Volume 79, No. 3 Fall 2016 Mississippi Libraries Vol. 79 No. 3 • Fall 2016 Page 71
A Quarterly Publication of the ISSN 0194-388X Mississippi Library Association ©2016
Editorial Staff Contents President’s Page...... 72 Editor Tina Harry Virtual Reference Services in Level VI Higher Education Institutions in Catalog & Asst. Automation Librarian the SACS Region: A Content Analysis...... 73 The University of Mississippi [email protected] Michael Mounce
2016 Annual Conference...... 79 Assistant Editor Mississippi Authors’ Awards Tracy Carr Library Services Bureau Director Keynote Speaker Mississippi Library Commission Poster Sessions [email protected] Conference Schedule at a Glance
Copy Editor News Briefs...... 85 Audrey Beach People In The News...... 88 Resource Librarian Mississippi Delta Community College Book Reviews...... 91 [email protected] The Jim Crow Routine: Everyday Performances of Race, Civil Rights and Segregation in Mississippi News Reporter The Littlest Bunny in Mississippi: an Easter Adventure Sarah Mangrum Access Services Librarian / Choctaw Resurgence in Mississippi: Race, Class, and Nation Building in the Assistant Clinical Professor Jim Crow South, 1830-1977 University of Southern Mississippi [email protected] The Mississippi Secession Convention: Delegates and Deliberations in Politics and War, 1861-1865 Book Review Editor Mark your Calendars...... 93 Michele Frasier-Robinson Librarian for Education & Psychology University of Southern Mississippi [email protected]
MLA Reporter Antoinette Giamalva On the cover: Nectar Drinking Bats of Arizona by Amanda Myers, McCain Library & Archives, Branch Manager University of Southern Mississippi. This 5-color relief print shows the Mexican long-tongued Ridgeland Public Library bat and the long-nosed bat, the two species of nectar drinking bats found in Arizona. These bats [email protected] pollinate various cactus species such as agave, saguaro, and the organ pipe cactus. You can find more works by this artist on Instagram at acmyers621 or at etsy.com/shop/admers
Indexer Kristin Rogers Mississippi Libraries is a quarterly, open access publication of the Mississippi Library Electronic Resources & Discovery Librarian Association (MLA). The articles, reports, and features herein represent viewpoints of The University of Mississippi their respective authors and are not necessarily the official options of the Association. [email protected] In order to assure the widest possible audience for the works published in Mississippi Libraries, the work is added, by contractual agreement, to one or more EBSCO Publishing databases. Mississippi Libraries is also indexed in Library Literature and Information Science Abstracts. For more informaton, visit http://misslib.org/publications Mississippi Libraries Vol. 79 No. 3 • Fall 2016 Page 72
2016 Executive Board President’s Page President Molly McManus “Mississippi Libraries: The Heart Systems Librarian U.S. Army Engineer Research and of Our Communities” is the theme Development Center of the Mississippi Library Associa- tion 2016 Annual Conference that Vice-President Jenniffer Stephenson will be held in Vicksburg, 18-21, Director 2016. Your vice president, Jenniff- Greenwood-Leflore Public Library System er Stephenson, and her committees Secretary have planned a great schedule of Jamie Bounds Wilson events. As always, there will be a Electronic Resources & wide range of programs and events Web Services Librarian Millsaps College that will be of interest to library staff from public, academic, school, or Treasurer special libraries. While profession- Blair Booker Assistant Librarian al development and continuing ed- Holmes Community College ucation are well-known benefits of our annual conference, perhaps one at 465. The membership commit- Immediate Past President Patsy C. Brewer of the most important parts is the tee recently conducted a survey to Library Director ability to network with colleagues see what current and former MLA Waynesboro-Wayne County Library across the state. The MLA executive members expect from and hope ALA Councilor board recently passed a conference to gain by MLA membership. In Ellen Ruffin cancellation policy to formalize pol- the survey, we were happy to see McCain Library and Archives icies and to clarify our procedures that ‘overall satisfaction’ with MLA Curator, de Grummond Children’s Literature Collection for accepting purchase orders. You is high with 41% of respondents can find additional information ‘mostly satisfied’ and 35% of re- SELA Councilor about the conference in this issue spondents ‘extremely satisfied’. A Melissa R. Dennis Head of Research & Instruction Services of Mississippi Libraries and on our lack of communication outside of University of Mississippi Libraries association website at http://www. conference was an area of concern misslib.org. and some suggested regional or Hattiesburg is the location for our multiple events throughout the year. Section Chairs 2017 conference and our Vice Pres- Although 71% of those responding Association of College and Research ident-elect, Sarah Mangrum, will thought that their return on