Pathological Aspects of Hepatocellular Tumors 77 4 Pathological Aspects of Hepatocellular Tumors

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pathological Aspects of Hepatocellular Tumors 77 4 Pathological Aspects of Hepatocellular Tumors Pathological Aspects of Hepatocellular Tumors 77 4 Pathological Aspects of Hepatocellular Tumors Hale Kirimlioglu, MD, Anthony J. Demetris, MD, and Michael A. Nalesnik, MD CONTENTS HEPATOCELLULAR ADENOMA HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA FIBROLAMELLAR HCC CLEAR CELL HCC SCLEROSING HCC COMBINED HCC AND CHOLANGIOCELLULAR CARCINOMA SARCOMATOID HCC HEPATOBLASTOMA REFERENCES 1. HEPATOCELLULAR ADENOMA Hepatocellular adenoma (HA) is an uncommon and benign tumor of the liver, seen most often in young women of childbearing age with a history of oral contraceptive use (Table 1) (1). The longer the duration of intake of oral contra- ceptives, the higher the risk of developing hepatic adenoma (2). Anabolic steroid use also is associated with HA, and an example of this lesion arising in conjunc- tion with growth hormone therapy for Turner’s syndrome has been reported (3). An association of liver cell adenoma and various genetic metabolic disorders (such as glycogen storage diseases types I, III, or IV, galactosemia, tyrosinemia, and, rarely, diabetes mellitus or familial adenomatous polyposis) also has been reported (4–9). From: Current Clinical Oncology: Hepatocellular Cancer: Diagnosis and Treatment Edited by: B. I. Carr © Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ 77 78 Kirimlioglu et al. Table 1 Neoplastic Hepatocellular Lesions: Selected Features Clinical features Pathological features HA Usually single, rarely Clonal growth of normal multiple; associated appearing hepatocytes with birth control pills; with arterial vasculature may bleed and otherwise bland trabecular architecture HCC, usual Most commonly arises Single, multiple, or diffuse in cirrhotic liver tumors; cytologically abnormal hepatocytes with arterial vasculature and trabecular to solid architecture HCC Variants Most often in young adults Large, aberrant hepatocytes Fibrolamellar without cirrhosis; with large nucleoli; HCC surgical resection may be abundant cytoplasm more efficacious than in variably fibrotic stroma in case of usual HCC Clear cell HCC Similar to HCC Cytoplasmic clearing of hepa- tocytes because of lipid or glycogen may cause confu- sion with similarly appear- ing tumors arising in other organs Sclerosing HCC Reported association with Malignant cells in densely hypercalcemia fibrous stroma may cause c onfusion with other forms of adenocarcinoma; large cells of fibrolamellar type not seen Combined HCC/ Similar to HCC Cells resemble a mixture of cholangio- malignant hepatocytes and carcinoma bile duct epithelial cells likely representing diver- gent differentiation from precursor cell Sarcomatoid HCC Rare, similar to HCC Sarcomatous element derives from malignant hepatocel- lular element (Continued) Pathological Aspects of Hepatocellular Tumors 79 Table 1 (Continued) Neoplastic Hepatocellular Lesions: Selected Features Clinical features Pathological features Hepatoblastoma Most common primary Epithelial, mixed epithelial tumor of infancy and mesenchymal patterns and childhood; association with several congenital abnormalities Fig. 1. Two mass lesions arising in a noncirrhotic liver. The large one proved to be a HA, and the smaller one was a focal nodular hyperplasia. The characteristic fibrous scar of the latter is not evident in this photograph (see Fig. 3). The tumor may present as a palpable mass with or without abdominal pain. Bleeding into the tumor may occur, and hemoperitoneum resulting from tumor rupture with free hemorrhage into the peritoneal space is a surgical emergency. Serum α-fetoprotein (AFP) levels are within normal limits. 1.1. Macroscopic Pathology HA characteristically appears as a well-circumscribed, nonlobulated lesion arising within a noncirrhotic liver (Fig. 1). Adenomas can range from 1 to more than 30 cm, but most are between 5 and 15 cm in diameter. Adenomas typically occur in subcapsular locations and in the right lobe. The tumor may be pedun- 80 Kirimlioglu et al. culated (10). It usually is solitary; however, multiple lesions are seen rarely, particularly in glycogen storage disease type I and in the condition referred to as liver adenomatosis (4,5,11,12). The color varies from yellow to tan and can be variegated because of a combination of intratumoral hemorrhage, infarction, and fatty changes (4,13). Adenomas usually are unencapsulated. 