In Deal of the Century, Palestinians Stranded Between Two Elections

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

In Deal of the Century, Palestinians Stranded Between Two Elections UK £2 Issue 242, Year 5 EU €2.50 February 2, 2020 www.thearabweekly.com Hints Middle East Lebanon’s of Qatari after Brexit many scandal crises Page 14 Page 18 Pages 3,10 Arabic language learning industry on the rise but apprenticeship is complex Native speakers often recognise the difficulty of learning Arabic. Khadija “I can only salute their efforts. Hamouchi Myself, an Arabic ‘native’ speaker, I am in continuous language training through my daily read- earning the Arabic ing activity,” said Farah, a young language is no longer Jordanian banker in Dubai. solely the concern of Informal surveys of students parents in the Arab show difficulties of grammar, diaspora regarding their the different script and the vast Looking at elections. US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu foreign-born children logic difference between Arabic take part in the announcement of US Middle East peace plan at the White House, January 28. (AFP) Land a scattering of others around as a Semitic language and English the world. as a Latin language. “The main Hundreds of thousands of challenge is to educate learners language learners worldwide are from the onset about the diglossic attracted to Arabic, making the nature of Arabic, i.e., the split be- In Deal of the Century, language ever more relevant in the tween classical and the dialects,” 21st century. That trend led lead- Abouzahr said. ing language learning app Duolin- Sara said: “Learners need to go to add Arabic to its repertoire understand that there are several Palestinians stranded last June. levels to the language. Not all dia- The Arab World Institute in Paris lects will make them understood announced the first internation- everywhere.” ally recognised certification that Most classes in accredited lan- between two elections assesses proficiency in mod- guage-learning institutions focus ern standard Arabic, a much- rigidly on classical Arabic and its acclaimed development among grammar, which represents only The Arab Weekly staff The deal was expected to help US Jews are divided on Trump. It Arabic teachers and learning part of the picture of the language. Trump court the Evangelical Chris- was not surprising that Palestinian institutions. “I sometimes wished my profes- tian right, an important part of his President Mahmoud Abbas cited “More than 415,000 people sor linked the grammar, vocabu- London political base. criticism of the deal by J street, a have started the course since our lary and syntax of classical Arabic “Trump needs them, their money, liberal Jewish organisation that is launch on June 26, 2019,” said to one local dialect. I would have S President Donald Trump’s their presence at his rallies and their not part of Trump’s constituen- Michaela Kron, Duolingo’s public learnt more efficiently and rel- much-anticipated Middle continued support in the elections,” cies. relations manager. “To give a evantly to daily life,” said Amelia East peace plan was short said Israeli columnist Nahum Barnea. Both US and Israeli leaders also point of comparison, we launched Blunt, a British student in Middle U on surprises but not on Trump’s pro-Israel stances have have legal trouble in common. our Hindi course, a highly re- Eastern studies. US and Israeli claims of “historic” momentum in the US Republican Trump is facing an impeachment quested course, in 2018. In the achievement. establishment. A recent Gallup Poll trial in the US Senate and Netan- first month, the course had about The initiative announced Janu- indicated that Republican respond- yahu is defending himself against 53,000 active learners, compared Beyond the political ary 28 would extend Israel’s control ents had shifted to a more pro-Israel corruption charges. As he with- to the 415,000 active learners (for over Jerusalem and allow it to an- stance in the past ten years. In 1988, drew his request of immunity, the Arabic course).” drive and motives, nex a good part of West Bank settle- Gallup said 47% of Republican and Netanyahu was hoping his asso- In the United States, following interest had to do ments, including the Jordan Valley. 42% of Democratic respondents ciation with Trump could help him the 9/11 attacks, the 2003 US-led more altruism and The Palestinians, who were not in- sided with the Israelis in the conflict change the narrative at home. invasion of Iraq and the Arab volved in putting the plan together, with the Palestinians. In March 2019, Interestingly, Arab-Israelis (pre- uprisings, universities could not cultural enrichment were offered the conditional promise 43% of Democrats stated pro-Israel 1948 Palestinians) could weigh open enough classes to satisfy outlooks. of demilitarised statehood, a 4-year positions while 76% of Republican in against Netanyahu’s fortunes. demands of students. Many of “freeze” on settlements and $50 bil- asked said they sided with Israel. Ayman Odeh, leader of the Joint those pursuing Middle