AND THEIR HOST PLANTS by Robert Ashby Flock a Thesis Submitted To

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AND THEIR HOST PLANTS by Robert Ashby Flock a Thesis Submitted To The distribution of Arizona leafhoppers and their host plants Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Flock, Robert A., 1914- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 27/09/2021 21:40:16 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/552049 THE DISTRIBUTION .OF ARIZONA LEAFH0PP2R3 AND THEIR HOST PLANTS by Robert Ashby Flock A Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Department of Entomology and Economic Zoology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Graduate College University of Arizona 1940 Approved: Major Professor c;i ; £ 9 y ? / A CKE' O’. .’LSDGE.ISNT I would like to express my appreciation to Dr. E. D Ball, Dr. 0. T. VorhjLGs, and Dr. L. P. V/ehrle, who have made it possible for me to work on this group of insects V CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Distribution and Host Plants of Arizona Species Family ClCADELLIDAE 9 Subfamily PAROPINAE Koebelia o tD Subfamily AGALLINAE 10 Agalliopsis 10 Agallla 12 Certagallia 13 Aceratagallia 15 Subfamily MACROPSIDAE 18 Bythosoopus 18 Macropsis 18 Subfamily IDIOCERINAE 19 Idiocerus 19 Subfamily CICADELLININAE 23 Oncometopia 23 Homalodisca 24 Neokolla 24 Ciboyia 25 Cicadella 25 Siminius 25 Helochara 26 Graphocephala 26 Draeculacephala 26 Cameocephala 27 Subfamily GYPONINAE Dragonana 27 Gyponana 27 Gypona 29 Prairiana 29 Ponana 30 Xerophloea 32 Subfamily JASSINAE 32 Memnonia 32 Xestocephalus 33 Nionia 33 Dorycephalus 34 -i- Heoalus 34 Spangbergiella 34 Parabolocratus 35 Dicyphonia 36 Aligia 36 Mesaaia 37 Bandara 38 Twinlngia 38 Soaphoideus..... 39 Osbornellus - 39 Prescottla 40 Soaphytbpeus 41 Flexamia 44 Latulus . 46 Pains 46 Polynamia 46 Hebecephalus 47 Laevacephalus 48 Ampllcephalus 49 Deltocephalus - 49 Lonatura 50 Klnonla 50 Gillettielia 50 Athysanella 51 Drlotura 51 Uhoka 51 Athysanus 52 Bxitlanus 52 Limnlotettlz 52 Ophiola 53 Coramulus 53 Stlrelus 53 Penestirellus 54 Eutettix 54 Atanus 55 Opsins 55 Horvellina Ollarianus ■ : II Horvellina 57 Menosoma' 59 Phlepsins 59 Phlepsius 60 Texananus 61 Acinopterus 63 Idiodonns 65 Colladonus 66 Conodonus 67 Doleranus 67 Friscananus 68 Ballana 68 Gyperana 69 Elymana 70 Chlorotettix 70 — 11 Jassus 71 Neoeoelidia 71 Paracoelidia 73 Balclutha 74 Nesosteles 74 Baldulus 75 Macrosteles 75 Sonronlus 76 Subfamily TYPHLOCYBINAE 76 Protalebra 76 Dlkraneura 76 Alconeura 79 Empoasca 81 Idona 88 Typhlocyba 88 Eupteryz 89 Hymetta 89 Erythroneura 89 Family MEMBRA.CIDAE 94 Subfamily SMILIINAE 94 Ceresa 94 Stictocephala 96 Stictolobus 97 Micrutalis 98 Parantonae 98 Glossonotus 98 Hiliria 99 Palonica 99 Telamona 99 Tropldarnis 100 Antianthe 100 Telamonanthe 100 Cyrtolobus 100 Ophiderma 101 Vanduzea 101 Bajulata 102 Amastris 102 Polyglypta 103 Bryantla 103 Publilia 103 Entylia 104 Subfamily DARNINAE 104 Stlctopelta 104 Aconophora 105 Subfamily H0PL0PH0RINAE 105 Platycotis 105 ill- Subfamily MEMBRACINAE 105 Bnchenopa 105 Hypsoprora 106 Campyienehia 106 Tylopelta 106 Philya 107 Leiosc^.ta 107 . Subfamily OMTROTINAE 107 Miorooentrus 107 Platyoentrus 108 Tylooentrus 108 Tuberculooentrus 108 Centrodontus 108 Multareis 108 Subfamily AETHALIOHIHAE 109 Aethalion 109 Family CERCOPIDAE 110 Tomaapis 110 Aphrophora 110 Clastoptera 111 Philaronia 115 Family FULGORIDAE 117 Subfamily FULGORINAS 117 Soolopsella 117 Rhabdooephala 117 Amyole 117 Calyptoprootus 118 Cyrpoptus 118 Poblioia 119 Subfamily DICTYOFHORINAE 119 Seolops 119 Yucanaa 128 Or game ra 123 Deserta 123 Orgerius 183 Acinaca 124 Ticidia 124 Timonidia 125 Subfamily ACHILHAE 125 Elidiptera 125 Catonia 125 Subfamily CIXIIHAE 127 Oliarus 127 — iv— Oliaronus 130 Cixius 130 Oeolidlus 131 Plntalia 132 Mlcroledrida 132 Oecleus 133 Myndus 136 Subfamily L3SBJAE 138 Fitohlella 138 Bruohomorpha 139 Aphelonema 141 Papagona 142 Hysteropterum 143 Ulixes 144 Tylana 144 Thlonia 145 Picumna 145 Buthiscia 145 Naettteus 145 Misodeaa 146 Dietyssonla 146 Osbornia 146 / Subfamily ACAMLONIIHAE 147 Acanalonia 147 Subfamily FIATHAE 148 Ormenis 148 Misthamophantia 149 Flatoides 150 Subfamily DERBHAE 150 Cedusa 150 Cenchrea 150 Amalopota 151 Anotia 151 Otiooerus 152 Bothiooerus 152 Subfamily DELPHAOHJAE . 