DOCSLIB.ORG

KPMG Updated Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
KPMG Updated Report Seqwater expenditure review PRUDENCY AND EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT Updated Report for the Queensland Competition Authority March 2018 Important Notice If you are a party other than the Queensland Competition Authority, KPMG: • owes you no duty (whether in contract or in tort or under statute or otherwise) with respect to or in connection with the attached report or any part thereof; and • will have no liability to you for any loss or damage suffered or costs incurred by you or any other person arising out of or in connection with the provision to you of the attached report or any part thereof, however the loss or damage is caused, including, but not limited to, as a result of negligence. If you are a party other than the Queensland Competition Authority and you choose to rely upon the attached report or any part thereof, you do so entirely at your own risk. Limitations The responsibility for determining the adequacy or otherwise of our terms of reference is that of the Queensland Competition Authority. The services provided under our engagement (‘Services’) have not been undertaken in accordance with any auditing, review or assurance standards. Any reference to ‘audit’ and ‘review’, throughout this report, is not intended to convey that the Services have been conducted in accordance with any auditing, review or assurance standards. Further, as our scope of work does not constitute an audit or review in accordance with any auditing, review or assurance standards, our work will not necessarily disclose all matters that may be of interest to the Queensland Competition Authority or reveal errors and irregularities, if any, in the underlying information. In preparing this report, we have had access to information provided by Seqwater, as well as publicly available information. We have relied upon the truth, accuracy and completeness of any information provided or made available to us in connection with the Services without independently verifying it. The publicly available information used in this report is current as of March 2018. We do not take any responsibility for updating this information if it becomes out of date. This report provides a summary of KPMG’s findings during the course of the work undertaken for the Queensland Competition Authority under the terms of the engagement contract. The findings in this report are subject to change as our analysis progresses during the course of this engagement Any findings or recommendations contained within this report are based upon our assessment and our reasonable professional judgement based on the information that is available from the sources indicated. Should the project elements, external factors and assumptions change then the findings and recommendations contained in this report may no longer be appropriate. Accordingly, we do not confirm, underwrite or guarantee that the outcomes referred to in this report will be achieved. We do not make any statement as to whether any forecasts or projections will be achieved, or whether the assumptions and data underlying any such prospective financial information are accurate, complete or reasonable. We will not warrant or guarantee the achievement of any such forecasts or projections. There will usually be differences between forecast or projected and actual results, because events and circumstances frequently do not occur as expected or predicted, and those differences may be material. KPMG | i © 2018 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of KPMG International. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. Executive summary Seqwater as it is known today was officially formed on 1 January 2013, in accordance with the South East Queensland Water (Restructuring) Act 2007 as amended by the South East Queensland Water (Restructuring) and Other Legislation Amendment Regulation (No.1) 2012. This resulted in the merger of Seqwater and Linkwater, as well as transfer of responsibility for certain functions of the then Water Grid Manager to Seqwater. This followed the earlier merger of Seqwater and Watersecure in July 2011. As a result, Seqwater now owns and operates 26 dams, 37 water treatment plants (WTPs), 51 weirs and two bores and aquifers that supply up to 90 per cent of Southeast Queensland’s (SEQ) drinking water. It also owns and operates a 600‐kilometre network of pipelines, as well as the Western Corridor Recycled Water Scheme (WCRWS) and Gold Coast Desalination Plant (GCDP). Seqwater’s bulk water prices are set by the Queensland Government and subject to review by the Queensland Competition Authority (QCA or Authority) at the government’s request. In May 2017, the Authority was tasked with conducting an investigation into Seqwater’s proposed bulk water prices for the period 1 July 2018 to 30 June 2021.1 This represents the second investigation by the Authority following the establishment of Seqwater on 1 January 2013.2 To support its investigation, the Authority has engaged KPMG to independently assess the prudency and efficiency of Seqwater's forecast operating and capital expenditure (opex and capex respectively) associated with its bulk water supply activities. Specifically, in accordance with our terms of reference and at the request of the Authority, KPMG evaluated: • Seqwater's forecast opex and capex over