DOCSLIB.ORG

Hilary Putnam

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hilary Putnam 111 Hilary Putnam 011 111 A beautiful statement of almost all the ideas that I take to be of lasting value and vital importance Hilary Putnam Hilary Putnam is one of the most famous and influential living philosophers. In Hilary Putnam: Pragmatism and Realism, Putnam responds to ten new papers exam- ining his central ideas, written by highly respected Putnam scholars especially 0111 for this volume. Putnam’s work touches on almost every area of interest in contemporary Anglo- American philosophy. His ideas have had repercussions in the philosophy of language and the philosophy of mind, as well as countless areas of metaphysics. Many of Putnam’s most influential ideas can be traced back to his two key commit- ments: to pragmatism and to realism. In this book, well-known top scholars examine these two fundamental positions and their place in Putnam’s work. In addition to responding to each paper, there is a new essay by Putnam himself on pragmatism and nonscientific knowledge. The insight into Putnam’s work provided by the contributions to his work, 0111 combined with Putnam’s extensive and detailed responses, make this essential reading for anyone with an interest in the ideas and influence of Hilary Putnam. Contributors: Ruth Anna Putnam, Hilary Putnam, Richard Warner, Robert Brandom, Nicholas Rescher, John Haldane, Tadeusz Szubka, John Heil, Wolfgang Künne, Gary Ebbs and Charles Travis. James Conant is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Chicago. He is the editor of Putnam’s collected papers. Urszula M. Z˙eglen´ is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Turon´, Poland. She is the editor of Donald Davidson: 0111 Truth, Meaning and Knowledge (Routledge, 1999). 5111 1 Routledge studies in twentieth-century philosophy 1 1 1 The Story of Analytic Philosophy Plot and heroes Edited by Anat Biletzki and Anat Matar 2 Donald Davidson Truth, meaning and knowledge Edited by Urszula M. Z·eglen´ 11 3 Philosophy and Ordinary Language The bent and genius of our tongue Oswald Hanfling 4 The Subject in Question Sartre’s critique of Husserl in The Transcendence of the Ego Stephen Priest 5 Aesthetic Order A philosophy of order, beauty and art 11 Ruth Lorland 6 Naturalism A critical analysis Edited by William Lane Craig and J. P. Moreland 7 Grammar in Early Twentieth-Century Philosophy Edited by Richard Gaskin 8 Peter Winch’s Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11 Rules, magic and instrumental reason Berel Dov Lerner 9 Hilary Putnam Pragmatism and realism 11 Edited by James Conant and Urszula M. Z˙eglen´ 111 Hilary Putnam Pragmatism and realism 011 111 Edited by James Conant and · Urszula M. Zeglen´ 0111 0111 TL E D U G O 0111 E R • • T a p y u lo ro r G & Francis 5111 London and New York 1 First published 2002 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.” © 2002 Selection and editorial matter, James Conant and Urszula M. Z˙eglen´. Individual essays, the contributors. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Hilary Putnam: pragmatism and realism / edited by James Conant and Urszula M. Z˙eglen´ p. cm. – (Routledge studies in twentieth-century philosophy) Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Putnam, Hilary. 2. Pragmatism. 3. Realism. I. Z˙eglen´, Urszula M. II. Conant, James. III. Series. B945.P874 H55 2001 191–dc212001048163 ISBN 0-203-99637-2 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0–415–25605–4 (Print Edition) 111 Contents 011 111 List of contributors vii Preface xi Acknowledgements xii PART I Hilary Putnam and pragmatism 1 0111 Introduction 3 URSZ ULA M. Z˙ EGLEN´ 1 Taking pragmatism seriously 7 RUTH ANNA PUTNAM Comment on Ruth Anna Putnam’s paper 12 HILARY PUTNAM 2 Pragmatism and nonscientific knowledge 14 HILARY PUTNAM 0111 3 Pragmatism and legal reasoning 25 RICHARD WARNER Comment on Richard Warner’s paper 38 HILARY PUTNAM 4 Pragmatics and pragmatisms 40 ROBERT BRAND OM Comment on Robert Brandom’s paper 59 HILARY PUTNAM 5 Knowledge of the truth in pragmatic perspective 66 0111 NICHOLAS RESCHER Comment on Nicholas Rescher’s paper 80 HILARY PUTNAM 5111 vi Contents 1 PART II Putnam on realism 87 Introduction 89 U RSZULA M. Z˙ E GLE N´ 6Realism with a metaphysical skull 97 J OHN HALD ANE Comment on John Haldane’s paper 105 1 HILARY P U TNAM 7 The causal theory of perception and direct realism 109 TADEUS Z S ZUBKA 1 Comment on Tadeusz Szubka’s paper 125 HILARY P U TNAM 8 Functionalism, realism and levels of being 128 J OHN HEIL Comment on John Heil’s paper 143 