Sixth Sudden Oak Death Science Symposium

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sixth Sudden Oak Death Science Symposium Sixth Sudden Oak Death Science Symposium Meeting Abstracts June 20 – 23, 2016 Fort Mason, San Francisco, CA Sixth Sudden Oak Death Science Symposium Fort Mason, San Francisco June 20 - 23, 2016 Welcome…………………………………………………………………... 1 Symposium Scientific Committee.………………………………………... 1 Conference Sponsors…………………………………………………........ 2 Program of Events Overview……………………………………………… 3 Oral Presentation Abstracts…………………..………………………........ 5 Poster Abstracts…………………………………………………………… 45 ABSTRACTS FROM THE SIXTH SUDDEN OAK DEATH SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM Welcome Welcome to the Sixth Sudden Oak Death Science Symposium. Many of you have been a part of the Phytophthora ramorum community for the past 15 years, experiencing the successes and failures as well as the balancing and prioritization of issues that come from vicissitudes in tree mortality, politics, and funding. It is difficult to sustain programs as new problems arise to compete for limited resources, yet here we all are. We appreciate your dedication and continued collaboration. Persistence and partnerships are the central focus of the field trip, highlighting the cooperative research and management being conducted by agencies working to protect the resources they manage, while also contributing to our knowledge of how to stop pathogen spread. These partnerships led to the first detection of P. tentaculata in restoration sites. As pathologists took a closer look, numerous Phytophthora species were detected on several California native plant species. While our collaboration, awareness, and concern for P. ramorum led to these detections, it is dismaying that, despite all we have learned, we still have so much more work to do to prevent plant pathogen spread and protect forests from inadvertent pathogen introductions. We hope this Symposium inspires you to continue this battle with renewed energy. Thank you for your continued concern for the health of forests, communities, and nurseries Susan J. Frankel, Sudden Oak Death Research USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station Albany, California; [email protected] Janice Alexander, Sudden Oak Death Outreach Coordinator California Oak Mortality Task Force/UC Cooperative Extension Marin County Novato, California; [email protected] Katie Harrell, Communications Director California Forest Pest Council/UC Berkeley Berkeley, California; [email protected] Symposium Scientific Committee Clive Brasier, UK Forest Research (emeritus) Matteo Garbelotto, UC Berkeley Everett Hansen, Oregon State University Jennifer Parke, Oregon State University David Rizzo, UC Davis Joan Webber, UK Forest Research 1 ABSTRACTS FROM THE SIXTH SUDDEN OAK DEATH SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM Conference Sponsors California Board of Forestry and Fire Protection Sacramento, CA California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Sacramento, CA California Oak Mortality Task Force, California Forest Pest Council Sacramento, CA Hetch Hetchy Regional Water System Services of the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission San Francisco, CA Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Los Altos, CA National Park Service, Golden Gate National Recreation Area San Francisco, CA USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine Emergency Response, Response and Recovery, Plant Pathogens and Weeds Center for Plant Health Science and Technology Raleigh, North Carolina USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, State and Private Forestry, Forest Health Protection Vallejo, CA USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station Albany, CA University of California, - Berkeley, Forest Pathology and Mycology Lab University of California – Davis, Department of Plant Pathology University of California Cooperative Extension, Marin County Novato, CA 2 ABSTRACTS FROM THE SIXTH SUDDEN OAK DEATH SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM Program of Events Overview MONDAY, JUNE 20, 2016 10:00 - 3:30 Phytophthora Identification Training, UC Berkeley, Morgan Hall Lounge 6:00 - 8:00 Evening Registration & Welcome Social, Log Cabin, the Presidio TUESDAY, JUNE 21, 2016 8:00 - 8:30 Registration, Fort Mason, Gallery 308 8:45 - 8:55 Check