Twostates Or One?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Twostates Or One? How AMLO could ruin Mexico Did covid come from a lab? Belarus: pirate and pariah The capex bonanza MAY 29TH–JUNE 4TH 2021 Two states or one? The hopeless peace process Contents The Economist May 29th 2021 5 The world this week Britain 7 A summary of political 21 The bbc’s problems and business news 22 An Australian trade deal An adviser speaks Leaders 23 The hush in the City 9 Israel and Palestine 23 Two states or one? 24 Class and nature writing 10 Corporate investment 26 Zoom justice Innovation nations 26 A surge in banknotes 10 The euro zone 28 Bagehot Mr Levelling Up Take one for the team 11 Ventilation Europe Fresh thinking about 29 Belarus hijacks a plane fresh air On the cover 30 Russia’s Czech problem 12 Mexico 31 A Turkish mobster takes The Israeli-Palestinian peace The false messiah on the government process has become an obstacle to progress: leader, Letters 31 Norwegian folk music page 9. The ideal of two states 14 On digital currencies, 32 Parisian voters has failed. It has left the Holy technology and China, 34 Charlemagne How Land looking like one unequal Wyoming, ice hockey farmers still rule Europe state, page 44 Briefing United States How amlo could ruin Mexico 17 Mexico’s populist Andrés Manuel López Obrador 35 Texas moves righter president pursues bad policies by 36 The George Floyd Act The unnoticed radical improper means: leader, page 12. 37 Central America Elections on June 6th will 37 Infrastructure year determine how deeply—and ruinously—he can transform his 38 Wildlife wars country: briefing, page 17 39 New York’s new island 40 Lexington The Kamala Did covid-19 come from a lab? dilemma How can the world prepare for a future pandemic when it does The Americas not know where this one came Patronage in Brazil from? Page 57. What to make of 41 the lab theory, page 58. 42 Chile’s new constitution Improving the ventilation of 43 The Shining Path returns buildings will help curb covid-19, 43 Canada’s Butter Rage page 75. The case for clean air: leader, page 11 The capex bonanza Firms are Middle East & Africa rediscovering their love for investment: leader, page 10. 44 One-state reality in We analyse their plans, page 67 the Holy Land Free exchange When 47 Islam and homosexuality Belarus: pirate and pariah does transitory inflation 47 Mali’s coup within a coup Having hijacked a Ryanair plane, become sustained? Some 48 A vicious jihadist is dead it has only one friend to turn to, lessons from the 1970s, page 29. Russia puts the Czech page 73 Republic on an ocial enemies list, page 30 → Activating the digital element of your subscription means that you can search our archive, read all of our daily journalism and listen to audio versions of our stories. Just visit economist.com/activate Contents continues overleaf 6 Contents The Economist May 29th 2021 Asia Finance & economics 49 Myanmar’s worried 67 An investment bonanza investors 68 Recovery in the euro zone 50 Commerce after a coup 69 Buttonwood The 51 Islamists in Bangladesh crypto-fiat divide 51 Australia’s frisky whales 70 How to end the pandemic 52 India’s crisis eases 70 America’s housing market 53 Banyan China loses the 71 Morbid finance in France Philippines 72 Chasing Chinese assets 73 Free exchange Inflation China and the 1970s 54 Inequality in education 55 Hazing at weddings Science & technology 56 Chaguan A revealing 75 How covid-19 really Afghan strategy spreads 78 Eunuch gm mosquitoes 78 Autonomous weapons 79 A better fog trap International 57 Where covid-19 came from Books & arts 58 The likelihood of a 80 History and memory in laboratory origin Russia 81 Satirical fiction 82 Cosmopolitan Prague 82 A history of censorship Business 83 Persian music 61 The future of Big Oil 63 China’s logistics race Economic & financial indicators 63 Chinese tech’s online 84 Statistics on 42 economies binge dax 64 A rare mega-merger Graphic detail 64 Refloating the cruise 85 Educated voters’ leftward shift is surprisingly old industry 65 Bartleby Decision fatigue Obituary 66 Schumpeter Strategic 86 Yuan Longping, feeder of China and the world u-turns Volume 439 Number 9247 Published since September 1843 Subscription service to take part in “a severe contest between For our full range of subscription oers, including The best way to contact our Customer Service Please intelligence, which presses forward, digital only or print and digital bundled, visit: team is via phone or live chat. You can contact us and an unworthy, timid ignorance Economist.com/oers on or ; please check obstructing our progress.” our website for up to date opening hours. If you are experiencing