invest- Libraries (ACRL) Section Chair be soliciting the help of volunteers. ment of membership was fair, many Michele Frasier-Robinson Please contact her if you want to vol- lapsed and non-members men- Public Library Section Chair unteer to help with the conference. tioned the cost of membership as a Jennifer Wann The executive board is in the midst deterrent to joining. The executive School Library Section Chair of collecting RFPs for our 2018, 2019 board and membership commit- Venetia Oglesby and 2020 conferences. We hope that tees will continue to use the survey many locations throughout the state results to inform decisions. If you Special Libraries Section Chair Joyce Shaw will submit proposals. The confer- have any suggestions about MLA, ence site selection committee will the conference, or membership, Trustees Section Chair begin the review process after the please contact me or any member of Rickey Jones conference. the executive board. For more information, visit: I’m delighted to report that our http://misslib.org/Executive-Board association membership is currently Mississippi Libraries Vol. 79 No. 3 • Fall 2016 Page 73 Virtual Reference Services in Level VI Higher Education Institutions in the SACS Region: A Content Analysis
Michael Mounce is to examine the extent to which librarians at Mississippi State “con- Reference and Instructional Services virtual reference services are avail- tinue to investigate effective ways Librarian, Professor of Library Services able in Level VI institutions in the to provide virtual reference services Roberts-LaForge Library Delta State University SACS region. In this study, the au- where our patrons are, when they thor presents data and information need us.” (Powers et al. 2010).
1 pertaining to those services in 107 Other articles in the literature Abstract Level VI institutions. These institu- included examples of institutions This study examines virtual ref- tions were located in eleven states in providing virtual reference services erence services in academic librar- the southeastern and south central via text messaging. For example, ies of Level VI higher education United States. Also, some institu- Brooks and Zubarev discussed the institutions in the SACS region. A tions were excluded from this study. implementation and use of those content analysis study was used to The institutions there were excluded services via text messaging at the analyze the web sites of the institu- were institutions at other levels (i.e. John Jay College of Criminal Justice, tions’ libraries. When analyzing the Level V), unaccredited institutions, a college within the City Universi- web sites, the author collected in- and institutions outside the SACS ty of New York. The authors men- formation pertaining to the librar- region. tioned that their institution’s library ies’ virtual reference services. The had used a Blackberry phone to pro- purpose of this article is to provide Literature Review vide those services. Sometime later, the results of the study. In addition, the library staff decided to make a Virtual Reference Services in this article also includes a review of change by switching to a software Particular Universities the literature, a discussion regard- interface instead of continuing to In the library literature, the au- ing the results, conclusions, and use a phone for providing the ser- thor found examples of academic recommendations. vices (Brooks and Zubarev 2012). libraries providing virtual reference Some articles in the literature fo- services to their patrons. Some of Introduction cused on changes or improvements the articles found in the literature Virtual reference services have that have been made to services discussed various academic librar- become more common in academic provided by librarians. For example, ies providing those services via live libraries in recent years. The librar- Nicol and Crook discussed some chat. In one article, Powers et al. ies of Level VI higher education in- improvements made to the virtual discussed librarians’ experiences of stitutions in the Southern Associa- reference services at the libraries of providing virtual reference services tion of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Washington State University – Pull- via live chat at the Mississippi State region have provided those services man. In the past, librarians at this University Libraries. Powers et al. via email, live chat, and other elec- institution had answered patrons’ discussed their participation in live tronic methods. Level VI institu- online questions, such as live chat chat with other libraries in a con- tions are the universities and other questions, in separate online loca- sortium from the fall of 2004 – early institutions in the SACS region that tions. However, a decision was made 2008, their transition to a local live grant four or more types of doctoral to centralize their virtual reference chat service in 2008, and the use degrees. The purpose of this study services. In 2011, the libraries im- of a local live chat service. The ar- 1 Peer-Reviewed Article. Received: March 3, 2016 plemented the LibAnswers