Integrated Para-Xylene & Purified

EIA Report ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT

For Integrated Para-Xylene & Purified Terephthalic Acid (PX-PTA) Project within the existing Refinery Complex At

IOCL Paradip Refinery & Petrochemical Complex, Paradip Village: Abhaychandrapur P.O. Jhimani - Kujang Taluk: Kujang

[Project termed under Schedule 5(c) Category ‘A’ – Petro-chemical complexes (industries based on processing of petroleum fractions & natural gas and/or reforming to aromatics” as per EIA Notification 2006 and its Amendments]

Submitted by:

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, PARADIP REFINERY

EIA CONSULTANT:

M/s. Hubert Enviro Care Systems (p) Limited

June 2021

1 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Declaration by the Head of the Accredited Consultant Organization

I, Dr. J. R. Moses hereby, confirm that the below mentioned experts prepared the EIA/EMP for the “Integrated Para-Xylene & Purified Terephthalic Acid (PX-PTA) Project within the existing Refinery Complex” at Abhaychandrapur village, Jagatsinghpur District, Odisha State by M/s. Indian Oil Corporation Limited and also confirms that I shall be fully accountable for any misleading information mentioned in this statement.

Signature:

Date: 24-06-2021

Name: Dr. J.R Moses

Designation: CEO

Name of the EIA Consultant Organization: Hubert Enviro Care Systems (p) Ltd., Chennai.

NABET Certificate No & Validity: NABET/EIA/1922/RA 0172 Valid up to 13/10/2022.

2 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Declaration of Experts contributing to the EIA

I hereby certify that I was involved in the preparation of EIA/ EMP for the “Integrated Para-Xylene & Purified Terephthalic Acid (PX-PTA) Project within the existing Refinery Complex” at Abhaychandrapur village, Jagatsinghpur District, Odisha State by M/s. Indian Oil Corporation Limited as EIA Coordinator with the support of the following Functional Area Experts.

EIA Co-ordinator

Name: Dr. J R Moses

Signature:

Date:24-06-2021

Contact Information: Hubert Enviro Care Systems (p) Ltd., # A-21, Phase III, Behind Lions Club School, Thiru-vi-ka Industrial Area, Guindy, Chennai –600032. Tamil Nadu, India. Email: [email protected]

Website: www.hecs.in

Functional Area Experts (FAEs):

S. Functional Duration of Name of the Expert Signature No. Areas Involvement Sep 2018 till Dr. J R Moses date 1. AP FAE Sep 2018 till Mr. Vamsee Krishna Navooru date Sep 2018 till 2. AQ FAE Dr. J R Moses date Sep 2018 till Dr. J R Moses date FAE Sep 2018 till 3. WP Mr. Vamsee Krishna Navooru date Sep 2018 till FAA Mr. Chengalvarayan date Sep 2018 till 4. SHW FAE Mr. A. Manoharan March 2021

3 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. Functional Duration of Name of the Expert Signature No. Areas Involvement Sep 2018 till Mr. Vamsee Krishna Navooru date Sep 2018 till 5. SE FAE Mr. V. Dhivakar date Sep 2018 till Dr.. Sundararajan date 6. EB FAE Sep 2018 till Dr. Rajkumar Samuel date Sep 2018 till 7. HG FAE Mr. MallikarjunaRao date Sep 2018 till 8. Geo FAE Mr. MallikarjunaRao date Sep 2018 till Mr. Vivek P. Navare date 9. NV FAE Sep 2018 till Mr. Vamsee Krishna Navooru date Sep 2018 till 10. LU FAE Mr. VenkateswarluRachala date Sep 2018 till 11. RH FAE Dr. J R Moses date Sep 2018 till Mr. A. Manoharan March 2020 12. SC FAE Feb 2020 till Dr.B.C.Nagaraja March 2021 AP - Air pollution monitoring, prevention and control AQ - Meteorology, air quality modeling and prediction EB - Ecology and biodiversity HG - Hydrology, ground water and water conservation LU - Land use NV - Noise & Vibration RH - Risk assessment and hazards management SC - Soil conservation SE - Socio-economics SHW - Solid and hazardous waste management WP - Water pollution monitoring, prevention and control

4 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Acknowledgement

The following personnel are gratefully acknowledged for their fullest support in collection, compilation of needful data regarding the project and kind cooperation in fulfilling the report on Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)/EMP for “Integrated Para-Xylene & Purified Terephthalic Acid (PX-PTA) Project within the existing Refinery Complex” at Abhaychandrapur village, Jagatsinghpur District, Odisha State by M/s. Indian Oil Corporation Limited

M/s. Indian Oil Corporation Limited

1) Mr. BR Malik – Chief General Manager (HSE) 2) Mr. Sarvesh Kumar – Deputy General Manager (HSE) 3) Mr. SF Hashmy – Chief Manager (HSE) 4) Mr. B.Barla – Senior Manager (HSE) M/s Hubert Enviro Care System Private Limited

1) Dr. J R Moses (CEO and EIA Coordinator) 2) Dr. Raj Kumar Samuel (Director- Technical) 3) Mr. Vamsee Krishna Navooru (Consultancy Head) 4) Mr. Manoj Kumar (Risk Engineer) 5) Ms. S. Rekha (Trainee Engineer) 6) Mr.M. Rabik Raja (Trainee Engineer)

5 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Contents

CHAPTER 1 ...... 26 1 INTRODUCTION ...... 27 1.1 Introduction to Project & Project Proponent ...... 27 1.2 Purpose of the EIA report ...... 30 1.3 Brief description of the Project ...... 30 1.4 EIA cost ...... 31 1.5 Scope of the study & Methodology adopted ...... 31 1.5.1 Objectives of the EIA Report ...... 32 1.5.2 Scope of Work ...... 32 1.5.3 EIA Process ...... 34 1.6 Objectives of the Study ...... 35 1.7 Applicable Regulatory Framework ...... 36 1.8 ToR Compliance ...... 41 Material Handling, Storage and Transportation ...... 82 CHAPTER 2 ...... 101 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...... 102 2.1 Project Description...... 102 2.1.1 Type of Project ...... 103 2.2 Need of the project ...... 103 2.3 Site Location ...... 103 2.4 Existing Environmental Setup ...... 111 2.5 Project Cost ...... 112 2.6 Proposed Schedule for Approval and Implementation ...... 112 2.7 Project Details ...... 112 2.7.1 Existing Facility ...... 112 2.7.2 Size & Magnitude of Operation ...... 114 2.7.3 Existing Utilities ...... 116 2.7.3.1 Existing Gas Monitoring System ...... 121 2.7.3.2 Existing Fire protection system ...... 122 2.7.4 Proposed Facility ...... 125 2.7.4.1 Technology & Process Description ...... 125 2.7.4.1.1 Paraxylene (PX) ...... 125

6 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

2.7.4.1.2 Purified Terephthalic Acid (PTA) ...... 135 2.7.4.2 Raw Material and products ...... 158 2.7.5 Proposed Offsite Facilities ...... 162 2.7.6 Proposed unit facilities and Utilities ...... 164 2.7.7 Proposed Gas Monitoring System ...... 168 2.7.7.1 Mitigation Measures ...... 169 2.7.7.2 Precaution & Safety Measures against Fire Hazards ...... 170 2.7.7.3 Assessment of new & untested Technology ...... 170 2.7.8 Sulphur Balance ...... 171 2.8 Plot area ...... 171 2.8.1 Site Photographs ...... 171 2.8.2 Land Area Breakup ...... 175 2.9 Manpower ...... 180 2.10 Power and Fuel Requirements ...... 180 2.11 Water requirements ...... 181 2.12 Source of water Supply ...... 185 2.13 Project schedule ...... 186 2.14 Air Pollution Control Measures ...... 186 2.15 Green Belt ...... 186 2.16 Water Pollution Control Measures ...... 190 2.17 Proposed Effluent Treatment Plant ...... 194 2.17.1 PX Effluent Treatment ...... 195 2.17.2 PTA Effluent Treatment ...... 195 2.18 Solid waste Management ...... 199 2.19 Hazardous Waste Management ...... 199 CHAPTER 3 ...... 205 3 DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT ...... 206 3.1 Preamble ...... 206 3.2 Study Area ...... 206 3.3 Description of Study Area ...... 206 3.4 Environmentally/Ecologically Sensitive areas ...... 210 3.5 Physical Conditions of PIA district ...... 216 3.5.1 PIA District Profile ...... 216

7 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

3.5.2 Climatic Conditions ...... 216 3.5.3 Natural Resources of PIA District ...... 217 3.5.3.1 Flora & Fauna ...... 217 3.5.3.2 Forest Resources ...... 217 3.5.3.3 Irrigation ...... 218 3.5.3.4 Agricultural Resources ...... 219 3.5.3.5 Mineral Resources ...... 219 3.5.4 Land Use & Land Cover ...... 221 3.5.4.1 Land Use and Land Cover of the Study Area ...... 225 3.5.5 Topography ...... 228 3.5.6 Geomorphology of PIA district ...... 230 3.5.7 Geomorphology of the Study Area ...... 230 3.5.8 Hydrogeology of PIA district ...... 235 3.5.9 Drainage Pattern in PIA district ...... 236 3.5.10 Geology ...... 238 3.5.11 Seismicity ...... 238 3.5.12 Soils in PIA District ...... 240 3.5.13 Natural Hazards in PIA District ...... 241 3.6 Air Environment ...... 242 3.6.1 Meteorological Conditions ...... 243 3.6.2 Meteorological Data Collection ...... 243 3.6.3 General Meteorological Scenario based on IMD Data ...... 243 3.6.4 Meteorological Scenario during Study Period ...... 245 3.6.5 Atmospheric Inversion ...... 246 3.7 Ambient Air Quality ...... 247 3.7.1 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations ...... 247 3.7.2 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Techniques and Frequency ...... 250 3.7.3 Results and Discussions ...... 251 3.7.4 Observations ...... 256 3.8 Noise Environment ...... 256 3.8.1 Results and Discussions ...... 256 3.8.2 Observations ...... 257 3.9 Water Environment ...... 259

8 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

3.9.1 Surface Water Resources ...... 259 3.9.1.1 Surface Water Quality Assessment ...... 259 3.9.1.2 Results and Discussions ...... 268 3.9.2 Ground Water Resources ...... 268 3.9.2.1 Ground Water Quality ...... 269 3.9.2.2 Results and Discussions ...... 276 3.10 Soil as a resource and its quality ...... 276 3.10.1 Results and Discussions ...... 282 3.11 Biological Environment ...... 282 3.11.1 Flora ...... 283 3.11.2 Fauna ...... 287 3.11.3 Management in and around Project area ...... 293 3.11.4 Summary ...... 294 3.12 Socio Economic Profile ...... 295 3.12.1 Socio Economic Profile of PIA District ...... 295 3.12.1.1 Socio Economic Aspects ...... 295 3.12.1.2 Population and Household Size ...... 296 3.12.1.3 Sex Ratio ...... 297 3.12.1.4 Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes ...... 297 3.12.1.5 Education & Literacy ...... 297 3.12.1.6 Health Facilities ...... 298 3.12.1.7 Employment and Livelihood ...... 299 3.12.2 Socio Economic Profile of study area ...... 299 3.12.2.1 Employment and livelihood ...... 307 3.12.2.2 Educational infrastructure within study area ...... 308 3.12.2.3 Dwelling within study area ...... 316 3.12.2.4 Health facilities within the study area ...... 316 3.12.3 Observations ...... 317 CHAPTER 4 ...... 318 4 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES . 319 4.1 Introduction ...... 319 4.2 Proposed Project Activities ...... 319 4.3 Construction Phase...... 319

9 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

4.3.1 Impacts during Construction Phase ...... 320 4.3.2 Mitigation Measures for Construction Phase ...... 320 4.3.3 Land environment...... 321 4.3.4 Air environment ...... 323 4.3.5 Water environment ...... 324 4.3.6 Noise environment ...... 324 4.3.7 Waste generation ...... 325 4.3.8 Ecology ...... 326 4.3.9 Social environment ...... 326 4.4 Operation Phase ...... 326 4.4.1 Impacts during Operational Phase ...... 326 4.5 Air Environment ...... 327 4.5.1 Meteorological data ...... 327 4.5.2 AERMET Process ...... 328 4.5.3 AERMOD Process ...... 329 4.5.4 Emissions ...... 330 4.5.4.1 Point Source Emission (Proposed Stack Emission) ...... 332 4.5.4.2 Summary on Stack Emission ...... 340 4.5.4.3 Line source emission (Transportation) ...... 341 4.5.4.4 Summary on Transportation Emission ...... 348 4.5.4.5 Cummulative Emission ...... 349 4.5.4.6 Summary on Cummulative Emission ...... 355 4.5.4.7 Other Emission-Storage Tank vent & PX-Process vent emmission ...... 356 4.5.4.8 Summary on Other Emission-Storage Tank vent & PX-Process vent emmission363 4.5.4.9 Other Emission-PTA Process vent & Silo vent emmission ...... 364 4.5.4.10 Summary on Other Emission- PTA Process vent & Silo vent emmission ...... 378 4.5.5 Impacts due to Traffic and Transportation ...... 379 4.6 Noise Environment ...... 379 4.6.1 Impact ...... 379 4.6.2 Mitigation Measure ...... 380 4.7 Water Environment ...... 381 4.7.1 Mitigation Measures ...... 382 4.7.2 Waste Water Quality, Quantity and Treatment Method ...... 382

10 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

4.8 Land Environment ...... 383 4.8.1 Potential Impact Due to Location ...... 383 4.8.2 Impacts Due to Changes in Land Use Pattern ...... 383 4.8.3 Mittigation Measures ...... 383 4.9 Marine Environment ...... 383 4.10 Solid Waste Management ...... 384 4.10.1 Impact Due to Solid Waste Generation ...... 384 4.10.2 Mitigation Measures ...... 384 CHAPTER 5 ...... 385 5 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES ...... 386 5.1 Introduction ...... 386 5.2 Site Alternative ...... 386 5.3 Water Supply Alternative ...... 386 5.4 Technology Alternative ...... 386 CHAPTER 6 ...... 387 6 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ...... 388 6.1 Introduction ...... 388 6.2 Environmental Effects Monitoring in EIA ...... 388 6.2.1 Post Project Environment Monitoring Program ...... 389 6.2.2 Monitoring Methodologies ...... 390 6.3 Reporting & Documentation ...... 391 6.4 Budget for Environmental Monitoring Plan ...... 391 CHAPTER 7 ...... 393 7 ADDITIONAL STUDIES ...... 394 7.1 Public Consultation ...... 394 7.1.1 Reply to the issues raised by the public during Public Hearing on 02.03.2021 398 7.2 Risk Assessment ...... 415 7.3 Applicability of Environmental Clearance ...... 416 7.4 Consent for Existing Operation ...... 416 7.5 TOR issued by MoEF ...... 417 7.6 Copy of Standard TOR...... 418 CHAPTER 8 ...... 424 8 PROJECT BENEFITS ...... 425

11 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

8.1 Project Benefits ...... 425 CHAPTER 9 ...... 427 9 ENVIRONMENTAL COST AND BENEFIT ANALYSIS ...... 428 CHAPTER 10 ...... 429 10 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ...... 430 10.1 Introduction ...... 430 10.2 Objectives of EMP ...... 430 10.3 EMP Structure and Organization ...... 431 10.4 EMP Roles and Responsibilities ...... 432 10.5 Environmental Management Plan for Construction Phase ...... 434 10.5.1 Air Quality ...... 434 10.5.2 Noise Environment ...... 435 10.5.3 Water Quality and Water Resources ...... 435 10.5.4 Solid Waste ...... 435 10.5.5 Land Environment ...... 436 10.5.6 Ecology ...... 436 10.5.7 Socio Economic ...... 436 10.6 Environmental Management Plan for Operation Phase ...... 436 10.6.1 Air Pollution Management ...... 437 10.6.1.1 Gaseous Waste Emissions ...... 439 10.6.2 Waste Water Management ...... 442 10.6.3 Solid Waste Management ...... 445 10.6.4 Noise Environment ...... 446 10.6.5 Material Handling Storage and Transportation ...... 446 10.6.6 Green Belt Development ...... 449 10.6.7 Rain Water Harvesting Plan ...... 451 10.7 Occupational Health and Safety ...... 454 10.7.1 Safety Measures ...... 456 10.7.2 Precaution & Safety Measures Against Fire Hazards ...... 457 10.8 Environmental Management Cell ...... 458 10.9 Corporate Environmental Policy ...... 458 10.10 Budgetary Provision for Environmental Management Plan ...... 460 10.11 Corporate Social Responsibility ...... 460

12 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

10.12 Corporate Environmental Responsibility (CER) ...... 460 CHAPTER 11 ...... 462 11 SUMMARY & CONCLUSION ...... 463 CHAPTER 12 ...... 465 12 DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS ...... 466 12.1 Brief Profile of Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Limited (HECS) ...... 466 12.2 QCI-NABET - EIA Accreditation ...... 468 12.3 Copy of QCI NABET Accreditation ...... 469

13 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

List of Tables Table 1-1 Chronology of Environmental clearances & CRZ clearance ...... 29 Table 1-2Applicable Acts and Rules for the proposed Refinery project ...... 37 Table 2-1Geographical coordinates of the project site ...... 103 Table 2-2 Existing Environmental Setup of the study region ...... 111 Table 2-3List of major Industries within 10km Radius from the project site ...... 112 Table 2-4 Time Schedule for completion of the proposed project ...... 112 Table 2-5 Existing /Approved/Proposed Units ...... 114 Table 2-6 List of Existing utilities at PDR ...... 116 Table 2-7 Existing storage tanks ...... 117 Table 2-8 Pipelines to South Loading Jetty ...... 120 Table 2-9 Pipeline crossing Santra Creek for the Proposed PX PTA project ...... 120 Table 2-10 Limits of Gas Detector Type ...... 121 Table 2-11 List of firefighting facility available ...... 122 Table 2-12 Equipment List- PX Process Unit ...... 137 Table 2-13 Equipment List- PTA Process Unit ...... 147 Table 2-14 Existing and proposed product ...... 158 Table 2-15 Details of Proposed Chemicals and Catalyst for PX and PTA ...... 158 Table 2-16 Equipment List- Offsite & Utilities ...... 162 Table 2-17 Major facilities in the proposed PX unit with Capacity ...... 164 Table 2-18 Major facilities in the proposed PTA unit with Capacity ...... 165 Table 2-19 Major facilities in the proposed New ETP ...... 166 Table 2-20 Proposed Utilities ...... 166 Table 2-21 Upcoming Storage Facilities ...... 167 Table 2-22 Sulphur balance for Proposed Facility ...... 171 Table 2-23 Land use planning of the Project Site ...... 175 Table 2-24 Manpower Requirement ...... 180 Table 2-25 Power and Fuel Requirement ...... 181 Table 2-26 Existing and Proposed Water Requirements ...... 182 Table 2-27 Green Belt Area Breakup...... 187 Table 2-28 Summary of Plantation for the year 2007-2020 ...... 189 Table 2-29 Characteristics of Effluent Generated ...... 193 Table 2-30 Characteristics Final effluent discharge to sea ...... 193 Table 2-31 Solid Waste in Operational Phase ...... 199 Table 2-32 Existing Hazardous Wastes Generation ...... 200 Table 2-33 Proposed Hazardous Wastes Generation ...... 200 Table 3-1 Environmentally Sensitive Areas within 15km from Project Boundary ...... 210 Table 3-2 Source wise Irrigation potential created during the year 2009-10 & 2010-11 ..... 218 Table 3-3 District land use/land cover statistics (2011-12) for Jagatsinghapurdistrict...... 221 Table 3-4 Land Use Pattern of the Study Area ...... 225 Table 3-5Geomorphology of the Study Area ...... 230 Table 3-6 Climatological Summary -Paradip port (1971-2000)...... 244 Table 3-7 Meteorological Data for the Study Period (March - May 2019) ...... 245

14 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

.Table 3-8 Details of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Locations ...... 247 Table 3-9 Analytical Methods for Analysis of Ambient Air Quality Parameters ...... 250 Table 3-10 Summary of the average baseline concentrations of pollutants ...... 252 Table 3-11 Day and Night Equivalent Noise Levels ...... 257 Table 3-12 Test methods used for the analysis of water quality parameters ...... 259 Table 3-13 Details of Surface water sampling locations ...... 261 Table 3-14: Surface water Monitoring Results ...... 263 Table 3-15: Dynamic ground water resources of Jagatsinghapur District ...... 268 Table 3-16 Details of Groundwater Quality Monitoring Locations ...... 269 Table 3-17 Ground Water Monitoring Results ...... 271 Table 3-18 Soil & Sediment Quality Monitoring Locations ...... 276 Table 3-19 Soil & Sediment Quality Monitoring Results ...... 279 Table 3-20 List of flora reported/observed in the study area ...... 283 Table 3-21 List of Mangroves in the study area ...... 286 Table 3-22 List of Fauna observed in the study area ...... 287 Table 3-23 Social Indicators of Jagatsinghapur District ...... 296 Table 3-24Education Infrastructures in the Jagatsinghapur District ...... 298 Table 3-25 Medical Facilities available in JagatsinghapurDistrict ...... 298 Table 3-26 Population profile within study area ...... 300 Table 3-27 Summary of Socioeconomic indicators within the study area ...... 307 Table 3-28 Classification of workers within study area ...... 307 Table 3-29 Details of Literacy population in the study area ...... 309 Table 3-30 Health facilities available in the study area ...... 316 Table 4-1 Existing Stack Emission details ...... 330 Table 4-2Proposed Stack Emission details...... 334 Table 4-3 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of PM Obtained Through Modeling on stack emission ...... 335 Table 4-4 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Sulphur Dioxide obtained through modeling on stack emission ...... 336 Table 4-5 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of oxide of Nitrogen obtained through modeling on stack emission ...... 337 Table 4-6 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Carbon Monoxide obtained through modeling on stack emission ...... 338 Table 4-7 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Carbon Dioxide obtained through modeling on stack emission ...... 339 Table 4-8 Total Maximum GLCs from the Point Source (Stack Emissions) ...... 340 Table 4-9 Proposed Transportation Emission details ...... 344 Table 4-10 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Particulate Matter obtained through modeling on Transportation emission ...... 345 Table 4-11 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of oxide of Nitrogen obtained through modeling on Transportation emission ...... 346 Table 4-12 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Carbon Monoxide obtained through modeling on Transportation emission ...... 347

15 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Table 4-13 Total Maximum GLCs from the transportation Emissions ...... 348 Table 4-14 Proposed Cumulative Emission details (Point source emission and Line source emission) ...... 349 Table 4-15 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Particulate Matter obtained through modeling on Cummulative emission ...... 350 Table 4-16 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Sulphur Dioxide obtained through modeling on Cummulative emission ...... 351 Table 4-17 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of oxide of Nitrogen obtained through modeling on Cummulative emission ...... 352 Table 4-18 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Carbon Monoxide obtained through modeling on Cummulative emission ...... 353 Table 4-19 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Carbon Dioxide obtained through modeling on Cummulative emission ...... 354 Table 4-20 Total Maximum GLCs from the Cummulative Emissions (point source emission & line source emission) ...... 355 Table 4-21 Proposed Storage tank vents and PX-process vent Emission details ...... 358 Table 4-22 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of VOC obtained through modeling on other vent emission ...... 359 Table 4-23 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Benzene obtained through modeling on other vent emission...... 360 Table 4-24 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Toluene obtained through modeling on other vent emission...... 361 Table 4-25 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Carbon Dioxide obtained through modeling on other vent emission ...... 362 Table 4-26 Total Maximum GLCs from the Storage Tank vent & PX-Process vent emmission ...... 363 Table 4-27 Proposed PTA Process vent & Silo vent emission details ...... 366 Table 4-28 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Benzene obtained through modeling on other vent emission...... 367 Table 4-29 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Toluene obtained through modeling on other vent emission...... 368 Table 4-30 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Xylene obtained through modeling on other vent emission...... 369 Table 4-31 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Acetic Acid obtained through modeling on other vent emission ...... 370 Table 4-32 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Methanol obtained through modeling on other vent emission ...... 371 Table 4-33 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of MethylAcetate obtained through modeling on other vent emission ...... 372 Table 4-34 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Bromide obtained through modeling on other vent emission...... 373 Table 4-35 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Methyl Bromide obtained through modeling on other vent emission ...... 374

16 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Table 4-36 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Carbon Monoxide obtained through modeling on other vent emission ...... 375 Table 4-37 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of PTA Dust obtained through modeling on other vent emission ...... 376 Table 4-38 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Nitrogen obtained through modeling on other vent emission...... 377 Table 4-39 Total Maximum GLCs from the Process & Silo Vent Emissions ...... 378 Table 4-40 Existing & proposed vehicular movement per Hour (Peak Hour) ...... 379 Table 4-41 Traffic Volume after Implementation of the Project ...... 379 Table 6-1 Post Project Environmental Monitoring Plan ...... 389 Table 6-2 Budgetary allocation for Environmental Monitoring ...... 391 Table 10-1 Responsibility for EMP Implementation ...... 432 Table 10-2 Proposed Pollution control scheme ...... 437 Table 10-3 Standards for Emissions from Furnaces, heaters and Boilers ...... 438 Table 10-4 Gaseous Waste Emissions from PX Plant ...... 440 Table 10-5 Gaseous Waste Emissions from PTA Plant ...... 441 Table 10-6 Waste Effluents from PX Plant ...... 442 Table 10-7 Waste Effluents from PTA Plant ...... 444 Table 10-8 Liquid Waste Effluents from Offsite and Utilities ...... 445 Table 10-9 Raw Material Storage and Dispatch Facilities ...... 447

17 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

List of Figures

Figure 1-1 EIA Process ...... 35 Figure 2-1 Index map of the project site ...... 107 Figure 2-2 Google image showing salient features within 0- 1 Km radius ...... 108 Figure 2-3 Google image showing salient features within 0- 5 Km radius ...... 109 Figure 2-4 Google image showing salient features 0- 10 Km Radius Map around the study region ...... 110 Figure 2-5 Schematic diagram of Existing Refinery ...... 114 Figure 2-6 Fire Water Network South ...... 123 Figure 2-7 Fire Water Network in North...... 124 Figure 2-8 Process Flow Diagram ...... 154 Figure 2-9 Schematic representation of Process of PX unit ...... 155 Figure 2-10 Schematic representation of Process of PTA Unit-Sheet 1 ...... 156 Figure 2-11 Schematic representation of Process of PTA Unit-Sheet 2 ...... 157 Figure 2-12Material Balance across PX Process Unit ...... 161 Figure 2-13Material Balance across PTA Process Unit ...... 162 Figure 2-14 Site Photographs of Existing Refinery Complex ...... 172 Figure 2-15 Site Photographs of Proposed facility ...... 173 Figure 2-16 Photographs of Existing ETP ...... 173 Figure 2-17 Photographs of Existing STP ...... 174 Figure 2-18 Existing Refinery Layout ...... 177 Figure 2-19 Proposed Layout ...... 178 Figure 2-20 Existing and proposed plot plan...... 179 Figure 2-21 Water Balance Diagrams of Existing Refinery ...... 183 Figure 2-22 Water Balance Diagrams of Proposed Refinery ...... 184 Figure 2-23 Water Balance Diagrams for after expansion of Refinery ...... 185 Figure 2-24 Green Belt Layout ...... 188 Figure 2-25 Flow diagram of Effluent Treatment plant (Existing) ...... 192 Figure 2-26 Flow diagram of Effluent Treatment plant (Proposed) ...... 192 Figure 2-27 Flow Diagram of WRP Plant (Existing) ...... 193 Figure 2-28 Effluent Treatment plant (Proposed Layout) ...... 198 Figure 2-29 Google Earth demarcation of SLF area in IOCL Paradip Refinery ...... 201 Figure 2-30 Photograph of Secured Landfill Area with Geotextile Membrane around it in IOCL Paradip Refinery ...... 202 Figure 2-31 Lablelling of Hazardous waste Containers ...... 202 Figure 2-32 Hazardous Waste labelsdisplayed on packaging ...... 203 Figure 2-33 Hazardous Waste Storage area ...... 204 Figure 3-1Map showing the Satellite Image of the study area of Project ...... 208 Figure 3-2Topo Map of Study area ...... 209 Figure 3-3 Environmental sensitive areas covering within 15 km from project boundary ... 215 Figure 3-4 Mineral Map of Odisha (Orissa) ...... 220 Figure 3-5Land use pattern of the Jagatsinghapur District ...... 223 Figure 3-6Land use map of the Jagatsinghapur District ...... 224

18 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 3-7 Land Use Pattern of the Study Area ...... 226 Figure 3-8 Land Use Map of the Study Area ...... 227 Figure 3-9Physical Map of Odisha ...... 228 Figure 3-10Contour Map of Study Area ...... 229 Figure 3-11Geomorphology Pattern of the Study Area ...... 232 Figure 3-12Geomorphology Map of Jagatsinghapur District ...... 233 Figure 3-13Geomorphology Map of the Study Area ...... 234 Figure 3-14Hydrogeology Map of Jagatsinghapur District ...... 236 Figure 3-15Drainage map of the study area ...... 237 Figure 3-16Geology Map of Orissa ...... 238 Figure 3-17 Seismicity Map of India ...... 239 Figure 3-18 Soil map of India ...... 241 Figure 3-19 Wind hazard Map of India ...... 242 Figure 3-20 Wind rose during study period (March - May 2019) ...... 246 Figure 3-21Atmospheric inversion level at the project site ...... 247 Figure 3-22Map showing the Air monitoring locations ...... 249 Figure 3-23: Trends of Measured Ambient Concentrations in the Study Area ...... 255 Figure 3-24 Map showing the Noise Monitoring locations ...... 258 Figure 3-25: Map showing the surface water monitoring locations ...... 262 Figure 3-26 Map showing the groundwater monitoring locations ...... 270 Figure 3-27 Map showing the soil monitoring locations ...... 278 Figure 4-1 Wind rose diagram of Meteorological data considered for Modelling (March to May 2019) ...... 328 Figure 4-2 Project layout with proposed stack coordinates ...... 332 Figure 4-3 Google earth demarcation of proposed stack with coordinates ...... 333 Figure 4-4 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of PM within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on stack emission ...... 335 Figure 4-5 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of SO2within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on stack emission ...... 336 Figure 4-6 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of NOx within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on stack emission ...... 337 Figure 4-7 Predicted 1-Hr GLC’s of CO within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on stack emission ...... 338 Figure 4-8 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of CO2 within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on stack emission ...... 339 Figure 4-9 Project layout with PTA truck Route ...... 341 Figure 4-10 Project layout with Toluene truck Route ...... 342 Figure 4-11 Google earth demarcation of proposed truck route with coordinates ...... 343 Figure 4-12 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of PM within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on Transportation emission ...... 345 Figure 4-13 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of NOx within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on Transportation emission ...... 346

19 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-14 Predicted 1-Hr GLC’s of CO within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on Transportation emission ...... 347 Figure 4-15 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of PM within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on Cummulative emission ...... 350 Figure 4-16 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of SO2 within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on Cummulative emission ...... 351 Figure 4-17 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of NOx within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on Cummulative emission ...... 352 Figure 4-18 Predicted 1-Hr GLC’s of CO within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on Cummulative emission ...... 353 Figure 4-19 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of CO2 within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on Cummulative emission ...... 354 Figure 4-20 Project layout with proposed storage tank vent & PX-process vent coordinates ...... 356 Figure 4-21 Google earth demarcation of proposed storage tank vent & PX-process vent coordinates ...... 357 Figure 4-22 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of VOC within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on other vent emissions ...... 359 Figure 4-23 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of Benzene within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on other vent emissions ...... 360 Figure 4-24 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of Toluene within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on other vent emissions ...... 361 Figure 4-25 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of CO2 within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on other vent emissions ...... 362 Figure 4-26 Project layout with proposed PTA Process vent & Silo vent coordinates ...... 364 Figure 4-27 Google earth demarcation of proposed PTA Process vent & Silo vent coordinates ...... 365 Figure 4-28 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of Benzene within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on other vent emissions ...... 367 Figure 4-29 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of Toluene within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on other vent emissions ...... 368 Figure 4-30 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of Xylene within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on other vent emissions ...... 369 Figure 4-31 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of Acetic Acid within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on other vent emissions ...... 370 Figure 4-32 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of Methanol within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on other vent emissions ...... 371 Figure 4-33 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of MethylAcetate within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on other vent emissions ...... 372 Figure 4-34 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of Bromide within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on other vent emissions ...... 373 Figure 4-35 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of Methyl Bromide within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on other vent emissions ...... 374

20 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-36 Predicted 1-Hr GLC’s of CO within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on other vent emissions ...... 375 Figure 4-37 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of PTA Dust within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on other vent emissions ...... 376 Figure 4-38 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of Nitrogen within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on other vent emissions ...... 377 Figure 7-1 Public Hearing Advertisements(Odisha) ...... 395 Figure 7-2 Public Hearing Advertisements(English) ...... 396 Figure 7-3 Public Hearing Announcement in nearby villages ...... 397 Figure 7-4 Public Hearing photographs ...... 397 Figure 10-1 Typical HSE Department Organogram ...... 431 Figure 10-2Mode of Transport for Product materials ...... 447 Figure 10-3 Green Belt Photographs ...... 450 Figure 10-4 Ecological park in Paradip Refinery ...... 451 Figure 10-5 Rain water harvesting integrated with ecological park ...... 452 Figure 10-6 Storm water pond for collecting surface runoff inside Refinery ...... 453 Figure 10-7 Organogram for OHC ...... 456 Figure 10-8 EHS Policy ...... 459

21 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

List of Annexure

ANNEXURE No. Documents

1 Land documents

2 Latest EC and its certified compliance report

Latest CTO with all CTO’s and CTE’s since inception with chronology 3 table & Self certified compliance report of latest CTO submitted to SPCB, Odisha

4 PESO license

5 Earlier EC’s and its certified compliance report

6 Overall plan of PDR & Proposed ETP layout

7 Approval for Water Extraction

Green Belt Demarcation with the species of trees planted & Green belt 8 Layout

9 Water Balance Chart

10 Risk Assessment

11 ERDMP

12 Material Safety Data Sheet

13 Raw Data for AAQ

14 Hazardous Waste Authorization

15 Heath Monitoring Report

16 LDAR Report

17 Fire Protection Management

18 CSR Activity

19 Latest Safety audit report

20 Wildlife conservation plan

21 Latest Daily Environmental Safety Report

22 Occupational Hazardous Toxic gas monitoring data

22 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

ANNEXURE No. Documents

23 Approval target group for Pre Medical Check-up for Toxic Exposure

24 No litigation Affidavit

25 Flood risk assessment

26 Monitoring reports

27 Noise Survey Report

28 Medical Facilities within IOCL Paradip Refinery

29 Land allocation for proposed green belt

30 Executive Summary

31 Flare Management System

32 Latest Analysis report of effluent characteristics discharging into sea

33 Recommendation from OCZMA for laying pipeline across santra creek

34 MoM for FG/NG from GAIL

23 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

List of Abbrevations

EIA Environmental Impact Assessment IOCL Indian Oil Corporation Limited FCCU Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Unit CDU Crude Distillation Unit VDU Vacuum Distillation Unit PET Polyethylene Terephthalate PSF Poly Sulfone PFY Phenol Formaldehyde AIT Auto Ignition Temperature LPG Liquefied Petroleum Gas HAZOP Hazard and Operability Study CPP Captive Power plant VOC Volatile Organic Carbon ETP Effluent Treatment Plant HC Hydrocarbon HPVGT High Pressure Vent Gas Treatment OLIC Odisha lift Irrigation Corporation OAIC Odisha Argo Industries Corporation IMD Indian Meteorological Department TDS Total Dissolved Solids BOD Biochemical Oxygen Demand COD Chemical Oxygen Demand PUC Pollution Under Control GLC Ground Level Concentration SBL Stable Boundary Layer CBL Convective Boundary Layer LOS Level of service DM Demineralised Water LTD Low Tide line

24 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

ToR Terms of Reference OISD Oil Industry safety Directorate PLC Programmable Logic Controller ALARP As Low as reasonably Practicable ESC Enterprise Social Commitment EMP Environmental Management plan PM Particulate Matter SO2 Sulphur Dioxide NO2 Oxides of Nitrogen H2S Hydrogen Sulphide ISBL Inside Battery Limit LDAR Leak Detection And Repair OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration VAUs Ventilation Air Units EAUs Exhaust Air Units IBR Indian Boiler Regulation

25 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

26 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Introduction to Project & Project Proponent

Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) is India's largest commercial enterprise engaging in the business of refining, pipeline transportation, marketing of petroleum products and also involving in exploration production of crude oil gas, marketing of natural gas and petrochemicals. IOCL accounts for nearly half of India’s petroleum products market share owning 11 refineries. It is the 11th refinery of IOCL. Hon’ble Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi dedicated the refinery cum Petrochemical Complex to Nation on 7th Feb 2016.

The refinery was commissioned in the year 2015with a capacity of 15 MMTPA has been set up at an estimated cost of Rs. 34,555 crores. The major processing units provided were Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Unit (FCCU) 4.2 MMTPA, Crude/ Vacuum Distillation unit (CDU/ VDU) 15 MMTPA, Delayed Coking unit 4.1 MMTPA, Diesel Hydro Treating Unit of 5.2 MMTPA, VGO hydro treatment Unit 5.4 MMTPA, Sulfur Recovery Unit 2 x 525 TPD + 1 TGTU.

Paradip Refinery has a unique INDMAX Unit technology, which is indigenously been developed by Indian Oil's R&D Centre. The INDMAX (FCC) Unit has designed to produce 44% LPG, the highest yield from such plants. The commissioning of INDMAX Unit at Paradip marks a major milestone in the history of Indian refining. With this, Indian Oil has been recognized globally as a technology licensor. The other first-time technological features of the Refinery include Flue Gas Desulphurisation facilities, Vapour Recovery system from jetty loading and an alkylation process to get octane-rich low-benzene MS blend component, etc.

The refinery can process 100% high Sulphur and heavy crude oil to produce various petroleum products like Petrol and diesel BS-IV quality, kerosene, Aviation Turbine fuel, Propylene, Sulphur and Petroleum Coke. The refinery has also designed to produce Euro-IV premium quality Motor Spirit and other green auto fuel variants for export to advanced countries. The products from the Refinery meet the energy demands of the domestic market and partly the South-East Asia export market. The finished petroleum products from Paradip Refinery being shipped to as far as Asia Pacific, Europe, USA, and to the demand centers in the east of India, northeast and to some southern states like Andhra Pradesh and Telangana.

27 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Paradip Refinery has spread over a total area of 3,345 acres, including about 314 acres for Residential and about 240 acres of land for other office and buildings. The area of 355 acres is utilized for the connecting road in the total area. Land documents enclosed as Annexure 1.

The refinery is equipped with crude oil tanks to store High-Sulphur heavy crude, with petroleum product & intermediate tanks (including for liquid Sulphur storage tanks). Apart from these liquid storage facilities, there are LPG storage mounded bullets, propylene storage mounded bullets, Hydrogen and alkylation feed mounded bullets. An elaborate infrastructure is in place for pumping crude oil to the Paradip Refinery and for smooth, safe and efficient movement of the finished products. This includes a crude oil unloading facility at Paradip offshore with the first Single Point Mooring (SPM) facility on the east coast of India; a complex cross-country product pipeline network; a marketing terminal with truck loading bays and tank-wagon gantry; and an LPG terminal with facilities for road dispatch. But the biggest crude receipt and product dispatch infrastructure of Paradip Refinery is the captive South Oil Jetty, the first-of-its-kind in India made for a greenfield coastal refinery. The products are dispatched through pipelines (20-25%), rail (20-25%), road (15-20%) & coastal (40-50%) movements.

With an aim to add more value, a 0.680 MMTPA capacity Polypropylene (PP) Plant, based on Propylene recovered from Cracked LPG generated from INDMAX Plant, is under implementation and is scheduled for completion by 2019. The refinery also has plans to setup an Ethylene Recovery Unit /Mono-Ethylene Glycol (MEG) These units are expected to be completed by 2020-21.

The existing refinery obtained several Environmental Clearances since 1997.Summary of EC’s obtained enclosed as with latest EC obtained from MoEF vide: J-11011/344/2016-IA. II(I) dated 11thOct 2018, enclosed as Annexure-2. The existing plant is under operation with OPCB consent for Air and water obtained vide: 5543/IND-I-CON-6414 dated 31.03.2021 valid till 31.03.2022 copy enclosed as Annexure 3.

PESO license obtained vide P/HQ/OR/15/1163 (P223845) dated 29.12.2020 Valid Up to: 31.12.2023 enclosed as Annexure-4.

Mr. Sarvesh Kumar, Deputy General Manger (HSE) of IOCL Paradip Refinery is the Project Proponent with the registered office address: IOCL Paradip Refinery P.O. Jhimani, Paradip Dist., Jagatsinghpur- 754141.

28 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Table 1-1 Chronology of Environmental clearances & CRZ clearance S. Date of Status of MoEF File No Units No issue Project EC for Setting up grass root 1 J-11011/26/97-IA.II(I) 24.12.1997* Deferred Petroleum Refinery of 9MMTPA

EC for Setting up grass root 2 J-11011/26/1997-IA.II(I) 28.04.2003* Deferred Petroleum Refinery of 9MMTPA

EC for Grass Root Refinery 3 J-11011/70/2007-IA. II(I) cum Petrochemical Complex 06-07-2007 Commissioned of 15 MMTPA

Extension of validity of Environmental Clearance for J-11011/395/2012-IA. 4 Grass Root Refinery cum 18-09-2014 Commissioned II(I) Petrochemical Complex of 15 MMTPA

EC Ammendment with Rapid Railway Loading System J-11011/395/2012-IA. 5 (RRLS) for Pet Coke 06-01-2015 Commissioned II(I) Evacuation and Minor revision in Secondary Unit Capacities

EC and CRZ for Ethylene J-11011/344/2016-IA. Under 6 Recovery Unit, Mono Glycol 11-10-2018 II(I) Construction Unit & BS VI facilities

EC for Integrated Paraxylene& J-11011/395/2012-IA Purified Terephthalic 7 Ongoing Applied now II(I) Acid(PX-PTA) within the existing Refinery Complex

CRZ Clearances

CRZ for laying Storm Water 8 11-86/2011-IA.III outfall pipelines to sea for 21-02-2012 Commissioned Paradip Refinery Project

CRZ for Pet Coke Evacuation 9 11-30/2015-IA.III 11-02-2016 Commissioned Unit

*Note :The project was deferred as withdrawl of tax incentives from Govt. Orissa and viability of the project affected. Later on the capacity is revised to 15 MMTPA for improving economic viability after agreement with Govt. of Orissa on tax incentives. Accordingly, DFR is prepared for with revised project details and EC obtained in 2007.

29 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

The proposed project warrants CRZ clearance for the pipeline transfer from south part to north part of the refinery. Also the recommendation from OCZMA vide., F.No.OCZMA/37/2021143/OCZMA dt.10.05.2021 . The recommendation is attached as Annexure 33.

1.2 Purpose of the EIA report The Government of India, Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC), New Delhi, vide notification no. S. O. 1533 dated 14th September, 2006, and its amendments, has made it mandatory to obtain ‘Prior Environmental Clearance (EC) ’ for New projects listed in the schedule, Expansion and Modernization of existing projects listed in the schedule, any change in product mix in the existing manufacturing unit falling within the schedule to that notification from MoEF&CC (for Category A projects) or from SEIAA (for Category B projects).

The EIA submission at MoEF&CC pertains to Proposed “Integrated Para-Xylene & Purified Terephthalic Acid (PX-PTA) Project within the existing Refinery Complex, Odisha. The Project falls under Schedule 5 (c) - “Petro-chemical complexes (industries based on processing of petroleum fractions & natural gas and/or reforming to aromatics” Category A, since all the projects under this schedule falls under “A” category as per EIA Notification 2006 and its subsequent amendments.

1.3 Brief description of the Project Nature:M/s. IOCL, Paradip Refinery and Petrochemical Complex as a part of the compliance to the regulatory requirement i.e., to obtain Environmental Clearance from MoEF& CC has appointed M/s. Hubert Enviro Care Systems Private Limited, as EIA Consultant who is accredited by National Accreditation Board for Education and Training (NABET)- Quality Council of India (QCI), New Delhi for Schedule 5(c) - “Petro-chemical complexes (industries based on processing of petroleum fractions & natural gas and/or reforming to aromatics” Category A.

Size:

The 15.0 MMTPA Paradip Refinery Project (PDRP) has commissioned in Fuel- Refinery mode. The original configuration of PDRP included production of Petrochemical products, viz. Polypropylene (PP), Paraxylene (PX) and Styrene Monomer (SM) based on Refinery streams, in addition to fuel products. Considering the encouraging demand growth of Purified Terephthalic Acid (PTA), IOCL planned to install Integrated Paraxylene (PX) Units of 0.8

30 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

MMTPA and PTA Units of 1.2 MMTPA capacity at Paradip and associated utilities and offsite facilities at Paradip Refinery.

Location:

The existing complex is located at Abhaychandrapur village, Jagatsinghpur District, Odisha State. The site is located 3.6 Km from Paradip city towards NNE.

Importance to the Country & Region:

Eastern India does not have any economic size of PSF, PFY or PET resin plants. The first PTA plant at IOCL Paradip can provide steady supply of feedstock PTA to PSF, PYF and PET resin plants. The polyester resins/chips will further have processed to produce audio/ video tapes, x-ray films, photographic films, tapes, aseptic bottles for packing mineral water, carbonated drinks, vegetable oil, cosmetics, toiletries, tea, coffee etc. Thus using PTA from Paradip refinery plant at Odisha, a number of secondary and tertiary downstream industries could be set-up by entrepreneurs who could bring large investment to the state of Odisha and to Eastern India as a whole. This in turn would also help in generating larger employment potential in the region.

1.4 EIA cost

EIA & CRZ study was undertaken by HECS for an amount of Rs.53,00,000 Lakhs (Inclusive of GST).

1.5 Scope of the study & Methodology adopted EIA is the process of identifying, predicting, evaluating and mitigating the biophysical, social and other relevant effects of development proposals prior to major decisions being taken and commitments made. These studies integrate the environmental concerns of developmental activities into the process of decision – making.

An Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is an assessment of the possible impact, whether positive or negative, that a proposed project may have on the environment, together consisting of the natural, social and economic aspects, i.e., aiming at “Sustainable Development” due to the project activities.

31 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

1.5.1 Objectives of the EIA Report

 To ensure environmental considerations are explicitly addressed and incorporated into development and decision-making process.  To anticipate and avoid, minimize or offset the adverse significant biophysical, social and other relevant effects of the above project proposal.  To protect the productivity and capacity of natural systems and the ecological processes which maintain their respective functions.  To promote development that is sustainable and optimizes resource use as well as management opportunities.  To fully recognize the scope and requirements of the Terms of Reference and comply it.

1.5.2 Scope of Work

The scope of the work mentioned includes an assessment study of proposed refinery unit and their impact on the region. This study puts forward the most effective ways to protect the environment form increasing pollution caused by the burgeoning industrial development and recommendations for environmental-friendly development initiatives in the region.

This EIA report presents the existing baseline scenario and the assessment and evaluation of the environmental impacts that may rise during the construction and operational phases of the project. This report also highlights the Environmental Monitoring Program during the construction and operation phases of the project and the post-project monitoring program. In terms of the EIA Notification of the MoEF&CC dated 14th September 2006 and subsequent amendments the generic structure of the EIA document will be as under: Chapter 1: Introduction

Introductory information is present in this Chapter. The introduction chapter provides background to the project, project proponent and describes the objective of this document. The purpose and organization of the report is present in this chapter. Chapter 2: Project Description

32 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

This Chapter includes Project Description and Infrastructure Facilities delineating all the industrial and environmental aspect of the industry of Paradip Refinery expansion project as well as process details of proposed products. Chapter 3: Description of the Environment

This Chapter provides baseline environmental status of Environmental Components (Primary data) delineating meteorological details of the project site and surrounding area. Chapter 4: Anticipated Environmental Impacts & Mitigation Measures

This Chapter presents the analysis of impacts on the environmental and social aspects of the project as a result of establishment of plan and thereby suggesting the mitigation measures. Chapter 5: Analysis of Alternatives (Technology and Sites)

This chapter includes the justification for the selection of the project site from Environmental point of view as well as from economic point of view. Chapter 6: Environmental Monitoring Program

This chapter will include the technical aspects of monitoring, the effectiveness of mitigation measures which will include the measurement methodologies, frequency, location, data analysis, reporting schedules etc. Chapter 7: Additional Studies

This chapter will detail about the Public Consultation sought regarding the project. It will also identify the risks of the Project in relation to the public and the surrounding environment during construction and operation phases of the plant and thereby presents Disaster Management Plan, Social impact assessment and R&R action plans. Chapter 8: Project Benefits

This chapter deals with improvement in physical and social infrastructures, employment potential and other tangible benefits. Chapter 9: Environmental Cost Benefit Analysis

This chapter summarizes the cost benefit analysis if it is available in scoping stage.

Chapter 10: Environmental Management Plan

This is the key Chapter of the report and presents the mitigation plan, covers the institutional and monitoring requirements to implement environmental mitigation measures and to assess their adequacy during project implementation.

33 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Chapter 11: Summary and Conclusion

This chapter summarizes the information given in Chapters in this EIA/EMP report and the conclusion based on the environmental study, impact identification, mitigation measures and the environmental management plan. Chapter 12: Disclosure of the Consultant

Names of consultants engaged in the preparation of the EIA/EMP report along with their brief resume and nature of Consultancy rendered are included in this Chapter.

1.5.3 EIA Process

The EIA process followed for this EIA report is composed of the following stages: 1. Study of project information 2. Screening & Scoping environmental pre-feasibility study & application for approval of ToR 3. Collection of detailed project management plan/report 4. Baseline data collection 5. Impact identification, Prediction & Evaluation 6. Mitigation measures & delineation of EMP 7. Risk assessment and safety & disaster management plan 8. Review & finalization of EIA Report based on the ToR requirements. 9. Public consultation 10. Submission of Final EIA report for implementation of mitigation measures & EMP as well as necessary clearances from relevant Authority

The EIA Cycle based on the above stages has been illustrated as per the ToR dated 30th Sept 2018, in Figure 1.1.

34 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 1-1 EIA Process

1.6 Objectives of the Study The major objective of this study is to prepare a detailed Environmental Impact Assessment Study within the study area i.e. 10 km radius from the project.

35 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

1.7 Applicable Regulatory Framework The following are some of the acts and rules related to environment that are applicable for the proposed project:

1. EIA Notification 2006 and its amendments 2. Manufacture Storage and Import of Hazardous Chemicals Rules,1989 and its amendments 3. Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act,1974 and its amendments 4. Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act,1981 and its amendments

5. Hazardous Waste (Management, Handling and Transboundary movement) Rules,2008 and its amendments 6. Public Liability InsuranceAct,1991 and its amendments 7. Environmental (Protection)Rules,1986 and its amendments 8. The Noise Pollution (Regulation and control) rules, 2000 9. Factories Rules 1950 and its amendments 10. Petroleum Act, 1934 11. Explosive Act,1884 12. Central Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 The details of applicable Acts and Rules and the applicability to the project is given in Table 1-2

36 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Table 1-2Applicable Acts and Rules for the proposed Refinery project S. Act and Rules Purpose Objective Applicability No applicable 1. EIA Notification New projects, Protection and As the proposal is for 2006 and its Expansion Improvement of compliance to amendments modernization, the Environment petrochemical change of product manufacturing, mix of the existing Environmental project clearance from Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) is applicable 2. The Manufacture, Handling of Regulate the Preparation/ update of Storage and Hazardous manufacture, On-site Emergency Import of Chemicals storage and Preparedness Plan and Hazardous import of submission to Factory Chemicals Rules, Hazardous inspectorate 1989 and its Chemicals Preparation/ update of amendments Safety Report and submit to Factory inspectorate. Preparation of Material Safety Data Sheet 3. The Water New projects, Prevention, Consent to Establish (Prevention and Expansion control and and Consent to Control of modernization, abatement of Operate from State Pollution) Act, change of product water pollution Pollution Control 1974 and its mix of the existing Board to be obtained amendments project, Existing for expansion plants

37 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. Act and Rules Purpose Objective Applicability No applicable 4. The Air New projects, Prevention, Consent to Establish (Prevention and Expansion control and and Consent to Control of /modernization, abatement of air Operate from State Pollution) Act, change of product pollution Pollution Control 1981 and its mix of the existing Board to be obtained amendments project, Existing for expansion industries 5. The Hazardous Management, Prevention, Hazardous waste and other wastes Handling and Control and Authorization from (Management, Transboundary abatement of State Pollution Control Handling and Movement of pollution Board to be obtained Transboundary Hazardous waste for expansion Movement Rules) 2016 and Solid Waste Management Rules 2016 6. The New projects, Protection and Environmental Environmental Expansion/moderni Improvement of Standards as specified (Protection)Rules, zation change of the Environment are to be complied. 1986 and its product mix of the Submission of Amendments existing project, Environment Existing industries Statement on yearly basis to PCB 7. The Noise New projects, To protect the Noise control measure Pollution Expansion/moderni workers and Comply with Noise (Regulation and zation change of public from standards and Control) Rules, product mix of the noise related submission of monthly 2000 existing project, problems report to PCB Existing industries

38 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. Act and Rules Purpose Objective Applicability No applicable 8. The Public Transportation of To provide Provision of Liability Liability Hazardous immediate relief Insurance Policy Insurance Act, Substance to persons 1991 and its affected by amendments accident involving hazardous substances and also for Establishing an Environmental Relief fund 9. Factories Rules New projects, Control of Factory License from 1950 and its Expansion/moderni workplace Factory inspectorate amendments zation change of environment, product mix of the and providing existing project, for good health Existing industries. and safety of workers 10. The Petroleum New projects, Production, License to be acquired Act, 1934 Expansion/moderni Storage and for storage and zation change of import of adequate safety product mix of the petroleum and measures are in place. existing project, provides the Existing industries regulations for the safety and environmental measures

39 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. Act and Rules Purpose Objective Applicability No applicable 11. The Explosive New projects, Production, Safety measures are to Act, 1884 Expansion/moderni Storage and be complied for the zation change of import of storage of chemicals in product mix of the explosive the plant as per PESO existing project, substance in and guidelines. Existing industries around the project and provides the regulations for the safety and environmental measures 12. The Central New projects, Check the Adequate Motor Vehicle Expansion/moderni pollution load of environmental Act, 1988 zation change of vehicles inside measures are put in product mix of the the plant place to check the existing project, vehicular emissions. Existing industries

40 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

1.8 ToR Compliance S. Terms of Reference Compliance No STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR CONDUCTING ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY FOR PETRO- CHEMICAL COMPLEXES (INDUSTRIES BASED ON PROCESSING OF PETROLEUM FRACTIONS &NATURAL GAS AND/OR REFORMING TO AROMATICS) AND INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN EIA/EMP REPORT

 Standard TOR 1 Executive Summary Brief executive summary is provided as a Separate booklet which is enclosed as Annexure 30 2 Introduction i. Details of the EIA Consultant M/s. Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Ltd., Chennai including NABET accreditation NABET Accredited Number: NABET/EIA/1922/RA 0172 Valid up to 13/10/2022

ii. Information about the Project M/s. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, Proponent IOCL Paradip Refinery, Survey no: 218, Abhaychandrapur village, Jhimani P.O., Kujang Taluk, Jagatsinghpur Dist., Paradip, Odisha -754141 iii. Importance and Benefits of the Importance of the project: Project 1. The project is of national importance and will reduce import dependence to the tune of 1.2 million MT per year PTA product through domestic production and reduction in foreign exchange outgo. 2. The project of Indian Oil is one of significant projects under the Govt. of India’s “Make in India” Initiative for the Manufacturing Sector. 3. The proposed project is to meet the market potential having a deficit of about 2.2 MMTPA PTA in India by 2024. 4. An important project under the Petroleum Chemicals and Petrochemicals Investment Region (PCPIR) in Odisha and spur industrial investment and development of the region. 5. Expand Petrochemical Production footprint of Indian Oil, Paradip Refinery in Odisha. 6. The PTA plant project along with under construction MEG Plant at Paradip, will accelerate the development of Textile Industry in the Eastern Region of India. Leading to additional employment opportunities.

Benefits of the project: 1. The project will propel industrial development, downstream industry revolution in Odisha and eastern regions of India, which will support consequential development of entrepreneurship, MSMEs in nearby locality and state of Odisha. 2. The project will help India in attaining Self Sufficiency in PTA product demand as feedstock for industries in value addition chain of products like Polyester fiber, Yarn, Textiles, PET polymer production. 3. Employment opportunities about 5000 people directly /indirectly during construction period and about 200 persons

41 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

during Operating period. 4. The project will spur further investments in the downstream industries, Textile Industries and provide better socio- economic benefits, direct and indirect employment opportunities. 3 Project Description i. Cost of project and Time of completion The cost of the project is Rs.11783 Crores.

Time of completion: Expected by December, 2024.

ii. Products with capacities for the proposed project Proposed Capacity S.No. Name of the Unit (MMTPA) 1 Para Xylene (PX) 0.8 2 Purified Terepthalic Acid (PTA) 1.2

iii. If expansion project, details of Quantity – TMT/Year EC Details S.No. Streams existing products with capacities and Existing Proposed whether adequate land is available Refinery Products for expansion, reference of earlier EC if any. 1 Naphtha Exports 0 -- 2 BS-IV MS 0 -- 3 BS-VI MS 3260 -- 4 Reformate 96 -- 5 SKO 312 -- 6 ATF Domestic 463 -- J-11011/344/2016-IA-II(I) dated 7 BS-IV HSD 0 -- 11thOct 2018 8 BS-VI HSD 6017 -- Under Construction 9 Sulphur 350 -- 10 PetCoke 1253 -- 11 LPG 932 -- 12 Poly-Propylene 678 -- 13 Fuel & Loss 1641 -- Petro-chemical Products

42 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

J-11011/344/2016-IA-II(I) dated Mono-Ethylene Glycol 14 332 KTA -- 11thOct 2018 (MEG) Under Construction 15 Para Xylene 0 800600TPA Feed to PTA as a Raw material Purified Terepthalic Acid 16 0 1200000TPA Proposed Product (PTA) Associated Products 17 Di-ethylene Glycol 24 KTA -- J-11011/344/2016-IA-II(I) dated 11thOct 2018 18 Tri-ethylene Glycol 1 KTA -- Under Construction

19 Toluene 0 50000TPA Proposed Product

No additional land required. The total land area is 3345 Acres. Adequate land is available for expansion & Land document attached as Annexure 1

iv. List of Raw materials and their Raw Source S. No. Quantity Unit Mode of Transport source with mode of transportation Material Reformate 310000 kg/h Internal Pipeline 1 2 Hydrogen 651 (PX) +31 (PTA) kg/h Internal Pipeline

3 Paraxylene 97200 kg/h Internal Pipeline

Further details are given in Chapter 2, Section 2.7.3 of EIA report v. Other chemicals and materials Mode of S. No. Chemicals/ Catalyst Quantity Unit Storage Capacity required with quantities and storage Storage capacities 1. Acetic Acid 4200 kg/h Storage tank 2x 425 m3 2. Hydrogen Bromide 80 kg/h Drums ~ 100 T 3. Sodium Formate 56 kg/h Drums ~ 100 T 4. Sodium Carbonate 1843 kg/h Drums ~ 1000T 5. Conc Caustic Soda flakes 109 kg/h Bags ~ 300 T 6. Hydrogen Peroxide 4.2 kg/h Drums ~ 10 T

43 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

7. Amine 1 kg/h Tank ~ 2T 8. Antifoam 1500 kg Drums ~1.5 T 9. Sulfolane 96630 kg Drums ~ 80 T 10. Monoethanolamine 44 kg Tanker / Drum ~ 0.05 T 11. DimethayDisulfide 257 kg Tanker / Drum ~ 0.3 T 12. Perchloroethylene 930 kg Drum ~ 1 T Liquid Catalyst- kg/h Tanker ~ 50 T 13. 1597 Cobalt/Manganese solution 14. R-450 PTA Reactor 69.4 m³ Drum ~ 35 T 15. R-820 Catalytic Oxidizer 22.3 m³ Bag / box ~ 20 T 16. R-880 LP Catalytic Oxidizer 0.98 m³ Bag / box ~ 1 T 17. Clay Catalyst – Activated Clay 108 m³ Bag ~ 1200 m3 18. Clay Catalyst – Activated Clay 760 m³ Bag 19. Clay Catalyst – Activated Clay 291 m³ Bag

Details given in Chapter 2, Section 2.7.3.2 Table 2-15 of EIA report Details of emission, effluents, 1. Emission: hazardous waste generation and a. Existing: their management Emission per stack (g/s) Fuel Type Flue gas Flow S.No Stack details used Rate (Nm3/hr) PM SO2 NOx CO

1 DHDT Gas Fired 31128 0.03 0.13 1.04 0.05

Gas + Oil 2 Utility Boiler - 3 Fired 285793 0.32 0.66 7 0.83

Gas + Oil 3 Utility Boiler - 4 Fired 285793 0.33 1.53 7.21 0.81

44 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Gas Turbine – 1- HRSG- 4 1 Naptha 1062841 0.76 12.64 47.59 2.95

HDT Reactor Feed Gas + Oil 5 Heater Fired 15834 0.02 0.1 0.12 0.03

Vacuum Charge Heater Gas + Oil 6 of AVU Fired 112108 0.07 5.57 4.21 0.82

7 FCC Regenerator NA 320000 2.69 75.56 0.78 7.52

8 Reformer of HGU Naphtha 175222 0.004 2.02 4.6 1.6

Fresh Feed Preheater of Gas + Oil 9 FCC Fired 61013 0.05 4.63 0.49 0.67

10 CCR Gas Fired 523959 0.06 1.43 3.5 5.2

MHC 1st Train Reactor Feed Heater of VGO- 11 HDT Gas Fired 64717 0.07 0.36 0.37 0.32

Atmospheric Distillation 12 Heater of VGO-HDT Gas Fired 15834 0.01 0.01 0.15 0.03

13 Gas Turbine – 2-HRSG-2 Naptha 1062841 0.84 9.03 42.68 5.47

Gas Turbine – 3- HRSG- 14 3 Naptha 1062841 0.87 4.28 55.38 3.65

Gas + Oil 15 Coker Heater - Stack-1 Fired 78412 0.04 0.34 0.87 0.1

16 AVU-CDU Gas Fired 201847 0.1 7.06 3.81 1.34

45 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Gas + Oil 17 Coker Heater - Stack-2 Fired 78412 0.16 3.52 1.54 0.4

18 SRU Acid gas 106499 0.02 12.64 1.07 2.38

19 Charge Heater of NHDT Gas Fired 48778 0.02 0.09 0.62 0.15

Gas + Oil 20 Utility Boiler - 1 Fired 285793 0.42 11.09 10.51 1.82

Gas + Oil 21 Utility Boiler - 2 Fired 285793 0.29 17.78 5.29 2.2

Total (g/s) 7.18 170.48 198.8 38.35

b. Proposed:

Point source Emission:

Fuel Rate Flue gas Emission per stack (g/s) S.No Stack details (Natural Flow Rate Gas) (kg/hr) (Nm3/hr) PM SO2 NOx CO CO2

Tatory 433 4679 - 0.0257 0.1688 - 451.53 Furnace

ISOMAR 2747 29708 - 0.0833 0.6052 - 1402.36 Furnace

XFU 1 7594 82116 - 0.5597 2.7983 - 9553.61

XFU 2 4840 52339 - 0.4396 2.1955 - 7495.03

46 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Utility Boiler – 5 19973 325061 0.4528 4.5139 22.575 1.6931 - (Standby)*

Flare 15 162 0.0002 0.0023 0.0113 0.0008 -

Total (g/s) 0.453 5.6245 28.3541 1.6939 18902.53

Note:

The data is obtained from Section 7.1.2.1 of Detailed Feasibility Report prepared by Toyo Engineering India Pvt. Ltd. and integration of flow rate of fuel.

