DOCSLIB.ORG

The Most Dangerous Man in America: Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers Teaching Guide I © 2010 Zinn Education Project, Judith Ehrlich, and Rick Goldsmith I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Most Dangerous Man in America: Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers Teaching Guide I © 2010 Zinn Education Project, Judith Ehrlich, and Rick Goldsmith I The Most Dangerous Man in America: Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers Teaching Guide i © 2010 Zinn Education Project, Judith Ehrlich, and Rick Goldsmith i Teaching Guide The Most Dangerous Man in America: Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers This teaching guide was prepared for middle school, high school, and college classrooms to enhance student understanding of the issues raised in the film. The lessons are appropriate for U.S. history, government, and language arts classrooms. The guide was developed by the Zinn Education Project in collaboration with the The Most Dangerous Man in America filmmakers Judith Ehrlich and Rick Goldsmith. Written by Bill Bigelow Sylvia McGauley Tom McKenna Hyung Nam Julie Treick O’Neill © 2010 Zinn Education Project, Judith Ehrlich, and Rick Goldsmith Contact the Zinn Education Project (www.zinnedproject.org) for permission to reprint any of the contents in course packets, newsletters, books, or other publications. Contents About the Film . 1 About the Guide . 3 Introduction . 5 Lesson One: What Do We Know About the Vietnam War? Forming Essential Questions . 11 Lesson Two: Rethinking the Teaching of the Vietnam War. 15 Lesson Three: Questioning the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. 27 Lesson Four: The Most Dangerous Man in America Reception . 31 Lesson Five: Film Writing and Discussion Questions . 51 Lesson Six: The Trial of Daniel Ellsberg . 59 Lesson Seven: Blowing the Whistle: Personal Writing . 71 Lesson Eight: Choices, Actions and Alternatives . 81 Resources . 87 Credits and Acknowledgments . 97 Contents v © 2010 Zinn Education Project, Judith Ehrlich, and Rick Goldsmith v About the Film The Most Dangerous Man in America: Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers The MosT Dangerous Man in aMerica and risks life in prison to end the war he helped catapults us to 1971 where we find America in the plan. It is a story that held the world in its grip, grip of a dirty war based on lies. And Dr. Daniel with daily headlines, the top story on the nightly Ellsberg, one of the nation’s leading war planners, news for weeks on end. has the documents to prove it. Armed with 7,000 Ellsberg’s leak of the top secret Pentagon pages of top secret documents he leaks the truth Papers sets into motion an extraordinary series of about the Vietnam War to the New York Times events. The Nixon administration first goes after Daniel Ellsberg worked for the State Department in Vietnam from mid-1965 to mid-1967. About the Film 1 © 2010 Zinn Education Project, Judith Ehrlich, and Rick Goldsmith 1 Our tale is told by Ellsberg— as narrator, in current interviews and riveting archival footage— and a cast of supporting characters who “lived” the Pentagon Papers episode including Ellsberg’s wife and son, “co-conspirator” Tony Russo, historian/activist Howard Zinn, journalists Hedrick Smith and Max Frankel, attorneys Lenny Weinglass and James Goodale, Watergate principals Egil “Bud” Krogh and John Dean, and—in a rarely seen interview and his own secret White House tapes—Presi- H dent Nixon himself. I © lka artmann The film speaks directly to Daniel Ellsberg with his son Michael at the April 26, 1980 Anti-Nuclear Rally the world today, as national in San Francisco. security and the people’s right to know are in constant the nation’s press, resulting in a First Amend- tension. It raises questions about civil cour- ment battle that, within two weeks, ends up in age, following conscience, taking risks, and the Supreme Court. Ellsberg goes underground speaking truth to power. It challenges people to avoid a nationwide FBI manhunt. When he everywhere who are looking to better under- emerges, he is hailed as a hero, accused of being a stand the world of power and who search their traitor, ostracized by friends, and finds himself on own hearts for ways to take a stand and make trial for his life. a difference. tHe MOsT DANGErOUS Produced and directed by AcAdemy AwArd® MAN IN AMERICa NomiNee tHe MOsT DANGErOUS MAN IN AMERICa DANIEL ELLSBERG AND Best Documentary Feature tHe MOsT THE PENTAGON PAPERS A film by Judith Ehrlich & Rick Goldsmith DANIEL ELLSBERG