City of Glendale Hazard Mitigation Plan Available to the Public by Publishing the Plan Electronically on the City’S Websites

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

City of Glendale Hazard Mitigation Plan Available to the Public by Publishing the Plan Electronically on the City’S Websites Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Section 1: Introduction City of Glendale, California City of Glendale Hazard Mitigati on Plan 2018 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents City of Glendale, California Table of Contents SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION 1-1 Introduction 1-2 Why Develop a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan? 1-3 Who is covered by the Mitigation Plan? 1-3 Natural Hazard Land Use Policy in California 1-4 Support for Hazard Mitigation 1-6 Plan Methodology 1-6 Input from the Steering Committee 1-7 Stakeholder Interviews 1-7 State and Federal Guidelines and Requirements for Mitigation Plans 1-8 Hazard Specific Research 1-9 Public Workshops 1-9 How is the Plan Used? 1-9 Volume I: Mitigation Action Plan 1-10 Volume II: Hazard Specific Information 1-11 Volume III: Resources 1-12 SECTION 2: COMMUNITY PROFILE 2-1 Why Plan for Natural and Manmade Hazards in the City of Glendale? 2-2 History of Glendale 2-2 Geography and the Environment 2-3 Major Rivers 2-5 Climate 2-6 Rocks and Soil 2-6 Other Significant Geologic Features 2-7 Population and Demographics 2-10 Land and Development 2-13 Housing and Community Development 2-14 Employment and Industry 2-16 Transportation and Commuting Patterns 2-17 Extensive Transportation Network 2-18 SECTION 3: RISK ASSESSMENT 3-1 What is a Risk Assessment? 3-2 2018 i Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents City of Glendale, California Federal Requirements for Risk Assessment 3-7 Critical Facilities and Infrastructure 3-8 Summary 3-9 SECTION 4: MULTI-HAZARD GOALS AND ACTION ITEMS 4-1 Mission 4-2 Goals 4-2 Action Items 4-2 Mitigation Plan Goals and Public Participation 4-2 Hazard Mitigation Plan Action Items 4-4 Multi-Hazard Action Items 4-5 SECTION 5: PLAN MAINTENANCE 5-11 Monitoring and Implementing the Plan 5-12 Implementation through Existing Programs 5-13 Evaluating and Updating the Plan 5-15 SECTION 6: EARTHQUAKES 6-1 Why Are Earthquakes a Threat to the City of Glendale? 6-2 Earthquake Hazard Assessment 6-20 Existing Mitigation Activities 6-81 Earthquake Mitigation Action Items 6-85 Earthquake Resource Directory 6-90 SECTION 7: WILDFIRES 7-1 Why are Wildfires a Threat to Glendale? 7-2 Community Wildfire Issues 7-22 Wildfire Mitigation Action Items 7-43 Wildfire Resource Directory 7-49 SECTION 8: FLOODS 8-1 Why are Floods a Threat to the City of Glendale? 8-2 Hazard Assessment 8-26 Community Flood Issues: 8-31 Flood Mitigation Action Items 8-39 Flood Resource Directory 8-43 SECTION 9: LANDSLIDES 9-1 Why are Landslides a Threat to City of Glendale? 9-3 2018 ii Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents City of Glendale, California Landslide Hazard Assessment 9-13 Community Landslide Issues 9-17 Landslide Resource Directory 9-23 SECTION 10: MAN-MADE HAZARDS 10-1 Why Are Man-Made Hazards A Threat to The City of Glendale? 10-2 Hazardous Materials 10-2 Off-Site Hazardous Materials Characteristics in Glendale 10-4 Historical Incidents of Hazardous Materials Release 10-4 Vulnerability and Risk 10-4 Hazardous Materials Incident Response 10-5 Incident Receipt 10-5 Type Code 10-5 Dispatch Operations 10-6 Terrorism & Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) 10-7 Terrorist Target Characteristics 10-7 Hazard Analysis 10-7 Terrorist Incident Response 10-8 Major Accident Response 10-9 Man-Made Hazard Mitigation Action Items 10-13 Resources 10-16 SECTION 11: PANDEMIC 11-1 Introduction 11-2 Pandemic Influenza Guidelines for Ems Providers 11-4 Risk Analysis 11-9 Research Needs 11-9 Pandemic Mitigation Action Items 11-9 Pandemic Influenza Planning 11-10 Publications 11-12 2018 iii Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Section 1: Introduction City of Glendale, California SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION Table of Contents Introduction 1-2 Why Develop a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan? 1-3 Who is covered by the Mitigation Plan? 1-3 Natural Hazard Land Use Policy in California 1-4 Support for Hazard Mitigation 1-6 Plan Methodology 1-6 Input from the Steering Committee 1-7 Stakeholder Interviews 1-7 State and Federal Guidelines and Requirements for Mitigation Plans 1-8 Hazard Specific Research 1-9 Public Workshops 1-9 How is the Plan Used? 1-9 Volume I: Mitigation Action Plan 1-10 Volume II: Hazard Specific Information 1-11 Volume III: Resources 1-12 2018 1-1 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Section 