Lazy Eye: Understanding and Treating Amblyopia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lazy Eye: Understanding and Treating Amblyopia Lazy Eye: Understanding and Treating Amblyopia A complete guide on the causes and treatments of Lazy Eye (Amblyopia) Created by Definition You’ve been to the general optometrist or an ophthalmologist, and you’ve just been told your child has amblyopia. And if your child is over the age of eight, you may have even been told there is no way to treat the condition. This news obviously comes as a shock. Even though amblyopia affects 2-4% of children in this country, you’ve probably never heard of the condition. Like any concerned parent, you’ve scrambled to your computer, your mind racing with questions. What exactly is amblyopia? What is a “lazy eye”, and how is it different from “crossed eyes” or “wandering eyes”? Can children over the age of eight be treated for this condition? What is amblyopia? Amblyopia is the technical term for a condition that is often referred to as “lazy eye.” The nickname, “lazy eye,” arises from the fact that one eye sees more clearly than the other. This clearer-seeing eye performs the bulk of the work, which naturally makes us consider the other eye “lazy.” (It should be noted that a person can also have amblyopia in both eyes, in which case both eyes would be considered ‘lazy’.) The American Optometric Association defines the condition: “Amblyopia (lazy eye) is the loss or lack of development of vision in an eye that is unrelated to any eye health problem. The brain, for some reason, does not acknowledge the images seen by the amblyopic eye. Reduced vision due to amblyopia is not correctable with lenses alone.” The AOA continues, “If there is a large enough difference in the degree of nearsightedness, farsightedness or astigmatism between the two eyes, or if the eyes are crossed, the brain learns to ignore one image in favor of the other.” What does that mean? In essence, at a very early age, as your child’s visual system is developing, his or her brain is not receiving similar images from the two eyes (we’ll get into the causes in a little bit.) In fully functioning visual systems, the brain combines the two similar images into one complete image. This one image allows you to see things clearly, and in 3D. In amblyopia, the brain has difficulty combining the images from the two eyes because the visual information from each eye is being processed differently. One image is clearer than the other and spatial information from each eye is also different. Because the brain cannot effectively combine the two images, it suppresses, or “turns off” one of them. When the suppression occurs over a long period of time eventually the clarity of vision with that eye becomes worse. The visual system is designed to use both eyes to explore visual space. When both eyes are working it is called binocular (literally “two eyed”) vision. An amblyope has binocular vision, they are just not very good at it. They are binocular peripherally and suppress centrally. Amblyopia almost always affects one eye, but may occur in both eyes as well. The difference between amblyopia and strabismus Amblyopia, or “lazy eye”, is often confused with strabismus, or “crossed eyes”. Strabismus is when an eye is physically turned in, out, up or down. Strabismus is related to eye alignment, while amblyopia has to do with the sharpness of the images in each eye. A constant unilateral strabismus can actually cause amblyopia (one eye is turned all the time), while alternating or intermittent strabismus rarely causes “lazy eye.” Strabismus is usually easy to spot, but amblyopia is not. Without actually checking the acuity in each eye at a vision screening or eye exam, it can be very difficult to tell whether a child has amblyopia. What causes amblyopia? The root cause of amblyopia is a poorly developed visual system. One eye sees more clearly than the other eye due to a number of reasons: 1. Constant eye turn (strabismus) in one eye 2. Anisometropia (large differences in vision/prescriptions between the two eyes) 3. Reduced vision in one eye due to trauma, lid droop, etc. Remember, this is a neurological process. The brain will work mostly with the eye that has the clearer image and will suppress the image from the lazy eye. How would a parent notice amblyopia in children? Amblyopia is difficult to detect by simple observation. The most common indicator is an obvious difficulty with depth perception. A child who has trouble catching and throwing objects, or is clumsy and always bumping into things may have amblyopia. Amblyopia can be detected at a school screening, but not always. “It’s one of the reasons it’s important for kids to be seen for an eye exam from the first year of life and on, because outwardly it’s not real obvious,” said Dr. Brandon Begotka of The