problems when trying to Editorial oces in London and also: subscribe, please visit our Help pages at: PEFC certified Amsterdam, Beijing, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, www.economist.com/help This copy of The Economist Dakar, Dallas, Dubai, Johannesburg, Madrid, for troubleshooting advice. is printed on paper sourced Mexico City, Moscow, Mumbai, New Delhi, New from sustainably managed York, Paris, San Francisco, São Paulo, Seoul, forests certified by PEFC Shanghai, Singapore, Tokyo, Washington DC PEFC/16-33-582 www.pefc.org Registered as a newspaper. © 2021 The Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved. Neither this publication nor any part of it may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of The Economist Newspaper Limited. Published every week, except for a year-end double issue, by The Economist Newspaper Limited. The Economist is a registered trademark of The Economist Newspaper Limited. Printed by Walstead Peterborough Limited The world this week Politics The Economist May 29th 2021 7 of the coronavirus. A foreign agency said he was very con- ministry spokesman accused cerned about Iran’s claim to be Coronavirus briefs America of smearing China enriching uranium to a purity To am GMT May th and of ignoring the possibility level of 60%, a level only coun- that the virus originated in the tries that are making bombs Weekly confirmed cases by area, m United States. attempt to reach. 3 India 2 Twenty-one competitors in a Abubakar Shekau, the leader of Western Europe 100km ultra-marathon in a Boko Haram, a jihadist group 1 mountainous area of western that enslaves girls, reportedly Other US China were killed by extreme died in Nigeria after blowing 0 weather, including hail. himself up to avoid capture by 2020 2021 Belarus hijacked a Ryanair rival jihadists. Mr Shekau has Vaccination doses plane flying from one eu coun- The Texas legislature passed a been declared dead five times % of adults with try (Greece) to another (Lithua- bill that allows the state’s before, only to resurface. But Total ’000 1st dose 2nd nia) with more than 100 people residents to carry a handgun this time the reports appear to Israel 10,568 98 92 UAE 12,416 95 60 on board. The plane was in without a licence. The law sets be true. Bhutan 483 95 0 Belarusian airspace. Citing a up an online course in gun Mongolia 2,730 90 44 “bomb threat”, the authorities safety for people unsure about Army officers in Mali forced Malta 491 87 50 sent a fighter jet to make it how to handle weapons. the president and prime min- Maldives 465 75 39 land in Minsk, the Belarusian ister to resign because they Britain 61,995 74 45 capital. They arrested two Israel and Hamas, the militant were upset about a reshuffling Chile 17,794 70 55 Bahrain 1,621 68 56 passengers: Roman Protasev- Islamist group that controls of the cabinet. The same offi- Canada 21,638 67 6 ich, an exiled journalist, and Gaza, stuck to a recently cers carried out a coup last United States 287,789 66 50 his girlfriend. Mr Protasevich agreed ceasefire. To bolster the September. Sources: Johns Hopkins University CSSE; had rallied opposition to Alex- truce Antony Blinken, Amer- Our World in Data; United Nations ander Lukashenko, the despot ica’s secretary of state, held After years of dodge and who stole Belarus’s presi- separate meetings with Binya- deferment, Jacob Zuma, a The number of officially dential election last year. No min Netanyahu, Israel’s prime former president of South recorded cases in India con- bomb was found. Russia minister, and Mahmoud Africa, appeared in court. He tinued to fall, on one day applauded Mr Lukashenko’s Abbas, the president of the faces 18 charges relating to an dropping below 200,000 for boldness; the eu mulled sanc- Palestinian Authority. He also arms deal signed by the gov- the first time in weeks. tions on his isolated regime. went to Egypt and Jordan. ernment in the late 1990s, including an allegation that he Germany banned most visi- Switzerland said it was walk- Republicans in the American accepted a bribe from Thales, a tors from Britain because of ing away from years of negoti- Congress introduced legisla- French defence firm. Both he the spreading Indian variant ations on a new treaty with the tion to beef up the govern- and the firm deny the charges. of covid-19 in that country. eu aimed at harmonising ment’s monitoring of anti- French officials said people dozens of messy individual Semitic attacks. The conflict In Peru16 people were massa- entering from Britain would deals on trade, investment and between Israel and Hamas has cred in a village in a region have to quarantine, but the movement of people.