AND THE PENTAGON PAPERS PENTAGON THE AND ELLSBERG DANIEL Judith Ehrlich and Rick Freedom oF expression AwArd - NatioNal Board of review ToronTo inTernATionAl Film FesTivAl - official SelectioN inTernATionAl documenTAry Film FesTivAl AmsTerdAm (idFA) - Special Jury award DANGErOUS pAlm springs inTernATionAl Film FesTivAl - audieNce award, BeSt documeNtary MAN IN Goldsmith. AMERICa DANIELAND ELLSBERG THE “A great teaching tool! The Pentagon Papers controversy remains PENTAGON PAPERS the key test case of press freedom vs. national security and For more information this film brilliantly lays out the competing claims with a rare combination of objectivity and passion.” – Robert Scheer, Journalist and professor of Communications, University of Southern California “Detailed, clearly told, persuasive” – Mike Hale, THE NEw YORk TIMES about the film, including In 1971, Daniel Ellsberg, a high-level Pentagon official and Vietnam War strategist, concludes that the war is based on decades of lies and leaks 7,000 pages of top secret documents to The New York Times, making headlines around the world. Hailed as a hero, vilified as a traitor, and ostracized by even his closest colleagues, statements from each of Ellsberg risks life in prison to stop a war he helped plan. This political thriller is a riveting story of how one man’s profound change of heart led directly to Watergate, Nixon’s resignation and the end of the Vietnam War. DVD BONUS FEATURES: • The Nixon Tapes (audio highlights from the Oval Office) the directors, visit • Chapters and curriculum guide • Daniel Ellsberg today AcAdemy AwArd® • Spanish subtitles available • Filmmaker bios • More NomiNee 94 minutes / Color / 16:9 / Stereo or 5.1 surround / closed captions cc Best Documentary Feature www.mostdangerousman. A film by FOR EDUCATIONAL New Day Films • PO Box 1084 ISBN: 978-1-57448-266-9 Harriman, NY 10926 • 888-367-9154 USE ONLY FOR EDUCATIONAL Judith Ehrlich USE ONLY www.newday.com Any unauthorized use or duplication of this DVD is prohibited by law. & Rick Goldsmith org. 2 The Most Dangerous Man in America: Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers Teaching Guide © 2010 Zinn Education Project, Judith Ehrlich, and Rick Goldsmith About the Teaching Guide This Teaching guide was prepared for high people, themes, events, and issues that are in the school and college classrooms to enhance student film through a simulated reception with close to understanding of the issues raised in the film, The 30 characters. Most Dangerous Man in America: Daniel Ellsberg Lesson Five: Film Writing and Discussion and the Pentagon Papers. The lessons are appro- Questions provides a wealth of discussion ques- priate for U.S. history, government and language tions and writing prompts for use during and arts classrooms. The guide was developed by the after the film. Zinn Education Project in collaboration with Lessons Six through Eight are for use after Judith Ehrlich and Rick Goldsmith. students have viewed the film. Using a variety of teaching strategies, includ- Lesson Six: The Trial of Daniel Ellsberg is ing role play, critical reading, discussion, mock a mock trial that invites students to determine trial, small group imaginative writing, and per- what precedent might have been set with the trial sonal narrative, the teaching guide encourages of Ellsberg and Russo if the case had not been students to consider some of Vietnam’s lessons. dismissed. Lesson Seven: Blowing the Whistle: One key lesson of the film is that we all have the Personal Writing provides students with an potential to be “truth-tellers.” Although not all opportunity to explore the ways they themselves students will have the opportunity to affect the regularly make important choices about whether course of history as Daniel Ellsberg did, all will or not to resist injustice or remain silent. be in positions to make important decisions in Lesson Eight: Choices, Actions and Alterna- the name of justice. tives helps students explore how human agency Lessons One through Four are for use prior shapes history. Using the choice-points of the to showing the film. Vietnam War, students can recognize the impor- Lesson One: What Do We Know About the tant consequences of decisions and actions by Vietnam War? Forming Essential Questions people in history and how they can be agents who helps the teacher assess what students already can co-shape their world today. know or think they know and surfaces essential The Resources section offers a selection of questions that can be referenced while viewing recommended books, films, and