DOCSLIB.ORG

Aquatic Protected Areas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aquatic Protected Areas Aquatic Protected Areas What works best and how do we know? World Congress on Aquatic Protected Areas Cairns, Australia - August 2002 Editors: JP Beumer, A Grant and DC Smith National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in Publication entry APAC Congress (2002: Cairns, Qld.). Aquatic protected areas – what works best and how do we know? World Congress on Aquatic Protected Areas proceedings. Bibliography ISBN 0-646-43022-X 1. Protected areas – Management – Congresses 2. Aquatic resources – Management – Congresses I. Beumer, J.P. (John Peter), Grant, A., Smith, D.C. II. ASFB III. Title 333.95 © ASFB Australia 2003 This book is available from: President, ASFB, WA Marine Research Laboratory PO Box 20, North Beach WA 6020 Australia. Design cover and printed by Printery & Print on Demand University of Queensland Printery, St Lucia: Queensland, Australia. Formatting and production: Diane Mahon – PIRVic Victoria, Australia. EDITORS J P Beumer Queensland Fisheries Service GPO Box 46 Brisbane, Queensland 4001, Australia A Grant 626 Park Street Carlton North, Victoria 3054, Australia D C Smith Primary Industries Research Victoria Queenscliff Centre PO Box 114 Queenscliff, Victoria 3225, Australia Text Editor Diane Mahon Primary Industries Research Victoria Queenscliff Centre PO Box 114 Queenscliff, Victoria 3225, Australia Editorial Board We gratefully acknowledge the time and effort of the following individuals: Simon Banks Greg Jenkins Jim Barrett John Koehn John Beumer Darryl McPhee Mark Butz Sandy Morison Colin Buxton Andre Punt Rick Fletcher David C Smith John Glaister Terry Walker David Hobday Trevor Ward iii ORGANISING COMMITTEES Organising Committee John Glaister Sport and Recreation Queensland, Queensland (Congress Chair) John Beumer Queensland Fisheries Service, Queensland (Publications Chair) John Koehn Department of Sustainability and Environment, Victoria (President ASFB) Rochelle Manderson OzAccom Conference Services, Queensland Ian McPhail Environmental Protection Agency, Queensland Ian Poiner CSIRO Marine Research, Queensland Mike Rimmer Department of Primary Industries, Queensland (Social Program Chair) Andrew Sanger Western NSW Fisheries, New South Wales (Treasurer) David C. Smith Primary Industries Research Victoria, Victoria Peter Taylor Environment Australia, Australian Capital Territory Imogen Zethoven World Wide Fund for Nature Australia, Queensland Program Committee David C Smith Primary Industries Research Victoria, Victoria (Program Chair) Rodrigo Bustamante CSIRO Marine Research, Queensland Mark Butz Environment Australia, Australian Capital Territory Colin Buxton Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute, Tasmania Phil Cadwallader Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Queensland Prue Gaffey Environment Australia, Australian Capital Territory Don Hough Department of Sustainability and Environment, Victoria John Koehn Department of Sustainability and Environment, Victoria Bern Megrey Alaska Fisheries Science Center, Alaska Margaret Moore World Wide Fund for Nature Australia, Victoria Hugh Possingham The University of Queensland, Queensland Alister Robertson Charles Sturt University, New South Wales Keith Sainsbury CSIRO Marine Research, Tasmania John Tanzer Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Queensland Trevor Ward University of Western Australia, Western Australia iv CONGRESS SPONSORS Principal Sponsor Host Organisation Government Agency Sponsors Sponsors v CONTENTS Editors iii Organising Committees iv Congress Sponsors v Preface xiii THEME 1 Why Marine Protected Areas? Elliott A. Norse 1 Blame My Grandmother – She Said It Was Ok! John Harrison 10 Marine Protected Areas and Fishing Closures as Fisheries Management Tools Joanna Fisher, Paul Murphy and Wendy Craik 14 Giving up Fishing Ground To Reserves: The Costs and Benefits Trevor J. Ward 19 Western Australian Community-Initiated Fish Habitat Protection Areas Colin Chalmers 30 Is there a Place for Aquatic Protected Areas in the Management of Small Pelagic Fish in Coastal Waters? Daniel J. Gaughan 32 Where do Marine Protected Areas Fit Within an Ecologically Sustainable Development Framework? A