DOCSLIB.ORG

Little Wabash River I Watershed Tmdl Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Little Wabash River I Watershed Tmdl Report Illinois Bureau of Water Environmental P.O. Box 19276 Protection Agency Springfield, IL 62794-9276 June 2008 IEPA/BOW/08-014 LITTLE WABASH RIVER I WATERSHED TMDL REPORT Printed on Recycled Paper TMDL Development for the Little Wabash River I Watershed, Illinois This file contains the following documents: 1) U.S. EPA Approval letter for Stage Three TMDL Report 2) Stage One Report: Watershed Characterization and Water Quality Analysis 3) Stage Two Report: Data Report 4) Stage Three Report: TMDL Development 5) Implementation Plan Report Final Stage 1 Progress Report Prepared for Illinois Environmental Protection Agency September 2006 Little Wabash Watershed Little Wabash River (C19, C21), Paradise Lake (RCG), Lake Mattoon (RCF), First Salt Creek (CPC-TU-C1), Second Salt Creek (CPD 01, CPD 03, CPD 04), Salt Creek (CP-EF-C2, CP-TU-C3), Lake Sara (RCE), East Branch Green Creek (CSB 07, CSB 08) and Dieterich Creek (COC 10) Limno-Tech, Inc. www.limno.com Little Wabash Watershed September 2006 Final Stage 1 Report Table of Contents First Quarterly Progress Report (April 2006) Second Quarterly Progress Report (May 2006) Third Quarterly Progress Report (June 2006) Fourth Quarterly Progress Report (September 2006) Limno-Tech, Inc. i First Quarterly Progress Report Prepared for Illinois Environmental Protection Agency April 2006 Little Wabash Watershed Little Wabash River (C19, C21), Lake Paradise (RCG), Lake Mattoon (RCF), First Salt Creek (CPC-TU-C1), Second Salt Creek (CPD 01, CPD 03, CPD 04), Salt Creek (CP-EF-C2, CP-TU-C3), Lake Sara (RCE), East Branch Green Creek (CSB 07, CSB 08), Dieterich Creek (COC 10), and Clay City Side Channel Reservoir (RCU) Limno-Tech, Inc. www.limno.com Little Wabash Watershed First Quarterly Progress Report April 2006 Final Stage 1 Report TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................1 Background....................................................................................................................1 Methods..........................................................................................................................1 Results............................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................4 TMDL Process...............................................................................................................4 Illinois Assessment and Listing Procedures ..................................................................4 List of Identified Watershed Impairments .....................................................................5 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION ...........................................................................8 Methods..........................................................................................................................8 Little Wabash River Watershed Characterization..........................................................8 Lake Mattoon...............................................................................................................22 Little Wabash River (Segment C 19) Watershed Characterization .............................24 Little Wabash (Segment C 21) Watershed Characterization .......................................24 Lake Paradise (Segment RCG) Watershed Characterization.......................................25 Lake Mattoon (Segment RCF) Watershed Characterization .......................................27 First Salt Creek (Segment CPC-TU-C1) Watershed Characterization........................28 Second Salt Creek (Segments CPD 04, CPD 03 and CPD 01) Watershed Characterization ...........................................................................................................29 Salt Creek (Segment CP-TU-C3) Watershed Characterization...................................30 Salt Creek (Segment CP-EF-C2) Watershed Characterization....................................31 Lake Sara (Segment RCE) Watershed Characterization .............................................32 East Branch Green Creek (Segment CSB 08) Watershed Characterization................33 East Branch Green Creek (Segment CSB 07) Watershed Characterization................34 Dieterich Creek (Segment COC 10) Watershed Characterization...............................34 Clay City Side Channel Reservoir (Segment RCU) Watershed Characterization.......35 DATABASE DEVELOPMENT AND DATA ANALYSIS .............................................35 Data Sources and Methods...........................................................................................35 CONFIRMATION OF CAUSES AND SOURCES OF IMPAIRMENT .........................36 Little Wabash (Segment C 19).....................................................................................44 Little Wabash (Segment C 21).....................................................................................48 Lake Paradise (Segment RCG) ....................................................................................49 Lake Mattoon (Segment RCF).....................................................................................51 First Salt Creek (Segment CPC-TU-C1)......................................................................53 Second Salt Creek (Segment CPD 04).........................................................................54 Second Salt Creek (Segment CPD 03).........................................................................54 Second Salt