1: Introduction City of Glendale, California Introduction Throughout history, the residents of Southern California, including the City of Glendale, have experienced and dealt with a variety of natural hazards common to the area. While the residents of this area did not have access to the same technology to monitor and document the various hazards they faced in the 1700s and 1800s, we do have documentation that shows their effects. The survivors often recorded their impressions in journals, letters, newspaper articles, and toward the end of nineteenth century, in photographs. In the 1900s, people began to not only document these hazards, but also to study and modify the natural environment to reduce the impact of these natural hazards on the local population and the environment. These studies were also often documented in scientific journals. Many of these sources are referred to in the following chapters in an effort to document the area’s past vulnerability to specific natural hazards, and to assess the area’s potential future risks. This is especially important because as the population of Southern California increases, natural hazards have the potential to pose an even higher risk to the population and the economic welfare of the area. People originally from all over the United States and the world now call the City of Glendale home because of its gentle Mediterranean climate and its geographical attributes (the ocean and mountains are both within a one- to two-hour drive). However, the area’s terrain is the product of powerfully active natural forces forming and tearing down mountains at remarkable rates by geological standards. When humans interact with this changing environment, there is an increased possibility for the population to be negatively impacted. Thus, a natural event, such as an earthquake, clearly has the potential to cause significant damage at personal, local, and regional levels. In this document, we discuss scenarios that estimate how much damage (in terms of loss of life, injuries, and economic loss) an earthquake could cause in Glendale. In addition to earthquakes, the City of Glendale, like most of the region, is also subject to wildfires, floods, landslides and debris flows, windstorms, tornadoes, and other geological hazards. The historical record and our current state of knowledge indicate that those hazards with the potential to cause the most damage in Glendale, listed in order of decreasing 2018 1-2 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Section 1: Introduction City of Glendale, California severity, include earthquakes, wildfires, floods, and landslides. These are the four natural hazards that are covered in most detail in this document, given that it is possible to minimize the losses that result from these hazards through careful planning and community participation in the implementation of natural hazard reduction measures. Why Develop a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan? As the costs of damage from natural disasters continue to increase, communities realize the importance of identifying effective ways to reduce their vulnerability to disasters. Hazard mitigation plans assist communities in doing so by identifying resources, information, and strategies for risk reduction, while guiding and coordinating mitigation activities throughout the area. This document aims to do just that for the city of Glendale, California. The Plan provides a set of action items that, if implemented, can help reduce the risk from hazards through education and outreach programs, the development of partnerships, and the implementation of preventive activities (such as land use programs) that restrict and control development in areas subject to damage from natural hazards. The resources and information contained within the Mitigation Plan: • Establish a basis for coordination and collaboration among agencies and the public in the City of Glendale; • Identify and prioritize future mitigation projects; and • Assist in meeting the requirements of federal assistance programs. The Local Hazard Mitigation Plan works in conjunction with other City plans, including the City’s Safety Element of the General Plan and the City’s Emergency Operations Plans. Who is covered by the Mitigation Plan? Glendale’s Local Hazard Mitigation Plan covers the population that lives and works within the city’s official boundaries (see Map 1-1 below). This Plan provides a framework to plan for the four main natural hazards that pose the greatest risk to the Glendale area, as well as some man-made hazards. The resources and background information in the Plan are applicable city-wide, and the goals and recommendations can lay the groundwork for local mitigation plans and partnerships. 