DOCSLIB.ORG

SHEMINI Vol.29 No.30.Qxp Layout 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SHEMINI Vol.29 No.30.Qxp Layout 1 22 April 2017 26 Nisan 5777 Shabbat ends London 9.00pm Jerusalem 7.51pm Volume 29 No. 30 Shemini Shabbat Mevarchim. Rosh Chodesh Iyar is on Wednesday and Thursday. Artscroll p.588 | Hertz p.443 | Soncino p.651 In memory of Faiga Ratza bat Ze’ev "This you may eat from everything that is in the water: everything that has fins and scales in the 1 water, in the seas, and in the streams, those you may eat" (Vayikra 11:9). Sidrah Summary: Shemini 1st Aliya (Kohen) – Vayikra 9:1-16 day, as well as parts of the shelamim offering The sidrah begins almost a year after the Exodus which they had also brought. from Egypt, on Rosh Chodesh Nisan. After seven 5th Aliya (Chamishi) – 10:16-19 days of inaugurating the Mishkan, Moshe Moshe criticises Elazar and Itamar for burning instructs Aharon to bring two special offerings, one of the chatat offerings instead of eating parts an elevation offering (olah) and a sin offering of it. Aharon defends their actions, based on their (chatat). The people are also told to bring a status as mourners (Rashi). Moshe accepts chatat, two olah offerings and two peace Aharon’s justification. offerings (shelamim). Aharon approaches the 6th Aliya (Shishi) – 11:1-32 altar (mizbeach), together with his sons, and they begin the process of bringing these offerings. God teaches Moshe and Aharon some of the laws of kashrut. Only an animal with completely split Point to Consider: what was the purpose of hooves and which chews the cud is kosher. Aharon’s special sin offering? (see Rashi to 9:2) Therefore, animals like the camel and pig, which 2nd Aliya (Levi) – 9:17-23 have only one of these characteristics, are Aharon and his sons finish the offerings, after forbidden. Fish are only kosher if they have both which Aharon blesses the people with the priestly fins and scales. The Torah lists forbidden birds by blessing (Rashi). Moshe and Aharon then bless name. Flying insects are also prohibited food, the people that the Divine presence will rest upon with limited exceptions (that are today difficult to them (Rashi). identify). Kosher animals which die without proper slaughter (shechitah), as well as dead non-kosher 3rd Aliya (Shlishi) – 9:24-10:11 animals transmit ritual impurity (tumah) to one A fire comes from heaven and consumes the who touches them. offerings on the mizbeach. The people fall to the (Shevi’i) ground in praise to God. Nadav and Avihu, two of 7th Aliya – 11:33-47 Aharon’s sons, bring an incense offering (ketoret) The Torah lists some basic laws of how certain in a pan, which they had not been commanded utensils can become impure (tameh) and how to do. A fire descends from God, killing them they need to be treated thereafter. All creeping instantly. Aharon is silent (see articles on p.3 and insects are forbidden to eat. Keeping these laws p.4). Moshe asks two of their cousins to remove allows a person to become sanctified and holy. the bodies. Moshe tells Aharon and his two surviving sons, Elazar and Itamar, not to show Haftarah any public display of mourning. God relates to This reading from the book of Shmuel (II) relates Aharon that no one is allowed to do service in the the journey of the ark to Jerusalem, led by King Mishkan drunk. David. Tragedy strikes on this journey, when Uzzah the son of Avinadav dies trying to stop the Question: what were the names of Moshe and ark falling. Upon its eventual arrival in Jerusalem, Aharon’s cousins? Answer on bottom of page 6. David dances joyfully in public and is criticised by 4th Aliya (Revi’i) – 10:12-15 his wife Michal, the daughter of Shaul. Natan the Moshe tells Aharon and his sons to eat the prophet tells David that his line of kingship will last remaining parts of a special meal offering forever and that his son Shlomo (Solomon) will (mincha) that they themselves had brought that build the Temple. United Synagogue Daf Hashavua Produced by US Living & Learning together with the Rabbinical Council of the United Synagogue Editor: Rabbi Chaim Gross Editor-in-Chief: Rabbi Baruch Davis Editorial Team: Ilana Epstein, Michael Laitner, Sharon Radley Available also via email US website www.theus.org.uk ©United Synagogue To sponsor Daf Hashavua please contact Loraine Young on 020 8343 5653, or [email protected] If you