Aug 13 2010 in Re

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Aug 13 2010 in Re U.S. Department of Homeland Security U. S. Citizenship and Immigration Services identifying data deleted to Office ofAdminislrufive Appeals MS 2090 pnvent clearly unwarranted Washinaton.", DC 20529-2090 invasion of personal privacy U.S. Citizenship and Immigration PUBLIC COPY FILE: Office: NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER Date: -LIN 06 105 54262 AUG 13 2010 IN RE: PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as a Skilled Worker or Professional pursuant to Section 203(b)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1153(b)(3) ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: INSTRUCTIONS: Enclosed please find the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All of the documents related to this matter have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Please be advised that any further inquiry that you might have concerning your case must be made to that office. If you believe the law was inappropriately applied by us in reaching our decision, or you have additional information that you wish to have considered, you may file a motion to reconsider or a motion to reopen. The specific requirements for filing such a request can be found at 8 C.F.R. 5 103.5. All motions must be submitted to the office that originally decided your case by filing a Form 1-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, with a fee of $585. Please be aware that 8 C.F.R. 5 103.5(a)(l)(i) requires that any motion must be tiled within 30 days of the decision that the motion seeks to reconsider or reopen. DISCUSSION: The preference visa petition was denied by the Director, Nebraska Service Center, and is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be dismissed. The petitioner is a motel. It seeks to employ the beneficiary permanently in the United States as an general maintenance worker.' As required by statute, the petition is accompanied by a Form ETA 750, Application for Alien Employment Certification, approved by the United States Department of Labor (DOL). The director determined that the petitioner had not established that it had the continuing ability to pay the beneficiary the proffered wage. The director denied the petition accordingly. The record shows that the appeal is properly filed, timely and makes a specific allegation of error in law or fact. The procedural history in this case is documented by the record and incorporated into the decision. Further elaboration of the procedural history will be made only as necessary. The single issue in this case is whether or not the petitioner has the ability to pay the proffered wage as of the 2001 priority date and continuing until the beneficiary obtains lawful permanent residence. Section 203(b)(3)(A)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 5 1153(b)(3)(A)(i), provides for the granting of preference classification to qualified immigrants who are capable, at the time of petitioning for classification under this paragraph, of performing skilled labor (requiring at least two years training or experience), not of a temporary nature, for which qualified workers are not available in the United States. The regulation at 8 C.F.R. 5 204.5(g)(2) states in pertinent part: Ability of prospective employer to pay wage. Any petition filed by or for an employment-based immigrant which requires an offer of employment must be accompanied by evidence that the prospective United States employer has the ability to pay the proffered wage. The petitioner must demonstrate this ability at the time the priority date is established and continuing until the beneficiary obtains lawful permanent residence.' Evidence of this ability shall be either in the form of copies of annual reports, federal tax returns, or audited financial statements. 1 The record indicates that the petitioner substituted the instant beneficiary for the original beneficiary. The record contains an I797 Receipt notice dated October 23, 2002 for the approval of the original beneficiary's 1-140 petition (LIN 03 001 51475). United- States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) computer records do not indicate that the original beneficiary ever adjusted his status as a result of the prior approved 1-140 petition. The petitioner also indicated on the 1-140 petition that the petitioner's owner had filed an 1-130 relative petition (LIN 99 146 51984) for the beneficiary as the beneficiary's brother, and that the beneficiary's mother, Laxmiben Patel, had also filed an 1-130 petition (WAC 05 156 54339) for the beneficiary. The AAO notes that the director stated in his decision that the petitioner is required to demonstrate sufficient financial resources to pay the first year of the beneficiary's proffered wage. Pursuant to 8 Page 3 The petitioner must demonstrate the continuing ability to pay the proffered wage beginning on the priority date, which is the date the Form ETA 750, Application for Alien Employment Certification, was accepted for processing by any office within the employment system of the DOL. See 8 C.F.R. 5 204.5(d). The petitioner must also demonstrate that, on the priority date, the beneficiary had the qualifications stated on its Form ETA 750, Application for Alien Employment Certification, as certified by the DOL and submitted with the instant petition. Matter of Wing's Tea House, 16 I&N Dec. 158 (Act. Reg. Comm. 1977). Here, the Form ETA 750 was accepted on April 30, 2001.