Western Australian Perspective W. J. Fletcher 41 Aboriginal Cultural Sub-Regions as Surrogates for Biodiversity Mosaics in Cape York, Australia – Towards Reconciliation of Management Values and on-Ground Realities Chris Roberts and Arnold Wallis 49 Incorporating Terrestrial and Underwater Cultural Resources in Aquatic Protected Areas Management to Aid Community Development, Enhance Tourism and Facilitate Resource Stewardship Gail A. Vander Stoep 59 Marine Reserves: Time for a Global Perspective Dirk Zeller 70 Review of Generic No-Take Areas and Conventional Fishery Closure Systems and their Application to the Management of Tropical Fishery Resources Along North-Western Australia Stephen J. Newman, Glenn A. Hyndes, James W. Penn, Michael C. Mackie and Peter C. Stephenson 75 Law Reaches New Depths: The Endeavour Hydrothermal Vents Marine Protected Area David Leary 86 Balancing Native Fish Diversity, Exotic Fish Impacts, and Angling in New Zealand, North Island Dune Lakes David K. Rowe 96 vii CONTENTS Creating a National System of Marine Protected Areas – A Conservation Perspective Kate Davey 103 Issues, Especially Marine Protected Areas, that Affect the Australian Fishing Industry R. Pennington 106 THEME 2 Optimal Design of Individual Marine Protected Areas and MPA Systems Tundi Agardy 111 Broad-Scale Biodiversity Assessments For Marine Protected Areas in New South Wales, Australia D. A. Breen, R. P. Avery and N. M. Otway 120 A Framework for Systematic Marine Reserve Design in South Australia: A Case Study R. R. Stewart and H. P. Possingham 132 A First Step Toward Broad-Scale Identification of Freshwater Protected Areas for Pacific Salmon and Trout in Oregon, USA Kelly Burnett, Gordon Reeves, Dan Miller, Sharon Clarke, Kelly Christiansen and Ken Vance- Borland 144 Bioregional Frameworks for Assessments of Freshwater Biodiversity in Australia J. T. P. Tait, S. Choy, and R. Lawson 155 What does Larval Fish Biology Tell us about the Design and Efficacy of Marine Protected Areas? Jeffrey M. Leis 170 Metapopulation Structure of a Temperate Fish in Relation to Spatial Variation in Hydrodynamics: Implications for Selection of Marine Protected Areas Gregory P. Jenkins, Anthony J. Fowler and Kerry P. Black 181 Multiscale Decision Support for Aquatic Protected Area Placement Reg Watson 191 Declaration of Marine Protected Areas – The Case of the Balleny Islands Archipelago, Antarctica Jacqui Burgess, Emma Waterhouse, Alan D. Hemmings, and Peter Wilson 196 Designing Representative and Adequate MPAs in a Structured Environment Nicholas Bax and Alan Williams 203 Involving Fishers’ Data in Identifying, Selecting and Designing MPAs: An Illustration From Australia’s South-East Region Alan Williams and Nicholas Bax 212 What Features Matter when Designing Protected Areas for Fish in Beds of Seagrass: A Review Jane E. Jelbart and Pauline Ross 220 Establishing Marine Protected Areas in Vietnam: A Capacity-Building Approach James Hall and BUI Thi Thu Hien 229 viii CONTENTS Assessing the Importance of Coastal Habitats for Fisheries, Biodiversity and Marine Reserves: A New Approach Taking into Account “Habitat Mosaics” Greg A. Skilleter and Neil R. Loneragan 240 Role of Habitat Mapping in Marine Protected Area Planning – A Case Study in the Bruny Bioregion, Tasmania Alan Jordan and Neville Barrett 250 Use of a Temperate Reef-Fish Community to Identify Priorities in the Establishment of a Marine Protected Area Emanuel J. Gonçalves, Miguel Henriques and Vítor C. Almada 261 THEME 3 Success Factors in the Implementation and Management of Aquatic Protected Areas Billy D. Causey 275 Consultation with Indigenous Communities Regarding Fish Habitat Areas – The Cape York Peninsula Experience Rebecca Sheppard 285 Success Factors in Management of the Great Australian Bight Marine Park (South Australian and Federal Australian Waters) Ross Belcher 295 Restoration of Koaro (Galaxias Brevipinnis) in a New Zealand Lake – Integrating Traditional Indigenous Resource Management Practices with Contemporary Conservation Biology K. Young and S. Smale 302 Fish Habitat Area Network in Queensland, Australia – An Innovative Aquatic Protected Area Approach Scott McKinnon, Rebecca Sheppard and David Sully 313 User Fees at Bunaken Marine Park, Indonesia: Lessons in Developing Tourism-Related