DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction to Xstrata

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Introduction to Xstrata Transformation through Organic Growth and Operational Excellence Steve de Kruijff, COO Xstrata Copper North Queensland Analyst Visit Ernest Henry Mining – April 2011 1 Xstrata Copper is a fundamental pillar of Xstrata’s diversified model § Headquartered in Brisbane, employing over 17,000 people in eight countries § Top five global mined and refined copper producer – Mined copper production of 913,500 tonnes in 2010 § Revenue of US$14bn and operating profit of US$3.8bn in 2010 § Industry-leading approved project pipeline to further transform business and increase production by more than 50% over next four years Xstrata Copper profit* by country Contribution to Xstrata profit* Argentina Coal 16% 29% Zinc Australia 13% 22% Peru 22% Nickel 9% Alloys 4% Canada 7% Chile Copper 33% 45% *Based on earnings before interest, depreciation, tax and amortisation 2 Continued transformation and growth has created a leading global copper producer... Industry Ranking - 2005 Industry Ranking - 2010 Mined Production Codelco Codelco BHP Billiton Freeport Phelps Dodge Mount Isa Ernest Henry BHP Billiton Freeport Alumbrera Xstrata Copper #4 Rio Tinto + Anglo American Top five share: 36% Xstrata Copper #9 Top five share: 36% Tintaya, Antamina, Kidd, Collahuasi, Lomas Bayas 0 500 1000 1500 2000 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Smelter Production Codelco Codelco Nippon Jiangxi Copper KGHM Mount Isa Xstrata Copper #3 Grupo Mexico + Aurubis Mitsubishi Altonorte Xstrata Copper #19 Top five share: 25% Horne Nippon Mining Top five share: 27% 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Refined Production Codelco Codelco Phelps Dodge Aurubis Townsville Grupo Mexico + Freeport Nippon Tintaya SxEw Jiangxi Copper KGHM Top five share: 26% Lomas Bayas SxEw Xstrata Copper #5 Top five share: 29% Collahuasi SxEw CCR 0 500 1000 1500 2000 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Source: Brook Hunt, The Long-Term Outlook for Copper, 2nd Quarter Data Volume 2009, 4th Quarter Data Volume 2005. 3 ...with a strong portfolio of geographically diverse assets and projects 4 Further resource growth over last 12 months... § Continual extensions of existing mine lives and growth of project resources § Over 400% increase in resource base since 2005 to almost 90Mt copper in 2010 § Generation of new projects: West Wall § Updates to Frieda River and Antamina in 2011 not included Growth of Xstrata Copper resource base 100 Mt equity contained 90 Cu in mineral resources 80 Greenfield Projects Canada 70 North Chile 60 Southern Peru Minera Alumbrera 50 North Queensland 40 30 20 10 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Source: Xstrata Copper Ore Reserves and Mineral Resources 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 5 ...and operational excellence underpins the on-going transformation of assets § Approved projects to provide ›50% increase in production by the end of 2014 – Five brownfield project expansions: Lomas Bayas II, Ernest Henry underground, Antamina expansion, Collahuasi expansion and Tintaya/Antapaccay expansion – One major greenfield expansion: Las Bambas § Further 20% improvement to C1 cash costs over next four years § Further development projects provide option to deliver >1Mtpa additional copper production Continuous cost improvement Production growth profile* kt mined copper C1 cash cost 1800 Feasibility / Scoping 1600 Approved / Implementation Xstrata Xstrata Existing Production Copper 1400 Copper 2010 2015 1200 1000 800 600 400 Xstrata Copper 200 2006 Percentile 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Source: Brook Hunt Note: * Life extensions included in existing production 6 Further growth optionality § Collahuasi progressing concept studies into brownfield expansion to >1 million tonnes per annum (100%) copper production § Potential for >1 million tonnes per annum (100%) initial copper production from three major greenfield projects in final feasibility studies § Evaluation of potential new projects to add to Xstrata Copper’s development portfolio – West Wall, Agua Rica Indicative Annual Project Country Development Stage Mineral Resource Production (100%)¹ El Pachón Argentina Final Feasibility 1.8Bt @ 0.51% Cu ~400kt Tampakan Philippines Final Feasibility 2.4Bt @ 0.60% Cu ~450kt Frieda River PNG Final Feasibility 1.9Bt @ 0.45% Cu ~260kt Collahuasi exp Chile Concept studies 7.1Bt @ 0.82% Cu ~500kt Energia Austral Chile Feasibility n/a ~1,100 MW West Wall Chile Advanced Exploration 750Mt @ 0.54% Cu ¹ Average production over first five years 7 North Queensland Division Production capacity § Regional office −Mount Isa § Mount Isa Underground mines −170,000tpa