DOCSLIB.ORG

Selective Licensing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Selective Licensing Appendix A: The data February 2020 Map 8: Rural Urban Classification by MSOAs in County Durham Map 9: Population Density by MSOA (ONS 2017 Population Estimates) 2 Map 10: Estimated Distribution of HMOs by MSOA (2019) Table 7: Properties to let or for sale on Rightmove (October 2019) Proportion of properties Proportion of properties MSOA Name TO LET on 01 Oct 2019 FOR SALE on 01 Oct 2019 Bishop Auckland and South Church 1.20% 2.56% Horden 0.97% 2.89% Hutton Henry and Wingate 0.87% 2.59% Chilton and Ferryhill Station 0.82% 2.06% Easington Colliery North 0.76% 1.37% Shildon 0.71% 2.02% Durham City 0.71% 0.71% Shotton Colliery 0.69% 1.19% Bowburn and Shincliffe 0.67% 2.00% Easington Colliery South and Eden Hill 0.62% 0.84% Spennymoor-Green Lane and Dean Bank 0.62% 1.38% Annfield Plain South and South Moor 0.62% 2.30% Pelton and Grange Villa 0.60% 1.57% Bishop Middleham and Sedgefield 0.58% 2.65% Langley Moor and Nevilles Cross 0.55% 1.46% Langley Park Cornsay and Satley 0.52% 1.68% Belmont and Carville 0.50% 1.65% Cockton Hill and Etherley Dene 0.48% 2.16% Esh Winning and Ushaw Moor West 0.45% 1.49% Brasside and Newton Hall 0.44% 0.98% Crook South and Willington North 0.42% 2.14% Gilesgate Moor 0.41% 0.74% 3 Sacriston and Waldridge 0.41% 1.49% St Helens Auckland and West Auckland 0.41% 2.18% Bearpark and Witton Gilbert 0.40% 1.53% Cornforth and Ferryhill 0.40% 1.53% Blackhalls 0.39% 1.55% Crook North Howden-le-Wear and Tow Law 0.39% 1.52% Cassop and Coxhoe 0.36% 1.23% Stanley North and Kip Hill 0.33% 1.45% Framwellgate Moor and Pity Me 0.33% 1.19% Dawdon and Seaham Harbour 0.33% 1.06% Burnopfield Dipton North and Tantobie 0.33% 1.82% Thornley Deaf Hill and Wheatley HIll 0.32% 1.32% Henknowle and Woodhouse Close 0.32% 1.73% Byers Green and Spennymoor 0.32% 1.37% Chester-le-Street South 0.32% 1.54% Passfield and Shotton 0.31% 1.38% Fishburn and Trimdons 0.30% 1.79% Annfield Plain North and Dipton South 0.30% 1.18% Coundon and Willington South 0.29% 1.71% Newton Aycliffe Central 0.28% 0.60% Murton South and South Hetton 0.28% 1.74% Chester-le-Street West and Pelton Fell 0.28% 1.21% Bowes and Middleton-in-Teesdale 0.27% 1.25% Acre Rigg and Peterlee Central 0.27% 0.97% Sherburn and West Rainton 0.25% 1.30% Barnard Castle and Startforth 0.24% 1.64% Stanhope and Wolsingham 0.22% 2.17% Brandon 0.22% 1.31% Midridge and Woodham Village 0.21% 1.82% Leadgate North and Consett East 0.20% 1.51% Hamsterley and Staindrop 0.19% 1.83% Chester-le-Street North 0.19% 1.43% Aycliffe Village Newton Aycliffe South 0.18% 1.11% Beamish Ouston and Urpeth 0.15% 1.29% Craghead and South Stanley 0.14% 1.35% Consett West and Castleside 0.14% 1.63% Dalton-le-Dale and Deneside 0.13% 0.83% Seaham North and Seaton 0.13% 1.01% Spernnymoor North and Tudhoe 0.12% 1.01% Bournmoor and Great Lumley 0.12% 0.96% Newton Aycliffe East 0.11% 0.94% Delves and Leadgate South 0.10% 1.16% Medomsley and Shotley 0.09% 1.63% Lanchester 0.07% 1.42% 4 Table 8: Datasets by Criteria Criteria Dataset Period Covered Comparison Area Average House Price North-east Low Demand Property Vacancies 2016/17 to 2018/19 Property Turnover County Durham Police ASB 2015/16 to 2017/18 North-east Fire Brigade - Secondary Fires Anti-social Behaviour Durham County Council (DCC) ASB and 2016/17 to 2018/19 County Durham Noise Complaints DCC Environmental Health Complaints 2016/17 to 2018/19 County Durham Poor Property Condition DCC Household Energy Efficiency 2019 County Durham ratings ONS Population Estimates; Births and Migration 2017 County Durham Deaths data Deprivation Index of Deprivation 2015 2015 England Police Crime Crime 2015/16 to 2017/18 North-east Fire Brigade - Primary Fires Table 9: ASB