1.2. Microscopic Pathology HAs contain normal-appearing hepatocytes arranged in a trabecular architec- ture between one and three cells thick (Fig. 2A,B). There are no portal tracts and, therefore, the normal hepatic microanatomical relationships are lacking. The hepatocyte nuclei are small, round, and uniform. Nucleoli are inconspicuous. Mitoses are absent or few. Cytoplasm is pale or eosinophilic. In some adenomas, clear changes of the cytoplasm may be prominent because of increased storage of glycogen, fat, or both. Cholestasis is not uncommon. The normal reticulin pattern is well-preserved, and Kupffer’s cells exist in their usual locations. Small venous and arterial branches are seen throughout the tumor (Fig. 2C). Occasional larger vessels are seen and also may appear as feeding vessels adjacent to the tumor (Fig. 2D). Occasionally, the tumoral hepatocytes may contain periodic acid–Schiff (PAS)-positive, diastase-resistant hyaline globules (14,15), Mallory’s hyaline (16), or degenerate-appearing hyperchromatic nuclei (17). The distinction of HA from well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may be difficult or impossible by conventional light microscopy. The clinical context is important in this regard, and the diagnosis of hepatic adenoma outside of the setting of a young woman taking oral contraceptives should be viewed with suspicion. Immunohistochemical markers occasionally may be helpful in distinguishing HA from a well-differentiated HCC. Investigations should focus on suspicious-looking areas that are characterized by a clonal appearance (referring to a focus of cells that has a distinctly different look from the surrounding adenoma). This may be the result of cytological to architectural differences such as solid growth or formation of pseudoacini. Dem- onstration of AFP positivity is strong evidence in support of HCC over adenoma. In our experience, foci of carcinoma within an adenoma usually show increased cytological atypia and cell cycle activity, highlighted by the marker Ki-67, in comparison with adjacent adenoma and surrounding liver. Such changes must be interpreted in the context of the overall lesion, that is, the pathologist must make the interpretation as to whether he or she believes that carcinoma, if found, involves the entire lesion or only a portion of the tumor. Other immunostains do not add appreciably to the diagnostic information. Estrogen, progesterone, and androgenic steroid receptors have been detected in 26–73% of adenomas in different series (18,19) and also may be seen in HCC. Hepatic progenitor cells are identifiable by immunohistochemical means in a considerable proportion of HAs and support the hypothesis that oval hepatic progenitor cells play a role in Pathological Aspects of Hepatocellular Tumors 81 Fig. 2. (A) Interface of HA and normal liver. The adenoma comprises most of the photomicrograph and has numerous white areas at this low magnification because of increased intracellular fat. The normal liver (lower right hand por- tion) has a more solid appearance. The interface is smooth and no capsule is seen (stain, hematoxylin–eosin; original magnification, ×4). (B) High-power view of HA. The bland appearance and trabecular (continued on pages 76 and 77) 82 Kirimlioglu et al. Fig. 2. (continued from page 75) arrangement of tumor cells is apparent. Large and small fat vesicles are seen within cell cytoplasm (stain, hematoxylin–eosin; original magnification, ×40). (C) Vasculature within HA. Immunostain high- lights the dispersed arterial vasculature supplying the adenoma cells (stain, anti- CD31 immunoperoxidase; original magnification, ×20). (D) Cell proliferation Pathological Aspects of Hepatocellular Tumors 83 the development of hepatic tumors (20). However, their identification does not distinguish benign from malignant tumors. Comparative genomic hybridization has been suggested as a useful ancillary technique for the distinction of adenoma and carcinoma. Gains and losses of chromosome sites on 1q, 4q, 8p, 8q, 16p, and 17p were found to be the six most frequent alterations in HCC by this approach, and detection of one or more of these has been proposed as evidence in support of the diagnosis of carcinoma (21). These authors have updated this technique by using fluorescent in situ hybridization to detect quantitative anomalies of chromosomes 1, 6, 7, and 8, thereby distinguishing HCCs from adenomas and other benign lesions in paraf- fin-embedded material (22). The distinction between HA and focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) has clinical significance, because FNH is a benign condition that does not undergo malignant transformation and rarely ruptures, allowing in some cases for a more conserva- tive approach to management (23). Magnetic resonance imaging, enhanced CT, scintigraphic findings, and angiography show large peripheral vessels with cen- tripetal flow and are diagnostically useful, but the best method for the differen- tiation of HA and FNH is surgical biopsy (1,24,25). Histopathologically, both FNH and HA contain benign-appearing hepato- cytes. The presence of fibrous bands with artery branches and peripheral ductular hepatocytes in the absence of true bile ducts is characteristic of FNH (Fig. 3). Small vessels are also seen in the lobular portion
Recommended publications
  • Abdominal and Pelvic Imaging Findings Associated with Sex Hormone Abnormalities
    UCSF UC San Francisco Previously Published Works Title Abdominal and pelvic imaging findings associated with sex hormone abnormalities. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7cq623wg Journal Abdominal radiology (New York), 44(3) ISSN 2366-004X Authors Kurzbard-Roach, Nicole Jha, Priyanka Poder, Liina et al. Publication Date 2019-03-01 DOI 10.1007/s00261-018-1844-1 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Abdominal Radiology https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1844-1 (0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,-volV) REVIEW Abdominal and pelvic imaging findings associated with sex hormone abnormalities 1 1 1 2 Nicole Kurzbard-Roach • Priyanka Jha • Liina Poder • Christine Menias Ó Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Hormones are substances that serve as chemical communication between cells. They are unique biological molecules that affect multiple organ systems and play a key role in maintaining homoeostasis. In this role, they are usually produced from a single organ and have defined target organs. However, hormones can affect non-target organs as well. As such, biochemical and hormonal abnormalities can be associated with anatomic changes in multiple target as well as non-target organs. Hormone-related changes may take the form of an organ parenchymal abnormality, benign neoplasm, or even malignancy. Given the multifocal action of hormones, the observed imaging findings may be remote from the site of production, and may actually be multi-organ in nature. Anatomic findings related to hormone level abnormalities and/or laboratory biomarker changes may be identified with imaging. The purpose of this image-rich review is to sensitize radiologists to imaging findings in the abdomen and pelvis that may occur in the context of hormone abnormalities, focusing primarily on sex hormones and their influence on these organs.
    [Show full text]
  • Liver & Pancreas
    276A ANNUAL MEETING ABSTRACTS 1263 Renal Pathology in Hematopoeitic Cell Transplantation Design: We studied 58 consecutive liver allografts from 53 pediatric patients (<18 Recipients yrs) who underwent OLT from 1995-2006. All allograft biopsies were scored for the ML Troxell, M Pilapil, D Miklos, JP Higgins, N Kambham. OHSU, Portland, OR; following features: 1) CLH (mild, moderate, severe), 2) portal AR (mild, moderate, Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA. severe), 3) zone 3 fibrosis (mild=perivenular or severe=bridging), and 4) ductopenia. Background: Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) associated acute and chronic Five explanted livers that were removed during the course of retransplantation for graft renal toxicity can be due to cytotoxic conditioning agents, radiation, infection, failure in this group were also reviewed. immunosuppressive agents, ischemia, and graft versus host disease (GVHD). We have Results: Mean age at OLT was 7 yrs (range 7 wks-18 yrs) with 29 boys and 24 girls. reviewed consecutive renal biopsy specimens in HCT patients from a single center. We reviewed a total of 417 allograft biopsies (mean 7.2 per allograft) obtained 2 days Design: The files of Stanford University Medical Center Department of Pathology were - 11 yrs post-OLT; 200 (48%) of these were protocol biopsies. Forty-six allografts (79%) searched for renal biopsy specimens in patients who received HCT (1995-2005); 11 had >1 yr of histologic follow-up, 29 (50%) had >3 yrs, and 21 (36%) >5 yrs. Overall, cases were identified (post BMT time 0.7 to 14.5 years). The biopsies were processed CLH was observed on at least one occasion in 38 (66%) allografts.