Creek (Segment CPD 01).........................................................................56 Limno-Tech, Inc. Page i Little Wabash Watershed First Quarterly Progress Report April 2006 Final Stage 1 Report Salt Creek (Segment CP-TU-C3).................................................................................56 Salt Creek (Segment CP-EF-C2) .................................................................................57 Lake Sara (Segment RCE)...........................................................................................57 East Branch Green Creek (Segment CSB 08)..............................................................59 East Branch Green Creek (Segment CSB 07)..............................................................59 Dieterich Creek (Segment COC 10) ............................................................................60 Clay City Side Channel Reservoir (Segment RCU) ....................................................61 CONCLUSIONS................................................................................................................62 NEXT STEPS ....................................................................................................................64 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................64 APPENDIX A. DATA SOURCES AND LOCAL CONTACTS......................................67 APPENDIX B. PHOTOGRAPHS.....................................................................................71 List of Tables Table 1. Impaired Waterbodies in the Little Wabash River Watershed ............................ 6 Table 2. Watershed soils (Source: STATSGO) .............................................................. 14 Table 3. Land Cover in Little Wabash River Watershed.................................................. 17 Table 4. Percent of Fields, by Crop, with Indicated Tillage Practice1.............................. 19 Table 5. 2002 Animal Statistics by County for the Little Wabash River Watershed ....... 19 Table 6. Population Summary.......................................................................................... 21 Table 7. NPDES Discharges and Parameters ................................................................... 23 Table 8. Land Cover in Segment C 21 Little Wabash River Subwatershed..................... 25 Table 9. Land Cover in Segment RCG Lake Paradise Subwatershed .............................. 26 Table 10. Estimated Nonpoint Phosphorus Loading Rates1 ............................................ 27 Table 11. Land Cover in Segment RCF, Lake Mattoon Subwatershed........................... 28 Table 12. Land Cover in Segment CPC-TU-C1 First Salt Creek Subwatershed.............. 29 Table 13. Land Cover in the Second Salt Creek Subwatershed (Segments CPD 04, CPD 03 and CPD 01)......................................................................................................... 30 Table 14. Land Cover in Segment CP-TU-C3 Salt Creek Subwatershed......................... 31 Table 15. Land Cover in Segment CP-EF-C2 Salt Creek Subwatershed ......................... 32 Table 16. Land Cover in Segment RCE Lake Sara Subwatershed................................... 33 Table 17. Land Cover in Segment CSB 08 East Branch Green Creek Subwatershed...... 33 Table 18. Land Cover in Segment CSB 07 East Branch Green Creek Subwatershed..... 34 Table 19. Land Cover in Segment COC 10 Dieterich Creek Subwatershed ................... 35 Table 20. Water Quality Data Summary for the Little Wabash Watershed .................... 37 Table 21. Water Quality Standards and Number of Exceedances.................................... 40 Table 22. Waterbody Impairment Causes and Sources (from IEPA, 2006) for the Little Wabash River Watershed.......................................................................................... 42 Table 23. Other Potential Sources
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for the Wabash River Watershed, Ohio
    Appendix E Response to Comments WW-16J Re: Response to Public Comments - Comment Period ending March 27, 2004 Wabash River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL), Ohio Dear Sir/Madam: Thank you for your recent comments regarding the Draft Wabash River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) document dated February 2004. The U.S. EPA has responded to your comments below. We first address the comments related to designated use and then address all remaining comments. In 1999, Ohio EPA completed a thorough examination of habitat and biological and chemical conditions in the Wabash River watershed. Ohio EPA found that Wabash River watershed’s Warmwater Habitat use designation was still appropriate. Consequently, we used the nutrient and sediment targets associated with the Warmwater Habitat use designation in this TMDL.1 Comments from: Ohio Department of Agriculture Comment: Page 23, the first sentence is a repeat of the last sentence at the bottom of page 22. Response: This typo does not exist in the PDF version of the report that was made available on U. S. EPA’s Web page. Comment: Page 23, the footnote "plans" should be "plants" Response: Comment addressed. 1The State expects to propose Water Quality Standards (WQS) rules changes based on the 1999 work study later this year. Their rule-making process includes an opportunity for public comment. The use designations and the 1999 study results for the areas upstream of the state line provide useful information that should be taken into consideration when recommending implementation strategies to restore the watershed. 2 Comment: Page 25, the footnote at the bottom of table 7-1 should be "from " instead of "form" Response: Comment addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 1 15(2):79-81