Vision Therapy Center. “Some kids will go for years before their parents notice there is a problem. “ He notes that kids figure out how to function even with amblyopia. In most cases, the brain suppresses the image from the eye, so there isn’t any double vision. The child never realizes the brain is doing this because the eye is being suppressed. Research If you’ve been told that your child has amblyopia, or “lazy eye”, then you may have also been told there’s no effective treatment for lazy eye in children older than the age of eight. The notion that older children and adults can’t be treated is based on a long-held, but incorrect, belief concerning the “critical period.” Since it is rare for amblyopia to develop in a child over the age of eight, many doctors over the years have assumed that the brain’s ability to change with respect to visual acuity is limited beyond this age. However, recent research, as well as years of proven success among vision therapy patients, has proven that assumption wrong. What is the source of the misinformation about amblyopia? In her book Fixing My Gaze, neuroscientist Sue Barry relates how the misconception in the scientific and medical communities began. She writes that since the mid-1990s, the “scientific and medical communities have cited strabismus and a related disorder called amblyopia as classic examples of developmental disorders that cause permanent changes in vision if they are not corrected within a critical period in early life.” The conclusions, she states, were based on experiments by David Hubel and Torsten Wiesel at Harvard Medical School. The two studied cats that had strabismus, or misaligned eyes. It was noted that the vision in the cats had not developed normally, and that they could not see in 3D. Many scientists and doctors assumed the cats would never acquire stereo vision because they had not acquired the ability during what is referred to as a “critical period” of vision development. In this period, it was assumed, if certain visual skills (specifically visual acuity and stereopsis) were not learned by the brain, they could not be developed later in life. Hope with a “plastic” brain Barry cites that more recent scientific research indicates otherwise. The adult brain appears to be more “plastic” than had been previously thought, and the circuitry of the brain can actually change at any age as a result of our actions and experiences. Recent research indicates that children age seven through 17 with amblyopia may still benefit from amblyopia treatment. A study, funded by the National Eye Institute (NEI), appeared in the April 2005 issue of Archives of Ophthalmology. According to the director of the NEI, Paul A. Sieving, M.D., Ph.D., “Doctors now feel confident that traditional treatments for amblyopia will work for many older children.” It‘s great to see clinical research backing what clinicians in the optometric vision therapy field have known for years. So what are these “traditional treatments” for amblyopia that are mentioned in the study? Traditional treatment typically involves prescribing glasses and then patching the stronger eye with an eye patch or using eye drops to blur the better-seeing eye while doing daily activities. This is the common approach taken by many medical practitioners for amblyopia and the duration of the patching can vary from a few hours to the entire day. Research indicates we shouldn’t rely exclusively on patching for amblyopia Dr. Dan Fortenbacher, a developmental optometrist, noted in a post on the blog VisionHelp that there is a new body of research that indicates “it is better to treat the amblyopic patient with binocular vision therapy in conjunction with a more limited amount of occlusion (patching) therapy.” Dr. Fortenbacher refers to several studies, including a review of an important study on eye-hand coordination skills in children with and without amblyopia, and a list of 105 scientific papers showing the evidence-based research on the topic of binocular vision in the treatment of amblyopia. Dr. Kellye Knueppel of The Vision Therapy Center notes that the critical period years are still the best time to catch and treat amblyopia, which is why it’s important for parents to pursue good eye care with their children at an early age. However, this latest body of evidence bodes well for people of all ages who are suffering from amblyopia. Treatments Traditionally, patching and/or prescribing glasses have been used to treat amblyopia, often for children at a younger age. Today, studies (mentioned above) have shown that combining vision therapy with patching is a more effective treatment than just patching alone. The reason vision therapy is so important in amblyopia treatment is that it gets at the root cause: the two eyes do not perceive visual space the same and therefore cannot work together.
