DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Hazard Mitigation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Hazard Mitigation Plan I SECTION 2: PLAN UPDATE CITY OF LA CAÑADA FLINTRIDGE LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN One Civic Center Drive, La Cañada Flintridge, CA 91011 (This page is intentionally left blank) Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Why Prepare this Plan ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Updating the Plan ............................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Who Will Benefit .............................................................................................................. 3 2 PLAN UPDATE 4 2.1 Planning Process ............................................................................................................... 5 2.2 How it was Prepared ........................................................................................................ 7 2.3 Public Involvement ........................................................................................................... 7 2.3.1 Outreach Strategy 7 2.3.2 Public Meetings 8 2.4 Plan Mission and Goal ..................................................................................................... 9 3 PLAN MAINTENANCE 11 3.1 Monitoring and Review.................................................................................................. 12 3.1.1 Plan Monitoring 12 3.1.2 Plan Evaluation 12 3.1.3 Plan Updates 13 3.1.4 Continued Public Involvement 14 3.2 Plan Adoption ................................................................................................................. 14 3.3 Implementation Through Existing Programs .............................................................. 14 3.3.1 Update of Mitigation Efforts 15 4 COMMUNITY PROFILE 16 4.1 Geography ....................................................................................................................... 17 4.2 Historical ......................................................................................................................... 17 4.2.1 Major Past Events 18 4.3 Physical Setting ............................................................................................................... 19 4.3.1 Topology 19 4.3.2 Geology 20 4.3.3 Climate 20 4.4 Development Profile ....................................................................................................... 21 4.4.1 Land Use 21 4.4.2 Housing and Community Development 23 iv 4.4.3 Critical Facilities and Infrastructure 23 4.5 Community Demographic Profiles ............................................................................... 25 4.5.1 Population Demographics 25 4.5.2 Age Distribution 25 4.5.3 Race 26 4.6 Economy .......................................................................................................................... 27 4.6.1 Income 27 4.6.2 Industry, Businesses, and Institutions 27 4.6.3 Employment Trends 28 4.7 Transportation ................................................................................................................ 28 4.8 Schools ............................................................................................................................. 29 5 RISK ASSESSMENT 30 5.1 Hazard Identification and Approach ............................................................................ 31 5.1.1 Identified Hazards of Concern 31 5.1.2 Inventory of Community Assessments 33 5.1.3 Risk Analysis 34 5.1.4 Vulnerability Assessment 34 5.2 Action Plan Implementation .......................................................................................... 34 5.2.1 Status of Mitigation Action Items 34 5.2.2 Mitigation Action Items 34 5.3 Federal Guidelines .......................................................................................................... 35 5.4 Data Sources ................................................................................................................... 35 5.5 Limitations ...................................................................................................................... 35 5.6 Benefit-Cost Analysis ..................................................................................................... 35 6 CAPABILITIES ASSESSMENT 44 6.1 Capabilities Assessment ................................................................................................. 45 6.1.1 Planning and Regulatory 45 6.1.2 Administrative and Technical 47 6.1.3 Fiscal Mitigation Capabilities 50 6.1.4 Education and Outreach 51 7 EARTHQUAKE 53 7.1 General Background ...................................................................................................... 54 7.1.1 Causes 54 7.1.2 Characteristics 55 7.2 Hazard Profile ................................................................................................................ 57 7.2.1 Past Events 57 v 7.2.2 Locations 58 7.2.3 Frequency 59 7.2.4 Severity 59 7.2.5 Warning Time 60 7.3 Secondary Impacts ......................................................................................................... 61 7.4 Risk Assessment .............................................................................................................. 61 7.4.1 Exposure Assessment 61 7.4.2 Vulnerability Assessment 64 7.5 Mitigation Strategy ........................................................................................................ 67 7.5.1 Goals and Objectives 67 7.5.2 Previous Plan Mitigation Action Items 68 7.5.3 Current Mitigation Action Items 69 7.5.4 Action Plan and Implementation 71 7.6 Resource Directory ......................................................................................................... 