White Storks in Armenia: Population, Trend, and Relationships to Humans

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

White Storks in Armenia: Population, Trend, and Relationships to Humans WHITE STORK POPULATIONS ACROSS THE WORLD White Storks in Armenia: population, trend, and relationships to humans Karen Aghababyan, Maro Kochinyan, J.C. Lyman, L. Stepanyan, Acopian Center for the Environment (ACE) Zusammenfassung Over the 3 years, the mean productivity ranged from 2.33 to 2.59 Zwischen 2005 und 2007 sammelten wir in Armenien Daten von young fledged per nest. The number of young fledged per nest has 993 Weißstorchnestern. Die meisten Nester befanden sich in der increased: the number of nests with four fledglings has increased Ararat Niederung (87% der Nester im Jahr 2007). Die Zahl der (63 in 2005, 98 in 2006 and 125 in 2007), while the number of Brutpaare stieg von 548 HPa im Jahr 2005 auf 601 HPa 2006 und nests fledging only two young has decreased (195 in 2005, 165 in 624 HPa 2007 an. Der Brutbestand während des letzten Weiß- 2006 and 150 in 2007). storchzensus im Jahr 1984 war mit 668 HPa höher. Dies wird mit möglichen Doppelzählungen von Nestern im Jahr 1984 in Ver- Nest site choice has also changed: in 2005-2007, 818 (82.4% out of bindung gebracht. Es kann sich aber auch um einen realen Rück- total number of observed nests) nests were placed on pylons, com- gang infolge der Zerstörung von Feuchtgebieten in der Zeit der pared with only 335 nests (50.1% out of total number of observed Sowjetunion handeln. nests) in 1984. During the study period, 115 nests were destroyed: of these, 61 nests (53%) were destroyed by wind and 25 nests (21.7%) Der durchschnittliche Reproduktionserfolg (JZa) lag zwischen by fire (due to electrical short circuit). Nests placed on roofs of 2,33 und 2,59 Jungen pro Nest. Die Anzahl von flüggen Jungvö- houses cause damage by blocking the drainage pipes in the roofs. geln pro Nest stieg an: die Anzahl von Nestern mit vier flüggen Conservation measures were directed at improving the relation- Jungvögeln hat zugenommen (63 – 2005; 98 – 2006 und 125 – ship between humans and storks, by providing special nest-plat- 2007), während die Anzahl mit nur zwei Jungen abgenommen hat forms for the roofs of houses, rehabilitating injured Storks, and (195 - 2005; 165 - 2006 und 150 - 2007). recreating the Storks as a national symbol of Armenia. Die Nistplatzwahl hat sich seit 1984 verändert. Im Zeitraum zwi- Methods schen 2005 und 2007 wurden 818 Nester (82,4%) auf elektrischen Strommasten gefunden, während es noch 1984 nur 335 Nester The research data were collected during 2005 – 2008. The stu- (50,1%) waren. Während der Untersuchungszeit wurden 115 dy area includes the Ararat, Armavir, Aragatsotn, Yerevan, Lori, Nester zerstört, davon 61 Nester (53%) durch Wind und 25 Nes- Shirak and Vayots Dzor marzes (regions) of Armenia (see map on ter (21,7%) durch Feuer infolge eines elektrischen Kurzschlusses. Fig. 1). Data collection involved 167 expeditions lasting a total of Storchennester, die auf Hausdächern gebaut wurden, blockierten 245 days. In total, we visited 245 locations, and detected nests in die Regenwasserrinnen und verursachten so Schäden an der Bau- 116 of them. substanz des Hauses. Die Schutzmaßnahmen zielten darauf ab, das Verhältnis zwischen den Weißstörchen und den Menschen zu Data from 983 White Stork nests were collected during our visits verbessern. So wurden spezielle Nestplattformen für Häuser auf- in the spring-summer season, via direct observations and with the gestellt und verletzte Störche gepflegt. Außerdem wurde mithilfe assistance of village inhabitants (“nest neighbors”). Usually, nest einer intensiven Öffentlichkeitsarbeit versucht, den Weißstorch neighbors are those people who live closest to the storks’ nests. wieder als ein nationales Symbol von Armenien zu etablieren. To determine the number of White Storks in Armenia we used the method of complete counts by mapping each nest site. For every Summary nest we have fixed the following data: During 2005-2007 we collected data on 993 nests of White Storks y Geographical coordinates using GPS “Garmin 60CSx”; nests in Armenia, most of which (87.0% of pairs in 2007) are found in were classified as located on pylons or high-tension electricity the Ararat plain. In the years 2005-2007 we recorded an increase pylons, building roofs, trees, waterworks, statues, and cranes. in the number of Storks: in 2005, 2006, and 2007 we have recorded y Number of adult storks occupying the nest, and number of 548, 601, and 624 pairs respectively. The number of pairs counted fledglings. during the previous census in 1984 was higher (668 pairs), and it is unclear: is it result of possible duplcation during the 1984 count y Contact details for the “nest neighbors” (name and phone as a result of erros in methodology, or a real decrease might have number) been caused by wetland degradation