DOCSLIB.ORG

Dissociation of Memory Signals for Metamemory in Rhesus Monkeys (Macaca Mulatta)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dissociation of Memory Signals for Metamemory in Rhesus Monkeys (Macaca Mulatta) Animal Cognition https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-019-01246-5 ORIGINAL PAPER Dissociation of memory signals for metamemory in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) Emily Kathryn Brown1 · Benjamin M. Basile2 · Victoria L. Templer3 · Robert R. Hampton1 Received: 19 August 2018 / Revised: 28 January 2019 / Accepted: 31 January 2019 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Some nonhuman species demonstrate metamemory, the ability to monitor and control memory. Here, we identify memory signals that control metamemory judgments in rhesus monkeys by directly comparing performance in two metamemory paradigms while holding the availability of one memory signal constant and manipulating another. Monkeys performed a four-choice match-to-sample memory task. In Experiment 1, monkeys could decline memory tests on some trials for a small, guaranteed reward. In Experiment 2, monkeys could review the sample on some trials. In both experiments, monkeys improved accuracy by selectively declining tests or reviewing samples when memory was poor. To assess the degree to which different memory signals made independent contributions to the metamemory judgement, we made the decline-test or review-sample response available either prospectively, before the test, or concurrently with test stimuli. Prospective meta- memory judgements are likely controlled by the current contents of working memory, whereas concurrent metamemory judgements may also be controlled by additional relative familiarity signals evoked by the sight of the test stimuli. In both paradigms, metacognitive responding enhanced accuracy more on concurrent than on prospective tests, suggesting additive contributions of working memory and stimulus-evoked familiarity. Consistent with the hypothesis that working memory and stimulus-evoked familiarity both control metamemory judgments when available, metacognitive choice latencies were longer in the concurrent condition, when both were available. Together, these data demonstrate that multiple memory signals can additively control metacognitive judgements in monkeys and provide a framework for mapping the interaction of explicit memory signals in primate memory. Keywords Metacognition · Information seeking · Monitoring · Working memory · Familiarity Introduction answer and a vague sense of which choice feels most famil- iar. The memory systems giving rise to these signals dif- Performance on memory tasks is supported by a variety fer in flexibility, robustness against interference, and the of memory systems, each characterized by distinct func- conditions under which they are available for introspective tional properties and underlying neural substrates (Sherry monitoring. Monitorable memory signals have gained par- and Schacter 1987; Squire and Zola-Morgan 1991; Yoneli- ticular attention because they afford subjects the opportu- nas 2002). For example, a contestant on a trivia show may nity to control their cognition, such as by seeking additional answer based on a combination of retrieval of the correct information or altering response strategy. The way in which subjects monitor and control different memory signals can be assessed using metamemory paradigms. * Emily Kathryn Brown [email protected] Metamemory is the ability to monitor memory processes and adapt behavior or cognition in accord with monitored 1 Department of Psychology, Yerkes National Primate memory signals. Metamemory is exemplified by the game Research Center, Emory University, 36 Eagle Row, Atlanta, show “Who wants to be a millionaire?” wherein contest- GA 30322, USA ants must answer trivia questions and make judgments about 2 Laboratory of Neuropsychology, NIMH, NIH, Bethesda, whether they have answered correctly. Contestants are given MD, USA the opportunity to reconsider their answers after reflection, 3 Department of Psychology, Providence College, Providence, or to collect additional information by contacting a friend. RI, USA Vol.:(0123456789)1 3 Animal Cognition The metamemory judgments made by contestants can be manipulated. Prospective metamemory judgments are made controlled by whether a memory was successfully retrieved, before the test options have been seen and thus favor moni- has been successfully held in working memory, or evokes toring of working memory because information about the strong relative familiarity compared to other test options relative familiarity of the test options is not yet available. (Flavell 1979; Kornell 2013; Nelson 1996). Just as memory Concurrent metamemory judgments are made in the pres- performance often reflects a combination of memory signals, ence of the memory test. Monkeys can still monitor work- so too do metamemory judgements. ing memory in concurrent metamemory judgments, and A substantial body of work with nonhuman primate spe- additional information about the relative familiarity of the cies indicates that they can monitor memory, as indicated sample and distractors is