Rebecca-Recommends-2020-2021
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
AIRPORT MASTER PLANNING GOOD PRACTICE GUIDE February 2017
AIRPORT MASTER PLANNING GOOD PRACTICE GUIDE February 2017 ABOUT THE NEW ZEALAND AIRPORTS ASSOCIATION 2 FOREWORD 3 PART A: AIRPORT MASTER PLAN GUIDE 5 1 INTRODUCTION 6 2 IMPORTANCE OF AIRPORTS 7 3 PURPOSE OF AIRPORT MASTER PLANNING 9 4 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS 13 5 BASIC PLANNING PROCESS 15 6 REGULATORY AND POLICY CONTEXT 20 7 CRITICAL AIRPORT PLANNING PARAMETERS 27 8 STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION AND ENGAGEMENT 46 9 KEY ELEMENTS OF THE PLAN 50 10 CONCLUSION 56 PART B: AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TEMPLATE 57 1 INTRODUCTION 58 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 59 C O N T E S 3 AIRPORT MASTER PLAN 64 AIRPORT MASTER PLANNING GOOD PRACTICE GUIDE New Zealand Airports Association | February 2017 ABOUT THE NZ AIRPORTS ASSOCIATION The New Zealand Airports Association (NZ Airports) is the national industry voice for airports in New Zealand. It is a not-for-profit organisation whose members operate 37 airports that span the country and enable the essential air transport links between each region of New Zealand and between New Zealand and the world. NZ Airports purpose is to: Facilitate co-operation, mutual assistance, information exchange and educational opportunities for Members Promote and advise Members on legislation, regulation and associated matters Provide timely information and analysis of all New Zealand and relevant international aviation developments and issues Provide a forum for discussion and decision on matters affecting the ownership and operation of airports and the aviation industry Disseminate advice in relation to the operation and maintenance of airport facilities Act as an advocate for airports and safe efficient aviation. Airport members1 range in size from a few thousand to 17 million passengers per year. -
Legal Submissions for Queenstown Airport Corporation Limited (Further Submitter 31054) Dated: 6 August 2020
Before the Queenstown Lakes District Council In the Matter of the Resource Management Act 1991 And In the Matter of the Queenstown Lakes Proposed District Plan Hearing Stream 18 (Rural Visitor Zone) Legal Submissions for Queenstown Airport Corporation Limited (Further Submitter 31054) Dated: 6 August 2020 Counsel | Rebecca Wolt | Barrister Email | [email protected] Phone | +64 21 244 2950 1 Introduction 1. These legal submissions are filed on behalf of Queenstown Airport Corporation Limited (QAC) in respect of its further submission on the Queenstown Lakes Proposed District Plan (PDP) addressing an original submission (OS31021) by Corbridge Estates Limited Partnership (Corbridge) to rezone approximately 322 ha of land located at 707 Wanaka-Luggate Highway Limited from Rural Zone to Rural Visitor Zone (RVA). 2. The Corbridge land is proximate to Wanaka Airport (Airport), under the Airport’s main flight path, and partly within the Airport’s Operative Outer Control Boundary (OCB). 3. QAC is responsible for the management and planning of Wanaka Airport pursuant to a long-term lease by Queenstown Lakes District Council (QLDC). 4. QAC opposes the Corbridge submission for reverse sensitivity and amenity reasons and seeks retention of the land’s Rural zoning. Legal Framework 5. Ms Scott for QLDC has addressed the statutory framework within which decisions on submissions and further submissions must be made.1 Ms Scott’s submissions are generally accepted as correct and adopted here. 6. The issue of jurisdictional scope arises for the Corbridge submission, and Ms Scott’s submissions on that2 will be addressed and elaborated upon shortly. QAC 7. QAC was incorporated in 1988 and is responsible for operating Queenstown Airport. -
Ngāti Hinerangi Deed of Settlement