Utility Boiler -5 is standby and will be in intermittent operation only for the PTA plant start up

Line Source Emission:

No.of.Vehicle per day (Based on maximum Emission (g/s) S.N Vehicle operation capacity) based on BS-VI type of o type PM NOX CO vehicles 1 4W 5 0.000004 0.000104 0.000617 2 HW 1-PTA 164 0.000137 0.006287 0.054667 HW 2- 3 7 0.000010 0.000447 0.003889 Toluene Total (g/s) 0.000150 0.006838 0.059172

Cumulative Emission:

Max. Base NAAQ Estimated Incremental Pollutant line Conc. Total Conc. (µg/m3) standard % increase Conc. (µg/m3) (µg/m3) (µg/m3)

PM 95.7 0.10 95.8 100 0.10

47 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

SO2 15.7 1.16 16.86 80 7.39

NOx 30.06 5.89 35.95 80 19.59

CO 50 78.69 128.69 4000 157.38

CO2 - 8099.82 8099.82 - -

Other emissions:

Storage Vents & process vent Emission:

PX Vents:

Emission per vent (g/s) S.No Storage Tank Vent details VOC Benzene Toluene CO2

1 Toluene day tank- 045-TK-001A 0.078125 - - -

2 Toluene day tank- 045-TK-001B 0.078125 - - -

3 Plant inventory tank- 044-TK-001 - 0.0167 0.00755 -

4 Paraxylene day tank- 049-TK-001 A 0.220486 - - -

5 Paraxylene day tank- 049-TK-001 B 0.220486 - - -

6 Desorbent storage tanks-049-TK-002 0.451389 - - -

7 Plant inventory storage tanks- 049-TK-003 0.451389 - - -

8 Aromatic tank-048-TK-001 1.006944 - - -

9 Light reformate storage tank-048-TK-002 1.145833 - - -

48 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

10 Isomer Regeneration Vent - - - 97.222

PTA Vents

Flue Emission (g/s) Process gas S.N & Silo Flow Meth Methy Carbo PT Acet o Vent Rate Benze Tolue Xyle Metha yl Bromi l n A Nitrog ic details (Nm3/ ne ne ne nol aceta ne bromi monox Dus en Acid hr) te de ide t

G1- Process Inert 29200 0.16 1. 0.3 0.487 0.73 0.406 6.489 0.406 0.73 3.244 0 - Vents- 0 2 051-C- 175

G2/G3/ 0.00 0.02 13400 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.003 0.051 0.004 0.009 0.051 - G4- 1 5 PTA Day silo 0.00 0.02 13400 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.003 0.051 0.004 0.009 0.051 - A/B 1 5 Off- 2. Spec PTA Silo- 0.00 0.02 13400 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.003 0.051 0.004 0.009 0.051 - 051-M- 1 5 600A/B /C

PSV Vent 19.16 3. 55 ------Scrubbe 67 r Stack

49 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

0.16 0.07 19.166 Total (g/s) 0.312 0.502 0.748 0.415 6.642 0.418 0.757 3.397 5 5 7

Further details on emissions & sources are provided in chapter 4, Section 4.5 of EIA report

2. Effluents details:

a. Existing:

Existing (m3/hr)

ETP Effluent Total Fresh Treated S. No Description Conden / Water Water Water Use of sate Outlet Sewage Loss Used outlet Used Generat ed (a+b) (a) (b)

Cooling 1482 1482 0 0 0 0 323 1159 1 tower

DM Water 1334.8 586.8 748 0 0 0 175 0 2 Makeup

Service 465.2 465.2 0 0 0 372.16 0 93.1 3 Water

Refinery 0 0 0 0 372.16 0 372.16 0 4 unit

PX-PTA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 unit

6 Project 100 100 0 0 0 0 80 20

50 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

7 Others 5 5 0 0 0 0 4 1

8 Domestic 110 110 0 0 0 0 88 22

9 Boiler 0 0 0 1119.8 0 0 40 0

Total 3497 2749 748 1119.8 372.16 372.16 1082.2 1295.1

b. Proposed:

Proposed (m3/hr)

ETP Total Fresh Treated Effluent/ S. No Description Water Water Water Condens Use of Sewage Outlet Loss Used ate Used outlet Generat ed (a+b) (a) (b)

Cooling 930.5 911 19.5 0 0 0 213.6 716.9 1 tower

DM Water 286 0 286 0 0 0 21.2 0 2 Makeup

Service 60 60 0 0 0 48 145.5 12 3 Water

4 Refinery unit 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5 PX-PTA unit 0 0 0 0 48 0 145.5* 0

6 Project 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

7 Others 20 20 0 0 0 0 16 4

51 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

8 Domestic 3 3 0 0 0 0 2.4 0.6

9 Boiler 0 0 0 264.8 0 0 9.3 0

Total 1299.5 994 305.5 264.8 48 48 408 733.5

3. Hazardous waste materials will be properly disposed as per the Hazardous Wastes (Management, Handling and Transboundary Movement) Rules 2016;

Hazardous waste authorization has been made with SPCB, Odisha- IND-IV-HW-930/5028 dated 24.05.2019 valid till 31.03.2024 is enclosed as Annexure-14.

a.Existing Hazardous waste

Scheduled as Existing Approved S.No Details of Frequency of per HWM Quantity Quantity TPY Storage and Disposal . Waste disposal rules TPY

Stored in intermediate storage facility (covered warehouse with impervious floor and shed) Spent 1 Schedule-I 4.2 2484.4 2500 Within 90 days catalyst

Disposal in SLF -1497.4 / Co-processing in cement industry - 987

2 Spent Clay Schedule-I 4.5 145.5 720 Within 90 days Directly sent to SLF

3 Ash Schedule-I 36.0 - Within 90 days Directly sent to SLF

52 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

37.2

Directly sent to DCU for 4 Oily Sludge Schedule-I 4.1 1456.1 Within 90 days processing

2748 (Oil Stored in impervious sludge/ metallic containers before Emulsion/ unloading in melting pit for 5 Oily Sludge Schedule-I 4.1 74.2 Slop Oil) Within 90 days oil recovery

Sludge is disposed in HW incinerator

180 Sent to incinerator for 6 Coke Schedule-I 4.4 16.7 Within 90 days disposal

b.Proposed Hazardous waste

Proposed Scheduled as per Frequency of S.No. Details of Waste Quantity Storage and Disposal HWM rules disposal TPD PX Spent Clay from Clay 1 Schedule-I 4.5 0.12 Within 90 days Captive SLF Treaters Metals Recovery or Spent Catalyst from 2 Schedule-I 1.6 0.01 Within 90 days Landfill in Captive Reactor SLF Spent Clay from Clay 3 Schedule-I 4.5 1.44 Within 90 days Captive SLF Treater Spent Adsorbent from 4 Schedule-I 1.6 0.24 Within 90 days Captive SLF Adsorbent Chambers Metal recovery by 5 Catalyst from Reactor Schedule-I 1.6 0.04 Within 90 days authorized recycler Spent Clay fromClay 6 Schedule-I 4.5 0.26 Within 90 days Captive SLF Treater

53 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

PTA Recovery by catalyst 7 PTA Spent Catalyst Schedule-I 1.6 0.0438 Within 90 days manufacturer Disposal in authorized Schedule-I 8 Filters, Oils 0.0685 Within 90 days HW incinerator / Sale 3.3/5.1 to authorized users Sale to authorized 9 Pails, Corrosion, Paint Schedule-I 21.1 0.0137 Within 90 days users

10 Laboratory Solvents Schedule-I 20.2 0.0003 Within 90 days Disposal in ETP

11 Waste Solvents Schedule-I 20.2 0.0110 Within 90 days Disposal in ETP

vi. Requirement of water, power, with a. Requirement of water source of supply, status of approval, water balance diagram, man-power Required Quantity (m3/hr) S. No. Water Source Extraction Approval requirement (regular and contract) Existing Proposed After Expansion Government of Odisha has approved 3950m3/hr which is issued by Mahanadi 1 2749 994 3743 River Government of Odisha & valid upto: Oct 2021 is attached as Annexure7

54 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

b.Water balance diagram

Water Balance Diagrams of Existing Refinery

55 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Water Balance Diagram of Proposed facility

56 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Water Balance Diagram for after expansion of Refinery

The Water Balance diagram is given in Chapter 2, Figure 2-23.

57 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

c. Requirement of power

S. Power Source Required Quantity Extraction No. Existing Proposed After Expansion Approval 30.5 MWh 1 Existing Gas Turbine 240.5 MWh (190.5+50) 271 MWh Internally

d. Requirement of manpower

Operation Phase:

S. No Description Regular Contractual Total 1 Existing (Nos) 975 547 1522 2 Proposed (Nos) 200 200 400 3 After Expansion (Nos) 1175 747 1922

Construction phase : 5421 Nos. vii.Process description along with a.Process description major equipment’s and machineries, Feed for the proposed PX-PTA plant will be Reformate, which is produced by processing Naphtha in CCRU. Reformate will process flow sheet (quantitative) be processed in the PX plant to produce PX, toluene & other products, which will further be processed in the PTA plant for from raw material to products to be production of PTA provided Detailed process description in given in Chapter 2, Section 2.7.4.1 of EIA report

b.Major equipment and machineries for PX: S. Equipment Tag No. Equipment Description No. Sulfolane Process Unit (Extractive Distillation) 1 044-C-001 Extractive Distillation Column 2 044-C-002 Recovery Column Benzene-Toluene Fractionation Unit (Unit-045) 1 045-C-001 Benzene-Toluene Column No 1 2 045-C-002 Benzene-Toluene Column No 2 Tatoray Process Unit (Unit-046) 1 046-F-001 Charge Heater

58 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

2 046-R-001 Reactor 3 046-K-001 Recycle Gas Compressor Xylenes Fractionation Unit (Unit -048) 1 048-F-001 Raffinate Column No 2 Reboiler Heater 2 048-F-002A/B Xylene Column No 2 Reboiler Heaters 3 048-C-002 Xylene Column No 1 4 048-C-003 Xylene Column No 2 Parex Process Unit (Unit-049) 1 049-C-001 Raffinate Column No 1 2 049-C-002 Raffinate Column No 2 3 049-V-001 Adsorbent Chamber No 1 4 049-V-002 Adsorbent Chamber No 2 Isomar Process Unit(Unit-050) 1 050-F-001 Charge Heater 2 050-C-001 Deheptanizer 3 050-C-002 Stabilizer 4 050-R-001 Reactor 5 050-K-001 Recycle Gas Compressor

c.Major equipments and machineries for PTA: S. No. Equipment Tag No. Equipment Description 1 051-A-220 Oxidation Reactor Agitator 2 051-A-310 1st PTA Crystallizer Agitator 3 051-A-320 2nd PTA Crystallizer Agitator 4 051-A-330 3rd PTA Crystallizer Ag 5 051-K-151 Off-Gas Expander 6 051-K-901 Steam Turbine 7 051-R-220 Oxidation Reactor 8 051-R-450 PTA Reactor 9 051-R-820 Catalytic Oxidizer 10 051-R-880 LP Catalytic Oxidizer 11 051-T-600 A/B PTA Day Silos

The process flow diagram of PX and PTA is given in Chapter 2, Figure 2-8

59 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

d.Process flow diagram of PX

60 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

e.Process flow diagram of PTA

viii. Hazard identification and Further details of proposed safety systems are detailed in Chapter 7, Section 7.2 of EIA report & Rapid Risk Assessment is details of proposed safety systems attached as Annexure 10.

61 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

1.Identification of Hazardous Areas

The procedure for RRA starts with identification of major risk areas are as follows:  Toxic chemical storage area  Process Plant involving hazardous chemicals

The Major Hazards will be as described below  Possibility of injury during chemicals handled, during operations and due to intoxication.  Possibilities of fire hazards at transformers, switchgear and other electrical equipment etc.

2.Hazard Identification – Paraxylene

HEALTH ENVIRONMENTAL PHYSICAL Acute Toxicity –Inhalation : Category 4 Aquatic Toxicity : Category- 2 Flammable : Category 3flammable Acute Toxicity -Oral– Category 4Skin Irritation Category: 2

STUDY/ HAZARD CATEGORY 1 CATEGORY2 CATEGORY3 CATEGORY4 CATEGORY5 STATEMENT AcuteOral <5mg/kg >5 <50mg/kg >50<300mg/kg >300<2000 >2000< LD50 Fatalifswallowed Fatalifswallowed Toxic ifswallowed mg/kg 5000mg/kg Harmfulif May beharmful swallowed ifswallowed Acute Dermal < 50 mg/kg > 50 < 200 mg/kg > 200 < 1000 > 1000 < 2000 > 2000 < 5000 LD50 Fatal in contact with Fatal in contact mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg May be skin with skin Toxic in contact Harmful in contact harmful in contact with skin with skin with skin Acute See footnote Inhalation below this table Dust LC50 < 0.05 mg/L > 0.05 < 0.5 mg/L > 0.5 < 1.0 mg/L > 1.0 < 5 mg/L Gases LC50 < 100 ppm/V > 100 < 500 ppm/V > 500 < 2500 >2500 < 20000 Vapours LC50 <0.5 mg/L >0.5 < 2.0 mg/L ppm/V ppm/V

62 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Fatal if inhaled Fatal if inhaled > 2.0 < 10 mg/L > 10 < 20 mg/L Toxic if inhaled Harmful if inhaled Flammable Flash point < 23 Flash point < 23 Flash point > 23 Flash point > 60 Not Applicable liquids degrees C and initial degrees C and degrees C< 60 degrees C < 93 boiling point < 35 initial boiling point degrees C. degrees C. degrees C. Extremely > 35 degrees C. Flammable liquid Combustible liquid flammable liquid Highly flammable and vapour and vapour liquid and vapour

STUDY/ CATEGORY 1 CATEGORY 2 CATEGORY 3 HAZARD STATEMENT Eye Irritation Effects on the cornea, iris or 2A: Effects on the cornea, iris or Not applicable conjunctiva that are not expected to conjunctiva that fully reverse within reverse or that have not fully 21 days. reversed within 21 days. Causes severe eye irritation. Causes severe eye damage. 2B : Effects on the cornea, iris or conjunctiva that fully reverse within 7 days. Causes eye irritation. Skin Irritation Destruction of skin tissue, with sub Mean value of >2.3 > 4.0 for erythema Mean value of >1.5 < 2.3 for categorization based on exposure of / eschar or edema in at least 2 of 3 erythema / eschar or edema in up to 3 minutes (A), 1 hour (B), or tested animals from gradings at 24, 48, at least 2 of 3 4 hours (C). and 72 hours (or on 3 consecutive days tested animals from gradings Causes severe skin burns and eye after onset if reactions are delayed); at 24, 48, and 72 hours (or on damage. inflammation that persists to end of the3 consecutive days after onset (normally 14-day) observation period. if reactions are delayed). Causes skin irritation. Causes mild skin irritation. Environment: 96 hr LC50 (fish) <1 mg/L 48 hr 96 hr LC50 (fish) >1< 10 mg/L 48 hr 96 hr LC50 (fish) >10< 100 Acute Toxicity EC50 (crustacea) < 1 mg/L, 72/96 EC50 (crustacea) >1< 10 mg/L 72/96 mg/L 48 hr EC50 (crustacea) Category hr ErC50 (aquatic plants) < 1 mg/L hr ErC50 (aquatic plants) >1< 10 mg/L >10< 100 mg/L 72/96 hr Very toxic to aquatic life Toxic to aquatic life ErC50 (aquatic plants) >10< 100 mg/L Harmful to aquatic life Flammable Extremely flammable aerosol Flammable aerosol Not Applicable Aerosol

63 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Flammable solidsUsing the burning rate test, Using the burning rate test, substances Not Applicable substances or mixtures other than or mixtures other than metal powders: metal powders: (a) wetted zone (a) wetted zone does not stop fire for does not stop fire and at least 4 minutes and (b) burning time (b) burning time < 45 seconds or < 45 seconds or burning rate > 2.2 burning rate > 2.2 mm/secondmm/second Using the burning rate Using the burning rate test, metal test, metal powders that have burning powders that have burning time < 5 time > 5 < 10 minutes minutes Flammable solid Flammable solid Flammable gases Gases, which at 20 degrees C and a Gases, other than those of category 1, Not Applicable standard pressure of 101.3 kPA: which, at 20 degrees C and a standard are ignitable when in a mixture of pressure of 101.3 kPA, have a 13% or less by volume in air; or flammable range while mixed in air. have a flammable range with air of Flammable gas at least 12 percentage points regardless of the lower flammable limit. Extremely flammable gas

Hazard Ratings

NFPA HAZARD CODES RATING SYSTEM Health : 2 0 – No Hazard Flammability : 3 1 – Slight Hazard Reactivity : 0 2 – Moderate Hazard 3 – Serious Hazard 4 – Severe Hazard

SKINCONTACT SKINABSORPTION EYECONTACT INHALATION INGESTION Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

3.Hazard Identification – Purified Terephthalic Acid

Terephthalic Acid is a sand-like white powder. It is used as a reagent to neutralize alkali in wool, asan additive to poultry feeds, and to increase the effectiveness of certain antibiotics.

64 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

The following acute (short-term) health effects may occur immediately or shortly after exposure to Terephthalic Acid:  Contact can irritate the skin and eyes.  Breathing Terephthalic Acid can irritate the nose, throat and lungs causing coughing, wheezing and/or shortness of breath.  Chronic Health Effects  Cancer Hazard  Repeated exposure to Terephthalic Acid may affect the kidneys.  Improper use of respirators is dangerous

Fire Hazards  Terephthalic Acid may burn, but does not readily ignite.  Use dry chemical, CO2, water spray, alcohol or polymer foam extinguishers.  Poisonous gases are produced in fire.

HAZARDRATING NFPA Flammability 1 Reactivity 0 HazardRatingKey:0=minimal;1=slight;2=moderate;3=serious; 4=severe

Following are the proposed safety measures in the plant.  Emergency isolation valves are to be provided/online monitoring via DCS PLC monitoring that will closely monitor the process flow and parameters in a safe place and auto mode through gas/fire detector system.  Passive fire protection such as fire proofing shall be recommended.  Appropriate detection measures such as fire and gas detectors are recommended and the same to be deep-rooted throughout the plant area. ix. Expansion/ modernization proposals Expansion (a) Copy of all Environmental Note: Clearance(s) including (In Form 1 in has been mentioned as Modernization based on the interpretation while applying on the form-1) amendments thereto obtaining for the project from a. MoEF&CC/SEIAA shall be Status of Status of attached as an Annexure. A S. No MoEF&CC File No Units Date of issue certified copy of the latest Project compliance monitoring report of the 1 J-11011/26/97-IA.II(I) 24.12.1997* Deferred Deferred EC for Setting up grass root Regional office of the Ministry

65 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

of Environment and Forests as Petroleum Refinery of per circular dated 30th May, 9MMTPA 2012 on the status of compliance of conditions EC for Setting up grass root J-11011/26/1997- stipulated in all existing 2 Petroleum Refinery of 28.04.2003* Deferred Deferred environmental clearances IA.II(I) 9MMTPA including Amendments shall be provided. In addition, status of EC for Grass Root Refinery compliance of Consent to J-11011/70/2007-IA. Partially 3 cum Petrochemical Complex 06-07-2007 Commissioned Operate for the ongoing II(I) Complied existing operation of the of 15 MMTPA project from SPCB shall be attached with the EIA-EMP Extension of validity of report Environmental Clearance Partially (b) In case the existing project has J-11011/395/2012-IA. Complied- 4 for Grass Root Refinery 18-09-2014 Commissioned not obtained environmental II(I) Same condition clearance, reasons for not cum Petrochemical as in EC-2007 taking EC under the provisions Complex of 15 MMTPA of the EIA notification 1994 and/or EIA notification 2006 EC Ammendment with shall be provided. Copies of Rapid Railway Loading Partially Consent to Establish / No J-11011/395/2012-IA. System (RRLS) for Pet Coke Complied- objection certificate and 5 06-01-2015 Commissioned Consent to Operate (in case of II(I) Evacuation and Minor Same condition units operating in prior to EIA revision in Secondary Unit as in EC-2007 notification 2006, CTE and Capacities CTO of FY 2005-2006) obtained from the SPCB shall EC and CRZ for Ethylene be submitted. Further J-11011/344/2016-IA. Recovery Unit, Mono Under Partially 6 11-10-2018 compliance report to the II(I) Glycol Unit & BS VI Construction Complied conditions of Consents from facilities the SPCB shall be submitted. EC for Integrated J-11011/395/2012-IA 7 Paraxylene& Purified Ongoing Applied now - II(I) Terephthalic Acid(PX-PTA)

66 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

CRZ Clearances

S. No MoEF&CC File No Units Date of issue Status of Project

CRZ for laying Storm Water 8 11-86/2011-IA.III outfall pipelines to sea for 21-02-2012 Commissioned Paradip Refinery Project

CRZ for Pet Coke 9 11-30/2015-IA.III 11-02-2016 Commissioned Evacuation Unit

Note : 1. J-11011/70/2007-IA. II(I) dt.06-07-2007- Partially complied for which the action taken report- IOCL /PDR/HSE/MoEFCC/EC/2021-22/002 dated 29.04.2021 has been attached along with Annexure-2. 2. Latest EC- J-11011/344/2016-IA. II(I) dt.11-10-2018- Partially complied on the below points.  For not installating the webcam with night vision capability at the effluent discharge point. (Specific condition no. xx)  For not publishing the EC,2018 within 7days from the date of issue of clearance letter. (General condition no.xv) For which the Action taken report – IOCL /PDR/HSE/MoEFCC/EC/2021-22/003 dated 04.06.2021 is attachéd along with Annexure 2.  In which the Night vision Web cam will be installed within Oct,2021.  The EC publishing in newspaper was inadvertly missed, however the same was published later on 18.09.2020 and noted the general condition in future.

Earlier EC’s Attached as Annexure 5.

Certified Earlier EC’s Complaince report Attached along with Annexure 5. Lateste EC- J-11011/344/2016-IA-II(I) dated 11th Oct Attached as Annexure 2. 2018 Certified Latest EC’s Complaince report with the Action Attached along with Annexure 2. taken report.

67 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. No Latest CTO No. Date of issue Valid till Status of compliance

1 Ref No.- 5543/IND-I-CON-6414 31.03.2021 31.03.2022 Complaied

Latest CTO- Ref No.- 5543/IND-I-CON-6414 dated 31.03.2021 valid till 31.03.2022 with all CTO’s and Attached as Annexure 3. CTE’s since inception along with chronology table Self certified compliance report of latest CTO submitted Attached along with Annexure 3. to SPCB,Odisha 4 Site Details i. Location of the project site The project site is situated at IOCL Paradip Refinery, Survey no: 218, Abhaychandrapur village, Jhimani P.O., Kujang covering village, Taluka/Tehsil, Taluk, Jagatsinghpur Dist., Paradip, Odisha -754141. District and State, justification for selecting the site. Whether other sites Alternate sites were not considered since the proposed expansion is within the existing refinery complex. Adequate land is were considered available with IOCL Paradip for the proposed expansion.

ii. A Topo sheet of the study area of radius of 10 km and site location on 1:50,000/ 1:25,000 scale on an A3/A2 sheet (including al eco- sensitive areas and environmentally sensitive places)

68 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Topomap of the study area in 1:50000 scale

No notified Eco-sensitive areas and environmentally sensitive places within 10km radius from the project boundary.

Topo map in 1:50,000 scale for the study area on an A3 sheet including environmental sensitive areas/ eco-sensitive areas is given in Chapter 3, Section 3.5.5, Figure 3-2 of EIA report. iii. Details w.r.t option analysis for Alternate sites were not considered since the proposed expansion is within the existing refinery complex. Adequate land is selection of site available with IOCL Paradip for the proposed expansion.

iv. Co-ordinates (lat-long) of all four Co-ordinates of all four corners of the site S. No corners of the site Latitude Longitude

69 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

1 20°15'57.9''N 86°34'48.89''E 2 20°14'39.63''N 86°37'5.97''E 3 20°16'8.3''N 86°36'24.62''E 4 20°16'42.52''N 86°36'5.11''E v. Google map Earth downloaded of Google map Earth downloaded of the project site the project site

70 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

vi. Layout maps including existing The layout indicating storage area, plant area, greenbelt area, utilities etc is appended in Chapter 2, Section 2.8.2 of EIA unit as well as proposed unit report and the layout including existing unit as well as proposed unit enclosed as Annexure-6. The Greenbelt layout is indicating storage area, plant area, attached in the Annexure-8. greenbelt area, utilities etc. If located within an industrial The project site is situated outside industrial area/Estate/Complex. area/Estate/Complex, layout of Industrial indicating location of unit within the Industrial area/Estate. vii. Photographs of the proposed Photographs of the proposed and existing plant site, existing, plantation/greenbelt are appended in Chapter 2, Section 2.8.1, and existing (if applicable) plant site, Figure 2-14 and Figure 2-15. existing, show photographs of plantations/greenbelt, in particular. viii. Land use break-up of total land Classification of landuse of Project Site: Builtup, Urban (As per Bhuvan 2011-12) of the project site (indicate and acquired), government/ private- Existing Proposed After Expansion agriculture, forest, wasteland, water Description (Acres) (Acres) (Acres) Percentage, % bodies, settlements, etc shall be a. Refinery Project area included (not required for industrial Built Up area 1748 75 1823 65.32% area) Roads 355 0 355 12.72% Green Belt 580 0 580 20.78% Vacant Land 108 0 33 1.18% Subtotal (a) 2791 75 2791 100% b. Residential Area i.Plot Area 204 0 204 64.97 ii.Green Belt 110 0 110 35.03 Subtotal (b) 314 0 314 100.00 c.Other Office and Building i.Plot Area 155 0 155 64.58 ii.Green Belt 85 0 85 35.42 Subtotal (c) 240 0 240 100.00 Total Area(a+b+c) 3270 75 3345 d. On other's land Green belt (d) 75 0 75 Total Green belt Area from 850 0 850 30.46 a,b,c and d

Note: The proposed 75 acres is utilized from the existing vacant land inside the IOCL Paradip Refinery Complex.

71 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Details given in Chapter 2, Section 2.8.2 of EIA report

ix. A list of major industries with List of major industries within the study area (10 km radius) name and type within the study area S. No Description Distance (~km) Direction (10 km radius) shallbe incorporated. Land use details of the study area) 1. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited 1.68 N 2. IOCL Paradip Marketing Terminal 1.72 N 3. Paradip Power plant Limited 3.17 NNE 4. Adani Wilmar Limited (Edible oil) 3.28 NE 5. Arcelor Mittal Nippon Steel India Limited 5.24 NE 6. IFFCO Plant 6.3 NE x. Geological features and Geo- a.Geological features hydrological status of the study area  Geologically the study area including the site consisting of Alluvial formations of Recent geological age. shall be included.  These alluvial formations are developed by the action of Mahanadi river and Bay of Bengal sea.  The alluvium developed due to the river action is designated as Fluvial alluvium.  Similarly, the alluvium developed due to the sea action is named as Coastal Alluvium.  The basement rocks are existing below 100m from the existing ground level.  The geological formation of this district is entirely alluvium of recent origin.  The entire district comes under Mahanadi Delta Division and Cuttack Coastal Plain. b.Geo-hydrological status  The study area including the project site is part of coastal and fluvial alluvium developed due to the deltaic nature of Mahanadi River with Bay of Bengal.  The area is covered with thick pile of younger and older alluvial formations to an extent of more than 100m bgl.  Below the alluvium there are sandstone formations with intercalation of clay beds are reported which are part of ParadeepTechtonic Depression of Mahanadi Basin.  These sedimentary formations are extended more than 900m thickness which are successively underlined with basement crystalline rocks.  Groundwater occurs in semi-confined to unconfined nature in the alluvial formations within the study area.  There are potential shallow fresh water aquifers existing within the study area at 10 to 20m depth from the existing ground levels.  The existing bore wells it is understood that the groundwater level is between 3 to 4 mbgl.  Below the fresh water aquifers there are saline water aquifers which are present at 40 to 50m bgl within the alluvial formations.  The deeper aquifer system is also present within the Paradeep Depression in deep seated sedimentary formations.

72 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Further detailed Geological features and Geo-hydrological status is provided in Chapter 3, Section 3.5.10, Section 3.5.8 of EIA report xi. Details of drainage of the project upto 5km radius of the study area. If the site is within 1Km radius of any major river, peak and lean season river discharge as well as flood occurrence frequency based on peak rainfall data of the past 30 years. Details of Flood Level of the project site and maximum of Flood of the river shall also be provided (mega green field projects)

Drainage Map showing the study area

1. Mahanadi River is the one of the major perennial river flowing from west to east of the project site at a distance of ~6.18km (NNE) merging into Bay of Bengal.

2. Santara Nadi, one of the tributaries of Mahanadi River which bifurcate the refinery complex and merges into Bay of Bengal.

3. Jatadharmuhan Nadi is flowing at a distance of ~2km (SSW) which merge into Bay of Bengal.

4. Dhenkiagalia Nadi is flowing adjacent to the southern part of refinery complex which merges into Santara

73 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Nadi.

5. Taladanda is a lined canal, which is at a distance of ~4.87km (ENE).

Based on 30 years rainfall data, the highest HFL recorded was 3.91m MSL during 1999 Super Cyclone.

S. No Description Distance (~km) Direction 1 Bay of Bengal 0.55 SE 2 DhenkiagaliaNadi(adjacent to project site) 0.03 W 3 Santara Nadi(adjacent to project site) 0.08 E 4 AtharabankiNadi 1.03 E 5 MahangaNadi 1.21 W 6 JatadharmuhanNadi 2 SSW 7 Taladanda canal 4.87 ENE The Refinery Site itself does not flood in any of the flood scenarios tested. The HPP level of 4.06m MSL exceeds the 1999 Cyclone high water level of 3.91m MSL by 150mm.

Flood risk assessment report prepared by URS scott wilson for IOCL Paradip Refinery is also enclosed as Annexure 25. xii. Status of acquisition of land. If Land acquisition is not required as the proposed expansion is within the existing facility. acquisition is not complete, stage of the acquisition process and expected Land Documents are enclosed as Annexure 1 time of complete procession of the land. Note: As per form-1 16 acre has to acquired for the proposed project based on the preliminary project feasibility study carried out. Based on the Detailed feasibility study it is identified, as the land acquisition is not required xiii. R&R details in respect of land Not applicable, since no land acquisition involved. in line with state Government policy 5 Forest and wildlife related issues (if applicable): i. Permission and approvals for Not Applicable, since no forest land involved. the use of forest land (forestry clearance), if any, and recommendations of the State Forest Department (if applicable) ii. Land use map based on High Not Applicable, since no forest land involved. resolution satellite imagery (GPS) of

74 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

the proposed site delineating the forest land (in case of projects involving forest land more than 40 Ha) iii. Status of application submitted Not Applicable, since no forest land involved. for obtaining the stage I Forestry Clearance along with latest status shall be submitted iv. The projects to be located Not Applicable since no National parks, Sanctuaries, Biosphere Reserves, Migratory Corridors of Wild Animals in within 10 Km of the National parks, 10km radius from the project boundary. Sanctuaries, Biosphere Reserves, Migratory Corridors of Wild Animals, the project proponent shall submit the map duly authenticated by Chief Wildlife Warden showing these features vis-à-vis the project location and the recommendations or comments of the Chief Wildlife Warden-thereon. v. Wildlife Conservation Plan There are two Schedule-I Species in study area i.e., reptiles named Nilssoniahurum (Gray 1831) and Lissemyspunctata duly authenticated by the Chief (Bonnaterre 1789) habitats. There are two Schedule-I- Part-IV Species in study area i.e Butterfly-Hypolimnas misippus and Wildlife Warden of the State Castalius rosimon Government for conservation of schedule I fauna, if any exists in the Action plan for conservation of Marine life including Olive Ridley Turtle has been prepared in 2013 by Mangrove Forest study area. Division (Wildlife), Rajnagar, Odisha and approved by Principal Cheif Conservator Forest(WL) & CheiWildlife Warden, Odisha. The fund allocation by IOCL of INR 20.04Cr.for the conservation of Marine life over a period of implantation of 10yrs.

The Wildlife conservation plan prepared by Mangrove Forest Division (Wildlife), Rajnagar, Odisha is enclosed as Annexure 20.

vi. Copy of application submitted Not applicable since no notified Sanctuaries/ National Parks/ Eco-sensitive zones/ areas within the 15km radius from the for clearance under the Wildlife project boundary. (Protection) Act, 1972 to the Standing Committee of the National Board for Wildlife. 6 Environmental Status

75 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

i. Determination of atmospheric The daily inversion level at the project site varies from 50 to 1750m during 6 AM to 6 PM, the maximum recorded at 5 PM, inversion level at the project site March 2019. Further details are given in Chapter 3, Section 3.6.2 and Section 3.6.5 and site- specific micrometeorological data using Meteorological Data for the Study Period (March - May 2019) temperature, relative humidity, S. No Parameter Observation hourly wind speed and direction and 1. Temperature Max. Temperature: 43°C rainfall Min. Temperature: 19°C Avg. Temperature: 29.83°C 2. Hourly Average Relative 80.05% Humidity 3. Hourly Average Wind Speed 3.04m/s 4. Predominant Wind Direction South ii. AAQ data (except monsoon) at 8 The ambient air quality have been monitored at 8 locations for 14 parameters as per NAAQS/CPCB guidelines within the locations for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, study area. The average baseline levels of PM10 (55.35 – 80.53µg/m³), PM2.5 (27.72 – 38.16µg/m³), SO2(8.63 – NOX, CO and other parameters 13.21µg/m³), NO2(16.15 – 25.30µg/m³), the nearest CPCB AAQ monitoring station is PPL Guest House in which the annual relevant to the project shall be average for the year 2018: PM10 (113 µg/m³), PM2.5 (37 µg/m³), SO2(19 µg/m³), NO2(11 µg/m³). collected. The monitoring stations All the parameters are well within the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Industrial, Commercial and Residential shall be based on CPCB guidelines areas at all monitoring locations during the study period from March 2019 - May 2019. and take into account the predominant wind direction, population AAQ monitoring locations are provided in the Chapter 3, Section 3.7and monitoring results are provided in the Chapter 3, zone, sensitive receptors including Section 3.7 reserved forests. iii. Raw data of all AAQ measurement Raw data of all AAQ measurement for 12 weeks of all stations as per frequency given in the NAAQM notification of Nov. for 12 weeks of all stations as per 2009 along with- min-max, average and 98% values for each of the AAQ parameters from data of all AAQ stations are frequency given in the NAAQM provided as Annexure 13 notification of Nov. 2009 along with- min-max, average and 98% values for each of the AAQ parameters from data of all AAQ stations should be provided as an annexure to the EIA report iv. Surface water quality of nearby Surface water sampling locations River (100m upstream and S. Location Distance from project Direction from project downstream of discharge point) and Water bodies other surface drains at eight No code boundary (~km) boundary locations as per CPCB/ MoEF&CC guidelines. 1 Stream near Udayabat SW1 4.04 N 2 Mahanadi d/s near Musharhia SW2 7.56 NNE

76 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

3 Marine sample near Port SW3 4.77 E 4 Santara nadi d/s SW4 0.16 E 5 Marine sample near project site SW5 0.64 E 6 Mahanga Nadi SW6 1.34 SW 7 Mahanadi u/s near Balaramapur SW7 8.59 NW 8 Sanatara nadi u/s SW8 0.1 W

Surface water quality of nearby River

Surface water Marine Standard Limit Parameter sample sample ranges Class A Class B Class C Class D Class E pH 6.76 to 7.84 7.94 to 7.98. 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 Total Dissolved 2640 mg/l to 32040 mg/l to 500 - 1500 - 2100 Solids (TDS) 19128 mg/l 34677 mg/l . 320.2 mg/l – 5602.4 mg/l – Hardness 300 - - - - 3875.6 mg/l 6401.6 mg/l 1 mg/l and BOD 3 to 5 mg/l 2 3 3 - - 19mg/l COD 4 to 154 mg/l 18 to 36 mg/l - - - - -

Surface water quality of nearby River and other surface drains at eight locations as per CPCB/ MoEF&CC guidelines are collected & analyzed and the details are provided in the Chapter 3, Section 3.9. v. Whether the site falls near to No Polluted stretch of river identified as per CPCB within 10km radius from the project site. polluted stretch of river identified by the CPCB/MoEF& CC, if yes give details vi. Ground water monitoring at Ground water monitoring results at 8 locations minimum 8 locations shall be included Standard Limit Parameter Range of Results Permissible Acceptable Limit Limit No pH 7.02 and 8.21 6.5-8.5 Relaxation Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) 406mg/l –868 mg/l 500mg/l 2000 mg/l Chloride 94.03 mg/l – 251.21 mg/l 250mg/l 1000 mg/l Sulphate 32.03mg/l – 108.31 mg/l 200mg/l 400 mg/l Hardness 143 mg/l – 301mg/l 200mg/l 600 mg/l

77 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Ground water monitoring at minimum 8 locations are collected & analyzed. Futher detailed Ground water monitoring results were provided in the Chapter 3, Section 3.9 vii.Noise levels monitoring at 8 Noise levels monitoring results at 8 locations within the study area locations within the study area. Day Time (dB(A)) Night Time (dB(A)) Site Results Standards Results Standards Industrial areas (Project site) 53.8 75 47.1 70 Commercial areas (Paradip, Coast Guard) 64.8 65 54.2 55 Residential area (Paradipgarh, Dochakki, Musadiha, 50.9- 42.6- 55 45 Dhinkia, Sunadiakandha and Gandakipur) 58.6 47.5

Noise levels monitoring at 8 locations within the study area are collected & analyzed. Further detailed Noise level monitoring results were provided in the Chapter 3, Section 3.8 viii. Soil characteristics as per Soil characteristics as per CPCB guidelines CPCB guidelines  The pH of the soil samples ranged from 5.63 to 7.94. Indicating that the soils are moderately acidic to moderately alkaline in nature.  Conductivity of the soil samples ranged from195 to280 μmhos/cm.  Nitrogen content ranged from 165.42 mg/kg to 313.8 mg/kg.  Phosphorous ranged from 133.17 mg/kg to 296.71 mg/kg.  Potassium content ranges from 69.9 mg/kg to 144.69 mg/kg.

Futher detailed Soil characteristicsare analyzed as per CPCB guidelines are provided in the Chapter 3, Section 3.10, Table 3-19 of EIA report. ix. Traffic study of the area, type of Traffic study is carried out including type and frequency of vehicles, transportation of materials and additional traffic due to vehicles, frequency of vehicles for the proposed project based on IRC:106-1990- Guideline for capacity of urban road in plain area. Details are given in transportation of materials, Chapter 4, Section 4.5.5 of EIA report. The existing parking arrangements are sufficient for the proposed project. additional traffic due to proposed project, parking arrangement etc. Existing & proposed vehicular movement per Hour (Peak Hour) Total vehicles PCU Total PCU S. Type of Existing Existing Proposed Propose after project Factors after project No Vehicle vehicles PCU vehicles d PCU implementatio IRC (SP implementatio n 41) n 1 2 wheeler 124 93 0 0 127 0.75 93 2 3 wheelers 48 96 0 0 48 2 96 4 wheelers/ 3 91 91 5 5 96 1 96 cars

78 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

4 truck/Lorry 79 292.3 17 62.9 96 3.7 355.2 agricultural 5 11 44 0 0 11 4 44 tractor light emission 6 9 12.6 0 0 9 1.4 12.6 vehicle Total 362 628.9 22 67.9 384 696.8

Traffic Volume after Implementation of the Project Road Volume of Volume LOS Traffic For the Road Capacity V/C Ratio Traffic (V) Category* Classification (C) Existing 362 628.9 1500 0.42 “B” Stable Traffic Flow After 384 696.8 1500 0.47 “B” Stable Traffic Flow implementation

*LOS (Level of Service) categories are A-Free Flow, B- Reasonably Free Flow, C-Stable Flow, D-Approaching unstable flow, E- Unstable flow, F- Forced or breakdown flow.

Due to propose project there will be slight increment in the vehicle movement but the level of service (LOS) anticipated will be Stable Traffic Flow.

x. Detailed description of flora and Flora and Fauna study is carried out found within the 10km radius study area and the details are provided in Chapter 3, fauna (terrestrial and aquatic) Section 3.5.3.1 and Section 3.11 existing in the study area shall be given with special reference to rare, a.Flora endemic and endangered species. If There is a vulnerable herbs in the study area i.e., named Acanthephippium silhetense and Coelogyne trinervis Schedule-I fauna and found within There is a vulnerable tree in the study area i.e., named Lagerstroemia minuticarpa the study area, a Wildlife There is a endangered Shrub Mangrove in the study area i.e., named Acanthus volubilis Wall Conservation plan shall be prepared There are three endangered Tree Mangrove in the study area i.e., named Bruguiera sexangula, Heritiera kanikensis and furnished Majumdar and Heritiera littoral is Dryand b.Fauna There is a vulnerable Amphibian in the study area i.e., named Philautus garo (Boulenger 1919) There is a endangered bird in the study area i.e., named Baer’s Pochard There is a vulnerable bird in the study area i.e., named Lesser Adjutant

79 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

There is a near threatened fish in the study area i.e., named Indian butter Cat fish There are two Schedule-I Species in study area i.e., reptiles named Nilssoniahurum (Gray 1831) and Lissemyspunctata (Bonnaterre 1789) habitats. There are two numbers of Schedule-I-Part-IV in study area i.e., Hypolimnas misippus and Castalius rosimon

Summary on Flora in the Study area Data Least Near Critically Not yet assessed Endangered Vulnerable Deficient Concern Threatened Endangered Trees — — 65 3 — 1 — Grasses — — 7 — — — — Herbs — — 33 — — 2 — Shrubs — — 11 1 — — — Climber — — 7 — — — — Sedges — — 8 — — — — Fern __ __ 1 ______

Summary on Fauna in the Study area Not yet Data Least Near Endangered Vulnerable Near Threatened assessed Deficient Concern Threatened Mammals — — 16 — — — — Reptiles — — 6 — — 1 6 Amphibians — 4 17 — — 1 — Butterfly 52 — 4 — — — — Birds — — 59 1 1 1 — Fish — — 7 — 1 — —

Action plan for conservation of Marine life including Olive Ridley Turtle has been prepared in 2013 by Mangrove Forest Division (Wildlife), Rajnagar, Odisha and approved by Principal Cheif Conservator Forest(WL) & CheiWildlife Warden, Odisha. The fund allocation by IOCL of INR 20.04Cr.for the conservation of Marine life over a period of implantation of 10yrs. Wildlife conservation plan along with the cost breakup is attached as Annexure-20 xi. Socio-economic status of the study Socio-economic profile of the study area area S.No Particulars Study Area Unit 1 Number of villages and Town in the Study Area 102 Nos. 2 Total Households 80839 Nos.

80 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

3 Total Population 358725 Persons 4 Children Population (0-6 Years Old) 36501 Persons 5 SC Population 75330 Persons 6 ST Population 3603 Persons 118859 7 Total Working Population Persons

8 Main Workers 95224 Persons 23635 9 Marginal Workers Persons

10 Cultivators 27679 Persons 18768 11 Agricultural Labourers Persons 5087 12 Household Industries Persons 67325 13 Other Workers Persons 14 Literates population 279756 Persons

Further detailed socio-economic status of the study area is provided in the Chapter 3, Section 3.12

7 Impact and Environmental Management Plan i. Assessment of ground level The ground level concentration of pollutants (PM10, PM2.5, SO2&NOx) using AERMOD software were assessed and concentration of pollutants from presented in Chapter 4 Section 4.5 of EIA report. the stack emission based on site- specific meteorological features. In AERMOD Software Version 8.0.5 was used for air dispersion modeling and is applicable to a wide range of buoyant or case the project is located on a neutrally buoyant emissions up to a range of 10 km. The air quality contours shall be plotted on a location map showing the hilly terrain, AQIP modeling shall location of the project site are shown in GLCs for proposed is given in Chapter 4 Section 4.5 of EIA report be done using inputs of the specific Total Maximum GLCs from the Stack Emissions including transportation terrain characteristics for Max. Base NAAQ Estimated Incremental determining the potential impacts Pollutant line Conc. Total Conc. (µg/m3) standard % increase Conc. (µg/m3) of the project on the AAQ. (µg/m3) ** (µg/m3) Cumulative impact of all sources PM 95.7 0.10 95.8 100 0.10 of emissions (including SO2 15.7 1.16 16.86 80 7.39 transportation) on the AAQ of the NOx 30.06 5.89 35.95 80 19.59 area shall be assessed. Details of CO 50 78.69 128.69 4000 157.38 the model used and the input data

81 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

used for modelling shall also be CO2 - 8099.82 8099.82 - - provided. The air quality contours Note: shall be plotted on a location map showing the location of project 1. CO2 parameter is not available for NAAQ standards site, habitation nearby, sensitive receptors, if any. 2.*Since the maximum base line concentration of CO is below detectable limit, the detectable limit of CO 50 µg/m3 is considered 3.** Max. Base line values were observed at Paradwip (Coast guard) at a distance ~4.91km, E from the project boundary.

ii. Water Quality modelling - in case The refinery effluent are treated in Effluent Treatment Plant followed by RO Plant and the final reject water after of discharge in water body. treatment meeting MINAS Standards is disposed into the sea.

The Water Quality Modeling is not done in the marine disposal area.The treated effluent is being discharged into deep sea. No other effluent is being discharged into the river.

The existing and proposed effluent disposal into deep sea is 190.88 m3/hr and 86.18 m3/hr respectively. After expansion, 277.06m3/hr will be discharge into deep sea that it is observed to be within the marine discharge approval limit of 350m3/hr as per the OPCB consent for Air and water obtained vide: 5543/IND-I-CON-6414 dated 31.03.2021 valid till 31.03.2022. The industrial effluent is discharged into deep sea through the pipeline where its outlet of pipe is at a distance of 3km from the Low Tide Line (LTL).

Impact of the transport of raw Material Handling, Storage and Transportation material and end products on the surrounding environment shall be  Hazardous chemicals will be stored in closed tanks and drums with appropriate blanketing systems. assessed and provided. In this  All transfers from drums / tanks will be done through pumps in closed pipelines. regard, options for transport of raw  The loading of finished products to trucks and drums will be done through automated filling systems materials and finished products and with overflow protections. wastes (large quantities) by rail or  All key raw materials will be charged to the reactors through closed pipeline systems including rail-cum road transport or conveyor- pneumatic systems for solid handling. cum-rail transport shall be  Raw materials/ intermediates/ products will be stored in closed tanks/drums provided with breather examined. arrangements to avoid fugitive emissions. Further detailes are given in Chapter 10 Section10.6.5 of EIA report.

82 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

iii. A note on treatment of waste water a.Wastewater management from different plant operations, extent recycled and reused for 3 3 3 different purposes shall be Unit Existing (m /hr) Proposed (m /hr) After expansion (m /hr) included. Complete scheme of Effluent generation 1082.1 408 1490.1 effluent treatment, characteristics ETP treatment capacity 1580 408 1988 of untreated and treated effluent to Recycled water 748 305.5 1053.5 meet the prescribed standards of discharge under E(P) rules. Existing Approx. 1082.1 m3/hr of effluent is generated in the existing facility of which 190.88 m3/hr rejects from RO is disposed to Deep Sea, 50 m3/hr rejects from RO is sent to Coke Dust Suspension and 50 m3/hr rejects from RO is sent to Coke Cutting.. Remaining 748m3/hr from RO is reused back in the system for DM Water Makeup. Proposed In the proposed expansion Approx. 408 m3/hr of effluent is generated in the proposed facility of which 78% of effluent is processed in RO plant and its rejects of 86.18 m3/hr is disposed into deep sea. The remaining RO processed water of 305.5m3/hr is reused back in the system for DM Water Makeup and cooling tower. New ETP is proposed for installation to process effluent @ 408 m3/hr with 10% design Margin (Maximum capacity with high TOC)

b.Characteristics of effluent being generated

83 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

7 DO IS 3025 (P:38) mg/l ND 8 Alkalinity IS 3025 (P:23) mg/l 191 9 NH3 IS 3025 (P:34) mg/l 29.5 10 Conductivity IS 3025 (P:14) μs/cm 1117 11 ORP APHA 2580 mV 20

c.Characteristics of effluent before discharge

Sl Limits as per Parameters Test Method UoM Results No MINAS 1 pH IS 3025 (P:11) - 6.0 -8.5 8 2 BOD IS 3025 (P:44) mg/l 15 9 3 COD IS 3025 (P:58) mg/l 125 78 Oil & 4 IS 3025 (P:39) mg/l 5 <4.0 Grease 5 TSS IS 3025 (P:17) mg/l 20 <4 6 Sulphide IS 3025 (P:29) mg/l 0.5 <0.10 7 Phenol IS 3025 (P:43) mg/l 0.35 0.09 8 Cyanide IS 3025 (P:27) mg/l 0.2 <0.02 9 NH3 IS 3025 (P:34) mg/l 15 1.2 10 Alkalinity IS 3025 (P:23) mg/l 172 11 Chloride IS 3025 (P:32) mg/l 973 12 TDS IS 3025 (P:16) mg/l 1001 13 Turbidity IS 3025 (P:10) NTU <0.1 14 TKN ASTM D3590 A mg/l 40 2.1 15 P IS 3025 P:31 b mg/l 3 0.068 16 Cr(VI) IS 3025 P:52 a mg/l 0.1 <0.1 17 Cr total APHA 23rd edition 3125 A & B mg/l 2 <0.1 18 Pb APHA 23rd edition 3125 A & B mg/l 0.1 <0.001 19 Hg APHA 23rd edition 3125 A & B mg/l 0.01 <0.001 20 Zn APHA 23rd edition 3125 A & B mg/l 5 0.016 21 Ni APHA 23rd edition 3125 A & B mg/l 1 0.011 22 Cu APHA 23rd edition 3125 A & B mg/l 1 0.003 23 V APHA 23rd edition 6200 B. mg/l 0.2 <0.001

84 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

USEPA 8260C using capillary 24 Benzene column and MSD with Purge & mg/kg 0.1 <0.005 Trap device (USEPA 5030C)

Effluent generated from Purified Terephthalic Acid (PTA), Paraxylene (PX) and & offsite and utilities plant are to be collected, segregated and treated in ETP to meet applicable regulatory requirements before final disposal. RO based treatment is envisaged for final disposal. Rejects from RO plant to be transfer in sea.

ZLD is not being followed whereas the OPCB consent obtained vide:5543/IND-I-CON-6414 dated 31.03.2021 valid till 31.03.2022 approved marine disposal is 350 m3/hr And the actual discharge into the Deep sea in 277.06 m3/hr.

The effluent treatment scheme is given in Chapter 2 Section 2.16 and Section 2.17 of EIA report.

Wastewater treatment and disposal details are provided in the Chapter 10, Section 10.6.2 of EIA report. iv. Details of stack emission and action plan for control of emissions Fuel Rate Flue gas Emission per stack (g/s) to meet standards. S.No Stack details (Natural Flow Rate Gas) (kg/hr) (Nm3/hr) PM SO2 NOx CO CO2 Tatory 1. 433 4679 - 0.0257 0.1688 - 451.53 Furnace ISOMAR 2. 2747 29708 - 0.0833 0.6052 - 1402.36 Furnace 3. XFU 1 7594 82116 - 0.5597 2.7983 - 9553.61

4. XFU 2 4840 52339 - 0.4396 2.1955 - 7495.03 Utility Boiler 5. – 5 19973 325061 0.4528 4.5139 22.575 1.6931 - (Standby)* 6. Flare 15 162 0.0002 0.0023 0.0113 0.0008 - 18902.53 Total (g/s) 0.453 5.6245 28.3541 1.6939

85 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Further details of stack emission are provided in the Chapter 4 Section4.5.4 of EIA report.

Details of action plan for control of emissions:  Use of clean burning fuel gas and natural gas in PX-PTA unit.  Installation of low NOx burners in all the furnaces and boilers  Tall stacks for better dispersion of flue gases.  Online monitoring of SOx, NOx, CO and PM emissions from furnaces/boilers.  Monitoring of ambient air quality as per revised MoEF&CC  Installation of internal floating roof with double seals in all Class-A tanks for reduction of fugitive emissions.  Provision of mechanical seals in all the hydrocarbon pumps for reduction of fugitive emissions.  Reduction of hydrocarbon losses and to attain zero leakage status.  All the proposed tanks are of Internal floating roof type minimizing the fugitive emissions in comparison to External floating roof tanks  All the tanks will be under Nitrogen blanketing

v. Measures for fugitive emission Details of action plan for control of fugitive emissions control  Installation of floating roof with double seals in all Class-A tanks for reduction of fugitive emissions.  Provision of mechanical seals in all the hydrocarbon pumps for reduction of fugitive emissions.  All the proposed tanks are of Internal floating roof type minimizing the fugitive emissions in comparison to External floating roof tanks  All the tanks will be under Nitrogen blanketing

vi. Details of hazardous waste Hazardous waste materials will be properly disposed as per the Hazardous Wastes (Management, Handling and generation and their storage, Transboundary Movement) Rules 2016; utilization and management, Copies of MOU regarding Hazardous waste authorization has been made with SPCB, Odisha- IND-IV-HW-930/5028 dated 24.05.2019 valid till utilization of solid and hazardous 31.03.2024 is enclosed as Annexure-14. waste in cement plant also be included. EMP shall include the concept of waste-minimization, Existing Hazardous Waste: recycle/ reuse/recover techniques, Scheduled as Existing Approved S.No Details of Frequency of Energy conservation, and natural per HWM Quantity Quantity TPY Storage and Disposal . Waste disposal resource conservation. rules TPY Stored in intermediate Spent 1 Schedule-I 4.2 2484.4 2500 Within 90 days storage facility (covered catalyst warehouse with impervious

86 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

floor and shed)

Disposal in SLF -1497.4 / Co-processing in cement industry - 987 2 Spent Clay Schedule-I 4.5 145.5 720 Within 90 days Directly sent to SLF Schedule-I - 3 Ash 36.0 Within 90 days Directly sent to SLF 37.2 Directly sent to DCU for 4 Oily Sludge Schedule-I 4.1 1456.1 Within 90 days processing 2748 (Oil Stored in impervious sludge/ metallic containers before Emulsion/ unloading in melting pit for 5 Oily Sludge Schedule-I 4.1 74.2 Within 90 days Slop Oil) oil recovery Sludge is disposed in HW incinerator 180 Sent to incinerator for 6 Coke Schedule-I 4.4 16.7 Within 90 days disposal

Proposed Hazardous Waste: Proposed Scheduled as per Frequency of S.No. Details of Waste Quantity Storage and Disposal HWM rules disposal TPD PX Spent Clay from Clay 1 Schedule-I 4.5 0.12 Within 90 days Captive SLF Treaters Metals Recovery or Spent Catalyst from 2 Schedule-I 1.6 0.01 Within 90 days Landfill in Captive Reactor SLF Spent Clay from Clay 3 Schedule-I 4.5 1.44 Within 90 days Captive SLF Treater Spent Adsorbent from 4 Schedule-I 1.6 0.24 Within 90 days Captive SLF Adsorbent Chambers Metal recovery by 5 Catalyst from Reactor Schedule-I 1.6 0.04 Within 90 days authorized recycler Spent Clay fromClay 6 Schedule-I 4.5 0.26 Within 90 days Captive SLF Treater PTA

87 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Recovery by catalyst 7 PTA Spent Catalyst Schedule-I 1.6 0.0438 Within 90 days manufacturer Disposal in authorized Schedule-I 8 Filters, Oils 0.0685 Within 90 days HW incinerator / Sale 3.3/5.1 to authorized users Sale to authorized 9 Pails, Corrosion, Paint Schedule-I 21.1 0.0137 Within 90 days users

10 Laboratory Solvents Schedule-I 20.2 0.0003 Within 90 days Disposal in ETP

11 Waste Solvents Schedule-I 20.2 0.0110 Within 90 days Disposal in ETP vii. Proper utilization of fly ash shall No generation of flyash as Natural Gas will be used as fuel for the boilers. be ensured as per Fly Ash notification, 2009. A detailed plan of action shall be provided. viii. Action plan for the green belt Refinery has developed existing greenbelt area of 580 Acres in refinery area while in total it occupies about 850acres of development plan in 33% area i.e., green belt. The green belt occupies about 30.46% only land with not less than 1500 trees More than 8 lakh trees have been planted by IOCL. This is ongoing job and PDR has the commitment to plant @5000 trees per Ha. Giving details of Species, every year towards environment management and preserve eco system. Survival rate is 95%. width of plantation, planning As per Paradip refinery project’s EC condition for green belt (GB) development was on 580 acres land and green belt on the schedule etc. shall be included. same has been developed in full. Additional tree plantation has been done on land in and around residential township, along The green belt shall be around the access roads, village schools, panchayats, coastal villages etc. IOCL Paradip refinery till now has done plantation of project boundary and a scheme for suitable species trees about 8.5 Lakh including GB covering about 800 acres area. Further plantation of 100000 trees is greening of the roads used for the under execution. project shall also be incorporated. The details of Species along with the green belt demarcation are provided in Annexure 8.

SNO Description Existing Proposed Total 1 Total area of Green 343.983 113 343.983 Belt 2 Percentage of total 30.46 10 40.46 project area 3 No. of Plants 809624 282500 1092124 4 Funds allocated 80962400 30000000 110962400 The land allocation for proposed green belt area is given in Annexure 29. Further details are given in Chapter 2, Section 2.15 of EIA report.

88 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

ix. Action plan for rain water Two (02 nos) storm water reservoirs (Capacities: 2,96,000 KL and 3,13,000 KL) have been developed to store rain water in harvesting measures at plant site monsoon in the refinery premises. The Storm water pond for collecting surface runoff inside the Refinery is given in shall be submitted to harvest Chapter 10, Figure 10-6 of EIA report. The Rain water harvesting integrated with ecological park is given in Chapter 10, rainwater from the roof tops and Figure 10-5 of EIA report. storm water drains to recharge the ground water and also to use for Further details are given in Chapter 10, Section 10.6.7 of EIA report. the various activities at the project site to conserve fresh water and reduce the water requirement from other sources. x. Total capital cost and recurring Capital cost and Recurring cost /annum for environmental pollution control measures cost /annum for environmental pollution control measures shall be S. Capital Cost Recuring Cost, included. Description No. in Crores in Crores 1. Air Pollution i.Stack 22.4 2.4 ii.APC equipments 1.7 0.17 2. Water Pollution i.ETP 336 3.9 3. Noise Pollution i. Acoustic enclosure 1.7 0.17 4. Solid Waste management - 0.1 5. Storm Water management/ Rain water harvesting - - 6. Green belt development 3 0.3 Total 364.8 7.04 xi. Action plan for Post-project Action plan for Post-project environmental monitoring environmental monitoring shall be S. Frequency of Particulars Parameters for Monitoring submitted No monitoring 1. Air pollution monitoring Ambient air quality within the Continuous PM, SOx, NOX, NO2, CO, O3, VOC premises

89 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Ambient air quality within the Twice in a week All 12 parameters as given in NAAQS premises Ambient air quality at 1 location in Twice in a week All 12 parameters as given in NAAQS Prevalent Down Wind Direction Ambient air quality at 1 location in Twice in a week All 12 parameters as given in NAAQS Up Wind Direction 2. Noise monitoring At two locations within the premises Once in a month Noise Levels in dB(A) 3. Ground water quality monitoring One location at site Quaterly Physicochemical properties and Heavy Metals The groundwater results are compared with the acceptable and permissible water quality standards as per IS: 10500 (2012) 4. Soil Quality monitoring One location near Hazardous waste Annually Physicochemical properties, Nutrients, storage area at site and one location Heavy metals as per IS 2720 (All Parts) outside site 5. Effluent Quality Monitoring Inlet and outlet of ETP Once a month pH, Temp, TDS, TSS, Chloride, Sulphide, Sulphate, fluoride, ammoniacal Nitrogen, Sodium, Copper, Zinc, Phenolic compounds, Oil and Grease, Boron, BOD, COD, Total Residual Chlorine, Arsenic, Cadmium, Total Chromium, Hexavalent Chromium, Lead, Selenium, Mercury, Pesticides, Alpha emitters, Free Ammonia, Dissolved Phosphates, Total Kjeldhal nitrogen, Cyanide, Nickel, Residual Sodium Carbonate. All the Parameters are to be verified as per CPCB Standard Guidelines. Inlet and out let of STP Once a month Sewage is Biologically treated as a part of the ETP and standards are met through the pH, Temp, TDS, TSS, BOD, COD, Oil and grease. All the Parameters are to be verified as per CPCB Standard Guidelines.

90 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

6. Work place Monitoring Quarterly Noise, VOC, Lux levels

xii. Onsite and offsite Disaster (natural The Risk Assessment has been carried out by using the PHAST software . Risk Assessment report and is attached as and Man-made) preparedness and Annexure-10 Emergency Management Plan including Risk Assessment and On-site emergency plans and offsite Disaster management with ERDMP enclosed as Annexure 11. damage control. Disaster Management Plan should be linked with District Disaster Management Plan. 8 Occupational Health i. Plan and fund allocation to ensure All the occupational health related expenditure of casual & contract workers incorporated in the scope of contractor and the occupational health & safety of compliance to the statutory rules in this regard is ensured. Approximate cost for OHC checkup is Rs. 2200 per person. all contract and casual workers IOCL officials OHC checkup is carried out under composite contract with the VK hospitals.

M/s IOCL, PDR, Safety, Health and Environment Policy (SHE) provided in Chapter 10, Section 10.9 of EIA report. ii. Details of exposure specific health The specific health status evaluation of worker’s medical report is enclosed as Annexure 15. status evaluation of worker. If the worker’s health is being evaluated The medical facities available within the IOCL Paradip Refinery is enclosed as Annexure 28. by pre-designed format, chest x- rays, Audiometry, Spirometry, Vision testing (Far and near vision, color vision and any other ocular defect), ECG, during pre- placement and periodical examinations give the details of the same. Details regarding last month analyzed data of above mentioned parameters as per age, sex, duration of exposure and department wise. iii. Details of existing Occupational & Main Hazards identified within the refinery complex are Safety Hazards. What are the 1.Fire Hazard exposure levels of hazards and 2.Electrical Hazards

91 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

whether they are Permissible 3.Thermal Hazard Exposure level (PEL) if these are 4.Occupational Hazards etc., not within PEL, what measures the Environmental monitoring is being carried out within the refinery shop floors and the parameters are mainly VOCs, H2S, company has adopted to keep them CO and HCs . within PEL. So that health of the In addition to the above Noise and illumination levels are also being carried out on regular intervals. Same will be continued workers can be preserved. even after expansion. Occupational Hazardous Toxic gas monitoring data are attached as Annexure 22. For other prominent toxic gas hazards (NH3, Cl2, SO2), gas detectors are installed in the production blocks for early detection of any abnormal / accidental presence with audio-visual alarming systems. For rest of the chemical hazards, any exposure and subsequent adverse health effect is assessed through periodical medical check-up of employees as per the unit wise chemical hazards identification. The test consists of Blood test, urine test, PFT, KFT, urine phenol etc. The details unit wise chemicals /hazards with possible health risk and prescribed test for periodical Medical check-ups are enclosed as Annexure 23. iv. Annual report of health status of Periodic medical examination is the same as the pre-employment screening and may be modified according to current workers with special reference to conditions, such as changes in the employee's symptoms, site hazards or exposures. Medical reports of few Employees of Occupational Health and Safety IOCL Paradip Refinery are attached as Annexure 15. 9 Corporate Environment Policy i. Does the company have a well laid Yes, the company have a well laid down Environmental Policy approved by its Board of Directors. down Environmental Policy approved by its Board of M/s. IOCL, PDR, Environment, Health & Safety Policy (EHS) provided in Chapter 10, Section 10.9 of EIA report. Directors? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA report ii. Does the Environment Policy Yes prescribe for standard operating A dedicated Environmental Management Cell (EMC) will be in force to bring into focus of any infringement/ deviation/ process/procedures to bring into violation of the environemnt. Details provided in Chapter 10, Section 10.8 of EIA report. focus any infringement/ deviation/ violation of the environemnt or forest norms/ conditions? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA iii. What is the hierarchical system or Hierarchical system or Administrative order of the company to deal with the environmental issues and for ensuring Administrative order of the compliance is provided in Chapter 10, Section 10.3 of EIA report. company to deal with the environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the environmental clearance conditions? Details of this system may be given.

92 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

iv. Does the company have system of System of reporting of non-compliances/ violations of environemntal norms & the Board Hierarchical system or reporting of non-compliances/ Administrative order of the company to deal with the environmental issues and for ensuring compliance is provided in violations of environemntal norms Reporting mechanism detailed in Chapter 10, Section 10.3 of EIA report. to the Board of Directors of the company and/or Stakeholders or Daily report signed by Unit Head to Head Quarter on compliance to the HSE parameters are enclosed in Annexure-21 stakeholders at large? This reporting mechanism shall be detailed in the EIA report 10 Details regarding infrastructure The site layout indicating all the facilities is enclosed as Annexure 6. facilities such as sanitation, fuel, restroom etc. to be provided to the Infrastructure facilities such as sanitation, restroom etc. shall be provided to the labour force during construction as well as labour force during construction as well to the casual workers including truck drivers during operation phase. as to the casual workers including truck drivers during operation phase.

11 Enterprise Social Commitment (ESC) i. Adequate funds (at least 2.5% of As per OM F. No: 22-65/2017-IA.III dated 1st May 2018 M/s IOCL will Allocate 0.125% of the project cost (11783 Crores) the project cost) shall be towards CER i.e. 0.125% of 11783 Crores = 14.72Crores earmarked towards the Enterprise Social Commitment based on As per CEPI compliance for SPA 1.5 times of slab to be allotted(1.5 * 14.72)=22.093 Crores public Hearing issues and item- wise details along with the bound action plan shall be included. Socio-Economic development activities need to be elaborated upon. 12 Any litigation pending against the No litigation and the affidavit is attached as Annexure project and/ or any direction/ order passed by any Court of Law against the project, if so, details thereof shall also be included. Has the unit received any notice under the section 5 of Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 or relevant Sections of Air and Water Acts? If so, details thereof and compliance /ATR to the notice(s) and

93 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

present status of the case. 13 A tabular chart with index for point Point wise ToR compliance is provided in provided in Chapter 1 & Section 1.8 of EIA Report. wise compliance of above TOR  SPECIFIC TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR EIA STUDIES FOR PETRO- CHEMICAL COMPLEXES (INDUSTRIES BASED ON PROCESSING OF PETROLEUMFRACTIONS&NATURALGASAND/ORREFORMINGTO AROMATICS)

Raw S. Modeof Mode of Storage Details on requirement of raw Material/ Quantity Unit Source No. Transport storage capacity material (naphtha /gas Fuel feedstock), its source of supply 1 Reformate 310000 Kg/h Internal Pipeline Tanks 15000 m3 and storage at the plant. Hydrogen 651 (PX) + Internal Pipeline No storage - 2 Kg/h 1 31 (PTA) 3 Paraxylene 97200 Kg/h Internal Pipeline Tanks 2x 9730 m3 4 FG/NG 374 KTPA Internal Pipeline No storage -

Further details of raw material and product given in Chapter 2, Section 2.7.4.2 of EIA report.

Complete process flow diagram for PX and PTA unit with material balance given in Chapter 2, Section 2.7.4.2. 2 Complete process flow diagram for all products with material balance. Brief description of equipments for various process for PX and PTA is given in Chapter 2, Section 2.7.4and Section 2.7.5 Brief description of equipments for 3 various process (cracker, separation, polymerization etc) Details of proposed source-specific pollution control schemes and S.N Pollution control scheme Stack details equipments to meet the national o standards 1. Tatory Furnace 2. ISOMAR Furnace  Installation of low NOx burners in all the furnaces and boilers 3. XFU 1 4  Adequate stack height XFU 2 4.  APH will be provided 5. Utility Boiler – 5 (Standby)* 6. Flare  Tall flare stack for better dispersion of flue gases. Storage vents: 7. Toluene day tank- 045-TK-001A  Installation of floating roof with double seals for

94 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

8. Toluene day tank- 045-TK-001B reduction of fugitive 9. Plant inventory tank- 044-TK-001 emissions 10. Paraxylene day tank- 049-TK-001 A  Provision of mechanical seals in all the hydrocarbon pumps for reduction of fugitive emissions. 11. Paraxylene day tank- 049-TK-001 B  All the proposed tanks are of Internal floating roof type 12. Desorbent storage tanks-049-TK-002 minimizing the fugitive emissions in comparison to 13. Plant inventory storage tanks- 049-TK-003 External floating roof tanks 14. Aromatic tank-048-TK-001  All the tanks will be under Nitrogen blanketing 15. Light reformate storage tank-048-TK-002 16. Isomer Regeneration Vent

Further details are given in Chapter 10, Section 10.5and Section 10.6 Details on VOC emission  Installation of floating roof with double seals for reduction of fugitive emissions control system from vents,  Provision of mechanical seals in all the hydrocarbon pumps for reduction of fugitive emissions stacks, fugitive emissions and  All the proposed tanks are of Internal floating roof type minimizing the fugitive emissions in comparison to External flare management, etc. floating roof tanks 5  All the tanks will be under Nitrogen blanketing  Primary as well as secondary sealsfor all storage tanks will be provided.  LDAR program will be done frequently to identify any leaksresulting in fugitive emissions.  Adequate water sprinkling will bedone to reduce road dust due tovehicular movement.  Details on Fire Protection Management enclosed as Annexure17  Flare Management system is enclosed as Annexure 31. 6 Details on proposed LDAR protocol LDAR monitoring is done by third party in every quarter and the LDAR report taken is enclosed as Annexure 16 Raw data of all AAQ measurement is provided as Annexure 13 Ambient air quality should 7 include hydrocarbon (methane AAQ locations detail is provided in the Chapter 3, Section 3.7 and monitoring results include hydrocarbon (methane and and non-methane), VOC and non-methane), VOC are provided in the Chapter 3, Section 3.7, Table 3-10 of EIA report. VCM (if applicable). Action plan to meet the standard APC Measures prescribed under EPA for petro chemical  Installation of low NOx burners in all the furnaces and boilers complex  Adequate stack height of maximum 81.1m will be provided in XFU-1 8  Air pre heater(APH) along with balance draft (ID fan & FD fan) will be provided as per the furnaces duties.  Tall flare stack for better dispersion of flue gases of stack height 140m will be provided.  Installation of floating roof with double seals for reduction of fugitive

95 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

emissions  Provision of mechanical seals in all the hydrocarbon pumps for reduction of fugitive emissions  All the proposed tanks are of Internal floating roof type minimizing the fugitive emissions in comparison to External floating roof tanks  All the tanks will be under Nitrogen blanketing Water Pollution Control Measures Waste water will be treated in ETP followed by RO and treated effluent will be discharged to deep sea. Solid and Hazardous Waste Disposal.  Inorganic waste will be given to authorized OSPCB vendors.  Municipal solid waste will be used in the existing organic waste converter and the resultant solid is used as manur  Spent Catalyst is being stored in intermediate storage facility (covered warehouse with impervious floor and shed) and disposal in SLF & Co-processing in cement industry within 90 days as per Hazardous waste authorization from OSPCB.

Adequate number of continues monitoring system will be installed.