have any comments or questions regarding Daf Hashavua please email [email protected] 2 Solutions in the Sidrah: Silence – The Language of the Heart by Rabbi Yoni Birnbaum, Hadley Wood Jewish Community In January of this year, The Baal HaTurim suggests that the connection ‘The Silver Line’, a senior between these two instances is to indicate that citizens’ helpline founded the tragedy of the passing of the righteous is as by Esther Rantzen in momentous as the stopping of the sun. 2013, revealed a shocking statistic. Data collected In the context of the pain felt by those who by the organisation over tragically suffer in silence, such as those people several months showed that referred to by Sophie Andrews, perhaps we can calls to the helpline were increasing at a rate of suggest an alternative connection. There are 5% to 10% every month, with staff at the helpline those for whom the immensity of the emotional handling approximately 1,700 calls per day. pain felt in their hearts is akin to the ‘silencing’ (dimming) of the sun itself. In that moment, it may In discussing the possible reasons for this feel as if there is no possibility whatsoever of a dramatic increase, the charity’s Chief Executive bright, sunlit future. They are silent because there Sophie Andrews explained that more and more are no words of hope to express. pensioners had been choosing to suffer in silence, for fear of being viewed as a burden on Former Secretary General of the United Nations, society. This was particularly pronounced in calls Dag Hammerskjold, once described silence as received after 11.00pm, when some two-thirds the ‘language of the heart’. Silence itself, as in of callers described themselves as suffering from the silence expressed by the pain of Aharon, a mental health condition such as depression, or the silence of those who had waited or may yet were unwilling to seek medical help. “In the still be waiting to call The Silver Line, is also a 80-90 generation”, Andrews remarked, “there is language. Yet it is one that requires a deep form a real stigma in talking about how you of empathic listening in order to understand it. feel….They say that they don’t want anyone to Hearing that silence can be challenging, but know how they feel, because they don’t want doing so may go a long way to assisting those in their independence taken away from them…” desperate need of help. This week’s sidrah contains one of the most tragic episodes in the Torah, the sudden death of two of Aharon’s sons. Strikingly, the Torah records Aharon’s reaction with just two brief words: “and Aharon was silent” (‘vayidom Aharon’ – Shemot 10:3). The Baal HaTurim (Rabbi Ya’akov ben Asher d. 1340) notes that the Hebrew word ‘vayidom’, meaning ‘and he was silent’, also occurs in the Book of Yehoshua (Joshua), referring to the miraculous ‘silencing’ or ‘stopping’ of the sun in order to aid the Jewish people in battle (Yehoshua 10:12). Esther Rantzen In memory of Devorah bat Moshe Bentzion 3 Lessons from Nadav and Avihu by Rabbi Marc Levene, Belmont United Synagogue For the past eight weeks Nadav and Avihu were not given ‘creative (20 chapters), the Torah licence’ in the Mishkan. As Kohanim they had has focused on the laws very specific instructions. The Torah laid out with of building the Mishkan meticulous detail exactly how they should act. (Tabernacle). Each aspect Therefore their decision to bring their own of its structure was offering, even out of love and commitment to commanded by God, God, was not acceptable. Although it was meticulously studied by the heartfelt, it was had devastating consequences. people and constructed to the letter. The various Their second error was to act without enough parts were built by conscientious craftsmen, and prior thought. With great zeal and passion they the Kohanim learned and prepared for their rushed into their service, but without enough special duties. The Israelites watched as this concern for their actions, as this was not what magnificent centrepiece took shape, designed God demanded of them. to reach its goal as a hub for their daily religious practice. In order to finalise the building These lessons can be instructive for us. Even of the Mishkan, Moshe led a seven-day-long when our deeds are genuine and sincere, without inauguration service. proper thought they could sometimes have grave consequences. Whether