the period 1 July 2018 to 30 June 2028 (consistent with the current 10-year price path); • Seqwater's actual capex (to the extent available) over the period 1 July 2014 to 30 June 2018, where this exceeds capex recommended by the QCA in the previous price investigation;3 and • Costs arising from any review events over the period 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2018. An assessment of the historical and forecast opex and capex represents a critical component in any investigation of (regulated) bulk water prices. To do this, and consistent with the Authority’s Terms of Reference, we have assessed the prudency and efficiency of Seqwater’s expenditure forecasts. To do this, we have adopted the following definitions: • Prudent, if it can be justified by reference to an identified need or cost driver; and • Efficient, if it is the least cost to deliver on an appropriately defined scope and standard of works and minimises Seqwater's long‐run costs of providing bulk water supply services. Where KPMG has assessed expenditure as not prudent or inefficient, we have either identified appropriate adjustments to the proposed expenditure profile provided by Seqwater to better align with 1 Queensland Government. Treasurer and Minister for Trade and Investment. Referral Notice for the Review of South East Queensland Bulk Water Prices. 25 May 2017. 2 The first pricing investigation was completed for the period 1 January 2015 to 30 June 2018. 3 KPMG note actual capex over this period was less than that allowed by the QCA and therefore this second evaluation was not required. KPMG | i © 2018 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of KPMG International. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. that of a prudent or efficient service provider, or we have excluded the expenditure from the forecast altogether. A detailed review of Seqwater’s demand forecast was considered out of scope for the purposes of KPMG’s assessment provided the forecasts within the regulatory submission are within the range published by Seqwater as part of its Water Security Program (WSP). As part of this review, KPMG has confirmed that the demand forecasts included in the regulatory submission are consistent with those presented under the WSP. Specifically, Seqwater has provided for a hybrid demand scenario encompassing a combined low and medium growth scenario in its submission to the Authority. KPMG provided its initial assessment to the QCA on 14 November 2017. This assessment was based on information provided by Seqwater over the period 11 August 2017 to 22 September 2017, as well as meetings held with Seqwater staff during 21, 22 and 24 August 2017.4 On 31 January 2017, Seqwater submitted its response to the QCA’s Draft Report. QCA sought for KPMG to reconsider its findings in lieu of this submission, and further information, provided by Seqwater to the date 26 February 2018. This report has been updated to now include KPMG revised recommendations arising from the evaluation of Seqwater’s response. KPMG has not sought to update all areas of its report and instead focused solely on those key areas where Seqwater has provided sufficiently robust information warranting further consideration. These key areas include: • Sampled capex projects (see Sections 7.8, 7.13, and 7.15); • Assessment of systematic issues (see Section 7.21); • Opex step changes (see Section 8.10); • Productivity targets (see Section 8.11); and • Review events (see Section 9). Further, to maintain the integrity of our original findings, we have not sought to adjust the language in the original assessment sections. Finally, KPMG has also assessed additional allowances sought by Seqwater (see Section 10), specifically: • More flexible arrangements in relation to large projects providing for the capitalisation of opex; and • Additional expenditure (capex and opex) associated with remobilisation of one train at the Luggage Point Advanced Water Treatment Plant (AWTP) as part of the Western Corridor Recycled Water Scheme (WCRWS). Our approach To support the Authority with its investigation, KPMG has approached this task by focusing on three separate, though interrelated, steps as shown in Figure 1. KPMG assessment approach, below. As Step 1, KPMG reviewed Seqwater’s governance arrangements and planning frameworks for consistency with good industry practices, providing for appropriate controls (e.g.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Queensland Public Boat Ramps
    Queensland public boat ramps Ramp Location Ramp Location Atherton shire Brisbane city (cont.) Tinaroo (Church Street) Tinaroo Falls Dam Shorncliffe (Jetty Street) Cabbage Tree Creek Boat Harbour—north bank Balonne shire Shorncliffe (Sinbad Street) Cabbage Tree Creek Boat Harbour—north bank St George (Bowen Street) Jack Taylor Weir Shorncliffe (Yundah Street) Cabbage Tree Creek Boat Harbour—north bank Banana shire Wynnum (Glenora Street) Wynnum Creek—north bank Baralaba Weir Dawson River Broadsound shire Callide Dam Biloela—Calvale Road (lower ramp) Carmilla Beach (Carmilla Creek Road) Carmilla Creek—south bank, mouth of creek Callide Dam Biloela—Calvale Road (upper ramp) Clairview Beach (Colonial Drive) Clairview Beach Moura Dawson River—8 km west of Moura St Lawrence (Howards Road– Waverley Creek) Bund Creek—north bank Lake Victoria Callide Creek Bundaberg city Theodore Dawson River Bundaberg (Kirby’s Wall) Burnett River—south bank (5 km east of Bundaberg) Beaudesert shire Bundaberg (Queen Street) Burnett River—north bank (downstream) Logan River (Henderson Street– Henderson Reserve) Logan Reserve Bundaberg (Queen Street) Burnett River—north bank (upstream) Biggenden shire Burdekin shire Paradise Dam–Main Dam 500 m upstream from visitors centre Barramundi Creek (Morris Creek Road) via Hodel Road Boonah shire Cromarty Creek (Boat Ramp Road) via Giru (off the Haughton River) Groper Creek settlement Maroon Dam HG Slatter Park (Hinkson Esplanade) downstream from jetty Moogerah Dam AG Muller Park Groper Creek settlement Bowen shire (Hinkson