Risk Assessment & Disaster The Risk Assessment has been carried out by using the PHAST software. Risk Assessment report and is attached as Management Plan Annexure 10 and the Disaster Management Plan as Annexure 11. i. Identification of hazards ii. Consequence Analysis i.Identification of hazards iii. Measures for mitigation of risk The procedure for RRA starts with identification of major risk areas are as follows:  Toxic chemical storage area  Process Plant involving hazardous chemicals The Major Hazards will be as described below  Possibility of injury during chemicals handled, during operations and due to intoxication.  Possibilities of fire hazards at transformers, switchgear and other electrical equipment etc. 9 1.Hazard Identification – Paraxylene

HEALTH ENVIRONMENTAL PHYSICAL Acute Toxicity –Inhalation : Category 4 Aquatic Toxicity : Category- 2 Flammable : Category 3flammable Acute Toxicity -Oral– Category 4Skin Irritation Category: 2

STUDY/ HAZARD CATEGORY 1 CATEGORY2 CATEGORY3 CATEGORY4 CATEGORY5 STATEMENT

96 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

AcuteOral <5mg/kg >5 <50mg/kg >50<300mg/kg >300<2000 >2000< LD50 Fatalifswallowed Fatalifswallowed Toxic ifswallowed mg/kg 5000mg/kg Harmfulif May beharmful swallowed ifswallowed Acute Dermal < 50 mg/kg > 50 < 200 mg/kg > 200 < 1000 > 1000 < 2000 > 2000 < 5000 LD50 Fatal in contact with Fatal in contact mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg May be skin with skin Toxic in contact Harmful in contact harmful in contact with skin with skin with skin Acute See footnote Inhalation below this table Dust LC50 < 0.05 mg/L > 0.05 < 0.5 mg/L > 0.5 < 1.0 mg/L > 1.0 < 5 mg/L Gases LC50 < 100 ppm/V > 100 < 500 ppm/V > 500 < 2500 >2500 < 20000 Vapours LC50 <0.5 mg/L >0.5 < 2.0 mg/L ppm/V ppm/V Fatal if inhaled Fatal if inhaled > 2.0 < 10 mg/L > 10 < 20 mg/L Toxic if inhaled Harmful if inhaled Flammable Flash point < 23 Flash point < 23 Flash point > 23 Flash point > 60 Not Applicable liquids degrees C and initial degrees C and degrees C< 60 degrees C < 93 boiling point < 35 initial boiling point degrees C. degrees C. degrees C. Extremely > 35 degrees C. Flammable liquid Combustible liquid flammable liquid Highly flammable and vapour and vapour liquid and vapour

97 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

up to 3 minutes (A), 1 hour (B), or tested animals from gradings at 24, 48, at least 2 of 3 4 hours (C). and 72 hours (or on 3 consecutive days tested animals from gradings Causes severe skin burns and eye after onset if reactions are delayed); at 24, 48, and 72 hours (or on damage. inflammation that persists to end of the3 consecutive days after onset (normally 14-day) observation period. if reactions are delayed). Causes skin irritation. Causes mild skin irritation. Environment: 96 hr LC50 (fish) <1 mg/L 48 hr 96 hr LC50 (fish) >1< 10 mg/L 48 hr 96 hr LC50 (fish) >10< 100 Acute Toxicity EC50 (crustacea) < 1 mg/L, 72/96 EC50 (crustacea) >1< 10 mg/L 72/96 mg/L 48 hr EC50 (crustacea) Category hr ErC50 (aquatic plants) < 1 mg/L hr ErC50 (aquatic plants) >1< 10 mg/L >10< 100 mg/L 72/96 hr Very toxic to aquatic life Toxic to aquatic life ErC50 (aquatic plants) >10< 100 mg/L Harmful to aquatic life Flammable Extremely flammable aerosol Flammable aerosol Not Applicable Aerosol Flammable solidsUsing the burning rate test, Using the burning rate test, substances Not Applicable substances or mixtures other than or mixtures other than metal powders: metal powders: (a) wetted zone (a) wetted zone does not stop fire for does not stop fire and at least 4 minutes and (b) burning time (b) burning time < 45 seconds or < 45 seconds or burning rate > 2.2 burning rate > 2.2 mm/second mm/second Using the burning rate Using the burning rate test, metal test, metal powders that have burning powders that have burning time < 5 time > 5 < 10 minutes minutes Flammable solid Flammable solid Flammable gases Gases, which at 20 degrees C and a Gases, other than those of category 1, Not Applicable standard pressure of 101.3 kPA: which, at 20 degrees C and a standard are ignitable when in a mixture of pressure of 101.3 kPA, have a 13% or less by volume in air; or flammable range while mixed in air. have a flammable range with air of Flammable gas at least 12 percentage points regardless of the lower flammable limit. Extremely flammable gas

Hazard Ratings

NFPA HAZARD CODES RATING SYSTEM Health : 2 0 – No Hazard

98 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Flammability : 3 1 – Slight Hazard Reactivity : 0 2 – Moderate Hazard 3 – Serious Hazard 4 – Severe Hazard

SKINCONTACT SKINABSORPTION EYECONTACT INHALATION INGESTION Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

2.Hazard Identification – Purified Terephthalic Acid Terephthalic Acid is a sand-like white powder. It is used as a reagent to neutralize alkali in wool, asan additive to poultry feeds, and to increase the effectiveness of certain antibiotics. The following acute (short-term) health effects may occur immediately or shortly after exposure to Terephthalic Acid:  Contact can irritate the skin and eyes.  Breathing Terephthalic Acid can irritate the nose, throat and lungs causing coughing, wheezing and/or shortness of breath.  Chronic Health Effects  Cancer Hazard  Repeated exposure to Terephthalic Acid may affect the kidneys.  Improper use of respirators is dangerous

Fire Hazards  Terephthalic Acid may burn, but does not readily ignite.  Use dry chemical, CO2, water spray, alcohol or polymer foam extinguishers.  Poisonous gases are produced in fire.

HAZARDRATING NFPA Flammability 1 Reactivity 0 HazardRatingKey:0=minimal;1=slight;2=moderate;3=serious; 4=severe

ii.Consequence Analysis The Risk Assessment has been carried out by using the PHAST software. Consequence Analysis of the Risk Assessment is attached as Annexure 10 - in the below following APPENDIX's

99 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

APPENDIX 1 – PTA – VAPOUR CLOUD DISPERSION – CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS APPENDIX 2 – PTA – FLASH FIRE – CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS APPENDIX 3 – PTA – JET FIRE – CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS APPENDIX 5 – PTA – POOL FIRE – CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS APPENDIX 8 – PX – VAPOUR CLOUD DISPERSION – CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS APPENDIX 9 – PX – FLASH FIRE – CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS APPENDIX 10 – PX – JET FIRE – CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS APPENDIX 12 – PX – POOL FIRE – CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS

iii.Measures for mitigation of risk Following are the proposed safety measures in the plant.  Emergency isolation valves are to be provided/online monitoring via DCS PLC monitoring that will closely monitor the process flow and parameters in a safe place and auto mode through gas/fire detector system.  Passive fire protection such as fire proofing shall be recommended. Appropriate detection measures such as fire and gas detectors are recommended and the same to be deep-rooted throughout the plant area.

100 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

101 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

2.1 Project Description

Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) has set up grass root refinery at Paradip with a crude processing capacity of 15.0 MMTPA. The 15.0 MMTPA Paradip Refinery Project (PDRP) has commissioned in Fuel- Refinery mode. The original configuration of PDRP included production of Petrochemical products, viz. Polypropylene (PP), Paraxylene (PX) and Styrene Monomer (SM) based on Refinery streams, in addition to fuel products. Considering the encouraging demand growth of Purified Terephthalic Acid (PTA), IOCL planned to install Integrated Paraxylene (PX) Units of 0.8 MMTPA and PTA Units of 1.2 MMTPA capacity at Paradip and associated utilities and offsite facilities at Paradip Refinery.

Paradip Refinery ventured into Petrochemical segment with inclusion of 0.680 MMTPA capacity Polypropylene (PP) Plant, 332 KT MEG plant and the proposed 1.2 MMTPA capacity Purified Terephthalic Acid (PTA) plant.

PTA is a non-hazardous, solid white powder, which is the preferred raw material and the basic building block to produce Polyester Staple Fibre (PSF), Polyester Filament Yarn (PFY), bottle and industrial grade polyester resin, polyester chips and so on. PSF and PFY are substitutes for natural cotton and widely used for production of textiles and garments. Eastern India does not have any economic size of PSF, PFY or PET resin plants. The first PTA plant at IOCL Paradip can provide steady supply of feedstock PTA to PSF, PYF and PET resin plants. The polyester resins/chips will further have processed to produce audio/ video tapes, x-ray films, photographic films, tapes, aseptic bottles for packing mineral water, carbonated drinks, vegetable oil, cosmetics, toiletries, tea, coffee etc. Thus using PTA from Paradip refinery plant at Odisha, a number of secondary and tertiary downstream industries could be set-up by entrepreneurs who could bring large investment to the state of Odisha and to Eastern India as a whole. This in turn would also help in generating larger employment potential in the region.

Monoethylene Glycol (MEG) plant is also being set-up at Paradip Refinery and used as a raw material to manufacture items like polyester fibre, textiles. The above PP, MEG and PTA plant products shall be building blocks for envisaged Plastic & Textile Park respectively in Odisha.

102 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

2.1.1 Type of Project M/s Indian Oil Corporation limited, Paradip Refinery proposes “Integrated Para-Xylene & Purified Terephthalic Acid (PX-PTA) Project at IOCL Paradip Refinery & Petrochemical Complex, Paradip, Odisha. The Project is under Schedule 5 (c) - “Petro-chemical complexes (industries based on processing of petroleum fractions & natural gas and/or reforming to aromatics” Category A, since all the projects under this schedule falls under “A” category.

2.2 Need of the project

The 15.0 MMTPA Paradip Refinery Project (PDRP) had commissioned in Fuel Refinery mode. The original configuration of PDRP included production of Petrochemical products, viz. Polypropylene (PP), Para-xylene (PX) and Styrene Monomer (SM) based on Refinery streams, in addition to fuel products. Considering the encouraging demand growth of Purified Terephthalic Acid (PTA), feasibility study had carried for Integrated PX and PTA Units of 1.2 MMTPA capacity each at Paradip. As per Market Report, there is a deficit of about 2.2 MMTPA PTA in India by 2024. So in order to meet the market potential IOCL proposed the above project.

2.3 Site Location

The existing complex is located at Abhaychandrapur village, Jagatsinghpur District, Odisha State. The site is located 3.6 Km from Paradip city towards NNE. Index map of the project site is given in Figure 2-1. Base map showing area within 15Km, 10Km (Figure 2-4), 5Km (Figure 2-3) and 1 Km (Figure 2-2). Geographical coordinates of the project site given below in Table 2-1. Project Site Layout is given in Figure 2-19.

Table 2-1Geographical coordinates of the project site

S. No Location Latitude (N) Longitude (E) South Block 1 Site Center 1 20°14'52.12"N 86°35'45.19"E 2 A 86°34'48.89''N 20°15'57.9''E 3 B 86°35'6.09''N 20°15'47.51''E 4 C 86°35'5.94''N 20°15'44.78''E 5 D 86°35'10.39''N 20°15'41''E

103 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. No Location Latitude (N) Longitude (E) 6 E 86°35'11.1''N 20°15'39.42''E 7 F 86°35'20.39''N 20°15'34.84''E 8 G 86°35'20.39''N 20°15'34.84''E 9 H 86°35'40.87''N 20°15'23.81''E 10 I 86°35'36.28''N 20°15'26.48''E 11 J 86°36'4.59''N 20°15'0.52''E 12 K 86°36'8.38''N 20°15'0.39''E 13 L 86°36'31.25''N 20°14'49.62''E 14 M 86°36'37.13''N 20°14'44.33''E 15 N 86°36'37.13''N 20°14'44.33''E 16 O 86°36'48.89''N 20°14'42.95''E 17 P 86°36'53.57''N 20°14'43.04''E 18 Q 86°37'1.45''N 20°14'43.51''E 19 R 86°37'5.97''N 20°14'39.63''E 20 S 86°37'5.97''N 20°14'39.63''E 21 T 86°37'5.97''N 20°14'39.63''E 22 U 86°37'0.63''N 20°14'33.97''E 23 V 86°37'0.63''N 20°14'33.97''E 24 W 86°36'47.53''N 20°14'32.75''E 25 X 86°36'47.53''N 20°14'32.75''E 26 Y 86°36'47.53''N 20°14'32.75''E 27 Z 86°36'42.42''N 20°14'25.71''E 28 A1 86°36'46.29''N 20°14'20.92''E 29 A2 86°36'46.29''N 20°14'20.92''E 30 A3 86°35'26.24''N 20°14'22.32''E 31 A4 86°35'36.47''N 20°14'27.85''E 32 A5 86°35'32.01''N 20°14'31.65''E 33 A6. 86°35'32.87''N 20°14'50.36''E 34 A7 86°35'32.87''N 20°14'50.36''E

104 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. No Location Latitude (N) Longitude (E) 35 A8 86°35'28.02''N 20°15'0.21''E 36 A9 86°35'28.02''N 20°15'0.21''E 37 A10 86°35'24.08''N 20°15'8.26''E 38 A11 86°35'24.08''N 20°15'8.26''E 39 A12 86°35'7.27''N 20°15'18.09''E 40 A13 86°35'5.12''N 20°15'22.23''E 41 A14 86°34'59.65''N 20°15'25.41''E 42 A15 86°34'59.65''N 20°15'25.41''E 43 A16 86°34'59.65''N 20°15'25.41''E 44 A17 86°34'59.65''N 20°15'25.41''E 45 A18 86°34'59.65''N 20°15'25.41''E 46 A19 86°34'54.47''N 20°15'26.98''E 47 A20 86°34'54.47''N 20°15'26.98''E 48 A21 86°34'54.47''N 20°15'26.98''E 49 A22 86°34'51.12''N 20°15'29.76''E 50 A23 86°34'47.82''N 20°15'33.05''E 51 A24 86°34'50.42''N 20°15'34.14''E 52 A25 86°34'52.38''N 20°15'37.72''E 53 A26 86°34'47.4''N 20°15'46.68''E North Block 54 Site Center 2 20°15'45.49"N 86°36'10.08"E 55 B1 20°15'53.57''N 86°35'16.57''E 56 B2 20°15'58.67''N 86°35'17.54''E 57 B3 20°16'6.96''N 86°35'25.49''E 58 B4 20°16'12.94''N 86°35'27.17''E 59 B5 20°16'15.65''N 86°35'35.22''E 60 B6 20°16'22.8''N 86°35'35.26''E 61 B7 20°16'23.38''N 86°35'40.7''E 62 B8 20°16'26.24''N 86°35'40.7''E

105 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. No Location Latitude (N) Longitude (E) 63 B9 20°16'26.39''N 86°35'46.18''E 64 B10 20°16'41.94''N 86°36'1.68''E 65 B11 20°16'42.52''N 86°36'5.11''E 66 B12 20°16'41.26''N 86°36'9.76''E 67 B13 20°16'26.36''N 86°36'16.3''E 68 B14 20°16'15.93''N 86°36'19.35''E 69 B15 20°16'14.24''N 86°36'19.81''E 70 B16 20°16'11.84''N 86°36'20.79''E 71 B17 20°16'9.24''N 86°36'23.2''E 72 B18 20°15'32.44''N 86°36'29.82''E 73 B19 20°15'32.68''N 86°36'46.61''E 74 B20 20°15'10.86''N 86°36'49.06''E 75 B21 20°15'9.51''N 86°37'16.16''E 76 B22 20°16'8.3''N 86°36'24.62''E 77 B23 20°15'2.14''N 86°37'16.09''E 78 B24 20°15'2.14''N 86°37'12.81''E 79 B25 20°14'58.26''N 86°37'11.07''E 80 B26 20°14'58.24''N 86°37'9.38''E 81 B27 20°14'57.3''N 86°37'3.17''E 82 B28 20°14'55.72''N 86°37'1.94''E 83 B29 20°14'52.73''N 86°36'52.53''E 84 B30 20°14'52.66''N 86°36'46.36''E 85 B31 20°15'15.5''N 86°36'11.23''E 86 B32 20°15'25.06''N 86°36'0.19''E 87 B33 20°15'32.76''N 86°35'50.22''E

106 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 2-1 Index map of the project site

107 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 2-2 Google image showing salient features within 0- 1 Km radius

108 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 2-3 Google image showing salient features within 0- 5 Km radius

109 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 2-4 Google image showing salient features 0- 10 Km Radius Map around the study region

110 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

2.4 Existing Environmental Setup The site details and the surrounding features is summarized in Table 2-2

Table 2-2 Existing Environmental Setup of the study region

S. No Particulars Details 1. Geographical Location 20°14'52.12"N, 86°35'45.19"E Elevation above Mean Sea 2. 1-5 m MSL Level 3. Present Land Use Industrial Distance Description Direction 4. Nearest Railway Station (~km) Paradip 1.75 E 5. Nearest Airport Bhubaneswar Airport 78.1 W 6. Nearest Highway NH5A 3.61 N Trilochanbur ~0.050 W 7. Nearest habitation /Village Abhaychandpur ~0.143 W 8. Nearest Town Rangiagarh 0.17 NNE 9. Nearest City Bhubaneswar 78.1 W 10. Densely populated area Paradwipagarh 3.71 NNE Santara River 0.08 NNE 11. Inland water bodies Mahanadi River 6.18 NNE Reserved Forests/Protected Forests/Notified Wildlife Mangroves are present in Santara creek which 12. Sanctuary/Notified national bifurcate the refinery into North & South parts parks/Ecologically sensitive areas 14. Defense Installations None -- -- Archeologically Important 15. None -- -- places/sites Interstate/ National 16. None -- -- Boundaries 17. Hills/Valleys None -- --

111 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Table 2-3List of major Industries within 10km Radius from the project site S. No Description Distance (km) Direction 1 Paradip Port Trust 4.98 E 2 PPL Plant 3.17 E 3 IOCL Paradip Marketing Terminal 1.72 E 4 Adani Wilmar Limited (Edible oil) 3.28 NE 5 Arcelor Mittal Nippon Steel India Limited 5.24 NE 6 IFFCO Plant 6.3 NE

2.5 Project Cost

The estimated cost for the proposed projects Integrated Para-Xylene & Purified Terephthalic Acid (PX-PTA) Project in approx. as Rs.11783 crores.In Form 1 the project cost has given as 913700lacs based on preliminary project feasibility study. Based on the Detailed feasibility study for the project for the final project estimate is arrived as Rs.11783 crores.

2.6 Proposed Schedule for Approval and Implementation

The Time Schedule for completion of the proposed project is given in Table 2-4 Table 2-4 Time Schedule for completion of the proposed project

S. No. Particulars Time Schedule 1 EC July 2021 2 Consent to Establish from OPCB August 2021 3 Commissioning expected 2024 4 Consent to Operate from OPCB 2024

2.7 Project Details

2.7.1 Existing Facility Crude Oil is processed in Crude and Vacuum Distillation Unit (CDU/VDU). In CDU, crude oil is the first heated in a heat exchanger train. It is then heated in a furnace; fractionated in Crude Distillation Column where physical separation takes place based on boiling point difference. The top product is LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas), which is splitted in C3 and C4 components. C4 component is further processed in Alkylation Unit (Sulphuric Acid as catalyst) consisting of acid regeneration facility and n-butane Isomerisation, for production of Alkylate which is used for boosting octane value of Motor Spirit (MS).

112 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

The 2nd fraction from CDU is Naphtha which is hydrotreated and splitted into Light and Heavy Naphtha. The Heavy Naphtha along with Coker Heavy Naphtha and FCC Heavy Naphtha is sent to PX Complex for production of Para Xylene. The PX complex comprises of Naphtha Hydrotreating Unit, Continuous Catalytic Reformer. The Light Naphtha is sent as feed to Hydrogen Generation Unit/Naphtha Pool.

The 3rd fraction from CDU is Kero Cut, which is treated in ATF Treatment Unit to remove undesirable sulphurous compounds to produce Superior Kerosene and ATF. The 4th fraction from CDU is Diesel cut which is hydrotreated in DHDT to produce 10 ppm ‘S’ HSD and 50 ppm ‘S’ HSD.

The reduced crude oil from CDU is processed in Vacuum Distillation Unit (VDU). VGO (Vacuum Gas Oil) from VDU is hydrotreated in VGOHDT Unit and then processed in FCC (Fluidised Catalytic Cracker). The VGOHDT Unit processes a VGO feed with around 3% sulphur and 0.7% Conradson Carbon Residue (CCR) and produces low sulphur and low CCR feed for FCC through hydrotreatment. FCC produces petrochemical feed stocks such as Ethylene, FCC LPG containing Propylene, and also FCC Naphtha, FCC Light Cycle Oil (HSD component) and Clarified Oil, a component routed to (Delayed Coker Unit) DCU or blended in Internal Fuel Oil. The Hydrogen requirement of DHDT and VGO-HDT unit is met from its production in Hydrogen Generation Unit (HGU). Residue from VDU is processed in DCU (Delayed Coker Unit), which is a secondary processing unit to improve distillate yield besides producing coke. Part residue is used as High Sulphur Fuel Oil in utility boilers with Flue gas desulphurisation in refinery operations. Propylene is separated from C3/ C4 stream from FCC to produce Propylene, which is further processed to produce Polypropylene.

MEG will be produced from ethylene and oxygen. Ethylene is recovered from FCC off gas via Ethylene Recovery Unit and Oxygen from air through Air Separation Unit.

Gases from cracking units & hydrotreatment units are amine treated and H2S rich gas is processed in SRU (Sulphur Recovery Units) to produce Sulphur. The Schematic diagram of Existing Refinery is given in Figure 2-5

113 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 2-5 Schematic diagram of Existing Refinery 2.7.2 Size & Magnitude of Operation

The size & Magnitude of Operation in terms of existing/approved/proposed units and year of commissioning at IOCL, Paradip is given in Table 2-5

Table 2-5 Existing /Approved/Proposed Units

Final Remark Proposed configuration S. Existing Plant / Equipment / Facility Configuration after Units Configuration No expansion

1 Crude/ Vacuum Distillation Unit MMTPA 15 - 15 2 Delayed Coking Unit MMTPA 4.1 - 4.1 3 Diesel Hydrotrating Unit MMTPA 5.2 - 5.2 4 VGO Hydrotreatment Unit MMTPA 5.4 - 5.4 5 Fluidised Catalytic Cracking Unit MMTPA 4.2 - 4.2 2 x 2 x 6 Sulphur Recovery Unit MMTPA 0.191625, - 0.191625, 1 TGTU 1 TGTU 6a Standby SRU MMTPA 0.191625 - 0.191625 Upcoming

7 Hydrogen Plant MMTPA 0.07258 - 0.07258

8 Alkylation Unit MMTPA 0.65 - 0.65

9 Polypropylene Unit MMTPA 2 x 0.340 - 2 x 0.340

114 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Final Remark Proposed configuration S. Existing Plant / Equipment / Facility Configuration after Units Configuration No expansion

GT with GT with HRSG HRSG 3 x 102 3 x 102 MW MW STG 2 x 30 STG 2 x MW 30 MW 1 UB will Captive Power Plant & Cooling UB 4 x 300 UB-5 – UB 5 x be unter 10 - Tower TPH 300TPH 300 TPH PX-PTA project Standby Standby GT GT with with HRSG HRSG 1 x 1 x 30 MW 30 MW (366MW, (366MW, 1200 TPH) 1200 TPH) 11 LPG Treater MMTPA 0.21 - 0.21 12 LPG Treater (Cracked LPG) MMTPA 1.85 - 1.85 13 LPG Treater (Coker LPG) MMTPA 0.165 - 0.165 14 ATF (Merox) MMTPA 1.2 - 1.2 227 + 398 = 227 + 398 15 SWS 1 + SWS II KLPH - 625 = 625 16 ARU KLPH 1353 - 1353 17 Continues Catalytic Reformer MMTPA 3.941 - 3.941 Pet Coke Evacuation Through 18 Rapid Railway Loading System MMTPA 1.3 - 1.3 (RRLS) 19 MEG MMTPA 0.332 - 0.332 Ongoing 20 ERU MMTPA 0.18 - 0.18 Ongoing 21 DEG MMTPA 0.024 - 0.024 Ongoing Ongoing 22 TEG MMTPA 0.001 - 0.001 Deferred 23 ISOM MMTPA 1.1 - 1.1 Ongoing 24 HGU – New MMTPA 2 x 0.060 - 2 x 0.060 Ongoing 25 Kero De Sulfurization Unit MMTPA 0.3 - 0.3 Air Separation Unit (ASU) under Ongoing 26 MMTPA 0.21 - 0.21 MEG IGHDS (Indmax Gasoline Deferred 27 MMTPA 1.15 - 1.15 Desulphurization) Para – Xylene Complex (Includes Sulfolane Extraction 28 Unit, BT (Benzene Toluene MMTPA - 0.8 0.8 Fractionation Unit, Tatoray unit, Xylene Fractination Unit (XFU) Parex unit and Isomar Unit 29 PTA (Purified Terephthalic Acid) MMTPA - 1.2 1.2

115 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

2.7.3 Existing Utilities Existing utilities of Paradip Refinery is given in the Table 2-6and the storage facility available in the refinery is given in the

Table 2-7. The Crude Oil and Product Pipelines to South Loading Jetty in listed in Table 2-8 Table 2-6 List of Existing utilities at PDR

S. Description Working Standby Total Capacity No Gas Turbine Generators 1 2 1 3 102 MW Each (GTG) Heat Recovery Steam 220 TPH HHP 2 2 1 3 Generators (HRSGs) Steam Steam Turbines 3 2 - 2 30 MW Each Generators (STGs) 4 Utility Boilers (UBs) 3 1 4 300 TPH HHP CT 1 16000 KLPH CT 2 16000 KLPH (PP) 5 Cooling Tower CT 3 - 4 28000 KLPH CT 4 44000 KLPH CT-5 25200 KLPH UF = 1170 TPH 1 UF - 1 6 DM Water Plant 5 DM 5 385 TPH each Trains LP -5 13000 Nm3/hr each 7 Air Compressor 7 HP - 2 250 Nm3/hr Each 14600/16000 8 Nitrogen Generation Plant 1 - 1 Nm3/hr 9 Raw Water Reservoirs 2 - 2 265000 KL Each 312000 KL 10 Storm Water Reservoirs 2 - 2 296000 KL 11 ETP 1 - 1 1580 m3/hr

116 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Table 2-7 Existing storage tanks

PDR Crude Tanks Ht SFV Tank Service Type Dia(m) SFH(m) (m) (m3) 201-Tk-001 79 13.61 11.701 55440 201-Tk-002 79 13.61 11.726 55387 201-Tk-003 79 13.61 11.701 55422 201-Tk-004 79 13.61 11.726 55884 201-Tk-005 79 13.61 11.623 55999 201-Tk-006 79 13.61 11.745 54977 201-Tk-007 Floating 79 13.61 11.716 55341 Crude 201-Tk-008 Roof 79 13.61 11.701 55523 201-Tk-009 79 13.61 11.711 55377 201-Tk-010 79 13.61 11.726 55216 201-Tk-011 79 13.61 11.708 55216 201-Tk-012 79 13.61 11.708 55216 201-Tk-013 79 13.61 11.708 55216 201-Tk-014 79 13.61 11.708 55216 PDR Product Tanks and Bullets

SFH SFV Tank Product Type Dia (m) Ht (m) (m) (m3) 1 205-Tk-004 58 16 14.024 37523 2 205-Tk-005 Flaoting 58 16 14.014 37496 Naphtha 3 205-Tk-006 Roof 58 16 14.004 37530 4 205-Tk-007 58 16 14.019 37544 5 205-Tk-008 40.7 15.5 13.501 17837 6 205-Tk-011 50.5 16 14.019 28534 Flaoting 7 205-Tk-012 MS 50.5 16 14.014 28562 Roof 8 205-Tk-013 50.5 16 14.014 28580 9 205-Tk-014 50.5 16 14.032 28613 10 205-Tk-019 46.3 16 14.011 23877 11 205-Tk-022 52.3 16 13.999 30621 12 205-Tk-023 52.3 16 14.009 30634 Flaoting HSD 13 205-Tk-024 Roof 52.3 16 13.99 30478 14 205-Tk-025 52.3 16 13.99 30791 15 205-Tk-026 52.3 16 13.99 30692 16 205-Tk-027 52.3 16 14.009 30616 17 205-Tk-015 Dual 49.5 17 13.726 26912 18 205-Tk-016 Purpose 49.5 17 13.717 26913 CRIF 19 205-Tk-017 Kero 49.5 17 13.721 26913 20 205-Tk-018 (DPK) 49.5 17 13.737 26913 Flaoting 21 205-Tk-038 SKO 49.5 15.5 13.506 26482 Roof 22 205-Tk-051 Sulphur Coned 15.3 13 11.887 2197

117 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

SFH SFV Tank Product Type Dia (m) Ht (m) (m) (m3) 23 205-Tk-052 Roof 15.3 13 11.956 2197 24 205-Tk-053 15.3 13 11.977 2197 Floating 25 203-Tk-017 PCK 35 15.3 13.31 13022 Roof

Bullet Product SFV (m3) Dia (m) Length (m) 1 205-V-003 2478 2 205-V-004 2474 3 205-V-005 2475 4 205-V-007 2476 5 205-V-008 LPG 2474 6 205-V-009 2475 7 205-V-012 2484 8 205-V-013 2478 6.4 93 9 205-V-014 2480 10 205-V-006 2475 11 205-V-010 2478 12 205-V-011 2472 PROPYLENE 13 205-V-015 2486 14 205-V-016 2490 15 205-V-017 2489

PDR-Intermediate Storage Tanks SFH Tank Service Type Dia (m) Ht (m) SFV (m3) (m) Floating 1 126-TK-001 FLO 24 15 13.50 5930 Roof 2 203-TK-001 CRIF; N2 49.5 17.5 13.37 24682 NHT FEED 3 203-TK-002 blanket 49.5 17.5 13.37 24986 4 203-TK-005 CRIF; N2 49.5 17.5 13.50 25204 DHDT FEED 5 203-TK-006 blanket 49.5 17.5 14.00 26100 6 203-TK-007 51.1 15.5 13.40 27804 VR Coned Roof 7 203-TK-008 51.1 15.5 13.40 27829 8 203-TK-010 VGO HDT Coned Roof; 78.2 15.5 13.30 65294 9 203-TK-011 FEED N2 blanket 78.2 15.5 13.30 64556 CRIF; N2 10 203-TK-015 HGU FEED 20.2 17.51 13.55 4285 blanket LT. CRIF; N2 11 203-TK-020 35 17.5 14.07 13088 REFORMATE blanket 12 203-TK-026 WET SLOPS Coned Roof 20.2 15.5 12.50 4031 LT. DRY 13 203-TK-027 Coned Roof 20.2 16.5 13.50 4279 SLOPS HVY DRY 14 203-TK-028 Coned Roof 31.9 15.5 13.00 10470 SLOP CRIF; N2 15 203-TK-056 CCR FEED 20.2 17.5 13.77 4318 blanket

118 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

PDR-Intermediate Storage Tanks SFH Tank Service Type Dia (m) Ht (m) SFV (m3) (m) Floating 16 203-TK-042 ALKYLATE 33.5 16.5 13.40 11468 Roof CRIF; N2 17 203-TK-048 FCC LCN 24.7 17.5 13.94 6347 blanket LT. HDT. CRIF; N2 18 203-TK-049 20.2 17.5 13.99 4262 NAPHTHA blanket 19 105-TK-001 30 15 13.00 9154 20 105-TK-002 HSFO Coned Roof 30 15 13.00 9133 21 105-TK-003 30 15 13.00 9108 22 110-TK-001 GTG 22.6 17.5 14.18 5618 CRIF 23 110-TK-002 NAPHTHA 22.6 17.5 14.18 5616 24 110-TK-004 Floating 22.6 16.5 14.18 5635 GTG HSD 25 110-TK-005 Roof 22.6 16.5 14.18 5641 26 124-TK-001 Floating 30 30 11.75 8819 IFO 27 124-TK-002 Roof 30 15 11.75 8819 28 190-TK-855 12 15 11.00 1074 29 190-TK-856 HSD DAY Fixed cum 12 15 11.00 1074 30 190-TK-857 TANK floating roof 12 15 11.00 1074 31 190-TK-858 12 15 11.00 1074 32 190-TK-851 HSFO DAY 11 14.3 12.40 1401 Fixed roof 33 190-TK-852 TANK 11 14.3 12.30 1392 34 190-TK-853 NAPHTHA Fixed cum 12 15 11.30 1073.5 35 190-TK-854 DAY TANK floating roof 12 15 11.30 1073.5 36 230-TK-010 ETP SLOP 15.3 12.4 11.67 2137 Fixed roof 37 230-TK-011 OIL TANK 15.3 12.4 11.67 2137

PDR-Alkylation and Hydrogen Bullets Tank Service SFV (m3) Dia (m) Length (m) 1 203-V-003 2262 2 203-V-004 nC4, iC4 2310 6.4 85 3 203-V-005 2272 SFV (m3) Dia (m) Length (m) 1 203-V-027A 2262 2 203-V-027B H2 2310 4 20 3 203-V-027C 2272

119 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Table 2-8 Pipelines to South Loading Jetty

Size Flow Rate Design Pressure S. No Service (inches) (KLPH) (kg/Cm2) 1 HSD (Export) 30 3930 36.67 2 HSD (Domestic) 30 3930 36.67 3 DPK (ATF) 30 3930 34.23 4 MS (Premium) 30 3930 3994 5 MS (Regular) 26 2900 37.42 6 Naphtha 34 5360 36.45 7 Propylene 10 360 46.09 Propylene (Vapor return to 8 8 2996 37.41 Refinery) Utilities Line (Instrument Air, 9 4 - - Nitrogen and Service Water) 10 Crude 38 4000 27.2 11 Propane 16 600 TPH - 12 Butane 16 600 TPH - 13 MEG 20 1100 -

Table 2-9 Pipeline crossing Santra Creek for the Proposed PX PTA project

S. No Service Size (inches) 1 Fire Water 24 2 Cooling tower make up 20 3 DM Water 12 4 Instrument Air 8 5 Plant Air 6 6 Steam Condensate out 8 7 Boiler BlowDown 4 8 BFW(MP) 4 9 MP Steam Export 16 10 HHP Steam 20

120 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. No Service Size (inches)

Fuel Gas 16 11 12 Fuel oil 6 13 Closed Blowdown and Hydracarbon slop 14 Hydrogen 3 15 Raffinate 4 16 Reformate 10

2.7.3.1 Existing Gas Monitoring System Gas detectors are installed at critical locations throughout the plant areas to detect the presence of flammable/combustible gas or hydrocarbon vapors and toxic gas. Toxic gas detectors (including but not limited to Cl2) detectors with associated audio-visual alarms shall be provided: i) In process / O&U areas where toxic gases are potentially present ii) In buildings containing or handling toxic gases iii) In HVAC inlets for buildings in process / O&U areas where toxic gases are potentially present and in adjacent units. The Gas Detection System (GDS) will sound sounders and flash either yellow or blue beacons automatically depending on the type of leakage (flammable / toxic), the annunciation shall be unit wide based on any detector in alarm (i.e. lool). The Lower Explosion limit of various Gas detector is given in Table 2-10 Table 2-10 Limits of Gas Detector Type

Alarm Points Gas Detector Type Min LEL Max. LEL Point Type Combustible 20% 40% HC Detectors 1 10%

H2S Detectors 10 15 Chlorine 1 3 CO 50 PPM 300 PPM

SO2 2 PPM 5 PPM

NH3 25 35

121 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

O2 Depletion <19% --

2.7.3.2 Existing Fire protection system Fire hydrant pipelines used to supply water under pressure to various places within Terminal and parking area. The fire hydrant system consists of: (a) Double Fire hydrant posts and monitors (b) Diesel driven fire water pumps (c) Fire water storage tanks The fire hydrant mains cover the entire Terminal. The number of fire monitors and hydrant points provided are given in Table 2-11

Table 2-11 List of firefighting facility available

Item Terminal Facilities 4 FT + 2 FN + 1 DCP Tender + 1 HP + Fire Tenders/ Fire Fighting Engines 1 ERT

Water Storage Capacity 28000 KL Fire Hoses 400 Jet/ Fog/ Spray Nozzles 321 Foam branch - Jumbo jet Nozzles - Foam Compound - Clean Agent Fire Extinguishers:2 Kg,4 Kg, - 6 Kg & 10 Kg capacity 2.5 Kgs

122 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 2-6 Fire Water Network South

123 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 2-7 Fire Water Network in North

124 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

2.7.4 Proposed Facility

2.7.4.1 Technology & Process Description

Feed for the proposed PX-PTA plant will be Reformate, which is produced by processing Naphtha in CCRU. Reformate will be processed in the PX plant to produce PX, which will further be processed in the PTA plant for production of PTA.The Overall Process flow diagram of PX-PTA unit is given in Figure 2-8

2.7.4.1.1 Paraxylene (PX)

Reformate is utilized for production of MS as well as PX. By-products of the PX plant viz. Raffinate and Heavy Aromatics will be blend in MS/Naphtha pools. The other product, Toluene from PX plant will be sold to merchants. The process diagram of PX unit is given in Figure 2-9 Fuel gas from the PX complex will be routed to the refinery Fuel Gas header

Paraxylene Unit has a capacity of 0.8 MMTPA. Brief description of the unit is given below:

Paraxylene Unit consists of the following blocks:

 Xylene Fractionation Unit  Sulfolane Unit (Extractive Distillation)  Benzene-Toluene Fractionation Unit  Tatoray Unit  Parex Unit  Isomar Unit a) Xylenes Fractionation Unit Feed to the Xylenes Fractionation Unit emanates from three sources, coming in the form of Debutanizer bottoms from the CCR Platforming Unit, Toluene Column bottoms from the Benzene-Toluene Fractionation Unit and Deheptanizer bottoms from the Isomar Unit. The Plat forming Unit’s Debutanizer bottoms is feed to the Reformate Splitter. The Light Reformate, i.e. the Reformate Splitter overhead liquid product, is pumped to the Feed Surge Drumin the ED Sulfolane Unit. The Reformate Splitter net bottoms, consisting of C8+aromatics,

125 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report are heated in the Clay Treater Feed Heater prior to entering the Clay Treaters. The Clay Treaters are responsible for removing olefinic material from the feed to the Xylene Columns. The effluent flow from the Clay Treaters is divided into two equally flowing streams; each acting as a feed to one of the two Xylene Columns. The flow rate of each of these two streams is reset by the level in the bottom of the Reformate Splitter.

In order to mitigate flare loads, this unit design employs the use of two identical Xylene Columns with identical overhead systems. In addition to receiving an equal amount of Reformate Splitter bottoms feed, each Xylene Column also receives an equal amount of Deheptanizer bottoms feed and an equal amount of Toluene Column bottoms feed, both of which consist primarily of mixed xylenes. The Deheptanizer bottoms are fed to the Xylene Column at the upper feed tray location. The Toluene Column bottoms combine with the Reformate Splitter bottoms prior to entering the Xylene Column at the lower feed tray location. Overhead vapors from Xylene Column No 1 are condensed in the hot (shell) sides of Parex Raffinate Column Reboiler A, Parex Extract Column Reboiler A, and Isomar Deheptanizer Reboiler A. Similarly, overhead vapors from Xylene Column No 2 are condensed in the hot (shell) sides of Parex Raffinate Column Reboiler B, Parex Extract Column Reboiler B, and Isomar Deheptanizer Reboiler B. Condensed material from each train is pressured up to each system’s respective Xylene Column Receiver. From here, the net overhead liquid is pumped from each receiver to one of two Parex Feed Surge Drums.Each surge drum effluent stream is fed to the Parex Unit by two pumps operating in parallel. Prior to feeding the Parex Unit, however, the pump discharge streams combine into a single stream that is cooled by the Deheptanizer Feed-Parex Feed Exchanger in the Isomar Unit.

Each Xylene Column employs the use of two fired heaters operating in parallel to reboil the circulating bottoms material. There is a large degree of heat integration involved with the Xylene Column circulating bottoms systems. During normal operation, the circulating bottoms from Xylene Column No 1 are used as heat transfer media for the Parex Desorbent Rerun Column Reboiler, Clay Treater Feed Heater, Heavy Aromatics Column Reboiler, and Parex Raffinate Column Auxiliary Reboiler A. Meanwhile, the circulating bottoms from Xylene Column No2 are used as heat transfer media for the Tatoray Stripper Reboiler and Parex Raffinate Column Auxiliary Reboiler B. Although this describes the flow scheme during normal

126 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report operation, the circulating bottoms systems were designed such that each train is capable of providing 100 percent of the duty required by any heat user, with the exception of the Parex Raffinate Column Auxiliary Reboilers. In the case of these heat users, Auxiliary Reboiler A will only accommodate flow from train one and Auxiliary Reboiler B will only accommodate flow from train two.

The Xylene Column net bottoms material is comprised of C9+aromatics.Netbottoms streams from each Xylene Column combine into a single stream prior to feeding the Heavy Aromatics Column. Here, the C9 and C10 aromatics are taken overhead, condensed, and pumped to the Feed Surge Drumin the Tatoray Unit. Overhead vapors from the Heavy Aromatics Column are condensed both by an air cooler and by the Reformate Splitter Feed Heater, as hell and tube exchanger responsible for heating the Debutanizer bottoms feed from the Plat forming Unit. Heavier C11+aromatics are pumped from the bottom of the Heavy Aromatics Column to the Fuel Oil System. b) Sulfolane Process Unit (Extractive Distillation) The Sulfolane process uses extractive distillation to recover high purity aromatics from a light reformates feed stock. Feed to the unit is obtained from the overhead of the Reformate Splitter in the Xylenes Fractionation Unit, and from the bottoms stream of the Stripper in the Isomar Process unit. Extractive distillation is the method used to separate close-boiling components using a solvent that alters the volatility between the components. The solvent is generally a polar compound having a boiling point higher than the mixture. When applied to extractive distillation, the volatility of the aromatics is depressed relative to the other components in the mixture such that the non-aromatics can be distilled overhead in the Extractive Distillation Column. There are two primary columns in the extractive distillation unit, they are the Extractive Distillation Column and the Recovery Column (or solvent stripper column). Aromatic feed, typically pre-fractionated, is directed to the Extractive Distillation Column. It exchanges heat with the lean solvent and enters a central stage of the trayed column. The lean solvent is introduced near of top of the Extractive Distillation column.

127 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Combining solvent and feed alters the relative volatilities of the components to be separated because of the non-ideal behavior of the mixture. This is the key to the process. The selectivity of the solvent renders aromatics relatively less volatile than the non-aromatics.

As the hydrocarbon vapor stream flows up the Extractive Distillation column, counter- current to the descending solvent, the aromatics are selectively absorbed. The function of the upper section of the Extractive Distillation Column is to maximize aromatic recovery. The overhead vaporis non-aromatic and is referred to as the raffinate. These vapors are condensed and sent to storage. A portion of the raffinate liquid is used as column reflux to rectify entrained solvent out of the overhead product. Overhead water is collected in the Extractive Distillation Column Receiver water boot and returned to the column. The Extractive Distillation Column is reboiled with steam. There is are boiler preheater to recover heat from the lean solvent to reduce steam consumption in the reboiler.

In the lower section of the Extractive Distillation Column, the non-aromatics are preferentially stripped out of the liquid and enter the upper portion of the column as a vapor phase due to the solvents electivity, which has made the saturates relatively more volatile than the aromatics. Again, because of finite selectivity, some aromatics, primarily benzene, are stripped into the upper section of the column where they must be re-absorbed. The lower section of the Extractive Distillation Column serves the function of aromatics purification.

The Extractive Distillation Column bottoms will contain solvent and highly purified aromatics. This material is sent to the Recovery Column (solvent stripper column). In this column, aromatics are separated from solvent under vacuum with steam stripping. The overhead aromatic product, depending on the composition (BorBT) is condensed and sent to storage or to clay treating prior to product fractionation. A portion of the extract liquid is used as reflux to remove residual solvent from the extract vapors. The Recovery Column is reboiled with steam. Water is collected in the Recovery Column Receiver water boot and is directed to the steam generator. This generator (heated by exchange with the Recovery Column bottoms) produces the stripping steam that is returned to the bottom of the Recovery Column via the Solvent Regenerator. Solvent is purified of residual hydrocarbons as it flows down the Recovery Column.At the bottom of the Recovery Column the solvent is essentially pure Sulfolane with a small amount of

128 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report water. This is then returned to the Extractive Distillation Column as lean solvent. A slip stream of lean solvent is directed to a Solvent Regenerator to remove any degradation products. c) Benzene-Toluene Fractionation Unit

The Benzene-Toluene Fractionation Unit consists of two fractionation columns, the Benzene Column and the Toluene Column, and a set of two Clay Treaters. The purpose of this unit is to separate a purified benzene product from the C7+ aromatics, as well as separating toluene from C8+ aromatics so that the toluene can be sent to the Tatoray unit and to gasoline blending and the C8+ material can feed the Xylene Fractionation Unit. There are three separate feed streams that enter the Benzene Toluene Fractionation Unit. They consist of the overhead material from the ED Sulfolane Recovery Column, the overhead material from the Parex Finishing Column, and the bottoms material from the Tatoray Stripper.

Overhead material from the ED Sulfolane Recovery Column is preheated by the Clay Treater Charge Exchanger then heated to the Clay Treater process temperature by the Clay Treater Charge Heater. Feed flows downward through the Clay Treaters where olefins are removed. The effluent from the Clay Treaters is cooled in the Clay Treater Charge Exchanger before mixing with overhead material from the Parex Finishing Column and the Stripper Bottoms product from the Tatoray Unit. The combined feed stream then enters the Benzene Column. The Benzene Column feed from the Clay Treater Charge Tank contains saturated water, which is removed in the Benzene Column Receiver.

The Benzene Column produces a side-draw benzene product, which is cooled and sent to storage. The toluene-rich Benzene Column bottoms product is heat exchanged with the Toluene liquid from the Toluene Column Receiver and fed the Toluene Column. The Toluene Column overhead vapor stream is condensed and the net product is sent to the Tatoray Unit and gasoline blending. The Toluene Column bottoms stream feeds the Xylene Column in the Xylenes Fractionation Unit. d) Tatoray Process Unit

The Tatoray Process Unit flow scheme consists of a fixed-bed reactor and a product separation section. The fresh feed to the Tatoray unit comes from the overhead of the Toluene Column in the Benzene-Toluene Fractionation Unit and the overhead of the Heavy Aromatics Column in

129 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report the Xylenes Fractionation Unit. Feed is first combined with hydrogen-rich recycle gas in the Combined Feed Exchanger where it is preheated and vaporized by exchange with the hot reactor effluent. The feed is heated to reaction temperature in the Charge Heater before entering the Reactor. Feed flows down-flow over the catalyst bed. There act or effluent is then cooled by exchange with the combined feed, condensed, and sent the Separator. Hydrogen-rich recycle gas leaves the top of the Separator and is compressed in the Recycle Compressor. The recycle gas is mixed with makeup gas from the hydrogen central distribution system. The combined recycle gas joins the liquid feed upstream of the Combined Feed Exchanger.

A portion of the gas from the top of the Separator is vented to remove accumulated light ends from the recycle gas loop. This vent is sent to the fuel gas header. Liquid from the bottom of the Separator is preheated in the Stripper Feed-Overhead Exchanger and Stripper Feed-Bottoms Exchanger before entering the Stripper. The light ends and a small portion of the benzene go overhead from the Stripper and are cooled and separated into gas and liquid products.

The Stripper Vent Condenser on the Stripper Receiver maximizes benzene recovery. The Stripper overhead vapor is sent to fuel gas. The benzene and xylene products, together with the unreacted toluene and C9/C10Aromatics, come from the bottom of the Stripper, are cooled in the Stripper Feed- Bottoms Exchanger, and finally go to the Benzene Column in the Benzene- TolueneFractionationUnit.TheStrippernetoverheadliquidissenttotheIsomarStripperto remove the light ends. e) Parex Process Unit

The purpose of the Parex unit is to separate Paraxylene from all other C8 Aromatics. The Parex process belongs to the UOP family of adsorption separation technologies based on the Sorbex separation concept.

The mixed Xylenes feed from the Xylene Fractionation Unit is first heated in the Deheptanizer Feed- Parex Feed exchanger located in the Isomar unit. A temperature controller adjusts the flow

130 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report through the heat exchanger to hold the temperature of the Parex feed at the desired value of 147 ºC. This unit has two parallel adsorption trains and a common Fractionation Section. The total feed enters the unit and then splits equally into two streams going to identical adsorbent trains. The feed then passes through the Feed Filter. The filter, remove any particulate matter that may damage the rotary valve or plug the adsorbent bed internals. The feed from the feed filter passes through the feed flow controller and into the Rotary valve. The Rotary Valves control the flow of feed, Desorbent, Extract and Raffinate streams to and from each set of Adsorbent Chambers.

The separation takes place in the adsorbent chambers. Each adsorbent chamber is divided into twelve adsorbent “beds”. Each bed of adsorbent is supported from below by a specialized grid, which also contains highly engineered flow distributors to inject or withdraw liquid from the individual adsorbent beds, or redistribute the liquid over the cross-sectional area of the adsorbent chamber. Each flow distributor is connected to the Rotary valve by a bed line piping.

Each train has 24 adsorbent beds with grids and 24 bed lines connecting the grids to the Rotary Valve. Due to practical construction considerations, the 24 adsorbent beds are contained in two adsorption chambers in series with 12 beds in each chamber.

At any given time, only four of the bed lines are active, carrying the net streams into and out of the adsorbent chamber. The Rotary Valve is used to periodically switch the positions of the liquid feed and withdrawal points as the composition profile moves down the adsorbent chamber. Chamber Circulation pumps provide the liquid circulation from the bottom of one adsorbent chamber to the top of the other.

The dilute extract from the Rotary Valve is heated in the Extract Column Feed- Bottoms exchanger before feeding the Extract Column. The overhead vapor from the Extract Column is condensed in the Extract Column Condenser and collected in the Extract Column Receiver, which floats on the flare header through the Parex Vent Drum.

During normal operation the pressure drop through the Extract Column Condenser, the overhead vapor line, and the line from the condenser to the receiver will be stable enough that additional

131 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report control of the extract column pressure is not required. A nitrogen purge is provided to the vent from the receiver to prevent material from returning from the vent to the receiver as the level in the receiver changes.

The Extract Column Overhead Pumps provide reflux to the top of the column and also the net overhead liquid, which is sent to the Finishing Column after getting preheated in the Finish Column Feed-Bottoms exchanger. The Extract Column is reboiled using heat from the Xylene Column overhead vapors in the Extract Column Reboiler. Desorbent from the Extract Column Bottoms Pumps is cooled in the Extract Column Feed-Bottoms Exchanger and the Desorbent Cooler.

A temperature differential transmitter is used between two of the Extract Column trays to monitor the temperature profile of the column. Adjusting the flow of the net extract stream enables the control of the composition for the extract.

An on-line analyzer monitors the overhead content of desorbent and helps in monitoring the desorbent loss with the extract.

The net overhead liquid from the Extract Column is heated in the Finishing Column Feed- Bottoms exchanger and passes to the Finishing Column. The column is reboiled using desuperheated MP steam in the Finishing Column Reboiler. The para-xylene product leaves the Finishing Column Bottoms Pumps under level control in finishing column and is cooled in the Finishing Column Feed-Bottoms Exchanger, the Para xylene Cooler and the Para xylene Trim Cooler and is stored in Para xylene day tank.

It would then intermittently be pumped out to Paraxylene product storage tank in offsites through Paraxylene Transfer Pumps. The overhead vapor from the Finishing Column is condensed in the Finishing Column Condenser. From the Finishing Column condenser, the liquid flows into the Finishing Column Receiver.

The Finishing Column Overhead Pumps provide the reflux to the top of the column and also the net overhead toluene, which is sent to the Benzene Column in the B-T Fractionation Unit.

132 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Similar to the extract column the overhead receiver pressure floats with the relief header and a nitrogen purge line is provided to the vent line from the receiver to prevent material from returning from the vent to the receiver as the level in the receiver changes.

The Rotary Valves direct the raffinate from the Adsorbent Chambers to the Raffinate Column Feed-Bottoms Exchanger where it is heated upstream of the Raffinate Column (049-C-001).

Vapors from the Desorbent Rerun Column are also directed to the feed tray of the Raffinate- column. The column is reboiled using the Xylene Column overhead vapors in the Raffinate Column Reboiler and circulating bottoms from Xylene column in the Raffinate Column Auxiliary Reboiler. The desorbent leaves the Raffinate Column Bottoms Pumps and is cooled in the Raffinate Column Feed-Bottoms Exchanger and the Desorbent Cooler and is returned to the Adsorbent Chambers through the Rotary Valve after being filtered in the Desorbent Filter.

The overhead vapor from the Raffinate Column is condensed in the Raffinate Column Condenser and the liquid is collected in the Raffinate Column Receiver. Any uncondensed vapor leaves the receiver and is further cooled in the Raffinate Column Vent Condenser and the liquid is collected in the Raffinate Column Vent Drum, which floats on the Parex Vent Drum. Liquid from the vent drum runs back to the receiver and the total reflux is provided to the column using the Raffinate Column Reflux Pumps. Any water collected in the receiver is sent to the wastewater treatment plant (By others).

A Raffinate side cut is taken from near the top of the column and collected in the Raffinate Column Sidecut Surge Drum before going to the Isomar Unit.

During operation of the unit the heavy contaminants present in the feed will accumulate in the desorbent. To prevent this accumulation part of the desorbent leaving the Raffinate column is directed to Desorbent Rerun Column. The column is reboiled using Circulating bottoms from Xylene Column in the Desorbent Rerun Column Reboiler The overhead vapors are directed to the Raffinate column. Heavy contaminants are removed from the bottom of the column.

Bottoms material from the Desorbent Rerun Column is removed on an intermittent basis. The heavy aromatics stream will be routed to the Heavy Aromatics Column Bottoms Cooler in the Xylene fractionation unit and then routed to the fuel oil system.

133 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

The Desorbent Rerun Column Bottoms Pumps, which are of proportioning type, withdraw a fixed quantity of heavy aromatics from the Desorbent rerun column. The Desorbent Rerun Column bottom level is maintained by regulating the duty of the Desorbent Rerun Column Reboiler through the LIC/FIC control.

The Desorbent Storage Tank provides the storage capacity for the desorbent makeup. The desorbent storage tank is an atmospheric tank which is nitrogen blanketed. The makeup desorbent is routed to the Desorbent Rerun column using the Desorbent Makeup Pump.

A Plant Inventory Storage Tank is provided to store the material in the unit in the event of a shutdown or a period of maintenance. Desorbent mixed with other process fluids are stored in the plant inventory tank. This tank is an atmospheric tank that is nitrogen blanketed.

The Parex Sump Tank is provided to collect the material vented and drained from the equipment during the normal operation and maintenance to conserve the valuable desorbent. The desorbent sump tank is a horizontal vessel located below grade to facilitate draining of process equipment. The Parex Sump Tank Pump provides the necessary hydraulic head to move the material in the sump tank to the plant inventory tank. The Parex Sump Tank Pumpout Cooler cools the material before being routed to the Plant Inventory Storage Tank.

The Desorbent Pumpout Cooler and Desorbent Pumpout Trim Cooler cools the material from the Parex Unit sufficiently for storage in an atmospheric tank. This is also used during startup and commissioning operations. f) Isomar Process Unit

An Isomar unit is always associated with the recovery of one or more xylene isomers. In this case the Isomar Unit is combined with the UOP Parex process for recovery of paraxylene. Fresh mixed xylene feed is first sent to a Xylene Column in the Xylene Fractionation Unit, which rejects C9+ aromatic components in order to meet feed specifications to the Parex unit. The Xylene Column overhead, containing less than 500 ppm C9+ aromatics, is then directed to the Parex unit where para-xylene is recovered. The raffinate from the Parex unit, containing less than 1 wt% para-xylene, is then sent to the Isomar unit which produces para-xylene from the

134 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report other C8 aromatics. This C8 aromatics stream, Deheptanizer bottoms, is recycled back to the Xylene Column completing the loop.

The feed to the Isomar unit is first cooled by exchange with the Deheptanizer feed. By lowering the feed temperature, the duty on the Combined Feed Exchanger increases and the duty on the Product Condenser is decreased, thus reducing its size. The feed is then combined with hydrogen-rich recycle gas and make-up gas to replace the small amount of hydrogen consumed in the Isomar reactor. The combined feed is then vaporized by exchange with reactor effluent in the Combined Feed Exchanger and then heated to reactor operating temperature in the Charge Heater. The hot vapor feed is then sent to the Reactor where it is passed radially through a fixed bed of catalyst. The reactor effluent is cooled by exchange with the combined feed, condensed in the Product Condenser and then sent to the Separator. To maintain the correct catalyst hydration level required for optimum catalyst performance, water is injected into the reactor feed upstream of the Combined Feed Exchanger.

Hydrogen-rich gas is taken off the top of the Separator and recycled back to the Reactor using a motor driven Recycle Compressor. A small portion of the recycle gas is sometimes purged to remove accumulated light ends from the recycle gas loop. Liquid from the bottom of the Separator is heated on its way to the Deheptanizer by two exchangers: The Deheptanizer Feed Isomar Feed Exchanger, and the Deheptanizer Feed-Parex Feed Exchanger.

The C7- overhead from the Deheptanizer is cooled and separated into gas and liquid products. The Deheptanizer overhead gas is chilled and separated with the chilled vapor exported to a low pressure fuel gas system while chilled liquid is returned to the column overhead receiver. The receiver liquid, along with Tatoray Stripper overhead liquid is sent to the Stripper to remove water and light hydrocarbons from the overhead product before it is sent to the ED Sulfolane Unit. The C8+ fraction from the bottom of the Deheptanizer is then recycled back to the Xylene Column.

2.7.4.1.2 Purified Terephthalic Acid (PTA) Purified Terephthalic Acid (PTA) Unit has a capacity of 1.2 MMTPA. Brief description of the unit is given below;

135 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Terephthalic acid is produced by oxidizing para-xylene with air in an acetic acid solvent. The unique catalyst system contains ionic forms of cobalt, manganese, and bromine. Although other catalyst systems can be used, they do not provide the same conversion and reaction selectivity. The reaction releases a large amount of heat, which can be removed by allowing some of the solvent to boil. Water is a co-product. The process diagram of PTA unit is given in Figure 2-10 and Figure 2-11

Process Reaction: -

PTA Plant consists of the following two section:

 TA Slurry Section  Purified Terephthalic Acid Section a) TA Slurry Section

The Oxidation Plant is designed for continuous operation and consists of five main sections: Reaction, TA Slurry Crystallisation, TA Solvent Interchange, Catalyst Feed and Solvent Treatment.

In the Reaction section paraxylene feedstock is mixed with acetic acid solvent and catalyst solution and reacted with air. The major proportion of the terephthalic acid produced in the exothermic reaction is precipitated in the reactor to form slurry. The reactor vapours pass through a two stage rectifier column which allows recovery of acetic acid, and excess reactor water is withdrawn from the overheads aqueous condensate.

In the TA Crystallisation section the reactor exit slurry is depressurised and cooled in a series of three crystallising vessels. The precipitated terephthalic acid product is recovered and transferred directly to the Purification Plant by continuous filtration incorporating Solvent Interchange. A

136 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report proportion of the mother liquor generated in this stage is purged to the Solvent Stripper via the TA Mother Liquor Filter.

In the Catalyst Feed section, fresh catalyst is imported and the flow adjusted to produce a catalyst solution for feed to the Reaction Section.