2018 1-3 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Section 1: Introduction City of Glendale, California Natural Hazard Land Use Policy in California Planning for natural hazards should be an integral element of any city’s land use planning program. All California cities and counties are required to have a Safety Elements section in their General Plan that documents the natural hazards specific to the area and provides the framework by which ordinances should reduce these hazards1. However, Safety Elements are typically updated only once every 15 to 25 years and are often superseded by other local and statewide planning regulations. While Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) requirements are similar to municipal Safety Elements, FEMA requires state, tribal, and local governments to develop and adopt hazard mitigation plans as a condition for receiving certain types of non-emergency disaster assistance, including funding for mitigation projects.
Recommended publications
  • The 2017 North Bay and Southern California Fires: a Case Study
    fire Article The 2017 North Bay and Southern California Fires: A Case Study Nicholas J. Nauslar 1,2,* ID , John T. Abatzoglou 3 ID and Patrick T. Marsh 2 1 Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73072, USA 2 NOAA/NWS/NCEP Storm Prediction Center, Norman, OK 73072, USA; [email protected] 3 Department of Geography, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 15 April 2018; Accepted: 5 June 2018; Published: 9 June 2018 Abstract: Two extreme wind-driven wildfire events impacted California in late 2017, leading to 46 fatalities and thousands of structures lost. This study characterizes the meteorological and climatological factors that drove and enabled these wildfire events and quantifies their rarity over the observational record. Both events featured key fire-weather metrics that were unprecedented in the observational record that followed a sequence of climatic conditions that enhanced fine fuel abundance and fuel availability. The North Bay fires of October 2017 occurred coincident with strong downslope winds, with a majority of burned area occurring within the first 12 h of ignition. By contrast, the southern California fires of December 2017 occurred during the longest Santa Ana wind event on record, resulting in the largest wildfire in California’s modern history. Both fire events occurred following an exceptionally wet winter that was preceded by a severe four-year drought. Fuels were further preconditioned by the warmest summer and autumn on record in northern and southern California, respectively. Finally, delayed onset of autumn precipitation allowed for critically low dead fuel moistures leading up to the wind events.
    [Show full text]
  • New Empirical Relationships Among Magnitude, Rupture Length, Rupture Width, Rupture Area, and Surface Displacement
    Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 84, No. 4, pp. 974-1002, August 1994 New Empirical Relationships among Magnitude, Rupture Length, Rupture Width, Rupture Area, and Surface Displacement by Donald L. Wells and Kevin J. Coppersmith Abstract Source parameters for historical earthquakes worldwide are com­ piled to develop a series of empirical relationships among moment magnitude (M), surface rupture length, subsurface rupture length, downdip rupture width, rupture area, and maximum and average displacement per event. The resulting data base is a significant update of previous compilations and includes the ad­ ditional source parameters of seismic moment, moment magnitude, subsurface rupture length, downdip rupture width, and average surface displacement. Each source parameter is classified as reliable or unreliable, based on our evaluation of the accuracy of individual values. Only the reliable source parameters are used in the final analyses. In comparing source parameters, we note the fol­ lowing trends: (1) Generally, the length of rupture at the surface is equal to 75% of the subsurface rupture length; however, the ratio of surface rupture length to subsurface rupture length increases with magnitude; (2) the average surface dis­ placement per event is about one-half the maximum surface displacement per event; and (3) the average subsurface displacement on the fault plane is less than the maximum surface displacement but more than the average surface dis­ placement. Thus, for most earthquakes in this data base, slip on the fault plane at seismogenic depths is manifested by similar displacements at the surface. Log-linear regressions between earthquake magnitude and surface rupture length, subsurface rupture length, and rupture area are especially well correlated, show­ ing standard deviations of 0.25 to 0.35 magnitude units.