Eastern Key players in the industry are lion in economic incentives. The Democratic Party has increas- List of Arab parties in the Israeli studies, politics and global affairs addressing the problems. The Rather than an opening towards ingly shifted to progressive positions. parliament, said “the path to trial study classical Arabic or modern Duolingo app teaches the alphabet negotiations, the proposal is a pack- Many of the reactions by Democratic is paved and no diplomatic public standard Arabic. methodically, introduces grammar age left at the door of the Palestinians presidential nomination contenders relations stunt in the world” would “All these global events spurred with context and provides phonet- with the option, US diplomats said, to were critical of the Trump plan. prevent Netanyahu from being a policy interest, more media ics exercises. A tour at language accept or offer an alternative to it. brought to justice. coverage and high-paying jobs sections of libraries in Lebanon In recent years, US positions have As they head to the Americans and Israelis seem in the intelligence community in provides learners with introduc- been clearly favourable to Israel, in- wary of the risk that electoral one- particular,” said Hossam Abou- tory books about local dialects. United Nations to protest, cluding the recognition of the Jewish upmanship in Israel could make zahr, a Lebanese American who “We face a new generation of state’s sovereignty over Jerusalem the Palestinians face things worse for the Palestinians, started the Living Arabic Project learners who juggle between mod- and the Golan Heights. repercussions not only with extremists in Israel pushing online initiative to support learn- ern standard Arabic to understand The absence of the Palestinians of the US and Israeli for immediate annexation of set- ing Arabic. the media and fieldwork with local was glaring both in the preparation of elections but also the tlements and the United States re- Beyond the political and job- communities. We are becoming the plan as in regard to the theatrics fallout of changed luctant to get involved. prospect drive, interest centred on aware of this need and act accord- of its announcement. As they head to realities of the region. Washington would like to avoid altruism and cultural enrichment. ingly during our lessons,” said the United Nations to pro- a showdown before Israel’s “Many of our students are Hameed Abdulrahman, a freelance test, the Palestinians find March 2 election. White House humanitarian aid workers travel- teacher in Cairo. themselves stranded be- senior adviser Jared Kushner ling to the Middle East but also The Arabic language learning tween two elections and expressed “the hope” that young corporate professionals industry is getting attention from the changed realities of Israelis “wait until after the based in the Middle East willing all sides and what would serve the region. election and we’ll work with to converse with the locals,” said learners even better is the creation Observers saw the them to try to come up with Aline Sara, CEO of NaTakallam, an of a methodical approach to how White House announce- something.” award-winning start-up offering the language is used daily. ment as less pertinent to Israel’s Channel 12 reported conversational learning pro- Middle East peacemak- that Israeli Finance Minister grammes delivered by refugees. Khadija Hamouchi, an ing than to forthcoming Moshe Kahlon told Palestin- Abouzahr said Arab-American award-winning technology elections in the United ian Authority Civil Affairs communities have become more entrepreneur and researcher, States and Israel. Minister Hussein al-Sheikh established and integrated, creat- is the co-founder of Jawla Inc, Israel has its third election in less the Palestinians should “tem- ing increased interest in learning an online publishing tool for than a year next month. Prime Min- per their response until after the about Arab culture in museums right-to-left languages, including Protesting. Palestinian and through cultural and media Arabic in particular. She conveys ister Binyamin Netanyahu’s Likud President Mahmoud Abbas March elections in Israel” because events. “Even Netflix and Hulu stories of change and homegrown party has a narrow lead in polls over speaks in the West Bank city “everything could change after the have modern Arabic shows,” he intellectual thinking in the Middle the centrist Blue and White alliance of Ramallah, January 22. (AP) vote.” of Benny Gantz. P2,6-7,11 said. East and North Africa. 2 February 2, 2020 Top news Britain Reactions to US Mideast peace warns Israel initiative reflect regional divide against annexation Mohammed Alkhereiji The Arab Weekly staff London egional reactions to US London President Donald Trump’s much-anticipated Deal of ritain warned Israel R the Century varied from against seizing parts of cautious support to complete rejec- the West Bank in line tion, leaving the latest attempt at B with US President Donald resolving the decades-long Israeli- Trump’s peace plan for Israelis Palestinian conflict up in the air.