In the Solvent Treatment Section, impure solvent recovered from the Reaction and TA Solvent Interchange Sections, is processed to remove acetic acid and water from the higher boiling reaction by-products. The recovered solvent is fractionated to remove low boiling impurities, and produces clean acetic acid solvent for re-use in the Oxidation Plant. The higher-boiling by- products are quench cooled in water and the resulting slurry transferred to a TA Residues Recovery Unit for recovery of catalyst, intermediates and by-products from the residues. The equipment list of PX process unit in given the Table 2-12

Table 2-12 Equipment List- PX Process Unit

S. Equipment Tag No. Equipment Description No. Sulfolane Process Unit (Extractive Distillation) 1 044-P-007A/B Antifoam Injection Pumps 2 044-P-001A/B Charge Pumps 3 044-A-001 Chemical Injection Conservation Vent 4 044-V-004 Ejector Condensate Drum 5 044-C-001 Extractive Distillation Column 6 044-P-003A/B Extractive Distillation Column Bottoms Pumps 7 044-AC-001 Extractive Distillation Column Condenser 8 044-P-005A/B Extractive Distillation Column Overhead Pumps 9 044-P-006A/B Extractive Distillation Column Overhead Water Pumps 10 044-E-004 Extractive Distillation Column Reboiler 11 044-E-003 Extractive Distillation Column Reboiler Preheater 12 044-P-004A/B Extractive Distillation Column Reboiler Pumps 13 044-V-002 Extractive Distillation Column Receiver 14 044-V-001 Feed Surge Drum 15 044-P-012A/B Inventory Transfer Pumps

137 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. Equipment Tag No. Equipment Description No. 16 044-E-001 Lean Solvent - Feed Exchanger 17 044-E-002 Lean Solvent Cooler 18 044-P-010A/B Lean Solvent Pumps 19 044-P-002A/B MEA Injection Pumps 20 044-TK-001 Plant Inventory Tank 21 044-F-001 Plant Inventory Tank Heater 22 044-E-005 Raffinate Cooler 23 044-C-002 Recovery Column 24 044-E-006 Recovery Column Condenser 25 044-EJ-001A/B Recovery Column Ejectors 26 044-P-008A/B Recovery Column Overhead Pumps 27 044-P-009A/B Recovery Column Overhead Water Pumps 28 044-E-007 Recovery Column Reboiler 29 044-V-003 Recovery Column Receiver 30 044-RD-001 A/B Rupture Disc 31 044-RD-002 A/B Rupture Disc 32 044-RD-003 A/B Rupture Disc 33 044-E-011 Solvent Cooler 34 044-V-005 Solvent Regenerator 35 044-E-009 Solvent Regenerator Reboiler 36 044-E-010 Stripping Steam Generator 37 044-V-006 Sulfolane Sump 38 044-P-011A/B Sulfolane Sump Pump Benzene-Toluene Fractionation Unit (Unit-045) 1 045-P-002A/B Benzene Sidedraw No 1 Pumps 2 045-P-006A/B Benzene Sidedraw No 2 Pumps 3 045-C-001 Benzene-Toluene Column No 1 4 045-P-004A/B Benzene-Toluene Column No 1 Bottoms Pumps 5 045-AC-001 Benzene-Toluene Column No 1 Condenser

138 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. Equipment Tag No. Equipment Description No. 6 045-E-003 Benzene-Toluene Column No 1 Reboiler 7 045-V-002 Benzene-Toluene Column No 1 Receiver 8 045-P-001A/B Benzene-Toluene Column No 1 Reflux Pumps 9 045-C-002 Benzene-Toluene Column No 2 10 045-P-008A/B Benzene-Toluene Column No 2 Bottoms Pumps 11 045-AC-002 Benzene-Toluene Column No 2 Condenser 12 045-E-005 Benzene-Toluene Column No 2 Reboiler 13 045-V-003 Benzene-Toluene Column No 2 Receiver 14 045-P-005A/B Benzene-Toluene Column No 2 Reflux Pumps 15 045-E-001 Clay Treater Charge Exchanger 16 045-E-002 Clay Treater Charge Heater 17 045-V-001A/B Clay Treaters 18 045-TK-001A/B Toluene Day Tanks 19 045-E-004 Toluene Product Cooler 20 045-P-003A/B Toluene Product Pumps 21 045-P-007A/B Toluene Sidedraw Pumps 22 045-P-009A/B Toluene Transfer Pumps Tatoray Process Unit (Unit-046) 1 046-F-001 Charge Heater 2 046-P-001A/B Charge Pumps 3 046-E-001 Combined Feed Exchanger 4 046-A-001A/B Detonation Arrestor 5 046-EJ-001 Ejector 6 046-V-001 Feed Surge Drum 7 046-AC-001 Product Condenser 8 046-R-001 Reactor 9 046-K-001 Recycle Gas Compressor 10 046-A-002 Refrigerant System 11 046-V-002 Separator

139 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. Equipment Tag No. Equipment Description No. 12 046-C-001 Stripper 13 046-AC-002 Stripper Condenser 14 046-E-002 Stripper Feed-Bottoms Exchanger 15 046-E-004 Stripper Feed-Overhead Exchanger 16 046-P-002A/B Stripper Overhead Pumps 17 046-E-003 Stripper Reboiler 18 046-P-003A/B Stripper Reboiler Pumps 19 046-V-003 Stripper Receiver 20 046-E-005 Stripper Vent Condenser Xylenes Fractionation Unit (Unit -048) 1 048-AC-002 Aromatics Cooler 2 048-TK-001 Aromatics Tank 3 048-P-015A/B Aromatics Transfer Pumps 4 048-E-012 Aromatics Trim Cooler 5 048-E-008 Clay Treater Feed Heater 6 048-V-003A/B Clay Treaters 7 048-E-003 Gasoline Cooler 8 048-C-004 Heavy Aromatics Column 9 048-P-013A/B Heavy Aromatics Column Bottoms Pumps 10 048-P-014A/B Heavy Aromatics Column Overhead Pumps 11 048-E-011 Heavy Aromatics Column Reboiler 12 048-V-008 Heavy Aromatics Column Receiver 13 048-TK-002 Light Reformate Storage Tank 14 048-P-018A/B Light Reformate Transfer Pumps 15 048-A-001 MP Steam Desuperheater 16 048-P-012A/B Parex Feed Pumps 17 048-V-007 Parex Feed Surge Drum 18 048-F-001 Raffinate Column No 2 Reboiler Heater 19 048-P-009A/B/C Raffinate Column No 2 Reboiler Pumps

140 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. Equipment Tag No. Equipment Description No. 20 048-V-005 Raffinate Column No 2 Reboiler Separator 21 048-P-001A/B Reformate Feed Charge Pumps 22 048-V-001 Reformate Feed Surge Drum 23 048-E-002 Reformate Feed-Combined Gasoline Exchanger 24 048-C-001 Reformate Splitter 25 048-E-004 Reformate Splitter Auxiliary Reboiler 26 048-P-003A/B Reformate Splitter Bottoms Pumps 27 048-AC-001 Reformate Splitter Condenser 28 048-E-001 Reformate Splitter Feed Heater 29 048-P-002A/B Reformate Splitter Gasoline Sidedraw Pumps No 1 30 048-P-004A/B Reformate Splitter Gasoline Sidedraw Pumps No 2 31 048-P-005A/B Reformate Splitter Overhead Pumps 32 048-E-005 Reformate Splitter Reboiler No 1 33 048-E-006 Reformate Splitter Reboiler No 2 34 048-V-002 Reformate Splitter Receiver 35 048-E-007 Reformate Splitter Sidedraw Cooler 36 048-E-013 Reformate Splitter Start-up Reboiler 37 048-C-002 Xylene Column No 1 38 048-P-006A/B Xylene Column No 1 Bottoms Pumps 39 048-P-008A/B Xylene Column No 1 Net Overhead Pumps 40 048-E-009A/B Xylene Column No 1 Reboilers 41 048-V-004 Xylene Column No 1 Receiver 42 048-P-007A/B Xylene Column No 1 Reflux Pumps 43 048-P-016 Xylene Column No 1 Sample Pump 44 048-C-003 Xylene Column No 2 45 048-P-010A/B/C/D Xylene Column No 2 Bottoms Pumps 46 048-E-010 Xylene Column No 2 Feed-Net Overhead Exchanger 47 048-P-011A/B/C Xylene Column No 2 Overhead Pumps 48 048-F-002A/B Xylene Column No 2 Reboiler Heaters

141 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. Equipment Tag No. Equipment Description No. 49 048-V-006 Xylene Column No 2 Receiver 50 048-P-017 Xylene Column No 2 Sample Pump Parex Process Unit (Unit-049) 1 049-V-001 Adsorbent Chamber No 1 2 049-V-002 Adsorbent Chamber No. 2 3 049-P-001A/B/C Chamber Circulation Pumps 4 049-ME-001 Coplanar Manifolding Indexer 5 049-AC-002 Desorbent Cooler 6 049-A-002 Desorbent Filters 7 049-P-015A/B Desorbent Makeup Pumps 8 049-AC-005 Desorbent Pumpout Cooler 9 049-E-015 Desorbent Pumpout Trim Cooler 10 049-C-005 Desorbent Rerun Column 11 049-E-017 Desorbent Rerun Column Bottoms Cooler 12 049-P-014A/B Desorbent Rerun Column Net Bottoms Pumps 13 049-E-013 Desorbent Rerun Column Reboiler 14 049-TK-002 Desorbent Storage Tank 15 049-P-016A/B Desorbent Transfer Pumps 16 049-EJ-001 Ejector 17 049-C-003 Extract Column 18 049-P-009A/B Extract Column Bottoms Pumps 19 049-E-008 Extract Column Feed-Bottoms Exchanger 20 049-P-008A/B Extract Column Overhead Pumps 21 049-E-009A/B Extract Column Reboiler 22 049-V-008 Extract Column Receiver 23 049-P-018A/B Extract Pumps 24 049-V-011 Extract Surge Drum 25 049-A-001 Feed Filters 26 049-C-004 Finishing Column

142 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. Equipment Tag No. Equipment Description No. 27 049-E-011 Finishing Column Auxiliary Reboiler 28 049-P-012A/B Finishing Column Bottoms Pumps 29 049-AC-003 Finishing Column Condenser 30 049-P-011A/B Finishing Column Overhead Pumps 31 049-E-010 Finishing Column Reboiler 32 049-V-009 Finishing Column Receiver 33 049-V-006 Isomar Feed Surge Drum 34 049-P-002A/B Line Flush Pumps 35 049-AC-004 Paraxylene Cooler 36 049-TK-001 A/B Paraxylene Day Tanks 37 049-F-001A/B Paraxylene Day Tanks Heater 38 049-P-013A/B Paraxylene Transfer Pumps 39 049-E-012 Paraxylene Trim Cooler 40 049-V-010 Parex Sump 41 049-P-017A/B Parex Sump Pump 42 049-E-016 Parex Sump Pumpout Cooler 43 049-V-007 Parex Water Injection Drum 44 049-TK-003 Plant Inventory Storage Tank 45 049-C-001 Raffinate Column No 1 46 049-E-004 Raffinate Column No 1 Reboiler 47 049-C-002 Raffinate Column No 2 48 049-E-005A/B Raffinate Column No 2 Feed-Bottoms Exchanger 49 049-E-007 Raffinate Column No 2 Steam Generator 50 049-P-005A/B Raffinate Column No1 Bottoms Pumps 51 049-E-001A/B Raffinate Column No1 Cold Feed Exchanger 52 049-AC-001 Raffinate Column No1 Condenser 53 049-E-002A/B Raffinate Column No1 Hot Feed Exchanger 54 049-V-003 Raffinate Column No1 Receiver 55 049-P-003A/B Raffinate Column No1 Reflux Pumps

143 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. Equipment Tag No. Equipment Description No. 56 049-P-004A/B Raffinate Column No1 Sidecut Pumps 57 049-E-003 Raffinate Column No1 Vent Condenser 58 049-V-004 Raffinate Column No1 Vent Drum 59 049-P-006A/B Raffinate Column No2 Bottoms Pumps 60 049-P-007A/B Raffinate Column No2 Overhead Pumps 61 049-E-006A/B/C/D Raffinate Column No2 Reboiler 62 049-V-005 Raffinate Column No2 Receiver 63 049-E-014 Start-Up Heater 64 049-V-012 Steam Separator 65 049-P-010A/B Water Injection Pumps Isomar Process Unit(Unit-050) 1 050-P-008 Caustic Circulation Pump 2 050-F-001 Charge Heater 3 050-A-003 Chemical Injection Conservation Vent 4 050-P-007A/B Chemical Injection Pump 5 050-V-002 Clay Treater 6 050-E-005 Clay Treater Charge Exchanger 7 050-E-006 Clay Treater Charge Heater 8 050-E-001 Combined Feed Exchanger 9 050-C-001 Deheptanizer 10 050-P-002A/B Deheptanizer Bottoms Pumps 11 050-P-003A/B Deheptanizer Overhead Pumps 12 050-AC-002 Deheptanizer Condenser 13 050-E-002 Deheptanizer Feed-Isomar Feed Exchanger 14 050-E-003 Deheptanizer Feed-Parex Feed Exchanger 15 050-E-004 Deheptanizer Reboiler 16 050-V-003 Deheptanizer Receiver 17 050-E-007 Deheptanizer Trim Condenser 18 050-K-002 Deheptanizer Vent Gas Compressor

144 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. Equipment Tag No. Equipment Description No. 19 050-A-001 Desuperheater 20 050-EJ-001 Ejector 21 050-P-001A/B Isomar Charge Pumps 22 050-P-005A/B Knockout Pumps 23 050-AC-001 Product Condenser 24 050-R-001 Reactor 25 050-K-001 Recycle Gas Compressor 26 050-A-002 Refrigeration Package 27 050-V-001 Separator 28 050-A-004 Silencer 29 050-C-002 Stabilizer 30 050-E-009 Stabilizer Bottoms Cooler 31 050-AC-003 Stabilizer Condenser 32 050-P-004A/B Stabilizer Overhead Pumps 33 050-E-008 Stabilizer Reboiler 34 050-V-004 Stabilizer Receiver 35 050-E-010 Stabilizer Vent Chiller 36 050-V-005 Vent Knockout Drum 37 050-V-006 Water Injection Drum 38 050-P-006A/B Water Injection Pumps Miscellaneous Equipment for PX Process Unit 1 050-V-060 ATM Flash Drum 2 050-AC-051 ATM Flash Drum Condenser 3 050-M-051 BD Sump 4 050-P-059A/B BD Sump Pump 5 050-P-051A/B CBD Pumps-1 6 050-P-053A/B CBD Pumps-2 7 050-V-051 Closed Blowdown Drum-1 8 050-V-053 Closed Blowdown Drum-2

145 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. Equipment Tag No. Equipment Description No. 9 050-E-051 Condensate Cooler 10 050-P-057A/B Condensate Pumps 11 050-M-052A/B CRWS Pit-1/2/3/4 12 050-P-056A/B/C CRWS Transfer Pump-1/2/3/4 13 050-P-063 Dewatering Pump for CBD-1 Pit 14 050-P-064 Dewatering Pump for CBD-2 Pit 15 050-P-065A/B/C/D Fire Water Booster Pump-1/2/3/4 16 050-V-054 Flare KOD-1 17 050-V-056 Flare KOD-2 18 050-G-051 Fuel Gas Filter/Coalescer 19 050-E-052 Fuel Gas Heater 20 050-V-064 Fuel Gas KOD 21 050-V-059 LP Flash Drum 22 050-A-052 LP Vent Silencer 23 050-A-051 MP Vent Silencer 24 050-P-061A/B Oil Side Pump for OWS Pit-1 25 050-P-062 Oil Side Pump for OWS Pit-2 26 050-M-053 OWS Pit-1 27 050-M-054 OWS Pit-2 28 050-V-061 Steam Continuous Blowdown Drum 29 050-V-062 Steam Intermittent Blowdown Drum 30 050-V-057 Waste Water Sump-1 31 050-V-063 Waste Water Sump-2 32 050-P-054A/B Waste Water Transfer Pumps-1 33 050-P-058A/B Waste Water Transfer Pumps-2 34 050-P-055A/B Water Side Pump for OWS Pit-1 35 050-P-060 Water Side Pump for OWS Pit-2

146 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report b) Purified Terephthalic Acid (PTA Section)

TA Slurry (TA) product from the Oxidation Plant contains a small quantity of impurities which must be removed before the material can be used in the manufacture of polyester products. This is achieved in the Purification Plant by selective catalytic hydrogenation of an aqueous solution of TA slurry at elevated temperature and pressure. Purified Terephthalic Acid (PTA) is subsequently crystallised and recovered by employing solid/liquid separation and drying steps. The principal impurity, 4 Carboxy- Benzaldehyde (4CBA), is hydrogenated to para- Toluic Acid. The para-Toluic Acid, being more soluble in water than PTA, remains in aqueous solution during the subsequent crystallisation and product recovery stages. The equipment list of PTA process unit in given the Table 2-13

Table 2-13 Equipment List- PTA Process Unit

S. No. Equipment Tag No. Equipment Description 1 051-V-903 0.8 Kg/Cm2g Steam Separator 2 051-M-235 051-E-235 Mist Eliminator 3 051-H-N235 051-E-235 Silencer 4 051-M-245 051-E-245 Mist Eliminator 5 051-H-N245 051-E-245 Silencer 6 051-M-255 051-E-255 Mist Eliminator 7 051-H-N255 051-E-255 Silencer 8 051-C-230 1st Dehydration Tower 9 051-E-280 1st Hpvgt Preheater 10 051-M-270 1st Pass Reverse Osmosis Unit 11 051-V-274 1st Pass RO Effluent Drum 12 051-P-270 A/B 1st Pass RO High Pressure Feed Pumps 13 051-S-501 1st Pressure Filter Outlet Screw 14 051-V-455 1st PTA Crystallizer 15 051-A-310 1st PTA Crystallizer Agitator 16 051-A-455 1st PTA Crystallizer Agitator 17 051-E-415 1st PTA Preheater 18 051-G-271 A/B 1st RO Feed Oil Filters 19 051-E-101 1st Stage Compressor Intercooler 20 051-V-350 1st Stage Wash Drum 21 051-P-350 A/B 1st Stage Wash Pumps 22 051-V-310 1st TA Crystallizer 23 051-E-314 1st TA Crystallizer 2nd Condenser

147 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. No. Equipment Tag No. Equipment Description 24 051-E-312 1st TA Crystallizer Hot Condenser 25 051-V-902 2.0 Kg/Cm2g Steam Separator 26 051-C-232 2nd Dehydration Tower 27 051-P-232 A/B 2nd Dehydration Tower Bottom Pumps 28 051-E-285 2nd Hpvgt Preheater 29 051-M-275 2nd Pass Reverse Osmosis Unit 30 051-P-277 A/B 2nd Pass RO High Pressure Effluent Pumps 31 051-P-274 A/B 2nd Pass RO High Pressure Feed Pumps 32 051-S-502 2nd Pressure Filter Outlet Screw 33 051-V-460 2nd PTA Crystallizer 34 051-A-320 2nd PTA Crystallizer Agitator 35 051-A-460 2nd PTA Crystallizer Agitator 36 051-E-420 2nd PTA Preheater 37 051-G-272 2nd RO Feed Oil Filter 38 051-E-102 2nd Stage Compressor Intercooler 39 051-V-360 2nd Stage Wash Drum 40 051-P-360 2nd Stage Wash Pump 41 051-V-320 2nd TA Crystallizer 42 051-E-323 2nd TA Crystallizer Hot Condenser 43 051-V-972 32.6 Kg/Cm2g Steam Separator 44 051-V-465 3rd PTA Crystallizer 45 051-A-330 3rd PTA Crystallizer Agitator 46 051-A-465 3rd PTA Crystallizer Agitator 47 051-E-425 3rd PTA Preheater 48 051-G-273 3rd RO Feed Oil Filter 49 051-E-103 3rd Stage Compressor Intercooler 50 051-V-330 3rd Ta Crystallizer 51 051-V-974 4.8 Kg/Cm2g Steam Flash Drum 52 051-V-901 4.8 Kg/Cm2g Steam Separator 53 051-V-470 4th PTA Crystallizer 54 051-A-470 4th PTA Crystallizer Agitator 55 051-E-430 4th PTA Preheater 56 051-V-475 5th PTA Crystallizer 57 051-A-475 5th PTA Crystallizer Agitator 58 051-E-435 5th PTA Preheater 59 051-M-1205 Air Compressor Condensate Sump 60 051-P-1205 A/B Air Compressor Condensate Sump Pumps 61 051-P-913 Amine Pump

148 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. No. Equipment Tag No. Equipment Description 62 051-V-923 Atmospheric Condensate Flash Drum 63 051-H-N103 Blow-Off Silencer 64 051-G-733 A/B Carbonate Filter 65 051-R-820 Catalytic Oxidizer 66 051-E-807 Catox Start-Up Heater 67 051-M-1210 Clean Run-Off Sump 68 051-P-1210 Clean Runoff Sump Pump 69 051-P-1202 Compressor Building Sump Pump 70 051-P-1094 A/B Concentrated Caustic Large Transfer Pumps 71 051-P-1090 A/B Concentrated Caustic Small Transfer Pumps 72 051-T-1090 Concentrated Caustic Storage Tank 73 051-P-1091 Concentrated Caustic Unloading Pump 74 051-T-902 Condensate Collection Tank 75 051-P-905 A/B Condensate Collection Tank Pumps 76 051-E-436 Condensate Preheater 77 051-P-902 A/B Condensate Pumps 78 051-V-1159 A/B Conveying Gas Dryer 79 051-G-1161 A/B Conveying Gas Dryer Afterfilter 80 051-M-1159 Conveying Gas Dryer Package 81 051-M-601 Conveying Gas Dryer Package 82 051-G-1160 A/B Conveying Gas Dryer Prefilter 83 051-V-492 Crystallizer KO Drum 84 051-E-267 A÷C Dehydration Tower Condensate Reheaters 85 051-P-265 A/B Dehydration Tower Final Condenser Reflux Pumps 86 051-E-265 Dehydration Tower Overhead Final Condenser 87 051-V-258 Dehydration Tower Reflux Drum 88 051-E-238 Dehydration Tower Reflux Heater 89 051-P-258 A/B Dehydration Tower Reflux Pumps 90 051-P-1054 A/B Demineralized Water Large Booster Pumps 91 051-P-1050 A/B Demineralized Water Small Booster Pumps 92 051-E-259 DHT Condensate Cooler 93 051-V-239 DHT Condensate Flash Drum 94 051-P-239 A/B DHT Condensate Flash Drum Pumps 95 051-E-235 DHT Overhead 1st Condenser 96 051-E-245 DHT Overhead 2nd Condenser 97 051-E-255 DHT Overhead 3rd Condenser 98 051-M-1090 /, 051-M-1091 Dilute Caustic Static Mixers 99 051-S-503 Dryer Inlet Screw

149 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. No. Equipment Tag No. Equipment Description 100 051-V-530 Dryer Steam Condensate Drum 101 051-P-530 A/B Dryer Steam Condensate Drum Pumps 102 051-E-873 Dryer Vent Catox Preheater 103 051-V-871 Dryer Vent KO Drum 104 051-K-871 Dryer Vent Liquid Ring Pump 105 051-KM-101 Dryer Vent Liquid Ring Pump 106 051-M-871 Dryer Vent Liquid Ring Pump Package 107 051-E-550 Dryer Vent Scrubber Condenser 108 051-P-540 A/B Dryer Vent Scrubber Pumps 109 051-E-871 Dryer Vent Seal Flush Cooler 110 051-P-871 A/B Dryer Vent Seal Flush Pumps 111 051-E-902 Ejector Condenser 112 051-E-155 Expander Re-heater 113 051-G-731 Fe/Cr Filter 114 051-H-M731 Fe/Cr Purge Pipe 115 051-V-440 Feed Heater Condensate Pot 116 051-P-570 H2O2 Metering Pump 117 051-P-201 A/B HBr Pumps 118 051-T-201 HBr Storage Tank 119 051-P-200 HBr Unloading Pump 120 051-M-900 HHP Steam Desuperheater Package 121 051-C-275 High Pressure Absorber 122 051-E-755 High Pressure Absorber Reflux Cooler 123 051-C-840 High Pressure Bromine Scrubber 124 051-P-260 A/B High Pressure Seal Pumps 125 051-V-950 HP Condensate Flash Drum 126 051-M-1130 HP Nitrogen Generation Package 127 051-V-971 HP Steam Let Down Flash Drum 128 051-M-1202 ISBL Compressor Building Sump 129 051-M-1262 Jet Mixer for Main ISBL Sump 130 051-P-202 A/B Liquid Catalyst Pumps 131 051-T-202 Liquid Catalyst Storage Tank 132 051-P-203 Liquid Catalyst Unloading Pump 133 051-C-750 Low Pressure Absorber 134 051-V-750 Low Pressure Absorber Drum 135 051-P-750 A/B Low Pressure Absorber Hac Pumps 136 051-R-880 LP Catalytic Oxidizer 137 051-E-875 LP Catox Heater

150 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. No. Equipment Tag No. Equipment Description 138 051-M-160 LP Catox Quench Contactor 139 051-E-872 LP Vent Catox Preheater 140 051-V-870 LP Vent KO Drum 141 051-K-870 LP Vent Liquid Ring Pump 142 051-M-870 LP Vent Liquid Ring Pump Package 143 051-E-870 LP Vent Seal Flush Cooler 144 051-P-870 A/B LP Vent Seal Flush Pumps 145 051-M-1201 Main IABL Sump 146 051-P-1201 A÷D Main ISBL Sump Pumps 147 051-P-205 A/B Mother Liquor Reactor Feed Pumps 148 051-V-973 MP Steam Flash Drum 149 051-P-973 A/B MP Steam Flash Drum Pumps 150 051-E-975 MP Steam Superheater 151 051-A-730 Neutralization Reactor Agitator 152 051-V-730 Neutralization Reactor Drum 153 051-P-730 A/B Neutralization Reactor Drum Pumps 154 051-K-151 Off-Gas Expander 155 051-V-620 Off-Spec PTA Reslurry Drum 156 051-A-620 Off-Spec PTA Reslurry Drum Agitator 157 051-P-620 Off-Spec PTA Reslurry Pump 158 051-T-601 Off-Spec PTA Silo 159 051-H-603 Off-Spec PTA Silo Discharge Bin 160 051-S-601 Off-Spec PTA Silo Transfer Rotary Feed Valve 161 051-M-1261 Oil Skimmer for ISBL Compressor Building Sump 162 051-C-780 Ox Unit PSV Scrubber 163 051-V-780 Ox Unit PSV Sump 164 051-E-740 Oxidation Feed Mix Preheater 165 051-R-220 Oxidation Reactor 166 051-A-220 Oxidation Reactor Agitator 167 051-G-735 Polishing Filter 168 051-V-732 Precipitation Reactor 169 051-A-732 Precipitation Reactor Agitator 170 051-P-732 A/B Precipitation Reactor Pumps 171 051-V-509 A/B/C Pressure Filter Discharge Chutes 172 051-P-475 A/B Pressure Filter Feed Pumps 173 051-G-510 A/B/C Pressure Filters 174 051-G-101 Process Air Compressor Filter And Silencer 175 051-G-266 Process Condensate Oil Filter

151 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. No. Equipment Tag No. Equipment Description 176 051-G-265 Process Condensate Solids Filter 177 051-C-175 Process Inerts Vent 178 051-C-160 Process Vent Scrubber 179 051-P-160 A/B Process Vent Scrubber Recirculation Pumps 180 051-M-650 PTA Conveying System 181 051-E-480 PTA Crystallizer Vent Condenser 182 051-H-601 A/B PTA Day Silo Discharge Bin 183 051-M-600 A/B PTA Day Silo Dust Collectors 184 051-H-600 A/B PTA Day Silo Target Box 185 051-S-600 A/B PTA Day Silo Transfer Rotary Feed Valves 186 051-T-600 A/B PTA Day Silos 187 051-DR-530 PTA Dryer 188 051-V-515 PTA Dryer Inerts Separator 189 051-S-504 A/B PTA Dryer Outlet Rotary Feed Valves 190 051-V-531 PTA Dryer Seal Pot 191 051-V-540 PTA Dryer Vent Scrubber 192 051-G-410 A/B PTA Feed Booster Pump Suction Filters 193 051-P-410 A/B PTA Feed Booster Pumps 194 051-V-410 PTA Feed Mix Drum 195 051-A-410 PTA Feed Mix Drum Agitator 196 051-V-520 PTA Mother Liquor Drum 197 051-M-520 PTA Mother Liquor Drum Jet Mixer 198 051-P-520 A/B PTA Mother Liquor Drum Pumps 199 051-H-602 PTA Off Spec Silo Target Box 200 051-R-450 PTA Reactor 201 051-E-440 PTA Reactor Feed Heater 202 051-P-411A÷C PTA Reactor Feed Pumps 203 051-G-605 A/B PTA Silo Solid Screen 204 051-M-551 PTA Transfer Line Jacket 205 051-V-490 PTA Vent Knock Out Drum 206 051-E-490 PTA Vent Knockout Drum Condenser 207 051-P-490 A/B PTA Vent KO Drum Circulation Pumps 208 051-E-845 Quench Cooler 209 051-V-734 Reconstitution Drum 210 051-A-734 Reconstitution Drum Agitator 211 051-E-736 Reconstitution Drum Heater 212 051-P-734 A/B Reconstitution Drum Pumps 213 051-V-906 Recovery Condensate Pot

152 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. No. Equipment Tag No. Equipment Description 214 051-P-906 A/B Recovery Condensate Pumps 215 051-E-805 Recuperative Heater 216 051-E-269 RO Feed Exchanger 217 051-G-269 A/B RO Feed Solids Filters 218 051-V-272 RO Purge Drum 219 051-P-272 A/B Ro Purge Drum Pumps 220 051-P-840 A/B Scrubber Quench Pumps 221 051-G-260 A/B Seal Flush Filters 222 051-T-780 Sodium Carbonate Storage Tank 223 051-P-780 A/B Sodium Carbonate Storage Tank Pump 224 051-P-782 Sodium Carbonate Unloading Pump 225 051-T-860 Sodium Formate Storage Tank 226 051-P-860 A/B Sodium Formate Storage Tank Pump 227 051-P 861 Sodium Formate Unloading Pump 228 051-E-745 Solvent Condenser 229 051-V-322 A/B/C Solvent Exchange Filter Discharge Chutes 230 051-G-320 A/B/C Solvent Exchange Filters 231 051-E-215 Start-Up Heater 232 051-E-261 Steam Condensate Preheater 233 051-E-906 Steam Condensate Trim Cooler 234 051-K-901 Steam Turbine 235 051-T-905 Steam Turbine Condensate Collection Tank 236 051-P-901 A/B Steam Turbine Condensate Pumps 237 051-E-901 Steam Turbine Condenser 238 051-H-N906 Steam Vent Silencer 239 051-E-705 Stripper Reboiler 240 051-P-710 Stripper Reboiler Pump 241 051-C-710 Stripper Tower 242 051-P-330 A/B TA Filter Feed Pumps 243 051-V-340 TA Mother Liquor Drum 244 051-M-340 TA Mother Liquor Drum Jet Mixer 245 051-P-380 A/B TA Mother Liquor Purge Pumps 246 051-V-380 Ta Mother Liquor Purge Receiver 247 051-J-905 A÷E Vacuum Ejector 248 051-M-720 Wiped Film Evaporator

153 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 2-8 Process Flow Diagram

154 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 2-9 Schematic representation of Process of PX unit

155 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 2-10 Schematic representation of Process of PTA Unit-Sheet 1

156 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 2-11 Schematic representation of Process of PTA Unit-Sheet 2

157 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

2.7.4.2 Raw Material and products The Overall Material Balance across PX and PTA Process Unit is given in Figure 2-12 and Figure 2-13 respectively.

Table 2-14 Existing and proposed product

Quantity – TMT/Year EC Details S.No. Streams Existing Proposed Refinery Products 1 Naphtha Exports 0 -- 2 BS-IV MS 0 -- 3 BS-VI MS 3260 -- 4 Reformate 96 -- 5 SKO 312 -- 6 ATF Domestic 463 -- J-11011/344/2016-IA-II(I) dated 7 BS-IV HSD 0 -- 11thOct 2018 8 BS-VI HSD 6017 -- Under Construction 9 Sulphur 350 -- 10 PetCoke 1253 -- 11 LPG 932 -- 12 Poly-Propylene 678 -- 13 Fuel & Loss 1641 -- Petro-chemical Products J-11011/344/2016-IA-II(I) dated Mono-Ethylene Glycol 14 332 KTA -- 11thOct 2018 (MEG) Under Construction 15 Para Xylene 0 800600TPA Feed to PTA as a Raw material Purified Terepthalic Acid 16 0 1200000TPA Proposed Product (PTA) Associated Products 17 Di-ethylene Glycol 24 KTA -- J-11011/344/2016-IA-II(I) dated 11thOct 2018 18 Tri-ethylene Glycol 1 KTA -- Under Construction

19 Toluene 0 50000TPA Proposed Product

Table 2-15 Details of Proposed Chemicals and Catalyst for PX and PTA

Mode S. Chemicals/ Modeof Storage Quantity Unit of No. Catalyst Source Transport Capacity Storage

Storage Acetic Acid 4200 Kg/h External Road 2x 425 m3 1. tank

158 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Hydrogen Bromide 80 Kg/h External Road Drums ~ 100 T 2. Sodium Formate 56 Kg/h External Road Drums ~ 100 T 3. Sodium Carbonate 1843 Kg/h External Road Drums ~ 1000T 4. Conc Caustic Soda 109 Kg/h External Road Bags ~ 300 T 5. flakes

Hydrogen Peroxide 4.2 Kg/h External Road Drums ~ 10 T 6. Amine 1 Kg/h External Road Tank ~ 2T 7. Antifoam Kg External Road Drums ~1.5 T 8. 1500 Sulfolane Kg External Road Drums ~ 80 T 9. 96630 Tanker Monoethanolamine Kg External Road ~ 0.05 T 10. 44 / Drum

Tanker / DimethayDisulfide Kg External Road ~ 0.3 T 11. 257 Drum

Perchloroethylene Kg External Road Drum ~ 1 T 12. 930 Liquid Catalyst- Cobalt/Manganese 1597 Kg/h External Road Tanker ~ 50 T 13. solution

R-450 PTA Reactor External Road Drum ~ 35 T 14. 69.4 m³ R-820 Catalytic Bag / External Road ~ 20 T 15. Oxidizer 22.3 m³ box

R-880 LP Catalytic Bag / External Road ~ 1 T 16. Oxidizer 0.98 m³ box

Clay Catalyst – 108 m³ External Road Bag 17. Activated Clay

Clay Catalyst – 760 m³ External Road Bag ~ 1200 m3 18. Activated Clay

Clay Catalyst – 291 m³ External Road Bag 19. Activated Clay

159 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

I. Paraxylene (PX) Process Unit a) Feed  Reformate (Existing CCR-Platforming unit) Each unit in the Aromatic Complex will be designed for TWO (2) Design Feed Cases. Feed to the Aromatic Complex is a depentanized reformate from the existing CCR-Platforming unit.  Hydrogen During the start-up and normal operation, make-up hydrogen to the Tatoray Unit and Isomar Unit will be supplied from Hydrogen Generation Unit (HGU) Source-1 or existing CCR Platforming Unit. Aromatic Complex Units shall be designed for both quality of Make-up hydrogen. b) Product  Para-Xylene The project shall also produce Toluene, Heavy Aromatics (MS Blend Stock), Raffinate. c) Catalyst & Chemical The catalyst and chemicals required for the operation of Para-Xylene Unit in given in Table 2-15

II.Purified Terepthalic Acid (PTA) Process Unit a) Feed  Paraxylene from PX Unit  Acetic Acid  Cobalt Manganese Acetate Catalyst Solution  Hydrobromic Acid (HBr)  Sodium Formate  Sodium Carbonate  Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH)  Hydrogen Peroxide  Palladium On Carbon Catalyst b) Product  Purified Terepthalic Acid (PTA)

160 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report c) Catalyst & Chemical The Catalyst and Chemical required for the operation of Purified Terepthalic Acid Unit is given in Table 2-15.

Figure 2-12Material Balance across PX Process Unit

161 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 2-13Material Balance across PTA Process Unit 2.7.5 Proposed Offsite Facilities

The equipment list of offsite and utilities are given the Table 2-16 Table 2-16 Equipment List- Offsite & Utilities

S. No. Equipment Tag No. Equipment Description 1 135-A-001 Aux Boiler Package 2 221-P-001A/B CBD DRUM PUMP (FLARE KOD AREA) 3 104-A-002 CLO2 Generator Package 4 221-V-003 Closed Blow down drum 104-CT-001A/B/ 5 Cooling Tower Cells C/D/E/F/G/H/I/J/K/L 6 104-A-003 Cooling tower chemical injection package 7 104-A-001 Cooling Tower Package 8 104-A-004 Cooling tower Side stream filter Package 9 104-P-004A/B Cooling tower SSF back wash transfer pump 10 104-SU-001 Cooling Tower Sump 104-P-001A/B/C/ 11 Cooling water circulation Pumps D/E/F/G 12 104-P-002A/B Cooling water Emergency Pump 13 208E-P-005A/B CRWS Pit Pump (PX OSBL Tankage Area) 14 221-P-003 Dewatering Pump for CBD drump pump (flare KOD area)

162 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. No. Equipment Tag No. Equipment Description Dewatering pump for Hydrocarbon CBD drum pump no. 1 15 208E-P-009A/B (PX-OSBL Tankage area) Dewatering pump Hydrocarbon CBD drum pump no. 2 16 208E-P-010 (Toluene gantry area) 17 236-A-001 Effluent Treatment Plant package 18 221-SU-001 Flare pit 19 221-P-002A/B Flare pit Pump 20 104-TK-003 HCL Storage Tank 21 135-DS-001 HHP to HP let down 22 135-DS-003 HHP to LP let down 23 135-DS-002 HHP to MP let down 24 122A-V-002F HP air receiver 25 104-P-008A/B Hydro Chloride (HCL) loading cum unloading Pump 26 208E-V-001 Hydrocarbon CBD drum no. 1 (PX-OSBL Tankage Area) 27 208E-V-002 Hydrocarbon CBD drum no. 2 (Toluene gantry Area) Hydrocarbon CBD drum pump no. 1 (PX OSBL Tankage 28 208E-P-001A/B Area) 29 208E-P-002A/B Hydrocarbon CBD drum pump no. 2 (Toluene gantry Area) 30 221-E-001 Main Flare KOD Cooler 31 221-V-001 MAIN Flare KOD Drum 32 221-P-004A/B MAIN FLARE KOD PUMP 33 221-A-001 Main Flare Package 34 104-SU-002 Neutralisation Pit (Cooling Tower Area) 35 104-P-005A/B Neutralisation Pit Pump (cooling Tower Area) 36 104-P-009 Oil side pump for OWS pit (Cooling Tower Area) Oil side pump for OWS sump No. 01 (PX OSBL Tankage 37 208E-P-004A/B Area) 38 208E-P-008 Oil side pump for OWS sump No. 02 (Toluene gantry Area) 39 104-SU-003 OWS pit 40 104-P-003A/B OWS Pit Pump (Cooling Tower Area) 41 208E-SU-004 OWS SUMP no. 1 (PX-OSBL Tankage Area) 42 208E-SU-005 OWS SUMP no. 2 (Toluene gantry Area) 43 208D-TK-002A/B PX storage tank 44 208D-P-002A/B PX transfer pumps 45 208A-TK-001 Raffinate storage tank 46 208A-P-001A/B Raffinate transfer pump 47 208A-TK-002 Reformate tank 48 208A-P-002A/B Reformate transfer pumps 49 104-SU-004 Side stream filter backwash sump

163 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. No. Equipment Tag No. Equipment Description 50 104-P-007A/B Sodium chlorite loading cum unloading Pump 51 104-TK-002 Sodium chlorite Storage tank 52 104-P-006A/B Sulphuric acid loading cum inloading Pump 53 104-TK-001 Sulphuric Acid storage tanks 54 208D-TK-001A/B Toluene Storage tank 55 208D-P-001A/B Toluene Transfer pump (For Tanker Loading) 56 135-SL-001 Vent silencer for HP 57 135-SL-003 Vent silencer for LP 58 135-SL-002 Vent silencer for MP Water side pump for OWS sump No. 01 (PX OSBL 59 208E-P-003A/B Tankage Area) Water side pump for OWS sump No. 2 (Toluene gantry 60 208E-P-006 Area) 61 Natural Gas (NG) receipt Terminal and Distribution network

2.7.6 Proposed unit facilities and Utilities

Major facilities in the proposed PX unit, PTA unit & ETP with Capacity is given in Table 2-17, Table 2-18 and Table 2-19 respectively.The proposed utilities for Paradip PX-PTA Unit is given in the Table 2-20. The Upcoming Storage Facilities is given in Table 2-21. Table 2-17 Major facilities in the proposed PX unit with Capacity

S.NO. DESCRIPTION SIZE / CAPACITY 1 Paraxylene (PX) 0.8 MMTPA* 2 PX Sub-station 41 m x 135 m 3 PX – PTA Centralized Control Room 46 m x 52.5 m 4 PX Satellite Rack Room. 46 m x 51 m 5 Pre ETP Unit Peak: 3 m3/hr Revamp of existing CCRU PSA System 6 Capacity enhancement of existing from 12 Beds in MS mode to 16 beds in CCRU Hydrogen PSA Aromatics Mode 7 Flare Capacity : 1674 TPH PX Area (over and above the ISBL tanks) (nominal capacities) 8 PX ISBL TANKFARM -Aromatic Tank-7390 m3 m -Ligh reformate storage tank-7390m3

164 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S.NO. DESCRIPTION SIZE / CAPACITY -Plant inventory tank-260m3 -Paraxylene day tank-2 x 3900m3 -Desorbent storage tank- 2810m3 -Plant Inventory storage tank-2810m3 -Toluene day tank- 2 x 320m3 PX OSBL Area (nominal capacities) -Reformate Storage tank-15000m3 3 9 (PX OSBL TANKFARM) - Paraxylene tank-2 x 9730m - Toluene storage tank-2 x 1049m3 - Raffinate storage tank – 6430m3

10 PX-PTA Lab Building 52 m x 31 m 11 Operator Shelter for PX Unit 10 m x 21 m Fire Water Booster Pump House for PX 21 m x 9 m 12 Unit Note:* In Form-1 it has been mentioned as 0.78MMTPA based on the preliminary project feasibility study. Based on the Detailed feasibility study the capacity has been given as 0.8MMTPA.

Table 2-18 Major facilities in the proposed PTA unit with Capacity

S.NO. DESCRIPTION SIZE / CAPACITY

1 Purified Terephthalic Acid (PTA) 1.2 MMTPA HP Nitrogen - Normal- 55 Nm3/h Peak - 10115 Nm3/h N2 Unit including Storage and LP Nitrogen - Normal - 145 Nm3/h 2 Vaporizer Peak - 18209 Nm3/h Liquid Nitrogen working storage: 126 Ton 2 Day Silo – 2100 m3 each 3 PTA Day Silos and Off-spec Silos 1 Off-spec Silo – 2100 m3 4 PTA Product Silos 4 x 3238 m3 each working volume PTA Automatic Storage & Retrieval System (ASRS) Warehouse and ASRS for 1,00,000 nos. of FIBC Bags 5 along with PTA loading facility to Overall block area – 310 m x 230 m Trucks and associated office and other buildings

165 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S.NO. DESCRIPTION SIZE / CAPACITY Total Bagging Rate – 300 TPH Total 8 no of Machines 6 No’s Working (Bagging Rate – 50 6 Product Bagging System TPH) 2 No’s Standby (Bagging Rate – 50 TPH) 7 Fire water booster pumps 4 x 350 m3/hr each Mother Liquor and Acetic acid Day ML – 1 x 1558 m3 (nominal) AA – 8 tanks 2 x 425 m3 (nominal) 9 PTA Sub-station 122 m x 38 m 10 PTA Satellite Rack room 46 m x 51 m 11 DG and DG room 6 MW DEG, 20 m x 36 m 12 Operator Shelter 20 m x 10 m

Table 2-19 Major facilities in the proposed New ETP

S.NO. DESCRIPTION SIZE / CAPACITY ETP with Anaerobic and Aerobic 1 408 m3/hr Treatment with integerated RO

ETP Substation, SRR & Control 2 Room will be one building with G+2 50 m x 35 m structure Table 2-20 Proposed Utilities

S. No Description Size/Capacity Units 1 Utility Boiler-5* 300 TPH 2 Substation and SRR Building for UB-5 61.6 x 17 m 3 Cooling water Makeup 910 TPH 4 Cooling Tower Area for PX-PTA 75 x 200 m 5 Sub-Station for Cooling Tower 36 x 24 m 6 Demineralized Water peak 264.9 TPH 7 Steam (HHP) peak 194 TPH 8. Instrumentation Air 3618 Nm3/hr 9 Nitrogen 18594 Nm3/hr

166 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

10 Power 30.5 MWH 11 Natural Gas/Fuel Gas in PX unit 18 TPH 12 Natural Gas/Fuel Gas in New Boiler 20 TPH 13 NG RECEIPT TERMINAL and distribution network 240 TPH PP and PTA container storage yard and Rail Loading 14 32 x 843 m facility 15 Maintenance and Staff Building 19 x 7 m 16 Local GIS Room 32 x 12 m

17 Product Loading Gantry for Toluene - Area 148 x 38 m 3 18 Product Loading Gantry for Toluene- 2 Loading Arm 45 m /hr 19 PX-PTA Hub Distribution Substation North 35 x 24 m Note:

 In Form-1 it is mensioned as that, the desalination plant is proposed based on the preliminary project feasibility study. However, the unit dropped during detailed feasibility study  In Form-1 Utility Boiler-5 is not mentioned based on the preliminary project feasibility study. However, the Utility Boiler-5is included during detailed feasibility study.  In Form-1 it is proposed to have new housing facility for 200 operational employees. However, Housing facility dropped during detailed feasibility study for the project

Table 2-21 Upcoming Storage Facilities

Tank Service Type Dia(m) Ht (m) 203-TK-009 VR Coned Roof 51.1 15.5 201-TK-015 79 13.61 201-TK-016 79 13.61 Crude Floating Roof 201-TK-017 79 13.61 201-TK-018 79 13.61 205-TK-028 52.3 16 205-TK-029 HSD Floating Roof 52.3 16 205-TK-030 52.3 16 BS-VI Tank Service Type Dia(m) Ht (m) 203-TK-018 HGU Feed Dome Roof 203-TK-019 205-TK-037 SKO Floating Roof 40.7 15.5 MEG ERU

167 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Tank Service Type 207-Tk-003A/B/C/D/E MEG Fixed Roof m3 42,940 207-Tk-004A/B DEG Fixed Roof m3 4,528 207-Tk-005A/B TEG Fixed Roof m3 636 207-HS-002 A/B/C/D ETHYLENE Horton Sphere m3 4x3053 PDR 10 Additional Tanks

Tank Service Type Dia(m) Ht (m) 203-TK-003 NHT Feed CRIF; N2 blankering 49.5 17.5

203-TK-004 DHDT Feed CRIF; N2 blankering 49.5 17.5 Coned Roof; N2 203-TK-012 VGO-HDT Feed 78.2 15.5 blanketing 205-TK-039 50.5 16 MS Floating Roof 205-TK-040 50.5 16 205-TK-043 50.5 16 Alkylate Floating Roof 205-TK-044 50.5 16 205-TK-050 PCK Floating Roof 35 15.3 205-TK-054 -- -- Sulphur Coned Roof 205-TK-055 -- --

2.7.7 Proposed Gas Monitoring System

Pumps handling LPG or hydrocarbons above Auto Ignition Temperature (AIT) or within or above 80 C of flashpoint, hydrocarbon gas detectors located between pump pairs and at the end of the pump row. Pumps handlings Toxic products, toxic gas detectors located between pump pairs and at the end of the pump row. Pumps handling fluids where there may be a risk of a gas leak aadditionally have gas detectors located with one meter of the pump seal area Compressors handling LPG and Hydrogen, these units fitted with flame detectors.

Columns rated as HIGH or MEDIUM risk, flame detectors located to view the base. Vessels handling fluids above AIT or over 3150 C rated as HIGH RISK, flame detectors located to cover the ground under vessels. Reactors operating at high temperature, flame detectors located to cover the ground under reactors. Reactors which may cause an exothermic or runaway reaction, flame detectors located to cover the ground under reactors

168 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

2.7.7.1 Mitigation Measures

The highest standards of safety are being implemented by examining the potential hazards, accessibility, constructability, operability and maintainability to ensure a safe and environmentally sound plant and facilities.

 Eye-wash and safety showers are provided in all appropriate locations.  All hazardous and hydrocarbon drains are routed to closed systems.  Definition of environmental requirements, Noise studies and associated recommendations, Dispersion calculations and associated recommendations  Escape Routes, Accessibility, Operability and Constructability reviews and implementation of recommendations.  All safety requirements of Indian Boiler Regulations (IBR) will be complied in the design.  Fire water sprinkler systems will be implemented for applicable equipment, as per OISD code requirements.  Safety insulation is provided for all pipes/surfaces operating at temperature higher than 60°C.  Pressure safety valves are provided for over-pressure protection of equipment and piping in all applicable locations.  Double isolation valves are provided for high pressure streams and hydrogen services.  HAZOP study has been performed for PX-PTA units during FEED phase. HAZOP recommendations from the HAZOP study shall be incorporated into the design of these systems.  Detailed HAZOP and SIL study for all units are envisaged during detailed engineering phase of the project. All HAZOP recommendations will be complied and recommendations from the studies will be implemented.  Compliance to all National and Local rules and regulations by statutory bodies will be ensured.

169 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

2.7.7.2 Precaution & Safety Measures against Fire Hazards IOCL has taken lot of safety measures against Fire hazards in course of the design &operation of two plants. They are as follows:

 N2 Blanketing in flammable storage tanks  Breather Valves  Earthing Continuity  Lightening Arrester as per IS specification & monitoring of Earth Pit  Flame proof electrical fittings  Periodic Tank Inspection  Storage & handling of Bulk Chemicals & Plant Operations through DCS System  Periodic Checking of Critical Instruments In addition to the above measures the new technology has the following measures embedded in its design- following are the safety measures in the new unit:  Process Design and Engineering is such that it can cater to any emergency happening in the Plant.  Provision of nitrogen blanketing of the reactor on occasion of a reactor trip  Critical trips are implemented in the system  Better Process Control System  Safety Critical Alarms are implemented for the new unit  Automated Safety Instrumented System.  Over/Under Pressure Relief Protection  Overfill Containment.  Emergency Response

2.7.7.3 Assessment of new & untested Technology Paradip Refinery has a unique INDMAX Unit technology, which is indigenously been developed by Indian Oil's R&D Centre. The INDMAX (FCC) Unit has designed to produce 44% LPG, the highest yield from such plants. The commissioning of INDMAX Unit at Paradip marks a major milestone in the history of Indian refining. With this, IndianOil has now recognized globally as a technology licensor. The other first-time technological features of the Refinery include Flue Gas Desulphurisation facilities, Vapour Recovery system from jetty

170 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

loading and an alkylation process to get octane-rich low-benzene MS blend component, etc. So no alternative technologies available.

2.7.8 Sulphur Balance

Detailed Sulphur balance is given in Table 2-22. Table 2-22 Sulphur balance for Proposed Facility

Post BS VI & Total crude to be Processed T/day Post PX/PTA MEG Average sulphur content in the crude % 2.9 2.9 Total sulphur input through crude TMTPA 435 435 Total sulphur in products TMTPA 431.5 431.5 Total Sulphur emissions from process TMTPA 3.5 3.58 stacks and heaters

Total SO2 emissions into atmosphere Kg/hr 875 895.2 Kg/Ton of Total SO emissions into atmosphere 0.467 0.477 2 crude

From PX PTA, additional pollution load of SO2 emission will be 0.162 TMTPA

2.8 Plot area The proposed project is planned within the existing facility of IOCL located at Abhaychandrapur village, Jagatsinghpur District, Odisha State. The total land area is 3345 Acres. Plot plan is shown below as Figure 2-18 also attached as Annexure -6 and Green Belt demarcation and the species planted is enclosed as Annexure- 8.

2.8.1 Site Photographs

Site Photographs of Existing facility and proposed facility is enclosed as Figure 2-14 and Figure 2-15 respectively. The ETP and STP Photographs are given in Figure 2-16 and Figure 2-17 respectively.

171 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

23.08.2019 23.08.2019

Figure 2-14 Site Photographs of Existing Refinery Complex

172 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Proposed PX Site-19.06.2021 Proposed PTA Site-19.06.2021

Figure 2-15 Site Photographs of Proposed facility

19.06.2021 19.06.2021

Figure 2-16 Photographs of Existing ETP

173 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

23.08.2019 23.08.2019 23.08.2019

Figure 2-17 Photographs of Existing STP

174 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

2.8.2 Land Area Breakup

Detailed Land breakup is summarized in Table 2-23. The Existing and Proposed Refinery Layout is given in Figure 2-18 and Figure 2-19 respectively. The Overall Existing and proposed plot plan is given in Figure 2-20.

Table 2-23 Land use planning of the Project Site Percentage, Description Existing Proposed After Expansion (Acres) (Acres) (Acres) % a. Refinery Project area Built Up area 1748 75 1823 65.32% Roads 355 0 355 12.72% Green Belt 580 0 580 20.78% Vacant Land 108 0 33 1.18% Subtotal (a) 2791 75 2791 100% b. Residential Area i.Plot Area 204 0 204 64.97 ii.Green Belt 110 0 110 35.03 Subtotal (b) 314 0 314 100.00 c.Other Office and Building i.Plot Area 155 0 155 64.58 ii.Green Belt 85 0 85 35.42 Subtotal (c) 240 0 240 100.00 Total Area(a+b+c) 3270 75 3345 d. On other's land Green belt (d) 75 0 75 Total Green belt Area 850 0 850 30.46 from a,b,c and d Note: As per form-1 16 acre has to acquired for the proposed project based on the preliminary project feasibility study carried out. Based on the Detailed feasibility study it is identified, as the land acquisition is not required. 1.Proposed PX PTA site area 75 acre is utilized from the existing vacant land inside the IOCL Paradip Refinery Complex. Land acquisition is not applicable. 2.Paradip refinery project’s Latest EC granted in 2018- -J-11011/344/2016-IA. II(I) dt.11.10.2018 the condition for green belt (GB) development was 748.72 acres land. Accordingly Green belt has been developed to comply the EC condition. In subsequent year the plantation has been increased and as of now 850 acre of land is planted. 3.A per Latest EC granted in 2018- J-11011/344/2016-IA. II(I) dt.11.10.2018 the existing land area mention is 1194 ha(2950.30acre) which is excluding the township area. In proposed project, the total land area with township is 3345 acre.

175 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

4.IOCL Paradip refinery has already done tree plantations of suitable species about 8.5 Lakh including GB area. Further plantation of 100000 trees is under execution. 5.Pardip is industrial area and IDCO Government of Odisha do not have any land for allocating to any industry. 6.Paradip Area is under SPA CEPI 2018 (NGT order OA 1038/2018 heariing date 10.07.2019) and Greenbelt coverage is required 33% or 40 % . 7.IOCL will explore land for plantation from others e.g. District administration, Forest department of Odisha, NHAI, SH / PWD etc. to meet the balance Green belt. 8.Residential area - Township, CISF Colony etc.

9.The Green belt alloted in section d(others land) is the land area near by schools and villages

10.Additional tree plantation has been done on land in peripheral villages, along access roads, schools, panchayats, nearby district areas etc.

176 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 2-18 Existing Refinery Layout

177 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 2-19 Proposed Layout

178 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 2-20 Existing and proposed plot plan

179 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

2.9 Manpower

The existing refinery has a total of 996 permanent employees and 547 contract workers. Approximately temporary employment for ~5400 persons provided during construction phase based on various skills and 1922 persons including temporary and permanent staff during operation phase. The Breakup of manpower details in given in Table 2-24 Table 2-24 Manpower Requirement

During Construction Phase S. No. Description Proposed Approx 5400 (considering 5 million man hours in 1 Contract workers three years’ construction phase) 2 Permanent workers 21 RHQ+site Total 5421

During Operation Phase S. Existing Proposed Total Description No. Permanent CISF Others Permanent Contract 850+75+50 1 Manpower Present+MEG+BS- 395 152 200 200 1922 VI)

2.10 Power and Fuel Requirements The power requirement for the existing facility is met from Captive Power plant (CPP). For proposed project the power requirement will be 30.5 MW to be sourced from Existing Gas Turbine. The Breakup of power and fuel details in given in

Table 2-25. In Form-1 it is proposed to source the power from New GT of 102MW capacity of proposed quantity 80MW. Based on the detailed feasibility study the source of power is identified to be taken from existing gas turbine which has sufficient capacity and also the proposed quantity is also reduced to 30.5MW.

180 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Table 2-25 Power and Fuel Requirement

Capacity Details Source Existing Proposed Total Power 240.5 Mwh Existing Gas 30.5 Mwh 271 Mwh Requirement (190.5+50) Turbine

FO 32.99 KTPA 0 32.99 KTPA From existing storage 310 KTPA 310 KTPA From existing storage HSFO 0 (114.9+196) Naphtha 574.4 KTPA 0 574.4 KTPA From existing storage GAIL- Form Proposed FG/NG 64.7TPH 240TPH 304.7TPH Pipeline

Existing utility data is as per AOR 2019-20 + the proposed utility load of MEG and BS VI project.

The MoU with the concernerd will be executed prior to commissioning of the facility. Tthe MoM with GAIL is attached as Annexure 34.

2.11 Water requirements

a. Existing facility Total water requirement of the existing facility is 3497 m3/hr of which fresh water requirement is 2749m3/hr and Effluent generation is 1082.1 m3/hr.

b. Proposed Total water requirement of the proposed facility is 1299.5 m3/hr of which fresh water requirement is 994m3/hr and Effluent generation is 408 m3/hr.

In Form-1 the proposed effluent generation has been given as 300m3/hr based on the preliminary project feasibility study. Based on detailed feasibility study for the project the effluent generation is 408m3/hr.

Existing and proposed water consumption details given in Table 2-26

181 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Table 2-26 Existing and Proposed Water Requirements

Existing (m3/hr) Proposed (m3/hr) Total after expansion (m3/hr)

r r r d d d r r r e d d d e e d d d e e e e e e e e e g e e e t e g t e g t e t t t t t t s t s t s t a s s s a a a a a a a a a a a e e e e e e d d d U l U l U l w U U U w w

t t t r r r e e e W W W e S. Descrip W W W t t t e e r r r t t t e e e

u u u T e T e T e s s s S l l l t t t e e e S S a a a h h h

l l l o o o s s s t t t a a a / a a a t r t r t r s s s No tion / /

P P P t t t o o o a a a s f s f s f t t e e e e e e t u u u o o o o o o r n r n r n T T T n L n L L n n n n

W W W e O e O e O e e T T T e e e F F F e e e e E E E d d d s s s u u u l G l G G l n n n f f U U U f f f o o o f E E C C C

(a+b (b (a+b (a (a+b E (a) (b) (a) (b) ) ) ) ) ) 148 148 115 930. 91 19. 213. 716 241 23 536. 187 Cooling 0 0 0 0 323 0 0 0 19.5 0 0 0 2 2 9 5 1 5 6 .9 2.5 93 6 5.9 1 tower

133 586 74 162 58 103 196. DM 0 0 0 175 0 286 0 286 0 0 0 21.2 0 0 0 0 0 Water 4.8 .8 8 0.8 7 4 2 2 Makeup 465. 465 372. 4 145. 525. 52 42 105. Service 0 0 0 0 93.1 60 60 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 2 .2 16 8 5 2 5 0 1 3 Water 372. 372. Refinery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 16 4 unit 42 517. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 4 145. PX-PTA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 5* 5 unit 10 100 100 0 0 0 0 80 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 80 20 6 Project 0 7 Others 5 5 0 0 0 0 4 1 20 20 0 0 0 0 16 4 25 25 0 0 0 0 20 5 Domesti 11 110 110 0 0 0 0 88 22 3 3 0 0 0 0 2.4 0.6 113 0 0 0 0 90.4 22.6 8 c 3 111 264 136 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 49.3 0 9 Boiler 9.8 .8 2.8 349 274 74 111 372. 372. 108 129 129 99 305 264 4 4 733 479 37 105 136 42 42 149 202 Total 7 9 8 9.8 16 16 2.2 5.1 9.5 4 .5 .8 8 8 408 .5 6.5 43 3.5 2.8 0 0 0.2 8.6 Note: * In proposed water balance, the additional water generated within the PX-PTA process (97.5 m3/hr) is added to the effluent along with the effluent from service water(48 m3/hr).

182 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 2-21 Water Balance Diagrams of Existing Refinery

183 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 2-22 Water Balance Diagrams of Proposed Refinery

184 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 2-23 Water Balance Diagrams for after expansion of Refinery 2.12 Source of water Supply The total water requirement will be met from Mahanadi River through pipeline with a distance from the sourse to refinery receiving point is around 93km( actual length of pipeline) while the radial distance of the same is 75km as per the Latest CTO 5543/IND-I-CON-6414

185 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report dated 31.03.2021 valid till 31.03.2022. Approval for extraction of water enclosed as Annexure.7

2.13 Project schedule

Proposed project will be implemented in a period of around 37 months.

2.14 Air Pollution Control Measures Paradip Refinery has adopted various measures for control of gaseous emissions. These include:  Use of clean burning fuel gas and natural gas in PX-PTA unit  Installation of low NOx burners in all the furnaces and boilers  Tall stacks for better dispersion of flue gases  Online monitoring of SOx, NOx, CO and PM emissions from furnaces/boilers  Monitoring of ambient air quality as per revised MoEF  Installation of internal floating roof with double seals in all Class-A tanks for reduction of fugitive emissions  Provision of mechanical seals in all the hydrocarbon pumps for reduction of fugitive emissions  Reduction of hydrocarbon losses and to attain zero leakage status  All the proposed tanks are of Internal floating roof type minimizing the fugitive emissions in comparison to External floating roof tanks  All the tanks will be under Nitrogen blanketing

2.15 Green Belt Refinery has developed greenbelt in 580 acres area in and around Refinery. Approximately more than 8 lac trees have been planted by Refinery. This is ongoing job and PDR has the commitment to plant at 5000 trees every year towards environment management and preserve eco system. Survival rate is 95%. Green belt demarcation and species planted is enclosed as Annexure-08. The Summary of Plantation from the year 2007 to 2020 is given in Table 2-28. The green belt occupies about 30.46% only. The green belt area breakup is given in Table 2-27.

186 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Table 2-27 Green Belt Area Breakup

After Existing Proposed Percentage, Description Expansion (Acres) (Acres) % (Acres) a. Refinery Project area-2791acre Green Belt(a) 580 0 580 20.78 b. Residential Area-314acre Green Belt(b) 110 0 110 35.03 c.Other Office and Building-240acre Green Belt (c) 85 0 85 35.42 d. On other's land Green belt (d) 75 0 75 Total Green belt Area (a+b+c+d) 850 0 850 30.46 Note: 1.Paradip refinery project’s Latest EC granted in 2018- - J-11011/344/2016-IA. II(I) dt.11.10.2018 the condition for green belt (GB) development was 748.72 acres land. Accordingly Green belt has been developed to comply the EC condition. In subsequent year the plantation has been increased and as of now 850 acre of land is planted. 2.Additional tree plantation has been done on land in peripheral villages, along access roads, schools, panchayats, nearby district areas etc. 3.IOCL Paradip refinery has already done tree plantations of suitable species about 8.5 Lakh including GB area. Further plantation of 100000 trees is under execution. 4.Pardip is industrial area and IDCO Government of Odisha do not have any land for allocating to any industry. 5.Paradip Area is under SPA CEPI 2018 (NGT order OA 1038/2018 heariing date 10.07.2019) and Greenbelt coverage is required 33% or 40 % . 6.IOCL will explore land for plantation from others e.g. District administration, Forest department of Odisha, NHAI, SH / PWD etc. to meet the balance Green belt. 7.The Green belt alloted in section d(others land) is the land area near by schools and villages

SNO Description Existing Proposed Total 1 Total area of Green Belt (Ha) 343.983 113 343.983

2 Percentage of total project 30.46 10 40.46 area

3 No. of Plants 809624 282500 1092124 4 Funds allocated 80962400 30000000 110962400 The land allocation for proposed green belt area is given in Annexure 29.

187 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 2-24 Green Belt Layout

188 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Table 2-28 Summary of Plantation for the year 2007-2020

SUMMARY OF PLANTATION

2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 2012- 2013- 2014- 2015- 2016- 2017- 2018- 2019- 2020- Total 08 09 10 11 12 13 14* 15* 16 17 18 19 20 21

Refinery 260750 215000 111250 - - - - - 3350 16000 19000 34783 3298 3065 666496

Township + 50682 - 5000 5000 6000 3000 - 11460 - - 1000 - 500 2696 85338 CISF

Zero point ------1560 - 1560

Jagatsinghpur ------32000 ------32000 (Balia) Cuttack ------18630 ------18630 (Kisanagar)

PPT ------5600 - 5600

TOTAL 311432 215000 116250 5000 6000 3000 0 62090 3350 16000 20000 34783 10958 5761 809624

189 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

2.16 Water Pollution Control Measures In Paradip Refinery, to treat waste water, a state-of-the-art ETP with VOC capture system has been installed. The typical configuration of ETP of Paradip Refinery consists of:  American Petroleum Institute (API) separator  Tilted Plate Interceptor (TPI)  Oily Dissolved Air Floatation (Oily-DAF)  Bio Tower  Aeration Tank and Clarifier  Biological Dissolved Air Floatation (Bio-DAF)  VOC Removal Facility  Reverse Osmosis (RO) Waste water collection systemAPI/TPI Equalization tank Oily DAF Bio Tower  Aeration Tank  Clarifier  Bio DAF  Final collection Basin. Oil recovered in API/TPI is collected in Slop tank. VOC system is installed all the oil laden sources like Slop Tank, Brine Tank, Equalization Tank and Oily DAF. The Refinery Effluents contains pollutants like oil (Free and Emulsified) BOD, COD and suspended solids, which are required to be removed before discharging the effluent for further reuse. Primary treatment is provided for the part removal of free oil in the influent in the units like API separator followed by TPI separator. Emulsified oil will be removed in the secondary Oil Separation units like DAF System. Here coagulant and flocculent used for better separation.

After Secondary Oil removal the influent is led into biological treatment for removal of BOD. Here, Bio Tower (attached growth process) and Aeration (suspended growth process) are two biological treatment system. Oil free water undergoes bacteriological treatment under aerobic condition for removal of COD and BOD. Then suspended flocs from aeration tank are removed in the clarifier. Clear supernatant routed to bio DAF wherein suspended solids removed with pressurized stream from treated effluent. This effluent is collected in the check basin which is a feed to RO system.

There is also sludge treatment facility. The Sludge is categorized as Oily Sludge and Bio- Sludge and is treated separately. The Bio Sludge is thickened and dewatered separately and then sent for final disposal as manure. The Oily Sludge will be thickened and pumped to DCU unit for further processing

190 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

After primary and secondary treatment completed in ETP section, treated effluent collected in check basin is sent for tertiary treatment for achieving maximum recycle. Tertiary treatment comprises the following:

Treated effluent from check basinRGSF Basket Strainer UF Skid Cartridge filter  RO skid  RO Permeate tank  UCR for reuse During the process of filtration in RGSF (Rapid Gravity Sand Filter), the impurities are removed from water. They precipitate in the voids between the grains of the filter bed. The specific grain size is 0.5 mm to 2 mm.

After filtration, basket strainers are provided for trapping any sand particles that may leak out and go into ultra-filtration system thus causing choking in the UF system.

Ultra-filtration is a membrane process in which a porous membrane is used to separate or reject colloidal and particulate matter.

UF permeate then enter into the Micron cartridge filter for removal of particle of size upto 5 micron. Then the output enters into the Reverse Osmosis (RO) system. Two stage RO system having 5 skids is installed to get the desired output @ 78% recovery.

Then finally RO permeate passed through the degasser tower to reduce CO2 before sending it to UCR for reuse in DM plant and CT make up. The Flow diagram of ETP and WRP is given in Figure 2-26 and Figure 2-27 respectively. The Treated effluent characteristics is given in Table 2-29. Latest Analysis report of effluent characteristics discharging into sea is enclosed in Annexure 32.

Inlet to ETP

 Desalter brine and OWS/CRWS water treated in API/TPI  Stripped Sour water treated in OILY DAF  Steam Blow down and CT Blow down directly to water recovery through check basin  Landfill leachate and SCTP treated oxidized spent caustic to Bio Tower  Domestic sewage in aeration tank  ETP drain to API/TPI

191 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 2-25 Flow diagram of Effluent Treatment plant (Existing)

Figure 2-26 Flow diagram of Effluent Treatment plant (Proposed)

192 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 2-27 Flow Diagram of WRP Plant (Existing) Table 2-29 Characteristics of Effluent Generated

ETP inlet (effluent generated) data in Jan’21 S. NO. PARAMETER TEST METHOD UoM RESULT FLOW (m3/hr) 1 pH IS 3025 (P:11) - 9.9 2 BOD IS 3025 (P:44) mg/l 180 3 COD IS 3025 (P:58) mg/l 1370 4 Oil & Grease IS 3025 (P:39) mg/l 264 5 TSS IS 3025 (P:17) mg/l 84 6 Sulphide IS 3025 (P:29) mg/l 4.3 7 DO IS 3025 (P:38) mg/l ND 8 Alkalinity IS 3025 (P:23) mg/l 191 9 NH3 IS 3025 (P:34) mg/l 29.5 10 Conductivity IS 3025 (P:14) μs/cm 1117 11 ORP APHA 2580 mV 20

Table 2-30 Characteristics Final effluent discharge to sea

Sl Limits as No Parameter Test Method UoM per MINAS Results s 1 pH IS 3025 (P:11) - 6.0 -8.5 8 2 BOD IS 3025 (P:44) mg/l 15 9 3 COD IS 3025 (P:58) mg/l 125 78 Oil & 4 IS 3025 (P:39) mg/l 5 <4.0 Grease 5 TSS IS 3025 (P:17) mg/l 20 <4

193 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Sl Limits as Parameter Test Method UoM Results No per MINAS s 6 Sulphide IS 3025 (P:29) mg/l 0.5 <0.10 7 Phenol IS 3025 (P:43) mg/l 0.35 0.09 8 Cyanide IS 3025 (P:27) mg/l 0.2 <0.02 9 NH3 IS 3025 (P:34) mg/l 15 1.2 10 Alkalinity IS 3025 (P:23) mg/l 172 11 Chloride IS 3025 (P:32) mg/l 973 12 TDS IS 3025 (P:16) mg/l 1001 13 Turbidity IS 3025 (P:10) NT <0.1 14 TKN ASTM D3590 A mg/lU 40 2.1 15 P IS 3025 P:31 b mg/l 3 0.068 16 Cr(VI) IS 3025 P:52 a mg/l 0.1 <0.1 17 Cr total APHA 23rd edition 3125 A & mg/l 2 <0.1 18 Pb APHAB 23rd edition 3125 A & mg/l 0.1 <0.001 19 Hg APHAB 23rd edition 3125 A & mg/l 0.01 <0.001 20 Zn APHAB 23rd edition 3125 A & mg/l 5 0.016 21 Ni APHAB 23rd edition 3125 A & mg/l 1 0.011 22 Cu APHAB 23rd edition 3125 A & mg/l 1 0.003 23 V APHAB 23rd edition 6200 B. mg/l 0.2 <0.001 USEPA 8260C using 24 Benzene capillary mg/kg 0.1 <0.005 column and MSD with

2.17 Proposed Effluent Treatment Plant Effluent generated from Purified Terephthalic Acid (PTA), Paraxylene (PX) and & offsite and utilities plant are to be collected, segregated and treated in ETP to meet applicable regulatory requirements before final disposal. RO based treatment is envisaged for final disposal. Rejectsfrom RO plant to be transfer in sea. The Layout of Proposed Effluent Treatment Plant is given in Figure 2-28. Effluent Treatment Plant Configuration for PX-PTA integrated Complex have complete Effluent Treatment Plant including WWT plant and effluent & disposal facilities includes the following sections  Surge & Equalization System  Anaerobic Treatment System  Aerobic Treatment Section  Water Filtration Section (Tertiary treatment)  Sludge Handling & Separation System

194 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

New ETP is proposed for installation to process effluent @ 408 m3/hr with 10% design Margin (Maximum capacity with high TOC).

2.17.1 PX Effluent Treatment

PX effluent at first treated in Pre-Treatment plant due to high aromatic content. The purpose of PRE-TREATMENT PLANT is to reduce Benzene and other Aromatics in the feed to the effluent treatment plant.

The following effluent streams are to be routed to the Pre treatment Plant for removal of Benzene and other Aromatics:  HC contaminated effluent shall be treated by combination of distillation operation on continuous mode followed by carbon bed adsorption as guard bed.  The PX (ISBL) effluent streams are routed to the Pre-treatment Plant for removal of Benzene and other Aromatics:  Distillation column diameter shall be adequate to handle the surge flow.  Downstream carbon bed adsorption system shall be designed for 5% of wastewater feed hydrocarbon load.  Adsorption system shall act as a guard bed and shall be designed for hydraulic load Suitable filters shall be provided for removal of grease upstream of the distillation column.  Pre-treated effluent / Off spec Tank shall be provided downstream the carbon bed adsorption system as a buffer tank for absorbing shock to ETP. During normal operation of EPTP, pretreated effluent will be collected in this tank and will be transferred to ETP for further treatment. Treated effluent from Pre-treatment Plant shall have benzene concentration less than 10 ppm and total Aromatics (including Benzene) less than 20 ppm

2.17.2 PTA Effluent Treatment

a) Equalization section

PTA plant process wastewater streams are piped to the Surge Tank and then to Equalization

Tank. The surge tank collects the relatively high and periodic flows from the sources. The holding / storage provided by the surge tank allows for controlled, reduced flow transfer to the equalization tank

195 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

b) Anaerobic Treatment System

The equalized effluent is pumped to a conditioning tank. Chemicals are added into the conditioning tank (mostly neutralized chemicals and nutrients etc.). From the conditioning tankthe neutralized effluent is then fed to the proposed Anaerobic Reactor, UASB (Upflow

Anaerobic Sludge Blanket Digester) by use of reactor feed pumps. Target COD reduction in anaerobic reactor is >80% (After complete stabilization). The anaerobically treated wastewaterwith reduced COD load from the reactor top is allowed to flow by gravity to the aerobic wastewater treatment system. Methane rich biogas collected in reactor top is conveyed to BiogasHandling System. Condensate traps to be provided at the inlet line of Biogas Handling Systemto remove condensate from biogas. From the biogas zone of the anaerobic reactor, the biogasis drawn through biogas compressors/ liquid ring pump pressurized and then sent to flaresystem for flaring.

c) Aerobic Treatment Section

After treatment in anaerobic section, the process waste water will be routed to effluent treatment & disposal facilities for final treatment. Treated wastewater from anaerobic section iscombined with boiler; cooling tower and demineralized water blow down streams and are routed to effluent treatment & disposal facilities for final treatment. Along with process water effluent streams, the other liquid effluents stream like contaminated rain water streams shall also be separately routed to effluent treatment and disposal facilities for final treatment. The effluents pass through aeration tank and clarifier before moving to water filtration section. Aerobic section shall be designed to handle Cooling Tower blowdown and sider stream filter waste water.

d) Tertiary Treatment:

Water filtration section is located in downstream the Aerobic Treatment Units. The aerobic effluent coming from aeration & clarification systems contains a significant amount of suspended solids that need to be removed by means of a tertiary treatment. Tertiary treatment section includes:

 Filtration system through pressure sand filter  Activated carbon Filters  Ultra filtration and RO based system

196 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

e) Sludge Handling & Dewatering System

Dewatering system for sludge generated from plant will be done by using belt presswhich will be a common facility for all streams. Hopper and sludge loading facilities will also be provided. The sludge will be dewatered from inlet consistency of 3-4% solids to ~22% solids in the belt press. The filtrate from belt press will be recycled back to aeration tank. Solid collection with necessary trolley, handling and disposal from the RO unit will be done suitably.

197 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 2-28 Effluent Treatment plant (Proposed Layout)

198 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

2.18 Solid waste Management a) During Construction Phase During construction phase 2.4394 TPD of solid waste is envisaged. It will be the scope of the contractor to collect and dispose the solid waste generated during construction phase as per PCB norms. b) During Operation Phase

During Operation Phase Total of 864.9 Kg/day of solid waste is generated of which 518.94 kg/Day of organic waste will be used in the existing organic waste converter and remaining Inorganic waste will be disposed through authorized vendors. The existing and proposed waste generated is given in Table 2-31 Table 2-31 Solid Waste in Operational Phase

Quantity (Kg/day) S. List of Treatment / disposal method After No Items Existing Proposed Expansion 1 Will be used in the existing Organic 410.94 108 518.94 organic waste converter and the waste resultant solid is used as manure 2 Inorganic 273.96 72 345.96 Authorized OSPCB vendors waste Total 684.9 180 864.9 As per CPCB 0.45 kg/ capita/ day

2.19 Hazardous Waste Management The hazardous wastes generated from the ISBL Process Plant mainly consist of spent. The Existing & Proposed Hazardous waste generation is given in Table 2-32

Table 2-32 & Table 2-34 respectively. The Secured ladfill area photography is given in Figure 2-28 and the getextile membrane provided around the SLF area is given in Figure 2-30. The location of SLF in IOCL Paradip Refinery is 20°16'5.25"N, 86°36'20.51"E. The Hazardous waste authorization- IND-IV-HW-930/5028 dated 24.05.2019 valid till 31.03.2024 is attached in Annexure 14.