in our personal or The inauguration was celebrated by the nation. professional lives, we should strive to consider Yet after the preparation ceremonies were how people will be affected by our actions. completed, on the first day of ‘proper’ service, an event happened that marred their elation and When observing laws which carry serious brought a tragic final note to the festivities. consequences when broken, such as driving within the speed limit, the need for exactitude is Enveloped in the excitement of the inaugural obvious. Yet even when acting towards another festivities, Nadav and Avihu, the sons of Aharon, person in a context with less risk or potential for approached the altar and brought an legal punishment, it is important that we listen to unauthorised incense offering.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Philosophic Homilies of Nissim of Girona - 14704
    Syllabus PHILOSOPHIC HOMILIES OF NISSIM OF GIRONA - 14704 Last update 12-09-2021 HU Credits: 2 Degree/Cycle: 2nd degree (Master) Responsible Department: Jewish Thought Academic year: 0 Semester: 1st Semester Teaching Languages: Hebrew Campus: Mt. Scopus Course/Module Coordinator: Prof. Zeev Harvey Coordinator Email: [email protected] Coordinator Office Hours: Tu 11:30-12:30 Teaching Staff: Prof Zeev Harvey page 1 / 4 Course/Module description: One of the great medieval authorities on Jewish law, Rabbi Nissim ben Reuben of Girona ( Ha-Ran, c. 1310-1376) is known for his Commentary on BT Nedarim, his Commentaries on Rabbi Isaac Alfasi's Halakhot, and his Novellae on various Talmudic tractates. However, he was also a profound and original philosophic homilist. His book of philosophic homilies, known as "Derashot Ha-Ran," had a significant influence on medieval Jewish philosophy both directly and also indirectly, through his student Rabbi Hasdai Crescas and his student's student Rabbi Joseph Albo. Course/Module aims: We shall read together one homily from Derashot Ha-Ran. In the last month of the semester, we shall discuss the papers of participants. Learning outcomes - On successful completion of this module, students should be able to: ability to analyze a medieval philosophic sermon Attendance requirements(%): 100% Teaching arrangement and method of instruction: Reading and discussion Course/Module Content: A seminar paper (about 20-25 pp.) or a short paper (about 7-10 pp.). The paper is to be submitted by the final class (11.1.22). It may be on any subject connected with Derashot Ha-Ran, and may be written in accordance with various approaches, e.g., historical, analytic, or philological.
    [Show full text]
  • Moses Hayim Luzzatto's Quest for Providence
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 10-2014 'Like Iron to a Magnet': Moses Hayim Luzzatto's Quest for Providence David Sclar Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/380 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] “Like Iron to a Magnet”: Moses Hayim Luzzatto’s Quest for Providence By David Sclar A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in History in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The City University of New York 2014 © 2014 David Sclar All Rights Reserved This Manuscript has been read and accepted by the Graduate Faculty in History in satisfaction of the Dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Prof. Jane S. Gerber _______________ ____________________________________ Date Chair of the Examining Committee Prof. Helena Rosenblatt _______________ ____________________________________ Date Executive Officer Prof. Francesca Bregoli _______________________________________ Prof. Elisheva Carlebach ________________________________________ Prof. Robert Seltzer ________________________________________ Prof. David Sorkin ________________________________________ Supervisory Committee iii Abstract “Like Iron to a Magnet”: Moses Hayim Luzzatto’s Quest for Providence by David Sclar Advisor: Prof. Jane S. Gerber This dissertation is a biographical study of Moses Hayim Luzzatto (1707–1746 or 1747). It presents the social and religious context in which Luzzatto was variously celebrated as the leader of a kabbalistic-messianic confraternity in Padua, condemned as a deviant threat by rabbis in Venice and central and eastern Europe, and accepted by the Portuguese Jewish community after relocating to Amsterdam.
