The Aesthetics of Movement Variations on Gilles Deleuze and Merce Cunningham

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Aesthetics of Movement Variations on Gilles Deleuze and Merce Cunningham The Aesthetics of Movement Variations on Gilles Deleuze and Merce Cunningham Camilla Damkjær Doctoral dissertation 2005 In “co-tutelle” with l’Université Paris VIII Department of Musicology and Performance Studies University of Stockholm S-106 91 Stockholm Sweden Abstract This thesis is an interdisciplinary study of the aesthetics of movement in Gilles Deleuze’s writings and in Merce Cunningham’s choreographies. But it is also a study of the movement that arises when the two meet in a series of variations, where also their respective working partners Félix Guattari and John Cage enter. It is a textual happening where the random juxtaposition between seemingly unrelated areas, philosophy and dance, gives rise to arbitrary connections. It is a textual machine, composed of seven parts. First, the methodological architecture of the juxtaposition is introduced and it is shown how this relates to the materials (the philosophy of Deleuze and the aesthetics of Cunningham), the relation between the materials, and the respective contexts of the materials. The presence of movement in Deleuze’s thinking is then presented and the figure of immobile movement is defined. This figure is a leitmotif of the analyses. It is argued that this figure of immobile movement is not only a stylistic element but has implications on a philosophical level, implications that materialise in Deleuze’s texts. Then follow four parts that build a heterogeneous whole. The analysis of movement is continued through four juxtapositions of particular texts and particular choreographies. Through these juxtapositions, different aspects of movement appear and are discussed: the relation between movement and sensation, movement in interaction with other arts, movement as a means of taking the body to its limit, movement as transformation. Through these analyses, the aesthetics of Cunningham is put into new contexts. The analyses also put into relief Deleuze’s use of figures of movement, and these suddenly acquire another kind of importance. In the seventh and concluding part, all this is brought into play. Key words: interdisciplinary studies, Gilles Deleuze, Merce Cunningham, John Cage, Félix Guattari, Francis Bacon, dance, philosophy, movement, choreography, the body, heterogeneity, juxtaposition, representation, happening, chance. © 2005: Camilla Damkjær ISBN 91 86434 27 6 THEATRON-serien Stiftelsen för utgivning av teatervetenskapliga studier 2 Table of contents: Opening . 4 Introduction: Methods and materials . 5 Chapter 1: Movements and images . 33 Chapter 2: L’Athlétisme of the material – Logique de la sensation and Torse . 77 Chapter 3: Moving to le rythme, from chaos to consistance – “1837 – De la ritournelle” and Variations V . .. 121 Chapter 4: How to construct a body in movement – Untitled Solo, Suite by Chance and le corps sans organes . 160 Chapter 5: Movements and transformations of desire – le devenir and Beach Birds for Camera . 206 Conclusion: The jeu of chance . 250 List of abbreviations . 255 Bibliography . 256 Résumé en français . 265 3 Opening This is an interdisciplinary study of the aesthetics of movement in Gilles Deleuze’s writings and in Merce Cunningham’s choreographies. But it is also a study of the movement that arises when the two are confronted in a series of variations. A series of variations that are also inhabited by many more: most prominently by their respective working partners Félix Guattari and John Cage. But on our way we will also meet seemingly peripheral characters that suddenly play a part in the series. It is a series of variations, but it is also a textual happening, where the random juxtaposition between seemingly unrelated characters and areas, Deleuze and Cunningham, philosophy and dance, gives rise to arbitrary meetings and connections. It is a textual experiment where the juxtaposition becomes a machine that produces its own connections and forces your sensation, imagination and thought in sometimes unforeseen directions. It is a study of that which cannot be compared, that which can only be confronted in a meeting, where the similarities and differences, the concordances and discordances, become happy instances of chance. The programme of the experimentation that I will put into action consists of seven parts. Each is individual and yet relates to the whole. Between them non-linear lines are traced. Let us play. 4 Introduction Methods and materials “C’est peut-être que nous sommes en train de vivre d’une nouvelle manière les rapports théorie-pratique.” (ID, 288) In these variations methods and materials are intrinsically related and intertwined. The method mimes the materials, learns from the way the materials relate to each other, and indirectly takes into account the context that surrounds the materials. These three aspects coexist and