DOCSLIB.ORG

103494 FSPLT3 3985492.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
103494 FSPLT3 3985492.Pdf Environmental Assessment CONTENTS Page No. 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Regulatory Framework ................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Project Location ............................................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Purpose and Need ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Decision to be Made ..................................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Plan Conformance ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.6 Internal Scoping and Agency Coordination .................................................................................. 8 1.7 Tribal Coordination ....................................................................................................................... 9 1.8 External Scoping and Public Outreach ......................................................................................... 9 2 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES ..................................................................................................... 12 2.1 No Action Alternative ................................................................................................................. 12 2.2 Proposed Action .......................................................................................................................... 12 2.3 Design Elements and Alignment Alternatives Considered but Eliminated ................................ 23 3 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ................................. 26 3.1 Unaffected Resources ................................................................................................................. 26 3.2 Livestock Grazing ....................................................................................................................... 27 3.3 Area of Critical Environmental Concern .................................................................................... 29 3.4 Cultural Resources ...................................................................................................................... 30 3.5 Soils/Geology/Minerals .............................................................................................................. 34 3.6 Floodplains .................................................................................................................................. 36 3.7 Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. ................................................................................................ 38 3.8 Water Resources ......................................................................................................................... 38 3.9 Vegetation and Weeds ................................................................................................................ 39 3.10 Wildlife ....................................................................................................................................... 40 3.11 Special Status Species and Migratory Birds ............................................................................... 41 3.12 Recreation ................................................................................................................................... 60 3.13 Health and Human Safety ........................................................................................................... 63 3.14 Section 4(f) .................................................................................................................................. 63 3.15 Noise ........................................................................................................................................... 65 3.16 Air Quality .................................................................................................................................. 66 3.17 Visual Resources ......................................................................................................................... 66 3.18 Cumulative Impacts .................................................................................................................... 68 4 LIST OF PREPARERS ................................................................................................................ 72 5 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................. 74 APPENDICES Appendix A. Agency Coordination Appendix B. Public and Agency Involvement/Public Comments Appendix C. El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro National Historic Trail Buckman Road Segment, Retracement Trail Project Biological Assessment and Evaluation Appendix D. BLM Visual Contrast Worksheets El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro National Historic Trail, TOC-i Buckman Road Segment, Retracement Trail Project Environmental Assessment FIGURES Page No. Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map .............................................................................................................. 3 Figure 2. Proposed Action (West Alignment) Map ............................................................................. 13 Figure 3. Proposed Location for Trail along and under Caja del Rio Road ........................................ 14 Figure 4. Proposed Trail Connections to the MRC ............................................................................. 15 Figure 5. Typical terrain along Segment 1 .......................................................................................... 16 Figure 6. Plan View of the BLM Dead Dog Trailhead Parking Improvements .................................. 17 Figure 7. Typical terrain along Segment 2 .......................................................................................... 17 Figure 8. Alignment Alternatives Considered, but Eliminated from Detailed Analysis ..................... 24 Figure 9. Grazing Allotments and Livestock Fencing ......................................................................... 28 Figure 10. Arroyo de los Frijoles 100-year Floodplain ......................................................................... 37 TABLES Page No. Table 1. Public Outreach .................................................................................................................... 10 Table 2. Trail Distance by Managing Agency ................................................................................... 12 Table 3. Mitigation Measures for the Proposed Action ..................................................................... 18 Table 4. Removed and Relocated Livestock Fencing ........................................................................ 29 Table 5. Eligible or Potentially Eligible Historic Sites ...................................................................... 31 Table 6. Soils Present within the Project Area ................................................................................... 34 Table 7. Federally listed, State listed, and Sensitive Species and Potential to Occur within the Project Area .......................................................................................................................... 43 Table 8. Recreational Resources within the Project Area .................................................................. 61 Table 9. Project Classification for Noise Analysis............................................................................. 