service, Accepted: August 2, 2016 ticle concluded by stating that the Mississippi Libraries Vol. 79 No. 3 • Fall 2016 Page 74 which become the location for all of reference services. Vecchione and links to virtual reference services those services. After implementing Ruppel discussed an anonymous and the terminology used in those LibAnswers, librarians began an- web based survey that they conduct- links to virtual reference services. swering patrons’ questions sent to ed on the topic of text messaging vir- Also, they found out the locations the library via email, texting, chat, tual reference services in libraries. of virtual reference chat boxes, how and Twitter in one location. After The survey was sent to various email chat services are provided (locally one academic year of using the cen- listservs, and 221 people responded or via consortiums), and all modes tralized method of virtual reference to the survey. Since the survey was of virtual reference services that are services, librarians at Washington anonymous, there was no informa- offered. In the results of their study, State University – Pullman noted a tion given about the respondents, the authors stated that most of the 61.03% increase in patron questions such as the types of libraries in examined institutions placed their received in their libraries (Nicol and which they worked. Approximate- links to those services on their main Crook 2013). ly 43% of the survey recipients re- library web pages. Other results of sponded. One of the results of the the study included the following: Studies in Virtual Reference study included a few findings from most of the examined institutions Services respondents. First, the respondents using at least one mode of virtual Some articles in the published indicated that ready reference and reference services, almost half of literature provide a broad picture circulation questions were the most those institutions providing those of virtual reference services by dis- common types of questions received services via live chat, and the insti- cussing those services in general. via text messages in their libraries. tutions with higher enrollments or Devine, Paladino, and Davis, for Second, the respondents reported more advanced degrees being more instance, discussed a comprehen- that various technological tools were likely to offer those services via live sive survey of academic libraries in used in their libraries for providing chat (Yang and Dalal 2015). the United States that focused on text messaging virtual reference live chat virtual reference services. services. Third, most of the respon- Methodology The survey was sent to 451 higher dents reported that they received education institutions and about This study focused on Level VI “10 or less questions per month” via 50% of the recipients responded. higher education institutions in the text messages. Fourth, a majority of The results of their study included SACS region. Therefore, the first the respondents indicated that the a few findings. First, 85% of the re- step of this study was to find a list of library staff in the respondents’ li- spondents stated that their libraries all of those institutions. The author braries received training to prepare provide live chat virtual reference conducted a search for those institu- them for providing text messaging services independently, instead of tions on the SACS Commission on virtual reference services (Vecchi- in consortiums with other libraries. Colleges web site. In the search, the one and Ruppel 2012). Second, institutions with doctoral author limited the search results to In the literature, the author also degrees have generally offered those Level VI institutions. After clicking found some articles that discuss vir- services via live chat longer than the search link, the author viewed a tual reference services in general. non-doctoral institutions. Third, list of all of the Level VI institutions, For example, Yang and Dalal wrote the methods of training library staff which included 110 institutions. an article about a content analysis to prepare them for providing those The institutions included universi- study they conducted which dis- services via live chat differed among ties, one college, and a few medical cussed those services in academic institutions. Some institutions pro- schools. libraries. The authors of that study vided their library staff with train- The second step of this study was obtained a list of 362 institutions ing sessions while others required to collect and record the data. Using via a random sample method. Af- on the job training (Devine, Paladi- the content analysis research meth- terward, they scanned the web sites no, and Davis 2011). od, the author collected data from of those institutions’ libraries to find Another article focused on the the web sites of the Level VI institu- out what library web pages have the topic of text messaging virtual tions and their libraries. The author Mississippi Libraries Vol. 79 No. 3 • Fall 2016 Page 75 collected the data and recorded it in Table 1: Virtual Reference Services an Excel spreadsheet. For the study, Methods