in for Field Trip, Fort Mason, Gallery 308 9:00 - 5:30 “Research & Management of Sudden Oak Death & Other Phytophthora Species on the San Francisco Peninsula” Field Trip (Lunch Provided) 5:30 Return to Ft Mason, Galley 308 5:30 - 6:30 California Oak Mortality Task Force Management Committee meeting, Fort Mason, Gallery 308 WEDNESDAY, JUNE 22, 2016 8:00 - 9:00 Registration and Coffee 9:00 - 10:00 Impacts & Status of Phytophthora ramorum 10:05 - 10:20 Break 10:20 - 11:40 Sudden Oak Death & Landscape Ecology 11:45 - 12:45 Lunch (Provided) 12:45 - 2:15 Sudden Oak Death Management 2:30 - 2:50 Break 2:50 - 4:15 Ecology: Forest Change Over Time 4:15 - 5:15 Acute Oak Decline in the United Kingdom 5:30 - 6:30 Poster Session (Social with local foods) 7:00 - 9:00 Dinner & Social at Matteo Garbelotto’s home THURSDAY, JUNE 23, 2016 8:00 - 9:00 Registration and Coffee 9:00 - 10:20 Genetics 10:20 - 10:40 Break 10:40 - 11:20 Genetics, cont. 11:20 - 12:00 Nurseries & Managed Landscapes 12:00 - 1:00 Lunch (Provided) 1:00 - 2:00 Nurseries & Managed Landscapes, cont. 2:00 - 2:15 Break 2:15 – 3:35 Phytophthora Detections in Native Plant Nurseries & Restoration Sites 3:35 - 3:45 Break 3:45 – 5:00 Phytophthora Detections in Native Plant Nurseries & Restoration Sites, cont. 5:00 Adjourn 3 ABSTRACTS FROM THE SIXTH SUDDEN OAK DEATH SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM 4 ABSTRACTS FROM THE SIXTH SUDDEN OAK DEATH SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM Oral Presentation Abstracts (in agenda order) 5 ABSTRACTS FROM THE SIXTH SUDDEN OAK DEATH SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM 6 ABSTRACTS FROM THE SIXTH SUDDEN OAK DEATH SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM Slowing spread of sudden oak death in Oregon forests, 2001-2015 Alan Kanaskie, Randy Wiese, Danny Norlander, Jon Laine, and Sarah Navarro, Oregon Department of Forestry, Salem, OR 97310; [email protected]; Ellen Michaels Goheen and Ron Rhatigan, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region FHP, Central Point, OR; Everett Hansen, Wendy Sutton, Paul Reeser, Nik Grunwald, and Zhian Kamvar, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR; Nancy Osterbauer, Oregon Department of Agriculture, Salem OR. Sudden oak death, caused by Phytophthora ramorum, is lethal to tanoak (Notholithocarpus densiflorus) and threatens this species throughout its range in Oregon. The disease was first discovered in coastal southwest Oregon forests in July 2001. An interagency team attempted to eradicate the pathogen through a program of early detection and mandatory destruction of infected and nearby host plants. Eradication treatments eliminated disease from most infested sites, but the disease continued to spread slowly, mostly in a northward direction. Following a sharp increase in disease in 2010 and 2011, a result of leaving many infestations untreated, the program shifted goals from complete eradication to slowing spread. In 2012 the quarantine regulations were changed by establishing a Generally Infested Area (GIA) in which eradication on was no longer required by law. Since then, eradication treatments (cutting and burning host plants) have been focused on new infestations that occur outside of the GIA. All new infestations outside the GIA are cut and burned, but the size of the treatment area varies with available funds and location of the site. Since 2001 the area under quarantine has expanded seven times: from 22 km2 (9 mi2) in 2001 to 1,333 km2 (515 mi2) in 2015, which is approximately 31% of the total area of Curry County. The GIA has expanded four times and currently stands at 151 km2 (58 mi2). Within this area, hundreds of thousands of tanoaks have died in the since 2012, creating a high risk for wildfire and damage from falling trees. From the initial infestations of 2001, the disease has been found a maximum distance of 28 km (17.5 mi) to the north, 12 km (7.5 mi) to the northeast along the Chetco River, and 11 km (7 mi) to the southeast along the Winchuck River. In early 2015 the EU1 genetic lineage of P. ramorum was detected on a single tanoak tree located approximately 1 mile north of a small private nursery (now closed) near the Pistol River. Genotype comparison of the tanoak and nursery isolates suggests the nursery as the probable source for the forest infestation. This is the first report of the EU1 lineage in US forests. All host plants within approximately 130 m of the infected tree were cut and burned in 2015. Two post-treatment assays of soil and vegetation on the infested site failed to detect P. ramorum. 