DOCSLIB.ORG

Grass Valley Creek Watershed Fire Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Grass Valley Creek Watershed Fire Management Plan Grass Valley Creek Watershed Fire Management Plan Prepared for: Bureau of Land Management Prepared By: Kenneth C. Baldwin Registered Professional Forester December 31, 2002 Grass Valley Creek Watershed Fire Management Plan Prepared by: Kenneth C. Baldwin, RPF #1855 PO Box 40 Douglas City, CA 96024 (530) 623-3208 Presented by : Trinity County Resource Conservation District PO Box 1450 Weaverville, CA 96093 (530) 623-6004 Funded by: Bureau of Land Management Redding Field Office “Jobs-in-the-Woods” December 31, 2002 Contract Number BAA010010-T.O. #003 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION & OVERVIEW .......................................................................................1 PURPOSE...........................................................................................................................................................1 LOCATION ........................................................................................................................................................2 OWNERSHIP ......................................................................................................................................................2 TOPOGRAPHY ...................................................................................................................................................3 CLIMATE AND FIRE WEATHER .........................................................................................................................3 PAST FIRES AND PRESENT THREATS................................................................................................................4 FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY: HAZARD, RISK AND VALUES AT RISK ....................................................................6 Fire Hazard..................................................................................................................................................6 Fire Risk.......................................................................................................................................................7 Values at Risk...............................................................................................................................................7 FIRE FIGHTING RESOURCES .............................................................................................................................8 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM (FIRE ACCESS) ...................................................................................................11 Roads Originating from State Highway 299..............................................................................................11 Named Roads Originating from Highway 299 (listed from west to east)..............................................12 Poker Bar Road and Connecting Roads (listed from south to north).................................................12 Lewiston Road and Connecting Roads (listed from south to north)..................................................12 Timber Trails .....................................................................................................................................13 Trinity Dam Boulevard and Connecting Roads (listed from south to north).....................................13 Clark Creek Road...............................................................................................................................13 Shingle Shanty Road..........................................................................................................................13 Dam Access Road and Connecting Roads (listed from north to south).............................................14 County Line Road and Connecting Roads (from north to south) ......................................................14 Hoadley Peaks Road and Connecting Roads (from south to north)...................................................15 Unnamed Roads Originating from Highway 299 (listed from west to east)..........................................16 Roads Originating in Adjacent Watersheds...............................................................................................17 CHAPTER 2. NATURAL RESOURCES....................................................................................................18 WILDLIFE HABITAT VEGETATION TYPES ......................................................................................................18 Sierran Mixed-Conifer (SMC) Forest Habitat...........................................................................................20 Klamath Mixed-Conifer (KMC) Forest Habitat ........................................................................................21 Douglas-fir (DFR) Forest Habitat.............................................................................................................21 White Fir (WFR) Forest Habitat................................................................................................................22 Ponderosa Pine (PPN) Forest Habitat ......................................................................................................23 Closed-Cone Pine-Cypress (CPC) Forest Habitat ....................................................................................23 Montane Hardwood-Conifer (MHC) Forest Habitat.................................................................................24 Montane Hardwood (MHW) Forest Habitat .............................................................................................25 Montane Riparian (MRI) Forest Habitat...................................................................................................25 Montane Chaparral (MCP) Shrub Habitat................................................................................................26 Annual Grassland Habitat (AGS) ..............................................................................................................26 