DOCSLIB.ORG

The Persian Wars – a Victory and Its Consequences Around 510 B.C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Persian Wars – a Victory and Its Consequences Around 510 B.C The Persian Wars – a Victory and its Consequences Around 510 B.C., the Athenians, with the help of the Spartans, toppled the tyrannical rule of the sons of Peisistratos. The Athenian nobleman, Kleisthenes, instituted then around 508 B.C. a new reform: the farmers became then freer in comparison to the nobles, and could now better make their political opinions felt in the public gatherings. So the process was introduced, which eventually led to democracy. [Athenian democracy was based on exclusivity and inequality, and must not be confused with the American ideal of inclusive and equal democracy.] For this process, the Persian wars were also important. They strengthened the power and self-confidence of Athens in the first self-preservation exercise after the era of the tyrannical rulers. The city could, based on its military success in these wars, attain after 477 B.C. a political and economic supremacy for a while among the Greeks. Most of the reports about the Persian wars also come from this time. In them, the pride of the Greeks is reflected in having conquered such a mighty power as the Persians. And they celebrated this victory as a triumph of the love of freedom. The Initial Situation Around 715 B.C., the empire of the Medes had formed in Iran, which rose to be the leading power in the near east a century late. The Persians in southern Iran were, at first, dependent upon the Medes, until the Persian King Cyrus II succeeded in 550 B.C. in defeating the King of the Medes, and making himself the ruler of the Median Empire. Shortly thereafter, in 547/546 B.C., Cyrus conquered also the empire of the Lydians in western Asia Minor. A few of the Greek cities on Asia Minor's west coast, which until then had recognized Lydian sovereignty, resisted the new power. The Persians secured their new possessions in Asia Minor by means of occupying troops for this reason. Aside from this, they placed tyrants in most of the cities. These were Greeks [who were employed by the Persians to rule over the Greek cities]. One of the successors of King Cyrus, Darius, introduced around 521 B.C. a strict administration: the leadership of the entire state was in the hands of the great king. He considered everyone else, without exception, as subjects, who were duty-bound to unconditional obedience to him. As his helpers in administration were Persian satraps, representatives, placed into all countries, who directed the tributes [payments] to the great king into his central treasuries in the royal palaces. The “eyes” and “ears” of the king served as additional observers. That’s what his The Persian Wars – page 1 confidants were called, who were placed directly below the king, and informed him about everything worth knowing. So that all commands and notices reached their goals quickly, large long-distance roads were built, and post stations were set up everywhere for exchanging horses and messengers. In this way, one could cover three hundred kilometers per day. A message from Susa to Miletus was transmitted in seven days; normally, ninety days were necessary for this. In one aspect, the great king gave to all peoples of his empire complete freedom: each was allowed to continue to practice his religion. The culture, too, of the Ionian Greeks was hardly influenced. In contrast to the Persian Empire, the Greek cities and states scattered over the coasts of the Mediterranean and Black Seas did not form a unit. Their commonality lay in their culture, in language and religion, in science and philosophy, and not the least in the desire of each city to be independent. The Course of the Persian Wars The Greeks rebel against the Persians. It was mainly a coincidence that the wars between the Persians and the Greeks broke out. As Herodotus reports, Aristagoras, one of the tyrants installed by the Persians in Miletus, planned in 499 B.C. a revolt. Because of a failed military action, he expected to be punished by the Persians. Before he dared to rebel, he sought help in the motherland, and emphasized thereby that this was a fight for freedom against the Persians. But only Athens and Eretria promised [to send] a few ships. Among the Greeks in Asia Minor, however, the rebellion spread very quickly. But it was suppressed by the Persians. They destroyed Miletus, and deported its inhabitants. In the other areas, they simply renewed the old system of rule. The Victory at Marathon. But that didn’t satisfy the Persians. They didn’t want to simply accept the support of a rebellion against them coming from Greek cities. From this, the further Persian wars arose. In 490 B.C., a well-armed Persian army set itself into motion against Greece. It