DOCSLIB.ORG

Chaco's Place in the Formalized Landscape.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chaco's Place in the Formalized Landscape.Pdf CHACO’S PLACE IN THE FORMALIZED LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND SURVEYING OF LARGE SCALE GEOMETRIES AS Hopi ceremonial instrument RITUAL PRACTICE DENNIS DOXTATER - UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA Biographic Note The author is a licensed architect with professional academic and practice experience in architecture and landscape architecture. A professional Bachelor of Architecture is from the University of Washington, Seattle, with a M.A. in Socio-Cultural Anthropology at the same institution. A Doctor of Architecture comes from an interdisciplinary program at the University of Michigan. Present status is Professor Emeritus in the College of Architecture, Planning and Landscape Architecture at the University of Arizona. The ancestral Doxtater name is Oneida Indian. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 READING THIS BOOK FROM DIFFERENT BACKGROUNDS 3 Social organization 3 Introducing probability comparisons between existing and random patterns 4 “Reading” the design analyses 6 A note to archaeologists 9 1. Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Formalized Large Scale Ritual 11 Frameworks in the Landscape Shamanistic use of “web” structures in the landscape 11 Ritually used cross frameworks in the larger landscape 26 Archaeological interpretations of the interim between shamanistic and 32 historic landscapes Possible origins of ritual landscape cross structures on the Southern Colorado 39 Plateau 2. Probability Comparisons: Alignment Involvement of Great Kiva 51 Locations Existing literature on random comparisons 51 Influence of large scale natural topography on alignments 52 Natural features used in the analysis 57 Locations of great kiva sites 58 Comparing BMIII/PI and PII/PIII 70 3. A Surveyed East Meridian and First Triadic Structure of Chaco 79 The first built ceremonial site as mediator of a large scale bipolar line 84 Intercardinal axes and a triadic ritual definition in Chaco Canyon 86 Great kiva linkage to the landscape: “villages” in the West 93 PROBABILITY TEST: THE MOUNT WILSON MERIDIAN 97 4. Formalizing the “West” and a Triadic Plateau Frame 106 Kiva Mesa – Broken Flute Cave 106 A second axis from Sipapu: Butler Wash Main Panel – Lowry 109 The Ganado Cross as more defined southern pole in the West 115 A Ship Rock mediator between West and East 117 Later Lowry and Village of the Great Kivas: an introduction to major 120 changes at Chaco PROBABILITY TEST: THE “FAN” PATTERN OF LINES FROM THE SIPAPU 126 5. “East” Communities and Integration with the Triadic Chaco Focus 132 PROBABILITY TEST: LOCATIONS OF PI GREAT KIVAS AND THEIR 138 ALIGNED RELATIONSHIP TO THE GREATER LANDSCAPE AND EARLY TRIADIC CHACO Early alignments not involved in the Chaco focus 145 REVISED TRIADIC EXPRESSION OF CHACO/CURVED ROCK THAT 147 SPEAKS New meaning to Curved Rock That Speaks/Pueblo Bonito: A Lizard Head 152 meridian 6. The Lizard Head Meridian: Framing the Large Scale Foundation 156 for Formalized Great Houses in Chaco Establishing the Lizard Head meridian 158 The search for natural cross axes congruent with the new meridian: Chaco East X 160 Adjusting the original Chaco triangle to create Chaco West X 165 Axial unification and bringing power to the Curved Rock That Speaks 170 Canyon survey points and lines as framework for major great kivas and houses 174 7. Locating New Great Houses / Casa Rincoñada and Orienting 175 Monumental Walls An architectural history perspective on “monumental” great houses 175 Architecturalization of the meridian: Pueblo Alto and Tsin Kletsin 180 Hungo Pavi as “Keeper of Chaco East X”: symbolically understanding early great 183 walls Pueblo del Arroyo and Chetro Ketl: terminating the axes of West Chaco X 187 Meanings of Peñasco Blanco and Una Vida additions 190 Formal integration of Casa Rincoñada, New Alto and Pueblo Bonito 193 PROBABILITY TEST: GREAT HOUSE WALLS AS ASTRONOMY OR 200 LANDSCAPE INTEGRATION? NOT YET A TEMPLE 205 8. The Plateau Frame Beyond Chaco 208 “OUTLIERS” Kin Ya’a