Wet Meadow Habitat (WTM).....................................................................................................................27 Barren Habitat (BAR)................................................................................................................................27 Lacustrine Habitat (LAC) ..........................................................................................................................27 GEOLOGY .......................................................................................................................................................27 i SOILS ..............................................................................................................................................................28 Granitic Soils .............................................................................................................................................28 Ultramafic Soils .........................................................................................................................................32 Other Soils .................................................................................................................................................33 WILDLIFE AND FISHERIES ..............................................................................................................................36 Wildlife.......................................................................................................................................................36 Fish and Water Quality..............................................................................................................................37 Threatened and Endangered Species.........................................................................................................38 CULTURAL RESOURCES .................................................................................................................................38 CHAPTER 3. LANDOWNER VALUES AND GOALS ............................................................................38 ISSUES, CONCERNS AND GUIDELINES ............................................................................................................39 Bureau of Land Management Guidelines ..................................................................................................39 Bureau of Land Management Goals ..........................................................................................................42 Industrial Forest Landowner Guidelines...................................................................................................42 Industrial Forest Landowner Goals...........................................................................................................43 Residential Forest Landowner Guidelines.................................................................................................44 Residential Forest Landowner Goals ........................................................................................................45 CHAPTER 4. FORESTRY ...........................................................................................................................46 PUBLIC FORESTRY..........................................................................................................................................47 INDUSTRIAL FORESTRY..................................................................................................................................51 RURAL RESIDENTIAL FORESTRY....................................................................................................................52
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Centennial Industrial Site Habitat Management Plan for Pine Hill Flannelbush
    Centennial Industrial Site Habitat Management Plan for Pine Hill Flannelbush Centennial Industrial Site Habitat Management Plan for the Pine Hill Flannelbush (Fremontodendron decumbens) Prepared for: Rise Grass Valley, Inc. PO Box 271 Grass Valley, CA 95945 Prepared by: Greg Matuzak, Principal Biologist Greg Matuzak Environmental Consulting LLC 471 Sutton Way, Suite #210 Grass Valley, CA 95945 Email: [email protected] November 2019 Centennial Industrial Site Habitat Management Plan for Pine Hill Flannelbush TABLE OF CONTENTS INFORMATION SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ iv Habitat Management Plan Summary ................................................................................ v 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Pine Hill Flannelbush USFW Recovery Plan ............................................................ 1-1 1.2 Centennial Industrial Site in Nevada County ....................................................... 1-2 1.3 Project Understanding ........................................................................................... 1-3 1.4 Purpose of the Habitat Management Plan .......................................................... 1-4 2 SPECIES DESCRIPTION, IDENTIFICATION, DISTRIBUTION, AND ECOLOGY .................... 2-1 2.1 Description and Identification ............................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case 12/17
    Case 19-10547 Doc 66 Filed 05/15/19 Entered 05/15/19 12:26:25 Page 1 of 2 Information to identify the case: Debtor Falcon V, L.L.C. EIN 81−4041725 Name United States Bankruptcy Court Middle District of Louisiana Date case filed for chapter 11 5/10/19 Case number: 19−10547 Official Form 309F (For Corporations or Partnerships) Notice of Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case 12/17 For the debtor listed above, a case has been filed under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. An order for relief has been entered. This notice has important information about the case for creditors, debtors, and trustees, including information about the meeting of creditors and deadlines. Read both pages carefully. The filing of the case imposed an automatic stay against most collection activities. This means that creditors generally may not take action to collect debts from the debtor or the debtor's property. For example, while the stay is in effect, creditors cannot sue, assert a deficiency, repossess property, or otherwise try to collect from the debtor. Creditors cannot demand repayment from the debtor by mail, phone, or otherwise. Creditors who violate the stay can be required to pay actual and punitive damages and attorney's fees. Confirmation of a chapter 11 plan may result in a discharge of debt. A creditor who wants to have a particular debt excepted from discharge may be required to file a complaint in the bankruptcy clerk's office within the deadline specified in this notice. (See line 11 below for more information.) To protect your rights, consult an attorney.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessor Book Boundaries National Parks : 1178 O § 1242 E ¦¨ GRAN S N 0322 D D AVE