Cu in concentrate § Mount Isa smelter −280,000tpa copper anodes § Ernest Henry open cut mine −90,000tpa Cu in concentrate −110,000ozpa Au in concentrate § Townsville Refinery & Port −300,000tpa of copper cathodes 8 North Queensland Division 2010 Highlights § 2010 production of 232kt copper in concentrate from Mount Isa underground mines and Ernest Henry − equivalent to 25% of Xstrata Copper’s total annual copper production § Contributed 22% of Xstrata Copper’s EBITDA of $3.8bn § Recorded Real Unit Costs savings of US$96 million in 2010 § Townsville Refinery & Port produced a record 287kt of copper cathode 9 Mount Isa copper operations § U/G Ore reserves (Proved /Probable): 64mt @ 2.5% cu § U/G Mineral resources (Measured/Indicated/Inferred): 200mt @ 2.0% cu § Open Cut Mineral resources (Indicated/Inferred) : 283mt @ 1.1% cu § Underground drilling exploration programme focused on mineralisation associated with existing orebodies. § Concept study underway into a large scale zinc and copper open pit as an extension to the current Black Star open pit mine § Feasibility study underway into potential of inert grinding and or leaching of residual copper and cobalt from the Mount Isa concentrator tailing − Pilot plant trial § Mount Isa Mines received 2010 Australian Export Award – Minerals & Energy Category § Continuing improvement in safety performance – 2010 LTIFR of 0.7 (Qld Mining Industry LTIFR , 3.5) 10 Copper market update 11 Multi-decade structural price trends are not unprecedented Copper Price (real terms) US$/t 14000 Industrialisation of the USA 12000 Rebuilding of Europe, the growth of Japan and the Oil shock 10000 Industrialisation of China 8000 and other BRICs 6000 4000 2000 0 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 The industrialisation of China and other BRICs represents a demand shift similar to that seen in USA, Europe and Japan 12 Developing world growth is reshaping the global economy... Contribution to Global GDP Global urban migration % urbanised 100% 80% Rural 60% China 40% India 20% Urban 0% 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 China will have 221 one million plus Emerging markets are expected to account population cities by 2025 – compared to for more than 50% of global GDP by 2030 Europe with 35 today Source: BofA Merrill Lynch, IMF , UN Department of Economic & Social Affairs , McKinsey Global Institute 13 ... generating a structural shift in commodity demand Populous nations have a multiplier effect on commodity demand Commodity intensity¹ Energy consumption per capita (kWh/capita) Mid-cycle commodities (Indexed to 100 at maximum) e.g. Copper, lead and zinc 15'000 100 USA: 3,873bn kWh Late cycle commodities e.g. Platinum, nickel 75 10'000 Japan 50 Early cycle commodities Europe China: ~7,000bn kWh by 2020 e.g. Steel, iron ore 5'000 20 China: 3,438bn kWh Chinese GDP: ~$2.5k/capita US GDP: ~$50k/capita Indonesia 0 India 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 $50k Indian GDP: ~$1k/capita 0 0 2'000 4'000 GDP per capita (real, 2005 USD) Population (cumulative bn) Increasing intensities generate a demand China’s per capita energy consumption is shift for commodities in emerging markets expected to double by 2020 • As a percentage of US intensity peak, China today is: • Demand is also expected to grow strongly in India, 12% Copper, 1% nickel and 30% iron ore Indonesia and Brazil Source: IMF, USGS, CIA Factbook Note: 1 Stylised intensity curves based on developed countries 14 Existing copper production continues to underperform § Maintaining current production Primary copper head grades, % rates is increasingly challenging as the industry faces: 1.5 1.4 – Falling head grades and 1.3 deeper mines 1.2 – Labour disputes and technical 1.1 issues 1 § Mine supply underperformed again 0.9 in 2010 – actual vs plan shortfall 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 totalled 700kt. § Lower grades, technical issues, Mine production actual vs plan labour disputes, sovereign risk and 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 project ramp up difficulties 0 -100 continue to generate high rates of -200 disruption. -300 -400 § Underperformance has continued -500 -600 -700 in 2011, with production guidance -700 -800 revised lower at a number of -800 -917 -900 -952 -987 -966 major mines. -1000 Data: Brook Hunt Copper Mine Costs, Brook Hunt Long-Term Outlook for Copper – 1st Quarter Data Volume 2011, Xstrata Copper estimates 15 Supply recovery is impeded by project constraints § Although high copper prices have Probable copper mine project supply encouraged new mine supply, the 7000 kt copper response has lagged recovering demand, and constraints on growth remain. 6000 Although the mine project pipeline § Economic uncertainties and volatility has recovered from the economic of capital and operating costs remain crisis, forecast output from new 5000 mine projects over the next five impediments to the financing of years remains below 2009 levels. projects § Future supply growth is concentrated 4000 in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BHP Economic Contribution Report 2017 1 Chief Financial Officer’S Introduction