7 ABSTRACTS FROM THE SIXTH SUDDEN OAK DEATH SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM Lessons from 15 years of monitoring sudden oak death and forest dynamics in California forests Margaret Metz, Department of Biology, Lewis & Clark College, Portland, OR 97219; [email protected]; J. Morgan Varner, Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA; Ross Meentemeyer, Center for Geospatial Analytics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC; Kerri Frangioso and David Rizzo, Department of Plant Pathology, UC Davis, Davis, CA. Fifteen years ago we began monitoring host composition and disease impacts in what would eventually become a network of permanent forest monitoring plots throughout the known and predicted range of Phytophthora ramorum in California coastal forests. Stretching approximately 500 miles from Big Sur to the California-Oregon border, the plot network captures variation in interactions among the pathogen, its potential hosts, and the environment across wide gradients in
Recommended publications
  • Draft Final Report
    Draft Saddle Mountain Open Space Preserve Management Plan Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration Prepared for: Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District 747 Mendocino Avenue Santa Rosa, CA 95401 Prepared by: Prunuske Chatham, Inc. 400 Morris St., Suite G Sebastopol, CA 95472 March 2019 This page is intentionally blank. Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District March 2019 Saddle Mountain Open Space Preserve Management Plan Initial Study/Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration Table of Contents Page 1 Project Information ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 California Environmental Quality Act Requirements .................................................................... 3 1.2.1 Public and Agency Review ................................................................................................. 3 2 Project Description ................................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Project Location and Setting ......................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Project Goals and Objectives ......................................................................................................... 4
    [Show full text]
  • Artemisia Californica Less
    I. SPECIES Artemisia californica Less. [Updated 2017] NRCS CODE: Subtribe: Artemisiinae ARCA11 Tribe: Anthemideae (FEIS CODE: Family: Asteraceae ARCAL) Order: Asterales Subclass: Asteridae Class: Magnoliopsida flowering heads spring growth seedling, March 2009 juvenile plant photos A. Montalvo flowering plant, November 2005 mature plant with flower buds August 2010 A. Subspecific taxa None. Artemisia californica Less. var. insularis (Rydb.) Munz is now recognized as Artemisia nesiotica P.H. Raven (Jepson eFlora 2017). B. Synonyms Artemisia abrotanoides Nuttall; A. fischeriana Besser; A. foliosa Nuttall; Crossostephium californicum (Lessing) Rydberg (FNA 2017). C. Common name California sagebrush. The common name refers to its strong, sage-like aroma and endemism to California and Baja California. Other names include: coastal sage, coast sage, coast sagebrush (Painter 2016). D. Taxonomic relationships The FNA (2017) places this species in subgenus Artemisia . The molecular phylogeny of the genus has improved the understanding of relationships among the many species of Artemisia and has, at times, placed the species in subgenus Tridentadae; morphology of the inflorescences and flowers alone does not place this species with its closest relatives (Watson et al. 2002). The detailed phylogeny is not completely resolved (Hayat et al. 2009). E. Related taxa in region There are 18 species and a total of 31 taxa (including infrataxa) of Artemisia in southern California, all of which differ clearly from A. californica in habitat affinity, structure, or both (Munz 1974, Jepson eFlora 2017). Within subgenus Artemisia (as per FNA 2017), A. nesiotica from the Channel Islands is the most similar and was once considered part of A. californica ; it can be distinguished by its wider leaves with flat leaf margins (not rolled under).