199 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Table 2-32 Existing Hazardous Wastes Generation

Scheduled Approved Existing S. Details of as per Quantity Frequency Storage and Quantit No. Waste HWM TPY of disposal Disposal y TPY rules Stored in intermediate storage facility (covered warehouse with impervious floor Spent Schedule-I Within 90 and shed) 1 2484.4 2500 catalyst 4.2 days Disposal in SLF - 1497.4 / Co- processing in cement industry - 987 Spent Schedule-I 720 Within 90 2 145.5 Directly sent to SLF Clay 4.5 days Schedule-I - Within 90 3 Ash 36.0 Directly sent to SLF 37.2 days Oily Schedule-I Within 90 Directly sent to DCU 4 1456.1 Sludge 4.1 days for processing Stored in impervious 2748 (Oil metallic containers sludge/ before unloading in Oily Schedule-I Emulsion/ Within 90 5 74.2 melting pit for oil Sludge 4.1 Slop Oil) days recovery Sludge is disposed in HW incinerator Schedule-I 180 Within 90 Sent to incinerator for 6 Coke 16.7 4.4 days disposal

Table 2-33 Proposed Hazardous Wastes Generation

Propos Scheduled as ed Frequency Storage and S.No. Details of Waste per HWM Quanti of disposal Disposal rules ty TPD PX Spent Clay from Schedule-I Within 90 1 0.12 Captive SLF Clay Treaters 4.5 days Metals Recovery Spent Catalyst Schedule-I Within 90 2 0.01 or Landfill in from Reactor 1.6 days Captive SLF Spent Clay from Schedule-I Within 90 3 1.44 Captive SLF Clay Treater 4.5 days

200 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Spent Adsorbent Schedule-I Within 90 4 from Adsorbent 0.24 Captive SLF 1.6 days Chambers Metal recovery Catalyst from Schedule-I Within 90 5 0.04 by authorized Reactor 1.6 days recycler Spent Clay Schedule-I Within 90 6 0.26 Captive SLF fromClay Treater 4.5 days PTA Recovery by Schedule-I Within 90 7 PTA Spent Catalyst 0.0438 catalyst 1.6 days manufacturer Disposal in authorized HW Schedule-I Within 90 8 Filters, Oils 0.0685 incinerator / Sale 3.3/5.1 days to authorized users Pails, Corrosion, Schedule-I Within 90 Sale to authorized 9 0.0137 Paint 21.1 days users Laboratory Schedule-I Within 90 10 0.0003 Disposal in ETP Solvents 20.2 days Schedule-I Within 90 11 Waste Solvents 0.0110 Disposal in ETP 20.2 days

Figure 2-29 Google Earth demarcation of SLF area in IOCL Paradip Refinery

201 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 2-30 Photograph of Secured Landfill Area with Geotextile Membrane around it in IOCL Paradip Refinery

Figure 2-31 Lablelling of Hazardous waste Containers

202 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

19.06.2021 19.06.2021

19.06.2021

Figure 2-32 Hazardous Waste labelsdisplayed on packaging

203 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

19.06.2021 19.06.2021

Figure 2-33 Hazardous Waste Storage area

204 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT

205 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

3 DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT

3.1 Preamble This chapter depicts the establishment of baseline for valued environmental components, as identified in and around the proposed project with an area of 3,345 Acres (1353.673 Hectare) located at IOCL Paradip Refinery, Paradip, Jagatsinghapur District, Odisha state. The primary baseline data monitored covered three (3) months i.e., from March to May 2019, and secondary data was collected from government and semi-government organizations published data. The primary baseline data has been generated by m/s. Hubert Enviro Care Systems (p) ltd, Chennai, a MoEF&CC approved environmental testing laboratory for the following terrestrial environmental components.  Meteorology: Temperature, Relative Humidity, Rainfall, Wind Speed & Direction- Refer Section - 3.6.1

 Ambient Air Quality: Particulate matter <10-micron size (PM10), Particulate matter

<2.5-micron size (PM2.5), Sulphur Dioxide (SO2), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Carbon

Monoxide (CO), Lead (Pb), Ozone (O3), Benzene (C6H6), Benzo (a) pyrene (C20H12),

Arsenic (As), Nickel (Ni), Ammonia (NH3) & VOC- Refer Section - 3.7  Ambient Noise Levels: Day equivalent noise levels, Night equivalent noise levels - Refer Section - 3.8  Inland Water Quality: Groundwater Quality, Surface Water Quality - Refer Section - 3.9  Soil Quality - Refer Section - 3.10  Biological Environment - Refer Section - 3.11  Social Economic Status - Refer Section - 3.12

3.2 Study Area A 10 Km radial distance with the project site boundary as the epicentre has been identified as the General study area for assessing the baseline environmental status. The core study area is the project area and its immediate surroundings to the tune of 1.0 Km radius from the boundary. Further the Project Impact/Influence Area (PIA) is 10Km from the boundary of the core area covering IOCL Paradip Refinery, Paradip, Jagatsinghapur District, Odisha State.

3.3 Description of Study Area As Described in Chapter 1, M/s IOCL Paradip Refinery project site is located at Paradip, Jagatsinghapur district, Odisha state. The project site is well connected with road, rail and

206 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

water ways, where Paradip Railway station is located at a distance0.54 Km WNW from the project boundary and Biju Patnaik International Airport, Bhubaneshwar is located at a distance of 79.03 Km towards W from project boundary and Paradip Port is located at a distance of 5.77 Km towards E from project boundary. An overall idea of the study area with reference to the physical conditions are presented for better understanding in the following sections before proceeding into the section on the prevailing environmental conditions of the study area. The map showing the satellite image of the study area is given in Figure 3-1and Topo Map of the study area is given in Figure 3-2.

207 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 3-1Map showing the Satellite Image of the study area of Project

208 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 3-2Topo Map of Study area

209 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

3.4 Environmentally/Ecologically Sensitive areas This section details with the environmentally sensitive areas present within the project site and surrounding environs. It included national parks, state forest, essential habitats etc. The environmental sensitive areas covering an aerial distance of 15 km from the project boundary is given in Table 3-1 and Figure 3-3 Table 3-1 Environmentally Sensitive Areas within 15km from Project Boundary

S. Areas Distance & Direction from project boundary No. 1 Areas protected under Nil international conventions, national or local legislation for their ecological, landscape, cultural or other related value Sl. 2 Areas which are important Description Distance (~Km) Direction No or sensitive for ecological Ocean, Rivers and Canals reasons – Wetlands, 1 Bay of Bengal 0.55 SE 2 Mahanadi River 6.18 NNE Watercourses or other 3 Paika River 8.62 NW water bodies, coastal zone, 4 Taladanda canal 4.87 ENE Forests biospheres, mountains, 5 BhitarKharinasi R.F 12.58 NE 6 Protected Forest 0.76 SSW forests 7 Jatadharbaratanda P.F 6.09 SSW 8 Jogidhankud P.F 9.68 ENE 9 Saralikud P.F 11.45 ENE 10 Sanatubi P.F 12.09 NE 11 Petachhola P.F 13.15 NNE 12 P.F 14.76 ENE Nadi Dhenkiagalia Nadi (adjacent 13 to project site) 0.03 W Santara Nadi (adjacent to 14 project site) 0.08 E 15 AtharabankiNadi 1.03 E 16 MahangaNadi 1.21 W 17 JatadharmuhanNadi 2 SSW 18 GarhigirhiNadi 6.89 NNW 19 NunaNadi 7.02 N 20 PaunshiapatNadi 7.15 NNW

210 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. Areas Distance & Direction from project boundary No. 21 GuptiNadi 7.46 NNE 22 BoitaraNadi 8.26 ENE 23 Kula Nadi 9.04 NNW 24 AkharhaahallNadi 9.27 NNE 25 ArholNadi 9.28 NNE 26 KharinasiNadi 9.34 NE 27 PotaNadi 9.65 WSW 28 KaduamadoliNadi 9.83 ENE 29 KholaNadi 9.86 NE 30 GuptagiriNadi 12.01 NNE 31 SonakhodaNadi 12.03 NNE 32 Nara Nadi 14.82 SW 33 MajurahiJor 12.94 ENE 34 Bruddha N 13.82 W 35 Haldia N 13.87 WSW 36 Saunlia N 13.33 SW 37 Harhua N 8.16 W Nala 38 MusharhiaNala 6.27 ENE 39 ChandapurNala 6.56 WNW 39 BarhatubiNala 10.3 NE 40 SanatubiNala 11.18 NE 41 GaliaNala 11.59 NE 42 BatigharGaliaNala 12.31 ENE 43 ShalijangaNala 13.08 NW 3 Areas used by protected,  Mahanadi Delta has extensive mangrove forests located at a important or sensitive distance 6.93km(NE) from the project site species of flora or fauna  The Kujang Coast and Hetamundia Seashore Village is for breeding, nesting, predominant turtle nesting area. foraging, resting, over  Mangroves are present in Santara creek which bifurcates wintering, migration the refinery into North & South parts  There are two Schedule-I Species in study area i.e., reptiles named Nilssoniahurum (Gray 1831) and Lissemyspunctata (Bonnaterre 1789) habitats. 4 Inland, coastal, marine or Sl. Distance Description Direction No (~Km) underground waters Inland Dhenkiagalia Nadi (adjacent to 1 project site) 0.03 W Santara Nadi (adjacent to project 2 site) 0.08 E 3 AtharabankiNadi 1.03 E 4 MahangaNadi 1.21 W 5 JatadharmuhanNadi 2 SSW

211 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. Areas Distance & Direction from project boundary No. 6 Taladanda canal 4.87 ENE 7 Mahanadi River 6.18 NNE 8 GarhigirhiNadi 6.89 NNW 9 NunaNadi 7.02 N 10 PaunshiapatNadi 7.15 NNW 11 GuptiNadi 7.46 NNE 12 BoitaraNadi 8.26 ENE 13 Paika River 8.62 NW 14 Kula Nadi 9.04 NNW 15 AkharhaahallNadi 9.27 NNE 16 ArholNadi 9.28 NNE 17 KharinasiNadi 9.34 NE 18 PotaNadi 9.65 WSW 19 KaduamadoliNadi 9.83 ENE 20 KholaNadi 9.86 NE 21 GuptagiriNadi 12.01 NNE 22 SonakhodaNadi 12.03 NNE 23 MajurahiJor 12.94 ENE 24 Nara Nadi 14.82 SW Coastal 25 Bay of Bengal 0.55 SE 5 State, National boundaries Nil 6 Routes or facilities used NH 5A (Chandikhol – Paradip Port highway), ~3.67 Km, N by the public for access to recreation or other tourist, pilgrim areas 7 Defence installations Coast Guard Dist. HQ~4.11km, ENE 8 Densely populated or Paradip (Population: ~68585 nos.), ~3.05 Km, E built-up area (Nearest Town, City, District) 9 Areas occupied by Sl. Distance Description Direction sensitive man-made land No (~Km) uses (hospitals, schools, Hospital 1 Vivekananda Hospital 2.76 NNE places of worship, 2 Loyal Health Care Paradip 4.18 ENE community facilities) 3 Port hospital 4.42 ENE 4 ESI Hospital 4.8 NE 5 Biju Patnaik Memorial Hospital 5.06 ENE Schools & Colleges 1 Orissa Maritime Academy 2.34 ENE 2 Delhi Public School, IOCL 2.38 NNE

212 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. Areas Distance & Direction from project boundary No. Township 3 NAC Municipal High School 3.04 NE 4 port school 3.19 ENE 5 Bethany Convent School 3.33 ENE 6 V Point KG School 3.38 ENE 7 Saraswati Sishu Mandir 3.42 ENE 8 Kendriya Vidyalaya Paradip Port 3.96 ENE S.K.Academy English Medium 4 9 School NNE 10 Sagarika Kala Niketan 4.08 NNE 11 Twinkle Twinkle 4.08 ENE 12 D.A.V Public School 4.54 ENE 13 St.Xavier's High School 4.55 ENE 14 Maa Ambika High School 5.09 NNE 15 DAV Public School, IFFCO 6.59 NE 16 B.B High School 8.29 WNW Religious Places 1 MaaRamachandiTemple 0.72 ENE 2 BasudebaTemple 1.71 WNW 3 Hanumantemple 1.94 WNW 4 SetalaTemple 2.31 ENE 5 HanumanTemple 2.47 ENE 6 JagannathMandir 2.6 ENE 7 LodGopalajiuTemple 3.75 WNW 8 MaaSantoshiTemple 4.09 ENE 9 BhadrakaliTemple 4.17 ENE 10 PandavTemple 4.22 ENE 11 TariniTemple 4.22 ENE 12 MaaMangalaTemple 4.33 WSW 13 MukteswarTemple 4.33 ENE 14 LordShivaTemple 4.75 WNW 15 RamGhatHanumanTemple 4.92 ENE 16 MaaBajraBudhiTemple 7.2 WNW 17 LaxminarayanTemple 7.74 WNW 10 Areas containing Fishing Harbour Paradip, ~9.5km NE important, high quality or scarce resources, (groundwater resources, surface resources, forestry, agriculture, fisheries, tourism, minerals) 11 Areas already subjected to Paradip Industrial area attracts CEPI score of 60.61 (CPCB pollution or environmental monitoring during 2018) (NGT proceedings)

213 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. Areas Distance & Direction from project boundary No. damage (those where existing legal environmental standards are exceeded) 12 Areas susceptible to Project site is located at seismic zone-III, natural hazard which could Paradip coast is prone to Cyclone and Tsunami. cause the project to present environmental problems, (earthquakes, subsidence, landslides, erosion or extreme or adverse climatic conditions)

214 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 3-3 Environmental sensitive areas covering within 15 km from project boundary

215 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

3.5 Physical Conditions of PIA district In this section, the physical conditions of PIA district are discussed in general and wherever possible references to the conditions prevailing in the study area in particular are also provided. The physical conditions are discussed as under:  District profile  Drainage, land use, geology, Physiographic profile  Natural resources  Climatic conditions, seismic zone characteristics and natural hazard

3.5.1 PIA District Profile Jagatsinghapur District is one of the coastal district of Odisha. It lies between 19°58’ and 20°23’N latitude and 86°30’ and 86°45’E longitude. The district is surrounded by the Bay of Bengal in the East, Kendrapada District in the North, Cuttack District in the West and Puri District in the South. It occupies an area of 1668 sq.kms which accounts for 1.07% of the total area of the state. This district is situated in the delta region of the river Mahanadi. The district comprises two district tracts. The first being marshy and swampy stripes along with the coast covered with wild growth of reeds and tropical jungle. The second tract covers fertile plain land. Since 1870, two big canals were built which supply water to this area. Also in the year 1960, a natural sea port i.e., Paradip port was built on the Bay of Bengal. Source:http://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/DCHB_A/21/2111_PART_A_DCHB_JAG ATSINGHAPUR.pdf

3.5.2 Climatic Conditions The south-west monsoon is the principal source of rainfall in the district. The district is characterized by a Topical monsoon climate having three distinct seasons in a year viz. winter, summer and rainy seasons. The Bay of Bengal, which forms the eastern boundary of the district, plays a vital role in controlling the climate of the district. The Normal rainfall of the district is 1501.3 mm. The annual average rainfall in last seven years is 1436 mm. About 75% of the total rainfall occurs during the period from June to September. In the period between April and May 3 to 4 cyclonic rains generally occur in the district that causes a drop in the temperature. The temperature varies from 15 to 37ºC. The relative humidity varies from 74 to 86 percent during the year. Source: http://cgwb.gov.in/District_Profile/Orissa/jagasingpur.pdf

216 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

3.5.3 Natural Resources of PIA District 3.5.3.1 Flora & Fauna The forest area is only 8% of total geographical area. There is no natural forest worth its name in this district. Hental (phoenix paludosa) grows here abundantly in clusters, which is scattered and confined to the sea-coast. The mangrove forests are locally called ‘Hental Van’ or Hental forests. Rich vegetation accounts for widespread of wildlife. Among the animal’s crocodiles are common. Also varieties of birds are seen along the coastal areas. Flora and Fauna of PIA are discussed in Section 3.11. Source: http://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/DCHB_A/21/2111_PART_A_DCHB_JAGATSING HAPUR.pdf

3.5.3.2 Forest Resources The little forests found in Jagatsinghapur District are of moist mixed deciduous Forests, North tropical deciduous forest. Forest Type prevalent in this district is the Sal dominated mixed deciduous forest. The forest cover area of the district is 133 Sq.Km., out of geographical area of 1668 sq.km which is a moderately dense forest, and 127 sq.km is open forest. The district is having 132.92 km of DLC forest area. However, on introduction of Forest Rights Act, 2006, 47 titles have been distributed to the forest dwellers involving about 31.83 acres of forest land. The Dhartang Garh PRF comprising an area of 112.92 ha. of forest stands for scenic beauty and an excellent habitat for wildlife. Its radius is 07 Km. This forest is surrounded by Gopalpur G.P of Jagatsinghapur district. This forest consists of variety of flora and fauna and some rare species of medicinal plants such as Satabari, bishalyakarani, Patalgaruda, kochila, Karanja, Ashok, Amla, Bela and tree species like Teak, Bamboo, Mahagani, Deodaru, Panasa etc. and wildlife like deer, monkey, jungle mouse, fox, hyna and different types of birds such as, koel, chilla, jhinka, pecha, Rajamani, Haladibasanta, Kumbhatua, Badudi etc. Visitor immunity and recreational facilities have been developed for casual visitors to the forest and for wild life lovers. Local villagers have been motivated to help forest people immensely in tracking down the poachers to control the wildlife crime and ensure forest protection. Hence a VSS has been formed comprising local inhabitants from Goplapur village and Pandra village. The Kilipal PRF comprises an area of 161.98 ha of forest. Its radius is 11.60km. This forest is protected by Paruna VSS. They keep a constant watch on the forest arranging roster duty, as a result of which, forest density is showing an upward trend.

217 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Source: http://gopabandhuacademy.gov.in/sites/default/files/gazetter/Jagatsinghapur_Gazetteer.pdf 3.5.3.3 Irrigation Water is an important factor than soil. An ample and well distributed rainfall is a matter of vital importance to cultivators. In most of the years the amount of rainfall is sufficient, the average being 58 inch per annum. But it is unevenly distributed causing deficiency in critical months to crops. That is why artificial irrigation becomes absolutely necessary. Now-a-days the country has started implementing bold economic reforms in the agriculture sector. The Odisha Lift irrigation Corporation (OLIC) hydrologist assesses the water potential in the district. The Odisha Agro Industries Corporation (OAIC) also undertakes the work of digging bore well by private enterprises. Under watershed development project for rain fed, agriculture, mini watersheds are identified. Under this scheme, cultivators are motivated to switch over to the cropping pattern by providing inputs under crop demonstration programme. The Source wise Irrigation potential created during the year 2009-10 & 2010-11 is given in Table 3-2 Table 3-2 Source wise Irrigation potential created during the year 2009-10 & 2010-11

Minor Major/Medium Lift Irrigation Other Irrigation Irrigation Total Project Sources Year Project Project (Hectare) (Flow) (Hectare) (Hectares) (Hectare) (Hectares) Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi 2009- 34.77 17.17 0.0 0.0 11.77 6.13 25.83 13.52 72.37 36.82 10 2010- 34.77 17.17 0.0 0.0 11.85 6.17 28.98 28.86 75.6 52.2 11

Source: http://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/DCHB_A/21/2111_PART_A_DCHB_JAGATSING HAPUR.pdf

218 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

3.5.3.4 Agricultural Resources Agriculture starts just before monsoon. The cultivators plough their fields in the month of May and sowing of grain starts from Akshaya Trutiya i.e., last part of May. There are two seasonal crops namely Kharif and Rabi. Growing and harvesting in rainy, autumn and winter season is known as Kharif crop whereas the said operation after winter and in summer is known as Rabi crop throughout all the districts of Odisha. Paddy is the main crop. In addition to this coconut, mango, banana, pineapple etc. and another cash crop pan (betel leaf) are also cultivated in this district. Among other cereals wheat, maize etc. pulses like mung, oilseeds like groundnut, tin, sunflower etc. and sugarcane are also produced in the district. During the year 2010-11, out of 111 thousand hectares’ cultivable land, Kharif and Rabi paddy covered 88 thousand hectares, which were 47.37% of gross cropped area of 179.60 thousand hectares. The paddy production was 138.96 thousand MT. The Net area sown and Gross cropped area during 2010-11 were 91 and 186 thousand hectares respectively and the cropping intensity was 204%. Source: http://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/DCHB_A/21/2111_PART_A_DCHB_JAGATSING HAPUR.pdf

3.5.3.5 Mineral Resources Heavy minerals: The beach and sand dune deposit, along the coast, contains heavy minerals like monazite, rutile, illeminite and zircon etc. Such deposits are seen around Dhenkia- Nuagaon sector of the district covering 8km coastal length and having 17.35 Million Tonnes of total heavy mineral deposit with a grade of 5.90% of heavies. The Mineral Map of Odisha (Orissa) is given in Figure 3-4 River Sand deposits: The river sand deposits have been reported around Alipingal, Nuapada, Hazipur-Nuapari, Erada, Madhysasan, Sikhar, Tarpur-Gokulpukr, Mundilo and Jaipur area along the Devi and Mahanadi rivers of the district and suitable for sand mining. Clay: Silty clay of Upper deltaic deposit is used for brick kiln industry. Source:http://gopabandhuacademy.gov.in/sites/default/files/gazetter/Jagatsinghapur_Gazette er.pdf

219 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 3-4 Mineral Map of Odisha (Orissa)

220 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

3.5.4 Land Use & Land Cover Total geographic area of Jagatsinghapur district is 1668 Sq.Km. Urban Builtup area is 52.12 Sq.Km and Rural Builtup area is 253.25 Sq.Km. Details of land use/land cover statistics for Jagatsinghapur district were given in Table 3-3. Land Use pattern of Jagatsinghapur district is given in Figure 3-5and Land use map of Jagatsinghapur district is given in Figure 3-6 Table 3-3 District land use/land cover statistics (2011-12) for Jagatsinghapurdistrict

S.N Area in Area in Area in Division of Land Use/Land Cover Area (%) o. Sq.Km. acres Ha 1 Builtup, Urban 52.12 12879.11 5212 3.125 2 Agriculture, Crop Land 269495.1 1090.61 109061 65.384 8 3 Agriculture, Fallow 2.68 662.24 268 0.161 4 Forest, Forest Plantation 0.36 88.96 36 0.022 5 Forest, Swamp/ Mangroves 6.54 1616.07 654 0.392 6 Barren/ unculturable/ Wastelands, 5.65 1396.14 565 0.339 scrub land 7 Wetlands/Water Bodies, Inland 16.36 4042.64 1636 0.981 Wetland 8 Wetlands/water Bodies, River 134.31 33188.67 13431 8.052 stream/Canals 9 Builtup, Rural 253.25 62579.34 25325 15.183 10 Agriculture, Plantation 1.94 479.38 194 0.116 11 Forest,Deciduous 22.17 5478.32 2217 1.329 12 Forest,Scrub Forest 0.69 170.50 69 0.041 13 Barren/Unculturable/Wastelands, Salt 10.62 2624.26 1062 0.637 Affected land 14 Barren/unculturable/Wastelands, 10.08 2490.82 1008 0.604 Sandy Area 15 Wetlands/Water Bodies, coastal 23.84 5890.98 2384 1.429 Wetland 16 Wetlands/Water Bodies, 36.78 9088.52 3678 2.205

221 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S.N Area in Area in Area in Division of Land Use/Land Cover Area (%) o. Sq.Km. acres Ha Reservoir/Lakes/Ponds Total 412171.1 1668.00 166800 100 4

222 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 3-5Land use pattern of the Jagatsinghapur District

223 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 3-6Land use map of the Jagatsinghapur District

224 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

3.5.4.1 Land Use and Land Cover of the Study Area Total Project Study area is 490.48 Sq.Km. The Land Use Pattern is given in Table 3-4. The Land Use Pattern and Land Use Map of the Study area are given in Figure 3-7and Figure 3-8 respectively. Table 3-4 Land Use Pattern of the Study Area

Area (Sq. Area Area Percentage S.No. Description km) (Acres) (Hectares) (%) 1 Fallow land 80.69 19938.90 8069 16.45 2 Cropland 78.02 19279.13 7802 15.91 3 River/ Stream/ Canals 46.63 11522.51 4663 9.51 4 Urban 40.06 9899.03 4006 8.17 5 Rural 27.68 6839.87 2768 5.64 6 Coastal wetland 17.48 4319.40 1748 3.56 7 Deciduous 10.30 2545.18 1030 2.10 8 Salt affected land 7.16 1769.27 716 1.46 Reservoirs/ Lakes/ 9 4.96 1225.64 496 1.01 Ponds 10 Sandy area 2.62 647.42 262 0.53 11 Scrub land 2.26 558.46 226 0.46 Swamp/ mangrove 12 2.00 494.21 200 0.41 forest 13 Inland Wetland 1.61 397.84 161 0.33 14 Scrub Forest 1.21 299.00 121 0.25 15 Forest plantation 0.25 61.78 25 0.05 16 Plantation 0.08 19.77 8 0.02 17 Ocean 167.47 41382.92 16747 34.14 Total 490.48 78925.34 49048 100

225 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 3-7 Land Use Pattern of the Study Area

226 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 3-8 Land Use Map of the Study Area

227 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

3.5.5 Topography The district comprises two distinct tracts, the first being marshy and swampy strips along with the coast covered with wild growth of reeds and tropical jungle. The second tract covers fertile plain land. The soil is of alluvial type. Mahanadi, Kathajodi, Devi, Biluakhai are the main rivers of the district. These rivers and two main canal Taladanda and Machhagaon are irrigating the district. Physical map of Odisha is given as Figure 3-9 and Topo map of study area is given as Figure 3-2 and contour map of the study area is given as Figure 3-10. Source:http://dcmsme.gov.in/dips/2016-17/DIPS%20of%20Jagatsinghapur%202016-17.pdf

Figure 3-9Physical Map of Odisha

228 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 3-10Contour Map of Study Area

229 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

3.5.6 Geomorphology of PIA district Physiographically the district can broadly have divided into two distinct units, viz. i. The saline marshy tract along the coast ii. The very gently sloping plain (i). The saline marshy tract forms a long and narrow strip along the coast. The width of this tract varies from 3 to 15 km and is intersected by tidal streams and shrubby vegetation. Sand dunes of varied relief extend continuously for kilometres parallel to the coast. These sand dunes usually forming 5 to 6 chains are gently sloping on the bay side and steeply sloping on the inland side, due to their Aeolian origin. The gently sloping alluvial plain occurs to the west of the saline marshy tract and forms the most fertile part of the district. (ii). The general slope of this tract is towards east and southeast and varies from 0.50 to 1.60 m/km. The distribution of different soil types in the district depends much on its physiographic and lithologic variations. The Geomorphology Map of the Jagatsinghapur District is shown as Figure 3-12. Source:http://cgwb.gov.in/District_Profile/Orissa/jagasingpur.pdf

3.5.7 Geomorphology of the Study Area Geomorphologically the study area within 10km radius of the site consisting three major units such as Coastal Plains, Flood Plains and Estuarine zone. Based on the nature and age of deposition the first two units viz., Coastal Plains & Flood Plains are divided into three and two sub-units respectively. The coastal plains are classified as Younger coastal plains, older coastal plains and Younger deltaic plains. The flood plains, which are developed due to the impact of Mahanadi and its tributaries on the pre-existing landforms, are classified as Younger flood plain, which is currently in active development stage and an older flood plain. There is a zone of estuarine plains, where the Mahanadi river merges with sea, existing in the northeastern part of the study area, which is typically, express the intermixing nature of beach sands with river sands The total Geographical area of the study area is 490.48 Sq.Km. The Geomorphology of the study area is given in Table 3-5 and Geomorphology pattern and Geomorphology Map of the study area is given in Figure 3-11and Figure 3-13respectively. Table 3-5Geomorphology of the Study Area

Area in Area in S.No. Geomorphology Area in Sq.Km Total Area % Acres Hectares 1 Coastal Origin - Younger Coastal plain 91.86 22699.07 9186 18.73

230 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

2 Coastal Origin - Older Coastal plain 76.56 18918.36 7656 15.61 3 Coastal Origin - Younger Deltaic plain 70.34 17381.37 7034 14.34 4 Fluvial Origin- Older flood plain 20.23 4998.93 2023 4.12 5 Fluvial Origin- Active flood plain 8.06 1991.67 806 1.64 6 Water bodies 219.06 54130.82 21906 44.66 Estuarine Plain 4.37 1079.85 437 0.89 Total 490.48 121200.06 49048 100

231 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 3-11Geomorphology Pattern of the Study Area

232 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 3-12Geomorphology Map of Jagatsinghapur District

233 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 3-13Geomorphology Map of the Study Area

234 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

3.5.8 Hydrogeology of PIA district  Recent Alluvium 0.57mbgl to 5.05mbgl 0.35mbgl to 4.82mbgl,  pre-monsoon shows rise of 0-2m in 37.5% of wells, and fall of 0-2m in 56.3% and 2- 4m in 6.3%of the wells.  post-monsoon shows rise of 0-2m in 57.1% of wells, fall of 0-2m in 42.9 % of the wells. The State is underlain by diverse rock types ranging in age from Archaean to Recent. The State can be hydro geologically sub divided into consolidated, semi-consolidated & unconsolidated formations. The consolidated formations include hard crystallines and compact sedimentary rocks whereas semi consolidated formations include weathered and friable Gondwana sedimentaries and loosely cemented Baripada beds. The unconsolidated formations include laterites and recent alluvium. The yield of tubewells tapping granite gneisse ranges between 10-35 m3/hr whereas other consolidated formations, it ranges between 5-18 m3/hr. The yield of tubewells in semi-consolidated formations range between 20-115 m3/hr.The hydrogeology map of Jagatsinghapur District is given in Figure 3-14 Source:http://cgwb.gov.in/District_Profile/Orissa/jagasingpur.pdf

Geo-hydrological Status of the Study Area The study area including the project site is part of coastal and fluvial alluvium developed due to the deltaic nature of Mahanadi River with Bay of Bengal. The area is covered with thick pile of younger and older alluvial formations to an extent of more than 100m bgl. Below the alluvium there are sandstone formations with intercalation of clay beds are reported which are part of ParadeepTechtonic Depression of Mahanadi Basin. These sedimentary formations are extended more than 900m thickness which are successively underlined with basement crystalline rocks. Groundwater occurs in semi-confined to unconfined nature in the alluvial formations within the study area. There are potential shallow fresh water aquifers existing within the study area at 10 to 20m depth from the existing ground levels. Based on the observations made in the existing bore wells it is understood that the groundwater level is between 3 to 4 mbgl. Below the fresh water aquifers there are saline water aquifers which are present at 40 to 50m bgl within the alluvial formations. The deeper aquifer system is also present within the Paradeep Depression in deep seated sedimentary formations

235 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 3-14Hydrogeology Map of Jagatsinghapur District

3.5.9 Drainage Pattern in PIA district The main rivers flowing in the district are Mahanadi, Saunlia, Alaka and Devi. The branches of Devi river are Biluakhai, Gobari river where as the branches of Mahanadi are Paika, Chirotpala and Hansua river. All the rivers and its branches fall into the Bay of Bengal. 1 The problem of drainage becomes acute towards the lower reaches of the deltas. The coastal ridges offer an effective barrier to a free discharge of the flood water. Sometimes the huge sand deposits create marshy conditions and affect the production of crops. Due to its geographical situation, the district is congenial and prone to occurrence of various natural calamities like flood, cyclone and drought. To prevent the calamities, many river dam projects, canal construction works and irrigation works were made in and nearby district. Two main canals i.e. Taladanda and Machhagaon provide water for irrigation in the district. The drainage map of the Study Area is given as Figure 3-15. Source:http://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/DCHB_A/21/2111_PART_A_DCHB_J AGATSINGHAPUR.pdf

236 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 3-15Drainage map of the study area

237 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 3.5.10 Geology Geologically the study area including the site consisting of Alluvial formations of Recent geological age. These alluvial formations are developed by the action of Mahanadi river and Bay of Bengal sea. The alluvium developed due to the river action is designated as Fluvial alluvium. Similarly, the alluvium developed due to the sea action is named as Coastal Alluvium. The basement rocks are existing below 100m from the existing ground level. The geological formation of this district is entirely alluvium of recent origin. The entire district comes under Mahanadi Delta Division and Cuttack Coastal Plain. The region is formed over the estuary of the Mahanadi. Geological map of Orissa is given as Figure 3-16. Source:http://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/DCHB_A/21/2111_PART_A_DCHB_J AGATSINGHAPUR.pdf

Figure 3-16Geology Map of Orissa

3.5.11 Seismicity As per Vulnerability Atlas of India- 3rd Edition, the project location/study area falls in Zone III, which is categorized as a Moderate Risk Zone. The seismicity map of India is shown in Figure 3-17 EIA Report

Figure 3-17 Seismicity Map of India

239 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

3.5.12 Soils in PIA District Based on the physical and chemical characteristics, mode of origin and occurrence, soils of the district may be classified into three groups namely Alfisols, Aridisols and Entisols. i.Alfisols: This includes deltaic alluvial soils and this type of soils occupies nearly 90% of the entire district area. The deltaic alluvial soils are generally deficient in phosphate (P2O5) and nitrogen (N). Both the total and available potassium are fairly adequate and PH varies between 7.38 and 8.16. ii.Aridisols: These are saline and saline alkali soils and occur in small pockets in the north eastern and south eastern corner of the district near coast. These are rich in calcium, magnesium and also consist of half decomposed organic matter. iii.Entisols: This includes coastal sandy soils and occurs as narrow elongated ridge along the coast line. The soils are deficient in nitrogen, phosphoric acid and humus, but not in potash and lime. Soil map of India is given in Figure 3-18. Source: http://cgwb.gov.in/District_Profile/Orissa/jagasingpur.pdf

240 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 3-18 Soil map of India

3.5.13 Natural Hazards in PIA District As per Odisha wind hazard map Jagatsinghapur district is falling under very high damage risk zone B. Wind Hazard Map of India is given in Figure 3-19.

241 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 3-19 Wind hazard Map of India

3.6 Air Environment Baseline ambient air quality assessment gives the status in the vicinity of site and is an indispensable part of environmental impact assessment studies. Significant changes, in

242 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report predominant winds and weather conditions are observed in winter, summer and post- monsoon seasons apart from the local topographic influences. The baseline status of air environment in the study area is assessed through a systematic air quality surveillance programme.

3.6.1 Meteorological Conditions The regional air quality is influenced by the meteorology of that region. The principal weather parameters that influence the concentration of the air pollutants in the surroundings are wind speed, wind direction and temperature. The meteorological data is useful for proper interpretation of the baseline data. It is used as input for air quality dispersion models for predicting the post project environmental scenario i.e. ground level concentrations due to proposed utilities like Boilers &DG sets etc.

3.6.2 Meteorological Data Collection Available secondary data pertaining to the meteorological parameters was obtained from the IMD Climatological tables. In addition, baseline meteorological data (primary data) was generated during the study period (March to May 2019). The methodology adopted for monitoring surface observations is as per the standard norms laid down by Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) i.e. IS:8829 and Indian Meteorological Department (IMD).

3.6.3 General Meteorological Scenario based on IMD Data The nearest Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) station located to project site is Paradip port. The Climatological data of Paradip port (20 18’ N and 86o 41’ E), published by the IMD, based on daily observations at 08:30 and 17:30 hour IST for a 30 year period (1971- 2000), is presented in the following sections on the meteorological conditions of the region. The monthly variations of the relevant meteorological parameters are reproduced in Table 3-6.

243 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Table 3-6 Climatological Summary -Paradip port (1971-2000)

Predominant Relative Vapour Rainfall Wind Temp (°C) Humidity Pressure Mean (mm) Directions (%) hPa Wind Month (From)* Speed No. Daily Daily (kmph) Total of 08:30 17:30 08:30 17:30 08:30 17:30 Max. Min. days Jan 26.9 15.8 10.8 0.6 78 70 19.1 19.9 9.4 N E Feb 28.5 19.2 23.6 1.8 78 74 23.1 23.9 10.7 N S Mar 30.9 22.8 36.4 1.5 78 79 28.4 29.2 12.1 SW S Apr 31.9 25.1 32.1 2.1 80 83 32.4 33 15.3 SW SW May 32.6 26.1 97 3.9 81 83 34.6 35 16 SW SW Jun 32.5 26.3 219.2 9.6 82 83 34.5 34.8 14.4 SW SW Jul 31.3 25.5 243.4 13.1 86 85 33.8 33.9 13.3 SW SW Aug 31.2 25.5 343.8 14.7 86 85 33.6 33.8 12.5 SW SW Sep 31.6 25.6 256.2 10.6 83 82 33.3 33.1 11.5 SW SW Oct 31.5 24 161.9 5.9 79 77 30.2 30 8.6 N S Nov 29.9 19.9 85 2.5 77 72 24.2 24.3 8.4 N NE Dec 27.6 16 11.6 0.5 75 68 18.9 19.6 8.3 N NE Max. 32.6 26.3 343.8 14.7 86 85 34.6 35 16 Annual Wind Min. 26.9 15.8 10.8 0.5 75 68 18.9 19.6 8.3 Predominant Annual direction is Total / 30.5 22.7 1521.0 66.8 80 79 28.8 29.2 11.8 South West Mean

As per the above IMD climatological Data given in Table 3-6, the observations drawn are as follows Highest Mean daily maximum temperature is32.6oC and the Lowest mean daily minimum temperature is 15.8oC were recorded in the months of May and January respectively Maximum and minimum relative humidity of 86% and 68% were recorded in the months of July & August and December respectively.

244 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Maximum and minimum rainfall of 343.8 mm and 10.8 mm was recorded in the months of August and January respectively. Maximum and minimum Mean wind speed is 16km/hr and 8.3km/hr was recorded in the months of May and December respectively. Annual Wind predominant pattern is South West.

3.6.4 Meteorological Scenario during Study Period The meteorological scenario in and around the project site is an essential requirement during study period for proper interpretation of baseline air quality status. Meteorological data was collected during the study period (March -May 2019) and is presented in Table 3-7. The wind rose for the study period is given as Figure 3-20. Table 3-7 Meteorological Data for the Study Period (March - May 2019)

S. No Parameter Observation 1. Temperature Max. Temperature: 43°C Min. Temperature: 19°C Avg. Temperature: 29.83°C 2. Average Relative 80.05% Humidity 3. Average Wind Speed 3.04m/s 4. Predominant Wind South Direction

245 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 3-20 Wind rose during study period (March - May 2019)

3.6.5 Atmospheric Inversion

Atmospheric inversion level at the project site was monitored; the results observed at the site during the study period are as follows.  Average atmospheric temperature: 29.83°C  Average Relative humidity:80.05%  Average Wind speed: 3.04 m/s The daily inversion level calculated based on the average temperature and average wind speed at the project site and the maximum inversion height is derived by the graph plotted based on the average temperature and average wind speed. The daily inversion level at the project site varies from 50 to 3849 m during 5 AM to 4 PM, the maximum recorded at 3849 m during 2nd May 2019 at 4 pm. This is shown in the following Figure 3-21.

246 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 3-21Atmospheric inversion level at the project site

3.7 Ambient Air Quality The selection criteria for monitoring locations are based on the following:  Topography/Terrain  Meteorological conditions – Upwind and Downwind locations  Residential and sensitive areas within the study area  Representatives of regional background air quality/pollution levels and  Representation of likely impacted areas

3.7.1 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations To evaluate the baseline air quality of the study area, Eight (08) monitoring locations have been identified as per Meteorological data during the study period (March –May 2019).As per IMD, The wind predominance during study period is from South West to North East. AAQ monitoring locations are selected based on study period wind predominance, map showing the air monitoring locations is given in Figure 3-22 and the details of the locations are given in Table 3-8. .Table 3-8 Details of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Locations

Station Distance (km) from Azimuth Location Type of Wind Code Project boundary Directions

A1 Project Site - Within Site

A2 Paradwipgarh c/w 4.41 NNE

247 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Station Distance (km) from Azimuth Location Type of Wind Code Project boundary Directions

A3 Dochhaki d/w 4.08 NE

A4 Musharhia d/w 6.9 NE

A5 Paradwip (Coast Guard) c/w 4.91 E

A6 Dhinkia c/w 2.11 W

A7 Sunadiakandha c/w 2.46 W

A8 Gandakipur c/w 3.35 NNW

248 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 Figure 3-22Map showing the Air monitoring locations EIA Report

3.7.2 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Techniques and Frequency Ambient air quality was monitored twice in a week for One (01) season (shall cover 12 weeks), i.e. 3 months (March 2019 – May 2019). PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, Pb, NH3, C6H6,

C20H12, As, Ni, TVOC, Methane and Non-Methane Hydrocarbon were monitored. Sampling was carried out as per Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) monitoring guidelines at each location. Analytical methods used for analysis of parameters are given in Table 3-9. Table 3-9 Analytical Methods for Analysis of Ambient Air Quality Parameters

S.N NAAQ standards: Samplin Parameters Analytical method o 2009 g Time

Sulphur Dioxide IS:5182(Part-2):2001 50 80 (24 24 1 3 (SO2), μg/m (Reaff:2006) (Annual) Hours) Hours

Nitrogen Dioxide 40 80 (24 24 2 3 IS: 5182 (Part - 6): 2006 (NO2), μg/m (Annual) Hours) Hours

Particulate Matter 40 60 (24 24 3 3 IS: 5182 (Part - 23): 2006 (PM2.5), μg/m (Annual) hours) Hours

Particulate Matter 60 100 (24 24 4 3 IS:5182 (Part– 23): 2006 (PM10), μg/m (Annual) hours) Hours

IS:5182(Part–10):1999 2 5 CO mg/m3 4 (1hour) 8 Hours (Reaff:2006) (8 hours)

IS:5182(Part–22):2004 0.5 1(24 24 6 Pbμg/m3 (Reaff:2006) (Annual) hours) Hours

100 3 180 7 O3, μg/m IS: 5182 (Part – 9): 1974 8 Hours (8hours) (1hour)

100 3 APHA(air) 2nd edition 400(24 8 NH3, μg/m 8 Hours (Indophenol-blue method) (Annual) hours)

IS:5182(Part–11):1999 5 5 24 9 Benzene, μg/m3 (RA:2009) (Annual) (Annual) Hours

Benzo (a) pyrene, IS:5182(Part–12):2004 1 1 24 10 ng/m3 (RA:2009) (Annual) (Annual) Hours

250 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S.N NAAQ standards: Samplin Parameters Analytical method o 2009 g Time

6 6 24 11 Arsenic, ng/ m3 APHA (air) 2nd edition (Annual) (Annual) Hours

In house method (AAS 20 20 24 12 Nickel ng/ m3 method) based on CPCB Hours guidelines volume 1 (Annual) (Annual)

HECS/AIR/AMBIENT/SOP/ 13 TVOC - - 8 Hours 018:2013

Methane 14 IS 5182 (Part 17) - - 8 Hours Hydrocarbon

Non-Methane 15 IS 5182 (Part 17) - - 8 Hours Hydrocarbon

3.7.3 Results and Discussions

The variations of the pollutants PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NO2, CO, Pb, O3, NH3, C6H6, C20 H12, As and Ni are compared with National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), MoEF&CC Notification, November, 2009. Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Data (March 2019 – May 2019) for the study area is given in Table 3-10 and trends of measured ambient concentration in the study area were graphically represented in Figure 3-23

251 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Table 3-10 Summary of the average baseline concentrations of pollutants

Locations Paradwip Conc. NAAQ Paradwipg Musharhi Sunadiaka Gandakip Parameters Project Site Dochhaki (Coast Dhinkia Standards arh a ndha ur Guard) A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 Min. 52.72 50.19 47.73 51.65 67.15 48.71 46.16 46.90

PM10 Conc. Max 75.14 71.53 68.02 73.61 95.70 69.42 65.78 66.84 100 (µg/m³) Avg. 63.22 60.19 57.24 61.94 80.53 58.42 55.35 56.25 (24 Hours) 98th 74.70 71.12 67.63 73.19 95.14 69.02 65.40 66.45 ‘tile Min. 27.04 24.60 23.81 25.61 31.82 24.33 23.11 23.57 PM2.5 Conc. Max 38.53 35.06 33.94 36.50 45.35 34.68 32.94 33.59 (µg/m3) 60 Avg. 32.43 29.50 28.56 30.71 38.16 29.18 27.72 28.27 (24 Hours) 98th 38.31 34.85 33.74 36.29 45.09 34.48 32.75 33.40 ‘tile Min. 7.19 10.74 8.73 9.34 11.01 7.99 8.38 7.63 SO2 Conc. Max 80 10.25 15.30 12.44 13.30 15.70 11.39 11.94 10.88 (µg/m3) Avg. (24 Hours) 8.63 12.88 10.47 11.20 13.21 9.59 10.05 9.16 98th 10.19 15.21 12.36 13.23 15.61 11.32 11.87 10.81

252 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Locations Paradwip Conc. NAAQ Paradwipg Musharhi Sunadiaka Gandakip Parameters Project Site Dochhaki (Coast Dhinkia Standards arh a ndha ur Guard) A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 ‘tile Min. 13.46 20.63 16.57 17.82 21.09 15.16 15.96 14.40

3 NO2 Conc.(µg/m ) Max 19.18 29.40 23.61 25.39 30.06 21.61 22.74 20.53 80 Avg. 16.15 24.75 19.87 21.37 25.30 18.19 19.14 17.28 (24 Hours) 98th 19.07 29.23 23.47 25.25 29.89 21.49 22.61 20.41 ‘tile 1 BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ Pb (μg/m3) Avg. (24 hour) 0.05) 0.05) 0.05) 0.05) 0.05) 0.05) 0.05) 0.05) 4 BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ CO (mg/m3) Avg. (1hour) 0.05) 0.05) 0.05) 0.05) 0.05) 0.05) 0.05) 0.05) 180 O3 (μg/m3) Avg. 19.24 15.65 13.39 16.99 21.53 13.19 11.87 12.53 (1hour) 400 NH3 (μg/m3) Avg. 12.39 14.51 10.74 11.53 16.49 9.43 8.39 7.58 (24 hours) 5 BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ Benzene (μg/m3) Avg. (Annual) 1) 1) 1) 1) 1) (LOQ 1) 1) (LOQ 1)

253 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Locations Paradwip Conc. NAAQ Paradwipg Musharhi Sunadiaka Gandakip Parameters Project Site Dochhaki (Coast Dhinkia Standards arh a ndha ur Guard) A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 Benzo (a) pyrene, 1 BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ Avg. (ng/m3) (Annual) 1) 1) 1) 1) 1) (LOQ 1) 1) (LOQ 1) 6 BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ Arsenic (ng/ m3) Avg. (Annual) 2) 2) 2) 2) 2) (LOQ 2) 2) (LOQ 2) 20 BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ Nickel (ng/m3) Avg. (Annual) 10) 10) 10) 10) 10) (LOQ 10) 10) (LOQ 10) BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ TVOC (ppm) Avg. - 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) Methane HC BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ Avg. - (µg/m3) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) Non-Methane HC BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ BLQ (LOQ Avg. - (µg/m3) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) Note: BDL (Below detectable limit), DL (Detectable limit), BLQ (Below Detectable Limit), LOQ (Limit Of Quantification)

254 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 3-23: Trends of Measured Ambient Concentrations in the Study Area

255 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

3.7.4 Observations

The ambient air quality has been monitored at 8 locations for 14 parameters as per

NAAQS/CPCB guidelines within the study area. The average baseline levels of PM10 (55.35

– 80.53µg/m³), PM2.5 (27.72 – 38.16µg/m³), SO2(8.63 – 13.21µg/m³), NO2(16.15 – 25.30µg/m³), the nearest CPCB AAQ monitoring station is PPL Guest House in which the annual average for the year 2018: PM10 (113 µg/m³), PM2.5 (37 µg/m³), SO2(19 µg/m³),

NO2(11 µg/m³).

All the parameters are well within the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Industrial, Commercial and Residential areas at all monitoring locations during the study period from March 2019 - May 2019.

3.8 Noise Environment The prevailing ambient noise level at a particular location is nothing but the resultant (total) of all kinds of noise sources existing at various distances around that location. The ambient noise level at a location varies continuously depending on the type of surrounding activities. Ambient noise levels have been established by monitoring noise levels at Eight(08) locations in and around 10Km distance from project area during the study period using precision noise level meter. The noise monitoring locations in the study area were selected after giving due consideration to the various land use categories. The land use categories include commercial, residential, rural and sensitive areas. Noise levels were recorded on an hourly basis for one complete day at each location using pre- calibrated noise levels. A map noise showing the noise monitoring locations is given in Figure 3-24.

3.8.1 Results and Discussions

Based on the recorded hourly noise levels at each monitoring location, the day equivalent (Ld) and night equivalent (Ln) were calculated;  Ld: Average noise levels between 6:00 hours to 22.00 hours.  Ln: Average noise levels between 22:00 hours to 6.00 hours. The comparison of day equivalent noise levels (Ld) and night equivalent noise levels (Ln) with the respective CPCB stipulated noise standards for various land use categories are shown in the Table 3-11.

256 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Table 3-11 Day and Night Equivalent Noise Levels

Noise level in Distance (km) CPCB Standard Location Azimuth dB(A) Leq Environmental S. Location from Project No Code Direction Lday LNight Setting boundary Day Night (Ld) (Ln) 1 Project Site N1 Within Site 53.8 47.1 75 70 Industrial 2 Paradwipgarh N2 4.41 NNE 53.7 44.2 55 45 Residential 3 Dochhaki N3 4.08 NE 51.3 42.6 55 45 Residential 4 Musharhia N4 6.9 NE 58.6 47.5 55 45 Residential 5 Paradwip (Coast Guard) N5 4.91 E 64.8 54.2 65 55 Commercial 6 Dhinkia N6 2.11 W 52.4 43.7 55 45 Residential 7 Sunadiakandha N7 2.46 W 50.9 43.2 55 45 Residential 8 Gandakipur N8 3.35 NNW 53.3 43.1 55 45 Residential

3.8.2 Observations

The observations of day equivalent and night equivalent noise levels at all locations are given below  In Industrial areas (Project site) day time noise levels was about 53.8 dB(A) and 47.1 dB(A) during night time, which is within prescribed limit given by CPCB (75 dB(A) Day time & 70 dB(A) Night time).  In Commercial areas (Paradwip (Coast Guard)) day time noise levels was about 64.8 dB(A) and night time noise levels was about 54.2 dB(A), which is within the prescribed limit given by CPCB (65 dB(A) Day time & 55 dB(A) Night time).  In residential area (Paradwipgarh, Dochhaki, Musharhia, Dhinkia, Sunadiakandha and Gandakipur) day time noise levels varied from 50.9 dB(A) to 58.6 dB(A) and night time noise levels varied from 42.6 dB(A) to 47.5 dB(A) across the sampling stations. The field observations during the study period indicate that the ambient noise levels in some residential area is exceeding the prescribed limit given by CPCB (55 dB(A) Day time & 45 dB(A) Night time).

257 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 3-24 Map showing the Noise Monitoring locations

258 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

3.9 Water Environment

3.9.1 Surface Water Resources The main rivers flowing in the district are Mahanadi, Saunlia, Alaka and Devi. The branches of Devi River are Biluakhai, Gobari River where as the branches of Mahanadi are Paika, Chirotpala and Hansua River. All the rivers and its branches fall into the Bay of Bengal. The problem of drainage becomes acute towards the lower reaches of the deltas. The coastal ridges offer an effective barrier to a free discharge of the flood water. Sometimes the huge sand deposits create marshy conditions and affect the production of crops. Due to its geographical situation, the district is congenial and prone to occurrence of various natural calamities like flood, cyclone and drought. To prevent the calamities, many river dam projects, canal construction works and irrigation works were made in and nearby district. Two main canals i.e. Taladanda and Machhagaon provide water for irrigation in the district. Source: http://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/DCHB_A/21/2111_PART_A_DCHB_JAGATSING HAPUR.pdf

3.9.1.1 Surface Water Quality Assessment To establish the baseline status of water environment, the representative sampling locations for surface water within a radial distance of 10Km from project site have been selected as per CPCB guidelines of Water Quality Monitoring through an adequate survey of the project area. Test methods used for the analysis of water quality parameters is given in Table 3-12.

Table 3-12 Test methods used for the analysis of water quality parameters

Sl. No Parameter Measured Test Method 1 Colour IS:3025 (Part- 4) 1983 (Reaff 2006) 2 Turbidity IS 3025(Part - 10):1984 3 pH IS:3025 (Part - 11): 1983 (Reaff: 2006) 4 Conductivity IS:3025 (Part - 14): 1983 (Reaff: 2006) 5 Total Dissolve Solids IS: 3025:1(Part - 16) 1984 (Reaff 2006) 6 Total Suspended Solids IS 3025 (Part - 17) 1984 (Reaff 1996) 7 Alkalinity as CaCO3 IS:3025,1 (Part - 23) 1986 (Reaff 2009) Total Hardness as 8 CaCo3 IS:3025 (Part - 21) 1983 (Reaff 2006)

259 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Sl. No Parameter Measured Test Method 11 Sodium IS:3025,5(Part - 45) 1993 (Reaff 2006) 12 Potassium IS:3025,5(Part - 45) 1993 (Reaff 2006) 9 Calcium as Ca IS 3025 (Part - 40):1991 10 Magnesium as Mg IS 3025 (Part - 46) 1994 13 Carbonate IS 3025, (Pt 23) 1986 (R 2006) 14 Bi carbonate IS 3025, (Pt 23) 1986 (R 2006) 15 Chloride IS 3025 (Part - 32):1988 16 Sulphate SO4 IS 3025(Part - 24):1986 17 Nitrate as NO3 ASTM (Part - 31)1978 18 Phosphate IS 3025 (Pt 45) 1993 (R 2006) 19 Fluorides as F IS 3025 (Part - 60):2008 20 Cyanide IS 3025 (Part-27):1986 21 Arsenic IS 3025:(Part-37):1988(Reaff 2009) 22 Boron IS:3025 (Part - 57):2003 23 Cadmium IS 3025 (Part - 41)1991 24 Chromium, Total IS:3025 (Part - 52) 2003 (Reaff 2009) 25 Copper IS:3025 (Part - 42)1992 (Reaff: 2009) 26 Iron IS 3025 (Part - 53):2003 27 Lead IS:3025 (Part - 47) 1994 (Reaff 2009) 28 Manganese IS 3025:(Part - 59):2006 29 Mercury IS 3025 (Part48):1994 RA 1999 30 Nickel IS 3025:(Part-54):2003(Reaff 2009) 31 Selenium IS 3025 Part (56)2003 32 Zinc IS:3025 (Part - 49) 1994 (Reaff 2009) 33 Dissolved Oxygen IS:3025 (Part - 38)1989 (Reaff 2009) 34 BOD 5210B APHA22nd Edn 2012 35 COD IS:3025 (Part-58)-2006

The prevailing status of surface water quality has been assessed during the study period. Surface water quality results are provided in Table 3-14. A map showing the surface water monitoring locations is given in Figure 3-25. The Details of the surface water monitoring locations is given in Table 3-13

260 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Table 3-13 Details of Surface water sampling locations

Distance from S. Location Direction from Water bodies project boundary No code project boundary (~Km) 1 Stream near Udayabat SW1 4.04 N 2 Mahanadi d/s near Musharhia SW2 7.56 NNE 3 Marine sample near Port SW3 4.77 E 4 Santara nadi d/s SW4 0.16 E Marine sample near project 5 SW5 0.64 E site 6 Mahanga Nadi SW6 1.34 SW Mahanadi u/s near 7 SW7 8.59 NW Balaramapur 8 Sanatara nadi u/s SW8 0.1 W

261 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 3-25: Map showing the surface water monitoring locations

262 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Table 3-14: Surface water Monitoring Results

2 pH (at 25°C) -- 6.5-8.5 6.98 6.76 7.98 6.92 7.94 7.08 7.84 6.86

3 EC µS/cm - 4386 24685 50174 27451 52341 29345 9946 25972 Total Dissolve 4 mg/l 500 2640 16934 32040 34677 18556 6734 Solids 19128 17124 Total Suspended 5 mg/l - 2 36 78 16 36 13 18 11 Solids Total Alaklinity as 6 mg/l - 213.1 221.3 344.3 90.2 98.4 259.0 138.5 72.1 CaCO3 Total Hardness as 7 mg/l 200 320.2 3201.2 5602.4 2898.7 6401.6 3875.6 1238.7 2714.7 CaCO3 8 Sodium as Na mg/l - 660 4418 8551 5148 9406 4843 1734 4137

263 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

10 Calcium as Ca mg/l - 40.08 240.48 480.96 181.2 320.64 284.16 96.19 163.4

11 Magnesium as Mg mg/l - 53.46 631.8 1069.2 594.3 1360.8 769.15 242.56 560.4 19597.3 12 Chloride as Cl mg/l 250 1375.77 9204.81 17815.75 9122.4 9867.15 3612.64 8469.2 3

13 Sulphate as SO4 mg/l 400 147.4 1521.42 2469.18 1402.3 2530.72 1745.64 617.98 1392.7

14 Nitrate as NO3 mg/l 20 2.48 4.12 4.56 4.1 1.24 3.48 5.7 3.6

15 Phosphate as PO4 mg/l - 1.59 0.99 0.06 0.28 0.26 0.62 0.12 0.19

16 Fluorides as F mg/l 1.5 0.34 0.76 0.68 0.81 0.72 0.87 0.12 0.65 BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ 17 Cyanide mg/l 0.05 (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 18 Arsenic mg/l 0.05 BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ

264 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Marine Mahana Surface Stream Mahanadi Marine Sanatar sample di u/s water near d/s near sample Mahang Sanatara Sl.N a nadi near near Parameter Unit Standards Udayab Musharhi near a Nadi nadi u/s o d/s project Balaram (IS 2296 at a Port site apur Class – A) SW1 SW2 SW3 SW4 SW5 SW6 SW7 SW8 (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ 19 Boron as B mg/l - (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ 20 Cadmium as Cd mg/l 0.01 (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ 0.001) 0.001) 0.001) 0.001) 0.001) 0.001) 0.001) 0.001) BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ 21 Chromium, Total mg/l 0.05 (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ 22 Copper as Cu mg/l 1.5 (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 23 Lead as Pb mg/l 0.1 BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ

265 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Marine Mahana Surface Stream Mahanadi Marine Sanatar sample di u/s water near d/s near sample Mahang Sanatara Sl.N a nadi near near Parameter Unit Standards Udayab Musharhi near a Nadi nadi u/s o d/s project Balaram (IS 2296 at a Port site apur Class – A) SW1 SW2 SW3 SW4 SW5 SW6 SW7 SW8 (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ 24 Manganese as Mn mg/l 0.5 (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ 0.05) 0.05) 0.05) 0.05) 0.05) 0.05) 0.05) 0.05) BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ 25 Mercury mg/l 0.001 (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ 0.0005) 0.0005) 0.0005) 0.0005) 0.0005) 0.0005) 0.0005) 0.0005) BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ 26 Nickel as Ni mg/l - (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ 27 Selenium as Se mg/l 0.01 (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 28 Zinc mg/l 15 BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ

266 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

(Note: BLQ – Below Limit of Quantification; LOQ – Limit Of Quantification)

267 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

3.9.1.2 Results and Discussions Surface water sample results as presented in Table 3-14 are discussed below:  Surface water sampling results except marine sample are compared with Surface water standards IS 2296:1992.  pH in the collected surface water samples varies between 6.76 to 7.84 which is within the limit of IS 2296:1992, where pH value of marine sample ranges from 7.94 to 7.98.  The Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) value of collected surface water sample ranges from 2640 mg/l to 19128 mg/l. TDS value of marine sample ranges from 32040 mg/l to 34677 mg/l.  The Total hardness value of the collected surface water sample ranges between 320.2 mg/l – 3875.6 mg/l. Total hardness value of marine sample ranges between 5602.4 mg/l – 6401.6 mg/l.  BOD values of the collected surface water samples are ranges between 1 mg/l and 19mg/l. BOD value of the marine sample ranges between 3 mg/l to 5 mg/l.  COD value of the collected surface water varies from 4 to 154 mg/l. COD value of the marine sample ranges between 18 mg/l to 36 mg/l.  The concentration of heavy metals like As, Cd, Cr, Pb, Mn, Hg, Ni and Se are within the limits of IS 2296:1992.

3.9.2 Ground Water Resources

The ground water resources of the district have been assessed adopting the methodology recommended by the ground water Estimation Committee (1997), constituted by Govt. of India. The task was jointly carried out by the central Ground Water Board and Ground Water Survey and Investigation, Department of Water Resources, Govt. of Orissa. The block wise computation of ground water resources in the district has been meager and all the blocks fall under the safe category. The stage of ground water development varies from 31.53% to 67.26% in different blocks. The overall stage of ground water development of the district is 47.37%. The ground water resources of Jagatsinghapur district are as given in Table 3-15. Table 3-15: Dynamic ground water resources of Jagatsinghapur District

Potential Attribute /Quantity Annual Replenishable Ground Water Resources 45029 Ham

268 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Potential Attribute /Quantity Net Ground Water Draft 21332 Ham Projected Demand for domestic and industrial uses up to 2463 Ham 2005 Stage of Ground Water Development 14.57 %

(Source:http://cgwb.gov.in/District_Profile/Orissa/jagasingpur.pdf)

3.9.2.1 Ground Water Quality Total Eight (08) ground water monitoring locations were identified for assessment in different villages around the project site based on the usage of sub surface water by the settlements/ villages in the study area. The groundwater results are compared with the acceptable and permissible water quality standards as per IS: 10500 (2012) for drinking water. Groundwater quality monitoring locations and results are given in Table 3-16 and Table 3-17. A map showing the groundwater monitoring locations is given in Figure 3-26. Table 3-16 Details of Groundwater Quality Monitoring Locations

Station Distance (km) from Azimuth Location Code Project boundary Directions GW1 Project Site Within Site GW2 Paradwipgarh 4.41 NNE GW3 Dochhaki 4.08 NE GW4 Musharhia 6.9 NE GW5 Paradwip (Coast Guard) 4.91 E GW6 Dhinkia 2.11 W GW7 Sunadiakandha 2.46 W GW8 Gandakipur 3.35 NNW

269 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 3-26 Map showing the groundwater monitoring locations

270 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Table 3-17 Ground Water Monitoring Results Drinking water Paradwi Project Paradwi Dochha Musharh Sunadia Gandakipu Standard (IS p (Coast Dhinkia S. Site pgarh ki ia kandha r 10500: 2012) Guard) N Parameters Unit Accep Permi o table ssible GW1 GW2 GW3 GW4 GW5 GW6 GW7 GW8 Limit Limit Haze BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ (LOQ 1. Colour 5 15 n (LOQ 1) (LOQ 1) (LOQ 1) (LOQ 1) (LOQ 1) (LOQ 1) (LOQ 1) 1) BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ (LOQ 2. Turbidity NTU 1 5 15 (LOQ 1) (LOQ 1) (LOQ 1) (LOQ 1) (LOQ 1) (LOQ 1) 1) 3. pH -- 6.5-8.5 NR 8.21 7.02 7.35 7.51 7.57 7.12 7.39 7.28 µS/c 4. Conductivity - - 1269 745 1084 987 663 1175 1352 1201 m Total Dissolve 5. mg/l 500 2000 785 474 679 609 406 760 868 779 Solids Total 6. Suspended mg/l - - 2 3 34 5 3 6 5 4 Solids Alkalinity as 7. mg/l 200 600 151 148 175 230 117 199 259 186 CaCO3

271 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

CaCO3 9. Sodium as Na mg/l - - 121 45 89 62 51 102 131 112 Potassium as 10. mg/l - - 16 3 12 9 4 10 15 14 K 11. Calcium as Ca mg/l 75 200 52.41 60.12 58.12 48.1 31.86 61.3 62.32 54.2 Magnesium as 12. mg/l 30 100 29.06 33.8 31.3 29.16 15.31 26.71 35.26 31.74 Mg 13. Chloride as Cl mg/l 250 1000 251.21 94.03 182.31 128.69 104.14 209.32 229.36 226.42

14. Sulphate SO4 mg/l 200 400 108.31 42.47 73.16 32.03 41.92 86.26 52.75 90.54

15. Nitrate as NO3 mg/l 45 NR 4.8 3.5 3.9 5.1 4.1 3.9 6 4.6

16. Phosphate PO4 mg/l - - 0.71 4.42 0.08 0.09 0.11 0.18 0.21 0.04 17. Fluorides as F 1 1.5 0.52 0.39 0.5 0.56 0.51 0.48 0.47 0.27 18. Cyanide mg/l 0.05 NR BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ (LOQ

272 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Drinking water Paradwi Project Paradwi Dochha Musharh Sunadia Gandakipu Standard (IS p (Coast Dhinkia S. Site pgarh ki ia kandha r 10500: 2012) Guard) N Parameters Unit Accep Permi o table ssible GW1 GW2 GW3 GW4 GW5 GW6 GW7 GW8 Limit Limit (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ (LOQ 19. Arsenic as As mg/l 0.01 0.05 (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ (LOQ 20. Boron as B mg/l 0.5 1.0 (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ Cadmium as BLQ (LOQ 21. mg/l 0.003 NR (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ Cd 0.001) 0.001) 0.001) 0.001) 0.001) 0.001) 0.001) 0.001) BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ Chromium as BLQ (LOQ 22. mg/l 0.05 NR (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ Cr 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 23. Copper as Cu mg/l 0.05 1.5 BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ (LOQ

273 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Drinking water Paradwi Project Paradwi Dochha Musharh Sunadia Gandakipu Standard (IS p (Coast Dhinkia S. Site pgarh ki ia kandha r 10500: 2012) Guard) N Parameters Unit Accep Permi o table ssible GW1 GW2 GW3 GW4 GW5 GW6 GW7 GW8 Limit Limit (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 24. Total Iron mg/l 0.3 NR 0.2 0.19 0.14 0.11 0.07 0.13 0.12 0.18 BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ (LOQ 25. Lead as Pb mg/l 0.01 NR (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ Manganese as BLQ (LOQ 26. mg/l 0.1 0.3 (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ Mn 0.05) 0.05) 0.05) 0.05) 0.05) 0.05) 0.05) 0.05) BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ (LOQ 27. Mercury mg/l 0.001 NR (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ 0.0005) 0.0005) 0.0005) 0.0005) 0.0005) 0.0005) 0.0005) 0.0005) BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ (LOQ 28. Nickel as Ni mg/l 0.02 NR (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01) 0.01)

274 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Drinking water Paradwi Project Paradwi Dochha Musharh Sunadia Gandakipu Standard (IS p (Coast Dhinkia S. Site pgarh ki ia kandha r 10500: 2012) Guard) N Parameters Unit Accep Permi o table ssible GW1 GW2 GW3 GW4 GW5 GW6 GW7 GW8 Limit Limit BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ Selenium as BLQ (LOQ 29. mg/l 0.01 NR (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ Se 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) 0.005) BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ (LOQ 30. Zinc as Zn mg/l 5 15 (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ (LOQ 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1) 0.1)

(Note: BLQ – Below Limit of Quantification; LOQ – Limit Of Quantification; NR – No Relaxation)

275 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

3.9.2.2 Results and Discussions A summary of analytical results are presented below:  The ground water results of the study area indicate that the pH range varies between 7.02 and 8.21. It is observed that the pH range is within the limit of IS 10500:2012.  The Total Dissolved Solids range is varied between 406mg/l –868 mg/l for the ground water, whereall the samples are well within the permissible limit of IS 10500: 2012.  The acceptable limit of the chloride content is 250mg/l and permissible limit is 1000 mg/l. The chloride content in the collected ground water samplesof the study area ranges between 94.03 mg/l – 251.21 mg/l. It is observed that all the samples are well within the permissible limit of IS 10500:2012.  The acceptable limit of the sulphate content is 200mg/l and permissible limit is 400mg/l. the sulphate content of the collected ground water samples of the study area is varied between 32.03mg/l – 108.31 mg/l.It is observed that all the samples are meeting the acceptable limit of the IS 10500: 2012.  The Total hardness ranges is between 143 mg/l – 301mg/l for ground water samples. It is observed that all the samples are well within the permissible limit of the IS 10500: 2012.