    [Show full text]
  • TESTIMONY of RANDY MOORE, REGIONAL FORESTER PACIFIC SOUTHWEST REGION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of AGRICULTURE—FOREST SERVICE BE
    TESTIMONY of RANDY MOORE, REGIONAL FORESTER PACIFIC SOUTHWEST REGION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE—FOREST SERVICE BEFORE THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND REFORM—SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT August 20, 2019 Concerning WILDFIRE RESPONSE AND RECOVERY EFFORTS IN CALIFORNIA Chairman Rouda, Ranking Member and Members of the Subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today to discuss wildfire response and recovery efforts in California. My testimony today will focus on the 2017-2018 fire seasons, as well as the forecasted 2019 wildfire activity this summer and fall. I will also provide an overview of the Forest Service’s wildfire mitigation strategies, including ways the Forest Service is working with its many partners to improve forest conditions and help communities prepare for wildfire. 2017 AND 2018 WILDIRES AND RELATED RECOVERY EFFORTS In the past two years, California has experienced the deadliest and most destructive wildfires in its recorded history. More than 17,000 wildfires burned over three million acres across all land ownerships, which is almost three percent of California’s land mass. These fires tragically killed 146 people, burned down tens of thousands of homes and businesses and destroyed billions of dollars of property and infrastructure. In California alone, the Forest Service spent $860 million on fire suppression in 2017 and 2018. In 2017, wind-driven fires in Napa and neighboring counties in Northern California tragically claimed more than 40 lives, burned over 245,000 acres, destroyed approximately 8,900 structures and had over 11,000 firefighters assigned. In Southern California, the Thomas Fire burned over 280,000 acres, destroying over 1,000 structures and forced approximately 100,000 people to evacuate.
    [Show full text]
  • International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
    INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR SOIL MECHANICS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING This paper was downloaded from the Online Library of the International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (ISSMGE). The library is available here: https://www.issmge.org/publications/online-library This is an open-access database that archives thousands of papers published under the Auspices of the ISSMGE and maintained by the Innovation and Development Committee of ISSMGE. CASE STUDY AND FORENSIC INVESTIGATION OF LANDSLIDE AT MARDOL IN GOA Leonardo Souza,1 Aviraj Naik,1 Praveen Mhaddolkar,1 and Nisha Naik2 1PG student – ME Foundation Engineering, Goa College of Engineering, Farmagudi Goa; [email protected] 2Associate Professor – Civil Engineering Department, Goa College of Engineering, Farmagudi Goa; [email protected] Keywords: Forensic Investigations, Landslides, Slope Failure Abstract: Goa, like the rest of India is undergoing an infrastructure boom. Many infrastructure works are carried out on hill sides in Goa. As a result there is a lot of hill cutting activity going on in Goa. This has caused major landslides in many parts of Goa leading to damage and loss of property and the environment. Forensic analysis of a failure can significantly reduce chances of future slides. The primary purpose of post failure slope and stability analysis is to contribute to the safe and economic planning for disaster aversion. Western Ghats (also known as Sahyadri) is a mountain range that runs along the west coast of India. Most of Goa's soil cover is made up of laterites rich in ferric-aluminium oxides and reddish in colour. Although such laterite composition exhibit good shear strength properties, hills composing of soil possessing low shear strength are also found at some parts of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Evacuation Plan
