DOCSLIB.ORG

IFLA Guidelines for Continuing Professional Development: Principles and Best Practices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IFLA Guidelines for Continuing Professional Development: Principles and Best Practices IFLA Guidelines for Continuing Professional Development: Principles and Best Practices Written by: Jana Varlejs, with input from Vivian Lewis, Susan Schnuer, Juanita Jara de Sumar of the Continuing Professional Development and Workplace Learning (CPDWL) Section Second edition of: Continuing Professional Development: Principles and Best Practices, 2006 Publication date: May 2016: Endorsed by the IFLA Professional Committee Jana Varlejs, 2016 © 2016 by Jana Varlejs. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (Unported) license. To view a copy of this license, visit: creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 IFLA P.O. Box 95312 2509 CH Den Haag Netherlands www.ifla.org 2 Table of Contents: Preface ................................................................................................................................. 6 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. 8 Introduction ........................................................................................................................14 Part I — Principles and Best Practices — By Role........................................................... 20 Chapter 1 — The learner ......................................................................................................................... 20 1.1 Principle ................................................................................................................................. 20 1.1.1 Rationale ........................................................................................................................ 20 1.2 Best practice .......................................................................................................................... 20 1.2.1 Self-assessment ............................................................................................................. 20 1.2.2 Performance appraisal ................................................................................................. 21 1.2.3 Competency gaps ......................................................................................................... 22 1.2.4 Personal learning plan ................................................................................................. 22 1.2.5 Current position pre-eminence .................................................................................. 23 1.3 Summary ................................................................................................................................ 23 Chapter 2 — The employer..................................................................................................................... 24 2.1 Principle ................................................................................................................................. 24 2.1.1 Rationale ........................................................................................................................ 24 2.2 Best practice .......................................................................................................................... 24 2.2.1 Overseer for staff development ................................................................................. 24 2.2.2 Needs assessment ........................................................................................................ 25 2.2.3 Learning opportunities ................................................................................................ 26 2.2.4 Documentation of staff progress .............................................................................. 28 2.2.5 Budget for staff development .................................................................................... 29 2.2.6 Work time for learning ................................................................................................ 30 2.2.7 Evaluation of staff development programme.......................................................... 32 2.3 Summary ................................................................................................................................ 32 Chapter 3 — Professional associations, consortia, government agencies, and other bodies with library development responsibilities ....................................................................................................... 33 3.1 Principle ................................................................................................................................. 33 3.1.1 Rationale ........................................................................................................................ 33 3.2 Best practice .......................................................................................................................... 33 3.2.1 Guidelines and recognition ........................................................................................ 33 3 3.2.2 Learning needs ............................................................................................................. 33 3.2.3 Coordination of efforts ............................................................................................... 34 3.2.4 Information dissemination ......................................................................................... 35 3.2.5 Sponsorship of learning resources ............................................................................ 35 3.2.6 Advocacy and policy.................................................................................................... 36 3.3 Summary ................................................................................................................................ 36 Chapter 4 — Library/Information Science (LIS) degree granting programmes ............................. 37 4.1 Principle ................................................................................................................................. 37 4.1.1 Rationale ........................................................................................................................ 37 4.2 Best practice .......................................................................................................................... 37 4.2.1 Motivating students whilst pursuing continuing education ................................... 37 4.2.2 Conducting and disseminating research ................................................................... 38 4.2.3 Encouraging LIS school involvement in continuing education............................ 38 4.2.4 Advising professional and government bodies ....................................................... 