during the Soviet period. y The year of construction of the current nest, the number of The data comparison suggests that there was some decrease in the young, and frequency of accidents to nests were all detailed breeding population of White Storks in Armenia after 1984, but with the help of “nest neighbors”, who also recorded causes an increasing trend during 2005-7. However, the apparent decrea- of nest destruction (wind, nest burning by electricity wires, se may be a result of differences in the methods used for the two etc), falls of nestlings and eggs from their nests, and deaths surveys. The 1984 study (ADAMIAN 1990) was carried out by of adult storks, etc. post: the author sent out simple questionnaires by post, with a request for these to be completed and returned. Using this me- y Details of any cases of conflict between storks and people in thod it is hard to avoid duplication of data. By contrast, our study the village. was carried out by mapping and providing actual counts of nests, which means that there is no duplication and only a very low like- The data collected by researchers and students from the Acopi- lihood of missing a nest. The increase during 2005-2007 may be an Center for the Environment (ACE) were recorded on special due to a short-term fluctuation, or part of a longer-term trend. To forms, while the observations of nest neighbors were recorded determine the specific cause we need longer-term (at least 10-15 on wall-calendars (Fig. 2) designed for our current study. Each years) monitoring of population. censused nest was numbered with a special label to assist with future monitoring (Fig. 3). The comparison of mean annual productivity throughout Arme- nia (Tab. 2) shows that the average number of fledglings per nest The combined methods of direct counting and data recorded by ranged from 2.33 to 2.59. In general, mean productivity appears “nest neighbors” allowed us to count almost all the nests in Ar- to be stable, with fluctuations in some years (e.g. in 2006), which menia, and to obtain comprehensive informations about breeding may be related to the abundance of prey species, but conclusions times, and breeding success. regarding general trends of breeding performance require lon- ger-term monitoring to be carried out. The collected data were stored in a Microsoft Access 2003 data- base (Microsoft Office 2003) for further data analysis. Statistical Nest locations analyses were carried out using Excel 2003 (MS Office 2003) and SPSS 11.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, II). The analyses In Armenia, White Storks build their nests on electricity pylons, included calculating mean breeding success and standard devia- roofs, trees, and sometimes even on monuments or non-opera- tions. Mapping and spatial analysis were conducted with ArcGIS tional cranes. We analyzed data for 993 nests (Tab. 3) and deter- GIS 9.2 (ESRI, Redlands, CA). mined that White Storks mostly breed on various types of electri- city pylons (82.4%), including: regular wood and concrete pylons; Results of the census 2005 - 2007 railway pylons; and high voltage iron pylons (Fig. 6). A total of 993 nests were detected during 2005-2007 in the Ararat, The second most frequent nest locations are roofs: storks pla- Armavir, Vayoc Dzor, Shirak, Lori, Aragatsotn and Yerevan mar- ce nests on roofs of schools and local administration buildings zes (regions) of Republic of Armenia. Of these, 548 were occupied (usually the tallest buildings in the village), as well as on roofs of by pairs and 32 by single birds in 2005, 601 by pairs and 36 by private houses. By building nests on roofs, storks can cause seri- single birds in 2006, and 624 by pairs and 21 by single birds in ous damage to houses, since they generally place nests on draina- 2007. ge system pipes that can then become blocked. The result is that moisture accumulates in the walls causing damage to homes (Fig. Distribution of White Storks in Armenia was not uniform (Fig.4). 7). Most of the nests are situated in the Ararat valley (543 pairs, 87.0% in 2007), while several small subpopulations inhabit Shirak Comparison of our data with data collected in 1984 (ADAMIAN (26 pairs, 4.2%) and Lori (40 pairs, 6.4%) plateaus and Arpa river 1990) suggests that, over the years, storks have shifted their pre- valley (15 pairs, 2.4%). ferred nest locations from roofs to pylons. Nest sites on pylons are vulnerable to fire (caused by short circuits), or wind. During The total output of fledglings in 2005 was 1,310 (from 545 nests), 2005-2007, we recorded 115 cases of nest damage. 61 nests (53%) 1,385 (from 594 nests) in 2006, and 1,615 (from 623 nests) in were destroyed by wind, and 25 nests (21.7%) by fire. Damage to 2007. Mean productivity (JZa = young fledged per pair ± SD) was nests was relatively low in 2005 (25 cases), but higher in 2006 (37 2.40±1.07 in 2005, 2.33±1.29 in 2006 and 2.59±1.26 in 2007 (Fig.