also available. by their ability to selectively decline difficult tests, review Here, we assessed both prospective and concurrent meta- previously studied but forgotten information, seek informa- memory judgments. In Experiment 1, we used a decline- tion when ignorant, or adaptively wager rewards based on test paradigm, in which monkeys chose to avoid some tests recent test choices (Basile et al. 2015; Brown et al. 2017; for a small, but guaranteed, reward (Fujita 2009; Hampton Hampton 2001; Kornell et al. 2007; Templer and Hampton 2001; Suda-King 2008; Suda-King et al. 2013; Templer and 2012; Washburn et al. 2010). Only recently has experimental Hampton 2012; Templer et al. 2017; Washburn et al. 2010). work been directed at determining which specific memory In Experiment 2, we used an information-seeking paradigm, systems are subject to memory monitoring and how different in which monkeys chose to review the sample on some trials memory signals interact to control metamemory judgments (Basile et al. 2009, 2015; Beran and Smith 2011; Call and in nonhumans (e.g., Coutinho et al. 2015; Smith et al. 2013; Carpenter 2001; Castro and Wasserman 2013; Iwasaki et al. Takagi and Fujita 2018). 2013; Kirk et al. 2014; Kornell et al. 2007; Marsh 2014; Because memory systems provide different types of infor- Marsh and MacDonald 2012; McMahon et al. 2010; Vining mation, and multiple systems contribute to performance on and Marsh 2015; Watanabe and Clayton 2016). Using these memory tasks, metamemory is likely controlled by a com- two paradigms to assess metacognition, presented both pro- bination of memory signals. The way that these signals are spectively and concurrently, provides a powerful test of the weighted in metamemory decisions in monkeys is unknown. generalizability of our findings. One possibility is that in the presence of multiple memory To compare the contributions of working memory and signals, metacognitive choice may be guided by only one, familiarity in both decline-test and information-seeking such as the strongest signal. A second possibility is that mul- paradigms, we required a common metric. In prior work tiple memory signals contribute additively to metamemory with the decline-test paradigm, monkeys showed a perfor- judgments, such that congruent positive signals strengthen mance advantage on chosen tests compared to performance the likelihood of a high-confidence metamemory judgment. on forced tests when there was no option to decline the To evaluate the degree to which monkey metamemory is memory test (Brown et al. 2017; Hampton 2001; Templer controlled by multiple memory signals, we compared meta- and Hampton 2012). When monkeys monitored memory memory judgments under conditions that always allowed for to choose when to use the decline-test response, they dis- the use of one memory signal but systematically manipulated proportionately chose to take trials when memory was the availability of a second memory signal. In nonhuman strong and selectively avoided tests on which memory was primates, there is strong evidence that recognition memory weak, resulting in higher accuracy on tests they chose to performance is supported by at least two types of memory: take. Forced trials included both trials on which memory working memory and relative familiarity (Basile and Hamp- was strong, which would have been chosen had that option ton 2013; Wittig et al. 2016; Wittig and Richmond 2014). been available, and trials on which memory was weak, Working memory is a limited-capacity system that allows which may have been declined, had the option been avail- the active, relatively short-term maintenance and manipula- able. This accuracy benefit can be applied equivalently to tion of information (Baddeley 2000, 2003). Familiarity is a both decline-test and information-seeking paradigms. On passive signal evoked by the re-presentation of a stimulus choice trials in the information-seeking paradigm, subjects that has been seen previously (Yonelinas 2002; Yonelinas can either choose to take the test immediately, if memory is et al. 2010). In matching to sample memory tests, the image strong, or first review the sample, if memory is weak. Forced seen as a sample on the current trial can potentially be held trials, when the option to review the sample is omitted, will in working memory during the delay. The sample image is include some tests that would have been taken immediately also expected to be relatively more familiar than the distrac- and some tests when subjects would have first reviewed the tors presented with it at test, because
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Compare and Contrast Two Models Or Theories of One Cognitive Process with Reference to Research Studies