3.10 Soil as a resource and its quality As the entire district is situated at Mahanadi Deltaic region, mostly the soil is alluvial. Besides, brown soils (hydromorphic) and recently formed hydromorphic soils are also found in this district. Technically the suborder associations of the soil may be classified as Aquepts- Aquents, Fluvents-Aqueots-Aqualfs and Ochrepts-Orthents. Soil analysis was carried as per IS: 2720 methods. Soil quality monitoring locations & results are given in Table 3-18 &Table 3-19. Map showing the soil monitoring locations is given in Figure 3-27. (Source: http://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/DCHB_A/21/2111_PART_A_DCHB_JAGATSING HAPUR.pdf) Table 3-18 Soil & Sediment Quality Monitoring Locations

Location Distance (Km) Direction Location Code w.r.t project site w.r.t. project site S1 Project Site Within Site S2 Paradwipgarh 4.41 NNE S3 Dochhaki 4.08 NE

276 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Location Distance (Km) Direction Location Code w.r.t project site w.r.t. project site S4 Musharhia 6.9 NE S5 Paradwip (Coast Guard) 4.91 E S6 Dhinkia 2.11 W S7 Sunadiakandha 2.46 W S8 Gandakipur 3.35 NNW

277 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 3-27 Map showing the soil monitoring locations

278 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Table 3-19 Soil & Sediment Quality Monitoring Results

Paradwi Project Paradwipg Sunadiakandh Gandakipu S.N Parameter Dochhaki Musharhia p (Coast Dhinkia Units Site arh a r o s Guard) S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 Loamy Soil 1 Fine Sandy Clay Clay Clay Loam Fine sand Clay Fine sand Texture Sand 2 Sand % 80.16 51.32 12.4 1.86 38.77 91.42 38.6 88.6 3 Silt % 16.44 11.21 7.44 8.61 36.4 4.96 14.97 8.11 4 Clay % 3.4 37.47 80.16 89.53 24.83 3.62 46.43 3.29 5 pH 7.94 6.22 6.12 5.63 6.4 6.27 5.94 6.45 Electrical umhos/c 6 conductivit 236 227 196 213.6 280 210 245 195 m y Bulk 7 gm/cc 1.44 1.21 1.19 1.18 1.38 1.4 1.29 1.48 Density Cation meq/100 8 Exchange 13.62 9.87108 26.5 22.71 16.09 15.33 24.2 11.54 gm Capacity 9 Moisture % 8.31 9.12 14.06 16.2 9.53 6.81 4.77 5.23

279 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Paradwi Project Paradwipg Sunadiakandh Gandakipu S.N Parameter Dochhaki Musharhia p (Coast Dhinkia Units Site arh a r o s Guard) S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 content Organic 10 % 0.62 0.46 1.42 1.12 0.76 0.6 1.33 0.72 Carbon Organic 11 % 1.07 0.79 2.45 1.93 1.31 1.03 2.29 1.24 matter Nitrogen 12 mg/kg 253.76 216 195.6 165.42 313.8 295.3 226.35 238.3 as N Phosphoru 13 mg/kg 286.31 246.61 272.23 296.71 260.5 173.88 288.72 133.17 s 14 Potassium mg/kg 130.17 93.26 96.25 112.15 135.6 144.69 69.9 110.62 15 Calcium mg/kg 73.42 91.64 126 88.72 107.31 106.73 95.43 99.27 Magnesiu 16 mg/kg 139.66 122.6 140.21 97.05 119.06 133.4 110.08 129.6 m BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ 17 Boron mg/kg (DL 0.1) (DL 0.1) (DL 0.1) (DL 0.1) (DL 0.1) (DL 0.1) (DL 0.1) (DL 0.1) BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ BLQ 18 Cadmium mg/kg (DL 0.1) (DL 0.1) (DL 0.1) (DL 0.1) (DL 0.1) (DL 0.1) (DL 0.1) (DL 0.1)

280 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Paradwi Project Paradwipg Sunadiakandh Gandakipu S.N Parameter Dochhaki Musharhia p (Coast Dhinkia Units Site arh a r o s Guard) S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 19 Chromium mg/kg 6.27 5.89 14.55 15.62 16.24 2.98 8.52 6.13 20 Copper mg/kg 31.43 21.47 37.6 25.69 36.75 18.55 36.11 36.92 21 Manganese mg/kg 67.66 42.31 79.34 65.43 197.54 37.12 247.08 31.08 22 Zinc mg/kg 21.46 15.92 16.36 13.73 17.93 15.1 20.64 13.7 (Note:BDL: Below Detectable Limit; DL: Detectable Limit; BLQ: Below Limit of Quantification; LOQ: Limit Of Quantification)

281 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

3.10.1 Results and Discussions

Summary of analytical results  The pH of the soil samples ranged from 5.63 to 7.94. It shows that the soils are moderately acidic to moderately alkaline in nature.  Conductivity of the soil samples ranged from195 to280 μmhos/cm.  Nitrogen content ranged from 165.42 mg/kg to 313.8 mg/kg.  Phosphorous ranged from 133.17 mg/kg to 296.71 mg/kg.  Potassium content ranges from 69.9 mg/kg to 144.69 mg/kg.

3.11 Biological Environment

An ecological study of the ecosystem is essential to understand the impact of industrialization and urbanization on existing flora and fauna of the study area. Studies on various aspects of ecosystem play an important role in identifying sensitive issues for under taking appropriate action to mitigate the impact, if any. The biological study was under taken as a part of the EIA study report to understand the present status of ecosystem prevailing in the study area, to compare it with past condition with the help of available data, to predict changes in the biological environment as a result of present activities and to suggest measures for maintaining its health. Secondary information was collected to list the flora & fauna in 10 km radius.

During secondary survey, following aspects were considered for ecological studies:  Assessment of present status of flora and fauna;  Identification of rare and endangered species of plants and animals (if any);  Identification of ecologically sensitive areas within the study area;  Assessment of migratory route of wildlife (if any); and  Assessment of Aquatic Ecology with specific reference to aquatic birds.

Project site is situated near Dhenkia. In this region comprises of deciduous type forests, along the Mahanadhi river, numerous wetland and human population area. There is Mangrove forest situated towards North east of the project site but from 8.5 km from the plant area. The project area is considered as core area, whereas, 10 km radial distance for the project site is being considered as buffer area

282 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

3.11.1 Flora The information of important terrestrial Angiosperm habit such as herb, shrub, climber, grass, sedge and tree were collected from the secondary sources. Mahanadi delta once had extensive mangrove forests located at a distance 6.93km(NE) from the project site. An inventory of the list reported in the study area is given in Table 3-20. Table 3-20 List of flora reported/observed in the study area

Life IUCN S.No Scientific Name Family Local Name form Status Ulat-kombol, Hati- 1 Abroma augusta Sterculiaceae Shrub LC piola 2 Abutilon hirtum Malvaceae Herb Jopa bondha LC 3 Abutilon indicum Malvaceae Herb ─ LC 4 Acacia diadenia Mimosaceae Tree Sia-nahar LC Acanthephippium 5 Orchidaceae Herb ─ VU silhetense 6 Aegle marmelos Rutaceae Tree Beal LC 7 Aeschynomene aspera Fabaceae Shrub Kuhila, Kankula. LC 8 Albizia lebbeck Mimosaceae Tree Kothiya-koroi, Sirish. LC 9 Albizia odoratissima Mimosaceae Tree Sirolu, Koroi. LC 10 Albizia procera Mimosaceae Tree Tantari-asing, Koroi. LC Alysicarpus 11 Fabaceae Herb ─ LC bupleurifolius 12 Alysicarpus monilifer Fabaceae Herb ─ LC 13 Alysicarpus vaginalis Fabaceae Herb Chauli, Sauri LC 14 Ampelocissus latifolia Vitaceae Shrub ─ LC 15 Anacardium occidentale Annacardiaceae Tree Kaju-badam LC 16 Antiaris toxicaria Moraceae Tree Dhuna-goch LC 17 Apluda mutica Poaceae Grasses ─ LC 18 Argemone mexicana Papaveraceae Herb ─ LC 19 Argemone mexicana Fabaceae Herb siyalakanta LC 20 Aristida setacea Poaceae Grasses ─ LC 21 Arthraxon prionodes Poaceae Grasses ─ LC Artocarpus 22 Moraceae Tree kothal LC heterophyllus 23 Artocarpus hirsutus Moraceae Tree Sam LC 24 Artocarpus incisus Moraceae Tree ─ LC 25 Azadirachta indica Meliaceae Tree ─ LC 26 Bambusa bambos Poaceae Grasses ─ LC 27 Barringtonia acutangula Lecythidaceae Tree Hendol, Hinyol LC 28 Bauhinia purpurea Caesalpiniaceae Tree Og-yok,. Kurial LC 29 Bauhinia racemosa Caesalpiniaceae Tree kanchan LC 30 Bauhinia retusa Caesalpiniaceae Tree ─ LC

283 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Life IUCN S.No Scientific Name Family Local Name form Status Beilschmiedia 31 Lauraceae Tree ─ LC roxburghiana 32 Biophytum sensitivum Oxalidaceae Herb ─ LC 33 Brassica campestris Brassicacea Herb ─ LC 34 Buchanania lanzan Anacardiaceae Tree Piyal LC 35 Bulbostylis barbata Cyperaceae Sedge ─ LC 36 Bulbostylis densa Cyperaceae Sedge ─ LC 37 Bulbostylis puberula Cyperaceae Sedge ─ LC 38 Butea monosperma Fabaceae Tree bipornok LC 39 Butea parviflora Fabaceae Shrub ─ LC 40 Capparis zeylanica Capparaceae Shrub ─ LC 41 Careya arborea Lecythidaceae Tree Kumbi LC Cardiospermum 42 Sapindaceae Herb ─ LC halicacabum 43 Casearia vareca Flacourtiaceae Herb ─ LC 44 Cassia fistula Caesalpiniaceae Tree Sonaru, Sonalu. LC 45 Cayratia trifolia Vitaceae Climber ─ LC 46 Cicer arietinum Fabaceae Herb ─ LC 47 Cinamomum bejolghota Lauraceae Tree Tejpat, Mahpat, Tejpat. LC 48 Cissampelos pareira Menispermaceae Climber ─ LC 49 Cissus quadrangularis Vitaceae Climber ─ LC 50 Citrus limon Rutaceae Tree Nemu tenga. LC 51 Clematis buchananiana Ranunculaceae Climber ─ LC 52 Coelogyne trinervis Orchidaceae Herb ─ VU 53 Courtoisia cyperoides Cyperaceae Sedge ─ LC 54 Creteva magna Capparaceae Herb Barun LC 55 Crinum amoenum Amaryllidaceae Herb ─ LC 56 Crotalaria alata Fabaceae Herb ─ LC 57 Crotalaria linifolia Fabaceae Herb ─ LC 58 Crotalaria mysorensis Fabaceae Herb ─ LC 59 Crotalaria prostrata Fabaceae Herb Dhundhuni LC 60 Crotalaria verrucosa Fabaceae Herb ─ LC 61 Crypteronia paniculata Lythraceae Climber ─ LC 62 Cymbopogon flexuosus Poaceae Grasses Nemu-gondhibon. LC 63 Cynodon dactylon Poaceae Grasses ─ LC 64 Cyperus compressus Cyperaceae Sedge ─ LC 65 Dalbergia latifolia Fabaceae Tree ─ LC 66 Dalbergia sissoo Fabaceae Tree Sisu-goch. LC 67 Desmodium pulchellum Fabaceae Shrub ─ LC 68 Desmodium triquetrum Fabaceae Herb ─ LC 69 Digitaria longiflora Poaceae Grasses ─ LC 70 Dillenia indica Dilleniaceae Tree Outenga, Ou-tenga. LC

284 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Life IUCN S.No Scientific Name Family Local Name form Status 71 Drymaria diandra Caryophyllaceae Herb ─ LC 72 Euryale ferox Nymphaeaceae Herb ─ LC 73 Ficus amplissima Moraceae Tree ─ LC 74 Ficus benghalensis Moraceae Tree Barh LC 75 Ficus hispida Moraceae Tree Dimoru LC Mou-dimoru,. Jagya- 76 Ficus racemosa Moraceae Tree LC dimoru. 77 Ficus religiosa Moraceae Tree ─ LC 78 Fimbristylis miliacea Cyperaceae Sedge ─ LC 79 Garcinia lancaefolia Clusiaceae Tree Mahi thekera LC 80 Garcinia xanthochymus Clusiaceae Tree ─ LC 81 Globba sessiliflora Zingiberaceae Herb ─ LC 82 Glycosmis pentaphylla Rutaceae Tree Gin Berry LC 83 Gmelina arborea Verbenaceae Tree ─ LC 84 Gmelina asiatica Verbenaceae Shrub Gomari LC 85 Helicteres isora Sterculiaceae Shrub ─ LC 86 Kyllinga triceps Cyperaceae Sedge ─ LC Lagerstroemia 87 Lythraceae Tree Saoni. VU minuticarpa 88 Lagerstroemia speciosa Lythraceae Tree ─ LC 89 Ludwigia perennis Onagraceae Herb ─ LC 90 Ludwigia prostrata Onagraceae Herb ─ LC Malvastrum 91 Malvaceae Herb ─ LC coromandelianum 92 Mangifera indica Anacardiaceae Tree Aam, Am, Aam. LC 93 Pongamia pinnata Fabaceae Tree koroch LC 94 Portulaca oleraceae Portulacaceae Herb ─ LC 95 Portulaca quadrifida Portulacaceae Herb ─ LC 96 Pouzolzia hirta Urticaceae Herb ─ LC 97 Pseudarthria viscida Fabaceae Shrub ─ LC 98 Psidium guajava Myrtaceae Tree ─ LC 99 Pterocarpus marsupium Fabaceae Tree IndianKino, Bijasal LC 100 Pycreus stramineus Cyperaceae Sedge ─ LC 101 Schima wallichii Theaceae Tree ─ LC 102 Semecarpus anacardium Anacardiaceae Tree Bhallataka, geeru beeja LC 103 Shorea assamica Dipteroarpaceae Tree Mekoi, Mekahi. LC 104 Sida acuta Malvaceae Herb ─ LC 105 Solanum melongena Solanaceae Herb ─ LC 106 Solanum tuberosum Solanaceae Herb ─ LC 107 Soymida febrifuga Meliaceae Tree Raktarohan LC 108 Spondias pinnata Anacardiaceae Tree Amara, Amra-tenga LC 109 Stephania japonica Menispermaceae Climber ─ LC

285 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Life IUCN S.No Scientific Name Family Local Name form Status 110 Sterculia urens Sterculiaceae Tree Kulu LC 111 Sterculia sp. Sterculiaceae Tree ─ LC 112 Sterculia villosa Sterculiaceae Tree Odal, Udal. LC 113 Swietenia mahagoni Meliaceae Tree ─ LC 114 Syzygium cumini Myrtaceae Tree Jamu, kala jamu LC 115 Syzygium salicifolium Myrtaceae Tree ─ LC 116 Tectona grandis Verbenaceae Tree Segun. LC 117 Tephrosia purpurea Fabaceae Herb ─ LC 118 Terminalia chebula Combretaceae Tree ─ LC 119 Terminallia arjuna Combretaceae Tree Arjun. LC 120 Tinospora cordifolia Menispermaceae Climber ─ LC 121 Toona ciliata Meliaceae Tree Lal-poma LC 122 Trapa natans Trapaceae Herb ─ LC 123 Viscum articulatum Viscaceae Shrub ─ LC 124 Vitex negundo Verbenaceae Tree Posotiya LC

Table 3-21 List of Mangroves in the study area

Local IUCN S.No Scientific Name Family Life form Name Status 1 Acanthus ilicifolius Acanthaceae Shrub Harkancha LC 2 Acanthus volubilis Acanthaceae Shrub Harkancha EN 3 Acrostichum aureum Adiantaceae Fern Kharakhari LC 4 Bruguiera sexangula Rhizophoraceae Tree Bandari EN 5 Ceriops decandra Rhizophoraceae Tree Garana LC 6 Dolichandrone spathacea Bignoniaceae Tree Gosinga LC 7 Excoecaria agallocha Euphorbiaceae Tree Guan LC Kanika 8 Heritiera kanikensis Stercullaceae Tree Sundari EN Dhala 9 Heritiera littoralis Stercullaceae Tree Sundari EN 10 Kandelia candel Rhizophoraceae Tree Sindhuka LC 11 Rhizophora macronata Rhizophoraceae Tree Raai LC 12 Sonneratia caseolaris Sonneratiaceae Tree Orua LC 13 Xyloearpus granatum Meliaceae Tree Shishumar LC 14 Xylocarpus mekongensis Meliaceae Tree Pitamari LC (LC- Least Concern, NT- near Threatened, EN- Endangered, NA-Not yet assessed, DD -Data Deficient, VU-Vulnerable)

Source:

 Fascicles of flora of India. Botanical survey of India. https://bsi.gov.in/page/en/fascicles-of-flora-of-india

286 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

3.11.2 Fauna

The information of important terrestrial animals group such as birds, reptiles and mammals were collected from the secondary sources. An inventory of the animals has been prepared separately for mammals, reptiles and birds. List of fauna reported in the study area is given in Table 3-22. Table 3-22 List of Fauna observed in the study area

Mammals in around project site

A total of 16 species of Mammals were recorded from the secondary source

S. IUCN Scientific Name Family Name Common Name No status 1 Mus musculus Muridae Common Mouse LC 2 Funambulus pennanti Sciuridae Palm -Squirrel LC 3 Mus rattus Muridae Indian rat LC 4 Lepus nigricollis Leporidae Indian Hare LC 5 Rattus norvegicus Muridae Brown Rat LC 6 Felis catus Felidae Cat LC 7 Felis chaus Felidae Jungle Cat LC 8 Canis aureus Canidae Asiatic Jackal LC Indian Grey 9 Herpestes edwardsii Herpestidae Mongoose LC Small Asian 10 Herpestes javanicus Herpestidae Mongoose LC 11 Macaca mulatto Cercopithecidae Rhesus Macaque LC 12 Hystrix brachyura Hystricidae Porcupine LC 13 Rhizomys pruinosus Spalacidae Hoary Bamboo Rat LC Short nosed Indian 14 Cynopterus sphinx Pteropodidae fruit Bat LC Lesser Asiatic 15 Scotophilus kuhlii Vespertilionidae yellow Bat LC 16 Suncus murinus Soricidae Asian House Shrew LC

(EN-Endangered; VU-Vulnerable; NT-Near Threatened; LC- Least Concern in IUCN red list) Amphibian and reptile Diversity in around project site

A total of 36 species were referred. There are Turtle nesting sites along the Mahanadhi river mouth region. The Kujang Coast and Hetamundia Seashore Village is predominant turtle nesting area. IWPA S. No Scientific name Family IUCN schedule Amphibian

287 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

IWPA S. No Scientific name Family IUCN schedule 1 Duttaphrynus melanostictus Bufonidae LC NS 2 Megophrys parva Megophryidae LC NS 3 Microhyla ornata Microhylidae LC NS 4 Microhyla berdmorei Microhylidae LC NS 5 Hoplobatrachus tigerinus Dicroglossidae LC IV 6 Euphlyctis cyanophlyctis Dicroglossidae LC IV 7 Fejervarya teraiensis Dicroglossidae LC IV 8 Fejervarya pierrei Dicroglossidae LC IV 9 Fejervarya syhadrensis Dicroglossidae LC IV 10 Fejervarya nepalensis Dicroglossidae LC IV 11 Limnonectes khasianus Dicroglossidae DD IV 12 Amolops assamensis Ranidae DD IV 13 Amolops gerbillus Ranidae LC IV 14 Humerana humeralis Ranidae LC IV 15 Silvirana leptoglossa Ranidae LC IV 16 Clinotarsus alticola Ranidae LC IV 17 Hylarana tytleri Ranidae LC IV 18 Polypedates teraiensis Rhacophoridae LC NS 19 Philautus garo Rhacophoridae VU NS 20 Rhacophorus bipunctatus Rhacophoridae LC NS 21 Ichthyophis garoensis Ichthyophiidae DD NS 22 Ichthyophis moustakius Ichthyophiidae DD NS Reptile 23 Nilssonia hurum Tryonichidae VU I 24 Lissemys punctata Tryonichidae LC I 25 Xenochrophis piscator Tryonichidae NE II 26 Amphiesma stolata Tryonichidae NE IV 27 Enhydris enhydris Tryonichidae LC IV 28 Ptyas mucosa Tryonichidae NE II 29 Ptyas korros Tryonichidae NE IV 30 Rhabdophis subminiatus Tryonichidae LC IV 31 Chrysopelea ornata Tryonichidae NE IV 32 Psammodynastes pulverulentus Tryonichidae NE IV 33 Naja kaouthia Elapidae LC II 34 Bungarus fasciatus Elapidae LC IV 35 Trimeresurus albolabris Viperidae LC IV (S-I-Schedule-Iof Indian Wild Life Protection Act-1972; EN-Endangered; VU-Vulnerable; NT-Near Threatened; LC- Least Concern in IUCN red list) Birds Diversity in around project site

A total of 62 species of birds, belonging to 17 families, were recorded from the secondary source.

288 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Conservation S.No Common Name Scientific name status I ANATIDAE

1. Gadwall Mareca strepera LC 2. Lesser Whistling Duck Dendrocygna javanica LC 3. Eurasian Wigeon M. penelope LC 4. Baer’s Pochard Aythya baeri En 5. Common Teal Anas crecca LC 6. Mallard A. platyrhynchos LC 7. Northern Pintail A. acuta LC 8. Northern Shoveller Spatula clypeata LC 9. Red-crested Pochard Netta rufina LC 10. Ferruginous Duck A. nyroca NT 11. Garganey S. querquedula LC 12. Common Pochard A. ferina LC 13. Tufted Duck A. fuligula LC II CHARADRIIDAE

14. Northern Lapwing Vanellus vanellus LC 15. Grey-headed Lapwing V. cinereus LC 16. Red-wattled Lapwing V. indicus LC 17. Pacific Golden Plover Pluvialis fulva LC 18. River Lapwing V. duvaucelii LC 19. Little Ringed Plover Charadrius dubius LC 20. Greater Sand Plover C. leschenaultii LC III ARDEIDAE

21. Great Egret Ardea alba LC 22. Intermediate Egret A. intermedia LC 23. Little Egret Egretta garzetta LC 24. Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis LC 25. Grey Heron Ardea cinerea LC 26. Indian Pond Heron Ardeola grayii LC IV PHALACROCORACIDAE

27. Little Cormorant Microcarbo niger LC V CICONIIDAE 28. Asian Openbill Anastomus oscitans LC 29. Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus Vu VI JACANIDAE 30. Pheasant-tailed Jacana Hydrophasianus LC chirurgus 31. Bronze-winged Jacana Metopidius indicus LC VII RECURVIROSTRIDAE

32. Pied Avocet Recurvirostra avosetta LC VIII PODICIPEDIDAE

289 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Conservation S.No Common Name Scientific name status 33. Little Grebe Tachybaptus ruficollis LC 34. Great Crested Grebe Podiceps cristatus LC IX RALLIDAE

35. Common Coot Fulica atra LC 36. Purple Swamphen Porphyrio porphyrio LC X ALCEDINIDAE

37. White-throated Kingfisher Halcyon smyrnensis LC 38. Common Kingfisher Alcedo atthis LC 39. Pied Kingfisher Ceryle rudis LC 40. Ruddy Kingfisher H. coromanda LC XI MOTACILLIDAE

41. Western Yellow Wagtail Motacilla flava LC 42. White Wagtail M. alba LC 43. Citrine Wagtail M. citreola LC 44. Grey Wagtail M. cinerea LC XII LARIDAE

45. Black-headed Gull Chroicocephalus LC ridibundus 46. Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybrida LC XIII HIRUNDINIDAE

47. Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica LC XIV FALCONIDAE

50. Common Kestrel Falco tinnunculus LC XV ACCPITRIDAE

51. Pied Harrier Circus melanoleucos LC 52. Eastern Marsh Harrier C. spilonotus LC 53. Osprey Pandion haliaetus LC XVI SCOLOPACIDAE

54. Jack Snipe Lymnocryptes minimus LC 55. Common Snipe Gallinago gallinago LC 56. Marsh Sandpiper Tringa stagnatilis LC 57. Green Sandpiper T. ochropus LC 58. Wood Sandpiper T. glareola LC 59. Common Sandpiper Actitis hypoleucos LC 60. Common Green Shank T. nebularia LC 61. Little Stint Calidris minuta LC XVII ROSTRATULIDAE

62. Greater Painted-snipe Rostratula benghalensis LC

290 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

(EN-Endangered; VU-Vulnerable; NT-Near Threatened; LC- Least Concern in IUCN red list) Butterfly Diversity in around project site

A total number of 56 species of butterflies belonging to 5 families were reported. Among various families of butterflies found, Nymphalidae family was represented by 17 species followed by 16 species of Pieridae, 11 species of Lycaenidae, 5 species of Papilionoidae, 6 species of Hesperidae.

S.No Scientific Name IUCN WPA Family Papilionidae 1 Graphium doson NE - 2 Graphium agamemno NE - 3 Pachliopta aristolochiae LC - 4 Papilio demoleus NE - 5 Papilio polytes NE - Family Nymphalidae 6 Danaus genutia NE - 7 Tirumala limniace NE - 8 Parantica aglea NE Schedule II - Part II 9 Euploea core LC Schedule IV 10 Melanitis leda NE - 11 Phalanta phalantha NE - 12 Acraea terpsicore NE - 13 Phalanta phalantha NE - 14 Ariadne merione NE - 15 Ariadne ariadne NE - 16 Junonia iphita NE - 17 Junonia orithya NE - 18 Junonia atlites NE - 19 Junonia lemonias NE - 20 Junonia almana LC - 21 Hypolimnas misippus NE Schedule I - Part IV 22 Hypolimnas bolina NE - Family Pieridae 23 Catopsilia pomona NE - 24 Catopsilia pyranthe NE - 25 Eurema hecabe NE - 26 Eurema brigitta NE - 27 Eurema laeta NE - 28 Delias eucharis NE - 29 Pareronia hippia NE - 30 Ixias marianne NE - 31 Ixias pyrene NE - 32 Colotis aurora NE - 33 Colotis danae NE - 34 Colotis fausta NE -

291 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

35 Colotis amata NE - 36 Colotis vestalis NE - 37 Belenois aurota NE - 38 Cepora nerissa NE Schedule II - Part II Family Lycaenidae 39 Caleta caleta NE - 40 Castalius rosimon NE Schedule I - Part IV 41 Tarucus nara NE - 42 Euchrysops cnejus NE Schedule II - Part II 43 Catochrysops strabo NE - 45 Zizeeria karsandra LC - 46 Zizina otis NE - 47 Chilades lajus NE - 48 Freyeria putli NE - 49 Leptotes plinius NE - 50 Spindasis vulcanus NE - Family Hesperiidae 51 Borbo cinnara NE - 52 Pelopidas mathias NE - 53 Hasora chromus NE - 54 Suastus gremius NE - 55 Telicota ancilla NE - 56 Spialia galba NE -

Fish Diversity in around project site

S.No Common Name Species IUCN 1 Indian butter Cat fish Ompok bimacutatus NT 2 Rohu labeo rohita LC 3 Mrigal Cirrhinus mrigata LC 4 (Magur) Ctarias magur LC 5 Sunset Gourami Trichogaster talius LC 6 Dangila danio Danio dangita LC 7 Tiger Loach Botia dario LC 8 Devil fish Chaca chaca LC (EN-Endangered; VU-Vulnerable; NT-Near Threatened; LC- Least Concern in IUCN red list) Source :  Fauna of Mahanadi Estuary Orissa. Zoological Survey of India Calcutta. 1998. http://faunaofindia.nic.in/PDFVolumes/ess/003/index.pdf  Fauna of Orissa. Part 3. State Fauna Series 1. Zoological Survey of India. 1991 https://zsi.gov.in/App/regcenters.aspx?reg=544&link=538  Bivash Pandav, B C Choudhury and C S Kar. 1994. Sea Turtle Nesting Habitats on the Coast of Orissa1 https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Sea-Turtle-Nesting-Habitats-on-the-Coast-of- Orissa1 PandavChoudhury/8c4be98dcc768e2d89e79cf676476fac178fc451?p2df

292 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

3.11.3 Management in and around Project area

Environmental problems in the state of Odisha have been influenced partly by the increasing population, survival needs of the poor and the economic greed of the commercial interests. They are also aggravated by prevalent economic disparities and unemployment, which are deeply embedded in unsustainable patterns of production and consumption; ill-informed policies and programs; and inappropriate developing strategies. As far as the forest resources of the Near Brahmaputra valley is concerned, gap in scientific knowledge, increasing demands, lack of value addition are the main causes for which the vast potential is yet to be tapped properly and in some cases over exploited. Gap in scientific knowledge on various forest resources and products is a major problem for management of resources in the state. Although considerable amounts of revenue have been collected from forest products where local people are also directly or indirectly involved in gathering and in some cases marketing as well, but they have hardly any knowledge on the silvicultural management of various minor forest products. Except for some well-known commercial species, the information on distribution of various forest products, their density, regeneration status, yield estimate and harvesting levels are lacking. There is need to formulate sound management plan that addresses the knowledge about the life cycle pattern of the species, productivity and yield estimation techniques. Monitoring and maintaining of the complex ecosystem is important aspect of bioresource management. Technical aspects include choice between different methods and techniques and development of appropriate harvesting and processing technologies. There is also social aspect of resource management that deal with people, cultures, belief systems, attitudes and behaviour, ethics, aspirations and social values. As far as the state of Odisha is concerned, all these aspects should be taken into consideration prior to the formulation of management strategies. Finally, exercise of administrative power in another important aspect to hold control over users of resources and decision-making. For reclamation of degraded forest lands and riparian sites, plantation and ecorestoration programme may be initiated with prioritize species in relation to ecoregion/ agro-climatic zones. In riparian sites plantation of bamboo and various species of grass can be initiated to check erosion. Eco-sensitive zones in the valley should be demarcated and regulations may be imposed on developmental projects like mega dams, industrial activities, 34 quarrying and mining in such areas are other important measures of conservation may be initiated.

293 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Updation of the database on floristic diversity in terms of species, ecosystems & genetic traits with reference to status, pressures and also in regard to changing climate are other issues of resource management. Source: 1. List of Schedule Species http://wiienvis.nic.in/Database/ScheduleSpeciesDatabase_7969.aspx

3.11.4 Summary a.Flora  There is a vulnerable herbs in the study area i.e., named Acanthephippium silhetense and Coelogyne trinervis  There is a vulnerable tree in the study area i.e., named Lagerstroemia minuticarpa  There is a endangered Shrub Mangrove in the study area i.e., named Acanthus volubilis Wall  There are three endangered Tree Mangrove in the study area i.e., named Bruguiera sexangula, Heritiera kanikensis Majumdar and Heritiera littoral is Dryand b.Fauna  There is a vulnerable Amphibian in the study area i.e., named Philautus garo (Boulenger 1919)  There is a endangered bird in the study area i.e., named Baer’s Pochard  There is a vulnerable bird in the study area i.e., named Lesser Adjutant  There is a near threatened fish in the study area i.e., named Indian butter Cat fish  There are two Schedule-I Species in study area i.e., reptiles named Nilssoniahurum (Gray 1831) and Lissemyspunctata (Bonnaterre 1789) habitats.  There are two numbers of Schedule-I-Part-IV in study area i.e., Hypolimnas misippus and Castalius rosimon

Summary on Flora in the Study area Data Near Not yet Least Endange Vulnera Critically Deficien Threatene assessed Concern red ble Endangered t d Trees — — 65 3 — 1 — Grasses — — 7 — — — — Herbs — — 33 — — 2 — Shrubs — — 11 1 — — — Climber — — 7 — — — —

294 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Sedges — — 8 — — — — Fern __ __ 1 ______

Summary on Fauna in the Study area Data Least Near Not yet Endange Vulnera Near Deficien Concer Threaten assessed red ble Threatened t n ed Mammals — — 16 — — — — Reptiles — — 6 — — 1 6 Amphibians — 4 17 — — 1 — Butterfly 52 — 4 — — — — Birds — — 59 1 1 1 — Fish — — 7 — 1 — —

3.12 Socio Economic Profile In terms of population per Sq.Km Jagatsinghapur is 2nd densely populated district in the state. The population of the district is 11,36,971 which comprise of 5,77,865 male and 5,59,106 female populations. Source: (Census 2011)

3.12.1 Socio Economic Profile of PIA District

In Jagatsinghapur district 29.2% of the people does not have house, 89.9% of people uses firewood for cooking, 47.3% of people uses kerosene for lighting and 45.9% of people are landless

Source:

 People’s Audit of Health, Education and Livelihood- Survey Report of Odisha, 2012- http://phdmaodisha.nic.in/Reports/HDRS/PaheliReport-Odisha-2009-10-2012.pdf

3.12.1.1 Socio Economic Aspects A socio-economic study was undertaken in assessing aspects which are dealing with social and cultural conditions, and economic status in the study area. The study provides information such as demographic structure, population dynamics, infrastructure resources, and the status of human health and economic attributes like employment, per-capita income, agriculture, trade, and industrial development in the study area. The study of these characteristic helps in identification, prediction and evaluation of impacts on socio-economic and parameters of human interest due to proposed project developments. The parameters are:

295 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

 Demographic structure  Infrastructure Facility  Economic Status  Health status  Cultural attributes  Awareness and opinion of people about the project and Industries in the area. Table 3-23 shows some important Social Indicators of Jagatsinghapur District. Table 3-23 Social Indicators of Jagatsinghapur District

S.No Social Indicators Jagatsinghapur District 1 Decadal variation % 7.5 2 Urban population % 10.20 3 Sex ratio 968 4 0-6 age group % 9.11 5 Population density (Persons per square Km) 682 6 Scheduled caste population % 21.8 7 Scheduled tribe population % 0.7 8 Literacy rate % 86.59 9 Work Participation rate % 35.5 10 Main Workers % 25.52 11 Marginal Workers % 9.98 12 Cultivators % 27.58 13 Agricultural labourers % 27.33 14 Workers in household industries % 4.05 15 Other workers % 41.04

Source: http://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/2111_PART_B_DCHB_JAGATSINGHAPUR.p df

3.12.1.2 Population and Household Size The total population of the district as per 2011 Census is 11,36,971. Of the total population, 5,77,865 are males and 5,59,106 are females. The population of the district is further

296 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report distributed as 10,20,991 living in rural areas and 1,15,980 living in urban areas. The total number of households in the Jagatsinghapur district is 2,60,846.

Source: http://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/2111_PART_B_DCHB_JAGATSINGHAPUR.p df

3.12.1.3 Sex Ratio The sex ratio is defined as number of females to 1000males. According to 2011 Census, the sex ratio of the district is 968. The sex ratio of the rural and urban areas of Jagatsinghapur district is 976 and 900 respectively. The 0-6 age group sex ratio is 9.11 for the district. Source: http://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/2111_PART_B_DCHB_JAGATSINGHAPUR.p df

3.12.1.4 Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Total Scheduled Castes (SCs) population reported in the district is 2,48,152 persons, constituting about 21.83 percent of total population of the district. Total Scheduled tribe population reported in the district is 7,862 persons constituting about 0.69 percent of total population. Source: http://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/2111_PART_B_DCHB_JAGATSINGHAPUR.p df

3.12.1.5 Education & Literacy The study of the education and literacy profile in the region is relevant in order to have an understanding whether the proposed project can utilize skilled human resources available within the area. According to 2011 census data, the literacy rate in the Jagatsinghapur district is 86.59 %. The literacy rate has been the major determinant of the rise or fall of the other indicators. The accessibility of Primary and Upper Primary education has increased the literacy rate as well as reducing the dropout rate. Table 3-24 Shows the details of education infrastructures in Jagatsinghapur District.

297 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Table 3-24Education Infrastructures in the Jagatsinghapur District

Total schools Rural Schools Type of school Government Private Government Private Primary 906 34 886 32 Primary + Upper Primary 361 89 346 81 P + UP+ Secondary + Higher Secondary 1 2 0 1 UP only 67 66 67 66 UP + Secondary + Higher Secondary 0 0 0 0 P + UP + Secondary 8 14 8 9 UP + Secondary 161 128 153 126

(Source: District Information Systems on Education (DISE report card 2016-17))

3.12.1.6 Health Facilities Primary Health Centers (PHCs) and Health Sub-centers (HSCs) are providing the preventive, curative and rehabilitative health care services to the rural people. The district has good number of public health systems accessible and affordable apart from the private health facilities. The Health Facilities given in Table 3-25. Table 3-25 Medical Facilities available in JagatsinghapurDistrict

Name of Type Facilities As on 11th June 2019 the of Total Facility Active Facilities District Facili Total Publi Priva Urb Rur Total Pub Priva Urb Rur ty [(A+B c [A] te [B] an al [(A+B lic te [B] an al ) or [C] [D] ) or [A] [C] [D] (C+D) (C+D) ] ] Jagatsin SC 189 189 0 0 189 189 189 0 0 189 ghapur PHC 37 37 0 0 37 35 35 0 0 35 CHC 12 11 1 1 11 12 11 1 1 11 SDH 0 0 0 0 0 DH 2 2 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 1 Total 240 239 1 1 239 237 236 1 1 236

298 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

(Note: SC – Sub Center; PHC – Primary Health Center; CHC – Community Health Center; SDH – Sub District Hospital; DH – District Hospital) (Source: National Health Mission, as on June 11, 2019)

3.12.1.7 Employment and Livelihood The relevance of economic activity and livelihood pattern is important in the context of the study since depending on the existing situation one can predict the impact of the project activity on the economy of the region. In Jagatsinghapur district, as per the Census 2011, there were a total of 4,03,649 workers, comprising 1,11,320 cultivators, 1,10,323 agricultural labourers, 16,357 house hold Industry workers and 1,65,649 other workers. A vast majority of the people living in rural areas mainly depend on agriculture and animal husbandry for their livelihood. Source: http://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/2111_PART_B_DCHB_JAGATSINGHAPUR.p df

3.12.2 Socio Economic Profile of study area

Social Economic Profile of the study area

The project area comes under the Jagatsinghapur District of Odisha. Table 3-26 provides the details on population profile within study area. Table 3-27 show the socio-economic indicator within the study area.

299 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Table 3-26 Population profile within study area

Population Scheduled Scheduled Total Total Total Sl. No of in the age Sex Castes Tribes Name Population Population Population No Households group 0-6 ratio Population Population Person Male Female Person Person Person Jagatsinghapur 1 Abhayachandapur 8 28 13 15 5 1154 0 12 2 Aganasi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Alligarh 122 506 269 237 39 881 0 0 4 Anantapur 103 405 200 205 29 1025 110 0 5 Badabandha 196 889 460 429 90 933 98 6 6 Badagabapur 279 1193 623 570 113 915 152 0 7 Bagadia 544 2736 1422 1314 293 924 887 0 8 Bagoi 405 1970 1006 964 184 958 182 0 9 Baharatari 32 140 72 68 10 944 40 1 10 Baidigadi 52 227 115 112 23 974 5 29 11 Balarampur 1143 5464 2838 2626 521 925 1247 0 12 Baleipur 150 680 358 322 38 899 51 0 13 Balia 361 1681 828 853 180 1030 233 0 14 Balidia 386 1972 989 983 228 994 66 4

300 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Population Scheduled Scheduled Total Total Total Sl. No of in the age Sex Castes Tribes Name Population Population Population No Households group 0-6 ratio Population Population Person Male Female Person Person Person 15 Balitutha 297 1231 598 633 138 1059 320 0 16 Bamadeipur 710 3161 1592 1569 346 986 919 3 17 Banapatakandha 135 631 332 299 45 901 57 0 18 Barabelari 28 133 61 72 24 1180 0 0 19 Baradakandha 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 Baulanga 300 1429 738 691 134 936 196 1 21 Bayanalkandha 43 186 98 88 18 898 104 0 22 Bhitarasrichandanpur 59 295 150 145 28 967 48 0 23 Bhutumundai 850 3933 2035 1898 422 933 811 4 24 Boitarakuda 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 Chadeigahanjharakati 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 Chakradharpur 180 851 432 419 94 970 198 4 27 Chakulia 104 474 245 229 49 935 1 0 28 Chatua 366 1577 809 768 165 949 239 1 29 Chaukimatha 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 Chauliapalanda 6 30 13 17 6 1308 0 0

301 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Population Scheduled Scheduled Total Total Total Sl. No of in the age Sex Castes Tribes Name Population Population Population No Households group 0-6 ratio Population Population Person Male Female Person Person Person 31 Chhatarakandha 124 524 268 256 64 955 0 0 32 Dagan 189 813 388 425 68 1095 337 0 33 Dhinkia 832 4141 2114 2027 365 959 1649 2 34 Gandakipur 1310 5925 3025 2900 591 959 4305 1 35 Garhkujang 455 2082 1031 1051 242 1019 1247 0 36 Ghodamara 121 593 309 284 58 919 359 0 37 Gobinda Pur 512 2153 1060 1093 164 1031 434 0 38 Guamunda 200 795 413 382 70 925 50 0 39 Jaganathapur 90 385 209 176 34 842 4 0 40 Jamukana 167 680 330 350 69 1061 358 0 41 Jhimani 595 2963 1502 1461 314 973 502 3 42 Kaduapalli-kandha 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 Kansaripatia 5 9 4 5 0 1250 5 0 44 Karatutha 258 1142 562 580 103 1032 185 0 45 Katakulla 182 890 464 426 84 918 42 0 46 Katha-ada 107 417 243 174 35 716 41 0

302 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Population Scheduled Scheduled Total Total Total Sl. No of in the age Sex Castes Tribes Name Population Population Population No Households group 0-6 ratio Population Population Person Male Female Person Person Person 47 Keruadia-kandha 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 Kothi 425 2074 1063 1011 187 951 361 0 49 Kujang 38443 176065 90027 86038 17500 956 41187 462 50 Mahakaldia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 Mangarajpur 724 3314 1674 1640 309 980 1647 0 52 Mirigidiakandha 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 Musadia 810 2852 1625 1227 387 755 186 27 54 Naladia Palanda 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 Narendrapur 319 1442 750 692 151 923 478 0 56 Niharuni 72 314 160 154 44 963 52 0 57 Nimidhihi 261 1371 704 667 163 947 151 5 58 Noliasahi 191 780 406 374 101 921 0 0 59 Nuagan 1248 5185 2674 2511 424 939 547 0 60 Nuagarh 525 2565 1282 1283 309 1001 236 0 61 Panigadiakandha 4 12 6 6 1 1000 3 0 62 Paradipgarh (CT) 1006 4790 2425 2365 505 975 1807 48

303 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Population Scheduled Scheduled Total Total Total Sl. No of in the age Sex Castes Tribes Name Population Population Population No Households group 0-6 ratio Population Population Person Male Female Person Person Person 63 Paradip(M) 17485 68585 37300 31285 7403 846 7167 2924 64 Parapada 71 360 189 171 35 905 86 0 65 Parianga 152 625 313 312 72 997 113 0 66 Patapur 147 752 401 351 63 875 58 14 67 Pitambarpur 143 680 343 337 77 983 32 0 68 Polanga 96 396 216 180 72 833 24 21 69 Potak 81 356 193 163 30 845 43 0 70 Purusotampur 127 560 276 284 38 1029 253 0 71 Raghunathpur 515 2527 1266 1261 202 996 554 0 72 Rajapur 157 669 298 371 65 1245 321 0 73 Rangiagarh 430 2068 1072 996 237 929 429 12 74 Ranipada 98 439 227 212 39 934 8 0 75 Raulapada 44 185 98 87 23 888 75 0 76 Sahada 264 1115 522 593 115 1136 253 0 77 Saharadia 303 1447 739 708 156 958 366 0 78 Sandhapur 154 784 385 399 92 1036 19 0

304 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Population Scheduled Scheduled Total Total Total Sl. No of in the age Sex Castes Tribes Name Population Population Population No Households group 0-6 ratio Population Population Person Male Female Person Person Person 79 Santara 338 1683 872 811 166 930 437 0 80 Siju 303 1531 776 755 172 973 219 0 81 Srirampur 155 747 386 361 68 935 93 0 82 Sunadiakandha 96 509 245 264 96 1078 0 0 83 Tentulia 296 1284 661 623 84 943 165 0 84 Tentuliakhamar 320 1403 733 670 138 914 313 0 85 Trilochanpur 554 2803 1436 1367 250 952 935 0 86 Uchhabanandpur 157 908 467 441 102 944 72 0 87 Udayabata 449 1953 1008 945 291 938 111 11 Kendrapara 88 Akhadasali 35 174 89 85 26 955 6 0 89 Chhanda 214 998 517 481 109 930 41 0 90 Gararomita 454 1953 977 976 219 999 507 0 91 Kankadia 61 290 143 147 30 1028 15 0 92 Khurusia 278 1068 550 518 87 942 33 0 93 Khurusiapat 120 456 230 226 50 983 124 0

305 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Population Scheduled Scheduled Total Total Total Sl. No of in the age Sex Castes Tribes Name Population Population Population No Households group 0-6 ratio Population Population Person Male Female Person Person Person 94 Koratapanga 240 1076 550 526 84 956 211 0 95 Lunia 21 95 45 50 6 1111 0 0 96 Nalitajori Pal 33 168 78 90 34 1154 0 0 97 Nandanpur 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98 Paunsiapal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 99 Rajendra Nagar 32 158 79 79 24 1000 41 0 100 Subala 209 1067 565 502 105 888 20 8 101 Taradeipur 4 19 13 6 2 462 0 0 102 Tekarapanga 169 736 387 349 75 902 49 0

Total 80839 358725 185659 173066 36501 932 75330 3603 (Source: Census 2011)

306 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Table 3-27 Summary of Socioeconomic indicators within the study area

S.No Particulars Study Area Unit 1 Number of villages and Town in the Study Area 102 Nos. 2 Total Households 80839 Nos. 3 Total Population 358725 Persons 4 Children Population (0-6 Years Old) 36501 Persons 5 SC Population 75330 Persons 6 ST Population 3603 Persons

7 Total Working Population 118859 Persons

8 Main Workers 95224 Persons

9 Marginal Workers 23635 Persons

10 Cultivators 27679 Persons

11 Agricultural Labourers 18768 Persons

12 Household Industries 5087 Persons

13 Other Workers 67325 Persons

14 Literates population 279756 Persons (Source: Census 2011)

3.12.2.1 Employment and livelihood

Economic vibrancy in area is shown by the type and nature of the occupation available in the area. Of the total working population, the majority is the main workers i.e. they have steady job more than six months per annum. It is due to the industrialization in the area. The job opportunity is due to the development of Industrial and Service sectors. Table 3-28 shows the classification of workers within the study area.

Table 3-28 Classification of workers within study area

Type of workers Main Marginal 1 Cultivators 23443 4236 2 Agri. Labourers 11076 7692 3 Household Industries 3422 1665

307 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

4 Others 57283 10042 Total 95224 23635 (Source: Census 2011)

3.12.2.2 Educational infrastructure within study area

The district has good primary and secondary education infrastructure in urban and rural areas. The people around the study area have well connected to educational infrastructures. Table 3-29 shows the literates population.

308 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Table 3-29 Details of Literacy population in the study area

Total Literates Literates Literates Sl. Illiterate Illiterate Illiterate Name Population Population Population Population No Persons Male Female Person Person Male Female Jagatsinghapur 1 Abhayachandapur 28 13 7 6 15 6 9 2 Aganasi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Alligarh 506 437 249 188 69 20 49 4 Anantapur 405 319 170 149 86 30 56 5 Badabandha 889 752 407 345 137 53 84 6 Badagabapur 1193 967 530 437 226 93 133 7 Bagadia 2736 1985 1135 850 751 287 464 8 Bagoi 1970 1582 868 714 388 138 250 9 Baharatari 140 123 64 59 17 8 9 10 Baidigadi 227 167 88 79 60 27 33 11 Balarampur 5464 4438 2434 2004 1026 404 622 12 Baleipur 680 561 318 243 119 40 79 13 Balia 1681 1251 674 577 430 154 276 14 Balidia 1972 1506 809 697 466 180 286 15 Balitutha 1231 970 501 469 261 97 164

309 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Total Literates Literates Literates Sl. Illiterate Illiterate Illiterate Name Population Population Population Population No Persons Male Female Person Person Male Female 16 Bamadeipur 3161 2362 1282 1080 799 310 489 17 Banapatakandha 631 538 296 242 93 36 57 18 Barabelari 133 87 52 35 46 9 37 19 Baradakandha 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 Baulanga 1429 1148 618 530 281 120 161 21 Bayanalkandha 186 130 75 55 56 23 33 22 Bhitarasrichandanpur 295 231 126 105 64 24 40 23 Bhutumundai 3933 3001 1676 1325 932 359 573 24 Boitarakuda 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 Chadeigahanjharakati 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 Chakradharpur 851 720 383 337 131 49 82 27 Chakulia 474 410 219 191 64 26 38 28 Chatua 1577 1220 665 555 357 144 213 29 Chaukimatha 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 Chauliapalanda 30 22 10 12 8 3 5 31 Chhatarakandha 524 407 226 181 117 42 75 32 Dagan 813 597 299 298 216 89 127

310 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Total Literates Literates Literates Sl. Illiterate Illiterate Illiterate Name Population Population Population Population No Persons Male Female Person Person Male Female 33 Dhinkia 4141 3181 1750 1431 960 364 596 34 Gandakipur 5925 4349 2410 1939 1576 615 961 35 Garhkujang 2082 1564 817 747 518 214 304 36 Ghodamara 593 443 238 205 150 71 79 37 Gobinda Pur 2153 1805 922 883 348 138 210 38 Guamunda 795 624 341 283 171 72 99 39 Jaganathapur 385 313 179 134 72 30 42 40 Jamukana 680 499 259 240 181 71 110 41 Jhimani 2963 2166 1187 979 797 315 482 42 Kaduapalli-kandha 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 Kansaripatia 9 7 3 4 2 1 1 44 Karatutha 1142 919 472 447 223 90 133 45 Katakulla 890 702 390 312 188 74 114 46 Katha-ada 417 332 194 138 85 49 36 47 Keruadia-kandha 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 Kothi 2074 1644 909 735 430 154 276 49 Kujang 176065 138868 75374 63494 37197 14653 22544

311 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Total Literates Literates Literates Sl. Illiterate Illiterate Illiterate Name Population Population Population Population No Persons Male Female Person Person Male Female 50 Mahakaldia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 Mangarajpur 3314 2668 1432 1236 646 242 404 52 Mirigidiakandha 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 Musadia 2852 2205 1334 871 647 291 356 54 Naladia Palanda 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 Narendrapur 1442 1173 640 533 269 110 159 56 Niharuni 314 221 118 103 93 42 51 57 Nimidhihi 1371 1053 575 478 318 129 189 58 Noliasahi 780 441 273 168 339 133 206 59 Nuagan 5185 4143 2262 1881 1042 412 630 60 Nuagarh 2565 2003 1056 947 562 226 336 61 Panigadiakandha 12 10 6 4 2 0 2 62 Paradipgarh (CT) 4790 3709 1998 1711 1081 427 654 63 Paradip(M) 68585 52575 30069 22506 16010 7231 8779 64 Parapada 360 288 162 126 72 27 45 65 Parianga 625 488 271 217 137 42 95 66 Patapur 752 560 326 234 192 75 117

312 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Total Literates Literates Literates Sl. Illiterate Illiterate Illiterate Name Population Population Population Population No Persons Male Female Person Person Male Female 67 Pitambarpur 680 547 297 250 133 46 87 68 Polanga 396 248 153 95 148 63 85 69 Potak 356 286 161 125 70 32 38 70 Purusotampur 560 430 230 200 130 46 84 71 Raghunathpur 2527 2158 1134 1024 369 132 237 72 Rajapur 669 465 240 225 204 58 146 73 Rangiagarh 2068 1615 879 736 453 193 260 74 Ranipada 439 367 199 168 72 28 44 75 Raulapada 185 144 79 65 41 19 22 76 Sahada 1115 836 426 410 279 96 183 77 Saharadia 1447 1025 577 448 422 162 260 78 Sandhapur 784 636 325 311 148 60 88 79 Santara 1683 1351 731 620 332 141 191 80 Siju 1531 1195 658 537 336 118 218 81 Srirampur 747 622 328 294 125 58 67 82 Sunadiakandha 509 328 185 143 181 60 121 83 Tentulia 1284 1095 594 501 189 67 122

313 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Total Literates Literates Literates Sl. Illiterate Illiterate Illiterate Name Population Population Population Population No Persons Male Female Person Person Male Female 84 Tentuliakhamar 1403 1008 565 443 395 168 227 85 Trilochanpur 2803 2135 1156 979 668 280 388 86 Uchhabanandpur 908 640 359 281 268 108 160 87 Udayabata 1953 1308 719 589 645 289 356 Kendrapara 88 Akhadasali 174 135 75 60 39 14 25 89 Chhanda 998 788 426 362 210 91 119 90 Gararomita 1953 1468 798 670 485 179 306 91 Kankadia 290 249 123 126 41 20 21 92 Khurusia 1068 867 476 391 201 74 127 93 Khurusiapat 456 331 187 144 125 43 82 94 Koratapanga 1076 839 466 373 237 84 153 95 Lunia 95 80 38 42 15 7 8 96 Nalitajori Pal 168 124 64 60 44 14 30 97 Nandanpur 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98 Paunsiapal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 99 Rajendra Nagar 158 108 63 45 50 16 34

314 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

TOTAL 358725 279756 153665 126091 78969 31994 46975 (Source: Census 2011)

315 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

3.12.2.3 Dwelling within study area

Due to industrialization in nearby area and various Government Schemes, the standard of dwelling place has improved.

3.12.2.4 Health facilities within the study area

The majority of people visit nearby Hospitals/health services provided by the Government. The area has got good public health facilities at easily reachable distances. Even for any minor ailments they contact medical facilities immediately as it is very accessible to them. The local transport facilities and the communication facilities are the main reasons to get immediate medical attention. The emergency medical service facility “108” is very familiar and being used by the people in this area. The incidents of institutional delivery are high due to awareness, education, economic development, proximity to health delivery system. The Infant mortality rate and the maternal mortality rate have significantly reduced.

Table 3-30 Health facilities available in the study area

Sl.No Type Study area 1 Community health centre 3 2 Primary health centre 0 3 Primary health sub-centre 25 4 Maternity and Child Welfare Centre 2 5 TB hospital/Clinic 2 6 Hospital Allopathic 7 7 Hospital Alternative Medicine 2 8 Dispensary 4 9 Veterinary hospital 4 10 Mobile health clinic 1 11 Family Welfare Centre 4 Non Government Medical facilities 12 5 Out Patient (Source: Census 2011)

316 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

3.12.3 Observations

The public has mixed responses of industrialization in the study area. The people near to the site are very apprehensive about the developments of refinery. The people of villages away from the site are welcoming the industrialization as it provides job opportunities and good infrastructure developments.

The total population of the district as per 2011 Census is 11,36,971. Of the total population, 5,77,865 are males and 5,59,106 are females. The population of the district is further distributed as 10,20,991 living in rural areas and 1,15,980 living in urban areas. The total number of households in the Jagatsinghapur district is 2,60,846.According to 2011 census data, the literacy rate in the Jagatsinghapur district is 86.59 %.According to 2011 Census, the sex ratio of the district is 968.The 0-6 age group sex ratio is 9.11 for the district. In Jagatsinghapur district, 29.2% of the people do not have houses, 89.9% of people uses firewood for cooking, 47.3% of people uses kerosene for lighting and 45.9% of people are landless. This project will provide better socio-economic benefits by providing direct and indirect employment.

317 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

CHAPTER 4 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES

318 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

4 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES 4.1 Introduction

One of the important components in the process of environmental impact assessment is identification of significant impacts as it leads to other elements such as quantification and evaluation of impacts. Any change in environment whether adverse or beneficial, wholly or partially, resulting from impacting activity is called Environmental Impact. Each individual activity with respect to each environmental parameter will have its own impact potential. Proposed project activities will be carried out in such a way so that potential adverse/negative impacts are avoided, wherever possible. While for remaining impacts which are inevitable, practicable mitigation measures will be recommended to minimize the adverse impacts.

The prediction of impacts helps to develop and implement mitigation measures/environment management plan in such a way that the developmental activity will minimize the deterioration of environmental quality.

4.2 Proposed Project Activities

The proposed project will have impacts on environment during the tenure of two phases; i.e. construction phase and operation phase.

4.3 Construction Phase

Construction phase of the proposed project is temporary and will mainly involve the following generic construction activities

 Excavation  Formwork & concreting  Material handling and Transportation  Use of Tools and Potable power tools  Scaffolding  Crane Usage  Mechanical Equipment’s  Working in confined space

319 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

4.3.1 Impacts during Construction Phase

As the main impacts of the construction phase are envisaged in terms of air pollution only, this natural mitigation would be significantly helpful in elimination of predicted impacts of the phase. The overall impact of the pollution on the environment during construction phase is localised in nature, reversible and is for a short period . However, the following principal major impacts to the environment are considered for further planning of mitigation measures:  The use of automobiles and machinery during construction can deteriorate the air quality and generate temporary emission.  The use of automobiles and machinery generates noise pollution from construction activities.  The irregular working hours, & traffic, night-working, flood-lighting and transportation damage the socioeconomic balance of surrounding region.  Effects may occur due to the accumulation of the contaminant in water resources & soil due to uptake of construction material.  Short term heavy construction might cause increase in noise level  Effects on work place condition & human health due to the accidents during the construction works.  Effects on the socio-economic activity due to direct impacts or indirect impacts on socio-economic activities.

4.3.2 Mitigation Measures for Construction Phase

 The entire construction activities will be confined with the designated area inside the existing premises.  The small amount of unused construction material shall be stored in proper area to utilise further in construction activities and surplus excavated material shall be disposed of in suitable pre-identified areas.  Construction material shall be stored at adequate distance from the water storage in order to prevent any chances of accidental leakage or spillage which could pollute the water storage  Wherever required impervious lining shall be provided to the storage premises to avoid accidental mixing or mixing due to fugitive losses.  To reduce the dust generation on site wherever & whenever required water shall be

320 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

sprinkled on ground or stock pile of excavated soil.  Equipments / machineries shall be used efficiently and shall be kept shut in order to reduce air emission, noise pollution and consumption of energy resource  Emission from the equipments/machineries shall be monitored on regular basis and possible implementation shall be provided on site  Transport vehicles shall be monitored & maintained regularly to control the emission quality and fuel consumption  Provision of necessary PPEs like face mask & eye-glasses to employees /labours engaged in construction activities.  The machineries/equipment used on site shall be maintained so they do work with optimum efficiency generating less noise pollution  Operation of machineries/equipment causing high noise level shall be stopped during the night time and all such operations shall be planned for day time only.  Transportation activities shall not be conducted during the night (other than in case of emergency) to avoid high noise level in nearby villages/locality.

4.3.3 Land environment a) Impacts

The proposed process units under the PX PTA project will be implemented within M/s IOCL, PDR premises. The proposed project will be done in land area, which is identified as appropriate location based on environmental and engineering requirements. The activities carried out during the construction phase will involve a change in the land use from vacant industrial land to a built up industrial land, which will pose the following impacts on the land environment.

1. Compaction of soil and a change in the soil structure due to the use of heavy construction vehicles and machineries. 2. Removal of soil from the site. 3. Mixing of the topsoil and subsoil. 4. Dispersion of dust.

Transportation of construction material (quarry material, cement &steel, paint, bricks etc) during construction phase of the project results in use of public infrastructure like roads, railways, drainage, water and power supply which in turn results in extra burden.

321 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

During the construction phase of the project there will be short term employment generation in the form of skilled and semiskilled labours. This could be for a period of maximum 2 to 3 years but the daily wage unskilled labours employed locally. Also majority of the works will be sub-contracted. There could be several impacts due to the location of construction camp in the area where in local area will receive people from most part of the country. b) Mitigation Measures

1. Employing techniques such as restricting access during wet conditions, using protective boarding and low ground pressure machineries to minimize compaction of soil. 2. The removed soil will be properly stored for subsequent reinstatement. 3. Reuse of excess excavated material for road development, green belt development and landscaping. 4. A well designed closed depository for storage of construction materials to prevent land/soil pollution. 5. Effective stabilization of altered landforms to minimize soil erosion and the potential for water pollution (e.g. Vegetation). 6. Reuse of construction wastes such as sand, brick, gravel, cement for developing internal road and project structures.

7. Trucks with construction material susceptible for fugitive suspension will be covered with tarpaulin covers during transport of construction materials 8. Transportation management will be adopted for movement of vehicles transporting construction materials and traffic will be regulated. 9. Vehicles deployed will confirm to emission norms (air/noise) of CPCB and have validPollution Under Control(PUC) certificates 10. Very old vehicles (more than 20 years) will not be allowed at site 11. Trucks will comply with standards for exhaust emissions and noise levels.

12. To avoid/minimise impact/strain on the existing infrastructure, the worker camps will be self-sufficient and would not rely on any local resource. This would help to avoid any conflict with the local population. To mitigate impacts from health hazards, sanitation facilities will be provided

322 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

4.3.4 Air environment

In order to predict the impact of constructional and operational activities on the ambient air quality, the data on emission, micrometeorology and from Indian meteorological department (IMD)were collected. All these data will be used to predict ground level concentration of

(GLCs) of SO2, NOX and PM10 for different temporal variations. In the construction phase, activities like site clearance, site leveling, movements of workers and material, construction of road, transportation activities will generate dust, gaseous pollutants and particulate matter and affect the air quality. Other impacts include - 1. Site Preparation-fencing, boundary and clearing of site will cause disturbance to the surroundings. 2. Excavation, backfilling and leveling. 3. Hauling and dumping of earth materials and construction spoils. 4. Foundation works can cause dust generation which will decrease the air quality and it can impact the labors working. 5. Fabrication, erection of steel structures such as tanks, pipelines and sheds. 6. Construction of internal roads drains and water supply. 7. Cleaning and landscaping. 8. Emission from Construction DG & Construction Equipment’s. a) Mitigation Measures

1. Barricading the construction area and minimizing exposed areas to reduce dust generation. 2. Areas generating dust during dry weather will be sprayed with water. 3. Creation of vegetation screens to act as a barrier to dust. 4. Appropriate enclosed areas for storage of construction materials. 5. Facilitating the workers with the required personal protective equipment’s. 6. Efficient usage and maintenance of equipment’s/machineries to lower air emissions, noise pollution and consumption of energy resource. 7. Exhaust vent of DG set will be provided with adequate stack height to ensure quick dispersal of gaseous emissions. 8. Periodic monitoring and maintenance of transport vehicles to check on the quality of emission to be within permissible limits and consumption of fuel.

323 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

9. Regular inspection of construction site to ensure timely removal and disposal of construction debris to the dumping sites or for recycle/reuse.

4.3.5 Water environment a) Impacts

1. Contamination of watercourses by leakage from fuel and materials storage areas. 2. Oil and suspended solids in run-off from vehicles and access roads. 3. Use of heavy machineries and vehicles causes compaction of topsoil due to which a change in the surface water drainage pattern may occur. 4. Generation of sewage / process effluent and blow down. b) Mitigation measures

1. The water demand during the construction phase will be met from the existing Refinery water source(Mahanadi River) 2. Storehouse will be located at a distance away from the water storage area to prevent accidental release or spillage. 3. Proper management of rain water run-off during monsoon and creating bunds to utilize the rain water for construction purpose. 4. An appropriate water management system will be implemented.

4.3.6 Noise environment a) Impacts

During construction phase, the noise will mostly be produced because of building activities and machineries used for carrying out construction. Construction activities mainly involve diesel generators, laying of foundation, erection of superstructure, clearing of obstruction and trees if any from the proposed area. Activities such as construction of labor camps, onsite office, pneumatic hammers, compressors, concrete mixers, construction material plants however, do not cause significant noise pollution. But if the work continuous for longer duration, it can affect the health of local people and workers involved in the project work. b) Mitigation Measures

1. Barricading the construction site.

324 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

2. The green belt will help in reducing the noise nuisance. 3. Selection of equipment’s of high quality. 4. Proper planning and organizing of construction activities which will help in avoiding loud verbal exchanges between the intervening parties. 5. Transportation activities will be carried out only during the day and only in case of emergency, the transportation activities will be permitted in night time. 6. The vehicles used for construction activities and transportation of materials will be provided with the horn of low noise level as recommended by RTO/ concerned authorities. 7. Minimization of operation time of noisy equipment and operation of machineries/equipment that generate high levels of noise only during day time. 8. Inadequate use of plant and equipment, namely, running on full power when the work does not necessitate it will be avoided. 9. Personal protective equipment’s, education and public awareness and exposure control through rotation of work will be provided to the workers engaged in construction activities in the area generating high levels of noise.

4.3.7 Waste generation

The source of waste are metal pieces, cardboards, wooden scrap, sand gravels etc., generation of chemical waste by general site practices (e.g. vehicle and plant maintenance/servicing), municipal waste generated by site workers. a) Mitigation measures

1. Recycling/reusing/recovering materials where possible and thereby neglecting or reducing the disposal requirements. 2. Separation of construction material for reuses either to be used on onsite filling or can be used as public fill. 3. Training the staff in waste minimizing practices. 4. Chemical waste should be stored in a locked area so as to avoid leaching of harmful chemicals in the soil or nearby water bodies (If any).

325 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

4.3.8 Ecology

Except for the removal of weeds, the ecological status of the site will be well maintained by conserving/ developing the greenbelt at the site.

4.3.9 Social environment

A socio-economic study was undertaken with the help of secondary sources in assessing aspects, which are dealing with social and cultural conditions, and economic status in the study area. The study provides information such as demographic structure, population dynamics, infrastructure resources, and the status of human health and economic attributes like employment, per-capita income, agriculture, trade, and industrial development in the study area. There will be temporary employment for manpower required during construction phase available from local communities. Overall, socioeconomic effect of construction phase will be positive due to direct and indirect employment opportunities for the local population

4.4 Operation Phase From an Environmental perspective, this phase is of paramount significance due to its potential to invoke long-term impacts. The adverse effects that are likely to occur during this operational phase of the project are Air pollution (gaseous Emissions), Effluent generation, Noise Generation, Solid waste Generation etc.

4.4.1 Impacts during Operational Phase

Because of its potential to create long-term impacts, this phase is very important from the environmental impact point of view. The basic impacts like gaseous emissions, water consumption/ pollution and solid waste will have the potential to adversely affect air, water and land / soil in the vicinity of the project site.

This phase will broadly include the following direct and indirect activities / actions:

 Storage and transportation of raw materials and finished products.  Gaseous emissions  Effluent Generation, treatment and disposal  Noise Generation  Solid waste generation

326 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

4.5 Air Environment

Base line data reveals that the ambient air quality has been monitored at 8 locations for 14 parameters as per NAAQS/CPCB guidelines within the study area. The average baseline levels of PM10 (55.35 – 80.53µg/m³), PM2.5 (27.72 – 38.16µg/m³), SO2 (8.63 – 13.21µg/m³),

NO2(16.15 – 25.30µg/m³).