websites. For the film. everyone using this guide, an essential background Lessons Two and Three introduce the history reading is Chapter 18: “The Impossible Victory: of the Vietnam War that Daniel Ellsberg sought Vietnam” from Howard Zinn’s A People’s History to make public with the Pentagon Papers and is of the United States (HarperCollins, 2005). still missing from most textbooks. Although it would be ideal to use all the les- Lesson Four: The Most Dangerous Man in sons, each lesson is a stand-alone activity. America Reception prepares students for the About the Teaching Guide 3 © 2010 Zinn Education Project, Judith Ehrlich, and Rick Goldsmith 3 Introduction Wouldn’t you go to jail to help end the war? —Daniel Ellsberg ask young people simple quesTions It’s not surprising. Many Americans who about America’s war in Vietnam. Why was the lived through the war in Vietnam found they United States in Vietnam? For how long? Who also lacked basic information necessary for a was the enemy? Who won? Most, if not all, will solid understanding of a war that demanded struggle to find answers. They don’t know.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Copyright by Nhu Quynh-Thuy Truong 2009
    Copyright by Nhu Quynh-Thuy Truong 2009 Renewing Political Legitimacy: Pragmatic Reforms and Doi Moi by Nhu Quynh-Thuy Truong, B.A. Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Asian Studies The University of Texas at Austin May 2009 Renewing Political Legitimacy: Pragmatic Reforms and Doi Moi Approved by Supervising Committee: Abstract Renewing Political Legitimacy: Pragmatic Reforms and Doi Moi Nhu Quynh-Thuy Truong, M.A. The University of Texas at Austin, 2009 Supervisors: Huaiyin Li & William Hurst The Vietnamese Communist Party (VCP) first launched Doi Moi [Renovation] in 1986— 10 years after the VCP officially assumed power in 1976 of the Socialist Republics of Vietnam. As the VCP describes, Doi Moi is a comprehensive economic reform package with new initiatives toward building ―a mixed economy‖ that introduces ―market mechanism with state management and a socialist orientation‖ to Vietnam‘s economy. With Doi Moi, pragmatism has evidently taken center stage in place of dogmatic concerns for ideological correctness. The thesis seeks to first examine the conditions and factors that gave impetus for the economic reforms in Vietnam. These conditions and factors are especially evident when they are examined in a comparative context with the Soviet Union and China‘s experiences with similar reforms as they are done here in the thesis. Moreover, the change of orientation from a centrally planned economy to market-oriented economy is reflected in Doi Moi‘s decentralization and economic liberalization reforms as well as the VCP‘s opening up to international reintegration and reconciliation with namely the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Tape Subject
    1 NIXON PRESIDENTIAL MATERIALS STAFF Tape Subject Log (rev. Mar-02) Conversation No. 140-1 Date: August 14, 1972 Time: 7:55 pm Location: Camp David Study Table The Camp David operator talked with the President. Request for a call to John D. Ehrlichman -Ehrlichman’s location Conversation No. 140-2 Date: August 15, 1972 Time: Unknown between 8:43 pm and 9:30 pm Location: Camp David Study Table The President talked with the Camp David operator. [See Conversation No. 202-12] Request for a call to Julie Nixon Eisenhower Conversation No. 140-3 Date: August 15, 1972 Time: 9:30 pm - 9:35 pm Location: Camp David Study Table The President talked with Julie Nixon Eisenhower. [See Conversation No. 202-13] 2 NIXON PRESIDENTIAL MATERIALS STAFF Tape Subject Log (rev. Mar-02) ***************************************************************** BEGIN WITHDRAWN ITEM NO. 1 [Personal returnable] [Duration: 4m 57s ] END WITHDRAWN ITEM NO. 1 ***************************************************************** Conversation No. 140-4 Date: August 16, 1972 Time: Unknown between 8:15 am and 8:21 am Location: Camp David Study Table The President talked with the Camp David operator. [See Conversation No. 202-14] Request for a call to Alexander M. Haig, Jr. Conversation No. 140-5 Date: August 16, 1972 Time: 8:21 am - 8:29 am Location: Camp David Study Table The President talked with Alexander M. Haig, Jr. [See Conversation No. 202-15] Paul C. Warnke -George S. McGovern's statement -Possible briefing of Warnke -Security clearance process -Questions on Pentagon Papers 3 NIXON PRESIDENTIAL MATERIALS STAFF Tape Subject Log (rev. Mar-02) -The President’s instructions -Report by Richard M.