Recommended publications
  • Vision Therapy and Post-Concussion Syndrome Management: a Case Report Elizabeth Murray OD, Katie Connolly OD
    Vision Therapy and Post-Concussion Syndrome Management: A Case Report Elizabeth Murray OD, Katie Connolly OD Abstract: Current therapy for post-concussion syndrome with visual symptoms are to rest and decrease visual demand. This case looks at vision therapy for first line treatment when decreasing visual demand is not ideal. I. Case History On 5/30/2017, a 37 year old white male presented for persistent visual symptoms following a traumatic brain injury to the occipital lobe with torsion on the brain stem. The injury occurred on 4/3/2017 from a motor vehicle accident, and he had since been cleared from cognitive rest. At the time of the accident, he reported no loss of consciousness but did have post traumatic amnesia. Initially, he reported feeling fine, but his symptoms progressively worsened. He denied blur and diplopia, but was symptomatic for significant cognitive fatigue, gaze instability, visual stimuli triggered headaches, photophobia, and noise sensitivity. He is a pediatric oncologist with significant visual and cognitive demanding duties that exacerbate his symptoms. Ocular and medical history were unremarkable prior to the accident. At the time, he was taking Fioricet and Amitriptyline as directed for headaches and to aid in sleep, respectively. He had been seeing a Chiropractor for vestibular therapy that included some oculomotor therapy and planned to begin cognitive therapy at an outpatient rehabilitation hospital. II. Pertinent findings Entering distance visual acuities were 20/20 OD, OS and OU and near visual acuities were 20/20 OD, 20/25-1 OS, and 20/15-1 OU, without correction. Pupils and extraocular muscles were unremarkable.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan Q Full Benefit Description
    B E N E F I T D E S C R I P T I O N State Employee Health Plan This booklet describes the health benefits that the Kansas State Employees Health Care Commission provides to Members and their Dependents. These benefits are funded by: The Kansas State Employees Health Care Commission Third Party Administrator (TPA): : Blue Cross Blue Shield of Kansas has been retained to administer claims under this Plan. The TPA provides Administrative Services Only pursuant to this Benefit Description, including claims processing and administration of appeals and grievances. For answers to questions regarding eligibility for benefits, payment of claims, and other information about this Plan contact: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Kansas 1133 SW Topeka Blvd Topeka, KS 66629 By Phone 785-291-4185 or Toll Free at 1-800-332-0307 www.bcbsks.com/state Company is not the insurer under this Program and does not assume any financial risk or obligation with respect to claims. Plan Q Benefit Description 2021 Section I Coverage ................................................................................................. 1 Part 1: General Provisions ................................................................................ 1 Responsibilities of the Third Party Administrator (TPA) ..................................... 1 Case Management/Cost Effective Care ............................................................ 1 How to Contact the TPA .................................................................................... 2 Services from Non Network Providers
    [Show full text]
  • Year in Review Issue
    Gregg’s LANDING The exclusiveG newsletter for the residentsLife of Gregg’s Landing January 2021 2020 YEAR IN REVIEW ISSUE YOUR STORIES. YOUR PHOTOS. YOUR COMMUNITY. New Year (finally), New You ! LEAVE IT TO TOPTEC $500 OFF! WE'LL TAKE CARE OF IT. YEAR END SPECIAL $85.00 BRACES Furnace Tune-up INVISALIGN Special *12/1/2020 - 1/31/2021 COMPREHENSIVE TREATMENT ONLY **COUPON MUST BE PRESENT Don't pay until 2021 when you nance a new Lennox* YOUR SPECIALIST FOR: systemfor as little as $132 a month. Early Treatment • Adult Treatment Plus get up to $1,200 in rebates. Ronald S. Jacobson Raymond Y. Tsou No contact service call policy – Techs. D.D.S., M.S. D.M.D., M.S. Diamond Plus Provider wears face masks, gloves & booties IL. Lic. #055-042909 Visit us Online Vernon Hills Office: Chicago Office: 280 W. Townline Rd. 4200 W. Peterson Ave. JTORTHO.COM Suite 220 Suite 116 Vernon Hills, IL 60061 Chicago, IL 60646 Visit our Doctors at our Vernon Hills or Chicago Location 847-816-0633 773-545-5333 2 Gregg's Landing Life • January 2021 January 2021 • Gregg's Landing Life 3 847-780-8200 You can purchase sessions, membership plans and gift cards... please call or Visit our Facebook page or website for promotions. Northshoresalt.com CONDITIONS BENEFITS • Asthma • Clear Pollens, Pollutants, Toxins & Airways • Cough • Reduce Bronchial Inflammation • Sinusitis • Relieve Skin Conditions such as Dermatitis, • COPD Eczema, & Psoriasis • Bronchitis • Improve Lung Function • Stress • Strengthen the Immune System against • Ear Infection Cold, Flu, & Lung Irritants • Allergies • Reduce Triggers that Promote Respiratory Illness • Eczema • Clean Nasal Cavities and Sinuses • Psoriasis • Cystic Fibrosis WE SELL 1282 Old Skokie Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • Amblyopia: Can Laser Acupuncture Be an Option?