coincide. The smallest circuit sends us to the largest, which sends us back again. It is a methodological ritournelle. Questions and answers Deleuze (following Bergson) insists that the question of right or wrong does not concern the rightness of the answer, but whether the question is rightly or wrongly asked from the beginning. It is through asking the right questions, and not confusing things that should not be confused, that we get the right answers. The liberty of thought depends on the liberty to formulate your own questions (B, DR). But the material, too, asks questions. For instance, it can ask us questions indirectly through making certain kinds of answers impossible. This is the case in the work of Merce Cunningham. By deliberately making answers that rely on narration and psychology impossible, he asks us, among other things, what signfication and interpretation is. By blocking our usual answers, he forces us to ask our questions differently, and thereby to reflect upon the possible methods we can use to approach his work. My temporary answer to the above question is a methodological choice that does not lead me away from Cunningham, searching for an explanation outside his work. It leads me into the core of his work (or at least one aspect of it) through a mimétique relation to some of his principles, namely, the principle of juxtaposing seemingly unrelated elements, such as dance and music, deliberately keeping them separate, and letting them create their own connections which do not refer to a master plot that defines the meaning. This choice, however, is not only an answer to a question Cunningham’s work asks me, but also a series of questions raised by my combination of materials. For how is it possible to deal simultaneously with something as different and heterogeneous as the philosophy of Gilles Deleuze and the choreographies of 5 Merce Cunningham? Actually, this is probably the most important question that my materials have asked me, as it concerns the very nature of the combination I am working with. Methodological mimétisme – a textual happening machine We have in the humanities become accustomed to all kinds of interdisciplinary combinations of theory and aesthetic or social materials. But we are sometimes in danger of being blinded by this familiarity. We risk forgetting the very nature of the combinations and wiping out the differences between the materials. There is a risk that we take our method for granted and forget to explain what we are actually doing. I would like to insist on the differences between my materials, and reflect upon what this means for the possible ways in which they can be combined. And as a matter of fact, the materials themselves contain important reflections on this matter. The work of Gilles Deleuze has already been frequently used in diverse interdisciplinary studies. His work invites it (especially his collaborations with Félix Guattari) as it is already in itself characterised by an interdisciplinarity that is hard to repeat and worthy of admiration. The work of Deleuze is increasingly included in the canon of contemporary theory. But I would like to insist on the fact that the work of Deleuze is not a “theory”, but a philosophy in its own right, and I would like to consider it and treat it as such. This might sound paradoxical as I am myself working on Deleuze in an interdisciplinary context. However, my objection is not against an interdisciplinary approach to Deleuze – on the contrary – but it has to do with the way I consider my materials to be related to each other. His philosophy has to be considered as a work, an œuvre to be analysed in itself, and since it is so intrinsically related to his writing it should not be extracted from it. His philosophy is an object of analysis, not a theory to be applied. That is one reason why I have decided to work through concrete analyses of particular texts and not with an overall comprehension of his philosophy. The other reason is that I find that this is also the method that does most justice to the work of Merce Cunningham. Whenever we are writing about dance, the practice of dancing is already in a tricky situation. As dance is a non-verbal phenomenon, it is hard to let it speak for itself. The work of Merce Cunningham is extremely complicated, advanced and obviously the object of serious reflection, and in order to do it justice, I believe we have to consider it in its own right – not only as something to be explained by theory. Choreography is a way of thinking, not least in the case of Cunningham, though it is more than hard to verbalise its philosophy. 6 There are thus two basic principles behind my choice of method: the insistence on the difference between my two materials, dance and philosophy, and an insistence on the equality of the two parts of my materials (Gilles Deleuze and Merce Cunningham). This is my attempt to answer the question of how we can treat such heterogeneous materials simultaneously without neglecting the difference between them.