Recommended publications
  • Syria and Repealing Decision 2011/782/CFSP
    30.11.2012 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 330/21 DECISIONS COUNCIL DECISION 2012/739/CFSP of 29 November 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Syria and repealing Decision 2011/782/CFSP THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, internal repression or for the manufacture and maintenance of products which could be used for internal repression, to Syria by nationals of Member States or from the territories of Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in Member States or using their flag vessels or aircraft, shall be particular Article 29 thereof, prohibited, whether originating or not in their territories. Whereas: The Union shall take the necessary measures in order to determine the relevant items to be covered by this paragraph. (1) On 1 December 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/782/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria ( 1 ). 3. It shall be prohibited to: (2) On the basis of a review of Decision 2011/782/CFSP, the (a) provide, directly or indirectly, technical assistance, brokering Council has concluded that the restrictive measures services or other services related to the items referred to in should be renewed until 1 March 2013. paragraphs 1 and 2 or related to the provision, manu­ facture, maintenance and use of such items, to any natural or legal person, entity or body in, or for use in, (3) Furthermore, it is necessary to update the list of persons Syria; and entities subject to restrictive measures as set out in Annex I to Decision 2011/782/CFSP. (b) provide, directly or indirectly, financing or financial assistance related to the items referred to in paragraphs 1 (4) For the sake of clarity, the measures imposed under and 2, including in particular grants, loans and export credit Decision 2011/273/CFSP should be integrated into a insurance, as well as insurance and reinsurance, for any sale, single legal instrument.
    [Show full text]
  • Access Resource
    The State of Justice Syria 2020 The State of Justice Syria 2020 Syria Justice and Accountability Centre (SJAC) March 2020 About the Syria Justice and Accountability Centre The Syria Justice and Accountability Centre (SJAC) strives to prevent impunity, promote redress, and facilitate principled reform. SJAC works to ensure that human rights violations in Syria are comprehensively documented and preserved for use in transitional justice and peace-building. SJAC collects documentation of violations from all available sources, stores it in a secure database, catalogues it according to human rights standards, and analyzes it using legal expertise and big data methodologies. SJAC also supports documenters inside Syria, providing them with resources and technical guidance, and coordinates with other actors working toward similar aims: a Syria defined by justice, respect for human rights, and rule of law. Learn more at SyriaAccountability.org The State of Justice in Syria, 2020 March 2020, Washington, D.C. Material from this publication may be reproduced for teach- ing or other non-commercial purposes, with appropriate attribution. No part of it may be reproduced in any form for commercial purposes without the prior express permission of the copyright holders. Cover Photo — A family flees from ongoing violence in Idlib, Northwest Syria. (C) Lens Young Dimashqi TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 2 Introduction 4 Major Violations 7 Targeting of Hospitals and Schools 8 Detainees and Missing Persons 8 Violations in Reconciled Areas 9 Property Rights
    [Show full text]
  • August 2011 Postcard