Recommended publications
  • August 2011 Postcard
    postcard_marchapril_2020.qxp_MARCH APRIL 2020 Postcard 1/29/20 10:06 AM Page 2 ¡ DEAR PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: PLACE You have repeatedly boasted of your skills as a negotiator. If you were the You may wish leader of Palestine, would you view the recently released Israel-Palestine 35¢ “peace plan” as a serious overture? Of course not! Any negotiator would STAMP hastily dismiss a proposal that only reflects one side’s interests. How does HERE to send these this deal advance peace? It’s clear this proposal will not lead to a peace set- tlement and could only result in a worsening divide and more violence and injustice. What does the U.S. get out of this deal? Nothing but the promise of greater global distrust. This proposal cards to forgoes any sense of partiality and signals an almost complete acquiescence to Israeli desires. So much for putting “America First.” President TO: Donald Trump PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP THE WHITE HOUSE 1600 PENNSYLVANIA AVE, NW and the WASHINGTON, DC 20500 Senator and ¡ Representative DEAR SENATOR: PLACE It’s painfully clear to objective observers that President Trump’s Israel- Palestine “peace plan” is simply a green light for Israel to do as it wishes. 35¢ in whose The plan embarrassingly forgoes any premise of U.S. impartiality and puts a STAMP blind rubber stamp on Israel’s desire to annex the West Bank and exert its HERE control over Palestinians. How does this deal advance peace? It’s clear this constituency proposal will not lead to a peace settlement and could only result in a worsening divide and more violence and injustice.
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli–Palestinian Peacemaking January 2019 Middle East and North the Role of the Arab States Africa Programme
    Briefing Israeli–Palestinian Peacemaking January 2019 Middle East and North The Role of the Arab States Africa Programme Yossi Mekelberg Summary and Greg Shapland • The positions of several Arab states towards Israel have evolved greatly in the past 50 years. Four of these states in particular – Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the UAE and (to a lesser extent) Jordan – could be influential in shaping the course of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. • In addition to Egypt and Jordan (which have signed peace treaties with Israel), Saudi Arabia and the UAE, among other Gulf states, now have extensive – albeit discreet – dealings with Israel. • This evolution has created a new situation in the region, with these Arab states now having considerable potential influence over the Israelis and Palestinians. It also has implications for US positions and policy. So far, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the UAE and Jordan have chosen not to test what this influence could achieve. • One reason for the inactivity to date may be disenchantment with the Palestinians and their cause, including the inability of Palestinian leaders to unite to promote it. However, ignoring Palestinian concerns will not bring about a resolution of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, which will continue to add to instability in the region. If Arab leaders see regional stability as being in their countries’ interests, they should be trying to shape any eventual peace plan advanced by the administration of US President Donald Trump in such a way that it forms a framework for negotiations that both Israeli and Palestinian leaderships can accept. Israeli–Palestinian Peacemaking: The Role of the Arab States Introduction This briefing forms part of the Chatham House project, ‘Israel–Palestine: Beyond the Stalemate’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Geopolitical Dynamics of the Middle East and Their Impact on Israeli-Palestinian Peace Efforts
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Honors Theses Lee Honors College 4-25-2018 The Changing Geopolitical Dynamics of the Middle East and their Impact on Israeli-Palestinian Peace Efforts Daniel Bucksbaum Western Michigan University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/honors_theses Part of the Comparative Politics Commons, International Relations Commons, and the Other Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Bucksbaum, Daniel, "The Changing Geopolitical Dynamics of the Middle East and their Impact on Israeli- Palestinian Peace Efforts" (2018). Honors Theses. 3009. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/honors_theses/3009 This Honors Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Lee Honors College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Changing Geopolitical Dynamics of the Middle East and their Impact on Israeli- Palestinian Peace Efforts By Daniel Bucksbaum A thesis submitted to the Lee Honors College Western Michigan University April 2018 Thesis Committee: Jim Butterfield, Ph.D., Chair Yuan-Kang Wang, Ph.D. Mustafa Mughazy, Ph.D. Bucksbaum 1 Table of Contents I. Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………3 II. Source Material……………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 III. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 IV. Historical Context for the Two-State Solution………………………………………………………...6 a. Deeply Rooted and Ideological Claims to the Land……………………………………………….…..7 b. Legacy of the Oslo Accords……………………………………………………………………………………….9 c. Israeli Narrative: Why the Two-State Solution is Unfeasible……………………………………19 d. Palestinian Narrative: Why the Two-State Solution has become unattainable………..22 e. Drop in Support for the Two-State Solution; Negotiations entirely…………………………27 f.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gulf States and the Middle East Peace Process: Considerations, Stakes, and Options
    ISSUE BRIEF 08.25.20 The Gulf States and the Middle East Peace Process: Considerations, Stakes, and Options Kristian Coates Ulrichsen, Ph.D, Fellow for the Middle East conflict, the Gulf states complied with and INTRODUCTION enforced the Arab League boycott of Israel This issue brief examines where the six until at least 1994 and participated in the nations of the Gulf Cooperation Council— oil embargo of countries that supported 1 Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Israel in the Yom Kippur War of 1973. In Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates 1973, for example, the president of the (UAE)—currently stand in their outlook and UAE, Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, approaches toward the Israeli-Palestinian claimed that “No Arab country is safe from issue. The first section of this brief begins by the perils of the battle with Zionism unless outlining how positions among the six Gulf it plays its role and bears its responsibilities, 2 states have evolved over the three decades in confronting the Israeli enemy.” In since the Madrid Conference of 1991. Section Kuwait, Sheikh Fahd al-Ahmad Al Sabah, a two analyzes the degree to which the six brother of two future Emirs, was wounded Gulf states’ relations with Israel are based while fighting with Fatah in Jordan in 3 on interests, values, or a combination of 1968, while in 1981 the Saudi government both, and how these differ from state to offered to finance the reconstruction of state. Section three details the Gulf states’ Iraq’s Osirak nuclear reactor after it was 4 responses to the peace plan unveiled by destroyed by an Israeli airstrike.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel: Background and U.S. Relations in Brief
    Israel: Background and U.S. Relations in Brief Updated May 18, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R44245 SUMMARY R44245 Israel: Background and U.S. Relations in Brief May 18, 2020 The following matters are of particular significance to U.S.-Israel relations. Jim Zanotti Israeli unity government, possible West Bank annexation, and COVID-19. In May Specialist in Middle 2020, Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and his main political rival Benny Eastern Affairs Gantz formed a unity government, bringing an end to a long political stalemate in Israel that had continued through three elections in April 2019, September 2019, and March 2020. Netanyahu and Gantz cited the COVID-19 pandemic and the need to address its public health, economic, and other implications for Israel as a major reason for their agreement. By accepting a unity government, Gantz departed from his campaign pledge not to join with Netanyahu, who is scheduled to begin a criminal trial on corruption charges on May 24. While the agreement provides for Gantz to rotate into the position of prime minister by November 2021, and appears to give him broad powers of approval over the government’s actions, his choice to join Netanyahu split his Kahol Lavan party and might leave Netanyahu with an overall political advantage. Arguably, the most significant aspect of the Netanyahu-Gantz deal for U.S. policy is its explicit authorization of a cabinet and Knesset vote on annexing West Bank territory—in coordination with the United States—after July 1, 2020 (see more on the issue’s significance below).