Financing Mechanisms for Marine Protected Areas Elizabeth A. Halpenny 323 Public Participation in New Zealand: The Effectiveness of Marine Reserve Advisory Committees Laani Uunila 328 Development, Outcomes and Future of an Area Closure Implemented by the Indigenous Communities of Northern Cape York Michael Phelan 339 Marine Protected Areas Generally Require Emphasis on Specific Objectives for Efficiency and Broad Community Acceptability Norman Halse 347 Community Engagement in the Establishment of Marine Protected Areas: An Australian Case Study Don Hough and Joan Phillips 352 ix CONTENTS Marine Protected Area in Republic Of Maldives Geoff Dews, Danielle-Louise Quinn and Aishath Hameed 359 Determining Reef Fish Abundance in Marine Protected Areas in the Northern Mariana Islands Michael S. Trianni 366 Establishing Marine Protected Areas in British Columbia: An NGO Perspective Sabine Jessen and Natalie Ban 377 Legal Framework and Enforcement Experience of Marine Protected Areas in Tasmania, New South Wales and Commonwealth Waters Warwick Gullett 388 THEME 4 Measuring Effectiveness in Marine Protected Areas – Principles and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Director of National Parks Annual Report 2012–13 © Director of National Parks 2013
    Director of National Parks Parks of National Director Annual ReportAnnual 2012–13 Director of National Parks Annual Report 2012–13 Managing the Australian Government’s protected areas © Director of National Parks 2013 ISSN 1443-1238 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process, re-used or redistributed without prior written permission from the Director of National Parks. Any permitted reproduction must acknowledge the source of any such material reproduced and include a copy of the original copyright notice. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and copyright should be addressed to: The Director of National Parks, PO Box 787, Canberra ACT 2601. Director of National Parks Australian business number: 13 051 694 963 Credits Front cover Maps – Environmental Resources Information Network Acacia alata photographed at the Australian National Botanic Gardens Designer – Papercut – David Woltschenko Editor – Byron Smith for Embellish Creative Sunrise at Booderee National Park, looking out to Bowen Island Indexer – Barry Howarth Little kingfisher, Kakadu National Park – Louise Denton Printed by – Union Offset Co. Pty Ltd Red crab, Christmas Island National Park Kakadu ranger Samantha Deegan with baby northern quoll Background image: sea urchin – Margarita Goumas Map data sources Collaborative Australian Protected Area Database, (CAPAD 2010), Commonwealth Marine Reserves:© Commonwealth of Australia, Department of the Environment, 2013 State and Territory Borders, Australian Waters: © Commonwealth of Australia, Geoscience Australia Caveat: All data presumed to be correct as received from data providers. No responsibility is taken by the Commonwealth for errors or omissions. The Commonwealth does not accept responsibility in respect to any information given in relation to, or as a consequence of anything contained herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding More About Marine Parks in South Australian Waters
    Understanding more about marine parks in South Australian waters An Educational Resource for Years 7 to 10 Department for Environment and Water Acknowledgements Understanding more This online curriculum-linked resource was produced by Angela from Angela about marine parks in Colliver Consulting Services. Contents South Australian waters Dr Shelley Paull from National Parks and Wildlife Service South Australia and Introduction 1 colleagues from Parks Australia assisted in the development of this resource. How to use this resource book 2 The curriculum-linked resource is A suggested learning methodology 3 designed to support teachers in schools Curriculum Connections 4 implement teaching and learning programs about marine parks in South Marine Parks 101 11 Australian waters. A suggested learning sequence 17 This work is licensed under a Creative Appendix 31 Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC 4.0) References 32 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Student Project Files 37 by-nc/4.0/ The Project File 38 Resource 1.1 Your Design Brief 39 Resource 1.2 Define 41 Under this licence you can share and Resource 1.2.1 Write a definition 42 adapt but must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the licence, Resource 1.2.2 Getting to know South Australia's marine parks 43 and indicate if changes were made. Resource 1.2.3 South Australia’s marine park zones 44 The material may not be used for commercial purposes. Resource 1.2.4 Our connections to places 45 The following statement must be used Resource 1.3 Discover 47 on any copy or adaptation of the Resource 1.3.1 Other people’s connections 49 material.