    [Show full text]
  • Seqwater's 22 October Submission / Response To
    SEQWATER’S 22 OCTOBER SUBMISSION / RESPONSE TO QCA REQUEST OF 12 OCTOBER 12 October 2012 I hereby provide Seqwater with a further information request. Seqwater’s detailed responses to each item would be appreciated by COB 19 October 2012, please. Happy to discuss at any time noting the proposed due date of COB 19 October 2012 From: Colin Nicolson [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, 19 October 2012 1:10 PM To: Angus MacDonald Cc: George Passmore; Damian Scholz Subject: FW: Information Request 12 October 2012 Hello Angus Here are our responses to the above information request. QCA Question 1 - Cedar Pocket Stakeholders (Issues Arising (IA) Cedar Pocket 2012) submitted that more details were required regarding Seqwater’s proposed renewals expenditure [outlined in the NSP] on “electricity supply assets” in 2025-26 at $30,000. Please provide more details regarding this proposed expenditure. Seqwater Response to Item 1 The Assets in question are a property pole, meter box (excluding the meters), cabling and a distribution board. The renewal is scheduled based on the Seqwater “standard asset life” of 20 years for this type of equipment. It was installed in 2005 and will be 20 years old when the work is scheduled. The cost estimate is drawn from the estimated replacement costs as set out in Section 5.2.2 and Section 9 of the Irrigation Infrastructure Renewal Projections - 2013/14 to 2046/47 Report on Methodology. The renewal timing, will be reviewed on an ongoing basis so that it is only delivered when condition warrants. The scope and cost estimate will be reviewed prior to commencement of work to ensure the delivery is efficient.
    [Show full text]
  • Water for Life
    SQWQ.001.002.0382 • se a er WATER FOR LIFE • Strategic Plan 2010-11 to 2014-15 Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority (QBWSA) trading as Seqwater 1 SQWQ.001.002.0383 2010-11 to 2014-15 Strategic Plan Contents Foreword ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 Regional Water Grid ......................................................................................................................................... 4 . Seqwater's vision and mission ......................................................................................................................... 5 Our strategic planning framework ................................................................................................................... 5 Emerging strategic issues ................................................................................................................................ 7 Seqwater's goals and strategy for 2010-11 to 2014-15 ................................................................................... 8 • Budget outlook............................................................................................................................................... 10 Strategic performance management ................................................................................................................. 11 Key Performance Indicators ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule a - Urban Utilities High Level Water Restrictions
    Schedule A - Urban Utilities High Level Water Restrictions This schedule details the way in which potable water from the Seqwater bulk water supply is permitted to be used after commencement of High Level Water Restrictions. For assistance with interpretation of this document please refer to the definition section at the end of this document. Category High Level Water Restrictions 1.1 Residential and non- Total ban on sprinklers. Hand-held hoses with a twist or trigger nozzle can be used for watering established residential premises gardens and lawns: a. Odd numbered properties Watering established gardens and lawns - 4am-8am and 4pm-8pm - Tuesday and Saturday (Note this does not include b. Even or un-numbered properties production and sale area - 4am-8am and 4pm-8pm irrigation for non-residential - Wednesday and Sunday consumers) Bucket or watering can may be used at any time. Only one hose at a time can be used at the property. The following are not permitted: ‐ Hoses without a twist or trigger nozzle ‐ Hoses which are not hand- held (e.g. left to run hooked in a tree). Category High Level Water Restrictions 1.2 Residential premises As per restriction item 1.1 Watering of gardens only for residents eligible for concession 1.3 Residential and non- Wasting water by way of leaking taps and plumbing fittings and overflowing containers or structures (including residential premises but not limited to pools, spas and rainwater tanks) and allowing water to flow onto roads, pathways and driveways during is prohibited. Water wastage 1.4 Residential and non- Sprinklers with a timer and hand- held hoses with a twist or trigger nozzle can be used for watering newly residential properties established gardens and lawns: Watering newly established a.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Lockyer Valley Water Supply Scheme Annual Network Service Plan