HILARY P U TNAM 11 9 From alethic anti-realism to alethic realism 144 W O L F GANG K Ü NNE Comment on Wolfgang Künne’s paper 166 HILARY P U TNAM 10 Truth and trans-theoretical terms 167 GARY EBBS Comment on Gary Ebbs’s paper 186 HILARY P U TNAM 11 What laws of logic say 188 11 C H ARLE S TRAVIS Comment on Charles Travis’s paper 209 HILARY P U TNAM Notes 211 Writings of Hilary Putnam 229 Bibliography 231 Index 239 11 11 111 Contributors 011 111 Robert Brandom is Distinguished Service Professor of Philosophy at the University of Pittsburgh. He is the author of Making It Explicit (1994) and Articulating Reasons (2000), and the editor of the Harvard edition of Sellars’ Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind (1997), and Rorty and His Critics (2000). Tales of the Mighty Dead, a collection of his historical essays on Spinoza, Leibniz, Hegel, Frege and Heidegger, is forthcoming from Harvard. He is currently at work on a book about Hegel. 0111 James Conant is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Chicago. His interests include the philosophy of language, questions on ethics and political philosophy, literary forms of philosophical work and the history of philosophy. He has published widely in each of these areas, with a recent focus on Frege and Wittgenstein. He is the editor of Hilary Putnam’s collected papers. Gary Ebbs is Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He previously taught at Harvard University and the University of Pennsylvania. He is the author of Rule-Following and 0111 Realism (1997), and articles on philosophy of language, philosophy of logic, philosophy of mind and the history of the analytic philosophy. A unifying goal of his current research is to describe the methodology of rational inquiry from an engaged, practical point of view. John Haldane is Professor of Philosophy at the University of St Andrews. Currently he is also Stanton Lecturer in Divinity at Cambridge, and Royden-Davis Professor of Humanities at Georgetown University. He is the co-author (with J. J. C. Smart) of Atheism and Theism and editor of several collections including Philosophy and Public Affairs. A volume of his 0111 essays entitled Faithful Reason is due to be published by Routledge in 2002. John Heil is Professor of Philosophy at Monash University and Paul B. Freeland Professor of Philosophy at Davidson College. His interests lie in metaphysics, philosophy of mind and epistemology. His most recent 5111 book is Philosophy of Mind: A Contemporary Introduction (Routledge 2000). viii Contributors 1 Wolfgang Künne is Chair of Philosophy at the University of Hamburg. He is Vice-President of the German Society for Analytic Philosophy and President of the International Bolzano Society. He is the editor of Direct Reference, Indexicality, and Propositional Attitudes and of Bolzano and Analytical Philosophy. His book Conceptions of Truth is forthcoming. Hilary Putnam is Cogan University Professor Emeritus at Harvard University. His books include Reason, Truth and History; Realism with a Human Face; Renewing Philosophy; Words and Life; Pragmatism and The 1 Threefold Cord: Mind, Body and World. Ruth Anna Putnam is Professor Emerita of Philosophy at Wellesley 1 College, where she taught for 35 years. She is the editor of The Cambridge Companion to William James. She has written and continues to write on William James, John Dewey, ethics and political philosophy. Nicholas Rescher is University Professor of Philosophy at the University of Pittsburgh, where he served for many years as Director of the Center for Philosophy of Science. A former president of the American Philosoph- 11 ical Association, he is an honorary member of Corpus Christi College, Oxford. Author of more than eighty works ranging over many areas of philosophy, he was awarded the Alexander von Humboldt Prize for Humanistic Scholarship in 1984. Tadeusz Szubka is Associate Professor of Philosophy, Catholic University of Lublin, Poland. He held various visiting fellowships at British, American and Australian universities. He is the author of Metafizyka anal- ityczna P. F. Strawsona (1995) and co-editor of The Mind–Body Problem (1994). He is currently completing a book on the semantic antirealism 11 of Michael Dummett. Charles Travis is Professor of Philosophy at the Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    03/05/2017 William James (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (ca. 1895, in The Letters of William James, ed. by Henry James, Boston, 1920) William James First published Thu Sep 7, 2000; substantive revision Tue Oct 29, 2013 