    JAMS272_proof ■ 1 March 2016 ■ 1/8 + MODEL J Acupunct Meridian Stud 2016;--(-):--e-- Available online at www.sciencedirect.com 61 62 1 63 2 Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies 64 3 65 4 66 5 journal homepage: www.jams-kpi.com 67 6 68 7 69 8 70 9 CLINICAL CASE REPORT 71 10 72 11 73 12 74 13 75 14 76 15 Amblyopia: Can Laser Acupuncture be an 77 16 78 17 Option? 79 18 80 19 Q27 Q1 81 20 Marzio Vanzini, Michele Gallamini* 82 21 83 22 Available online --- 84 23 85 24 86 25 Received: Nov 20, 2015 Abstract 87 26 Revised: Jan 11, 2016 This paper describes the results of the treatment of amblyopia in young patients using an 88 27 Accepted: Jan 13, 2016 unconventional laser-acupuncture technique. After obtaining satisfactory results in the 89 28 treatment of a 14-year-old amblyopic girl, the treatment was applied to 13 amblyopic 90 29 children aged 3e11 years, with an encouraging outcome. An ultralow-light-intensity laser KEYWORDS 91 30 with a square-wave modulated emission was applied over a sequence of acupuncture acupuncture; 92 31 points. Each session lasted <15 minutes, and the treatment was performed once a week amblyopia; 93 32 in 6-week cycles. Patients were followed for several years to evaluate the long-term re- laser acupuncture; 94 33 lazy eye; sults and/or to extend the treatment. All except two of the treated patients showed a 95 34 ultralow-light-intensity rapid increase in visual acuity after several treatment sessions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Persistence of Fad Interventions in the Face of Negative Scientific Evidence: Facilitated Communication for Autism As a Case Example
    Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention ISSN: 1748-9539 (Print) 1748-9547 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tebc20 The persistence of fad interventions in the face of negative scientific evidence: Facilitated communication for autism as a case example Scott O. Lilienfeld, Julia Marshall, James T. Todd & Howard C. Shane To cite this article: Scott O. Lilienfeld, Julia Marshall, James T. Todd & Howard C. Shane (2014) The persistence of fad interventions in the face of negative scientific evidence: Facilitated communication for autism as a case example, Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 8:2, 62-101, DOI: 10.1080/17489539.2014.976332 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2014.976332 Published online: 02 Feb 2015. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 5252 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 1 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tebc20 Download by: [University of Lethbridge] Date: 05 October 2015, At: 05:52 Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 2014 Vol. 8, No. 2, 62–101, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2014.976332 EBP Advancement Corner The persistence of fad interventions in the face of negative scientific evidence: Facilitated communication for autism as a case example Scott O. Lilienfeld1, Julia Marshall1, James T. Todd2 & Howard C. Shane3 1Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2Department of Psychology, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI, USA, 3Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA ................................................................................................................................................. Abstract Communication disorder and mental health professionals may assume that once novel clinical techniques have been refuted by research, they will be promptly abandoned.