and Muddy Water 208 Standing Rock 213 EXTENSION OF THE WILSON MERIDIAN Cerro Moctezuma and Paquime 216 Replicating the Chaco landscape/architecture scheme at Aztec 218 Aztec West X and its great house emulation of Chaco West X 223 The Great North Road as ritual integrator of Aztec and Chaco 228 9. Toward an Anthropology of Prehistoric Landscape/Architecture 239 Design ANCESTRAL PUEBLO EVOLUTION OF FORMALIZED LANDSCAPE RELIGION The religious effect of alignments among or with prominent natural features 240 Formalization of a triadic ritual framework across a likely previously shamanistic 242 plateau Lizard Head meridian and Curved Rock That Speaks 243 The move to Aztec 247 The great north road as design/surveying evidence 249 Territorialization of landscape ritual and formality 250 Adding a design dimension to cultural anthropology 254 A SUMMARY OF PROBABILITY TESTING OF POSSIBLE DESIGN PATTERNS 255 Simple three-point alignments among a total group of great kiva sites 256 Testing the Mount Wilson meridian complex 257 Testing the “fan” pattern of lines from the Sipapu 258 Symbolic “great walls”: comparing probabilities of astronomical with landscape 259 meaning FUTURE RESEARCH 260 Appendix I: Computer Applications as Essential Design Analysis Tools 262 Geopatterns 2 264 Geopatterns 3 270 Appendix II: Prehistoric Surveying 273 A field exercise aligning an interim point between two visible end points 275 Simulating a line survey between Humphrey’s Peak and Blanca Peak 278 List of Three – Point Alignment Accuracies Described in the Analyses 285 References Cited 289 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS 1. Butler Wash panel detail. 12 2. Numic and Yuman spiderweb of landscape features and connecting trails. 13 3. Spatial layout of Isoma ritual. 14 4. “Cosmic” structure of shamanistic Warao landscape. 15 5. Symbolic structure of the Warao roundhouse. 18 6. Oppositional structures of the Navajo cosmos. 21 7. Symbolic meanings of the Navajo Hogan. 23 8. Formal graphic diagram of quartets of natural ritual foci in the Tewa landscape 27 9. Graphically formal diagram of “local cosmology” of the Keres Pueblos. 28 10. Dualistically structured “villagescape” around 14th century Rio Grande pueblo. 29 11. Triaxial ritual structure of Hopi landscape and ceremonial cycle. 30 12. Most coincidentally accurate three-point alignment of natural features; possible 40 early line to Comb Ridge; relation of alignments to Canyon de Chelly. 13. “Sipapu” as junction of the Little Colorado and Colorado Rivers in the Grand 42 Canyon. 14. Highest mountains other most prominent natural features in the Ancestral Pueblo 44 region. 15. Two coincidental crosses formed by prominent natural features: De Chelly X and 46 Kin Bineola X. 16. Comb Ridge natural north-south “axis mundi”. 47 17. Butler Wash Main Panel rock art. 49 _________________________________________________________________________ 18. Location of 61 Basketmaker III – Pueblo III great kiva sites plus 21 most 53 significant natural features on the Southern Colorado Plateau. 19. Thirteen random point areas in Chaco Canyon to test the influence of smaller 54 scale linear features on alignment numbers. 20. Examples of most prominent natural features in the Ancestral Pueblo landscape. 59 21. Locations of the most prominent natural features used in the analysis. 60 22. Great kiva images from Google Earth. 61 23. Location of test area in which all 61 existing great kiva sites occur, and in which 67 100 sets of equivalent numbers of random points are scattered. 24. Probability relationship between random and designed alignments. 68 25. Box and whisker plots for tests of random alignments at ten accuracies. 69 26. Number of involved alignments for each site, natural and built, during early and 71 late periods. 27. Box and whisker plots for alignments created in 100 sets of 34 random points at 72 four accuracies, compared to the number of alignments among 34 early great kiva points. 28. Comparisons of early and late great kiva groups in combination and individually. 73 29. Comparisons of numbers of alignments in the existing 34 and 27 groups taken 74 independently w/o natural features. 