152 Copicerus 152 Sacoharodyne 152 Stenocranus 153 Bostaera 153 Stobaera 153 Liburnia • 153 Pissonotus 153 Factors Influencing the Distribution 154 Bibliography 159 THE DISTRIBUTION OF ARIZONA LEAFHOPPBRS . AND THEIR HOST PLANTS Introduction For the past twelve years the leafhopper collection and library o f Dr. E. D. Ball has been located at the University of - .Arizona, This collection and the associated field notes contained the data from a very complete study of the species found in Arizona, The writer made a sur­ vey of the biological data pertaining to Arizona leaf- hoppers which.was finished just before the collection was shipped to the National Museum. A. survey of the literature was also made in order to have a complete list of the species found in the state and additional biological data. Considerable time was spent in determining unidentified material with which valuable biological data was associated more information will be available when the unmounted and unidentified material in the collection is worked up at the National Museum. The writer has worked with Dr. Ball for several years and is familiar with the collection and notes. He has collected leafhoppers and other insects in many parts of the state, often with Dr. Ball, and is familiar with the places which are discussed in the notes. This paper con­ sists largely of records made by Dr. Ball and interpreted -1- —2w by the writer. The.term leafhopper is used in this paper in the general sense meaning not only the Clcadellidae or true leafhoppers, but also the Membracidae or treehoppers, the Cercopidae or spittlebugs, and the Fulgoridae or waxhoppers. These four families are quite similar in habits and are closely related to;each other. They are usually studied together because the methods of collecting and preparing specimens for study are much the same for each of the groups. These four families and the family Cicadidae consti­ tute the suborder Auchenorrhyncha of the order Homoptera. The order Homoptera is a very large group of diversified insects which is difficult to characterize collectively. All species are plant feeders and have mouth parts of the piercing-sucking type, without palpi. The wings when present are of a nearly, uniform texture. The Cicadidae are distinguished from the leafhoppers by having hind legs which are not fitted'for jumping. They are large species with entirely membranous wings. The nymphs are sub­ terranean. The suborder Sterrnorrhyncha contains the scales, aphids, white flies and jumping plant lice. The Auchenorrhyncha are distinguished from the Sterrnorrhyncha by having the beak plainly arising from the base of the — 3— head, and the tarsi, at least of the middle and hind legs, three jointed. They are always free living insects. The leafhopper fauna of Arizona is extremely rich. For example, of the 1,725 picadellidae which have been found in the United States, nearly 600 species have been found in Arizona. There are 94 Membracidae included in the present paper in comparison with 35 in a recent list of the Membracidae of Utah (Jorgenson), or 201 kinds re­ corded in the Van Duzee catalogue of North America. There are 182 species of Fulgoridae recorded from the state while Dozier lists 132 from Mississippi and Van Duzee lists 362 from the United States. This great variety of species is partially a result of the large number of different cli­ matic and floristic areas in the state. Also the state is so situated that we not only have a large percentage of the North American forms but we also have many forms whose affinities are with the