Recommended publications
  • Biodiversity Action Plan for Amulsar, Armenia Prepared For: Lydian
    Biodiversity Action Plan for Amulsar, Armenia Prepared for: Lydian International By: Chancery Cottage, Kentisbeare, Cullompton, Devon, EX15 2DS, UK. Tel. +44 (0)1884 266694. www.treweek.co.uk. CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT .............................................................................................. 3 1.2 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ...................................................................................................... 3 1.3 LEGISLATIVE, REGULATORY AND POLICY FRAMEWORK ......................................................... 4 1.3.1 ARMENIAN LAW ............................................................................................................... 4 1.3.2 LENDER POLICIES, REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS ........................................................ 5 1.3.3 LYDIAN POLICY ................................................................................................................ 5 1.3.4 OTHER GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS ............................................................................... 5 1.4 OVERVIEW OF BIODIVERSITY AFFECTED BY THE PROJECT ..................................................... 5 1.5 THE BAP AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHER DOCUMENTS ................................................. 6 2 BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN ................................................................................................ 8 APPENDICES APPENDIX 1
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Tourist Attraction
    Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... rediscover armenia guide armenia > tourism > rediscover armenia guide about cilicia | feedback | chat | © REDISCOVERING ARMENIA An Archaeological/Touristic Gazetteer and Map Set for the Historical Monuments of Armenia Brady Kiesling July 1999 Yerevan This document is for the benefit of all persons interested in Armenia; no restriction is placed on duplication for personal or professional use. The author would appreciate acknowledgment of the source of any substantial quotations from this work. 1 von 71 13.01.2009 23:05 Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... REDISCOVERING ARMENIA Author’s Preface Sources and Methods Armenian Terms Useful for Getting Lost With Note on Monasteries (Vank) Bibliography EXPLORING ARAGATSOTN MARZ South from Ashtarak (Maps A, D) The South Slopes of Aragats (Map A) Climbing Mt. Aragats (Map A) North and West Around Aragats (Maps A, B) West/South from Talin (Map B) North from Ashtarak (Map A) EXPLORING ARARAT MARZ West of Yerevan (Maps C, D) South from Yerevan (Map C) To Ancient Dvin (Map C) Khor Virap and Artaxiasata (Map C Vedi and Eastward (Map C, inset) East from Yeraskh (Map C inset) St. Karapet Monastery* (Map C inset) EXPLORING ARMAVIR MARZ Echmiatsin and Environs (Map D) The Northeast Corner (Map D) Metsamor and Environs (Map D) Sardarapat and Ancient Armavir (Map D) Southwestern Armavir (advance permission
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of Dry Grasslands in Armenia: First Results from the 13Th EDGG Field Workshop in Armenia