71 7.6.1 Local Resources 71 7.6.2 State Resources 72 7.6.3 Federal Resources 73 7.6.4 Publications 74 7.7 Sources ............................................................................................................................ 75 8 FLOOD 76 8.1 General Background ...................................................................................................... 77 8.1.1 Causes and Characteristics 77 8.2 Hazard Profile ................................................................................................................ 78 8.2.1 Past Events 78 8.2.2 Locations 80 8.2.3 Frequency 82 8.2.4 Severity 82 8.2.5 Warning Time 82 8.3 Secondary Impacts ......................................................................................................... 83 8.3.1 Debris Flow 83 8.4 Risk Assessment .............................................................................................................. 83 8.4.1 Exposure Assessment 83 8.4.2 Vulnerability Assessment 85 8.5 Mitigation Strategy ........................................................................................................ 88 8.5.1 Goals and Objectives 88 8.5.2 Previous Plan Mitigation Action Items 89 8.5.3 Current Mitigation Action Items 90 8.5.4 Action Plan and Implementation 91 8.6 Resource Directory ......................................................................................................... 91 8.6.1 Local Resources 91 vi 8.6.2 State Resources 92 8.6.3 Federal Resources 93 8.6.4 Publications 97 8.7 Sources ............................................................................................................................ 97 9 LANDSLIDE 98 9.1 General Background ...................................................................................................... 99 9.1.1 Causes and Characteristics 99 9.1.2 What is a Debris Flow? 99 9.1.3 Landslide and Events Impacts 100 9.1.4 Landslide Conditions 100 9.2 Hazard Profile .............................................................................................................. 101 9.2.1 Past Events 101 9.2.2 Locations 103 9.2.3 Frequency 105 9.2.4 Severity 105 9.2.5 Warning Time 105 9.3 Secondary Impacts ....................................................................................................... 106 9.4 Risk Assessment ............................................................................................................ 106 9.4.1 Exposure Assessment 106 9.4.2 Vulnerability Assessment 108 9.5 Mitigation Strategy ...................................................................................................... 110 9.5.1 Landslide Building / Zoning Codes 110 9.5.2 Goals and Objectives 110 9.5.3 Previous Plan Mitigation Action Items 111 9.5.4 Current Mitigation Action Items 111 9.5.5 Action Plan and Implementation 113 9.6 Resource Directory ....................................................................................................... 113 9.6.1 Local Resources 113 9.6.2 State Resources 113 9.6.3 Federal Resources 115 9.6.4 Publications 115 9.7 Sources .......................................................................................................................... 116 10 WILDFIRE 117 10.1 General Background .................................................................................................... 118 10.1.1 Causes and Characteristics 118 10.2 Hazard Profile .............................................................................................................. 119 10.2.1 Past Events 119 10.2.2 Locations 119 10.2.3 Frequency 119 10.2.4 Severity 120 vii 10.2.5 Warning Time 120 10.3 Secondary Impacts ....................................................................................................... 120 10.4 Risk Assessment ............................................................................................................ 120
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PUBLIC SAFETY U Building a Safer Los Angeles 99
    MOTION PUBLIC SAFETY U Building a Safer Los Angeles 99 From time to time it is appropriate for the Council to review and update ordinances adopted in the past. The urgency to do this is compounded when those ordinances relate to public safety, and even more so when a natural disaster affects our City such as the recent wildfires. In recent years, the City has made strides in enhancing the protection and character of our hillside communities, specifically our hillside single family home communities. Both in 2011 and again 2017 the City adopted stricter Baseline Hillside Ordinances to better ensure public safety in those neighborhoods. Though these ordinances addressed out of scale development and neighborhood character, the secondary effects ensure safer communities and better design that reduces risk during catastrophic events such as wildfires. The City must ensure that our growing multifamily housing stock is being constructed safely with skilled labor, and is resilient in the face of growing threats from wildfires and other natural disasters. In late 2018 the risk and devastation from wildfires was on full display throughout California. The risk associated with wildfires has grown exponentially in recent years. The frequency and intensity of these fires has made them a serious public safety risk. Their speed and intensity have created an urgent need to address their impacts. Much of this increased risk comes from the growing impacts of climate change that has changed the ecological makeup of our forests and climatic shifts that have driven the region into drought year after year, as well as rapid growth of our urban-wildland interface.