Number of Percentage of the author found the following vir- Institutions Institutions tual reference services data: modes Email only 18 16.8% of virtual reference services (such as Email and chat 28 25.9% live chat), the locations of links to those services on the web sites, and Email and texting 2 1.85% terminology used in those links, Email, chat, and texting 47 43.5% such as “Ask a Librarian.” Also, the author found the following demo- Email, chat, texting, and Twitter 8 7.4% graphic data: geographic locations, Email, chat, texting, and Skype 1 0.92% number of libraries at the institu- tions, number of library staff at the Email, chat, and Twitter 2 1.85% institutions, number of reference or Email, chat, and Facebook 1 0.92% research librarians/staff at the insti- tutions, and the institutions’ student Total 107 100% enrollment numbers. The author collected and recorded the data for institutions provided those services institution with one library linked to this study in March and April 2015. via Twitter. One institution used those services on the library’s home Also, it should be noted that two in- Skype and one used Facebook. In page. The institutions that had two stitutions were excluded from the Table 1, the methods of virtual refer- or more libraries placed their links study because of lack of data and ence services provided in the Level either on the “University Libraries” another institution was excluded VI institutions are listed. The num- home page or on the home page of because it was located outside the bers and percentages of institutions the main library. United States. Therefore, this study providing those methods of virtual actually focuses on 107 of the 110 Demographic Data reference services are also listed. institutions. The 107 Level VI institutions that In addition to discovering the were included in this study were lo- types of virtual reference services Results of the Study cated in several states in the south- used at these institutions, the author eastern and south central United Virtual Reference Services examined how the libraries con- States. Of all the geographic loca- For this study, the author exam- nected users with these services on tions, Texas had the largest number ined the web sites of the libraries of their web sites. The term “Ask a Li- of Level VI institutions that were in- the 107 Level VI institutions to find brarian” was used far more than any cluded in this study with 27 institu- out what methods of virtual refer- other term. Fifty-six of the 107 insti- tions (25.23%). The U.S. states of the ence services the institutions’ librar- tutions (52.3%) used “Ask a Librari- institutions and the numbers and ies provided. Eighteen institutions an” to market their virtual reference percentages of institutions in those (16.8%) provided those services via services. The term “Ask Us” was used states are listed in Table 2. email only. The remaining 89 in- by 19 institutions (17.75%) and the The institutions in this study var- stitutions (82.4%) provided those term “Contact Us” was used by 12 ied in regard to how many libraries services via email plus one or more institutions (11.2%). Several other they had. Twenty-nine of the insti- other methods. Besides email, the terms, such as “Ask a Question” and tutions (27.1%) had only one library other electronic methods included “Ask Us Anything” were used at the while 34 of them (31.77%) had five live chat, text messaging, Twitter, libraries of the other institutions. or more libraries. The remaining 43 Skype, and Facebook. In their pro- There was not much variation institutions (40.18%) had two, three, vision of virtual reference services, in regard to where the links to vir- or four libraries. The author was un- 87 of the institutions used live chat tual reference services were locat- able to determine the number of and 58 used text messaging. Ten ed on the libraries’ web sites. Each Mississippi Libraries Vol. 79 No. 3 • Fall 2016 Page 76
Table 2: Geographic Locations were 15 institutions (14.4%) with States Number of Percentage of enrollments of 30,000 – 39,999 stu- Institutions Institutions dents. The remaining 10 institutions Alabama 8 7.47% (9.6%) had enrollments of 40,000 or Florida 14 13% more students. Georgia 9 8.4% Discussion Kentucky 2 1.86% In this study, the author examined virtual reference services offered by Louisiana 9 8.4% Level VI institutions in the SACS Mississippi 5 4.67% region. Also, this study analyzed possible connections between those North Carolina 9 8.4% services and the following factors of South Carolina 3 2.8% the institutions: number of libraries, number of library staff members, Tennessee 10 9.34% number of reference or research Texas 27 25.23% staff members, and student enroll- ment. A search of the published lit- Virginia 11 10.28% erature found no information sug- Total 107 100% gesting a connection between any of those factors and higher education institutions’ provision of virtual ref- libraries for one of the institutions staff members and 21 institutions erence services. However, some data in the study. (19.6%) had 20 or more. No exact gathered