Original Land Subdivisions of Ohio

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Original Land Subdivisions of Ohio STATE OF OHIO • DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES • DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ORIGINAL LAND SUBDIVISIONS OF OHIO A AD AN ES C AT ST ED IT UN ERIE MICHIGAN MERIDIAN SURVEY LAKE TWELVE-MILE SQUARE RESERVATION TWO-MILE SQUARE RESERVATION NORTH AND EAST OF THE FIRST PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CONNECTICUT WESTERN RESERVE CONGRESS LANDS NORTH OF OLD SEVEN RANGES SOUTH AND EAST OF THE FIRST PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN SCHOENBRUNN TRACT GNADENHUTTEN TRACT UNITED STATES SALEM TRACT MILITARY DISTRICT OLD SEVEN RANGES BETWEEN THE MIAMIS REFUGEE LANDS CONGRESS LANDS WEST OF MIAMI RIVER CONGRESS LANDS EAST OF SCIOTO RIVER DONATION TRACT VIRGINIA MILITARY DISTRICT SYMMES PURCHASE OHIO COMPANY PURCHASE 0 10 20 30 40 miles 0 10 20 30 40 kilometers SCALE 1:2,000,000 Generalized version of map MG-2, available as 1:500,000-scale (poster-size) print and in digital (GIS) format. To order contact Geologic Records Center (614) 265-6576. FRENCH GRANTS SUBDIVISION VIRGINIA MILITARY DISTRICT REFUGEE LANDS OLD SEVEN RANGES EBENEZER ZANE TRACT EPHRIAM KIMBERLY GRANT GNADENHUTTEN TRACT SOUTH AND EAST OF THE FIRST PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN SYMMES PURCHASE SALEM TRACT NORTH AND EAST OF THE FIRST PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN BETWEEN THE MIAMIS SCHOENBRUNN TRACT MICHIGAN MERIDIAN SURVEY CONNECTICUT WESTERN RESERVE CONGRESS LANDS NORTH OF OLD SEVEN RANGES TWELVE-MILE SQUARE RESERVATION OHIO COMPANY PURCHASE CONGRESS LANDS WEST OF MIAMI RIVER TWO-MILE SQUARE RESERVATION DONATION TRACT CONGRESS LANDS EAST OF SCIOTO RIVER INDIAN LAND GRANTS UNITED STATES MILITARY DISTRICT FRENCH GRANTS WATER Recommended citation: Ohio Division of Geological Survey, 2003 (2006), Original land subdivisions of Ohio: Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey Map MG-2, generalized page-size version, 1 p., scale 1:2,000,000. .
Recommended publications
  • Ohio Land Acquisition Study Sheet
    2010 Back to History Lesson Plan “Dominion of War” Team Members: Cheryl Coker, Linda Dils, Karen Shank Instructional Post-Revolutionary War Settlement in Ohio Unit: Title of From Battlefield to Homestead Lesson: Grade Level: Grades 4-5 The lesson focuses on the impact the Description: Revolutionary War had on settlement in Ohio and the different ways land was obtained by settlers Standards: History: Benchmarks B & C, GLI 4.2; 5.6 Include Standard, People in Society: Benchmark B, GLI 4.3 Benchmark Letters, and GLI Geography: Benchmark C, GLI 4.10; 5.7, 5.10 numbers Skills: Benchmarks A & B, GLI 4.1, 4.3; 5.3 Duration: 3 - 4 45-minute classes Materials and Resources: “Revolutionary War Bounty Land Grants.” Lloyd DeWitt Bockstruck. Genealogy.com. http://www.genealogy.com/24_land.html. Images from Ohio Memory listed in Primary Source Materials. www.Daytonology.blogspot.com: “The Virginia Military District”: flowchart “Acquiring Land in Virginia Military District” 1 “Land Grants and Sales.” Ohio Historical Society. Ohio History Central: An Online Encyclopedia of Ohio History. http://ohiohistorycentral.org/entry.php?rec=1312&nm=Land-Grants-and- Sales. Outline map of Ohio Spiral Questions for John Yancy Land Grant document Study sheet used for note taking Homework assignment Primary Source Materials: Material available from Ohio Memory: www.ohiomemory.org . John Yancy Land Grant, November 23, 1819. Manchester Historical Society. Warren County Land Patent, August 20, 1812, United States General Land Office. Edna L. Bowyer Records Center & Archives of Warren County. William Salmon Deed, April 17, 1801, John Adams. Tuscarawas County Historical Society. Warm Up: Spiral question activity using the John Yancy Land Grant image Students will work in groups to answer questions; class discussion will follow to clarify details of the image.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8 the Early History of the Public Domain