    [Show full text]
  • From Israel's Perspective, Joe Biden Is As Good As It Gets—For A
    Selected articles concerning Israel, published weekly by Suburban Orthodox Toras Chaim’s (Baltimore) Israel Action Committee Edited by Jerry Appelbaum ( [email protected] ) | Founding editor: Sheldon J. Berman Z”L Issue 8 5 2 Volume 20 , Number 3 1 Parshias Re'eh | Shabbos Mevarchim August 15 , 20 20 From Israel’s Perspective, Joe Biden Is as Good as It Gets — for a Democrat By Shmuel Rosner nytimes.com August 9, 2020 And any vice - presidential pick is better than Susan election because we fear losing President Trump. For Rice. many reasons, he is seen by Israelis as one of the In the pile of old notebooks I saved from when I was friendliest leaders in the history of the United States - Israel covering American politics for an Israeli newspaper (and alliance. Israel is one of few countries in the world in when reporters still used a pad and pen), I found five which the pr esident is highly popular: A whopping 56 mentions of Joe Biden’s Israel story. percent of Israelis prefer Mr. Trump in the upcoming Most of them are from 2008 — first during the election, compared to 16 percent who support Mr. Biden. Democratic primary, when Mr. Biden was running against As far as Israelis are concerned, Mr. Biden has two Barack Obama, and then the general election, when Mr. disadvantages. He is not Mr. Trump, and he is a Biden was running alongside Mr. Obama. I was cover ing Democr at. In other words, he is not the candidate they that election for the Tel Aviv - based Haaretz, and every support and he comes from the party many of them mention of Israel was of interest to me.
    [Show full text]
  • Just Below the Surface: Israel, the Arab Gulf States and the Limits of Cooperation
    Middle East Centre JUST BELOW THE SURFACE ISRAEL, THE ARAB GULF STATES AND THE LIMITS OF COOPERATION IAN BLACK LSE Middle East Centre Report | March 2019 About the Middle East Centre The Middle East Centre builds on LSE’s long engagement with the Middle East and provides a central hub for the wide range of research on the region carried out at LSE. The Middle East Centre aims to enhance understanding and develop rigorous research on the societies, economies, polities and international relations of the region. The Centre promotes both special- ised knowledge and public understanding of this crucial area, and has outstanding strengths in interdisciplinary research and in regional expertise. As one of the world’s leading social science institutions, LSE comprises departments covering all branches of the social sciences. The Middle East Centre harnesses this expertise to promote innova- tive research and training on the region. Middle East Centre Just Below the Surface: Israel, the Arab Gulf States and the Limits of Cooperation Ian Black LSE Middle East Centre Report March 2019 About the Author Ian Black is a former Middle East editor, diplomatic editor and European editor for the Guardian newspaper. He is currently Visiting Senior Fellow at the LSE Middle East Centre. His latest book is entitled Enemies and Neighbours: Arabs and Jews in Palestine and Israel, 1917–2017. Abstract For over a decade Israel has been strengthening links with Arab Gulf states with which it has no diplomatic relations. Evidence of a convergence of Israel’s stra- tegic views with those of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Bahrain has accumulated as all displayed hostility to Iran’s regional ambitions and to United States President Barack Obama’s policies during the Arab Spring.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Possible Annexation of West Bank Areas: Frequently Asked
    Israel’s Possible Annexation of West Bank Areas: Frequently Asked Questions Updated July 14, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46433 SUMMARY R46433 Israel’s Possible Annexation of West Bank July 14, 2020 Areas: Frequently Asked Questions Jim Zanotti Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has stated his intent for Israel to annex parts Specialist in Middle of the West Bank in 2020. Annexation could raise issues for Congress, and varying Eastern Affairs congressional views on the subject have contributed to debate about implications for U.S.-Israel relations. Congress may conduct additional oversight of Trump Administration actions and could modify or place conditions on U.S. funding for Israel, the Palestinians, and various international organizations. While the West Bank has been under Israeli military administration since its capture from Jordan in the 1967 Arab-Israeli War, its status has been different from Israel proper (the territory Israel controlled before the war). Israel’s government has a mandate—based on the May 2020 power-sharing agreement between Netanyahu and Defense Minister Benny Gantz—to bring the matter of annexation to a cabinet and/or Knesset vote as early as July 1, 2020, provided that it is done in coordination with the United States. Palestinian leaders strongly oppose annexation, partly because it could undermine their hopes for a viable Palestinian state with territorial contiguity. Israeli annexation could thus have significant consequences for future U.S. efforts to secure a negotiated Israeli- Palestinian peace. In addition to the specific territorial and administrative impact of annexation, it could more broadly affect Palestinian national aspirations and the future of the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank and Gaza, Israel’s efforts to reconcile its actions with its self-proclaimed identity as both a Jewish and a democratic state, and Israeli and Palestinian security concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trump Peace Plan: Aiming Not to Make a Deal, but to Make a Deal Possible
    1 COVER PAGE 2 THE BEGIN-SADAT CENTER FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY Mideast Security and Policy Studies No. 175 The Trump Peace Plan: Aiming Not to Make a Deal, but to Make a Deal Possible Douglas J. Feith and Lewis Libby 3 The Trump Peace Plan—Aiming Not to Make a Deal, but to Make a Deal Possible Douglas J. Feith and Lewis Libby © The Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies Bar-Ilan University Ramat Gan 5290002 Israel Tel: 972-3-5318959 [email protected] www.besacenter.org ISSN 0793-1042 July 2020 Cover image: President Donald Trump unveils his peace plan for Israel and the Palestinians, Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead 4 The Begin-Sadat (BESA) Center for Strategic Studies The Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies is an independent, non-partisan think tank conducting policy-relevant research on Middle Eastern and global strategic affairs, particularly as they relate to the national security and foreign policy of Israel and regional peace and stability. It is named in memory of Menachem Begin and Anwar Sadat, whose efforts in pursuing peace laid the cornerstone for conflict resolution in the Middle East. BESA Perspectives are short pieces on timely and fundamental Israeli, Middle Eastern, and global issues. Mideast Security and Policy Studies serve as a forum for publication or re- publication of research conducted by BESA associates. Colloquia on Strategy and Diplomacy summarize the papers delivered at conferences and seminars held by the Center for the academic, military, official, and general publics. In sponsoring these discussions, the BESA Center aims to stimulate public debate on, and consideration of, contending approaches to problems of peace and war in the Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • Bahrain: Unrest, Security, and U.S
    Bahrain: Unrest, Security, and U.S. Policy Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs Updated February 24, 2020 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov 95-1013 Bahrain: Unrest, Security, and U.S. Policy Summary A 2011 uprising by a mostly Shia opposition to the Sunni-minority-led regime of Bahrain’s Al Khalifa ruling family has subsided, but punishments of oppositionists and periodic demonstrations continue. The uprising did not achieve its goal of establishing a constitutional monarchy, but the unrest compelled the ruling family to undertake some modest reforms. Elections for the lower house of a legislative body, last held in 2018, were marred by the banning of opposition political societies and allegations of gerrymandering. The mainstream opposition uses peaceful forms of dissent, but small factions, reportedly backed by Iran, have conducted some attacks on security officials. The government’s repression presents a policy dilemma for the United States because Bahrain is a longtime ally that is pivotal to maintaining Persian Gulf security. The country has hosted a U.S. naval command headquarters for the Gulf region since 1948; the United States and Bahrain have had a formal Defense Cooperation Agreement (DCA) since 1991; and Bahrain is designated by the United States as a “major non-NATO ally.” There are nearly 5,000 U.S. forces, mostly Navy, in Bahrain, which relies on U.S.-made arms. Because of the government’s use of force against protesters, both the Obama and Trump Administrations curtailed U.S. assistance to Bahrain’s internal security organizations. The Trump Administration has prioritized countering Iran and addressing other regional security issues, and to that end has lifted the previous Administration’s conditionality on major arms sales to Bahrain’s military and has corroborated Bahrain leadership assertions that Iran is providing material support to violent opposition factions in Bahrain.