    Lower Lockyer Valley Water Supply Scheme Annual Network Service Plan December 2013 Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 3 2. Scheme Details ...................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Scheme background and context ............................................................................................ 3 2.2 Infrastructure details ................................................................................................................ 3 2.3 Customers and water entitlements serviced ........................................................................... 4 2.4 Water availability and use ........................................................................................................ 4 2.5 Water trading ........................................................................................................................... 5 2.6 Irrigation Customer Consultation ............................................................................................. 5 2.7 Customer service standards .................................................................................................... 6 3. Financial Performance .......................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Tariffs ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water for South East Queensland: Planning for Our Future ANNUAL REPORT 2020 This Report Is a Collaborative Effort by the Following Partners
    Water for South East Queensland: Planning for our future ANNUAL REPORT 2020 This report is a collaborative effort by the following partners: CITY OF LOGAN Logo guidelines Logo formats 2.1 LOGO FORMATS 2.1.1 Primary logo Horizontal version The full colour, horizontal version of our logo is the preferred option across all Urban Utilities communications where a white background is used. The horizontal version is the preferred format, however due to design, space and layout restrictions, the vertical version can be used. Our logo needs to be produced from electronic files and should never be altered, redrawn or modified in any way. Clear space guidelines are to be followed at all times. In all cases, our logo needs to appear clearly and consistently. Minimum size 2.1.2 Primary logo minimum size Minimum size specifications ensure the Urban Utilities logo is reproduced effectively at a small size. The minimum size for the logo in a horizontal format is 50mm. Minimum size is defined by the width of our logo and size specifications need to be adhered to at all times. 50mm Urban Utilities Brand Guidelines 5 The SEQ Water Service Provider Partners work together to provide essential water and sewerage services now and into the future. 2 SEQ WATER SERVICE PROVIDERS PARTNERSHIP FOREWORD Water for SEQ – a simple In 2018, the SEQ Water Service Providers made a strategic and ambitious statement that represents decision to set out on a five-year journey to prepare a holistic and integrated a major milestone for the plan for water cycle management in South East Queensland (SEQ) titled “Water region.
    [Show full text]
  • Lin-Et-Al-2018.Pdf
    Received: 20 February 2017 Revised: 13 July 2017 Accepted: 17 July 2017 DOI: 10.1002/aqc.2831 RESEARCH ARTICLE Impacts of fishing, river flow and connectivity loss on the conservation of a migratory fish population Hsien‐Yung Lin1 | Christopher J. Brown2 | Ross G. Dwyer3 | Doug J. Harding4 | David T. Roberts5 | Richard A. Fuller1 | Simon Linke2 | Hugh P. Possingham1 1 Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Biological Sciences, The Abstract University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 1. Migratory species depend on connected habitats and appropriate migratory cues to complete Australia their life cycles. Diadromous fish exemplify species with migratory life cycles by moving 2 The Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith between connected freshwater and saltwater habitats to reproduce. However, migration University, Nathan, QLD, Australia increases the exposure of fish to multiple threats and it is critical that managers integrate hab- 3 School of Biological Sciences, The University itat connectivity into resource management and conservation. of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia 4 Department of Natural Resources and Mines, 2. The benefit of alternative management actions was assessed for a diadromous fish, the Landcentre, Woolloongabba, Australia Australian bass Percalates novemaculeata, using a spatio‐temporal population model informed 5 Seqwater, Ipswich, QLD, Australia by individual‐based movement data. The management actions comprise seasonal closures Correspondence during the spawning season, and controlling fishing pressure by limiting catch or effort. Hsien‐Yung Lin, Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Biological 3. The benefits of implementing seasonal closures depend upon interactions among how fishing Sciences, The University of Queensland, St pressure is controlled, the response of anglers to fishery regulations and river flow regimes.