    12 Palaearctic Grasslands 46 ( J u ly 20 2 0) Scientfc Report DOI: 10.21570/EDGG.PG.46.12-51 Biodiversity of dry grasslands in Armenia: First results from the 13th EDGG Field Workshop in Armenia Alla Aleksanyan1,2 , Idoia Biurrun3 , Elena Belonovskaya4 , Beata Cykowska-Marzencka5 , Asun Berastegi6 , Andreas Hilpold7 , Philipp Kirschner8 , Helmut Mayrhofer9 , Dariia Shyriaieva10 , Denys Vynokurov10 , Thomas Becker11 , Ute Becker12 , Iwona Dembicz13,14 , George Fayvush1 , Dieter Frank15 , Martn Magnes9 , Itziar García-Mijangos3 , Marine Oganesian16 , Salza Palpurina17 , Aslan Ünal18 , Yuliia 19 13,20,21* Vasheniak & Jürgen Dengler 1Department of Geobotany and Plant Eco-Physiology, Insttute of Botany 12Green School in the Botanic Garden, Johannes Gutenberg University afer A.L. Takhtajyan, NAS RA, Acharyan 1, 0040, Yerevan, Armenia; al- Mainz, Anselm-Franz-von-Bentzel-Weg 9 b, 55128 Mainz, Germany; beck- [email protected]; [email protected] [email protected] 2Chair of Biology and Biotechnology, Armenian Natonal Agrarian Universi- 13Vegetaton Ecology, Insttute of Natural Resource Sciences (IUNR), Zurich ty, Teryan 74, 0009, Yerevan, Armenia University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), Grüentalstr. 14, 8820 Wädenswil, 3Department of Plant Biology and Ecology, University of the Basque Coun- Switzerland; [email protected]; [email protected] try UPV/EHU, P.O. Box 644, 48080 Bilbao, Spain; [email protected]; 14Department of Plant Ecology and Environmental Conservaton, Faculty of [email protected] Biology, University of Warsaw, ul. Zwirki I Wigury 101, 02-089 Warsaw, 4Department of Biogeography, Insttute of Geography, Russian Academy of Poland Sciences, Staromonetny per. 29, 119017 Moscow, Russia; ebe- 15Saxony-Anhalt Environment Agency, Reideburger Str. 47, Halle 06116, [email protected] Germany; [email protected] 5Department of Mycology, W.
    [Show full text]
  • Yerevan Green City Action Plan
    DRAFT (3 July 2017) Yerevan Green City Action Plan Yerevan 2017 OFFICIAL USE Yerevan’s Green City Action Plan Disclaimer This Green City Action Plan was prepared for the City of Yerevan by an international team of experts led by Ernst & Young, s.r.o. (Czech Republic). Other members of the consortium included GEOtest, SWECO, SEVEn and local experts. The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), the Czech Government's Official Development Assistance Technical Cooperation Fund or the City of Yerevan do not carry any responsibility for the selection, involvement and monitoring of Ernst & Young and / or any third party claims towards EBRD for utilizing services provided by Ernst & Young. 1 OFFICIAL USE Executive Summary In the light of continuous global urbanization, sustainable development challenges increasingly stem from cities. Yerevan is fully aware of these challenges, as the administrative as well as economic centre of Armenia, the overall economic prosperity of the country is substantially anchored on Yerevan’s economic development The quality of the urban environment, including air, water, soil, biodiversity, environmental assets and ecosystems are negatively impacted by human activities such as transport, energy, water use and waste management. In the recent years, many measures have already been taken to remedy the situation, but the measures should be doubled in the coming years to raise the quality of life in the City to standards seen in many European cities. These efforts will also help Yerevan contribute to global efforts in climate change mitigation and the transition to green economy. Methodology The Green City Action Plan (GCAP) was developed by applying 4 stage methodology, which is as follows: Stage 1 focused on relevant information and data identification, collection, processing and analysis to establish the baseline indicators, which rank the city compared to internationally recognized benchmarks.