in this study suggests that The 107 institutions had various numbers of reference or research there may be a connection between numbers of library staff members. staff members were found for six of the factors and the virtual reference In this study, the term “library staff the institutions. services that are provided at SACS members” refers to all types of li- Student enrollment numbers accredited Level VI institutions. brary staff, including faculty. The were collected for 104 of the 107 Regarding the number of librar- author found that 38 of the institu- institutions. Three of the 107 in- ies, the author assumed that the in- tions (35.5%) had a staff size of less stitutions were excluded from the stitutions with two or more libraries than 50 employees. Twenty-six of enrollment data because they were would offer more types of virtual the institutions (24.29%) had a staff medical schools that were within reference services than those with size of 50 – 100 employees, while 38 larger universities. Thirty-five of the only one library. Some data in the of the institutions (35.5%) had over 104 institutions (33.6%) had small study suggests that generally, the in- 100 employees. Also, the author was student enrollments with less than stitutions with two or more libraries unable to obtain the exact numbers 10,000 students. However, a large offered more types of those services, of library staff members for five of majority of the 104 institutions had although there were some excep- the institutions. large student enrollments of 10,000 tions. The author found that 65.5% The numbers of reference or re- or more students. As many as 69 of (19 out of 29) of the institutions search staff members at the institu- the institutions (66.3%) had more with only one library offered those tions in this study also varied. The than 10,000 students enrolled. More services via email and at least one author found that 39 of the 107 in- specifically, 23 of the institutions other method. In contrast, 89.6% stitutions (36.4%) had less than 10 (22.1%) had enrollments of 10,000 (69 out of 77) of the institutions reference or research staff mem- – 19,999 students and 21 of those with two or more libraries offered bers. Also, 41 institutions (38.3%) institutions (20.1%) had 20,000 those services via email and at least had 10 – 19 reference or research – 29,999 students enrolled. There one other method. The percentage Mississippi Libraries Vol. 79 No. 3 • Fall 2016 Page 77 of institutions that had two or more at the institutions. The author’s as- found for 104 of the 107 institutions. libraries providing virtual reference sumption was that the institutions Regarding the smaller institutions, services in more ways than just with large numbers of reference or the author found that 65.7% (23 out email is about 24% higher than the research staff members offer more of 35) of the institutions with enroll- percentage of single library insti- types of virtual reference services ments of less than 10,000 students tutions providing those services in than those with small numbers of offered virtual reference services via more ways than email. those types of staff members. Some email and at least one other meth- In regard to the number of library data in this study suggests that the od. In contrast, 92.7% (64 out of 69) staff members, the author’s assump- author’s assumption is generally of the institutions with enrollments tion was that the institutions with true, although there were some ex- of 10,000 or more students offered large library staffs offer more types ceptions. Sixty-six percent (26 out those services via email and at least of virtual reference services than the of 39) of the institutions that had one other method. The percentage institutions with small library staffs. less than ten reference/research staff of “10,000 or more” institutions pro- Some data in the study generally members provided virtual refer- viding virtual reference services in supports that assumption, although ence services via email and at least more ways than just email is about there were some exceptions. The au- one other method. In contrast, as 27% higher than the percentage of thor found that 65.78% (25 out of 38) many as 95.1% (39 out of 41) of the “less than 10,000” institutions pro- of the institutions that had less than institutions with 10 – 19 reference viding those services in multiple 50 library staff members provided or research staff members provid- electronic methods. virtual reference services in more ed those services in more ways than ways than just email.. On the other just email. The percentage of “10 Conclusions and hand, 96.1% (25 out of 26) of the in- – 19” institutions providing virtu- Recommendations stitutions that had 50 – 100 library al reference services in more ways In conclusion, a large majority of staff members provided those ser- than just email is about 29% higher Level VI institutions in the SACS re- vices in more ways than just email. than the percentage of “less than 10” gion, 83.1%, were found to provide The percentage of “50 – 100 staff institutions providing those services virtual reference