~ The proffered wage as stated on the Form ETA 750 is $18.02 per hour ($37,48lper year). The Form ETA 750 states that the position requires two years of prior work experience in the proffered position. The AAO conducts appellate review on a de novo basis. See Soltane v. DOJ, 38 1 F.3d 143, 145 (3d Cir. 2004). The AAO considers all pertinent evidence in the record, including new evidence properly submitted upon appeaL4 On appeal, counsel states that the petitioner has the ability to pay the proffered wage as of 2001 and onward. Counsel states that the petitioner provided evidence in its response to the director's WE of the petitioner's additional assets such as certificate of deposits, bank account and an existing line of credit,. Counsel resubmits the petitioner's Forms 1120s for tax years 2001 to 2006, with a list of the petitioner's gross sales and total assets for these years, and submits for the first time, the petitioner's Form 1120S for tax year 2007. Counsel also-submits Forms 1040 U.S. individual ~ncomeTax Return for identified on Motel Assets Purchase Agreement in the record as the peritloner'; olvners. I:or 1a.x years 2001 10 2007. ('oun.;c.l also submits copi~.sof thc I.om~s1 I 20s fvr idcntifitd as another of- businesses. Counsel also submits a letter dated November 4, 200 , the petitioner's accountant. C.F.R. 5 204.5(g)(2), the petitioner has to establish its ability to pay the proffered wage at the time the priority date is established and continuing until the beneficiary obtains lawful permanent residence. Although the director examined the petitioner's tax returns for tax years 2001 to 2006 in his decision, his focus on the petition's priority year is misplaced. The AAO will withdraw this part of the director's decision. Counsel in a cover letter with the initial 1-140 petition refers to the date of certification for the initial ETA Form-750 as September 4, 2002. The AAO notes that the date of receipt of the ETA Form-750 by DOL determines the priority date. Thus, April 30, 2001 is the priority date for the instant petition. 4 The submission of additional evidence on appeal is allowed by the instructions to the Form I- 290B, which are incorporated into the regulations by the regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(a)(l). The record in the instant case provides no reason to preclude consideration of any of the documents newly submitted on appeal. See Matter ofSoriano, 19 I&N Dec. 764 (BIA 1988). Page 4 have a net worth of Statement for , dated October 10, 2008. Among the additional evidence that counsel submits are- copies of U.S. Savings Bonds in the name of,and business checking accounts for . Further documentation submitted on appeal include a receipt for a key- jumbo Only two documents in the evidence submitted on appeal pertain directly to the petitioner: the August 30, 2008 statements for two of the petitioner's Small Business checking accounts with National City Bank. These two statements indicate ending balances of $6,260.49 and $3,794.61, respectively. The evidence in the record of proceeding shows that the petitioner is structured as an S corporation. On the petition, the petitioner claimed to have been established in January 2, 1997, to have a gross annual income of $143,918, and to currently employ two workers. According to the tax returns in the record, the petitioner's fiscal year is based on a calendar year. The AAO does not find a Form ETA 750, Part B, filled out and signed by the instant beneficiary. Therefore, the record cannot establish whether the beneficiary worked for the petitioner as of the 2001 priority date.5 The petitioner must establish that its job offer to the beneficiary is a realistic one. Because the filing of an ETA 750 labor certification application establishes a priority date for any immigrant petition later based on the ETA 750, the petitioner must establish that the job offer was realistic as of the priority date and that the offer remained realistic for each year thereafter, until the beneficiary obtains lawful permanent residence.
Recommended publications
  • Urban Society and Communal Independence in Twelfth-Century Southern Italy
    Urban society and communal independence in Twelfth-Century Southern Italy Paul Oldfield Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of PhD. The University of Leeds The School of History September 2006 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. Acknowledgements I would like to express my thanks for the help of so many different people, without which there would simply have been no thesis. The funding of the AHRC (formerly AHRB) and the support of the School of History at the University of Leeds made this research possible in the first place. I am grateful too for the general support, and advice on reading and sources, provided by Dr. A. J. Metcalfe, Dr. P. Skinner, Professor E. Van Houts, and Donald Matthew. Thanks also to Professor J-M. Martin, of the Ecole Francoise de Rome, for his continual eagerness to offer guidance and to discuss the subject. A particularly large thanks to Mr. I. S. Moxon, of the School of History at the University of Leeds, for innumerable afternoons spent pouring over troublesome Latin, for reading drafts, and for just chatting! Last but not least, I am hugely indebted to the support, understanding and endless efforts of my supervisor Professor G. A. Loud. His knowledge and energy for the subject has been infectious, and his generosity in offering me numerous personal translations of key narrative and documentary sources (many of which are used within) allowed this research to take shape and will never be forgotten.
