EPJ manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Measurement of a false electric dipole moment signal from 199Hg atoms exposed to an inhomogeneous magnetic field S. Afach1,2,3, C. A. Baker4, G. Ban5, G. Bison2, K. Bodek6, Z. Chowdhuri2, M. Daum2, M. Fertl1,2a, B. Franke1,2b, P. Geltenbort7, K. Green4,8, M. G. D. van der Grinten4, Z. Grujic9, P. G. Harris8, W. Heil10 , V. Helaine´ 2,5c, R. Henneck2, M. Horras1,2d, P. Iaydjiev4e, S. N. Ivanov4f , M. Kasprzak9, Y. Kerma¨ıdic11, K. Kirch1,2, P. Knowles9g, H.-C. Koch9,10 , S. Komposch1,2, A. Kozela12, J. Krempel1, B. Lauss2, T. Lefort5, Y. Lemiere` 5, A. Mtchedlishvili2, O. Naviliat-Cuncic5h, J. M. Pendlebury8, F. M. Piegsa1, G. Pignol11, P. N. Prashant2,13, G. Quem´ ener´ 5, D. Rebreyend11, D. Ries2, S. Roccia14, P. Schmidt-Wellenburg2, N. Severijns13, A. Weis9, E. Wursten13, G. Wyszynski1,6, J. Zejma6, J. Zenner1,2, G. Zsigmond2 1 ETH Zurich,¨ Institute for Particle Physics, CH-8093 Zurich,¨ Switzerland 2 Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), CH–5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland 3 Hans Berger Department of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, D-07747 Jena, Germany 4 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0QX, United Kingdom 5 LPC Caen, ENSICAEN, Universite´ de Caen Basse-Normandie, CNRS/IN2P3, Caen, France 6 Marian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, 30–059 Cracow, Poland 7 Institut Laue–Langevin, Grenoble, France 8 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QH, United Kingdom 9 Physics Department, University of Fribourg, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland 10 Institut fur¨ Physik, Johannes–Gutenberg–Universitat,¨ D–55128 Mainz, Germany 11 LPSC, Universite´ Grenoble Alpes, CNRS/IN2P3, Grenoble, France 12 Henryk Niedwodniczanski´ Institute for Nuclear Physics, 31–342 Cracow, Poland 13 Instituut voor Kern– en Stralingsfysica, University of Leuven, B–3001 Leuven, Belgium 14 CSNSM, Universite´ Paris Sud, CNRS/IN2P3, Orsay Campus, France Received: date / Revised version: date Abstract. We report on the measurement of a Larmor frequency shift proportional to the electric-field strength for 199Hg atoms contained in a volume permeated with aligned magnetic and electric fields. This shift arises from the in- terplay between the inevitable magnetic field gradients and the motional magnetic field. The proportionality to electric- field strength makes it apparently similar to an electric dipole moment (EDM) signal, although unlike an EDM this effect is P- and T-conserving. We have used a neutron magnetic resonance EDM spectrometer, featuring a mercury co-magnetometer and an array of external cesium magnetometers, to measure the shift as a function of the applied magnetic field gradient. Our results are in good agreement with theoretical expectations. PACS. XX.XX.XX No PACS code given 1 Introduction B, E have been motivated principally by the search for elec- tric dipole moments (EDMs) of simple non-degenerate sys- Recent investigations characterizing frequency shifts for spins tems (neutron, atoms, molecules) and the potential discovery contained in vessels permeated with magnetic and electric fields of new sources of CP violation [1]. Such experiments look for shifts, proportional to an applied electric field, of the Larmor a Now at University of Washington, Seattle WA, USA. precession frequency of stored particles. Any additional such arXiv:1503.08651v2 [physics.atom-ph] 3 Aug 2015 b Now at Max-Planck-Institute of Quantum Optics, Garching, Ger- shift is therefore a potential source of systematic errors. Among many. the few magnetic-field related spurious shifts, one is of par- 2 c Now at LPSC, Grenoble, France. ticular concern: due to the motional magnetic field E × v=c , d Present address: Hauptstrasse 60, CH-4455 Zunzgen, Switzer- a shift arises that is proportional to the electric-field strength land. and therefore mimics an EDM signal. Interestingly enough, 2 e On leave from INRNE, Sofia, Bulgaria. E × v=c effects were already the main limiting factor for the f On leave from PNPI, St. Petersburg, Russia. early neutron beam experiments [2]. Then, with the advent of g Present address: Rilkeplatz 8/9, A-1040 Vienna, Austria. the storable ultra-cold neutrons (UCN), it was erroneously as- h Now at Michigan State University, East-Lansing, USA. sumed for many years that this false EDM signal would vanish, Correspondence to: [email protected],[email protected] based on the argument that the velocity of trapped particles av- 2 Please give a shorter version with: \authorrunning and \titlerunning prior to \maketitle erages to zero. The first correct and comprehensive calculation shift proportional to the electric field strength, thus inducing a of this effect was given in Ref. [3], in the context of an EDM false EDM. experiment with stored particles. For completeness, it should As mentioned above, the first detailed calculation