    ! The following sample is for the learning objective: Compare and contrast two models or theories of one cognitive process with reference to research studies. What is the question asking for? * A clear outline of two models of one cognitive process. The cognitive process may be memory, perception, decision-making, language or thinking. * Research is used to support the models as described. The research does not need to be outlined in a lot of detail, but underatanding of the role of research in supporting the models should be apparent.. * Both similarities and differences of the two models should be clearly outlined. Sample response The theory of memory is studied scientifically and several models have been developed to help The cognitive process describe and potentially explain how memory works. Two models that attempt to describe how (memory) and two models are memory works are the Multi-Store Model of Memory, developed by Atkinson & Shiffrin (1968), clearly identified. and the Working Memory Model of Memory, developed by Baddeley & Hitch (1974). The Multi-store model model explains that all memory is taken in through our senses; this is called sensory input. This information is enters our sensory memory, where if it is attended to, it will pass to short-term memory. If not attention is paid to it, it is displaced. Short-term memory Research. is limited in duration and capacity. According to Miller, STM can hold only 7 plus or minus 2 pieces of information. Short-term memory memory lasts for six to twelve seconds. When information in the short-term memory is rehearsed, it enters the long-term memory store in a process called “encoding.” When we recall information, it is retrieved from LTM and moved A satisfactory description of back into STM.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissociation Between Declarative and Procedural Mechanisms in Long-Term Memory
    ! DISSOCIATION BETWEEN DECLARATIVE AND PROCEDURAL MECHANISMS IN LONG-TERM MEMORY A dissertation submitted to the Kent State University College of Education, Health, and Human Services in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Dale A. Hirsch August, 2017 ! A dissertation written by Dale A. Hirsch B.A., Cleveland State University, 2010 M.A., Cleveland State University, 2013 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2017 Approved by _________________________, Director, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Bradley Morris _________________________, Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Christopher Was _________________________, Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Karrie Godwin Accepted by _________________________, Director, School of Lifespan Development and Mary Dellmann-Jenkins Educational Sciences _________________________, Dean, College of Education, Health and Human James C. Hannon Services ! ""! ! HIRSCH, DALE A., Ph.D., August 2017 Educational Psychology DISSOCIATION BETWEEN DECLARATIVE AND PROCEDURAL MECHANISMS IN LONG-TERM MEMORY (66 pp.) Director of Dissertation: Bradley Morris The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential dissociation between declarative and procedural elements in long-term memory for a facilitation of procedural memory (FPM) paradigm. FPM coupled with a directed forgetting (DF) manipulation was utilized to highlight the dissociation. Three experiments were conducted to that end. All three experiments resulted in facilitation for categorization operations. Experiments one and two additionally found relatively poor recognition for items that participants were told to forget despite the fact that relevant categorization operations were facilitated. Experiment three resulted in similarly poor recognition for category names that participants were told to forget. Taken together, the three experiments in this investigation demonstrate a clear dissociation between the procedural and declarative elements of the FPM task.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Memory and Cued Recall Max V
    Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern University Honors Program Theses 2016 Working memory and cued recall Max V. Fey 8602950 Karen Naufel Georgia Southern University Lawrence Locker Georgia Southern University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/honors-theses Part of the Cognitive Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Fey, Max V. 8602950; Naufel, Karen; and Locker, Lawrence, "Working memory and cued recall" (2016). University Honors Program Theses. 220. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/honors-theses/220 This thesis (open access) is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Honors Program Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Working Memory and Cued Recall Working Memory and Cued Recall An Honors Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Honors in the Department of Psychology. By Maximilian Fey Under the mentorship of Dr. Karen Naufel ABSTRACT Previous research has found that individuals with high working memory have greater recall capabilities than those with low working memory (Unsworth, Spiller, & Brewers, 2012). Research did not test the extent to which cues affect one’s recall ability in relation to working memory. The present study will examine this issue. Participants completed a working memory measure. Then, they were provided with cued recall tasks whereby they recalled Facebook friends. The cues varied to be no cues, ambiguous cues high in imageability, and cues directly related to Facebook. The results showed that there was no difference between individual’s ability to recall their Facebook friends and their working memory scores.