datasets and categories Police ASB DCC - ASB Fire - ASB categories DCC - Noise Categories categories categories Environmental Secondary Fires Environmental Noise-Alarm Nuisance Nuisance Noise-Barking Dog Personal Personal Noise-Music Noise-Other Animals and Birds Noise-Party Noise-People Noise-TV/Radio Noise-Unidentified/other Noise-Vehicle repairs Noise-Vehicles Noise-Vehicles / Transport Table 10: Main ASB incident types by dataset in County Durham Datasets Main Categories Key Points Environmental Of these three incident types, Personal ASB DCC Environmental Nuisance incidents account for 59% of all DCC ASB Complaints Personal complaints in the area. These three incident types account for 84% of all Barking Dogs Noise complaints. DCC Noise Complaints Music Barking dogs accounts for 51% of all Noise People complaints. Environmental Police ASB Nuisance Nuisance incidents account for 64% of Police ASB Personal 5 Loose refuse (including Garden) These four types account for 78% of all Scrub Land Fire Brigade Secondary secondary fire incidents. Small refuse/rubbish/recycle container Fires Over half (53%) are under the 'Loose refuse' (excluding wheelie bin) category. Wheelie Bins Total incidents in these categories 63,285 Graph 7: Acre Rigg and Peterlee Central ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 35.4% 35.6% 33.3% 34.9% 45.7% 33.5% 32.2% 32.3% 33.2% 39.7% 31.1% 32.2% 34.4% 31.9% 14.7% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES Graph 8: Aycliffe Village Newton Aycliffe South ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 33.9% 34.7% 37.1% 52.7% 56.3% 35.6% 31.7% 30.9% 21.6% 21.9% 30.5% 33.5% 32.0% 25.7% 21.9% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES Graph 9: Chester-le-Street West and Pelton Fell ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 27.2% 29.8% 41.1% 34.0% 35.7% 29.5% 30.2% 32.6% 30.6% 33.9% 43.2% 40.0% 28.3% 33.3% 30.4% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES 6 Graph 10: Consett West and Castleside ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 25.4% 30.1% 42.9% 45.0% 41.6% 32.1% 30.8% 31.9% 23.4% 27.0% 42.5% 39.1% 25.3% 31.5% 31.5% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES Graph 11: Craghead and South Stanley ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 34.9% 28.7% 32.8% 44.7% 50.5% 33.0% 32.3% 39.0% 27.6% 22.7% 38.3% 34.8% 27.6% 26.0% 26.8% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES Graph 12: Dalton-le-Dale and Deneside ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 32.4% 26.4% 30.7% 36.7% 40.2% 30.7% 32.3% 32.0% 34.2% 36.9% 42.9% 31.3% 33.3% 37.0% 22.9% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES 7 Graph 13: Gilesgate Moor persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 24.1% 26.3% 33.8% 37.3% 39.7% 35.6% 34.6% 28.2% 33.3% 29.3% 38.0% 40.3% 39.1% 29.4% 31.0% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES Graph 14: Passfield and Shotton ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 22.1% 29.6% 30.1% 37.3% 39.5% 42.1% 34.6% 34.7% 32.0% 29.6% 30.7% 30.9% 35.9% 35.8% 35.3% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES Graph 15: Sherburn and West Rainton ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 26.6% 26.9% 34.5% 29.7% 44.1% 29.4% 31.7% 32.0% 38.2% 31.0% 41.7% 43.7% 38.3% 24.8% 27.3% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES 8 Graph 16: Bishop Auckland and South Church ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 28.7% 34.4% 34.6% 38.9% 34.6% 38.4% 35.9% 33.7% 34.9% 40.4% 32.9% 29.7% 31.7% 30.6% 20.7% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES Graph 17: Chilton and Ferryhill Station ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 28.0% 31.6% 37.9% 42.9% 36.4% 33.1% 32.7% 29.8% 25.0% 47.0% 32.3% 32.1% 38.8% 