The Relics of Christ

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Relics of Christ The relics of Christ Everyone passing away leaves behind material traces of their life. The existence of a Jewish man, called Jesus of Nazareth, is supported by strong historical evidence. The question therefore is raised: Are the various artifacts associated with his life truly authentic? Apart from this question, the history of relics — authentic or fake — is an amazing, fascinating chapter of Christian history through the centuries, especially the relics of Jesus Christ, which remain the most venerated and famous. Not everyone has the ability to travel and venerate these relics throughout Europe and the Middle East, the geographic areas where they are concentrated. Instead, Our Sunday Visitor offers you a brief presentation of 10 of these holy artifacts, such as the Shroud of Turin, the Crown of Thorns, the Holy Nails and the Holy Coat, which have survived through the present. Read on to take a journey through history and science, investigating the mysteries of many of Jesus’ relics. 1. The Holy Cross Once, Martin Luther said that “one could build a whole house using all the parts of the True Cross scattered around the world,” mocking the Catholic tradition of venerating relics and pilgrimages to places where they were located. Fragments of the True Cross, one of the nails and part of the titulus are found at the Basilica of the Holy Cross in Jerusalem. This is not true. According to meticulous research carried out in the 19th century, all the known fragments of the Holy Cross amount to less than one-ninth of its original volume. The history of the Holy Cross begins with Constantine the Great, the Roman emperor famous for having granted religious freedom to all Christians in 313. At this time there was a belief, kept alive by the Christians of Jerusalem, that the material evidence of Christ’s crucifixion was buried there. Constantine, the first Christian emperor of Roman history, sent his mother, Helena — who is regarded today as a saint by both the Catholic and Orthodox Churches — to Jerusalem. On September 14, which would become the Feast of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross, she discovered three wooden crosses and three nails in an old cistern not far from Golgotha, where Christ was crucified. She divided Jesus’ cross into three pieces, to be sent to Rome, Constantinople and Jerusalem. Even the titulus, stating “Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews,” as stated in St. John’s Gospel, was divided into two pieces. Upon her return to Rome, she converted a part of her house into a chapel, to host the relics she brought to Rome: a fragment of the cross, the half of the titulus and three nails. Today, this is the site of the Basilica of the Holy Cross in Jerusalem, although in 1629 some of the relics were transferred to the newly constructed St. Peter’s Basilica by Pope Urban VIII. The other two parts of the cross mentioned above were divided again into smaller parts, currently spread throughout Europe. In the past it was common to divide a relic into smaller fragments, according to the belief that even the smallest fragment had the same sacred power as the whole relic. In Jerusalem, after St. Helena found the cross, pilgrims were allowed to kiss the piece left there. Beside the relic, they needed to put in place a person as staurophylax (“custodian of the cross”) in order to prevent pilgrims from taking a little piece of the cross with a bite! 2. The Holy Nails How are we to establish which are the true ones, given that there are 36 “holy nails” in Europe, but only three of them nailed Jesus to the cross? Unexpected help came in 1968 from an archaeological discovery near Jerusalem. Four tombs were excavated and found three nails near the body of a young man, crucified supposedly between 6 and 65 A.D. They are rectangular in shape, 16 centimeters long and 0.9 centimeters wide at their thickest point. The comparison suggests that some “holy nails” are not genuine, since some are too long or made of silver. Two of the alleged Holy Nails are still venerated today. Let us take into account the oldest sources, according to whom Helena discovered three nails of Jesus’ cross in Jerusalem. The first one is venerated today in the Roman Basilica of the Holy Cross in Jerusalem. The second nail was brought to Constantinople in 1354 by a Venetian merchant, Pietro Torrigiani. Pope Innocent VI was interested in acquiring the precious relics, but his offer was lower than the one made from Siena, by the rector of the Santa Maria Della Scala Hospital. Since the canon law forbade the trade of relics, Torrigiani signed a deed of donation to the hospital, but in reality, they rewarded him very generously “under the table.” The fate of the third Holy Nail of St. Helena is more difficult to clarify. According to Theodoret of Cyrus, a part was embedded in the helmet of Constantine, while another part was melted into his horse’s harness. There are two places now where the emperor’s harness is venerated. The first is in Carpentras, France, the second in Milan, Italy. In 1576, Bishop Charles Borromeo, a leading figure of the Counter- Reformation, carried the relic three times through the streets of Milan, praying for the end of a deadly plague. Since the plague ended, they had no doubt: The holy nail made the miracle. 