William James was an original thinker in and between the disciplines of physiology, psychology and philosophy. His twelve­hundred page masterwork, The Principles of Psychology (1890), is a rich blend of physiology, psychology, philosophy, and personal reflection that has given us such ideas as “the stream of thought” and the baby's impression of the world “as one great blooming, buzzing confusion” (PP 462). It contains seeds of pragmatism and phenomenology, and influenced generations of thinkers in Europe and America, including Edmund Husserl, Bertrand Russell, John Dewey, and Ludwig Wittgenstein. James studied at Harvard's Lawrence Scientific School and the School of Medicine, but his writings were from the outset as much philosophical as scientific. “Some Remarks on Spencer's Notion of Mind as Correspondence” (1878) and “The Sentiment of Rationality” (1879, 1882) presage his future pragmatism and pluralism, and contain the first statements of his view that philosophical theories are reflections of a philosopher's temperament. James hints at his religious concerns in his earliest essays and in The Principles, but they become more explicit in The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy (1897), Human Immortality: Two Supposed Objections to the Doctrine (1898), The Varieties of Religious Experience (1902) and A Pluralistic Universe (1909). James oscillated between thinking that a “study in human nature” such as Varieties could contribute to a “Science of Religion” and the belief that religious experience involves an altogether supernatural domain, somehow inaccessible to science but accessible to the individual human subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 62, No. 3; September 1984 PUTNAM's PARADOX David Lewis Introduction. Hilary Putnam Has Devised a Bomb That Threatens To
    Australasian Journal of Philosophy Vol. 62, No. 3; September 1984 PUTNAM'S PARADOX David Lewis Introduction. Hilary Putnam has devised a bomb that threatens to devastate the realist philosophy we know and love. 1 He explains how he has learned to stop worrying and love the bomb. He welcomes the new order that it would bring. (RT&H, Preface) But we who still live in the target area do not agree. The bomb must be banned. Putnam's thesis (the bomb) is that, in virtue of considerations from the theory of reference, it makes no sense to suppose that an empirically ideal theory, as verified as can be, might nevertheless be false because the world is not the way the theory says it is. The reason given is, roughly, that there is no semantic glue to stick our words onto their referents, and so reference is very much up for grabs; but there is one force constraining reference, and that is our intention to refer in such a way that we come out right; and there is no countervailing force; and the world, no matter what it is like (almost), will afford some scheme of reference that makes us come out right; so how can we fail to come out right? 2 Putnam's thesis is incredible. We are in the presence of paradox, as surely as when we meet the man who offers us a proof that there are no people, and in particular that he himself does not exist. 3 It is out of the question to follow the argument where it leads.
    [Show full text]
  • Putnam's Theory of Natural Kinds and Their Names Is Not The
    PUTNAM’S THEORY OF NATURAL KINDS AND THEIR NAMES IS NOT THE SAME AS KRIPKE’S IAN HACKING Collège de France Abstract Philosophers have been referring to the “Kripke–Putnam” theory of natural- kind terms for over 30 years. Although there is one common starting point, the two philosophers began with different motivations and presuppositions, and developed in different ways. Putnam’s publications on the topic evolved over the decades, certainly clarifying and probably modifying his analysis, while Kripke published nothing after 1980. The result is two very different theories about natural kinds and their names. Both accept that the meaning of a natural- kind term is not given by a description or defining properties, but is specified by its referents. From then on, Putnam rejected even the label, causal theory of reference, preferring to say historical, or collective. He called his own approach indexical. His account of substance identity stops short a number of objections that were later raised, such as what is called the qua problem. He came to reject the thought that water is necessarily H2O, and to denounce the idea of metaphysical necessity that goes beyond physical necessity. Essences never had a role in his analysis; there is no sense in which he was an essentialist. He thought of hidden structures as the usual determinant of natural kinds, but always insisted that what counts as a natural kind is relative to interests. “Natural kind” itself is itself an importantly theoretical concept, he argued. The paper also notes that Putnam says a great deal about what natural kinds are, while Kripke did not.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Hilary Putnam, Reason, Truth and History, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1979). Henceforth 'RTH'. the Position Th
