DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1503.08651V2 [Physics.Atom-Ph] 3 Aug 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1503.08651V2 [Physics.Atom-Ph] 3 Aug 2015 EPJ manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Measurement of a false electric dipole moment signal from 199Hg atoms exposed to an inhomogeneous magnetic field S. Afach1,2,3, C. A. Baker4, G. Ban5, G. Bison2, K. Bodek6, Z. Chowdhuri2, M. Daum2, M. Fertl1,2a, B. Franke1,2b, P. Geltenbort7, K. Green4,8, M. G. D. van der Grinten4, Z. Grujic9, P. G. Harris8, W. Heil10 , V. Helaine´ 2,5c, R. Henneck2, M. Horras1,2d, P. Iaydjiev4e, S. N. Ivanov4f , M. Kasprzak9, Y. Kerma¨ıdic11, K. Kirch1,2, P. Knowles9g, H.-C. Koch9,10 , S. Komposch1,2, A. Kozela12, J. Krempel1, B. Lauss2, T. Lefort5, Y. Lemiere` 5, A. Mtchedlishvili2, O. Naviliat-Cuncic5h, J. M. Pendlebury8, F. M. Piegsa1, G. Pignol11, P. N. Prashant2,13, G. Quem´ ener´ 5, D. Rebreyend11, D. Ries2, S. Roccia14, P. Schmidt-Wellenburg2, N. Severijns13, A. Weis9, E. Wursten13, G. Wyszynski1,6, J. Zejma6, J. Zenner1,2, G. Zsigmond2 1 ETH Zurich,¨ Institute for Particle Physics, CH-8093 Zurich,¨ Switzerland 2 Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), CH–5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland 3 Hans Berger Department of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, D-07747 Jena, Germany 4 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0QX, United Kingdom 5 LPC Caen, ENSICAEN, Universite´ de Caen Basse-Normandie, CNRS/IN2P3, Caen, France 6 Marian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, 30–059 Cracow, Poland 7 Institut Laue–Langevin, Grenoble, France 8 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QH, United Kingdom 9 Physics Department, University of Fribourg, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland 10 Institut fur¨ Physik, Johannes–Gutenberg–Universitat,¨ D–55128 Mainz, Germany 11 LPSC, Universite´ Grenoble Alpes, CNRS/IN2P3, Grenoble, France 12 Henryk Niedwodniczanski´ Institute for Nuclear Physics, 31–342 Cracow, Poland 13 Instituut voor Kern– en Stralingsfysica, University of Leuven, B–3001 Leuven, Belgium 14 CSNSM, Universite´ Paris Sud, CNRS/IN2P3, Orsay Campus, France Received: date / Revised version: date Abstract. We report on the measurement of a Larmor frequency shift proportional to the electric-field strength for 199Hg atoms contained in a volume permeated with aligned magnetic and electric fields. This shift arises from the in- terplay between the inevitable magnetic field gradients and the motional magnetic field. The proportionality to electric- field strength makes it apparently similar to an electric dipole moment (EDM) signal, although unlike an EDM this effect is P- and T-conserving. We have used a neutron magnetic resonance EDM spectrometer, featuring a mercury co-magnetometer and an array of external cesium magnetometers, to measure the shift as a function of the applied magnetic field gradient. Our results are in good agreement with theoretical expectations. PACS. XX.XX.XX No PACS code given 1 Introduction B, E have been motivated principally by the search for elec- tric dipole moments (EDMs) of simple non-degenerate sys- Recent investigations characterizing frequency shifts for spins tems (neutron, atoms, molecules) and the potential discovery contained in vessels permeated with magnetic and electric fields of new sources of CP violation [1]. Such experiments look for shifts, proportional to an applied electric field, of the Larmor a Now at University of Washington, Seattle WA, USA. precession frequency of stored particles. Any additional such arXiv:1503.08651v2 [physics.atom-ph] 3 Aug 2015 b Now at Max-Planck-Institute of Quantum Optics, Garching, Ger- shift is therefore a potential source of systematic errors. Among many. the few magnetic-field related spurious shifts, one is of par- 2 c Now at LPSC, Grenoble, France. ticular concern: due to the motional magnetic field E × v=c , d Present address: Hauptstrasse 60, CH-4455 Zunzgen, Switzer- a shift arises that is proportional to the electric-field strength land. and therefore mimics an EDM signal. Interestingly enough, 2 e On leave from INRNE, Sofia, Bulgaria. E × v=c effects were already the main limiting factor for the f On leave from PNPI, St. Petersburg, Russia. early neutron beam experiments [2]. Then, with the advent of g Present address: Rilkeplatz 8/9, A-1040 Vienna, Austria. the storable ultra-cold neutrons (UCN), it was erroneously as- h Now at Michigan State University, East-Lansing, USA. sumed for many years that this false EDM signal would vanish, Correspondence to: [email protected],[email protected] based on the