The nearest CPCB AAQ monitoring station is PPL Guest House in which the annual average for the year 2018: PM10 (113 µg/m³), PM2.5 (37 µg/m³), SO2(19 µg/m³), NO2(11 µg/m³). Source: https://cpcb.nic.in/displaypdf.php?id=bWFudWFsLW1vbml0b3JpbmcvTG9jYXRpb25fZGF 0YV8yMDE4LnBkZg==

All the parameters are well within the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Industrial, Commercial and Residential areas at all monitoring locations during the study period from

March 2019 - May 2019. Stack emission of PM, SOx & NOx are due to process units, Flare and DG. Adequate measures will be taken to control Air Pollution.

4.5.1 Meteorological data

The meteorological data for a month, i.e. from 01/03/2019 to 31/05/2019 was considered for the study. Data included for AERMET were daily wind speed, wind direction, temperature, relative humidity, air pressure, precipitation, and solar radiation recorded during the period. AERMET reformats meteorological data so that it can be used as input for AERMOD model.

The wind rose for the study period is given as Figure 4-1

327 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-1 Wind rose diagram of Meteorological data considered for Modelling (March to May 2019) 4.5.2 AERMET Process For the 3 phase AERMET processing of the meteorological data, specifications of the land use in the area are required to determine the terrain roughness for modelling. The land use was characterized for in and around the site. The surface characteristics for the site and surroundings were selected and used to calculate the Albedo, Bowen ratio and surface roughness parameters.

328 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

4.5.3 AERMOD Process

AERMOD Software Version 8.0.5 was used for air dispersion modelling and is applicable to a wide range of buoyant or neutrally buoyant emissions up to a range of 50 km. In addition to more straight forward cases, AERMOD is also suitable for complex terrain and urban dispersion scenarios.

AERMOD is a steady-state plume model. In the stable boundary layer (SBL), it assumes the concentration distribution to be Gaussian in both the vertical and horizontal. In the convective boundary layer (CBL), the horizontal distribution is also assumed to be Gaussian, but the vertical distribution is described with a bi-Gaussian probability density function (pdf). This behavior of the concentration distributions in the CBL was demonstrated by Willis and Deardorff (1981) and Briggs (1993). Additionally, in the CBL, AERMOD treats “plume lofting,” whereby a portion of plume mass, released from a buoyant source, rises to and remains near the top of the boundary layer before becoming mixed into the CBL. AERMOD also tracks any plume mass that penetrates into the elevated stable layer, and then allows it to re-enter the boundary layer when and if appropriate. For sources in both the CBL and the SBL AERMOD treats the enhancement of lateral dispersion resulting from plume meander. The emissions from proposed stacks are estimated and used for the air dispersion modeling as shown in Table 4-2.

Maximum incremental values for PM, SO2, NOx and CO have been represented as pictorial concentration contours and as tabular concentration values in following sections

329 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

4.5.4 Emissions Table 4-1 Existing Stack Emission details

Stack Details Emission per stack (g/s) Fuel Type Exit Flue gas S.No Stack details Temp used Height (m) Dia. (m) Velocity Flow Rate PM SO NOx CO (°C) 2 (m/s) (Nm3/hr) 1. DHDT Gas Fired 60 167 4.2 1.22 31128 0.03 0.13 1.04 0.05 Gas + Oil 2. Utility Boiler - 3 73.5 180 3 14.5 285793 0.32 0.66 7.00 0.83 Fired Gas + Oil 3. Utility Boiler - 4 73.5 180 3 14.5 285793 0.33 1.53 7.21 0.81 Fired Gas Turbine – 1- 4. Naptha 70.5 170 6 13.5 1062841 0.76 12.64 47.59 2.95 HRSG-1 HDT Reactor Feed Gas + Oil 5. 60 195 0.997 3.2 15834 0.02 0.10 0.12 0.03 Heater Fired Vacuum Charge Gas + Oil 6. 55 150 3.8 7 112108 0.07 5.57 4.21 0.82 Heater of AVU Fired 7. FCC Regenerator NA 65 226 3.5 15 320000 2.69 75.56 0.78 7.52 8. Reformer of HGU Naphtha 46.7 150 4 7.12 175222 0.004 2.02 4.60 1.60 Fresh Feed Gas + Oil 9. 62 189 2.6 10 61013 0.05 4.63 0.49 0.67 Preheater of FCC Fired 10. CCR Gas Fired 103 160 4.39 7 523959 0.06 1.43 3.50 5.20 MHC 1st Train Reactor Feed 11. Gas Fired 60 194 1.456 5.1 64717 0.07 0.36 0.37 0.32 Heater of VGO- HDT Atmospheric 12. Distillation Heater Gas Fired 60 147 2.35 6.5 15834 0.01 0.01 0.15 0.03 of VGO-HDT

330 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Stack Details Emission per stack (g/s) Fuel Type Exit Flue gas S.No Stack details Temp used Height (m) Dia. (m) Velocity Flow Rate PM SO NOx CO (°C) 2 (m/s) (Nm3/hr) Gas Turbine – 2- 13. Naptha 70.5 170 6 13.5 1062841 0.84 9.03 42.68 5.47 HRSG-2 Gas Turbine – 3- 14. Naptha 70.5 170 6 13.5 1062841 0.87 4.28 55.38 3.65 HRSG-3 Coker Heater - Gas + Oil 15. 60 190 2.9 6.2 78412 0.04 0.34 0.87 0.10 Stack-1 Fired 16. AVU-CDU Gas Fired 64 150 4.79 7 201847 0.10 7.06 3.81 1.34 Coker Heater - Gas + Oil 17. 60 190 2.9 6.2 78412 0.16 3.52 1.54 0.40 Stack-2 Fired 18. SRU Acid gas 71 316 4.5 5 106499 0.02 12.64 1.07 2.38 Charge Heater of 19. Gas Fired 70 170 2.8 7 48778 0.02 0.09 0.62 0.15 NHDT Gas + Oil 20. Utility Boiler - 1 73.5 180 3 14.5 285793 0.42 11.09 10.51 1.82 Fired Gas + Oil 21. Utility Boiler - 2 73.5 180 3 14.5 285793 0.29 17.78 5.29 2.20 Fired Total (g/s) 7.18 170.48 198.80 38.35 Note: Fuel Gas (FG) is the major fuel consumption in heaters. Only shortfall is made up with fuel Oil (FO) in dual fired heaters. In Gas Turbine, Naptha is fired and exhaust gas is utilized for steam up.

331 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

4.5.4.1 Point Source Emission (Proposed Stack Emission)

Figure 4-2 Project layout with proposed stack coordinates

332 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-3 Google earth demarcation of proposed stack with coordinates

333 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Table 4-2Proposed Stack Emission details

Stack Coordinates Flue Stack Details Emission per stack (g/s) Fuel gas S. Rate Max Stack Flow Exit N (Natura Heig . details Rate Dia. Veloc N E ht Tem PM SO2 NOx CO CO2 o l Gas) 3 (m) ity (Nm / (m) p (kg/hr) (m/s) hr) (°C) Tatory 0.025 1. 20°15'50.65" 86°35'49.49" 433 4679 43.5 180 0.97 1.8 - 0.1688 - 451.53 Furnace 7 ISOMAR 0.083 1402.3 2. 20°15'47.79" 86°35'49.57" 2747 29708 60.2 180 2.25 2.1 - 0.6052 - Furnace 3 6 0.559 9553.6 3. XFU 1 20°15'45.09" 86°35'49.64" 7594 82116 81.1 180 3.708 2.1 - 2.7983 - 7 1 0.439 7495.0 4. XFU 2 20°15'42.46" 86°35'49.51" 4840 52339 61.73 180 4.192 1.1 - 2.1955 - 6 3 Utility Boiler – 5 0.452 4.513 1.693 5. 20°15'17.16" 86°35'32.62" 19973 325061 73.5 180 3 12.8 22.575 - (Standby) 8 9 1 * 0.000 0.002 0.000 6. Flare 20°15'35.86" 86°36'11.85" 15 162 140 331 1.5 0.025 0.0113 - 2 3 8 18902. 5.624 28.354 1.693 Total (g/s) 0.453 53 5 1 9 Note: 1. The data is obtained from Section 7.1.2.1 of Detailed Feasibility Report prepared by Toyo Engineering India Pvt. Ltd. and integration of flow rate of fuel. 2. Utility Boiler -5 is standby and will be in intermittent operation only for the PTA plant start up.

334 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-4 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of PM within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on stack emission

Table 4-3 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of PM Obtained Through Modeling on stack emission Distance from UTM coordinates (m) Direction Conc. Centre of S. No from Centre (µg/m3) Project SIte E N of Project Site (~km) 1. 457316 2240086 0.10691 1 W 2. 457316 2241086 0.0997 1.41 NW 3. 457316 2239086 0.062 1.41 SW 4. 456316 2240086 0.06083 2 W 5. 457316 2242086 0.05969 2.24 NNW 6. 456316 2239086 0.05573 2.24 WSW 7. 457316 2243086 0.04934 3.16 NNW 8. 456316 2241086 0.04563 2.24 WNW 9. 455316 2240086 0.04336 3 W 10. 459316 2241086 0.04236 1.41 NE

335 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-5 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of SO2within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on stack emission

Table 4-4 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Sulphur Dioxide obtained through modeling on stack emission Distance from UTM coordinates (m) Direction Conc. Centre of S. No from Centre (µg/m3) Project SIte E N of Project Site (~km) 1. 457316 2240086 1.16123 1 W 2. 457316 2241086 1.02893 1.41 NW 3. 456316 2240086 0.8264 2 W 4. 457316 2242086 0.74074 2.24 NNW 5. 457316 2239086 0.697 1.41 SW 6. 458316 2241086 0.66865 1 N 7. 456316 2239086 0.65152 2.24 WSW 8. 457316 2243086 0.62335 3.16 NNW 9. 458316 2242086 0.57572 2 N 10. 460316 2242086 0.5419 2.82 NE

336 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-6 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of NOx within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on stack emission

Table 4-5 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of oxide of Nitrogen obtained through modeling on stack emission Distance from UTM coordinates (m) Direction Conc. Centre of S. No from Centre (µg/m3) Project SIte E N of Project Site (~km) 1. 457316 2240086 5.88927 1 W 2. 457316 2241086 5.15371 1.41 NW 3. 456316 2240086 4.18841 2 W 4. 457316 2242086 3.73953 2.24 NNW 5. 457316 2239086 3.50805 1.41 SW 6. 458316 2241086 3.43833 1 N 7. 456316 2239086 3.33455 2.24 WSW 8. 457316 2243086 3.14953 3.16 NNW 9. 458316 2242086 2.95101 2 N 10. 460316 2242086 2.74009 2.82 NE

337 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-7 Predicted 1-Hr GLC’s of CO within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on stack emission

Table 4-6 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Carbon Monoxide obtained through modeling on stack emission Distance from UTM coordinates (m) Direction Conc. Centre of S. No from Centre (µg/m3) Project SIte E N of Project Site (~km) 1. 457316 2240086 1.73122 1 W 2. 457316 2239086 1.61135 1.41 SW 3. 458316 2240086 1.54914 Project Site Project Site 4. 458316 2239086 1.49613 1 S 5. 459316 2238086 1.42198 2.24 SSE 6. 456316 2240086 1.37225 2 W 7. 456316 2239086 1.34013 2.24 WSW 8. 457316 2241086 1.26342 1.41 NW 9. 458316 2238086 1.23531 2 S 10. 459316 2237086 1.19594 3.16 SSE

338 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-8 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of CO2 within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on stack emission

Table 4-7 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Carbon Dioxide obtained through modeling on stack emission Distance from UTM coordinates (m) Direction Conc. Centre of S. No from Centre (µg/m3) Project SIte E N of Project Site (~km) 1. 457316 2241086 8099.821 1.41 NW 2. 457316 2240086 6593.569 1 W 3. 458316 2241086 5727.344 1 N 4. 458316 2242086 5090.748 2 N 5. 458316 2240086 4706.845 Project site Project site 6. 456316 2239086 4552.406 2.24 WSW 7. 457316 2242086 3899.017 2.24 NNW 8. 456316 2240086 3816.203 2 W 9. 459316 2242086 3596.204 2.24 NNE 10. 456316 2241086 3507.212 2.24 WNW

339 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

4.5.4.2 Summary on Stack Emission Maximum pollutant concentrations of PM, SO2 ,NOx and CO2observed due to proposed expansion for an 24hr-average period have been studied and CO observed due to proposed expansion for an 1hr-average period have been studied. The total increase in concentrations above baseline status to estimate the percentage increase and summarized in Error! Reference source not found.Error! Not a valid bookmark self-reference..

Table 4-8 Total Maximum GLCs from the Point Source (Stack Emissions)

Max. Estimated Max Base NAAQ Base line Incremental Total Conc. % Pollutant line standard Conc. Conc. (µg/m3) increase location (µg/m3) (µg/m3) (µg/m3) PM 95.7 0.10 95.8 100 0.10 Paradwip SO 15.7 1.16 16.86 80 7.39 2 (Coast NO 30.06 5.88 35.94 80 19.56 x Guard)- A5 CO 50* 1.73 51.73 4000 3.46 CO2 - 8099.82 8099.82 - -

Note:

1. CO2 parameter is not available for NAAQ standards 2.*Since the maximum base line concentration of CO is below detectable limit, the detectable limit of CO 50 µg/m3 is considered 3.** Max. Base line values were observed at Paradwip (Coast guard) at a distance ~4.91km, E from the project boundary

340 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

4.5.4.3 Line source emission (Transportation)

PTA Truck route R1 to R3

Start : (20°16'4.09"N, 86°35'49.05"E)

End: (20°16'30.1"N, 86°36'08.2"E)

Figure 4-9 Project layout with PTA truck Route

341 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Toluene Truck route R1 to R3

Start :(20°15'22.5"N, 86°36'27.5"E)

End : (20°16'30.1"N, 86°36'08.2"E)

Figure 4-10 Project layout with Toluene truck Route

342 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-11 Google earth demarcation of proposed truck route with coordinates

343 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Table 4-9 Proposed Transportation Emission details

No.of.Vehicle per day Emission (g/s) S. Vehicle (Based on maximum n type operation capacity) based o on BS-VI type of vehicles PM NOX CO

1 4W 5 0.000004 0.000104 0.000617

HW 1- 2 164 0.000137 0.006287 0.054667 PTA

HW 2- 3 7 0.000010 0.000447 0.003889 Toluene

Total (g/s) 0.000150 0.006838 0.059172

Note:

Coordinate of Starting Point 20°16'4.09"N, 86°35'49.05"E PTA product truck Coordinate of Ending Point 20°16'30.1"N, 86°36'08.2"E

Coordinate of Starting Point 20°15'22.5"N, 86°36'27.5"E Toluene product truck Coordinate of Ending Point 20°16'30.1"N, 86°36'08.2"E

344 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-12 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of PM within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on Transportation emission

Table 4-10 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Particulate Matter obtained through modeling on Transportation emission Distance from UTM coordinates (m) Direction Conc. Centre of S. No from Centre (µg/m3) Project SIte E N of Project Site (~km) 1. 458316 2242086 0.02742 2 N 2. 458316 2241086 0.0076 1 N 3. 457316 2243086 0.00667 3.16 NNW 4. 459316 2241086 0.00647 1.41 NE 5. 458316 2243086 0.00644 3 N 6. 458316 2240086 0.00576 Project site Project site 7. 459316 2243086 0.00537 3.16 NNE 8. 457316 2244086 0.00516 4.12 NNW 9. 459316 2242086 0.00478 2.24 NNE 10. 459316 2238086 0.00471 2.24 SSE

345 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-13 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of NOx within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on Transportation emission

Table 4-11 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of oxide of Nitrogen obtained through modeling on Transportation emission UTM coordinates (m) Distance from Direction Conc. Centre of from Centre S. No 3 E N (µg/m ) Project SIte of Project (~Km) Site 1. 458316 2242086 1.25863 2 N 2. 458316 2241086 0.34914 1 N 3. 457316 2243086 0.30618 3.16 NNW 4. 458316 2243086 0.29596 3 N 5. 459316 2241086 0.29386 1.41 NE 6. 458316 2240086 0.26452 Project site Project site 7. 459316 2243086 0.24575 3.16 NNE 8. 457316 2244086 0.23699 4.12 NNW 9. 459316 2238086 0.21644 2.24 SSE 10. 459316 2242086 0.21146 2.24 NNE

346 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-14 Predicted 1-Hr GLC’s of CO within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on Transportation emission

Table 4-12 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Carbon Monoxide obtained through modeling on Transportation emission UTM coordinates (m) Distance from Direction Conc. Centre of from Centre S. No 3 E N (µg/m ) Project SIte of Project (~Km) Site 1. 458316 2242086 78.73534 2 N 2. 459316 2242086 32.5808 2.24 NNE 3. 459316 2244086 31.26969 4.12 NNE 4. 458316 2240086 30.98063 Project site Project site 5. 458316 2241086 30.02529 1 N 6. 458316 2243086 29.31596 3 N 7. 460316 2243086 26.72553 3.60 NNE 8. 458316 2239086 26.11 1 S 9. 460316 2245086 22.94802 5.38 NNE 10. 459316 2241086 21.16236 1.41 NE

347 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

4.5.4.4 Summary on Transportation Emission Maximum pollutant concentrations of PM and NOx observed due to proposed expansion for an 24hr-average period have been studied and CO observed due to proposed expansion for an 1hr-average period have been studied. The total increase in concentrations above baseline status to estimate the percentage increase and summarized in Error! Reference source not found.Table 4-13.

Table 4-13 Total Maximum GLCs from the transportation Emissions

Max. Base Estimated NAAQ Total Conc. % Pollutant line Conc. Incremental Conc. standard (µg/m3) increase (µg/m3) (µg/m3) (µg/m3)

PM 95.7 0.02 95.72 100 0.02

NOx 30.06 1.25 31.31 80 4.16

CO 50 78.73 128.73 4000 157.46

Note: 1. * Max. Base line values were observed at Paradwip (Coast guard) at a distance ~4.91km, E from the project boundary

348 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

4.5.4.5 Cummulative Emission

Table 4-14 Proposed Cumulative Emission details (Point source emission and Line source emission)

Stack Fuel Stack Details Emission per stack (g/s) S. Coordinates Rate Flue gas N Stack details (Natural Flow Rate Exit Height Temp Dia. o N E Gas) (Nm3/hr) Velocity PM SO2 NOx CO CO2 (m) (°C) (m) (kg/hr) (m/s) 20°15'5 86°35'4 1. Tatory Furnace 433 4679 43.5 180 0.97 1.8 - 0.0257 0.1688 - 451.53 0.65" 9.49" ISOMAR 20°15'4 86°35'4 1402.3 2. 2747 29708 60.2 180 2.25 2.1 - 0.0833 0.6052 - Furnace 7.79" 9.57" 6 20°15'4 86°35'4 9553.6 3. XFU 1 7594 82116 81.1 180 3.708 2.1 - 0.5597 2.7983 - 5.09" 9.64" 1 20°15'4 86°35'4 7495.0 4. XFU 2 4840 52339 61.73 180 4.192 1.1 - 0.4396 2.1955 - 2.46" 9.51" 3 Utility Boiler – 5 20°15'1 86°35'3 5. 19973 325061 73.5 180 3 12.8 0.4528 4.5139 22.575 1.6931 - (Standby)* 7.16" 2.62" 20°15'3 86°36'1 6. Flare 15 162 140 331 1.5 0.025 0.0002 0.0023 0.0113 0.0008 - 5.86" 1.85" S. N Vehicle type No.of.Vehicle per day (Based on maximum operation capacity) PM SO2 Nox CO CO2 o 0.00000 0.0006 1 4W 5 - 0.000104 - 4 17 0.00013 0.0546 2 HW 1-PTA 164 - 0.006287 - 7 67 0.00001 0.0038 3 HW 2-Toluene 7 - 0.000447 - 0 89 18902. Total(g/s) 0.4532 5.6245 28.3609 1.7531 530

349 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-15 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of PM within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on Cummulative emission

Table 4-15 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Particulate Matter obtained through modeling on Cummulative emission UTM coordinates (m) Distance from Direction Conc. Centre of from Centre S. No E N (µg/m3) Project SIte of Project (~Km) Site 1. 457316 2240086 0.10691 1 W 2. 457316 2241086 0.09996 1.41 NW 3. 457316 2239086 0.06201 1.41 SW 4. 456316 2240086 0.06084 2 W 5. 457316 2242086 0.05972 2.24 NNW 6. 456316 2239086 0.05578 2.24 WSW 7. 457316 2243086 0.04956 3.16 NNW 8. 456316 2241086 0.0459 2.24 WNW 9. 458316 2242086 0.04455 2 N 10. 455316 2240086 0.04345 3 W

350 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-16 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of SO2 within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on Cummulative emission

Table 4-16 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Sulphur Dioxide obtained through modeling on Cummulative emission UTM coordinates (m) Distance from Direction Conc. Centre of from Centre S. No E N (µg/m3) Project SIte of Project (~Km) Site 1. 457316 2240086 1.16123 1 W 2. 457316 2241086 1.02893 1.41 NW 3. 456316 2240086 0.8264 2 W 4. 457316 2242086 0.74074 2.24 NNW 5. 457316 2239086 0.697 1.41 SW 6. 458316 2241086 0.66865 1 N 7. 456316 2239086 0.65152 2.24 WSW 8. 457316 2243086 0.62335 3.16 NNW 9. 458316 2242086 0.57572 2 N 10. 460316 2242086 0.5419 2.82 NE

351 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-17 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of NOx within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on Cummulative emission

Table 4-17 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of oxide of Nitrogen obtained through modeling on Cummulative emission UTM coordinates (m) Distance from Direction Conc. Centre of from Centre S. No 3 E N (µg/m ) Project SIte of Project (~Km) Site 1. 457316 2240086 5.89096 1 W 2. 457316 2241086 5.16561 1.41 NW 3. 456316 2240086 4.18911 2 W 4. 457316 2242086 3.74015 2.24 NNW 5. 457316 2239086 3.5088 1.41 SW 6. 458316 2241086 3.43833 1 N 7. 456316 2239086 3.33595 2.24 WSW 8. 457316 2243086 3.15945 3.16 NNW 9. 458316 2242086 3.14134 2 N 10. 460316 2242086 2.74057 2.82 NE

352 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-18 Predicted 1-Hr GLC’s of CO within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on Cummulative emission

Table 4-18 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Carbon Monoxide obtained through modeling on Cummulative emission Distance from UTM coordinates (m) Direction Conc. Centre of S. No from Centre (µg/m3) Project SIte E N of Project Site (~Km) 1. 458316 2242086 78.6934 2 N 2. 459316 2242086 32.28149 2.24 NNE 3. 459316 2244086 31.28345 4.12 NNE 4. 458316 2240086 30.96416 Project site Project site 5. 458316 2241086 30.00931 1 N 6. 458316 2243086 29.30035 3 N 7. 460316 2243086 26.75492 3.60 NNE 8. 458316 2239086 26.09742 1 S 9. 460316 2245086 22.96254 5.38 NNE 10. 459316 2241086 21.19104 1.41 NE

353 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-19 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of CO2 within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on Cummulative emission

Table 4-19 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Carbon Dioxide obtained through modeling on Cummulative emission Distance from UTM coordinates (m) Direction Conc. Centre of S. No from Centre (µg/m3) Project SIte E N of Project Site (~Km) 1. 457316 2241086 8099.821 1.41 NW 2. 457316 2240086 6593.569 1 W 3. 458316 2241086 5727.344 1 N 4. 458316 2242086 5090.748 2 N 5. 458316 2240086 4706.845 Project site Project site 6. 456316 2239086 4552.406 2.24 WSW 7. 457316 2242086 3899.017 2.24 NNW 8. 456316 2240086 3816.203 2 W 9. 459316 2242086 3596.204 2.24 NNE 10. 456316 2241086 3507.212 2.24 WNW

354 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

4.5.4.6 Summary on Cummulative Emission Maximum pollutant concentrations of PM, SO2, NOx and CO2 observed due to proposed expansion for an 24hr-average period have been studied and CO observed due to proposed expansion for an 1hr-average period have been studied. The total increase in concentrations above baseline status to estimate the percentage increase and summarized in Table 4-20.

Table 4-20 Total Maximum GLCs from the Cummulative Emissions (point source emission & line source emission)

Max. Max Base Base line location Estimated NAAQ Total Conc. % Pollutant line Incremental standard (µg/m3) increase Conc. Conc. (µg/m3) (µg/m3) (µg/m3) PM 95.7 Paradwip 0.10 95.8 100 0.10 SO2 15.7 (Coast 1.16 16.86 80 7.39 NOx 30.06 Guard)- A5 5.89 35.95 80 19.59 CO 50* 78.69 128.69 4000 157.38 CO2 - 8099.82 8099.82 - - Note:

The incremental concentrations of PM, SO2, NOx and CO are observed to be 0.10%, 7.39%

19.59% and 157.38% respectively. The total pollutant concentrations of PM, SO2, NOx and CO are 95.7 µg/m3, 16.86 µg/m3, 35.95 µg/m3 and 128.69 µg/m3 , which is observed to be within NAAQ standards.

355 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

4.5.4.7 Other Emission-Storage Tank vent & PX-Process vent emmission

Figure 4-20 Project layout with proposed storage tank vent & PX-process vent coordinates

356 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-21 Google earth demarcation of proposed storage tank vent & PX-process vent coordinates

357 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Table 4-21 Proposed Storage tank vents and PX-process vent Emission details

Stack Coordinates Vent Details Emission per vent (g/s) S.N Storage Tank Vent details Height Temp Dia. Exit Velocity Benze Tolue o N E VOC CO2 (m) (°C) (m) (m/s) ne ne Toluene day tank- 045-TK- 20°15'49. 86°36'02. 0.0781 1 7 40 0.025 0.1 - - - 001A 6" 2" 25 Toluene day tank- 045-TK- 20°15'49. 86°36'03. 0.0781 2 7 40 0.025 0.1 - - - 001B 6 5 25 Plant inventory tank- 044-TK- 20°15'49. 86°36'03. 0.050 0.016 0.007 3 7 40 0.1 - - 001 0" 5 8 7 55 Paraxylene day tank- 049-TK- 20°15'51. 86°36'02. 0.2204 4 17 40 0.101 0.1 - - - 001 A 2" 2" 86 Paraxylene day tank- 049-TK- 20°15'51. 86°36'03. 0.2204 5 17 40 0.101 0.1 - - - 001 B 2" 5" 86 Desorbent storage tanks-049- 20°15'50. 86°36'02. 0.4513 6 15 45 0.152 0.1 - - - TK-002 3" 2" 89 Plant inventory storage tanks- 20°15'50. 86°36'03. 0.4513 7 15 45 0.152 0.1 - - - 049-TK-003 3" 5 89 20°15'52. 86°36'02. 1.0069 8 Aromatic tank-048-TK-001 17 40 0.304 0.1 - - - 1" 2" 44 Light reformate storage tank- 20°15'52. 86°36'03. 1.1458 9 17 40 0.152 0.01 - - - 048-TK-002 1" 5" 33 20°15'44. 86°35'56. 97.2 10 Isomer Regeneration Vent 30 120 0.15 17.3 - - - 50" 72" 22 3.6527 0.016 0.007 97.2 Total(g/s) 77 7 55 22

Note:

The data is obtained from Section 7.1.2.1 of Detailed Feasibility Report prepared by Toyo Engineering India Pvt. Ltd.

358 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-22 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of VOC within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on other vent emissions

Table 4-22 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of VOC obtained through modeling on other vent emission Distance from UTM coordinates (m) Direction Conc. Centre of S. No from Centre (µg/m3) Project SIte E N of Project Site (~Km) 1. 458316 2241086 91.35354 1 N 2. 458316 2242086 42.70533 2 N 3. 458316 2243086 40.18009 3 N 4. 458316 2240086 33.90201 Project site Project site 5. 458316 2244086 31.72217 4 N 6. 459316 2242086 27.26532 2.24 NNE 7. 457316 2240086 26.44746 1 W 8. 458316 2245086 25.94425 5 N 9. 459316 2243086 24.39668 3.16 NNE 10. 458316 2246086 21.40595 6 N

359 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-23 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of Benzene within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on other vent emissions

Table 4-23 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Benzene obtained through modeling on other vent emission Distance from UTM coordinates (m) Direction Conc. Centre of S. No from Centre (µg/m3) Project SIte E N of Project Site (~Km) 1. 458316 2241086 2.56533 1 N 2. 458316 2242086 0.81094 2 N 3. 459316 2242086 0.4194 2.24 NNE 4. 458316 2243086 0.39163 3 N 5. 459316 2243086 0.37502 3.16 NNE 6. 457316 2242086 0.32137 2.24 NNW 7. 460316 2242086 0.31513 2.82 NE 8. 457316 2243086 0.30667 3.16 NNW 9. 459316 2237086 0.27299 3.16 SSE 10. 457316 2244086 0.24116 4.12 NNW

360 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-24 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of Toluene within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on other vent emissions

Table 4-24 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Toluene obtained through modeling on other vent emission Distance from UTM coordinates (m) Direction Conc. Centre of S. No from Centre (µg/m3) Project SIte E N of Project Site (~Km) 1. 458316 2241086 1.15977 1 N 2. 458316 2242086 0.36662 2 N 3. 459316 2242086 0.18961 2.24 NNE 4. 458316 2243086 0.17705 3 N 5. 459316 2243086 0.16955 3.16 NNE 6. 457316 2242086 0.14529 2.24 NNW 7. 460316 2242086 0.14247 2.82 NE 8. 457316 2243086 0.13864 3.16 NNW 9. 459316 2237086 0.12342 3.16 SSE 10. 457316 2244086 0.10903 4.12 NNW

361 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-25 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of CO2 within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on other vent emissions

Table 4-25 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Carbon Dioxide obtained through modeling on other vent emission Distance UTM coordinates (m) Direction Conc. from Centre S. No from Centre (µg/m3) of Project E N of Project Site SIte (~Km) 1. 458316 2240086 277.7933 Project site Project site 2. 458316 2241086 266.6417 1 N 3. 458316 2242086 182.829 2 N 4. 456316 2239086 136.0366 2.24 WSW 5. 458316 2243086 131.4561 3 N 6. 457316 2238086 131.1408 2.24 SSW 7. 459316 2243086 130.7743 3.16 NNE 8. 455316 2238086 125.1713 3.60 WSW 9. 457316 2240086 119.79 1 W 10. 459316 2241086 110.5063 1.41 NE

362 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

4.5.4.8 Summary on Other Emission-Storage Tank vent & PX-Process vent emmission

Maximum pollutant concentrations of VOC, Benzene, Toluene and CO2 observed due to proposed expansion for an 24hr-average period have been studied. The total increase in concentrations above baseline status is summarized in Table 4-25.

Table 4-26 Total Maximum GLCs from the Storage Tank vent & PX-Process vent emmission

Pollutant Baseline values Estimated Incremental Conc. (µg/m3)

VOC BLQ 91.35

Benzene BLQ 2.56

Toluene -- 1.15

CO2 -- 277.79

Note:

1. There is no standard for VOC, Toluene & CO2

2. Benzene NAAQ 2009 standards is 5 µg/m3 (annual)

363 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

4.5.4.9 Other Emission-PTA Process vent & Silo vent emmission

Figure 4-26 Project layout with proposed PTA Process vent & Silo vent coordinates

364 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-27 Google earth demarcation of proposed PTA Process vent & Silo vent coordinates

365 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Table 4-27 Proposed PTA Process vent & Silo vent emission details

Vent Stack Emission (g/s) Coordinates Flue gas Details Process & S. Flow Meth Meth Carb Silo Vent Heig Tem Exit Aceti No Rate Dia Benz Tolue Xyle Meth yl Brom yl on PTA Nitro details N E ht p Velocit c (Nm3/hr) (m) ene ne ne anol aceta ine brom mono Dust gen (m) (°C) y (m/s) Acid te ide xide G1-Process 20°16 86°36 0.9 1. Inert Vents- 292000 43.5 27 1.8 0.3 0.487 0.73 0.162 0.406 6.489 0.406 0.73 3.244 0 - '07.8" '03.6" 7 051-C-175 20°16 86°36 G2/G3/G4- 13400 45 35 0.4 29.6 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.001 0.003 0.051 0.004 0.009 0.051 0.025 - '03.1" '02.3" PTA Day silo 20°16 86°36 2. A/B Off- Spec 13400 45 35 0.4 29.6 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.001 0.003 0.051 0.004 0.009 0.051 0.025 - '03.1" '02.7" PTA Silo- 051- 20°16 86°36 M-600A/B/C 13400 45 35 0.4 29.6 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.001 0.003 0.051 0.004 0.009 0.051 0.025 - '03.1" '03.2" PSV Vent 20°16 86°36 0.3 19.16 3. 55 27 80 0.z2 ------Scrubber Stack '8.53" '4.37" 5 67 19.16 Total (g/s) 0.312 0.502 0.748 0.165 0.415 6.642 0.418 0.757 3.397 0.075 67

Note:

The data is obtained from Section 7.1.2.2 of Detailed Feasibility Report prepared by Toyo Engineering India Pvt. Ltd.

366 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-28 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of Benzene within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on other vent emissions

Table 4-28 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Benzene obtained through modeling on other vent emission Distance from UTM coordinates (m) Direction Conc. Centre of S. No from Centre (µg/m3) Project SIte E N of Project Site (~km) 1. 458316 2242086 0.43865 2 N 2. 456316 2242086 0.27416 2.82 NW 3. 459316 2239086 0.20384 1.41 SE 4. 456316 2244086 0.2006 4.47 NNW 5. 455316 2242086 0.18984 3.60 WNW 6. 457316 2241086 0.18756 1.41 NW 7. 459316 2242086 0.17653 2.24 NNE 8. 455316 2245086 0.17557 5.83 NNW 9. 458316 2243086 0.17373 3 N 10. 459316 2243086 0.17193 3.16 NNE

367 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-29 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of Toluene within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on other vent emissions

Table 4-29 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Toluene obtained through modeling on other vent emission Distance from UTM coordinates (m) Direction Conc. Centre of S. No from Centre (µg/m3) Project SIte E N of Project Site (~km) 1. 458316 2242086 0.70718 2 N 2. 456316 2242086 0.44173 2.82 NW 3. 459316 2239086 0.32821 1.41 SE 4. 456316 2244086 0.32394 4.47 NNW 5. 455316 2242086 0.30527 3.60 WNW 6. 457316 2241086 0.30092 1.41 NW 7. 459316 2242086 0.28438 2.24 NNE 8. 455316 2245086 0.28333 5.83 NNW 9. 458316 2243086 0.27985 3 N 10. 459316 2243086 0.27668 3.16 NNE

368 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-30 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of Xylene within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on other vent emissions

Table 4-30 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Xylene obtained through modeling on other vent emission Distance from UTM coordinates (m) Direction Conc. Centre of S. No from Centre (µg/m3) Project SIte E N of Project Site (~Km) 1. 458316 2242086 1.05513 2 N 2. 456316 2242086 0.65882 2.82 NW 3. 459316 2239086 0.4893 1.41 SE 4. 456316 2244086 0.48389 4.47 NNW 5. 455316 2242086 0.45469 3.60 WNW 6. 457316 2241086 0.44751 1.41 NW 7. 459316 2242086 0.42408 2.24 NNE 8. 455316 2245086 0.42303 5.83 NNW 9. 458316 2243086 0.41732 3 N 10. 459316 2243086 0.41231 3.16 NNE

369 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-31 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of Acetic Acid within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on other vent emissions

Table 4-31 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Acetic Acid obtained through modeling on other vent emission Distance from UTM coordinates (m) Direction Conc. Centre of S. No from Centre (µg/m3) Project SIte E N of Project Site (~Km) 1. 458316 2242086 0.23307 2 N 2. 456316 2242086 0.14547 2.82 NW 3. 459316 2239086 0.10799 1.41 SE 4. 456316 2244086 0.10701 4.47 NNW 5. 455316 2242086 0.10026 3.60 WNW 6. 457316 2241086 0.09852 1.41 NW 7. 459316 2242086 0.09362 2.24 NNE 8. 455316 2245086 0.09351 5.83 NNW 9. 458316 2243086 0.09213 3 N 10. 459316 2243086 0.09096 3.16 NNE

370 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-32 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of Methanol within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on other vent emissions

Table 4-32 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Methanol obtained through modeling on other vent emission Distance from UTM coordinates (m) Direction Conc. Centre of S. No from Centre (µg/m3) Project SIte E N of Project Site (~Km) 1. 458316 2242086 0.58572 2 N 2. 456316 2242086 0.36566 2.82 NW 3. 459316 2239086 0.27152 1.41 SE 4. 456316 2244086 0.26874 4.47 NNW 5. 455316 2242086 0.25223 3.60 WNW 6. 457316 2241086 0.24809 1.41 NW 7. 459316 2242086 0.23536 2.24 NNE 8. 455316 2245086 0.23489 5.83 NNW 9. 458316 2243086 0.23161 3 N 10. 459316 2243086 0.22877 3.16 NNE

371 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-33 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of MethylAcetate within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on other vent emissions

Table 4-33 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of MethylAcetate obtained through modeling on other vent emission UTM coordinates (m) Distance from Direction Conc. Centre of from Centre S. No E N (µg/m3) Project SIte of Project (~Km) Site 1. 458316 2242086 9.37147 2 N 2. 456316 2242086 5.85109 2.82 NW 3. 459316 2239086 4.34518 1.41 SE 4. 456316 2244086 4.29868 4.47 NNW 5. 455316 2242086 4.03725 3.60 WNW 6. 457316 2241086 3.97236 1.41 NW 7. 459316 2242086 3.76622 2.24 NNE 8. 455316 2245086 3.75769 5.83 NNW 9. 458316 2243086 3.70619 3 N 10. 459316 2243086 3.66129 3.16 NNE

372 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-34 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of Bromide within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on other vent emissions

Table 4-34 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Bromide obtained through modeling on other vent emission Distance from UTM coordinates (m) Direction Conc. Centre of S. No from Centre (µg/m3) Project SIte E N of Project Site (~Km) 1. 458316 2242086 0.589 2 N 2. 456316 2242086 0.36789 2.82 NW 3. 459316 2239086 0.27332 1.41 SE 4. 456316 2244086 0.26987 4.47 NNW 5. 455316 2242086 0.25417 3.60 WNW 6. 457316 2241086 0.25047 1.41 NW 7. 459316 2242086 0.23683 2.24 NNE 8. 455316 2245086 0.23602 5.83 NNW 9. 458316 2243086 0.23306 3 N 10. 459316 2243086 0.23039 3.16 NNE

373 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-35 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of Methyl Bromide within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on other vent emissions

Table 4-35 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Methyl Bromide obtained through modeling on other vent emission Distance from UTM coordinates (m) Direction Conc. Centre of S. No from Centre (µg/m3) Project SIte E N of Project Site (~Km) 1. 458316 2242086 1.06497 2 N 2. 456316 2242086 0.6655 2.82 NW 3. 459316 2239086 0.49468 1.41 SE 4. 456316 2244086 0.48729 4.47 NNW 5. 455316 2242086 0.46051 3.60 WNW 6. 457316 2241086 0.45465 1.41 NW 7. 459316 2242086 0.42848 2.24 NNE 8. 455316 2245086 0.4264 5.83 NNW 9. 458316 2243086 0.42168 3 N 10. 459316 2243086 0.41718 3.16 NNE

374 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-36 Predicted 1-Hr GLC’s of CO within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on other vent emissions

Table 4-36 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Carbon Monoxide obtained through modeling on other vent emission Distance from UTM coordinates (m) Direction Conc. Centre of S. No from Centre (µg/m3) Project SIte E N of Project Site (~Km) 1. 458316 2242086 53.97387 2 N 2. 456316 2242086 46.14078 2.82 NW 3. 456316 2244086 42.75771 4.47 NNW 4. 459316 2242086 39.55771 2.24 NNE 5. 459316 2239086 39.40617 1.41 SE 6. 455316 2245086 38.31169 5.83 NNW 7. 459316 2243086 34.72436 3.16 NNE 8. 454316 2246086 31.13434 7.21 NNW 9. 455316 2242086 29.4794 3.60 WNW 10. 457316 2243086 28.15549 3.16 NNW

375 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-37 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of PTA Dust within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on other vent emissions

Table 4-37 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of PTA Dust obtained through modeling on other vent emission Distance from UTM coordinates (m) Direction Conc. Centre of S. No from Centre (µg/m3) Project SIte E N of Project Site (~Km) 1. 458316 2242086 0.10857 2 N 2. 460316 2242086 0.10211 2.82 NE 3. 459316 2242086 0.06468 2.24 NNE 4. 462316 2243086 0.06038 4.99 ENE 5. 457316 2241086 0.05948 1.41 NW 6. 456316 2242086 0.05564 2.82 NW 7. 457316 2240086 0.05521 1 W 8. 458316 2243086 0.05163 3 N 9. 457316 2242086 0.05091 2.24 NNW 10. 455316 2242086 0.04849 3.60 WNW

376 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 4-38 Predicted 24-Hrs’ GLC’s of Nitrogen within 10 km Radius of the Study Area on other vent emissions

Table 4-38 Estimated Top 10 Highest Concentrations of Nitrogen obtained through modeling on other vent emission Distance from UTM coordinates (m) Direction Conc. Centre of S. No from Centre (µg/m3) Project SIte E N of Project Site (~km) 1. 458316 2241086 150.7935 1 N 2. 458316 2242086 96.06833 2 N 3. 458316 2243086 60.6044 3 N 4. 458316 2240086 51.86108 Project site Project site 5. 459316 2242086 49.56477 2.24 NNE 6. 458316 2244086 46.40236 4 N 7. 456316 2240086 45.36553 2 W 8. 457316 2240086 43.48103 1 W 9. 459316 2244086 42.54081 4.12 NNE 10. 458316 2245086 39.63591 5 N

377 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

4.5.4.10 Summary on Other Emission- PTA Process vent & Silo vent emmission

Maximum pollutant concentrations of Benzene, Toluene, Xylene, Acetic Acid, Methanol, Methyl acetate, Bromine, Methyl bromide, PTA Dust and Nitrogen observed due to proposed expansion for an 24hr-average period have been studied and CO observed due to proposed expansion for an 1hr-average period have been studied. The total increase in concentrations is summarized in Table 4-38.

Table 4-39 Total Maximum GLCs from the Process & Silo Vent Emissions

Estimated Incremental Pollutant Conc. (µg/m3)

Benzene 0.43

Toluene 0.70

Xylene 1.05

Acetic Acid 0.23

Methanol 0.58

Methyl acetate 9.37

Bromine 0.58

Methyl bromide 1.06

Carbon monoxide 53.97

PTA Dust 0.10

Nitrogen 150.79

Note:

1. There is no standard for Toluene, Xylene, Acetic Acid, Methanol, Methyl acetate, Bromine, Methyl bromide, Nitrogen.

2. Benzene NAAQ 2009 standards is 5 µg/m3 (annual) & Carbon monoxide NAAQ 2009 standards is 4 mg/m3 (1hour).

378 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

4.5.5 Impacts due to Traffic and Transportation

The vehicular movement for the proposed project is given in Table 4-40.

Table 4-40 Existing & proposed vehicular movement per Hour (Peak Hour)

Total Total PCU vehicles PCU Propose Propo after S. Type of Existing Existing after Factors d sed project No Vehicle vehicles PCU project IRC (SP vehicles PCU implement implementa 41) ation tion 1 2 wheeler 124 93 0 0 127 0.75 93 2 3 wheelers 48 96 0 0 48 2 96 4 wheelers/ 3 91 91 5 5 96 1 96 cars 4 truck/Lorry 79 292.3 17 62.9 96 3.7 355.2 agricultural 5 11 44 0 0 11 4 44 tractor light 6 emission 9 12.6 0 0 9 1.4 12.6 vehicle Total 362 628.9 22 67.9 384 696.8

Table 4-41 Traffic Volume after Implementation of the Project

Road Volume of Volume V/C LOS Traffic For the Road Capacity Traffic (V) Ratio Category* Classification (C) Stable Traffic Existing 362 628.9 1500 0.42 “B” Flow After Stable Traffic 384 696.8 1500 0.47 “B” implementation Flow

*LOS (Level of Service) categories are A-Free Flow, B- Reasonably Free Flow, C-Stable Flow, D-Approaching unstable flow, E- Unstable flow, F- Forced or breakdown flow

Due to propose project there will be slight increment in the vehicle movement but the level of service (LOS) anticipated will be Stable Traffic Flow.

4.6 Noise Environment

4.6.1 Impact

The noise generated during the operational phase can be divided into two categories

379 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

A) Stationary source due to heavy duty machineries at the project site such as compressors, DG sets, pumps etc. B) Mobile source corresponding to mainly vehicular traffic for staff mobilization, materials, material transportation, liquid fuel transportation to project site, etc. Vibrations are expected to be generated by various activities associated with the proposed project during operational phase. The impact of vibrations beyond the site would be negligible during normal operation phase. However, the impacts on workers engaged in the plant area would be considerable due to occupational exposure. The proposed fixed major equipment/units such as compressors, pumps, DG sets etc., also generate vibrations during operational phase and may cause exposures to the workers/operators engaged at these units.

All equipment’s in the plant produce 40 to 55 dB(A) after control measures and equipment’s are designed/operated to have a noise level not exceeding 85 to 90 dB(A) as per the requirement of Occupational Safety and Health Administration Standard (OSHA). In addition, since most of the noise generating equipment would be in closed structures, the noise transmitted outside would be still lower and for any other case of higher noise sufficient safety ear plugs and ear muffs will be provided to the employees.

4.6.2 Mitigation Measure

 The major noise generating equipment like Compressors, DG sets, pumps etc. will be enclosed in an acoustic enclosure designed for an insertion loss of 25 dB (A) and silencers to other equipment etc.  Major noise generating equipment will be designed with 85 dB (A) ensuring cumulative noise at 1.0 m remains at 85 dB (A).  The occupational noise exposure to the workers in the form of eight hourly time weighted average will be maintained well within the prescribed Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standard limits.  Acoustic design with sound proof glass paneling will be provided for critical operator cabins / control rooms of individual modules as well as central control facilities.  Use of personal protective equipment’s/devices such as ear-muffs, ear plugs etc. will be strictly enforced for the workers engaged in high noise areas.

380 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

 Periodic maintenance of the equipment to be used in the developmental works will be carried out. Worn out parts will be replaced and rotating parts will be lubricated to minimize noise emissions.  Implementation of greenbelt for noise attenuation will be undertaken: shrub plantation; landscaping with horticulture; and Tree plantation at vehicle parking areas and along approach roads.  Ambient noise levels will be monitored at regular intervals during operational phase of the project.  Low vibration generating machines/equipment will be selected to meet international standards and foundations will be so designed to minimize vibrations and secured properly.  Vibration generating sources and their platforms should be maintained properly to minimize vibrations and related impacts.  Various standards pertaining to vibrations are formulated by statutory bodies like Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) and Director General of Mines Safety (DGMS), which is being practiced would be continued to mitigate the workers’ health effects due to vibrations.  Vibration dampers will be provided around the source of generation.  Transportation Management Plan will be prepared and the transportation of construction materials will be planned in line with the same. 4.7 Water Environment

No water will be extracted from ground water sources. The total raw water requirement for existing facility is 3497 m3/hr and for proposed operation phase total requirement will be 1299.5 m3/hr. On total after expansion 4796.5 m3/hr of raw water of which the fresh water of 3743 m3/hr will be taken from existing water source (Mahanadi River). New ETP is proposed for installation to process effluent @ 408 m3/hr with 10% design Margin (Maximum capacity with high TOC).

The source of water will be from Existing Refinery water source i.e., Mahanadi River. Hence there will be no separate permission is required for the proposed projects

381 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

4.7.1 Mitigation Measures

Various mitigation measures are proposed to be adopted to minimize the impact if any on the water environment due to the wastewater/runoff generation during the operation phase of the project.  Institutional arrangement for monitoring of water pollution.  Corrective and preventive measures if any contamination happens.  Monitoring should ensure early determination of any threats to water resources in terms of contamination.  If contaminated, proper expertise will be brought to schematize the various recharge mechanism to reduce or nullify the impact effects.

4.7.2 Waste Water Quality, Quantity and Treatment Method a) Existing

Approx. 1082.1 m3/hr of effluent is generated in the existing facility of which 190.88 m3/hr rejects from RO is disposed to Deep Sea, 50 m3/hr rejects from RO is sent to Coke Dust Suspension and 50 m3/hr rejects from RO is sent to Coke Cutting. The Sludge created during the treatment of about 32.46 m3/hr along with a water loss of about 10.76 m3/hr. Remaining 748m3/hr from RO is reused back in the system for DM Water Makeup. b) Proposed

In the proposed expansion Approx. 408 m3/hr of effluent is generated in the proposed facility of which 78% of effluent is processed in RO plant and its rejects of 86.18 m3/hr is disposed into deep sea. The Sludge created during the treatment of about 12.24 m3/hr along with a water loss of about 4.08 m3/hr. The remaining RO processed water of 305.5 m3/hr is reused back in the system for DM Water Makeup and cooling tower. New ETP is proposed for installation to process effluent @ 408 m3/hr with 10% design Margin (Maximum capacity with high TOC) The existing and proposed effluent disposal into deep sea is 190.88 m3/hr and 86.18 m3/hr respectively. On total, 277.06m3/hr will be discharge into deep sea and it is observed to be within the discharge approval limit of 350 m3/hr as per the OPCB consent for Air and water obtained vide:5543/IND-I-CON-6414 dated 31.03.2021 valid till 31.03.2022 copy enclosed as Annexure 3. The industrial effluent is discharged into deep sea through the pipeline where its outlet of pipe is at a distance of 3km from the Low Tide Line (LTL).

382 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

4.8 Land Environment During operational phase the impact shall be due to disposal of solid and hazardous waste generated during operation of the plant. Spent Catalyst after every 4-5 years will be duly recovered by PCB approved agencies

4.8.1 Potential Impact Due to Location The proposed expansion is within the IOCL existing facility, there will be no additional land acquisition and resettlement or Rehabilitation required. Therefore, there will not be any direct impacts.

4.8.2 Impacts Due to Changes in Land Use Pattern

One of the factor that is usually considered as a major impact from any project is the land use change. But since the proposed expansion will be established within the existing IOCL site, no land use change is foreseen, as the current land use is that of industrial.

4.8.3 Mittigation Measures

The following mitigation measures may be explored:

 Periodic maintenance and check of wastewater conveyance pipelines  Attempt to restore by replacing a part or putting together the torn or broken parts of the conveyance pipeline in case of any leakage is detected.  Necessary preventive measures for spillage from pipelines, such as surface RCC channels along the pipelines shall be adopted.  Treated wastewater quality shall be ensured as per standards before using internal use.

4.9 Marine Environment The impact in the context of biota and fishery resources in the area is not considered to be significant as the construction in the creek is for minimal period. The impact of closed conveyor passing through the creek would have least impact on the aquatic ecological status as there will be no spillage in this area.

The project proponent shall adopt preventive practices like leak monitoring of existing effluent discharge pipelines in the sea, surveillance to prevent any liquid hydrocarbon falling on the water body of the creek from the hydrocarbon pipelines passing over the bridge of Santa Creek. The project proponent shall have mitigation plan with Oil spill contaminant

383 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report boom under the new pipe bridge to take care of any inadvertent oil spills and suitable skimmers for recovering of any accidental oil spill over the creek water.

The existing and proposed effluent disposal into deep sea is 190.88 m3/hr and 86.18 m3/hr respectively. On total, 277.06m3/hr will be discharge into deep sea that it is observed to be within the marine discharge approval limit of 350 m3/hr as per the OPCB consent for Air and water obtained vide: 3946/IND-I-CON-6414 dated 27.03.2020 valid till 31.03.2021 copy enclosed as Annexure 3. The industrial effluent is discharged into deep sea through the pipeline where its outlet of pipe is at a distance of 3km from the Low Tide Line(LTL).

4.10 Solid Waste Management

4.10.1 Impact Due to Solid Waste Generation

During operation phase, various types of solid waste are likely to be generated which can be broadly categorized as Hazardous Waste and Non-hazardous Waste. Further, the generated solid waste generation may include Biodegradable, Recyclable and Inert compounds. The details of solid waste generation and its management proposed are discussed in Chapter 2, Section 2.18.

4.10.2 Mitigation Measures The hazardous waste generated can be processed by bioremediation techniques or with proper disposal to the authorities. The biodegradable waste generated can be composted and used as manure. The other waste can be disposed in municipal bins.

384 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

CHAPTER 5 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES

385 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

5 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES 5.1 Introduction

Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL), Paradip Refinery Proposes “Integrated Para-Xylene & Purified Terephthalic Acid (PX-PTA) Project at IOCL Paradip Refinery & Petrochemical Complex, Paradip

The range of alternatives selected for the purpose of analysis includes:

 Site alternative  Water supply alternative  Technology alternative

5.2 Site Alternative

Paradip Refinery, has spread over a total area of 3,345 acres, including about 314 acres for Residential and about 240 acres of land for other office and buildings. The area of 355 acres is utilized for the connecting road in the total area. Since the proposed project is expansion within the existing facility there is no new site/ alternative sites considered.

5.3 Water Supply Alternative

The total fresh water requirement of 2749 m3/hr for the existing refinery is met from water from Mahanadi River. Since the proposed project uses the existing water source there is no alternative water supply considered

5.4 Technology Alternative

Paradip Refinery has a unique INDMAX Unit technology, which is indigenously been developed by Indian Oil's R&D Centre. The INDMAX (FCC) Unit has designed to produce 44% LPG, the highest yield from such plants. The commissioning of INDMAX Unit at Paradip marks a major milestone in the history of Indian refining. With this, IndianOil has now recognized globally as a technology licensor. The other first-time technological features of the Refinery include Flue Gas Desulphurisation facilities, Vapour Recovery system from jetty loading and an alkylation process to get octane-rich low-benzene MS blend component, etc. So no alternative technologies available.

386 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

CHAPTER 6 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

387 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

6 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM 6.1 Introduction

Environmental monitoring is an essential tool for sustainable development & ensuring effective implementation of environmental management plan & mitigation measures adopted. Environmental monitoring will undertake primarily to determine the environmental effects of human activities and secondarily to increase understanding of cause – effect relationships between human activity and environmental change. Environment monitoring is a repetitive & systematic measurement of the characteristics of environmental components to test specific hypotheses of the effect of human activities on the environment. Environmental monitoring program enables the proponent to identify the deviation of environmental quality due to the proposed project activities.

6.2 Environmental Effects Monitoring in EIA

Environmental effects monitoring programs provide the necessary information to:

 Verify the accuracy of EIA predictions;  Determine the effectiveness of measures to mitigate adverse effects of projects on the environment. Environmental monitoring program is a vital process of any management plan of the development project. This helps in signalling the potential problems resulting from the proposed project and will allow for prompt implementation of effective corrective measures. The environmental monitoring will be required for the construction and operational phases. The main objectives of environmental monitoring area:

i. To assess the changes in environmental conditions, ii. To monitor the effective implementation of mitigation measures, iii. Warn significant deteriorations in environmental quality for further prevention action. iv. In order to meet the above objectives, the following parameters need to be monitored: v. Afforestation, vi. Water Quality and Public Health, vii. Air and Noise quality, viii. Soil Conservation, and ix. Sanitation and Waste Disposal

388 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

6.2.1 Post Project Environment Monitoring Program

The summarized form of post monitoring details is presented in the following Table 6-1.

Table 6-1 Post Project Environmental Monitoring Plan

S. Frequency of Particulars Parameters for Monitoring No monitoring 1. Air pollution monitoring

Ambient air quality within Continuous PM, SOx, NOX, NO2, CO, O3, the premises VOC Ambient air quality within Twice in a week All 12 parameters as given in the premises NAAQS Ambient air quality at 1 Twice in a week All 12 parameters as given in location in Prevalent Down NAAQS Wind Direction Ambient air quality at 1 Twice in a week All 12 parameters as given in location in Up Wind NAAQS Direction 2. Noise monitoring At two locations within the Once in a month Noise Levels in dB(A) premises

3. Ground water quality monitoring One location at site Quaterly Physicochemical properties and Heavy Metals The groundwater results are compared with the acceptable and permissible water quality standards as per IS: 10500 (2012) 4. Soil Quality monitoring One location near Hazardous Annually Physicochemical properties, waste storage area at site and Nutrients, Heavy metals as per IS one location outside site 2720 (All Parts)

389 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. Frequency of Particulars Parameters for Monitoring No monitoring 5. Effluent Quality Monitoring Inlet and outlet of ETP Once a month pH, Temp, TDS, TSS, Chloride, Sulphide, Sulphate, fluoride, ammoniacal Nitrogen, Sodium, Copper, Zinc, Phenolic compounds, Oil and Grease, Boron, BOD, COD, Total Residual Chlorine, Arsenic, Cadmium, Total Chromium, Hexavalent Chromium, Lead, Selenium, Mercury, Pesticides, Alpha emitters, Free Ammonia, Dissolved Phosphates, Total Kjeldhal nitrogen, Cyanide, Nickel, Residual Sodium Carbonate. All the Parameters are to be verified as per CPCB Standard Guidelines. Inlet and out let of STP Once a month Sewage is Biologically treated as a part of the ETP and standards are met through the pH, Temp, TDS, TSS, BOD, COD, Oil and grease. All the Parameters are to be verified as per CPCB Standard Guidelines. 6. Work place Monitoring Quarterly Noise, VOC, Lux levels

6.2.2 Monitoring Methodologies

Monitoring of environmental samples shall be done as per the guidelines provide by MoEF&CC/CPCB/SPCB-Odisha. The methods conducted or applied shall be approved or sanctioned by the any recognized body or authority i.e. MoEF&CC/CPCB/SPCB-Odisha.

390 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

As per the gathered information by IOCL Paradip Refinery on its previous EC and EIA, one AAQMS envisaged in for the current site for the project was relocated near the main entrance to the battery limit as the proposed unit was deferred that time. Further keeping in view of the increased vehicular movement through North Site of the plan for petrochemical product movement, two additional AAQMS with continuous AAQ monitoring system and manual monitoring to be installed in north site of the plant as per CPCB guideline.

6.3 Reporting & Documentation

All the necessary reports and documents shall be prepared complying with the statutory rules & regulations. Proper and due care shall be taken to adhere to the laid down rules and regulation by the government. Regular and periodic record shall be kept in order to ensure easier, comparable and brisk review and projection of past, present and future performances. Also, the management shall ensure to prepare separate records for water, wastewater, solid waste, air, emission, regularly and periodically in order to provide better and smooth vigilance.

The management shall look into the fact that as soon as the preparation of reports gets over it shall be forwarded to the concerned authority with due care for the purpose of reviewing. Adhering to the rules and regulations the management shall ensure that the outcome of the reports and the conclusions been drawn shall be prepared as per the laid down regulations and procedures. No breach of any convention shall be availed.

These reports/documents shall be regularly and periodically reviewed and any changes/ discrepancies found in mitigation measures/ operation/ management/ technology shall be brought into notice instantaneously and all possible corrective actions shall be taken to match the discrepancies been witnessed.

6.4 Budget for Environmental Monitoring Plan

Particulars and frequency of environmental Monitoring is given in Table 6-2.

Table 6-2 Budgetary allocation for Environmental Monitoring

Cost in S. No Particulars Frequency of monitoring Lakhs 1. Air pollution monitoring Stack monitoring Manual. Twice in a Month 150

391 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Cost in S. No Particulars Frequency of monitoring Lakhs Ambient Monitoring Continuous within the premises, 1 location in Prevalent 100 Down Wind and Up Wind Direction 2. Noise monitoring At two locations within Once in a month 3 the premises

3. Ground water quality monitoring 4 One location at site Quaterly 4. Soil Quality monitoring One location near Annually Hazardous waste storage area at site and 4 one location outside site 5. Effluent Quality Monitoring Inlet and outlet of ETP Once a month 10 6. VOC monitoring Quarterly 10 Total 281

392 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

CHAPTER 7 ADDITIONAL STUDIES

393 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

7 ADDITIONAL STUDIES 7.1 Public Consultation The project is falling under ‘A’ category as per EIA Notification 2006 and Public Hearing is mandatory as per ToR obtained. Hence draft EIA report has been prepared as per the No: J- 11011/395/2012-IA.II(I) dated 30th September 2018 and submitted for Public Hearing. Public Hearing paper advertisement was published in The New Indian Express and The Pramaya newspapers on 30.01.2021.

Public hearing was conducted by OSPCB on 02-03-2021 at 10.30am at Municipality Kalyan Mandap, Madhuban, Paradeep and Sri Kanhu Charan Dhir, Additional District Magistrate, Paradip presided over the meeting along with Er. Dillip Kumar Dash, Regional Officer, State Pollution Control Board, Odisha, Paradip. Newspaper Publication details and Public Hearing minutes are enclosed as Appendix 3. The newspaper advertisement details are shown in Figure 7-1 & Figure 7-2. Notice issued for public hearing is enclosed as Figure 7-3. Public Hearing photographs are shown in Figure 7-4. The total fund allotted for the commitment made on the requirement of public during public hearing is INR 6.64Cr.

394 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 7-1 Public Hearing Advertisements(Odisha)

395 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 7-2 Public Hearing Advertisements(English)

396 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 7-3 Public Hearing Announcement in nearby villages

Figure 7-4 Public Hearing photographs

397 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

7.1.1 Reply to the issues raised by the public during Public Hearing on 02.03.2021 Commitment on S.No Issue Raised by Issue Reply by IOCL Paradip fund allocation 1 Kishore Kumar He had welcomed the project and Recruitment for permanent post in IOCL is done through open - Parida from also showed his concerns about competition and candidates are selected as per Corporation Sarpanch, IOCL's failure in fulfilling prior recruitment policy. Dhinkia G.P commitments in local employment. For contractual engagement in various agencies working for Paradip Refinery, are done by the agency itself based on their requirement subject to meeting the requisite qualification and skill.

As per RR Plan 2002, approved by RPDAC under the chairmanship of RDC(C), Cuttack (Gov. of Odisha), for Paradip Refinery project, there is no provision for any preferential engagement at Paradip Refinery or in various agencies engaged by Paradip Refinery except preference in engagement of identified displaced persons who have not taken cash grant in the above RR plan. He requested to provide facilities Gov. of Odisha is arranging relief for natural calamities like Rs. 25 Lakh over 5 in local area to protect the villagers cyclonic storm & high tide. IOCL will extend support in such year for calamities during high tide and cyclonic events as per requirements in association with District support Storm periods when salty water Administration and concerned Gram Panchayat (GP). enters into their villages and agricultural land.

398 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Commitment on S.No Issue Raised by Issue Reply by IOCL Paradip fund allocation 2. Ranjan Kumar He had welcomed the project with Various developmental activities e.g. providing drinking - Bardhan from condition for spending CSR water facilities, infrastructure developments, women Govindapur, budgets in Dhinkia GP and nearby empowerment, organizing medical camps, community Dhinkia GP areas. development, promoting education, skill development trainings, swachhta & conservation of environment etc. in nearby GPs under CSR are being finalized by CSR team of Paradip Refinery in consultation with Dist. Administration.

IOCL Paradip refinery has spent about Rs. 7.3 Crore during FY 2019-20 under CSR in nearby GPs.

He further requested to recruit land For contractual engagement in various agencies working for 5.0 Lakh over 5 losers at least in contractual jobs, Paradip Refinery, are done by the agency itself based on their years for drain to reconstruct the by-pass road and requirement subject to meeting the requisite qualification and cleanliness, to clean the drains for eradicating skill. Mosquito mosquito nuisance in the area. containment In consultation with Dist. Administration, IOCL will explore measures and the possibility of reconstruction of bypass road under its CSR continuing. program. Regarding eradication of mosquito breeding, IOCL is already in the job and will continue the same. 3 BishnuCharan He expressed many things - - Swain from irrelevant to the project and Kujang, highlighted general environmental Jagatsinghpur condition of Paradip area. 4 Subash Pradhan He asked to provide Basic facilities Various basic amenities / facilities like providing drinking 5.0 Lakh over 5 from to the nearby areas. water, organizing medical health camps, mobile medical vans years for drain Trilochanpur, He emphasized on boundary side with free consultation & medicines, promoting education, cleanliness, Dhinkia drain cleaning in Dhinkia to swachhta & conservation of environment etc. in nearby GPs Mosquito

399 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Commitment on S.No Issue Raised by Issue Reply by IOCL Paradip fund allocation eliminate mosquito nuisance. under CSR are being carried out on regular basis. containment measures & Regarding boundary side drain cleaning & eradication of continuing. mosquito breeding, IOCL is already in the job and will continue the same. He also said agriculture land has In consultation with District Administration, installation of Rs. 25 Lakh over 5 been affected due to salty water sluice gate to prevent intrusion of salty water into agriculture years for taking up intrusion for which sluice gate to land will be explored under CSR project. these facilities. be provided. Being the GP dominated by agro Various developmental activities e.g. infrastructure dependent population he developments, women empowerment, organizing medical emphasized on utilization of more camps, mobile medical units with free consultation & CSR fund on education, road medicines, community development, promoting education, transport & health care facility by skill development trainings, swachhta & conservation of the unit. He stated that focus environment etc. in nearby GPs under CSR are being should be on the affected identified & finalized by CSR team of Paradip Refinery in agriculture land and local consultation with District Administration. employment. 5 Bikramjit He highlighted about the existing Paradip Refinery complex deployed latest technology Rs. 30.0 Lakh over 5 Samantaray pollution problems due to IOCL process units, equipments and commissioned refinery in years for social from Dhinkia refinery and expressed his year 2015-16andoperations gradually stabilised at rated issues like drinking concerns about their adverse capacity in 2019-20.All requisite pollution control facilities water, drainage, impacts. He supported the project have been installed & mitigation measures taken for women with a condition to minimize prevention of environmental pollution with compliance to the empowerment, existing pollution problems and applicable statutory rules, regulations and specified limits. scholarship etc. IOCL should look into the social High efficiency heater & boilers with low NOx burners, 3 issues of local area. treated low Sulphur fuel Gas (H2S <150 mg/Nm ) and fuel oil (<0.5%), BSVI Diesel fuel are being used.

400 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Commitment on S.No Issue Raised by Issue Reply by IOCL Paradip fund allocation

Monitoring reports enclosed Annexure-26. Display board has been installed for public view& appreciation for the emission and discharge parameters.

Awareness training programs are being conducted for Local Sarpanchs to disseminate information, knowledge about the pollution control measures installed in Paradip Refinery.

Pollution control measures as per standard meeting statutory requirement shall be implemented in the proposed project also. 6 Arakshita Das, He supported the project because Recruitment for permanent post in IOCL is done through open - Kothi no additional land is required. competition and candidates are selected as per Corporation However, he highlighted the recruitment policy. failure of IOCL in fulfilling For contractual engagement in various agencies working for previous commitments. Paradip Refinery, are done by the agency itself based on their requirement subject to meeting the requisite qualification and skill. As per RR Plan 2002, approved by RPDAC under the chairmanship of RDC(C), Cuttack (Gov. of Odisha), for Paradip Refinery project, there is no provision for any preferential engagement at Paradip Refinery or in various agencies engaged by Paradip Refinery except preference in engagement of identified displaced persons who have not taken cash grant in the above RR plan.

Various developmental activities e.g. providing drinking

401 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Commitment on S.No Issue Raised by Issue Reply by IOCL Paradip fund allocation water facilities, infrastructure developments, women empowerment, organizing medical camps, community development, promoting education, skill development trainings, swachhta & conservation of environment etc. in nearby GPs under CSR are being identified & finalized by CSR team of Paradip Refinery in consultation with Dist. Administration. IOCL Paradip refinery has spent about Rs. 7.3 Crore during FY 2019-20 under CSR in nearby GPs. He expressed that the project Medical health camps are being organized in nearby villages, Rs. 10.0 Lakh per should come and IOCL should take GPs. Last check-up was done in 2019-20, however the same month over 2 years up CSR activities including will resume on normalization of Covid-19 pandemic situation for mobile medical provision of medical facility and in the localities. Mobile medical services are being provided servicesandhealth drinking water supply in the area. in Paradip & Jagatsinghpur district. camps.