    [Show full text]
  • Vision Therapy
    bmchp.org | 888-566-0008 wellsense.org | 877-957-1300 Medical Policy Vision Therapy Policy Number: OCA 3.40 Version Number: 20 Version Effective Date: 06/01/21 + Product Applicability All Plan Products Well Sense Health Plan Boston Medical Center HealthNet Plan Well Sense Health Plan MassHealth ACO MassHealth MCO Qualified Health Plans/ConnectorCare/Employer Choice Direct Senior Care Options ◊ Notes: + Disclaimer and audit information is located at the end of this document. ◊ The guidelines included in this Plan policy are applicable to members enrolled in Senior Care Options only if there are no criteria established for the specified service in a Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) national coverage determination (NCD) or local coverage determination (LCD) on the date of the prior authorization request. Review the member’s product-specific benefit documents at www.SeniorsGetMore.org to determine coverage guidelines for Senior Care Options. Policy Summary The Plan considers vision therapy as a standard treatment option for certain conditions medically necessary when medical criteria are met. Prior authorization is required. It will be determined during the Plan’s prior authorization process if the service is considered medically necessary for the requested use. The Plan’s Medically Necessary medical policy, policy number OCA 3.14, specifies the product- specific definitions of medically necessary treatment, and the Plan’s Experimental and Investigational Treatment medical policy, policy number OCA 3.12, indicates the product-specific definitions of experimental or investigational treatment. Review the member’s applicable benefit documents rather Vision Therapy + Plan refers to Boston Medical Center Health Plan, Inc. and its affiliates and subsidiaries offering health coverage plans to enrolled members.
    [Show full text]
  • Vision Problems in TBI: Impacts on Cognition & Attention
    Vision Problems in TBI: Impacts on Cognition & Attention David H. Biberdorf, OD, FCOVD [email protected] www.valleyvision.net www.advancedneurovision.com Affiliations • Diplomate, American Board of Optometry (DABO) • Fellow, College of Optometry in Vision Development (FCOVD) • Member, Neuro-Optometric Rehabilitation Association (NORA) • Certified Brain Injury Specialist (CBIS) • Board Member, North Dakota Brain Injury Advisory Council • Board Member, International Sports Vision Association (ISVA) • Partner, Valley Vision Clinic, Ltd. Grand Forks, ND • Clinical director, Advanced Neuro-Vision Systems, LLC., Grand Forks & Fargo, ND. • Adjunct faculty, UND Dept. of Psychology, Grand Forks, ND. Disclaimers/Disclosures • Consultant, RightEye (Bethesda, MD) mTBI/TBI eye tracking metrics and App development • Consultant, Diopsys (Pine Brook, NJ) VEP biomarker algorithm for mTBI • Consultant, A.M.P. Systems (St. Louis, MO) concussion protocols. • Consultant, EyeNext (Turin, Italy) visual aspects of dyslexia/mTBI. 80-90% Why Vision? • 80-90% of all information entering the brain is visual • Over 50% of brain is involved in visual processing (over 30 brain regions and 8 cranial nerves) • Visual processing alone consumes 45% of brain’s energy • 90% of all concussions will have 1 or more ocular problems • Hidden vision problems frequently persist 6-9 months after a concussion • Vision problems can undermine the efficacy of other therapies and affect workplace productivity TBI Vision Problems: Visual Impairment vs. Visual Dysfunction • Visual Impairment: Visual acuity is decreased and/or the visual field is constricted; More common in moderate or severe TBI; More obvious and therefore easier to diagnose; Tends to be more “focal”; Relatively more “permanent”. Patient is rarely unaware of it. • Visual Dysfunction: Any disorder of afferent or efferent function.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Care Flexible Spending Account Expense Eligibility List