65 Table 10. Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions ................................................. 68 Table 11. Cumulative Effects Summary .............................................................................................. 70 El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro National Historic Trail, TOC-ii Buckman Road Segment, Retracement Trail Project Environmental Assessment ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS APE Area of Potential Effect AUM Animal Unit Month BAE Biological Assessment and Evaluation BLM Bureau of Land Management CEQ Council on Environmental Quality CFLHD Central Federal Lands Highway Division CR County Road EA environmental assessment EO Executive Order EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ERMA Extensive Recreation Management Area FHWA Federal Highway Administration FLAP Federal Lands Access Program MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 MIS Management Indicator Species MOU Memorandum of Understanding mph miles per hour MRC Municipal Recreation Complex NEPA National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended NFMA National Forest Management Act NMDFG New Mexico Department of Game & Fish NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NPS National Park Service NRHP National Register of Historic Places NTSA National Trails System Act ROW right-of-way SHPO State Historic Preservation Officer SRMA Special Recreation Management Area USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers USFS U.S. Forest Service USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service VQO Visual Quality Objectives WOUS Waters of the U.S. El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro National Historic Trail, Acronyms-I Buckman Road Segment, Retracement Trail Project Environmental Assessment 1 INTRODUCTION Development of an approximately 15-mile-long trail is being proposed by the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SOUNDS LIKE a PLAN the Official Newsletter of APA New Mexico
    Winter 2019-2020 JANUARY 2020 SOUNDS LIKE A PLAN The Official Newsletter of APA New Mexico Our Year In Review IN THIS ISSUE On behalf of the Board of the American Planning WHO WE ARE - Association—New Mexico Chapter, it is our pleasure CHAPTER OVERVIEW to present this Annual Report and Winter Newsletter PAGE 2 to our Membership. The Chapter capped off a busy year by co-hosting the annual confer- FINANCIAL REPORT & ence together with our partner Western Planner (please see article on page 6 for more details on the conference). STRATEGIC PLAN PAGE 4 At the end of the year, the Chapter supported the nomination of three distinguished members to the College of Fellows of the AICP: Dale Dekker, AICP; Phyllis Taylor, AICP; and Kizito Wijenje, AICP. WESTERN PLANNER RECAP Behind the scenes, our Treasurer has been working hard on taxes and PAGE 6 working on our non-profit incorporation, which will facilitate easier chapter management in the future. Also, look for us to roll out a new Chapter website by mid-February, 2020, once we deal with some ran- 2019 CHAPTER som-ware issues. AWARDS In between, we also participated in UNM-APA’s annual Meet the PAGE 8 Planners Event, which allows future planners to network with practic- ing planning professionals. In addition, last spring, we partnered with our allied professionals in architecture, engineering, and landscape PLANNER SPOTLIGHT: architecture for a multi-disciplinary professional mixer. LUCY FOMA! We have divided the rest of this Annual Report/Newsletter into two PAGE 10 sections: the first three pages provide an overview of the Chapter’s demographics, financials, and 2019-2020 Strategic Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • BULLETIN Chicago Herpetological Society
    BULLETIN of the Chicago Herpetological Society Volume 52, Number 5 May 2017 BULLETIN OF THE CHICAGO HERPETOLOGICAL SOCIETY Volume 52, Number 5 May 2017 A Herpetologist and a President: Raymond L. Ditmars and Theodore Roosevelt . Raymond J. Novotny 77 Notes on the Herpetofauna of Western Mexico 16: A New Food Item for the Striped Road Guarder, Conophis vittatus (W. C. H. Peters, 1860) . .Daniel Cruz-Sáenz, David Lazcano and Bryan Navarro-Velazquez 80 Some Unreported Trematodes from Wisconsin Leopard Frogs . Dreux J. Watermolen 85 What You Missed at the April Meeting . .John Archer 86 Gung-ho for GOMO . Roger A. Repp 89 Herpetology 2017......................................................... 93 Advertisements . 95 New CHS Members This Month . 95 Minutes of the April 14 Board Meeting . 96 Show Schedule.......................................................... 96 Cover: The end of a battle between two Sonoran Desert Tortoises (Gopherus morafkai). Photograph by Roger A. Repp, Pima County, Arizona --- where the turtles are strong! STAFF Membership in the CHS includes a subscription to the monthly Bulletin. Annual dues are: Individual Membership, $25.00; Family Editor: Michael A. Dloogatch --- [email protected] Membership, $28.00; Sustaining Membership, $50.00; Contributing Membership, $100.00; Institutional Membership, $38.00. Remittance must be made in U.S. funds. Subscribers 2017 CHS Board of Directors outside the U.S. must add $12.00 for postage. Send membership dues or address changes to: Chicago Herpetological Society, President: Rich Crowley Membership Secretary, 2430 N. Cannon Drive, Chicago, IL 60614. Vice-president: Jessica Wadleigh Treasurer: Andy Malawy Manuscripts published in the Bulletin of the Chicago Herpeto- Recording Secretary: Gail Oomens logical Society are not peer reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • New Mexico State Page 2020
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Community Assistance Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance Program New Mexico News A mesa at San Ildefonso Pueblo Photo Credit: MARELBU courtesy of Wikimedia Commons 2020 PROJECTS The National Park Service Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance (RTCA) program supports nonprofit organizations, community groups, tribes, and local, state, and federal government agencies. We help partners work together to create parks, develop trails and greenways, protect rivers and natural areas, and increase access to recreation opportunities. We help you engage a wide range of 5 2 community partners and also work to connect you to National Park Service (NPS) managed areas. 1 The RTCA program in New Mexico offers a wide range of services that can be tailored to meet the needs of an individual project. The NPS staff members are trained facilitators who 3 encourage project leaders to build collaborative partnerships among governmental and non-governmental stakeholders. We help communities and groups define their vision, goals, and objectives; analyze issues and opportunities; and develop 4 strategic action plans and time lines for projects. We do not 6 provide financial assistance, but can help project partners identify 7 and secure sources of funding and technical support. Find out more about how the National Park Service is supporting projects in New Mexico on the next page. CURRENT PROJECTS 1. Tucumcari Five Mile Park 2. Crownpoint Pathways 3. Rio Grande Trail - Socorro Valley Segment 4. Truth or Consequences Trails & River Access 5. San Ildefonso Pueblo Trails 6. Western New Mexico Internship Collaborative 7. NPS Visitation and Tourism Strategy in New Mexico View of the Rio Grande Trail - Socorro Valley Segment area.