39 4.3 Summary ................................................................................................................................ 39 Chapter 5 — All providers ...................................................................................................................... 40 5.1 Principle ................................................................................................................................. 40 5.1.1 Rationale ........................................................................................................................ 40 5.2 Best practice .......................................................................................................................... 40 5.2.1 Expert and committed leadership ............................................................................. 40 5.2.2 Instructional design ..................................................................................................... 40 5.2.3 Learning activities ........................................................................................................ 41 5.2.4 Qualified instructors .................................................................................................... 42 5.2.5 Effective management ................................................................................................ 42 5.2.6 Transfer of training ...................................................................................................... 44 5.2.7 Evaluation ..................................................................................................................... 44 5.3 Summary ................................................................................................................................ 46 Part II — Future Concerns ................................................................................................ 47 1.0 Continuing professional development online – additional quality issues? ........................... 47 2.0 Looking ahead ............................................................................................................................... 49 Part III — Supporting Materials ....................................................................................... 50 Glossary ...................................................................................................................................................... 50 References .................................................................................................................................................. 54 4 Appendix A: 2006 Continuing Professional Development: Principles and Best Practices ............................................................................................................................. 68 Appendix B: Examples of Continuing Education Guidelines
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Digital Convergence and the Information
    Digital Convergence and the Information Profession in Cultural Heritage Organizations: Reconciling Internal and External Demands Paul F. Marty* School of Library and Information Studies, College of Communication and Information, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-2100 Abstract. Nearly twenty years ago, W. Boyd Rayward became one of the first academics to examine the past, present, and future of how “electronic information and the functional integration of libraries, archives, and museums” would affect the information profession, laying the groundwork for an entire research agenda on the topic of “digital convergence,” where the increased use of and reliance on digital resources in libraries, archives, and museums has increasingly blurred the traditional distinctions between these institutions. This paper explores how Rayward’s early work in this area influenced the development of this topic over time, focusing on how information professionals in cultural heritage organizations can and should reconcile their internal perceptions of identity with the external expectations of their users, particularly those who do not or cannot clearly distinguish between different institutions or the information resources they manage. In a world where the traditional assumptions we take for granted about information organization and access in libraries, archives, and museums are simply not shared by our users, the future of the information profession depends on the ability of cultural heritage information professionals to transcend the traditional
    [Show full text]
  • On International Library and Information Work ISSN 2058-8399 (Online)
    on International Library and Information Work ISSN 2058-8399 (Online) Volume 50, Number 2, 2019 Editorial 2 Attending IFLA WLIC 2019: a dream come true Laura Caganazzo 4 CONUL ERASMUS Staff Mobility Week:Dublin, 17-21 June 2019 Sarah Brain 13 She said “no!” to Trump and “yes!” to a mobile library: A view from the Hannover Mobile Library Congress Ian Stringer 19 Book Review 25 CILIP ILIG Business 27 Sad News CILIP ILIG Alan Hopkinson Award CILIP ILIG Committee Profile: Rachel Bickley 29 Calendar of Events 31 The contents of this journal may be shared under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence Editorial Welcome to another Open Access issue of CILIP ILIG Focus! 2019 is rapidly coming to an end and it has been a lively year for us at CILIP ILIG, with many new faces on the committee, plenty of projects to get involved in, and a host of events - culminating in a very successful “Decolonising library collections and practices” conference in Cardiff last month. 2019 also saw the launch of CILIP’s Working Internationally scheme - an exciting Arts Council-funded initiative to promote collaborative working between libraries here in the UK and their international counterparts: https://www.cilip.org.uk/page/workinginternationally In a climate of ongoing political uncertainly, this is an important commitment to internationalism from CILIP. One stated aim of the scheme is to #BuildBridgesNotWalls – an idea which remains pertinent given the continued prominence of divisive politics, even despite the Berlin Wall having been torn down some thirty years ago now. This issue features three examples of international librarians converging in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archivist As a Modern Information Professional: Analysis of Skills in Light of Literature and Curricular Training