    [Show full text]
  • In Response to the La Tuna Fire, September 2017
    In Response to the La Tuna Fire, September 2017 Theodore Payne Foundation for Wild Flowers & Native Plants 10459 Tuxford Street, Sun Valley (La Tuna Canyon), CA 91352 818 768-1802 | theodorepayne.org La Tuna Fire The La Tuna Fire was first reported on Friday, September 1. Aided by high heat and erratic wind, it raged for three more days. More than 7,000 acres of La Tuna Canyon and the Verdugo Mountains burned before the fire was contained. The Verdugos, with about 16,000 acres of steep terrain, are surrounded by urban development. The last three substantial fires in the Verdugo Mountains were the 1955 La Tuna Fire (4,306 acres), the 1964 Whiting Woods Fire (6,950 acres), and the 1980 Sunland Fire (6,400 acres). According to Los Angeles County Fire Department records since the 1955 fire, the Verdugo Mountains average 1.1 fires every 3.6 years, each fire averaging 1,371 acres. Regeneration, not Restoration The dominant plant communities in the Verdugos are Southern Coastal Scrub, Chaparral, Oak Woodland, and Mixed Riparian Woodland. The La Tuna Fire was concentrated in Southern Coastal Scrub and Chaparral sections that are notoriously fire-prone but resilient. Chaparral fires are characteristically high-intensity and burn dense vegetation entirely to the ground, leaving behind virtually no above-ground growth, yet many species in these communities are able to rebound from fire. Examples of recovery include crown sprouting (the ability to re- grow from underground roots or stems) and seeds that germinate only after a fire, ensuring rapid recovery. Though it is tempting to want to actively restore vegetation after a fire, intervention can be harmful to the native plants that stabilize slopes and to wildlife that rely on native plants for habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Cal OES Daily Situation Report September 8, 2017
    Cal OES Daily Situation Report September 8, 2017 The Salmon August Complex, west of Etna in Siskiyou County. Photo Credit: caseyjhoward / Instagram 1 Duty Officer National Terrorism Advisory System EDO Sarah Poss Jennifer Gordon (Day) CSWC Watch Officer Chad Stokes (Night) [email protected] STAC Duty Officer 916-275-4069 FDO Bill Bondshu LDO Troy Clegg IDO Terri Mejorado CDO Nancy Smith SDO Joanne Phillips PIO Brad Alexander TDO Ben Green IT Michael Crews EQTP Yvette LaDuke Tribal Liaison POC Lori Nezhura Access and Functional Vance Taylor Needs POC 2 SITUATION SUMMARY Cal OES Activation Status State Operations Center Inland Region EOC Coastal Region EOC Southern Region EOC Level 2 Level 1 Level 1 Level 1 Cal OES State Operations Center The Cal OES State Operations Center (SOC) is activated at Level II in support of statewide fires and National Emergency Management Assistance Compact (EMAC) coordination. • On 09/08/17, the SOC is activated from 0900 – 1700 hours. Hurricane Harvey Deployments, State of Texas Resources requested in support of impacts due to Hurricane Harvey: • Urban Search and Rescue IST (Incident Support Team) – 4 Personnel from California • Urban Search and Rescue IST Cache Support Personnel – 6 Personnel from California • HEPP (Hazardous Equipment Push Package) Support Personnel – 4 Personnel from California • HEPP-7 (Hazardous Equipment Push Package) Cache and Personnel – 4 Personnel from California • California US&R Blue Incident Support Team (IST) Support Personnel – 30 Personnel from California • Swiftwater Flood-Search and Rescue (SF-S&R)10 - Ventura with 1 Cal OES Assistant Chief and 14 personnel (Demobilizing, returning to CA) • SF-S&R 12 - Long Beach with 1 Cal OES Assistant Chief and 15 personnel (Demobilizing, returning to CA) At the request of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Governor Edmund G.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Glendale Hazard Mitigation Plan Available to the Public by Publishing the Plan Electronically on the City’S Websites
    Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Section 1: Introduction City of Glendale, California City of Glendale Hazard Mitigati on Plan 2018 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents City of Glendale, California Table of Contents SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION 1-1 Introduction 1-2 Why Develop a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan? 1-3 Who is covered by the Mitigation Plan? 1-3 Natural Hazard Land Use Policy in California 1-4 Support for Hazard Mitigation 1-6 Plan Methodology 1-6 Input from the Steering Committee 1-7 Stakeholder Interviews 1-7 State and Federal Guidelines and Requirements for Mitigation Plans 1-8 Hazard Specific Research 1-9 Public Workshops 1-9 How is the Plan Used? 1-9 Volume I: Mitigation Action Plan 1-10 Volume II: Hazard Specific Information 1-11 Volume III: Resources 1-12 SECTION 2: COMMUNITY PROFILE 2-1 Why Plan for Natural and Manmade Hazards in the City of Glendale? 