30. Map comparison of existing early group alignments with highest random set of 75 34 points each of 100 sets at an accuracy of 0.075°. 31. Map comparison of total existing alignments with highest random set of 61 points 76 each of 100 sets. __________________________________________________________________________ 32. Coincidental natural cardinal alignment between Abajo Peak, El Diente and 80 Mount Wilson. 33. Simulation of required survey station points in cardinal north-south line from 83 Mount Wilson to McCarty’s Flow. 34. Photo of McCarty’s Flow, most recent volcanic event in the Zuni-Bandera field. 84 35. Chaco Canyon intersection of MountWilson – McCarty’s Flow axis and the 85 Sipapu “sunray” to Mount Chicoma and Truchas Peak. 36. Chimney Rock natural feature and associated later PII Chacoan “outlier” great 87 kiva and great house. 37. Most precise coincidental triaxial intersection point on the plateau adjacent to 88 later major Chacoan great kiva and house, Kin Bineola. 38. Hypothetical unification of MountWilson meridian, natural amphitheater and 89 most precise triaxial intersection point on plateau at Kin Bineola. 39. Location of “Curved Rock That Speaks” natural amphitheater with respect to 90 29SJ423 – Shabik’eschee line. 40. Plan of Shabik’eschee Basketmaker III village in Chaco Canyon. 91 41. Location of early great kiva sites and possible rock art evidence of early large- 94 scale ritual. 42. Coincidental natural and built features cardinally associated with Mount Wilson: 101 best two comparable patterns from 100,000 random sets. 43. Alternative test areas for Mount Wilson meridian pattern. 102 ____________________________________________________________________________ 44. Kiva Mesa BMIII great kiva site in large scale context with possible other early 108 ritual foci. 45. Technical drawing of “Main Panel” at Butler Wash: precise alignment with Sipapu 110 and Lowry great kiva. 46. Location of Rincon “great kiva” at the topographic tip of Comb Ridge with respect 112 to the Sipapu – Lowry line and the Main Panel at Butler Wash. 47. Location of Bluff great kiva and great house: relation to Sipapu – Lowry line.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wilderness Visitors and Recreation Impacts: Baseline Data Available for Twentieth Century Conditions
    United States Department of Agriculture Wilderness Visitors and Forest Service Recreation Impacts: Baseline Rocky Mountain Research Station Data Available for Twentieth General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-117 Century Conditions September 2003 David N. Cole Vita Wright Abstract __________________________________________ Cole, David N.; Wright, Vita. 2003. Wilderness visitors and recreation impacts: baseline data available for twentieth century conditions. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-117. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 52 p. This report provides an assessment and compilation of recreation-related monitoring data sources across the National Wilderness Preservation System (NWPS). Telephone interviews with managers of all units of the NWPS and a literature search were conducted to locate studies that provide campsite impact data, trail impact data, and information about visitor characteristics. Of the 628 wildernesses that comprised the NWPS in January 2000, 51 percent had baseline campsite data, 9 percent had trail condition data and 24 percent had data on visitor characteristics. Wildernesses managed by the Forest Service and National Park Service were much more likely to have data than wildernesses managed by the Bureau of Land Management and Fish and Wildlife Service. Both unpublished data collected by the management agencies and data published in reports are included. Extensive appendices provide detailed information about available data for every study that we located. These have been organized by wilderness so that it is easy to locate all the information available for each wilderness in the NWPS. Keywords: campsite condition, monitoring, National Wilderness Preservation System, trail condition, visitor characteristics The Authors _______________________________________ David N.