    Chapter 8 The Early History of the Public Domain During and following the period of the signing of the treaty of peace with Britain which ended the Revolutionary War, the vast territory be- yond the Allegheny Mountains became the property of the federal gov- ernment as then constituted under the Articles of Confederation. This development was the outcome of the disputes among the separate colonies as to ownership and jurisdiction over segments of the region ex- tending from the Great Lakes to the neighborhood of the Gulf of Mexico. As already shown in the previous chapters, much of this region was unexplored and populated only by Indian tribes. But the "right" to it was bought dearly in blood and suffering by the colonists in their struggle against the French claim to occupation. As some of the colonies had boundaries that did not abut any part of this region, they were unwilling to enter a union which thus cut them off from claims to a portion of this new territory. Appeasement came about only through the successive cessions of the claims of the various states in the Confederation to the national government. In this way, the public domain was created. It has proved to be a source of irrita- tion, dispute, corruption, and even despair to the Republic for more than a century and a half. Yet its distribution and development in this period form one of the most remarkable historical episodes in the story of civilized man. The Northwest Ordinance The first project to dispose of a part of the public domain was an ordinance passed by the Continental Congress in 1785.
    [Show full text]
  • The Miami Slaughterhouse
    The Miami Slaughterhouse In the 1780’s, a Squirrel could reach Cincinnati from Pittsburg and never touch the ground. In part because of this heavy tree canopy, the land between the Little Miami River and the Great Miami River was known to have some of the richest farm land ever seen. The land between the Miami’s was a special hunting ground for the Indians. They would not give it up without a fight. In 1966, while researching a high school term paper, I found a diary written by Mary Covalt called “Reminiscences of Early Days about the construction and defense of Covalt Station primarily set during the years 1789 until 1795. “ My story tonight is about ordinary men and women coming down the Ohio River to settle in the land between the Little Miami and Great Miami Rivers. The Covalts who came down the Ohio and built Covalt Station in the area now known as Terrace Park were my ancestors. Mary Covalt’s diary along with other letters and personal accounts gives us the chance to use a zoom lens to focus on how life was lived was during this period. This story takes place in the Old Northwest Territory, and more specifically in the Ohio Territory and very specifically in the land between the two Miami Rivers. Not many of us would want to personally experience the sacrifices made to develop this land. Innocently, these pioneers came to a place that would embroil them in a life and death struggle for the next five years. These five years in the Old Northwest Territory would settle once and for all if America’s future growth would be west of the Allegany Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Is Unique Visual Depiction of the Complex and Varied Land Survey Systems in Ohio Attachments
    Ohio Is Unique Visual Depiction of the complex and varied Land Survey Systems in Ohio Attachments: Bureau of Land Management Prime Meridian Map Illustrates the original land subdivision systems in the contiguous US, designated by the locations of Prime Meridians. Note Ohio detail. Ohio Original Land Subdivision Map and Key Visually exemplifies the complexity of Ohio’s original land subdivision systems in comparison with other states. Key demonstrates the differences in basic measurement systems of the various regions within Ohio. Provided by the Professional Land Surveyors of Ohio, Inc. 150 E. Wilson Bridge Rd., Suite 300; Worthington, OH 43085 Contact: Melinda Gilpin, Executive Director 614-761-2313 or [email protected] “Ohio is unique among the states of the Union in its variety of its land subdivisions. No other state has so many kinds of original surveys.” C.E. Sherman, Original Ohio Land Subdivisions, Volume III, Final Report, Ohio Cooperative Survey Example of a Metes and Bounds Survey Metes and Bounds Public Land Survey System (PLSS) States Principle Meridians and Baselines Map Bureau of Land Management A Very Brief Summary of Ohio Land Survey Subdivisions Virginia Military District • Only metes and bounds subdivision • Military bounty lands for Virginia soldiers Old Seven Ranges • 6-mi. sq. townships, 1785 section numbering • Surrounds Kimberly Grant Symmes Purchase • 6-mi. sq. townships, 1785 section numbering • Townships/ranges reversed Between the Miamis • Continues Symmes “system” Connecticut Western Reserve • 5-mi. sq. townships, privately subdivided • Includes Firelands, land to compensate residents of several Conn. towns burned during Revolution Ohio Company Purchase • 6-mi. sq. townships, 1785 section numbering • 1st large land purchase from federal government • Site of Marietta, 1st permanent settlement in NW Terr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Public Land Survey System for the Cadastral Mapper
