 2014). 53% (64/120) of the sampled books are categorised as numerous researchers and business practitioners in recent years. This ‘craft and hobbies’ whereas the other book categories show has been seen in the growing number of publications on this topic similar percentages (art & design: 10%; house & home DIY: since the 1990s. However, the overall volume of literature dealing 10%; science & technology: 9%; business & economics: 8%; with upcycling is still low and no major review has been presented. and the rest as miscellaneous).2 The theses search on Google Therefore, in order to further establish this field, this paper analyses Scholar simultaneously conducted by the author showed a and summarises the current body of literature on upcycling, focusing similar recent surge of publication: 90% (37/41) of these in the on different definitions, trends in practices, benefits, drawbacks and 3 barriers in a number of subject areas, and gives suggestions for future sample (since 2001) were published between 2009 and 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste to Energy in the Age of the Circular Economy Best Practice Handbook
    WASTE TO ENERGY IN THE AGE OF THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY BEST PRACTICE HANDBOOK NOVEMBER 2020 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK WASTE TO ENERGY IN THE AGE OF THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY BEST PRACTICE HANDBOOK NOVEMBER 2020 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) © 2020 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 8632 4444; Fax +63 2 8636 2444 www.adb.org Some rights reserved. Published in 2020. ISBN: 978-92-9262-480-4 (print); 978-92-9262-481-1 (electronic); 978-92-9262-482-8 (ebook) Publication Stock No. TIM200330-2 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22617/TIM200330-2 The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/.
    [Show full text]
  • Upcycling Food Waste Is More Likely to Have Been Adopted by Start-Ups and Smaller Work from an Economic Perspective If It Is Players
    With the food and beverage Upcycling industry under mounting pressure to cut upstream food waste, upcycling is an food waste interesting prospect. In this whitepaper we consider how to make it viable and effective. The reduction of food waste is a complex, but urgent, issue. Room for improvement According to the Food and Agriculture Waste and Resources Action Programme Organization of the UN (FAO), a third of food (WRAP) has estimated total volumes of produced globally each year - 1.3 billion tonnes - is avoidable food waste across sub-sectors of wasted or lost1. If current trends continue the UK food and beverage manufacturing unchecked, by 2030 66 tonnes of food will be lost industry (Figure 1)4. Dairy production came out or thrown away per second2. top, accounting for almost a quarter (23 As food waste increases, conversely there is a percent) of total avoidable food waste in the growing number of mouths to feed. In 2050 it’s UK. This was followed by meat, poultry and predicted that the world population will reach 9.6 fish which accounted for 18 percent. Ambient billion. Unless changes are made, there’s risk of a products were also in the top three, generating global food gap: production will be insufficient to 15 percent of avoidable waste. meet the calorific needs of humanity. The World Resources Institute (WRI) identifies reduction of food loss and waste as a top priority in its suggested measures for a sustainable food future*. It suggests a 25 percent improvement would reduce the food gap by 12 percent3. For the first time we have
    [Show full text]
  • Exploration of the Role of Extended Producer Responsibility for the Circular Economy in the Netherlands
    Exploration of the Role of Extended Producer Responsibility for the circular economy in the Netherlands June 27th 2016 Table of contents 1 Introduction 3 2 EPR & routes for optimization 5 3 Extend the scope of EPR regulation to new products and waste streams 6 3.1 EPR in neighboring regions 6 3.2 Criteria for EPR implementation 10 3.3 Relevance of new EPR obligations in the Netherlands 13 4 Deepen the scope of EPR within regulated waste streams 18 5 Strengthen the financial EPR incentives for eco-design 23 5.1 Weight 25 5.2 Design for recycling 25 5.3 Presence of hazardous materials 26 5.4 Durability (lifetime) of products 27 5.5 Prevention 27 5.6 Repairability 28 5.7 Recycled content 29 6 Conclusions and following steps 30 7 References 33 8 Appendix 1: interviews 37 9 Appendix 2: countries 41 10 Appendix 3: feedback of VPN (in Dutch) 48 Notes 52 Total number of pages: 54 Page 2 Version No. Date Status To 5 27 June 2016 Final concept Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment, Hans Spiegeler Authors: Maarten Dubois (EY Belgium), Diana de Graaf (EY Netherlands), Joachim Thieren (EY Belgium) Acknowledgements: The authors thank Roeland Bracke, Peter Borkey, Paul Rotteveel, Eelco Smit and Charline Ducas for their collaboration and feedback. This report does not necessarily represent their opinion and the content of the study is the sole responsibility of the authors. Page 3 1 Introduction Already in the ’70s and ’80s, the Netherlands have positioned themselves as frontrunners in the management of waste and secondary resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Reuse Explorations Guide Innovative Programs and Strategies