3. The Longinus Spear According to the legend, the Roman soldier, Longinus — his name as referred to by ancient Christians — was cured of cataracts when he pierced the side of Jesus on the cross and the blood and water flowed out. Longinus was later baptized and martyred. The spearhead of Longinus’ spear resides in the Vatican. Pilgrims reporting from the Holy Land mention his spear up to the eighth century, not later. The history of this relic goes on from Constantinople. At the time of the Fourth Crusade, in 1204, Franks and Venetians invaded Constantinople and stole many relics, but not the spear. The Latin Empire of Constantinople founded by the Crusaders was repeatedly threatened by the Greeks and Bulgarians. Therefore, the ruler, Baldwin II, was forced to sell to King Louis IX of France the spear staff, in order to collect resources to defend his Empire. Two centuries later, Constantinople was invaded again, this time by Ottoman Turks led by Mehmed II, on May 29, 1453. It meant the end of the long history of the Byzantine Empire. In 1492, Sultan Bayerid II proposed an agreement to Pope Innocent VIII: to welcome the sultan’s brother, Cem, a dangerous pretender to the Ottoman throne, to Rome. The agreement was that the brother had to remain in Rome in exchange for the return of the Longinus headspear. The relic arrived in Rome from Ancona, an Italian city on the Adriatic Sea, delivered by two eminent cardinals. Pope Benedict XIV, in the 18th century, had many doubts on its authenticity. He asked the King of France to send the spear’s staff to Rome to verify the authenticity. The two pieces fit together perfectly. 4. The Pillar of Scourging Given the huge number of relevant historical and religious sites in Rome, someone could ignore the small Basilica of Santa Prassede, dating back to 822, decorated with marvelous Eastern-style mosaics, located not far from the famous Marian Basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore (St. Mary Major). The Pillar of Scourging is venerated at the Roman Basilica of Santa Prassede. Here you could venerate one of the most relevant relics related to the passion of Christ: the Pillar of Scourging, made of Egyptian marble, whose shape is the same as the architectonic style of the Hellenistic age. There is no evidence that the pillar is the one at which Jesus was beaten and scourged in Pilate’s praetorium; nevertheless, it is very likely. The first mention comes from the journal of Egeria, a pilgrim who visited the Holy Land in the late fourth century, who observed, “Many devotees went to Zion to pray before the pillar at which Jesus was scourged.” It’s worth noting that in this place, Mount Zion, outside Jerusalem’s walls, there was a temple of the Judeo-Christian community. They preserved many Old Testament traditions, beliefs and precepts neglected by other Christians, including the prohibition of any contact with bodily remains within the city walls. Therefore, the pillar did not transgress any rule. In 1009, Caliph Al-Hakim ordered the destruction of the Church of the Apostles, where the pillar had been moved. To avoid destruction, it was brought first to Constantinople, then Rome in 1223, thanks to the papal legate to Constantinople, Cardinal Giovanni Colonna. The rulers of the Latin Emperor gave him the pillar as a gift for Pope Honorius III in order to get his support. The cardinal very happily accepted the gift, since colonna in Italian means “pillar,” and in his crest, there was precisely … a pillar! 5. The Crown of Thorns Modern reconstruction of the Crown of Thorns based on the Shroud of Turin. In 1870, Charles Rohault de Fleury, a French architect, counted 139 thorns throughout all Europe venerated as belonging to Christ’s Crown of Thorns. At least half of them are fake relics on the basis of the studies carried out in Paris, where the true crown has been located for almost 800 years. The hoop of the crown, about 12 centimeters large, is made of Juncus balticus, a plant species typical of the Eastern Mediterranean basin. According to some botanists, in the crown there were no more than 50 or 60 thorns.