    ARTIGO RDBCI: Revista Digital Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação 10.20396/rdbci.v15i2.8644523 RDBCI : Digital Journal of Library and Information Science THE ARCHIVIST AS A MODERN INFORMATION PROFESSIONAL: ANALYSIS OF SKILLS IN LIGHT OF LITERATURE AND CURRICULAR TRAINING O ARQUIVISTA COMO MODERNO PROFISSIONAL DA INFORMAÇÃO: ANÁLISE DE COMPETÊNCIAS À LUZ DA LITERATURA E DA FORMAÇÃO CURRICULAR EL ARCHIVERO CON INFORMACIÓN PROFESIONAL MODERNA: ANÁLISIS DE COMPETENCIA EN LA LUZ DE LA LITERATURA Y PLAN DE ESTUDIOS DE FORMACIÓN ¹Jorge Santa Anna Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo Correspondência ¹Jorge Santa Anna Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo. Vitória, ES. E-mail: [email protected] ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0709-3639 Submitted: 13-09-2016 Accepted: 13-02-2017 Published: 28-04-2017 JITA: AC. Relationship of LIS with other fields. © RDBCI: Rev. Digit. Bibliotecon. Cienc. Inf. Campinas, SP v.15 n.2 p. 289-307 May/Aug. 2017 [289] RDBCI: Revista Digital Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação DOI 10.20396/rdbci.v15i2.8644523 RDBCI : Digital Journal of Library and Information Science RESUMO: As demandas e exigências do mercado de trabalho no âmbito das profissões da informação desencadeiam necessidades de aprimoramento das práticas profissionais, por conseguinte, remetem à reforma curricular, haja vista formar profissionais competentes que atendam as necessidades sociais. Os arquivistas, ao serem categorizados como profissionais da informação, também se inserem nesse contexto, devendo adquirir status de um Moderno Profissional da Informação (MIP). Sendo assim, este estudo analisa as competências do MIP relacionando-as ao arquivista, com base na literatura e na formação curricular. Investiga na literatura o que vem sendo publicado sobre o MIP; compara as competências do MIP com o arquivista; e investiga essas competências no âmbito da formação arquivística.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Library Outreach Services on Elder Users in Rural Virginia: a Case Study of the Washington County Public Library
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 5-2018 The Impact of Library Outreach Services on Elder Users in Rural Virginia: A Case Study of the Washington County Public Library Everette Scott Sikes University of Tennessee Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Recommended Citation Sikes, Everette Scott, "The Impact of Library Outreach Services on Elder Users in Rural Virginia: A Case Study of the Washington County Public Library. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2018. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/5069 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Everette Scott Sikes entitled "The Impact of Library Outreach Services on Elder Users in Rural Virginia: A Case Study of the Washington County Public Library." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Information Sciences. Bharat Mehra, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Rachel A. Fleming-May, Vandana Singh Accepted for the Council: Dixie L. Thompson Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) The Impact of Library Outreach Services on Elder Users in Rural Virginia: A Case Study of the Washington County Public Library A Thesis Presented for the Master of Science Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Everette Scott Sikes May 2018 Copyright © 2018 by Everette Scott Sikes All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Descriptive Tagging Practices by Library, Archive, and Museum Professionals Using an Inter-Indexing Consistency Approach
    1 Christine Angel – St. John’s University A Comparison of Descriptive Tagging Practices by Library, Archive, and Museum Professionals using an Inter-Indexing Consistency Approach Abstract This study is a comparison of the descriptive tagging practices among library, archive, and museum professionals using an inter-indexing consistency approach. The first purpose of this study was to determine the extent of the similarities and differences among professional groups when assigning descriptive tags to different object types typically found within the library, archive and museum environments. The second purpose of this study was to compare the descriptive practices of these three professional groups to different object types typically found within the library, archive and museum environments. Findings from this study indicate while there were few differences in depth of indexing per object type among professional groups, various levels of description were applied to the different object types. Levels of description were derived from: (1) the three dimensional or physical media pictured; (2) the digital surrogate; (3) the objects aboutness; (4) the technique and materials used to make the physical object, and; (5) written text. Data analysis also indicates there was a significant difference between means in the total number of exact matched primary tags applied per object type. As such, information retrieval within the online environment could be improved if there was better quality control in the application of the different levels of description among information professionals. Introduction Collaboration among library, archive, and museum professionals is uncommon especially in the online environment. One reason for this is because information professionals have “…often emphasized their distinctions from one another, largely on the basis of the physical format of the information they held” (O’Toole and Cox 2006, xi-xii).
    [Show full text]
  • The Faces of the College of Information Editor’S Table of Letter Contents
    www.coi.unt.edu Volume 69 Number 2 Fall 2010 The intersection of People, Information, and Technology. The Faces of the College of Information editor’s table of letter contents Cover: Issue highlights Features 3- 7 Throughout most ofCall Number’s sixty-nine in interesting fellowships and internships at the College 8-9 year history, it has provided news of the school National Library of Medicine, the U.S. Department and updates on the alumni with little reporting on of Transportation, Library of Congress, University Departments 10-13 students currently studying at UNT. In fairly recent of Puerto Rico, University of North Texas Health times, however, we have included a student section in Science Center, and the American Embassy in Rome. Faculty 14-19 each publication which has grown to several pages, five Other articles in this issue cover exciting news such in the last issue, but we have not focused on students as the Department of Library & Information Sciences Staff 19 in our feature or theme section of the magazine. This cohort grant called LEAP (Library Education for issue is the first to make a special effort to show our US-Affiliated Pacific) that will begin in fall 2011, Students 19-23 readers what outstanding professionals the College of articles about the new LIS Department chair and Information is producing. three new faculty members, and the opportunity to Alumni 23-30 The Dean’s column and a number of articles provide study abroad in summer 2011. For the Department of overviews of our student body while others include Learning Technologies, there is a report of the trip to Advancement 30-31 reports on individuals, 65 in all.
    [Show full text]
  • DOCUMENT RESUME Moving Beyond Planning To
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 425 698 IR 018 956 TITLE Moving beyond Planning to Technology Implementation. Resource Manual. A Portfolio of Processes. INSTITUTION Mid-Continent Regional Educational Lab., Aurora, CO. SPONS AGENCY Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED), Washington, DC. PUB DATE 1998-00-00 NOTE 313p.; This document is comprised largely of pages photocopied from other documents, books, and journal articles--some figures, illustrations, and text may, therefore, reproduce poorly. CONTRACT RJ96006101 PUB TYPE Reports Descriptive (141) Guides - Non-Classroom (055) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC13 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Computer Assisted Instruction; Computer Managed Instruction; Computer Networks; *Computer Uses in Education; *Educational Technology; Elementary Secondary Education; Information Literacy; *Information Technology; Integrated Learning Systems; Microcomputers; Professional Development; *Program Implementation; Strategic Planning ABSTRACT The goal of this technology implementation workshop is to provide education leaders with frameworks, models, and processes for decision making in relation to technology implementation issues. The workshop components are based on a systems view of implementation comprised of Human Capacity Building, Technical Infrastructure, Organizational Structures and Support, and Connections to Teaching and Learning. This participant manual will serve as a portfolio for individuals to experience and collect frameworks, processes, and strategies that can be utilized in their respective education systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Essays on Archives, Public Policy, and Collective Memory. Edited by Cheryl Avery and Mona Holmlund
    PUBLICATION REVIEWS 55 Better Off Forgetting? Essays on Archives, Public Policy, and Collective Memory. Edited by Cheryl Avery and Mona Holmlund. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2010. 242 pp. Index. Softcover. $24.95. $22.00 for SAA members. To ask archivists if society is better off forgetting is a bold and heretical question. The title of this volume of essays is somewhat enigmatic, and raises questions such as: Who is forgetting? What is being forgotten? What is the meaning of forgetting? These questions are never directly answered, and the essays themselves do not explicitly ad- dress the title’s question. A close reading of the introduction is required to discern the editors’ goal in assembling this particular set of essays: to explore the neglect of the archival enterprise from the perspective of Canadian public policy. One word that characterizes the contents of this collection of essays is “wide- ranging.” Co-editors Cheryl Avery and Mona Holmlund (archivist and art history professor, respectively, at the University of Saskatchewan) have assembled diverse authors from different fields to address the many issues that affect the well-being of the archival enterprise. The wide scope is reflected in the titles of the five parts: “The History of Funding,” “Access and Privacy,” “The Digital Age,” “Accountability and the Public Sphere,” and “Resource for the Present.” Fortunately, the volume includes an index to improve access to the host of ideas discussed. In part one, archivists Marion Beyea and Shelley Sweeney address the inadequate level of funding for archives in Canada. Beyea recounts the development of the Canadian archival system in the 1970s and 1980s (including public funding for archival process- ing and professional development) and its subsequent erosion.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study Into the Use and Usefulness of Applied LIS Research in New
    68th IFLA Council and General Conference August 18-24, 2002 Code Number: 009-118-E Division Number: VII Professional Group: Library and Information Science Journals Joint Meeting with: - Meeting Number: 118 Simultaneous Interpretation: - Do Information Professionals Use Research Published in LIS Journals? Kathlyn J. Turner Reference/Document Delivery Science Library University of Otago Dunedin, New Zealand Abstract: This paper is a précis of a research project conducted in March 2001 for the Master of Library and Information Studies at New Zealand’s Victoria University of Wellington. The project investigated the perceptions of information professionals (denoting qualified practitioners) in New Zealand regarding applied LIS (Library and Information Studies) research. It was hoped the findings would direct the future production of such research in a way that might promote its use. The project assessed the local situation and attempted to redress an imbalance in the literature created by previous studies focusing on the production, rather than consultation, of LIS research by the practising community. Project participants were asked to indicate their amount of research use; their motivations for and against consulting the research; and their opinions concerning the relationship between LIS research and practice, and how it might be improved. Amounts of research consultation were compared with the following participant variables: S Library / information qualifications; S Experience, indicated by number of years / months in current position; S Library / information centre size; S Organisational context of the library / information centre; S Involvement in professional activities such as conferences. Anyone wishing to read the original research paper is welcome to contact me using the following email address: [email protected] 1 Introduction The literature repeatedly indicates that research use by information professionals is remarkably low (McClure and Bishop, 1989).