    postcard_marchapril_2020.qxp_MARCH APRIL 2020 Postcard 1/29/20 10:06 AM Page 2 ¡ DEAR PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: PLACE You have repeatedly boasted of your skills as a negotiator. If you were the You may wish leader of Palestine, would you view the recently released Israel-Palestine 35¢ “peace plan” as a serious overture? Of course not! Any negotiator would STAMP hastily dismiss a proposal that only reflects one side’s interests. How does HERE to send these this deal advance peace? It’s clear this proposal will not lead to a peace set- tlement and could only result in a worsening divide and more violence and injustice. What does the U.S. get out of this deal? Nothing but the promise of greater global distrust. This proposal cards to forgoes any sense of partiality and signals an almost complete acquiescence to Israeli desires. So much for putting “America First.” President TO: Donald Trump PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP THE WHITE HOUSE 1600 PENNSYLVANIA AVE, NW and the WASHINGTON, DC 20500 Senator and ¡ Representative DEAR SENATOR: PLACE It’s painfully clear to objective observers that President Trump’s Israel- Palestine “peace plan” is simply a green light for Israel to do as it wishes. 35¢ in whose The plan embarrassingly forgoes any premise of U.S. impartiality and puts a STAMP blind rubber stamp on Israel’s desire to annex the West Bank and exert its HERE control over Palestinians. How does this deal advance peace? It’s clear this constituency proposal will not lead to a peace settlement and could only result in a worsening divide and more violence and injustice.
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli–Palestinian Peacemaking January 2019 Middle East and North the Role of the Arab States Africa Programme
    Briefing Israeli–Palestinian Peacemaking January 2019 Middle East and North The Role of the Arab States Africa Programme Yossi Mekelberg Summary and Greg Shapland • The positions of several Arab states towards Israel have evolved greatly in the past 50 years. Four of these states in particular – Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the UAE and (to a lesser extent) Jordan – could be influential in shaping the course of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. • In addition to Egypt and Jordan (which have signed peace treaties with Israel), Saudi Arabia and the UAE, among other Gulf states, now have extensive – albeit discreet – dealings with Israel. • This evolution has created a new situation in the region, with these Arab states now having considerable potential influence over the Israelis and Palestinians. It also has implications for US positions and policy. So far, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the UAE and Jordan have chosen not to test what this influence could achieve. • One reason for the inactivity to date may be disenchantment with the Palestinians and their cause, including the inability of Palestinian leaders to unite to promote it. However, ignoring Palestinian concerns will not bring about a resolution of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, which will continue to add to instability in the region. If Arab leaders see regional stability as being in their countries’ interests, they should be trying to shape any eventual peace plan advanced by the administration of US President Donald Trump in such a way that it forms a framework for negotiations that both Israeli and Palestinian leaderships can accept. Israeli–Palestinian Peacemaking: The Role of the Arab States Introduction This briefing forms part of the Chatham House project, ‘Israel–Palestine: Beyond the Stalemate’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Geopolitical Dynamics of the Middle East and Their Impact on Israeli-Palestinian Peace Efforts
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Honors Theses Lee Honors College 4-25-2018 The Changing Geopolitical Dynamics of the Middle East and their Impact on Israeli-Palestinian Peace Efforts Daniel Bucksbaum Western Michigan University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/honors_theses Part of the Comparative Politics Commons, International Relations Commons, and the Other Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Bucksbaum, Daniel, "The Changing Geopolitical Dynamics of the Middle East and their Impact on Israeli- Palestinian Peace Efforts" (2018). Honors Theses. 3009. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/honors_theses/3009 This Honors Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Lee Honors College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Changing Geopolitical Dynamics of the Middle East and their Impact on Israeli- Palestinian Peace Efforts By Daniel Bucksbaum A thesis submitted to the Lee Honors College Western Michigan University April 2018 Thesis Committee: Jim Butterfield, Ph.D., Chair Yuan-Kang Wang, Ph.D. Mustafa Mughazy, Ph.D. Bucksbaum 1 Table of Contents I. Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………3 II. Source Material……………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 III. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 IV. Historical Context for the Two-State Solution………………………………………………………...6 a. Deeply Rooted and Ideological Claims to the Land……………………………………………….…..7 b. Legacy of the Oslo Accords……………………………………………………………………………………….9 c. Israeli Narrative: Why the Two-State Solution is Unfeasible……………………………………19 d. Palestinian Narrative: Why the Two-State Solution has become unattainable………..22 e. Drop in Support for the Two-State Solution; Negotiations entirely…………………………27 f.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gulf States and the Middle East Peace Process: Considerations, Stakes, and Options
    ISSUE BRIEF 08.25.20 The Gulf States and the Middle East Peace Process: Considerations, Stakes, and Options Kristian Coates Ulrichsen, Ph.D, Fellow for the Middle East conflict, the Gulf states complied with and INTRODUCTION enforced the Arab League boycott of Israel This issue brief examines where the six until at least 1994 and participated in the nations of the Gulf Cooperation Council— oil embargo of countries that supported 1 Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Israel in the Yom Kippur War of 1973. In Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates 1973, for example, the president of the (UAE)—currently stand in their outlook and UAE, Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, approaches toward the Israeli-Palestinian claimed that “No Arab country is safe from issue. The first section of this brief begins by the perils of the battle with Zionism unless outlining how positions among the six Gulf it plays its role and bears its responsibilities, 2 states have evolved over the three decades in confronting the Israeli enemy.” In since the Madrid Conference of 1991. Section Kuwait, Sheikh Fahd al-Ahmad Al Sabah, a two analyzes the degree to which the six brother of two future Emirs, was wounded Gulf states’ relations with Israel are based while fighting with Fatah in Jordan in 3 on interests, values, or a combination of 1968, while in 1981 the Saudi government both, and how these differ from state to offered to finance the reconstruction of state. Section three details the Gulf states’ Iraq’s Osirak nuclear reactor after it was 4 responses to the peace plan unveiled by destroyed by an Israeli airstrike.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel: Background and U.S. Relations in Brief
    Israel: Background and U.S. Relations in Brief Updated May 18, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R44245 SUMMARY R44245 Israel: Background and U.S. Relations in Brief May 18, 2020 The following matters are of particular significance to U.S.-Israel relations. Jim Zanotti Israeli unity government, possible West Bank annexation, and COVID-19. In May Specialist in Middle 2020, Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and his main political rival Benny Eastern Affairs Gantz formed a unity government, bringing an end to a long political stalemate in Israel that had continued through three elections in April 2019, September 2019, and March 2020. Netanyahu and Gantz cited the COVID-19 pandemic and the need to address its public health, economic, and other implications for Israel as a major reason for their agreement. By accepting a unity government, Gantz departed from his campaign pledge not to join with Netanyahu, who is scheduled to begin a criminal trial on corruption charges on May 24. While the agreement provides for Gantz to rotate into the position of prime minister by November 2021, and appears to give him broad powers of approval over the government’s actions, his choice to join Netanyahu split his Kahol Lavan party and might leave Netanyahu with an overall political advantage. Arguably, the most significant aspect of the Netanyahu-Gantz deal for U.S. policy is its explicit authorization of a cabinet and Knesset vote on annexing West Bank territory—in coordination with the United States—after July 1, 2020 (see more on the issue’s significance below).