    [Show full text]
  • Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) ‘Whose Vietnam?’ - ‘Lessons learned’ and the dynamics of memory in American foreign policy after the Vietnam War Beukenhorst, H.B. Publication date 2012 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Beukenhorst, H. B. (2012). ‘Whose Vietnam?’ - ‘Lessons learned’ and the dynamics of memory in American foreign policy after the Vietnam War. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:02 Oct 2021 Bibliography Primary sources cited (Archival material, government publications, reports, surveys, etc.) ___________________________________________________________ Ronald Reagan Presidential Library (RRPL), Simi Valley, California NSC 1, February 6, 1981: Executive Secretariat, NSC: folder NSC 1, NSC Meeting Files, Ronald Reagan Presidential Library (RRPL). ‘News clippings’, Folder: ‘Central American Speech April 27, 1983 – May 21, 1983’, Box 2: Central American Speech – Exercise reports, Clark, William P.: Files, Ronald Reagan Presidential Library (RRPL).
    [Show full text]
  • NAPF Report to UN Secretary General on Disarmament Education
    Report to UN Secretary-General on NAPF Disarmament Education Activities The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation (NAPF) has been educating people in the United States and around the world about the urgent need for the abolition of nuclear weapons since 1982. Based in Santa Barbara, California, the Foundation’s mission is to educate and advocate for peace and a world free of nuclear weapons, and to empower peace leaders. The following document was submitted to United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon. It will make up a portion of the “Report of the Secretary-General to the 69th Session of the General Assembly on the Implementation of the Recommendations of the 2002 UN Study on Disarmament and Non-Proliferation Education.” Websites www.wagingpeace.org NAPF’s primary website, www.wagingpeace.org, serves as an educational and advocacy tool for members of the public concerned about nuclear weapons issues. During this reporting period, there were over 700,000 unique visitors to this site. The Waging Peace site covers current nuclear weapons policy and other relevant issues of global security. It includes information about the Foundation’s activities and offers visitors the opportunity to participate in online advocacy and activism. The site additionally offers a unique archive section containing hundreds of articles and essays on issues ranging from nuclear weapons policy to international law and youth activism. The site is updated frequently. www.nuclearfiles.org The Foundation’s educational website, www.nuclearfiles.org, details a comprehensive history of the Nuclear Age. It is regularly updated and expanded. By providing background information, an extensive timeline, access to primary documents and analysis, this site is one of the preeminent online educational resources in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Living Under Drones Death, Injury, and Trauma to Civilians from US Drone Practices in Pakistan
    Fall 08 September 2012 Living Under Drones Death, Injury, and Trauma to Civilians From US Drone Practices in Pakistan International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Clinic Stanford Law School Global Justice Clinic http://livingunderdrones.org/ NYU School of Law Cover Photo: Roof of the home of Faheem Qureshi, a then 14-year old victim of a January 23, 2009 drone strike (the first during President Obama’s administration), in Zeraki, North Waziristan, Pakistan. Photo supplied by Faheem Qureshi to our research team. Suggested Citation: INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION CLINIC (STANFORD LAW SCHOOL) AND GLOBAL JUSTICE CLINIC (NYU SCHOOL OF LAW), LIVING UNDER DRONES: DEATH, INJURY, AND TRAUMA TO CIVILIANS FROM US DRONE PRACTICES IN PAKISTAN (September, 2012) TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I ABOUT THE AUTHORS III EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS V INTRODUCTION 1 METHODOLOGY 2 CHALLENGES 4 CHAPTER 1: BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT 7 DRONES: AN OVERVIEW 8 DRONES AND TARGETED KILLING AS A RESPONSE TO 9/11 10 PRESIDENT OBAMA’S ESCALATION OF THE DRONE PROGRAM 12 “PERSONALITY STRIKES” AND SO-CALLED “SIGNATURE STRIKES” 12 WHO MAKES THE CALL? 13 PAKISTAN’S DIVIDED ROLE 15 CONFLICT, ARMED NON-STATE GROUPS, AND MILITARY FORCES IN NORTHWEST PAKISTAN 17 UNDERSTANDING THE TARGET: FATA IN CONTEXT 20 PASHTUN CULTURE AND SOCIAL NORMS 22 GOVERNANCE 23 ECONOMY AND HOUSEHOLDS 25 ACCESSING FATA 26 CHAPTER 2: NUMBERS 29 TERMINOLOGY 30 UNDERREPORTING OF CIVILIAN CASUALTIES BY US GOVERNMENT SOURCES 32 CONFLICTING MEDIA REPORTS 35 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • The First Amendment Implications of Convergence
    Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal Volume 9 Volume IX Number 2 Volume IX Book 2 Article 3 1999 Panel I: The First Amendment Implications of Convergence Andrew Jay Schwartzman Media Access Project Nicholas Jollymore Time Inc. Janine Jaquet New York University Jonathan Zittrain Berkman Center for Internet & Society; Harvard Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/iplj Part of the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Andrew Jay Schwartzman, Nicholas Jollymore, Janine Jaquet, and Jonathan Zittrain, Panel I: The First Amendment Implications of Convergence, 9 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 421 (1999). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/iplj/vol9/iss2/3 This Transcript is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PANEL I.TYP.DOC 9/29/2006 4:34 PM Panel I: The First Amendment Implications of Convergence Moderator: James Goodale* Panelists: Andrew Jay Schwartzman** Nicholas Jollymore*** Janine Jaquet**** Jonathan Zittrain***** MR. GOODALE: Well, I have to tell you—this is one of my more exciting moments, because I have taught a course on this very subject ever since I came to Fordham Law School. And no one could teach a more exciting course, because every year the technol- ogy changes, which means every year the law is subject to change.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Paul Harold Rubinson 2008
    Copyright by Paul Harold Rubinson 2008 The Dissertation Committee for Paul Harold Rubinson certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Containing Science: The U.S. National Security State and Scientists’ Challenge to Nuclear Weapons during the Cold War Committee: —————————————————— Mark A. Lawrence, Supervisor —————————————————— Francis J. Gavin —————————————————— Bruce J. Hunt —————————————————— David M. Oshinsky —————————————————— Michael B. Stoff Containing Science: The U.S. National Security State and Scientists’ Challenge to Nuclear Weapons during the Cold War by Paul Harold Rubinson, B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2008 Acknowledgements Thanks first and foremost to Mark Lawrence for his guidance, support, and enthusiasm throughout this project. It would be impossible to overstate how essential his insight and mentoring have been to this dissertation and my career in general. Just as important has been his camaraderie, which made the researching and writing of this dissertation infinitely more rewarding. Thanks as well to Bruce Hunt for his support. Especially helpful was his incisive feedback, which both encouraged me to think through my ideas more thoroughly, and reined me in when my writing overshot my argument. I offer my sincerest gratitude to the Smith Richardson Foundation and Yale University International Security Studies for the Predoctoral Fellowship that allowed me to do the bulk of the writing of this dissertation. Thanks also to the Brady-Johnson Program in Grand Strategy at Yale University, and John Gaddis and the incomparable Ann Carter-Drier at ISS.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark Feldstein Witness Statement