    Health Care Flexible Spending Account Expense Eligibility List The health care FSA expense eligibility list will help you identify specific services, products and medications that are eligible for reimbursement under your health care flexible spending account (HC FSA) or your limited health care flexible spending account (if you have an HSA, your participation in the health care FSA is limited to out-of-pocket dental and vision expenses). You can use the list to search for the expense you have a question about, and it will show you if that expense is covered under the HC FSA and/or the limited HC FSA. It will also show you whether you need to submit a Letter of Medical Necessity and/or a doctor’s prescription for the expense to be reimbursed. Although not every expense is listed here, there are over 500 services, products, and medications that serve as a guide to eligible expenses. As additional information is available, this summary list will be updated, but the information is general and may be changed or updated without notice. Expenses are determined to be eligible for FSA reimbursement depending on the TriNet plan document, which must comply with Internal Revenue Code rulings. If a difference occurs between this list and either TriNet’s plan document or an Internal Revenue Code ruling, TriNet’s plan document, in compliance with the Internal Revenue Code, will govern. As FSA regulations are constantly changing, this summary does not guarantee reimbursement, but can be used as a guideline for submitting claims. If you have specific questions, you may call the TriNet Solution Center at 800.638.0461, Monday through Friday, 4:30 a.m.- 9 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 21-1075 Appendum to Emergency Motion for Stay
    USCA Case #21-1075 Document #1890432 Filed: 03/18/2021 Page 1 of 258 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT NO. 21-1075 CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE, DR. ERICA ELLIOT, GINGER KESLER, ANGELA TSIANG, JONATHAN MIRIN PETITIONERS V. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS APPENDUM TO EMERGENCY MOTION FOR STAY PENDING REVIEW OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE EXPEDITED REVIEW VOLUME 2 Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. W. Scott McCollough Children’s Health Defense McCollough Law Firm, P.C. 48 Dewitt Mills Road 2290 Gatlin Creek Rd. 1227 North Peachtree Pkwy, Suite 202 Dripping Springs, TX 78620 Peachtree City, Georgia 30269 Texas Bar No. 13434100 NY Bar No. 1999994 EMAIL: [email protected] EMAIL: [email protected] TEL: 512.888.1112 TEL: 774.239.4768 FAX: 512.692.2522 FAX: 512.692.2522 Counsel for all Petitioners USCA Case #21-1075 Document #1890432 Filed: 03/18/2021 Page 2 of 258 TABLE OF CONTENTS Item ....................................................................................................................... Tab VOLUME 1 Report and Order, In the Matter of Updating the Commission’s Rule for Over-the-Air Reception Devices, FCC 21-10, WT Docket No. 19-71, __ FCC Rcd ___ (January 7, 2021) ............................................................................... A Affidavit of Jonathan Mirin in Support of Motion for Stay ..................................... B Affidavit of Dr. Erica Elliot in Support of Motion for Stay ..................................... C Affidavit of Jennifer Baran in Support of Motion for Stay ...................................... D Affidavit of Ginger Kesler in Support of Motion for Stay ....................................... E Affidavit of Dr. David Hoffman in Support of Motion for Stay ............................. F Affidavit of Angela Tsiang in Support of Motion for Stay .....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Schulman Randy
    AN INTEGRATED MODEL OF VISION Randy L. Schulman, MS, OD, FCOVD EyeCare Associates, PC [email protected] 444 Westport Avenue 6515 Main Street 2600 Post Road 1425 Bedford Street Norwalk, CT 06851 Trumbull, CT 06611 Southport, CT 06890 Stamford, CT 06905 (203) 840-1991 (203) 374-2020 (203) 255-4005 (203) 357-0204 www.cteyecareassociates.com Skeffington’s Four Circles ● Identification ○ What is it? ● Centering ○ Where/When is it? ● Anti-Gravity ○ Where am I? ● Speech/Auditory ○ How do I organize, relate/communicate about it? Expanded Model of Vision ● Expanded understanding of our patients ● Includes more than just vision ● Looks at environment, social interactions, cognitive concerns ● Addresses total body health such as biological, biochemical, structural concerns An Integrated Model Mind/Body Physical Mental Biochemical Where What Emotional Move Talk Energetic Spiritual Physical Ocular ● What am I measuring as the problem? ○ Refraction ○ Oculomotor, Accommodative, Binocular skills ○ Ocular Health Body ● How is their physical body/structure? ○ Posture ○ Balance ○ Vestibular ○ Proprioception ● Do they have full range of motion, flexibility? ● What is their exercise routine like? Biochemical ● What is their biochemistry like? ○ Blood work ○ Genetic profile ○ What is their diet like? ● What medications/supplements are they taking? ○ Vitamins ○ Nutrients Mental ● What is their chief complaint? ○ What is their thoughts on the problem and how it affects them? ● What is their general attitude? ○ Optimistic ○ Pessimistic ○ Stuck in past
