Chapel-En-Le-Frith Parish NEIGHBOURHOOD

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapel-En-Le-Frith Parish NEIGHBOURHOOD Chapel-en-le-Frith Parish NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSULTATION STATEMENT CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Consultation Process 3. Issues Raised 4. Draft Neighbourhood Plan 5. Draft Neighbourhood Plan Consultees 6. Commentary on Consultation Responses 7. Summary of general responses from the Public 8. Conclusion 1. Introduction The Consultation Statement has been prepared to fulfil the legal requirements of Part 5, Section 15 of the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 by: a. Detailing all those who were consulted about the proposed Neighbourhood Plan; b. Outlining details of the consultation process; c. Providing a summary of the main issues and concerns that were raised during the Consultation; d. Detailing how these issues and concerns have been considered and addressed in the Neighbourhood Plan. The Parish of Chapel-en-le-Frith is situated in High Peak. A significant area of the Parish lies within the Peak District National Park. The Parish is divided into four Wards, Chapel-en-le-Frith East, Chapel-en-le-Frith West, Dove Holes and Martinside and Combs and Whitehough. The majority of the settlement in the Parish falls within Chapel-en-le-Frith East and Chapel-en-le-Frith West Wards. The Village of Dove Holes has a distinct community and is located approximately 3 miles from the larger settlement of Chapel-en-le-Frith. There are also a number of smaller communities in Sparrowpit, Combs and Whitehough together with smaller settlements in Bagshaw, Blackbrook and Tunstead Milton. The Parish Council at its meeting on 1 May 2012 resolved that the whole of the Parish should be included in the Neighbourhood Development Plan and made application to High Peak Borough Council in accordance with the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 No 637. The reasons for the designation of the whole of the Parish as the area for the Neighbourhood Development Plan were: A ten-year Action Plan developed by the Chapel-en-le-Frith Regeneration Partnership, following the Market Town Health Check and Dove Holes Village Plan in 2002, had come to an end and so the time was right to engage in a full consultation in order to develop a new long-term plan for the parish. The Parish was at a critical stage in its development, because: a) It had been identified as a place for major housing developments in the High Peak Borough Council and Derbyshire Dales draft core strategy ( June 2010). The location and extent of the proposed residential developments (target of 650 houses to be built by 2026) were of great concern to residents. A Public Meeting was held in September 2010 following which the Parish Council agreed that a ‘Vision’ should be created for the future of the Parish. b) After ten years of reasonably healthy business growth, there were a number of empty commercial premises in Chapel-en-le-Frith and no retail outlets in Dove Holes or other areas in the Parish. Ways of stimulating local business was considered to be critical to the future of the Parish and developed with full public engagement. c) The town’s major employer (Federal Mogul Friction Products Ltd) was engaged in the rationalisation and modernisation of its plant, which would hopefully result in a secure future for the company, but would also lead to land being released for alternative development. d) Tourism pressures on the Peak District National Park are intense, but it was considered that towns on the perimeter of the National Park, like Chapel-en-le-Frith, have considerable tourist potential, which, if fully tapped, could release pressure on the National Park and bring increased prosperity to the parish. e) Within the Parish a number of small communities, Combs, Whitehough, Sparrowpit, Bagshaw, Blackbrook, Tunstead Milton and Dove Holes who have individual needs and issues to address. 1 Following four initial public meetings, Chapel Vision was formed to be the vehicle to develop the Neighbourhood Plan working in partnership with the Parish Council to carry out the following: Involve the whole community to gather the views and opinions of as many individuals, groups and businesses as possible. Liaise with relevant authorities and organisations to make the plan as effective as possible. Determine the types of survey and information gathering to be used. Be responsible for the analysis of the surveys, the production and distribution of the final report to the Parish Council. The Chapel Vision Steering Group membership was formed from members of the public who attended the initial meetings around the Parish and expressed an interest to be involved with the preparation of the Neighbourhood Plan. There were also four members of the Parish Council on the Steering Group. The Neighbourhood Development Plan Area was officially approved by High Peak Borough Council on 11 April 2013, following a 6 week period of public consultation as required within Part 2, Section 6 of the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012. 