Ngāti Hinerangi Deed of Settlement Our package to be ratified by you Crown Offer u Commercial Redress u $8.1 million u 5 commercial properties u 52 right of first refusals u Cultural Redress u 14 DOC and Council properties to be held as reserves or unencumbered u 1 overlay classification u 2 deeds of recognition u 11 statutory acknowledgements u Letters of introduction/recognition, protocols, advisory mechanisms and relationship agreements u 1 co-governance position for Waihou River. Commercial Redress u $8.1m Quantum (Cash) u Subject to any purchase of 5 Commercial Properties u Manawaru School Site and house (Land only), Manawaru u Part Waihou Crown Forest Lease (Southern portion) Manawaru u 9 Inaka Place, Matamata u 11 Arawa St, Matamata (Land only) u Matamata Police Station (Land only) u 52 Right of First Refusals u Te Poi School, Te Poi (MOE) u Matamata College (MOE) u Matamata Primary (MOE) u Omokoroa Point School (MOE) u Weraiti u 47 HNZC Properties Cultural Redress u Historical Account u Crown Apology u DoC Properties u Te Ara O Maurihoro Historical Reserves (East and West) (Thompsons Track) u Ngā Tamāhine e Rua Scenic Reserve (Pt Maurihoro Scenic Reserve) u Te Tuhi Track (East and West) (Kaimai Mamaku Conservation Park) u Te Taiaha a Tangata Historical Reserve (Whenua-a-Kura) u Waipapa Scenic Reserve(Part Waipapa River Scenic Reserve) u Te Hanga Scenic Reserve (Kaimai Mamaku conservation Park) u Te Mimiha o Tuwhanga Scenic Reserve(Tuwhanga) u Te Wai o Ngati Hinerangi Scenic Reserve (Te Wai o Ngaumuwahine 2) u Ngati Hinerangi Recreational Reserve (Waihou R. -
Orders Made to Identify Poplar (5339) and Fir (3021) Reduced Heights Necessary to Meet 1997 OLS By
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT Decision No. A \ \~ 12009 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) and an application for enforcement orders under Section 316 of the Act BETWEEN ROTORUA REGIONAL AIRPORT LIMITED (ENV-2009-AKL-304) Applicant GEOFFREY WAYNE FISCHER Respondent Hearing: At Rotorua on 1ih, 18th September 2009 Court: Environment Judge J A Smith Environment Commissioner PA Catchpole Enviromnent Commissioner CE Manning Appearances: Mr V Rive and Mr L U Hinchey for Rotorua Regional Airport Limited Mr G W Fischer for himself Date ofDecision: 9th November 2009 DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT A: Orders as sought refused. B: Orders made to identify Poplar (5339) and Fir (3021) reduced heights necessary to meet 1997 OLS by: [a] identifying current RL of top of both trees; 2 [b] identifying RL for ground level and 1997 OLS level for both trees; [cl identifying height of trees to remain and to be removed to comply with 1997 OLS. C: The Airport Company or its authorized agents who have received a copy of this decision may enter the site to undertake survey, measurements, and mark the two trees with the 1997 OLS level. Such access is to occur at reasonable times on notice to the owner and tenant. D: If agreement cannot be reached within 1 week of each tree being marked the court will convene a teleconference to discuss final or further orders or directions. E: Leave and costs are reserved. REASONS FOR DECISION Introduction [1] Rotorua Regional Airport Limited (the Airport Company) seeks enforcement orders against Mr G W Fischer, directing him to trim trees on his property at 628 Te Ngae Road, Rotorua. -
Jljne 24.] the NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE. 1687
JlJNE 24.] THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE. 1687 MILI',rARY" .AREA No. 2 (PAE~A}-~ootdMed. MILIT4.~Y AREA No. 2 (PAEROA)--ccmtinuea. 553336 Mo.Ara, James Bertie, gold-miner, Royoroft St., Waihi. 552856 Mapp, Clifford Lewis, dairy-farmer, Walton-Kiwitahi Rd., 516003 :M:cAra, John Leslie, electrician, Waikinci. · · Walton. 584680 McCarthy, Winston, dairy-farmer, No. 1 Rural Mail Delivery, 586707 Margan, .Cuthbert Dudley, ma.star butcher, Wilson St., Waih,i, Te Puke. 544118 Markland, .George William, electrician, Ohope, Wha.katane. 582595 McClinchie, Robert Matthew, farmer, Omokoroa, Tauranga. 540100 Marshall, Eric Thomas, school-teacher, Main Rd., Katikati. 514922 McConnell, Alick James, boilermaker, Kopu, Thames. 546820 Marshall, Walter George, bank clerk, 15 Seddon St., Rot.orua. 514923 McConnell, Sinclair, shop-assistant, Waimana. 512736 Marshall, William Leslie, farm-manager, Thames Rd. 528705 McCulloch, Colin James, farmer, Motumaoho, Morrinsville. 626695 Martelli, Donald Ferguson, farm hand, Reporoa. 576533 McCulloch, Norman Angus, engineer, Ruapehu St., Taupo. 