    [Show full text]
  • President Trump Peace Strategy: Emerging Conflict Between Israel and Palestine
    International Affairs and Global Strategy www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-574X (Paper) ISSN 2224-8951 (Online) Vol.82, 2020 President Trump Peace Strategy: Emerging Conflict Between Israel and Palestine Jibrin Ubale Yahaya, PhD Department of Political Science, National Open University of Nigeria (NOUN), Jabi Abuja Abstract When Donald Trump was elected as US President in November 2016, he initially signaled some real hope for the peaceful resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Some analysts argued that he may actually manage to deliver what he calls "the deal of the century" and bring peace to Israel and Palestine. These assumptions were based on the fact that President Trump is the type of person that could wake up one morning, say "enough", and pressure Israeli and Palestinian leaders to sign a peace deal on his terms. Early on in his presidency, Trump made the conflict a strategic priority and unconventionally chose to go to the Middle East (Saudi Arabia, Israel and Palestine) on his first trip abroad as President. During a press conference with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas in Bethlehem, he said that "if Israel and the Palestinians can make peace, it will begin a process of peace all throughout the Middle East." This was in line with Europe's standard inside-out approach (Israeli-Palestinian peace first, Israeli-Arab normalization later). But on December 2019, Trump made it clear that his much-anticipated peace deal will favour Israel when he recognized Jerusalem as Israel's capital and promised to move the US embassy there. This led Abbas to brand Trump's peace efforts as "the slap of the century" and say the US could no longer play any role in the Middle East peace process following the move.
    [Show full text]
  • How Is the Composition of the Global Working Class Today? PLUS: the Reactionary Nature of Zionism * Conflict Between Japanese
    www.thecommunists.net New Series Issue Nr.35 April 2020 How is the Composition of the Global Working Class Today? PLUS: The Reactionary Nature of Zionism * Conflict between Japanese and Chinese Stalinists * On the Character of the Current Historic Period 2 Contents RevCom NS#35 I April 2020 English-Language Theoretical Review of the Revolutionary Communist International Tendency (RCIT), New Series No.35, April 2019 Zionism – the Wolf in the Cloth of a Sheep The Role of the Simon Wiesenthal Center p.3 On the Composition of the International Working Class A new report of the UN’s International Labour Office with interesting figures about social developments between 2000 and 2018 p.11 Once again on the Composition of the International Working Class Some additional information which confirm the shift away from the old imperialist countries towards the South as well as China 2018 p.15 A Powerful Confirmation A bourgeois study on the revolutionary character of the current historic period p.19 Dogfight among Social-Imperialists A telling attack on the Chinese regime by the Japanese Communist Party p.21 What the RCIT Stands for p.23 Picture on the cover: Striking teamsters battling police on the streets of Minneapolis, Minnesota, June 1934 (Source: Wikipedia, https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/30/Battle_strike_1934.jpg) Revolutionary Communism is the monthly English-language journal published by the Revolutionary Communist International Tendency (RCIT). The RCIT has sections and activists in South Korea, Pakistan, Kashmir, Sri Lanka,
    [Show full text]