    THE PUBLIC LAND SURVEY SYSTEM FOR THE CADASTRAL MAPPER FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF CADASTRAL MAPPERS In conjunction with THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Proudly Presents COURSE 2 THE PUBLIC LAND SURVEY SYSTEM FOR THE CADASTRAL MAPPER Objective: Upon completion of this course the student will: Have an historical understanding of the events leading up to the PLSS. Understand the basic concepts of Section, Township, and Range. Know how to read and locate a legal description from the PLSS. Have an understanding of how boundaries can change due to nature. Be presented with a basic knowledge of GPS, Datums, and Map Projections. Encounter further subdividing of land thru the condominium and platting process. Also, they will: Perform a Case Study where the practical applications of trigonometry and coordinate calculations are utilized to mathematically locate the center of the section. *No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any matter whatsoever without written permission from FACM www.FACM.org Table Of Contents Course Outline DAY ONE MONDAY MORNING - WHAT IS THE PLSS? A. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW TO THE PLSS……………………………..…………1-2 B. SURVEYING IN COLONIAL AMERICA PRIOR TO THE PLSS………………...……..1-3 C. HISTORY OF THE PUBLIC LAND SURVEY SYSTEM…………………………….….…..1-9 1. EDMUND GUNTER……………………………………………………….………..…..…..……1-10 2. THE LAND ORDINANCE OF 1785…………………………………………..………….……..1-11 3. MAP OF THE SEVEN RANGES…………………………………….……………………………1-15 D. HOW THE PUBLIC LAND SURVEY SYSTEM WORKS………..………………………1-18 1. PLSS DATUM………..…………………………………………………….………………1-18 2. THE TOWNSHIP………..………………………………………………….………………1-18 DAY 1 MORNING REVIEW QUESTIONS……………………………………………..1-20 i Table Of Contents MONDAY AFTERNOON – SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE A.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Development, Land Use, and the System of Cities in Northwest Ohio During the Nineteenth Century
    CREATING CONNECTIONS: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, LAND USE, AND THE SYSTEM OF CITIES IN NORTHWEST OHIO DURING THE NINETEENTH CENTURY Matthew D. Bloom A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2009 Committee: Andrew M. Schocket, Advisor David Shoemaker Graduate Faculty Representative Edmund J. Danziger, Jr. Timothy F. Messer-Kruse © 2009 Matthew D. Bloom All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Andrew M. Schocket, Advisor Examining how economics, geography, and politics interacted in the expansion and economic changes within the United States, this dissertation investigated the symbiotic relationships and their qualities among the economic transformations of an urban area and its surrounding hinterland throughout the nineteenth century. Specifically, it investigated how the economic and population changes within Toledo, Ohio, molded the development of agricultural hinterlands and how the condition and settlement of the surrounding rural areas shaped the economic changes of Toledo. The quality of transportation connections among Toledo and other nascent towns, market interactions among residents, and the relationships between land quality and usage provided for symbiotic economic development of urban areas and rural hinterlands. The ability to use certain transportation infrastructures, the condition of land, and the availability of natural resources determined the type, quantity, and strength of market connections among people, which influenced the amount and forms of economic change for the area. Conclusions of this study were drawn from analyzing census records, newspaper advertisements and editorials, agricultural reports, and business records and literature. This research introduced a new paradigm of regional economic change named the “subregional model” which included a hub, local economic centers, small villages and farms, and links of various qualities.