    [Show full text]
  • Rabbi Nissim of Girona on the Constitutional Power of the Sovereign
    Rabbi Nissim of Girona on the Constitutional Power of the Sovereign Warren Zev Harvey* Of all medieval Jewish philosophers after Maimonides, the one whose legal thinking is most constitutional was Rabbi Nissim ben Reuben of Girona, known by the acronym Ran (Rabbenu Nissim). He was born in about 1310 and died in 1376. He lived, taught, and judged in Barcelona, then part of the Crown of Aragon. A prolific writer, he authored a celebrated commentary on Rabbi Isaac Alfasi’s Sefer ha-Halakhot and a commentary on the tractate of Nedarim, printed in standard editions of the Babylonian Talmud and customarily studied in the place of Rashi’s commentary (which does not exist on that tractate). In addition, he wrote novellae on selected tractates of the Babylonian Talmud and scores of legal responsa. In the realm of philosophical thought, he composed an influential collection of philosophic homilies, known asDerashot ha-Ran (“The Homilies of Rabbi Nissim”); and he also wrote an unfinished commentary on the Pentateuch, ending with Gen 23:20. All of his works were written in Hebrew.1 Ran was the leading authority of his day in rabbinic law and the most original Jewish political philosopher between Maimonides and Abrabanel. He was also, as already said, the most constitutionally minded of all medieval Jewish philosophers after Maimonides. It is because of the constitutional nature of his legal philosophy that I have entitled this paper, “Rabbi Nissim of * This paper was originally delivered as the seventh annual Ivan Meyer Lecture in Jewish Law at the Center for Jewish Law and Contemporary Civilization, Benjamin N.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel Rynhold MY PERSONAL JEWISH
    Daniel Rynhold Daniel Rynhold is Professor of Jewish philosophy and Dean at the Bernard Revel Graduate School of Jewish Studies, Yeshiva University. His most recent book, coauthored with Michael J. Harris, is Nietzsche, Soloveitchik, and Contemporary Jewish Philosophy. MY PERSONAL JEWISH PHILOSOPHICAL ODYSSEY n another life, I would likely now be working in a laboratory pur- suing a research project in some branch of chemistry, which would Ihave been a noble pursuit. Instead, I am pursuing what I hope is no less a noble alternative in the world of Jewish philosophy. I men- tion this because if you will bear with the story of how I came to do what I do, which I have often spoken about but never really commit- ted to writing, it happens to be highly relevant to many of the questions on which this symposium on Jewish thought is based, in particular that of why the participants personally chose to be involved in this fi eld. I was educated and lived all my life in London, until moving to the Bernard Revel Graduate School in 2007 to take up a Jewish philoso- phy post. The British education system differs in many ways from the American system, though some elements may have changed in the past three decades, so this should not be assumed to describe the contem- porary situation. (I do not wish to upset any old friends working in Jewish education in the UK.) Three of those differences are particu- larly pertinent here. First, one specialized very early in English high schools, such that one studied just three or four subjects during years 11 and 12.