    [Show full text]
  • "Gastrointestinal Tract Pathology"
    IIC,J CALIFORNIA TUMOR TISSUE REGISTRY "GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT PATHOLOGY" Study Cases, Subscription A March 2000 California Tumor Tissue Registry c/o: De1mrtment of Pathology and Human Anatomy Loma Linda Univcr.;ily School ofMcd.icine 11021 Campus Avenue, AH 335 Lomn Linda, California 92350 (909) 558-4788 FAX: (909) 558·0188 E-mail: [email protected] Case oftbe Month: www.llu.edu/Uu/cttr/cotm Target audience: Practicing pathologists and pathology residents. Goal: To acquairu the participam with the hiswlogic featu res of a variety of benign and malignant neoplasms and tumor-l ike conditions. Objectives: n1e participant will be able to recognize morphologic features ofa variety of benign and malignam neoplasms and tWllOr-like conditions and relate those processes to pertinent references in d1e medical literature. Educational methods and media: Review of representative glass slides v.ith associated histories. Feedback on consensus diagnoses lt·om participating pathologists. Listing of selected references from the medical literature. Principal faculty: Weldon K. Bullock, Ml) Donald R. Chase, MD CME Credit: Lorna Li.nda University School of Medicine designates this continuing medical education·activity for up to 2 hours of Category I of the Physician's Recogn ition Award oft he· American Medical Association. CME credit is offered for d1e subscription year only. Accreditation: Loma Linda University School of Medicine is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to sponsor continuing medical education for physicians. Contributor: James A. Henry, M.D. Case No. 1 - March 2000 Woodbridge, VA Tissue from: Terminal ileum Accession #28502 Clinical Abstract: This 37-year-old black female presented with several weeks' history of right lower quadrant abdominal pain radiating to the right side of the back and right inguinal area.
    [Show full text]
  • Conversion of Morphology of ICD-O-2 to ICD-O-3
    NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH National Cancer Institute to Neoplasms CONVERSION of NEOPLASMS BY TOPOGRAPHY AND MORPHOLOGY from the INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES FOR ONCOLOGY, SECOND EDITION to INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES FOR ONCOLOGY, THIRD EDITION Edited by: Constance Percy, April Fritz and Lynn Ries Cancer Statistics Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program National Cancer Institute Effective for cases diagnosed on or after January 1, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .......................................... 1 Morphology Table ..................................... 7 INTRODUCTION The International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition1 (ICD-O-3) was published by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2000 and is to be used for coding neoplasms diagnosed on or after January 1, 2001 in the United States. This is a complete revision of the Second Edition of the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology2 (ICD-O-2), which was used between 1992 and 2000. The topography section is based on the Neoplasm chapter of the current revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), Tenth Revision, just as the ICD-O-2 topography was. There is no change in this Topography section. The morphology section of ICD-O-3 has been updated to include contemporary terminology. For example, the non-Hodgkin lymphoma section is now based on the World Health Organization Classification of Hematopoietic Neoplasms3. In the process of revising the morphology section, a Field Trial version was published and tested in both the United States and Europe. Epidemiologists, statisticians, and oncologists, as well as cancer registrars, are interested in studying trends in both incidence and mortality.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoplasms of the Liver
    Modern Pathology (2007) 20, S49–S60 & 2007 USCAP, Inc All rights reserved 0893-3952/07 $30.00 www.modernpathology.org Neoplasms of the liver Zachary D Goodman Department of Hepatic and Gastrointestinal Pathology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC, USA Primary neoplasms of the liver are composed of cells that resemble the normal constituent cells of the liver. Hepatocellular carcinoma, in which the tumor cells resemble hepatocytes, is the most frequent primary liver tumor, and is highly associated with chronic viral hepatitis and cirrhosis of any cause. Benign tumors, such as hepatocellular adenoma in a noncirrhotic liver or a large, dysplastic nodule in a cirrhotic liver, must be distinguished from well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma. Cholangiocarcinoma, a primary adenocarci- noma that arises from a bile duct, is second in frequency. It is associated with inflammatory disorders and malformations of the ducts, but most cases are of unknown etiology. Cholangiocarcinoma resembles adenocarcinomas arising in other tissues, so a definitive diagnosis relies on the exclusion of an extrahepatic primary and distinction from benign biliary lesions. Modern Pathology (2007) 20, S49–S60. doi:10.1038/modpathol.3800682 Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma; hepatocellular adenoma; dysplastic nodule; cholangiocarcinoma A basic principle of pathology is that a neoplasm more than 3 to 1 (Figure 1). Among primary liver usually differentiates in the manner of cells that are tumors that come to clinical attention, over three- normally present in the tissue in which the fourths are hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), while neoplasm arises. Thus, primary neoplasms and the second most common primary malignancy, tumor-like lesions that occur in the liver usually cholangiocarcinoma (CC) accounts for 8% (Figure resemble the major constituent cells of the liver, 2).