    [Show full text]
  • Alnus Glutinosa
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2019.12.13.875229; this version posted December 13, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. Investigations into the declining health of alder (Alnus glutinosa) along the river Lagan in Belfast, including the first report of Phytophthora lacustris causing disease of Alnus in Northern Ireland Richard O Hanlon (1, 2)* Julia Wilson (2), Deborah Cox (1) (1) Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Belfast, BT9 5PX, Northern Ireland, UK. (2) Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK * [email protected] Additional key words: Plant health, Forest pathology, riparian, root and collar rot. Abstract Common alder (Alnus glutinosa) is an important tree species, especially in riparian and wet habitats. Alder is very common across Ireland and Northern Ireland, and provides a wide range of ecosystem services. Surveys along the river Lagan in Belfast, Northern Ireland led to the detection of several diseased Alnus trees. As it is known that Alnus suffers from a Phytophthora induced decline, this research set out to identify the presence and scale of the risk to Alnus health from Phytophthora and other closely related oomycetes. Sampling and a combination of morphological and molecular testing of symptomatic plant material and river baits identified the presence of several Phytophthora species, including Phytophthora lacustris. A survey of the tree vegetation along an 8.5 km stretch of the river revealed that of the 166 Alnus trees counted, 28 were severely defoliated/diseased and 9 were dead.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidio Phytophthora Management Recommendations
    2016 Presidio Phytophthora Management Recommendations Laura Sims Presidio Phytophthora Management Recommendations (modified) Author: Laura Sims Other Contributing Authors: Christa Conforti, Tom Gordon, Nina Larssen, and Meghan Steinharter Photograph Credits: Laura Sims, Janet Klein, Richard Cobb, Everett Hansen, Thomas Jung, Thomas Cech, and Amelie Rak Editors and Additional Contributors: Christa Conforti, Alison Forrestel, Alisa Shor, Lew Stringer, Sharon Farrell, Teri Thomas, John Doyle, and Kara Mirmelstein Acknowledgements: Thanks first to Matteo Garbelotto and the University of California, Berkeley Forest Pathology and Mycology Lab for providing a ‘forest pathology home’. Many thanks to the members of the Phytophthora huddle group for useful suggestions and feedback. Many thanks to the members of the Working Group for Phytophthoras in Native Habitats for insight into the issues of Phytophthora. Many thanks to Jennifer Parke, Ted Swiecki, Kathy Kosta, Cheryl Blomquist, Susan Frankel, and M. Garbelotto for guidance. I would like to acknowledge the BMP documents on Phytophthora that proceeded this one: the Nursery Industry Best Management Practices for Phytophthora ramorum to prevent the introduction or establishment in California nursery operations, and The Safe Procurement and Production Manual. 1 Title Page: Authors and Acknowledgements Table of Contents Page Title Page 1 Table of Contents 2 Executive Summary 5 Introduction to the Phytophthora Issue 7 Phytophthora Issues Around the World 7 Phytophthora Issues in California 11 Phytophthora
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Maleae (Rosaceae) Based on Multiple Chloroplast Regions: Implications to Genera Circumscription
    Hindawi BioMed Research International Volume 2018, Article ID 7627191, 10 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7627191 Research Article Phylogeny of Maleae (Rosaceae) Based on Multiple Chloroplast Regions: Implications to Genera Circumscription Jiahui Sun ,1,2 Shuo Shi ,1,2,3 Jinlu Li,1,4 Jing Yu,1 Ling Wang,4 Xueying Yang,5 Ling Guo ,6 and Shiliang Zhou 1,2 1 State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China 2University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100043, China 3College of Life Science, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China 4Te Department of Landscape Architecture, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China 5Key Laboratory of Forensic Genetics, Institute of Forensic Science, Ministry of Public Security, Beijing 100038, China 6Beijing Botanical Garden, Beijing 100093, China Correspondence should be addressed to Ling Guo; [email protected] and Shiliang Zhou; [email protected] Received 21 September 2017; Revised 11 December 2017; Accepted 2 January 2018; Published 19 March 2018 Academic Editor: Fengjie Sun Copyright © 2018 Jiahui Sun et al. Tis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Maleae consists of economically and ecologically important plants. However, there are considerable disputes on generic circumscription due to the lack of a reliable phylogeny at generic level. In this study, molecular phylogeny of 35 generally accepted genera in Maleae is established using 15 chloroplast regions. Gillenia isthemostbasalcladeofMaleae,followedbyKageneckia + Lindleya, Vauquelinia, and a typical radiation clade, the core Maleae, suggesting that the proposal of four subtribes is reasonable.
