Monitoring of Occupational and Environmental Aeroallergens – EAACI Position Paper
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
POSITION PAPER Monitoring of occupational and environmental aeroallergens – EAACI Position Paper Concerted action of the EAACI IG Occupational Allergy and Aerobiology & Air Pollution M. Raulf1, J. Buters2, M. Chapman3, L. Cecchi4, F. de Blay5, G. Doekes6, W. Eduard7, D. Heederik6, M. F. Jeebhay8, S. Kespohl1,E.Krop6, G. Moscato9, G. Pala10, S. Quirce11, I. Sander1, V. Schlunssen€ 12, T. Sigsgaard12, J. Walusiak-Skorupa13, M. Wiszniewska13, I. M. Wouters6 & I. Annesi-Maesano14,15 1Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Ruhr-Universitat€ Bochum (IPA), Bochum; 2ZAUM- Center of Allergy & Environment, Helmholtz Zentrum Munchen/Technical€ Universitat€ Munchen,€ Christine Kuhne€ Center for Allergy Research and Education (CK-CARE), Member of the German Center of Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany; 3Indoor Biotechnologies Ltd, Cardiff, UK; 4Interdepartmental Centre of Bioclimatology, University of Florence, Allergy and Clinical Immunology Section, Azienda Sanitaria di Prato, Prato, Italy; 5Department of Chest Diseases, University Hospital Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France; 6Division of Environmental Epidemiology, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; 7Department of Chemical and Biological Work Environment/National Institute of Occupational Health, Institute of Medical Biology, University in Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway; 8Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health Research, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; 9Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine of the University of Pavia, Pavia; 10Occupational Physician’s Division, Local Health Authority of Sassari, Sassari, Italy; 11Department of Allergy, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ) and CIBER of Respiratory Diseases CIBERES, Madrid, Spain; 12Department of Public Health, Section for Environment, Occupation and Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; 13Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Lodz, Poland; 14INSERM, Equipe Epidemiologie des allergies et des maladies respiratorires UMR-S 707, Paris; 15EPAR, FacultedeM edecine Saint- Antoine, UPMC, Paris, France To cite this article: Raulf M, Buters J, Chapman M, Cecchi L, de Blay F, Doekes G, Eduard W, Heederik D, Jeebhay MF, Kespohl S, Krop E, Moscato G, Pala G, Quirce S, Sander I, Schlunssen€ V, Sigsgaard T, Walusiak-Skorupa J, Wiszniewska M, Wouters IM, Annesi-Maesano I. Monitoring of occupational and environmental aeroallergens – EAACI Position Paper. Allergy 2014; 69: 1280–1299. Keywords Abstract allergen monitoring; environment; immuno- Exposure to high molecular weight sensitizers of biological origin is an important logical tests; occupational exposure; sampling methods. risk factor for the development of asthma and rhinitis. Most of the causal aller- gens have been defined based on their reactivity with IgE antibodies, and in many Correspondence cases, the molecular structure and function of the allergens have been established. Monika Raulf, PhD, Institute for Prevention Significant information on allergen levels that cause sensitization and allergic and Occupational Medicine of the German symptoms for several major environmental and occupational allergens has been Social Accident Insurance, Ruhr-Universitat€ reported. Monitoring of high molecular weight allergens and allergen carrier par- € Bochum (IPA), Burkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, ticles is an important part of the management of allergic respiratory diseases and 44789 Bochum, Germany. requires standardized allergen assessment methods for occupational and environ- Tel.: +49-(0)234-302-4582 mental (indoor and outdoor) allergen exposure. The aim of this EAACI task Fax: +49-(0)234-302-4610 force was to review the essential points for monitoring environmental and occu- E-mail: [email protected] pational allergen exposure including sampling strategies and methods, processing Accepted for publication 30 May 2014 of dust samples, allergen analysis, and quantification. The paper includes a sum- mary of different methods for sampling and allergen quantification, as well as DOI:10.1111/all.12456 their pros and cons for various exposure settings. Recommendations are being made for different exposure scenarios. Edited by: Marek Sanak 1280 Allergy 69 (2014) 1280–1299 © 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd Raulf et al. Monitoring of aeroallergens Key Message Box • Effectiveness of interventions to reduce allergen exposure can only be evaluated if appropriate aller- • A key factor for the development of respiratory gen measurements are included. allergy is the contact between the respiratory organ • More harmonized