of such be mentioned that Stark interference effects, such as the one false EDMs for stored particles was given in Ref. [3] in the reported for 199Hg in Ref. [4], are also known to produce false context of the RAL-Sussex-ILL neutron EDM experiment [8]. EDM signals for atoms. The effect discussed in the present ar- The authors derived expressions for the two limiting cases: ticle is of a different nature, and to make the distinction we will non adiabatic and adiabatic, corresponding to 2πfLτ 1 and refer to it as the motional false EDM. 2πfLτ 1 respectively, where τ is the typical time parti- Our collaboration is conducting a program to search for cles take to cross the trap. Both regimes are of interest, since the neutron EDM [5], using the new ultracold neutron (UCN) 199Hg atoms fall into the first category whereas UCNs fall into source [6] at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI). We are currently the second. More general results, valid for a broad range of working with an upgraded version of the spectrometer [7] that frequencies, were obtained only for cylindrical symmetry and was used to establish the best nEDM limit, specular reflections. The expressions of the frequency shifts for the two limiting regimes are : −26 jdnj < 2:9 × 10 e cm (90% C.L.); γ2D2 @B at the Laue Langevin Institute (ILL) [8]. One distinct feature δf = 0 E (non adiabatic) (2) of this device is a mercury co-magnetometer [9] using a spin- L 32π c2 @z 199 2 polarized vapor of Hg atoms that precess in the same vol- vxy @B0 ume as the neutrons. The nEDM analysis is then based on the δfL = 2 2 E (adiabatic), (3) 4π B0 c @z ratio of the Larmor precession frequencies, R = fn=fHg, which to first order is free of magnetic field fluctuations. However, where γ is the gyromagnetic ratio, D is the diameter of the both neutrons and mercury atoms are subject to a frequency trap, c is the velocity of light and vxy is the particle velocity shift that is proportional to the electric field, due to the unavoid- transverse to B0. Note the absence of the gyromagnetic ratio in able presence of magnetic-field gradients. As will be shown, Eq. (3). Indeed, in the adiabatic case, the frequency shift can false the motional false neutron EDM, dn , is negligible, at least at be interpreted as originating from a phase of purely geometric the current level of sensitivity. In contrast, the mercury-induced nature, or Berry’s phase [11,12], and is therefore independent false nEDM of the coupling strength to the magnetic field. These results were then complemented and extended us- γn dfalse;Hg = dfalse ≈ 3:8 dfalse; (1) ing the general theory of relaxation (Redfield theory) [13,14], n γ Hg Hg Hg and then by solving the Schrodinger¨ equation directly [15]. In Ref. [14], an expression valid for arbitrary field distributions or where dfalse is the motional mercury false EDM and γ , γ are Hg n Hg trap shapes was obtained in the non-adiabatic limit : the gyromagnetic ratios of the neutron and 199Hg respectively, is a major systematic effect that must be precisely controlled. One of the main improvements accomplished recently within γ2 δf = hxB + yB i E (non adiabatic), (4) the experiment is the installation of an array of cesium mag- L 2πc2 x y netometers that surrounds the precession chamber. This new where the brackets refer to the average over the storage volume. device has made it possible to measure the magnetic field dis- For a cylindrical uniform gradient and a trap with cylindrical tribution, and thus to calculate the vertical gradient in the trap, symmetry, Eq. (4) reduces to Eq. (2). which underlies the false EDM discussed here. Using the relationship between the frequency shift and the In this article, we report on the first direct measurement false EDM, of a motional false EDM signal for stored mercury atoms. A comparison to theoretical expectations is also presented. h dfalse = δf (E) 2E L where h is Planck’s constant, together with Eqs. (2) and (3), one 2 Theory of frequency shifts induced by can now readily calculate the magnitude of the false EDMs for magnetic field gradients: a brief reminder the mercury and for the neutron (both direct and mercury in- duced). Given our experimental conditions (see section 3) and Particles with a magnetic moment exposed to a magnetic field, assuming a neutron velocity of 3 m/s, one obtains: B0 = B0^z, precess at the Larmor frequency fL = γ B0=2π @B where γ is the gyromagnetic ratio. Because of experimentally dfalse = 0 1:490 × 10−29 e cm=(pT/cm) (5) unavoidable magnetic field gradients, the Larmor frequency of n @z a particle moving through this field will be subject to a shift, known as the Ramsey-Bloch-Siegert (RBS) shift [10]. If an @B0 E B dfalse = 1:148 × 10−27 e cm=(pT/cm) (6) electric field (parallel or anti-parallel to 0) is applied – as Hg @z is the case in experiments searching for EDMs – the moving particle will experience an additional motional magnetic field 2 @B Bv = E × v=c .