    [Show full text]
  • Retrograde Amnesia for Spatial Memory Induced by NMDA Receptor-Mediated Long-Term Potentiation
    The Journal of Neuroscience, January 1, 2001, 21(1):356–362 Retrograde Amnesia for Spatial Memory Induced by NMDA Receptor-Mediated Long-Term Potentiation Vegard Heimly Brun,1 Kristin Ytterbø,1 Richard G. M. Morris,2 May-Britt Moser,1 and Edvard I. Moser1 1Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway, and 2Department of Neuroscience, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9LE, Scotland, United Kingdom If information is stored as distributed patterns of synaptic acid (CPP) was administered before the high-frequency stimu- weights in the hippocampal formation, retention should be lation, water maze retention was unimpaired. CPP administra- vulnerable to electrically induced long-term potentiation (LTP) tion blocked the induction of LTP. Thus, high-frequency stimu- of hippocampal synapses after learning. This prediction was lation of hippocampal afferents disrupts memory retention only tested by training animals in a spatial water maze task and then when it induces a change in the spatial pattern of synaptic delivering bursts of high-frequency (HF) or control stimulation weights. The NMDA receptor dependency of this retrograde to the perforant path in the angular bundle. High-frequency amnesia is consistent with the synaptic plasticity and memory stimulation induced LTP in the dentate gyrus and probably also hypothesis. at other hippocampal termination sites. Retention in a later Key words: memory; spatial memory; synaptic plasticity; hip- probe test was disrupted. When the competitive NMDA recep- pocampus; dentate gyrus; LTP; NMDA receptor; CPP; water tor antagonist 3-(2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)propyl-1-phosphonic maze; rat; saturation; retrograde amnesia Long-term potentiation (LTP) refers to the major cellular model this idea, McNaughton et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Deciphering Neural Codes of Memory During Sleep
    Deciphering Neural Codes of Memory during Sleep The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Chen, Zhe and Matthew A. Wilson. "Deciphering Neural Codes of Memory during Sleep." Trends in Neurosciences 40, 5 (May 2017): 260-275 © 2017 Elsevier Ltd As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2017.03.005 Publisher Elsevier BV Version Author's final manuscript Citable link https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/122457 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author Trends Neurosci Manuscript Author . Author Manuscript Author manuscript; available in PMC 2018 May 01. Published in final edited form as: Trends Neurosci. 2017 May ; 40(5): 260–275. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2017.03.005. Deciphering Neural Codes of Memory during Sleep Zhe Chen1,* and Matthew A. Wilson2,* 1Department of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience & Physiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA 2Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA Abstract Memories of experiences are stored in the cerebral cortex. Sleep is critical for consolidating hippocampal memory of wake experiences into the neocortex. Understanding representations of neural codes of hippocampal-neocortical networks during sleep would reveal important circuit mechanisms on memory consolidation, and provide novel insights into memory and dreams. Although sleep-associated ensemble spike activity has been investigated, identifying the content of memory in sleep remains challenging.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Information Modulates the Neurocognitive Dynamics of Episodic Autobiographical Memory Retrieval
    Spatial Information Modulates the Neurocognitive Dynamics of Episodic Autobiographical Memory Retrieval by Melissa Hebscher A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Psychology University of Toronto © Copyright by Melissa Hebscher, 2018 Spatial Information Modulates the Neurocognitive Dynamics of Episodic Autobiographical Memory Retrieval Melissa Hebscher Doctor of Philosophy Department of Psychology University of Toronto 2018 Abstract Episodic autobiographical memory (EAM) enables reliving past experiences, recalling the sensory information associated with that event. Spatial information is thought to play an early and important role in EAM, contributing to the dynamics of retrieval. Using a combination of behavioural, neuroimaging, and neurostimulation approaches, this dissertation aimed to examine the temporal dynamics of EAM and the role spatial information plays in its retrieval. Chapter 2 demonstrated a temporal precedence for spatial information at the behavioural level, but importantly found high individual variability in early recall of spatial information. Further, individual differences in spatial aspects of EAM were reflected in hippocampal and precuneus grey matter volumes. Chapter 3 examined the temporal dynamics of EAM at the neural level using magnetoencephalography (MEG). While cueing individuals with familiar locations altered the dynamics of retrieval, it did not confer an early neural advantage. Together with the findings from Chapter 2, these results indicate that early spatial information alters the dynamics of EAM retrieval, but does not play a ubiquitous or automatic role in EAM. This study also found that spatial perspective during EAM retrieval was associated with a well-established neural component of episodic memory recollection. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) administered to the precuneus disrupted this association, demonstrating that this region is crucially involved in neural processing of spatial perspective during EAM.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Memory and the Organization of Brain Systems
    4818 • The Journal of Neuroscience, April 30, 2008 • 28(18):4818–4822 Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive Working Memory and the Organization of Brain Systems Yael Shrager,1 Daniel A. Levy,2 Ramona O. Hopkins,3 and Larry R. Squire4 1University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, 2Weizmann Institute of Science, Rechovot 76100, Israel, 3Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, and 4Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Diego, California 92161 Working memory has historically been viewed as an active maintenance process that is independent of long-term memory and indepen- dent of the medial temporal lobe. However, impaired performance across brief time intervals has sometimes been described in amnesic patients with medial temporal lobe damage. These findings raise a fundamental question about how to know when performance depends on working memory and when the capacity for working memory has been exceeded and performance depends on long-term memory. We describe a method for identifying working memory independently of patient performance. We compared patients with medial temporal lobe damage to controls who were given either distraction or no distraction between study and test. In four experiments, we found concordance between the performance of patients and the effect of distraction on controls. The patients were impaired on tasks in which distraction had minimal effect on control performance, and the patients were intact on tasks in which distraction disrupted control performance. We suggest that the patients were impaired when the task minimally depended on working memory (and instead depended substantially on long-term memory), and they performed well when the task depended substantially on working memory.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Working Memory and How Does It Affect Learning?