    UNITED STATES v. JULIAN PAUL ASSANGE Declaration of Mark Feldstein I, Mark Feldstein, hereby declare as follows: 1. Expert witness background and role in this case I am a journalism historian and professor at the University of Maryland and serve as its Eaton Chair in broadcast journalism. I earned a bachelor’s degree from Harvard College in 1979 and a PhD from the University of North Carolina in 2002. In between, I worked for twenty years as an investigative reporter at CNN, NBC News, ABC News and local television stations in the US, broadcasting hundreds of reports that won several dozen journalism awards. I am the author of one book and numerous peer-reviewed journal articles, book chapters, and magazine and newspaper articles that have focused on various aspects of journalism history, investigative reporting, leaking and whistleblowing, freedom of the press, and related issues. I have been quoted hundreds of times as an expert on these and other journalism issues by the news media, including the Guardian, Observer, International Herald Tribune, BBC, Reuters, Agence France-Presse, New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, Al Jazeera, and other outlets in the US, Europe, Asia, Africa, Latin America and the Mideast. I have lectured around the world on investigative reporting, censorship, freedom of the press, media history and journalistic ethics, and I have testified about these issues in the US Senate and in American courts in both criminal and civil cases. I have been asked by attorneys for Julian Assange to render my evaluation for this case from a journalistic perspective, focusing on the history of classified information disclosures to journalists and the US government’s response to such leaks; whether Assange is a journalist and entitled to protection of free speech/press under the US Constitution’s First Amendment; the journalistic implications of Assange’s indictment under the US Espionage Act; and the political dimensions of this case in the context of the Trump administration’s battle with the press.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Formulation an Anti-Authoritarian Review of Books
    THE NEW FORMULATION AN ANTI-AUTHORITARIAN REVIEW OF BOOKS February 2003 Volume 2, Number 1 Volume Two, Issue One February 2003 Editor: Chuck Morse Copy Editors: Matt Hoffmann, Erin Royster, Matt Stoner, Shanti Salas, with help from Paul Glavin and Nur Yavuz Cover Illustration: "Vineta para Invitation" by Leopoldo Mendez, 1944. The New Formulation 2620 Second Avenue, #4B San Diego, CA 92103-U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] On the Internet: http://flag.blackened.net/nf7index.htm Biannual Subscriptions: $7 in the United States and $10 elsewhere. Please make checks payable to Charles Morse. © 2003 The New Formulation Statement to Contributors: Contributions are encouraged. This journal is restricted to comparative book reviews. Reviews must examine the failings and virtues of books for a contemporary anarchist theory and politics. Anarchism is understood here as a doctrine seeking the abolition of capitalism, the nation-state, and hierarchy generally, and the creation of a cooperative economy, a decentralized confederation of communes or municipalities, and a culture of liberation. The deadline for the next issue is July 1, 2003. Each review must treat at least two books and one must have been published in the previous two years. In some cases, reviews of works in other media (such as film) will be accepted. Reviews of two books should be between 2,500 to 3,000 words and reviews of three should be 3,500 to 4,000 words. Contents P r o g r a m 1 The State in Hyper-Drive: the Post-September 11th U.S. by Paul Glavin 2 Review of Silencing Political
    [Show full text]
  • More Than a Paycheck
    More than a paycheck NEWS FROM THE WAR TAX RESISTANCE MOVEMENT April/May 2 01 2 Stop the Money Who says this must be so? California Who cares that this is so? Oakland — Northern California War Tax I shudder that the raids and bombs Resistance joins with CodePINK, Occupy have made us less than human. Oakland, and others in GDAMS demonstra - tion, April 17, 12-4 pm, Oakland Federal I wish to go to our deserted schools Building, 1301 Clay St. Press conference, to understand why we are like this. speakers, music, and visuals on the histori - I used to dream of space, cal extent of U.S. military interventions and costs. March to nearby state