    [Show full text]
  • From Israel's Perspective, Joe Biden Is As Good As It Gets—For A
    Selected articles concerning Israel, published weekly by Suburban Orthodox Toras Chaim’s (Baltimore) Israel Action Committee Edited by Jerry Appelbaum ( [email protected] ) | Founding editor: Sheldon J. Berman Z”L Issue 8 5 2 Volume 20 , Number 3 1 Parshias Re'eh | Shabbos Mevarchim August 15 , 20 20 From Israel’s Perspective, Joe Biden Is as Good as It Gets — for a Democrat By Shmuel Rosner nytimes.com August 9, 2020 And any vice - presidential pick is better than Susan election because we fear losing President Trump. For Rice. many reasons, he is seen by Israelis as one of the In the pile of old notebooks I saved from when I was friendliest leaders in the history of the United States - Israel covering American politics for an Israeli newspaper (and alliance. Israel is one of few countries in the world in when reporters still used a pad and pen), I found five which the pr esident is highly popular: A whopping 56 mentions of Joe Biden’s Israel story. percent of Israelis prefer Mr. Trump in the upcoming Most of them are from 2008 — first during the election, compared to 16 percent who support Mr. Biden. Democratic primary, when Mr. Biden was running against As far as Israelis are concerned, Mr. Biden has two Barack Obama, and then the general election, when Mr. disadvantages. He is not Mr. Trump, and he is a Biden was running alongside Mr. Obama. I was cover ing Democr at. In other words, he is not the candidate they that election for the Tel Aviv - based Haaretz, and every support and he comes from the party many of them mention of Israel was of interest to me.
    [Show full text]
  • Just Below the Surface: Israel, the Arab Gulf States and the Limits of Cooperation
    Middle East Centre JUST BELOW THE SURFACE ISRAEL, THE ARAB GULF STATES AND THE LIMITS OF COOPERATION IAN BLACK LSE Middle East Centre Report | March 2019 About the Middle East Centre The Middle East Centre builds on LSE’s long engagement with the Middle East and provides a central hub for the wide range of research on the region carried out at LSE. The Middle East Centre aims to enhance understanding and develop rigorous research on the societies, economies, polities and international relations of the region. The Centre promotes both special- ised knowledge and public understanding of this crucial area, and has outstanding strengths in interdisciplinary research and in regional expertise. As one of the world’s leading social science institutions, LSE comprises departments covering all branches of the social sciences. The Middle East Centre harnesses this expertise to promote innova- tive research and training on the region. Middle East Centre Just Below the Surface: Israel, the Arab Gulf States and the Limits of Cooperation Ian Black LSE Middle East Centre Report March 2019 About the Author Ian Black is a former Middle East editor, diplomatic editor and European editor for the Guardian newspaper. He is currently Visiting Senior Fellow at the LSE Middle East Centre. His latest book is entitled Enemies and Neighbours: Arabs and Jews in Palestine and Israel, 1917–2017. Abstract For over a decade Israel has been strengthening links with Arab Gulf states with which it has no diplomatic relations. Evidence of a convergence of Israel’s stra- tegic views with those of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Bahrain has accumulated as all displayed hostility to Iran’s regional ambitions and to United States President Barack Obama’s policies during the Arab Spring.
    [Show full text]
  • Bogdan SZAJKOWSKI*
    Alternative Politics, Vol.3, No.3, 256-419, November 2011 256 TIMELINE OF THE ARAB REVOLT: DECEMBER 2010 – JUNE 2011 Bogdan SZAJKOWSKI* December 17, 2010 Tunisia - Mohamed Bouazizi, a 26-year-old unemployed, sets fire to himself in the central Tunisian town of Sidi Bouzid, protesting at the confiscation by police of his fruit and vegetable cart. He suffers third-degree burns across his entire body and is subsequently treated in the Traumatology Centre for Severe Burns in the town of Ben Arous. His self-immolation sparks demonstrations in which protesters burned tyres and chanted slogans demanding jobs. Protests soon spread to other parts of the country including the towns of al-Ragab and Maknasi in central Tunisia, and later the capital, Tunis. Videos of the Sidi Bouzid demonstrations are online soon after the protest began and the Twitter website carries extensive commentary of the protests. December 19, 2010 Tunisia - Protests spread to Kairouan (holy city located in north-central Tunisia), Sfax (city 270 km southeast of Tunis), and Ben Guerdane (town in south-eastern Tunisia, close to the border with Libya). December 20, 2010 Tunisia - Mohamed Al Nouri Al Juwayni, the Tunisian development minister, travels to Sidi Bouzid to announce a new $10m employment programme. But protests continue unabated. December 21, 2010 Tunisia - President Ben Ali carries out limited cabinet reshuffle and warns that protesters would be punished if rioting continued in the country. December 22, 2010 Tunisia - Lahseen Naji, a 22-year-old commits suicide in the midst of another demonstration over unemployment in Sidi Bouzid by climbing an electricity pylon and electrocuting himself on the cables, after shouting out ―No to misery, no to unemployment!