had the task of subjugating Athens and Eretria, because these [cities] had helped the Greeks in Asia Minor. After the Persians had enslaved the Eretrians, they landed at the plain of Marathon. Encouraged by their military leader Miltiades, the Athenians left their city and positioned themselves for battle against the Persians. They were supported only by approximately one thousand men from the allied neighboring city of Platea. Unexpectedly, the Persians were defeated and driven The Persian Wars – page 2 back to their ships. The Greek hoplite formation, and the ability of the military leaders, had succeeded against the Persian superpower. New Preparations for War. King Darius then prepared a new war. As Herodotus writes, Asia hummed with Persian weaponry. Rebellions and revolts in Egypt and Babylon delayed Darius, and subsequently his successor Xerxes, from further maneuvers against Greece. But Athens, too, strengthened its weaponry. Themistokles, a leading Athenian politician, succeeded in building two hundred new battleships. When the Persians sent ambassadors to demand the subjugation, around thirty city-states combined into a federation in 481 B.C., and set their disagreements with one another aside. But this federation included only southern Greece, with Corinth, Athens, and Sparta, the strongest city in Greece. Therefore, Sparta took the political and military leadership in this federation. The other Greek city-states did not join this federation. Some were on the side of the Persians, or did not feel threatened by them. Others, like the Greeks in Asia Minor, were forced to place their military forces into the service of the great [Persian] king. The military maneuvers of Xerxes. When the Persian army, in 480 B.C. moved against Greece, Xerxes was at the height of his power. He had carefully prepared this military expedition. His goal was the subjugation of all Greece. At Mount Athos, where once a Persian fleet had suffered a grounding, the great king caused his own canal to be constructed, and he crossed the Hellespont on a specially-built pontoon bridge. The fleet and the land army proceeded together. They encountered the first resistance in mid-Greece at Thermopyle, a narrow pass between the mountains and the sea. There, the Greeks had blocked the path on land. A bitter battle arose. This battle has become very famous, because a small Greek army under the command of the Spartan Leonidas had at first successfully defended this narrow pass against the Persian superpower. Only after a betrayal was it encircled; almost all the Greek – around one thousand – died. The decisive battle took place at sea in the straights between Athens and [the island called] Salamis. As the leader of the Athenian fleet, Themistokles, had foreseen, the big Persian ships hindered each other in the narrowness of the sound, and were beaten by the more maneuverable Greek fleet. Xerxes fled in great haste, but left his army behind. It saw action once again in the next year in Attica, and was finally conquered in 479 B.C. at Plataea. The Persian Wars – page 3 Greece after the Persian Wars In 478/477 B.C., Athens made a federation with many Aegean cities, the Delian- Attic League, in which it assumed a leadership role. [This is often simply called the “Delian League”.] But it exploited its hegemony in order to dictate laws to its fellow league-members, and to help itself to the federation fees collected by them. Sparta and its Peloponnesian federation feared that Athens would expand its power still farther. So the two most powerful states in Greece, Athens and Sparta, struggled for dominance. In 431 B.C., the Peloponnesian War began, which ended in 404 B.C. with Sparta’s victory. By means of victories in the Persian wars, the Athenian people had discovered what they could do. This experience was important for the rise of democracy. [Athenian democracy was based on two ideas: exclusivity and inequality. People were not equal, and only the best could fully participate as citizens. In this way, it was a very different kind of democracy than the American ideal.] After the defeat against Sparta, the aristocratic classes tried to get rid of democracy. The attempt did not succeed. Democracy had become, in the meantime, so firmly established [among the citizen class], that it could survive even a defeat. [The Athenians did not want a return to an inherited nobility, but rather looked toward a “natural aristocracy” – as Jefferson would later call it – that determined those top few percent of the population deemed truly worthy of participating as citizens.] The Persian Wars – page 4 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historically Speaking