    [Show full text]
  • Form OR-20-S, Instructions for Oregon S Corporation Tax Return
    Oregon S Corporation Tax Form OR-20-S Instructions 2019 Table of contents Important reminders ............................................ 2 Form instructions What’s new .................................................................... 2 Heading and checkboxes .................................................... 7 Questions ............................................................................... 8 Form changes and looking ahead .............. 3 Line instructions ..................................... 3 Estimated tax payments Additions ............................................................................... 9 Filing information Subtractions ........................................................................ 10 Who must file with Oregon? .............................................. 4 Net loss deduction ............................................................. 10 Excise or income tax? ........................................................... 5 Tax ........................................................................................ 11 Shareholder information ..................................................... 5 Credits .................................................................................. 11 Composite returns ............................................................... 5 LIFO benefit recapture addition ...................................... 11 Withholding requirement ................................................... 5 Net tax .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Instructions for Form 1125-E (Rev. October 2016)
    Userid: CPM Schema: Leadpct: 100% Pt. size: 10 Draft Ok to Print instrx AH XSL/XML Fileid: … s/I1125E/201610/A/XML/Cycle04/source (Init. & Date) _______ Page 1 of 2 13:39 - 29-Sep-2016 The type and rule above prints on all proofs including departmental reproduction proofs. MUST be removed before printing. Department of the Treasury Instructions Internal Revenue Service for Form 1125-E (Rev. October 2016) Compensation of Officers Section references are to the Internal Revenue Code Disallowance of Deduction for Employee unless otherwise noted. Compensation in Excess of $1 Million Future Developments Publicly held corporations cannot deduct compensation to a “covered employee” to the extent that the compensation For the latest information about developments related to exceeds $1 million. Generally, a covered employee is: Form 1125-E and its instructions, such as legislation The principal executive officer of the corporation (or an enacted after they were published, go to www.irs.gov/ individual acting in that capacity) as of the end of the tax form1125e. year, or An employee whose total compensation must be General Instructions reported to shareholders under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 because the employee is among the three Purpose of Form highest compensated officers for that tax year (other than Certain entities with total receipts of $500,000 or more use the principal executive officer). Form 1125-E to provide a detailed report of the deduction for compensation of officers. For this purpose, compensation does not include the following. Who Must File Income from certain employee trusts, annuity plans, or Form 1125-E must be completed and attached to Form pensions, and 1120, 1120-C, 1120-F, 1120-RIC, 1120-REIT, or 1120S, if Any benefit paid to an employee that is excluded from the entity has total receipts (defined below) of $500,000 or the employee's income.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Pass-Through Entity
    2020 Connecticut FORM Pass-Through CT-1065/ CT-1120SI Entity Tax Instructions This booklet contains Dear Taxpayer, information and 2020 has been a challenging year to say the least. Rest assured, however, instructions about the that the tax professionals at the Connecticut Department of Revenue following forms: Services (DRS) stand ready to provide our customers with world-class service. All of us at DRS have been busy reinventing how the agency • Form CT-1065/ delivers assistance to our citizens. The COVID-19 pandemic has forced CT-1120SI public servants to reflect on how we can improve the delivery of services in a changing environment. I think you will find the DRS approach is • Form CT-1065/ more efficient and convenient. CT-1120SI EXT The instructions in this booklet and our forms that are available on • Form CT-1065/ our website at portal.ct.gov/DRS contain everything you will need to complete your 2020 Connecticut pass‑through entity tax filing. Please CT-1120SI ES remember that electronic filing is the easiest and most efficient way to • Schedule CT K-1 file. In fact, if you are expecting a refund, electronic filing is the sure way to receive that refund as quickly as possible. All of your electronic • Schedule CT-AB filing options are contained in these instructions. • Schedule CT-CE Your feedback is critically important, especially during these challenging times. I encourage you to let us know how we are doing. We welcome • Schedule CT-NR your ideas and suggestions. You may send an email or call to personally speak to a Taxpayer Services representative.