2-2 History of Glendale 2-2 Geography and the Environment 2-3 Major Rivers 2-5 Climate 2-6 Rocks and Soil 2-6 Other Significant Geologic Features 2-7 Population and Demographics 2-10 Land and Development 2-13 Housing and Community Development 2-14 Employment and Industry 2-16 Transportation and Commuting Patterns 2-17 Extensive Transportation Network 2-18 SECTION 3: RISK ASSESSMENT 3-1 What is a Risk Assessment? 3-2 2018 i Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents City of Glendale, California Federal Requirements for Risk Assessment 3-7 Critical Facilities and Infrastructure 3-8 Summary 3-9 SECTION 4: MULTI-HAZARD GOALS AND ACTION ITEMS 4-1 Mission 4-2 Goals 4-2 Action
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Plan
    City of Glendale EMERGENCY PLAN FOREWORD This Emergency Plan addresses the City of Glendale’s planned response to extraordinary emergency situations associated with natural disasters, technological incidents, and national security emergencies. The plan does not address normal day-to-day emergencies or the well- established and routine procedures used in coping with such emergencies. Instead, the operational concepts reflected in this plan focus on potential large-scale disasters which can generate unique situations requiring unusual emergency responses. This plan is a preparedness document – designed to be read, understood, and exercised prior to an emergency. It is designed to include the City of Glendale as part of the California Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) and National Incident Management System (NIMS). Individuals and agencies assigned emergency responsibilities within this plan have prepared appropriate supporting plans and related Standard Operating Procedures. This plan has been organized into four parts as follows: PART ONE – is the Basic Plan which provides overall organizational and operational concepts for responding to various types of identified hazards that may impact the jurisdiction. PART TWO – includes functional Annexes which describe the emergency response organization. Each Annex is supported by a statement of mission objectives, initial action checklists and the emergency management organizational structure to be used by assigned personnel. PART THREE – contains operational data such as listing of resources, key personnel, essential facilities, disaster reimbursement process, and other data needed for conducting emergency operations. PART FOUR – contains the Departmental Emergency Plan. Each City department will maintain an updated copy of both this City Emergency Plan and a Departmental Emergency Plan as further described in this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plants and Fire Safety Special Issue
    $10.00 (Free to Members) VOL. 38, NO. 2 AND VOL. 38, NO. 3 • APRIL 2010 AND JULY 2010 FREMONTIA JOURNAL OF THE CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY SPECIAL ISSUE: NATIVE PLANTS AND FIRE SAFETY VOLUME 38:2/38:3, APRIL 2010/JULY 2010 FREMONTIA CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY CNPS, 2707 K Street, Suite 1; Sacramento, CA 95816-5113 FREMONTIA Phone: (916) 447-CNPS (2677) Fax: (916) 447-2727 Web site: www.cnps.org Email: [email protected] VOL. 38, NO. 2, APRIL 2010 AND VOL 38, NO. 3, JULY 2010 MEMBERSHIP Membership form located on inside back cover; Copyright © 2010 dues include subscriptions to Fremontia and the CNPS Bulletin California Native Plant Society Mariposa Lily . $1,500 Family or Group . $75 Bob Hass, Editor Benefactor . $600 International or Library . $75 Betsey Landis, Advisor Patron . $300 Individual . $45 Beth Hansen-Winter, Designer Plant Lover . $100 Student/Retired/Limited Income . $25 Brad Jenkins, Jake Sigg, and CORPORATE/ORGANIZATIONAL Carol Witham, Proofreaders 10+ Employees . $2,500 4-6 Employees . $500 7-10 Employees . $1,000 1-3 Employees . $150 CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY STAFF (SACRAMENTO) CHAPTER COUNCIL Executive Director . Tara Hansen David Magney (Chair); Larry Levine Dedicated to the Preservation of Finance & Administration Manager . (Vice Chair); Marty Foltyn (Secretary); the California Native Flora Cari Porter Board of Directors Representatives: Membership & Development Coor- Brian LeNeve, Orchid Black The California Native Plant Society dinator . Stacey Flowerdew Alta Peak (Tulare) . Joan Stewart (CNPS) is a statewide nonprofit organi- Conservation Program Director . Bristlecone (Inyo-Mono) . zation dedicated to increasing the Greg Suba Steve McLaughlin understanding and appreciation of Rare Plant Botanist .