    [Show full text]
  • Adenostoma Fasciculatum Profile to Postv2.Xlsx
    I. SPECIES Adenostoma fasciculatum Hooker & Arnott NRCS CODE: ADFA Family: Rosaceae A. f. var. obtusifolium, Ron A. f. var. fasciculatum., Riverside Co., A. Montalvo, RCRCD Vanderhoff (Creative Order: Rosales Commons CC) Subclass: Rosidae Class: Magnoliopsida A. Subspecific taxa 1. Adenostoma fasciculatum var. fasciculatum Hook. & Arn. 1. ADFAF 2. A. f. var. obusifolium S. Watson 2. ADFAO 3. A. f. var. prostratum Dunkle 3. (no NRCS code) B. Synonyms 1. A. f. var. densifolium Eastw. 2. A. brevifolium Nutt. 3. none. Formerly included as part of A. f. var. f. C. Common name 1. chamise, common chamise, California greasewood, greasewood, chamiso (Painter 2016) 2. San Diego chamise (Calflora 2016) 3. prostrate chamise (Calflora 2016) Phylogenetic studies using molecular sequence data placedAdenostoma closest to Chamaebatiaria and D. Taxonomic relationships Sorbaria (Morgan et al. 1994, Potter et al. 2007) and suggest tentative placement in subfamily Spiraeoideae, tribe Sorbarieae (Potter et al. 2007). E. Related taxa in region Adenostoma sparsifolium Torrey, known as ribbon-wood or red-shanks is the only other species of Adenostoma in California. It is a much taller, erect to spreading shrub of chaparral vegetation, often 2–6 m tall and has a more restricted distribution than A. fasciculatum. It occurs from San Luis Obispo Co. south into Baja California. Red-shanks produces longer, linear leaves on slender long shoots rather than having leaves clustered on short shoots (lacks "fascicled" leaves). Its bark is cinnamon-colored and in papery layers that sheds in long ribbons. F. Taxonomic issues The Jepson eFlora and the FNA recognize A. f. var. prostratum but the taxon is not recognized by USDA PLANTS (2016).
    [Show full text]
  • (Rosaceae), I. Differentiation of Mespilus and Crataegus
    Phytotaxa 257 (3): 201–229 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/pt/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.257.3.1 STUDIES IN MESPILUS, CRATAEGUS, AND ×CRATAEMESPILUS (ROSACEAE), I. DIFFERENTIATION OF MESPILUS AND CRATAEGUS, EXPANSION OF ×CRATAEMESPILUS, WITH SUPPLEMENTARY OBSERVATIONS ON DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE CRATAEGUS AND AMELANCHIER CLADES JAMES B. PHIPPS Department of Biology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada; email: [email protected] Abstract The paper argues the position for retaining a monotypic Mespilus, i.e., in the sense of M. germanica, the medlar. Recent cladistic papers lend support for Mespilus being sister to Crataegus, and there is a clear morphological distinction from Cra- taegus, emphasized by adaptation to carnivore frugivory. Mespilus secured, the paper then treats each of the known hybrids between Mespilus and Crataegus, making the new combination Crataemespilus ×canescens (J.B. Phipps) J.B. Phipps. Keywords: Crataemespilus ×canescens (J.B. Phipps) J.B. Phipps comb. nov.; inflorescence position; medlar; Mespilus a folk-genus; Mespilus distinct from Crataegus; Rosaceae; taxonomic history of Mespilus Introduction The author has a long-standing interest in generic delimitation in the Maloid genera of the Rosaceae (Maleae Small, formerly Maloideae C. Weber, Pyrinae Dumort.), as shown particularly in a series of papers with K. Robertson, J. Rohrer, and P.G. Smith (Phipps et al. 1990, 1991; Robertson at al. 1991, 1992; Rohrer at al. 1991, 1994) which treated all 28 genera of Maleae as recognised by us. There is also a revisionary treatment of New World Heteromeles M.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Agricultural Research Department of Agriculture
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE VOL. V WASHINGTON, D. C, OCTOBER II, 1915 No. 2 PERENNIAL MYCELIUM IN SPECIES OF PERONOSPO- RACEAE RELATED TO PHYTOPHTHORA INFES- TANS By I. E. MELHUS, Pathologist, Cotton and Truck Disease Investigations, Bureau of Plant Industry INTRODUCTION Phytophthora infestans having been found to be perennial in the. Irish potato (Solanum tvherosum), the question naturally arose as to whether other species of Peronosporaceae survive the winter in the northern part of the United States in the mycelial stage. As shown in another paper (13),1 the mycelium in the mother tuber grows up the stem to the surface of the soil and causes an infection of the foliage which may result in an epidemic of late-blight. Very little is known about the perennial nature of the mycelium of Peronosporaceae. Only two species have been reported in America: Plasmopara pygmaea on Hepática acutiloba by Stewart (15) and Phytoph- thora cactorum on Panax quinquefolium by Rosenbaum (14). Six have been shown to be perennial in Europe: Peronospora schachtii on Beta vtUgaris and Peronospora dipsaci on Dipsacus follonum by Kühn (7, 8) ; Peronospora alsinearum on Stellaria media, Peronospora grisea on Veronica heder aefolia, Peronospora effusa on S pinada olerácea, and A triplex hor- tensis by Magnus (9); and Peronospora viiicola on Vitis vinifera by Istvanffi (5). Many of the hosts of this family are annuals, but some are biennials, or, like the Irish potato, are perennials. Where the host lives over the winter, it is interesting to know whether the mycelium of the fungus may also live over, especially where the infection has become systemic and the mycelium is present in the crown of the host plant.