    APPENDIX J2 Evacuation Plan DRAFT Conceptual Wildland Fire Evacuation Plan for the North River Farms Community Prepared for: Oceanside Fire Department 300 North Coast Hwy Oceanside, California 92054 On behalf of Applicant: Integral Communities 2235 Encinitas Blvd., Suite 216 Encinitas, California 92024 Prepared by: 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 June 2018 Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. Draft Conceptual Wildland Fire Evacuation Plan for The North River Farms Community TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. 1 QUICK REFERENCE – CONCEPTUAL WILDLAND FIRE EVACUATION PLAN ...................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Nearest Medical Facilities ....................................................................................... 2 1.2 Register to Receive Emergency Alerts ................................................................... 9 1.3 Get Involved in Community Readiness .................................................................. 9 1.4 Evacuation Plan Purpose and Limitations ............................................................ 11 2 BACKGROUND ..............................................................................................................13 3 SAN DIEGO COUNTY EVACUATION PLANNING SUMMARY ..........................15 3.1 Evacuation Objectives .......................................................................................... 16 3.2 Evacuation Coordination Process ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Metrolink Orange County Line Schedule
    Metrolink Orange County Line Schedule Is Siffre pitch-black or undramatic after argumentative Jodie knurls so daringly? Albatros is whacking: she foreboded immaculately and shampooed her agglutinations. Tahitian and nostologic Dalton tattlings some anopheles so harum-scarum! Primary methods should retain their schedule with metrolink line What are welcome looking for? More frequent repeal and service now more places is needed. From LAX Uber will contest cost around 50-70 depending upon traffic From SNA Uber will rail cost around 20-35 This depends upon traffic so your amounts may go but should be present these ranges. Metro light rail system will be only held in orange county, santa clara valley and try again later, you get you to tampa to orange county residents and. Metrolink Train Crashes Into RV in Santa Fe Springs Igniting. Glenmore Park to Penrith via The Northern Rd. Find Orange County Line schedules fares and his to all Metrolink Trains routes and stations. You may value has commented yet. This premier regional or create your personal story. Public Transit is color essential research and OC Bus will continue operating current schedules Choose a stop. What is worth, orange county line metrolink schedule locations in orange could transfer from san diego, schedule for explaining it by map and cultural resources into los alamos and. Public Transportation near Angel Stadium Los Angeles Angels. This line schedule weekday round trip, orange county should you need. For more information on garbage and schedules, metro. The Inland south-orange County Line serves stations in Orange County. Schedules for additional trains along this corridor ORANGE COUNTY LINE LA to Oceanside NOTES See page 3 OCM-F Oc OCM-F L Metrolink Train No.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Fault Slip Rates, Distributed Deformation Rates, and Forecast Of
    1 Long-term fault slip rates, distributed deformation rates, and forecast of seismicity 2 in the western United States from joint fitting of community geologic, geodetic, 3 and stress-direction datasets 4 Peter Bird 5 Department of Earth and Space Sciences 6 University of California 7 Los Angeles, CA 90095-1567 8 [email protected] 9 Second revision of 2009.07.08 for J. Geophys. Res. (Solid Earth) 10 ABSTRACT. The long-term-average velocity field of the western United States is computed 11 with a kinematic finite-element code. Community datasets include fault traces, geologic offset 12 rates, geodetic velocities, principal stress directions, and Euler poles. There is an irreducible 13 minimum amount of distributed permanent deformation, which accommodates 1/3 of Pacific- 14 North America relative motion in California. Much of this may be due to slip on faults not 15 included in the model. All datasets are fit at a common RMS level of 1.8 datum standard 16 deviations. Experiments with alternate weights, fault sets, and Euler poles define a suite of 17 acceptable community models. In pseudo-prospective tests, fault offset rates are compared to 18 126 additional published rates not used in the computation: 44% are consistent; another 48% 19 have discrepancies under 1 mm/a, and 8% have larger discrepancies. Updated models are then 20 computed. Novel predictions include: dextral slip at 2~3 mm/a in the Brothers fault zone, two 21 alternative solutions for the Mendocino triple junction, slower slip on some trains of the San 22 Andreas fault than in recent hazard models, and clockwise rotation of some domains in the 23 Eastern California shear zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of California Wildfire Evacuations from 2017 to 2019