    Historically Speaking Marathon at 2,500 ugust 12 marks an accepted date for By BG John S. Brown Greeks recently conquered by Persia rose the 2,500th anniversary of the Battle in revolt. Athens and the tiny city-state of A U.S. Army retired of Marathon, although the actual date Eretria attempted to assist, but the Per- may instead be September 12, depending upon how one sians utterly crushed the Ionians. Darius resolved to crush interprets the Lacedaemonian lunisolar calendar. The most Athens and Eretria as well and to bring the European Greeks notable commemoration will probably be the Athens into his orbit. Had he succeeded, he would have snuffed out Marathon this year, and other marathons around the world the democratic experiment, independent Hellenic civiliza- will undoubtedly take notice as well. Ironically, the ardu- tion and Greek national identity with a single stroke. ous 26-mile race is based upon an athletic performance by After preliminary operations in Thrace and Macedonia, the legendary Philippides that may not have actually oc- Darius launched a naval expedition directly across the curred. The battle itself did occur and is rightly regarded Aegean Sea. Securing—or devastating—islands en route, as among the most decisive in history. Marathon is ar- the Persians sacked Eretria and landed an army more than guably the first major battle for which we have a reliable twice the size of what Athens could muster in the sheltered record, provided largely by the world’s first actual histo- Bay of Marathon. Hippias recommended the spot, both be- rian, Herodotus.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Greek Hoplites and Their Origins
    Ancient Greek Hoplites and their Origins By Jordan Wilde Senior Seminar (HST 499W) June 6, 2008 Primary Reader: Dr. Benedict Lowe Secondary Reader: Dr. Lorie Carlson Course Instructor: Dr. David Doellinger History Department Western Oregon University 1 The ancient Greek hoplites were heavily armed infantry soldiers, known for wearing extensive armor, carrying a large rounded shield, spears, and a sword. By looking at armor, weapons, tactics, and vases recovered from archaeological digs, along with literature of the time, such as Homer’s Iliad (ca. 700 B.C.)1 and Hesiod’s Shield of Heracles (ca. end of the late 8th century B.C)2, who and what a hoplite was can be defined. The scholarly consensus has been that eighth century B.C. is crucial in exploring the origins of hoplites. The eighth century sees a dramatic increase in population leading to the rise of city-states and hoplites. In this paper I am going to consider the evidence for the existence of hoplites during the eighth century B.C. and whether or not there is any evidence for their existence before this. When examining evidence for defining when hoplites first appeared, it’s important to understand what makes a hoplite unique, specifically his equipment, weapons, and tactics. In the article “Hoplites and Heresies,” A.J. Holladay looks at the overall view of the hoplite on the battlefield and some forms of military tactics the Greeks might have had. Holladay examines what is typically assumed as hoplite customs, fighting in a close pack, with their shields in their left hand protecting themselves and their neighbors as well as carrying a spear in their right hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Marathon 2,500 Years Edited by Christopher Carey & Michael Edwards
    MARATHON 2,500 YEARS EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SUPPLEMENT 124 DIRECTOR & GENERAL EDITOR: JOHN NORTH DIRECTOR OF PUBLICATIONS: RICHARD SIMPSON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS PROCEEDINGS OF THE MARATHON CONFERENCE 2010 EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON 2013 The cover image shows Persian warriors at Ishtar Gate, from before the fourth century BC. Pergamon Museum/Vorderasiatisches Museum, Berlin. Photo Mohammed Shamma (2003). Used under CC‐BY terms. All rights reserved. This PDF edition published in 2019 First published in print in 2013 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN: 978-1-905670-81-9 (2019 PDF edition) DOI: 10.14296/1019.9781905670819 ISBN: 978-1-905670-52-9 (2013 paperback edition) ©2013 Institute of Classical Studies, University of London The right of contributors to be identified as the authors of the work published here has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Designed and typeset at the Institute of Classical Studies TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory note 1 P. J. Rhodes The battle of Marathon and modern scholarship 3 Christopher Pelling Herodotus’ Marathon 23 Peter Krentz Marathon and the development of the exclusive hoplite phalanx 35 Andrej Petrovic The battle of Marathon in pre-Herodotean sources: on Marathon verse-inscriptions (IG I3 503/504; Seg Lvi 430) 45 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaic Eretria