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation Impact Statement
    1 CONTENTS 1. PROBLEM DEFINITION 3 1.1 Background to the problem 3 1.2 The problem 6 2 WHY GOVERNMENT ACTION IS NEEDED 7 3. POLICY OPTIONS FOR MANAGING AUSTRALIAN MARINE PARKS 8 3.1 Policy options 8 3.2 Comparison of policy options 12 4. BENEFITS AND COSTS OF THE POLICY OPTIONS 13 4.1 The four goals for establishing the marine parks 18 4.2 Social and economic outcomes (costs) 22 4.3 Compliance/regulatory costs 31 5. PROCESS USED TO DEVELOP MARINE PARKS POLICY OPTIONS 33 5.1 Option 1 33 5.2 Option 2 39 6 PREFERRED POLICY OPTION 40 7 IMPLEMENTATION AND REVIEW 41 7.1 Reviewing management arrangements 41 7.2 Involvement of stakeholders and partner agencies in the implementation and review of management plans 41 7.3 Next steps 42 APPENDIX A: DETAILED INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROCESSES USED TO DEVELOP THE POLICY OPTIONS 45 Processes informing Option 1 45 Processes informing Option 2 48 APPENDIX B: EXAMPLES OF CONSERVATION FEATURES AND SOCIO- ECONOMIC VALUES IN AUSTRALIAN MARINE PARKS 50 APPENDIX C: STATISTICS FOR AUSTRALIAN MARINE PARKS AND NETWORKS UNDER OPTIONS 1 AND 2—AREA AND NUMBER OF CONSERVATION FEATURES INCLUDED IN ZONES THAT OFFER A HIGH LEVEL OF PROTECTION, COMMERCIAL FISHERY DISPLACEMENT AND ACCESS FOR RECREATIONAL FISHERS 65 2 1. PROBLEM DEFINITION 1.1 Background to the problem According to Australia’s 2016 State of the environment report, Australia’s marine environment is generally in good condition, but is subject to a wide range of pressures.1 Several pressures that, in the past, have had substantial impacts on the marine environment (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • In Marine Protected Areas Authors
    Title: Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) in marine protected areas Authors: Renee Albrecht1,2, Carly N. Cook3, Olive Andrews4,5, Kelsey E. Roberts6,3, Martin F. J. Taylor7, Michael B. Mascia1, Rachel E. Golden Kroner1 Affiliations: 1 –Moore Center for Science, Conservation International, 2011 Crystal Drive, Suite 600, Arlington, VA 22202, USA 2 –Bren School of Environmental Science & Management, University of California - Santa Barbara, 2400 Bren Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA 3 –School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800 Australia 4 –Whaleology, 37 Hekerua Road, Oneroa, Auckland, New Zealand 5 –Conservation International, University of Auckland Building 302, Room 331, 23 Symonds Street, Auckland 1010, New Zealand 6 –School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, 145 Endeavor Hall Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA 7 –World Wildlife Fund-Australia, 4/340 Adelaide Street, Brisbane QLD 4179, Australia 1 Highlights ● Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) affects MPAs ● We documented patterns, trends, and causes of enacted and proposed PADDD in MPAs ● Widespread downgrading in Australia authorized commercial and recreation fishing ● Downgrades to the Coral Sea Marine Park constitute the largest PA downgrade to date ● Science and policy responses are required to safeguard MPAs in the long term Abstract Marine protected areas (MPAs) are foundational to global marine biodiversity conservation efforts. Recently, countries have rapidly scaled up their MPA networks to meet targets established by the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). While MPA networks are intended to permanently safeguard marine ecosystems, evidence points to widespread legal changes that temper, reduce, or eliminate protected areas, known as protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD).