    [Show full text]
  • General Vertical Files Anderson Reading Room Center for Southwest Research Zimmerman Library
    “A” – biographical Abiquiu, NM GUIDE TO THE GENERAL VERTICAL FILES ANDERSON READING ROOM CENTER FOR SOUTHWEST RESEARCH ZIMMERMAN LIBRARY (See UNM Archives Vertical Files http://rmoa.unm.edu/docviewer.php?docId=nmuunmverticalfiles.xml) FOLDER HEADINGS “A” – biographical Alpha folders contain clippings about various misc. individuals, artists, writers, etc, whose names begin with “A.” Alpha folders exist for most letters of the alphabet. Abbey, Edward – author Abeita, Jim – artist – Navajo Abell, Bertha M. – first Anglo born near Albuquerque Abeyta / Abeita – biographical information of people with this surname Abeyta, Tony – painter - Navajo Abiquiu, NM – General – Catholic – Christ in the Desert Monastery – Dam and Reservoir Abo Pass - history. See also Salinas National Monument Abousleman – biographical information of people with this surname Afghanistan War – NM – See also Iraq War Abousleman – biographical information of people with this surname Abrams, Jonathan – art collector Abreu, Margaret Silva – author: Hispanic, folklore, foods Abruzzo, Ben – balloonist. See also Ballooning, Albuquerque Balloon Fiesta Acequias – ditches (canoas, ground wáter, surface wáter, puming, water rights (See also Land Grants; Rio Grande Valley; Water; and Santa Fe - Acequia Madre) Acequias – Albuquerque, map 2005-2006 – ditch system in city Acequias – Colorado (San Luis) Ackerman, Mae N. – Masonic leader Acoma Pueblo - Sky City. See also Indian gaming. See also Pueblos – General; and Onate, Juan de Acuff, Mark – newspaper editor – NM Independent and
    [Show full text]
  • Apr 3 0 1958 Library
    RB5IOHAL GRAVTJIT SURVEY OF THE CARRIZO MOUNTAINS AREA, ARIZONA AHD HEW MEXICO By Donald Plouff APR 3 0 1958 LIBRARY U. S. Geological Survey Released to open file May 8, 1958. 42821 This report has not "been edited or evieved for conformity to Geological Survey standards or nomenclature. Contents Page Abstract - . ».-.-. ... ............... ...... ,-. 3 Introduction -- --- - - .« « -.-.-----«- -.- k Asknovledgments ».« £»- -.» »-. -. « -. -.-...-.»-».»«o. 5 Geology » . - . 5 Gfcrfiral - - ............... «... ... 5 Preeambrian roeks -» . » . .. - 6 IVe-Permian sedimentary rocks «> ----- - .- 9 Permian and younger sedimentary rocks -- « 11 Igneous rocks « 12 Sills and laccoliths > 12 Plugs and dikes - - 13 Structure - - - 15 Field survey - - « - 1? Station location - - 1? Equipment « - ...... - . 17 Elevation control - - - . --. .- .- 18 Gravity measurement - .-- ----- 19 Reduction of data - - - - - 21 Interpretation -« - - 22 References - - -- --- 27 42821 Illustrations Main ref. on Page Figure 1. Index map showing location and structural setting of the Carrizo Mountains area, Arizona and New Mexico -- -- -»- 4 2. Generalized geologic map of the Carrizo Mountains area, Arizona and New Mexico ..» - 6 3- Gravity and geologic profiles along line A-A1 / showing known and inferred intrusives and hypothetical relations at depth - - - . .... 12 k. Dlagramm. trie section of Ship Rock diatreme and *>^ hypothetical extension to depth - - 1J 5. Bouguer gravity anomaly map of the Carrizo Mountains area, Arizona and New Mexico 19 All illustrations are at end of text. Tables Table 1. Generalized section of the sedimentary rocks in the Carrizo Mountains area 10 2. Principal facts for gravity base stations of the Carrizo Mountains area, Arizona and Mexico -- .-* 20 REGIONAL GRAVITY SURVEY1 OF THE CARRIZO MOUNTAINS AREA, ARIZONA AKP KEW MEXICO By Donald Plouff Abstract A total of 570 gravity stations were established within an area of about 1,000 square miles south of the common corner of Colorado, Utah, Arizona, and ffew Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: a Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators
    USDA United States Department of Agriculture Research Natural Areas on Forest Service National Forest System Lands Rocky Mountain Research Station in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, General Technical Report RMRS-CTR-69 Utah, and Western Wyoming: February 2001 A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and E'ducators Angela G. Evenden Melinda Moeur J. Stephen Shelly Shannon F. Kimball Charles A. Wellner Abstract Evenden, Angela G.; Moeur, Melinda; Shelly, J. Stephen; Kimball, Shannon F.; Wellner, Charles A. 2001. Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-69. Ogden, UT: U.S. Departmentof Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 84 p. This guidebook is intended to familiarize land resource managers, scientists, educators, and others with Research Natural Areas (RNAs) managed by the USDA Forest Service in the Northern Rocky Mountains and lntermountain West. This guidebook facilitates broader recognitionand use of these valuable natural areas by describing the RNA network, past and current research and monitoring, management, and how to use RNAs. About The Authors Angela G. Evenden is biological inventory and monitoring project leader with the National Park Service -NorthernColorado Plateau Network in Moab, UT. She was formerly the Natural Areas Program Manager for the Rocky Mountain Research Station, Northern Region and lntermountain Region of the USDA Forest Service. Melinda Moeur is Research Forester with the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain ResearchStation in Moscow, ID, and one of four Research Natural Areas Coordinators from the Rocky Mountain Research Station. J. Stephen Shelly is Regional Botanist and Research Natural Areas Coordinator with the USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Headquarters Office in Missoula, MT.
    [Show full text]
  • Subgrid Variability of Snow Water Equivalent at Operational Snow Stations in the Western USA
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES Hydrol. Process. 27, 2383–2400 (2013) Published online 24 May 2012 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9355 Subgrid variability of snow water equivalent at operational snow stations in the western USA Leah Meromy,1* Noah P. Molotch,1,2 Timothy E. Link,3 Steven R. Fassnacht4 and Robert Rice5 1 Department of Geography, Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA 2 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA 3 Department of Forest Ecology and Biogeosciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA 4 ESS – Watershed Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA 5 Sierra Nevada Research Institute, University of California at Merced, Merced, CA, USA Abstract: The spatial distribution of snow water equivalent (SWE) is a key variable in many regional-scale land surface models. Currently, the assimilation of point-scale snow sensor data into these models is commonly performed without consideration of the spatial representativeness of the point data with respect to the model grid-scale SWE. To improve the understanding of the relationship between point-scale snow measurements and surrounding areas, we characterized the spatial distribution of snow depth and SWE within 1-, 4- and 16-km2 grids surrounding 15 snow stations (snowpack telemetry and California snow sensors) in California, Colorado, Wyoming, Idaho and Oregon during the 2008 and 2009 snow seasons. More than 30 000 field observations of snowpack properties were used with binary regression tree models to relate SWE at the sensor site to the surrounding area SWE to evaluate the sensor representativeness of larger-scale conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Primary Architecture of the Chacoan Culture
    9 The Primary Architecture of the Chacoan Culture A Cosmological Expression Anna Sofaer TUDIES BY THE SOLSTICE PROJECT indicate that the solar-and-lunar regional pattern that is symmetri- Smajor buildings of the ancient Chacoan culture cally ordered about Chaco Canyon’s central com- of New Mexico contain solar and lunar cosmology plex of large ceremonial buildings (Sofaer, Sinclair, in three separate articulations: their orientations, and Williams 1987). These findings suggest a cos- internal geometry, and geographic interrelation- mological purpose motivating and directing the ships were developed in relationship to the cycles construction and the orientation, internal geome- of the sun and moon. try, and interrelationships of the primary Chacoan From approximately 900 to 1130, the Chacoan architecture. society, a prehistoric Pueblo culture, constructed This essay presents a synthesis of the results of numerous multistoried buildings and extensive several studies by the Solstice Project between 1984 roads throughout the eighty thousand square kilo- and 1997 and hypotheses about the conceptual meters of the arid San Juan Basin of northwestern and symbolic meaning of the Chacoan astronomi- New Mexico (Cordell 1984; Lekson et al. 1988; cal achievements. For certain details of Solstice Pro- Marshall et al. 1979; Vivian 1990) (Figure 9.1). ject studies, the reader is referred to several earlier Evidence suggests that expressions of the Chacoan published papers.1 culture extended over a region two to four times the size of the San Juan Basin (Fowler and Stein Background 1992; Lekson et al. 1988). Chaco Canyon, where most of the largest buildings were constructed, was The Chacoan buildings were of a huge scale and the center of the culture (Figures 9.2 and 9.3).
