All About Europa
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
JUICE Red Book
ESA/SRE(2014)1 September 2014 JUICE JUpiter ICy moons Explorer Exploring the emergence of habitable worlds around gas giants Definition Study Report European Space Agency 1 This page left intentionally blank 2 Mission Description Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer Key science goals The emergence of habitable worlds around gas giants Characterise Ganymede, Europa and Callisto as planetary objects and potential habitats Explore the Jupiter system as an archetype for gas giants Payload Ten instruments Laser Altimeter Radio Science Experiment Ice Penetrating Radar Visible-Infrared Hyperspectral Imaging Spectrometer Ultraviolet Imaging Spectrograph Imaging System Magnetometer Particle Package Submillimetre Wave Instrument Radio and Plasma Wave Instrument Overall mission profile 06/2022 - Launch by Ariane-5 ECA + EVEE Cruise 01/2030 - Jupiter orbit insertion Jupiter tour Transfer to Callisto (11 months) Europa phase: 2 Europa and 3 Callisto flybys (1 month) Jupiter High Latitude Phase: 9 Callisto flybys (9 months) Transfer to Ganymede (11 months) 09/2032 – Ganymede orbit insertion Ganymede tour Elliptical and high altitude circular phases (5 months) Low altitude (500 km) circular orbit (4 months) 06/2033 – End of nominal mission Spacecraft 3-axis stabilised Power: solar panels: ~900 W HGA: ~3 m, body fixed X and Ka bands Downlink ≥ 1.4 Gbit/day High Δv capability (2700 m/s) Radiation tolerance: 50 krad at equipment level Dry mass: ~1800 kg Ground TM stations ESTRAC network Key mission drivers Radiation tolerance and technology Power budget and solar arrays challenges Mass budget Responsibilities ESA: manufacturing, launch, operations of the spacecraft and data archiving PI Teams: science payload provision, operations, and data analysis 3 Foreword The JUICE (JUpiter ICy moon Explorer) mission, selected by ESA in May 2012 to be the first large mission within the Cosmic Vision Program 2015–2025, will provide the most comprehensive exploration to date of the Jovian system in all its complexity, with particular emphasis on Ganymede as a planetary body and potential habitat. -
Astrobioacademic2015.Pdf
Astrobiology - the science of life in the universe Caleb Scharf Are we alone? Where do we come from? A Bayesian analysis of received wisdom… Life arose ‘quickly’ in first few 100 Myrs on Earth… Evidence for high abiogenesis probability? Spiegel & Turner 2012 A Bayesian analysis of received wisdom… Life arose ‘quickly’ in first few 100 Myrs on Earth Evidence for high abiogenesis probability? Not necessarily, choice of prior dominates posterior probability...life on Earth could be 1st in universe However, one independent example of abiogenesis would push posterior rate to >1 per Gyr on suitable planets Spiegel & Turner 2011 Where can we look to find an independent abiogenesis? ‘Shadow life’ Earth Multiple OoL events Demonstrate independence? Extinct/fossil Mars Extant Surface effluvia Icy Moons Cryovolcanic geyser contents (Europa, Enceladus) Interior exploration Novel metabolism/surface exploration Other bodies (Ceres, Titan, Venus) Upper atmosphere exploration Atmospheric biosignatures Exoplanets Pigmentation/surface characteristics (Rocky) Technosignatures Where can we look to find an independent abiogenesis? ‘Shadow life’ Earth Multiple OoL events Demonstrate independence? Extinct/fossil Mars Extant Surface effluvia Icy Moons Cryovolcanic geyser contents (Europa, Enceladus) Interior exploration Novel metabolism/surface exploration Other bodies (Ceres, Titan, Venus) Upper atmosphere exploration Atmospheric biosignatures Exoplanets Pigmentation/surface characteristics (Rocky) Technosignatures Mars • Clear evidence of periods with substantial surface/near surface liquid water Cemented pebbles in ancient stream bed? Recurring Slope Lineae - brine/hydrated salts • Increasing evidence of organic deposits (inc. 10 C-atom ‘fatty acid- like’ compound) in mudstone that could be indigenous (i.e. not meteoritic) Icy Moons Good evidence of subsurface liquid zones (morphology, induced magnetic field, plumes). -
NAC Planetary Protection Subcommittee, December 8-9, 2015