2 2. Consultation Process Initial Public Meetings 07 March 2011 Combs Village Hall 09 March 2011 Sparrowpit Memorial Institute 10 March 2011 Dove Holes Methodist Church 16 March 2011 Chapel-en-le-Frith Town Hall Other Consultations Saturday morning drop-in event at Chapel-en-le-Frith Town Hall with maps and 15 October 2011 progress on Plan Saturday morning drop-in event at Dove Holes Community Centre with maps 12 November 2011 and progress on Plan Every household in the Parish delivered a survey with FREEPOST March 2012 return envelope Questionnaire sent to every retail business in the Parish with a FREEPOST return envelope Questionnaire sent to every commerical business in the Parish with a FREEPOST return envelope 17 January 2014 Open Day - Display at Chapel-en-le-Frith Town Hal l 18 January 2014 Open Day - Display at Chapel-en-le-Frith Town Hal l 24 January 2014 Open Day - Display at Chapel-en-le-Frith Town Hal l 25 January 2014 Open Day - Display at Chapel-en-le-Frith Town Hal l How people were consulted In March 2011 four meetings were arranged at venues around the Parish and were open to all residents. The meetings were published on the seven notice boards around the Parish, on the Parish Council website and in the local press. The meetings were well attended and those present were asked four questions: 1. What do you like about living in the Parish? 2. What don’t you like about living in the Parish? 3. What would you like to see in the future in the Parish? 4. What wouldn’t you like to see in the future in the Parish? People were asked to put their names forward to volunteer to join a Steering Group to prepare a Plan for the Parish or alternatively to join a Working Group. With support from Rural Action Derbyshire the Chapel Vision Steering Group was formed and it considered all the comments made at the four public meetings and divided them into common areas of concern. 3 From this the following Working Groups were formed: Housing Countryside Transport Infrastructure Economic/Tourism The Working Groups appointed a Chairman who represented the Group on the Steering Committee along with four Parish Councillors and other interested residents. Chapel Vision Constitution was agreed on 18 January 2012 together with Terms of Reference for Working Groups. High Peak Borough Council allocated Officer support to each of the Working Groups to ensure that the Plan evolved in conformity with the Policies of the High Peak Local Plan. Officer support was also made available by the Peak District National Park Authority. In October and November 2011 two Saturday morning drop in events were held in Chapel-en-le-Frith and Dove Holes to update residents on the themes/issues that had come forward in the initial consultation meetings. Large scale maps were presented and residents were asked to mark areas that they wished to remain as countryside. The Chapel Vision Steering Committee having regard for the evidence gathered to date produced a survey which was delivered to every household in the Parish with a FREEPOST return envelope. The results of the surveys were analysed by a professional data inputter and the data was made available to each of the Working Groups. 4 3. Issues Raised Number of proposed houses to be built Lack of Affordable Housing Employment Opportunities Promotion of tourism Development of Community facilities Parking issues Scope of public transport Preservation of open countryside and green spaces Ability of the local infrastructure to cope with more residents 4. Draft Neighbourhood Plan The responses from the consultations were developed into policies for inclusion in the Neighbourhood Plan with the following policy areas: Housing Employment, Tourism and Community Land Development Town Centre Sustainable Transport and Movement Countryside 5. Draft Neighbourhood Plan Consultees English Heritage Natural England Environment Agency Derbyshire County Council Government Pipelines Severn Trent Water Electricity North West United Utilities The Coal Authority Network Rail NHS England - Area Team Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire British Telecom Mono Consultants C/O Mobile Operators Association Highways Agency HCA Derbyshire Constabulary Derbyshire Fire and Rescue Service National Grid Whaley Bridge Town Council Wormhill Parish Council Chinley Buxworth & Brownside Parish Council Hartington and Upper Quarter Parish Council Edale Parish Council Peak Forest Parish Council High Peak Borough Council Peak District National Park Authority Buxton Volunteer Bureau Derbyshire Gypsy Liaison Group Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire Chambers of