Recommended publications
  • Finding Jesus: the Shroud of Turin Episode There Is No Record of What Jesus Looked Like in the New Testament. There Are No Conte
    Finding Jesus: The Shroud of Turin Episode There is no record of what Jesus looked like in the New Testament. There are no contemporary descriptions at all. However, the Bible does record how Joseph of Arimathea, a member of the Jewish council and a sympathizer with Jesus, wrapped his dead body in expensive linen, and buried it in his own family tomb. In the 14th Century a shroud, bearing the image of a crucified man, surfaces in France, before eventually finding a home in Turin. Is this the very shroud that Joseph wrapped Jesus in? Is the image of the man Jesus Christ? The shroud appears to tell the whole story of Jesus’ Passion in one image – the scourging; the Crown of Thorns; carrying the cross; the Crucifixion; the spear in his side. For centuries, the shroud is a source of great controversy – many Christians believe it is genuine, but others have their doubts. In 1978 a team of scientists lead by former US Navy physicist Dr. John Jackson spend five days intensively studying the shroud, before ultimately concluding it is genuine. It isn’t a forgery or the work of an artist. But a decade later, in 1988, the shroud is subject to Radiocarbon 14 dating – scientists at three separate laboratories date the samples of the Shroud to some point between AD1260–1390. This strongly suggests the shroud is a medieval fake after all. In a final twist, the film visits the Cathedral of San Salvador, in Oviedo, Spain, where there is another burial cloth venerated as having covered the face of Jesus.
    [Show full text]
  • Christ's Crucifixion: the Case of the Crown of Thorns
    Christ’s Crucifixion: The Case of the Crown of Thorns Christ’s Crucifixion: The Case of the Crown of Thorns As the Easter weekend passes here in Prague, the postcard photographs and paintings of Christ are everywhere, seen available to buy at the markets and local stalls or plastered on street walls across the city. We are all familiar with the image – Christ, pinned to the wooden cross, limply hanging in a position of suffering, head hung low with the prickly, painful Crown of Thorns piercing his temples. It is a haunting presentation of Christ’s sacrifice to humanity, the harrowing crown depicted as the mocking sign of monarchical rule of the Son of God. This image of the crowned Christ has endured through history, an emblem of affective piety, the crown itself serving as a painful reminder of his cause. But where did this image of Christ crowned in thorns originate and how has it become one of the most enduring depictions of Jesus in visual history? Dr. Emily Davenport Guerry’s compelling lecture titled Passion Relics and Patrons between Paris and Prague sought to answer this question as the eighth lecture in the ‘Medieval Conceptual Conflicts and Contrasts: Text and Image’ series held in the Faculty of Arts on Wednesday 12th of April. Dr. Davenport Guerry is a current lecturer in Medieval History at the University of Kent, Compiled Apr 1, 2019 10:18:50 PM by Document Globe ® 1 as has taught at Oxford and York in the past, with a special interest in relic culture and Christian iconography.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Jerome Church Norwalk
    ST. JEROME CHURCH NORWALK 06/29 9:00 am For the parish ALTAR FLOWERS The altar flowers for this weekend are in memory of VIGIL FOR SUNDAY Alfred F. Celentano, given by Mr. & Mrs. Gerald J. 4:30 pm Anthony DeSantis Moran. (family) THIRTEENTH SUNDAY IN ORDINARY TIME 06/30 8:00 am John Dillane (Pat Spinola) 9:15 am Emma Larchevesque (family) 11:00 am Alfred F. Celentano (M/M Gerald J. Moran) THE BANNS OF MARRIAGE are announced for the last 6:00 pm Robert McCarthy time between Marisa Ulmer and Thomas Cummings. (Hall family) 07/01 9:00 am Antoinette Riccardelli (Bob & Judi Dennehy) 07/02 9:00 am Henry Bittner (1 st Anniv.) (Pat & Phil Florio) 07/03 9:00 am Deceased mothers & fathers 07/04 9:00 am Joseph Corica ADORATION OF THE BLESSED SACRAMENT Adoration is