    [Show full text]
  • A New Direction for California Wildfire Policy— Working from the Home Outward
    A New Direction for California Wildfire Policy— Working from the Home Outward February 11, 2019 Compiled by Douglas Bevington, Forest Director, Environment Now California Program [email protected] A New Direction for California Wildfire Policy— Working from the Home Outward Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................................................3 Introduction by Douglas Bevington .........................................................................................................................................4 Recommendations ..........................................................................................................................................................................7 A More Effective Approach for Preventing Wildland-Urban Fire Disasters by Jack Cohen .............................8 CalFire's 20th Century Fire Suppression Policy is Not Appropriate for a 21st Century Climate by Timothy Ingalsbee ..................................................................................................................................................................10 Common Myths about Forests and Fire by Chad Hanson ............................................................................................12 by Dominick DellaSala ..................................................14 Facts about California Forests, Wildfires, and Carbon Biomass Power is a False Solution by Brian
    [Show full text]
  • CANYON 2 FIRE October 9, 2017
    ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY CANYON 2 FIRE October 9, 2017 s A Report to the Orange County Fire Authority Board of Directors AFTER ACTION REPORT CANYON 2 FIRE TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................... 5 HISTORICAL INFORMATION .............................................................................................................................. 7 FIGURE 1: SEVENTY-YEAR MAJOR FIRE HISTORY LIST—ORANGE COUNTY ..................................................................... 8 FIGURE 2: SEVENTY-YEAR MAJOR FIRE HISTORY MAP—ORANGE COUNTY .................................................................... 9 FIRE PREVENTION AND COMMUNITY EDUCATION ........................................................................................ 10 ADVANCE PLANNING / DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS CENTER ....................................................................... 13 FIGURE 3: STATION COVERAGE LEVELS ...................................................................................................................16 FIGURE 4: 12+HOUR STATION COVERAGE ..............................................................................................................16 INCIDENT NARRATIVE ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 015-2018 SHMP FINAL Appendices
    APPENDICES – 2018 STATE HAZARD MITIGATION TEAM ROSTER OF AGENCIES AND STAKEHOLDER ORGANIZATIONS AECOM National Governments Alameda County Office of Emergency Services Alpine County Operational Area Inland Region IV Air Resources Control Board (ARB) Amador County Operational Area Inland Region IV American Planning Association California Chapter American Red Cross (Sacramento Chapter) Association of Bay Area Governments Association of Contingency Planners Association of Environmental Professionals Burbank Fire Corps Business and Industry Council for Emergency Planning & Preparedness (BICEPP) Business, Consumer Services, and Housing Agency Business Executives for National Security (BENS) Business Recovery Managers Association Butte County Operational Area Inland Region III California Adaptation Forum California Association of Councils of Governments Cahuilla Band of Indians California Board of Forestry and Fire Protection Calaveras Council of Governments California Coastal Commission California Conservation Corps California Community Colleges California Department of Community Services and Development California Department of Conservation California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation California Department of Education California Department of Food and Agriculture California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CALFIRE) California Department of General Services California Department of Housing and Community Development California Department of Insurance California Department of Public Health California Department of Public
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Disaster List California Wildfires As of December 8, 2017