    [The Journal of Philosophical Research XVII (1992): 313-345] Brains in a Vat, Subjectivity, and the Causal Theory of Reference Kirk Ludwig Department of Philosophy University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611-8545 1. Introduction In the first chapter of Reason, Truth and History,1 Putnam argued that it is not epistemically possible that we are brains in a vat (of a certain sort). If his argument is correct, and can be extended in certain ways, then it seems that we can lay to rest the traditional skeptical worry that most or all of our beliefs about the external world are false. Putnam’s argument has two parts. The first is an argument for a theory of reference2 according to which we cannot refer to an object or a type of object unless we have had a certain sort of causal interaction with it. The second part argues from this theory to the conclusion that we can know that we are not brains in a vat. In this paper I will argue that Putnam’s argument to show that we cannot be brains in a vat is unsuccessful. However, the flaw is not in the argument from the theory of reference to the conclusion 1 Hilary Putnam, Reason, Truth and History, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1979). Henceforth ‘RTH’. The position that Putnam advances in this first chapter is one that in later chapters of RTH he abandons in favor of the position that he calls ‘internal realism’. He represents the arguments he gives in chapter 1 as a problem posed for the ‘external realist’, who assumes the possibility of a God’s eye point of view.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Theory of Reference: Kripke, Marcus, and Its Origins
    THE NEW THEORY OF REFERENCE SYNTHESE LIBRARY STUDIES IN EPISTEMOLOGY, LOGIC, METHODOLOGY, AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Managing Editor: JAAKKO HINTIKKA, Boston University Editors: DIRK V AN DALEN, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands DONALD DAVIDSON, University of California, Berkeley THEO A.F. KUIPERS, University ofGroningen, The Netherlands PATRICK SUPPES, Stanford University, California JAN WOLEN-SKI, Jagielionian University, KrakOw, Poland THE NEW THEORY OF REFERENCE: KRIPKE, MARCUS, AND ITS ORIGINS Edited by PAUL W. HUMPHREYS University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, U S.A. and JAMES H. FETZER University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN, US.A . ..... SPRINGER-SCIENCE+BUSINESS" MEDIA, B.V. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available. ISBN 978-0-7923-5578-6 ISBN 978-94-011-5250-1 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-94-011-5250-1 Printed on acid-free paper AII Rights Reserved © 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht Originally published by Kluwer Academic Publishers in 1998 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1998 No part ofthis publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, inc1uding photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permis sion from the copyright owner. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAUL W. HUMPHREYS and JAMES H. FETZER / Introduction vii PART I: THE APA EXCHANGE 1. QUENTIN SMITH / Marcus, Kripke, and the Origin of the New Theory of Reference 3 2. SCOTT SOAMES / Revisionism about Reference: A Reply to Smith 13 3. QUENTIN SMITH / Marcus and the New Theory of Reference: A Reply to Scott Soames 37 PART II: REPLIES 4. SCOTT SOAMES / More Revisionism about Reference 65 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Hilary Putnam on Logic and Mathematics , by Geoffrey Hellman