    [Show full text]
  • Deduction LLC, and LLP Returns
    ® Quickfinder Small Business Quickfinder® Handbook (2019 Tax Year) Updates for December 2019 Legislation and Other Recent Guidance Replacement Pages for Two-Sided (Duplex) Printing Instructions: This packet contains “marked up” changes to the pages in the Small Business Quickfinder® Handbook that were affected by December 2019 legislation, which was enacted after the Handbook was published. Additionally, changes were made based on other guidance issued after the Handbook was published. This is a specially designed update packet for owners of the 3-ring binder version of the Handbook who have access to a printer that prints two-sided (duplex). Simply print the entire PDF file (make sure to select two-sided or duplex printing), three-hole punch the pages, and then replace the pages in your Handbook. It’s that easy. Reference Materials and Worksheets Tab A Topics Where to File: Business Returns Estate Inventory Worksheet ..................................Page A-13 Filing Addresses—2019 Returns ..........................Page A-1 Reconciliation of Income Reported on Principal Business Activity Codes— Final Form 1040 and Estate’s Fiduciary Forms 1065, 1120, and 1120S .............................Page A-1 Return (or Beneficiary’s Return) .........................Page A-14 Business Quick Facts Data Sheet ..........................Page A-1 Allocation of Indirect Costs to Ending Inventory Under IRC Sec. 263A .........................Page A-15 Types of Payments—Where to Report ...................Page A-2 Business Valuation Worksheet .............................Page
    [Show full text]
  • Modernize E-File Guide
    DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE DEVELOPER’S GUIDE MODERNIZED E-FILE GUIDE FOR SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS AND ELECTRONIC RETURN ORIGINATORS CITY OF NEW YORK GENERAL CORPORATION TAX AND UNINCORPORATED BUSINESS TAX TAX YEAR 2014 OCTOBER 2014 V1.0 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 4 1.1 What’s New For Tax Year 2014? .................................................................................. 4 1.1.1 Additional E-Fileable Tax Forms ................................................................................................. 5 1.1.2 Removal of “Attached” xml Schedules ........................................................................................ 5 1.1.3 Incorporation of Worksheets into Primary Forms ........................................................................ 5 1.1.4 Consolidation of NYC-200V Payment Vouchers ......................................................................... 5 1.2 Exclusions From Business Tax e-File ......................................................................... 5 1.3 TY2014 Preparer Mandate ............................................................................................ 6 1.4 2014 Tax Year e-File Calendar ..................................................................................... 6 2.0 ACCEPTANCE AND PARTICIPATION ............................................................... 7 2.1 Participation Requirements ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 S Corporation Form M8 Instructions
    UPDATED FINAL DRAFT 11/2/20 2020 S Corporation Form M8 Instructions What’s New for 2020 Contents For Taxpayers Affected by Federal Tax Law Passed after December 31, 2018 General Information . 1-4 Under current law, definitions used in determining Minnesota taxable income are based Filing Requirements . 1 on the Internal Revenue Code, as amended through December 31, 2018. Since that date, Due Date . 2 Congress has enacted the following: Payment Options . 2 Filing Reminders . 3 • Taxpayer Certainty and Disaster Tax Relief (TCDTR) Act of 2020 M8 Instructions . 5-7 • Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) of 2020 M8A Instructions . 8-10 • Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act of 2020 Financial Institutions . 10 • Paycheck Protection Program Flexibility Act (PPPFA) of 2020 • Public Law 116-147 of 2020 (S.4116) KS Instructions . 11-15 Nonconformity Instructions . 16-18 These acts contain changes affecting S-Corporations for tax year 2020. Because Minnesota Questions? has not adopted these federal changes, adjustments are required to correctly determine your You can find forms and infor- shareholders’ Minnesota taxable income. Use Schedules KSNC to report nonconformity adjustments relating to the TCDTR, FFCRA, CARES Act, PPPFA, and S.4116. mation, including answers to frequently asked questions and Minnesota Backup Withholding options for filing and paying Minnesota backup withholding must be made on any reportable payment made to a electronically, on our website at: corporation. The Minnesota backup withholding must be passed through to the shareholders www.revenue.state.mn.us based upon the income distributed to the shareholders. Send us an email at: e-Services Upgrade [email protected] Our e-Services system has a new look and feel! The new design is more intuitive and user friendly.