fauna of Mexico and South America. • Our large number of recorded species is a result of the thorough work done in the state by Dr. Ball and other workers. He has built up one of the most important collec­ tions in the country. In 1932 it contained 2,800 species, 510 types, and paratypes of 600 species, totalling in all over 60,000 specimens. Since that time he has added a large amount of Arizona material. - 4 - In this state there is. an unusually good opportunity to study the ecological relationships of the leafhoppers. Plants and plant associations are often distinctly segre­ gated and the specific relationships can often be accu­ rately determined. These specific plant relationships are very important and will be listed wherever possible. When no specific relationship is known for a species, the distribution will be recorded by means of the life zone or geographic area. Specific localities have not been transferred from the notes in most cases. In the case of polyphagous species the type of plant upon which it is •found is usually given. Some species, for instance, are found on many types, of trees, and others on many types of herbaceous plants. " The most distinctive leafhopper fauna is found in the Lower Sonoran Zone. This zone includes those portions of the western and southern part of the state which are below about 4,000 to 4,500 feet in elevation. Typical plants are the creosote bush (Larrea tridentata), palo verde (Parkinsonia miorophylla), mesquite (Prosopis velutina), and the desert grassland. The Upper Sonoran Zone is the richest zone in regard to the number of kinds of leafhoppers. This zone occurs from 4,500 feet to 6,500 feet in the mountains. J,ive oaks pinon pine (Pinus edulis) , .juniper, sage brush (Artemisia tridentata), are typical plants, and the chaparral and northern short grassland are important plant associations in this zone. The Transition Zone occupies a considerable portion of the state. Its characteristic plants are yellow pine (Finns ponderosa). Chihuahua pine (Finns leiophylla). and Gambel oak (Q,uercus gambelii). This zone usually occurs between 6,500 to 8,000 feet elevation.
Recommended publications
  • Tumacacori Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation [PW-05-03-D2-001]
    Tumacacori Potential Wilderness Evaluation Report Tumacacori Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation [PW-05-03-D2-001] Area Overview Size and Location: The Tumacacori Potential Wilderness Area (PWA) encompasses 37,330 acres. This area is located in the Tumacacori and Atacosa Mountains, which are part of the Nogales Ranger District of the Coronado National Forest in southeastern Arizona (see Map 4 at the end of this document). The Tumacacori PWA is overlapped by 30,305 acres of the Tumacacori Inventoried Roadless Area, comprising 81 percent of the PWA. Vicinity, Surroundings and Access: The Tumacacori Potential Wilderness Area is approximately 50 miles southeast of Tucson, Arizona. The Tumacacori PWA is centrally located within the mountain range and encompasses an area from Sardina and Tumacacori Peaks at the northern end to Ruby Road at the southern end and from the El Paso Natural Gas Line on the eastern side to Arivaca Lake on its western side. The PWA is adjacent to the Pajarita Wilderness Area, Arivaca Lake and Peña Blanca Lake. Both Pena Blanca and Arivaca Lakes are managed by the Arizona Game and Fish Department. Interstate 19 (I-19) connects the Tucson metropolitan area to the City of Nogales and the incorporated community of Sahuarita. The unincorporated communities of Green Valley, Arivaca Junction-Amado, Tubac, Tumacacori-Carmen and Rio Rico, Arizona and Sonora, Mexico are within close proximity to the eastern side of the Tumacacori Mountains and the PWA. State Highway 289 provides access from I-19 across private and National Forest System lands into the Tumacacori Ecosystem Management Area to Peña Blanca Lake and Ruby Road (NFS Road 39).