every day, in the church, between 4:00- 07/05 9:00 am Bob & Dorothy Callahan 5:00PM. Come and spend some quiet time alone with (Bob & Judi Dennehy) our Lord. 07/06 9:00 am Our troops VIGIL FOR SUNDAY 4:30 pm Vincenzo & Nallie Santorella (Daughter-in-law) FOURTEENTH SUNDAY IN ORDINARY TIME 07/07 8:00 am Dorothy Callahan REACH Registration is currently underway. (Voutsinas family) All forms should be submitted now (with or without 9:15 am Julia Schmidt payment) to enable us to prepare for the fall classes. (Rogalski family) 11:00 am Vincenzo Iannone, Jr. Book orders have to be made soon. Thanks for your cooperation. (family) 6:00 pm Maria Corasaniti (Bob & Pat Olson) If you know of a new family or a family with a child entering first grade or kindergarten, please ask them to On the first Wednesday of each month, immediately following the contact us as soon as possible at: 9:00 AM Mass, there will be an anointing of the sick in the [email protected] or call us at 203-846- sanctuary.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cult of Saint Jerome in Dalmatia in The
    Ines Ivić THE CULT OF SAINT JEROME IN DALMATIA IN THE FIFTEENTH AND THE SIXTEENTH CENTURIES MA Thesis in Medieval Studies Central European University CEU eTD Collection Budapest May 2016 THE CULT OF SAINT JEROME IN DALMATIA IN THE FIFTEENTH AND THE SIXTEENTH CENTURIES by Ines Ivić (Croatia) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Medieval Studies. Accepted in conformance with the standards of the CEU. ____________________________________________ Chair, Examination Committee ____________________________________________ Thesis Supervisor ____________________________________________ Examiner CEU eTD Collection ____________________________________________ Examiner Budapest May 2016 THE CULT OF SAINT JEROME IN DALMATIA IN THE FIFTEENTH AND THE SIXTEENTH CENTURIES by Ines Ivić (Croatia) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Medieval Studies. Accepted in conformance with the standards of the CEU. ____________________________________________ External Reader CEU eTD Collection Budapest May 2016 THE CULT OF SAINT JEROME IN DALMATIA IN THE FIFTEENTH AND THE SIXTEENTH CENTURIES by Ines Ivić (Croatia) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Medieval Studies. Accepted in conformance with the standards of the CEU. ____________________________________________ External Supervisor CEU eTD Collection Budapest May 2016 I, the undersigned, Ines Ivić, candidate for the MA degree in Medieval Studies, declare herewith that the present thesis is exclusively my own work, based on my research and only such external information as properly credited in notes and bibliography.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparitive Study of the Sudarium of Oviedo and the Shroud of Turin
    III CONGRESSO INTERNAZIONALE DI STUDI SULLA SINDONE TURIN, 5TH TO 7TH JUNE 1998 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE SUDARIUM OF OVIEDO AND THE SHROUD OF TURIN By; Guillermo Heras Moreno, Civil Engineer, Head of the Investigation Team of the Spanish Centre for Sindonology (EDICES). José-Delfín Villalaín Blanco, DM, PhD. Professor of Forensic Medicine at the University of Valencia, Spain. Vice-President of the Investigation. Spanish Centre for Sindonology (CES). Member of the Investigation Team of the Spanish Centre for Sindonology (EDICES). Jorge-Manuel Rodríguez Almenar, Professor at the University of Valencia, Spain. Vice-President of the Spanish Centre for Sindonology (CES). Vicecoordinator of the Investigation Team of the Spanish Centre for Sindonology (EDICES). Drawings by: Margarita Ordeig Corsini, Catedrático de Dibujo, and Enrique Rubio Cobos. Spanish Centre for Sindonology (CES). Translated from the Spanish by; Mark Guscin, BA M Phil in Medieval Latin. Member of the Investigation Team of the Spanish Centre for Sindonology (EDICES). Revised by; Guillermo Heras Moreno CENTRO ESPAÑOL DE SINDONOLOGÌA. AVDA. REINO DE VALENCIA, 53. 