services in more member” institutions providing in multiple electronic methods. ways than just email. That high per- more than email virtual reference Also, 90.4% (19 out of 21) of the in- centage suggests that virtual refer- services is about 31% higher than stitutions with 20 or more reference ence services of most academic li- the percentage of “less than 50” in- or research staff members provided braries are no longer limited to the stitutions providing those services those services in more ways than email method. Also, the two meth- in more ways than just email. Also, just email. The percentage of “20 or ods that were used the most for pro- 92.1% (35 out of 38) of the institu- more” institutions providing virtu- viding those services in the Level VI tions that had over 100 library staff al reference services in more ways institutions besides email were live members provided those services than just email is about 24% higher chat and text messaging. Further- in more ways that just email. The than the percentage of “less than 10” more, the author found that other percentage of institutions that had institutions providing those services electronic methods, such as Twitter, over 100 library staff members pro- in multiple electronic methods. have started being used in the pro- viding virtual reference services in Regarding enrollments, the au- vision of those services in some aca- more ways than just email is about thor assumed that the institutions demic libraries of the institutions in 27% higher than the percentage of with large student enrollments offer this study. The use of live chat, text institutions with less than 50 staff more types of virtual reference ser- messaging and other methods in the members providing those services vices than the institutions with small libraries of Level VI institutions in- in more ways than email. student enrollments. Some data in dicates that academic libraries have A more specific focus of this this study supported that assump- and continue to branch out in vari- study was on the number of ref- tion, although there were some ous ways in order to provide virtual erence or research staff members exceptions. Enrollment data was reference services to their patrons. Mississippi Libraries Vol. 79 No. 3 • Fall 2016 Page 78
The author has a few recommen- viewing the web sites of other librar- References Brooks, Marvie, and Mark Zubarev. 2012. “Another dations for anyone who needs more ies which have already implemented Lane on the Information Highway? A Case Study information about virtual reference those services. Further research in of Experimenting with Text Message Reference.” The Reference Librarian 53(2): 170-81. services. The author recommends this area may expand beyond this Devine, Christopher, Emily B. Paladino, and John reviewing the document “Guide- study to consider how much users A. Davis. 2011. “Chat Reference Training After One Decade: The Results of a National Survey lines for Implementing and Main- are taking advantage of these vir- of Academic Libraries.” The Journal of Academic taining Virtual Reference Services.” tual reference services at these in- Librarianship 37(3): 197-206. Nicol, Erica C., and Linda Crook. 2013. “Now It’s This document, which was created stitutions. Other studies may need Necessary: Virtual Reference Services at Washing- by the Reference and User Services to explore any connection between ton State University, Pullman.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 39(2): 161-68. Association, provides helpful tips traditional reference services (face- Powers, Amanda C., David Nolen, Li Zhang, Yue Xu, for those who need to implement to-face help or phone calls) and and Gail Peyton. 2010. “Moving from the Con- sortium to the Reference Desk: Keeping Chat and those services at their libraries or newer services (virtual reference) Improving Reference at the MSU Libraries.” Inter- manage their existing services. For to determine if virtual reference net Reference Services Quarterly 15(3): 169-88. Vecchione, Amy, and Margie Ruppel. 2012. “Refer- those wishing to implement new services provided by larger academ- ence is Neither Here Nor There: A Snapshot of virtual reference services in their li- ic institutions are a fad or a good SMS Reference Services.” The Reference Librarian 53(4): 355-72. braries, the author also recommends investment. Yang, Sharon Q., and Heather A. Dalal. 2015. “Delivering Virtual Reference Services on the Web: An Investigation into the Current Practice by Academic Libraries.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 41(1): 68-86. Mississippi Libraries Vol. 79 No. 3 • Fall 2016 Page 79 2016 Annual Conference Mississippi Library Association Annual Conference Vicksburg October 18 - 21, 2016
ACADEMIC LIBRARY
Mississippi Libraries: The Heart of Our Communities