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-2021 Arizona Hunting Regulations
    Arizona Game and Fish Department 2020-2021 Arizona Hunting Regulations This publication includes the annual regulations for statewide hunting of deer, fall turkey, fall javelina, bighorn sheep, fall bison, fall bear, mountain lion, small game and other huntable wildlife. The hunt permit application deadline is Tuesday, June 9, 2020, at 11:59 p.m. Arizona time. Purchase Arizona hunting licenses and apply for the draw online at azgfd.gov. Report wildlife violations, call: 800-352-0700 Two other annual hunt draw booklets are published for the spring big game hunts and elk and pronghorn hunts. i Unforgettable Adventures. Feel-Good Savings. Heed the call of adventure with great insurance coverage. 15 minutes could save you 15% or more on motorcycle insurance. geico.com | 1-800-442-9253 | Local Office Some discounts, coverages, payment plans and features are not available in all states, in all GEICO companies, or in all situations. Motorcycle and ATV coverages are underwritten by GEICO Indemnity Company. GEICO is a registered service mark of Government Employees Insurance Company, Washington, DC 20076; a Berkshire Hathaway Inc. subsidiary. © 2019 GEICO ii ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT — AZGFD.GOV AdPages2019.indd 4 4/20/2020 11:49:25 AM AdPages2019.indd 5 2020-2021 ARIZONA HUNTING4/20/2020 REGULATIONS 11:50:24 AM 1 Arizona Game and Fish Department Key Contacts MAIN NUMBER: 602-942-3000 Choose 1 for known extension or name Choose 2 for draw, bonus points, and hunting and fishing license information Choose 3 for watercraft Choose 4 for regional
    [Show full text]
  • Coronado National Forest
    CORONADO NATIONAL FOREST TUMACACORI ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT AREA Transportation Analysis Plan June 2005 Revised August 2009 Edited By ELI CURIEL JR. ID Core Team Leader Approved By /s/ Kent C. Ellett August 13, 2009 Kent C. Ellett, Nogales District Ranger Date Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Step 1 – Setting Up the Analysis .................................................................................................................................... 4 Step 2 – Describing the Situation ................................................................................................................................... 6 Table 2.1 – Existing Transportation system .................................................................................................. 9 Table 2.2 - Existing Road Classifications .................................................................................................... 26 Step 3- Identifying Issues .............................................................................................................................................. 26 Table 3.1 Annual Deferred Maintenance Costs .......................................................................................... 28 Step 4- Assessing Benefits, Problems and Risks of the Existing Road System ........................................................ 30 Lands .............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A GUIDE to the GEOLOGY of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona: the Geology and Life Zones of a Madrean Sky Island
    A GUIDE TO THE GEOLOGY OF THE SANTA CATALINA MOUNTAINS, ARIZONA: THE GEOLOGY AND LIFE ZONES OF A MADREAN SKY ISLAND ARIZONA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 22 JOHN V. BEZY Inside front cover. Sabino Canyon, 30 December 2010. (Megan McCormick, flickr.com (CC BY 2.0). A Guide to the Geology of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona: The Geology and Life Zones of a Madrean Sky Island John V. Bezy Arizona Geological Survey Down-to-Earth 22 Copyright©2016, Arizona Geological Survey All rights reserved Book design: M. Conway & S. Mar Photos: Dr. Larry Fellows, Dr. Anthony Lux and Dr. John Bezy unless otherwise noted Printed in the United States of America Permission is granted for individuals to make single copies for their personal use in research, study or teaching, and to use short quotes, figures, or tables, from this publication for publication in scientific books and journals, provided that the source of the information is appropriately cited. This consent does not extend to other kinds of copying for general distribution, for advertising or promotional purposes, for creating new or collective works, or for resale. The reproduction of multiple copies and the use of articles or extracts for comer- cial purposes require specific permission from the Arizona Geological Survey. Published by the Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress, #100, Tucson, AZ 85701 www.azgs.az.gov Cover photo: Pinnacles at Catalina State Park, Courtesy of Dr. Anthony Lux ISBN 978-0-9854798-2-4 Citation: Bezy, J.V., 2016, A Guide to the Geology of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona: The Geology and Life Zones of a Madrean Sky Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Reintroduction of the Tarahumara Frog (Rana Tarahumarae) in Arizona: Lessons Learned