608206 Martin, Albert Walther, farmer, Otailarakau, Te Puke. 580781 McCullough, Robert, carpenter, Katikati. 590352 Martin, Everard Garlick, farmer, Ngakuru Rural Delivery; 618893 McDonald, Alexander Donald, farmer, care of Mr. F. E. · Rotorua. Hughes, Waharoa, Matamata. ·· 552227 Martin, Frederick James, farmer, Campbell Rd., Walton. 574114 McDonald, Archibald Duncan, radio serviceman, Rewi St., 584415 Martin, Hugh, farmer, Broadlands, Repormt, via Rotorua. Te Aroha. 604358 Masters, Ernest Osborne; timber-worker, Post-office, Mourea, 627172 McDonnell, Thomas Clifford, farmer, Station Rd., Matamata. Rotorua. 502372 :M:cDowalJ, Arnold Stuart, bank clerk, 7 Johnstone St., Te 494370 Mathers, William David, farmer, Trig Rd., Waihi. Aroha. 541619 Mathews, Herbert Mostyn, farmer, ,No. 7 Rd., Springdale, 482039 McDuff, Lawrence George, road ganger, Harvey St., East Waitoa. -
452 Morgan Road Matamata
Matamata Horse Trial 20-21 Feb 2021 452 Morgan Road Matamata Event Secretary: Email: [email protected] Entries: online via Equestrian Entries at www.equestrianentries.co.nz Entries close: Tuesday 9 Feb 2021 Payment can be made by DC to 03 0363 0002486-00 Reference riders name & class Course Designers: Tich Massey CCI4*S Campbell Draper CCI3*S CCI2*S CCN2* Bing Allen CCN105/1* Denise McGiven CCN95 & CCN80 All horses and riders in Class 1-3 must be FEI registered. 1. Randlab CCI4*-S Dressage Test CCI4*A2021 PM $1000 Rug/Trophy $700 $600 $400 $300 EF $290 2. Dunstan Horse Feeds CCI3*-S Dressage Test CCI3*A2021 PM $500 Rug/Trophy $350 $250 $180 $180 EF $250 3. Maxlife Batteries CCI2*-S Dressage Test CCI2*A2021 PM $350 Rug/Trophy $250 $200 $150 $100 EF $200 4. OJZ Promotions Rosettes CCN2*-S Dressage Test B5 PM $300/Rug, $250 $170, $150 $100 EF $170 5. Harcourts Kevin Deane Real Estate CCN1*-S Dressage Test B5 (X/C1.05, S/J 1.10) PM $150/Rug $120 $110 $90 EF $130 6. Matamata-Piako District Council CCN105-S Open Dressage Test A5 PM $150/Rug/Trophy $120 $110, $90, $80 EF $110 7. Giltrap Agrizone CCN105-S Restricted to riders that have not competed in 2* (1* pre 2019) or above since Jan 2010 Dressage Test A5 PM $150 Rug $120 $110 $90 $80 EF $110 8. BNZ CCN95-S Open Dressage Test A3 Rug & Trophy 1st Rosettes 1-5 EF $90 9. NZ Bloodstock CCN95-S (restricted to Thoroughbred’s) Dressage Test A3 Rug 1st Rosettes 1-5 EF $90 10. -
Jetstar Brings More Visitors to Queenstown for Christmas
Dec 23, 2011 16:46 +08 Jetstar Brings More Visitors to Queenstown for Christmas Crew of the first Jetstar flight on the Wellington to Queenstown route celebrate. • First flights from Wellington and Sydney to Queenstown almost sold-out • Growing New Zealand tourism through competition and low fares • Jetstar’s on time performance for Queenstown 88 per cent Hundreds of friends, family members and holidaymakers arrived in Queenstown today on Jetstar’s inaugural flights from Wellington and Sydney, just in time for Christmas and New Year. All but a handful of the 180 seats on flight JQ293 from Wellington were filled, with the A320 aircraft touching down in Queenstown mid-morning. Meanwhile, more than 170 passengers winged their way across the Tasman from Sydney on flight JQ223 to arrive in Queenstown mid-afternoon. Jetstar Australia & NZ CEO, David Hall, joined Queenstown Airport CEO, Steve Sanderson, and Destination Queenstown CEO, Tony Everitt, in welcoming passengers. “We’re pleased to be bringing friends and families together for Christmas, and more visitors to Queenstown,” Mr Hall said. “In addition to our new Sydney and Wellington flights, we’ve introduced an extra weekly Melbourne service and two extra weekly flights to Auckland. “In total, these services have the potential to bring an additional 180,000 additional travellers into the region each year,” said Mr Hall said. “Our low fares, which are at least 30 per cent lower than our competitor’s, mean travellers have more money to spend once they arrive.” Mr Sanderson said: “Today’s inaugural flights represent another significant inbound tourism injection for Queenstown. -
Council Agenda - 26-08-20 Page 99