35.7% 16.7% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES Graph 18: Dawdon and Seaham Harbour ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 31.8% 28.5% 31.2% 32.1% 45.1% 33.1% 32.8% 40.4% 33.9% 35.3% 38.5% 36.0% 27.8% 34.1% 19.6% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES 9 Graph 19: Easington Colliery North ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 33.3% 33.3% 26.9% 29.1% 28.4% 35.9% 36.0% 38.1% 50.8% 44.8% 37.3% 34.9% 33.5% 15.8% 21.8% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES Graph 20: Hutton Henry and Wingate ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 24.4% 27.6% 29.1% 37.7% 39.0% 36.1% 41.9% 40.8% 41.6% 37.4% 39.5% 30.5% 30.1% 20.8% 23.6% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES Graph 20: Murton South and South Hetton ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 25.2% 27.7% 28.3% 28.4% 35.9% 33.6% 35.3% 29.7% 30.7% 30.4% 42.5% 36.3% 41.1% 33.7% 41.0% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES 10 Graph 21: Thornley Deaf Hill and Wheatley Hill ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 28.0% 29.2% 26.2% 22.7% 26.1% 35.1% 33.7% 31.5% 32.4% 32.9% 38.3% 39.3% 41.3% 42.2% 40.9% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES Graph 22: Henknowle and Woodhouse Close ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 36.5% 31.8% 31.2% 32.9% 52.5% 24.0% 26.1% 35.6% 42.4% 21.3% 44.8% 41.0% 27.9% 25.8% 26.2% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES Graph 23: Pelton and Grange Villa ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 30.3% 26.1% 27.8% 28.8% 46.0% 34.6% 37.0% 40.5% 35.2% 33.6% 39.3% 32.8% 31.6% 36.0% 20.4% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES 11 Graph 24: Cockton Hill and Etherley Dene ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 36.7% 30.6% 32.6% 38.9% 45.5% 27.6% 36.4% 35.7% 35.2% 39.4% 35.7% 25.9% 33.1% 31.7% 15.2% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES Graph 25: Cornforth and Ferryhill ASB
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Town Crier Issue 509 Friday 6Th May 2011 Page 1 N Crier Shildon Ow Classifieds Istri C T & D T All About Local People
    Published at: Friday 6th May 2011 First Floor, Town Council Offices, Issue 509 Civic Hall Square, Shildon, RIER DL4 1AH. N C Telephone/Fax: 01388 775896 Shildon W Duty journalist: 0790 999 2731 ric t O & D i s t T At the heart www.shildontowncrier.com of our wonderful community email: [email protected] AAP supports ‘valued Town tightens the community facility’ net on scrap thieves Police operation Hansel, avoid paying tax and duty targeting scrap metal on fuel that all road users thieves in County Durham, are required to pay. focused its attention on Police visited two scrapyards Shildon on Wednesday 27th in the area to ensure regula- April. tions were being adhered to A checkpoint was estab- and to promote their ‘Good lished in Lambton Street in Practice’ scheme to respon- the town, where suspicious sible owners. vehicles were intercepted Metal theft is estimated to by police with help from account for up to 8% of all Vehicle and Operator crime in the Durham Police Services Agency and Her Force area, with many more Majesty’s Revenue and instances suspected of Customs officers. going unreported. Several cars, vans and PC Andy Sutherland, who lorries were stopped during helped to plan Operation the exercise. Hansel said, “With scrap This resulted in two vehicle metal values remaining seizures, five waste carrying high, this is an area which offences and fifteen fixed is currently proving very Children from the Community Centre saying a big ‘thank you’ to the AAP. penalty notices for various attractive to criminals. Bishop Auckland and residents in Shildon and ment for them to enjoy.