9-16™ • E-46005-VALENCIA. Telèfono-Fax: 96- 33 459 47 • E-Mail: [email protected] ©1998 All Rights Reserved Reprinted by Permission 1 1 - INTRODUCTION. Since Monsignor Giulio Ricci first strongly suggested in 1985 that the cloth venerated in Oviedo (Asturias, Northern Spain), known as the Sudarium of Oviedo, and the Shroud of Turin had really been used on the same corpse, the separate study of each cloth has advanced greatly, according to the terminology with which scientific method can approach this hypothesis in this day and age. The paper called "The Sudarium of Oviedo and the Shroud of Turin, two complementary Relics?" was read at the Cagliari Congress on Dating the Shroud in 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Fig. 1) Crown Molded Onto the Forehead. Larger Number of Thorns
    4 fig. 1) Crown molded onto the forehead. Larger number of thorns in contact with the bone. THE CORONATION OF THORNS IN THE LIGHT OF THE SHROUD* SEBASTIANO RODANTE, M.D. In this study we will objectively examine the blood clots on the forehead and the nape of the neck, caused by the crown of thorns, as they appear in the black and white photo of the Holy Shroud; dark blood on the white background (figs. 2 & 3). In order to better understand the location of the clots and the direction of the blood flows toward right** or left** in respect to the observer, let us imagine the imprinted sheet unfolded (fig. 4). Putting oneself at A, looking toward the head, the blood from the wound in the R side is at C, i.e. at the R of the observer. Therefore on the frontal imprint, everything which we see on our R corresponds to the R of the Crucified, and the direction of the blood flows toward the R or toward the L of the observer corresponds, in effect, to the R or the L of the Crucified. Putting ourselves at B however, looking toward the feet, the imprint of the R shoulder is at D; i.e. at the L of the observer. Thus the dorsal imprint is laterally reversed. This being granted, we will study the puncture lesions caused on the head by the crown of thorns. For many years I have observed the sindonic Face in the life-size photo made by Giuseppe Enrie in 1931.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-1059 Resolution to Stand in Solidarity with the People of Paris
    STUDENT SENATE BILL 2019-1059 TITLE: Resolution to Stand in Solidarity with the People of Paris and the Christian Community AUTHORS: Colin Solomon, Senator Sophia Bond SPONSORS: Catholic Gators, Senator Nick Meyer, Senator Solmaz Karimi, Senator Gabi Zlatanoff, Senator Jessica Martinez, Senator Anthony Portugues, Senator Rebecca Ragan, Senator Gabbi Hernandez, Senator Casey Witte, Christina Pugliese, Senator Lindsay Kaighin, Senator Brady Alexander, Allocations Committee Chairwoman Katie Hernandez, Senator Brianna Adan, Senator Noah Wright WHEREAS, the Notre-Dame de Paris Catholic cathedral on the Île de la Cité in Paris has been a recognizable symbol of Paris and the French nation since its completion in 13451; and, WHEREAS, alongside the Sacré-Cœur Basilica, the Notre-Dame de Paris has been a holy pilgrimage site for the world’s Christians in Paris since its construction2; and, WHEREAS, the Western facade, spire, rose windows, and flying buttresses of the Notre-Dame de Paris cathedral are some of the most famed examples of French Gothic architecture in the world3,4; and, WHEREAS, the Notre-Dame de Paris has been home to many of the world’s religious artifacts and works of art including the crown of thorns worn by Jesus of Nazareth during his crucifixion, the tunic of St. Louis, and various paintings5; and, WHEREAS, the Notre-Dame de Paris cathedral has stood witness to over 850 years of French history, including the coronation of Napoléan Bonaparte, the French Revolution, World War I, and World War II, the latter of which included the
    [Show full text]
  • A Commentary on Jerome's Contra Vigilantium by Amy