argument that the velocity of trapped particles av- 2 Please give a shorter version with: \authorrunning and \titlerunning prior to \maketitle erages to zero. The first correct and comprehensive calculation shift proportional to the electric field strength, thus inducing a of this effect was given in Ref. [3], in the context of an EDM false EDM. experiment with stored particles. For completeness, it should As mentioned above, the first detailed calculation of such be mentioned that Stark interference effects, such as the one false EDMs for stored particles was given in Ref. [3] in the reported for 199Hg in Ref. [4], are also known to produce false context of the RAL-Sussex-ILL neutron EDM experiment [8]. EDM signals for atoms. The effect discussed in the present ar- The authors derived expressions for the two limiting cases: ticle is of a different nature, and to make the distinction we will non adiabatic and adiabatic, corresponding to 2πfLτ 1 and refer to it as the motional false EDM. 2πfLτ 1 respectively, where τ is the typical time parti- Our collaboration is conducting a program to search for cles take to cross the trap. Both regimes are of interest, since the neutron EDM [5], using the new ultracold neutron (UCN) 199Hg atoms fall into the first category whereas UCNs fall into source [6] at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI). We are currently the second. More general results, valid for a broad range of working with an upgraded version of the spectrometer [7] that frequencies, were obtained only for cylindrical symmetry and was used to establish the best nEDM limit, specular reflections. The expressions of the frequency shifts for the two limiting regimes are : −26 jdnj < 2:9 × 10 e cm (90% C.L.); γ2D2 @B at the Laue Langevin Institute (ILL) [8]. One distinct feature δf = 0 E (non adiabatic) (2) of this device is a mercury co-magnetometer [9] using a spin- L 32π c2 @z 199 2 polarized vapor of Hg atoms that precess in the same vol- vxy @B0 ume as the neutrons. The nEDM analysis is then based on the δfL = 2 2 E (adiabatic), (3) 4π B0 c @z ratio of the Larmor precession frequencies, R = fn=fHg, which to first order is free of magnetic field fluctuations. However, where γ is the gyromagnetic ratio, D is the diameter of the both neutrons and mercury atoms are subject to a frequency trap, c is the velocity of light and vxy is the particle velocity shift that is proportional to the electric field, due to the unavoid- transverse to B0. Note the absence of the gyromagnetic ratio in able presence of magnetic-field gradients. As will be shown, Eq. (3). Indeed, in the adiabatic case, the frequency shift can false the motional false neutron EDM, dn , is negligible, at least at be interpreted as originating from a phase of purely geometric the current level of sensitivity. In contrast, the mercury-induced nature, or Berry’s phase [11,12], and is therefore independent false nEDM of the coupling strength to the magnetic field. These results were then complemented and extended us- γn dfalse;Hg = dfalse ≈ 3:8 dfalse; (1) ing the general theory of relaxation (Redfield theory) [13,14], n γ Hg Hg Hg and then by solving the Schrodinger¨ equation directly [15]. In Ref. [14], an expression valid for arbitrary field distributions or where dfalse is the motional mercury false EDM and γ , γ are Hg n Hg trap shapes was obtained in the non-adiabatic limit : the gyromagnetic ratios of the neutron and 199Hg respectively, is a major systematic effect that must be precisely controlled. One of the main improvements accomplished recently within γ2 δf = hxB + yB i E (non adiabatic), (4) the experiment is the installation of an array of cesium mag- L 2πc2 x y netometers that surrounds the precession chamber. This new where the brackets refer to the average over the storage volume. device has made it possible to measure the magnetic field dis- For a cylindrical uniform gradient and a trap with cylindrical tribution, and thus to calculate the vertical gradient in the trap, symmetry, Eq. (4) reduces to Eq. (2). which underlies the false EDM discussed here. Using the relationship between the frequency shift and the In this article, we report on the first direct measurement false EDM, of a motional false EDM signal for stored mercury atoms. A comparison to theoretical expectations is also presented. h dfalse = δf (E) 2E L where h is Planck’s constant, together with Eqs. (2) and (3), one 2 Theory of frequency shifts induced by can now readily calculate the magnitude of the false EDMs for magnetic field gradients: a brief reminder the mercury and for the neutron (both direct and mercury in- duced). Given our experimental conditions (see section 