    [Show full text]
  • LIZARD HEAD WILDERNESS Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests San Juan National Forest
    LIZARD HEAD WILDERNESS Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests San Juan National Forest The following acts are prohibited on National Forest System lands within the Lizard Head Wilderness on the Norwood Ranger District of the Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests and on the Mancos - Dolores Ranger District of the San Juan National Forest 1. Entering or being in the restricted area with more than 15 people per group, with a maximum combination of people and stock not to exceed 25 per group. 36 CFR 261.58(f) 2. Building, maintaining or using a fire, campfire, or wood-burning stove fire: a) Within one hundred (100) feet of any lake, stream or National Forest System Trail. b) Above tree line. c) Within Navajo Basin of the restricted area (as depicted on Exhibit A; and at T.41N.,R.10W NMPM, portions of Sections 4,5,6; T.41N,R.11W NMPM, a portion of Section 1; and T42N R10W NMPM, portions of Section 31, 32, 33.). 36 CFR 261.52(a) 3. Storing equipment, personal property, or supplies for longer than three (3) days. 36 CFR 261.57 (f) 4. Hitching, tethering, hobbling or otherwise confining a horse or other saddle or pack animal: 1) in violation of posted instructions, or 2) within 100 feet of all lakes, streams, and National Forest System Trails. Pursuant to 36 CFR 261.51, this Order shall also constitute posted instructions. 36 CFR 261.58 (aa). 5. Possessing a dog that is a) not under control, or that is disturbing or damaging wildlife, people or property.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Arizona History Index, M
    Index to the Journal of Arizona History, M Arizona Historical Society, [email protected] 480-387-5355 NOTE: the index includes two citation formats. The format for Volumes 1-5 is: volume (issue): page number(s) The format for Volumes 6 -54 is: volume: page number(s) M McAdams, Cliff, book by, reviewed 26:242 McAdoo, Ellen W. 43:225 McAdoo, W. C. 18:194 McAdoo, William 36:52; 39:225; 43:225 McAhren, Ben 19:353 McAlister, M. J. 26:430 McAllester, David E., book coedited by, reviewed 20:144-46 McAllester, David P., book coedited by, reviewed 45:120 McAllister, James P. 49:4-6 McAllister, R. Burnell 43:51 McAllister, R. S. 43:47 McAllister, S. W. 8:171 n. 2 McAlpine, Tom 10:190 McAndrew, John “Boots”, photo of 36:288 McAnich, Fred, book reviewed by 49:74-75 books reviewed by 43:95-97 1 Index to the Journal of Arizona History, M Arizona Historical Society, [email protected] 480-387-5355 McArtan, Neill, develops Pastime Park 31:20-22 death of 31:36-37 photo of 31:21 McArthur, Arthur 10:20 McArthur, Charles H. 21:171-72, 178; 33:277 photos 21:177, 180 McArthur, Douglas 38:278 McArthur, Lorraine (daughter), photo of 34:428 McArthur, Lorraine (mother), photo of 34:428 McArthur, Louise, photo of 34:428 McArthur, Perry 43:349 McArthur, Warren, photo of 34:428 McArthur, Warren, Jr. 33:276 article by and about 21:171-88 photos 21:174-75, 177, 180, 187 McAuley, (Mother Superior) Mary Catherine 39:264, 265, 285 McAuley, Skeet, book by, reviewed 31:438 McAuliffe, Helen W.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 SSSA Program