    A COMMENTARY ON JEROME’S CONTRA VIGILANTIUM BY AMY HYE OH DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Classical Philology with a concentration in Medieval Studies in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2013 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Danuta Shanzer Professor Ralph Mathisen Professor Jon Solomon Professor Stephan Heilan, University of Osnabrück ABSTRACT Innkeepers inspired this dissertation. After working on ‘innkeepers’ as a topic for a research seminar paper, I soon discovered that the term caupo counted as an insult according to several church fathers, including Jerome. In the Contra Vigilantium, Jerome mocked his enemy, Vigilantius, by calling him a caupo who mixed water with wine; I wondered whether the title was true and the insult was deserved. What remained was to figure out who this man was and why he mattered. The dissertation is comprised of four parts: introductory chapters, a text with an en face translation, a philological/historical commentary, and appendices. The first chapter introduces Vigilantius, discusses why a commentary of the Contra Vigilantium is needed, and provides a biography, supported by literary and historical evidence in response to the bolder and more fanciful account of W.S. Gilly.1 The second chapter treats Vigilantius as an exegete. From a sample of his exegesis preserved in Jerome’s Ep. 61, I determine that Jerome dismissed Vigilantius’ exegesis because he wanted to protect his own orthodoxy. The third chapter situates Vigilantius in the debate on relic worship. His position is valuable because he opposed most of his contemporaries, decrying relics instead of supporting their translation and veneration.
    [Show full text]
  • Shroud Spectrum International No. 31 Part 6
    14 In the East during the Middle Ages, artists' conceptions of a thorny crown took a variety of patterns. One example is this "Crown of Thorns and Mocking of Christ", where the thorns sprout like young plants in a box. A manuscript illumination in the Vyšehrad Coronation Gospels (1085-86), Prague. Reproduced by permission of the University Library, Prague. 15 QUESTIONS IN A QUANDARY Monsignore Paleotto tells us: Many who have seen the crown in France report that it forms a sort of helmet. But where in France, during the XVIth century, was such a crown to be seen? The Crown of Thorns, which King Saint Louis redeemed from the Venetians in 1239, for which the Sainte- Chapelle was erected, and which is still conserved in the cathedral of Notre-Dame de Paris, is a mere bandeau of rushes, innocent of thorns. Hardly a "crown", for with a diameter of 21 cm (8¼ inches), it would slip over a man's head to rest on his shoulders. Yet Louis IX was satisfied that the relic was authentic. As Paleotto observed by direct examination of the Holy Shroud, puncture wounds appear in every part of the Lord's head; wounds and bloodflows typical of thorn punctures. Only a mass of thorn branches affixed to the head could have caused these injuries. What became of this cruel bonnet, tinged with the blood of Christ? Weaving our way through many writings, we find a few that might possibly be significant: IVth century — "There was a colony of judeo-christians living on Mount Sion until the byzantine-christians took over in the IVth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for C14 Dating of Charred Material Removed from the Shroud
    Proposal for C14 Dating of Charred Material Removed from the Shroud by Robert A. Rucker, MS (nuclear) Rev. 1, October 15, 2018 Reviewed by Mark Antonacci, JD, Author of two books on the Shroud Thurman Cooper, MS (radiochemistry) Jonathan Prather, PhD (biomedical) Kevin N. Schwinkendorf, PhD (nuclear) Abstract In 1988 the Shroud was carbon-14 (C14) dated to 1260 to 1390 AD (Ref. 1), but other evidence (Ref. 2) is consistent with a first century date for the Shroud. To resolve this discrepancy, this proposal recommends that C14 dating be done on samples of the charred material removed from the Shroud in 2002. Nuclear analysis computer calculations based on the neutron absorption hypothesis were used to predict the measured dates for this charred material, as shown in Figure 1. If there is reasonable agreement between the measured dates and the predictions in Figure 1, i.e. about AD 3100 to AD 4800 for samples near the elbows, it would indicate that neutrons were absorbed by the linen, producing additional C14 in the Shroud. This new C14 would explain why the Shroud was C14 dated to 1260 to 1390 AD instead of the first century. Figure 1. C14 Dates Objective Predicted by MCNP To determine whether the 1988 dating of the Shroud to the Middle Ages can be explained by the neutron absorption hypothesis. Hypothesis The neutron absorption hypothesis (Ref. 2 to 4) is: 1. Neutrons were included in the burst of radiation emitted from within the body that formed the image. 2. Some of these neutrons would have been absorbed in the linen to form new C14 atoms on the Shroud.