‖ 257 Bogdan Szajkowski Ramzi Al-Abboudi, under the burden of business debt, ironically made possible by the country‘s micro-credit solidarity programme, commits suicide.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Possible Annexation of West Bank Areas: Frequently Asked
    Israel’s Possible Annexation of West Bank Areas: Frequently Asked Questions Updated July 14, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46433 SUMMARY R46433 Israel’s Possible Annexation of West Bank July 14, 2020 Areas: Frequently Asked Questions Jim Zanotti Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has stated his intent for Israel to annex parts Specialist in Middle of the West Bank in 2020. Annexation could raise issues for Congress, and varying Eastern Affairs congressional views on the subject have contributed to debate about implications for U.S.-Israel relations. Congress may conduct additional oversight of Trump Administration actions and could modify or place conditions on U.S. funding for Israel, the Palestinians, and various international organizations. While the West Bank has been under Israeli military administration since its capture from Jordan in the 1967 Arab-Israeli War, its status has been different from Israel proper (the territory Israel controlled before the war). Israel’s government has a mandate—based on the May 2020 power-sharing agreement between Netanyahu and Defense Minister Benny Gantz—to bring the matter of annexation to a cabinet and/or Knesset vote as early as July 1, 2020, provided that it is done in coordination with the United States. Palestinian leaders strongly oppose annexation, partly because it could undermine their hopes for a viable Palestinian state with territorial contiguity. Israeli annexation could thus have significant consequences for future U.S. efforts to secure a negotiated Israeli- Palestinian peace. In addition to the specific territorial and administrative impact of annexation, it could more broadly affect Palestinian national aspirations and the future of the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank and Gaza, Israel’s efforts to reconcile its actions with its self-proclaimed identity as both a Jewish and a democratic state, and Israeli and Palestinian security concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trump Peace Plan: Aiming Not to Make a Deal, but to Make a Deal Possible
    1 COVER PAGE 2 THE BEGIN-SADAT CENTER FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY Mideast Security and Policy Studies No. 175 The Trump Peace Plan: Aiming Not to Make a Deal, but to Make a Deal Possible Douglas J. Feith and Lewis Libby 3 The Trump Peace Plan—Aiming Not to Make a Deal, but to Make a Deal Possible Douglas J. Feith and Lewis Libby © The Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies Bar-Ilan University Ramat Gan 5290002 Israel Tel: 972-3-5318959 [email protected] www.besacenter.org ISSN 0793-1042 July 2020 Cover image: President Donald Trump unveils his peace plan for Israel and the Palestinians, Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead 4 The Begin-Sadat (BESA) Center for Strategic Studies The Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies is an independent, non-partisan think tank conducting policy-relevant research on Middle Eastern and global strategic affairs, particularly as they relate to the national security and foreign policy of Israel and regional peace and stability. It is named in memory of Menachem Begin and Anwar Sadat, whose efforts in pursuing peace laid the cornerstone for conflict resolution in the Middle East. BESA Perspectives are short pieces on timely and fundamental Israeli, Middle Eastern, and global issues. Mideast Security and Policy Studies serve as a forum for publication or re- publication of research conducted by BESA associates. Colloquia on Strategy and Diplomacy summarize the papers delivered at conferences and seminars held by the Center for the academic, military, official, and general publics. In sponsoring these discussions, the BESA Center aims to stimulate public debate on, and consideration of, contending approaches to problems of peace and war in the Middle East.
    [Show full text]