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial and Marine Protected Areas in Australia
    TERRESTRIAL AND MARINE PROTECTED AREAS IN AUSTRALIA 2002 SUMMARY STATISTICS FROM THE COLLABORATIVE AUSTRALIAN PROTECTED AREAS DATABASE (CAPAD) Department of the Environment and Heritage, 2003 Published by: Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra. Citation: Environment Australia, 2003. Terrestrial and Marine Protected Areas in Australia: 2002 Summary Statistics from the Collaborative Australian Protected Areas Database (CAPAD), The Department of Environment and Heritage, Canberra. This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from Department of the Environment and Heritage. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: Assistant Secretary Parks Australia South Department of the Environment and Heritage GPO Box 787 Canberra ACT 2601. The views and opinions expressed in this document are not necessarily those of the Commonwealth of Australia, the Minister for Environment and Heritage, or the Director of National Parks. Copies of this publication are available from: National Reserve System National Reserve System Section Department of the Environment and Heritage GPO Box 787 Canberra ACT 2601 or online at http://www.deh.gov.au/parks/nrs/capad/index.html For further information: Phone: (02) 6274 1111 Acknowledgments: The editors would like to thank all those officers from State, Territory and Commonwealth agencies who assisted to help compile and action our requests for information and help. This assistance is highly appreciated and without it and the cooperation and help of policy, program and GIS staff from all agencies this publication would not have been possible. An additional huge thank you to Jason Passioura (ERIN, Department of the Environment and Heritage) for his assistance through the whole compilation process.
    [Show full text]
  • Bradford 2020 A14 Final Report Report.Pdf
    Final Report Russell W. Bradford, Dirk Holman, Toby A. Patterson, Paul J. Rogers Project A14 - Identification of near-shore habitats of juvenile white sharks in south- western Australia July 2020 Milestone 9 – Research Plan v5 (2019) Enquiries should be addressed to: Russell Bradford CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere. GPO Box 1538, Hobart, Tasmania Email: [email protected] | Phone: (03) 6232 5077 Project Leader’s Distribution List Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment PIRSA Fisheries and Aquaculture Keith Rowlings Department of Environment and Water, SA Simon Bryars Parks Australia Parks Australia Yalata Land Management Alessandro (Sandro) Madonna Preferred Citation Bradford RW, Holman D, Patterson TA, Rogers PJ. (2020). A14: Identification of near-shore habitats of juvenile white sharks in south-western Australia. Final Report to the National Environmental Science Program, Marine Biodiversity Hub. CSIRO, Hobart, Tasmania. Copyright This report is licensed by the University of Tasmania for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Australia Licence. For licence conditions, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Acknowledgement CSIRO, SARDI & DEW would like to acknowledge the Far West Coast peoples, the traditional owners of the land on which we conducted this research and pay our respects to their Elders past and present. This work was undertaken for the Marine Biodiversity Hub. This project was supported through funding from the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Program (NESP) and the Director of National Parks. NESP Marine Biodiversity Hub partners include the University of Tasmania; CSIRO, Geoscience Australia, Australian Institute of Marine Science, Museums Victoria, Charles Darwin University, the University of Western Australia, Integrated Marine Observing System, NSW Office of Environment and Heritage, NSW Department of Primary Industries.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Framework for Protected Areas: Australia
    Legal Framework for Protected Areas: Australia Ben Boer* Stefan Gruber** Information concerning the legal instruments discussed in this case study is current as of 6 May 2010 * Professor Emeritus, Australian Centre for Climate and Environmental Law, Faculty of Law, University of Sydney. ** PhD candidate, Australian Centre for Climate and Environmental Law, Faculty of Law, University of Sydney; legal practitioner, Chamber of Lawyers Frankfurt am Main, Germany. The authors are grateful for the comments of Dr Graeme Worboys and Professor Rob Fowler on this case study. 