3) and Particles with a magnetic moment exposed to a magnetic field, assuming a neutron velocity of 3 m/s, one obtains: B0 = B0^z, precess at the Larmor frequency fL = γ B0=2π @B where γ is the gyromagnetic ratio. Because of experimentally dfalse = 0 1:490 × 10−29 e cm=(pT/cm) (5) unavoidable magnetic field gradients, the Larmor frequency of n @z a particle moving through this field will be subject to a shift, known as the Ramsey-Bloch-Siegert (RBS) shift [10]. If an @B0 E B dfalse = 1:148 × 10−27 e cm=(pT/cm) (6) electric field (parallel or anti-parallel to 0) is applied – as Hg @z is the case in experiments searching for EDMs – the moving particle will experience an additional motional magnetic field 2 @B Bv = E × v=c .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Applications of Magnetic Resonance to Current Detection and Microscale Flow Imaging Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2fw343zm Author Halpern-Manners, Nicholas Wm Publication Date 2011 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Applications of Magnetic Resonance to Current Detection and Microscale Flow Imaging by Nicholas Wm Halpern-Manners A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Chemistry in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Alexander Pines, Chair Professor David Wemmer Professor Steven Conolly Spring 2011 Applications of Magnetic Resonance to Current Detection and Microscale Flow Imaging Copyright 2011 by Nicholas Wm Halpern-Manners 1 Abstract Applications of Magnetic Resonance to Current Detection and Microscale Flow Imaging by Nicholas Wm Halpern-Manners Doctor of Philosophy in Chemistry University of California, Berkeley Professor Alexander Pines, Chair Magnetic resonance has evolved into a remarkably versatile technique, with major appli- cations in chemical analysis, molecular biology, and medical imaging. Despite these successes, there are a large number of areas where magnetic resonance has the potential to provide great insight but has run into significant obstacles in its application. The projects described in this thesis focus on two of these areas. First, I describe the development and implementa- tion of a robust imaging method which can directly detect the effects of oscillating electrical currents. This work is particularly relevant in the context of neuronal current detection, and bypasses many of the limitations of previously developed techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Precession and Thomas-Wigner Rotation: Correct Solutions and Their Implications
    epl draft Header will be provided by the publisher This is a pre-print of an article published in Europhysics Letters 129 (2020) 3006 The final authenticated version is available online at: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1209/0295-5075/129/30006 Thomas precession and Thomas-Wigner rotation: correct solutions and their implications 1(a) 2 3 4 ALEXANDER KHOLMETSKII , OLEG MISSEVITCH , TOLGA YARMAN , METIN ARIK 1 Department of Physics, Belarusian State University – Nezavisimosti Avenue 4, 220030, Minsk, Belarus 2 Research Institute for Nuclear Problems, Belarusian State University –Bobrujskaya str., 11, 220030, Minsk, Belarus 3 Okan University, Akfirat, Istanbul, Turkey 4 Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey received and accepted dates provided by the publisher other relevant dates provided by the publisher PACS 03.30.+p – Special relativity Abstract – We address to the Thomas precession for the hydrogenlike atom and point out that in the derivation of this effect in the semi-classical approach, two different successions of rotation-free Lorentz transformations between the laboratory frame K and the proper electron’s frames, Ke(t) and Ke(t+dt), separated by the time interval dt, were used by different authors. We further show that the succession of Lorentz transformations KKe(t)Ke(t+dt) leads to relativistically non-adequate results in the frame Ke(t) with respect to the rotational frequency of the electron spin, and thus an alternative succession of transformations KKe(t), KKe(t+dt) must be applied. From the physical viewpoint this means the validity of the introduced “tracking rule”, when the rotation-free Lorentz transformation, being realized between the frame of observation K and the frame K(t) co-moving with a tracking object at the time moment t, remains in force at any future time moments, too.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetic Moment of a Spin, Its Equation of Motion, and Precession B1.1.6
    Magnetic Moment of a Spin, Its Equation of UNIT B1.1 Motion, and Precession OVERVIEW The ability to “see” protons using magnetic resonance imaging is predicated on the proton having a mass, a charge, and a nonzero spin. The spin of a particle is analogous to its intrinsic angular momentum. A simple way to explain angular momentum is that when an object rotates (e.g., an ice skater), that action generates an intrinsic angular momentum. If there were no friction in air or of the skates on the ice, the skater would spin forever. This intrinsic angular momentum is, in fact, a vector, not a scalar, and thus spin is also a vector. This intrinsic spin is always present. The direction of a spin vector is usually chosen by the right-hand rule. For example, if the ice skater is spinning from her right to left, then the spin vector is pointing up; the skater is rotating counterclockwise when viewed from the top. A key property determining the motion of a spin in a magnetic field is its magnetic moment. Once this is known, the motion of the magnetic moment and energy of the moment can be calculated. Actually, the spin of a particle with a charge and a mass leads to a magnetic moment. An intuitive way to understand the magnetic moment is to imagine a current loop lying in a plane (see Figure B1.1.1). If the loop has current I and an enclosed area A, then the magnetic moment is simply the product of the current and area (see Equation B1.1.8 in the Technical Discussion), with the direction n^ parallel to the normal direction of the plane.
    [Show full text]
  • Electron Spins in Nonmagnetic Semiconductors
    Electron spins in nonmagnetic semiconductors Yuichiro K. Kato Institute of Engineering Innovation, The University of Tokyo Physics of non-interacting spins Optical spin injection and detection Spin manipulation in nonmagnetic semiconductors Physics of non-interacting spins 2 In non-magnetic semiconductors such as GaAs and Si, spin interactions are weak; To first order approximation, they behave as non-interacting, independent spins. • Zeeman Hamiltonian • Bloch sphere • Larmor precession ∗ • , , and • Bloch equation The Zeeman Hamiltonian 3 Hamiltonian for an electron spin in a magnetic field magnetic moment of an electron spin : magnetic moment : magnetic field : Landé g-factor (=2 for free electrons) : Bohr magneton 58 eV/T , ) : electronic charge : Planck constant : free electron mass : spin operator : Pauli operator The Zeeman Hamiltonian 4 Hamiltonian for an electron spin in a magnetic field magnetic moment of an electron spin : magnetic moment : magnetic field : Landé g-factor (=2 for free electrons) : Bohr magneton 2 58 eV/T : electronic charge : Planck constant : free electron mass : spin operator 2 : Pauli operator The energy eigenstates 5 Without loss of generality, we can set the -axis to be the direction of , i.e., 0,0, 1 Spin “up” |↑ |↑ 2 1 2 2 1 Spin “down” |↓ |↓ 2 1 2 2 Spinor notation and the Pauli operators 6 Quantum states are represented by a normalized vector in a Hilbert space Spin states are represented by 2D vectors Spin operators are represented by 2x2 matrices.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
    Chapter 4, page 1 4 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Pieter Zeeman observed in 1896 the splitting of optical spectral lines in the field of an electromagnet. Since then, the splitting of energy levels proportional to an external magnetic field has been called the "Zeeman effect". The "Zeeman resonance effect" causes magnetic resonances which are classified under radio frequency spectroscopy (rf spectroscopy). In these resonances, the transitions between two branches of a single energy level split in an external magnetic field are measured in the megahertz and gigahertz range. In 1944, Jevgeni Konstantinovitch Savoiski discovered electron paramagnetic resonance. Shortly thereafter in 1945, nuclear magnetic resonance was demonstrated almost simultaneously in Boston by Edward Mills Purcell and in Stanford by Felix Bloch. Nuclear magnetic resonance was sometimes called nuclear induction or paramagnetic nuclear resonance. It is generally abbreviated to NMR. So as not to scare prospective patients in medicine, reference to the "nuclear" character of NMR is dropped and the magnetic resonance based imaging systems (scanner) found in hospitals are simply referred to as "magnetic resonance imaging" (MRI). 4.1 The Nuclear Resonance Effect Many atomic nuclei have spin, characterized by the nuclear spin quantum number I. The absolute value of the spin angular momentum is L =+h II(1). (4.01) The component in the direction of an applied field is Lz = Iz h ≡ m h. (4.02) The external field is usually defined along the z-direction. The magnetic quantum number is symbolized by Iz or m and can have 2I +1 values: Iz ≡ m = −I, −I+1, ..., I−1, I.
    [Show full text]
  • Optical Detection of Electron Spin Dynamics Driven by Fast Variations of a Magnetic Field
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Optical detection of electron spin dynamics driven by fast variations of a magnetic feld: a simple ∗ method to measure T1 , T2 , and T2 in semiconductors V. V. Belykh1*, D. R. Yakovlev2,3 & M. Bayer2,3 ∗ We develop a simple method for measuring the electron spin relaxation times T1 , T2 and T2 in semiconductors and demonstrate its exemplary application to n-type GaAs. Using an abrupt variation of the magnetic feld acting on electron spins, we detect the spin evolution by measuring the Faraday rotation of a short laser pulse. Depending on the magnetic feld orientation, this allows us to measure either the longitudinal spin relaxation time T1 or the inhomogeneous transverse spin dephasing time ∗ T2 . In order to determine the homogeneous spin coherence time T2 , we apply a pulse of an oscillating radiofrequency (rf) feld resonant with the Larmor frequency and detect the subsequent decay of the spin precession. The amplitude of the rf-driven spin precession is signifcantly enhanced upon additional optical pumping along the magnetic feld. Te electron spin dynamics in semiconductors can be addressed by a number of versatile methods involving electromagnetic radiation either in the optical range, resonant with interband transitions, or in the microwave as well as radiofrequency (rf) range, resonant with the Zeeman splitting1,2. For a long time, the optical methods were mostly represented by Hanle efect measurements giving access to the spin relaxation time at zero magnetic feld3. New techniques giving access both to the spin g factor and relaxation times at arbitrary magnetic felds have been very actively developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Griffith's Example 4.3: Larmor Precession We Will Be Considering the Spin of an Electron
    Griffith's Example 4.3: Larmor Precession We will be considering the spin of an electron. The operator for the component of spin in the rˆ = (sin cosijˆˆ sin sin cosˆ ) k cos sin ei cos(½ ) leading to Sˆ which has an eigen-spinor rˆ rˆ i i sin e cos sin(½ )e i rˆ sin(½ )e with eigenvalue ½ and with eigenvalue -½ . We can imagine a cos(½ ) state in which the spin is initially in the x-z plane and makes an angle relative to the cos(½ ) z axis so (0) . sin(½ ) First we consider an applied magnetic field in the z direction providing interaction ˆ ˆ energy: H Bkozo SB Bmos. Using the standard eigenstates of Sz, ½0 B ˆ o H 0½ Bo Note that the difference between the energies of the spin up and spin down states is Bo. We expect things to oscillate at frequencies corresponding to the energy differences so the frequency for this problem is Bo, the Larmor frequency. The frequencies associated with the two states have a magnitude of one-half of the Larmor frequency; the difference between the frequencies is the relevant frequency for oscillation of probability density or, in this case, precessing. The hamiltonian is diagonal so the spin z up and down states are the eigenfunctions. a ½it ½0 Bo a cos(½ )e Hiˆ it () t t b ½it 0½ Bo b t sin(½ )e where = Bo . The expectation values can be computed with the results: Sz(t) = cos() ( /2); Sx(t) = sin() ( /2) sin(t);Sy(t) = -sin() ( /2) cos(t) Exercise: Compute Sz(t) and Sx(t) for(t) given above.
    [Show full text]
  • II Spins and Their Dynamics
    For the spins to precess, and for us to detect them, II we need to somehow force them away from Spins and their equilibrium – for example, make them perpendicular to the main field: Dynamics Lecture notes by Assaf Tal B0 1. Excitation 1.1 WhyU Excite? If we do this and let them be, two things will Let us recant the facts from the previous lecture: happen: 1 1. We’re interested in the bulk 1. They will precess about B0 at a rate gB0. (macroscopic) magnetization. 2. Eventually they will return to equilibrium 2. When put in a constant magnetic field, because of thermal relaxation. This this bulk magnetization tends to align usually takes ~ 1sec, but can vary. itself along the field: Until they return to thermal equilibrium their signal is “up for grabs”, which is precisely the idea of a basic NMR/MRI experiment: B0 1. Excite the spins. 2. Measure until they return to sum equilibrium. What to exactly do with the measured signal and how to recover an image from it is something we’ll discuss in subsequent lectures. Meanwhile, let’s Microscopic Macroscopic just ask ourselves how can one excite a spin? That is, how can one tilt it from its equilibrium position along the main field and create an angle between 3. The macroscopic magnetization precesses them (usually 90 degrees, but not always)? about the external magnetic field. 1.2 TheU RF Coils In MRI, we can only detect a signal from the spins if they precess and therefore induce a current in Fortunately (or perhaps unfortunately), our our MRI receiver coils by Faraday’s law.