NAC Planetary Protection Subcommittee, December 8-9, 2015 NASA ADVISORY COUNCIL Planetary Protection Subcommittee December 8-9, 2015 NASA Headquarters Washington, D.C. MEETING MINUTES _____________________________________________________________ Robert Lindberg, Chair ____________________________________________________________ Amy Kaminski, Executive Secretary Report prepared by Joan M. Zimmermann Zantech IT, Inc. 1 NAC Planetary Protection Subcommittee, December 8-9, 2015 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Words from the Chair 3 Discussion with Science Mission Directorate Associate Administrator 3 Planetary Protection Issues and Updates 5 Planetary Science Division Update 7 Mars Exploration Program Update 9 Committee on Space Research (COSPAR) Panel Colloquium - Mars Special Regions 11 - Icy Worlds 13 Meeting with European Space Agency’s Planetary Protection Working Group 13 MSL Gale Crater Observations 15 Mars 2020 Planetary Protection Requirements 16 Public Comment 18 Returned Sample Science Board 18 Mars 2020 Planetary Protection – Jet Propulsion Laboratory Briefing 20 Public Comment 27 Findings and Recommendations Discussion 27 Appendix A- Attendees Appendix B- Membership roster Appendix C- Presentations Appendix D- Agenda 2 NAC Planetary Protection Subcommittee, December 8-9, 2015 December 8, 2015 Introduction NASA Advisory Council (NAC) Planetary Protection Subcommittee (PPS) Chair, Dr. Robert Lindberg, opened the meeting. The Executive Secretary of the PPS, Dr. Amy Kaminski, made preparatory and logistical announcements. Introductions were made around the room. Words from the Chair Dr. Lindberg welcomed members to the meeting, and disclosed for purposes of transparency that he had recently taken a new position that has some relevance to planetary protection (PP), as Vice President for Orbital and Return Systems for Moon Express, a commercial entity that will be pursuing exploration and mining on the Moon. -
Openspace Is Developed to Run on Multiple Platforms, from Laptops to Virtual Reality Headsets to Planetarium Domes
Getting started System Requirements OpenSpace is developed to run on multiple platforms, from laptops to Virtual Reality headsets to planetarium domes. Machines with stronger graphics cards and processors have the most success with the software. OpenSpace cannot be run on smaller devices, including smartphones, tablets, and Google Chromebooks. Basic requirements ● Internet connection: Required to download the software ● Processor: i5 processor or newer ● Graphics: Support for OpenGL 3.3 ● Disk space: 6 GB ● Operating System (OS): MacOS 10.12 or later, Windows 7 or later For optimum performance ● Continuous Internet connection: For updated datasets, additional scenes including globe browsing, and an option of servers ● Processor: i9 3+ GHZ or latest intel processor ● Graphics: 1080/1080Ti or 2080/2080Ti ● Disk space: 50 GB ● Mouse and keyboard or other controller: For easiest navigation, we recommend using a keyboard and a mouse with a middle mouse button. OpenSpace also supports game controllers. Installation MacOS 1. For most uses of OpenSpace, download the software from our website. You can choose to download the application with just the core Digital Universe Atlas content or with additional scenes. Make sure to choose the download link for Mac. 2. After downloading, run the installer. OpenSpace will be installed in your applications folder. The installed OpenSpace folder contains everything you need to get started. Make sure you have permission to read and write files in all of the subfolders, or some features of OpenSpace will not work. ASTC 2019 | 1 Windows OS 1. For most uses of OpenSpace, download the software from our website. You can choose to download the application with just the core Digital Universe Atlas content or with additional scenes. -
Space Physics Project the Moons of the Planets