    [Show full text]
  • Lockyer Water Users Forum Inc
    lockyer water LWUF users forum Lockyer Water Users Forum Inc. P.O. Box 77 Gatton Qld 4343 Chair Queensland Competition Authority GPO Box 2257 Brisbane Qld 4001 28th November 2018 Dear Sir, RE: CENTRAL AND LOWER LOCK.YER IRRIGATORS SUBMISSION UNDER SECTION 23 OF THE QUEENSLAND COMPETITION AUTHORITY ACT 1997 PRICE PATH PERIOD 2020-2024 This submission is on behalf of the Lockyer Valley Irrigators in the following water supply schemes constructed and owned by the State of Queensland and operated by SEQW being: • Atkinson Dam • Lake Clarendon • Mortonvale Pipeline • Bill Gunn Dam This submission is in regard to the yet to be introduced 4 year price path (2020 - 2024) and seeks to address maters of fact in the continual underlying poor performance of the schemes and argues that new policy is required when formulating a price path for schemes that will never be able to reach cost recovery or breakeven. Lockyer Valley Irrigators will also be providing a response when the Commission calls for submissions on the SEQW prici,ng proposals for the four years from July 2019 Current Situation: SEQW has advised customers under the pricing principles expected to be implemented by the QCA that the next price path will include the introduction of Part A (fixed cost) and Part B (variable cost) groundwater pricing for Central Lockyer Water Supply Schemes and that will result in the water charges being split at 95% Part A and 5% Part B. Mortonvale Pipeline Users will in addition pay Part C and Part D charges on the pipeline. The introduction of fixed Part A charges will occur with the introduction of water allocations in the Central Lockyer.
    [Show full text]
  • Purified Recycled Water in the Lockyer Valley
    Fact Sheet December 2012 Purified Recycled Water in the Lockyer Valley The water supply security of South East Queensland (SEQ) has recently been increased by the construction of the Western Corridor Recycled Water Scheme. The infrastructure of advanced wastewater treatment plants provides purified recycled water (PRW) to the SEQ Water Grid for indirect potable reuse of effluent from urban areas. With a maximum combined production capacity of 232 million litres of PRW a day, it is the third largest recycled water scheme in the world and the largest in the southern hemisphere. This additional water supply is critical during drought conditions but is underused in wet periods. The provision of recycled water in an environmentally Background sound and socially-equitable manner requires measured The Urban Water Security Research Alliance (the Alliance) understanding of the potential impacts on the region’s worked closely with the Queensland Water Commission, soils, groundwater system, environment (such as salinity the former Queensland Department of Environment and issues) and the economy. Therefore, a holistic framework Resource Management, WaterSecure (now Seqwater) and was required to inform an integrated water management the SEQ Water Grid Manager, as well as irrigators and the plan involving the use of PRW. This was achieved through farming community. a multi-tiered assessment incorporating environmental risk analysis, climate modelling, regulatory considerations and Together we explored the feasibility of providing agro-economics. approximately 20 million litres per year of PRW to supplement irrigation supplies in the Lockyer Valley, 80 km The environmental risks and benefits from the supply of PRW west of Brisbane. were the core subjects addressed by this research, using a combination of field research, water quality and quantity Alliance research explored whether the use of PRW can serve modelling , and unstructured stakeholder interviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Wyaralong Dam: Issues and Alternatives
    Wyaralong Dam: issues and alternatives Issues associated with the proposed construction of a dam on the Teviot Brook, South East Queensland 2nd edition October 2006 Report prepared by Dr G Bradd Witt and Katherine Witt The proposed Wyaralong Dam: issues and alternatives 2nd edition October 2006 Wyaralong Dam: issues and alternatives Issues associated with the proposed construction of a dam on the Teviot Brook, South East Queensland 2nd Edition October 2006 Report prepared by Dr G Bradd Witt and Katherine Witt - 1 - The proposed Wyaralong Dam: issues and alternatives 2nd edition October 2006 Table of contents Table of contents ................................................................................. i 1.0 Executive summary ................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ............................................................................. 1 1.2 Key issues identified in this report ........................................ 2 1.3 Alternative proposition ........................................................ 3 2.0 Introduction and context............................................................ 5 2.1 The Wyaralong District ........................................................ 5 2.2 The Teviot Catchment ......................................................... 5 3.0 Key issues of concern ................................................................ 7 3.1 Catchment yield and dam yield ............................................ 7 3.2 Water quality...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dare Lawrence