    [Show full text]
  • Education for School Librarians: Trends and Issues from Selected Developing Countries
    World Library and Information Congress: 69th IFLA General Conference and Council 1-9 August 2003, Berlin Code Number: 069-E Meeting: 156. Education and Training & School Libraries and Resource Centres - Workshop Simultaneous Interpretation: - Education for School Librarians: Trends and Issues from Selected Developing Countries Sandra Lee, Gerald Brown, Constanza Mekis and Diljit Singh Abstract : A survey of the situation of school libraries in several developing countries. The main problems are huge populations to educate, budget limitations, and the training of teachers. Nevertheless, the progress of school libraries shows the continuous nature of improvement. International associations can help local communities by providing the necessary links to share experiences. Professional and personal competencies expressed in statements in developed countries have guided the education and performance appraisal of teacher librarians for many years. Continuous technological change, the importance of a collaborative instructional role and leadership are common themes in the literature (Bens, 1999; Fulton, 1998; Scheirer, 2000; Haycock, 1999). Role statements such as that published in Canada’s (ATLCA, 1997) are referenced widely in the literature and echoed by associations around the world. The IFLA/UNESCO School Library Guidelines were published in 2002. The evolution of the document is discussed by Hannesdottir challenged by varying definitions and stages of school library development around the world. Three basic elements emerge from the document including information studies, management and education. (Hannesdottir, 1995) The guidelines are intended to provide an integrated role statement linking information professional and teaching partner. (IFLA/UNESCO, 2002) IASL members have compiled the following snapshots of school libraries. This comparative discussion mixes some very different political and economic contexts but is linked by the 1 common theme of looking at the road ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • Chair-Elect (1 Position) Sara Borden Sara Borden Is a Certified Archivist
    Chair-Elect (1 position) ● Sara Borden Sara Borden is a Certified Archivist with a Master of Arts degree in history with a concentration in archives from Temple University’s Center for Public History. She is a dedicated archivist, public historian, and information professional who strives to be the best possible steward to the collections in her care and offer her patrons the best possible research experience. As with many archivists, archives is Borden's second career, but she considers it her true calling. She has loved history and doing research her whole life. Borden loves helping researchers discover the document that is the key to their inquiry, or teaching students that archives are not intimidating places and that when they visit archives, they can and should touch the documents. There is nothing quite like seeing a student make a connection between an historical event and a piece of paper that was created during that time. She works on a college campus and not-so-secretly believes she has the best job at the university. Currently, Borden is the Head of Archival Collections and Services at Rowan University Archives and Special Collections (UASC), where she has held several positions since her hiring in 2016. Borden's responsibilities include overseeing the daily functions of the UASC, processing collections, creating access points, writing and editing finding aids, making decisions regarding digitization, working with on- and off-campus stakeholders, fielding researcher inquiries, and instructing students. Prior to her time at Rowan, Borden was the Digital Services Librarian at the Historical Society of Pennsylvania and also held positions at the Penn Museum and PhillyHistory.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol 19 No 2.Pub
    Contents MLA Papers and Posters Win Awards HYPOTHESIS: ————————— The Journal of the Research Section of MLA Marcy Brown Wins First VOLUME 19, Number 2 Hospital Librarian Research Award Summer 2005 --Submitted by Carole Gilbert, Awards Committee Chair MLA Papers and Posters Win Awards— Hospital Librarian Research MLA is always a wonderful place to get ideas for projects and Award……………………….….….…....1 research. This year was no different as nearly 100 papers and almost 200 posters were presented by our colleagues. Officers and Executive Committee......2 The Awards Committee reviewed all abstracts prior to attend- ing MLA and selected those most likely to be research-based for further review. However, all posters were reviewed and as Chapter Research Committees Report: many papers as possible were attended by a group of volunteer The Physiology of a Research Study reviewers. Judges used a standard evaluation form for scoring ……………………………………….....3 the presentations and posters. At least two reviewers scored the papers and posters. After the annual meeting, score sheets were compiled and judges made the final determination of winners by International Research Reviews: email. What Public Health Teachers Know About Their Library Services and What are Their Needs and Expectations Thanks to all those who helped judge abstracts both at home and from a Scientific Library…..….…….…..4 at the meeting. This year I shared the huge job of judging pa- pers and posters with Molly Harris who took responsibility for the papers. Altogether we had a volunteer crew of more than 25 Research Section Business Meeting volunteers who made life much easier by selecting and critiqu- Annual Minutes……….………………...9 ing.
    [Show full text]