    [Show full text]
  • ASC Webinar: Practical Approach to Liver Cytology Indication
    ASC Webinar: Practical Approach to Liver Cytology Barbara A. Centeno, M.D. Director of AP Quality Assurance Director of Cytopathology and Senior member/Moffitt Cancer Center Professor/Departments of Oncologic Sciences Morsani College of Medicine University of South Florida 1 LIVER OUTLINE • Background • Cytology of benign liver and liver nodules • Cytology of Primary Liver Cancers – Hepatocellular carcinoma – Cholangiocarcinoma • Ancillary studies for key differential diagnoses • Metastases 2 Indication: Evaluation of a Mass • Nonneoplastic lesions – hemangioma • Benign liver nodule –FNH – Adenoma • Primary epithelial cancers – HCC –ICC • Less common nonepithelial neoplasms and malignancies • Metastases 3 KEY DIAGNOSTIC ISSUES • Distinction of benign or reactive hepatocytes in nonneoplastic or benign liver nodules from well- differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma • Distinction of poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma from cholangiocarcinoma or metastases • Determination of primary site of origin of metastases • Determination of histogenesis of poorly differentiated malignancie 4 APPROACH TO THE DIAGNOSIS OF LIVER LESIONS • Clinical history – Age and gender • Hepatoblastoma in infants • Adenoma in females – Underlying liver disease • HCV and Cirrhosis as a predisposing risk factor for HCC – Previous history of carcinoma • Radiological imaging – Borders, possible vascular lesion • Cytological findings • Ancillary studies • Correlate all findings 5 Hepatocytes • Monolayered sheets,thin trabeculae, single cells or small, loose groups
    [Show full text]
  • Biopsy Interpretation of Liver Tumors
    Biopsy interpretation of liver tumors Rish K. Pai MD, PhD Professor of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology Mayo Clinic Arizona Florida Society of Pathology Summer 2019 [email protected] ©2017 MFMER | slide-1 Liver mass biopsies: Diagnostic issues • Cirrhotics versus non-cirrhotics • Malignant tumor in the liver • How to approach these biopsies and confirm or exclude HCC • Subtypes of HCC and mixed tumors • Well-differentiated HCC • Recognize and correctly classify benign lesions • Recognize lesional tissue • Hepatocellular adenoma • Focal nodular hyperplasia ©2017 MFMER | slide-2 Liver mass biopsies: Upfront work • Have standard protocols for a biopsy of a liver mass • If multiple cores are taken, separate into different blocks • If a big core, divide and separate into two blocks • Cut unstained slides upfront to avoid wasting tissue • Don’t use up all the tissue: • Reserve tissue for molecular testing ©2017 MFMER | slide-3 Classification of liver tumors: Context! Cirrhotic liver Non-Cirrhotic liver • Hepatocellular carcinoma • < 50 y: • Hepatocellular adenoma • Cholangiocarcinoma • Focal nodular hyperplasia • Mixed • Hepatocellular carcinoma HCC/Cholangiocarcinoma • Other primary tumors • Metastases • Macroregenerative nodule (only on explant) • > 50 y: • Metastases • Dysplastic nodule (only on • Hepatocellular carcinoma explant) • Cholangiocarcinoma • Focal nodular hyperplasia • Other primary tumors ©2017 MFMER | slide-4 A note on Dysplastic nodules • Dysplastic nodule is only diagnosed in the setting of known cirrhosis – very rare to diagnose
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnosis and Management of Focal Liver Lesions
    ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Focal Liver Lesions Jorge A. Marrero, MD,1 Joseph Ahn, MD, FACG,2 K. Rajender Reddy, MD, FACG3 1University of Texas at Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA; 2Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA; 3University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Am J Gastroenterol advance online publication 19 August 2014; doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.213 Abstract Focal liver lesions (FLL) have been a common reason for consultation faced by gastroenterologists and hepatologists. The increasing and widespread use of imaging studies has led to an increase in detection of incidental FLL. It is important to consider not only malignant liver lesions, but also benign solid and cystic liver lesions such as hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia, hepatocellular adenoma, and hepatic cysts, in the differential diagnosis. In this ACG practice guideline, the authors provide an evidence-based approach to the diagnosis and management of FLL. Preamble The writing group was invited by the Practice Parameters Committee and the Board of the Trustees of the American College of Gastroenterology to develop a practice guideline regarding the suggested diagnostic approaches and management of focal liver lesions (FLLs). FLLs are solid or cystic masses or areas of tissue that are identified as an abnormal part of the liver. The term “lesion” rather than “mass” was chosen because “lesion” is a term that has a wider application, including solid and cystic masses. This guideline will be limited to primary liver lesions and the management approach to FLLs rather than focusing on the diagnosis and management of metastatic lesions, hepatocellular carcinoma, or cholangiocarcinoma.