    [Show full text]
  • Subject Guide 1 – Records Relating to Inclosure
    Durham County Record Office County Hall Durham DH1 5UL Telephone: 03000 267619 Email: [email protected] Website: www.durhamrecordoffice.org.uk Subject Guide 1 – Records Relating to Inclosure Issue no. 19 July 2020 Contents Introduction 1 Organisation of List 2 Alphabetical List of Townships 2 A 2 B 2 C 3 D 4 E 4 F 4 G 4 H 5 I 5 K 5 L 5 M 6 N 6 O 6 R 6 S 7 T 7 U 8 W 8 Introduction Inclosure (occasionally spelled “enclosure”) refers to a reorganisation of scattered land holdings by mutual agreement of the owners. Much inclosure of Common Land, Open Fields and Moor Land (or Waste), formerly farmed collectively by the residents on behalf of the Lord of the Manor, had taken place by the 18th century, but the uplands of County Durham remained largely unenclosed. Inclosures, to consolidate land-holdings, divide the land (into Allotments) and fence it off from other usage, could be made under a Private Act of Parliament or by general agreement of the landowners concerned. In the latter case the Agreement would be Enrolled as a Decree at the Court of Chancery in Durham and/or lodged with the Clerk of the Peace, the senior government officer in the County, so may be preserved in Quarter Sessions records. In the case of Parliamentary Enclosure a Local Bill would be put before Parliament which would pass it into law as an Inclosure Act. The Acts appointed Commissioners to survey the area concerned and determine its distribution as a published Inclosure Award.
    [Show full text]
  • East Durham College Dedicated Bus Services
    East Durham College ED1 Burnopfield to ED2 Blackfell to EDC Houghall Campus EDC Peterlee Campus Dedicated Bus Services Burnopfield, Post Office 0658 Blackfell, Knoulberry Road 0715 from 31st August 2021 Medomsley Church 0710 Concord Bus Station 0721 Term Time Only Consett Bus Station 0720 Washington Galleries Bus Station 0728 Annfield Plain, Tesco 0731 Shiney Row, Wheatsheaf 0738 Stanley Bus Station 0741 Newbottle, Front Street 0742 Sacriston, Greenwells Garage 0755 Houghton-le-Spring, Church 0747 1207 Student ID Cards must be shown when Aykley Heads 0806 Hetton-le-Hole Interchange 0754 1214 boarding any of the dedicated services EDC Houghall Campus 0817 South Hetton, Grasmere Terrace 0804 1224 Easington Lane High Street 0810 1230 Connections between services can be made at EDC Houghall Campus 1738 Murton, Cenotaph 0815 1235 either the Peterlee Campus or Houghall Campus Aykley Heads 1753 EDC Peterlee Campus 0825 1245 Sacriston, Greenwells Garage 1759 Stanley Bus Station 1811 EDC Peterlee Campus 1315 1735 Annfield Plain, Tesco 1819 Murton, Cenotaph 1325 1745 ED4 North Hylton to Consett Bus Station 1829 Easington Lane High Street 1330 1750 EDC Peterlee Campus Medomsley Church 1837 South Hetton, Grasmere Terrace 1335 1755 Burnopfield, Post Office 1848 Hetton-le-Hole Interchange 1344 1804 Houghton-le-Spring, Church 1352 1812 North Hylton, Business Park 0717 Newbottle, Front Street 1816 Hylton Castle, Health Centre 0722 Shiney Row, Wheatsheaf 1820 Southwick Green 0727 Darlington to Washington Galleries Bus Station 1829 Fulwell, The Grange
    [Show full text]
  • Durham County Council Election Results 1973-2005
    Durham County Council Election Results 1973-2005 Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher The Elections Centre Plymouth University The information contained in this report has been obtained from a number of sources. Election results from the immediate post-reorganisation period were painstakingly collected by Alan Willis largely, although not exclusively, from local newspaper reports. From the mid- 1980s onwards the results have been obtained from each local authority by the Elections Centre. The data are stored in a database designed by Lawrence Ware and maintained by Brian Cheal and others at Plymouth University. Despite our best efforts some information remains elusive whilst we accept that some errors are likely to remain. Notice of any mistakes should be sent to [email protected]. The results sequence can be kept up to date by purchasing copies of the annual Local Elections Handbook, details of which can be obtained by contacting the email address above. Front cover: the graph shows the distribution of percentage vote shares over the period covered by the results. The lines reflect the colours traditionally used by the three main parties. The grey line is the share obtained by Independent candidates while the purple line groups together the vote shares for all other parties. Rear cover: the top graph shows the percentage share of council seats for the main parties as well as those won by Independents and other parties. The lines take account of any by- election changes (but not those resulting from elected councillors switching party allegiance) as well as the transfers of seats during the main round of local election.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents. Proceedings at the Nomination. Page Polling Districts