    Herpetological Conservation and Biology 15(2):372–389. Submitted: 12 December 2019; Accepted: 11 June 2020; Published: 31 August 2020. REINTRODUCTION OF THE TARAHUMARA FROG (RANA TARAHUMARAE) IN ARIZONA: LESSONS LEARNED JAMES C. RORABAUGH1,8, AUDREY K. OWENS2, ABIGAIL KING3, STEPHEN F. HALE4, STEPHANE POULIN5, MICHAEL J. SREDL6, AND JULIO A. LEMOS-ESPINAL7 1Post Office Box 31, Saint David, Arizona 85630, USA 2Arizona Game and Fish Department, 5000 West Carefree Highway, Phoenix, Arizona 85086, USA 3Jack Creek Preserve Foundation, Post Office Box 3, Ennis, Montana 59716, USA 4EcoPlan Associates, Inc., 3610 North Prince Village Place, Suite 140, Tucson, Arizona 85719, USA 5Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum, 2021 North Kinney Road, Tucson, Arizona 85743, USA 6Arizona Game and Fish Department (retired), 5000 West Carefree Highway, Phoenix, Arizona 85086, USA 7Laboratorio de Ecología, Unidad de Biotecnología y Prototipos, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, Avenida De Los Barrios No. 1, Colonia Los Reyes Iztacala, Tlalnepantla, Estado de México 54090, México 8Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract.—The Tarahumara Frog (Rana tarahumarae) disappeared from the northern edge of its range in south- central Arizona, USA, after observed declines and die-offs from 1974 to 1983. Similar declines were noted in Sonora, Mexico; however, the species still persists at many sites in Mexico. Chytridiomycosis was detected during some declines and implicated in others; however, airborne pollutants from copper smelters, predation, competition, and extreme weather may have also been contributing factors. We collected Tarahumara Frogs in Sonora for captive rearing and propagation beginning in 1999, and released frogs to two historical localities in Arizona, including Big Casa Blanca Canyon and vicinity, Santa Rita Mountains, and Sycamore Canyon, Atascosa Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • A Synopsis of the Tribe Micrutalini Haupt (Homoptera, Membracidae, Smiliinae) 1
    A synopsis of the tribe Micrutalini Haupt (Homoptera, Membracidae, Smiliinae) 1 Albino M. Sakakibara 2 ABSTRACT. The tribe Micrutalini and its two genera, Trachytalis Fowler and Micrutalis Fowler, are redescribed. The following species are treated and, in some cases, nomenclatural changes introduced: Trachytalis isabellina Fowler, 1895; T distinguenda Fowler, 1895; T retrofasciata (Lethierry, 1890), comb.n.; Micrutalis atrovena Goding, 1930; M balteata (Fairmaire, 1846) = Acutalis lucidus Buckton, 1902, syn.n.; M bella Goding, 1929; M biguttula (Fairmaire, 1846), comb.n.; M binaria (Fairmaire, 1846) = Acutalisflaviventris Lethierry, 1890, syn.n.; M callan­ gensis Goding, 1930; M calva (Say, 1830); M. discalis (Walker, 1858); M dorsalis (Fitch, 1851); M dubia Fowler, 1895 = M zeteki Goding, 1928, syn.n.; M flava Goding, 1929; M jlavozonata (Faitmaire, 1846), comb.n. = Acutalis geniculata Stiil, 1862, syn.n. = Acutalis modesta Stãl, 1862, syn.n.; M godfreyi Sakakibara, 1976; M incerta Sakakibara, 1976; M lata Goding, 1930; M litterata (Fairmaire, 1846), comb.n.;M lugubrina(Stãl, 1862);M malleiferaFowler, 1895=M binariamutabilis Fowler, 1895, syn.n.; M minutus Buckton, 1902; M nigrolineata (Stiil, 1864); M nigromarginata Funkhouser, 1940; M notatipennis Fowler, 1895; M occidentalis (Goding, 1893); M pallens Fowler, 1895; M parva (Goding, 1893); M plagiata (Stãl, 1862) = Acutalis variabilis Berg, 1879, syn.n. = M chapadensis Goding, 1930, syn.n.; M punctifera (Walker, 1858); M semialba (Stãl, 1862); M stipulipennis Buckton, 1902; M tau Goding, 1930; M trifurcata Goding, 1893; M tripunctata (Fairmaire, 1846) = Acutalis moesta Stãl, 1859, syn.n. = M tartaredoides Goding, 1930, syn.n .. New species: Micrutalis diminuta sp.n. (Ecuador, Pichincha); Micrutalis divisa sp.n.