and validated exposure monitor- and inhaled air containing the allergens; most air- ing procedures to assess the relations between aller- borne allergens are components of or carried by gic outcome (sensitization, disease, efficacy of particles of 1–100 lm diameter. treatment, and preventive measurement) and aller- • Aeroallergen monitoring is a stepwise process gen exposure are needed. including selection of the suitable exposure assess- ment strategy, sampling methods, extraction proce- dure, allergen measurement, and data analysis. Exposure to airborne allergens of biological origin is an Choice of optimal procedures depends on the • important risk factor for the development of allergic asthma setting and objectives of allergen monitoring: in and rhinitis (1). For this EAACI task force report, we epidemiological (population) studies on exposure– defined ‘allergens’ as high molecular weight type I sensitizers; response relation, in intervention studies, in diagno- thus, macromolecules elicit specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) sis and follow-up of individual patients, in hazard responses in humans and exclude microbial pro-inflammatory identification for disease clusters, during identifica- components such as endotoxin or b-glucans. Most of the tion of cases of ‘new allergy’ or as part of routine thus-defined allergens are (glyco)proteins with molecular monitoring or health surveillance program. weights between 6 and 100 kD (refer to allergen databases in Ideally, allergen exposure assessment should be • Table 1). Although low molecular weight sensitizers are of based on (active) measurement of airborne concen- crucial importance for occupational airway disease, they are trations (outcome: allergen in ng (or pg) per m3 or also excluded because nonimmunological methods are used in particles per m3). In occupational studies, low- for their air monitoring. In practice, however, the term aller- flow personal airborne sampling in the breathing gen refers to either a single molecule, a mixture of molecules zone is the recommended standard procedure. For from the same source, or allergen-carrying particles such as outdoor exposures, particularly for pollen and grass pollen. mold spores, stationary air sampling at high flow The most relevant route of exposure for developing respi- rates is commonly used. In the indoor (domestic) ratory allergy is the contact between the respiratory organ environment, the allergen content of settled or res- and inhaled allergens. Airborne allergens are not present as ervoir dust is typically used to provide estimates of single molecules in the gas phase but components of identifi- exposure levels. able particles such as pollen grains (10–60 lm) or mold Exposure assessment for individual patients or a • spores (2–100 lm), or adsorbed to and carried on less well specific location requires repeated measurements to characterized and heterogeneous inorganic or organic dust account for temporal and spatial variations in air- particles as in house dust. As the site of deposition in the borne allergen levels. In population studies with respiratory tract determines health outcomes (Fig. 1A,B), the larger numbers of subjects in exposure categories, aerodynamic size and shape distribution of the particles is of repeated measurements are recommended in a lim- much relevance: inhalable, thoracic, and respirable fractions ited subset to document the reproducibility of the have been defined for occupational, indoor, and outdoor procedure and the within-workers variation of environments and should be measured depending on the out- exposure. In the diagnosis of individual patients, come of interest. anamnesis must include attention to the exposure history, and if the combined evidence of anamnesis and diagnostic tests (e.g., skin prick test, specific IgE, provocation test) may be sufficient for a define Table 1 Databases of type I allergens and other agents causing diagnosis, management of the patient can be pri- occupational respiratory diseases marily focused on allergen avoidance without the Allergen databases need for allergen measurement. http://www.allergen.org; WHO International Union of • Allergen exposure assessment procedures should be Immunological Societies: adequately validated, and optimization of the elution http://www.allergome.org; Allergome: and storage protocol is important. Immunoassays http://www.meduniwien.ac.at/allergens/allfam/; AllFam: based on monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies are Causative Occupational Agents databases the method of choice for allergen quantification. http://eaaci.net/sections-a-igs/ig-on-occupational-allergy/ • Results from different immunoassays are not allergen-list/235-occupational-allergens-list directly comparable and need to be standardized http://www.asthme.csst.qc.ca/document/Info_Gen/AgenProf/ against