    E S CONT NT . i Proceedings at the Nominat on . PAGE Polling Districts Castle Eden 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gateshead Heworth Hetton - le -Hole J arrow Lanchester Seaham Harbour Shotley Bridge South Shields Sunderland Winlaton Analysis of the P011 A nalysis o f Districts A l o f n na yses Tow ships O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Index of Townships RE F E RE N CE S l l f ll made to Doub e Entries in the Voting Co umns , where the o owing ‘ evi ations are used to denote other Districts CE for Castle Eden L for Lanchester CS Chester -le - Street SH Seaham Harbour D Durham SB Shotley Bridge G Gateshead SS South Shields H Heworth S Sunderland HH Hetton -le - Hole Wh Whickham J J arrow Wn Winlaton are l l Doub e Entries occur in the same District, the numbers on y are a—m PROCEEDING S AT THE NOMINATION . The Nomination for the Northern Division of the County o f Durham . l l ook p ace in the Market P ace , Durham , (the County Courts being i 2 oth o f 1 8 6 8 . nder repair) , on Friday, the November, . U ff Of . W E WOOLER, ESQ IRE , Under Sheri , Returning ficer _ SIR WI IA O of ll HEDWORTH LL MS N , BARONET , Whitburn Ha , was - of Elemore ll proposed by Henry John Baker Baker, Esquire , Ha , of f and seconded by Joseph Laycock, Esquire , Low Gos orth, l - - Newcast e upon Tyne .
    [Show full text]
  • Vol-14-No-1.Pdf
    EDITORIAL Another year has come and gone, and we trust that 1989 will be a happy and prosperous one for all our members. If our Society is to continue to flourish, however, it is essential that more members should play an active part in running its affairs. Ken Brown, our Secretary since 1983 (and acting Programme Organiser for the last year), is resigning at the Annual General Meeting in May, and Irene Blackburn, who is responsible for the Members' Interests and Second Time Around sections of the Journal, will be giving up her position as Research Editor later in the year. We are very grateful to them both for all the work they have done on our behalf. In addition to these two posts, we are still short of a Programme Organiser. If you know of anyone who might be willing to take on any of these jobs please let Ken Brown know as soon as possible - otherwise the Society may come to a grinding halt. One of the most important events of 1988 as far as the Society was concerned was the publication of the long-awaited Directory of Members' Interests. Its production entailed a great deal of hard work on the part of those responsible, and it also placed a severe strain on the Society's finances. In view of the fact that it was initially offered free to members (only the cost of postage and packing being charged), the demand for copies was disappointingly small. Copies are still available, and although now priced £2.75 each (post free to addresses in the U.K.), they are very good value.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Environment Audit Appendix 2. West Auckland to Shildon
    The 1825 Stockton & Darlington Railway: Historic Environment Audit Appendix 2. West Auckland to Shildon. October 2016 Archaeo-Environment for Durham County Council, Darlington Borough Council and Stockton Council. The 1825 Stockton & Darlington Railway: Historic Environment Audit: West Auckland to Shildon. Introduction This report is one of a series covering the length of the 1825 Stockton & Darlington Railway. It results from a programme of fieldwork and desk based research carried out between October 2015 and March 2016 by Archaeo-Environment and local community groups, in particular the Friends of the 1825 S&DR. This appendix covers the second 5.1km (3.17 miles) stretch between the Gaunless Accommodation Bridge at West Auckland and Shildon (figure 1). It outlines what survives and what has been lost starting at the north and heading south east to Shildon. It outlines the gaps in our knowledge requiring further research and the major management issues needing action. It highlights opportunities for improved access to the line and for improved conservation, management and interpretation so that the S&DR is a visitor destination of national and international importance. © Crown copyright 2016. All rights reserved. Licence number 100042279. Figure 1. Area discussed in this document (inset S&DR Line against regional background). Archaeo-Environment Ltd for Durham County Council, Darlington Borough Council and Stockton Borough Council 1 S&DR 1825: Opportunities for Heritage – Led Regeneration: West Auckland to Shildon. Historic Background At 7am, on the 27th September 1825, 12 waggons of coal were hauled from the Phoenix Pit at Witton Park to the foot of Etherley Ridge, and pulled up the North Bank 1,100 yards by a stationary engine.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Footpath Booklet