    [Show full text]
  • Coronado National Forest
    CORONADO NATIONAL FOREST FIRE MANAGEMENT PLAN Reviewed and Updated by _/s/ Chris Stetson ___________ Date __5/18/10 __________ Coronado Fire Management Plan Interagency Federal fire policy requires that every area with burnable vegetation must have a Fire Management Plan (FMP). This FMP provides information concerning the fire process for the Coronado National Forest and compiles guidance from existing sources such as but not limited to, the Coronado National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP), national policy, and national and regional directives. The potential consequences to firefighter and public safety and welfare, natural and cultural resources, and values to be protected help determine the management response to wildfire. Firefighter and public safety are the first consideration and are always the priority during every response to wildfire. The following chapters discuss broad forest and specific Fire Management Unit (FMU) characteristics and guidance. Chapter 1 introduces the area covered by the FMP, includes a map of the Coronado National Forest, addresses the agencies involved, and states why the forest is developing the FMP. Chapter 2 establishes the link between higher-level planning documents, legislation, and policies and the actions described in FMP. Chapter 3 articulates specific goals, objectives, standards, guidelines, and/or desired future condition(s), as established in the forest’s LRMP, which apply to all the forest’s FMUs and those that are unique to the forest’s individual FMUs. Page 1 of 30 Coronado Fire Management Plan Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION The Coronado National Forest developed this FMP as a decision support tool to help fire personnel and decision makers determine the response to an unplanned ignition.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ARCHAIC OCCUPATION of the ROSEMONT AREA, NORTHERN SANTA RITA MOUNTAINS, SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA by Bruce B. Huckell K with Cont
    THE ARCHAIC OCCUPATION OF THE ROSEMONT AREA, NORTHERN SANTA RITA MOUNTAINS, SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA by Bruce B. Huckell K with contributions by Lisa W. Huckell Robert S. Thompson Cultural Resource Management Division Arizona State Museum University of Arizona Archaeological Series No. 147, Vol. I THE ARCHAIC OCCUPATION OF THE ROSEMONT AREA, NORTHERN SANTA RITA MOUNTAINS, SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA by Bruce B. Huckell Contributions by Lisa W. Huckell Robert S. Thompson Submitted by Cultural Resource Management Division Arizona State Museum University of Arizona Prepared for ANAMAX Mining Company 1984 Archaeological Series No. 147, Vol. I CONTENTS FIGURES vii TABLES PREFACE xiii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS xvi ABSTRACT xviii Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION 1 The Archaic Period 2 Previous Research 5 2. THE ENVIRONMENT OF THE ROSEMONT AREA AND SURROUNDING REGIONS 11 General Geography 11 Geology 13 Climate 17 Vegetation 19 Fauna 28 The Paleoenvironment 29 Recent Changes in the Local Biotic Communities 30 Long-Term Changes in the Environment 32 3. A FRAMEWORK FOR RESEARCH AT THE ROSEMONT ARCHAIC SITES 35 Hunter-Gatherer Organization 35 Research Domains 38 Problem Domain I: Subsistence-Settlement Systems 38 Problem Domain II: Cultural and Temporal Affinities 40 Site Selection 41 4. INVESTIGATIONS AT AND DESCRIPTIONS OF THE SITES 43 Field Methods 43 Results of Excavations: Site Descriptions 46 AZ EE:2:62--The Wasp Canyon Site 48 Investigation 50 Features 52 Structures 52 Rock Clusters 56 Artifacts 58 iii iv Contents AZ EE:2:65 59 Investigation 59
    [Show full text]
  • Hemiptera, Membracidae, Smiliinae) with a New Synonym, a New Combination, and a New Country Record
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 557: 85–91 (2016)First Immature of the New World Treehopper tribe Thuridini... 85 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.557.6602 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research First Immature of the New World Treehopper tribe Thuridini (Hemiptera, Membracidae, Smiliinae) with a new synonym, a new combination, and a new country record Stuart H. McKamey1, Mitchell J. Porter2 1 USDA/ARS Systematic Entomology Lab, c/o NMNH MRC-168, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560, USA 2 Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 Corresponding author: Stuart H. McKamey ([email protected]) Academic editor: M. Webb | Received 16 September 2015 | Accepted 8 December 2015 | Published 28 January 2016 http://zoobank.org/E3D490F4-5654-47E4-95AA-3407F41648CE Citation: McKamey SH, Porter MJ (2016) First Immature of the New World Treehopper tribe Thuridini (Hemiptera: Membracidae: Smiliinae) with a new synonym, a new combination, and a new country record. ZooKeys 557: 85–91. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.557.6602 Abstract The species Thuris depressus Sakakibara (1975) is proposed as a syn. n. of Thuris binodosus (Goding 1926), comb. n. The distribution of the genus is expanded from Brazil and Peru to include Ecuador and Venezuela, and the immature is described based on 75 characters. Keywords Thuris, Parantonae, nymph, syn. n., comb. n., Ecuador, Venezuela Introduction Adult treehoppers (Membracidae, Aetalionidae, and Melizoderidae) are well known for the expanded,