    [Show full text]
  • The Holy Lance of Antioch
    The Holy Lance of Antioch A Study on the Impact of a Perceived Relic during the First Crusade Master Thesis By Marius Kjørmo The crucified Jesus and the Roman soldier Longinus with the spear that would become the Holy Lance. Portrait by Fra Angelico from the Dominican cloister San Marco, Florence. A Master Thesis in History, Institute of Archaeology, History, Culture Studies and Religion, University of Bergen, Spring 2009. 2 Contents Preface.........................................................................................................................................5 List of Maps..................................................................................................................................6 List of Illustrations.......................................................................................................................6 Cast of Characters.......................................................................................................................7 1. Introduction.........................................................................................................................................9 1.1. Introduction...........................................................................................................................9 1.2. Lance Historiography..........................................................................................................11 1.3. Terms and Expressions.......................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Who Is the Man of the Holy Shroud Tri
    SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE ON THE SHROUD OF TURIN DISPLAY INCLUDES Full-size Framed Replica of the Shroud of Turin Photographic Negative of the Shroud of Turin Forensic Model of the Man of the Shroud The Shroud of Turin contains many types of scientific evidence that provide information about its history and environmental Replica Instruments of the Passion: journey. The human blood on the Shroud is Type AB. This rare blood type matches the stains on another known relic, Crucifixion Nails the Sudarium of Oviedo, which many believe to be the cloth that covered the face of Jesus as he was taken down from the Roman Lance cross. In addition to sharing the same blood type, forensic Roman Flagrum experts have identified blood stains that perfectly match on both cloths. This is significant because the Sudarium has been in Oviedo, Spain since the year 611, so any point of contact between the Shroud of Turin and the Sudarium of Oviedo would have occurred before the seventh century. EXHIBIT TOURS Image credit American Confraternity of the Holy Shroud Exhibits tours by appointment. There are numerous To schedule a tour: specific species of plant [email protected] pollens on the Shroud that place it in or near 318-221-5296 the city of Jerusalem, Constantinople, and western Europe, all locations that align with the historical journey scholars believe to be CATHEDRAL OF accurate for the cloth. Image credit American Confraternity of the Holy Shroud PARISH AND SCHOOL sjbcathedral.org A specific soil Cathedral of St. John Berchmans sample from limestone has been identified on the Shroud of Podcast Turin – Travertine WHO IS THE MAN Aragonite – found Who is the Man of the Shroud? in only a few places manoftheshroud.wordpress.com in the Middle East, OF THE SHROUD? including the Old Apple iTunes Store City of Jerusalem.
    [Show full text]