    The Durham Heritage Coastal footpath The Countryside Code Respect, protect, enjoy! Respect other people l Consider the local community and other people enjoying the outdoors. l Leave gates and property as you find them and follow paths unless wider access is available. Protect the natural environment l Leave no trace of your visit and take your litter home. l Keep dogs under effective control Enjoy the outdoors l Plan ahead and be prepared. l Follow advice and local signs. Scan the code to find out more about Durham Heritage Coast. Public Transport Information For information on getting to the coast using public transport, www.traveline.info please go to , or telephone 0871 200 22 33. Introduction Welcome to Durham’s Heritage Coastal Footpath, an 11 mile walking route following the England Coast Path National Trail. Discover and explore spectacular grasslands, superb coastal denes and uncover the rich heritage that has shaped this coastline into a unique and fascinating place to be. Why is it so special? Durham’s Coastline is unique. Nowhere else in Britain has such a wonderful display of Magnesian Limestone Coastal Grasslands supporting a vast array of wildflowers and insects. The Northern Brown Argus butterfly can be found amongst these grasslands in the summer months and flowers such as orchids, Bloody Cranesbill, Thrift, Birds’ Eye Primrose and Common Rock Rose are a characteristic sight on the grassy cliff tops. The sound of Skylarks and Lapwings in the summer are a musical treat not to be missed. The coastal denes created at the end of the last ice age support some of the most natural woodland in North East England and provide a valuable habitat for mammals such as deer, foxes, badgers and bats.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham - Langley Park Service 14 Sunday 19Th November 2017 Only
    Durham - Langley Park Service 14 Sunday 19th November 2017 only Service 14 14 14 14 14 Durham Bus Station, Stand A - 1935 2035 2135 2235 Arnison Centre, Sainsbury's - 1946 2046 2146 2246 Sacriston Crossroads - 1954 2054 2154 2254 Langley Park, Stringer Terrace (a) - 2004 2104 2204 2304 Langley Park, Stringer Terrace (d) 1905 2005 2105 2205 - Sacriston Crossroads 1915 2015 2115 2215 - Arnison Centre, Sainsbury's 1922 2022 2122 2222 - Durham Bus Station, Stand A 1933 2033 2133 2233 - Durham - Consett Service 15 Thursday 16th - Sunday 19th November 2017 only SU SU Service 15 15 15 15 Durham Bus Station, Stand C 1935 2050 2205 2315 University Hospital of Nth Durham 1938 2053 2208 2318 Witton Gilbert, Glendinning Arms 1944 2059 2214 2324 Kaysburn 1946 2101 2216 2326 Lanchester, Village Green 1953 2108 2223 2333 Iveston 1959 2114 2229 2339 Leadgate, opposite Co-operative 2002 2117 2232 2342 Number One Roundabout 2006 2121 2236 2346 Consett Bus Station 2008 2123 2238 2348 Sunday 19th November 2017 only Service 15 Consett Bus Station 1845 Number One Roundabout 1847 Leadgate, opposite Co-operative 1851 Iveston 1854 Lanchester, Village Green 1859 Kaysburn 1907 Witton Gilbert, Glendinning Arms 1909 University Hospital of Nth Durham 1915 Durham Bus Station 1918 SU = Sunday Only Durham - Stanley Service 16 Thursday 16th - Sunday 19th November 2017 only SU SU SU Service 16 16 16 16 16 Durham Bus Station, Stand C 1855 1955 2055 2155 2255 University Hospital of Nth Durham 1859 1959 2059 2159 2259 Framwellgate Moor, New College 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300
    [Show full text]
  • Chester-Le-Street/Durham
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. Principal Area Boundary Review DISTRICT OF CHESTER LE STREET; CITY OF DURHAM LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION fc'Oll ENGLAND REPORT NO. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Mr G J Ellerton CMC MBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J G Powell FRIGS FSVA MEMBERS Lady Ackner Mr T Brockbank DL Professor G E Cherry Mi- K J L Newell Mr B Scholes OBE THE RT. HON. PATRICK JENKIN MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT BACKGROUND 1. In a letter dated 20 March 198! the Chester-le-Street District Council invited us to make proposals for certain changes to the boundary of their district with the district of the City of Durham. The suggestion for changes had arisen during the course of the review by the District Council of the parish pattern in their area and involved the parishes of Plawsworth and Sacriston. Durham City