Recommended publications
  • Proquest Dissertations
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, wfiMe others may be from any type of computer printer. Tfie quality of this reproducthm Is dependent upon ttie quality of the copy subm itted. Broken or indistinct print, ootored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleodthrough. substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these wiU be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to t>e removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at ttie upper left-tiand comer and continuing from left to rigtit in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have t>een reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higtier qualify 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any pfiotographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional ctiarge. Contact UMI directly to order. Bell & Howell Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 UMT CHILDREN'S DANCE: AN EXPLORATION THROUGH THE TECHNIQUES OF MERGE CUNNINGHAM DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Sharon L. Unrau, M.A., CM.A. The Ohio State University 2000 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Emeritus Philip Clark Professor Seymour Kleinman, Advisor Assistant Professor Fiona Travis UMI Number 9962456 Copyright 2000 by Unrau, Sharon Lynn All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Night of 100 Solos: a Centennial Event
    2019 Winter/Spring Season Brooklyn Academy of Music Adam E. Max, Katy Clark, BAM Board Chair President William I. Campbell and Nora Ann Wallace David Binder, BAM Board Vice Chairs Artistic Director Night of 100 Solos: A Centennial Event Choreography by Merce Cunningham BAM Howard Gilman Opera House Apr 16 at 7:30pm Running time: approx. 90 minutes, no intermission Presented without inter- Stager Patricia Lent mission, Events consist of Associate stager Jean Freebury excerpts of dances from the Music director John King repertory and new sequences Set designer Pat Steir arranged for the particular performance and place, Costume designers and builders Reid Bartelme & Harriet Jung with the possibility of several Lighting designer Christine Schallenberg separate activities happening Technical director Davison Scandrett at the same time. —Merce Cunningham Co-produced by Brooklyn Academy of Music, the Barbican London, UCLA’s Center for the Art of Performance, and the Merce Cunningham Trust Night of 100 Solos: A Centennial Event is part of the Merce Cunningham Centennial. Night of 100 Solos: A Centennial Event is generously supported by a major grant from the Howard Gilman Foundation. 2019 Winter/Spring is programmed by Joseph V. Melillo. Season Sponsor: Leadership support for dance at BAM provided by The Harkness Foundation for Dance Major support for dance at BAM provided by The SHS Foundation Support for the Signature Artists Series provided by the Howard Gilman Foundation Night of 100 Solos DANCERS Kyle Abraham, Christian Allen, Mariah Anton
    [Show full text]
  • American Masters 200 List Finaljan2014
    Premiere Date # American Masters Program Title (Month-YY) Subject Name 1 ARTHUR MILLER: PRIVATE CONVERSATIONS On the Set of "Death of a Salesman" June-86 Arthur Miller 2 PHILIP JOHNSON: A SELF PORTRAIT June-86 Philip Johnson 3 KATHERINE ANNE PORTER: THE EYE OF MEMORY July-86 Katherine Anne Porter 4 UNKNOWN CHAPLIN (Part 1) July-86 Charlie Chaplin 5 UNKNOWN CHAPLIN (Part 2) July-86 Charlie Chaplin 6 UNKNOWN CHAPLIN (Part 3) July-86 Charlie Chaplin 7 BILLIE HOLIDAY: THE LONG NIGHT OF LADY DAY August-86 Billie Holiday 8 JAMES LEVINE: THE LIFE IN MUSIC August-86 James Levine 9 AARON COPLAND: A SELF PORTRAIT August-86 Aaron Copland 10 THOMAS EAKINS: A MOTION PORTRAIT August-86 Thomas Eakins 11 GEORGIA O'KEEFFE September-86 