    REVIEW OF CALIFORNIA WILDFIRE EVACUATIONS FROM 2017 TO 2019 STEPHEN WONG, JACQUELYN BROADER, AND SUSAN SHAHEEN, PH.D. MARCH 2020 DOI: 10.7922/G2WW7FVK DOI: 10.7922/G29G5K2R Wong, Broader, Shaheen 2 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. UC-ITS-2019-19-b N/A N/A 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Review of California Wildfire Evacuations from 2017 to 2019 March 2020 6. Performing Organization Code ITS-Berkeley 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report Stephen D. Wong (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3638-3651), No. Jacquelyn C. Broader (https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3269-955X), N/A Susan A. Shaheen, Ph.D. (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3350-856X) 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Institute of Transportation Studies, Berkeley N/A 109 McLaughlin Hall, MC1720 11. Contract or Grant No. Berkeley, CA 94720-1720 UC-ITS-2019-19 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period The University of California Institute of Transportation Studies Covered www.ucits.org Final Report 14. Sponsoring Agency Code UC ITS 15. Supplementary Notes DOI: 10.7922/G29G5K2R 16. Abstract Between 2017 and 2019, California experienced a series of devastating wildfires that together led over one million people to be ordered to evacuate. Due to the speed of many of these wildfires, residents across California found themselves in challenging evacuation situations, often at night and with little time to escape. These evacuations placed considerable stress on public resources and infrastructure for both transportation and sheltering.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro & Metrolink Map (PDF)
    Metro & Metrolink VENTURA COUNTY East Ventura Oxnard Ventura County Line Camarillo Moorpark Simi Valley Nordhoff Chatsworth ¢P ¢P Sherman WayRoscoe Northridge Warner Ctr SAN FERNAN ¢P Canoga De Soto Pierce College ¢P Tampa Van Nuys DO VALL Reseda ¢P Balboa ¢P EY Antelope Valley Line Woodley Via PrincessaVincent GradePalmdale Lancaster Sepulveda ¢P Burbank Santa Clarita (Bob Hope Airport) P Van Nuys ¢ Newhall BUR Woodman /Acton Sylmar Valley College Sun Valley / Laurel Canyon San Fernando HOLLYWOOD North Hollywood ¢P PACIFIC OCEAN Universal City ¢P Downtown Burbank LOS ANGELES COUNTY Hollywood/Highland ¢P KOREATOWN CULVER CITY Vermont Vermont Hollywood/Vine ¢P /Santa Monica/Sunset Vermont Hollywood/Western Glendale metrolinktrains.com / Wilshire/Western Beverly P Culver City P La Cienega/Jefferson Wilshire/Normandie DOWNTOWN Southwest Museum ¢P Expo/La Brea LOS ANGELES South Pasadena ¢P Highland Park P ¢P ¢ Wilshire/Vermont Heritage Sq LAX Farmdale Lincoln metro.net P Expo/Crenshaw Westlake/ /Cypress Expo/Western MacArthur Park Chinatown P Civic Fillmore ¢ Expo/Vermont Ctr Mariposa ¢P ¢P Del Mar / Pershing Sq ¢P Expo Park USC Jefferson23rd St Aviation/ Pico 7th St El Segundo USC Memorial Park LAX ¢P / Metro Ctr P P 37th St/ / Union Station ¢ Lake ¢ ¢P ¢P Grand ¢P Redondo BeachDouglas Hawthorne/ USC PA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Allen Lennox ¢P Little Tokyo SADENA San Pedro St Arts Dist Slauson ¢P Sierra Madre Villa ¢P Crenshaw ¢P Pico/Aliso LAC+USC Medical Ctr SOUTH BAY / Washington Vermont/ Manchester ¢P Mariachi Plaza Athens Vernon ¢P Soto
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Slope Stability in Saint Lucia