    3/16/2016 What is working Do you observe these behaviours? memory and how does Is easily distracted when doing something not highly it affect learning? interesting Has trouble waiting his/her turn Struggles with getting started and completing a task. Watches and depends on friends to remind them of the current task Difficulty organising something with multiple steps… frequently stops, frequently loses their place Often seems restless and on the go Fails to progress despite working hard Quick mental arithmetic What is working memory? Who does it affect? 7 + 9 x 3 –4 = 35 x 9 = 35 x 76 = 1 3/16/2016 How does it differ from short term What is working memory? memory? Repeating multi-part instructions A system for temporary Carrying out instructions storage and manipulation of information, necessary for wide range of cognitive tasks Remembering a street address Following driving directions The ability to keep information Following driving directions as a new driver active in your mind for a short period of time (seconds) keeping it available for further processing Working memory is an essential function Alan Baddeley’s Working Memory Metaphor in every day life Central Executive Processes all stimuli we encounter Delegates it to the different parts of our brain that can take action Allows us to block out unnecessary information Visuo-Spatial Phonological Loop Episodic Buffer It keeps us updated on what’s Sketch Pad happening – and keeps us focused on what matters 2 3/16/2016 Working Memory (WM) Capacity: Storage AND Attention Dependent on Many Variables • WM capacity – affected by deficit: disease, genetics, age….but also fatigue, medication, mood.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissociating Visuo-Spatial and Verbal Working Memory: It's All in the Features
    Memory & Cognition https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0882-9 Dissociating visuo-spatial and verbal working memory: It’sall in the features Marie Poirier1 & James M. Yearsley1 & Jean Saint-Aubin2 & Claudette Fortin3 & Geneviève Gallant2 & Dominic Guitard2 # The Author(s) 2018 Abstract Echoing many of the themes of the seminal work of Atkinson and Shiffrin (The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 2; 89–195, 1968), this paper uses the feature model (Nairne, Memory & Cognition, 16, 343–352, 1988;Nairne,Memory & Cognition, 18; 251– 269, 1990; Neath & Nairne, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2;429–441, 1995) to account for performance in working-memory tasks. The Brooks verbal and visuo-spatial matrix tasks were performed alone, with articulatory suppression, or with a spatial suppression task; the results produced the expected dissociation. We used approximate Bayesian computation techniques to fit the feature model to the data and showed that the similarity-based interference process implemented in the model accounted for the data patterns well. We then fit the model to data from Guérard and Tremblay (2008, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34,556–569); the latter study produced a double dissociation while calling upon more typical order reconstruction tasks. Again, the model performed well. The findings show that a double dissociation can be modelled without appealing to separate systems for verbal and visuo-spatial processing. The latter findings are significant as the feature model had not been used to model this type of dissociation before; importantly, this is also the first time the model is quantitatively fit to data. For the demonstration provided here, modularity was unnecessary if two assumptions were made: (1) the main difference between spatial and verbal working-memory tasks is the features that are encoded; (2) secondary tasks selectively interfere with primary tasks to the extent that both tasks involve similar features.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Memory
    Working Memory Chapter 4 1 Working Memory Some memories are very fragile and go into oblivion very quickly. Working memory is one such memory. 1. Try this. Do this mentally. Write your answers on paper. a. 7 X 9 = 63 b. 74 X 9 = 666 c. 74 X 96 = 7104 2 Working Memory (WM) 1. We know attention is limited. So information that gets to memory is also limited. Thus capacity of working memory is limited. 2. Working memory is brief, immediate memory we use for current information. A portion of working memory coordinates ongoing mental activities. 3. Working memory has been known as short-term memory, and is contrasted from long-term. Some investigators believe the two are the same (Nairne, 2002). 3 1 Classic Research on Working Memory (Short-term Memory) 4 Short-term Memory In the 19th century, Sir George Hamilton discovered that he could accurately store about 7 items (marbles) in memory if he glanced at the items quickly. If the items were more than 7 his accuracy decreased. Sir George Hamilton 5 Short-term Memory 1. Miller (1956) wrote, “The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information”. 2. Miller suggested that the capacity of our short-term memory was small. We could store about 5-9 items in it. 3. He also showed that items could be “chunked”, which would increase our memory capacity. George Miller 6 2 Try This ! C T A I I L T C S F R O R E C A L L ! F R A C T O L I S T I C R E C A L L ! 7 Another Example 870-230-5339 (10 items) 870 + 230 + 5 3 3 9 (1) (1) (4) 2 chunks + 4 items (6 items) Capacity of short-term memory may be increased by a process called “chunking”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Method of Loci in Virtual Reality: Explicit Binding of Objects to Spatial Contexts Enhances Subsequent Memory Recall
    Journal of Cognitive Enhancement https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-019-00141-8 ORIGINAL RESEARCH The Method of Loci in Virtual Reality: Explicit Binding of Objects to Spatial Contexts Enhances Subsequent Memory Recall Nicco Reggente1 & Joey K. Y. Essoe1 & Hera Younji Baek1 & Jesse Rissman1,2 Received: 7 January 2019 /Accepted: 7 June 2019 # Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 Abstract The method of loci (MoL) is a well-known mnemonic technique in which visuospatial spatial environments are used to scaffold the memorization of non-spatial information. We developed a novel virtual reality-based implementation of the MoL in which participants used three unique virtual environments to serve as their “memory palaces.” In each world, participants were presented with a sequence of 15 3D objects that appeared in front of their avatar for 20 s each. The experimental group (N = 30) was given the ability to click on each object to lock it in place, whereas the control group (N = 30) was not afforded this functionality. We found that despite matched engagement, exposure duration, and instructions emphasizing the efficacy of the mnemonic across groups, participants in the experimental group recalled 28% more objects. We also observed a strong relation- ship between spatial memory for objects and landmarks in the environment and verbal recall strength. These results provide evidence for spatially mediated processes underlying the effectiveness of the MoL and contribute to theoretical models of memory that emphasize spatial encoding as the primary currency of mnemonic function. Keywords Memory enhancement . Method of loci . Virtual reality Introduction the MoL is a complicated, time-consuming mnemonic to imple- ment, but in fact, it is rather straightforward.
    [Show full text]
  • Sleep Problems Across Development: a Pathway to Adolescent Risk Taking Through Working Memory
    J Youth Adolescence DOI 10.1007/s10964-014-0179-7 EMPIRICAL RESEARCH Sleep Problems Across Development: A Pathway to Adolescent Risk Taking Through Working Memory April Gile Thomas • Kathryn C. Monahan • Angela F. Lukowski • Elizabeth Cauffman Received: 22 April 2014 / Accepted: 23 August 2014 Ó Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014 Abstract Problematic sleep can be detrimental to the middle childhood to adolescence. Although sleep problems development of important cognitive functions, such as in infancy, early childhood, and middle childhood were not working memory, and may have the potential for negative directly related to adolescent working memory, sleep behavioral consequences, such as risk-taking. In this way, problems during adolescence were associated with poorer sleep problems may be particularly harmful for youth— adolescent working memory. In turn, these deficits in whose cognitive abilities are still developing and who are working memory were related to greater risk taking in late more susceptible to risky behavior. Using data from a large, adolescence. In summary, the present results suggest that national, longitudinal study, continuity and change in sleep sleep problems in earlier periods are indicative of risk for problems were examined from 2 to 15 years of age and sleep problems later in development, but that sleep problems associated with deficits in working memory at age 15 and in adolescence contribute uniquely to deficits in working risk taking behaviors at age 18. Participants (N = 1,364 memory that, in turn, lead to risky behavior during late children; 48.3 % female) were assessed for sleep problems adolescence. (parent-report), working memory (behavioral task), and risk taking behavior (youth self-report).
    [Show full text]