    Economic Contribution Report 2017 We have a long-standing commitment to transparency. We are proud of the value we generate and how this contributes to building trust with the communities in which we operate. In this Report Chief Financial Officer’s Introduction 2 Tax and our 2017 Financial Statements 20 FY2017 Total economic contribution 3 Basis of Report preparation 21 Our contribution throughout the value chain 6 Glossary 22 Approach to transparency and tax 9 Independent auditor’s report to the Directors Our payments to governments 14 of BHP Billiton Plc and BHP Billiton Limited 23 Corporate Directory 24 BHP Billiton Limited. ABN 49 004 028 077. Registered in Australia. Registered office: 171 Collins Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia. BHP Billiton Plc. Registration number 3196209. Registered in England and Wales. Registered office: Nova South, 160 Victoria Street London SW1E 5LB United Kingdom. Each of BHP Billiton Limited and BHP Billiton Plc is a member of the Group, which has its headquarters in Australia. BHP is a Dual Listed Company structure comprising BHP Billiton Limited and BHP Billiton Plc. The two entities continue to exist as separate companies but operate as a combined Group known as BHP. The headquarters of BHP Billiton Limited and the global headquarters of the combined Group are located in Melbourne, Australia. The headquarters of BHP Billiton Plc are located in London, United Kingdom. Both companies have identical Boards of Directors and are run by a unified management team. Throughout this publication, the Boards are referred to collectively as the Board. Shareholders in each company have equivalent economic and voting rights in the Group as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • The Profitable and Untethered March to Global Resource Dominance!
    Athens Journal of Business and Economics X Y GlencoreXstrata… The Profitable and Untethered March to Global Resource Dominance! By Nina Aversano Titos Ritsatos† Motivated by the economic causes and effects of their merger in 2013, we study the expansion strategy deployment of Glencore International plc. and Xstrata plc., before and after their merger. While both companies went through a series of international acquisitions during the last decade, their merger is strengthening effective vertical integration in critical resource and commodity markets, following Hymer’s theory of internationalization and Dunning’s theory of Eclectic Paradigm. Private existence of global dominant positioning in vital resource markets, posits economic sustainability and social fairness questions on an international scale. Glencore is alleged to have used unethical business tactics, increasing corruption, tax evasion and money laundering, while attracting the attention of human rights organizations. Since the announcement of their intended merger, the company’s market performance has been lower than its benchmark index. Glencore’s and Xstrata’s economic success came from operating effectively and efficiently in markets that scare off risk-averse companies. The new GlencoreXstrata is not the same company anymore. The Company’s new capital structure is characterized by controlling presence of institutional investors, creating adherence to corporate governance and increased monitoring and transparency. Furthermore, when multinational corporations like GlencoreXstrata increase in size attracting the attention of global regulation, they are forced by institutional monitoring to increase social consciousness. When ensuring full commitment to social consciousness acting with utmost concern with regard to their commitment by upholding rules and regulations of their home or host country, they have but to become “quasi-utilities” for the global industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Empirical Inference of Related Trading Between Two Securities: Detecting Pairs Trading, Merger Arbitrage, and Strategy Rules*