    [Show full text]
  • Partnership Or S Corporation Income Tax Form and Instructions (K-120S)
    2020 Partnership or S Corporation Income Tax File your business taxes electronically! See back cover for details. ksrevenue.org What’s In This Book General Information ..................................... 2 K-120S Instructions ..................................... 6 K-120S AS Instructions................................ 9 Form K-120S ............................................... 11 Form K-120S AS.......................................... 13 Form K-121S .............................................. 15 Taxpayer Assistance .................... Back Cover Electronic Options ....................... Back Cover General Information If any due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, substitute the next regular workday. Who Must A Kansas Corporate income tax return must be filed by all corporations doing business in or deriving income from sources within Kansas who are required to file a federal income tax return, whether or not a tax is due. File a Banks and savings and loan associations allowed to file as small business corporations at the federal level are Return not allowed to file as small business corporations at the Kansas level. Those entities are required to file a Privilege Tax return (K-130) to report any income or loss. The federal level shareholders income or loss which is included in their individual federal income tax return is to be subtracted from federal adjusted gross income so as to not allow that income. A Partnership return (K-120S) must be completed by any business partnership, syndicate, pool, joint venture or other such joint enterprise to report income from operations. The Kansas Partnership return must be completed by every enterprise that has income or loss derived from Kansas sources regardless of the amount of income or loss. Income or loss derived from Kansas sources includes income or loss attributed to.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Kenilworth Castle 12Th Century
    THE HISTORY OF KENILWORTH CASTLE 12TH CENTURY - When and why people first created the site Kenilworth Castle was founded in the early 1120s by Geoffrey de Clinton, Lord Chamberlain and treasurer to Henry I Clinton was a local rival to Roger de Beaumont, the Earl of Warwick and owner of the neighbouring Warwick Castle, and the king made Clinton the sheriff in Warwickshire to act as a counterbalance to Beaumont's power. Henry I’s son had died and so he needed to show that he was powerful even though he did not have an heir The castle's original form is uncertain. It has been suggested that it consisted of a motte, an earthen mound surmounted by wooden buildings; however, the stone great tower may have been part of the original design. Henry II (Henry I’s grandson)succeeded to the throne at the end of a Civil war that lasted from 1135 to 1154 but during the revolt of 1173–74 he faced a significant uprising led by his son, Henry, backed by the French crown. The conflict spread across England and Kenilworth was garrisoned by Henry II's forces; By this point Kenilworth Castle consisted of the great keep, the inner bailey wall, a basic causeway across the smaller lake that preceded the creation of the Great Mere, and the local chase for hunting. De Clinton’s Keep. Windows were added much later, these would have been arrow slits and fishtail arrow slits in the original keep. THE HISTORY OF KENILWORTH CASTLE 13TH CENTURY – King John - Henry's successor, Richard I, paid relatively little attention to Kenilworth, but under King John significant building resumed at the castle.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 2 - Tax Returns and Forms
    2-1 Section 2 - Tax Returns and Forms 1 Nature of Changes Description Page No. List of Returns, Forms and Schedules 2-1 Due Date of Returns 2-19 Extension Forms 2-23 2 List of Returns, Forms and Schedules Following is a list of tax returns and forms showing File Source, Tax Class, Master File Tax Account Codes, and Document Codes. *Non-Masterfile. Please refer to IRM 3.12.21-4 for a list of forms sorted by MFT code. B–BMF E–EPMF I–IMF N–NMF Form No. Title File Tax Class MFT Doc. Source Code Code CP 2000 Proposed Changes to Income or Withholding Tax I 2 30 54 CT-1 Employer’s Annual Railroad Retirement Tax B/N 7,6 09,*71 11 Return CT-2 Employee Representatives Quarterly Railroad N 6 *72 02 Retirement Tax Return CTR Currency Transaction B 5 15,16, 89 SS-4 Application for Employer Tax Identification E/B 0,9 04 Number SS-10 Consent to Extend the Time to Assess Employment Taxes SS-16 Certificate of Election of Coverage Under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act SSA-1099 Social Security Benefit Statement 5 82 TYD-14 Taxpayer Delinquency Investigation I/B 2,6,9 14 TY-15 Unidentified and Excess Collection Voucher 1,2,3,4,5,6, 48 7,8 TY-18 Statement of Payment Due 2 17 TY-26 Statement of Tax Due IRS 1,2,3,4,5,6, 17 7,8 TYD-69 Taxpayer Delinquent Account N 6 17,18 W-2 Wage and Tax Statement B 5 88 11, 12, 21, 37, 38, 39, 40 W-2C Statement of Corrected Income and Tax Amounts B 5 88 44 W-2CM Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands B 5 88 Wage and Tax Statement W-2GU Guam Wage and Tax Statement B 5 88 W2-G Certain Gambling Winnings B 5 88 32 W-2VI US Virgin Islands Wage and Tax Statement B 5 88 W-3 Transmittal of Income and Tax Statements B 5 88 37, 38 Any line marked with # is for official use only 2-2 Form No.