1 Australia Abstract The Australian continent, together with its islands and marine areas, manifests high levels of biodiversity. It has a comprehensive and globally recognized legislative and policy regime for terrestrial and marine protected areas. Despite this generally innovative scheme, Australia continues to suffer from significant loss of its biodiversity. This case study sets out the Australian legislative framework, policy and principles of protected areas legislation and management at the federal level. It focuses primarily on the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth) and the regulations made thereunder. Attention is also given to the new concept of connectivity conservation and its implementation in Australia. The pertinent aspects of the 2009 review of the Act, and especially its recommendations on protected areas, are canvassed. The case study also briefly deals with the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Act 1975 (Commonwealth) and the Commonwealth legislation concerning the Antarctic. The various forms of terrestrial and marine protected areas and their legal frameworks are outlined, along with their establishment, planning, management and enforcement regimes. IUCN-EPLP No.
    [Show full text]
  • D18 1294700 2018-2600 Our Marine Parks Draft Grant Opportunity
    Fisheries Assistance and User Engagement Package – Our Marine Parks Round One Grant Opportunity Guidelines Opening date: 14 February 2019 Closing date and time: 2.00PM AEDT on 12 March 2019 Commonwealth policy Department of the Environment and Energy entity: Administering entity Community Grants Hub Enquiries: If you have any questions, contact Community Grants Hub Phone: 1800 020 283 Email: [email protected] Questions should be sent no later than 5/03/2019 Date guidelines released: 14/2/2019 Type of grant opportunity: Targeted competitive Contents 1. Our Marine Parks Round One Grant Opportunity processes ................................................ 4 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 5 2. About the Fisheries Assistance and User Engagement Package ......................................... 5 2.1 About the Our Marine Parks Grant Round One opportunity ............................................ 6 3. Grant amount and grant period ................................................................................................. 7 3.1 Grants available ............................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Project period ................................................................................................................... 7 4. Eligibility criteria ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Plan Appendix 3-1 Relevant Persons Consultation Report
    Environment plan Appendix 3-1 Relevant persons consultation report Stromlo-1 exploration drilling program Equinor Australia B.V. Level 15 123 St Georges Terrace PERTH WA 6000 Australia Rev 1, April 2019 www.equinor.com.au Environment plan Appendix 3-1 Stromlo-1 exploration drilling program Table of contents Page Regulatory requirements ......................................................................................... 1 List of relevant persons ........................................................................................... 3 Relevant person feedback, assessment of merit and Equinor responses ............. 10 Government departments and agencies – general .......................................................................... 12 Commonwealth Australian Antarctic Division (AAD) (DoEE) ........................................... 12 Commonwealth Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA) ......................................... 13 Department of Agriculture and Water Resources (DAWR) .............................................. 15 Commonwealth Department of Defence (DoD) – Australian Hydrographic Office and Directorate of Property Acquisition, Mining and Native Title ............................................ 16 Commonwealth Department of Industry, Innovation and Science (DIIS) ......................... 17 Commonwealth Director of National Parks ....................................................................... 18 Commonwealth Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC) .................. 21 Commonwealth
    [Show full text]
  • Draft South-West Commonwealth Marine Reserves Network Management Plan 2017, Director of National Parks, Canberra