    ARCHAIC ERETRIA This book presents for the first time a history of Eretria during the Archaic Era, the city’s most notable period of political importance. Keith Walker examines all the major elements of the city’s success. One of the key factors explored is Eretria’s role as a pioneer coloniser in both the Levant and the West— its early Aegean ‘island empire’ anticipates that of Athens by more than a century, and Eretrian shipping and trade was similarly widespread. We are shown how the strength of the navy conferred thalassocratic status on the city between 506 and 490 BC, and that the importance of its rowers (Eretria means ‘the rowing city’) probably explains the appearance of its democratic constitution. Walker dates this to the last decade of the sixth century; given the presence of Athenian political exiles there, this may well have provided a model for the later reforms of Kleisthenes in Athens. Eretria’s major, indeed dominant, role in the events of central Greece in the last half of the sixth century, and in the events of the Ionian Revolt to 490, is clearly demonstrated, and the tyranny of Diagoras (c. 538–509), perhaps the golden age of the city, is fully examined. Full documentation of literary, epigraphic and archaeological sources (most of which have previously been inaccessible to an English-speaking audience) is provided, creating a fascinating history and a valuable resource for the Greek historian. Keith Walker is a Research Associate in the Department of Classics, History and Religion at the University of New England, Armidale, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Persian Wars: Ionian Revolt the Ionian Revolt, Which Began in 499
    The Persian Wars: Ionian Revolt The Ionian Revolt, which began in 499 B.C. marked the beginning of the Greek-Persian wars. In 546 B.C. the Persians had conquered the wealthy Greek settlements in Ionia (Asia Minor). The Persians took the Ionians’ farmland and harbors. They forced the Ionians to pay tributes (the regular payments of goods). The Ionians also had to serve in the Persian army. The Ionians knew they could not defeat the Persians by themselves, so they asked mainland Greece for help. Athens sent soldiers and a small fleet of ships. Unfortunately for the Ionians, the Athenians went home after their initial success, leaving the small Ionian army to fight alone. In 493 B.C. the Persian army defeated the Ionians. To punish the Ionians for rebelling, the Persians destroyed the city of Miletus. They may have sold some of tis people into slavery. The Persian Wars: Battle of Marathon After the Ionian Revolt, the Persian King Darius decided to conquer the city-states of mainland Greece. He sent messengers to ask for presents of Greek earth and water as a sign that the Greeks agreed to accept Persian rule. But the Greeks refused. Darius was furious. In 490 B.C., he sent a large army of foot soldiers and cavalry (mounted soldiers) across the Aegean Sea by boat to Greece. The army assembled on the pain of Marathon. A general named Miltiades (Mill-te-ah-deez) convinced the other Greek commanders to fight the Persians at Marathon. In need of help, the Athenians sent a runner named Pheidippides (Fa-dip-e-deez) to Sparta who ran for two days and two nights.
    [Show full text]
  • A HISTORY of the PELASGIAN THEORY. FEW Peoples Of
    A HISTORY OF THE PELASGIAN THEORY. FEW peoples of the ancient world have given rise to so much controversy as the Pelasgians; and of few, after some centuries of discussion, is so little clearly established. Like the Phoenicians, the Celts, and of recent years the Teutons, they have been a peg upon which to hang all sorts of speculation ; and whenever an inconvenient circumstance has deranged the symmetry of a theory, it has been safe to ' call it Pelasgian and pass on.' One main reason for this ill-repute, into which the Pelasgian name has fallen, has been the very uncritical fashion in which the ancient statements about the Pelasgians have commonly been mishandled. It has been the custom to treat passages from Homer, from Herodotus, from Ephorus, and from Pausanias, as if they were so many interchangeable bricks to build up the speculative edifice; as if it needed no proof that genealogies found sum- marized in Pausanias or Apollodorus ' were taken by them from poems of the same class with the Theogony, or from ancient treatises, or from prevalent opinions ;' as if, further, ' if we find them mentioning the Pelasgian nation, they do at all events belong to an age when that name and people had nothing of the mystery which they bore to the eyes of the later Greeks, for instance of Strabo;' and as though (in the same passage) a statement of Stephanus of Byzantium about Pelasgians in Italy ' were evidence to the same effect, perfectly unexceptionable and as strictly historical as the case will admit of 1 No one doubts, of course, either that popular tradition may transmit, or that late writers may transcribe, statements which come from very early, and even from contemporary sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 18 Good Morning and Welcome to LLT121 Classical Mythology