    Empirical inference of related trading between two securities: Detecting pairs trading, merger arbitrage, and strategy rules* Keith Godfrey The University of Western Australia Working paper: 5 September 2013 The traditional approach to studying pairs trading is to simulate profitability using ex-post historical prices. I study the actual trades reported anonymously in security pairs and build statistical inferences of related trading. The approach is based on the time differences between trades. It can distinguish intrinsically related securities from pseudo-random sets, find stocks involved in merger arbitrage in massive sets of paired index constituents, and infer dominant trading rules of mean reversion algorithms. Empirical inference of related trading can enable further studies into pairs trading, strategy rules, merger arbitrage, and insider trading. Keywords: Inferred trading, empirical inference, pairs trading, merger arbitrage. JEL Classification Codes: G00, G10, C10, C40, C60 The availability of intraday trading or “tick” data with time resolution of a millisecond or finer is opening many avenues of research into financial markets. Analysis of two or more streams of tick data concurrently is becoming increasingly important in the study of multiple-security trading including index tracking, pairs trading, merger arbitrage, and market-neutral strategies. One of the greatest challenges in empirical trading research is the anonymity of reported trades. Securities exchanges report the dates, times, prices, and volumes traded, without identifying the traders. In studies of a single security, this introduces uncertainty of whether each market order that caused a trade was the buy or sell order, and there are documented approaches of inference such as Lee and Ready (1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Carta De Codelco
    Codelco Investor Presentation February 2014 Copyrights © 2011 CODELCO-CHILE. Todos los Derechos Reservados. CopyrightsCopyrights © 20112010 by CODELCO--CHILE. All Rights Reserved. 1 Codelco´s Highlights Industry Overview Operating & Financial Review Development Plan Update & Outlook Copyrights © 2011 CODELCO-CHILE. Todos los Derechos Reservados. CopyrightsCopyrights © 20112010 by CODELCO--CHILE. All Rights Reserved. 2 Codelco At a Glance World Largest Copper Producer: 10% of Market Share Copper Reserves and Sep 2013 Financial Results Resources (million US$) (million mft) Pre-Tax Profit 2,672 Geological Resources 339.5 EBITDA 4,194 Mineral Resources 131.9 EBITDA Margin 38.5% Reserves 63.6 Sep 2013 Production* Credit Ratings (thousand mft) S&P AA- Stable Copper 1,310 Moody‟s A1 Negative World largest copper producer Fitch A+ Stable Molybdenum 16.2 2nd world largest moly producer DBRS A Stable *: Includes 49% share in El Abra and 20% in Anglo American Sur Copyrights © 2011 CODELCO-CHILE. Todos los Derechos Reservados. CopyrightsCopyrights © 20112010 by CODELCO--CHILE. All Rights Reserved. 3 Codelco: Sales Breakdown Sales Breakdown by Product – Sep 2013 Sales Breakdown by Region (mft) – Sep 2013 100% US$ millions 2013 % 1% 1% 13% 10% Copper 10,128 92.9% 90% Molybdenum 378 3.5% 10% 80% 12% Other Products (anodic slimes, 395 3.6% 70% 18% sulfuric acid, etc.) 15% Total 10,901 100% 60% 50% 18% 20% Copper Sales Breakdown (mft) – Sep 2013 40% Refined Copper 80% 30% Concentrate 20% - Cathodes 74% - Anodes/Blister 6% 20% 41% 40% 10% 0% Sep-13 Sep-12 China Asia (exc. China) Europe Source: Codelco North America South America Oceania Copyrights © 2011 CODELCO-CHILE.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Chile in 2014
    2014 Minerals Yearbook CHILE U.S. Department of the Interior October 2017 U.S. Geological Survey THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF CHILE By Susan Wacaster Chile’s position in the world’s mineral economy was that of a accounted for by the mining sector—4.9% by state-owned leading producer of copper, gold, iodine, lithium, molybdenum, Corporación National del Cobre (CODELCO) and 5.1% by natural nitrates, rhenium, silver, and zinc. In 2014, Chile private mining operations. The mining sector’s contribution to continued to be the world’s leading producer of mined copper, Government revenue between 2003 and 2013 averaged about accounting for 31% of the total; iodine, 66%; and rhenium, 20% annually but had been decreasing since 2008. The decrease 56%. Chile was the world’s second-ranked producer of lithium, was directly related to a downturn in international prices for accounting for 36% of total mine production after Australia copper. Since 2012, the average annual rate of growth of the (with less than a 1% difference), and mined boron (ulexite), price of refined copper on both the London Metal Exchange accounting for 10% of total production after Turkey (which and the New York Metal Exchange decreased by an average accounted for 70% of world production). Chile was the world’s annual rate of 8%. In turn, the average annual rate of growth third-ranked producer of molybdenum, accounting for 17% of of copper mine production in Chile increased by 3% per year. world production after China (37% of world production) and Mining sector activities contributed significantly to other the United States (24%); and the fifth-ranked producer of mined economic sectors in Chile.