Georgia O'Keeffe 12 EUGENE O'NEILL: A GLORY OF GHOSTS September-86 Eugene O'Neill 13 ISAAC IN AMERICA: A JOURNEY WITH ISAAC BASHEVIS SINGER July-87 Isaac Bashevis Singer 14 DIRECTED BY WILLIAM WYLER July-87 William Wyler 15 ARTHUR RUBENSTEIN: RUBENSTEIN REMEMBERED July-87 Arthur Rubinstein 16 ALWIN NIKOLAIS AND MURRAY LOUIS: NIK AND MURRAY July-87 Alwin Nikolais/Murray Louis 17 GEORGE GERSHWIN REMEMBERED August-87 George Gershwin 18 MAURICE SENDAK: MON CHER PAPA August-87 Maurice Sendak 19 THE NEGRO ENSEMBLE COMPANY September-87 Negro Ensemble Co. 20 UNANSWERED PRAYERS: THE LIFE AND TIMES OF TRUMAN CAPOTE September-87 Truman Capote 21 THE TEN YEAR LUNCH: THE WIT AND LEGEND OF THE ALGONQUIN ROUND TABLE September-87 Algonquin Round Table 22 BUSTER KEATON: A HARD ACT TO FOLLOW (Part 1) November-87 Buster Keaton 23 BUSTER KEATON:
    [Show full text]
  • Hume's Objects After Deleuze
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School March 2021 Hume's Objects After Deleuze Michael P. Harter Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Continental Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Harter, Michael P., "Hume's Objects After Deleuze" (2021). LSU Master's Theses. 5305. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/5305 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HUME’S OBJECTS AFTER DELEUZE A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies by Michael Patrick Harter B.A., California State University, Fresno, 2018 May 2021 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Human beings are wholly dependent creatures. In our becoming, we are affected by an incredible number of beings who aid and foster our growth. It would be impossible to devise a list of all such individuals. However, those who played imperative roles in the creation of this work deserve their due recognition. First, I would like to thank my partner, Leena, and our pets Merleau and the late Kiki. Throughout the ebbs and flows of my academic career, you have remained sources of love, joy, encouragement, and calm.
    [Show full text]
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— Extensions Of
    June 7, 2006 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — Extensions of Remarks E1039 IN RECOGNITION OF THE WOMEN’S H. Savage of Idaho, David Williams Simnick of She will forever remain an inspiration to DIVISION OF THE FORT WORTH Illinois, Martin Iran Turman, Jr. of Indiana, many who seek guidance in her wisdom and METROPOLITAN BLACK CHAM- Preston Scott Bates of Kentucky, Seth D. words. She was noted for her no nonsense BER OF COMMERCE Dixon also of Kentucky, Benjamin David approach to the way of life as stated here, Goodman of Maine, Jonathan M. Brookstone ‘‘Don’t be nervous, don’t be tired and above HON. MICHAEL C. BURGESS of Maryland, Zachary Ryan Davis of Massa- all, don’t be bored. Those are the three de- OF TEXAS chusetts, Lauren Brenda Gabriell Hollier of stroyers of freedom’’. Her insight goes far be- IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Michigan, Marvin Anthony Liddell also of yond dance and choreography, but into the Michigan, Christine C. DiLisio of Missouri, real human dilemma. It was stated that, ‘‘she Wednesday, June 7, 2006 Vernon Telford Smith IV of Montana, Victoria was speaking less about dance and more Mr. BURGESS. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to Elizabeth Gilbert of the Model United Nations about an area of equal concern: human recognize the contributions of the Women’s program, Eoghan Emmet Kelley of New rights’’. All those who knew her dignified heart Division of the Fort Worth Metropolitan Black Hampshire, Danielle C. Desaulniers of New of compassion could not help but follow her Chamber of Commerce in its support for the Jersey, Juan Carlo Sanchez of New Mexico, lead.