SCHOOL LIBRARY Mississippi Libraries Vol. 79 No. 3 • Fall 2016 Page 80 Mississippi Authors’ Awards Kiese Laymon: Winner for Fiction – Long Division Kiese Laymon is a black southern writer, born and raised in Jackson, Mississippi. Laymon attended Millsaps College and Jackson State University before graduating from Oberlin College. He earned an MFA in Fiction from Indiana University and is currently a Professor of English and African American Studies at the University of Mississippi. Laymon is the author of the novel Long Division and a collection of essays How to Slowly Kill Yourself and Others in America, the UK edition released in 2016. Laymon has written essays, stories and reviews for numerous publications including Esquire, ESPN the Magazine, Colorlines, NPR, LitHub, The Los Angeles Times, Ebony, New York Times, PEN Journal, Oxford American, The Best American Series, and Guernica. Long Division was named one of the Best of 2013 by Buzzfeed, The Believer, Salon, Guernica, Contemporary Literature, Mosaic Magazine, Library Journal, Chicago Tribune and the Crunk Feminist Collective. It was also short-listed for the Believer Book Award, the Ernest Gaines Award and the Morning News Tournament of Books. Long Division won the 2014 Saroyan International Writing Award on November 10th. Three essays in How to Slowly Kill Yourself and Others in America have been included in the Best American series, the Best of Net award, and the Atlantic's Best Essays of 2013. He was selected a member of the Root 100 in 2013 and 2014 and Ebony Magazine Power 100 in 2015. Kiese Laymon has two books forthcoming, including a memoir called Heavy which will be released in 2017 and the novel called And So On which can be expected in the Spring of 2018, both from Scribner. Hester Bass: Winner for Juvenile – Seeds of Freedom: The Peaceful Integra- tion of Huntsville, Alabama Hester Bass is the author of Seeds of Freedom: The Peaceful Integration of Hunts- ville, Alabama (NCSS Woodson Honor, Parents’ Choice Silver Honor, and Junior Library Guild) and The Secret World of Walter Anderson (NCTE Orbis Pictus Award and SIBA Book Award). She lives in Santa Fe, New Mexico, but as a native of Georgia and former resident of Alabama and Mississippi, she often craves tur- nip greens. Suzanne Marrs: Winner for Non-Fiction – Meanwhile There Are Letters: The Correspondence of Eudora Welty and Ross Macdonald Professor Emerita of English at Millsaps College where she taught for twen- ty-seven years, Suzanne Marrs received the 1998 Phoenix Award for Outstand- ing Welty Scholarship from the Eudora Welty Society, and she was Mississippi’s Humanities Scholar of the Year in 2009. Marrs is the author of Eudora Welty, A Biography, for which she won a Mississippi Author Award, and of One Writer’s Imagination: The Fiction of Eudora Welty. She is the editor of What There Is to Say We Have Said: The Correspondence of Eudora Welty and William Maxwell and the co-editor (along with Tom Nolan) of Meanwhile There Are Letters: The Correspon- dence of Eudora Welty and Ross Macdonald (July 2015), which was a finalist for Edgar, Anthony, and Macavity Awards. Marrs met Eudora Welty in 1983, and they became good friends; once Marrs moved from the State University of New York – Oswego to Jackson, the two met on an almost daily basis, discussing literature and travel, exchanging anecdotes, and welcoming visiting writers and scholars to Mississippi. Though she has now retired from the faculty of Millsaps College, Marrs continues to serve as Welty Foundation Scholar-in-Residence at the Eudora Welty House and has a number of book projects in the offing. Mississippi Libraries Vol. 79 No. 3 • Fall 2016 Page 81 Keynote Speaker Zachary Benedict is a managing partner at MKM architecture + design, a firm dedicated to enhancing community health. As a son of a librarian, Zach grew up understanding the importance of libraries and has dedicat- ed his career to understanding the connection between people and places. With an appreciation towards the likes of Charlie Munger and Monty Py- thon, he has lectured internationally on various topics – discussions whose primary focus is to encourage communities to reevaluate the importance of inclusive civic space. At this year’s conference, Zach will be focusing on the evolving role of libraries and how their presence is critical for the fu- ture sustainability of the communities they serve. More importantly, he will share his work exploring why libraries are the hearts of every community.
Poster Sessions Wednesday Crafting Collections: Supporting the Student Success Initiative at Southern Miss By Elena Azadbakht, Tracy Englert, and Sarah Mangrum (University of Southern Mississippi) Searching for Answers: Using Student Searches to Determine Engagement By Jacqueline Reed and Ashley S. Dees (The University of Mississippi) Self-Published Books and Libraries: Should We or Shouldn’t We Buy? By Jennifer Culley (The University of Southern Mississippi) Keeping the Door Open – Ensuring Library Materials Are Accessible to All By Michael Paulmeno (Delta State University) Usage Comparison of Print and Electronic Theses and Dissertations at The University of Southern Mississippi By Sarah Mangrum and Elizabeth La Beaud (The University of Southern Mississippi) The Value of Oral History beyond Discovery and Preservation By Neil Guilbeau, Nickoal Eichmann-Kalwara, Hillary Richardsons (Mississippi State University)