    [Show full text]
  • Sevan Writers' Resort Conservation Management Plan
    CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN | 1 Sevan Writers’ Resort Conservation Management Plan Sevan Writers’ Resort Conservation Management Plan The Sevan Writers’ Resort Conservation Management Plan has been developed by urbanlab, commissioned by the Writers’ Union of Armenia with the financing of the Getty Foundation’s Keeping It Modern initiative, within the scope of the Sevan Writers’ Resort Conservation Management Plan Development and Scientific Restoration Project. The project was initiated and elaborated by Ruben Arevshatyan and Sarhat Petrosyan. urbanlab is a Yerevan-based independent urban think-do-share lab, aimed to promote democratization of urban landscape toward sustainable development in its broader understanding. Acknowledgement Conservation Management Plan Consultant: Jonas Malmberg, Álvaro Aalto Foundation (Helsinki) Research Lead: Ruben Arevshatyan Research Coordinator: Nora Galfayan Researcher on Architectural Archives: Aleksandra Selivanova (Moscow) Researcher on Interior and Furniture: Olga Kazakova (Moscow) Lead Architect: Sarhat Petrosyan, urbanlab Structural Consultant: Grigor Azizyan, ArmProject Legal Consultant: Narek Ashughatoyan, Legallab HORECA Consultant: Anahit Tantushyan Glass Structure Consultant: Vahe Revazyan, Gapex HVAC System Consultant: Davit Petrosyan, Waelcon Conservation Architect Consultant: Mkrtich Minasyan Design Consultant: Verena von Beckerat, Heide & Von Beckerath Scientific Consultants: Vladimir Paperny (Los Angeles), Marina Khrustaleva (Moscow), Karen Balyan, Georg Schöllhammer (Austria) Colour
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Armenia Yerevan
    MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA Y E R E V A N – 2008 C O N T E N T List of Acronyms and Abbreviations 4 A. Introduction 5 1. General Information 5 2. Brief Outline of Agriculture 5 3. General Description of Plant Production Sector 5 B. Main Part 8 Chapter 1. The State of Biodiversity 8 1.1. Basic Main Value of the Plant Genetic Resources 8 1.2. Diversity Within and Between Crops 8 1.2.1. The State of Diversity of Major Crops 8 1.2.2. Diversity of Minor Crops and Underutilized Species 9 1.2.3. Wild Crop Relatives and Wild Plants for Food Production 10 1.3. Diversity of Modern Selection Varieties 11 1.4. Diversity of local varieties 12 1.5. Factors influencing the state of the Plant Genetic Diversity 13 Chapter 2. The State of In Situ Management 14 2.1. PGRFA conservation in nature specially protected areas 14 2.1.2. State reserves 14 2.1.3. State protected areas and nature monuments 16 2.1.4. NSPAs and Ecosystem Management 16 2.1.5. In Situ Management of PGRFA outside of NSPA 16 2.2. In situ related projects (Inventories, Surveys and Research) 17 2.2.1. Research projects, surveys, management plans 17 2.2.2. Participatory Management 17 2.3. On-farm management 18 2.4. Restoring Agricultural Systems after Disasters 19 2.5. In situ conservation of Wild Crop Relatives and Wild Plants for Food 20 Production 2.6. Improvement of In Situ Management, Priorities and Needs 20 2.6.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Analysis Update for Armenia Final Report Prosperity, Livelihoods and Conserving Ecosystems (Place) Iqc Task Order #4
    BIODIVERSITY ANALYSIS UPDATE FOR ARMENIA FINAL REPORT PROSPERITY, LIVELIHOODS AND CONSERVING ECOSYSTEMS (PLACE) IQC TASK ORDER #4 February 2009 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by the Armenia Biodiversity Update Team of ECODIT. ECODIT Contract #EPP-I-04-06-00010-00; Task Order #04 AUTHORITY Prepared for USAID/Armenia under Prosperity, Livelihoods and Conserving Ecosystems (PLACE) Indefinite Quantity Contract number EPP-I-04-06-00010-00, Task Order #04 awarded 14 November 2008, entitled Biodiversity Analysis Update for Armenia (“Armenia Biodiversity Update”). This “Armenia Biodiversity Update” was completed in reference to the task order. The views expressed and opinions contained in this report are those of the Armenia Biodiversity Assessment Team and are not intended as statements of policy of either USAID or the contractor. PREPARED BY: ARMENIA BIODIVERSITY UPDATE TEAM ASSEMBLED BY ECODIT, INC. ECODIT, Inc. 1800 N. Kent Street, Suite 1260 Arlington, VA 22209 USA Tel: +1 703 841 1883 Fax: +1 703 841 1885 Web: www.ecodit.com BIODIVERSITY ANALYSIS UPDATE FOR ARMENIA – FINAL REPORT FEBRUARY 17, 2009 ECODIT Contract #EPP-I-04-06-00010-00; Task Order #04 BIODIVERSITY ANALYSIS UPDATE FOR ARMENIA