    2006. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 1 15(2):79-81 THE WABASH RIVER SYMPOSIUM Daryl R. Karns: Rivers Institute and Biology Department, Hanover College. Hanover, Indiana 47243 USA Mark Pyron: Department of Biology, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana 47306 USA Thomas P. Simon: Division of Fishes, Aquatic Research Center, Indiana Biological Survey, 6440 Fairfax Road, Bloomington, Indiana 47401 USA Important in both the natural and cultural The population of the Wabash River basin, history of the region, the Wabash River is within the State of Indiana, included approx- considered The River of Indiana, and it is the imately 3.56 million people in 2000 (U.S. designated State River. From its origin in the Census Bureau, http://quickfacts.census.gov/ state of Ohio to its junction with the Ohio Riv- qfd/states/ 18000.html). This represents 58.9% er, the Wabash runs 765 km. From the dam in of the entire population of Indiana. The econ- Huntington, Indiana to its terminus at the omy of the basin is primarily agriculture: but River, Ohio the Wabash flows freely for 661 manufacturing is of significant importance. of its total length, the longest stretch of km Land use in the Wabash River is primarily ag- free-flowing river in the United States east of ricultural (66%); however, significant portions the Mississippi River (Fig. 1). Several papers in the southern watershed are comprised of in this issue of the Proceedings of the Indiana forest (15%), and urban land uses (13%) (Pur- Academy of Science are devoted to aspects of due University, http://pasture.ecn.purdue.edu/ the biodiversity, environment, and conserva- —jychoi/wcLhome/).
    [Show full text]
  • LENAPE VILLAGES of DELAWARE COUNTY By: Chris Flook
    LENAPE VILLAGES OF DELAWARE COUNTY By: Chris Flook After the signing of the Treaty of Greenville in 1795, many bands of Lenape (Delaware) Native Americans found themselves without a place to live. During the previous 200 years, the Lenape had been pushed west from their ancestral homelands in what we now call the Hudson and Delaware river valleys ­ first into the Pennsylvania Colony in the mid­1700s and then into the Ohio Country around the time of the American Revolution. After the Revolution, many Natives living in what the new American government quickly carved out to be the Northwest Territory, were alarmed of the growing encroachment from white settlers. In response, numerous Native groups across the territory formed the pan­tribal Western Confederacy in an attempt to block white settlement and to retain Native territory. The Western Confederacy consisted of warriors from approximately forty different tribes, although in many cases, an entire tribe wasn’t involved, demonstrating the complexity and decentralized nature of Native American political alliances at this time. Several war chiefs led the Western Confederacy’s military efforts including the Miami chief Mihšihkinaahkwa (Little Turtle), the Shawnee chief Weyapiersenwah (Blue Jacket), the Ottawa chief Egushawa, and the Lenape chief Buckongahelas. The Western Confederacy delivered a series of stunning victories over American forces in 1790 and 1791 including the defeat of Colonel Hardin’s forces at the Battle of Heller’s Corner on October 19, 1790; Hartshorn’s Defeat on the following day; and the Battle of Pumpkin Fields on October 21. On November 4 1791, the forces of the territorial governor General Arthur St.
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois' River Otter Recovery Program Began in 1994, When Fifty Wild River
    River Otter Recovery Update Furbearer Program Management Note 97-1 Prepared by Bob Bluets, Division of Wildlife Resources, 5/97 Illinois' river otter recovery program began dogs (1). Cause of death was unknown for in 1994, when fifty wild river otters were six otters, but we suspected stress associated purchased from a supplier in Louisiana by with transport and handling because the the State of Kentucky and traded to Illinois otters were recovered shortly after and in the in exchange for seventy-five wild turkeys. immediate vicinity of releases . Four more A total of 346 river otters have been mortalities caused by drowning in hoop nets released since that time (Table 1) . were reported second-hand but unconfirmed . One hundred and fifty otters were obtained Most losses occurred within three months through turkey trades with Kentucky ; 196 after release, and were distributed among 12 were purchased directly through the Wildlife of 15 release sites (Newton Lake (4); Preservation Fund, Furbearer Fund, Illinois Golden Gate (2) (not including 3 suspected Conservation Foundation and DNR-Wildlife losses); Fox Ridge (3); Skillet Fork (3); Resources operational funds (Fig . 1). North Fork Embarras (2) ; Vermilion River (1); Lake Shelbyville (1) ; Carlyle Lake (1); Shoal Creek (1); Spoon River (2) ; Mackinaw River (3) ; Quiver Creek (1) ; Turk" Tradee 4&8%1 Sanganois (1 suspected)) : Recoveries probably underestimate actual mortality. Post-release radiotelemetry studies at two sites in Missouri yielded first year mortality rates of 12 .5% and 22.8% . Researchers in Indiana found an observed mortality rate of 11% (primarily from recoveries) and an actual mortality rate of 29% (from radiotelemetry) during the first year after a release at Muscatatuck National Wildlife Refuge.