    Latinos and the Change of a Nation: Implications for the Social Sciences 95th Annual Meeting of the Southwestern Social Science Association April 8 – 11, 2015 Grand Hyatt, Denver Denver, Colorado 1 SSSA Events Time Location Wednesday April 8 Registration & Exhibits 2:00 - 5:00 p.m. Imperial Ballroom SSSA Executive Committee 3:00 - 5:00 p.m. Mount Harvard Nominations Committee Meeting 1 4:00 – 5:30 pm Mount Yale Thursday April 9 Registration & Exhibits 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. Imperial Ballroom Nominations Committee 8:30 - 9:45 a.m. Mount Harvard Membership Committee 8:30 - 9:45 a.m. Mount Yale Budget and Financial Policies Committee 8:30 - 9:45 a.m. Mount Oxford Resolutions Committee 10:00 - 11:15 a.m. Mount Harvard Editorial Policies Committee 10:00 - 11:15 a.m. Mount Oxford Site Policy Committee 10:00 - 11:15 a.m. Mount Yale SSSA Council 1:00 - 3:45 p.m. Mount Oxford SSSA Presidential Address 4:00 - 5:15 p.m. Mount Sopris B SSSA Presidential Reception 5:30 - 7:30 p.m. Mount Evans Friday April 10 Registration & Exhibits 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. Imperial Ballroom SSSA Student Social & Welcome Continental 7:15 – 8:45 a.m. Grand Ballroom Breakfast (FOR REGISTERED STUDENTS ONLY, No Guests or Faculty/Professional Members) SSSA General Business Meeting 1:00 - 2:15 p.m. Grand Ballroom Saturday April 11 Registration 8:00 – 11:00 am Imperial Ballroom 2016 Program Committee 7:15 - 8:30 a.m. Pike’s Peak Getting to Know SSSA 8:30 – 9:15 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Fourteeners Checklist
    Colorado Fourteeners Checklist Rank Mountain Peak Mountain Range Elevation Date Climbed 1 Mount Elbert Sawatch Range 14,440 ft 2 Mount Massive Sawatch Range 14,428 ft 3 Mount Harvard Sawatch Range 14,421 ft 4 Blanca Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,351 ft 5 La Plata Peak Sawatch Range 14,343 ft 6 Uncompahgre Peak San Juan Mountains 14,321 ft 7 Crestone Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,300 ft 8 Mount Lincoln Mosquito Range 14,293 ft 9 Castle Peak Elk Mountains 14,279 ft 10 Grays Peak Front Range 14,278 ft 11 Mount Antero Sawatch Range 14,276 ft 12 Torreys Peak Front Range 14,275 ft 13 Quandary Peak Mosquito Range 14,271 ft 14 Mount Evans Front Range 14,271 ft 15 Longs Peak Front Range 14,259 ft 16 Mount Wilson San Miguel Mountains 14,252 ft 17 Mount Shavano Sawatch Range 14,231 ft 18 Mount Princeton Sawatch Range 14,204 ft 19 Mount Belford Sawatch Range 14,203 ft 20 Crestone Needle Sangre de Cristo Range 14,203 ft 21 Mount Yale Sawatch Range 14,200 ft 22 Mount Bross Mosquito Range 14,178 ft 23 Kit Carson Mountain Sangre de Cristo Range 14,171 ft 24 Maroon Peak Elk Mountains 14,163 ft 25 Tabeguache Peak Sawatch Range 14,162 ft 26 Mount Oxford Collegiate Peaks 14,160 ft 27 Mount Sneffels Sneffels Range 14,158 ft 28 Mount Democrat Mosquito Range 14,155 ft 29 Capitol Peak Elk Mountains 14,137 ft 30 Pikes Peak Front Range 14,115 ft 31 Snowmass Mountain Elk Mountains 14,099 ft 32 Windom Peak Needle Mountains 14,093 ft 33 Mount Eolus San Juan Mountains 14,090 ft 34 Challenger Point Sangre de Cristo Range 14,087 ft 35 Mount Columbia Sawatch Range