    [Show full text]
  • Pulsed Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
    Pulsed Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Experiment NMR University of Florida | Department of Physics PHY4803L | Advanced Physics Laboratory References Theory C. P. Schlicter, Principles of Magnetic Res- Recall that the hydrogen nucleus consists of a onance, (Springer, Berlin, 2nd ed. 1978, single proton and no neutrons. The precession 3rd ed. 1990) of a bare proton in a magnetic field is a sim- ple consequence of the proton's intrinsic angu- E. Fukushima, S. B. W. Roeder, Experi- lar momentum and associated magnetic dipole mental Pulse NMR: A nuts and bolts ap- moment. A classical analog would be a gyro- proach, (Perseus Books, 1981) scope having a bar magnet along its rotational M. Sargent, M.O. Scully, W. Lamb, Laser axis. Having a magnetic moment, the proton Physics, (Addison Wesley, 1974). experiences a torque in a static magnetic field. Having angular momentum, it responds to the A. C. Melissinos, Experiments in Modern torque by precessing about the field direction. Physics, This behavior is called Larmor precession. The model of a proton as a spinning positive Introduction charge predicts a proton magnetic dipole mo- ment µ that is aligned with and proportional To observe nuclear magnetic resonance, the to its spin angular momentum s sample nuclei are first aligned in a strong mag- netic field. In this experiment, you will learn µ = γs (1) the techniques used in a pulsed nuclear mag- netic resonance apparatus (a) to perturb the where γ, called the gyromagnetic ratio, would nuclei out of alignment with the field and (b) depend on how the mass and charge is dis- to measure the small return signal as the mis- tributed within the proton.
    [Show full text]
  • I Magnetism in Nature
    We begin by answering the first question: the I magnetic moment creates magnetic field lines (to which B is parallel) which resemble in shape of an Magnetism in apple’s core: Nature Lecture notes by Assaf Tal 1. Basic Spin Physics 1.1 Magnetism Before talking about magnetic resonance, we need to recount a few basic facts about magnetism. Mathematically, if we have a point magnetic Electromagnetism (EM) is the field of study moment m at the origin, and if r is a vector that deals with magnetic (B) and electric (E) fields, pointing from the origin to the point of and their interactions with matter. The basic entity observation, then: that creates electric fields is the electric charge. For example, the electron has a charge, q, and it creates 0 3m rˆ rˆ m q 1 B r 3 an electric field about it, E 2 rˆ , where r 40 r 4 r is a vector extending from the electron to the point of observation. The electric field, in turn, can act The magnitude of the generated magnetic field B on another electron or charged particle by applying is proportional to the size of the magnetic charge. a force F=qE. The direction of the magnetic moment determines the direction of the field lines. For example, if we tilt the moment, we tilt the lines with it: E E q q F Left: a (stationary) electric charge q will create a radial electric field about it. Right: a charge q in a constant electric field will experience a force F=qE.