    © Director of National Parks 2017 This document may be cited as: Director of National Parks 2017, Draft South-west Commonwealth Marine Reserves Network Management Plan 2017, Director of National Parks, Canberra. ISBN: This management plan is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Director of National Parks. Requests and enquires concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the: Manager South-west Marine Parks Network 203 Channel Highway Hobart TAS 7050 Photography credits Front cover Nudibranch (Parks Australia) DRAFT South-west Commonwealth Marine Reserves Network Management Plan 2017 1 FOREWORD Australia is surrounded by magnificent oceans and a marine environment that is the envy of the world. Our oceans are distinctive and diverse, home to marine life found nowhere else. Our oceans support people’s livelihoods and the Australian lifestyle. They provide places for people to watch wildlife, dive and snorkel, go boating and fish. Importantly, they create jobs in industries like fishing and tourism, and are a source of food and energy. Establishing marine parks is recognised as one of the best ways to conserve and protect marine species and habitats. In 2012, the Australian Government established 40 new marine parks around the country (formally called Commonwealth marine reserves). This was a significant achievement, expanding the total coverage of Australia’s National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas to 3.3 million km2—some 36 per cent of our oceans. Individual marine parks have been carefully located to include representative examples of Australia’s marine habitats and features.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth Marine Reserves Draft Plans 2017
    Associate Professor Will Figueira President, AMSA [email protected] 20 September, 2017 Ms Sally Barnes Director of National Parks Department of the Environment and Energy Dear Ms Barnes, RE: Comments on the Commonwealth Marine Reserves Draft Plans 2017 On behalf of members of the Australian Marine Sciences Association (AMSA), I am pleased to provide comments on the Draft Management Plans for Australia’s Marine Parks. AMSA represents Australian marine scientists from academia, industry, and government and engages in public policy discussion where we have specialist knowledge. Founded in 1963, the organisation has grown into Australia’s largest organisation for marine scientists; representing approximately 700 professional marine scientists across all Australian states and territories. In order to provide the most comprehensive, and specific, comments for this submission we asked our State Branches to conduct open, roundtable, discussions with their members. The following comments are science- based, with reference to peer-reviewed articles where possible, or follow general scientific principles as they apply to the International Union for the Conservation of Nature. AMSA welcomes that draft management plans were released for comment, and agrees with some of the newly proposed zoning, However, AMSA objects strongly to the substantial reduction in the area of highly protected zones, and to the vagueness in management regulations and transparency. The draft management plans indicate a deviation from science-based conservation planning, and risks missing the objectives of achieving biodiversity conservation. AMSA highly recommends a revision of the management plans following CAR principles. Below we outline our major issues with the current draft plan and also make comments relevant to specific Regions and Parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Director of National Parks Annual Report 2012–13
    2 Corporate overview and financial summary The Minister The Director of National Parks Statutory functions Non-statutory functions Financial summary Overview of the Director of National Parks’ responsibilities Joint management of nationally significant protected areas Protecting unique island ecosystems Calperum and Taylorville Stations Protecting the marine environment Understanding and studying Australia’s biodiversity Planning for the IUCN World Parks Congress Australia’s National Landscapes Case study: An historic moment Case study: Proclaiming the world’s biggest system of marine reserves Case study: Getting fire fit at Booderee Case study: Innovation at Australia’s top tourism attraction Case Study: Giving our plants a future Case Study: Bush Blitz—Species discovery — inspiring school kids and their teachers A blue-banded bee found during the Hiltaba Bush Blitz in South Australia. The Minister During 2012–13 the Hon. Tony Burke MP continued as the Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, with responsibility for the Director of National Parks. The Minister’s responsibilities in relation to the Director include assessing proposals for establishing Commonwealth reserves and conservation zones under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999; approving management plans for Commonwealth reserves; establishing and appointing members to boards of management for Commonwealth reserves jointly managed with Aboriginal owners; resolving disputes between the Director and 2 boards of management; and approving Commonwealth reserve use fees and other charges. 2 During 2012–13 the Minister: • announced the world’s biggest network of marine reserves in November 2012. Today Commonwealth marine reserves protect more than 2.8 million square kilometres of ocean environment, a major achievement for the long-term conservation and sustainable use of Australia’s oceans.
    [Show full text]