    Reuse Explorations Guide Innovative Programs and Strategies Written by Athena Lee Bradley and Mary Ann Remolador Northeast Recycling Council, Inc. (NERC) With funding from the Rural Utility Services, United States Department of Agriculture NERC is an equal opportunity provider and employer. August 2016 Acknowledgements The Northeast Recycling Council, Inc. (NERC) is a nonprofit organization that conducts projects in the eleven Northeast states, as well as around the country. Its mission is to promote sustainable materials management by supporting traditional and innovative solid waste best practices, focusing on waste prevention, toxics reduction, reuse, recycling and organics recovery. NERC received a grant from the United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Utility Services for “Innovative Strategies & Best Management Practices for Implementing Reuse Programs in Rural Communities in New York State & the St. Regis Mohawk Nation.” Through the project NERC provided webinars, trainings, resources, and technical assistance. The following individuals and organizations provided invaluable and generous assistance in the development and implementation of the project. NERC would like to extend its appreciation to and acknowledge the following people who worked with NERC on reuse: • Jan M. Oatman, Regional Recycling Coordinator, Development Authority of the North Country • St. Lawrence County Reuse Partnership: John Tenbusch, St. Lawrence County Environmental Management Council; Larry Legault, Operations/Recycling Manager, St. Lawrence County Solid Waste Operations; Chelle Lindahl, Co-Coordinator, Local Living Venture; and, Jennifer Lauzon, New York Department of Environmental Conservation, Region 6 • Larry Thompson, Recycling Coordinator, Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe (Akwesasne) • Catherine (Katie) Liendecker & others with Lyons Falls, New York and Lyons Falls Alive • MaryEllen Etienne, The Reuse Institute • Diane Cohen, Executive Director, Finger Lakes ReUse, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Scaling up Circular Strategies to Achieve Zero Plastic Waste in Thailand
    SCALING UP CIRCULAR STRATEGIES TO ACHIEVE ZERO PLASTIC WASTE IN THAILAND WWF Thailand, November 2020 ABOUT THIS REPORT PURPOSE: This report intends to promote existing circular strategies that support plastic waste management in Thailand, as well as to provide key insights and considerations to guide future strategic development among government and the private sector towards a more collaborative, fair and impactful circular waste management system for all those involved. In doing so, it aims to envision a sustainable, healthy and prosperous ‘zero plastic waste’ Thailand. Desired outcomes: • To serve as a knowledge base for conversations between WWF, national and local government, private sector businesses and supporting organisations (civil society, universities, think tanks, etc.). • To bring together diverse stakeholders to connect, collaborate and be part of an action- led network. • To develop trusted and impactful partnerships in Thailand between WWF and national and local government, private sector businesses and supporting organisations. • To generate awareness on a broader level around the benefits of reducing plastic waste. • To build a case for empowering informal waste collectors in their efforts to support national plastic waste achievements and targets. WWF THAILAND 2020 HOW TO READ THIS REPORT: This is Urgent: The COVID-19 Pandemic is The first half of this report - Sections Escalating Plastic Waste 1 to 3 - is intended to raise awareness While much has been made of the unexpected and empower conversations with environmental benefits of the COVID-19 pandemic and among policymakers, the private (e.g. an initial 5% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions), it has also brought additional challenges sector and supporting organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Waste Management
    STUDY GUIDE 2020 Modern Wasteland Exploring Waste Management 2020 ENVIROTHON STUDY GUIDE 1 20202019 Acknowledgements The following study guide was created by a team of students from the Ecosystem Management Technology Program at Fleming College. The team comprised of Douglas Bennett, Danielle Chiasson, Sadie Fischer, and Matthew Perry. The purpose of the study guide is to provide high school students with study materials that reflect the 2020 Ontario Envirothon Current Issue Topic: Waste Management. Key topics and learning objectives and interspersed throughout this document and are accompanied by various case studies and hands-on activities. This study guide was produced for Forests Ontario with the support of Forest Ontario’s Education Outreach Coordinator, Diana Corona Castro. Special thanks are also given to Sara Kelly, faculty member of the Ecosystem Management program at Fleming College. Support for the 2020 Ontario Envirothon Study Guide has been provided by: Acknowledgements also given to those who reviewed the study guide: • Jade Schofield, Project Manager – Sustainability and Climate Change, Town of Whitby • Laurie Westaway, Professor – Trent University • Mat Thijssen, Sustainability Manager – University of Waterloo • Aileen Barclay, Program Manager – Oak Ridges Moraine Land Trust • Michelle Rich, Community and Public Engagement Coordinator – York Region 2020 ENVIROTHON STUDY GUIDE 2 Table of Contents 2019 LEARNING OBJECTIVES 5 Key Topics 5 Learning Objectives 5 Tools and Recommended Resources 6 1.0 INTRODUCTION TO WASTE MANAGEMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Upcycling of Polymers
    Report of the Basic Energy Sciences Roundtable on Chemical Upcycling of Polymers April 30–May 1, 2019 Bethesda, Maryland Chair: Phillip F. Britt, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Co-Chair: Geoffrey W. Coates, Cornell University Co-Chair: Karen I. Winey, University of Pennsylvania Participants: Phillip Britt, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Jeffrey Byers, Boston College Eugene Chen, Colorado State University Geoffrey Coates, Cornell University Bryan Coughlin, University of Massachusetts–Amherst Christopher Ellison, University of Minnesota Jeannette Garcia, IBM Alan Goldman, Rutgers University Javier Guzman, ExxonMobil John Hartwig, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory/University of California–Berkeley Brett Helms, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory George Huber, University of Wisconsin Cynthia Jenks, Argonne National Laboratory Jill Martin, Dow Chemical Maureen McCann, Purdue University Steve Miller, University of Florida Hugh O'Neill, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Aaron Sadow, Ames Laboratory Susannah Scott, University of California–Santa Barbara Lawrence Sita, University of Maryland Dion Vlachos, University of Delaware Karen Winey, University of Pennsylvania Robert Waymouth, Stanford University Contents List of Figures .............................................................................................................................................. v List of Sidebar Figures ............................................................................................................................... v Abbreviations, Acronyms
    [Show full text]