    [Show full text]
  • Geodæsia: Exhibit Brochure
    Geodæsia: Land and Memory Geodæsia: the art of surveying and measuring land A Master’s Thesis Exhibit Miami University Libraries Walter Havighurst Special Collections 321 King Library http://spec.lib.muohio.edu 513.529.3323 IMAGE OF LAND hio in 1787 was part of the new Northwest Territory acquired from England in O the Treaty of Paris of 1783. Its heavily wooded land and dispersed prairies made transportation to the territory difficult and only available by river or trails carved through the wilderness. Despite these wild qualities, Americans wanted land in Ohio for many reasons. Land sales provided the new government with a cash flow to relieve its Revolutionary War debts. For veterans of the war, the land in the Territory became their compensation. For other men, land was an opportunity for fame and fortune. John Cleves Symmes - Revolutionary war veteran, member of the Continental Congress, and New Jersey Supreme Court judge - petitioned Congress for one million acres in the southwestern Ohio Territory in what came to be called the Symmes Purchase. Owning and selling so much land would, he hoped, earn him John Cleves Symmes, c.1793 a fortune and build up his reputation in elite Eastern circles. For most men, land in the territory was a fresh start – an opportunity for personal freedom. It meant a chance to live their lives free from actual slavery and free from debts and taxes. It was, in the case of squatters, also seen as free for the taking – both from the government and Native Americans. Typical maps of the time reflect this belief in opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • Scouting in Ohio
    Scouting Ohio! Sipp-O Lodge’s Where to Go Camping Guide Written and Published by Sipp-O Lodge #377 Buckeye Council, Inc. B.S.A. 2009 Introduction This book is provided as a reference source. The information herein should not be taken as the Gospel truth. Call ahead and obtain up-to-date information from the place you want to visit. Things change, nothing is guaranteed. All information and prices in this book were current as of the time of publication. If you find anything wrong with this book or want something added, tell us! Sipp-O Lodge Contact Information Mail: Sipp-O Lodge #377 c/o Buckeye Council, Inc. B.S.A. 2301 13th Street, NW Canton, Ohio 44708 Phone: 330.580.4272 800.589.9812 Fax: 330.580.4283 E-Mail: [email protected] [email protected] Homepage: http://www.buckeyecouncil.org/Order%20of%20the%20Arrow.htm Table of Contents Scout Camps Buckeye Council BSA Camps ............................................................ 1 Seven Ranges Scout Reservation ................................................ 1 Camp McKinley .......................................................................... 5 Camp Rodman ........................................................................... 9 Other Councils in Ohio .................................................................... 11 High Adventure Camps .................................................................... 14 Other Area Camps Buckeye .......................................................................................... 15 Pee-Wee .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Indirect Evidence for the Identity of Richard Andrews (1748–1824) of Stark County, Ohio
    Indirect Evidence for the Identity of Richard Andrews (1748–1824) of Stark County, Ohio By Jean Atkinson Andrews, CG A son who died young and three sons-in-law with unusual surnames show that Richard Andrews and Richard Anderson were one and the same. ichard Andrews arrived in Stark County by 1811, eight years after Ohio statehood. Despite evidence of his Maryland origins, his identity there Rremained uncertain. Not only did Richard and four of his six sons die before 1850, they had common first and last names, limited church affiliation, and minimal military service. Even so, Maryland associates, Ohio documents, and a son who never appears in his father’s records provide sufficient evidence to confirm that Richard Anderson of Washington County, Maryland, was Stark County settler Richard Andrews. LAND IN OHIO Tracing land in Richard’s estate locates him early on and distinguishes him from men of the same name. Richard’s Ohio landholdings began in 1811, when he bought nearly 550 acres at the Steubenville land office.1 On 30 July 1812 a final certificate was issued in the name of “Richard Andrews of Stark County.”2 © Jean Atkinson Andrews, CG, 582 Maidstone Way; Aiken, SC 29803; aandreje@gmail .com. Jean has traded a career in finance for writing and researching in Maryland, Ohio, and now South Carolina. She thanks Gary Friggens of Morgantown, West Virginia, for his contributions to this research. All websites were accessed on 7 February 2015. 