Space Physics Project The Moons of the Planets Ria Becker October 27, 2008 Contents 1 Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Definitions 2 3 The Earth's Moon 3 4 The Moons of Mars 3 4.1 Phobos . 3 4.2 Deimos . 4 5 The Moons of Jupiter 4 5.1 Io........................................... 5 5.2 Europa . 5 5.3 Ganymede . 6 5.4 Callisto . 6 6 The Moons of Saturn 7 6.1 Titan . 7 6.2 Enceladus . 8 6.3 Mimas . 8 6.4 Hyperion . 9 6.5 Epimetheus and Janus . 9 7 The Moons of Uranus 9 8 The Moons of Neptun 10 8.1 Triton . 10 1 Introduction 2 1 Introduction The aim of this project is to give an overview over the different moons of the planets in our solar system. The longest and best known is naturally the Earth's moon. In 1610 discovered Galileo Galilei four moons of Jupiter: Io, Europa, Ganymede and Callisto. Those where the first celestial objects confirmed to orbit an body other than the Earth. Until today there are more than 165 confirmed moons in the solar system discovered and the number of moons belonging to a planet differs greatly. The Earth has one large one, Mars has two small ones, Jupiter and Saturn have about 60, Uranus has 27 and Neptun 13. In contrary to that Mer- cury and Venus possess no natural satellites. Due to this large number of moons in the solar system, this report covers only the most interesting ones. Figure 1: Selected moons of the solar system [1]. -
Jupiter and the Galilean Moons Curriculum 9Th Through 12Th Grades (14 to 18 Years Old), 40 to 60 Minutes
Jupiter and the Galilean Moons Curriculum 9th through 12th grades (14 to 18 years old), 40 to 60 minutes This lesson plan was created by Digitalis Education Solutions, Inc. (DigitalisEducation.com) and is provided free of charge as a public service to encourage the teaching of astronomy. It was written for use with a Digitarium® planetarium system. You may need to modify this lesson to work with other systems with different capabilities. License Permission is granted to copy, distribute, and modify this document provided that existing copyright notices, the text of this license, and the text of the "Notice" section are not removed or modified, other than to add your own copyright notice for your modifications. Copyright Copyright 2008, Digitalis Education Solutions, Inc. Objectives Students will learn: • Basic definitions of the terms “planet,” “moon,” and “orbit;” • The historical relevance and a few facts about the life of Galileo Galilei; • Some characteristics of Jupiter and its four largest moons, the Galilean moons; • How Galileo's observations of the Galilean moons provided evidence for the heliocentric model of the solar system; and • Facts about recent, ongoing, and future missions to Jupiter or any of the Galilean moons. Materials required • Flashlight and extra batteries • OPTIONAL: Poster of portrait of Galileo Galilei • OPTIONAL: Poster(s) of Jupiter and the Galilean moons • Digitarium® system set for January 7, 1610 at 2 pm, with atmospheric effects and landscape on Last revision: November 26, 2008 1 I) Introduction (10 minutes) A) Inform students that you'll be learning about the planet Jupiter and its four largest moons today. -
Appendix: Planetary Facts, Data and Tools
Appendix: Planetary Facts, Data and Tools Planetary Constants See Tables A1 and A2. © Springer International Publishing AG 2018 395 A.P. Rossi, S. van Gasselt (eds.), Planetary Geology, Springer Praxis Books, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-65179-8 396 Appendix: Planetary Facts, Data and Tools Table A1 Bulk parameters for planets, dwarf planets and selected satellites Polar Equatorial Inverse Magnetic Atmospheric Mass radius radius flattening Density Gravity field pressure 24 3 2 Discovery Moons m [10 kg] rp [km] re [km] 1/f [–] [kg/m ] g [m/s ] B [T] p [bar] Planets Mercury prehistoric 0 0:330 2439:7 2439:7 – 5427 3:710 3.0107 1014 Venus prehistoric 0 4:868 6051:8 6051:8 – 5243 8:870 – 92 Earth prehistoric 1 5:972 6356:8 6378:1 298:253 5514 9:810 2.4105 1.014 Mars prehistoric 2 0:642 3376:2 3396:2 169:894 3933 3:710 – 0.006 Jupiter prehistoric 67 1898:190 66854:0 71492:0 15:41 1326 24:790 4.3104 > 1000 Saturn prehistoric 62 568:340 54364:0 60268:0 10:21 687 10:440 2.2105 > 1000 Uranus 1781 27 86:813 24973:0 25559:0 43:62 1271 8:870 2.3105 > 1000 Neptune 1846 14 102:413 24341:0 24764:0 58:54 1638 11:150 1.4105 > 1000 Dwarf m [1021 kg] planets (134340) 1930 5 13:030 1187:0 1187:0 – 1860 0:620 – 1109 Pluto (1) Ceres 1801 0 0:939 473:0 473:0 – 2161 0:280 – – (136199) 2005 1 16:600 1163:0 1163:0 – 2520 0:820 – – Eris (136472) 2005 1 < 4:400 715:0 715:0 20:00 1400 0:500 – 4–12109 Makemake 739:0 739:0 3200 (136108) 2004 2 4:010 620:0 620:0 – (min) 0:630 – – Haumea 2600 Appendix: Planetary Facts, Data and Tools 397 Satellites m [1021 kg] Earth’s moon -