    Lecture 18 Good morning and welcome to LLT121 Classical Mythology. In the next two or three class periods, we will be considering the goddess Artemis and her twin brother Apollo, two deities who, to a greater or lesser, extent represent this idea that the ancient Greeks must bow down before the divine. If you will recall from our last few class meetings, we talked about Dionysus, the god who was the externalization of partying, wine, and ecstatic possession, feel the power, feel the god inside you, feel the burn, and tear a few live animals apart. We also discussed the goddess Aphrodite, that wild and crazy goddess who is the externalization of the power of love, the power that, if you are lucky, at some point or another in your life, turns your mind to Jell-o and turns you into a love automaton. I wish you all such good luck. This is one half of the Greek psyche and this is one half of everybody’s psyche. The other half is represented by Artemis and Apollo, a goddess and a god who stand for getting a grip. Artemis is a virgin. She guards her virginity jealously. We’re going to go over a few stories this morning talking about what a bad career move it is to try to put the moves on the goddess Artemis. The god Apollo is not exactly chased. He is a bundle of contradictions, which represents, in and of himself, the full range of contradictions located, again, in the human psyche. When I believe it was Nietzsche who wanted to formulate his idea of the cosmic, he didn’t take out, oh, say, Artemis and Aphrodite.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean Culture
    ANTONIJE SHKOKLJEV SLAVE NIKOLOVSKI - KATIN PREHISTORY CENTRAL BALKANS CRADLE OF AEGEAN CULTURE Prehistory - Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean culture By Antonije Shkokljev Slave Nikolovski – Katin Translated from Macedonian to English and edited By Risto Stefov Prehistory - Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean culture Published by: Risto Stefov Publications [email protected] Toronto, Canada All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without written consent from the author, except for the inclusion of brief and documented quotations in a review. Copyright 2013 by Antonije Shkokljev, Slave Nikolovski – Katin & Risto Stefov e-book edition 2 Index Index........................................................................................................3 COMMON HISTORY AND FUTURE ..................................................5 I - GEOGRAPHICAL CONFIGURATION OF THE BALKANS.........8 II - ARCHAEOLOGICAL DISCOVERIES .........................................10 III - EPISTEMOLOGY OF THE PANNONIAN ONOMASTICS.......11 IV - DEVELOPMENT OF PALEOGRAPHY IN THE BALKANS....33 V – THRACE ........................................................................................37 VI – PREHISTORIC MACEDONIA....................................................41 VII - THESSALY - PREHISTORIC AEOLIA.....................................62 VIII – EPIRUS – PELASGIAN TESPROTIA......................................69
    [Show full text]
  • Graeco-Persian War
    A List of Some of the Major Players in the Graeco-Persian War Xerxes Claim to fame Ruled as Great King of Persia, King of Kings, from 486 BC until he was assassinated in 465 BC. Interesting Facts He was probably only about 30 years old at the time he led in person a massive amphibious invasion of mainland Greece from Asia Minor. X e rx e Among his subjects were many Greeks living along the west coast of Asia s E nt Minor, whom he compelled to fight against their brothers—the Greeks. hr on ed b y A . D av Did you know? ey Officially the objective of the Greek invasion was to punish two Greek cities Athens— and Eretria — for having supported a major rebellion of Asiatic Greeks against his father (499-4 BC). However, the size of his forces—perhaps a quarter of a million land troops, perhaps 600 warships— indicates that his real objective was, having conquered the Greeks who were resisting him, to incorporate mainland Greece in the huge Persian Empire, which stretched as far as modern-day Afghanistan. Themistocles Claim to Fame A wealthy Athenian born about 525 BC, making him about 45 years old at the time of his greatest feat—to devise the strategy that destroyed Xerxes’s navy at the battle of Salamis near Athens in August 480 BC. Interesting Facts Unlike Persia, Athens was a democracy—the world’s first, to be exact— where the chief executive officers of the state and the Generals (also Admirals) were elected by the People and responsible to the People of Athens.
    [Show full text]
  • “490 BC Project”?