    LEY S L P A Y E V INYO COUNTY R A S P R I E INYO COUNTY T20NR10E Jupiter Pioneer Copper Y Point of Point Queen N Mine Rocks L D Rob Roy Acme Omega Canyon A T20NR01E 0512 Mine H (historical) T20NR08E R Smith Mine Beck Kingston # Standard T20NR02E T20NR06E Sperry Rogers Mine Range Blackwater # T20NR11E 0485 # L T20NR03E T20NR05E T20NR07E Hills Western Spring Mine Excelsior A S # Mine Monarch I T19NR09EN Mine T20NR09E Number Two Red Hill # L # Talc Mine O # Mine T20NR04E Pleasanton Mine # # Horse N Mine # T25SR40E Searles L # F # Thief # Snow N L M#ine # I # T T19NR06EN Springs # Long S T19NR07EN T19NR08EN White I I Valley # #Moorehouse # U T Valley E #Mine Acme L E Mine Alexander Tecopa# Q E A Mine # G E Hills Pass S A Trona A# BootAh N Kingston # # Mine T25SR41E Trona Y S # Alexander A E T L C R T19NR12E V M V o L #Mine Cub Lee s # N t M Well N T25SR43E T25SR44E R T25SR46E A L O Argus T25SR45E T25SR47E L I T Argus Tank a S A # Sandora k # T19NR13E U Canyon I T19NR08EE T25SR42E A Mine G e H G Wingate S Sperry N Borosolvay # Pass I N N O # K K Virginia Lake N I L N # China # Sand View # Old Ibex T19NR10E 0486 Canyon Ann Mine Owlshead AT19NR03E Ibex A D U M O N T Mine O T19NR04E T Wash Pass T19NR06E H I L L S Lake M E # Mountains T Kingston D T L Ponga E T19NR09E Peak T19NR11E Mesquite E China # T19NR02E N L G # S # T19NR07E T19NR08E Crystal # # Mine P Valley N S South N T19NR05E Mesquite L I U O Lake Trona New York Mine Hills Owl Lake # # Mountains # TA 0520 E Rabbit Mesquite R O T Colorado N # SISKIYOU Searles E U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality
    Housing Element Rezone Implementation Program County of Nevada Environmental Impact Report 4.10 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY This section evaluates potential hydrology and water quality impacts that could result from the Nevada County Housing Element Rezone. Mitigation measures for potential impacts are identified where applicable. Information in this section comes from County of Nevada GIS mapping analysis as well as existing federal, state, and local regulations. 4.10.1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING CLIMATE Located on the western slope of the Sierra Nevada Mountain Range, Nevada County (County) enjoys a temperate climate with seasonal variations consisting of hot dry summers and cold wet winters. Average temperatures range from a low of 34 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) in January to a high of 91°F in July. Precipitation falls primarily from November to April in the form of both rain and snow with snow falling most winters. The majority of precipitation falls in December, January, and February. WATERSHEDS The proposed project areas lie within the Upper Bear and Upper Yuba subbasins. Both subbasins exist within the American River subregion, which consists of roughly 5,375 square miles and includes portions of six counties. More specifically, the project sites are located within three watersheds (Sites 1-9, 14, and 17 are in the Wolf Creek Watershed, Sites 10-13 are in the Deer Creek Watershed, and Sites 15, 16, and 18 are in the Middle Bear Watershed). The Upper Bear subbasin, which incorporates the Grass Valley area sites and the Lake of the Pines area sites, originates about 20 miles west of the crest of the Sierra Nevada in northern Placer County within the boundaries of the Tahoe National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Status Species Occurrences
    S U G A R L O A F M OUNTAIN T RAIL Biological Resources Report Prepared for: Bear-Yuba Land Trust (BYLT) ATTN: Bill Haire 12183 South Auburn Road Grass Valley, CA 95949 Ph: (530) 272-5994 and City of Nevada City ATTN: Amy Wolfson 317 Broad Street Nevada City, CA 95959 Ph: (530) 265-2496 Prepared by: Chainey-Davis Biological Consulting ATTN: Carolyn Chainey-Davis 182 Grove Street Nevada City, CA 95959 Ph: (530) 205-6218 August 2018 Sugarloaf Mountain Trail — Biological Inventory C h a i n e y - Davis Biological Consulting SUMMARY This Biological Resources Report (BRR) includes an inventory and analysis of potential impacts to biological resources resulting from the construction and operation of the Sugarloaf Mountain Trail, a proposed 1.5-mile public recreational trail in Nevada City, California, on a 30-acre open space preserve owned by the City of Nevada City (APN 036-020-026). The trail would be constructed, managed, and maintained by the Bear-Yuba Land Trust, a private non-profit organization. The project would expand an existing small, primitive trail and construct a new segment of trail on Sugarloaf Mountain, just north of Nevada City. The trail begins near the intersection of State Route 49 and North Bloomfield Road and terminates on Sugarloaf Mountain. The proposed trail includes a quarter-mile segment on an easement through private land. The project drawings are provided in Appendix A. Trail tread width will vary from 36 to 48 inches, depending on location and physical constraints, and constructed using a mini excavator, chainsaws, and a variety of hand tools.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Classification, 2003. 577 Pp. Pdf Icon[PDF – 7.1