    [Show full text]
  • The Philosophy of Don Hasdai Crescas
    Hl~ ILLINOI S UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN PRODUCTION NOTE University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library Brittle Books Project, 2009. 296 W56p Ri _ _ r THE PHILOSOPHY OF DON HASDAJ CRESCAS COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PRESS SALES AGENTS NEW YORK: LEMCKE & BUECHNER 30-32 EAST 20TH STREET LONDON : HUMPHREY MILFORD AMEN CORNER, E.C. SHANGHAI : EDWARD EVANS & SONS, LTD. 30 NORTH SZECHUEN ROAD COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY ORIENTAL STUDIES VOL. XVII THE PHILOSOPHY OF DON HASDAI CRESCAS BY MEYER WAXMAN SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY, IN THE FACULTY OF PHILOSOPHY, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY Qltu Pork COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PRESS 1920 All rights reserved PRINTED IN ENGLAND AT THE OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS NOTE A PECULIAR interest attaches to Hasdai Crescas. He swam against the current of the philosophical exposition of his day. He was bold enough to oppose the speculative reasoning of Aristotle, the man who held nearly all the philosophers in his grip during so many centuries; and, above all, he dared to criticize the introduction of Aristotelian views into the religious philosophy of his own people, even though these views were dressed in Jewish garb by the master hand of Maimonides. The current passed him by; it could not overwhelm him. In the following pages Dr. Meyer Waxman has given us a detailed and a very interesting exposition of Crescas's philosophic system; and he has added to this a comparison of Crescas's views, not only with those of Maimonides, but also with those of Spinoza. We have thus lined up for us the three greatest minds that speculative Jewish theology produced during the Middle Ages; and the means are afforded us to estimate the value of their dip into the Unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • LATE MEDIEVAL JEWISH WRITERS on MAIMONIDES Angel Sáenz
    LATE MEDIEVAL JEWISH WRITERS ON MAIMONIDES Angel Sáenz-Badillos Maimonides had a profound infl uence on every medieval Jewish intel- lectual. For more than two hundred years after his death it was almost impossible to disregard him or to overlook the great debates that he had provoked in his time. In the Christian kingdoms of the Iberian Peninsula, the Jewish writers of the fi fteenth century felt morally obli- gated to adopt an attitude in favor of or against Maimonides’ ideas.1 Here I will focus my attention on several Catalan authors of the fi rst and second half of the century, and I will try to trace different patterns of attitudes of respect to the Rambam. In view of the many facets of these debates, I will consider in particular the relations between faith and reason, Torah and the philosophy and science of the Greeks, and the role played by logic for these authors that not only lived at the same epoch in the same kingdom, the Crown of Aragon, but had also in common a certain familiarity with Latin, and with Christian Scholasticism.2 The name of Maimonides was not only associated with Aristotle, but also with Averroes. In his letter to Samuel ibn Tibbon, ha-Rambam recommended Averroes as one of the best commentators of Aristotle. Many of Averroes’ commentaries on the Aristotelian corpus were trans- lated from Arabic into Hebrew, and commented on by Jewish philoso- phers during the fourteenth century. At the end of this century and the beginning of the fi fteenth, Averroes was more popular in Jewish circles than Aristotle himself.
    [Show full text]
  • Sixteenth-Century Hebrew Books in the Library of Congress
    Sixteenth-Century Hebrew Books at the Library of Congress A Finding Aid פה Washington D.C. June 18, 2012 ` Title-page from Maimonides’ Moreh Nevukhim (Sabbioneta: Cornelius Adelkind, 1553). From the collections of the Hebraic Section, Library of Congress, Washington D.C. i Table of Contents: Introduction to the Finding Aid: An Overview of the Collection . iii The Collection as a Testament to History . .v The Finding Aid to the Collection . .viii Table: Titles printed by Daniel Bomberg in the Library of Congress: A Concordance with Avraham M. Habermann’s List . ix The Finding Aid General Titles . .1 Sixteenth-Century Bibles . 42 Sixteenth-Century Talmudim . 47 ii Sixteenth-Century Hebrew Books in the Library of Congress: Introduction to the Finding Aid An Overview of the Collection The art of Hebrew printing began in the fifteenth century, but it was the sixteenth century that saw its true flowering. As pioneers, the first Hebrew printers laid the groundwork for all the achievements to come, setting standards of typography and textual authenticity that still inspire admiration and awe.1 But it was in the sixteenth century that the Hebrew book truly came of age, spreading to new centers of culture, developing features that are the hallmark of printed books to this day, and witnessing the growth of a viable book trade. And it was in the sixteenth century that many classics of the Jewish tradition were either printed for the first time or received the form by which they are known today.2 The Library of Congress holds 675 volumes printed either partly or entirely in Hebrew during the sixteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Faith, Reason and Dogma in Jewish Philosophy