FINAL REPORT PROSPERITY, LIVELIHOODS AND CONSERVING ECOSYSTEMS (PLACE) IQC TASK ORDER #4 DISCLAIMER The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. BIODIVERSITY ANALYSIS UPDATE FOR ARMENIA – FINAL REPORT FEBRUARY 17, 2009 ECODIT Contract #EPP-I-04-06-00010-00; Task Order #04 [this page intentionally blank] BIODIVERSITY ANALYSIS UPDATE FOR ARMENIA – FINAL REPORT FEBRUARY 17, 2009 ECODIT Contract #EPP-I-04-06-00010-00; Task Order #04 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY his Biodiversity Analysis update responds to requirements of Section 119(d) of the FAA of 1961 (as T amended) and ADS 201.3.8.2 regarding biodiversity analysis for country strategic plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Abovian Walking Tour
    NOTES: ARMAVIR ARMAVIRB REGION MAP HHH a traveler’s reference guide ® excavations of some of the country’s most famous Highlights cities, from each period of the country’s history. ARMAVIR marz B INTRODUCTION Area: 1251 sq. km ²ðزìÆðÙ³ñ½ It is for its Christian history that the marz is most Population: 160300 • Visit Vagharshapat, the Seat of the famous for locals and Diaspora Armenians, who Marz capital: Armavir Catholicos and center of the Armenian make pilgrimages to Armenia as much to worship ByB RickH Ney Distance from Yerevan: 48 km Apostolic Church (p. 17) at the ca. 303 cathedral of Echmiadzin as to visit MapsB by RafaelH Torossian Marzpetaran: Tel: (237) 63 716 • Explore Metsamor, the birthplace of their homeland. And its Christian history is as Edited by BellaH Karapetian Largest City: Vagharshapat (Echmiadzin) brozne, and its 2800 BCE astral dramatic as its ritual, borrowing from Pagan rites observatory (p. 55) and beliefs that continue to thrive in their Christian TABLEB OF CONTENTS Armavir is Armenia’s Cradle of Civilization; home to some of the oldest cities in the Near East, the context. H • Attend Sunday service (or Feast Day) at INTRODUCTION (p. 3) world’s oldest known forging of bronze, and its first Echmiadzin cathedral; listen to its NATUREH (p. 3) Armavir is featured in Armenia’s Freedom Struggle Christian state. Both are just a few miles from spectacular choir (p. 29) DOH (p. 6) after WWI, and is home of the battle that insured each other, and taken together they explore a WHEN?H (p. 7) the country’s independence, at Sardarapat.
    [Show full text]
  • Sixth National Report of the Republic of Armenia to the Convention On
    SIXTH NATIONAL REPORT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA Convention on biological diversity Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity Table contents LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 4 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 5 SECTION 1: INFORMATION ON THE TARGETS BEING PURSUED AT THE NATIONAL LEVEL ..... 7 National Target 1: .......................................................................................................................................... 7 National Target 2: .......................................................................................................................................... 9 National Target 3: ....................................................................................................................................... 11 National Target 4:........................................................................................................................................ 12 National Target 5: ....................................................................................................................................... 17 National Target 6: ....................................................................................................................................... 19 National Target 7: .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ASSESSMENT of PRIORITY CAPACITY BUILDING NEEDS for BIODIVERSITY Report