    [Show full text]
  • \Ryhereas, the Valencia County Commission Met Upon Notice of Meeting Duly Published on April 17, 2019, at 5:00 P.M
    VALENCIA COUNTY BOÄRD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS RESoLUTION IIþ 2019- s4l ADOPTION OF MIDDLE RIO GRANDE ECONOMIC DEYELOPMENT PLAN \ryHEREAS, the Valencia County Commission met upon notice of meeting duly published on April 17, 2019, at 5:00 P.M. in the Valencia County Administration Building, 444 Luna Avenue, Los Lunas, New Mexico 87031; and, IVHEREAS, NMSA 1978, Section4-37-l (1995) provides that Counties have the power to, "provide for the safety, preserve the health, promote the prosperity and improve the morals, order, comfort and convenience of any county or its inhabitants"; and, \ryHEREAS, NMSA, 1978, Section 4-38-18 (1976) provides thataBoard of County Commissioner has the duty and authority "[t]o represent the county and have the care of the county property and the management of the interest of the county in all cases where no other provision is made by law; and, WHEREAS, the Middle Rio Grande Economic Development Association was formed amongst the members of Catron, Sierra, Socorro and Valencia Counties to develop the region into one that is both state and nationally competitive; and, WHEREAS, the MRGEDA identified those industries that are anticipated to provide the region with a competitive economic advantage, including (1) agriculture, (2) arts, entertainment, recreation, and visitor industries, (3) health care, (4) renewable energy and forest products, and (5) technology; and, IVHEREAS, in addition to articulating goals with respect to each of these sectors, the MRGEDA identified both detailed strategies and specifrc,target outcomes with respect to each sector that are designed to promote the prosperity of the region. NOIV, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Valencia by the authority granted the Board by the laws of the State of New Mexico and people of Valencia County, that the Board hereby adopts the20l6 Middle Rio Grande Economic Development Association's 2016 Economic Development Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 DRAFT Contents Rio Grande Trail Master Plan: Threading Partnerships
    Chapter 4 DRAFT Contents Rio Grande Trail Master Plan: Threading Partnerships ....................................................................................................... 3 Overview ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Pursuing National Trail Designation ..................................................................................................................................... 4 inset box: .............................................................................................................................................................................. 4 inset box: .............................................................................................................................................................................. 5 El Camino Real Historic Trail ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Continental Divide Trail .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Establishing a Governance Structure .................................................................................................................................... 5 Establish a Rio Grande Trail Nonprofit ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Genetics of the Imperiled Striped Whipsnake in Washington, USA
    Herpetological Conservation and Biology 15(3):597–610. Submitted: 9 March 2020; Accepted: 5 November 2020; Published: 16 December 2020. CONSERVATION GENETICS OF THE IMPERILED STRIPED WHIPSNAKE IN WASHINGTON, USA DAVID S. PILLIOD1,4, LISA A. HALLOCK2, MARK P. MILLER3, THOMAS D. MULLINS3, AND SUSAN M. HAIG3 1U.S. Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, 970 Lusk Street, Boise, Idaho 83706, USA 2Wildlife Program, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, 1111 Washington Street, Olympia, Washington 98504, USA 3U.S. Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, 3200 Southwest Jefferson Way, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA 4Corresponding author, email: [email protected] Abstract.—Conservation of wide-ranging species is aided by population genetic information that provides insights into adaptive potential, population size, interpopulation connectivity, and even extinction risk in portions of a species range. The Striped Whipsnake (Masticophis taeniatus) occurs across 11 western U.S. states and into Mexico but has experienced population declines in parts of its range, particularly in the state of Washington. We analyzed nuclear and mitochondrial DNA extracted from 192 shed skins, 63 muscle tissue samples, and one mouth swab to assess local genetic diversity and differentiation within and between the last known whipsnake populations in Washington. We then placed that information in a regional context to better understand levels of differentiation and diversity among whipsnake populations in the northwestern portion of the range of the species. Microsatellite data analyses indicated that there was comparable genetic diversity between the two extant Washington populations, but gene flow may be somewhat limited. We found moderate to high levels of genetic differentiation among states across all markers, including five microsatellites, two nuclear genes, and two mitochondrial genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Spacespace