Planetary Protection Independent Review Board Recommendations
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Headquarters Washington, DC 20546-0001 OC1 Reply to Attn of: 1 7 ?019 Science Mission Directorate NASA Response to Planetary Protection Independent Review Board Recommendations I want to thank Chair Alan Stem and the knowledgeable and hardworking board he pulled together fortheir quick and comprehensive work to produce this report of the Planetary Protection Independent Review Board (PPIRB). This report represents an important step forwardin a very complex area. It helps informhow we at NASA modernize our approach to the wide range of issues and work with the commercial and internationalpartners who will be involved with us in planetary exploration throughout the solar system in the coming years. The report reaffirms the direction of NASA's thinking and changing practice in this area. We appreciate the PPIRB's assessment that recent changes in the Planetary Protection Office (PPO) and its relocation to the Officeof Safetyand Mission Assurance (OSMA) have improved communication, clarity, and responsiveness to community needs and concerns. This is a firststep, and there is much important work left to do. Our intent is always to encourage exploration and to be responsible stewards of the amazing places we have the opportunity to visit and to do the very best science while also protecting our home planet. The report highlights changes in planetary science and planetary protection techniques in recent years. In light of the current pace of change, and the likelihood that it will accelerate in the future, NASA agrees that planetary protection policies need to be updated regularly and expeditiously to be effective.Moreover, and consistent with guidance froma recent report of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, the way planetary missions are implemented must adapt to the combination of scientific advances and the changing reality of space exploration. -
Planetary Protection Subcommittee,June 1-2, 2016
NAC Planetary Protection Subcommittee,June 1-2, 2016 NASA ADVISORY COUNCIL Planetary Protection Subcommittee June 1-2, 2016 NASA Headquarters Washington, D.C. MEETING MINUTES Report prepared by Joan M . Zimmermann lngenicomm, Inc. 1 NAC Planetary Protection Subcommittee,june 1-2, 2016 Table of Contents Introduction, day 1 3 Planetary Protection Update 3 Planetary Science Division Update 6 Discussion 7 Mars Exploration Program Update 8 Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) Curiosity Update 11 Discussion 12 Discussion with Science Mission Directorate (SMD) Acting Associate Administrator (AA) 12 Public comment period 13 Discussion 14 Introduction, day 2 15 NASA Life Sciences Capability Leadership 15 Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD) Programs and Plans 17 Antimicrobial Surface Technology 19 European Space Agency (ESA)/Committee on Space Research (COSPAR)Update 20 Spacecraft Microbiology in Human Exploration Missions 22 Life Detection Investments in SMD 24 Public comment 25 Discussion of Findings and Recommendations 25 Appendix A- Attendees Appendix B- Membership roster Appendix C- Presentations Appendix D- Agenda 2 NAC Planetary Protection Subcommittee,June 1-2, 2016 June 1, 2016 (Day 1) Introduction NASAAdvisory Council (NAC) Planetary Protection Subcommittee (PPS)Chair, Dr. Robert Lindberg, opened the meeting. The Executive Secretary of the PPS,Dr. Amy Kaminski, made preparatory and logistical announcements . Introductions were made around the room. Dr. Lindberg welcomed members of the subcommittee , and offered some thoughts on the previous meeting, which had produced two recommendations and two findings. The first recommendation, that NASA's Office of Planetary Protection embrace the new draft COSPAR guidelines on Mars Special Regions and water worlds such as Europa, was transmitted to the Science Mission Directorate (SMD) Associate Administrator (AA) and accepted .