    Instruction Manual Part 8 Vital Records, Geographic Classification, 2003 Vital Statistics Data Preparation U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics Hyattsville, Maryland October, 2002 VITAL RECORDS GEOGRAPHIC CLASSIFICATION, 2003 This manual contains geographic codes used by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) in processing information from birth, death, and fetal death records. Included are (1) incorporated places identified by the U.S. Bureau of the Census in the 2000 Census of Population and Housing; (2) census designated places, formerly called unincorporated places, identified by the U.S. Bureau of the Census; (3) certain towns and townships; and (4) military installations identified by the Department of Defense and the U.S. Bureau of the Census. The geographic place of occurrence of the vital event is coded to the state and county or county equivalent level; the geographic place of residence is coded to at least the county level. Incorporated places of residence of 10,000 or more population and certain towns or townships defined as urban under special rules also have separate identifying codes. Specific geographic areas are represented by five-digit codes. The first two digits (1-54) identify the state, District of Columbia, or U.S. Possession. The last three digits refer to the county (701-999) or specified urban place (001-699). Information in this manual is presented in two sections for each state. Section I is to be used for classifying occurrence and residence when the reporting of the geographic location is complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithium Resources and Requirements by the Year 2000
    Lithium Resources and Requirements by the Year 2000 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1005 Lithium Resources and Requirements by the Year 2000 JAMES D. VINE, Editor GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1005 A collection of papers presented at a symposium held in Golden, Colorado, January 22-24, 1976 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1976 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR THOMAS S. KLEPPE, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director First printing 1976 Second printing 1977 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Vine, James David, 1921- Lithium resources and requirements by the year 2000. (Geological Survey Professional Paper 1005) 1. Lithium ores-United States-Congresses. 2. Lithium-Congresses. I. Vine, James David, 1921- II. Title. HI. Series: United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 1005. TN490.L5L57 553'.499 76-608206 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-02887-5 CONTENTS Page 1. Introduction, by James D. Vine, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colo ______________-_______-_-- — ------- —— —— ——— ---- 1 2. Battery research sponsored by the U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration, by Albert Landgrebe, Energy Research and De­ velopment Administration, Washington, D.C., and Paul A. Nelson, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Ill-__- —— -____.—————— 2 3. Battery systems for load-leveling and electric-vehicle application, near-term and advanced technology (abstract), by N. P. Yao and W. J. Walsh, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, 111___.__________________________________-___-_________ — ________ 5 4. Lithium requirements for high-energy lithium-aluminum/iron-sulfide batteries for load-leveling and electric-vehicle applications, by A.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Initial Study
    NEVADA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA INITIAL STUDY To: Building Department* Nevada County Public Works Dept* Nevada Co Environmental Health Dept* City of Grass Valley* Nevada County Consolidated Fire District* Nevada Irrigation District* Northern Sierra Air Quality Mmgt District* PG&E* Dan Miller, District III Supervisor* Tyler Barrington, Principal Planner* Allison Ranch Property Owners Assn* County Counsel All individuals/organizations who have requested Notice of Availability of Initial Study* All agencies notified through the State Clearinghouse as listed on the Notice of Completion * Note: NOA only Date: July 9, 2015 Prepared by: Jessica Hankins, Project Planner Nevada County Planning Department 950 Maidu Avenue, Suite 170 Nevada City, CA 95959 (530) 265-1254 Email: [email protected] File Number(s): U14-009, MGT14-015, EIS14-012 Assessor’s Parcel Numbers: 22-120-28, -35; 22-160-27; 29-290-26; 29-350-03, -04, -16 Applicant: Newmont Mining Corp. 5326 Uranium City Road Ford, WA 99013 Telephone: (509) 258-4511 Owner: New Verde Mines LLC 5326 Uranium City Road Ford, WA 99013 Telephone: (509) 258-4511 Zoning Districts: Nevada County – IDR, RA-1.5 City of Grass Valley – P General Plan Designations: Nevada County – SDA, RES City of Grass Valley – P Project Location: 12509 Allison Ranch Road, Grass Valley 95949 Application Description: A Use Permit for the construction and operation of a groundwater collection conveyance and treatment system to manage water quality of historical mine drainage; and a Management Plan to address potential impacts on riparian habitat and wetland habitat near the conveyance and treatment system. Other Permits Which May Be Necessary: Based on initial comments received, the following permits may be required from the designated agencies: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Brunswick Industrial Site and East Bennett Road Right of Way (ROW) Biological Resources Assessment
    Brunswick Industrial Site and East Bennett Rd. ROW Biological Resources Assessment Brunswick Industrial Site and East Bennett Road Right of Way (ROW) Biological Resources Assessment Prepared for: Rise Grass Valley, Inc. PO Box 271 Grass Valley, CA 95945 Prepared by: Greg Matuzak, Principal Biologist Greg Matuzak Environmental Consulting LLC 471 Sutton Way, Suite #210 Grass Valley, CA 95945 Email: [email protected] November 2019 Brunswick Industrial Site and East Bennett Rd. ROW Biological Resources Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS INFORMATION SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ iv Report Summary ................................................................................................................... v 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Project Setting ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Project Understanding ........................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Previous Biological Resources Assessments of the Brunswick Site ....................... 1-3 1.4 Biological Resources Assessment Purpose ............................................................ 1-4 2 REGULATORY OVERVIEW ............................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Federal Regulations ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Centennial Industrial Site IMM Project - Biological Resources Impact Assessment