    [Show full text]
  • ROCKY MOUNTAIN HEALTH PLANS 2007 LIMITATIONS and EXCLUSIONS SOLO PPO Underwritten by Rocky Mountain Healthcare Options, Inc
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN HEALTH PLANS 2007 LIMITATIONS AND EXCLUSIONS SOLO PPO Underwritten by Rocky Mountain HealthCare Options, Inc A. Limitations and Exclusions (1) Limitations: (a) Preexisting Condition Limitation (i) Preexisting Condition Exclusion Imposed. RMHCO will not provide Benefits for services or supplies received by a Member in connection with a Preexisting Condition during a Preexisting Condition Limitation Period. (ii) Duration of Preexisting Condition Limitation Period. The Preexisting Condition Limitation Period shall be the twelve (12) month period starting on the Member=s effective date of coverage under this Contract. (iii) Reduction of Preexisting Condition Limitation Period for Creditable Coverage. The Preexisting Condition Period shall be reduced by the period of time the Member was covered by Creditable Coverage, if such Creditable Coverage was continuous to a date not more than ninety (90) days prior to the effective date of coverage under this Contract. (iv) Adopted Children. Dependent Children who are adopted or placed for adoption prior to their eighteenth (18th) birthday are not subject to the limitation for Preexisting Conditions. (b) Failure to Reside in the Service Area Except for Dependent Children, a Member who does not reside in the Service Area is not eligible to receive any Benefits under this Contract, including, but not limited to, Benefits for Medical Emergencies. (2) General Exclusions: The following are excluded from Health Care Services for which Benefits are provided under this Contract: (a) Any services or supplies not listed in the Schedule of Health Care Services, not Medically Necessary as defined by the Page 1 of 10 L&E-SOLO-107 Contract, or not required in accordance with the accepted standards of medical, surgical or psychiatric practice in the community where such services or supplies are to be rendered.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Dr
    CURRICULUM VITAE Dr. Peter L. Guhl, O.D., F.A.A.O., F.C.O.V.D., F.V.A.O., F.A.C.O.P., C.C.I.I. OFFICE: Dr. Peter Guhl, PLC & Associates 3630 George Washington Memorial Highway, Suite H Yorktown, Virginia 23693 Telephone: (757) 890-2020 Voice Mail: (757) 207-7998 Fax: (757) 890-9125 Email: [email protected] Web Site: guhl.vision EDUCATION: The Clayton School of Natural Health Birmingham, Alabama Doctor of Naturopathy Program Studies (N.D. Candidate) Nutrition - Doctoral Program Studies (Ph.D. Candidate) University of Houston Optometry College Houston, Texas Concentrated Ocular Therapeutics Course Advanced Ocular Therapeutics Course New England College of Optometry Boston, Massachusetts Pharmacology Certification Lighthouse of New York New York, New York Low Vision Certification Training Walter Reed Army Medical Center Washington D.C. Externship South End Health Clinic Boston, Massachusetts Internship 1 New England College of Optometry Boston, Massachusetts O.D., B.S. in Optometry Cum Laude Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio Major: Biology Kent State University Kent, Ohio Major: Engineering LICENSURE: Virginia: Therapeutic Optometric Licensure - Board of Optometry Connecticut: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Licensure - Board of Optometry Delaware: Diagnostic Licensure - Board of Optometry Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) Registered Provider EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: Private Practice - Dr. Peter Guhl, PLC & Associates - York County, Virginia Profile of the position: -Full strategic, tactical, organizational, compliance and managerial aspects of a solo practice. -Primary/preventative eyecare including specialty contacts, optical dispensary and eye care. -Medical eyecare including all non-surgical areas: Treatment/management of glaucoma, macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, infections, injuries, dry eye, peri-operative care, foreign body removal, etc.
    [Show full text]