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Habitat Proposal
    Billing Code 4310-55-P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2012–0042] [4500030114] RIN 1018-AX13 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for Jaguar AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), propose to designate 1 2 critical habitat for the jaguar (Panthera onca) under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). In total, we propose to designate as critical habitat approximately 339,220 hectares (838,232 acres) in Pima, Santa Cruz, and Cochise Counties, Arizona, and Hidalgo County, New Mexico. DATES: We will accept comments received or postmarked on or before [INSERT DATE 60 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. We must receive requests for public hearings, in writing, at the address shown in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by [INSERT DATE 45 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by one of the following methods: (1) Electronically: Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. In the Search field, enter Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2012– 0042, which is the docket number for this rulemaking. Then click on the Search button. You may submit a comment by clicking on “Comment Now!” (2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail or hand-delivery to: Public Comments Processing, Attn: FWS–R2–ES–2012–0042; Division of Policy and Directives Management; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, MS 2042–PDM; Arlington, VA 22203.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Behaviour and Life History of Membracine Treehoppers
    Journal of Natural History, 2006; 40(32–34): 1887–1907 Social behaviour and life history of membracine treehoppers CHUNG-PING LIN Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA and Department of Life Science, Center for Tropical Ecology and Biodiversity, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan (Accepted 28 September 2006) Abstract Social behaviour in the form of parental care is widespread among insects but the evolutionary histories of these traits are poorly known due to the lack of detailed life history data and reliable phylogenies. Treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae) provide some of the best studied examples of parental care in insects in which maternal care involving egg guarding occurs frequently. The Membracinae exhibit the entire range of social behaviour found in the treehoppers, ranging from asocial solitary individuals, nymphal or adult aggregations, to highly developed maternal care with parent–offspring communication. Within the subfamily, subsocial behaviour occurs in at least four of the five tribes. The Aconophorini and Hoplophorionini are uniformly subsocial, but the Membracini is a mixture of subsocial and gregarious species. The Hypsoprorini contains both solitary and gregarious species. Accessory secretions are used by many treehoppers to cover egg masses inserted into plant tissue while oviposition on plant surfaces is restricted to a few species. Presumed aposematic colouration of nymphs and teneral adults appears to be restricted to gregarious and subsocial taxa. Ant mutualism is widespread among membracine treehoppers and may play an important role in the evolutionary development of subsocial behaviour. The life history information provides a basis for comparative analyses of maternal care evolution and its correlation with ant mutualism in membracine treehoppers.
    [Show full text]
  • Crowning the Queen of the Sonoran Desert: Tucson and Saguaro National Park
    Crowning the Queen of the Sonoran Desert: Tucson and Saguaro National Park An Administrative History Marcus Burtner University of Arizona 2011 Figure 1. Copper Pamphlet produced by Tucson Chamber of Commerce, SAGU257, Box 1, Folder 11, WACC. “In a canon near the deserted mission of Cocospera, Cereus giganteus was first met with. The first specimen brought the whole party to a halt. Standing alone upon a rocky projection, it rose in a single unbranched column to the height of some thirty feet, and formed a sight which seemed almost worth the journey to behold. Advancing into the canon, specimens became more numerous, until at length the whole vegetation was, in places, made up of this and other Cacaceae. Description can convey no adequate idea of this singular vegetation, at once so grand and dreary. The Opuntia arborescens and Cereus Thurberi, which had before been regarded with wonder, now seemed insignificant in comparison with the giant Cactus which towered far above.” George Thurber, 1855, Boundary Commission Report.1 Table of Contents 1 Asa Gray, ―Plantae Novae Thurberianae: The Characters of Some New Genera and Species of Plants in a Collection Made by George Thurber, Esq., of the Late Mexican Boundary ii List of Illustrations v List of Maps ix Introduction Crowning the Queen of the Desert 1 The Question of Social Value and Intrinsically Valuable Landscapes Two Districts with a Shared History Chapter 1 Uncertain Pathways to a Saguaro National Monument, 1912-1933 9 Saguaros and the Sonoran Desert A Forest of Saguaros Discovering
    [Show full text]