    [Show full text]
  • Heteromeles Arbutifolia (Lindl.) M. Roemer NRCS CODE: Subfamily: Maloideae Family: Rosaceae (HEAR5) Photos: A
    I. SPECIES Heteromeles arbutifolia (Lindl.) M. Roemer NRCS CODE: Subfamily: Maloideae Family: Rosaceae (HEAR5) photos: A. Montalvo Order: Rosales Subclass: Rosidae Class: Magnoliopsida Fruits (pomes) in late fall and winter. A. Subspecific taxa None recognized by Phipps (2012, 2016) in Jepson Manual or Jepson e-Flora. B. Synonyms Photinia arbutifolia (Ait.) Lindl.; Crataegus arbutifolia Ait. (McMinn 1939) Heteromeles (Lindl.) M. Roemer arbutifolia var. arbutifolia ; H. a. var. cerina (Jeps.) E. Murray; H. a. var. macrocarpa (Munz) Munz; H. salicifolia (C. Presl) Abrams (Phipps 2016) (but see I. F. Taxonomic issues). C. Common name toyon, California Christmas berry, California-holly (Painter 2016); Christmas berry (CalFlora 2016). D. Taxonomic relationships Phylogenetic analyses based on molecular and morphological data confirm thatPhotinia is the most closely related genus (Guo et al. 2011). Photinia differs in having 20 stamens, fused carpels, and stone cells in the testa as well as occurring in summer-wet environments (Phipps 1992). E. Related taxa in region None. There is only one species of Heteromeles. The closely related Photinia is primarily tropical (Meyer 2008) and not in California. Toyon's taxonomic stability may be in part related to its reproductive mode (Wells 1969). F. Taxonomic issues The three varieties of H. arbutifolia listed above in cell I. B. are currently recognized in the USDA PLANTS (2016) database. G. Other One of the most widely distributed California shrubs. Also widely planted and well-known for its bright red fruits in winter. McMinn (1939) noted it had been planted widely in parks and gardens since about 1914. From the Greek words 'heter' for different and 'malus' for apple (Munz 1974).