    Centennial Industrial Site IMM Project - Biological Resources Impact Assessment From: Greg Matuzak, Principal Biologist Greg Matuzak Environmental Consulting LLC 471 Sutton Way, Suite #210 Grass Valley, CA 95945 Phone: (530) 557-5077 Email: [email protected] To: Rise Grass Valley Inc. PO Box 271 Grass Valley, CA 95945 Date: November 12, 2019 Re: Technical Memorandum for Centennial Industrial Site: Idaho-Maryland Mine Project – Biological Resources Impact Assessment The prepared Technical Memorandum (“Technical Memo”) is a Biological Resources Impact Assessment of the Centennial Industrial Site for the proposed Idaho-Maryland Mine Project (“IMM Project”). This Technical Memo is based on the results of the Centennial Industrial Site Biological Resources Assessment (“BRA”) Report (Matuzak, 2019a) and Aquatic Resources Delineation Report (Matuzak, 2019b). The two reports prepared by Greg Matuzak Environmental Consulting LLC for Rise Grass Valley Inc. (“Rise”) include review, evaluation, and assessment of the sensitive biological resources that have the potential to occur within the Centennial Industrial Site. The purpose of this Technical Memo is to present the results of the site specific impact assessment for sensitive biological resources based on the proposed IMM Project components. Additionally, avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures are presented to ensure that the proposed surface disturbance would not have a significant impact on such sensitive biological resources. This Technical Memo, along with the Biological Resources Assessment for the Centennial Industrial Site, satisfies the Nevada County General Plan and Nevada County Land Use and Development Code requirements for the development of such biological resource assessments. 1 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING Rise proposes to reinitiate underground mining and ore processing of the Idaho-Maryland Mine in Nevada County, CA.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Land Statistics 2020 U.S
    Public Land Statistics 2020 U.S. Department of the Interior • Bureau of Land Management U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management The Bureau of Land Management’s mission is to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. Production services were provided by the Bureau of Land Management’s National Operations Center in Denver, Colorado. PUBLIC LAND STATISTICS 2020 Volume 205 June 2021 BLM/OC/ST-21/001+1165 P-108-10 WELCOME TO PUBLIC LAND STATISTICS 2020 Welcome to the 2020 edition of Public Land Statistics (PLS), published by the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM). The 80-plus tables provide numerical data and detailed footnotes related to the BLM’s mission, programs, and accomplishments. Many of the minor acreage changes from one year to the next occur because: 1. Inholdings have been acquired, or some other land exchange has taken place during the year. 2. Improved geographic information system (GIS) mapping of land boundaries has enabled the BLM to recalculate the total acres within the units. Note that data presented in the 2020 PLS tables may not exactly match data in other BLM publications covering fiscal year (FY) 2020 operations and accomplishments. Such discrepancies occur because the databases that provide table data are not static; they are constantly being updated to provide the latest information, sometimes many months after the end of the fiscal year. The BLM remains committed to publishing a PLS report each year that is timely, complete, and as helpful as possible to readers.
    [Show full text]
  • CALIFORNIA DROUGHT an UPDATE: JUNE 2009 California Drought Status: 2009 Mid-Year Report
    State of California • Natural Resources Agency • California Department of Water Resources CALIFORNIA DROUGHT AN UPDATE: JUNE 2009 CALIFORNIA DROUGHT STATUS: 2009 MID-YEAR REPORT Cover photo of Mount Shasta in September, 2008 courtesy of Jack Trout, http://www.jacktrout.com ii INTRODUCTION FOREWORD This status report was prepared in response to a commitment to Governor Schwarzenegger that the Department of Water Resources (DWR) will monitor and report on water supply conditions and drought impacts. Following a dry 2007 and 2008, California is now in its third year of a drought. These years also mark a period of unprecedented restrictions in State Water Project and federal Central Valley Project (CVP) diversions from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to protect listed fish species. Together, these factors are having a significant impact on the ability to meet the state’s water supply needs. Drought impacts from this year’s water shortages are most severe in the west side of the San Joaquin Valley. CVP deliveries for that area are at 10 percent of contractors’ allocations this year, following deliveries of 40 percent in 2008 and 50 percent in 2007. The resulting water shortages are causing major economic impacts to agriculture and communities that depend on agriculture for employment. Demands for social services – food banks and unemployment assistance programs – have stretched the ability of local agencies to respond, as described in the Governor’s recent request for a presidential declaration of major disaster in Fresno County. One conclusion that is evident from this review of year-to-date conditions is the importance of preparing for the possibility of a dry 2010.
    [Show full text]