    [Show full text]
  • Deleuze and the Simulacrum Between the Phantasm and Fantasy (A Genealogical Reading)
    Tijdschrift voor Filosofie, 81/2019, p. 131-149 DELEUZE AND THE SIMULACRUM BETWEEN THE PHANTASM AND FANTASY (A GENEALOGICAL READING) by Daniel Villegas Vélez (Leuven) What is the difference between the phantasm and the simulacrum in Deleuze’s famous reversal of Platonism? At the end of “Plato and the Simulacrum,” Deleuze argues that philosophy must extract from moder- nity “something that Nietzsche designated as the untimely.”1 The his- toricity of the untimely, Deleuze specifies, obtains differently with respect to the past, present, and future: the untimely is attained with respect to the past by the reversal of Platonism and with respect to the present, “by the simulacrum conceived as the edge of critical moder- nity.” In relation to the future, however, it is attained “by the phantasm of the eternal return as belief in the future.” At stake, is a certain dis- tinction between the simulacrum, whose power, as Deleuze tells us in this crucial paragraph, defines modernity, and the phantasm, which is Daniel Villegas Vélez (1984) holds a PhD from the Univ. of Pennsylvania and is postdoctoral researcher at the Institute of Philosophy, KU Leuven, where he forms part of the erc Research Pro- ject Homo Mimeticus (hom). Recent publications include “The Matter of Timbre: Listening, Genea- logy, Sound,” in The Oxford Handbook of Timbre, ed. Emily Dolan and Alexander Rehding (Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2018), doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190637224.013.20 and “Allegory, Noise, and History: TheArcades Project Looks Back at the Trauerspielbuch,” New Writing Special Issue: Convo- luting the Dialectical Image (2019), doi: 10.1080/14790726.2019.1567795.
    [Show full text]
  • NP 2013.Docx
    LISTE INTERNATIONALE DES NOMS PROTÉGÉS (également disponible sur notre Site Internet : www.IFHAonline.org) INTERNATIONAL LIST OF PROTECTED NAMES (also available on our Web site : www.IFHAonline.org) Fédération Internationale des Autorités Hippiques de Courses au Galop International Federation of Horseracing Authorities 15/04/13 46 place Abel Gance, 92100 Boulogne, France Tel : + 33 1 49 10 20 15 ; Fax : + 33 1 47 61 93 32 E-mail : [email protected] Internet : www.IFHAonline.org La liste des Noms Protégés comprend les noms : The list of Protected Names includes the names of : F Avant 1996, des chevaux qui ont une renommée F Prior 1996, the horses who are internationally internationale, soit comme principaux renowned, either as main stallions and reproducteurs ou comme champions en courses broodmares or as champions in racing (flat or (en plat et en obstacles), jump) F de 1996 à 2004, des gagnants des neuf grandes F from 1996 to 2004, the winners of the nine épreuves internationales suivantes : following international races : Gran Premio Carlos Pellegrini, Grande Premio Brazil (Amérique du Sud/South America) Japan Cup, Melbourne Cup (Asie/Asia) Prix de l’Arc de Triomphe, King George VI and Queen Elizabeth Stakes, Queen Elizabeth II Stakes (Europe/Europa) Breeders’ Cup Classic, Breeders’ Cup Turf (Amérique du Nord/North America) F à partir de 2005, des gagnants des onze grandes F since 2005, the winners of the eleven famous épreuves internationales suivantes : following international races : Gran Premio Carlos Pellegrini, Grande Premio Brazil (Amérique du Sud/South America) Cox Plate (2005), Melbourne Cup (à partir de 2006 / from 2006 onwards), Dubai World Cup, Hong Kong Cup, Japan Cup (Asie/Asia) Prix de l’Arc de Triomphe, King George VI and Queen Elizabeth Stakes, Irish Champion (Europe/Europa) Breeders’ Cup Classic, Breeders’ Cup Turf (Amérique du Nord/North America) F des principaux reproducteurs, inscrits à la F the main stallions and broodmares, registered demande du Comité International des Stud on request of the International Stud Book Books.