    [Show full text]
  • Phytophthora: a Guide to Molecular Analyses
    Phytophthora: A guide to molecular analyses Kelly Ivors, Assoc. Professor Horticulture & Crop Science Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo Circa late 2002… Cal Poly Strawberry Center, 2016 Phytophthora… an old enemy Dozens of species detected in coastal California on: • avocado • asparagus • cauliflower (rare) • citrus • grape • pepper • raspberry • sage • Blightspinach and (rare)Dieback • strawberry • tomato • numerous ornamentals • and forest plants Root rot Phytophthora in ornamentals Hundreds of ornamental plants are susceptible. Incite root rot, crown rot, and foliar blights. Caused by a few dozen Phytophthora species in U.S. cinnamomi, cryptogea, citricola,citrophthora, cactorum, cambivora, drecshleri, foliorum, gonapodyides, heveae, hibernalis, nicotianae, palmivora, ramorum, syringae, tropicalis… plus many more. Phytophthora… an old enemy Phytophthora cinnamomi rootstock trial 1979 Phytophthora… an old enemy Phytophthora infestans Trial 1972 Phytophthora… an old enemy Phytophthora nicotianae Host resistance trial 1960s Phytophthora… an old enemy Phytophthora ornamental workshop 1970 Phytophthora… a new enemy Phytophthora ramorum Circa 1990s Phytophthora… a new enemy Phytophthora siskiyouensis 2007 (Foster City, CA) Blight and Dieback Root rot Phytophthora… a new enemy The more you look, the more you find… Extensive surveys have been conducted in historically underexplored ecosystems to determine the spread of invasive species in forest decline worldwide New records in 2007 collected by PDIC Host Common Name Fungus Record Itea virginica Sweetspire
    [Show full text]
  • The Phytophthora Cactorum Genome Provides Insights Into The
    www.nature.com/scientificreports Corrected: Author Correction OPEN The Phytophthora cactorum genome provides insights into the adaptation to host defense Received: 30 October 2017 Accepted: 12 April 2018 compounds and fungicides Published online: 25 April 2018 Min Yang1,2, Shengchang Duan1,3, Xinyue Mei1,2, Huichuan Huang 1,2, Wei Chen1,4, Yixiang Liu1,2, Cunwu Guo1,2, Ting Yang1,2, Wei Wei1,2, Xili Liu5, Xiahong He1,2, Yang Dong1,4 & Shusheng Zhu1,2 Phytophthora cactorum is a homothallic oomycete pathogen, which has a wide host range and high capability to adapt to host defense compounds and fungicides. Here we report the 121.5 Mb genome assembly of the P. cactorum using the third-generation single-molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing technology. It is the second largest genome sequenced so far in the Phytophthora genera, which contains 27,981 protein-coding genes. Comparison with other Phytophthora genomes showed that P. cactorum had a closer relationship with P. parasitica, P. infestans and P. capsici. P. cactorum has similar gene families in the secondary metabolism and pathogenicity-related efector proteins compared with other oomycete species, but specifc gene families associated with detoxifcation enzymes and carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) underwent expansion in P. cactorum. P. cactorum had a higher utilization and detoxifcation ability against ginsenosides–a group of defense compounds from Panax notoginseng–compared with the narrow host pathogen P. sojae. The elevated expression levels of detoxifcation enzymes and hydrolase activity-associated genes after exposure to ginsenosides further supported that the high detoxifcation and utilization ability of P. cactorum play a crucial role in the rapid adaptability of the pathogen to host plant defense compounds and fungicides.
    [Show full text]
  • North Bay Vital Signs
    North Bay Vital Signs An Integrated Ecosystem-Climate Monitoring Framework for Sonoma County Lisa Micheli (Pepperwood) and Deanne DiPietro (Point Blue Conservation Science) Co-chairs, North Bay Climate Adaptation Initiative (NBCAI) Science Working Group A report prepared for Community Foundation Sonoma County December 2013 A product of the North Bay Climate Adaptation Initiative www.northbayclimate.org NBCAI’s North Bay Vital Signs December 2013 North Bay Vital Signs: an Integrated Ecosystem-Climate Monitoring Framework for Sonoma County Lisa Micheli (Pepperwood) and Deanne DiPietro (Point Blue Conservation Science) Co-chairs, North Bay Climate Adaptation Initiative (NBCAI) Science Working Group A report prepared for Community Foundation Sonoma County, December 2013 1. Executive Summary This report summarizes the North Bay Climate Adaptation Initiative (NBCAI)’s progress towards designing and implementing a Sonoma County-wide network capable of detecting local changes in climate and biodiversity, and of feeding into regional, state and national networks designed to support natural resource management decision- making at multiple scales. The strategy outlined here advances the following NBCAI Vital Signs objectives. o To maximize the input of advising technical experts on an indicator framework o To utilize protected lands as potential “hubs” of an integrated climate-biota monitoring network o To establish a sustainable, long-term set of combined climate-hydrology-biology measuring stations o To define data structure, collection protocols, stewardship, statistics, sharing, and reporting needed to regularly assess the status of key climate-ecosystem indicators o To explore the appropriate role of citizen scientists o To assess the feasibility of monitoring implementation recommendations with voluntarily participating conservation land managers NBCAI’s science working group has accomplished the following first steps towards these objectives, as described in more detail in this report.
    [Show full text]