Recommended publications
  • Pocketbook for You, in Any Print Style: Including Updated and Filtered Data, However You Want It
    Hello Since 1994, Media UK - www.mediauk.com - has contained a full media directory. We now contain media news from over 50 sources, RAJAR and playlist information, the industry's widest selection of radio jobs, and much more - and it's all free. From our directory, we're proud to be able to produce a new edition of the Radio Pocket Book. We've based this on the Radio Authority version that was available when we launched 17 years ago. We hope you find it useful. Enjoy this return of an old favourite: and set mediauk.com on your browser favourites list. James Cridland Managing Director Media UK First published in Great Britain in September 2011 Copyright © 1994-2011 Not At All Bad Ltd. All Rights Reserved. mediauk.com/terms This edition produced October 18, 2011 Set in Book Antiqua Printed on dead trees Published by Not At All Bad Ltd (t/a Media UK) Registered in England, No 6312072 Registered Office (not for correspondence): 96a Curtain Road, London EC2A 3AA 020 7100 1811 [email protected] @mediauk www.mediauk.com Foreword In 1975, when I was 13, I wrote to the IBA to ask for a copy of their latest publication grandly titled Transmitting stations: a Pocket Guide. The year before I had listened with excitement to the launch of our local commercial station, Liverpool's Radio City, and wanted to find out what other stations I might be able to pick up. In those days the Guide covered TV as well as radio, which could only manage to fill two pages – but then there were only 19 “ILR” stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (9MB)
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details 2018 Behavioural Models for Identifying Authenticity in the Twitter Feeds of UK Members of Parliament A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF UK MPS’ TWEETS BETWEEN 2011 AND 2012; A LONGITUDINAL STUDY MARK MARGARETTEN Mark Stuart Margaretten Submitted for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhy at the University of Sussex June 2018 1 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ 1 DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................... 6 TABLES ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Parish Council Guide for Residents
    CHAPEL-EN-LE-FRITH PARISH WELCOME PACK TITLE www.chapel-en-le-frithparishcouncil.gov.uk PARISH COUNCILGUIDE FOR RESIDENTS Contents Introduction The Story of Chapel-en-le-Frith 1 - 2 Local MP, County & Villages & Hamlets in the Parish 3 Borough Councillors 14 Lots to Do and See 4-5 Parish Councillors 15 Annual Events 6-7 Town Hall 16 Eating Out 8 Thinking of Starting a Business 17 Town Facilities 9-11 Chapel-en-le-Frith Street Map 18 Community Groups 12 - 13 Village and Hamlet Street Maps 19 - 20 Public Transport 13 Notes CHAPEL-EN-LE-FRITH PARISH WELCOME PACK INTRODUCTION Dear Resident or Future Resident, welcome to the Parish of Chapel-en-le-Frith. In this pack you should find sufficient information to enable you to settle into the area, find out about the facilities on offer, and details of many of the clubs and societies. If specific information about your particular interest or need is not shown, then pop into the Town Hall Information Point and ask there. If they don't know the answer, they usually know someone who does! The Parish Council produces a quarterly Newsletter which is available from the Town Hall or the Post Office. Chapel is a small friendly town with a long history, in a beautiful location, almost surrounded by the Peak District National Park. It's about 800 feet above sea level, and its neighbour, Dove Holes, is about 1000 feet above, so while the weather can be sometimes wild, on good days its situation is magnificent. The Parish Council takes pride in maintaining the facilities it directly controls, and ensures that as far as possible, the other Councils who provide many of the local services - High Peak Borough Council (HPBC) and Derbyshire County Council (DCC) also serve the area well.
    [Show full text]
  • Saturday 11 December 2010
    Saturday 11 December 2010 Session 2010-11 No. 21 Edition No. 1096 House of Commons Weekly Information Bulletin This bulletin includes information on the work of the House of Commons in the period 6 - 10 December 2010 and forthcoming business for 13 – 17 December 2010 Contents House of Commons • Noticeboard .......................................................................................................... 1 • The Week Ahead .................................................................................................. 2 • Order of Oral Questions ....................................................................................... 3 Weekly Business Information • Business of the House of Commons 3 – 10 December 2010 ................................ 5 Bulletin • Written Ministerial Statements ............................................................................. 8 • Forthcoming Business of the House of Commons 13 – 24 December 2010 ...... 10 • Forthcoming Business of the House of Lords 13 – 24 December 2010 ............. 13 Editor: Adrian Hitchins Legislation House of Commons Public Legislation Information Office • Public Bills before Parliament 2010/11 .............................................................. 15 London • Bills – Presentation, Publication and Royal Assent ............................................ 23 SW1A 2TT • Public and General Acts 2010/11 ....................................................................... 23 www.parliament.uk • Draft Bills under consideration or published during 2010/11 Session
    [Show full text]
  • Land at Manchester Road Tunstead Milton High Peak Derbyshire
    ________________________________________________________ LAND AT MANCHESTER ROAD TUNSTEAD MILTON HIGH PEAK DERBYSHIRE ________________________________________________ Proof of Evidence A G Massie BSc (Hons) MRICS IRRV MCIArb Prepared on the instructions of High Peak Borough Council Market Place Buxton Derbyshire SK17 6EL Appeal Ref: APP/H1033/W/16/3147726 NOVEMBER | 2016 LIVERPOOL MANCHESTER GLASGOW LONDON Alabama House Hill Quays 272 Bath Street 26 York Street 6 Rumford Place 14 Commercial Street Glasgow London Liverpool L3 9BY Manchester M15 4PZ G2 4JR W1U 6PZ www.keppiemassie.com Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1 2.0 PURPOSE AND CONTENTS OF THE REPORT ........................................................... 2 3.0 THE NATIONAL PLANNING POLICY FRAMEWORK .................................................... 6 4.0 SITES WITH PLANNING PERMISSION AND UNDER CONSTRUCTION .......................... 9 5.0 OTHER SITES WITH PLANNING PERMISSION ...................................................... 19 6.0 LOCAL PLAN ALLOCATIONS AND OTHER IDENTIFIED SITES .................................. 45 7.0 SMALL SITES AND WINDFALL ALLOWANCE ......................................................... 59 8.0 CONCLUSIONS AND DELIVERABLE SUPPLY ......................................................... 62 9.0 DECLARATION ................................................................................................ 64 Appendices (Bound Separately) Appendix 1 North
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard Record of the Entire Day in PDF Format. PDF File, 0.51
    Friday Volume 619 13 January 2017 No. 90 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Friday 13 January 2017 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2017 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 577 13 JANUARY 2017 578 House of Commons Broadcasting (Radio Multiplex Services) Bill Friday 13 January 2017 9.34 am Kevin Foster (Torbay) (Con): I beg to move, That the The House met at half-past Nine o’clock Bill be now read a Second time. It is a pleasure to bring this Bill to the Floor of the PRAYERS House today for what I hope will be a constructive, interesting, informative and perhaps even entertaining debate. I should like to thank the Clerks in the Public [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Bill Office, my own staff and the radio team at the Department for Culture, Media and Sport for their BILL PRESENTED assistance in putting this draft Bill together. It is interesting that we are here to discuss this on Friday the 13th. Some LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE BILL people say that it is lucky for some, and I hope that it Presentation and First Reading (Standing Order No. 57) will be a lucky day for the Bill, given the issues that some Bills face when trying to make progress on a Mr Secretary Javid, supported by the Prime Minister, Friday. Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, Secretary Greg Clark, Secretary Jeremy Hunt, Secretary Andrea Leadsom and In the course of my remarks, I intend to explain the Ben Gummer, presented a Bill to make provision about details of the Bill and tell the House how I hope to non-domestic rating in England; to amend Chapter create an effective piece of legislation that will bring real 4ZA of Part 1 of the Local Government Finance Act benefits not only to listeners of DAB radio but to the 1992; to confer power on the Greater London Authority creative and media industries, as well as giving many and certain local authorities in England to impose community stations a real chance to go digital.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Communities Evaluation Report 2012 – 2013
    Sustainable Communities Evaluation Report 2012 – 2013 Completed by Elizabeth Woodward, Peak District School Farmers’ Market Coordinator For Soil Association Acknowledgements We thank the Peak District Rural Action Zone Leader programme for providing the funding for this project and for the support of their Leader coordinator Amanda Brown and her colleagues. This project would not have been a success without the hard work, commitment and enthusiasm of all of the participating schools, their pupils, staff and volunteers. Thank you to our project partners the Mid Wales Food and Land Trust who shared their intellectual and practical knowledge around the scheme and the effective delivery approach that has been successful in over 100 schools elsewhere in the country. The programme staff at the Soil Association, Sustainable Communities project would like to thank everyone who assisted in this evaluation and gave their time to share their views and help in pulling together all of the information collected over the duration of the project. Further thanks to all those who participated in the project questionnaires and evaluation group meetings. Contents Introduction 1.1 Brief Description of the Evaluation Aims and Objectives 1.2 Background to Sustainable Communities Project 1.3 Project Aims and Objective 1.4 Project Outputs 1.5 Programme Outcomes Methodology 2.1 Overview of Methods 2.2 Evaluation Framework 2.3 Desktop Research – Review of questionnaires and Quarterly Leader Reports 2.4 Limitations and Challenges Findings 3.1 Outputs 3.2 Producers
    [Show full text]
  • Development Management Policies
    Consultation Statement - Development Management Policies Peak District National Park Authority Local Plan Part 2 Development Management Policies Interim Consultation Statement October 2016 1 Consultation Statement - Development Management Policies TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. Introduction 3 2. Statement of Community Involvement 4 3. Consultation Process Overview - including timeline for Regulation 18 (Preparation of a local plan) 6 4. Issues and Preferred Approaches 9 5. Publication Stage Reg.19 (November 2016) 28 2 Consultation Statement - Development Management Policies 1. Introduction 1.1 This Consultation Statement has been prepared as a supporting document to the Peak District National Park Development Management Policies Document (DMP). It has also been produced to help comply with the requirements of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012 (hereafter referred to as ‘the Regulations’). It details how the National Park Authority has dealt with consultations, how comments (representations) have been sought, and how the representations that have been received have been addressed in the preparation and evolution of the DMP. 1.2 The DMP sets out the detailed policy framework that will be used for the determination of planning applications in the National Park alongside core policies already laid out in the adopted Core Strategy (2012). 1.3 In particular, and in line with the requirements of Regulation 22 of the Regulations, this statement sets out: • Which bodies and persons the Authority invited to make representations under Regulation 18; • How those bodies and persons were invited to make representations under Regulation 18; • A summary of the main issues raised by the representations made pursuant to Regulation 18; and • How many representations made pursuant to Regulation 18 have been taken into account.
    [Show full text]
  • High Peak Borough Council Halcrow Group Limited
    High Peak Borough Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Local Development Framework Level 1 Volume 1 - FINAL September 2008 Halcrow Group Limited Strategic Flood Risk Assessment High Peak Borough Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment High Peak Borough Council High Peak Borough Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Local Development Framework Level 1 - FINAL Volume 1 Contents Amendment Record This report has been issued and amended as follows: Issue Revision Description Date Signed 1 Draft Report 26/03/08 RD 2 Final Report 21/07/08 RD 2 1 Final Report 11/09/08 RD Prepared by: Beccy Dunn/Caroline Mills Checked by: John Parkin Approved by: Shirel Saranga Strategic Flood Risk Assessment High Peak Borough Council This page is left intentionally blank 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment High Peak Borough Council Contents List of Tables & Figures .......................................................................................................................6 Executive Summary ..............................................................................................................................8 1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................10 1.1 Terms of Reference .................................................................................................................10 1.2 Project Aims .............................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Trans-Pennine Routes Feasibility Study Scope Document