    [Show full text]
  • Fat-Containing Lesions of the Liver : a Pictorial Essay
    Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging (2015) 96, 201—211 ICONOGRAPHIC REVIEW / Gastrointestinal imaging Fat-containing lesions of the liver : A pictorial essay a a a M. Tekath , T. Klotz , P.F. Montoriol , c a a,∗,b J. Joubert-Zakeyh , J.-M. Garcier , D. Da Ines a Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Estaing University Hospital, 1, place Luci-Aubrac, 63003 Clermont-Ferrand cedex 1, France b Clermont University, University of Auvergne, ISIT, CNRS, UMR6284, BP 10448, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France c Anatomical and Cytological Pathology, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Estaing University Hospital, Estaing University Hospital, 1, place Lucie-Aubrac, 63003 Clermont-Ferrand cedex 1, France KEYWORDS Abstract The presence of fat within a hepatic lesion is unusual and can help to direct the Liver tumor; radiologist’s diagnosis. The aim of this iconographic review is to specify the various hepatic Hepatic steatosis; lesions that may contain fat and their appearance particularly on MRI. A histological correlation Magnetic resonance is also suggested for the most commonly found tumors. The identification of fat within a hepatic imaging tumor, along with other radiological signs and reflection on the clinical and epidemiological context, can lead to a diagnosis being reached or suggested, with confirmation if necessary, by a pathological examination. © 2013 Éditions franc¸aises de radiologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. The presence of fat in a liver lesion is not a standard finding and it can help to guide the radiologist towards a diagnosis. Fat may be macroscopic or microscopic. MRI is the modality of choice for detecting a fatty component in a hepatic tumor: fat-saturation sequence detects extracellular fat while chemical shift imaging identifies microscopic or intracellular lipids [1].
    [Show full text]
  • "Gastrointestinal Pathology"
    ' -.. CALIFORNIA TUMOR TISSUE REGISTRY "GASTROINTESTINAL PATHOLOGY" Study Cases, Subscription A November 2007 California Tumor Tissue Registry c/o: Department of Pathology and Hum110 Anatomy Lorna Linda University School of Medicine 11021 Campus A'•eoue, AR 335 Lorna Linda, California 92350 (909) 558-4788 FAX: (909) 558-0188 E-mail: [email protected] Web page: www.c!tr.org Web site & Case of the Month: www.cttr.org Target audience: Practicing pathologists and pathology residents. Goal: . To acquaint the panicipant with the histologic features ofa variety of benign and malignant neoplasms and tumor-like conditions. Objectives: The. panicipant will be uble to recognize morphologic features of a variety of benign and malignant neoplasms and rumor-like conditions and relate those processes to pertinent references in the medical literature. Educational methods and media: Review ofrepresentative glass slides with associated histories. Feedback on consensus diagnoses from participating pathologists. Listing of selected references from the medical literature. Principal faculty: Weldon K. Bullock, MD Donald R. Chase, MD CME Credit: Lorna Linda University School of Medicine designates this continuing medical education activity for a maximum of2 hours of Category I ofthe Physician's Recognition Award ofthe American Medical Association. CME credit is offered for the subscription year only. Accreditation: Lorna Linda University School of Medicine is accredited by the Accreditation Counci l for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to sponsor continuing medical education for physicians. 2 Study Cases, November 2007, Subscription A Contributor: LLUMC Pathology Group (mp) Case No. 1 - November 2007 A Lorna Linda, CA Tissue from: Small bowel Accession #30652 Clinical Abstract: A 74 year old woman had a past history of endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the vagina.