    Independent Institute POLICY REPORT Is it Time for a “490 B.C. Project”? High Schoolers Need to Know Our Classical Heritage By Morgan E. Hunter, Williamson M. Evers, and Victor Davis Hanson CONTENTS In recent decades, K-12 education policy has • Introduction been roiled by both the “Math Wars,” discovery • Part 1: The Classical World in American learning versus explicit instruction as the best way Education to teach math;1 and the “Reading Wars,” phonics • Part 2: The Ancient World under the versus whole language as the best way to teach Common Core 2 • Part 3: Conclusions and Recommendations children to read. Our current report finds that • Appendix: Errors in Another a new, extremely significant education issue has Common-Core-Inspired Textbook emerged—and that educators, parents, and citi- • Notes zens in general need to familiarize themselves with it, because the fight over this topic may be the most INTRODUCTION important of all the previous cultural fault lines. When Americans knew classical history, they could The issue is the systematic neglect of the content of reach beyond partisan differences by drawing on history and literature in favor of reading skills— the shared roots of our civilization. American stu- how to analyze a paragraph of text in a preconceived dents once learned, for example, about the Greek mode, with no concern with the actual content or victory at Marathon in 490 B.C. This kept Greece meaning of the work—and also the overemphasis from being swallowed up by the Persian Empire and on STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and ushered in the Golden Age of Athenian democracy Mathematics) and the corresponding neglect of the which, for all its shortcomings, was a pathbreaking humanities.
    [Show full text]
  • Phalanxes and Triremes: Warfare in Ancient Greece by Ancient History Encyclopedia, Adapted by Newsela Staff on 08.08.17 Word Count 1,730 Level 1230L
    Phalanxes and Triremes: Warfare in Ancient Greece By Ancient History Encyclopedia, adapted by Newsela staff on 08.08.17 Word Count 1,730 Level 1230L A lithograph plate showing ancient Greek warriors in a variety of different uniforms. Photo from Wikimedia. In the ancient Greek world, warfare was seen as a necessary evil of the human condition. Whether it be small frontier skirmishes between neighboring city-states, lengthy city-sieges, civil wars or large-scale battles between multi-alliance blocks on land and sea, the vast rewards of war were thought to outweigh the costs in material and lives. While there were lengthy periods of peace, the desire for new territory, war booty or revenge meant the Greeks were regularly engaged in warfare both at home and abroad. Toward professional warfare The Greeks did not always have professional soldiers. Warfare started out as the business of private individuals. Armed bands led by warrior leaders, city militias of part-time soldiers provided their own equipment and may have included all the citizens of the city-state. Eventually, the conduct of warfare started to move away from private individuals and into the realm of the state. This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com. In the early stages of Greek warfare in the Archaic period, training was haphazard. There were no uniforms or insignia and as soon as the conflict was over the soldiers would return to their farms. By the fifth century B.C, the military might of Sparta provided a model for all other states to follow.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 5 the Birth of the Hoplite I
    Warfare and Society in Ancient Greece Lecture 5 The birth of the hoplite I The birth of the hoplites Aristotle, Politics IV.1397b 5 It is proper that the government should be drawn only from those who possess heavy armor. Aristotle, Politics IV.1397b 16-28 The first political regime after the monarchies was composed of warriors and originally drawn from cavalry, for strength and superiority in warfare belonged to the cavalry. Without order heavy infantry is useless. In early times there was neither sound empirical practice in these matters nor rules for it, with the result that mastery on the battlefield rested with the cavalry. When the cities increased in population and number with arms became larger, then they took a share in the governing process. For this reason the constitutions we now call polities the ancients called democracies, for the middling class were few in number due to the smallness of the population, and consequently before this there was a small middling class, and given the form of contemporary military organization the people more easily tolerated being commanded. Cultural heritage of hoplitism Diodorus 15.44.3 Those who had previously called hoplites, from the shield they carried had their name changed to peltasts from the name of their new shield, the pelta. Hoplite ethics and the shield Plutarch, Moralia 220A, Sayings of the Spartans When someone asked Demaratus why the Spartans disgrace those who throw away their shields but no those who abandon their breastplates or helmets, he said that they put the latter on for their own sakes but the shield for the sake of the whole line.
    [Show full text]