    [Show full text]
  • Technicalreport
    T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T FRESHWATER MUSSELS (MOLLUSCA: UNIONOIDEA) OF THE LITTLE WABASH RIVER BASIN, ILLINOIS, WITH COMMENTS ON HISTORICAL CHANGES IN THE MAINSTEM DURING THE PAST HALF-CENTURY Jeremy S. Tiemann, Kevin S. Cummings, Christine A. Mayer, and Christopher A. Phillips Illinois Natural History Survey Division of Biodiversity and Ecological Entomology Section for Biotic Surveys and Monitoring Prepared for: the Upper Little Wabash River C-2000 Partnership INHS Technical Report 2008(4) Date of issue: 15 January 2008 INHS 1816 S. Oak St. Champaign, IL 61820 http://www.inhs.uiuc.edu TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT....................................................................................................2 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................2 DESCRIPTION OF STUDY AREA.....................................................................3 METHODS.....................................................................................................4 STATISTICAL ANALYSES..............................................................................5 RESULTS/DISCUSSION FRESHWATER MUSSELS OF THE LITTLE WABASH RIVER BASIN.......................... 6 HISTORICAL CHANGES IN THE LITTLE WABASH RIVER MAINSTEM DURING THE PAST 50 YEARS .................................................................... 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS................................................................................10 LITERATURE CITED....................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Geology of the Mount Carmel Area, Wabash County, Illinois
    557 IL6gui 1996-D Guide to the Geology of the Mount Carmel Area, Wabash County, Illinois W.T. Frankie, R.J. Jacobson, and B.G. Huff Illinois State Geological Survey M.B. Thompson Amax Coal Company K.S. Cummings and C.A. Phillips Illinois Natural History Survey Field Trip Guidebook 1996D October 26, 1996 Department of Natural Resources ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ON THE BANKS OF THE WABASH, FAR AWAY VERSE 1 Round my Indiana homestead wave the corn fields, In the distance loom the woodlands clear and cool. Often times my thoughts revert to scenes of childhood, Where I first received my lessons, nature's school. But one thing there is missing in the picture, Without her face it seems so incomplete. I long to see my mother in the doorway, As she stood there years ago, her boy to greet! CHORUS Oh, the moonlight's fair tonight along the Wabash, From the fields there comes the breath of new mown hay. Through the sycamores the candle lights are gleaming, On the banks of the Wabash, far away. VERSE 2 Many years have passed since I strolled by the river, Arm in arm with sweetheart Mary by my side. It I was there tried to tell her that I loved her, It was there I begged of her to be my bride. Long years have passed since I strolled through the churchyard, She's sleeping there my angel Mary dear. I loved her but she thought I didn't mean it, Still I'd give my future were she only here.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Tippecanoe County Compiled by Quinten Robinson, Tippecanoe County Historian the SETTING Tippecanoe County, Locate
    The History of Tippecanoe County Compiled by Quinten Robinson, Tippecanoe County Historian THE SETTING Tippecanoe County, located in west-central Indiana, is about 65 miles northwest of Indianapolis and 100 miles southeast of Chicago. Tippecanoe County is 21 miles east to west and 24 miles north to south and Lafayette, the county seat, is situated on the banks of the Wabash nearly in the center. About one-half the surface consists of broad, fertile, and nearly level plains. The balance consists of gently rolling uplands, steep hillsides or rich alluvial bottoms. Occasional wetlands or bogs are found but those were largely drained by the beginning of the 20th century. The Wabash River flows nearly through the middle of Tippecanoe County from northeast to southwest. Tributaries to the Wabash River that drain the north and west parts of Tippecanoe County are the Tippecanoe River, Burnett Creek, Indian Creek, and Little Pine Creek. Draining the south and east parts of the county are Sugar Creek, Buck Creek, North, South and Middle Forks of the Wildcat Creek, Wea Creek, and Flint Creek. Besides Lafayette, cities and towns in Tippecanoe County are West Lafayette, the home of Purdue University, Battle Ground, West Point, Otterbein, Dayton, Clarks Hill, Romney, Stockwell, Americus, Colburn & Buck Creek. In 2010 county population was set at 172,780 PREHISTORIC TIPPECANOE COUNTY The terrain, the Wabash River, and the creeks you see today in Tippecanoe County came to their present condition about 10,000 years ago as the last continental glacier retreated northward leaving a vastly different landscape than what had existed before the advance of the ice sheets began over 700,000 years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Wabash River Corridor Enhancement Project History