1. “Tract books and index for U.S. lands in Ohio but not including Virginia Military District, Connecticut Western Reserve, Fire Lands and Symmes Purchase,” Congress lands: 22 ranges and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Jesse Paramore Maryland, and She Died on 28 March 1858 in Fourth Generation Harrison County, Ohio
    6 The Paramore Families of the Upper Seven Ranges born on 24 December 1758 in Maryland. Margaret and Jesse had six children: Thomas, 2) John Paramore was born on 9 November John, Levi, Isaac, William and Jesse. 1751 in Stepney Parish, Somerset County, Maryland. His wife's name was Sophia, last name Biography of Jesse Edgington44 unknown. Richland County, Ohio John sold 60 acres of land to Samuel Ogden on 19 December 179341. This was apart of the original EDGINGTON, JESSE (deceased). He was born in Virginia and in an early day removed to tract of land called "Good Luck at Last". He then Jefferson Co., this State [i.e. Ohio], where he sold 37 acres to William Kinney on 8 December resided for several years, when he came to this 179842 and 76/2 acres to James Kerr on 21 county and settled in Springfield Township in December 179843. 1814 where he was one of the largest land- owners during his life. The first Presbyterian Church built in that township, of which he was a member and one of the founders, was erected on his land; he died in 1821, at an advanced age, leaving five children by his marriage to Miss Margaret Palmer. Thomas, the eldest son, was born in Virginia in 1781, and removed with his parents to Jefferson Co., Ohio where he lived until 1815, when he came to this county and settled in Springfield Township. He was married in Jefferson Co., Ohio, to Miss Mary Alban in 1802; they were the parents of ten children, of whom Margaret was the oldest; she was born in Jefferson Co., Ohio, Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMi films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI Bell & Howell Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 ‘EFFUSIONS OF FOLLY AND FANATICISM:” RACE, GENDER, AND CONSTITUTION-MAKING IN O m O , 1802-1923 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ohio Surveys
    Report on Ohio Survey Investigation -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A Report on the Investigation of the FGDC Cadastral Data Content Standard and its Applicability in Support of the Ohio Survey Systems Nancy von Meyer Fairview Industries, Inc For The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) National Integrated Land System (NILS) Project Office January 2005 i Report on Ohio Survey Investigation -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preface Ohio was the testing and proving grounds of the Public Land Survey System (PLSS). As a result Ohio contains many varied land descriptions and survey systems. Further complicating the Ohio land description scene are large federal tracts reserved for military use and lands held by other states prior to Ohio statehood. This document is not a history of the land system development for Ohio. The history of Ohio surveys can be found in other materials including the following: Downs, Randolf C., 1927, Evolution of Ohio County Boundaries”, Ohio Archeological and Historical Publications Number XXXVI, Columbus, Ohio. Reprinted in 1970. Gates, Paul W., 1968. “History of Public Land Law Development”, Public Land Law Review Commission, Washington DC. Knepper, George, 2002, “The Official Ohio Lands Book” Auditor of State, Columbus Ohio. http://www.auditor.state.oh.us/StudentResources/OhioLands/ohio_lands.pdf Last Accessed November 2, 2004 Petro, Jim, 1997, “Ohio Lands A Short History”, Auditor of State, Columbus Ohio. Sherman, C.E., 1925, “Original Ohio Land Subdivisions” Volume III of the Final Report to the Ohio Cooperative Topographic Survey. Reprinted in 1991. White, Albert C., “A History of the Public Land Survey System”, US Government Printing Office, Stock Number 024-011-00150-6, Washington D.C.
    [Show full text]