    Trans-Pennine Routes Feasibility Study Scope Document TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. DOCUMENT PURPOSE AND STATUS ...........................................................................2 2. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................2 3. BACKGROUND AND STUDY NEED ..............................................................................2 4. STUDY AIMS AND OBJECTIVES ...................................................................................4 5. GEOGRAPHIC AND MODAL SCOPE .............................................................................5 6. QUESTIONS TO BE ADDRESSED ..................................................................................6 7. STUDY STAGES .........................................................................................................6 8. POTENTIAL OPTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED ...................................................................7 9. STUDY OUTPUTS AND TIMINGS .................................................................................8 10. GOVERNANCE ARRANGMENTS ..............................................................................9 11. KEY MILESTONES .................................................................................................10 ANNEX A: MEMBERSHIP OF THE STUDY REFERENCE GROUP ............................................11 Page 1 of 12 1. DOCUMENT PURPOSE AND STATUS 1.1 This document sets out the scope of the trans-Pennine routes feasibility study. It has been developed
    [Show full text]
  • Moorlife: Final Report on Dissemination Activities
    MoorLIFE: Final report on Dissemination Activities 31st August 2015 (LIFE08 NAT/UK/00202) MoorLIFE: Final Report on Dissemination Activities August 2015 Executive Summary This report covers the dissemination activities of the MoorLIFE project from 1 April 2010 to 31 August 2015. MoorLIFE was a five-year project with a primary aim to protect the remaining active blanket bog in four project sites in the South Pennine Moors Special Area of Conservation. It had three main objectives: Protecting active blanket bog by treating the most badly damaged areas of the project sites, including bare and eroding peat. Ensuring the future sustainability of the blanket bog through wildfire mitigation actions and raising public awareness of wildfire risk and restoration. Developing knowledge and understanding, and its effective communication to practitioners and policy makers. Works have been undertaken to protect active blanket bog across four sites: Bleaklow, Black Hill, Rishworth Common and Turley Holes. Dissemination of information about the vital importance of the MoorLIFE project was a key element of project activities. There were two main target audiences which each required a different approach; members of the lay public, who may be interested in the moors for a variety of reasons (leisure, education etc.), and the technical audience which consists largely of conservation agencies, landowners and scientists interested in our work. A wide variety of methods were used to disseminate MoorLIFE project information. These included web based resources including a project website (www.moorsforthefuture.org.uk/moorlife), Facebook and Twitter, smartphone apps, videos, audio trails and games. The MoorLIFE section of the website accounts for over 30% of visits to www.moorsforthefuture.org.uk, an average of 28,000 views per year.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Radio (Alphabetical Order) Frequency Finder
    Independent Radio (Alphabetical order) Frequency Finder Commercial and community radio stations are listed together in alphabetical order. National, local and multi-city stations A ABSOLUTE RADIO CLASSIC ROCK are listed together as there is no longer a clear distinction Format: Classic Rock Hits Broadcaster: Bauer between them. ABBEY 104 London area, Surrey, W Kent, Herts, Luton (Mx 3) DABm 11B For maps and transmitter details see: Mixed Format Community Swansea, Neath Port Talbot and Carmarthenshire DABm 12A • Digital Multiplexes Sherborne, Dorset FM 104.7 Shropshire, Wolverhampton, Black Country b DABm 11B • FM Transmitters by Region Birmingham area, West Midlands, SE Staffs a DABm 11C • AM Transmitters by Region ABC Coventry and Warwickshire DABm 12D FM and AM transmitter details are also included in the Mixed Format Community Stoke-on-Trent, West Staffordshire, South Cheshire DABm 12D frequency-order lists. Portadown, County Down FM 100.2 South Yorkshire, North Notts, Chesterfield DABm 11C Leeds and Wakefield Districts DABm 12D Most stations broadcast 24 hours. Bradford, Calderdale and Kirklees Districts DABm 11B Stations will often put separate adverts, and sometimes news ABSOLUTE RADIO East Yorkshire and North Lincolnshire DABm 10D and information, on different DAB multiplexes or FM/AM Format: Rock Music Tees Valley and County Durham DABm 11B transmitters carrying the same programmes. These are not Broadcaster: Bauer Tyne and Wear, North Durham, Northumberland DABm 11C listed separately. England, Wales and Northern Ireland (D1 Mux) DABm 11D Greater Manchester and North East Cheshire DABm 12C Local stations owned by the same broadcaster often share Scotland (D1 Mux) DABm 12A Central and East Lancashire DABm 12A overnight, evening and weekend, programming.
    [Show full text]