Selective Licensing

Selective Licensing

Appendix A: The data February 2020 Map 8: Rural Urban Classification by MSOAs in County Durham Map 9: Population Density by MSOA (ONS 2017 Population Estimates) 2 Map 10: Estimated Distribution of HMOs by MSOA (2019) Table 7: Properties to let or for sale on Rightmove (October 2019) Proportion of properties Proportion of properties MSOA Name TO LET on 01 Oct 2019 FOR SALE on 01 Oct 2019 Bishop Auckland and South Church 1.20% 2.56% Horden 0.97% 2.89% Hutton Henry and Wingate 0.87% 2.59% Chilton and Ferryhill Station 0.82% 2.06% Easington Colliery North 0.76% 1.37% Shildon 0.71% 2.02% Durham City 0.71% 0.71% Shotton Colliery 0.69% 1.19% Bowburn and Shincliffe 0.67% 2.00% Easington Colliery South and Eden Hill 0.62% 0.84% Spennymoor-Green Lane and Dean Bank 0.62% 1.38% Annfield Plain South and South Moor 0.62% 2.30% Pelton and Grange Villa 0.60% 1.57% Bishop Middleham and Sedgefield 0.58% 2.65% Langley Moor and Nevilles Cross 0.55% 1.46% Langley Park Cornsay and Satley 0.52% 1.68% Belmont and Carville 0.50% 1.65% Cockton Hill and Etherley Dene 0.48% 2.16% Esh Winning and Ushaw Moor West 0.45% 1.49% Brasside and Newton Hall 0.44% 0.98% Crook South and Willington North 0.42% 2.14% Gilesgate Moor 0.41% 0.74% 3 Sacriston and Waldridge 0.41% 1.49% St Helens Auckland and West Auckland 0.41% 2.18% Bearpark and Witton Gilbert 0.40% 1.53% Cornforth and Ferryhill 0.40% 1.53% Blackhalls 0.39% 1.55% Crook North Howden-le-Wear and Tow Law 0.39% 1.52% Cassop and Coxhoe 0.36% 1.23% Stanley North and Kip Hill 0.33% 1.45% Framwellgate Moor and Pity Me 0.33% 1.19% Dawdon and Seaham Harbour 0.33% 1.06% Burnopfield Dipton North and Tantobie 0.33% 1.82% Thornley Deaf Hill and Wheatley HIll 0.32% 1.32% Henknowle and Woodhouse Close 0.32% 1.73% Byers Green and Spennymoor 0.32% 1.37% Chester-le-Street South 0.32% 1.54% Passfield and Shotton 0.31% 1.38% Fishburn and Trimdons 0.30% 1.79% Annfield Plain North and Dipton South 0.30% 1.18% Coundon and Willington South 0.29% 1.71% Newton Aycliffe Central 0.28% 0.60% Murton South and South Hetton 0.28% 1.74% Chester-le-Street West and Pelton Fell 0.28% 1.21% Bowes and Middleton-in-Teesdale 0.27% 1.25% Acre Rigg and Peterlee Central 0.27% 0.97% Sherburn and West Rainton 0.25% 1.30% Barnard Castle and Startforth 0.24% 1.64% Stanhope and Wolsingham 0.22% 2.17% Brandon 0.22% 1.31% Midridge and Woodham Village 0.21% 1.82% Leadgate North and Consett East 0.20% 1.51% Hamsterley and Staindrop 0.19% 1.83% Chester-le-Street North 0.19% 1.43% Aycliffe Village Newton Aycliffe South 0.18% 1.11% Beamish Ouston and Urpeth 0.15% 1.29% Craghead and South Stanley 0.14% 1.35% Consett West and Castleside 0.14% 1.63% Dalton-le-Dale and Deneside 0.13% 0.83% Seaham North and Seaton 0.13% 1.01% Spernnymoor North and Tudhoe 0.12% 1.01% Bournmoor and Great Lumley 0.12% 0.96% Newton Aycliffe East 0.11% 0.94% Delves and Leadgate South 0.10% 1.16% Medomsley and Shotley 0.09% 1.63% Lanchester 0.07% 1.42% 4 Table 8: Datasets by Criteria Criteria Dataset Period Covered Comparison Area Average House Price North-east Low Demand Property Vacancies 2016/17 to 2018/19 Property Turnover County Durham Police ASB 2015/16 to 2017/18 North-east Fire Brigade - Secondary Fires Anti-social Behaviour Durham County Council (DCC) ASB and 2016/17 to 2018/19 County Durham Noise Complaints DCC Environmental Health Complaints 2016/17 to 2018/19 County Durham Poor Property Condition DCC Household Energy Efficiency 2019 County Durham ratings ONS Population Estimates; Births and Migration 2017 County Durham Deaths data Deprivation Index of Deprivation 2015 2015 England Police Crime Crime 2015/16 to 2017/18 North-east Fire Brigade - Primary Fires Table 9: ASB datasets and categories Police ASB DCC - ASB Fire - ASB categories DCC - Noise Categories categories categories Environmental Secondary Fires Environmental Noise-Alarm Nuisance Nuisance Noise-Barking Dog Personal Personal Noise-Music Noise-Other Animals and Birds Noise-Party Noise-People Noise-TV/Radio Noise-Unidentified/other Noise-Vehicle repairs Noise-Vehicles Noise-Vehicles / Transport Table 10: Main ASB incident types by dataset in County Durham Datasets Main Categories Key Points Environmental Of these three incident types, Personal ASB DCC Environmental Nuisance incidents account for 59% of all DCC ASB Complaints Personal complaints in the area. These three incident types account for 84% of all Barking Dogs Noise complaints. DCC Noise Complaints Music Barking dogs accounts for 51% of all Noise People complaints. Environmental Police ASB Nuisance Nuisance incidents account for 64% of Police ASB Personal 5 Loose refuse (including Garden) These four types account for 78% of all Scrub Land Fire Brigade Secondary secondary fire incidents. Small refuse/rubbish/recycle container Fires Over half (53%) are under the 'Loose refuse' (excluding wheelie bin) category. Wheelie Bins Total incidents in these categories 63,285 Graph 7: Acre Rigg and Peterlee Central ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 35.4% 35.6% 33.3% 34.9% 45.7% 33.5% 32.2% 32.3% 33.2% 39.7% 31.1% 32.2% 34.4% 31.9% 14.7% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES Graph 8: Aycliffe Village Newton Aycliffe South ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 33.9% 34.7% 37.1% 52.7% 56.3% 35.6% 31.7% 30.9% 21.6% 21.9% 30.5% 33.5% 32.0% 25.7% 21.9% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES Graph 9: Chester-le-Street West and Pelton Fell ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 27.2% 29.8% 41.1% 34.0% 35.7% 29.5% 30.2% 32.6% 30.6% 33.9% 43.2% 40.0% 28.3% 33.3% 30.4% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES 6 Graph 10: Consett West and Castleside ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 25.4% 30.1% 42.9% 45.0% 41.6% 32.1% 30.8% 31.9% 23.4% 27.0% 42.5% 39.1% 25.3% 31.5% 31.5% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES Graph 11: Craghead and South Stanley ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 34.9% 28.7% 32.8% 44.7% 50.5% 33.0% 32.3% 39.0% 27.6% 22.7% 38.3% 34.8% 27.6% 26.0% 26.8% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES Graph 12: Dalton-le-Dale and Deneside ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 32.4% 26.4% 30.7% 36.7% 40.2% 30.7% 32.3% 32.0% 34.2% 36.9% 42.9% 31.3% 33.3% 37.0% 22.9% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES 7 Graph 13: Gilesgate Moor persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 24.1% 26.3% 33.8% 37.3% 39.7% 35.6% 34.6% 28.2% 33.3% 29.3% 38.0% 40.3% 39.1% 29.4% 31.0% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES Graph 14: Passfield and Shotton ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 22.1% 29.6% 30.1% 37.3% 39.5% 42.1% 34.6% 34.7% 32.0% 29.6% 30.7% 30.9% 35.9% 35.8% 35.3% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES Graph 15: Sherburn and West Rainton ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 26.6% 26.9% 34.5% 29.7% 44.1% 29.4% 31.7% 32.0% 38.2% 31.0% 41.7% 43.7% 38.3% 24.8% 27.3% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES 8 Graph 16: Bishop Auckland and South Church ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 28.7% 34.4% 34.6% 38.9% 34.6% 38.4% 35.9% 33.7% 34.9% 40.4% 32.9% 29.7% 31.7% 30.6% 20.7% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES Graph 17: Chilton and Ferryhill Station ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 28.0% 31.6% 37.9% 42.9% 36.4% 33.1% 32.7% 29.8% 25.0% 47.0% 32.3% 32.1% 38.8% 35.7% 16.7% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES Graph 18: Dawdon and Seaham Harbour ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 31.8% 28.5% 31.2% 32.1% 45.1% 33.1% 32.8% 40.4% 33.9% 35.3% 38.5% 36.0% 27.8% 34.1% 19.6% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES 9 Graph 19: Easington Colliery North ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 33.3% 33.3% 26.9% 29.1% 28.4% 35.9% 36.0% 38.1% 50.8% 44.8% 37.3% 34.9% 33.5% 15.8% 21.8% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES Graph 20: Hutton Henry and Wingate ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 24.4% 27.6% 29.1% 37.7% 39.0% 36.1% 41.9% 40.8% 41.6% 37.4% 39.5% 30.5% 30.1% 20.8% 23.6% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES Graph 20: Murton South and South Hetton ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 25.2% 27.7% 28.3% 28.4% 35.9% 33.6% 35.3% 29.7% 30.7% 30.4% 42.5% 36.3% 41.1% 33.7% 41.0% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES 10 Graph 21: Thornley Deaf Hill and Wheatley Hill ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 28.0% 29.2% 26.2% 22.7% 26.1% 35.1% 33.7% 31.5% 32.4% 32.9% 38.3% 39.3% 41.3% 42.2% 40.9% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES Graph 22: Henknowle and Woodhouse Close ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 36.5% 31.8% 31.2% 32.9% 52.5% 24.0% 26.1% 35.6% 42.4% 21.3% 44.8% 41.0% 27.9% 25.8% 26.2% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES Graph 23: Pelton and Grange Villa ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 30.3% 26.1% 27.8% 28.8% 46.0% 34.6% 37.0% 40.5% 35.2% 33.6% 39.3% 32.8% 31.6% 36.0% 20.4% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES 11 Graph 24: Cockton Hill and Etherley Dene ASB persistence Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 36.7% 30.6% 32.6% 38.9% 45.5% 27.6% 36.4% 35.7% 35.2% 39.4% 35.7% 25.9% 33.1% 31.7% 15.2% D C C A S B D C C N O I S E P O L I C E A S B S E C O N D A R Y OVERALL FIRES Graph 25: Cornforth and Ferryhill ASB

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    18 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us