    Hilary Putnam on Logic and Mathematics, by Geoffrey Hellman and Roy T. Cook (eds). Springer, 2018. pp. x+274. This review is due to be published in Mind. This is a pre-print and may be subject to minor alterations. The authoritative version should be sought at Mind. Putnam’s most famous contribution to mathematical logic was his role in investigating Hilbert’s Tenth Problem; Putnam is the ‘P’ in the MRDP Theorem. This volume, though, focusses mostly on Putnam’s work on the philosophy of logic and mathematics. It is a somewhat bumpy ride. Of the twelve papers, two scarcely mention Putnam. Three others focus primarily on Putnam’s ‘Mathematics without foundations’ (1967), but with no in- terplay between them. The remaining seven papers apparently tackle unrelated themes. Some of this disjointedness would doubtless have been addressed, if Putnam had been able to compose his replies to these papers; sadly, he died before this was possible. In this review, I will do my best to tease out some connections between the paper; and there are some really interesting connections to be made. Ultimately, though, my review will be only a little less bumpy than the volume itself. 1 Formal logic and mathematics Goldfarb’s paper is a short gem. In four-and-a-half sides, it provides a nice proof and discussion of one of Putnam’s (1965) ‘lesser-known but quite interesting’ theorems (p.45): if φ is a satisfi- able, identity-free, first-order formula, then there is a model of φ which interprets each primitive predicate of φ as a boolean combination of Σ1 sets.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy of Mind
    Introduction to Philosophy: Philosophy of Mind INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY: PHILOSOPHY OF MIND ERAN ASOULIN, PAUL RICHARD BLUM, TONY CHENG, DANIEL HAAS, JASON NEWMAN, HENRY SHEVLIN, ELLY VINTIADIS, HEATHER SALAZAR (EDITOR), AND CHRISTINA HENDRICKS (SERIES EDITOR) Rebus Community Introduction to Philosophy: Philosophy of Mind by Eran Asoulin, Paul Richard Blum, Tony Cheng, Daniel Haas, Jason Newman, Henry Shevlin, Elly Vintiadis, Heather Salazar (Editor), and Christina Hendricks (Series Editor) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted. CONTENTS What is an open textbook? vii Christina Hendricks How to access and use the books ix Christina Hendricks Introduction to the Series xi Christina Hendricks Praise for the Book xiv Adriano Palma Acknowledgements xv Heather Salazar and Christina Hendricks Introduction to the Book 1 Heather Salazar 1. Substance Dualism in Descartes 3 Paul Richard Blum 2. Materialism and Behaviorism 10 Heather Salazar 3. Functionalism 19 Jason Newman 4. Property Dualism 26 Elly Vintiadis 5. Qualia and Raw Feels 34 Henry Shevlin 6. Consciousness 41 Tony Cheng 7. Concepts and Content 49 Eran Asoulin 8. Freedom of the Will 58 Daniel Haas About the Contributors 69 Feedback and Suggestions 72 Adoption Form 73 Licensing and Attribution Information 74 Review Statement 76 Accessibility Assessment 77 Version History 79 WHAT IS AN OPEN TEXTBOOK? CHRISTINA HENDRICKS An open textbook is like a commercial textbook, except: (1) it is publicly available online free of charge (and at low-cost in print), and (2) it has an open license that allows others to reuse it, download and revise it, and redistribute it.
    [Show full text]
  • Putnam and Diamond on Religious Belief and the “Gulfs Between Us” Sofia Miguens*
    The Monist, 2020, 103, 404–414 doi: 10.1093/monist/onaa013 Article Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/monist/article/103/4/404/5905779 by University of Chicago user on 03 November 2020 The Human Face of Naturalism: Putnam and Diamond on Religious Belief and the “Gulfs between Us” Sofia Miguens* ABSTRACT Hilary Putnam and Cora Diamond both wrote on Wittgenstein’s Three Lectures on Religious Belief. They did it quite differently; my ultimate aim in this article is to explore this difference. Putnam’s view of religion is largely a view of ethical life; I look thus into his writings on ethics and his proposals to face the relativist menace therein. Still, in his incursions into philosophy of religion, describing religious experience through authors such as Rosenzweig, Buber, or Levinas, Putnam deals with what Diamond calls, after Wittgenstein, “the gulfs between us.” Such gulfs, and the threat of relativism they bring, need to be accounted for. With that purpose in mind I complement Putnam’s reading of the Three Lectures with Diamond’s own reading. Those who know my writings from that period [the early 1950s] may wonder how I reconciled my religious streak, which existed to some extent even back then, and my general scientific materialist worldview at that time. The answer is that I didn’t recon- cile them. I was a thoroughgoing atheist, and I was a believer. I simply kept these two parts of myself separate. —Hilary Putnam (1992,1) 1. RELIGION AS ETHICS AND THE NATURE OF PUTNAM’S WRITINGS ON RELIGION How does religion, broadly conceived, sit with Putnam’s philosophy? In what follows I try to answer this question.