    [Show full text]
  • Contested Consecrations and the Pursuit of Ecclesiastical Independence in Scotland And
    Contested Consecrations and the Pursuit of Ecclesiastical Independence in Scotland and Ireland in the Early 1120s Abstract This article investigates two comparable crises of leadership in Gaelic Christendom which occurred around the same time, in 1120-1; these culminated in failed episcopal appointments for St. Andrews and Dublin. The article is based on accounts from Scotland and Ireland which shed light on the developments in both countries; and on Historia Nouorum in Anglia (‘History of Recent Events in England’) by Eadmer, biographer and confidant of Anselm (archbishop of Canterbury from 1093 until his death in 1109). Eadmer was the principal contemporary first-hand witness to events in this period, but his evidence is somewhat problematic. There are few substantial comparative discussions of Scottish and Irish ecclesiastical developments in the 1120s; in addition, the work of Eadmer needs fuller consideration regarding Canterbury’s relationships with Gaelic churches. Eadmer’s depiction of the St. Andrews situation is especially significant because he himself was the bishop-elect. I assess how these crises arose, and how they caused the relationships between Gaelic churches and Canterbury to become highly strained. I aim to show that leaders in Scotland and Ireland undertook the pursuit of ecclesiastical independence in very different ways; and that both failed appointments, though eventually prompting a degree of independence, resulted in short-term stagnation. 2 Keywords Canterbury, Dublin, Eadmer, episcopal consecration, Gregorian reform, St Andrews Two crises of leadership occurred on opposite sides of the Irish Sea in 1120-1; both culminated in failed episcopal appointments, and caused relations between Gaelic Christendom and Canterbury to become highly strained.
    [Show full text]
  • Sub-Chapter S Corporation Income Tax Instructions ARKANSAS
    ARKANSAS 2019 Sub-Chapter S Corporation Income Tax Instructions Due Date: On or before the 15th day of the 4th month following the close of the tax year, for calendar year filers the due date is April 15th. Simple Reasons to e-file! Filing Confirmation Provided Arkansas Makes Complex Returns Easy e file File Federal & State Forms Together Secure Mailing Address: Physical Address: State of Arkansas Corporation Income Tax Corporation Income Tax Section 1816 W 7th St, Room 2250 P.O. Box 919 Ledbetter Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72203-0919 Little Rock, AR 72201-1030 Page 1 TAX HELP AND FORMS Internet ATAP You can access the Department of Finance and Administration’s Arkansas Taxpayer Access Point (ATAP) allows taxpayers or website at www.dfa.arkansas.gov. their representatives to log on to a secure site and manage their account online. Get current and prior year forms and instructions Access latest income tax info and archived news Access ATAP at www.atap.arkansas.gov to: Get e-file information Make Tax Payments You can e-mail questions to: Make Estimated Tax Payments [email protected] Make name and address changes View account letters (Registration is not required to make payments or to check refund status.) Phone General Information ................................................. (501) 682-4775 Mail Representatives are available to assist callers at the number above during normal business hours (Monday through Friday Corporation Income Tax Section from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.) with: P. O. Box 919 Little Rock, AR 72203-0919 Taxpayer Assistance Notices Received Forms Amended Returns Be sure to apply sufficient postage or your return will not be Audit and Examination Payment Information delivered by the U.S.
    [Show full text]