    Faith, Reason and Dogma in Jewish Philosophy Dr. Avi Kadish Course Number: 702.2190 Class Time: TBA Class Location: TBA E-Mail: [email protected] Course Description: Can God be proven? Can ideas ever be commanded? How did Judaism, Jewish philosophy and general philosophy change between the Middle Ages and that of the modern world? Can the Jewish tradition be read in a rational way? The axis of Jewish philosophy is in the tension between universal human reason and the unique experience of individuals or groups, and we will deal with that tension from many different angles throughout this course. In this course we will study the philosophy and dogmatics of Moses Maimonides (1135- 1204). We will contrast his rationalistic approach towards understanding the Torah and Jewish tradition to that of his critics (in the centuries between his own lifetime and the expulsion of the Jews from Spain in 1492). Course Requirements: Weekly reading assignments: These include questions to answer (via Moodle) about secondary texts from the bibliography, followed by discussion of them in class. Oral Presentation and Short Term Paper: The student is to choose a primary text on any issue in Jewish philosophy, which s/he will teach and analyze together with the rest of the class. Following this, a short written paper on the topic will be submitted. Final Examination Final Grade: Weekly Reading Assignments (online written summaries and feedback): 30% Oral Presentation and Short Term Paper (both on the same topic): 30% Final Examination: 40% 1 Course Outline and Reading List Week 1: The Illuminated Palace: An Introduction to Jewish Philosophy Online essay in two parts <http://thetorah.com/discovering-god-rationalistic-1/ > (read both parts) *Collected Excerpts from Primary Sources Week 2: The Illuminated Palace: An Introduction to Jewish Philosophy (continued) Raphael Jospe, "What is Jewish Philosophy" in Jewish Philosophy in the Middle Ages, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Green on Rudavsky, 'Jewish Philosophy in the Middle Ages: Science, Rationalism, and Religion'
    H-Judaic Green on Rudavsky, 'Jewish Philosophy in the Middle Ages: Science, Rationalism, and Religion' Review published on Monday, June 17, 2019 Tamar Rudavsky. Jewish Philosophy in the Middle Ages: Science, Rationalism, and Religion. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018. 320 pp. $40.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-19-958090-3. Reviewed by Alexander Green (State University of New York, University at Buffalo) Published on H- Judaic (June, 2019) Commissioned by Barbara Krawcowicz (Norwegian University of Science and Technology) Printable Version: http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=53586 Tamar Rudavsky’s new book, Jewish Philosophy in the Middle Ages: Science, Rationalism and Religion, is an important contribution to the ongoing debate about how to define medieval Jewish philosophy. Since the beginning of the twentieth century, there have been multiple and varying works that have attempted to understand Jewish thinkers and debates ranging from the time of Saadia Gaon in the ninth century to Baruch Spinoza in the seventeenth century. One of the major elements unifying Jewish philosophers living in Baghdad, Egypt, Spain, Provence, and Italy in the medieval world was the question of how to synthesize Greco-Arabic thought with that of the biblical and rabbinic tradition on issues such as the origin of the universe, the nature of God and the cosmos, the structure of the human soul, and the right way to live and to organize political communities. Most histories of medieval Jewish philosophy in the twentieth century have organized their studies chronologically and according to thinker or school of thought, while some of the more recent works present a more diverse account of the players in the field rather than just the famous names.[1] There is a strength to this model as it allows the reader to understand how every medieval Jewish philosopher and their schools of thought each developed their own approach to discerning the nature of God, providence, prophecy, creation, et cetera.