    MINISTRY OF NATURE PROTECTION ASSESSMENT OF PRIORITY CAPACITY BUILDING NEEDS FOR BIODIVERSITY Report GEF Project Implemented by UNDP Yerevan - 2002 1 ASSESSMENT OF PRIORITY CAPACITY BUILDING NEEDS FOR BIODIVERSITY NATIONAL REPORT Project National Coordinator SERGEY SHASHIKYAN Project Assistant GAYANE SIMONYAN National Consultants ARAM GEVORGYAN, GEORGE FAYVUSH, ALVINA AVAGYAN, SIRANUSH MURADYAN, YURA CHMSHKYAN, ZHIRAYR VARDANYAN, HASMIK KHACHATRYAN, VOLODYA ZORANYAN International Consultant DENNIS FENTON Design HARUTYUN MARDANYAN, EDWARD MARTIROSYAN The “Assessment of priority capacity building needs for biodiversity” has been produced by the financial assistance of Global Environmental Facility, within the framework of the UNDP/GEF ARM/97/G/31 "Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan, Phase II" Project. The authors express their gratitude to the GEF and UNDP Armenia Office for their LIST OF PARTICIPANTS support in the producing the National Report. 2 CHAPTER I IN –SITU AND EX-SITU CONSERVATION OF BIODIVERSITY IN ARMENIA INTRODUCTION CURRENT STATUS According to principles of legislation on nature protection the biodiversity in-situ conservation is implemented all over the country and mainly in the specially protected areas. In-situ conservation in the span includes establishing the special regimes for conservation and use, and out of the territory of span establishing the limits for use. Biodiversity in-situ conservation and sustainable use has a long history in Armenia. This can be seen in the traditional economical activities practices in Armenia. At the same time, special conservation and use regimes have been established for specially protected areas. Research by Armenian historians indicates that since the middle ages, or even as early as the 4th century, the Armenian King Khosrov established a manmade forest on the territory of present Khosrov reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation of Genetic Resources and Their Use in Traditional Food Production Systems by Small Farmers of the Southern Caucasus
    GARDENS of BIODIVERSITY Conservation of genetic resources and their use in traditional food production systems by small farmers of the Southern Caucasus Caterina Batello Senior Agricultural Officer, FAO Plant Production and Protection Division, Rome Damiano Avanzato Senior Researcher Centro di Ricerca per la Frutticoltura (CRA), Rome Zeynal Akparov Director, Genetic Resources Institute Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences (ANAS), Baku Tamar Kartvelishvili Deputy Chief of SC Georgian National Association for Animal Production (GNAAP), Tbilisi Andreas Melikyan Doctor Professor, Head of the Department of Plant and Vegetable Breeding State Agrarian University of Armenia, Yerevan GARDENS of BIODIVERSITY Conservation of genetic resources and their use in traditional food production systems by small farmers of the Southern Caucasus Photographs by Marzio Marzot FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS | ROME, 2010 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-106613-3 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Convention on the Conservation of the European Wildlife and Natural Habitats (Bern, 1979)
    CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF THE EUROPEAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL HABITATS (BERN, 1979) 3rd project Steering Committee meeting (Strasbourg, 14 January 2016) Armenia Hasmik Ghalachyan- Ministry of Nature Protection Republic of Armenia ARMENIA Area – 29740 sq. km Altitudes – 375 – 4095 m a.s.l. Flora - ~3800 species of vascular plants, Algae – 428 species Mosses – 399 species Fungi – 4207 species Lichens – 464 species EMERALD NETWORK IN ARMENIA -PHASE I 2009 - 2011 Potential Sites – 9 <<Khosrov Forest>> State reserve, <<Sevan>>, <<Lake Arpi>> National parks, <<Khor Virap>>, <<Plane grove>> State sactuaries and <<Khustup>>, <<Erakhi range>>, <<Lori lake>>, <<Sjuniqi shibljak>> Occupy 206 697,5 ha and forms 7% of the total country area. EMERALD NETWORK IN ARMENIA - 2013 Sites – 12 Four new areas were evaluated and were included in the “Emerald Network” "Aragats Alpine" State Sanctuarie- “Dilijan-Ijevan”- National park and State Sanctuarie "Gnishik" State Sanctuarie “Araratian Marshes” Nature monument areas And one changed The total area of the 12 Emerald Network sites is currently 291 364.0 ha territory and form around 9.8 percent of the total area. EMERALD NETWORK IN ARMENIA - 2014 1 new site – “Arevik” 1 site was devided on two: “Dilijan” and “Idjevan” 4 new ecosystems 1 new plant species EMERALD NETWORK IN ARMENIA - 2014 Sites – 14 Habitats – 21 Plants – 8 Birds – 117 Fishes – 3 Reptiles – 4 Mammals – 13 Invertebratae – 5 Total area 346 949 ha, and forms 11% of the total country area. EMERALD NETWORK IN ARMENIA - 2015 As result of of this year’s works and field trips it was decided: To organize and prepare descriptions of 8 new sites – <<Tatev>> <<Djermuk>> <<Khndzoresk>> <Djadjur>> <<Metsamor>> <<Armash>> <<Akhuryan>> <<.Lastiver>> where new for the work habitats exists, some rare birds nest, and some other vertebrate animals have good live conditions.
    [Show full text]