Drinking water supply is being done through tankers. Three Drinking water supply projects for nearby villages have been approved and are under execution at about Rs. 3.4 Cr expenditure. He also demanded about For contractual engagement in various agencies working for - requirement of local people to the Paradip Refinery, are done by the agency itself based on their extent of 70 % at least in requirement subject to meeting the requisite qualification and contractual jobs. skill.

402 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Commitment on S.No Issue Raised by Issue Reply by IOCL Paradip fund allocation He further emphasized that IOCL Scholarship to meritorious students is already in place and Rs. 8.0 Lakh for should resume its scheme of will be continued. There was a disruption during 2020 due to 2021-22 for awarding scholarship to local Covid-19 pandemic situation in Odisha. Scholarship Scheme scholarship award to meritorious student. has been utilised Rs 7 Lakh in 2019-20. meritorious students from nearby Gram Panchayats.

7 Pabitra Kumar He supported the project. Modern and best technological Pollution control measure Rs. 30 Lakh over 5 Sahoo from However, he requested district have been installed in Paradip Refinery. Pollution monitoring year for fulfilling Kothi administration to take up all local is being done on continuous basis and remains well within local concern, issues concerns with IOCL for fulfilling limits. related jobs. their demand and minimizing Monitoring reports enclosed as Annexure- 26.Display board pollution problems. is installed for public view for emission and discharge parameters.

Awareness programs are being conducted for nearby villages Sarpanchs and the same will be further conducted to enhance their knowledge. Pollution control measures as per standard meeting statutory requirement shall be implemented in the proposed project also.

IOCL has spent about Rs. 30 Crore for environment control operations and about Rs. 7 Crore under CSR program to nearby areas, villages, gram panchayats (GPs).

He further emphasize on general IOCL Paradip Refinery has been cleaning the NH-5 road from Rs. 6.0 Lakh annual

403 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Commitment on S.No Issue Raised by Issue Reply by IOCL Paradip fund allocation environmental issues to road ‘Zero Point’ to Dochakki engaging mechanized road cleaner for the road segment transportation, road conditions of on regular basis. As per resolution of the Environment cleaning. Paradip area and appealed for Committee Meeting in 2019 chaired by District Magistrate& introducing a road cleaning Collector, major industries of Paradip have been allocated the scheduled from Bhutamundai to road zones for cleaning and the same is being done. Paradip. Respective authorities NHAI, SPWD and Paradip municipality are maintaining roads in Paradip area.

8 NrusinghCharan He emphasized about IOCL has installed latest high efficiency Heaters Boilers with - Das from persistingissues related to air and Low NOx burners, uses very low Sulphur Fuel Gas (<150 Dhinkia noise pollution during operation of mg/NM3), Fuel Oil (<0.50%) and BS-VI Diesel fuel. All refinery. requisite pollution control facilities has been provided & mitigation measure being taken for prevention of environmental air pollution with compliance to the applicable statutory rules, regulations, specified limits. Continuous monitoring of emission and pollution, ambient air quality through analysers and accredited agencies is being done. The emissions are observed within limits. Monitoring report enclosed as Annexure-26. Display board is installed for public view for emission and discharge parameters. Low Noise level equipments are installed with acoustic enclosures for noise reduction. Noise level monitoring is being done periodically and corrective action taken. Noise level report enclosed as Annexure-27.

IOCL Paradip refinery spend about Rs. 30 Crore for environment control operations.

404 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Commitment on S.No Issue Raised by Issue Reply by IOCL Paradip fund allocation

He further intimated about Regarding boundary side drain cleaning & eradication of Rs. 5.0 Lakh over 5 breeding of mosquitoes in nearby mosquito breeding, IOCL is already in the job and will years for drain drain which are not cleaned by continue the same. cleanliness, IOCL. Mosquito containment measures and continuing. He finally expressed that he does IOCL Paradip Refinery has undertaken the following IOCL has spent not opposed the project but IOCL activities under the scope of CSR for the betterment of life of about Rs. 11 Crores should take up the existing issues the nearby villagers: in last 3 years under for providing a better life to the  Providing drinking water facilities CSR and nearby dwellers.  Organizing medical camps and mobile medical units environment  Infrastructural developments such as construction of program. concrete roads, toilet complex,  Promoting education by renovation of school building, library, boundary wall, boys & girls toilets, distribution of dual desk benches, UV water coolers & desktop computers.  Skill development in association with NSDC & CIPET.  Women empowerment – improving income generation capabilities of women through self-help group by distributing sewing machines, waste paper recycling machines. Few more machines have been planned for distribution in FY 2021-22 which will create employment opportunities and improve the livelihood of the women of neighbouring GPs.

405 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Commitment on S.No Issue Raised by Issue Reply by IOCL Paradip fund allocation 9 Shyma Sundar He had signed in the attendance - - Sahoo from sheet but remained absent Bagadia during deliberation.

10 Pramod Kumar He mentioned that industrialization Paradip Refinery has undertaken the following activities FourRest shelters for Jena from should be aimed at development. under the scope of CSR for the betterment of life of the contractual workers Nuagarh GP He intimated about failure of IOCL nearby villagers: inside Refinery in CSR activities, drinking water  Providing drinking water facilities complex have been supply, medical treatment,  Organizing medical camps and mobile medical units approved and three providing green belt and providing  Infrastructural developments such as construction of have been already minimum facilities to its concrete roads, toilet complex, completed and are in contractual employees.  Promoting education by renovation of school building, use. Balance one no. library, boundary wall, boys & girls toilets, distribution of completionexpected dual desk benches, UV water coolers & desktop bySep’2021. computers.  Skill development in association with NSDC & CIPET.  Women empowerment – improving income generation capabilities of women through self-help group by distributing sewing machines, waste paper recycling machines. Few more machines have been planned for distribution in FY 2021-22 which will create employment opportunities and improve the livelihood of the women of neighbouring GPs.

He demanded IOCL to provide (i) IOCL has provided (i) parking area at its refinery gate, Additional three a parking shed for its contractual Material gate, admin area and TTL gate.(ii) Medical camp drinking water employees (ii) medical camps in conducted in 2019-20 and same will be resumed in 2021 supply projects are

406 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Commitment on S.No Issue Raised by Issue Reply by IOCL Paradip fund allocation villages (iii) plantation by which could not be held in 2020 due to pandemic COVID-19 approved at cost of engaging NGOs and drinking situation. (iii) Tree plantation is under execution through Rs. 3.4 Crore for water to nearby villages. contract. Paradip refinery has planted approximately 8 Lacs execution over 2 trees since inception. (iv) Drinking water is being supplied years period. through tankers. He further requested that IOCL At this moment IOCL has no plan for establishing any super Rs. 10.0 Lakh over 5 should take up for establishment of speciality hospital at Paradip. However, IOCL is providing years for medical a super specialty hospital. He medical health services in nearby area villages GPs and camps and health supported the project with conducting medical camps at regular intervals. services. conditions to fulfil the above.

11 Rabindra Majhi, He supported the project with a Recruitment for permanent post in IOCL is done through open - Jamihara Ekata request to fulfil earlier competition and candidates are selected as per Corporation Mancha, commitments made by IOCL. recruitment policy. President from Gandakipur For contractual engagement in various agencies working for Paradip Refinery, are done by the agency itself based on their requirement subject to meeting the requisite qualification and skill.

Various developmental activities e.g. providing drinking

407 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

IOCL Paradip refinery has spent about Rs. 7.3 Crore during FY 2019-20 under CSR programs in nearby GPs. 12 Bipin Kumar He supported the project with a Facilities under CSR program are being fulfilled as per the Three drinking water Tripathy from request that IOCL should consult discussions with local villages Gram Panchayats,RPDAC supply projects are Mangarajpur with more and more local people recommendation and approval of District Administration. approved at cost of of the area through CSR activities. IOCL CSR program facilities areexecuted accordingly. Rs. 3.4 Crore for He further requested to complete execution over 2 drinking water supply to his GP for years period. which Rs. 3 crores has already been sanctioned. 13 Jogendra Tarai, He supported the project with a Recruitment for permanent post in IOCL is done through open - Mangarajpur request to fulfil earlier competition and candidates are selected as per Corporation commitments made by IOCL. recruitment policy.

For contractual engagement in various agencies working for Paradip Refinery, are done by the agency itself based on their requirement subject to meeting the requisite qualification and skill.

As per RR Plan 2002, approved by RPDAC under the

408 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Commitment on S.No Issue Raised by Issue Reply by IOCL Paradip fund allocation chairmanship of RDC(C), Cuttack (Gov. of Odisha), for Paradip Refinery project, there is no provision for any preferential engagement at Paradip Refinery or in various agencies engaged by Paradip Refinery except preference in engagement of identified displaced persons who have not taken cash grant in the above RR plan.

Various developmental activities e.g. providing drinking water facilities, infrastructure developments, women empowerment, organizing medical camps, community development, promoting education, skill development trainings, swachhta & conservation of environment etc. in nearby GPs under CSR are being identified & finalized by CSR team of Paradip Refinery in consultation with Dist. Administration.

IOCL Paradip refinery has spent about Rs. 7.3 Crore during FY 2019-20 under CSR in nearby GPs. 14 Dr. Ayeskant He opposed the project and the As per Paradip refinery project’s EC condition for green belt Rs. 1.5 Crore over 2 Ray public hearing and blamed the (GB) development wason 580 acres land and green belt on the years for tree entire process of EIA. He same has been developed in full. Additional tree plantation plantation. threatened to go on strike if the has been done on land in and around residential township, project comes mentioning that along access roads, village schools, panchayats, coastal villages etc. IOCL Paradip refinery till now has done IOCL has failed to provide 33% plantation of suitable species trees about 8.5 Lakh including plantation as per EC conditions. GB covering about 800 acres area. Further plantation of 100000 treesis under execution.

GB demarcated in google image Refinery layout enclosed as

409 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Commitment on S.No Issue Raised by Issue Reply by IOCL Paradip fund allocation Annexure-8. 15 Surendra He expressed that the project Facilities under CSR program are being fulfilled as per the - Mahanta, should come and development of discussions with local villages Gram Panchayats,RPDAC the area should be done. However, recommendation and approval of District Administration. IOCL should consult more and IOCL CSR program facilities are being executed accordingly. more local people examining their demands and to fulfil them. 16 Siba Charan He supported the project and IOCL Refinery has adequate budgetary provision towards New SRU for Biswal, emphasized to increase budget environmental work expenditure in year 2020-21 is Rs 30 environment Paribesha provisions for improvement of Crore. IOCL investment about Rs. 3800 Crore is under protection is under Surakhya Trust, environmental status of Paradip execution for BS-VI fuel Quality upgradation units. executionat the cost Paradeep area. of 371 Crore. He requested to maintain the road As per resolution of the Environment Committee Meeting in Rs. 5.0 Lakh per connecting Zero point to 2019 chaired by District Magistrate & Collector, Major year for the road Atharabanki for minimizing traffic industries of Paradip have been allocated the road zones for segment cleaning. congestion and air pollution. cleaning and the road cleaning is being done accordingly. Roads in Paradip area are being maintained by respective authorities NHAI, SPWD and Paradip municipality. Traffic management is carried out by the district administration, traffic police. IOCL Paradip Refinery has been cleaning the NH-5 road from ‘Zero Point’ to Dochakki engaging mechanized road cleaner on regular basis. He further appealed to start Proposed 8 Lane highway is part of Paradip Port Area - construction of the proposed 8 lane Development Zone and concern authorities will do needful. road from Paradip Project Proponent IOCL has no role for the highway construction.

410 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Commitment on S.No Issue Raised by Issue Reply by IOCL Paradip fund allocation 17 Sarat Kumar He questioned about the The query on authenticity of data is not relevant. - Rout from authenticity of data mentioned in Paradeep the executive summary and asked Paradip Refinery has undertaken the following activities IOCL to clarify if entire the CSR under the scope of CSR for the betterment of life of the budget has been spent for nearby villagers: betterment homeless people of  Providing drinking water facilities Jagatsinghpur.  Organizing medical camps and mobile medical units  Infrastructural developments such as construction of concrete roads, toilet complex,  Promoting education by renovation of school building, library, boundary wall, boys & girls toilets, distribution of dual desk benches, UV water coolers & desktop computers.  Skill development in association with NSDC & CIPET.  Women empowerment – improving income generation capabilities of women through self-help group by distributing sewing machines, waste paper recycling machines. Few more machines have been planned for distribution in FY 2021-22 which will create employment opportunities and improve the livelihood of the women of neighbouring GPs He showed his concern about the Flare is important integral part of safetydesignof a Refineryfor - flame visible from the flaring stack safe operation. The flare ensures combustion,requisite and its negative impacts on nearby dispersion, improves environmental conditions and reduces area including Bhitarakanika pollution. As per extant flare load, the radiation intensity is Wildlife Sanctuary. miniscule about 0.001 KW/m2 which has almost nil impact in comparison to solar radiation about 1.0 KW/m2. Flare Detail:

411 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Commitment on S.No Issue Raised by Issue Reply by IOCL Paradip fund allocation Height: 131 m, Dia: 80 inch, Location: Latitude 200 14’ 33.05” N& Longitude860 36’26.68” E Exit flow Velocity: 0.15 m/s 18 Ohirendra - Biswal, Bagadia He expressed that he supports For contractual engagement in various agencies working for industrialization in general but has Paradip Refinery, are done by the agency itself based on their no hopes on commitments made by requirement subject to meeting the requisite qualification and IOCL. skill.

IOCL Paradip Refinery has spent about Rs. 7.3 Crore under CSR in nearby GPs.

412 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Commitment on S.No Issue Raised by Issue Reply by IOCL Paradip fund allocation He further objected about not District Administration and Odisha SPCB has conducted - conducting public hearing inside Public Hearing consultation at the suitable location nearby villages. forcompliance to COVID-19 pandemic situation protocol and guidelines for protection and safety of public in general. He appealed before IOCL to take IOCL works with sustainable development & operations with Rs. 35 Lakh over 5 care of the health of water, forest, continual environment improvement philosophy for better year for fulfilment of people, animals and agricultural life to own employees, stakeholders, associates and nearby community concern land failing which people will be population. development forced to go on strike. IOCL has installed latest high efficiency Heaters Boilers with Low NOx burners, uses very low Sulphur Fuel Gas (<150 mg/NM3), Fuel Oil (<0.50%) and BS-VI Diesel fuel. Modern ETP of adequate capacity 1400M3/hr with matching RO recovery plant has been installed to treat effluent water and reduce discharge to minimum through re-use in refinery units itself. All requisite pollution control facilities has been provided & mitigation measure being taken for prevention of environmental air, water pollution with compliance to the applicable statutory rules, regulations, specified limits. Continuous monitoring of emission and treated effluent discharge, ambient air quality through analyzers and accredited agencies is being done. The quality parameters of emissions, noise & effluent discharge are being maintained within limits, monitoring report enclosed (Annexure-26).

Low Noise level equipments are installed with acoustic enclosures for noise reduction. Noise level monitoring is being done periodically and corrective action taken. Noise

413 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Commitment on S.No Issue Raised by Issue Reply by IOCL Paradip fund allocation level report enclosed (Annexure-27).

IOCL is aware of corporate citizen’s role & responsibilities take care of its surroundings. IOCL provide drinking water supply, medical & health amenities, sanitation, education & scholarship, skill development, self-employment assistance, environment pollution control operations and monitoring etc. to nearby population.

IOCL has spent about Rs. 30 Crore for environment control operations and about Rs. 7.3 Crore under CSR program to nearby areas, villages,gram panchayats (GPs).

414 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

7.2 Risk Assessment

The recommendations and mitigation measures of Risk Assessment will be implemented. The impact contours will be kept within the refinery limit. Continuous onsite and offsite emergency plan will be done in accordance with local district authorities. Periodic mock drills will be conducted and any gaps if found will be addressed. Risk Assessment report is attached as Annexure 10. Material Safety Data Sheet is enclosed in Annexure 12.and the Disaster Management Plan is enclosed in Annexure 11. The certified EC compliance to environmental conditions is provided in Annexure 2.

The following audits is being carried out periodically for environmental safety ,

 Internal System Audit on Yearly Basis.

 Internal & External Audit for OHSAS on Yearly Basis

 Cross refinery safety & Environment Audit Yearly Basis.

 External Safety Audit by OISD team once in Three Years.

 Pre-commissioning Safety Audit for each New Facility. Adequate ventilation will be maintained in the control room with a minimum of five to six air changes per hour. Air intake to be properly located in line with OISD-STD 163. The latest Cross-refinery safety & Environment Audit report is enclosed as Annexure 19 and the Latest Daily Environmental Safety Report is enclosed as Annexure 21. Following are the safety measures have been adopted in the plant. 1. Emergency isolation valves are provided with manual mode that will close them immediately through push button located at a safe place and auto mode that will close them immediately through gas/fire detector system. 2. The Vessels/ tanks are designed as per standards and corrosion protection is accounted in the design. 3. Material of Construction of vessels is assumed to be suitable for the process conditions. 4. The facilities are well designed as per acceptable Indian / International codes & standards. 5. Inherent safety like appropriate equipment spacing as per OISD-118, Hazardous area classification is considered. 6. Passive fire protection such as fire proofing shall be provided. 7. Appropriate detection measures such as fire and gas detectors are to be provided and verified throughout the plant area.

415 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

8. Use of separate Fire and Gas PLC (programmable logic controllers) for operation of gas detector and hardwiring of emergency switches for all new plants and facilities. 9. Inter distance Analysis for the facilities has been performed as per OISD standard and the facilities are located safely. Overall Risk is in ALARP region and plant is equipped with well-defined safety measures and no additional safety mitigation measures are recommended 7.3 Applicability of Environmental Clearance

List of latest and Existing Environmental Clearance obtained by MoEF & CC:

S. No MoEF File No Date of issue Status of Project

1 J-11011/70/2007-IA. II(I) 06-07-2007 Commissioned

2 11-86/2011-IA.III 21-02-2012 Commissioned

3 11-117/2009-IA-III 13-07-2012 Commissioned

4 11-33/2013-IA.III 19-09-2013 Commissioned

5 J-11011/395/2012-IA. II 18-09-2014 --

6 J-11011/395/2012-IA. II(I) 06-01-2015 Commissioned

7 11-30/2015-IA.III 11-02-2016 Commissioned

8 J-11011/344/2016-IA. II(I) 11-10-2018 Under Construction

9 J-11011/395/2012-IA II(I) - Applied now.

The existing refinery obtained several Environmental Clearances since 2007.Summary of EC’s obtained enclosed as with latest EC obtained from MoEF vide: J-11011/344/2016-IA. II (I) dated 11thOct 2018, enclosed as Annexure-2

7.4 Consent for Existing Operation The existing plant is under operation with OPCB consent for Air and water obtained vide: Ref No.- 5543/IND-I-CON-6414 dated 31.03.2021 valid till 31.03.2022 copy enclosed as Annexure 3. PESO license obtained vide P/HQ/OR/15/1163 (P223845) dated 29.12.2020 Valid Up to: 31.12.2023 enclosed as Annexure-4.

416 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

7.5 TOR issued by MoEF

417 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

7.6 Copy of Standard TOR

418 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

419 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

420 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

421 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

422 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

423 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

CHAPTER 8 PROJECT BENEFITS

424 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

8 PROJECT BENEFITS

8.1 Project Benefits

Importance of the project: 1. The project is of national importance and will reduce import dependence to the tune of 1.2 million MT per year PTA product through domestic production and reduction in foreign exchange outgo. 2. The project of Indian Oil is one of significant projects under the Govt. of India’s “Make in India” Initiative for the Manufacturing Sector. 3. The proposed project is to meet the market potential having a deficit of about 2.2 MMTPA PTA in India by 2024. 4. An important project under the Petroleum Chemicals and Petrochemicals Investment Region (PCPIR) in Odisha and spur industrial investment and development of the region. 5. Expand Petrochemical Production footprint of Indian Oil, Paradip Refinery in Odisha. 6. The PTA plant project along with under construction MEG Plant at Paradip, will accelerate the development of Textile Industry in the Eastern Region of India. Leading to additional employment opportunities.

425 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

5. PTA is a non-hazardous, solid white powder, which is the preferred raw material and the basic building block to produce Polyester Staple Fibre (PSF), Polyester Filament Yarn (PFY), bottle and industrial grade polyester resin, polyester chips and so on. 6. PSF and PFY are substitutes for natural cotton and widely used for production of textiles and garments. Eastern India does not have any economic size of PSF, PFY or PET resin plants. 7. The first PTA plant at IOCL Paradip can provide steady supply of feedstock PTA to PSF, PYF and PET resin plants. The polyester resins/chips can further be processed to produce audio/ video tapes, x-ray films, photographic films, tapes, aseptic bottles for packing mineral water, carborated drinks, vegetable oil, cosmetics, toiletries, tea, coffee etc. 8. The above PP and PTA plant products shall be building blocks for envisaged Plastic & Textile Park respectively in Odisha.

426 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

CHAPTER 9 ENVIRONMENTAL COST AND BENEFIT ANALYSIS

427 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

9 ENVIRONMENTAL COST AND BENEFIT ANALYSIS

This Chapter is not in Scoping Stage

428 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

CHAPTER 10 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

429 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

10 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

10.1 Introduction

This Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for Indian Oil Corporation Limited identifies the principles, procedures and methods that will be used to control and minimize the environmental impacts of the proposed minor construction and operational activities associated with the revamp project. It is intended to ensure that commitments made by IOCL to minimize project related environmental and social impacts are upheld throughout all project phases. As part of our ongoing commitment to excellence in environmental and social performance we will ensure the following:  Fulfill all environmental conditions associated with project approvals.  Develop, promote and foster a shared sense of responsibility for environmental and performance of the project.  Promote environmental awareness and understanding among employees and contractors through training, identification of roles and responsibilities towards environmental management and linking project performance to overall environmental performance.  Monitor environmental performance throughout the project and implement an adaptive management approach to continuous improvement and to meet the future regulations.

10.2 Objectives of EMP

 To suggest the formation of a core group (Environment Management Cell) responsible for implementation of environmental control & protective measures as well as monitoring of such implementation.  To ensure project components are compliant with all laws and approval conditions  Continue baseline monitoring  Facilitate a continual review of post construction and operation activities.  To suggest preventive and mitigation measures to minimize adverse impact and to maximize beneficial impacts like  Preparation of afforestation or Greenbelt Development scheme.

430 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

 Preparation of rain water harvesting scheme and energy conservation actions  To prepare a capital cost estimate and annual recurring cost for Environmental Management Plan.  To prepare a detailed action plan for implementation of mitigation measures.  Measure the effectiveness and success of proposed mitigation measures

10.3 EMP Structure and Organization This EMP is designed as an overriding document in a hierarchy of control plans, and sets out the overarching framework of environmental management principles that will be applied to the project during preconstruction, construction and operation phase of the project. The EMP contains guiding environmental principles and procedures for communication, reporting, training, monitoring and plan review to which all staff, contractors and subcontractors are required to comply with throughout the preconstruction, construction and operation phases of the proposed projects.

Figure 10-1 Typical HSE Department Organogram

431 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

The EMP should also be considered as an overall framework document that establishes the terms of reference for all project environmental and social sub-plans including the following:

 Environmental Supervision Plan (construction);  Environmental Monitoring Plan (construction and operation); and  Social and Health Management Plan (construction and operation).

10.4 EMP Roles and Responsibilities This section describes the organizational structure and responsibilities for implementation of the EMP as shown below in Table 10-1 Table 10-1 Responsibility for EMP Implementation

S.No Organisation Responsibility 1 HoD, HSE  Overall responsibility for environmental performance  Decision-maker on applicable policies.  Overall supervisory role during the construction phase  Overall responsibility for EMP implementation during the operating phase  Responsible for changes to the EMP as part of an adaptive approach to environmental and social management

432 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S.No Organisation Responsibility 2 Sectional Head – Env.,  Develop an environmental unit, headed by the Project HSE Environmental Officer to implement EMP responsibilities.  Oversight, implementation, monitoring and compliance of the EMP and any approval conditions, including construction supervision and performance of all staff, contractors and all subcontractors  Review of EMP performance and implementation of correction action, or stop work procedures, in the event of breaches ofEMP conditions, that may lead to serious impacts on local communities, or affect the reputation of the project.  Ensuring effective communication and dissemination of the content and requirements of the EMP to contractors and subcontractors  Assisting the contractor with implementation of EMP sub-plans  Ensuring compliance to all project social commitments, including implementation of corporate social responsibility.  Report environmental performance of the project directly to MoEF&CC  Report on environmental performance also to other government regulators as required. 3 SM / M, HSE  Implementation of the Environmental Monitoring Plan during construction and operation.  Supervision of contractor performance of implementation of the Construction.  Reporting any incidents or non-compliance with the EMP to the PCB.  Ensuring adequate training and education of all staff involved in environmental supervision.  Making recommendations to the MoEF&CC regarding EMP performance as part of an overall commitment to continuous improvement.

433 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S.No Organisation Responsibility 4 HoD, Project  Preparation and implementation of the Construction Department Management Plan  Prepare and maintain records and all required reporting data as stipulated by the EMP, for submission to the Supervising Engineer.  Ensure that all construction personnel and subcontractors are informed of the intent of the EMP and are made aware of the required measures for environmental and social compliance and performance  During construction, maintain traffic safety along access roads, with special emphasis on high trafficked areas 5 Independent  Report to MoEF&CC on project compliance with Environmental environmental and social commitments in the EMP, MonitoringConsultant EIA and other applicable standards.

10.5 Environmental Management Plan for Construction Phase

Environmental monitoring will be done during construction. The focus of monitoring during the construction phase will be to implement systematic observations to periodically measure the success of proposed mitigation measures and continue baseline data collection. The majority of construction monitoring shall be done visually and verified by the Construction Supervisor. Specific aspects to be addressed during construction include:

 Air quality  Noise  Water quality and water resources  Solid waste  Land environment

10.5.1 Air Quality

There will be major construction activities for the project, civil work like foundation for new vessels and supporting infrastructure for the new machineries will be carried out. During construction activities, dust emission and emissions from the movement of vehicles and construction activity is expected. However, following measures will be taken to reduce / contain such emissions.

434 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

 Water will be sprinkled on inner roads to prevent re-suspension of dust into ambient air due to movement of heavy vehicles etc.  Roads shall be kept free from mud, debris and other obstacles.  Separate civil construction material storage yard will be created within the site and it will be enclosed.  Cement bags will be separately stored under cover in bales. Sand will be stacked under tarpaulin cover.  Transport vehicles and construction equipment’s/ machineries will be properly maintained to reduce air emissions.  All construction workers will be provided appropriate PPEs like dust mask, ear plug, helmet, safety belt etc. and it will be mandatory for them to wear while entering the site itself.  Increase signage and speed limit postings

10.5.2Noise Environment

Following measures are proposed during construction period to mitigate adverse impacts of noise:  Construction activities will be done on round the clock basis.  All machineries to be used for construction purpose will be of highest standard of reputed make and compliance of noise pollution control norms by this equipment’s will be emphasized. All construction workers working in high noise areas will be provided appropriate PPEs like ear muffs and made to wear them during working hours.

10.5.3 Water Quality and Water Resources  Proper and sufficient sanitary facility will be created at the site in the form of Toilets & existing ETP will be used for treatment of sewage generated.  The water resource will be provided from the existing facility.

10.5.4Solid Waste  Main solid waste generation during construction phase will be construction debris like rubble, brick bats, debris, steel scrap, wooden scrap, sand, gravel etc. However, these materials are inert in nature and will not result into leaching of any substance or its constituent.

435 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

 These materials will be carefully sorted and will be used within premises for filling of low lying areas.  Wooden scrap, steel scrap will be given to authorized scrap dealers.  On completion of civil work, all debris etc. will be completely removed from site to avoid any incompatibility with future use.  All the wastes will be stored at a designated site within the premises to prevent scattered discharge on land.

10.5.5Land Environment

 Top soil layers shall be stored for reclamation and re-vegetation and reforestation at approved locations.  Existing storm water drainage facility will be used for disposal of storm water.

10.5.6Ecology

The Project site is present in existing area, there will not be clearance of land envisaged for proposed projects and adequate measures will be taken to maintain the existing greenbelt area of 580 Acres in refinery area while in total it occupies about 850acres of green belt. The green belt occupies about 30.46% only.

10.5.7Socio Economic

There will be temporary employment for manpower required during construction phase available from local communities. Overall socioeconomic effect of construction phase will be positive due to direct and indirect employment opportunity and preference will be given to the local communities as per IOCL Rules. 10.6 Environmental Management Plan for Operation Phase

Monitoring during the operation phase shall reflect those environmental and socio-economic issues that may persist upon completion of construction activities. Monitoring shall focus on evaluating the effectiveness of project mitigation measures and continue baseline monitoring and sampling. The mitigation measures to prevent adverse impact during the operation phase of the project shall focus on the following:  Air quality  Noise environment

436 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

 Solid and hazardous waste  Land environment

10.6.1Air Pollution Management

The air emission is controlled in PX-PTA complex by installing Online continuous emission monitoring systems, use of clean burning fuel gas and natural gas, increased stacks heights, installation of low NOx burners and floating roof in storage tanks for reduction of fugitive emissions & hydrocarbon losses and to attain zero leakage status. For the proposed project, IOCL Paradip allocates capital cost of INR 24.1 crores budget towards expenditure on stack and APC equipments, along with the recurring cost of INR 2.57 crores for the same. Ambient Air Quality is monitored both manually and continuous monitoring at AAQM stations in line with the CPCB/MoEF&CC guideline

The gaseous emissions from the PX-PTA complex will be controlled to meet all the relevant standards stipulated by the regulatory authorities. The Standards for Emissions from Furnaces, heaters and Boilers is given in Table 10-3.  The flare losses will be minimized and monitored regularly.  PX-PTA Complex will install continuous emission monitoring systems for SOx NOx CO and PM in major stacks with proper calibration facilities. Paradip Refinery has adopted various measures for control of gaseous emissions. These include:  Use of clean burning fuel gas and natural gas in PX-PTA unit.  Installation of low NOx burners in all the furnaces and boilers  Tall stacks for better dispersion of flue gases.  Online monitoring of SOx, NOx, CO and PM emissions from furnaces/boilers.  Monitoring of ambient air quality as per revised MoEF  Installation of internal floating roof with double seals in all Class-A tanks for reduction of fugitive emissions.  Provision of mechanical seals in all the hydrocarbon pumps for reduction of fugitive emissions.  Reduction of hydrocarbon losses and to attain zero leakage status. Table 10-2 Proposed Pollution control scheme

S. Stack details Pollution control scheme

437 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

No 1. Tatory Furnace 2. ISOMAR Furnace  Installation of low NOx burners in all the furnaces and boilers 3. XFU 1  Adequate stack height XFU 2 4.  APH will be provided 5. Utility Boiler – 5 (Standby)*  Tall flare stack for better dispersion of flue 6. Flare gases. Storage vents: 7. Toluene day tank- 045-TK-001A  Installation of floating roof with double seals for 8. Toluene day tank- 045-TK-001B reduction of fugitive 9. Plant inventory tank- 044-TK-001 emissions  Provision of mechanical seals in all the 10. Paraxylene day tank- 049-TK-001 A hydrocarbon pumps for reduction of fugitive 11. Paraxylene day tank- 049-TK-001 B emissions. 12. Desorbent storage tanks-049-TK-002  All the proposed tanks are of Internal floating Plant inventory storage tanks- 049-TK- roof type minimizing the fugitive emissions in 13. 003 comparison to External floating roof tanks 14. Aromatic tank-048-TK-001  All the tanks will be under Nitrogen blanketing Light reformate storage tank-048-TK- 15. 002 16. Isomer Regeneration Vent

Table 10-3 Standards for Emissions from Furnaces, heaters and Boilers

Limiting concentration in Sr. mg/Nm3, unless Parameter No. Existing New refineries, refineries furnaces, boilers Gas firing 50 50 1 Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) Liquid firing 1700 850 Gas firing 350 250 2 Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) Liquid firing 450 350 Gas firing 10 5 3 Particulate Matter (PM) Liquid firing 100 50 Gas firing 150 100 4 Carbon Monoxide (CO) Liquid firing 200 150 5 Nickel + Vanadium (Ni+V) Liquid firing 5 5 Hydrogen Sulphide (H2S) Liquid/gas 6 150 150 in fuel gas firing Sulphur content in liquid Liquid/gas 7 1.0 0.5 fuel, weight % firing a) Fugitive Emission Control Measures

438 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Monitoring of fugitive emissions from IOCL, PDR complex with the help of VOC (Volatile Organic Carbon), LDAR (Leak Detection and Repair) program is being done monthly with the help of an external agency. Thus observed leaks are identified and rectified. And the same will be continued after the proposed expansion. 10.6.1.1 Gaseous Waste Emissions The atmospheric pollution generated from the ISBL Process Plant mainly comes from the Process Inerts Vent (G1), PTA Day Silo A exhaust (G2), PTA Day Silo B exhaust (G3), Offspec PTA silo exhaust (G4), and ISBL PSV Vent Scrubber Stack (G5). There are two main exhaust treatments used in the PTA plant: catalytic oxidation and bag filtration. G1: Process Inerts Vent The off-gas to the process vent stack comes from the oxidation reactor, which contains various volatile organics such as benzene, methylbenzene, methanol, methyl acetate, methyl bromide, and other volatile organic substances. After the dimethylbenzene and acetic acid are recovered, most of the organic substances and methyl bromide contained by the waste gas will be oxidized and decomposed via the high pressure catalytic oxidation (CATOX) reactor. Low pressure vents requiring treatment, which include vent streams from the Low Pressure Absorber, the PTA Vent Knock Out Drum, and the PTA Dryer Scrubber vent, are treated in the Low Pressure catalytic oxidation system. The off-gas from the CATOX reactor and the Low Pressure catalytic oxidation system is scrubbed for bromine removal in the Process Vent Scrubber and combined in the Process Inerts Vent with the vent of the Reverse Osmosis Purge Drum, and the vent of the liquid catalyst tank. G2/G3/G4: Exhaust Gas from PTA Day Silo A, PTA Day Silo B, and PTA Off-Spec Silo Off-gas after catalytic oxidation and bromine scrubbing is used for the conveying of PTA product into the PTA day silos, and the off-spec silo. Because treated off gas is used for conveying, it does not contain any volatile organic substances. The vent of the silos is treated by a pulse bag-type dust removal system prior to discharging to the atmosphere, as it contains a small quantity of PTA powder. G5: ISBL PSV Vent Scrubber Stack

Many oxidation section relief valves are sent to the Ox unit PSV scrubber to reduce acetic acid concentration of the streams that are sent to the scrubber during a release event. The vent from the Ox Unit PSV Scrubber contains nitrogen sweep gas at a normal flow rate of 55 Nm3/h. The normal vent is pure Nitrogen, which contains no organic compounds. The Gaseous Waste Emissions from PX and PTA Plant is given in Table 10-4 and Table 10-4 respectively.

439 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Table 10-4 Gaseous Waste Emissions from PX Plant

Typical Unit Storage Tanks Amount Unit Frequency Pollutants Destination

Benzene- Toluene Day Volatile Toluene (Ton/ To Tanks (045- TK- 4.5 Continuous Organic Fractionat yr) Atmosphere 001A/B) Component ing Unit

Plant Inventory (Ton/ Benzene & To 7.37 Continuous Tank yr) Toluene Atmosphere

Reduced or Benzene Sulfolane no flow in To Tatoray Vent from Ejector (Kg/ 48-116 case of Charge Condensate Drum hr) less/no air Heater leakage into Toluene the system Volatile Paraxylene Day (Ton/ To 12.7 Continuous Organic Tanks yr) Atmosphere Component

Volatile Desorbent (Ton/ To Parex 13 Continuous Organic Storage Tank yr) Atmosphere Component

Volatile Plant Inventory (Ton/ To 13 Continuous Organic Storage Tank yr) Atmosphere Component

Volatile (Ton/ To Aromatics Tank 29 Continuous Organic yr) Atmosphere Component XFU Volatile Light Reformate (Ton/ To 33 Continuous Organic Storage Tank yr) Atmosphere Component

Intermittent (Once in Regeneration every four (Kg/ To Isomar Vent Gas from 1400 to five year CO2 hr) Atmosphere Separator for a period of 4 to 5 days)

440 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Table 10-5 Gaseous Waste Emissions from PTA Plant

Major pollutants composition Maximum Maximum Discharge Normal Normal Remar No. Pollutants Concentra Discharge sources Concentratio Discharge k tion rate (kg/h) n (mg/Nm3) rate (kg/h) (mg/Nm3) (Note 1) Discharge 291400 292000 Rate (Nm3/h)

Benzene 3 1 3.7 1.1 Toluene 4 1.2 6 1.8 Xylene 5 1.3 9 2.6 Process Acetic Acid 0.01 0.1 2 0.6 G1 Inerts Note 2 Methanol Vent 1 0.4 5 1.5 Methyl acetate 20 5.8 80 23 Bromine 3 0.9 5 1.5 Methyl 7 2.1 9 2.6 bromide Carbon monoxide 37 10.8 40 11.6 PTA Day Discharge Bag 6700 (Note 3) 13400 (Note 3) Silo A/B Rate (Nm3/h) Benzene 3.5 0.02 3.5 0.04 Toluene 4.1 0.03 4.1 0.04 Xylene 5 0.03 5 0.05 G2/ Acetic Acid 0.5 0.004 0.5 0.01 G3 Off-Spec Methanol 1.4 0.01 2.1 0.02 Filtration PTA Silo Methyl acetate 20 0.14 41 0.44 Bromine 3 0.02 3 0.03 Methyl 7.2 0.05 7.2 0.08 bromide Carbon monoxide 41 0.28 41 0.28 PTA dust 20 0.13 20 0.13 Note: 1. The duration for the high case is typically one hour at a frequency of two to four times per year. 2. The normal case is assumed that the off-spec PTA recycle system is not in service. The Max case is max emissions from the PTA day silos during transfer between PTA day silos and the off-spec PTAsilo.

441 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

3. HP Catalytic oxidation treatment and bromine scrubbing of the oxidation off gas. LP catalytic treatment of the discharge gas from the Low Pressure Absorber, Purification Vent Scrubber and Purification Dryer Scrubbervent

10.6.2Waste Water Management a) Existing Approx. 1082.1 m3/hr of effluent is generated in the existing facility of which 190.88 m3/hr rejects from RO is disposed to Deep Sea, 50 m3/hr rejects from RO is sent to Coke Dust Suspension and 50 m3/hr rejects from RO is sent to Coke Cutting. The Sludge created during the treatment of about 32.46 m3/hr along with a water loss of about 10.76 m3/hr. Remaining 748m3/hr from RO is reused back in the system for DM Water Makeup. b) Proposed In the proposed expansion Approx. 408 m3/hr of effluent is generated in the proposed facility of which 78% of effluent is processed in RO plant and its rejects of 86.18 m3/hr is disposed into deep sea. The Sludge created during the treatment of about 12.24 m3/hr along with a water loss of about 4.08 m3/hr. The remaining RO processed water of 305.5 m3/hr is reused back in the system for DM Water Makeup and cooling tower. New ETP is proposed for installation to process effluent @ 408 m3/hr with 10% design Margin (Maximum capacity with high TOC). The Waste Effluents from PX Plant is given in Table 10-6. Table 10-6 Waste Effluents from PX Plant

PX Contaminants Liquid Amoun Typical Process Service Frequency Stream t m3/hr Content ppm Destination Unit No Waste Water Benzene 2000 from Once in Toluene 700 Reformate Xylene every six Avg Intermitten Pre- Splitter Fractionation months for :0.268 t Treatment Receiver Unit No 048 period of 2 Xylenes Trace During clay or 3 days) treater dry out Waste Water Benzene- from Benzene- Pre- Toluene Avg: Continuou Toluene Continuous Benzene 2200 Treatmen Fractionator 0.03 s Column no1 t Unit -045 Receiver Boot Waste Water Benzene 2200 from Benzene- Toluene - Benzene- Toluene During dryers Pre- Toluene Avg: Intermitten Column no1 once in 6 Treatmen Fractionator 0.05 t Receiver Boot months Xylenes - t Unit -045 during clay Treater Dry

442 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

PX Contaminants Liquid Amoun Typical Process Service Frequency Stream t m3/hr Content ppm Destination Unit No out Waste Water Benzene 2200 Benzene- FromBenzene- Toluene - Pre- Toluene Avg:0.0 Continuou Toluene Continuous Treatmen Fractionato 2 s Column no2 Xylenes - t r Unit -045 ReceiverBoot Sulfone 0.05 m3/hr Benzene 2200 Waste Water Process Unit in case of Toluene 750 Pre- from Ejector Avg: 0.36 Continuou (Extractive no air Treatmen Condensate (Design) s Distillation) leakage into Xylenes - t Drum Unit-044 the system. Solvent Sulfone 2 m3 Intermitten Frequency – Sulfolane 20-70 % Diluted with Regenerator Process Unit t 2 times/ year (wt) Water and Bottom (pH (Extractive (Note-2) Aromatics 0-10 collected varies Distillation) (Wt%) Drums and according to Unit-044 Hydrocarbon 5-15 sent to pre- dilution) - Polymer (wt%) treatment Inorganic 2-10 Solids (wt%) (Note-1) Water Balance Raffinate Parex Avg IntermittenAs per process Benzene - Pre- Column no-1 Process Unit 0.0696 t requirement Toluene - Treatmen Receiver and -049 (6~ Xylenes - t Raffinate 8pH) column no1 vent Drum Waste Water Finishing Parex Avg IntermittenAs per process Benzene - Pre- column Process Unit :0.0450 t requirement Toluene - Treatmen Receiver -049 (6~ Xylenes - t Waste Water 8pH) Desorbent Parex Avg: IntermittenOnce in every Hydrocarbon 100% Desorbent Rerun Column Process 0.908 t six months Benzene Nil Rerun Bottoms Unit -049 Column Bottom is removed on a batch basis every one to two weeks and disposed of by sending to slopstank Clay Treater ISOMAR Avg : Intermitten One every Benzene 1700 Pre- Dry Out Process Unit- 0.455 t six months Toluene 700 treatme Water from 050 for a period nt Decheptanize of three to Xylenes 400 r Receiver ( four days 6 ~ 8 pH) Pre- Laboratory Avg: 0.2 Intermitten Based on -- Benzene 2200 treatme Effluent m3 t testing nt Effluent Avg: 1 Intermitten During Benzene/ Pre- -- 2200 during m3/hr t shutdown Aromatics treatme

443 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

PX Contaminants Liquid Amoun Typical Process Service Frequency Stream t m3/hr Content ppm Destination Unit No Shutdown nt Effluent from Paved Based on Pre- Avg ; 50 Intermitten Benzene/ Area during -- weather 2200 treatme m3 t Aromatics dry weather condition nt condition Sodium For twenty 71000 hours Bicarbonate Regeneration ISOMAR Avg: Intermitten during Sodium Spent Process Unit- 83000 ETP 6.0m3/h t Catalyst Chloride Catalyst 050 Regeneratio Balanc Water n e

Table 10-7 Waste Effluents from PTA Plant

Normal Maximum S. Flow rate Flow rate Peak Pollutants Sources of Discharge No of of [Duration] composition wastewater frequency . wastewate wastewate m3/hr (mg/L) r (m3/h) r (m3/h) Process TOC： 7500 -9500 wastewater 1 79 79 170 Continuous COD：20000- from RO Purge Drum 25000 pH：4-6 Process TOC：20000 - wastewater Intermittent 30000 2 from PTA 0 0 160 (for 2 hrs)) COD：65000- Vent Knock- out Drum 75000 pH：4-6 133 [TAR for 72 TOC：2500 – Intermittent hrs] (Note 2) 5000 COD： 7000- process 1636 (Note 1) 15000 SS： 500 - 3 wastewater 63 - Intermittent 114 [Process ： from ISBL 2000 Co 20 – 40 Upset for 72 Sumps Mn：10 – 20 hrs] pH：4 - 10 Note: 1.The flow rate of 1636 m3/hr is an assumed maximum case for fire water. The maximum flowrate shall be no less than max hourly rainfall across the ISBL curbed area (1500 m/hr; 125 mm/hr), TAR peak flowrate, and Process Upset peak flowrate even if the firewater case is less than this max.This water will be routed CRWS pond. Effleunt from CRWS pond will be treated in ETP. 20% magin shall be considered over peak flowrate as part of desing 2. Frequency not more than one event per 30-day period.

444 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Table 10-8 Liquid Waste Effluents from Offsite and Utilities

Value- S.No. Source Frequency Destination Composition m3/hr Tertiary treatment Cooling tower 221.67 – 1 Continuous through SSF blow down 236.96 backwash pit Side stream 2 18 Intermittent -do- Water filter Water containing oil from pump area, ETP through oily Oil contain shall be 3 Oily Drain - Intermittent water network 0-1000 ppm and oil and grease -12500 ppm 4 Storm water - NNF Storm Sewer Water

10.6.3Solid Waste Management Mainly four types of solid wastes are generated in the Refinery and its townships; namely oily sludge, biological sludge (from the biological treatment of the wastewater), other industrial solid wastes (intermittent) and the domestic solid wastes. The oily-sludge and spent catalyst of PX are the hazardous wastes generated in refinery operations. Oily sludge is generated mainly during cleaning of storage tanks and from ETP. Mechanical extraction method uses solvent & steam heating and then oily sludge is processed in a plant equipped with centrifuge in order to recover maximum possible oil and water. The sludge is broken down into water, oil and base sediments. Water is drained into ETP for further treatment while the recovered oil is pumped into slop oil tanks for reprocessing in the refinery. The base sediment (residual oily sludge) in solid state has an oil content of around 3-8%wt and is disposed through bioremediation facility inside the refinery.

One-time Catalyst is generated whenever the activity of catalyst is reduced to such a level that further plant operation is not possible. These catalysts are stored in drums and are disposed off suitably. Kitchen wastes are generated in every household of the township. Also canteen wastes are generated in refinery. Both these waste are collected and processed in Organic Waste Convertor. Waste batteries/Spent catalyst generated and returned back to manufactures/vendors under buyback scheme. Metal waste and drum waste generated are disposed suitably.

445 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

For the proposed project, IOCL Paradip allocates the recurring cost of INR 0.1crores budget towards expenditure on solid waste management. Spent Catalyst after every 4-5 years will be duly recovered by PCB approved agencies

10.6.4Noise Environment

To contain to the sound pollution in the vicinity of the plant site, all noise making equipment are specified with maximum noise generation upto 85 db (A). Only in some areas like Process Air Compressor House, where the sound level is expected to be higher (>90 dbA), suitable acoustic treatment will be provided along with mandatory use of ear plugs. Comprehensive measures for noise control will be followed at the design stage in terms of  Noise level specification of various rotating equipment as per Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards.  Equipment layout considering segregation of high noise generating sources.  Erecting suitable enclosures, if required, to minimize the impact of high noise generating sources.  Sizing the flare lines with low Mach number to have lower noise levels.  Green belt of appropriate width all around the refinery towards noise attenuation

10.6.5Material Handling Storage and Transportation  Hazardous chemicals are stored in closed tanks and drums with appropriate blanketing systems.  All transfers from drums / tanks are being done through pumps in closed pipelines.  The loading of finished products to trucks and drums is done through automated filling systems with overflow protections.  All key raw materials are charged to the reactors through closed pipeline systems including pneumatic systems for solid handling.  Raw materials/ intermediates/ products are stored in closed tanks/drums provided with breather arrangements to avoid fugitive emissions. The Mode of Transport for Product materials is given in Figure 10-2 and the Raw Material Storage and Dispatch Facilities is given in Table 10-9.

446 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 10-2Mode of Transport for Product materials

Table 10-9 Raw Material Storage and Dispatch Facilities

S.No Feed /Product/ Source Destination Remarks /mode of Receipt/ Intermediate dispatch FEED 1 Reformate PDR CCRU / PX Unit Interconnection pipe (Tie- in) Storage Tank 2 Acetic Acid OSBL PTA unit Tanker Unloading

PRODUCT 3 Paraxylene PX Unit PTA Unit Interconnection pipe (Tie- in)

4 Toluene PX Unit Merchant Sale Merchant sale by Tanker Loading 5 PTA bulk Silo PTA Unit Merchant Sale Merchant sale by Truck and wagon Loading INTERMEDIATE

447 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S.No Feed /Product/ Source Destination Remarks /mode of Receipt/ Intermediate dispatch 6 TA Mother Liquor Storage tank PTA Unit Interconnection pipe (Tie- in)

7 Raffinate PX Unit MS Blend Interconnection pipe (Tie- in) Unit 8 Heavy Reformate PX Unit MS Blend Interconnection pipe (Tie- in) Unit

Pipeline crossing Santra Creek for the Proposed PX PTA project

South part of North part of 1 Fire Water Pipe line crossing santara creek refinery refinery Cooling tower South part of North part of 2 Pipe line crossing santara creek make up refinery refinery South part of North part of 3 DM Water Pipe line crossing santara creek refinery refinery South part of North part of 4 Instrument Air Pipe line crossing santara creek refinery refinery South part of North part of 5 Plant Air Pipe line crossing santara creek refinery refinery Steam Condensate South part of North part of 6 Pipe line crossing santara creek out refinery refinery South part of North part of 7 Boiler BlowDown Pipe line crossing santara creek refinery refinery South part of North part of 8 BFW(MP) Pipe line crossing santara creek refinery refinery South part of North part of 9 MP Steam Export Pipe line crossing santara creek refinery refinery South part of North part of 10 HHP Steam Pipe line crossing santara creek refinery refinery South part of North part of 11 Fuel Gas Pipe line crossing santara creek refinery refinery South part of North part of 12 Fuel oil Pipe line crossing santara creek refinery refinery Closed Blowdown South part of North part of Pipe line crossing santara creek 13 and Hydracarbon refinery refinery Pipe line crossing santara creek South part of North part of 14 Hydrogen Pipe line crossing santara creek refinery refinery South part of North part of 15 Raffinate Pipe line crossing santara creek refinery refinery

448 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S.No Feed /Product/ Source Destination Remarks /mode of Receipt/ Intermediate dispatch South part of North part of 16 Reformate Pipe line crossing santara creek refinery refinery

10.6.6Green Belt Development

A comprehensive green belt development plan was prepared for the refinery in consultation with eminent ecologist and consequently, a large number of trees were planted inside the refinery premises to enhance the aesthetic look of the refinery as well as to serve the purpose of a pollution sink. Utmost priority is given to the Tree plantation activity, which is undertaken on a regular basis both inside the refinery premises and in township.

449 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

19.06.2021 19.06.2021 19.06.2021

Figure 10-3 Green Belt Photographs

450 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

To maintain eco-friendly environment in and around its premises, Paradip Refinery developed an ecological park in an area of approximately 2,30,000 m2

19.06.2021

Figure 10-4 Ecological park in Paradip Refinery 10.6.7Rain Water Harvesting Plan

Paradip Refinery, being a coastal location, water table is very high. Ground water recharging with rain water harvesting (RWH) system is not suitable for this region. Therefore, Rain water harvesting systems have not been constructed at Paradip Refinery & Township. However, two nos. of storm water reservoirs had been constructed in the Refinery premises to recieve storm water to use in refinery. Two nos. storm water ponds developed in ECO park and harvested storm water is used in horticulture in place of fresh water. Two (02 nos) storm water reservoirs (Capacities: 2,96,000 KL and 3,13,000 KL) have been developed to store rain water in monsoon in the refinery premises. The Storm water pond for collecting surface runoff inside Refinery is given in Figure 10-6. The Rain water harvesting integrated with ecological park is given in Figure 10-5 .

451 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

25.04.2020

Figure 10-5 Rain water harvesting integrated with ecological park

452 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

19.06.2021 19.06.2021

19.06.2021

Figure 10-6 Storm water pond for collecting surface runoff inside Refinery

453 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

10.7 Occupational Health and Safety

The workers are provided with proper health and safety measures. Personal protection equipment’s are given to the employers and made sure they wear it during the work. Regular health camps are conducted for all the workers alike. The Health & Safety department makes sure all the workers are not exposed to any kind of toxicity and is within the prescribed limit. Copy of EHS policy enclosed as Figure 10-8; Organogram for OHC is given in Figure 10-7.

The main objectives are

1. Maintenance and promotion of workers’ health and working capacity. 2. Improvement of working environment by following well-being program for its employees. 3. Monitor the workplace to maintain industrial hygiene practices. 4. Development of work culture in a direction which will support health and safety at work and thereby promoting positive social climate for smooth operation that will enhance productivity. 5. Area monitoring. 6. Employees to undergo annual health check-up. 7. All personnel will be provided with personal protective equipment’s individually as required. a) Construction Phase During the construction phase the following measures will be employed; 1. Personal Protective equipment’s will be provided to the workers. 2. Occupational Health Centre will be facilitated to address the emergencies that may arise. 3. Personnel will be trained about firefighting systems and first aid practices. 4. Regular monitoring of occupational health of employees. b) Operational phase

General functions of the safety committee will be;

1. Conduct routine workplace inspections. 2. Provide Personal Protective Equipment. 3. Develop and implement safe work procedures and rules. 4. Provide on-going safety training & Enforce safety rules and appropriate discipline.

454 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

5. Promote safety awareness and reduce the potential for injury/loss. 6. Identify workplace hazards. 7. Enforce of safety rules, measure safety performance & reduce frequency/severity of injuries. c) First aid Boxes

A first aid kit is a collection of supplies and equipment for use in giving first aid. First Aid boxes will be kept available in Security Room, Admin Block and at OHC. First Aid items will be issued to injure only by authorized persons.

Following are the contents of First Aid Box,

a.Dettol – Antiseptic solution b. Ciplox – Eye Drops c.Soframycin – Skin ointment d. Silverex – Burn ointment e.Betadine – Microbicidal solution f. Iodex – Pain reliever g. Sterilized Cotton Wool h. Surgical Paper Tape i. Small Sterilized Dressings j. Medium Sterilized Dressings k. Roller Bandage – 5 cm wide l. Roller Bandage – 10cm wide m. Band Aid n. Crocin / Paracetamol Tablet

Along with the above safety systems, company also ensured the below safety features to ensure Zero Accident.

1. No ignitable zones are declared and marked so. 2. Work permit system with strict compliance. 3. Dedicated chemical storage area with good ventilation and exhaust system and all chemical are stored as per compatibility. 4. Dyke walls provided for the day storage chemical tanks.

455 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

5. All reactors provided with safety valves followed by rupture discs and relief valve outlets are extended. 6. Calibration is ensured for the gauges of pressure, temperature and vacuum. 7. All reactors will be hydro tested and certified by the competent person once in a year. 8. Body earthing provided to all equipment’s involved in the process, electrical earthing, static earthing and instrument earthing provided wherever required. Ventilation air units (VAUs) and Exhaust air units (EAUs) and are provided to ensure good ventilation in the work environment. The tentative Emergency Organization Chart will be prepared and followed.

Figure 10-7 Organogram for OHC

10.7.1 Safety Measures

456 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

 Escape Routes, Accessibility, Operability and Constructability reviews and implementation of recommendations.  All safety requirements of Indian Boiler Regulations (IBR) will be complied in the design.  Fire water sprinkler systems will be implemented for applicable equipment, as per OISD code requirements.  Safety insulation is provided for all pipes/surfaces operating at temperature higher than 60°C.  Pressure safety valves are provided for over-pressure protection of equipment and piping in all applicable locations.  Double isolation valves are provided for high pressure streams and hydrogen services.  HAZOP study has been performed for PX-PTA units during FEED phase. HAZOP recommendations from the HAZOP study shall be incorporated into the design of these systems.  Detailed HAZOP and SIL study for all units are envisaged during detailed engineering phase of the project. All HAZOP recommendations will be complied and recommendations from the studies will be implemented.  Compliance to all National and Local rules and regulations by statutory bodies will be ensured. 10.7.2 Precaution & Safety Measures Against Fire Hazards IOCL has taken lot of safety measures against Fire hazards in course of the design & operation of two plants. They are as follows:  N2 Blanketing in flammable storage tanks.  Breather Valves.  Earthing Continuity.  Lightening Arrester as per IS specification & monitoring of Earth Pit.  Flame proof electrical fittings.  Periodic Tank Inspection.  Storage & handling of Bulk Chemicals & Plant Operations through DCS System.  Periodic Checking of Critical Instruments. In addition to the above measures the new technology has the following measures embedded in its design- following are the safety measures in the proposed PX-PTA unit:

457 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

 Process Design and Engineering is such that it can cater to any emergency happening in the Plant.  Provision of nitrogen blanketing of the reactor on occasion of a reactor trip.  Critical trips are implemented in the system  Better Process Control System.  Safety Critical Alarms are implemented for the new unit.  Automated Safety Instrumented System.  Over/Under Pressure Relief Protection.  Overfill Containment.  Emergency Response.

10.8 Environmental Management Cell

A separate environment management cell, HSE department consisting of qualified engineers is in place which monitors all aspects of environmental impacts being caused due to process units at IOCL, Paradip Refinery.

10.9 Corporate Environmental Policy

The safety policy of PDR is given in Figure 10-8

458 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Figure 10-8 EHS Policy

459 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

10.10 Budgetary Provision for Environmental Management Plan IOCL PDR allocates budget every year towards expenditure of environment related jobs. Below is the budget allocated for the year 2019-2020:

Capital Recuring S. Description No. Cost in Cost, in Crores Crores 1. Air Pollution i.Stack 22.4 2.4 ii.APC equipments 1.7 0.17 2. Water Pollution i.ETP 336 3.9 3. Noise Pollution i. Acoustic enclosure 1.7 0.17 4. Solid Waste management - 0.1 5. Storm Water management/ Rain water harvesting - - 6. Green belt development 3 0.3 Total 364.8 7.04

10.11 Corporate Social Responsibility CSR activities shall be carried out as per corporation’s CSR policy. Existing activities and spending for the Period 2019 -2020 enclosed as Annexure 18.

10.12 Corporate Environmental Responsibility (CER)

The company is aware of the obligations towards the Environment and to fulfill the social obligations. As per OM F. No: 22-65/2017-IA.III dated 1st May 2018 M/s IOCL will Allocate 0.125% of the project cost (11783 Crores) towards CER i.e. 0.125% of 11783 Crores = 14.73 Crores. As per CEPI compliance for SPA 1.5 times of slab to be allotted(1.5 * 14.72)=22.093 Crores. The detailed CER cost breakup is given below

460 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Amount (INR) S. Focus Areas Total No 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26

Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs. 1. Plantation 50,00,000 75,00,000 75,00,000 50,00,000 50,00,000 3,00,00,000

Environment Improvement - Mechanised cleaning Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs. 2. facility for roads of nearby 30,00,000 30,00,000 35,00,000 35,00,000 40,00,000 1,70,00,000 localities

Swachh Bharat - Public Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs. 3. Toilets, Sanitisation activities 45,00,000 70,00,000 70,00,000 50,00,000 50,00,000 2,85,00,000

Usage of renewable energy- Solar lanterns, Solar lighting Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs. 4. power, Paper recycling 25,00,000 30,00,000 40,00,000 30,00,000 25,00,000 1,50,00,000 equipments

Clean drinking water supply projects - Piped supply Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs. 5. projects, Bore wells, Through 60,00,000 75,00,000 65,00,000 70,00,000 60,00,000 3,30,00,000 tankers

Other activities under CER based on the approval of Rehabilitation & Periphery Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs. 6. Development Advisory 1,46,14,500 2,43,57,500 2,43,57,500 2,43,57,500 97,43,000 9,74,30,000 Committee (RPDAC) under the Chairmanship of District Collector

Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs. Total 3,56,14,500 5,23,57,500 5,28,57,500 4,78,57,500 3,22,43,00022,09,30,000

461 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

CHAPTER 11 SUMMARY & CONCLUSION

462 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

11 SUMMARY & CONCLUSION

An Environmental Impact Assessment Study has been carried out and assessed for the proposed project based on the ToR and baseline quality data collected for the study area. Identification and anticipation of the potential environmental impacts due to the proposed project with a delineation of appropriate impact mitigation measures in an Environmental Management plan during both construction and operation phases is provided in the EIA report prepared Based on the above evaluation the significance, value addition, impact on various components of environment during construction and operation phases is summarized below;

 Paradip Industrial area attracts CEPI score of 60.61(SPA) and IOCL will comply the CEPI guidelines by MoEF&CC.  The Project Proponent will follow all the statutory norms and guidelines as per CPCB/MoEF&CC to safeguard environment.  No land acquisition is carried out since the existing land area is used for proposed expansion.

 The incremental concentrations of PM, SO2, NOx and CO are observed to be 0.10%,

7.39% 19.59% and 157.38% respectively. The total pollutant concentrations of PM,

SO2, NOx and CO are 95.7 µg/m3, 16.86 µg/m3, 35.95 µg/m3 and 128.69 µg/m3 , which is observed to be within NAAQ standards  On total 3743 m3/hr of fresh water requirement for the project which is sourced from Mahanadi River. The approval for extraction of fresh water is 3950m3/hr which is issued by Government of Odisha & valid upto: Oct 2021.  The wastewater generated in the Refinery complex will be treated in ETP, part of treated effluent will be reused in the process and the balance will be disposed to marine with compliance to CPCB/MoEF&CC norms for marine disposal.  On total, 277.06m3/hr will be discharge into deep sea and it is observed to be within the discharge approval limit of 350 m3/hr as per the OPCB consent for Air and water obtained vide:5543/IND-I-CON-6414 dated 31.03.2021 valid till 31.03.2022.  The Hazardous waste generated like Spent Catalyst is being stored in intermediate storage facility (covered warehouse with impervious floor and shed) and disposal in SLF & Co-processing in cement industry within 90 days.

463 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

 Project site is located at seismic zone-III and Paradip coast is prone to Cyclone and Tsunami and IOCL will ensure all these scenarios are considered in designing.  There are two Schedule-I sensitive Species in study area i.e., reptiles named Nilssoniahurum(Gray 1831) and Lissemyspunctata (Bonnaterre 1789) habitats and IOCL will develop biodiversity management plan in accordance with local forest department recommendations and ensure there is no impacts on this species.  Action plan for conservation of Marine life including Olive Ridley Turtle has been prepared in 2013 by Mangrove Forest Division (Wildlife), Rajnagar, Odisha and approved by Principal Cheif Conservator Forest(WL) & CheiWildlife Warden, Odisha. The fund allocation by IOCl of INR 20.04Cr.for the conservation of Marine life over a period of implantation of 10yrs  The protected area Mahanadi Delta has extensive mangrove forests located at a distance ~6.93km (NE) from the project site and IOCL will develop biodiversity management plan in accordance with local forest department recommendations and ensure there is no impacts on mangroves.  The Kujang Coast and Hetamundia Seashore Village is predominant turtle nesting area and IOCL will develop biodiversity management plan in accordance with local forest department recommendations and ensure there is no impacts on this species.  Mangroves are present in Santara creek which bifurcates the refinery into North & South parts and IOCL will develop biodiversity management plan in accordance with local forest department recommendations and ensure there is no impacts on mangroves.  Defence installation of Coast Guard Dist. HQ is present at a distance of ~4.11km from the project site in ENE direction and if required NOC will be obtained from them.  The above project is proposed to meet the market potential having a deficit of about 2.2 MMTPA PTA in India by 2024.  The project will propel industrial development, downstream industry revolution in Odisha and eastern regions of India, which will support consequential development of entrepreneurship, MSMEs in nearby locality and state of Odisha.  The project will induce direct & indirect employment generation for local communities as well as state & region as a whole and preference will be given to the local communities within IOCL Rules/Policy.

464 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

CHAPTER 12 DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS

465 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

12 DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS

In order to assess the potential environmental impacts due to the proposed Integrated Para- Xylene & Purified Terephthalic Acid (PX-PTA) Project, M/s IOCL, PDR has engaged Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Limited, Chennai to undertake EIA study. The nature of consultancy service rendered covers terrestrial environmental assessment.

12.1 Brief Profile of Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Limited (HECS)

Enviro Care Systems was started in the year of 1997 by Dr. J.R.Moses with the vision to serve the world in all environmental related problems by completing the latest technological advancements available.

In the year 2004, Enviro Care Systems became Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Ltd after having collaboration with Hubert Stavoren B.V. for higher Technology.

The company provides total pollution control solutions to several industries like Thermal Power Plant, Pharma, R&D Facilities, Electroplating and Manufacturing, IT Parks, Residential Complexes, Dairies, Food Processing, Textile mills, Breweries, etc.

The company is specialized in executing projects right from concept development, supply, erection, commissioning and operation on turnkey basis. HECS has successfully executed more than 200 environmental engineering projects for various industrial sectors both in India and overseas. HECS has state-of-art facilities to provide quality environmental consultancy and engineering solutions.

Strengths of HECS

Number of Employees as on May 2021

Total No of Employees 1096 Consultancy 43 Laboratory 125 Projects 34 Operation & Maintenance 894

466 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

Declaration of Experts contributing to the EIA

I hereby certify that I was involved in the preparation of EIA/EMP for the “Integrated Para- Xylene & Purified Terephthalic Acid (PX-PTA) Project” at Abhaychandrapur village, Jagatsinghpur District, Odisha State by M/s. Indian Oil Corporation Limited as EIA Coordinator with the support of the following Functional Area Experts.

EIA Co-ordinator

Name: Dr. J R Moses

Signature:

Date:24-06-2021

Contact Information: Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Ltd., # A-21, Phase III, Behind Lions Club School, Thiru-vi-ka Industrial Area, Guindy, Chennai –600032. Tamil Nadu, India. Email: [email protected]

Website: www.hecs.in

Functional Area Experts (FAEs):

S. Functional Duration of Name of the Expert Signature No. Areas Involvement Sep 2018 till Dr. J R Moses date 13. AP FAE Sep 2018 till Mr. Vamsee Krishna Navooru date Sep 2018 till 14. AQ FAE Dr. J R Moses date Sep 2018 till Dr. J R Moses date FAE Sep 2018 till 15. WP Mr. Vamsee Krishna Navooru date Sep 2018 till FAA Mr. Chengalvarayan date Sep 2018 till 16. SHW FAE Mr. A. Manoharan March 2021

467 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

S. Functional Duration of Name of the Expert Signature No. Areas Involvement Sep 2018 till Mr. Vamsee Krishna Navooru date Sep 2018 till 17. SE FAE Mr. V. Dhivakar date Sep 2018 till Dr.. Sundararajan date 18. EB FAE Sep 2018 till Dr. Rajkumar Samuel date Sep 2018 till 19. HG FAE Mr. MallikarjunaRao date Sep 2018 till 20. Geo FAE Mr. MallikarjunaRao date Sep 2018 till Mr. Vivek P. Navare date 21. NV FAE Sep 2018 till Mr. Vamsee Krishna Navooru date Sep 2018 till 22. LU FAE Mr. VenkateswarluRachala date Sep 2018 till 23. RH FAE Dr. J R Moses date Sep 2018 till Mr. A. Manoharan March 2020 24. SC FAE Feb 2020 till Dr.B.C.Nagaraja March 2021 AP - Air pollution monitoring, prevention and control AQ - Meteorology, air quality modeling and prediction EB - Ecology and biodiversity HG - Hydrology, ground water and water conservation LU - Land use NV - Noise & Vibration RH - Risk assessment and hazards management SC - Soil conservation SE - Socio-economics SHW - Solid and hazardous waste management WP - Water pollution monitoring, prevention and control

12.2 QCI-NABET - EIA Accreditation

Consultancy Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd., Chennai NABET Certificate No & NABET/EIA/1922/RA 0172 Valid up to 13/10/2022 Date of validity MoEF Reg. Lab F.No. Q-15018/21/2017-CPW

468 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

12.3 Copy of QCI NABET Accreditation

Further details may be seen on the following URL: www.hecs.in

469 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051 EIA Report

HUBERT ENVIRO CARE SYSTEMS (P) LIMITED A-21, III-Phase, Behind Lions Club School, Thiru vi ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032 Ph: +91-44-43635555; Fax: +91-44-43635500

470 HECS/EIA/IOCL Paradip/Final/24.06.2021/1051