    [Show full text]
  • Electron Spin in Magnetic Field 휇 Interaction Energy 퐻 = −휇 퐵 Is Magnetic Dipole Moment (As for Compass Needle) 퐵 Is Magnetic Field, Dot-Product
    EE201/MSE207 Lecture 11 Electron spin in magnetic field 휇 Interaction energy 퐻 = −휇 퐵 is magnetic dipole moment (as for compass needle) 퐵 is magnetic field, dot-product 휇 = 훾orbital 퐿 or 휇 = 훾spin 푆 훾 is called gyromagnetic ratio In classical physics: 푞 charge (−푒 for electron) 훾cl = 2푚 mass In quantum mechanics: For orbital motion 훾orbital = 훾푐푙 For spin 훾spin = 푔 훾푐푙 g-factor 푔 ≈ 2.0023 for free electron, different values in materials In more detail 푚 Angular momentum 휔 푞 Classical physics 푅 퐿 = 푚푣푅 = 푚푅2휔 Magnetic moment 푞 휔 휇 = 퐼퐴 = 휋푅2 = 푞 휋푅2 휇 푞 current 푇 2휋 훾 = = area Therefore cl 퐿 2푚 Quantum, orbital motion 푒ℏ The same 훾, 퐿 = 푛ℏ 휇 = −푛 푧 푧 2푚 magnetic quantum number (usually 푚) The smallest value (quantum 푒ℏ of magnetic moment) 휇 = (Bohr magneton) 퐵 2푚 Quantum, spin 푆푧 = ±ℏ/2, but still 휇푧 ≈ ±휇퐵 (a little more, 휇푧 ≈ ±1.001 휇퐵 ), so 훾spin ≈ 2훾cl (i.e., 푔 ≈ 2). (Different people use different notations; sometimes 푔 = −2, sometimes 훾 is positive, sometimes 푔 is called gyromagnetic ratio, etc.) Evolution of spin in magnetic field 퐵 푑퐿 퐻 = −휇 퐵 = −훾퐵푆 torque 휇 × 퐵 = 훾퐿 × 퐵 휇 푑푡 Classically, precession 푑퐿푥 푑퐿푦 = 훾퐿푦퐵푧 = −훾퐿 퐵 as in a gyroscope. 푑푡 푑푡 푥 푧 (assume 퐵 = 퐵푧푘) Larmor precession, 휔 = 훾퐵. 2 푑 퐿푥 = −훾2퐵2퐿 ⇒ |휔| = |훾퐵 | 푑푡2 푧 푥 푧 퐵 Quantum mechanics ℏ 1 0 Assume 퐵 = 퐵 푘 퐻 = −훾퐵푆 = −훾퐵 푧 2 0 −1 푑휒 푑휒 푖 훾 is negative, −훾 is positive 푖ℏ = 퐻 휒 ⇒ = − 퐻 휒 푑푡 푑푡 ℏ 푑푎 푡 푖훾퐵 = 푎 푡 푎 푡 푎 0 푒푖훾퐵푡/2 휒 푡 = ⇒ 푑푡 2 ⇒ 휒 푡 = 푏 푡 푑푏 푡 푖훾퐵 푏 0 푒−푖훾퐵푡/2 = − 푏 푡 푑푡 2 0 1 푎 2 + 푏 2 = 1 Both and are eigenvectors 1 0 Average values 푖훾퐵푡/2 푎 = 푎(0) 휒 푡 = 푎 푒 푏 푒−푖훾퐵푡/2 푏 = 푏(0) 푖훾퐵푡 2 2 2 Obviously 푆푍 = const, since 푎푒 = 푎 and also precession about z-axis.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 13 — February 25, 2021 Prof
    MATH 262/CME 372: Applied Fourier Analysis and Winter 2021 Elements of Modern Signal Processing Lecture 13 | February 25, 2021 Prof. Emmanuel Candes Scribe: Carlos A. Sing-Long, Edited by E. Bates 1 Outline Agenda: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 1. Bird's eye view: physics at play, MRI machines 2. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) 3. Bloch phenomenological equations 4. Relaxation times A nice introductory video to MRI can be found here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ok9ILIYzmaY Last Time: We surveyed two techniques for efficiently computing non-uniform discrete Fourier transforms. We considered two distinct tasks: Type I : evaluating the Fourier transform at uniform frequencies from non-uniform data; and Type II : evaluating the transform at non-uniform frequen- cies from uniform data. Finally, we mentioned that Taylor approximations could be employed to simultaneously consider non-uniform grids in both domains, the so-called Type III problem. 2 Magnetic resonance imaging After studying computerized tomography (CT) and its connections to the Fourier transform, we now turn to discussing the principles behind magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). As we saw with X-ray tomography, the general idea of medical imaging is to measure the outcome of an interaction between the human body and a known energy source. In MRI, one measures the response of water molecules in the human body when subjected to low-energy electromagnetic pulses against a strong magnetic field. This makes MR an attractive imaging modality to practitioners, as there is no evidence that exposure to strong magnetic fields is harmful. Of course, in order to understand how electromagnetic pulses ultimately lead to an image, we need to construct a mathematical model of the relevant physics.
    [Show full text]