    Dare Lawrence Project Environmental Scientist Dare’s field of expertise includes aquatic ecology, water/sediment quality and environmental impact assessments and as a result has experience in collecting baseline data on a broad range of environmental components. Dare is experienced in assessing habitat condition and ecological health. His substantial field experience includes much of Australia, south East Asia and South America. Dare has been involved in a broad range of ecological assessments, ranging from urbanised systems, engineered mining landscapes to pristine coasts. For these projects, Dare has gained a working understanding of potential impacts to ecosystems and the legislation that supports them. SKILLSETS Environmental Impact Assessment QUALIFICATIONS 2016 James Cook University / Bachelor of Science (Honors) Groundwater 2013 SKEMA (France) / Bachelor of Oceanography Ecology MAJOR PROJECTS Environmental/Social Impact Assessment, BHP, MG/ES/BA Brazil Receiving Environment Monitoring Program, Glencore Coal Water / Sediment Quality Assets, Emerald QLD Environmental Impact Assessment, QGC Shell, Surat Basin QLD Ecotoxicology Receiving Environment Monitoring Program, RIO Tinto, Weipa QLD EIS, EA, EPBC, PRCP, Multicom, QLD MARKET SECTORS AFFILIATIONS Environmental Institute of Australia New Zealand Queensland Environmental Law Association Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology CONTACT Email [email protected] Phone 1800 779 363 Dare Lawrence – Project Environmental Scientist EXPERIENCE WATER QUALITY / AQUATIC ECOLOGY Aquatic Ecology Assessment, Stockland, North Lakes (2020). Assessing the potential for a waterway running through the project area to support aquatic life with the ability to magnify contaminants. Ecology Assessment, McIlwain, Brisbane (2020). Conducted flora and fauna (terrestrial and aquatic) surveys determining potential impacts from the upgrade of Teese Bridge. Ecology Assessment, Wasco-IOR, Brisbane (2020).
    [Show full text]
  • Published on DNRME Disclosure Log RTI Act 2009
    CTS No. 31998/19 DATE DUE TO DLO 18/12/2019 ELECTORATE OFFICE Ipswich Electorate Office NAME OF CONSTITUENT/MEMBER OF PUBLIC Sch 4 - Personal Information If applicable ISSUE Linking dams across Queensland RESPONDING OFFICER Name: Darren Thompson Author Position: Team Leader Business Unit: Water Supply, Natural Resources Division Phone: 3166 0154 FINAL APPROVAL Name: Trevor Dann DG/DDG/ED Position: Acting Executive Director Log Business Unit: Water Supply, Natural Resources Division Phone: 3137 4285 PLEASE NOTE: This advice is provided for the information of the Office of the Minister for Natural Resources, Mines and Energy to assist in preparing a response to the Electorate Office SUGGESTED RESPONSE TO ELECTORATE OFFICE Linking Dams Disclosure • Though the concept of large scale systems similar to those of the Bradfield Scheme have significant challenges, there may be an opportunity to undertake targeted improvements to regional connectivity where demand and supply characteristics are right. • There are already examples of this type of connectivity2009 that exist across the state where dams and pipelines provide water to where a demonstrated demand for water exists including Burdekin Haughton Water Supply scheme to Ross River Dam, the Burdekin to Moranbah pipeline and the North West pipeline near Mount Isa. DNRMEAct • The Queensland Government is ready to have a conversation with the Australian Government and its new National Water Grid Authorityon on a range of water infrastructure proposals including the opportunity for further increasing regional connectivityRTI where it makes sense (e.g. available supply within responsible limits commensurate with Queensland Water Plans and demonstrated demand for the water). • This could include identifying opportunities to explore the concept of connecting bulk water storages to where there is a clear demand for water at a price commensurate with the costs providing the water.
    [Show full text]