Thursday Fandom Hearts Unite By Antoinette Giamalva and Evanne Flanders (Madison County Library System) Serving Mississippi’s Communities Since 1914: An Exploration of Mississippi’s Extension Service By Denise A. Wetzel (Mississippi State University) Read Your Way Across Mississippi By Elisabeth Scott and Amanda Redmond (Mississippi Library Commission) The Impact of Academic Libraries’ Usage of Instructional Technology on Student Learning via Embedded Librarianship and Information Literacy By Vanjury “V” Dozier (Madison County Library System) Telling your library’s story: By the numbers By Joy Garretson (Mississippi Library Commission) Jumpstarting Creativity - Pinterest for Ideas By Megan Fleming (Bolivar County Library System - Robinson-Carpenter Memorial Library) Mississippi Libraries Vol. 79 No. 3 • Fall 2016 Page 82 Conference Schedule at a Glance Schedule at a Glance Tuesday, October 18th 1:00 - 4:00 PM Registration Open Pre-conference - Health & Retirement Fair for Mississippi Librarians - 1:00 - 4:00 PM Main Hallway 4:00 - 5:00 PM MLA Executive Board Meeting - Room 6 Dinner Dinner on your own. Find some friends and discover a new place to dine! Haunted Vicksburg Ghost Walk - Ticketed $ 8:00 PM (Tour begins at the southwest corner of the Old Court House Museum at the corner of (arrive by 7:45 PM) Monroe and Grove Streets at the small circular park.) Address is 1022 Monroe Street, Vicksburg. Wednesday, October 19th Coffee & Doughnut Social - Near the Registration Desk 8:00 AM - 9:30 AM Sponsored by 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM Registration Open Welcome to the MLA Community: A Guide for New Members - Room 4 Southern Miss SLIS Alumni (New Members Roundtable) Breakfast - Room 7 MAGNOLIA Steering Committee Meeting - Ticketed $ 9:30 AM 9:30 AM
8:30 AM - Room 6 8:30 AM -
Librarianship 101 & 201 Reunion - Ticketed Past Presidents Brunch - Ticketed $ Spread the Word - Room 5 (Limited to MLA Past Presidents) - Room 3 Off-site at The Nogalas House at Poster Session Lightning Round 1 Walnut Hills Restaurant 10:30 AM 10:30 AM 10:30 AM 9:30 AM - 9:30 AM - Room 4 9:30 AM -
Building a Bookmobile on a Shoestring Using the Framework for Everyday Advocacy - Room 5 Information Literacy for Higher Budget - Room 3 Education in Instruction Connecting the Branches - Overcoming Communication Barriers Using WordPress - 11:30 AM 11:30 AM ACRL Featured Speaker: 10:30 AM - Room 4 10:30 AM - Sharon Mader 11:00 AM Exhibits Grand Opening and Ribbon Cutting 12:00 PM 10:30 AM - Integrating Southern Miss Public Library Section Luncheon Room 2 Gulf Coast Library Into Featured Speaker: the Local Community University Library Directors' Business Cal Shepard, State Librarian
Meeting - Room 4 12:30 PM Room 7 State Library of North Carolina 11:30 AM - 1:00 PM
11:30 AM - Room 3 - Ticketed $ 1:00 PM 12:00 - PM 12:00 PM - 1:30 PM Pre-Ordered Boxed Lunches available for pickup at the Concession Stand (No outside food may be brought into the Vicksburg Convention Center per management.) MLA BUSINESS MEETING & GENERAL SESSION 1:00 - 2:30 PM Zachary Benedict, Partner at MKM Architect + Design Rooms 1 & 2 - Sponsored by a LSTA Grant from IMLS All That Glitters: The Southern Miss Advocacy with Friends - Sponsored by the Children’s Book Festival Approaches Friends of Mississippi Libraries, Inc. Its Golden Anniversary - Room 3 Room 4 The Jacqueline House African- American Museum - Room 6 Long Range Planning Committee Business 3:30 PM 3:30 PM 3:30 PM
2:30 PM - 2:30 PM - Virtual Reality in the Library - Room 5 2:30 PM - 2:30 PM - Meeting - Room 6
Keep Mississippi Weird: Unusual "Jewels" Friends of Mississippi Libraries, Inc. in Special Collections - Room 3 Business Meeting - Room 4 Beta Phi Mu, Beta Psi Chapter Exhibits & Silent Auction Open 11:00 AM - & 5:00 PM! OpenExhibits Silent 11:00 AM Auction Public Library Section Business Meeting Business Meeting - Room 6 USM SLIS Focus Group - Room 5 4:30 PM 4:30 PM 4:30 PM
3:30 PM - 3:30 PM - 3:30 PM - Room 7 3:30 PM - Fay B. Kaigler Children's Book Festival 50th Anniversary Celebration 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM Exhibit Hall A - Ticketed President's Reception and Scholarship Bash - Ticketed $ 6:00 PM B'nai B'rith Literary Association (The BB Club), 721 Clay Street, Vicksburg Mississippi Libraries Vol. 79 No. 3 • Fall 2016 Page 83
Schedule at a Glance Thursday, October 20th 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM Registration Open ississippi ept o d cation pdate hat is o r ort eas rin the ississippi chool i rar ection B siness ore han a B ildin o Books eachin ective se o ocial edia in ississippi eetin Ba ies to eniors and All i raries oo Feat rin hat s n Bet een oo Creating a Pop Up Library: We’re More i e l anks 9:30 AM 9:30 AM 9:30 AM
8:30 AM - 8:30 AM - 8:30 AM - han st Books oo oo he irt o s Circle o t dent esearch arnessin the rod ctivit o the oster ession i htnin o nd Colla oration Bet een Classroo to Create e ocal istor oo chool lic i raries Collections oo Feat rin Anna Brannin oo Co nit treach ervices akin the 10:30 AM 10:30 AM 10:30 AM 9:30 AM - 9:30 AM - harin cience oo 9:30 AM - i rar o t o the i rar oo