    OPENOPEN SPACESPACE newsletter Mayor Martin J. Chávez A Quarterly Newsletter of the Open Space Division and the Open Space Alliance Volume 6, Issue 4, October - December 2005 OPEN SPACE POLICE Still Dedicated to Open Space At the end of last year the Open Space With that change, please continue your vigi- Police (OSP) were absorbed into the Albuquer- lance on the trails and report any and all inci- que Police Department (APD). As a special unit dences that violate Open Space rules and regula- in APD administered by Captain Mike Castro and tions. Lieutenant Ruben Griego, the Open Space Police Please note that safety issues that require continue patrolling and responding to calls immediate attention will continue to be reported affecting Open Space properties and facilities. to Open Space Administrative Offices at 452-5206. Of course, there have been some changes. Thank you for your continued dedication to The OSP vehicles are now striped and marked in Open Space and happy trails! the APD tradition. You may see officers dressed in APD blue or bicycle black while others still sport the familiar tan and green. You may also encounter Open Space officers patrolling city parks, too. But does this affect you as a citizen or vol- unteer and the protocol for contacting the Open Space Division to report problems in Open Space? No. Except who you call to report prob- lems. Although Open Space Administrative Offices continue to maintain a dispatch unit for opera- Familiar faces: APD Open Space officers Luis Zamarron (L) and tions and maintenance, Open Space Police are George Gabaldon (R) now directly dispatched through APD.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Lower Rio Grande Valley and Santa Ana National Wildlife
    Final Lower Rio Grande Valley and Santa Ana National Wildlife Refuges Comprehensive Conservation Plan September 1997 (Reprint March 1999) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cover Artwork by Brian Cobble Table of Contents VISION........................................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary................................................................................................................... 6 1.0 Introduction and Regional Setting................................................................................. 8 1.1 LRGV Challenges............................................................................................... 8 2.0 Planning Perspectives and Considerations................................................................ 9 2.1 National Wildlife Refuge System ................................................................... 9 2.2 The Service & Ecosystem Management ...................................................... 9 2.3 Refuge Complex and Management Districts........................................... 10 2.4 Laguna Atascosa NWR -- A Partner with LRGV NWR............................ 10 2.5 Planning Perspectives.................................................................................... 10 2.6 The Issues.......................................................................................................... 11 2.7 The Need for Action........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report #85-5-03 the HERPETOLOGY of the OWYHEE
    FISH & WILDLIFE REFERENCE LIBRARY Technical Report #85-5-03 1985 THE HERPETOLOGY OF THE OWYHEE RIVER DRAINAGE, MALHEUR COUNTY, OREGON ik, A." 5w, Al Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Nongame Wildlife Program THE HERPETOLOGY OF THE OWYHEE RIVER DRAINAGE 14ALHEUR COUNTY, OREGON Alan D. St. John Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Nongame Wildlife Program Technical Report #85-5-03 1985 CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT 1 ............................................................... INTRODUCTION@ 1 .......................................................... STUDY AREA AND METHODS 2 ................................................. RESULTS 4 ................................................................ 6 Species Accounts -- Amphibians Long-toed Salamander .................................... 6 Great Basin Spadefoot......................................... 7 Western Toad ........................................ 7 Woodhouse's Toad................................................. 8 ............................................. 9 Pacific Treefrog ............................................. Spotted Frog 9 Northern Leopard.................................................Frog 10 ........................................ 10 Bullfrog ..................................................... Accounts 11 Species -- Reptiles ...................................... Desert Collared Lizard 11 Long-nosed Leopard Lizard....................................... 12 Western Fence Lizard .................................... 13 Sagebrush Lizard .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for North American Amphibians, Turtles, Reptiles & Crocodilians