Council Agenda - 26-08-20 Page 99 Project Number: 2-69411.00 Hauraki Rail Trail Enhancement Strategy • Identify and develop local township recreational loop opportunities to encourage short trips and wider regional loop routes for longer excursions. • Promote facilities that will make the Trail more comfortable for a range of users (e.g. rest areas, lookout points able to accommodate stops without blocking the trail, shelters that provide protection from the elements, drinking water sources); • Develop rest area, picnic and other leisure facilities to help the Trail achieve its full potential in terms of environmental, economic, and public health benefits; • Promote the design of physical elements that give the network and each of the five Sections a distinct identity through context sensitive design; • Utilise sculptural art, digital platforms, interpretive signage and planting to reflect each section’s own specific visual identity; • Develop a design suite of coordinated physical elements, materials, finishes and colours that are compatible with the surrounding landscape context; • Ensure physical design elements and objects relate to one another and the scale of their setting; • Ensure amenity areas co-locate a set of facilities (such as toilets and seats and shelters), interpretive information, and signage; • Consider the placement of emergency collection points (e.g. by helicopter or vehicle) and identify these for users and emergency services; and • Ensure design elements are simple, timeless, easily replicated, and minimise visual clutter. The design of signage and furniture should be standardised and installed as a consistent design suite across the Trail network. Small design modifications and tweaks can be made to the suite for each Section using unique graphics on signage, different colours, patterns and motifs that identifies the unique character for individual Sections along the Trail. -
Marginfuel Market Monitor
New Zealand Rental Vehicle Market Insights Report December 2018 2nd Edition Issued 24th January 2019 www.marginfuel.com INTRODUCTION We are pleased to present MarginFuel’s 2nd edition of the “New Zealand Rental Vehicle Market Insights Report”. The report summarises the Average Market Rate# (average rate) of the New Zealand Rental Car Market, with a focus on the most popular Vehicle Categories^ from New Zealand’s three major airports*, being Auckland, Christchurch and Queenstown Airports. The report is split into three sections. • Section 1 - December 2018 Analysis; overall the average rate increased Year on Year (YoY), with Direct Sales channels showing the largest increase. • Section 2 - Year to Date (YTD) Analysis from September to December 2018; as is the typical seasonal trend, the average rate bottomed out in September 2018, and began to climb into the high season. Average rates in December 2018, for all three locations, were up +11% to +22% YoY. • Section 3 - Forward Market Analysis from January to April 2019; average rates are trending upwards YoY from February to April 2019, however, there is still a flat spot in demand in late January 2019 (compared to late January 2018). Please do not hesitate to get in contact to discuss the Report, or your pricing requirements. Thanks, The MarginFuel Team Notes: ^ Underlying car type (make & model) data was mapped to commonly used car categories, being SUV, Intermediate, Compact and Economy, using the internationally recognised SIPP code mapping table * All three (3) airport locations include -
Queenstown Airport Corporation Limited Annual Report for Financial Year Ended 30 June 2020
Queenstown Airport Corporation Limited Annual Report for Financial Year Ended 30 June 2020 Contents Directory ................................................................................................................................................ 2 Annual Report ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Income Statement ................................................................................................................................ 13 Statement of Comprehensive Income ..................................................................................................... 14 Statement of Financial Position .............................................................................................................. 