    [Show full text]
  • Telfer W with Pr 800,000 Copper Signific Resourc
    4420 Newcrest Cover 04 6pp 16/9/04 9:52 AM Page 2 Telfer will be the largest gold mine in Australia, with projected annual production of more than 800,000 ounces of gold and 30,000 tonnes of copper for 24 years, positioning Newcrest as a significant and profitable Australian-based resources business. Newcrest Mining Limited Newcrest – The Sustainable Section 5 Resource Business 1 Sustainability and People 38 Section 1 Health and Safety 40 Our Results 2 Environment 42 Human Resources 43 Performance in Brief 2 Chairman’s Review 4 Section 6 ABN: 20 005 683 625 ABN: Managing Director and Corporate Governance 44 Chief Executive Officer’s Report 5 Board of Directors 45 Newcrest Senior Management 10 Corporate Governance 46 Financial Report 11 Section 7 Section 2 Concise Annual Report 2004 Financials 49 Operations 12 Directors’ Report 50 Cadia Valley Operations 14 Management Discussion and Analysis Ridgeway Gold/Copper Mine 14 of the Financial Statements 56 Cadia Hill Gold/Copper Mine 16 Statement of Financial Performance 58 Toguraci Gold Mine 19 Statement of Financial Position 59 Section 3 Statement of Cash Flows 60 Projects 22 Notes to the Concise Financial Report 61 Directors’ Declaration 68 Telfer Gold/Copper Project 24 Independent Audit Report 69 Cracow 26 Cadia East 28 Shareholder Information 70 Boddington Expansion Project 29 Five Year Summary 72 Section 4 Corporate Directory IBC Exploration 30 Strategy and Review 32 Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves 34 Newcrest Mining Limited Newcrest ABN: 20 005 683 625 Notice of Meeting Notice is hereby given that the 24th Annual General Newcrest Mining Limited Meeting will be held at the Hyatt Regency Hotel, Concise Annual Report 2004 99 Adelaide Terrace, Perth, Western Australia on Wednesday 27 October 2004 at 9.30am.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8: Colombia
    8 Colombia 8.1 Summary of Coal Industry 8.1.1 ROLE OF COAL IN COLOMBIA Coal accounted for eight percent of Colombia’s energy consumption in 2007 and one-fourth of total exports in terms of revenue in 2009 (EIA, 2010a). As the world’s tenth largest producer and fourth largest exporter of coal (World Coal, 2012; Reuters, 2014), Colombia provides 6.9 percent of the world’s coal exports (EIA, 2010b). It exports 97 percent of its domestically produced coal, primarily to the United States, the European Union, and Latin America (EIA, 2010a). Colombia had 6,746 million tonnes (Mmt) of proven recoverable coal reserves in 2013, consisting mainly of high-quality bituminous coal and a small amount of metallurgical coal (Table 8-1). The country has the second largest coal reserves in South America, behind Brazil, with most of those reserves concentrated in the Guajira peninsula in the north (on the country’s Caribbean coast) and the Andean foothills (EIA, 2010a). Its reserves of high-quality bituminous coal are the largest in Latin America (BP, 2014). Table 8-1. Colombia’s Coal Reserves and Production – 2013 Anthracite & Sub-bituminous & Total Global Indicator Bituminous Lignite (million Rank (million tonnes) (million tonnes) tonnes) (# and %) Estimated Proved Coal 6,746.0 0.0 67469.0 11 (0.8%) Reserves (2013) Annual Coal Production 85.5 0.0 85.5 10 (1.4%) (2013) Source: BP (2014) Coal production for export occurs mainly in the northern states of Guajira (Cerrejón deposit), Cesar, and Cordoba. There are widespread small and medium-size coal producers in Norte de Santander (metallurgical coal), Cordoba, Santander, Antioquia, Cundinamarca, Boyaca, Valle del Cauca, Cauca, Borde Llanero, and Llanura Amazónica (MB, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Investor Presentation
    Southern Copper Corporation November, 2018 0 I. Introduction 1 Safe Harbor Statement This presentation contains certain statements that are neither reported financial results nor other historical information. These estimates are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe-harbor provisions of the securities laws. These forward-looking estimates are subject to risk and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the expressed in the forward-looking statements. Many of these risks and uncertainties relate to factors that are beyond Southern Copper’s (SCC) ability to control or estimate precisely, such as future market conditions, commodity prices, the behavior of other market participants and the actions of governmental regulators. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward- looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this presentation. SCC does not undertake any obligation to publicly release any revision to these forward-looking estimates to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this presentation. 2 Corporate Structure 100.0% (*) AMERICAS MINING CORPORATION 88.9% (*) Public Float 11.1% (*) 99.29 % 99.96 % SCC Peru Branch Minera Mexico (*) As of September 30, 2018 3 Copper – The Best Fundamental Story in Commodities Solid Fundamentals Copper Consumption by Region ► Copper has the best fundamentals in the basic materials space: ― Expect 2.8% copper demand growth. 2018 demand driven by strong U. S. economic growth. ― Expect supply growth of 2% due to lack of projects. About 1/3 of world supply will discuss labor conditions. ― Our basic scenario does not consider an escalation of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Review and Summary Financial Statements 2010 Shareholder Information Continued
    Centrica plc Registered office: Millstream, Maidenhead Road, Windsor, Berkshire SL4 5GD Company registered in England and Wales No. 3033654 www.centrica.com Annual Review and Summary Financial Statements 2010 Shareholder Information continued SHAREHOLDER SERVICES Centrica shareholder helpline To register for this service, please call the shareholder helpline on 0871 384 2985* to request Centrica’s shareholder register is maintained by Equiniti, a direct dividend payment form or download it from which is responsible for making dividend payments and www.centrica.com/shareholders. 01 10 updating the register. OVERVIEW SUMMARY OF OUR BUSINESS The Centrica FlexiShare service PERFORMANCE If you have any query relating to your Centrica shareholding, 01 Chairman’s Statement please contact our Registrar, Equiniti: FlexiShare is a ‘corporate nominee’, sponsored by Centrica and administered by Equiniti Financial Services Limited. It is 02 Our Performance 10 Operating Review Telephone: 0871 384 2985* a convenient way to manage your Centrica shares without 04 Chief Executive’s Review 22 Corporate Responsibility Review Textphone: 0871 384 2255* the need for a share certificate. Your share account details Write to: Equiniti, Aspect House, Spencer Road, Lancing, will be held on a separate register and you will receive an West Sussex BN99 6DA, United Kingdom annual confirmation statement. Email: [email protected] By transferring your shares into FlexiShare you will benefit from: A range of frequently asked shareholder questions is also available at www.centrica.com/shareholders. • low-cost share-dealing facilities provided by a panel of independent share dealing providers; Direct dividend payments • quicker settlement periods; Make your life easier by having your dividends paid directly into your designated bank or building society account on • no share certificates to lose; and the dividend payment date.
    [Show full text]
  • Jacobs MCM- Quantitative Cost Analysis and Business Case Of
    Radi oacti ve Waste S tor age and Dispos al F acilities in S out h A ustr alia – Quantit ati ve C ost A nal ysis and Business C as e Radioactive Waste Storage and Disposal Facilities in South Australia – Quantitative Cost Analysis and Business Case Radioactive Waste Storage and Disposal Facilities in South Australia – Quantitative Cost Analysis and Business Case Project no: IW104700 Document title: Radioactive Waste Storage and Disposal Facilities in South Australia – Quantitative Cost Analysis and Business Case Revision: Draft Report V1 Date: 09 February 2016 Client name: South Australian Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission Client no: Jacobs Report (0.4) Project manager: Tim Johnson Authors: Darron Cook, Charles McCombie, Neil Chapman, Nigel Sullivan, Rohan Zauner, Tim Johnson File name: J:\IE\Projects\03_Southern\IW104700\21 Deliverables\Reformatted Docs for Client Release\09022016 Combined Papers V1.0.docx Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited ABN 37 001 024 095 Floor 11, 452 Flinders Street Melbourne VIC 3000 PO Box 312, Flinders Lane Melbourne VIC 8009 Australia T +61 3 8668 3000 F +61 3 8668 3001 www.jacobs.com COPYRIGHT: The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Document history and status Revision Date Description By Review Approved V0 19 Jan 2016 For Client review Darron Darron Cook Darron Cook, team Cook V1 9 February For public consultation Tim Johnson Darron Cook Darron Cook IW104700 i Radioactive Waste Storage and Disposal Facilities in South Australia – Quantitative Cost Analysis and Business Case Contents Executive Summary ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Peñasquito Site Tour
    Peñasquito Site Tour FEBRUARY 2020 PEÑASQUITO SITE TOUR 2.27.2020 Cautionary Statement CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS: This presentation contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which are intended to be covered by the safe harbor created by such sections and other applicable laws. Where a forward-looking statement expresses or implies an expectation or belief as to future events or results, such expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis. However, such statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed, projected or implied by the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements often address our expected future business and financial performance and financial condition; and often contain words such as “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “will,” “would,” “estimate,” “expect,” “believe,” “target,” “indicative,” “preliminary,” or “potential.” Forward-looking statements in this presentation may include, without limitation, (i) estimates of future production and sales, including production outlook, average future production, upside potential and indicative production profiles; (ii) estimates of future costs applicable to sales and all-in sustaining costs; (iii) estimates of project spend, budget estimates, sustaining capital and
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Codelco – 1.7MT Steady – Sum 1.7MT 2020 – GROWTH 1.7MT
    Expected forward production per copper miner Contents Codelco – 1.7MT steady – sum 1.7MT 2020 – GROWTH 1.7MT ....................................... 2 BHP – 1.7MT – 3.4 MT – growth 3.4MT ............................................................................ 4 Rio Tinto – 0.4MT = 3.8MT – growth 3.8MT ...................................................................... 4 Glencore – 1.4MT down to 1.3 MT long term – 2020=5.2MT, 2024=5.1MT ...................... 4 FCX – 1.5MT – growing to 1.9 2022 = 6.7 MT later 7.1 MT ............................................... 4 Anglo American0.8 – +0.45MT by 2023 – 7.5MT – later 8.35MT ...................................... 5 Antofagasta – 0.7MT, going to 1MT 2025 – 8.3MT later 9.35 MT ...................................... 5 Norilsk 0.5 – stable – 8.8 MT – 9.85 MT .............................................................................. 5 First quantum 0.7MT – 0.7MT – 9.5MT later 10.55MT ....................................................... 5 Sourhern copper 1MT – 2025 1 MT – 2027 1.7MT – 10.5MT – 11.55 MT by 2025. 2027 12.35 MT................................................................................................................................ 5 Teck 0.3 MT + 0.3 by 2023 – 10.8MT – 2023 12.15 MT ..................................................... 5 Barrick Gold – 0.15 rest included with Zaldivar for Antofagasta – 0.15 = 10.95/12.3 MT .. 6 Newcrest mining – 0.1 growth Wafi Golpu – 11.05/12.4 MT ............................................... 6 Seabridge gold KSM project .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]