    Wabash River Corridor Enhancement Project History Corridor Enhancement Project History Abstract: The Wabash River Enhancement Corporation (WREC) was formed in August, 2004, and it began active operations in July, 2005 when it hired its first Executive Director. WREC’s mission is to enhance the quality of life in the Wabash River Corridor by providing sustainable opportunities to improve health, recreation, education, economic development and environmental management. WREC has completed extensive preliminary planning in preparation for beginning the development phase of the corridor enhancement project. WREC has completed an agency strategic plan, and a two phase corridor master plan which developed a corridor master plan for the Lafayette – West Lafayette urban river front and a twenty year corridor master plan for the entire 31 + miles of the Wabash River Corridor in Tippecanoe County. WREC brought in over $1 million in support of these planning efforts. In 2015-18, it began transitioning into the development phase of the project, by beginning to take the urban riverfront conceptual master plan to the next level of planning – schematic design, and engineering. In 2020, WREC completed its first development project – Phase one of the Riverside Promenade, and elevated walkway in the Central Reach. WREC has also initiated land use and acquisition planning including environmental assessment and remediation work, and along with its partners most significantly - North Central Health Services (NCHS), have acquired 28 properties totaling over $6 million dollars in value. WREC has developed long range partnerships at the state and federal levels including the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Working with our Fourth District United States Congressman and the USACE, WREC has completed a three phase Wabash River Hydraulic Study if the Tippecanoe County river section and a Wabash River Reconnaissance Study.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Habitat and Otter Population Status Alan Woolf Southern Illinois University Carbondale
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Final Reports Cooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory 7-1997 Survey of Habitat and Otter Population Status Alan Woolf Southern Illinois University Carbondale Richard S. Halbrook Southern Illinois University Carbondale D. Todd Farrand Southern Illinois University Carbondale Chad Schieler Southern Illinois University Carbondale Ted Weber Southern Illinois University Carbondale Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cwrl_fr W-122-R-3. Recommended Citation Woolf, Alan; Halbrook, Richard S.; Farrand, D. Todd; Schieler, Chad; and Weber, Ted, "Survey of Habitat and Otter Population Status" (1997). Final Reports. Paper 7. http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cwrl_fr/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Cooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Final Reports by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SURVEY OF HABITAT AND OTTER POPULATION STATUS FINAL REPORT Federal Aid Project W-122-R-3 Submitted by: Cooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory, SIUC Presented to: Division of Wildlife Resources Illinois Department of Natural Resources Principal Investigators Alan Woolf Richard S. Halbrook Graduate Research Assistants/Staff D. Todd Farrand (Graduate Assistant) Chad Schieler (Graduate Assistant) Ted Weber (Researcher II) July 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES. iii LIST OF FIGURES.. v LIST OF APPENDICES. vii NEED. 1 OBJECTIVES. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.. 10 JOB 1.1. OTTER HABITAT CRITERIA AND MONITORING.. 11 OBJECTIVES.. 11 INTRODUCTION.. 11 METHODS. 12 Habitat Characterization. 12 Otter Monitoring. 23 RESULTS. 24 Habitat Characterization. 24 Otter Monitoring. 25 DISCUSSION.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wabash / Maumee River Connection