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    20_574310 bindex.qxd 1/28/05 12:00 AM Page 460 Index Arapahoe Basin, 68, 292 Auto racing A AA (American Automo- Arapaho National Forest, Colorado Springs, 175 bile Association), 54 286 Denver, 122 Accommodations, 27, 38–40 Arapaho National Fort Morgan, 237 best, 9–10 Recreation Area, 286 Pueblo, 437 Active sports and recre- Arapaho-Roosevelt National Avery House, 217 ational activities, 60–71 Forest and Pawnee Adams State College–Luther Grasslands, 220, 221, 224 E. Bean Museum, 429 Arcade Amusements, Inc., B aby Doe Tabor Museum, Adventure Golf, 111 172 318 Aerial sports (glider flying Argo Gold Mine, Mill, and Bachelor Historic Tour, 432 and soaring). See also Museum, 138 Bachelor-Syracuse Mine Ballooning A. R. Mitchell Memorial Tour, 403 Boulder, 205 Museum of Western Art, Backcountry ski tours, Colorado Springs, 173 443 Vail, 307 Durango, 374 Art Castings of Colorado, Backcountry yurt system, Airfares, 26–27, 32–33, 53 230 State Forest State Park, Air Force Academy Falcons, Art Center of Estes Park, 222–223 175 246 Backpacking. See Hiking Airlines, 31, 36, 52–53 Art on the Corner, 346 and backpacking Airport security, 32 Aspen, 321–334 Balcony House, 389 Alamosa, 3, 426–430 accommodations, Ballooning, 62, 117–118, Alamosa–Monte Vista 329–333 173, 204 National Wildlife museums, art centers, and Banana Fun Park, 346 Refuges, 430 historic sites, 327–329 Bandimere Speedway, 122 Alpine Slide music festivals, 328 Barr Lake, 66 Durango Mountain Resort, nightlife, 334 Barr Lake State Park, 374 restaurants, 333–334 118, 121 Winter Park, 286
    [Show full text]
  • Triangulation in Utah 1871-1934
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director Bulletin 913 TRIANGULATION IN UTAH 1871-1934 J. G. STAACK Chief Topographic Engineer UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1940 Tor sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. Price 20 cents (paper) CONTENTS Page Introduction ______________________________________________________ 1 Scope of report------__-_-_---_----_------------ --__---__ _ 1 Precision __ _ ________________________ _ __________________ _ ___ 1 Instruments used._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2 Station marks___- _ _.__ __ __ _ 2 Datum_-_-_-__ __________________________ ______ ______-___.__ 3 Methods of readjustment..._____.-.__..________.___._._...___.__ 4 Form of results__-.________________________ _.___-_____.______ 5 Arrangement__.______________________________ _ ___ _ ________ 6 Descriptions of stations._______________________________________ 6 Azimuths and distances.__ ____-_.._---_--_________ -____ __ __ ^ 7 Maps.__----__-----_-_---__-_--_-___-_-___-__-__-_-_-___.-.__ 7 Personnel_ _ __-----_-_-_---_---------_--__-____-__-_.--_.___ . 7 Projects 9 Uinta Forest Reserve, 1897-98_ 9 Cottonwood and Park City special quadrangles, 1903____ _ 19 Iron Springs special quadrangle, 1905____________________________ 22 Northeastern Utah, 1909.. -_. 26 Eastern Utah, 1910 - . 30 Logan quadrangle, 1913._________-__-__'_--______-___:_____.____ 42 Uintah County, 1913___-__. 48 Eastern Utah, 1914.. ... _ _ .. 55 Northern Utah, 1915 (Hodgeson)_____-___ __-___-_-_-__-_--. _. 58 Northern Utah, 1915 <Urquhart)_.
    [Show full text]