    [Show full text]
  • Hepatocellular Adenoma
    Liver Specialty Evening Conference Matthew M. Yeh, MD, PhD Professor of Pathology Adjunct Professor of Medicine University of Washington, Seattle Case History • A 65 year-old man presents with abdominal pain and abnormal liver tests. • Images of the abdomen reveals a liver mass. • History of non-invasive low-grade urothelial carcinoma 2 months ago, s/p TURP. • No underlying liver diseases or cirrhosis. • AFP: Normal. MR Images in Arterial Phase Non-cirrhotic liver with segment 8/4 lesion. Arterial phase hyperenhancment. Courtesy of Dr. Neeraj Lalwani, UWMC, Seattle MR Images in Venous Phase Non-cirrhotic liver with segment 8/4 lesion. Subtle washout on venous phase. Courtesy of Dr. Neeraj Lalwani, UWMC, Seattle MR Images in Delayed Phase Non-cirrhotic liver with segment 8/4 lesion. Delayed phase also shows subtle washout on venous phase. Courtesy of Dr. Neeraj Lalwani, UWMC, Seattle MR Coronal Image in the Delayed Phase Non-cirrhotic liver, lesion within segment 8/4 associated with PV thrombosis. Suspicion of liver primary vs. metastasis Courtesy of Dr. Neeraj Lalwani, UWMC, Seattle Case • A CT-guided liver biopsy was performed. Differential Diagnosis • Benign liver lesions – Hepatocellular – Biliary – Miscellaneous • Malignant liver lesions – Primary • Hepatocellular • Biliary • Other – Metastatic Differential Diagnosis • Benign liver lesions – Hepatocellular – Biliary – Miscellaneous • Malignant liver lesions – Primary • Hepatocellular • Biliary • Other – Metastatic 6th most common cancer Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk Factors Traditional Recently Recognized • HBV • HCV • Metabolic • Cirrhosis syndrome and • Alcohol obesity • Aflatoxin • Hemochromatosis • Alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency • Hepatocellular adenoma Malignant Liver Neoplasms in Non-Cirrhotic Liver Modified from Dr. Zachary Goodman, with permission Malignant Liver Neoplasms in Cirrhosis Modified from Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Histopathology IMPC HIS 001
    Histopathology IMPC_HIS_001 Purpose To perform histopathological examination and annotation on the standard list of tissues (see SOPs for IMPC Gross pathology & Tissue Collection) using the tissue orientation laid out in the SOP for IMPC Tissue Embedding & Block Banking. Experimental Design Minimum number of animals : 2M + 2F Age at test: Week 16 Notes Significance Score Not significant . Interpreted by the histopathologist to be a finding attributable to background strain (e.g. low- incidence hydrocephalus, microphthalmia) or incidental to mutant phenotype (e.g. hair- induced glossitis, focal hyperplasia, mild mononuclear cell infiltrate). OR Significant . Interpreted by the histopathologist as a finding not attributable to background strain and not incidental to mutant phenotype. Severity Score Sc Term Definition ore No lesion(s) or abnormalities detectable considering the age and sex of 0 Normal the animal Abnormality visible, involving single or multiple tissue types in a minimal 1 Mild proportion of an organ, likely to have no functional consequence 2 Moder Abnormality visible, involving multiple tissue types in a minority proportion ate of an organ, likely to have no clinical consequence (subclinical) Abnormality clearly visible, involving multiple tissue types in a majority 3 Marked proportion of an organ, likely to have minor clinical manifestation(s) Abnormality clearly visible, involving multiple tissue types in almost all 4 Severe visible area of an organ, likely to have major clinical manifestation(s) Parameters and Metadata
    [Show full text]