    Asian Carp Regional Coordinating Committee July 2010 Preventing Establishment of Asian Carp in the Great Lakes: The Wabash / Maumee River Connection What is the issue? indicates that it could happen at built on the Des Plaines River to lower floods. Preliminary data shows prevent inter-basin transfer; and There is a potential pathway for that the Maumee River has gotten longer term efforts such as hydraulic invasive Asian carp to move into Lake high enough to flood Eagle Marsh at and biological data acquisition and Erie during flooding via a natural least four times between 2004 and the hydrologic simulations to develop connection of glacial origin between date of this publication (the gage was viable methods to restrict Asian the Wabash and Maumee River installed in 2003). carp movement during annual or basins. more frequent flooding-related interconnections in the basin. What is the flood route? How is this possible? As part of the Great Lakes and During a flood, the potential route Mississippi River Inter-basin Study Spawning populations of Asian for fish from the Wabash River (GLRMIS), the US Army Corps of Carp were found in late May 2010 in would be: up the Wabash River to the Engineers is forming a team of the the Wabash River near Lafayette, Little River; up the Little River to best experts within the USACE Indiana, and large adult Bighead Graham McCulloch Ditch; up Graham and the State and Federal resource Asian carp were pulled from the McCulloch Ditch to Eagle Marsh; agencies surrounding the Great Wabash River at the base of the across Eagle Marsh to Junk Ditch to Lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • 1996 Illinois Fishing Guid
    ILLINOIS ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FISHERIES DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SPORT FISHING IN ILLINOIS The purpose of this guide is to help the Illinois has over 1.6 million acres of surface angler realize more fully the opportunities waters. Nearly two-thirds of this acreage is con- available for sport fishing in Illinois. All of the tained in the Illinois portion of Lake Michigan Department of Natural Resources fishing areas (976,640 acres). Approximately 26,440 miles of are included, together with a complete directory rivers and streams (325,000 acres) are found of streams and lakes in every county where sport throughout the state. These streams are fishing may be enjoyed. classified by width categories as follows: In order to acquaint everyone with the most 5-30 feet wide 20,000 miles 43,200 acres, important fish to be found in Illinois waters, 31-100 feet wide 3,900 miles 26,200 acres. thirty-one illustrations are presented with detailed 101-300 feet wide 1,030 miles 18,000 acres descriptions to aid in identification of the species 301 plus feet wide 1,513 miles 237,600 acres to be encountered. The three largest man-made lakes in Illinois Daily catch records obtained from census of were constructed by the U.S. Army Corps of angler success also reveal that nearly 90 percent Engineers. These reservoirs total 54,580 acres and of those who fish either catch only a few fish or are composed of: no fish at all. This lack of success is caused by a Carlyle Lake 24,580 acres lack of "know how" among fishermen — either m Lake Shelbyville 11,100 acres selecting the spots to fish, or in methods of luring Rend Lake 18,900 acres the fish.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Fishing and Roe Harvester Information
    2012 ILLINOIS COMMERCIAL FISHING INFORMATION This information is taken from the Fish and Aquatic Life Code and Administrative Rules. It does not supersede or modify the Fish and Aquatic Life Code or Administrative Rules and is presented only as a guide, which is subject to change. A complete listing of the Fish and Aquatic Life Code and Administrative Rules can be found at www.dnr.state.il.us. DEFINITIONS Resident Commercial Fishermen: An individual who has actually resided in Illinois for one year immediately preceding his application for a Commercial Fishing License and who does not claim residency for a commercial fishing license in another state or country. Dressed: Means having the head of aquatic life removed. Bar Measure: Distance from the outside of one knot to the inside of the adjoining knot on the same thread or strand. WATERS OPEN TO COMMERCIAL FISHING (open year round except as noted) 1. Lake Michigan (limited entry). For further information on Lake Michigan, contact the Division of Fisheries, Lake Michigan Program, 9511 Harrison Street, Des Plaines, IL 60016. 2. Mississippi River and connected public backwaters (wholly accessible by boat), except Quincy Bay, including Quincy Bay Waterfowl Management Area (open under special permit), and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wildlife Refuge waters, but includes that portion of the Kaskaskia River below the navigation lock and dam. 3. Illinois River and connected public backwaters (wholly accessible by boat), from Route 89 highway bridge downstream. except for: a) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wildlife Refuge waters; b) Donnelly/DePue Fish and Wildlife Area; c) Rice Lake Complex, including all of Big Lake; and d) Meredosia Lake in Cass and Morgan Counties during duck season.
    [Show full text]