    [Show full text]
  • Having Hands, Even in the Vat: What the Semantic Argument Really Shows About Skepticism by Samuel R Burns
    Having Hands, Even in the Vat: What the Semantic Argument Really Shows about Skepticism by Samuel R Burns A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts with Honors Department of Philosophy in The University of Michigan 2010 Advisors: Professor Gordon Belot Assistant Professor David Baker ”With relief, with humiliation, with terror, he understood that he also was an illusion, that someone else was dreaming him.” Jorge Luis Borges, “The Circular Ruins” “With your feet in the air and your head on the ground/Try this trick and spin it/ Your head will collapse/But there’s nothing in it/And you’ll ask yourself: ‘Where is my mind?’” The Pixies © Samuel R Burns 2010 To Nami ii Table of Contents Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................................iv 1. The Foundation ............................................................................................1 1.1. The Causal Theory of Reference ........................................................................4 1.2. Semantic Externalism ........................................................................................11 2. The Semantic Argument ...........................................................................16 2.1. Putnam’s Argument ...........................................................................................16 2.2. The Disquotation Principle ..............................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5. Language: Private, Public, Solitary, Shared on the Received
    Chapter 5. Language: private, public, solitary, shared On the received reading of Ludwig Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations1, the book contains an argument purporting to show the impossibility of a private language. There has been a lively debate, however, on how the relevant notion of a private language is to be understood, and what considerations should be taken to rule it out. Some have understood Wittgenstein to mean that a language must be something that several speakers actually share, while others take him to mean that a language must be something that they could, in principle, share. Or, slightly differently put, on one view, speaking a language presupposes the actual existence of a linguistic community upholding certain shared standards of meaning and correctness, while on the other view, it only presupposes that such a community might have existed. These views have come to be known as the ‘community view’ and the ‘solitary speaker’ view, respectively.2 Furthermore, supporters of the community view tend to think that the discussion about privacy holds a central place in Wittgenstein’s later philosophy, whereas those who support the solitary speaker view usually see its bearings as limited to the issue of the privacy of experience. 1 Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1958). References to this work will be indicated with the abbreviation PI followed by paragraph number. 2 Rather than two monolithic positions, what we have here is a spectrum of views ranging between two extremes. To mention but a few examples: the best-known formulations of the community view are to be found in Norman Malcolm, “Following a Rule” in his book Nothing is Hidden (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986), as well as in his essay “Wittgenstein on Language and Rules” in Wittgensteinian Themes: Essays 1978-1989 (ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Wittgenstein, Anxiety, and Performance Behavior
    Incapacity Incapacity Wittgenstein, Anxiety, and Performance Behavior Spencer Golub northwestern university press evanston, illinois Northwestern University Press www.nupress.northwestern.edu Copyright © 2014 by Spencer Golub. Published 2014 by Northwestern University Press. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Golub, Spencer, author. Incapacity : Wittgenstein, anxiety, and performance behavior / Spencer Golub. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8101-2992-4 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1889–1951. 2. Language and languages—Philosophy. 3. Performance—Philosophy. 4. Literature, Modern—20th century—History and criticism. 5. Literature—Philosophy. I. Title. B3376.W564G655 2014 121.68—dc23 2014011601 Except where otherwise noted, this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. In all cases attribution should include the following information: Golub, Spencer. Incapacity: Wittgenstein, Anxiety, and Performance Behavior. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2014. For permissions beyond the scope of this license, visit http://www.nupress .northwestern.edu/. An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high-quality books open access for the public good. More information about the initiative and links to the open-access version can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org. For my mother We go towards the thing we mean. —Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, §455 .
    [Show full text]
  • Wittgenstein and Haydn on Understanding Music
    Contemporary Aesthetics (Journal Archive) Volume 4 Volume 4 (2006) Article 15 2006 Wittgenstein and Haydn on Understanding Music Yael Kaduri Bezalel Academy of Art and Design, Jerusalem, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.risd.edu/liberalarts_contempaesthetics Part of the Aesthetics Commons Recommended Citation Kaduri, Yael (2006) "Wittgenstein and Haydn on Understanding Music," Contemporary Aesthetics (Journal Archive): Vol. 4 , Article 15. Available at: https://digitalcommons.risd.edu/liberalarts_contempaesthetics/vol4/iss1/15 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Liberal Arts Division at DigitalCommons@RISD. It has been accepted for inclusion in Contemporary Aesthetics (Journal Archive) by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@RISD. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Wittgenstein and Haydn on Understanding Music Yael Kaduri About CA Abstract Journal Wittgenstein's remarks about music have motivated philosophers to build a comprehensive picture of his philosophy of music, concentrating on the central Contact CA issues of musical meaning. It is often claimed that, according to Wittgenstein, understanding music consist in grasping the internal relationships between Links musical events. Musical practice, however, is naturally saturated with what philosophers often call extra-musical meanings. The present study, by Submissions considering a musical issue in Haydn's instrumental music, attempts to show that musical language games in the Wittgensteinian sense involve explanations Search Journal of music that enhance the listener's ability to understand music by broadening his musical competence. Nevertheless, constituting understanding of music, these explanations might use professional musical terms as well as non-musical terms, comparisons, gestures and so on.
    [Show full text]