    STANDARD COMMON AND CURRENT SCIENTIFIC NAMES FOR NORTH AMERICAN AMPHIBIANS, TURTLES, REPTILES & CROCODILIANS Sixth Edition Joseph T. Collins TraVis W. TAGGart The Center for North American Herpetology THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY www.cnah.org Joseph T. Collins, Director The Center for North American Herpetology 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 (785) 393-4757 Single copies of this publication are available gratis from The Center for North American Herpetology, 1502 Medinah Circle, Lawrence, Kansas 66047 USA; within the United States and Canada, please send a self-addressed 7x10-inch manila envelope with sufficient U.S. first class postage affixed for four ounces. Individuals outside the United States and Canada should contact CNAH via email before requesting a copy. A list of previous editions of this title is printed on the inside back cover. THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY BO A RD OF DIRE ct ORS Joseph T. Collins Suzanne L. Collins Kansas Biological Survey The Center for The University of Kansas North American Herpetology 2021 Constant Avenue 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Kelly J. Irwin James L. Knight Arkansas Game & Fish South Carolina Commission State Museum 915 East Sevier Street P. O. Box 100107 Benton, Arkansas 72015 Columbia, South Carolina 29202 Walter E. Meshaka, Jr. Robert Powell Section of Zoology Department of Biology State Museum of Pennsylvania Avila University 300 North Street 11901 Wornall Road Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Kansas City, Missouri 64145 Travis W. Taggart Sternberg Museum of Natural History Fort Hays State University 3000 Sternberg Drive Hays, Kansas 67601 Front cover images of an Eastern Collared Lizard (Crotaphytus collaris) and Cajun Chorus Frog (Pseudacris fouquettei) by Suzanne L.
    [Show full text]
  • Hanford Site Snake Hibernacula Report for Calendar Year 2016
    HNF-60780 Revision 0 Hanford Site Snake Hibernacula Report for Calendar Year 2016 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 P.O. Box 650 Richland, Washington 99352 Approved for Public Release Further Dissemination Unlimited HNF-60780 Revision 0 TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof or its contractors or subcontractors. This report has been reproduced from the best available copy. Printed in the United States of America HNF-60780 Revision 0 Hanford Site Snake Hibernacula Report for Calendar Year 2016 Date Published May 2017 J. Grzyb Mission Support Alliance Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management P.O. Box 650 Richland, Washington 99352 By Julia Raymer at 1:20 pm, May 24, 2017 Release Approval Date Approved for Public Release Further Dissemination Unlimited HNF-60780 Revision 0 Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Purpose and Scope........................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Snakes on the Hanford Site .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibians and Reptiles of Central-Eastern Washington*
    Amphibians and Reptiles of Central-Eastern Washington* Known Possibly Family Genus Species Common Name on on Refuge Refuge 1 Ambystomatidae macrodactylum Long-toed salamander X Ambystoma (Mole salamanders) tigrinum Tiger salamander1 X boreas Western toad X Bufonidae (True toads) Bufo woodhousii Woodhouse’s toad X Scaphiopodidae Spea intermontana Great Basin spadefoot2 X (Spadefoot toads) Hylidae (Tree frogs) Hyla regilla Pacific treefrog X catesbeiana American bullfrog3, 4 X Ranidae (True frogs) Rana pipiens Northern leopard frog4 X luteiventris Columbia spotted frog4 X Boidae (Pythons) Charina bottae Rubber boa5 X Hypsiglena torquata Night snake X Coluber constrictor Racer X Masticophis taeniatus Striped whipsnake X Colubridae (Solid tooths) Pituophis catenifer Gopher snake X elegans Western garter snake6 X Thamnophis sirtalis Common garter snake6 X Viperidae (Vipers) Crotalus viridis Northern Pacific rattlesnake X graciosus Sagebrush lizard X Sceloporus Phrynosomatidae occidentalis Western fence lizard X (Phrynosomatids) Phrynosoma douglasii Pigmy short-horned lizard X Uta stansburiana Common side-blotched lizard X Teiidae (Whiptails, tegus) Aspidoscelis neotesselata Colorado checkered whiptail X Scincidae (Skinks) Eumeces skiltonianus Western skink X Emydidae (Pond turtles) Chrysemys picta Painted turtle X 1 Inhabits shrub-steppe areas in the vicinity of water bodies suitable for breeding. 2 The most desert-adapted of any Northwest amphibian. It lays eggs in temporary puddles, its tadpoles mature quickly (in a few weeks under warm conditions), and the transformed toads can spend most of the year buried underground to escape the harsh surface conditions. 3 Introduced. 4 Fairly aquatic and do not use the shrub-steppe habitat itself, although they may be found in water bodies within Great Basin shrub-steppe.
    [Show full text]