    [Show full text]
  • Aesthetics Into the Twenty-First Century Curtis Carter Marquette University, [email protected]
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Philosophy Faculty Research and Publications Philosophy, Department of 1-1-2007 Aesthetics into the Twenty-first Century Curtis Carter Marquette University, [email protected] Published version. Filozofski vestnik, Vol. 28, No. 2 (2007): 67-81. Permalink. © 2007 Open Humanities Press. Used with permission. Filozofski vestnik volume/letnik XXviii • number/Številka 2 • 2007 • 67–81 AestHetiCs into tHe TwentY-FiRst Century Curtis l. Carter 1. the question posed for this issue of Filozofski vestnik, “the Revival of Aesthetics,” concerns the reappearance of aesthetics as an important theo- retical realm in the international and various national discussions. Major so- cietal shifts of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries now require that aes- thetics become more engaged in the world beyond the narrow corridors of the academy. in the past, philosopher aestheticians mainly have been drawn to aspects of art, or the experience of art, as seen through metaphysical, epis- temological, linguistic, or phenomenological lenses. Metaphysics leads us to questions concerning the nature of art itself, and to the nature of aesthetic properties. epistemology focuses on questions of interpretation and evalua- tion of art and the experiences that art provides. linguistic studies focus on the arts as forms of symbolism with language-like features, yet distinct from other forms of symbolism. Phenomenology examines the inner experiences that an artist or a perceiver, respectively, might undergo in the processes of making or responding to a work of art. A lesser number of aestheticians, beginning with Plato and extending to the present, also have considered questions relating to the societal roles that art might play in a constructive re-shaping of, or in some instances, endangering the well being of society.
    [Show full text]
  • Overturning the Paradigm of Identity with Gilles Deleuze's Differential
    A Thesis entitled Difference Over Identity: Overturning the Paradigm of Identity With Gilles Deleuze’s Differential Ontology by Matthew G. Eckel Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts Degree in Philosophy Dr. Ammon Allred, Committee Chair Dr. Benjamin Grazzini, Committee Member Dr. Benjamin Pryor, Committee Member Dr. Patricia R. Komuniecki, Dean College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo May 2014 An Abstract of Difference Over Identity: Overturning the Paradigm of Identity With Gilles Deleuze’s Differential Ontology by Matthew G. Eckel Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts Degree in Philosophy The University of Toledo May 2014 Taking Gilles Deleuze to be a philosopher who is most concerned with articulating a ‘philosophy of difference’, Deleuze’s thought represents a fundamental shift in the history of philosophy, a shift which asserts ontological difference as independent of any prior ontological identity, even going as far as suggesting that identity is only possible when grounded by difference. Deleuze reconstructs a ‘minor’ history of philosophy, mobilizing thinkers from Spinoza and Nietzsche to Duns Scotus and Bergson, in his attempt to assert that philosophy has always been, underneath its canonical manifestations, a project concerned with ontology, and that ontological difference deserves the kind of philosophical attention, and privilege, which ontological identity has been given since Aristotle.
    [Show full text]
  • Gilles Deleuze's
    Gilles Deleuze’s Empiricism and Subjectivity 55194_Roffe194_Roffe andand Deleuze.inddDeleuze.indd i 115/10/165/10/16 4:574:57 PPMM Leopards break into the temple and drink all the sacrifi cial vessels dry; it keeps happening; in the end, it can be calculated in advance and is incorporated into the ritual. Franz Kafka 55194_Roffe194_Roffe andand Deleuze.inddDeleuze.indd iiii 115/10/165/10/16 4:574:57 PPMM Gilles Deleuze’s Empiricism and Subjectivity A Critical Introduction and Guide JON ROFFE 55194_Roffe194_Roffe andand Deleuze.inddDeleuze.indd iiiiii 115/10/165/10/16 4:574:57 PPMM Edinburgh University Press is one of the leading university presses in the UK. We publish academic books and journals in our selected subject areas across the humanities and social sciences, combining cutting-edge scholarship with high editorial and production values to produce academic works of lasting importance. For more information visit our website: www.edinburghuniversitypress.com © Jon Roffe, 2016 Edinburgh University Press Ltd The Tun – Holyrood Road, 12(2f) Jackson’s Entry, Edinburgh EH8 8PJ Typeset in 11.5/15 Adobe Sabon by IDSUK (DataConnection) Ltd, and printed and bound in Great Britain by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon CR0 4YY A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978 1 4744 0582 9 (hardback) ISBN 978 1 4744 0584 3 (webready PDF) ISBN 978 1 4744 0583 6 (paperback) ISBN 978 1 4744 0585 0 (epub) The right of Jon Roffe to be identifi ed as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, and the Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 2003 (SI No.