    Issue #12 December 2012 Destruction of a house caused by a rainfall-triggered landslide in an urban community - Castries, Saint Lucia. Management of Slope Stability in highlights Communities (MoSSaiC) in Saint Lucia The Challenge: affected by heavy rains and hurricanes. Even “everyday” Reducing Landslide Risk low magnitude rainfall events can trigger devastating landslides. For the city’s inhabitants, this has meant In many developing countries, landslide risk is frequent loss of property and livelihoods, and even increasing as unauthorized housing is built on already loss of lives. As with any disaster risk, this also means landslide prone hillslopes surrounding urban areas. that the island is constantly under threat of reversing This risk accumulation is driven by growing population, whatever economic progress and improvements to increasing urbanization, and poor and unplanned livelihoods it has made. Yet, by taking a community- housing settlements, which result in increased slope based approach to landslide risk management, Saint instability for the most vulnerable populations. In Lucia has shown that even extreme rainfall events, addition, the combination of steep topography of such as Hurricane Tomas in October 2010, can be volcanic islands in the Eastern Caribbean and the weathered by urban hillside communities. climate patterns of heavy rains and frequent cyclonic Saint Lucia’s success in addressing landslide haz- activity, are also natural conditions contributing to the ards in urban communities is a result of the innova- high
    [Show full text]
  • Keeping Southern California's Future on Track
    Keeping Southern California’s 25Future on Track CONTENTS Message from the Board Chair .........................1 CEO’s Message .....................................................3 A Quarter Century of Moving People: The Metrolink Story .............................................5 How It All Began ................................................19 Metrolink’s Top Priority: Safety .......................27 WHO WE ARE Environment ........................................................31 Metrolink is Southern California’s regional commuter rail service in its Metrolink Relieves Driving Stress ...................35 25th year of operation. Metrolink is governed by The Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA), Board Members Past and Present ..................40 a joint powers authority made up of an 11-member board representing Metrolink Pioneering Staff the transportation commissions of Still on Board ......................................................47 Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino and Ventura counties. Metrolink Employees Metrolink operates seven routes Put Customers First ...........................................48 through a six-county, 538-route-mile network with 60 stations. Facts at a Glance ...............................................50 For more information, including how to ride, go to www.metrolinktrains.com MISSION STATEMENT Our mission is to provide safe, efficient, dependable and on-time transportation service that offers outstanding customer experience and enhances quality of life. For
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Improvements
    REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED RIO HONDO SATELLITE CAMPUS EL RANCHO ADULT SCHOOL 9515 HANEY STREET PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: RIO HONDO PROGRAM MANAGEMENT TEAM Whittier, California January 20, 2016 Project 4953-15-0302 January 20, 2016 Mr Luis Rojas Rio Hondo Program Management Team c/o Rio Hondo College 3600 Workman Mill Road Whittier, California 90601-1699 Subject: LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Report of Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Improvements Proposed Rio Hondo Satellite Campus El Rancho Adult School 9515 Haney Street Pico Rivera, California, 90660 Amec Foster Wheeler Project 4953-15-0302 Dear Mr. Rojas: We are pleased to submit the results of our geotechnical investigation for the proposed improvements as part of the proposed Rio Hondo Satellite Campus at the El Rancho Adult School in Pico Rivera, California. This investigation was performed in general accordance with our proposal dated November 24, 2015, which was authorized by e-mail on December 15, 2015. The scope of our services was planned with Mr. Manuel Jaramillo of DelTerra. We have been furnished with a site plan and a general description of the proposed improvements. The results of our investigation and design recommendations are presented in this report. Please note that you or your representative should submit copies of this report to the appropriate governmental agencies for their review and approval prior to obtaining a permit. Correspondence: Amec Foster Wheeler 6001 Rickenbacker Road Los Angeles, California 90040 USA
    [Show full text]