    Federal Disaster List California Wildfires As of December 8, 2017 https://www.fema.gov/disasters Newly Posted: California Lilac Fire (FM-5228) Incident period: December 07, 2017 Fire Management Assistance Declaration declared on December 07, 2017 California Skirball Fire (FM-5227) Incident period: December 06, 2017 Fire Management Assistance Declaration declared on December 06, 2017 California Rye Fire (FM-5226) Incident period: December 05, 2017 Fire Management Assistance Declaration declared on December 05, 2017 California Creek Fire (FM-5225) Incident period: December 05, 2017 Fire Management Assistance Declaration declared on December 05, 2017 California Thomas Fire (FM-5224) Incident period: December 04, 2017 Fire Management Assistance Declaration declared on December 05, 2017 --------- Posted Previously: California Potter Fire (FM-5219) - https://www.fema.gov/disaster/5219 Incident period: October 09, 2017 Fire Management Assistance Declaration declared on October 09, 2017 California Atlas Fire (FM-5214) - https://www.fema.gov/disaster/5214 Incident period: October 08, 2017 Fire Management Assistance Declaration declared on October 09, 2017 California Nuns Fire (FM-5220) - https://www.fema.gov/disaster/5220 Incident period: October 08, 2017 Fire Management Assistance Declaration declared on October 09, 2017 California Tubbs Fire (FM-5215) - https://www.fema.gov/disaster/5215 Incident period: October 08, 2017 Fire Management Assistance Declaration declared on October 09, 2017 California Sulphur Fire (FM-5221) - https://www.fema.gov/disaster/5221
    [Show full text]
  • Communication from Public
    Communication from Public Name: Elizabeth likes Date Submitted: 12/09/2019 01:52 PM Council File No: 19-0794 Comments for Public Posting: Building 200 homes in this area is ridiculous, am sure it would be extra money for the city, but we need green spaces too and the golf course was great as well as the hiking trail on the other side of the freeway, people hike and bike that a lot and it would be a shame to build houses. I have hiked and I loved playing golf there and now it is gone but would really like it to come back. This area is also prone to fires, only last year was the fire that started in Burbank and went over the hill and could have hit the housing area, but thanks to the fire dept it didn't. There was another one a few years ago that was in that same area and burned on both sides of the freeway almost to Lowell. We have a traffic problem now and 200 or 400 more cars just adds to the problem we already have. We don't need the houses there and hope that you will reconsider. Sincerely Ellizabeth Likes Communication from Public Name: Diana Faust Date Submitted: 12/09/2019 03:07 PM Council File No: 19-0794 Comments for Public Posting: Our city deserves to know its history. Tuna Canyon Detention Station should be memorialized on its original site, so descendants can walk the grounds where their family was unjustly incarcerated, and future generations of Angelenos can learn of and connect to this tragic historical moment.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Publication 1034
    ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA \.:::!!) Franchise Tax Board FTB Publication 1034 2018 Disaster Loss How to Claim a State Tax Deduction Table of Contents General Information ................................................................................3 Casualty and Disaster Losses ........................................................................3 Claiming a Disaster Loss on an Amended Tax Return ......................................................3 Disaster Loss Carryover Rules .......................................................................3 Net Operating Loss Carryback General Rule .............................................................4 How to Calculate a Disaster Loss ......................................................................4 Federal Postponement Periods .......................................................................4 Disasters Outside of California ........................................................................4 Documentation You Must Attach to your California Tax Return ...............................................5 When to Claim Your Disaster Loss ....................................................................5 How to Replace California Tax Returns Lost or Damaged in a Disaster ........................................5 Where to Get Forms to Claim Your Loss ................................................................6 Refunds .........................................................................................6 Information and Assistance on Claiming a California Disaster
    [Show full text]