    [Show full text]
  • In Jewish Law
    The “Killer Wife” (Qatlanit) in Jewish Law The “Killer Wife” (Qatlanit) in Jewish Law: A Survey of Sources Elaine Adler Goodfriend, California State University, Northridge, USA Abstract This article traces the development of Jewish law regarding the qatlanit or “killer-wife,” a woman who was twice widowed. The Jewish law examines the dilemma whether she should be allowed to marry again because of the risk that she poses a mortal danger to men whom she marries. Fear of marrying a woman twice-widowed plays a role in the story of Tamar, but Genesis 38 makes it clear that it is God who is responsible for the deaths of Er and Onan, and not the innocent widow. The Talmud prohibits the marriage of a twice-widowed woman, and attributes the demise of her husbands not to any intention on her part, but rather her “source” (sexual organs) or her “mazal” (fate as determined by astrology). Later responsa generally reflect a more lenient attitude towards the remarriage of the qatlanit in response to the tumult and tragedy of medieval Jewish history, as well as the growing influence of rationalism in Jewish thought. Modern rabbis, because of their openness to scientific thought and concern for the loneliness of old age, show a marked leniency towards the remarriage of a twice-widowed woman. Hebrew qatlanit, or “killer wife,” refers to a twice (or thrice) widowed woman who unintentionally caused the deaths of her husbands. This can be distinguished from the English term, “black widow,” which indicates a female serial murderer, one who kills her husbands for financial gain, revenge, or pleasure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Afterlife in Judaism1 Tyron Goldschmidt and Aaron Segal 1. Introduction the Majority of American Jews Do Not Believe in an A
    The Afterlife in Judaism1 Tyron Goldschmidt and Aaron Segal 1. Introduction The majority of American Jews do not believe in an afterlife. A pew poll (2008: 32) has 39% of US Jews believing in an afterlife. Contrast the general US population, of which 74% believe in an afterlife. The reservations aren’t reserved for the Jewish laity, but extend to certain Jewish intellectual circles too. That’s not the way it’s always been. On the contrary, belief in some form of afterlife has been counted as a fundamental principle of Jewish faith, and for orthodox Jews it still is. The traditional Jewish view about the afterlife is elaborate. It has a labyrinthine landscape and a complex chronology, including no less than: reincarnation, purgatory, annihilation, a world of departed souls, the bodily resurrection of the dead, and the World to Come. Our paper first addresses some of the skepticism in contemporary Jewish thought about the afterlife. We then outline the central features of the traditional Jewish view, along with some disagreements within the tradition. We then turn to a philosophical puzzle about the significance of the afterlife and close with a related discussion of its purpose. 2. Contemporary Skepticism Contemporary American Jews are skeptical about the afterlife. Doubtless, much of this results from a more general rejection of traditional religious views. Doubtless, much of it results from ignorance about what the traditional religious views are. However, some Jewish theologians--who are neither dismissive nor ignorant--endorse a more or less limited skepticism. And allegedly on the grounds of traditional Jewish values.
    [Show full text]
  • Maimonides, Crescas, and the Parable of the Castle
    Warren Zev Harvey Maimonides, Crescas, and the Parable of the Castle Rabbi Hasdai Crescas, the foremost medieval critic of Maimonides’ philosophy, was born in Barcelona around 1340, which is about two centuries after the birth of Maimo- nides in Cordoba in 1138. Crescas died in Saragossa in the winter of 1410/11. He was the judge of the Jews of the Crown of Aragon and advisor to King Joan I and Queen Violant de Bar, the famed benefactress of the arts and sciences. In this chapter, I will discuss Crescas’ sceptical critique of Maimonides. His critique of the Aristotelian con- cepts of place, time, the impossibility of an actual infinity, and the horror vacui, are documented in Harry Austryn Wolfson’s monumental study, Crescas’ Critique of Aris- totle.1 It is also discussed in my much more modest volume, Physics and Metaphysics in Hasdai Crescas.2 When we speak of Crescas’ sceptical critique of Maimonides, a question imme- diately forces itself upon us: What is the difference between Crescas’ scepticism and Maimonides’ scepticism?3 This question is at the heart of the phenomenon of Jewish scepticism. What is the difference between the scepticism of Crescas and the scep- ticism of Maimonides? For example, both philosophers are critical of the medieval proofs of God confidently affirmed by most other medieval philosophers. Both believe that what Maimonides called premise 26, namely the eternality of motion, has not been proved, and thus the proofs of God based on it are invalid. What, then, is the difference between Crescas’ scepticism and Maimonides’? The polysemic parable of the castle In order to illustrate the difference between the scepticisms of Maimonides and Crescas, I turn now to a midrash found in Genesis Rabbah, 39:1 (and parallels).
    [Show full text]