    [Show full text]
  • Rehabilitating the Witch: the Literary Representation of the Witch
    RICE UNIVERSITY Rehabilitating the Witch: The Literary Representation of the Witch from the Malleus Maleficarum to Les Enfants du sabbat by Lisa Travis Blomquist A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEGREE Doctor of Philosophy APPROVED, THESIS COMMITTEE Dr. Bernard Aresu Dr. Elias Bongmba, Professor ofRe · ious Studies Holder of the Harry and Hazel Chavanne Chair in Christian Theology HOUSTON, TX DECEMBER 2011 ABSTRACT Rehabilitating the Witch: The Literary Representation of the Witch from the Malleus Maleficarum to Les Enfants du sabbat by Lisa Travis Blomquist The representation of the witch in French literature has evolved considerably over the centuries. While originally portrayed as a benevolent and caring healer in works by Marie de France, Chretien de Troyes, and the anonymous author of Amadas et Ydoine, the witch eventually underwent a dramatic and unfortunate transformation. By the fifteenth century, authors began to portray her as a malevolent and dangerous agent of the Christian Devil. Martin Le Franc, Pierre de Ronsard, Joachim du Bellay, Fran9ois Rabelais, and Pierre Comeille all created evil witch figures that corresponded with this new definition. It was not until the eighteenth century, through the works of Voltaire and the Encyclopedistes, that the rehabilitation of the witch began. By the twentieth century, Anne Hebert, Jean-Paul Sartre, Maryse Conde, and Sebastiano Vassalli began to rewrite the witch character by engaging in a process of demystification and by demonstrating that the "witch" was really just a victim of the society in which she lived. These authors humanized their witch figures by concentrating on the victimization of their witch protagonists and by exposing the ways in which their fictional societies unjustly created identities for their witch protagonists that were based on false judgments and rumors.
    [Show full text]
  • Deleuze's Theory of Sensation: Overcoming the Kantian Duality
    3 Deleuze's Theory of Sensation: Overcoming the Kantian Duality Daniel W Smith Aesthetics since Kant has been haunted by a seemingly irretractable dualism. On the one hand. aesthetics designates the theory of sensib­ ility as the form of possible experience; on the other hand, it desig­ nates the theory of art as a rdl ection on real experience. The first is the objective element of sensation. which is conditioned by the a priori Conns of space and time (the 'T ranscendental Aesthetic ' aCthe en"rique of Pure Reason); the second is the subjective element of sensation, which is expressed in the feeling of pleasure and pain (the 'Critiqu e of Aesthetic Judgment' in the Critique of Judgment) , Gilles Deleuze ar­ gues that these two aspects of the theory of sensation (aesthetics) can � reunited only at the pric e of a radic al recasting of the transcenden­ tal project as form!Jlated by Kant, pushing it in the direction of what Schelling once called a 'superior empiricism': it is only when the conditions of experience in general become the genetic conditions of experience that they can be reunited with the structures of works real of an. In this case, the principles of sensation would at the same time Constitute the principles of composition of the work of art, and conver­ sely it would be the structure of the work of that reveals these conditions. I In what follows, I would like to examinean the means by �'hich Deleuze anempts to overcome this duality in aesthetics. follow­ this single thread through the network of his thought, even if in tramgcin g this line we sacrifice a cenain amount of detail in favor of a nain perspicuity.
    [Show full text]