building to join blue skies and gentler people. protest against cuts to education funding. I heard mother through her burqa Info: (510) 842-6124 or nowartax.org . pleading “Please stop! Petaluma — War tax resisters participate Stop the money. Stop the killing. in The Really Really Free Market Occupy Petaluma Public Event, April 14, 1-5 pm. Stop.” Music, workshops, clothes, art, kid’s activi - Another local explosion, ties, plants, seeds, community! One person can make a big statement. Rosalie more international lies. facebook.com/events/409991702351215 . Riegle, Tax Day 2 011, Evanston, IL. Photo courtesy Our global problem is that continued on page 4 of Neighbors for Peace. guns impose greater force than common sense or vision, which tells me that my mother’s world is crashing. What Does Conscience Require? By Berry Friesen athy Kelly quoted these lines from Hakim of the Afghan Youth Peace aying taxes that are used for war has annual federal tax return to witness for peace K long been a vexing problem for those and against the wars that have become a per - Volunteers in the December 2 011 P whose conscience forbids direct partici - manent feature of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel Ellsberg
    This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of hundreds of thousands of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 20755-6000 FOIA Case: 101038A 10 July 2017 JOHN GREENEWALD Dear Mr. Greenewald: This is our final response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request of 6 March 2017 for Intellipedia entries on "PENTAGON PAPERS" and/ or "Daniel Ells berg" and/ or "Daniel Sheehan" as well as any search results pages. A copy of your request is enclosed. As stated in our initial response to you, dated 7 March 20 17, your request was assigned Case Number 101038. For purposes of this request and based on the information you provided in your letter, you are considered an "all other" requester. As such, you are allowed 2 hours of search and the duplication of 100 pages at no cost. There are no assessable fees for this request. Your request has been processed under the provisions of the FOIA. For your information, NSA provides a service of common concern for the Intelligence Community (IC) by serving as the executive agent for Intelink. As such, NSA provides technical services that enable users to access and share information with peers and stakeholders across the IC and DoD.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenging the U.S. Nuclear Tests:The Golden Rule Sails Again
    Challenging the U.S. Nuclear Tests:The Golden Rule Sails Again Ann Wright Veterans for Peace Honolulu, Hawaii 96821 USA Email: [email protected] Abstract In January 1958, Andrew Bigelow and three other anti-nuclear activists attempted to sail the 30 foot ketch, The Golden Rule, from California into the U.S. nuclear testing zone in the Marshall Islands to try to stop nuclear testing. While on a stopover in Honolulu, a U.S. federal court issued an injunction barring the voyage of the Golden Rule into the nuclear test sites. Despite the injunction, the four crew members attempted to sail twice and were arrested by U.S. federal law enforcement officials, tried, convicted and given sixty-day sentences and imprisoned. 55 years later, The Golden Rule, was found in a small shipyard in Eureka, California and her historical significance recognized. The boat had suffered the ravages of time and was in terrible shape. She is being carefully renovated by members of Veterans for Peace who intend to sail the boat on the West Coast as an educational vessel that personifies opposition to militarism and the use of nuclear weapons. Using documents from the Quaker House in Honolulu, the saga of The Golden Rule is a part of the rich history of maritime Hawaii. Keywords: Pacific Nuclear Testing, Protest Ships, Marshall Islands, AEC, Greenpeace Introduction In 2010, Larry Zerlangs, the owner of a boatyard in Eureka, Northern California, hauled out of a nearby bay a 30 foot double-masted Alpha 30 sailboat that had broken loose of her moorings and sunk during a big storm.
    [Show full text]