Council had not at that stage completed their own parish review, but it was clear that the changes concerned were not supported by them or by the councils of the three parishes in their district which would be involved - Framwellgate Moor, Kimblesworth and Witton Gilbert. We decided to defer action on the matter until we had received Durham City Council's parish review report. ?., In submitting their report in August 1982 Durham City Council opposed all the district boundary changes suggested by Chester-le-Street District Council; Kimblesworth Parish Council wrote to us separately to emphasise their opposition to the ones affecting then. The City Council sent us a copy of a letter from the Durham County Council, however, which said, in relation to the possibility of changes in th^ Kimblesworth Parish boundary, that the Council considered that the villages of Kimblesworth and Nettlesworth (the latter currently in Plawsworth Parish, Chester-le-Street) should be treated as one settlement and that future development should be in relation to a single local plan.
    [Show full text]
  • 1999 No. 3382 EDUCATION, ENGLAND the Easington And
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 1999 No. 3382 EDUCATION, ENGLAND The Easington and Seaham Education Action Zone Order 1999 Made ---- 15th December 1999 Laid before Parliament 20th December 1999 Coming into force 10th January 2000 Whereas an application for the purpose of establishing an education action zone has been made to the Secretary of State with the consent of the governing bodies of every school listed in Schedule 2 to this Order. Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred on the Secretary of State by sections 10(1), 11 and 138(7) of, and paragraph 2 of Schedule 1 to, the School Standards and Framework Act 1998(a), the Secretary of State for Education and Employment hereby makes the following Order: Citation and commencement 1. This Order may be cited as the Easington and Seaham Education Action Zone Order 1999 and shall come into force on 10th January 2000. Interpretation 2. In this Order– “partners” means those persons listed in Schedule 1 to this Order; and “zone school” means a school listed in Schedule 2 to this Order. Constitution of education action zone 3. The schools listed in Schedule 2 to this Order shall constitute collectively an education action zone under the name of the Easington and Seaham Education Action Zone (“the zone”) for the purposes of Chapter III of Part I of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998. Education Action Forum 4. There shall be an Education Action Forum for the zone to be known as the Easington and Seaham Education Action Forum (“the Forum”), the membership of which shall include– (a) one person appointed by the governing body of each zone school, unless any such governing body choose not to make such an appointment; (b) either one or two persons appointed by the Secretary of State; (c) one person appointed by each partner, unless any partner chooses not to make such an appointment; (a) 1998 c.
    [Show full text]
  • East Durham Area Action Partnership Annual Report 2020-2021
    East Durham Area Action Partnership Better for everyone East Durham Area Action Partnership Annual Report 2020/21 Introduction The past twelve months have challenged us all in many ways. The Covid pandemic has changed how the council and Area Action Partnerships (AAPs) have had to work as many communities and local residents have struggled because of the restrictions that we have all had to follow. If there are positives we can take from this terrible situation it is that ‘community’ is alive and well in County Durham. Thousands of people have stepped forward and have taken action to ensure the most isolated and vulnerable have been looked after. The people of County Durham need to be applauded for their efforts. Many of those organisations that have been helping out have been supported by the AAPs who have provided funding to numerous groups enabling them to do their vital work. Some of this funding has come directly through the AAPs whilst other resources have been allocated from the County Councillors Neighbourhood Budgets. I’d like to take this opportunity to thank the AAP teams for their help and support in ensuring that our Neighbourhood Budgets have been making a real difference in local communities. The next year will be no less challenging but I am delighted to say that the AAPs are being given extra resources to help communities recover from the pandemic. There is also new funding to support the County Council’s Towns and Villages Programme and the AAPs will be playing a key role in ensuring this funding helps to improve communities across County Durham.
    [Show full text]