15 Statement of Changes in Equity ............................................................................................................. 16 Cash Flow Statement ............................................................................................................................. 17 Notes to the Financial Statements .......................................................................................................... 18 Statement of Service Performance ......................................................................................................... 44 Independent Auditor’s Report ............................................................................................................... -
Border Report – Port of Tauranga and Rotorua Airport August 2013
Border Report – Port of Tauranga and Rotorua Airport August 2013 Purpose A preliminary report to understand the level of risk the Port of Tauranga (POT) and Rotorua Airport present to the Bay of Plenty kiwifruit industry with the intent of determining if the current level of protection is adequate. Background Biosecurity in New Zealand consists of a multi –layer system that begins offshore with pre-border activities, incorporates the border and continues post-border into New Zealand where it becomes a joint effort between central government, regional councils, industry, community groups, and all New Zealanders, (a paper describing this system in more detail can be found on the KVH website www.kvh.org.nz/kiwifruit_biosecurity_risks). This paper will review a single layer, border interventions at ports of entry. Any port of entry has the potential to bring unwanted pests and diseases into New Zealand that could be detrimental to the kiwifruit industry, however, given the high concentration of the kiwifruit industry in the Bay of Plenty, this report has focused on the ports of entry in the immediate proximity to this region, which are the Port of Tauranga and the Rotorua Airport. The Port of Tauranga is New Zealand’s second largest port by container volume, and a major stop on the cruise ship circuit. Rotorua Airport is an International Airport receiving two trans-Tasman flights a week. Imports into POT, cruise ships, and passenger traffic through Rotorua Airport are all potential pathways for risk items to enter New Zealand and each will be reviewed to provide an overview of operations, potential risks that each present and how these risks are being mitigated. -
Kaimai Wind Farm Tourism and Recreation Impact Assessment
Kaimai Wind Farm Tourism and Recreation Impact Assessment REPORT TO VENTUS ENERGY LTD MAY 2018 Document Register Version Report date V 1 Final draft 31 August 2017 V2 GS comments 10 Oct 2017 V3 Visual assessment, cycle route 30 Nov 2017 V4 Updated visual assessment 16 February 2018 V5 Turbine update 30 May 2018 Acknowledgements This report has been prepared by TRC Tourism Ltd. Disclaimer Any representation, statement, opinion or advice, expressed or implied in this document is made in good faith but on the basis that TRC Tourism is not liable to any person for any damage or loss whatsoever which has occurred or may occur in relation to that person taking or not taking action in respect of any representation, statement or advice referred to in this document. K AIMAI WIND FARM TOURISM AND RECREATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT 2 Contents Contents ................................................................................................................. 3 1 Introduction and Background ........................................................................... 4 2 Existing Recreation and Tourism Setting ........................................................... 5 3 Assessment of Potential Effects ...................................................................... 12 4 Recommendations and Mitigation .................................................................. 18 5 Conclusion ...................................................................................................... 20 K AIMAI WIND FARM TOURISM AND RECREATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT